Timestamps and Sponsors: - Stephen Wolfram on Wolfram Physics Project on TOE: th-cam.com/video/1sXrRc3Bhrs/w-d-xo.html - Brilliant: brilliant.org/TOE for 20% off 00:00:00 Introduction 00:02:58 Physics from computation 00:11:30 Generalizing Turing machines 00:17:34 Dark matter as Indicating "atoms of space" 00:22:13 Energy as density of space itself 00:30:30 Entanglement limit of all possible computations 00:34:53 What persists across the universe are "concepts" 00:40:09 How does ChatGPT work? 00:41:41 Irreducible computation, ChatGPT, and AI 00:49:20 Recovering general relativity from the ruliad (Wolfram Physics Project) 00:58:38 Coming up: David Chalmers, Ben Goertzel, and more Wolfram
@Curt if there is any way for you to suggest to a sir Roger that time is, in fact, a compact dimension. He would understand that this one thing actually simplifies twitor theory and makes it self evolving as the phase space of time. relative tangent to time determines local vector.
What he is talking about with computational limitations is just the uncertainty principle showing itself... Everything is subjective because in order to have objective reality you need an observer that exists from beginning to end of all time... Even if such hypothetical observer exists, the end of time has not came yet therefore it's all subjective.
I want to drop something important about spatial dimensions. Infinite 0 dimensional existence can fit within any size 1 dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite one dimensional existence can fit inside of any size two-dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite two-dimensional planes can fit inside of any three dimensional existence, right‽ Do you see the pattern that I'm working at? Therefore it is easy to see if our spatial dimension object can hold infinite three dimensional existence inside of it including infinite universe versions inside of any size 4-dimensional object! This is a Kaleidoscope reality...
The structure and what he's talking about that is branching is the tree of Life, the singularity... We are all connected to it. All is 1. Spooky action at a distance isn't so spooky when you realize you are in a kaleidoscope reality! Everything was all as 1 at BigBang... Still is as 1 today... Not spooky. Same source energy... Same singularity. If all is one and all is connected what exactly is spooky?
Agreed. People often ask who you would choose to have dinner with who’s passed away. Einstein is an obvious choice and also one of mine, but Wolfram is a living version of that in my opinion. I would be delighted if I met him, let alone chatted with him at any length.
Stephen’s theoretical flexibility (i.e., his willingness to entertain new ideas and observe the open-endedness of “big questions”) impresses me even more than his fine technical expertise.
@flflflflfl His cross disciplinary approach (math, physics, engineering, computation, philosophy, and more) is refreshing. He is not just speculating. He possesses the bona fide to speak clearly and precisely. He is also an incredibly careful thinker. A true treat for the mind! Thank you, Curt!
What he is talking about with computational limitations is just the uncertainty principle showing itself... Everything is subjective because in order to have objective reality you need an observer that exists from beginning to end of all time... Even if such hypothetical observer exists, the end of time has not came yet therefore it's all subjective. He calls it hypergraph I call it kaleidoscope. I want to drop something important about spatial dimensions. Infinite 0 dimensional existence can fit within any size 1 dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite one dimensional existence can fit inside of any size two-dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite two-dimensional planes can fit inside of any three dimensional existence, right‽ Do you see the pattern that I'm working at? Therefore it is easy to see if our spatial dimension object can hold infinite three dimensional existence inside of it including infinite universe versions inside of any size 4-dimensional object! This is a Kaleidoscope reality... The structure and what he's talking about that is branching is the tree of Life, the singularity... We are all connected to it. All is 1. Spooky action at a distance isn't so spooky when you realize you are in a kaleidoscope reality! Everything was all as 1 at BigBang... Still is as 1 today... Not spooky. Same source energy... Same singularity. If all is one and all is connected what exactly is spooky?Google has one of the biggest breakthroughs with artificial intelligence recently-released they're going to have a artificial intelligence model palm that is a offline artificial intelligence model. This coupled with artificial intelligence doing simplification of coding and compression algorithms put thousands of lines of code into one line and send the data over air will allow offline AI to decompress the info and translate it back to the meaning of the thousands of lines of code! This will be revolutionary! Imagine watching 4k video that only takes same amount of data to watch as sending a message! This is the future! Google has done it!!
Well, yes, but what he is doing it was done before. He is revisiting existing theories and trying to go further. Only a genius like himself could do something like this, but not the only one who has done it.
@@FazeCloud i have seen all three podcast with Lex and yes their really good. And even his approach is really good and fantastic is nothing new and falls in many things according to many scientists.
@@clickaccept Stephen Wolfram (with others) invented SMP, which became Mathematica, which became WolframAlpha. I have used WolframAlpha quite a bit and it is quite impressive. He has written several books including "A New Kind of Science", "Metamathematics: Foundations & Physicalization", "A Project to Find the Fundamental Theory of Physics", and more. Not bad for someone just telling a story. For the record, I don't know (have never met) Stephen Wolfram. However, I do know folks who know him.
The camera work is pretty funny, long shaky zooms on his hands, etc Framing the weird bald robot in the background makes it look like he's being forced to speak under the watchful gaze of his AI masters. "Perhaps AI will be like a new force of nature, like hurricanes, in which we're powerless to do anything other than rebuild after the destruction..." While the AI smiles contently in the corner
That. Was. Nuts. I understood about half the words from an English, Greek, Latin perspective. And maybe 2% of the underlying meaning. You could almost feel the eddies of intellect and curiosity welling up. Thank you for posting this, now I just need a huge ladle to scoop my brains back in!
What he is talking about with computational limitations is just the uncertainty principle showing itself... Everything is subjective because in order to have objective reality you need an observer that exists from beginning to end of all time... Even if such hypothetical observer exists, the end of time has not came yet therefore it's all subjective. He calls it hypergraph I call it kaleidoscope. I want to drop something important about spatial dimensions. Infinite 0 dimensional existence can fit within any size 1 dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite one dimensional existence can fit inside of any size two-dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite two-dimensional planes can fit inside of any three dimensional existence, right‽ Do you see the pattern that I'm working at? Therefore it is easy to see if our spatial dimension object can hold infinite three dimensional existence inside of it including infinite universe versions inside of any size 4-dimensional object! This is a Kaleidoscope reality... The structure and what he's talking about that is branching is the tree of Life, the singularity... We are all connected to it. All is 1. Spooky action at a distance isn't so spooky when you realize you are in a kaleidoscope reality! Everything was all as 1 at BigBang... Still is as 1 today... Not spooky. Same source energy... Same singularity. If all is one and all is connected what exactly is spooky?Google has one of the biggest breakthroughs with artificial intelligence recently-released they're going to have a artificial intelligence model palm that is a offline artificial intelligence model. This coupled with artificial intelligence doing simplification of coding and compression algorithms put thousands of lines of code into one line and send the data over air will allow offline AI to decompress the info and translate it back to the meaning of the thousands of lines of code! This will be revolutionary! Imagine watching 4k video that only takes same amount of data to watch as sending a message! This is the future! Google has done it!!!
