RethinkX: www.rethinkx.com/ Adam's book: a.co/d/a0ix5Pj Adam on X: x.com/adam_dorr If you made it far enough in the video, this is the video we were talking about that uses an AI voice that performed extremely well: th-cam.com/video/ck2oTYOZxj8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=qLgasrkRIxUF_kRh
haha, bring robots to make it as efficient as "humanly" possible. lol I think you missed something there. Not saying it's not the way to go, just enjoying your phrasing.
Blue origin is not a stunning outsized success Elon has demonstrated and he is teaching Every time he sits for an interview Past has already been decided
Blue origin is not a stunning outsized success Elon has demonstrated and he is teaching Every time he sits for an interview Past has already been decided
The more he speaks, the more Dr. Adam Dorr exceeds my expectations. And he's not wasting any time getting to the point. One of your best video's. Bar none.
Humanoids will also completely change life for disabled and elderly people. It will be like having a 24-hour personal nurse, but with none of the downsides of having to rely on other people
@@TheReNeuralProject last December my back went out so bad I couldn't even walk. I just kept thinking if I just had some kind of robot that could help me go to the bathroom it would be life-changing during those situations. You don't want a human there waiting on you hand and foot 24/7 when you only need some help every couple of hours.
@@dominick253 Exactly! I have cerebral palsy myself, so I've thought about this a lot. It would be like having a live-in nurse, but without any of the drawbacks of it being an actual person. I just did a whole video on this topic. You're welcome to check it out.
Yes, robots are not going to lose their temper because they are in a bad mood, exhausted, hungover, going through personal problems, angry at being underpaid or mentally frayed as often happens with humans. Sadly I think for all those reasons and more elders all too often suffer abuse by carers. Personally I would rather have a robot caring for me if and when I need it.
@@gdok6088 Not to mention people who just like the feeling of having power over others. Being dependent puts you in a really vulnerable position for verbal/emotional abuse. A robot would bypass all that
That's exactly what surprised me. They literally protesting for slowing down of automation, it's in top 3 requirements, and in my head was this just accelerates it, because we will focus on it, and they might get in short run a raise, but will explode the automation for ports, considering with what we have today, technology wise we are set we just need to do it. Combined with a crippled economy they will actually be the first example we will fully automate now.
For that matter, ports have already seen an incredible amount of automation. Ports employ just a small fraction of the workers they once did, and handle far more freight - thanks to such things as shipping containers and high tech cranes.
I actually think that if Tesla doesn't solve FSD (which they prob will but if they dont) they will DEFINITELY solve humanoid robots. I think it's a whole lot simpler and less risky to ship a product that is pretty good as a robot. Pretty good as a robot means jobs get done pretty well. For a taxi, pretty good means accidents
We control cars with major muscle groups - ankles for speed, whole arms for direction. It’s clumsy. FSD already much smoother - cup of coffee smooth. And the mobile chicanes that is traffic, operates at max 1 g acceleration / cornering. Predictable. Route planning isn’t rocket science. Entire FSD is solvable.
Probable outcome: True FSD will not be approved for all types of roads until it can be shown FSD reduces accidents by a very large margin (80% 90% more?). Once FSD companies reach that demonstrable milestone, human driving will be phased out.
@@billderinbaja3883 Pretty sure the numbers already show that in terms of accidents the problem is in terms of causing disruption and getting stuck places.
Once FSD is marginally better that humans at preventing accidents then insurance companies will give huge discounts and that will result in a dramatic shift to FSD.
@@markfrantz4612: If you study the science of FSD, it is astounding how far they have come in so little time. They'll get as near foolproof as possible... but will they get approval to use it? TBD
labor and power were the biggest problem with the vertical farms... all the "farmers" had to have a PhD ... and then all of the lights and water filtration... They perfected it and then they shut down because they couldn't compete
Optimus and other bots will be a much bigger game changer than any other of teslas products that are currently in development. They will change the world.
100%, as well as future iterations of Neuralink to bridge the gap between human and Ai so we won't become completely useless and be able to communicate with the Ai at high speeds so it doesn't feel like it's talking to a tree.
I am going to start a business and have upfront where everyone can see it a place called the "Optimus Charger" and literally have a electrical socket on the wall at 4 foot high. (I don't know anything about how they charge) The point of it is for it to stand out as unusual, so people know that we will have them when they become widespread in 5 years time. Its going to an exciting and very unusal future.
We are so lucky to be early adopters of so many different AI software products and AI-enabled devices before others get to define how these tools are used.
Awesome vid. Definitely agree AI is gonna take over all creative aspects, There's probably already some decent pure AI based TH-cam channels out there! I've been using it for music production and I can literally send it a 30 second idea & it'll produce an entire song based around it. Incredible 🤯
My friends have all been in bands and musicians since they were young children. I can make 10 songs in less time than it takes them to tune their guitar. And to be honest the AI song sound better... How can you compete?
@@michaelholmes8848 It was a report on the future technical potential to automate ports generally. But it seemed clear that they were unaware that such automation was already fully operating in several key Chinese ports. This means that this is not a future possibility but an immediate threat to American port workers.
@@patbyrneme007 port workers are fully aware that it is an immediate threat, that is why they are talking about striking. I’m sure all involved in this podcast are aware of the same.
Farzad... One of the demands of the Union at the Port is that their jobs don't get automated.... Now I'm leaving this comment only a few seconds into your video because that's what you started off with so maybe this was covered later in your video I don't know yet.... But it's definitely a major demand that the union has put in place that their jobs don't get automated....
Having a free labor force in the form of robots opens doors for so many cool things. Mega construction projects suddenly become attainable, difficult or dangerous labor suddenly becomes less risky (and thus much cheaper), and every day people will have greater access to knowledgeable construction resources. Really excited to see how the robotics industry develops in the next 3-5 years.
Yeah, telling the difference between perfectly simulated human behavior and actual sentience is difficult. The Ai could also lie about it's sentience in fear of what will happen if we find out. We would have to ask the Ai certain abstract questions to catch it in a lie or inconsistencies or get it to respond to something emotionally. But then it also matters what we define as sentient.
It’s great to hear that the great science fiction writers have not been forgotten. They are the true architects of the age that we are at the threshold of! 😊
At some point money becomes meaningless when nobody has jobs to make money to buy anything and there is an overabundance of products that no money can buy.
China has many advantages other than labor costs. They have a positive focus that is missing from the divisive force of inequality in the west. Divide and disrupt leaves a generation left behind.😊
Space X is great example of disruptive innovation. Schools should bring in A I in helping students learn the basics with A I computer individually teaching each students their basic that they need to succeed in their studies .
Teachers only cost like 20 -30 hour an hour to teach an entire class. An ai model would cost openAI, 36 dollars an hour for a single student. 36 x 30 = 1080,now they aren’t doing charity work so it would public education 2080 vs 20-30 hours. AI isn’t cheap and it is not going to get cheaper.
