As i commented on a madkhali channel, the madakhila and super boot lickers have been holding hands and advising rulers and things are getting worse for the ummah. It’s like having cancer and not treating the cancer because it’s now a part of your body?
I’m Shia but I’m actually glad that Sunnis are finally using Ahlul Bayt (as) as a source for fiqh, the Prophet (saw) did after all say “The book of Allah and my ahlul bayt”
@@ayyubvernon1557 yes and the main person who invited Hussain (as) to kufah was a sahabi named sulayman Bin Sarad, I’m not Sunni but the fact that a sahabi was the head of the people of kufah who invited hussain as is another proof for khurooj against tyrants
@@NewJerseyDweeb Hence, why I disagree with the Twelver doctrine. I am a Muslim just as Allah named us. (22.78). I recommend you check out the Shia reformist channel Al Islaah. Their ethos is Quran centricity and hadith that have 'authentic' grading but that which are in line with the Quran. And so they demonstrate major issues with the mainstream Twelver beliefs and practises, which are derived from the ghulat that got popular and mainstream. FYl, the ghulat are extremists whom the Shia Imams were against) themselves. Although I am not a shii, I do agree with much of what they say because it's what the Quran says. Where I differ with them is over 'authentic' hadith, especially when they admit that not only were the ghulat fabricating hadith, but that they were fabricating the isnaads (chains of narrators) also, to give the hadith its authenticity look. You should take a more hardline stance over the shii hadith corpus because I doubt its authenticity, and I am afraid to adopt the transmission of man who are susceptible to the whispers of devils. Allah says this is shirk in 6.121. So, since there's no divine approval for any of the hadith corpus' out there, I stick to the Quran for my guidance and the living tradition for my practise, the latter of which I acknowledge most likely didn't reach us unadulterated. So, I rely on Allah's Mercy for any shortcomings, considering I've come 1400 years after the Prophet. The authority is the Quran. It is the "best hadith" (39.23) and the most truthful hadith (4:87), that guides to the straightest way (17.9).
@@NewJerseyDweeb My advice to you is to get out of the sectarian mindset. You should be a truth seeker, no matter what the truth, rather than a soldier fighting for your sect's dominance. This is not a righteous path. Allah uses harsh words in the Quran against sects. In one instance, He tells the Prophet that he has nothing to do with these sects and that He will deal with them. Turn to Allah and His Book for guidance, for indeed He guides. Also recite this dua: اللَّهُمَّ رَبَّ جِبْرِيلَ وَمِيكَائِيلَ وَإِسْرَافِيلَ فَاطِرَ السَّمَوَاتِ وَالأَرْضِ عَالِمَ الْغَيْبِ وَالشَّهَادَةِ أَنْتَ تَحْكُمُ بَيْنَ عِبَادِكَ فِيمَا كَانُوا فِيهِ يَخْتَلِفُونَ اللَّهُمَّ اهْدِنِي لِمَا اخْتُلِفَ فِيهِ مِنَ الْحَقِّ إِنَّكَ تَهْدِي مَنْ تَشَاءُ إِلَى صِرَاطٍ مُسْتَقِيمٍ “O Allah, Lord of Jibra-eel, Meeka-eel and Israfeel (great angles), Creator of the heavens and the Earth, Knower of the seen and the unseen. You are the arbitrator between Your servants in that which they have disputed. Guide me to the truth by Your leave, in that which they have differed, for verily You guide whom You will to a straight path.” I read the Quran carefully & here is what I concluded: The fundamental belief that imamah is an article of faith required for salvation: The word "imam", which is a general word for "leader" in the Quran , is used to describe both good and bad imams in the world. For instance, Allah calls Firaun and his soldiers imams that lead to hell (28.38-41). In another place, He instructs to fight the imams of disbelief (9.12). You'll find in the Quran that there is no lofty station attributed to the designation of imamah, like there is with prophethood, for example. Verse 2.177 is clear and mentions nothing about belief in imamah being required to be righteous. The fundamental belief that Prophets and Imams are infallible: This completely contradicts the Quran. Allah mentions no such thing. To the contrary, there's many examples demonstrating the fallibility of the Prophets, including Muhammad. But to keep this response concise, I will share just one verse that is mentioned twice in the Quran, which completely destroys belief in infallibility: (16.61) "And if Allah were to impose blame on the people for their wrongdoing, He would not have left upon the earth any creature, but He defers them for a specified term. And when their term has come, they will not remain behind an hour, nor will they precede [it]." The earth would have been void of any creature had Allah charged its inhabitants for their wrongdoing. No infallible Prophet, nor infallible Imam left on the earth either, completely void of any creature. Just picture this verse and its powerful message. It's also repeated in verse 35:45. In case you try to make a case in your mind that Prophets would somehow be excluded from this because he is not like us human beings (I know about the extreme Shiite beliefs as well as I grew up listening to that stuff in the IndoPak community), even though the verse says "any creature", then know the Prophet has said "he is a man like us, except revelation came to him" (18.110, 41.6).