What an amazing guest! Would love if you could consider Jonathan Gorard also, he has a great understanding of mathematics too and would be a great conversation!
@@TheoriesofEverything What he is talking about with computational limitations is just the uncertainty principle showing itself... Everything is subjective because in order to have objective reality you need an observer that exists from beginning to end of all time... Even if such hypothetical observer exists, the end of time has not came yet therefore it's all subjective. He calls it hypergraph I call it kaleidoscope. I want to drop something important about spatial dimensions. Infinite 0 dimensional existence can fit within any size 1 dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite one dimensional existence can fit inside of any size two-dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite two-dimensional planes can fit inside of any three dimensional existence, right‽ Do you see the pattern that I'm working at? Therefore it is easy to see if our spatial dimension object can hold infinite three dimensional existence inside of it including infinite universe versions inside of any size 4-dimensional object! This is a Kaleidoscope reality... The structure and what he's talking about that is branching is the tree of Life, the singularity... We are all connected to it. All is 1. Spooky action at a distance isn't so spooky when you realize you are in a kaleidoscope reality! Everything was all as 1 at BigBang... Still is as 1 today... Not spooky. Same source energy... Same singularity. If all is one and all is connected what exactly is spooky?Google has one of the biggest breakthroughs with artificial intelligence recently-released they're going to have a artificial intelligence model palm that is a offline artificial intelligence model. This coupled with artificial intelligence doing simplification of coding and compression algorithms put thousands of lines of code into one line and send the data over air will allow offline AI to decompress the info and translate it back to the meaning of the thousands of lines of code! This will be revolutionary! Imagine watching 4k video that only takes same amount of data to watch as sending a message! This is the future! Google has done it!!!
This is an incredible presentation! The concept of a Ruliad alone is an enormous leap forward in my framework of understanding how to look at the universe. Wolfram is an incredible treasure for all humanity. Thanks for sharing! Leave it to philosophers to have a completely chaotic style of cinematography. Tripods are your friends! Leave one of your cameras running at the same angle and zoom from start to finish. This will help the video be intelligible rather than feeling like it might transition into a chase thriller at any moment. Some of us are badly affected by motion sickness, which makes it challenging to process all the brilliant ideas being presented here. (Having steady shots would also greatly reduce your editing workload.) I volunteer to shoot video for you if you are ever in the Northwest.
Agreed - I had to avert my gaze, except when it seemed a compelling visual aid was being shown, due to the cinema chaos. No need for it, since multiple cameras were being used. It was an unfortunate way to present great content.
Oh man I could hug you right now ha. You are a TH-cam hero right now. I’m talking about the fact that you put a “skip to this part in the video” during your ad. An actual decent morale on TH-cam around viewers wanting to see the content they actually clicked on.
these people r badass. I’m so happy to have the courage to learn about these topics (: . I feel honored to be alive with these individuals. Well mates.. I hope everyone’s having a good night!!
I was just blown away, when i realised that, i as a observer of the system am part of the system. That changes a lot... Never thought about this before. Great lecture !
What he is talking about with computational limitations is just the uncertainty principle showing itself... Everything is subjective because in order to have objective reality you need an observer that exists from beginning to end of all time... Even if such hypothetical observer exists, the end of time has not came yet therefore it's all subjective. He calls it hypergraph I call it kaleidoscope. I want to drop something important about spatial dimensions. Infinite 0 dimensional existence can fit within any size 1 dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite one dimensional existence can fit inside of any size two-dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite two-dimensional planes can fit inside of any three dimensional existence, right‽ Do you see the pattern that I'm working at? Therefore it is easy to see if our spatial dimension object can hold infinite three dimensional existence inside of it including infinite universe versions inside of any size 4-dimensional object! This is a Kaleidoscope reality... The structure and what he's talking about that is branching is the tree of Life, the singularity... We are all connected to it. All is 1. Spooky action at a distance isn't so spooky when you realize you are in a kaleidoscope reality! Everything was all as 1 at BigBang... Still is as 1 today... Not spooky. Same source energy... Same singularity. If all is one and all is connected what exactly is spooky?Google has one of the biggest breakthroughs with artificial intelligence recently-released they're going to have a artificial intelligence model palm that is a offline artificial intelligence model. This coupled with artificial intelligence doing simplification of coding and compression algorithms put thousands of lines of code into one line and send the data over air will allow offline AI to decompress the info and translate it back to the meaning of the thousands of lines of code! This will be revolutionary! Imagine watching 4k video that only takes same amount of data to watch as sending a message! This is the future! Google has done it!!!!
We need to get Bernardo Kastrup, Sabine Hossenfelder, and Stephen Wolfram together to discuss the observation problem. I'll try to arrange this on my channel. Chat GPT has a few things to say about it as well :]
It seems that wolfram skips the problem of how consciousness "emerges" (a miracle occurs)! It is exactly this problem that Donald Hoffman is trying to solve assuming that the basic stuff are not space atoms but simple conscious atoms(agents)... then Donald is trying to derive space time etc
@@rodolforesende2048 I can see that. to his credit, and the other deep thinkers, the field of studying sustained consciousness is tricky enough as it is! But we need a solid answer to the initial spark to be sure. "to be sure" hehe
Beautiful. I've just finished the talk, and wow really good. I could follow it, although I would not like to look to those papers XD. But this is what an educational talk should be, how he link all these concepts to higher concepts connected to physics and mathematics, semantic gramática, I learn a lot only with these comparison. Really appreciated!!