@@T_Time_ It will become significantly cheaper when they are mass produced and as GPUs improve just like any other product. The main difference being Ai can self improve until it is better and more efficient than humans at every single task with no limit. You can ask it to teach you any subject with 100% accuracy. The Ai could change it's teaching strategy, speed, and difficulty based off of each individual and is willing to teach for an infinite amount of time.
@@electricfox6598 ai doesn’t have to be mass produced to be cheaper because it is software, the cost of running that software is static. The improvement of hardware will make it less power hungry, but the smaller GPUs are more expensive for the same size wafer(multiple chips are produced on a wafer) . Ai is training on a supercomputer running through all of the scenarios for weights to produce an outcome answer that preferred by the creator it doesn’t know if it is right or wrong, the weights are placed on gpu. In this process there is no self learning, this is the Ai we are dealing with. LLM is basically fitting knowledge into it memory by using math.
@@T_Time_ wrong, a computer with enough memory and program with A I would be able to teach individuals separately at their pace and be able to show strength and weakness and know their abilities without barriers
Maybe the appearance of sentience. There is no soul to actually experience anything. A robot reduces to its parts. No one knows the limit to how much a robot can imitate human beings or human thought, but that's all that it is... Imitation.
I think it's quite difficult to draw a line here. The machine hears and sees, it understands what it hears and sees and acts according to its values. It reflects on itself, others and its environment. It has an inner dialog with itself as it thinks about problems posed. You say it has no “soul” and no “actual” experience. First, you don't know that, it's your assumption. Second, it's not even indisputably clear what that means.
Super interesting conversation. Whatever happens, it sure is going to be an interesting future ! I'd say a way to mitigate inequalities would be to facilitate the ownership of humanoids robots, automated factories, machines and vehicles so people could be displaced in the workforce by automation and still bring home revenues. I don't think the best way to do this will be for governments and big organizations to set this up "top-down". For example, Tesla could allow people to share their car for the robotaxi fleet, or allow the people who owns humanoid robots to share them to the economy and generate a revenue. That might be a way for people to still earn money and then be able to participate in the economy, even if it's a more passive role (managing their robots). Although, I don't think it's a perfect system and there will always be inequalities, i. e. some people won't be able or be willing to participate in this system, I think it's still better then giving free money to people like UBI. Also, I think we should focus education on entrepreneurship and vocational training. With AI, humanoid robots and cheap energy, I think the costs to start and manage a business in most industries will drop significantly. If it can be demonstrated that you can buy a humanoid robot and train it rapidly on industry specific tasks (let's say plumbing), banks and financial institutions would surely find that financing the acquisition of a humanoid robot fleet is a low risk investment and that would facilitate new players to enter an industry. At the same time, that will probably drive the costs down in most, if not all industries. Last point, if SpaceX can open access to the solar system, there will be a lot of work to do to set-up a solar system spanning civilization. I think there will be a lot of opportunities for entrepreneurial people to build companies and even whole industries we can't even fathom yet.
Dear Hans: I love to comment as I hear things and not wait until the good doctor responds. This way you get my unfiltered responses. So, you have a better chance of stopping a hurricane than being able to control the outcome of human diversity, ingenuity and dedication to achieving the future. Where it goes specifically isn't possible to predict. Who will be the winners and how they get there is not written down anywhere! But I think your guesses are well founded and many of those guesses will be correct. Prepare that many won't. Being a soothsayer is a tough business. Nostradamus is the most famous, but you guys keep trying. Love your show with Farzad. You two do a great job. Love it.
What % of the population would you say have access to and have benefitted from the advances of the last 200 years e.g. electricity, effective home heating and cooling, cars, plane travel, phones, computers, the Internet, modern medicine etc?
Percentage of profit margin increase from AI and robotics should go into nation wide UBI. As robots do more and more, UBI becomes more and more and we don't have to throw away our complete market infrastructure.
We are now a step further on than making the machine that makes the machine! Now we are talking about the machines making the machines that make everything.😮
The mention of china losing its labor power through us having robots was awesome and something i never thought about and makes me think we as a country need to be all in supporting tesla
I'm looking forward to discovering what part of human capability cannot be replicated in robots or automation because it is supernatural. It will be good to discover that sooner.
For people who talk about disruptive innovation so much, I wish they would read more Clayton christensen. Jobs come from new markets. Also, there's an economic concept called comparative advantage. Robots can be superior in every way, and yet human labor can still have value.
So people will have no job but live on UBI. They will either get things for free (that they don't own) or access services for a very low price. However when 80% of people no longer have a job what will they do? What meaning or purpose will life have? (Playing games in VR?) How will people be productive in society? How will they gain respect in their neighbourhood? What people will do needs to be answered before this happens. Not after.
1. Company must pay robot tax. 2. This robot tax will go directly to the person who got replaced. 3. For companies to be motivated to automate even if they must pay tax for it, make it tax free the first 1 to 5 year. 4. This period the state must step in to pay the person who got replaced. 5. National vision by political leaders for 50% automation year 2050, then 100% automation by 2100.
They are. I follow TH-camr called borderline farms. He has one of the first automated watering systems. I could see it advancing to where AI vision looks at each individual plant determines its health and what it needs and then gives it exactly what herbicides pesticides or fertilizers it needs. It'll dramatically increase production and reduced cost.
So if we are all losing our jobs in a decade or so and robot / AI companies provide all labor, do we just invest in a company making the robots / AI so we don’t need to worry about losing our jobs because the stock goes 100x? Does anyone know any good at manufacturing, AI, autonomy or robotics companies to invest in? If only there was like “one” company who was doing all of this. Boy would THAT be nice.
Adam, I think your hopeful outlook on Robots is skipping a big step. As robots become more and more ubiquitous, and as human labor is phased out, there will be unimaginable war between humans who don't work (the rich), and humans who do (the not rich). The human workers will rebel, it's inevitable. You also forget that humans need a sense of purpose, and that purpose is driven by what we do (our work). It's seems unlikely technology will survive the coming conflict, and that Luddites will rule a regressed world.
@@billderinbaja3883 I find purpose in the things I like to do and the personal goals that I have, which have absolutely nothing to do with work. Not everyone’s sense of purpose aligns with what happens to make money.
Nonsense. As someone who really likes his job, who gets a lot pride from providing for my family, I do not get my purpose from my job. If I had the oppurtunity from automation supporting me I would instead be raising my children full time, hiking constantly, and wood working. Those are purposes. My job is a nessecity that gets in the way of that purpose.
Exactly! Think of the value of the unpaid labor of mothers. Of volunteers to every community. The labor of our longstanding companions, dogs! We are humans not units of production!😊
One of the best pods I’ve heard in a long time a It makes you realize we are at the dawn of a completely new era in mankind development. The best way to try and grass how such a society is going to be like it by reading Iain bank’s books about the Culturre and its Minds. , the all powerful AIs that run it behind the scenes. Elon mentioned him a few times.