Madkhalis are ghulaat murji’ah with their rulers who in practice will _never_ declare their own rulers to have nullified their Islam, no matter what they do, while routinely attacking other Muslim rulers that their own rulers oppose. They are hypocritical and refuse to submit themselves to the same “standards” that they apply against others. Madkhalis are ghulaat tabdee’ with scholars who differ with them in matters of ijtihad, and they claim that every scholar who differs with them in ijtihad is a mubtadi’ in aqeedah. Madaakhila are ghulaat in accusing people of khurooj, and they declare that anyone who does lawful inkar munkar even with just words against the Madaakhila’s rulers is a khariji whose blood is halaal to be spilled and whose wealth is halaal to be plundered. The Madaakhila deliberately conflate baghyy and bughaat, with khurooj and khawarij, even though the Salaf us-Saalih _never_ made this conflation. Madkhalis are ghulaat in their gentleness towards Ahlul Dhimma and the kuffar asliyyeen in general, while being ghulaat in their harshness towards the Muslim Ahlul Qiblah and even the Muslims upon the true Athari creeds and doctrines of the Salaf us-Saalih who are not ghulaat like the Madaakhila. Madkhalis are a deviant cult of ghulaat, and the true scholars of the Ahlul Hadith, the Athar, and the creed of the Salaf us-Saalih refute them.
I'm Shia and we have our differences but these videos and the ones on the Wahhabi massacres show that you are at least intellectually honest about all issues within Sunni Salafi circles and we may not agree on a lot but I respect your work.
اللهم صل على محمد وعلى آل محمد، كما صليت على إبراهيم وعلى آل إبراهيم إنك حميد مجيد. اللهم بارك على محمد وعلى آل محمد كما باركت على إبراهيم وعلى آل إبراهيم إنك حميد مجيد.
It seems to be the case that the great scholars of Ahlul Bayt (as) like Imam Hussain and Imam Zayd who was supported by Imam Abu Hanifa considered Khurooj against the tyrannical Muslims to be permissible or even recommended. If so how does that relate to the Sunni position and hadiths that say that Khurooj against tyrannical rulers is haram? Is it possible that hadiths such as “You listen and obey the ruler even if your back is struck and your wealth is taken, listen and obey.” in Sahih Muslim were fabricated in order to advance Umayyad and Abbasid political interests?
No because scholars would check authenticity based on hadith hitting certain criteria Which the hadith fulfilled If it hadn't then other scholars would have made criticism of this hadith book
I'm guessing you are Shia. In which case according to your theology, those "tyrannical Muslims" weren't really Muslims. So your point is moot. The hadith is correct, and the concept is also in the Quran, but where the madkhalis mess up is the fact that there are conditions to obedience. Neither the Ummayads or Abbasids had any say in what was written in Sahih Muslim and many Sunni scholars were involved in different rebellions, you mentioned one of them. So obviously their understanding of this hadith was not anything like the understanding of madkhalis
Aslamualikum brother Well made video mashallah But it would be good to point out the new Neo salafi concept of that only a kaffir ruler can be made khurooj against Which lead to foolishness on two sides On the madkhali side which lead to irja and with the militant movements that make it mandatory to takfeer rulers in order to rebel So a good informative video would be appreciated
You said he made his followers sheep they ask about khurooj but you're in the youtube scene don't you know followers from different channels come to troll other channels? Why would they ask about khurooj in the first place wonder where they get these ideas from.... One of the comments literally said "Daniel said" so is that a Daniel or abu mussab fan? You have a youtube channel yourself you should know better. What is this narrative you're trying to set up? Also you said that "I have a brain" like why even say this? clear ego issue. You also said you will try and not say bad things anymore, and that sometimes you say them because you are caught up in the moment, however you are literally later editing the same video and leaving whatever bad thing you said in the video, how does that happen? You literally showed by what you said that your ego blinds you, unless you were angry even after the video and while editing it. Brother do some self reflection you could be doing much better with the knowledge and platform you have push your ego aside and don't let it ruin your akhira allah yadeek oo yahdeena
