Rome had many enemies, but Persia really was their greatest enemy. The only state able to fight effectively against Rome at the height of its power. 22 wars fought over nearly 700 years.
Their greatest enemy, sure, but that doesn't mean a lot. Almost every single war fought between Rome and the Persians resulted in a humiliating defeat for the Persians. The Romans could've easily subdued Persia but it would've been disastrous on the long run.
@a.s.7936 I would agree, Persia's capacity for sustained campaigns rarely extended beyond a few months or a limited number of years. In contrast, Rome had the capability to assimilate conquered lands, while Persia remained closely tied to its core territories of inner Iran. I would count the Parthians and The Sassanids as diffent thought, Different dynasties and how they fought war as the Sassanids were more successful in their wars than their more Nomadic counterparts.
@@a.s.7936In matter of facts Roman had mostly humilated by Sassanid empire . Sassanid empire defeated the Romans in most battles and forced the Roman to pay heavy tributes to IranShahr despite they were outnumbered comparison to Romans army. Sassanid were superior by tactics , Armor and warfare quality and Economic . Sassanid were greatest enemy was Romans it was Altaic nomads such as White Huns and Gokturks which they permanently raid on Iran borders.
After the Arab invasions, Roman-Persian relations improved. The Byzantine Emperors and Buyid Emirs of Persia would exchange gifts between courts. For instance, in the late tenth century, Emir Azod-al-Dawla of Buyid Persia received a Byzantine gift of 200 royal robes and horses, white falcons, and other goods. At his death he left 500 pieces of Byzantine royal silk. However, the two powers also had conflicting interests over the region of Upper Mesopotamia. In the end, the Hamdanid Emirate of Syria and Jazira was partitioned between Byzantium and Persia.
@@williamrobert9898 Under the Buyids, the idea of "Iranshahr" (Iran) appears in geographical works, which were all written in Arabic by mostly Iranian authors. The geographer Istakhri, who was active in the late 10th-century and wrote; "The best cultivated (ma‘mur), fairest and most fertile part of the world, and the most established in its political life is the kingdom of Iranshahr."[38] Herzig and Stewart adds that;[37] "Considered together the preceding materials offer important clues to the question of Iranian identity under the Buyids. In the first instance we have rulers who are unashamedly Iranian and who sought by genealogy, title and homage to Persepolis to show their connection with the pre-Islamic Iranian past. At the same time, the inhabitants of the Buyid kingdoms and eastern Iranians showed a sometimes embarrassingly high level of self-esteem as the people of Iranshahr."
@@williamrobert9898buyid dynasty_ tahirid emirates _Saffarid dynasty and Samanid dynasty were all Iranian !! Buyid dynasty were deylamites but they had ancestor from bahram iv the SASSANID shah !! They were muslim shia but their religion doesnt change their identity, christianity is also came from israel and today most of europe and america believe on it
@@gameworld6740 yes but many emperors prior to the western collapse weren't eastern, trajan and carus made it the furthest into parthia/persia and neither were of eastern origin
Heraclius is still the greatest general since Caesar, he took his collapsing empire as far as it could go, the defeats at the hands of the arabs is not because of his incompetence but because the exhausted, plague ravaged and devastated empire had nothing left to fight with after 600 years of war with persia
Khosrow the II is such a tragic character in the sense he was the "almost" great. He had victory in his fingertips, yet in the end, it was not meant to be.
Iranians : "This Time we will be able to conquer Syria and Egypt" Also Iranians: *Conquered Syria and Egypt but years later, gets pushed back to babylon by the Romans*
I believe todays hostility between Iran and the west is deeply rooted in ancient rivalry between Rome and Iranian empires. Iranians see themselves having opposite set of values and cultural pillars to the western civilization.
@@valeriodelaurentiis5614 lol they want revenge against british for ruling over their country and faced humiliation for 90 years. They also don't like the west much because their people are treated like trash in western countries
As an IRANIAN. Who proud of our The stability and glory of several thousand years ! Should say all the polics that you can see of iran . Not a The dominant line of thought of the people But the dictatorisem of rules who not even iranian and sent by Islamist extremists. Our people just looking for peace after decays of tension
Persia fell due to the incompetent leadership of Yazdegard, I know that this sounds insane but the Rashiduns did not actually intend to destroy the Sassanids completely, it is a complicated matter but in short if Yazdegard did what Heraclius did and just decided to live with the fact that the Arabs took his most valuable lands then the Sassanids could have maybe just maybe held off the Arabs, after the crushing loss in the battle of Yarmouk, Heraclius decided to bid farewell to his lands in the Levant and did not try to deplete the empire any more on the other hand after the crushing loss in the battle of Al Qaddisyah, Yazdegard decided to try a last ditch effort to beat the Arabs at the battle of Nahavand, but the empire was already on its last breath and he decided to gamble the fate of his empire on this battle and unfortunately he lost it and it was not long before the empire collapsed rapidly afterwards
To be fair, Yazdgerd III was still a child for most of his reign. He was crowned in 632 at 8 years old, and he was 12 during Al-Qadisiyyah. Can't really blame the 12 year-old for being proud and stubborn. What really fucked the Empire was when Kawad II and his goons decided to coup and execute Khosrow (his own father) and all his own brothers in 628.