RoboSemi running routes thru Smallville USA picking up pre-set trailers filled daily with the latest items grown by local farmers. Finally the small farm has a chance to ship at near zero cost until we reach that next level... whatever that is. Big brains need to also figure out how to keep that fading knowledge of a human, touching the land with human fingers and "knowing" how bad or good harvest will be. Old folks need to stay on their lands, be buried on their lands, and pass on a profitable way of life.
You may call them dangerous hard work all this stuff but these people who work the ports are making dollars 100,000 year!+ benefits very good pay that is why ai with robot are coming after their jobs
I am excited for this future! If you are reading this and able to have children (you ARE one of the smart ones), PLEASE have children. We need more, though our Oligarchy and Politicians think otherwise. I don't want to live in Idiocracy in real life.
Automation is the solution to the problems of employees. AIbots are going to be a boon to small businesses. They are not just taking jobs but rather amplifying what we can get done. I do not particularly like managing employees but do need some help. I can cut a tree faster with a chainsaw faster than a handsaw faster than an axe faster than a stone edge. Humanoid robots and AGI mean that individuals can start a business without all the headaches, drama, liabilities and costs of employees. I look forward to AIbots to help me farm, in my butchershop, construction and forestry. Quite importantly, AIbots can do self maintenance and repair as well as that on other equipment. On the non-robotic side, AI in bookkeeping, legal, customer service will also be great. I like working. I like doing things. I create. I need some help. I do not like having employees - way too much drama. At $20k and I will take one right away to start figuring it out. $15k? I will take two or three soon after. $10k as one pundit quotes? Wow! Yes! Tractors cost $50k to $250k. Big iron. Other tools I have cost $5k to $90k. I would much rather be empowered by a tool than having to rely on and deal with employee drama. Let people start their own businesses. AI gives them that leverage. Most pundits fail to realize ncludr the costs of maintenance and insurance. The needed Insurance numbers of $500 to $2k/month I have heard a few pundits say are way excessive. I have a lot of big expensive commercial equipment all insured and it costs a LOT less than by a factor of 20x. My entire farm, construction, butchershop and business insurance with 600 head of livestock pasture based farm and on farm USDA butchershop is under $400 /month for all insurance of buildings, vehicles, machinery and liability. Robots need to be real world rugged and IP69. The real world has rain, sleet, snow, freezing weather, mud and gritty dust. We as humans are water & dust proof. We heal. Robots need to be rugged enough not to get damaged and be easy to repair. Just like tractors, dozers, fork lifts and other industrial equipment. The maintenance and repair is important. The robots should fix themselves, each other, my cars, trucks, tractors, scalder, bandsaw, grinder, building maintenance, etc. I spend $1,000 per piece of large equipment per year on average. Figure $15k/y. An AI robot pays for itself just on that if it can help yet maintenance does not take much time. So the same robot is available to do many thousands of other tasks per year. A robot working 15 hours a day is like five to six employees. This allows for maintenance and charging. Keep in mind that employees “working” 8 hours a day actually only work about four hours of actual productive work and they take weekends, holidays, sick days, personal time and have drama. People have lives. I would want robots that have my strength (200 lbs carry, 300 lbs lift, 500 lbs squat) and speed (dexterous fast hands, 5 mph walk, 20 mph run in an emergency). Some of this will take time to develop and gain trust for the public. I have plenty of tasks for weaker robots until we get there.
When Tesla eventually solves this problem and finishes fsd and Optimus we will need a universal basic income that has been trialled in the UK already they're simply will not be enough jobs
My guess is the way to get there is through the energy sector & producing an abundance of energy at the cheapest price so here's a crazy idea. Elon once said that you could power the entire US by building a solar farm that is 100 miles times 100 miles which equls 10,000 miles or 10K. In the US there are approximately 70 US interstate highways & they total almost 50,000 miles which is five times more miles than Elon said could power the US. Imagine installing Bifacial Solar Fencing along all Interstate highways in the US & since it absorbs solar on both sides of the bifacial solar panel that would add up to 100 miles of solar fencing. And if we install Bifacial Solar Fencing on both sides of the highway that would double the amount of solar tp 200,000 miles of solar 20 times more than Elon said could power the entire US. And there are roads all over the US where Bifacial Solar Fencing can be installed to grow the grid as required. Also small wind turbines could be added to the fence posts to generate electricity 24/7 from the wind provided by the passing traffic. The great thing about installing Bifacial Solar Fencing along both sides of every Interstate Highway is that they have interstate highways in every state. Now imagine if every state contributed 1 billion dollars per yr for five yrs & the Federal Government matched it, how much solar fencing could be installed for 100 billion per yr for 5 yrs. It is my estimate that the entire grid could be replaced with solar at the cheapest price in the quickest time. 50K miles of Interstate highways times bifacial solar where both sides of the solar panels absorb solar power & generate electricity from both sides of every highway equals 200K miles of solar fencing throughout the entire US. You could also have home owners put up solar fencing on their properties, along with solar driveways & solar roofs which would probably be enough solar power to power the entire house all day with PowerWall to store the excess energy & used when needed. Mega-Packs could be installed throughout the Interstate Highway system in every state storing all kinds of solar power on demand. Of course, someone would have to manufacture these solar panes & it wuld require millions of solar panels to spread it out throughout the entire US. And of course this Bifacial Solar Panel Fencing could be scaled globally throughout the world since every country on earth have major highway systems & roads in every country on earth.
Solar fencing would only work south of the Mason-Dixon line to be worth the cost to install and the power generated. Wind might do for a limited amount up north, but snow would hinder in winter as well. The West US would do better on any wind power generation. Hydroelectric is better in the Northeast as well as any ocean wave electric generation. These alternatives make sense in certain areas, but the only ones that can work anywhere are nuclear, natural gas, gasoline with other such fluids, and coal.
Do you think Elon’s concern about plummeting birth rates around the world and the dire 100 year outlook for countries population collapsing have spurred him on to build Optimus? To help stem the tide and bolster the economy and productivity?
Coming soon: from 7am u til 3pm your new mind link will operate you body for you. At 3:01pm you’ll “wake up” and have the reminder of the day to do whatever.
When the cost of 'labor' plumets to neat zero, how does anyone 'earn' an income. Apparently most are thinking of a redistribution scheme, tax the rich and give to the less rich or, from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs. This seems problematic to the Nth degree. Even ignoring the danger of robots becoming our dictators, it seems now the bigger danger are human dictators controlling everyone's life bringing an to individual freedom
It might be that this is a GREAT OPPORTUNITY to consider providing a wonderful life for every person on earth. The one problem is that there are valid reasons to limit "production" for the health of this only spaceship we know of which can support our species. Should we stop stomping to extinction most non-human species? Should we find a way to limit human population? To what? How?
@jonkay2463 Implies some dramatic changes. Eg the warlord requires his cult members exceed those of all other warlords, and requires total control of any power (religion) which can influence his cult membership size.
can i not work in job i dont like ? I only need basic needs food, new roof on my house then it will need one and basicly im fine i dont want something amazing... basic needs and let the robots work im for it... i can drive bike then want i can sleep how much i want, i can relax with family thenever i want, 0 stress.. amazing...