correct term for so called khurooj of Ahlulbayt alayhissalam is QIYAM . As , yazeed's rule was not legitimate (he was made ruler by going against the treaty of Hassan a.s. with Muawiya r.a. that ruler will be appointed by shura and not muawiya's son) , so Ahlulbayt esp. Husaain's a.s. rebellion is valid and it is not khurooj it is Qiyam. that is why it is also called Qiyam e Hussain. Now regarding these madkhali Bootlickers, they give examples from hadiths about Umar a.s. being asked by Salman al Farsi a.s. about how he got extra clothe for his dress , but when we question the gulf rulers they say " how dare you. "
This is the reason I don't like to be extremist, because among the sunni has bad apple among shia as well. Very sad stories of the ahlul bait of the 12 Imams. The shia who claimed shiatuali , among them become kawarij and killed imam Ali RA, Hussain RA betrayed by people of qufah, imam Zaid RA, left by his followers, so much they endure,by those betrayed, among who claimed shia, So evil those Muslims, shaitan blind them. Munafikin among us either from sunni or shia. I wish one day who seeking the truth come to common term sunni shia united. The extremist must gone among both groups. I my self , I'm Sunnah also I'm a shia, I say I'm a shia because I have the love toward Alhlul bait. Even most of the Islamic concepts I am Sunnah waljamaah. But I don't like judging other bidah here bidah there, I'm not agreed with shia who claimed Quran is altered and cursed the wife and sahabah. And I am not ghuluw toward the imams. Sunni shia I can learn from both. As I see the example of the 2 imam madzhab of sunni were a student to imam Jaffar sadiqRA. Nowadays our scholars not learn from others when it different. This how become narrow minded. Even imam Syafii RA learned from muktazillah. Take knowledge from others and learn. If benefits take if no good throws it,
Allāh ﷻ didn't send the Ahlel Bayt to us. He sent us the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ rather. Keep being a rabble-rouser despite the countless lives and property that have been lost to the several failed khurooj in our recent history. No one says forbidding evil is bad but it should be guided by etiquettes as laid down in the Qur'an and Sunnah. Your analogy isn't different from those who use one of those liberalist tendencies in the contemporary Arab to justify changing aspects of the deen. As I would tell such persons, our religion is based what the Prophet ﷺ taught and the understanding of his rightly guided companions. Anything else outside that is thrash.
The Abbasids were successful against the Umayyids and Ahl Hal wal Aqd made Baya to the new Khalifas after the khuruj and the Ulema of the time expressed the rulings based on Quran and Sunna and they were our Salaf Salih. Who is more Salafi than the actual Salaf Salih themselves? Who you or them? Is your understanding better of Fiqh and Hadith than Salaf Salih , who did Khuruj and established Bani Abbasid from Ahl Bayt ?
@@briancordero7674 Islamic guidance isn't determined by lineage. It's basically based on closeness to the guidance of the Qur'an and Sunnah. Whatever the Abbasids, Umayyads or Ottomans did isn't evidence for us if it contradicts the Qur'an and Sunnah based on the understanding of the Prophet's Companions and those who followed them upon righteousness.
@_Abdussalama Your premise is a misnomer. The Quran and Sunna doesn't judge without a human being involved.The Salaf Salih judged the best after the death of Rasullah. تركت فيكم ثقيلين كتاب الله و سنتي -رواية -كتاب الله و عترتي " I leave you two weighty things,the Book of Allah and my Sunna " in another narration " Book of Allah and my descents ".That is to say his righteous descents.Many Sahaba only seen the Prophet once in their life, while others knew him very intimately ,and others knew those who knew him intimately.And others were part of his household, and closest of his family members, and best of his companionship in regards to knowledge, character and deeds.Ahl Bayt and Closest Sahaba ,and those after them ,and those after them ,in like matter.