@Snips McGee Fair point but he had advisors, Idk the exact details but maybe if they came up with a plan to just try and consolidate power and recover from the the loss of Mesopotamia they could've lived long enough to fight another day while being better prepared
The Arabs didn't just stop at Syria with Heraclius. The repeatedly tried to conquer Anatolia, and even Constantinople. They also went on to conquer Egypt and Africa. The borders between the Arabs and Byzantines weren't that way because Heraclius gave up on the Levant, but because his successors aggressively defended Anatolia from further losses.
@@histguy101 I am talking about the Rashiduns mate, Heraclius did give up on the lands that he lost to the Arabs. The Levant fell first before Egypt that is why I mentioned it, The Rashiduns’ only notable win in Anatolia is the capture of the city of Tarsus, they did not penetrate any further as far as I know and they never attacked Constantinople, their successors (The Umayyads) did however, I actually can not remember a single battle in which the Byzantines were able to defeat the Rashiduns Edit: but yeah his successors did a great job at defending Anatolia from the Umayyads
Constantine II died in April 340; he was succeeded by Constantius II, so the related wars were fought by these two emperors against Shapur II (until 364).
I wrote this on another video on this topic also, but I agree with the notion that some historians have that the final war bettwen the Byzantines and the Sassanids was for all intents and purposes the acctual World War One.
@@iman_mosleh their alliances included states and groups from central Europe to China and a lot of smaller regional conflicts happened in this time, that were more or less tied to this war and most importantly the war's aftermath allowed for the Arabs to rise and dismantle the balance of power in West Asia and Europe that existed for centuries.
@@beachbum111111The Romans fell at the hands of the Germans without resistance, and the Persians rose from all the occupiers, and they still speak Persian and preserve their culture
Eastern Rome subsidized the poorer West during the empire, Rome could also much more easily concentrate it's forces against Persia when it didn't have to worry about the Danube and Rhine frontiers and politicial intrigue in the West.
@@sliftyy They lost even the Roman general who defeated the Goths and the Vandals failed to defeat the Persians and he lost in three battles against the Persians and made Justinian pay 200 million gold pieces to the Persians every year
@TonyFontaine1988 yes but still is rasidun didn't exist it would have survived more maybe even still exist but I think more became a super power who conquerd more of Europe
The Rasiduns were still at a huge disadvantage when they started their invasions. It was only through faith that they were able to win battles and conquer the both empires.
@@GeorgeWashington1792 Exaclty ! It's what I'm always saying, many give the argument of the Persians and the romans being very tired, but when we see the details of the battle (there is a good documentary about it in kings and generals) we see that the rashidun caliphate was really in a difficult situation... For me their expansion was one of the greatest military miracles in history
Roman parthian wars(not battle) Parthian victory: 1_Crassus invasion of parthia 2_Antony campaign 3_War over Armenia(58_63) 4_Trajan campaign 5_Parthian war of caracalla Roman victory: 1_Pompeii parthian invasion of 40 bc 2_Roman Persian war(161_166) 3_Roman Persian war(197_198) ☀️5_3🦅 _ Roman_sasanid wars(not battle) Sasanid victory: 1_Roman Persian war(237_244) 2_Roman Persian war(252_253) 3_Valerian campaign 4_Roman Persian war(337_361) 5_Julian campaign Roman victory: 1_Carus campaign 2_Roman Persian war(295_299) Stalemate: 1_Roman Persian war(231_232) 2_War against maximus(308) 🦁5_2🦅 _ Byzantine_sasanid war(not battle) Sasanid victory: 1_Iberian war 2_Lazica war Byzantine victory: 1_Roman Persian war(572_591) Stalemate: 1_Byzantine Persian war(421_422) 2_Byzantine Persian war(440) 3_Anastasian war 4_Byzantine Persian war(602_628) 🦁2_1☦️
@@marshallsilverstar9636 His message is full of errors. Just ignore these "Iran is superior" guys: they are just foolish nationalists. And as always, nationalism, rationality and objectivity do not go together.