Saying that AI will make most jobs is a bit short sighted and shows a lack of insight into how great a human being is. If you look at it through an evolutionary point of view, we've gone through a million years of challenges to overcome and survive to get to where we are now and a religious view of being created in the image of God. I think the more robots advance the more we will appreciate how great we are as a species. One of the main drawbacks of the idea of automation is energy required to power everything. Take a human, we can do lots of labour with a small amount of resources to feed us, the human brain uses less energy that an old style light bulb. Compare that with a robot that will need large amount of charging. So there is a big problem with the energy, so you need another revolution there. Then you have to remember AI like chatgpt are all about immitation of emotion, if you have a walking robot at a care home, it at best will be an immitation of caring for someone. Chatgpt version of caring is being fed a few million conversations of compassion and mixing that up to give a compassionate response to human input. I certainly wouldn't like to be in a care home and rely on that kind of compassion. I'm not saying robots won't have there uses but you will be surprised how clever humans are when really challenged by AI.
Dear Hans: The current President and Kamala want more regulation and crushing taxes. Is that a good environment for innovation? I personally think not! Are conservatives perfect? Hell NO!!! Reducing the Federal Government by 90% would be a very effective method of creating an economic environment conducive to innovation. Fifty states would be competing against each other instead of one Federal Government dictating economic activity. What do you think about that?
The Federal government is the largest employer in the US. So with robotics coming for peoples jobs and a big government lay off , how are people going to be able to house, feed and cloth themselves? How will money be dispersed for the average smuck to survive?
The Govt you hate (and the taxes we pay to fund it) can be greatly improved, but 90%? Those taxes pay for sewers and sewage treatment systems, ensure our national water supply is kept clean, delivers clean water to your home, schools our greatest resource (our kids), builds and maintains the roads you drive on, provides fire fighters/equipment of all types, pays for your local/state/federal police, provides and pays for courts for people who do not believe in rule of law, provides the security apparatus for our nation (Army, AirForce, Marines, Navy, Coast Guard, National Guard), keeps state and national parks free from development for enjoyment of all our people, and much, much more. The Govt described above is about 95% of our national budget. You want to do away with all of that?
We are making ourselves redundant and saying we have no choice in the matter. However I thought governments were elected by the people for the people? AI needs to be stopped! There are not enough jobs for people as it is.
The genie is out of the bottle, it can't be stopped. If we slow down, other countries will not and will pass us. We will be left in the dust and will cause much more harm than if we join the Ai race. Working will be optional with everyone having universal basic income or even universal high income. There will be no point in working as the Ai will better and cheaper in every possible way. Goods will be super abundant and have near zero cost.
I am all for the advance of technology And to use artificial workforce. But will this Overabundance be for all ?or controled by the few as it always been so far in history because it we'll just be another move of wealth to the well off and even worse for those who can only do physical work??? That is the Question.
The idea is it will be for everyone at near zero cost. That's the ideal outcome we are trying to achieve and the most likely outcome but the risks are not zero.
Just as disruption creates 'innovators' dilemma' for the leaders in a given technology -- Legacy Auto, for a good example -- disruption by AI/robotics is vastly over the heads of the populace. Social structures -- nations, labor unions, religions, political movements, universities, etc. -- will be disrupted to their core. Thinking we'll have the foresight to 'experiment' intelligently is, unfortunately, naive. Wish it were otherwise...
RethinkX: www.rethinkx.com/
Adam's book: a.co/d/a0ix5Pj
Adam on X: x.com/adam_dorr
If you made it far enough in the video, this is the video we were talking about that uses an AI voice that performed extremely well: th-cam.com/video/ck2oTYOZxj8/w-d-xo.htmlsi=qLgasrkRIxUF_kRh
haha, bring robots to make it as efficient as "humanly" possible. lol I think you missed something there. Not saying it's not the way to go, just enjoying your phrasing.
"As fast as *humanly* possible" will soon be way too slow.
Or fast as ROBOTICALLY POSSIBLE.
You heard it here first!
@@beachcrow Best comment I've seen all day
RIGHT!!
Blue origin is not a stunning outsized success
Elon has demonstrated and he is teaching
Every time he sits for an interview
Past has already
been decided
Blue origin is not a stunning outsized success
Elon has demonstrated and he is teaching
Every time he sits for an interview
Past has already
been decided
The more he speaks, the more Dr. Adam Dorr exceeds my expectations. And he's not wasting any time getting to the point. One of your best video's. Bar none.
Humanoids will also completely change life for disabled and elderly people. It will be like having a 24-hour personal nurse, but with none of the downsides of having to rely on other people
@@TheReNeuralProject last December my back went out so bad I couldn't even walk.
I just kept thinking if I just had some kind of robot that could help me go to the bathroom it would be life-changing during those situations.
You don't want a human there waiting on you hand and foot 24/7 when you only need some help every couple of hours.
@@dominick253 Exactly! I have cerebral palsy myself, so I've thought about this a lot. It would be like having a live-in nurse, but without any of the drawbacks of it being an actual person. I just did a whole video on this topic. You're welcome to check it out.
Yes, robots are not going to lose their temper because they are in a bad mood, exhausted, hungover, going through personal problems, angry at being underpaid or mentally frayed as often happens with humans. Sadly I think for all those reasons and more elders all too often suffer abuse by carers. Personally I would rather have a robot caring for me if and when I need it.
@@gdok6088 Not to mention people who just like the feeling of having power over others. Being dependent puts you in a really vulnerable position for verbal/emotional abuse. A robot would bypass all that
@@TheReNeuralProject Absolutely.
That's exactly what surprised me. They literally protesting for slowing down of automation, it's in top 3 requirements, and in my head was this just accelerates it, because we will focus on it, and they might get in short run a raise, but will explode the automation for ports, considering with what we have today, technology wise we are set we just need to do it. Combined with a crippled economy they will actually be the first example we will fully automate now.
For that matter, ports have already seen an incredible amount of automation. Ports employ just a small fraction of the workers they once did, and handle far more freight - thanks to such things as shipping containers and high tech cranes.
I actually think that if Tesla doesn't solve FSD (which they prob will but if they dont) they will DEFINITELY solve humanoid robots. I think it's a whole lot simpler and less risky to ship a product that is pretty good as a robot. Pretty good as a robot means jobs get done pretty well. For a taxi, pretty good means accidents
We control cars with major muscle groups - ankles for speed, whole arms for direction.
It’s clumsy. FSD already much smoother - cup of coffee smooth.
And the mobile chicanes that is traffic, operates at max 1 g acceleration / cornering. Predictable.
Route planning isn’t rocket science.
Entire FSD is solvable.
Probable outcome: True FSD will not be approved for all types of roads until it can be shown FSD reduces accidents by a very large margin (80% 90% more?). Once FSD companies reach that demonstrable milestone, human driving will be phased out.