Dear brothers and sisters who think the the Quran is insufficient and follow the hadith, read these ayahs. The Sunni mushriqeen run from these ayahs: And in anything over which you disagree - *its ruling is [to be referred] to Allah.* [Say], "That is Allah , my Lord; upon Him I have relied, and to Him I turn back." 42:10 "One day We shall raise from all Peoples a witness against them, from amongst themselves: and We shall bring thee as a witness against these (thy people): and We have sent down to thee the *Book explaining all things* , a Guide, a Mercy, and Glad Tidings to Muslims." 16:89 "O People of the Scripture, there has come to you Our Messenger making clear to you much of what you used to conceal of the Scripture and overlooking much. There has come to you from Allah *a light and a clear Book* ." 5:15 "Alif, Lam, Ra. These are the verses of the *Book and a clear Qur'an* ." 15:1 "Shall I seek other than Allah for judge, when He it is Who hath *revealed unto you (this) Scripture, fully explained* ? Those unto whom We gave the Scripture (aforetime) know that it is revealed from thy Lord in truth. So be not thou (O Muhammad) of the waverers." 6:114 " *A Book whose verses have been detailed* , an Arabic Qur'an for a people who know," 41:3 " *Thus do We explain the signs in detail* ; and perchance they may turn (unto Us)." 7:174 "And when We read it, follow thou the reading;" 75:18 "Nay more, *it is for Us to explain it (and make it clear)* : 75:19 "For We had certainly sent unto them a Book, based on knowledge, *which We explained in detail* ,- a guide and a mercy to all who believe." 7:52 "And they do not come to you with an argument except that *We bring you the truth and the best explanation* ." 25:33 " *Allah has sent down the best hadith* : a consistent Book wherein is reiteration. The skins shiver therefrom of those who fear their Lord; then their skins and their hearts relax at the remembrance of Allah. That is the guidance of Allah by which He guides whom He wills. And one whom Allah leaves astray - for him there is no guide." 39:23 "These are the verses of Allah which We recite to you in truth. *Then in what hadith after Allah and His verses will they believe?* " 45:6 "Then in what *hadith* after the Qur'an will they believe?" 77:50 So obey Allah, and obey His Messenger: but if ye turn back, *the duty of Our Messenger is but to proclaim (the Message) clearly and openly* . 64:12 "Say, "Obey Allah and obey the Messenger; but if you turn away - then upon him is only that [duty] with which he has been charged, and upon you is that with which you have been charged. And if you obey him, you will be [rightly] guided. *And there is not upon the Messenger except the [responsibility for] clear notification* ." 24:54 *The most merciful* 55:1 "It is *He* Who has taught the Qur'an." 55:2 " *The guiding of them is not thy duty* (O Muhammad), but Allah guideth whom He will. And whatsoever good thing ye spend, it is for yourselves, when ye spend not save in search of Allah's Countenance; and whatsoever good thing ye spend, it will be repaid to you in full, and ye will not be wronged." 2:272 "And We have certainly diversified in this Qur'an for the people from *every [kind of] example* ; *but man has ever been, most of anything, [prone to] dispute.* " 18:54 "Say, " Allah is most knowing of how long they remained. He has [knowledge of] the unseen [aspects] of the heavens and the earth. How Seeing is He and how Hearing! They have not besides Him any protector, and *He shares not His legislation with anyone.* "" 18:26 “You worship not besides Him except [mere] names you have named them, you and your fathers, for which Allah has sent down no authority. *Legislation is not but for Allah.* He has commanded that you worship not except Him. That is the correct religion, but most of the people do not know.” 18:40
@@SamirSiraj8542 I don't reject the word of the prophet, which is the Qur'an he recited from Allah. "[That] indeed, the Qur'an is the word of a noble Messenger." 69:40 What I reject are the slanderous hadiths attributed to him by the Sunnis. I defend the honour of the prophet against the Sunnis.
I hope one day see jahil north face to face . And I will call him . If you are man call me Hindu in my eyes . Abu Mussab called you brother. But he didn’t use brother to Daniel
As i commented on a madkhali channel, the madakhila and super boot lickers have been holding hands and advising rulers and things are getting worse for the ummah. It’s like having cancer and not treating the cancer because it’s now a part of your body?
the holy grail of the MADkhalis
Khawarij.. the only muslim countries were there is peace and prosperity those non native wants to destroy...
I’m Shia but I’m actually glad that Sunnis are finally using Ahlul Bayt (as) as a source for fiqh, the Prophet (saw) did after all say “The book of Allah and my ahlul bayt”
@@ayyubvernon1557 yes and the main person who invited Hussain (as) to kufah was a sahabi named sulayman Bin Sarad, I’m not Sunni but the fact that a sahabi was the head of the people of kufah who invited hussain as is another proof for khurooj against tyrants
You people have claim on ahlulbayt the same way a prostitute to modesty
@@NewJerseyDweeb Hence, why I disagree with the Twelver doctrine. I am a Muslim just as Allah named us.