I've been using GPT to keep up with the convo whenever I have a question. I asked it about syllogistic and aristotelean logic, and this is what version 3 came up with: "can you make a list of the ways to bridge the gap between human languge processing and your language modeling system using aristotelean and syllogistic logic?" As I mentioned earlier, my language modeling system is not explicitly based on syllogistic or Aristotelian logic. However, there are some ways in which the principles of these logical systems could potentially be used to bridge the gap between human language processing and AI language modeling. Here are a few possible examples: Developing algorithms that can recognize and classify linguistic categories. As I mentioned earlier, Aristotelian logic involves making assertions about categories of things. Similarly, AI language models could potentially benefit from algorithms that can accurately identify and classify different linguistic categories, such as nouns, verbs, and adjectives. This could help to improve the accuracy and naturalness of language generated by the model. Creating algorithms that can identify and analyze relationships between concepts. Syllogisms involve making assertions about the relationships between premises and conclusions. Similarly, AI language models could potentially benefit from algorithms that can identify and analyze relationships between different linguistic concepts and elements. This could help to improve the coherence and relevance of the language generated by the model. Developing algorithms that can reason about context and meaning. Both syllogistic and Aristotelian logic rely on the idea of reasoning about context and meaning in order to make valid deductions. Similarly, AI language models could potentially benefit from algorithms that can reason about context and meaning in order to generate language that is more contextually relevant and meaningful. Improving the model's ability to generate explanations and justifications. Syllogisms often involve providing explanations and justifications for a particular conclusion. Similarly, AI language models could potentially be improved by developing algorithms that can generate explanations and justifications for the language that they generate. This could help to increase the transparency and interpretability of the model. Overall, while my AI language model is not explicitly based on syllogistic or Aristotelian logic, there are some ways in which the principles of these logical systems could potentially be used to improve the accuracy, coherence, and relevance of the language generated by the model.
as to if this would cause alignment problems, my current thoughts lean toward thinking the opposite; it would likely garner more clarity. I feel like we should be able to look to the program itself for answers, kind of like a phenomenological 1st-"person" approach to bridging the gap.
I'm pretty sure each and every term and concept in this talk is a PhD's worth of knowledge and insight woven together. I'd really like to see something like this make it to mainstream academia somehow. Digging in deeper and understanding more is one thing, but I feel like there's a ton of scientific applications that should be pursued here.
"If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself" said one very famous scientists. Well I am a 60 years old dude with a little knowledge of science (MSc). I can't help but keep on thinking of Jordan Peterson whom I USED to think was one of the best minds in social sciences until one day I realised he is just using a lot jargon and sick language.
It's hard to believe that Stephen is in his 60s here talking right now. He has the intellectual energy of a very young man. I figured he couldn't be much older than me (mid-40s) because of this energetic nature, but that he must be at least a few years older just because of his accomplishments. Turns out he's 63, so just about old enough to be my father. Wild. Anyway, if you see this Stephen, much respect. I'm very appreciative of your analytical mind and your understanding of all of the tech on such a fundamental level in the AI landscape. There are a lot of philosophical alarmists out there scaring people right now, and I honestly think they might do well to sit down and have a talk with someone like yourself. You're helping ground us in all this craziness.
Thanks for sharing. Stephen Wolfram is very keen to promote the idea that complex things can be produced by simple rules. He did a wonderful job, and I believe it is true. Interesting, as the concept of a cellular automaton is very similar to the bagua in the I Ching, an ancient Chinese book dated to 200 BC. The I Ching also talks about how things and nature change and how people should respond. People can even predict the future according to Bagua and the I Ching, which is more like a superstition.
I LOVE this, Curt. But the staff and setup really HAS TO be ironed out BEFORE a guest starts speaking. Moving tables and chairs while he's talking, in front of him, isnt good... Prepare before they arrive, then let them speak with zero distractions.
One of the first things I was thinking about since the release of GPT for is a fact that when this is combined with Wolfram alpha, the ability of large language models to combine with what is being done on his hypergraphs might very well be a way to synthesize on a computer program a lot of relevant laws of physics that convened be demonstrated with physical experiments so it's and therefore can be verified how close the theoretical models that are being generated by the hypergraphs and Wolfram alpha can be used in literally creating physical engineering projects
If the universe is bound by computational irreducibility like Wolfram says, would it need to be run all the way to the "end" in order to separate what is possible from what is not? If one wanted to know exactly what is and isn't possible given a certain set of rules. Interesting concepts even though my brain is too small to comprehend them, thank you Mr Wolfram!
The funny thing is that AI starting from GPT will put to a test his theory of of Computational Equivalence that states that once a system can perform behavior that is complex, that system is as complex as any other system found in the universe and is computationally equivalent in its sophistication.
I think the biggest stroke of masterpiece with this is the ability to see the endgame and work backwards this is strategy of many great achievers in all sorts of games... She want to get full understanding you need to start at the end game and work yourself back to the beginning... This is the way to do it! Looking for problems you find solutions. Looking for solutions you find problems.
Man I'm listening further into this talk and I'm hearing Boscovich's voice listening to Stephen talk about atoms of space. I had never even heard of him until a couple years ago. Everybody thinks of Liebniz and Newton during that time, but after I read his Theory of Natural Philosophy, I found out that Nicola Tesla spent quite a bit of time studying his work, and it's remarkable to me that like DaVinci a hundred or so years ago, people rediscovered a lot of Tesla's insights into the nature of the universe in our time and began engineering things that we now use, like wireless charging technology. Seemed like magic when I read about it 25 years ago. Now we use it every day, but Tesla engineered it more than a century before that, and he used the musings of a man who lived another century earlier than that even. Boscovich had a way of looking at the problem of "what is matter" and "what is the universe made of" that echoes exactly what Mr. Wolfram is talking about here. More striking to me while reading it was his theory on how attractive forces (gravity) become infinitely strong up to a very specific point, and then there is an equally infinitely strong opposing force that actually opposes the ability of two atoms of matter from coming closer together when they reach a certain closeness. The way he put it, there's literally nothing in Newtonian physics that could oppose that force that would overcome the barrier between two atomic subunits, and his theory was that it's because those subunits must be contained within these subunits of space. Since two objects can't simultaneously occupy the same "point" (or space atom as Stephen says here), there would be no way for them to congeal together, thus the observation that we can empirically see, which is that things don't just stick together when you press them upon each other. Sometimes they do, but most of the time they don't. I don't remember hearing any of those insights in my physics courses. Maybe I missed them, I don't know, but that was some profoundly accurate insight that came from nothing but pure logical deduction. A lot of incredibly insightful things were hashed out by that man that I think Liebniz overlooked, which may be why Einstein didn't quite get everything right, because he was a follower of Liebniz. At this point I'm possibly talking out of my ass because I don't really understand most of what Einstein said, but I do know that his theories aren't congruent with observations we make in other areas of physics. Boscovich meanwhile, his observations and assertions were ironclad and are vindicated as being consistent with all that we've been able to empirically observe since then.
That's what he wants you to think. What he describes is a mix of unnecessary concepts and interesting ones, all formulated in a way which makes him look smart.