@@williamrobert9898 "In 945, Ahmad entered Iraq and made the Abbasid Caliph his vassal, at the same time receiving the laqab Mu'izz ad-Dawla ("Fortifier of the State"), while 'Ali was given the laqab Imād al-Dawla ("Support of the State"), and Hasan was given the laqab Rukn al-Dawla ("Pillar of the State")."
@@taiyeebmuhtadi bro that's not true, just go detailed on seljuks just because the king was ethnically turkic from modern day Turkmenistan that doesn't mean they were occupiers, in iran we all respect seljuks because they unified the kingdom and speared more iranic culture throw the empire, even their minister and some commanders and most of soldiers were iranians. Before the seljuks there were samanid and other Iranian kingdoms, i should mention when the seljuks came they even wanted to protect the samanid from collapsing but it was too late...
@@mint8648 cause it was too risky he managed to defeat the ottomans a couple times but was too afraid to do it because of bringing too much resistance and attention or he got busy with another threat whether that it was a different nation or sepratists
@@SDArgo_FoC You have to be joking me, that person is an Mongolic, he even looks very Mongolic, an Tajikistan current age nation Hero, not a Persian/Sassania other same nation
@@hamishegi9993 the buyids are arabized persians and sunnis but atleast all of them (that you mentioned) are muslim because of us unless if they are shia which makes them not
غُلِبَتِ الرُّومُ The Romans have been defeated. (Ar-Rum 30:2) فِي أَدْنَى الْأَرْضِ وَهُمْ مِنْ بَعْدِ غَلَبِهِمْ سَيَغْلِبُونَ In the nearer land (Syria, Iraq, Jordan, and Palestine), and they, after their defeat, will be victorious. (Ar-Rum 30:3) فِي بِضْعِ سِنِينَ ۗ لِلَّهِ الْأَمْرُ مِنْ قَبْلُ وَمِنْ بَعْدُ ۚ وَيَوْمَئِذٍ يَفْرَحُ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ Within three to nine years. The decision of the matter, before and after (these events) is only with Allah, (before the defeat of Romans by the Persians, and after, i.e. the defeat of the Persians by the Romans). And on that Day, the believers (i.e. Muslims) will rejoice (at the victory given by Allah to the Romans against the Persians), (Ar-Rum 30:4) بِنَصْرِ اللَّهِ ۚ يَنْصُرُ مَنْ يَشَاءُ ۖ وَهُوَ الْعَزِيزُ الرَّحِيمُ With the help of Allah, He helps whom He wills, and He is the All_Mighty, the Most Merciful. (Ar-Rum 30:5)
Brah partihans are no connection with persian Partihans are eastren iranic people pashtoons are the partihans plz first go and get information and then make a vedio
1 - Alif-Lãm-Mĩm. 2 - The Romans have been defeated 3 - in a nearby land.1 Yet following their defeat, they will triumph 4 - within three to nine years.1 The ˹whole˺ matter rests with Allah before and after ˹victory˺. And on that day the believers will rejoice 5 - at the victory willed by Allah. He gives victory to whoever He wills. For He is the Almighty, Most Merciful. 6 - ˹This is˺ the promise of Allah. ˹And˺ Allah never fails in His promise. But most people do not know. This is the Surah ar Rum from Quran this Surah is about Roman Persian war of 602-628 around the time this Surah came to world Romans suffered a heavy defeat from Persian army as it show on video Romans lost bunch of land Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Ankara. İf I told around that time that Romans were going to win within three to nine years would you believe me ? Quran did it.
when iran and eastern roman empire was occupied by sunni arabs romans changed their religion and language to arabic sunni islam and persians didnt changed their language and become the only country who create shia muslim and then in safavid era shia iran was against sunni ottomon who claim theirselves as the heir of romans and roman persian wars continued in their era😂. Most long live war on the planet.
@@Vntihero the thing is, even when rome captured the persian capital, that did not symbolize a victory. Persia was a country whose existance did not rely only on its capital to sustain itself. They could lose it, but they would always bounce back and reclaim it, resulting in a large number of stalemates.
Parthians were Iranians I hate when the word persia make so many misconceptions.the west called us Persia and British people still love to call us in that way while we are all Iranian (always be)and persian is only relatable to the parsi people (nowadays farsi).
What the hell are you talking about? Either you're uneducated or just heard something, persian is just ethnicity just like parthian, they are both iranian tribes.