(22.78). I recommend you check out the Shia reformist channel Al Islaah. Their ethos is Quran centricity and hadith that have 'authentic' grading but that which are in line with the Quran. And so they demonstrate major issues with the mainstream Twelver beliefs and practises, which are derived from the ghulat that got popular and mainstream. FYl, the ghulat are extremists whom the Shia Imams were against) themselves.
Although I am not a shii, I do agree with much of what they say because it's what the Quran says. Where I differ with them is over 'authentic' hadith, especially when they admit that not only were the ghulat fabricating hadith, but that they were fabricating the isnaads (chains of narrators) also, to give the hadith its authenticity look. You should take a more hardline stance over the shii hadith corpus because I doubt its authenticity, and I am afraid to adopt the transmission of man who are susceptible to the whispers of devils.
Allah says this is shirk in 6.121. So, since there's no divine approval for any of the hadith corpus' out there, I stick to the Quran for my guidance and the living tradition for my practise, the latter of which I acknowledge most likely didn't reach us unadulterated. So, I rely on Allah's Mercy for any shortcomings, considering I've come 1400 years after the Prophet.
The authority is the Quran. It is the "best hadith" (39.23) and the most truthful hadith (4:87), that guides to the straightest way (17.9).
@@NewJerseyDweeb My advice to you is to get out of the sectarian mindset. You should be a truth seeker, no matter what the truth, rather than a soldier fighting for your sect's dominance. This is not a righteous path. Allah uses harsh words in the Quran against sects. In one instance, He tells the Prophet that he has nothing to do with these sects and that He will deal with them. Turn to Allah and His Book for guidance, for indeed He guides.
Also recite this dua:
اللَّهُمَّ رَبَّ جِبْرِيلَ وَمِيكَائِيلَ وَإِسْرَافِيلَ فَاطِرَ السَّمَوَاتِ وَالأَرْضِ عَالِمَ الْغَيْبِ وَالشَّهَادَةِ أَنْتَ تَحْكُمُ بَيْنَ عِبَادِكَ فِيمَا كَانُوا فِيهِ يَخْتَلِفُونَ اللَّهُمَّ اهْدِنِي لِمَا اخْتُلِفَ فِيهِ مِنَ الْحَقِّ إِنَّكَ تَهْدِي مَنْ تَشَاءُ إِلَى صِرَاطٍ مُسْتَقِيمٍ
“O Allah, Lord of Jibra-eel, Meeka-eel and Israfeel (great angles), Creator of the heavens and the Earth, Knower of the seen and the unseen. You are the arbitrator between Your servants in that which they have disputed. Guide me to the truth by Your leave, in that which they have differed, for verily You guide whom You will to a straight path.”
I read the Quran carefully & here is what I concluded:
The fundamental belief that imamah is an article of faith required for salvation: The word "imam", which is a general word for "leader" in the Quran , is used to describe both good and bad imams in the world. For instance, Allah calls Firaun and his soldiers imams that lead to hell (28.38-41). In another place, He instructs to fight the imams of disbelief (9.12). You'll find in the Quran that there is no lofty station attributed to the designation of imamah, like there is with prophethood, for example. Verse 2.177 is clear and mentions nothing about belief in imamah being required to be righteous.
The fundamental belief that Prophets and Imams are infallible: This completely contradicts the Quran. Allah mentions no such thing. To the contrary, there's many examples demonstrating the fallibility of the Prophets, including Muhammad. But to keep this response concise, I will share just one verse that is mentioned twice in the Quran, which completely destroys belief in infallibility:
(16.61) "And if Allah were to impose blame on the people for their wrongdoing, He would not have left upon the earth any creature, but He defers them for a specified term. And when their term has come, they will not remain behind an hour, nor will they precede [it]."
The earth would have been void of any creature had Allah charged its inhabitants for their wrongdoing. No infallible Prophet, nor infallible Imam left on the earth either, completely void of any creature. Just picture this verse and its powerful message. It's also repeated in verse 35:45. In case you try to make a case in your mind that Prophets would somehow be excluded from this because he is not like us human beings (I know about the extreme Shiite beliefs as well as I grew up listening to that stuff in the IndoPak community), even though the verse says "any creature", then know the Prophet has said "he is a man like us, except revelation came to him" (18.110, 41.6).
I appreciate your better and sincere approach bro Haji.|
أني أحبك في الله!
Madkhalis are ghulaat murji’ah with their rulers who in practice will _never_ declare their own rulers to have nullified their Islam, no matter what they do, while routinely attacking other Muslim rulers that their own rulers oppose. They are hypocritical and refuse to submit themselves to the same “standards” that they apply against others.