@@Tschoii90 The ability to condense information and explain it to idiots is a good sign you know what you're talking about. Us true geniuses know this.
from the idea that reality is some energy ball that has it's own 'movement and momentum', everything stephen says is a logical conclusion of that. In this case, the energyball being equivalent to a hypergraph. based on his audience size, these ideas are becoming more mainstream. seems like we humans may soon understand where we came from without needing religious explanations. amazing.
Just to skip to the end, AI is going to be a new type of (periscope, microscope, telescope) into the mathematically transcendent & subtler physical domains or Supra space. Ironic that in the end we will probably make inner-space first contact before we make outer space first contact.
Many theoretical physicsts and even AI researchers would say that his thesis is fundmentaly flawed. His notion tht there are a set fo fundamental rules just gets us back to the a different version of the same old question...
Very interesting and creative. Now I have heard Mr. Wolfram talk on several occasions I understand more, however I must say: " for the love of God Montresore, complete your sentences and set the speed at a fraction of what you do"
25:50 ❤ Branchial Space: The space of quantum states, in which entangled states are nearby. Branchial space has the same relation to the multiway graph that physical space has to the causal graph, defining extent in each slice in a foliation of the multiway system. Branchial space is a generic term for what exists in branchlike hypersurfaces.
Although i have a somewhat technical background I am not a physicist or mathematician but I do know about how things get communicated & popularized, which like it or not, is probably a prerequisite for Dr. Wolfram’s theory gaining greater traction. Disseminating information through a firehouse is not the way to do it. I get that he has limited time & a lot to communicate before he can talk about higher level things. Or so he believes. He needs to present the basics of his theory in simplified graphical form at a calm measured pace and !not worry about leaving some things unexplained or questions unanswered ! The unexplained & unanswered are motivations to find out more, which leads to questions & engagement. When you overwhelm with information it reduces the ability to even formulate questions. I can’t count the number of physicists I’ve seen do this. They so love their idea they feel compelled to make sure everyone gets everything about it. Eric Weinstein could have a patent on it. The thing he should want *most is a question that says “I don’t understand, can we go back to the beginning and that bit about…” Oh - and get an assistant to pre-approve the AV setup.
Great lecture - very fascinating. I wanted to hear the whole thing. Unfortunately I was unable to finish watching due to the terrible and disruptive camera work and A/V production.
I mean, havent everyone considered the "computations in nature" and time just being incremental steps of applying the rules of the system to the participants? One state to the next. And then, how imensly complex this all is but somehow it seems to happen without any effort to us observers? That is why we have been thinking about biologial neural nets for the last 15 years, and how to design the silicon in a way that could mimic it. That language models have a "concept" of logic and language that goes beyond ours is something most people have been thinking about for atleast 9 years when we started to take the "concept" from one sentence in one language and just give that to another neural net as the starting point to give us the same sentence in another language. The entire talk is just things that most people have been doing for 10 years or more, but it was well put together in a great package where it all ties together well.
This guy is a genius : he tries to explain a fraction of his knowledge in simple words in the purpose that we mere mortals understand something ... He is like elon musk , he has so much to deliver knowledge in a very short timespace ...
![[FULL EP.16] เซียนพาลุย "เผือก-ฟรอยด์" กรี๊ดลั่น จนปูหนี | เฮ็ดอย่างเซียนหรั่ง | One Playground](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/FsqUvwS3b-Y/mqdefault.jpg)
Timestamps and Sponsors:
- Stephen Wolfram on Wolfram Physics Project on TOE: th-cam.com/video/1sXrRc3Bhrs/w-d-xo.html
- Brilliant: brilliant.org/TOE for 20% off
00:00:00 Introduction
00:02:58 Physics from computation
00:11:30 Generalizing Turing machines
00:17:34 Dark matter as Indicating "atoms of space"
00:22:13 Energy as density of space itself
00:30:30 Entanglement limit of all possible computations
00:34:53 What persists across the universe are "concepts"
00:40:09 How does ChatGPT work?
00:41:41 Irreducible computation, ChatGPT, and AI
00:49:20 Recovering general relativity from the ruliad (Wolfram Physics Project)
00:58:38 Coming up: David Chalmers, Ben Goertzel, and more Wolfram
@Curt if there is any way for you to suggest to a sir Roger that time is, in fact, a compact dimension. He would understand that this one thing actually simplifies twitor theory and makes it self evolving as the phase space of time. relative tangent to time determines local vector.
What he is talking about with computational limitations is just the uncertainty principle showing itself... Everything is subjective because in order to have objective reality you need an observer that exists from beginning to end of all time... Even if such hypothetical observer exists, the end of time has not came yet therefore it's all subjective.
He calls it hypergraph I call it kaleidoscope.
I want to drop something important about spatial dimensions. Infinite 0 dimensional existence can fit within any size 1 dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite one dimensional existence can fit inside of any size two-dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite two-dimensional planes can fit inside of any three dimensional existence, right‽ Do you see the pattern that I'm working at? Therefore it is easy to see if our spatial dimension object can hold infinite three dimensional existence inside of it including infinite universe versions inside of any size 4-dimensional object! This is a Kaleidoscope reality...
The structure and what he's talking about that is branching is the tree of Life, the singularity... We are all connected to it. All is 1. Spooky action at a distance isn't so spooky when you realize you are in a kaleidoscope reality! Everything was all as 1 at BigBang... Still is as 1 today... Not spooky. Same source energy... Same singularity. If all is one and all is connected what exactly is spooky?
Wolfram is out of control. This man keeps delivering top hits back to back nonstop
Agreed. People often ask who you would choose to have dinner with who’s passed away. Einstein is an obvious choice and also one of mine, but Wolfram is a living version of that in my opinion. I would be delighted if I met him, let alone chatted with him at any length.
He is op nerf pls
@@donquixoteupinhere Einsteins wife you mean
@@flavannoyed3585 😅
Stephen’s theoretical flexibility (i.e., his willingness to entertain new ideas and observe the open-endedness of “big questions”) impresses me even more than his fine technical expertise.
Well said!
Doesn't take much to impress some people.
@@JohnVKaravitis I'm sure you would impress many of those people! 😂
Got any examples?
@flflflflfl His cross disciplinary approach (math, physics, engineering, computation, philosophy, and more) is refreshing. He is not just speculating. He possesses the bona fide to speak clearly and precisely. He is also an incredibly careful thinker. A true treat for the mind! Thank you, Curt!
So grateful content like this is free.
Unlike the cost of a Mathematica licence!