![ILLSLICK - KILLSHOT REMIX [FULL VERSION]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/RIK8RrqIAzE/mqdefault.jpg)
Unfortunately the video would be blocked in some countries due to copyright.
Why so
I hope this video got viral, so interesting another ancient Civilization history, from Island of Java
At least it not blocked in my country France
Rome had many enemies, but Persia really was their greatest enemy. The only state able to fight effectively against Rome at the height of its power. 22 wars fought over nearly 700 years.
The most dangerous enemies for Rome were Germanic tribes
Who won the most
Their greatest enemy, sure, but that doesn't mean a lot. Almost every single war fought between Rome and the Persians resulted in a humiliating defeat for the Persians. The Romans could've easily subdued Persia but it would've been disastrous on the long run.
@a.s.7936 I would agree, Persia's capacity for sustained campaigns rarely extended beyond a few months or a limited number of years. In contrast, Rome had the capability to assimilate conquered lands, while Persia remained closely tied to its core territories of inner Iran. I would count the Parthians and The Sassanids as diffent thought, Different dynasties and how they fought war as the Sassanids were more successful in their wars than their more Nomadic counterparts.
@@a.s.7936In matter of facts Roman had mostly humilated by Sassanid empire . Sassanid empire defeated the Romans in most battles and forced the Roman to pay heavy tributes to IranShahr despite they were outnumbered comparison to Romans army.
Sassanid were superior by tactics , Armor and warfare quality and Economic .
Sassanid were greatest enemy was Romans it was Altaic nomads such as White Huns and Gokturks which they permanently raid on Iran borders.
The ending was just so well done, especially the music
After the Arab invasions, Roman-Persian relations improved. The Byzantine Emperors and Buyid Emirs of Persia would exchange gifts between courts. For instance, in the late tenth century, Emir Azod-al-Dawla of Buyid Persia received a Byzantine gift of 200 royal robes and horses, white falcons, and other goods. At his death he left 500 pieces of Byzantine royal silk. However, the two powers also had conflicting interests over the region of Upper Mesopotamia. In the end, the Hamdanid Emirate of Syria and Jazira was partitioned between Byzantium and Persia.
🤦 The Persian empire was no more after the 7th century, The Buyids were muslim shia
@@williamrobert9898 The Buyids were muslims shia dayalamite iranians
@@williamrobert9898 Under the Buyids, the idea of "Iranshahr" (Iran) appears in geographical works, which were all written in Arabic by mostly Iranian authors. The geographer Istakhri, who was active in the late 10th-century and wrote; "The best cultivated (ma‘mur), fairest and most fertile part of the world, and the most established in its political life is the kingdom of Iranshahr."[38]
Herzig and Stewart adds that;[37]
"Considered together the preceding materials offer important clues to the question of Iranian identity under the Buyids. In the first instance we have rulers who are unashamedly Iranian and who sought by genealogy, title and homage to Persepolis to show their connection with the pre-Islamic Iranian past. At the same time, the inhabitants of the Buyid kingdoms and eastern Iranians showed a sometimes embarrassingly high level of self-esteem as the people of Iranshahr."
@@williamrobert9898uneducated
@@williamrobert9898buyid dynasty_ tahirid emirates _Saffarid dynasty and Samanid dynasty were all Iranian !! Buyid dynasty were deylamites but they had ancestor from bahram iv the SASSANID shah !! They were muslim shia but their religion doesnt change their identity, christianity is also came from israel and today most of europe and america believe on it
Crazy how long those 2 superpowers fought and how little did the borders change
Excellent video, beautiful graphic and upbeat music.
Great iranian empire ❤️ respect to our old rival roma👏 nice video as always
This was intense like a thriller. Btw great video!
I'm from Iran and I love the history of my country, and respect to Italians ❤
I'm Italian and Iranian are my favourite people
What does it has to do with italians?
Eastern romans were greek and Armenians
That was not just eastern romans it was whole rome from parthian era@@gameworld6740
@@gameworld6740 yes but many emperors prior to the western collapse weren't eastern, trajan and carus made it the furthest into parthia/persia and neither were of eastern origin
@@Hannibalian Yes but Italy holding the capital doesn't represent Romans as they don't even speak the original latin
Heraclius is still the greatest general since Caesar, he took his collapsing empire as far as it could go, the defeats at the hands of the arabs is not because of his incompetence but because the exhausted, plague ravaged and devastated empire had nothing left to fight with after 600 years of war with persia
If only he knew the Turks race would overtake Anatolia in Middle ages&Istanbul :
@@afdalridwan3813 every Turkish nationalists wet dream I imagine
@@afdalridwan3813 constantinople*
@@nuutti8974 Cope
@@addali150 It was Constantinople then +ratio
Khosrow the II is such a tragic character in the sense he was the "almost" great. He had victory in his fingertips, yet in the end, it was not meant to be.