Madkhalis are ghulaat tabdee’ with scholars who differ with them in matters of ijtihad, and they claim that every scholar who differs with them in ijtihad is a mubtadi’ in aqeedah.
Madaakhila are ghulaat in accusing people of khurooj, and they declare that anyone who does lawful inkar munkar even with just words against the Madaakhila’s rulers is a khariji whose blood is halaal to be spilled and whose wealth is halaal to be plundered. The Madaakhila deliberately conflate baghyy and bughaat, with khurooj and khawarij, even though the Salaf us-Saalih _never_ made this conflation.
Madkhalis are ghulaat in their gentleness towards Ahlul Dhimma and the kuffar asliyyeen in general, while being ghulaat in their harshness towards the Muslim Ahlul Qiblah and even the Muslims upon the true Athari creeds and doctrines of the Salaf us-Saalih who are not ghulaat like the Madaakhila.
Madkhalis are a deviant cult of ghulaat, and the true scholars of the Ahlul Hadith, the Athar, and the creed of the Salaf us-Saalih refute them.
Hajji I'm Algerian, can you study and talk about the 1988 and 1991 Algerian crisis , Shamsi calls them khawarij
Shamsi calls millions of voters to the Islamic Salvation Front as khawarij
Why not brother إن شاء الله
@@BroHajji جزاكم الله خيرا I don't understand their position, at the end of the day Sharia is the best law for mankind and the only solution for us
@@BroHajjiplease brother may Allah bless you the army and the government should be exposed
I'm Shia and we have our differences but these videos and the ones on the Wahhabi massacres show that you are at least intellectually honest about all issues within Sunni Salafi circles and we may not agree on a lot but I respect your work.
Are you an Ithna’Ashari Imami Shi’i?
Lol khawarij and Shia uniting
Many shia are kuffar. So.
Your khawarij for looking at the rulers
How dare you assume that the ruler is not Ma’sum? Kharijee Takfeeree
Lol
اللهم صل على محمد وعلى آل محمد، كما صليت على إبراهيم وعلى آل إبراهيم إنك حميد مجيد.
اللهم بارك على محمد وعلى آل محمد كما باركت على إبراهيم وعلى آل إبراهيم إنك حميد مجيد.
ما شاءالله
Muslims have the right criticise. By Hand,Tongue or Heart.
Ma sha Allah very clear !
It seems to be the case that the great scholars of Ahlul Bayt (as) like Imam Hussain and Imam Zayd who was supported by Imam Abu Hanifa considered Khurooj against the tyrannical Muslims to be permissible or even recommended. If so how does that relate to the Sunni position and hadiths that say that Khurooj against tyrannical rulers is haram?
Is it possible that hadiths such as “You listen and obey the ruler even if your back is struck and your wealth is taken, listen and obey.” in Sahih Muslim were fabricated in order to advance Umayyad and Abbasid political interests?
No because scholars would check authenticity based on hadith hitting certain criteria
Which the hadith fulfilled
If it hadn't then other scholars would have made criticism of this hadith book
I'm guessing you are Shia. In which case according to your theology, those "tyrannical Muslims" weren't really Muslims. So your point is moot. The hadith is correct, and the concept is also in the Quran, but where the madkhalis mess up is the fact that there are conditions to obedience. Neither the Ummayads or Abbasids had any say in what was written in Sahih Muslim and many Sunni scholars were involved in different rebellions, you mentioned one of them. So obviously their understanding of this hadith was not anything like the understanding of madkhalis
Criticising by Hand, Tongue or Heart needs Knowledge & capacity.
Criticising any government is legitmate. Saying do not criticise openly is opposed to the Hadith.
Aslamualikum brother
Well made video mashallah
But it would be good to point out the new Neo salafi concept of that only a kaffir ruler can be made khurooj against
Which lead to foolishness on two sides
On the madkhali side which lead to irja and with the militant movements that make it mandatory to takfeer rulers in order to rebel
So a good informative video would be appreciated
You say it as if the rulers are not worthy of Takfeer already. Their removal Is Wajib and what we work towards at all times.
@mosaabtwice3999 😂😂😂😂 These are their rulers that they bootlick
Even in Hadiths text, the Prophet critiques the Arab rulers.
You said he made his followers sheep they ask about khurooj but you're in the youtube scene don't you know followers from different channels come to troll other channels? Why would they ask about khurooj in the first place wonder where they get these ideas from.... One of the comments literally said "Daniel said" so is that a Daniel or abu mussab fan? You have a youtube channel yourself you should know better. What is this narrative you're trying to set up?