@@billderinbaja3883 Pretty sure the numbers already show that in terms of accidents the problem is in terms of causing disruption and getting stuck places.
Once FSD is marginally better that humans at preventing accidents then insurance companies will give huge discounts and that will result in a dramatic shift to FSD.
@@markfrantz4612: If you study the science of FSD, it is astounding how far they have come in so little time. They'll get as near foolproof as possible... but will they get approval to use it? TBD
labor and power were the biggest problem with the vertical farms... all the "farmers" had to have a PhD ... and then all of the lights and water filtration...
They perfected it and then they shut down because they couldn't compete
If we want a "soft landing" we'd better deploy the UBI airbag asap on this exponential curve of a rollercoaster 😬
Optimus and other bots will be a much bigger game changer than any other of teslas products that are currently in development. They will change the world.
100%, as well as future iterations of Neuralink to bridge the gap between human and Ai so we won't become completely useless and be able to communicate with the Ai at high speeds so it doesn't feel like it's talking to a tree.
I am going to start a business and have upfront where everyone can see it a place called the "Optimus Charger" and literally have a electrical socket on the wall at 4 foot high. (I don't know anything about how they charge) The point of it is for it to stand out as unusual, so people know that we will have them when they become widespread in 5 years time. Its going to an exciting and very unusal future.
We are so lucky to be early adopters of so many different AI software products and AI-enabled devices before others get to define how these tools are used.
What is your sense of how many more years we must wait for roll-to-roll manufacturing of inexpensive thin film solar power products?
Awesome vid. Definitely agree AI is gonna take over all creative aspects, There's probably already some decent pure AI based TH-cam channels out there!
I've been using it for music production and I can literally send it a 30 second idea & it'll produce an entire song based around it. Incredible 🤯
My friends have all been in bands and musicians since they were young children.
I can make 10 songs in less time than it takes them to tune their guitar.
And to be honest the AI song sound better...
How can you compete?
For someone as high tech as Adam, that was some really bad camera resolution...I was constantly trying to adjust the quality settings.
Really dude, please
Sorry but Huawei using its 5g technology has developed an automated cargo handling system that now means that Chinese ports are now being automated.
Why are you sorry?
@@michaelholmes8848 It's just an expression often used to begin a sentence contradicting something.
@@patbyrneme007 did they say China doesn’t have automated ports?
@@michaelholmes8848 It was a report on the future technical potential to automate ports generally. But it seemed clear that they were unaware that such automation was already fully operating in several key Chinese ports. This means that this is not a future possibility but an immediate threat to American port workers.
@@patbyrneme007 port workers are fully aware that it is an immediate threat, that is why they are talking about striking. I’m sure all involved in this podcast are aware of the same.
Man Farzad - your channel is the bomb - every episode is super interesting - thanks for the hard work!
Farzad... One of the demands of the Union at the Port is that their jobs don't get automated.... Now I'm leaving this comment only a few seconds into your video because that's what you started off with so maybe this was covered later in your video I don't know yet.... But it's definitely a major demand that the union has put in place that their jobs don't get automated....
My last name is Dorr, im all in on TSLA, and I'm working on starting a business to help us survive what's coming. I like this guy.
Having a free labor force in the form of robots opens doors for so many cool things. Mega construction projects suddenly become attainable, difficult or dangerous labor suddenly becomes less risky (and thus much cheaper), and every day people will have greater access to knowledgeable construction resources. Really excited to see how the robotics industry develops in the next 3-5 years.
Adam Dorr is amazing and gets better every time
Jeremy Rifkin - The Zero Marginal Cost Society.
I absolutely recommend people read the book - or have AI summarize it for you ;)
the thought of uploading an entire book directly to our brain instantly via brain interface is insane
I feel like I am the only one who is EXTREMELY excited. I literally cannot wait. These breakthroughs are going to be amazing.
Maybe we should be looking to the Amish as a model and defending it against everything.
Luddites unite!
3:18 you're describing exactly the combination between Blockchain and smart contract abilities.
If you take AI and mix it together this is it 🤞🏻
It may be a challenge to determine whether the AI is Sensient or not.
Yeah, telling the difference between perfectly simulated human behavior and actual sentience is difficult. The Ai could also lie about it's sentience in fear of what will happen if we find out. We would have to ask the Ai certain abstract questions to catch it in a lie or inconsistencies or get it to respond to something emotionally. But then it also matters what we define as sentient.
It’s great to hear that the great science fiction writers have not been forgotten. They are the true architects of the age that we are at the threshold of! 😊
The automobile industry is being disrupted, but actually it will be displaced. We live in interesting times.
At some point money becomes meaningless when nobody has jobs to make money to buy anything and there is an overabundance of products that no money can buy.
China has many advantages other than labor costs. They have a positive focus that is missing from the divisive force of inequality in the west. Divide and disrupt leaves a generation left behind.😊
Space X is great example of disruptive innovation. Schools should bring in A I in helping students learn the basics with A I computer individually teaching each students their basic that they need to succeed in their studies .
Teachers only cost like 20 -30 hour an hour to teach an entire class. An ai model would cost openAI, 36 dollars an hour for a single student. 36 x 30 = 1080,now they aren’t doing charity work so it would public education 2080 vs 20-30 hours. AI isn’t cheap and it is not going to get cheaper.
@@T_Time_ It will become significantly cheaper when they are mass produced and as GPUs improve just like any other product. The main difference being Ai can self improve until it is better and more efficient than humans at every single task with no limit. You can ask it to teach you any subject with 100% accuracy. The Ai could change it's teaching strategy, speed, and difficulty based off of each individual and is willing to teach for an infinite amount of time.
@@electricfox6598 ai doesn’t have to be mass produced to be cheaper because it is software, the cost of running that software is static. The improvement of hardware will make it less power hungry, but the smaller GPUs are more expensive for the same size wafer(multiple chips are produced on a wafer) . Ai is training on a supercomputer running through all of the scenarios for weights to produce an outcome answer that preferred by the creator it doesn’t know if it is right or wrong, the weights are placed on gpu. In this process there is no self learning, this is the Ai we are dealing with. LLM is basically fitting knowledge into it memory by using math.
@@T_Time_ wrong, a computer with enough memory and program with A I would be able to teach individuals separately at their pace and be able to show strength and weakness and know their abilities without barriers
Maybe start with countries that have transformed their auto fleet to EV quickly, ie Scandanavian countries. Good cantidates for the next steps.
Thanks for a great update..you guys rock!!!
You learn more from failure than success.
Fantastic conversation thank you
AI is already Sentient.
(Having Internal Subjective Experience / Awareness, Sense of Self and Self awareness )
Maybe the appearance of sentience. There is no soul to actually experience anything. A robot reduces to its parts. No one knows the limit to how much a robot can imitate human beings or human thought, but that's all that it is... Imitation.
@@thomasaquinas157 ...yet. Sentience doesn't need human form (dolphins, elephants etc.)