Similar to Heraclius.
I love shapoor He rescued cristions from valerian and captured him
The inscription of his authority located in kermanshah
I am impressed by your work.
Damn, roman empire and sassanid empire are the true rival. They are fighting from years to years and generation to generations 😂😂
Persians after 400 years of war with the same country over the same territory: This time it will work
Iranians : "This Time we will be able to conquer Syria and Egypt"
Also Iranians: *Conquered Syria and Egypt but years later, gets pushed back to babylon by the Romans*
700 years*
@@historynerdneileditsBabylon was just a ruined city at that time
I believe todays hostility between Iran and the west is deeply rooted in ancient rivalry between Rome and Iranian empires. Iranians see themselves having opposite set of values and cultural pillars to the western civilization.
Not only Iran but Arabs and Indians also see themselves as rivals to West
@@KanuniSuleyman4857indians don't really see themselfs as rivals to the west. More like rivals to the Arabs
@@valeriodelaurentiis5614 lol they want revenge against british for ruling over their country and faced humiliation for 90 years. They also don't like the west much because their people are treated like trash in western countries
@@valeriodelaurentiis5614 They simply hate Muslims and Arabs but don't see them as rivals
As an IRANIAN. Who proud of our The stability and glory of several thousand years ! Should say all the polics that you can see of iran . Not a The dominant line of thought of the people
But the dictatorisem of rules who not even iranian and sent by Islamist extremists.
Our people just looking for peace after decays of tension
Persia fell due to the incompetent leadership of Yazdegard, I know that this sounds insane but the Rashiduns did not actually intend to destroy the Sassanids completely, it is a complicated matter but in short if Yazdegard did what Heraclius did and just decided to live with the fact that the Arabs took his most valuable lands then the Sassanids could have maybe just maybe held off the Arabs, after the crushing loss in the battle of Yarmouk, Heraclius decided to bid farewell to his lands in the Levant and did not try to deplete the empire any more on the other hand after the crushing loss in the battle of Al Qaddisyah, Yazdegard decided to try a last ditch effort to beat the Arabs at the battle of Nahavand, but the empire was already on its last breath and he decided to gamble the fate of his empire on this battle and unfortunately he lost it and it was not long before the empire collapsed rapidly afterwards
To be fair, Yazdgerd III was still a child for most of his reign. He was crowned in 632 at 8 years old, and he was 12 during Al-Qadisiyyah. Can't really blame the 12 year-old for being proud and stubborn. What really fucked the Empire was when Kawad II and his goons decided to coup and execute Khosrow (his own father) and all his own brothers in 628.
@Snips McGee Fair point but he had advisors, Idk the exact details but maybe if they came up with a plan to just try and consolidate power and recover from the the loss of Mesopotamia they could've lived long enough to fight another day while being better prepared
@@snipsmcgee9386 Ahahahahaha crowned an 8 years old kid
The Arabs didn't just stop at Syria with Heraclius. The repeatedly tried to conquer Anatolia, and even Constantinople. They also went on to conquer Egypt and Africa.
The borders between the Arabs and Byzantines weren't that way because Heraclius gave up on the Levant, but because his successors aggressively defended Anatolia from further losses.
@@histguy101 I am talking about the Rashiduns mate, Heraclius did give up on the lands that he lost to the Arabs. The Levant fell first before Egypt that is why I mentioned it, The Rashiduns’ only notable win in Anatolia is the capture of the city of Tarsus, they did not penetrate any further as far as I know and they never attacked Constantinople, their successors (The Umayyads) did however, I actually can not remember a single battle in which the Byzantines were able to defeat the Rashiduns
Edit: but yeah his successors did a great job at defending Anatolia from the Umayyads
this really reminds me of khey pard's videos that are similar to this, it's almost a complete replica of that style
khey pard you mean
@@mint8648 yeah, easy to get them mixed uop, since they both have very similar styles
@@senatorarmstrong4168 I can see why, it’s aesthetic is really good
and ollie bye
@@mint8648 that guy got hacked sadly
The borders after Heraclius' victory are incorrect. The borders returned to the 602 borders (status quo ante bellum)
Constantine II died in April 340; he was succeeded by Constantius II, so the related wars were fought by these two emperors against Shapur II (until 364).