What he is talking about with computational limitations is just the uncertainty principle showing itself... Everything is subjective because in order to have objective reality you need an observer that exists from beginning to end of all time... Even if such hypothetical observer exists, the end of time has not came yet therefore it's all subjective. He calls it hypergraph I call it kaleidoscope. I want to drop something important about spatial dimensions. Infinite 0 dimensional existence can fit within any size 1 dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite one dimensional existence can fit inside of any size two-dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite two-dimensional planes can fit inside of any three dimensional existence, right‽ Do you see the pattern that I'm working at? Therefore it is easy to see if our spatial dimension object can hold infinite three dimensional existence inside of it including infinite universe versions inside of any size 4-dimensional object! This is a Kaleidoscope reality... The structure and what he's talking about that is branching is the tree of Life, the singularity... We are all connected to it. All is 1. Spooky action at a distance isn't so spooky when you realize you are in a kaleidoscope reality! Everything was all as 1 at BigBang... Still is as 1 today... Not spooky. Same source energy... Same singularity. If all is one and all is connected what exactly is spooky?Google has one of the biggest breakthroughs with artificial intelligence recently-released they're going to have a artificial intelligence model palm that is a offline artificial intelligence model. This coupled with artificial intelligence doing simplification of coding and compression algorithms put thousands of lines of code into one line and send the data over air will allow offline AI to decompress the info and translate it back to the meaning of the thousands of lines of code! This will be revolutionary! Imagine watching 4k video that only takes same amount of data to watch as sending a message! This is the future! Google has done it!!
Next level stuff. Really think he is on to something fundamental. I probably need to watch this 3 times over.
He’s a real genius!
Well, yes, but what he is doing it was done before. He is revisiting existing theories and trying to go further. Only a genius like himself could do something like this, but not the only one who has done it.
Watch Lex Friedman #234 w/ Stephen Wolfram. He explains it and lex is able to ask questions and explain it well. Really good episode
@@FazeCloud i have seen all three podcast with Lex and yes their really good. And even his approach is really good and fantastic is nothing new and falls in many things according to many scientists.
@@javpineda3910 I have no idea what you are saying
Wolfram is one of the people that I consider off the scale - you can't even describe how good he is. It will be an understatement.
You mean, he's not a fraud like Whinestein?
Stephen Wolfram regards himself as the Einstein of our era... A statement that I think is 50% true.
I'm curious why? I strongly disagree. What do you mean by "good"? He's good a telling a story, thats about it.
@@clickaccept Stephen Wolfram (with others) invented SMP, which became Mathematica, which became WolframAlpha. I have used WolframAlpha quite a bit and it is quite impressive. He has written several books including "A New Kind of Science", "Metamathematics: Foundations & Physicalization", "A Project to Find the Fundamental Theory of Physics", and more. Not bad for someone just telling a story.
For the record, I don't know (have never met) Stephen Wolfram. However, I do know folks who know him.
@@peterschaeffer You seem to have misunderstood the question, which was addressed to the original post.
Exceptional! I want to travel back in time and have all my teachers listen to Stephen Wolfram.
Lol
He’s a gift to the world.
I think you mean “back to the future!” Maybe what you mean to say is you want your teachers to travel to the future so they can listen to Wolfram
@@exmodule6323 Well, I travel back and keep my subspace connection to 2023's youtube. 😎 On a phone that charges with sunlight.
I have already performed certain experiments along those lines. Cannot currently report results tho.
It's crazy how many different fields this guys work is affecting... I need a brain bucket every time I listen to him lol
More discussions like this please
👏 👏 👏
Thankyou for everything that you do Dr Wolfram
🤜🤛
The camera work is pretty funny, long shaky zooms on his hands, etc
Framing the weird bald robot in the background makes it look like he's being forced to speak under the watchful gaze of his AI masters.
"Perhaps AI will be like a new force of nature, like hurricanes, in which we're powerless to do anything other than rebuild after the destruction..."
While the AI smiles contently in the corner
That. Was. Nuts. I understood about half the words from an English, Greek, Latin perspective. And maybe 2% of the underlying meaning. You could almost feel the eddies of intellect and curiosity welling up.
Thank you for posting this, now I just need a huge ladle to scoop my brains back in!
The camera operators were all over the place during this talk 😅
Great talk and thanks for having it online.
I came down here looking for this comment. Great content! but c'mon guys...
Freestylin’ !
Yep, camera people - you had one job.
What he is talking about with computational limitations is just the uncertainty principle showing itself... Everything is subjective because in order to have objective reality you need an observer that exists from beginning to end of all time... Even if such hypothetical observer exists, the end of time has not came yet therefore it's all subjective. He calls it hypergraph I call it kaleidoscope. I want to drop something important about spatial dimensions. Infinite 0 dimensional existence can fit within any size 1 dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite one dimensional existence can fit inside of any size two-dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite two-dimensional planes can fit inside of any three dimensional existence, right‽ Do you see the pattern that I'm working at? Therefore it is easy to see if our spatial dimension object can hold infinite three dimensional existence inside of it including infinite universe versions inside of any size 4-dimensional object! This is a Kaleidoscope reality... The structure and what he's talking about that is branching is the tree of Life, the singularity... We are all connected to it. All is 1. Spooky action at a distance isn't so spooky when you realize you are in a kaleidoscope reality! Everything was all as 1 at BigBang... Still is as 1 today... Not spooky. Same source energy... Same singularity. If all is one and all is connected what exactly is spooky?Google has one of the biggest breakthroughs with artificial intelligence recently-released they're going to have a artificial intelligence model palm that is a offline artificial intelligence model. This coupled with artificial intelligence doing simplification of coding and compression algorithms put thousands of lines of code into one line and send the data over air will allow offline AI to decompress the info and translate it back to the meaning of the thousands of lines of code! This will be revolutionary! Imagine watching 4k video that only takes same amount of data to watch as sending a message! This is the future! Google has done it!!!
What an amazing guest! Would love if you could consider Jonathan Gorard also, he has a great understanding of mathematics too and would be a great conversation!