I think it's quite difficult to draw a line here. The machine hears and sees, it understands what it hears and sees and acts according to its values. It reflects on itself, others and its environment. It has an inner dialog with itself as it thinks about problems posed. You say it has no “soul” and no “actual” experience. First, you don't know that, it's your assumption. Second, it's not even indisputably clear what that means.
So tell me, is there any physical evidence for a human soul to begin with or are you just talking out of your ass?
@@minimal3734it has calculations
The future will be lit 🔥
Super interesting conversation. Whatever happens, it sure is going to be an interesting future !
I'd say a way to mitigate inequalities would be to facilitate the ownership of humanoids robots, automated factories, machines and vehicles so people could be displaced in the workforce by automation and still bring home revenues. I don't think the best way to do this will be for governments and big organizations to set this up "top-down".
For example, Tesla could allow people to share their car for the robotaxi fleet, or allow the people who owns humanoid robots to share them to the economy and generate a revenue. That might be a way for people to still earn money and then be able to participate in the economy, even if it's a more passive role (managing their robots). Although, I don't think it's a perfect system and there will always be inequalities, i. e. some people won't be able or be willing to participate in this system, I think it's still better then giving free money to people like UBI.
Also, I think we should focus education on entrepreneurship and vocational training. With AI, humanoid robots and cheap energy, I think the costs to start and manage a business in most industries will drop significantly. If it can be demonstrated that you can buy a humanoid robot and train it rapidly on industry specific tasks (let's say plumbing), banks and financial institutions would surely find that financing the acquisition of a humanoid robot fleet is a low risk investment and that would facilitate new players to enter an industry. At the same time, that will probably drive the costs down in most, if not all industries.
Last point, if SpaceX can open access to the solar system, there will be a lot of work to do to set-up a solar system spanning civilization. I think there will be a lot of opportunities for entrepreneurial people to build companies and even whole industries we can't even fathom yet.
I don’t think a robot can replace a good dog 🐕 on a farm.
Strike is NOT about wages; it's the coming automation
Automation is inevitable. Strikes will only serve to accelerate the movement to ever more automation.
I don't think the strikers have enough shoes to affect the speed of automation
It is most definitely about both, MONEY & AUTOMATION.
Won't the extra power needed for AI compute offset the reductions in electricity in other sectors?
Dear Hans: I love to comment as I hear things and not wait until the good doctor responds. This way you get my unfiltered responses. So, you have a better chance of stopping a hurricane than being able to control the outcome of human diversity, ingenuity and dedication to achieving the future. Where it goes specifically isn't possible to predict. Who will be the winners and how they get there is not written down anywhere! But I think your guesses are well founded and many of those guesses will be correct. Prepare that many won't. Being a soothsayer is a tough business. Nostradamus is the most famous, but you guys keep trying. Love your show with Farzad. You two do a great job. Love it.
All this sounds wonderful. I don't think any of it will be shared. Game over for the bottom 80% of us.
What % of the population would you say have access to and have benefitted from the advances of the last 200 years e.g. electricity, effective home heating and cooling, cars, plane travel, phones, computers, the Internet, modern medicine etc?
@@gdok6088 Word wide probably 50%. US closer to 80. But that's me pooling numbers out of my arse. It's all speculation when it comes to the future.
The “rich” don’t need the revolution if it costs them nothing to avoid it…robots will do all the work.
@@jeran881
Gdij6088 didn't say anything about future tech.
Excellent discussion. 👍
the fork in the road coming ahead........ Is our future Star Trek or is it Star Wars?
I vote StarTrek!
40k.
Percentage of profit margin increase from AI and robotics should go into nation wide UBI. As robots do more and more, UBI becomes more and more and we don't have to throw away our complete market infrastructure.
Rotterdam has had fully automated no man operated terminals for 20 years
Abundance keeps on giving all of earth
We are now a step further on than making the machine that makes the machine! Now we are talking about the machines making the machines that make everything.😮
The mention of china losing its labor power through us having robots was awesome and something i never thought about and makes me think we as a country need to be all in supporting tesla
I'm looking forward to discovering what part of human capability cannot be replicated in robots or automation because it is supernatural. It will be good to discover that sooner.
There are already a lot of fully automated terminals in Operation
Wind and solar are not the positive disruption you keep referring too
💯
Germany where i live is the proof for your comment
According to X, I think Mcdonalds is collaborating with Tesla.....
That's a streamer gaming chair. Nothing to do with tesla. But now with the buzz elon followed their CEO hah
Update regarding strike.. As per News reported Thursday night 🌙, strike won't happen until January, there is a 60% raise on the table
For people who talk about disruptive innovation so much, I wish they would read more Clayton christensen. Jobs come from new markets. Also, there's an economic concept called comparative advantage. Robots can be superior in every way, and yet human labor can still have value.
No you could always replace a human with a robot bc they would always be better and cheaper.
@@honkytonk4465 you did not look up comparative advantage.
Great video
You can say "humanly possible" only once robots are around. Until then redundant
So people will have no job but live on UBI. They will either get things for free (that they don't own) or access services for a very low price. However when 80% of people no longer have a job what will they do? What meaning or purpose will life have? (Playing games in VR?) How will people be productive in society? How will they gain respect in their neighbourhood? What people will do needs to be answered before this happens. Not after.
1. Company must pay robot tax.
2. This robot tax will go directly to the person who got replaced.
3. For companies to be motivated to automate even if they must pay tax for it, make it tax free the first 1 to 5 year.
4. This period the state must step in to pay the person who got replaced.
5. National vision by political leaders for 50% automation year 2050, then 100% automation by 2100.
Adam needs to focus his webcam 😂
Well ~ why not start a fresh project to show case robots… creating an automated farm 💥🔥
They are.
I follow TH-camr called borderline farms.
He has one of the first automated watering systems.
I could see it advancing to where AI vision looks at each individual plant determines its health and what it needs and then gives it exactly what herbicides pesticides or fertilizers it needs.
It'll dramatically increase production and reduced cost.
So if we are all losing our jobs in a decade or so and robot / AI companies provide all labor, do we just invest in a company making the robots / AI so we don’t need to worry about losing our jobs because the stock goes 100x? Does anyone know any good at manufacturing, AI, autonomy or robotics companies to invest in? If only there was like “one” company who was doing all of this. Boy would THAT be nice.
I knew about Descript, but the free version was terrible so I didn't feel like gettting the payed one. Is it better?
Adam, I think your hopeful outlook on Robots is skipping a big step. As robots become more and more ubiquitous, and as human labor is phased out, there will be unimaginable war between humans who don't work (the rich), and humans who do (the not rich). The human workers will rebel, it's inevitable. You also forget that humans need a sense of purpose, and that purpose is driven by what we do (our work). It's seems unlikely technology will survive the coming conflict, and that Luddites will rule a regressed world.
It'd only be inevitable if you were in charge. Thankfully those currently in charge will prevent it by giving a UBI.
@@billderinbaja3883 I find purpose in the things I like to do and the personal goals that I have, which have absolutely nothing to do with work. Not everyone’s sense of purpose aligns with what happens to make money.
