The unramped bolt and 9mm hammer were a pair. Together they would jam up the action if the disconnector was tampered with. They submitted a patent on it. This was another expression of their paranoia about unlawful "conversions" at the time. The unramped bolt forced the hammer back harder and faster, resulting in many broken hammer pins which they tried to fix by using stronger SS pins. That problem has been eliminated with the use of ramped bolts.
Here's the patent if you're interested... Henry Tatro, April 21, 1987, “Safety Device Preventing Conversion To Full Automatic Firing”, U. S. Patent No. 4,658,702.
have you had any luck finding the factory original stock? I just reconverted my gun back to 1992 outta the box configuration a few months ago The stock has a CS on the Right side near the receiver and it is shorter than the A2 stock
Why would you want to add a lock breach to a gun that is basically super simple. Granted the lock breach makes it smoother, but as for reliability, and not having to constantly clean it blow back as hard to beat.
@@psp1921tsmg but is it really more realible then a locked breach ?? i have fired a direct blow back pcc, and that heavy bolt , not just when slams back into the buffer, but when it slams forward it makes gun move down a bit.
I am not to knowledgeable on Modern Colts. But I have seen people build there rifles with an 80% lower. Then they'll have all the colt information CNC engraved on the lower. I have seen this done by several people I know. apparently it's legal because you're building the gun from scratch. I have no idea how you can then check to see if its a original colt or a home built rifle.
Most home builds are not anodized on the inside. Plus engraving doesn’t look like original colt. To build a colt correct lower would probably cost more than a used colt.
Super video, thanks for the info!
Bayonets are bad because all the Inner City gangs constantly doing bayonet charges at each other. same with all those fully semi-automatic rifles 😁
Fully semi-automatic assault machine guns loaded with baby-seeking rounds cause almost all of the crime in this country
The unramped bolt and 9mm hammer were a pair. Together they would jam up the action if the disconnector was tampered with. They submitted a patent on it. This was another expression of their paranoia about unlawful "conversions" at the time. The unramped bolt forced the hammer back harder and faster, resulting in many broken hammer pins which they tried to fix by using stronger SS pins. That problem has been eliminated with the use of ramped bolts.
Here's the patent if you're interested... Henry Tatro, April 21, 1987, “Safety Device Preventing Conversion To Full Automatic Firing”, U. S. Patent No. 4,658,702.
A ramped bolt is so much nicer on a m16 hammer
Some info on Buffers for Pistol Carbines would be cool too.
Yeah. I may do that as I’ve found I like the 10-11 ounce buffers in 9mm’s
Is the buffer tube milspec or civilian?
have you had any luck finding the factory original stock? I just reconverted my gun back to 1992 outta the box configuration a few months ago The stock has a CS on the Right side near the receiver and it is shorter than the A2 stock
I used an m16 stock that has no trap door
was it so hard for colt to just to stick a DI tube / piston of instead using shitty direct blow back ??
Why would you want to add a lock breach to a gun that is basically super simple. Granted the lock breach makes it smoother, but as for reliability, and not having to constantly clean it blow back as hard to beat.
@@psp1921tsmg but is it really more realible then a locked breach ?? i have fired a direct blow back pcc, and that heavy bolt , not just when slams back into the buffer, but when it slams forward it makes gun move down a bit.
@@geezerp1982 more reliable especially when dirty yes. Look at other unlocked blow backs. Thompson uzi Yeah blowback is so simple less moving parts
I am not to knowledgeable on Modern Colts. But I have seen people build there rifles with an 80% lower. Then they'll have all the colt information CNC engraved on the lower. I have seen this done by several people I know. apparently it's legal because you're building the gun from scratch. I have no idea how you can then check to see if its a original colt or a home built rifle.
Most home builds are not anodized on the inside. Plus engraving doesn’t look like original colt. To build a colt correct lower would probably cost more than a used colt.
I don't get it?
I thought C-Mags were good?
Win steel case is notorious for failures.
Yep just garbage ammo. Such a shame I had high hopes for it
Anything Winchester ammo is garbled
psa ar9s feed steel cased ammo haha
I don't get it?
I thought C-Mags were good?
Metal form is better