Will happen when our schedules align. We've spoken off air about this
@@TheoriesofEverything What he is talking about with computational limitations is just the uncertainty principle showing itself... Everything is subjective because in order to have objective reality you need an observer that exists from beginning to end of all time... Even if such hypothetical observer exists, the end of time has not came yet therefore it's all subjective. He calls it hypergraph I call it kaleidoscope. I want to drop something important about spatial dimensions. Infinite 0 dimensional existence can fit within any size 1 dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite one dimensional existence can fit inside of any size two-dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite two-dimensional planes can fit inside of any three dimensional existence, right‽ Do you see the pattern that I'm working at? Therefore it is easy to see if our spatial dimension object can hold infinite three dimensional existence inside of it including infinite universe versions inside of any size 4-dimensional object! This is a Kaleidoscope reality... The structure and what he's talking about that is branching is the tree of Life, the singularity... We are all connected to it. All is 1. Spooky action at a distance isn't so spooky when you realize you are in a kaleidoscope reality! Everything was all as 1 at BigBang... Still is as 1 today... Not spooky. Same source energy... Same singularity. If all is one and all is connected what exactly is spooky?Google has one of the biggest breakthroughs with artificial intelligence recently-released they're going to have a artificial intelligence model palm that is a offline artificial intelligence model. This coupled with artificial intelligence doing simplification of coding and compression algorithms put thousands of lines of code into one line and send the data over air will allow offline AI to decompress the info and translate it back to the meaning of the thousands of lines of code! This will be revolutionary! Imagine watching 4k video that only takes same amount of data to watch as sending a message! This is the future! Google has done it!!!
Long live Stephen Wolfram!
Superb talk! Wolfram's physics project is beautifully compatible with my own idea of discreatness of spacetime at planck scales.
This is an incredible presentation! The concept of a Ruliad alone is an enormous leap forward in my framework of understanding how to look at the universe. Wolfram is an incredible treasure for all humanity. Thanks for sharing!
Leave it to philosophers to have a completely chaotic style of cinematography. Tripods are your friends! Leave one of your cameras running at the same angle and zoom from start to finish. This will help the video be intelligible rather than feeling like it might transition into a chase thriller at any moment. Some of us are badly affected by motion sickness, which makes it challenging to process all the brilliant ideas being presented here. (Having steady shots would also greatly reduce your editing workload.) I volunteer to shoot video for you if you are ever in the Northwest.
Agreed - I had to avert my gaze, except when it seemed a compelling visual aid was being shown, due to the cinema chaos. No need for it, since multiple cameras were being used. It was an unfortunate way to present great content.
🤣
Stephen Wolfram is awesome.
Oh man I could hug you right now ha. You are a TH-cam hero right now. I’m talking about the fact that you put a “skip to this part in the video” during your ad. An actual decent morale on TH-cam around viewers wanting to see the content they actually clicked on.
Thank you so much
about time we had a progress update on his computational TOE, if there is any progress
Wolfram is making breakthroughs in how to pat himself on the back; being a relentless self promoter is his gift.
Is the camera operator six years old - well done.
these people r badass. I’m so happy to have the courage to learn about these topics (: . I feel honored to be alive with these individuals.
Well mates..
I hope everyone’s having a good night!!
Professor Wolfram is a cool Dude. 😎
Thank you! Stephen Wolfram is like Michio Kaku - out of control, but in a proper way!
Mr. Wolfram just entered my list of the most important and brilliant scientists of our time.
I was just blown away, when i realised that, i as a observer of the system am part of the system. That changes a lot... Never thought about this before. Great lecture !
Old Eastern proverb - 'you are the field and the knower of the field'
What he is talking about with computational limitations is just the uncertainty principle showing itself... Everything is subjective because in order to have objective reality you need an observer that exists from beginning to end of all time... Even if such hypothetical observer exists, the end of time has not came yet therefore it's all subjective. He calls it hypergraph I call it kaleidoscope. I want to drop something important about spatial dimensions. Infinite 0 dimensional existence can fit within any size 1 dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite one dimensional existence can fit inside of any size two-dimensional existence, right‽ Infinite two-dimensional planes can fit inside of any three dimensional existence, right‽ Do you see the pattern that I'm working at? Therefore it is easy to see if our spatial dimension object can hold infinite three dimensional existence inside of it including infinite universe versions inside of any size 4-dimensional object! This is a Kaleidoscope reality... The structure and what he's talking about that is branching is the tree of Life, the singularity... We are all connected to it. All is 1. Spooky action at a distance isn't so spooky when you realize you are in a kaleidoscope reality! Everything was all as 1 at BigBang... Still is as 1 today... Not spooky. Same source energy... Same singularity. If all is one and all is connected what exactly is spooky?Google has one of the biggest breakthroughs with artificial intelligence recently-released they're going to have a artificial intelligence model palm that is a offline artificial intelligence model. This coupled with artificial intelligence doing simplification of coding and compression algorithms put thousands of lines of code into one line and send the data over air will allow offline AI to decompress the info and translate it back to the meaning of the thousands of lines of code! This will be revolutionary! Imagine watching 4k video that only takes same amount of data to watch as sending a message! This is the future! Google has done it!!!!
Thank you both.
Wonderful as usual.
We need to get Bernardo Kastrup, Sabine Hossenfelder, and Stephen Wolfram together to discuss the observation problem. I'll try to arrange this on my channel. Chat GPT has a few things to say about it as well :]
Nah. It's already been solved.
@@flavannoyed3585 it has?! By whom?
It seems that wolfram skips the problem of how consciousness "emerges" (a miracle occurs)! It is exactly this problem that Donald Hoffman is trying to solve assuming that the basic stuff are not space atoms but simple conscious atoms(agents)... then Donald is trying to derive space time etc
@@rodolforesende2048 I can see that. to his credit, and the other deep thinkers, the field of studying sustained consciousness is tricky enough as it is! But we need a solid answer to the initial spark to be sure.
"to be sure" hehe
@@polymathpark Chris Langan, CTMU.
the camera operators on this lecture have dropped acid I think.
The audience seems very itchy also. I blame the robot.
This is amazing. Very motivating. :)
Curt is killing it 💯💯
ChatGPT + Wolfram plugin is incredible!
My New Favorite Channel!!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Beautiful. I've just finished the talk, and wow really good. I could follow it, although I would not like to look to those papers XD. But this is what an educational talk should be, how he link all these concepts to higher concepts connected to physics and mathematics, semantic gramática, I learn a lot only with these comparison. Really appreciated!!
Did you say "Grokking" ??? Stranger in a strange land" .. one of my favorites
Awesome, thanks you!
Congratulations on your continuing success :-)
I've been using GPT to keep up with the convo whenever I have a question.
I asked it about syllogistic and aristotelean logic, and this is what version 3 came up with:
"can you make a list of the ways to bridge the gap between human languge processing and your language modeling system using aristotelean and syllogistic logic?"
As I mentioned earlier, my language modeling system is not explicitly based on syllogistic or Aristotelian logic. However, there are some ways in which the principles of these logical systems could potentially be used to bridge the gap between human language processing and AI language modeling. Here are a few possible examples:
Developing algorithms that can recognize and classify linguistic categories. As I mentioned earlier, Aristotelian logic involves making assertions about categories of things. Similarly, AI language models could potentially benefit from algorithms that can accurately identify and classify different linguistic categories, such as nouns, verbs, and adjectives. This could help to improve the accuracy and naturalness of language generated by the model.