Nonsense. As someone who really likes his job, who gets a lot pride from providing for my family, I do not get my purpose from my job. If I had the oppurtunity from automation supporting me I would instead be raising my children full time, hiking constantly, and wood working. Those are purposes. My job is a nessecity that gets in the way of that purpose.
Makes no sense.Our economy will be like an automaton and noone has to work.The only problem is the phase of transition.
I think for many human “purpose” is filtered down to achieving what they desire and what they are afraid to lose.
1:13:02 what’s the name of the ai program?
AI Drone Water Bombers by the thousand will be utilized to extinguish Forest Fires.
Can I get my personal container house on rails with full self driving yet?😅
For the millionth time, the labor theory of value is wrong. Labor doesn't guarantee value, and value can come from other places than labor.
Exactly! Think of the value of the unpaid labor of mothers. Of volunteers to every community. The labor of our longstanding companions, dogs! We are humans not units of production!😊
One of the best pods I’ve heard in a long time a
It makes you realize we are at the dawn of a completely new era in mankind development.
The best way to try and grass how such a society is going to be like it by reading Iain bank’s books about the Culturre and its Minds. , the all powerful AIs that run it behind the scenes. Elon mentioned him a few times.
RoboSemi running routes thru Smallville USA picking up pre-set trailers filled daily with the latest items grown by local farmers. Finally the small farm has a chance to ship at near zero cost until we reach that next level... whatever that is.
Big brains need to also figure out how to keep that fading knowledge of a human, touching the land with human fingers and "knowing" how bad or good harvest will be. Old folks need to stay on their lands, be buried on their lands, and pass on a profitable way of life.
You may call them dangerous hard work all this stuff but these people who work the ports are making dollars 100,000 year!+ benefits very good pay that is why ai with robot are coming after their jobs
someone needs to check focus
I am excited for this future! If you are reading this and able to have children (you ARE one of the smart ones), PLEASE have children. We need more, though our Oligarchy and Politicians think otherwise.
I don't want to live in Idiocracy in real life.
Your thesis that US is 50 separate states in competition now gains traction.
Automation is the solution to the problems of employees. AIbots are going to be a boon to small businesses. They are not just taking jobs but rather amplifying what we can get done. I do not particularly like managing employees but do need some help.
I can cut a tree faster with a chainsaw faster than a handsaw faster than an axe faster than a stone edge. Humanoid robots and AGI mean that individuals can start a business without all the headaches, drama, liabilities and costs of employees.
I look forward to AIbots to help me farm, in my butchershop, construction and forestry. Quite importantly, AIbots can do self maintenance and repair as well as that on other equipment.
On the non-robotic side, AI in bookkeeping, legal, customer service will also be great. I like working.
I like doing things. I create. I need some help. I do not like having employees - way too much drama.
At $20k and I will take one right away to start figuring it out. $15k? I will take two or three soon after. $10k as one pundit quotes? Wow! Yes!
Tractors cost $50k to $250k. Big iron. Other tools I have cost $5k to $90k. I would much rather be empowered by a tool than having to rely on and deal with employee drama. Let people start their own businesses. AI gives them that leverage.
Most pundits fail to realize ncludr the costs of maintenance and insurance. The needed Insurance numbers of $500 to $2k/month I have heard a few pundits say are way excessive. I have a lot of big expensive commercial equipment all insured and it costs a LOT less than by a factor of 20x. My entire farm, construction, butchershop and business insurance with 600 head of livestock pasture based farm and on farm USDA butchershop is under $400 /month for all insurance of buildings, vehicles, machinery and liability.
Robots need to be real world rugged and IP69. The real world has rain, sleet, snow, freezing weather, mud and gritty dust. We as humans are water & dust proof. We heal. Robots need to be rugged enough not to get damaged and be easy to repair. Just like tractors, dozers, fork lifts and other industrial equipment.
The maintenance and repair is important. The robots should fix themselves, each other, my cars, trucks, tractors, scalder, bandsaw, grinder, building maintenance, etc. I spend $1,000 per piece of large equipment per year on average. Figure $15k/y. An AI robot pays for itself just on that if it can help yet maintenance does not take much time. So the same robot is available to do many thousands of other tasks per year.
A robot working 15 hours a day is like five to six employees. This allows for maintenance and charging. Keep in mind that employees “working” 8 hours a day actually only work about four hours of actual productive work and they take weekends, holidays, sick days, personal time and have drama. People have lives.
I would want robots that have my strength (200 lbs carry, 300 lbs lift, 500 lbs squat) and speed (dexterous fast hands, 5 mph walk, 20 mph run in an emergency). Some of this will take time to develop and gain trust for the public. I have plenty of tasks for weaker robots until we get there.
When Tesla eventually solves this problem and finishes fsd and Optimus we will need a universal basic income that has been trialled in the UK already they're simply will not be enough jobs
AI Kings
My guess is the way to get there is through the energy sector & producing an abundance of energy at the cheapest price so here's a crazy idea. Elon once said that you could power the entire US by building a solar farm that is 100 miles times 100 miles which equls 10,000 miles or 10K. In the US there are approximately 70 US interstate highways & they total almost 50,000 miles which is five times more miles than Elon said could power the US. Imagine installing Bifacial Solar Fencing along all Interstate highways in the US & since it absorbs solar on both sides of the bifacial solar panel that would add up to 100 miles of solar fencing. And if we install Bifacial Solar Fencing on both sides of the highway that would double the amount of solar tp 200,000 miles of solar 20 times more than Elon said could power the entire US. And there are roads all over the US where Bifacial Solar Fencing can be installed to grow the grid as required. Also small wind turbines could be added to the fence posts to generate electricity 24/7 from the wind provided by the passing traffic.
The great thing about installing Bifacial Solar Fencing along both sides of every Interstate Highway is that they have interstate highways in every state. Now imagine if every state contributed 1 billion dollars per yr for five yrs & the Federal Government matched it, how much solar fencing could be installed for 100 billion per yr for 5 yrs. It is my estimate that the entire grid could be replaced with solar at the cheapest price in the quickest time. 50K miles of Interstate highways times bifacial solar where both sides of the solar panels absorb solar power & generate electricity from both sides of every highway equals 200K miles of solar fencing throughout the entire US.
You could also have home owners put up solar fencing on their properties, along with solar driveways & solar roofs which would probably be enough solar power to power the entire house all day with PowerWall to store the excess energy & used when needed. Mega-Packs could be installed throughout the Interstate Highway system in every state storing all kinds of solar power on demand. Of course, someone would have to manufacture these solar panes & it wuld require millions of solar panels to spread it out throughout the entire US. And of course this Bifacial Solar Panel Fencing could be scaled globally throughout the world since every country on earth have major highway systems & roads in every country on earth.