Great video!
Excellent job
I wrote this on another video on this topic also, but I agree with the notion that some historians have that the final war bettwen the Byzantines and the Sassanids was for all intents and purposes the acctual World War One.
What do you mean?
@@iman_mosleh their alliances included states and groups from central Europe to China and a lot of smaller regional conflicts happened in this time, that were more or less tied to this war and most importantly the war's aftermath allowed for the Arabs to rise and dismantle the balance of power in West Asia and Europe that existed for centuries.
Iran: *Y'all laughed at me, now remember who still exists and who's only a relic from the Past*
The Persians were so thoroughly wiped that their language was arabized and their religion borderline extinct...
@@beachbum111111 yup lol
@@beachbum111111no, dear persian not Arab
COPE
@@beachbum111111The Romans fell at the hands of the Germans without resistance, and the Persians rose from all the occupiers, and they still speak Persian and preserve their culture
700 years wow
and that, kids, is why there are countries called "buffer countries"
Persia and Rome after annexing Armenia and Arab buffer states:
@@jordanplays-transitandgame1690 arabs were far from the conflict actually. most were in the centre of the peninsula. though idk about armenians
Ērānshāhr ❤
Romans and Persians : *Literally fought for Freaking almost 700 years and having lots of territorial changes*
Arabs : *Hello There*
Could you make a historical video of the Byzantine-Arab War?I'm looking forward to it
I dont understand why you had to start calling them byzantine..
From Persia (iran)🇮🇷 love❤️🇮🇹🇬🇷
I think that Alexander severus could had made several gains if he had more grip on the army
Surah ar-Rum alhamdulillah
17:18 Sassanid empire wanted to be Achaemenid empire XD
That's awsome! but What happend next? Who won at the end?
The arabs
ARABIA 🇸🇦🏴🇸🇦🇸🇦🏴🇸🇦🏴🗣️🗣️
Cancer
the reason the middle east will never see peace, muslims.
The prediction of Rum overcoming the Persians was true, Alhumdullilah
Im suprised that eastern rome defeated the persians more than a united rome did
When did this happen in the dream, even Justian failed this 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Eastern Rome subsidized the poorer West during the empire, Rome could also much more easily concentrate it's forces against Persia when it didn't have to worry about the Danube and Rhine frontiers and politicial intrigue in the West.
@@sliftyy They lost even the Roman general who defeated the Goths and the Vandals failed to defeat the Persians and he lost in three battles against the Persians and made Justinian pay 200 million gold pieces to the Persians every year
@@عليياسر-ذ5ب Of course, Persia is a formidable foe, an equal.
@@عليياسر-ذ5بbattle of Dara goes hard 😂😂
Mmm bloody beautiful
The best enemies in history
Great vid
Thanks
music at lazic war part?
Two Steps From Hell - El Dorado
Thanks
Rome is about to win...Persia is about to win...Rome is about to win...Persia is about to win...
bruh valrian campaing was persian victory and battle of ctesiphon in 264 was persian victory
Winner of the Rome-Persia Wars:
Rashidun Caliphate
Good work, but you forgot to include the Perso-Turkic War of 606-608
It's surprising that people thought one off the empire is gonna fall and the other would in the end both fell
Rome didn't fall
It let into its fall
@@hassanabdulilah8843 it survived another 800 years
@TonyFontaine1988 yes but still is rasidun didn't exist it would have survived more maybe even still exist but I think more became a super power who conquerd more of Europe
Rashidun about to storm everything
The Rasiduns were still at a huge disadvantage when they started their invasions. It was only through faith that they were able to win battles and conquer the both empires.
@@GeorgeWashington1792 Exaclty ! It's what I'm always saying, many give the argument of the Persians and the romans being very tired, but when we see the details of the battle (there is a good documentary about it in kings and generals) we see that the rashidun caliphate was really in a difficult situation... For me their expansion was one of the greatest military miracles in history
@Observe and Meditate There is more to it than meets the eye though
actually no Prophet were still fighting the Musrik armies around that time
🤡
Roman parthian wars(not battle)
Parthian victory:
1_Crassus invasion of parthia
2_Antony campaign
3_War over Armenia(58_63)
4_Trajan campaign
5_Parthian war of caracalla
Roman victory:
1_Pompeii parthian invasion of 40 bc
2_Roman Persian war(161_166)
3_Roman Persian war(197_198)
☀️5_3🦅
_
Roman_sasanid wars(not battle)
Sasanid victory:
1_Roman Persian war(237_244)
2_Roman Persian war(252_253)
3_Valerian campaign
4_Roman Persian war(337_361)
5_Julian campaign
Roman victory:
1_Carus campaign
2_Roman Persian war(295_299)
Stalemate:
1_Roman Persian war(231_232)
2_War against maximus(308)
🦁5_2🦅
_
Byzantine_sasanid war(not battle)
Sasanid victory:
1_Iberian war
2_Lazica war
Byzantine victory:
1_Roman Persian war(572_591)
Stalemate:
1_Byzantine Persian war(421_422)
2_Byzantine Persian war(440)
3_Anastasian war
4_Byzantine Persian war(602_628)
🦁2_1☦️
"Trajan campaign" won by Parthians?