Creating algorithms that can identify and analyze relationships between concepts. Syllogisms involve making assertions about the relationships between premises and conclusions. Similarly, AI language models could potentially benefit from algorithms that can identify and analyze relationships between different linguistic concepts and elements. This could help to improve the coherence and relevance of the language generated by the model.
Developing algorithms that can reason about context and meaning. Both syllogistic and Aristotelian logic rely on the idea of reasoning about context and meaning in order to make valid deductions. Similarly, AI language models could potentially benefit from algorithms that can reason about context and meaning in order to generate language that is more contextually relevant and meaningful.
Improving the model's ability to generate explanations and justifications. Syllogisms often involve providing explanations and justifications for a particular conclusion. Similarly, AI language models could potentially be improved by developing algorithms that can generate explanations and justifications for the language that they generate. This could help to increase the transparency and interpretability of the model.
Overall, while my AI language model is not explicitly based on syllogistic or Aristotelian logic, there are some ways in which the principles of these logical systems could potentially be used to improve the accuracy, coherence, and relevance of the language generated by the model.
as to if this would cause alignment problems, my current thoughts lean toward thinking the opposite; it would likely garner more clarity. I feel like we should be able to look to the program itself for answers, kind of like a phenomenological 1st-"person" approach to bridging the gap.
Unfortunately a lot of linguistics is jank, and requires deep conceptual reanalysis. I haven't seen AI be able to do this kind of thing yet.
OMG!
Did you get this result from gpt4 or gpt3?
@@tisaname8490 3
Finally a place where I can let rest my cynisme about people "teaching science in TH-cam '. Looking forward to this lecture, and your channel.
I'm pretty sure each and every term and concept in this talk is a PhD's worth of knowledge and insight woven together. I'd really like to see something like this make it to mainstream academia somehow. Digging in deeper and understanding more is one thing, but I feel like there's a ton of scientific applications that should be pursued here.
I love this guy and his enthusiasm.
Fascinating, thank you Curt.
Fantastic thank you
I get it now, thanks!
Geweldig!
🙇🏽♂There are no words to describe how Outstanding this man is! This lecture was spectacular to me anyway!
I'm so glad
So exciting! ❤
Outstanding
"If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself" said one very famous scientists. Well I am a 60 years old dude with a little knowledge of science (MSc). I can't help but keep on thinking of Jordan Peterson whom I USED to think was one of the best minds in social sciences until one day I realised he is just using a lot jargon and sick language.
JP is conman. he's found his fame and money.
Buzzwords and technical terms. Us geniuses would know better than to use words like "hypergraph".
@@flavannoyed3585 So true. We geniuses have to stick together, amirite ?
It's hard to believe that Stephen is in his 60s here talking right now. He has the intellectual energy of a very young man. I figured he couldn't be much older than me (mid-40s) because of this energetic nature, but that he must be at least a few years older just because of his accomplishments. Turns out he's 63, so just about old enough to be my father. Wild. Anyway, if you see this Stephen, much respect. I'm very appreciative of your analytical mind and your understanding of all of the tech on such a fundamental level in the AI landscape. There are a lot of philosophical alarmists out there scaring people right now, and I honestly think they might do well to sit down and have a talk with someone like yourself. You're helping ground us in all this craziness.
Thanks for sharing. Stephen Wolfram is very keen to promote the idea that complex things can be produced by simple rules. He did a wonderful job, and I believe it is true. Interesting, as the concept of a cellular automaton is very similar to the bagua in the I Ching, an ancient Chinese book dated to 200 BC. The I Ching also talks about how things and nature change and how people should respond. People can even predict the future according to Bagua and the I Ching, which is more like a superstition.
Obviously no system more complicated than a microphone, projector and camera for Mindfest 2023....
Outstanding 🙏
In chat I used the term "nerds" and wanted to clarify that I meant it in a jovial way. I love nerds, I am a nerd.
I LOVE this, Curt.
But the staff and setup really HAS TO be ironed out BEFORE a guest starts speaking.
Moving tables and chairs while he's talking, in front of him, isnt good...
Prepare before they arrive, then let them speak with zero distractions.
One of the first things I was thinking about since the release of GPT for is a fact that when this is combined with Wolfram alpha, the ability of large language models to combine with what is being done on his hypergraphs might very well be a way to synthesize on a computer program a lot of relevant laws of physics that convened be demonstrated with physical experiments so it's and therefore can be verified how close the theoretical models that are being generated by the hypergraphs and Wolfram alpha can be used in literally creating physical engineering projects
If the universe is bound by computational irreducibility like Wolfram says, would it need to be run all the way to the "end" in order to separate what is possible from what is not? If one wanted to know exactly what is and isn't possible given a certain set of rules. Interesting concepts even though my brain is too small to comprehend them, thank you Mr Wolfram!
The funny thing is that AI starting from GPT will put to a test his theory of of Computational Equivalence that states that once a system can perform behavior that is complex, that system is as complex as any other system found in the universe and is computationally equivalent in its sophistication.
Wow, this was at FAU. I wish much luck to the FAU Owls in the March Madness NCAA Final Four! 😀
I think the biggest stroke of masterpiece with this is the ability to see the endgame and work backwards this is strategy of many great achievers in all sorts of games... She want to get full understanding you need to start at the end game and work yourself back to the beginning... This is the way to do it! Looking for problems you find solutions. Looking for solutions you find problems.