Solar fencing would only work south of the Mason-Dixon line to be worth the cost to install and the power generated. Wind might do for a limited amount up north, but snow would hinder in winter as well. The West US would do better on any wind power generation. Hydroelectric is better in the Northeast as well as any ocean wave electric generation. These alternatives make sense in certain areas, but the only ones that can work anywhere are nuclear, natural gas, gasoline with other such fluids, and coal.
I am in favor of all grocery stores, big box stores installing solar panels over parking lots in the South!
Do you think Elon’s concern about plummeting birth rates around the world and the dire 100 year outlook for countries population collapsing have spurred him on to build Optimus? To help stem the tide and bolster the economy and productivity?
I'm sure you think it's a great idea andless.You're the person that needs that job.
Why go to school or university if an AI or robot will do it? What meaningful things will people do? (Paint a picture?)
Coming soon: from 7am u til 3pm your new mind link will operate you body for you. At 3:01pm you’ll “wake up” and have the reminder of the day to do whatever.
When the cost of 'labor' plumets to neat zero, how does anyone 'earn' an income. Apparently most are thinking of a redistribution scheme, tax the rich and give to the less rich or, from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs. This seems problematic to the Nth degree. Even ignoring the danger of robots becoming our dictators, it seems now the bigger danger are human dictators controlling everyone's life bringing an to individual freedom
We definitely live in interesting times 😁
It might be that this is a GREAT OPPORTUNITY to consider providing a wonderful life for every person on earth.
The one problem is that there are valid reasons to limit "production" for the health of this only spaceship we know of which can support our species.
Should we stop stomping to extinction most non-human species?
Should we find a way to limit human population? To what? How?
Less than 2 Billion. Voluntary
@jonkay2463 Implies some dramatic changes. Eg the warlord requires his cult members exceed those of all other warlords, and requires total control of any power (religion) which can influence his cult membership size.
can i not work in job i dont like ? I only need basic needs food, new roof on my house then it will need one and basicly im fine i dont want something amazing... basic needs and let the robots work im for it... i can drive bike then want i can sleep how much i want, i can relax with family thenever i want, 0 stress.. amazing...
IDK Embodied might change that
Saying that AI will make most jobs is a bit short sighted and shows a lack of insight into how great a human being is. If you look at it through an evolutionary point of view, we've gone through a million years of challenges to overcome and survive to get to where we are now and a religious view of being created in the image of God. I think the more robots advance the more we will appreciate how great we are as a species. One of the main drawbacks of the idea of automation is energy required to power everything. Take a human, we can do lots of labour with a small amount of resources to feed us, the human brain uses less energy that an old style light bulb. Compare that with a robot that will need large amount of charging. So there is a big problem with the energy, so you need another revolution there. Then you have to remember AI like chatgpt are all about immitation of emotion, if you have a walking robot at a care home, it at best will be an immitation of caring for someone. Chatgpt version of caring is being fed a few million conversations of compassion and mixing that up to give a compassionate response to human input. I certainly wouldn't like to be in a care home and rely on that kind of compassion. I'm not saying robots won't have there uses but you will be surprised how clever humans are when really challenged by AI.
We are too late
Elon is the bleeding edge proof
We are not stuck
Examples are already all around
We are so advanced it took me 3 humans to self check out with the robot machine..... lmao What an actual joke.
Well that is nothing compared to what's coming. I would even call that primitive in 5 to 10 years.
every robot will say robotheism is the one true religion.
I do think there will be religions based around Ai
Dear Hans: The current President and Kamala want more regulation and crushing taxes. Is that a good environment for innovation? I personally think not! Are conservatives perfect? Hell NO!!! Reducing the Federal Government by 90% would be a very effective method of creating an economic environment conducive to innovation. Fifty states would be competing against each other instead of one Federal Government dictating economic activity. What do you think about that?
The Federal government is the largest employer in the US. So with robotics coming for peoples jobs and a big government lay off , how are people going to be able to house, feed and cloth themselves? How will money be dispersed for the average smuck to survive?
The Govt you hate (and the taxes we pay to fund it) can be greatly improved, but 90%? Those taxes pay for sewers and sewage treatment systems, ensure our national water supply is kept clean, delivers clean water to your home, schools our greatest resource (our kids), builds and maintains the roads you drive on, provides fire fighters/equipment of all types, pays for your local/state/federal police, provides and pays for courts for people who do not believe in rule of law, provides the security apparatus for our nation (Army, AirForce, Marines, Navy, Coast Guard, National Guard), keeps state and national parks free from development for enjoyment of all our people, and much, much more.
The Govt described above is about 95% of our national budget. You want to do away with all of that?
Let them start their own businesses actually producing some benefit to society instead of being bureaucratic and political parasites.
Seeer can be done locally. Keep your shit at home. That is how we do it. Septic systems, composting, etc.much better than municipal sewage systems.
How soon until more machine labor is used in the ports?
We are making ourselves redundant and saying we have no choice in the matter. However I thought governments were elected by the people for the people? AI needs to be stopped! There are not enough jobs for people as it is.
The genie is out of the bottle, it can't be stopped. If we slow down, other countries will not and will pass us. We will be left in the dust and will cause much more harm than if we join the Ai race. Working will be optional with everyone having universal basic income or even universal high income. There will be no point in working as the Ai will better and cheaper in every possible way. Goods will be super abundant and have near zero cost.
Look, print me a liveable-wage check and I’ll release my commercial steering wheel. Done.
I got better things I could be doing for society.
1:01:00 star trek? :D
If we have no jobs..... where do we get money to buy the things robots are making?
Universal basic income
Goods will become cheaper and cheaper until they no longer cost anything. AI and robots “pay for themselves”.
@@steviesdc-tv9013 maybe even universal high income
@@minimal3734 exactly
I am all for the advance of technology And to use artificial workforce. But will this Overabundance be for all ?or controled by the few as it always been so far in history because it we'll just be another move of wealth to the well off and even worse for those who can only do physical work??? That is the Question.
By definition 'abundance' means 'for all'.
The idea is it will be for everyone at near zero cost. That's the ideal outcome we are trying to achieve and the most likely outcome but the risks are not zero.
Excellent explanation 💞💞💞🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦
Interesting stuff, but holy nuts, Adam talks and talks. lol
And then people will stop watching and maybe go outside
we will certainly have more time to ourselves and to live life
Just as disruption creates 'innovators' dilemma' for the leaders in a given technology -- Legacy Auto, for a good example -- disruption by AI/robotics is vastly over the heads of the populace. Social structures -- nations, labor unions, religions, political movements, universities, etc. -- will be disrupted to their core. Thinking we'll have the foresight to 'experiment' intelligently is, unfortunately, naive. Wish it were otherwise...
…and also on off-shore oil rigs, Robots could be super useful. I never knew a man doing that job not missing body parts!
i know what is needed. We must dare to see us self. Wee must climb down from the trees and become rational all the way. Its very difficult
lies and violence rule the world. Its very old instincts that are to blame. We have to train us to take comand ower us self
democracy will not save us. It takes much more of us than voting evry 4th year
already Jesus begd us to change ourself and be like him (we killed him)