The 602 war was a byzantine victory fro the others idk
@@marshallsilverstar9636 His message is full of errors. Just ignore these "Iran is superior" guys: they are just foolish nationalists. And as always, nationalism, rationality and objectivity do not go together.
@@Lurking_SturmtigerYeah you are likely true
Anyone know the soundtrack form 9:15 to 11:33 is? I couldn't find what name of the soundtrack is. (Already try all the below and none of them fit)
ikr i can't find it anywhere
It's from Attila Total War
The Roman _ Eranshahr wars ✅
Bros fought for more than half of millenia just to be knocked out by the caliphate
Yeah... that was a bit anticlimactic, now we will never know who was truly the stronger between the Romans and the Persians
Caliphate was annexed by iranian kingdoms later
@@cyrusthegreat7030 Nope
@@williamrobert9898 "In 945, Ahmad entered Iraq and made the Abbasid Caliph his vassal, at the same time receiving the laqab Mu'izz ad-Dawla ("Fortifier of the State"), while 'Ali was given the laqab Imād al-Dawla ("Support of the State"), and Hasan was given the laqab Rukn al-Dawla ("Pillar of the State")."
@cyrusthegreat7030 Thanks for proving my point lol
The Buyids were Shia Muslims and their court language was Arabic, enough said
Armenia couldn't take a break lol
today too
Good old days for persia
1:01 wow RIP bozo Crassus 😂😂😂
Two great superpower
هعی خدا چه عظمتی داشتیم 😢
True mate presia had back then gulfs and Armenia and north mid Asia
Persian empire was so powerful 😁
Ohh u was there?
Islamic caliphate : oh really ?
@achrafelkourchali3456 abu muslim khorasani🇮🇷: ummyids?
Battle of haran
Jumpscare in 18:43
Sorena
after Islam, we also had many fights with Roman (Seljuk-Byzantine Wars)
But Seljuk aren't persian
@@germanempirecountryball
did you think all of Iranian empires are or were Persian?😂
@@Iranian_Historianyou said "we". Stop the bullcrap history stealing.
Turks= History Stealer brooo seljuk are iranian turk not ottoman turk@@taiyeebmuhtadi
@@taiyeebmuhtadi bro that's not true, just go detailed on seljuks just because the king was ethnically turkic from modern day Turkmenistan that doesn't mean they were occupiers, in iran we all respect seljuks because they unified the kingdom and speared more iranic culture throw the empire, even their minister and some commanders and most of soldiers were iranians. Before the seljuks there were samanid and other Iranian kingdoms, i should mention when the seljuks came they even wanted to protect the samanid from collapsing but it was too late...
Roman and Persian was gangsta until Arab muslim horde is coming
The great sassanid empire ❤❤❤
Gokturks detail good.
iranian empires after that could never again make such an invasion into western borders!!!
Nader Shah wanted to, he even had an army of 375,009 men, but somehow he couldn’t make it past past Mosul
@@mint8648 cause it was too risky he managed to defeat the ottomans a couple times but was too afraid to do it because of bringing too much resistance and attention or he got busy with another threat whether that it was a different nation or sepratists
If you can consider timurid empire to be Iranian, it could be that
@@SDArgo_FoC I myself would never consider them iranian or their regime iranian. It was basically a turco-mongol creation.
@@SDArgo_FoC You have to be joking me, that person is an Mongolic, he even looks very Mongolic, an Tajikistan current age nation Hero, not a Persian/Sassania other same nation
زنده باد امپراطوری پر شکوه ساسانیان❤
Eww don't use the B word ever again
Besides that good video
sorry my arab ancestors ruined this beef
Sorry my persians ancestors runied umaayids and abassids(abu muslim khorasani and buyids)..