Man I'm listening further into this talk and I'm hearing Boscovich's voice listening to Stephen talk about atoms of space. I had never even heard of him until a couple years ago. Everybody thinks of Liebniz and Newton during that time, but after I read his Theory of Natural Philosophy, I found out that Nicola Tesla spent quite a bit of time studying his work, and it's remarkable to me that like DaVinci a hundred or so years ago, people rediscovered a lot of Tesla's insights into the nature of the universe in our time and began engineering things that we now use, like wireless charging technology. Seemed like magic when I read about it 25 years ago. Now we use it every day, but Tesla engineered it more than a century before that, and he used the musings of a man who lived another century earlier than that even. Boscovich had a way of looking at the problem of "what is matter" and "what is the universe made of" that echoes exactly what Mr. Wolfram is talking about here. More striking to me while reading it was his theory on how attractive forces (gravity) become infinitely strong up to a very specific point, and then there is an equally infinitely strong opposing force that actually opposes the ability of two atoms of matter from coming closer together when they reach a certain closeness. The way he put it, there's literally nothing in Newtonian physics that could oppose that force that would overcome the barrier between two atomic subunits, and his theory was that it's because those subunits must be contained within these subunits of space. Since two objects can't simultaneously occupy the same "point" (or space atom as Stephen says here), there would be no way for them to congeal together, thus the observation that we can empirically see, which is that things don't just stick together when you press them upon each other. Sometimes they do, but most of the time they don't. I don't remember hearing any of those insights in my physics courses. Maybe I missed them, I don't know, but that was some profoundly accurate insight that came from nothing but pure logical deduction. A lot of incredibly insightful things were hashed out by that man that I think Liebniz overlooked, which may be why Einstein didn't quite get everything right, because he was a follower of Liebniz. At this point I'm possibly talking out of my ass because I don't really understand most of what Einstein said, but I do know that his theories aren't congruent with observations we make in other areas of physics. Boscovich meanwhile, his observations and assertions were ironclad and are vindicated as being consistent with all that we've been able to empirically observe since then.
Thanks
Thank you so much!
Love your work!
Man I'm way to dumb for this but it's so fascinating.
That's what he wants you to think. What he describes is a mix of unnecessary concepts and interesting ones, all formulated in a way which makes him look smart.
@@MrFredericandre sure.
@@MrFredericandre I can neither confirm nor deny this.
@@Tschoii90 The ability to condense information and explain it to idiots is a good sign you know what you're talking about. Us true geniuses know this.
from the idea that reality is some energy ball that has it's own 'movement and momentum', everything stephen says is a logical conclusion of that. In this case, the energyball being equivalent to a hypergraph. based on his audience size, these ideas are becoming more mainstream. seems like we humans may soon understand where we came from without needing religious explanations. amazing.
Just to skip to the end, AI is going to be a new type of (periscope, microscope, telescope) into the mathematically transcendent & subtler physical domains or Supra space. Ironic that in the end we will probably make inner-space first contact before we make outer space first contact.
that's deep if you are saying what I think you are.
perhaps it's a precondition to do so
@@jayknight139 “Are you thinking what I’m thinking?”
@@Zeegoner idk, how would I know that?
Thank you for feeding our brains.
46:03 - I love how the captions say "Chachupiti" - I think they should rebrand to this.
very interesting
👌 mind map explaination ,this too in terms of hypergraph 🙏 physical space, hyper computations interesting all points.
Curt, it'd be great to see you in a podcast with Lex Fridman, ever thought about it? nice work, keep it comming =)
He already was in his podcast. Use search :)
Dr. Wolfram has a gifted mind however I can't see how his computational theory of the universe can make predictions
18:30 Thank You!!❤ Space, not Empty, 🤓
...Just DARK 😆
When Mr. Wolfram speaks it's always worth a listen. The OG of AI
Thanks for explanation
Thanks!
Thank *you*!
Many theoretical physicsts and even AI researchers would say that his thesis is fundmentaly flawed. His notion tht there are a set fo fundamental rules just gets us back to the a different version of the same old question...
I dont understand most of what Wolfram but holy shit is it interesting
Very interesting and creative. Now I have heard Mr. Wolfram talk on several occasions I understand more, however I must say: " for the love of God Montresore, complete your sentences and set the speed at a fraction of what you do"
25:50 ❤ Branchial Space: The space of quantum states, in which entangled states are nearby. Branchial space has the same relation to the multiway graph that physical space has to the causal graph, defining extent in each slice in a foliation of the multiway system. Branchial space is a generic term for what exists in branchlike hypersurfaces.
nice! cannot wait for this one
Although i have a somewhat technical background I am not a physicist or mathematician but I do know about how things get communicated & popularized, which like it or not, is probably a prerequisite for Dr. Wolfram’s theory gaining greater traction.
Disseminating information through a firehouse is not the way to do it.
I get that he has limited time & a lot to communicate before he can talk about higher level things.
Or so he believes.
He needs to present the basics of his theory in simplified graphical form at a calm measured pace and !not worry about leaving some things unexplained or questions unanswered !
The unexplained & unanswered are motivations to find out more, which leads to questions & engagement. When you overwhelm with information it reduces the ability to even formulate questions.
I can’t count the number of physicists I’ve seen do this. They so love their idea they feel compelled to make sure everyone gets everything about it.
Eric Weinstein could have a patent on it.
The thing he should want *most is a question that says “I don’t understand, can we go back to the beginning and that bit about…”
Oh - and get an assistant to pre-approve the AV setup.
Great lecture by Stephen, but why use the amateur film class?
The "Ruliad" looks eerily similar in form to a biological nervous network. The future of AI looks promising.
Looks like the Galatic web branching also. Amazing isn't it
@@DaysOfFunder Hell yeah! 🤩
You have to become the machine before you can build it properly.
16:00 computational irreducibility, different levels of computation enable different scales of understanding
Anyone here Rulial neighbors of mine?
(Ty Curt, Stephen is one of me favs)
Well done Wolfy :-)
Great lecture - very fascinating. I wanted to hear the whole thing. Unfortunately I was unable to finish watching due to the terrible and disruptive camera work and A/V production.
I mean, havent everyone considered the "computations in nature" and time just being incremental steps of applying the rules of the system to the participants? One state to the next. And then, how imensly complex this all is but somehow it seems to happen without any effort to us observers? That is why we have been thinking about biologial neural nets for the last 15 years, and how to design the silicon in a way that could mimic it. That language models have a "concept" of logic and language that goes beyond ours is something most people have been thinking about for atleast 9 years when we started to take the "concept" from one sentence in one language and just give that to another neural net as the starting point to give us the same sentence in another language.
The entire talk is just things that most people have been doing for 10 years or more, but it was well put together in a great package where it all ties together well.
Cool score, Curt
This guy is a genius : he tries to explain a fraction of his knowledge in simple words in the purpose that we mere mortals understand something ... He is like elon musk , he has so much to deliver knowledge in a very short timespace ...
nice hint towards Wolfram Alpha merging with ChatGPT
What is novel is the idea of an event horizon bounding the geometric transformations in hyperspace.
I use a fractal based software from 2003, lately it's anticipating where I want to start when I open it.
Starts at 3:40
I owe my Engineering degree to this man 🤲
At the end of the video you mentioned the off air chat you had with Stephen would come up shortly but it never did. Can you post it please?
39 mins am still going strong 🤗
Made it !!!❤ 61 mins!!
A brilliant mind trying to those not so fortunate. Very interesting.
The main question that was not addressed is what is computation in the rulaid space ? Why does a computation happen?