Also you said that "I have a brain" like why even say this? clear ego issue. You also said you will try and not say bad things anymore, and that sometimes you say them because you are caught up in the moment, however you are literally later editing the same video and leaving whatever bad thing you said in the video, how does that happen? You literally showed by what you said that your ego blinds you, unless you were angry even after the video and while editing it. Brother do some self reflection you could be doing much better with the knowledge and platform you have push your ego aside and don't let it ruin your akhira allah yadeek oo yahdeena
correct term for so called khurooj of Ahlulbayt alayhissalam is QIYAM . As , yazeed's rule was not legitimate (he was made ruler by going against the treaty of Hassan a.s. with Muawiya r.a. that ruler will be appointed by shura and not muawiya's son) , so Ahlulbayt esp. Husaain's a.s. rebellion is valid and it is not khurooj it is Qiyam. that is why it is also called Qiyam e Hussain. Now regarding these madkhali Bootlickers, they give examples from hadiths about Umar a.s. being asked by Salman al Farsi a.s. about how he got extra clothe for his dress , but when we question the gulf rulers they say " how dare you. "
This is the reason I don't like to be extremist, because among the sunni has bad apple among shia as well. Very sad stories of the ahlul bait of the 12 Imams. The shia who claimed shiatuali , among them become kawarij and killed imam Ali RA, Hussain RA betrayed by people of qufah, imam Zaid RA, left by his followers, so much they endure,by those betrayed, among who claimed shia,
So evil those Muslims, shaitan blind them. Munafikin among us either from sunni or shia.
I wish one day who seeking the truth come to common term sunni shia united. The extremist must gone among both groups.
I my self , I'm Sunnah also I'm a shia, I say I'm a shia because I have the love toward Alhlul bait. Even most of the Islamic concepts I am Sunnah waljamaah. But I don't like judging other bidah here bidah there, I'm not agreed with shia who claimed Quran is altered and cursed the wife and sahabah. And I am not ghuluw toward the imams. Sunni shia I can learn from both. As I see the example of the 2 imam madzhab of sunni were a student to imam Jaffar sadiqRA. Nowadays our scholars not learn from others when it different. This how become narrow minded. Even imam Syafii RA learned from muktazillah. Take knowledge from others and learn. If benefits take if no good throws it,
When will you release istigatha vedio
nasheed at intro name please
Such misguidance and abuse...May Allah guide you and many you are misleading
Allāh ﷻ didn't send the Ahlel Bayt to us. He sent us the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ rather. Keep being a rabble-rouser despite the countless lives and property that have been lost to the several failed khurooj in our recent history. No one says forbidding evil is bad but it should be guided by etiquettes as laid down in the Qur'an and Sunnah. Your analogy isn't different from those who use one of those liberalist tendencies in the contemporary Arab to justify changing aspects of the deen. As I would tell such persons, our religion is based what the Prophet ﷺ taught and the understanding of his rightly guided companions. Anything else outside that is thrash.
The Abbasids were successful against the Umayyids and Ahl Hal wal Aqd made Baya to the new Khalifas after the khuruj and the Ulema of the time expressed the rulings based on Quran and Sunna and they were our Salaf Salih. Who is more Salafi than the actual Salaf Salih themselves? Who you or them? Is your understanding better of Fiqh and Hadith than Salaf Salih , who did Khuruj and established Bani Abbasid from Ahl Bayt ?
@@briancordero7674 Islamic guidance isn't determined by lineage. It's basically based on closeness to the guidance of the Qur'an and Sunnah. Whatever the Abbasids, Umayyads or Ottomans did isn't evidence for us if it contradicts the Qur'an and Sunnah based on the understanding of the Prophet's Companions and those who followed them upon righteousness.
@_Abdussalama Your premise is a misnomer. The Quran and Sunna doesn't judge without a human being involved.The Salaf Salih judged the best after the death of Rasullah. تركت فيكم ثقيلين كتاب الله و سنتي -رواية -كتاب الله و عترتي " I leave you two weighty things,the Book of Allah and my Sunna " in another narration " Book of Allah and my descents ".That is to say his righteous descents.Many Sahaba only seen the Prophet once in their life, while others knew him very intimately ,and others knew those who knew him intimately.And others were part of his household, and closest of his family members, and best of his companionship in regards to knowledge, character and deeds.Ahl Bayt and Closest Sahaba ,and those after them ,and those after them ,in like matter.