@@hamishegi9993 the buyids are arabized persians and sunnis but atleast all of them (that you mentioned) are muslim because of us unless if they are shia which makes them not
غُلِبَتِ الرُّومُ
The Romans have been defeated. (Ar-Rum 30:2)
فِي أَدْنَى الْأَرْضِ وَهُمْ مِنْ بَعْدِ غَلَبِهِمْ سَيَغْلِبُونَ
In the nearer land (Syria, Iraq, Jordan, and Palestine), and they, after their defeat, will be victorious. (Ar-Rum 30:3)
فِي بِضْعِ سِنِينَ ۗ لِلَّهِ الْأَمْرُ مِنْ قَبْلُ وَمِنْ بَعْدُ ۚ وَيَوْمَئِذٍ يَفْرَحُ الْمُؤْمِنُونَ
Within three to nine years. The decision of the matter, before and after (these events) is only with Allah, (before the defeat of Romans by the Persians, and after, i.e. the defeat of the Persians by the Romans). And on that Day, the believers (i.e. Muslims) will rejoice (at the victory given by Allah to the Romans against the Persians), (Ar-Rum 30:4)
بِنَصْرِ اللَّهِ ۚ يَنْصُرُ مَنْ يَشَاءُ ۖ وَهُوَ الْعَزِيزُ الرَّحِيمُ
With the help of Allah, He helps whom He wills, and He is the All_Mighty, the Most Merciful. (Ar-Rum 30:5)
Written later by Caliph Uthman Ibn Affan
@@ShahanshahShahinexactly
@@ShahanshahShahinWritten in 614, nice one tho
Long live iran
Brah partihans are no connection with persian
Partihans are eastren iranic people pashtoons are the partihans plz first go and get information and then make a vedio
😂😂😂😂
@@Low_fee.6937 biggest group of partihans empire was parni or panni and parni or panni is one of the biggest tribe of pashtoons
Learn history joker 🤡
1 - Alif-Lãm-Mĩm.
2 - The Romans have been defeated
3 - in a nearby land.1 Yet following their defeat, they will triumph
4 - within three to nine years.1 The ˹whole˺ matter rests with Allah before and after ˹victory˺. And on that day the believers will rejoice
5 - at the victory willed by Allah. He gives victory to whoever He wills. For He is the Almighty, Most Merciful.
6 - ˹This is˺ the promise of Allah. ˹And˺ Allah never fails in His promise. But most people do not know.
This is the Surah ar Rum from Quran this Surah is about Roman Persian war of 602-628
around the time this Surah came to world Romans suffered a heavy defeat from Persian army as it show on video Romans lost bunch of land Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Ankara. İf I told around that time that Romans were going to win within three to nine years would you believe me ? Quran did it.
Khosrow II sure has a big nose :^l
Greatest sassanid king= khowsrow i
Khosrow Parviz 🥵
The Arabs came knocking just as peace was coming to the region.
Islamic state that defeated these two great empires after that.😎
when iran and eastern roman empire was occupied by sunni arabs romans changed their religion and language to arabic sunni islam and persians didnt changed their language and become the only country who create shia muslim and then in safavid era shia iran was against sunni ottomon who claim theirselves as the heir of romans and roman persian wars continued in their era😂. Most long live war on the planet.
انوشه باد ایران زمین
Rome won the majority.
Iran won 75 percent.
They didnt.
@@neroatlas9121 Rome won 11 wars, Persia won 8, so yes
@@Vntihero the thing is, even when rome captured the persian capital, that did not symbolize a victory. Persia was a country whose existance did not rely only on its capital to sustain itself. They could lose it, but they would always bounce back and reclaim it, resulting in a large number of stalemates.
@@neroatlas9121 Rome took the city 5 times and controlled the Tigris and Euphrates, most valuable part of the empire lol
ایرانشهر🇮🇷
Later...
Muhammad: Prepare the spread
You haven't even searched, Parthians were not Persian and how are you telling and showing the history??? Block and report
Parthians were Iranians
I hate when the word persia make so many misconceptions.the west called us Persia and British people still love to call us in that way while we are all Iranian (always be)and persian is only relatable to the parsi people (nowadays farsi).
oh nooo don't block him!!!
What the hell are you talking about? Either you're uneducated or just heard something, persian is just ethnicity just like parthian, they are both iranian tribes.
نداداش بلاکش نکن ناراحت میشه 😭😭🤣🤣
@@aegon_III حالا همون پیروز نهاوندی هم که شکم عمر رو جر داد لر بود ، بدبخت عرب زاده 😂😂😂 بعد تجزیه این ویرانه باید برگردید دشت و صحرا
Persian İs Anatolian Buyids - ZAZAS 🦅 Seljuk - TURKS 🐺