Dear brothers and sisters who think the the Quran is insufficient and follow the hadith, read these ayahs. The Sunni mushriqeen run from these ayahs:
And in anything over which you disagree - *its ruling is [to be referred] to Allah.* [Say], "That is Allah , my Lord; upon Him I have relied, and to Him I turn back." 42:10
"One day We shall raise from all Peoples a witness against them, from amongst themselves: and We shall bring thee as a witness against these (thy people): and We have sent down to thee the *Book explaining all things* , a Guide, a Mercy, and Glad Tidings to Muslims." 16:89
"O People of the Scripture, there has come to you Our Messenger making clear to you much of what you used to conceal of the Scripture and overlooking much. There has come to you from Allah *a light and a clear Book* ." 5:15
"Alif, Lam, Ra. These are the verses of the *Book and a clear Qur'an* ." 15:1
"Shall I seek other than Allah for judge, when He it is Who hath *revealed unto you (this) Scripture, fully explained* ? Those unto whom We gave the Scripture (aforetime) know that it is revealed from thy Lord in truth. So be not thou (O Muhammad) of the waverers." 6:114
" *A Book whose verses have been detailed* , an Arabic Qur'an for a people who know," 41:3
" *Thus do We explain the signs in detail* ; and perchance they may turn (unto Us)." 7:174
"And when We read it, follow thou the reading;" 75:18
"Nay more, *it is for Us to explain it (and make it clear)* : 75:19
"For We had certainly sent unto them a Book, based on knowledge, *which We explained in detail* ,- a guide and a mercy to all who believe." 7:52
"And they do not come to you with an argument except that *We bring you the truth and the best explanation* ." 25:33
" *Allah has sent down the best hadith* : a consistent Book wherein is reiteration. The skins shiver therefrom of those who fear their Lord; then their skins and their hearts relax at the remembrance of Allah. That is the guidance of Allah by which He guides whom He wills. And one whom Allah leaves astray - for him there is no guide." 39:23
"These are the verses of Allah which We recite to you in truth. *Then in what hadith after Allah and His verses will they believe?* " 45:6
"Then in what *hadith* after the Qur'an will they believe?" 77:50
So obey Allah, and obey His Messenger: but if ye turn back, *the duty of Our Messenger is but to proclaim (the Message) clearly and openly* . 64:12
"Say, "Obey Allah and obey the Messenger; but if you turn away - then upon him is only that [duty] with which he has been charged, and upon you is that with which you have been charged. And if you obey him, you will be [rightly] guided. *And there is not upon the Messenger except the [responsibility for] clear notification* ." 24:54
*The most merciful* 55:1
"It is *He* Who has taught the Qur'an." 55:2
" *The guiding of them is not thy duty* (O Muhammad), but Allah guideth whom He will. And whatsoever good thing ye spend, it is for yourselves, when ye spend not save in search of Allah's Countenance; and whatsoever good thing ye spend, it will be repaid to you in full, and ye will not be wronged." 2:272
"And We have certainly diversified in this Qur'an for the people from *every [kind of] example* ; *but man has ever been, most of anything, [prone to] dispute.* " 18:54
"Say, " Allah is most knowing of how long they remained. He has [knowledge of] the unseen [aspects] of the heavens and the earth. How Seeing is He and how Hearing! They have not besides Him any protector, and *He shares not His legislation with anyone.* "" 18:26
“You worship not besides Him except [mere] names you have named them, you and your fathers, for which Allah has sent down no authority. *Legislation is not but for Allah.* He has commanded that you worship not except Him. That is the correct religion, but most of the people do not know.” 18:40
Are you on Telegram?
@@AbaAslam Why?
Hadith is word of the prophet ﷺ. Hadith rejectors are kafirs. If you reject words of the prophet ﷺ (sahih hadith)then you are a kafir .
@@SamirSiraj8542 I don't reject the word of the prophet, which is the Qur'an he recited from Allah.
"[That] indeed, the Qur'an is the word of a noble Messenger." 69:40
What I reject are the slanderous hadiths attributed to him by the Sunnis. I defend the honour of the prophet against the Sunnis.
@@Quran_Alone_Dawah Obey Allah and obey his messenger - Quran. We obey the messenger . You can cope
I hope one day see jahil north face to face . And I will call him . If you are man call me Hindu in my eyes .
Abu Mussab called you brother. But he didn’t use brother to Daniel
Bro Allah reward you don't use
Words like ture cross
Please tell the name of Nasheed in beginning