@@embraceislamandeventuallyy1006 the question isnt whether he was a Muslim or not, the question is why was he made takfir of and not Nasser. Nasser never attacked a Muslim state but was fighting zionism. This is why Bro Hajji is making the link between Saddam's takfir and him going against Arab interests rather than him actually nullifying his Islam. It is very plausable that the takfir ruling was forced on Bin Baaz to legitimise fighting him. Sheikh Al Albani famously refused to make takfir of Saddam because at the end of the day he prayed and went to hajj, and didn't want to make the wrong call. Both Saddam and Nasser were ruling from other than Quran and Sunnah so some scholars say that that can nullify one's Islam. Allahualim.
Iraq didn't fail ahaha Khomeini decided to stop the war because they lost and Iraq took Iranian cities until 1990 then they retreated you don't know history so don't talk about things you don't know
@@eyeofeagle9518 lol Saddam wanted to invade Iran and he failed and Iran was slapping Iraq around until it ran out of ammunition while Iraq was praying Iran would stop, despite being armed by the world. Saddam failed in his objective and Iranians succeeded, and got a lot of war booty from Iraq as a result. What cities did Iraq get till 1990? Lol you do know the war is well documented so making lies up wont help you. Iraq held khorramshahr early in the war which Iranians liberated very quickly after, most of the war after 1982 was fought in Iraq till the end. Please don't comment on things you dont know about, especially to people who have studied it. 🙂
@@abdul-hadidadkhah1459 ahaha it's so obvious you don't know history :) you can say how much you want but this doesn't change the fact that Iran lost the war and Allah knows that :) Saddam Fred the Fao in 2 hours and Soleimani cried as you are crying seeing your lies ahaha you can't change history, you can try as much as you want but all the world knows the winner :) bye bye
Anyone who doubts what hajji has said should go listen to the words of sheikh khisk, one of the great ulema of Egypt at the time, who gave an eye witness testimony on how the baathist tortured not just him but other hufaaz,
Also Saeed Qutub RA and Zainab Al Ghazali RA estughfir Allah. There is a book translated into English called Return of the Pharoah, a very difficult read, due to hearing what happened to these pious people under the despotic regime. Actually written by Zainab Al Ghazali AR
Saddam invaded kuwait becuase he had just fought a war with iran defending arabia and due to the cost of the war iraq was in financial decline, saddam reached out to kuwait in the arab league meeting highlighting this and requesting they slow down oil pumping and raise the price so that iraq can also benefit as oppose to pumping alot of oil for cheap for america to buy it up. Long story short kuwait sided with usa and rejected sadams request this left him with no choice but to invade to take the oil fields by force and diplomacy did not work, this is when ibn baz made takfir on him affraid that saudi was next then he used the hadith of battle of hunayn when rasulAllah(ﷺ) requested to loan weapons from safwan to fight the tribes at taif, he used this as evidence to seek support from usa which then culminated in usa bases being set up across the arab peninsula and was used as a launch site for us bombers bombing iraq in the first and second gulf war, spilling the blood of muslims or so called "athiests" according to ibn baz fatwa
Assalamu Alaykum, I m just curious , I want to know why salafi dislike ikhwanul Muslimeen. An Egyptian imam ( a friend of Sheikh uthman ibn farooq) praised Mubarak and wished him in power. He would rather see Mubarak in power than morsi.
And again today we see these pseudo salafi's religiously defend Baath rule in Syria. It is a clear display of how a "Hukm" can change depending on the whims of corrupt regimes.
Narrated Abu Musa: Some people asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), "Whose Islam is the best? i.e. (Who is a very good Muslim)?" He replied, "One who avoids harming the Muslims with his tongue and hands." Sahih al-Bukhari 11 Book 2, Hadith 4
ASK YOURSELF FOR 10 SECONDS BROTHERS AND SISTERS !!!! IS THIS BENEFICIAL KNOWLEDGE, CALLING TO ALLAH AND HIS MESSENGER(PBUH) AND HELPING YOU GET TO JANNAH?? Did this video increase you in Eeman, did it get you closer to Allah ????? Pause for "10" seconds now and ask yourself that? Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa Barakatuhu
It Absolutely increases the Iman and Ihsan by spreading the TRUTH and condemning and standing up to a zalim. THIS IS ISLAM! Alhamdulillah for brother Hajji may Allah swt reward him. NOW brother let us ask you..IS IT BENEFICIAL TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM MUSLIMS? IS IT BENEFICIAL TO LIE TO THEM and WILL THIS PREVENTING OF TRUTH TO BE SPREAD TAKE YOU TO JANNAH? Pause for 10 seconds and ASK YOURSELF, by hiding the truth and appeasing these secular betraying so called rulers, WHO DO YOU SERVE? DOES YOUR IMAN INCREASE BY DOING THIS?! Wa alaikumu salaam may Alah swt remove the cowardice from you and make you strong as our Prophet saws, sahaba and salihin. Amin
@@Salafiyyah73 you are sick in love with murtadeen secular betraying rulers. STAND UP FOR ISLAM and be BRAVE. May Allah swt guide you away from your cowardly weak heart with a conviction of a candle in the wind
Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Amr: The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "A Muslim is the one who avoids harming Muslims with his tongue and hands. And a Muhajir (emigrant) is the one who gives up (abandons) all what Allah has forbidden." Sahih al-Bukhari 10 Book 2, Hadith 3
Brother Hajji may you please look into the narration and clarification of the work and business practice of Sayidah Khadijah that the modern imaams and feminists keep on voicing out.
In all fairness, Nasir was an Arab Nationalist but he also increased the number of Masjids substantially in Egypt. Many Ulema gave him an excuse of ignorance, because he was vehemently against the Ikhwan Muslimeen but accommodated Islam under his regime.
Saddam never repented from baathism, while the Qur'an states that the tawbah of such public figures needs to be done openly. Bin Baz was right about Saddam, and anyone consistent will say the same about Nasser. MIAW is the forefather of IS, and IS also made takfir on Saddam and all Iraqi leaders since the Republic was established.
I think the criticism is the timing of the fatwa of takfir, it's too convenient. When they were funding Saddam to wage a horribly intense war against Iran, the people weren't vocal about it.
th-cam.com/video/8cOMqFFsROE/w-d-xo.html Ibn Baz refused to call him a kaafir after he died. Why? He was a secularist, socialist who had the same principles as the Baa’th, so why refrain from calling him a kaafir, he never repented from socialism and secularism? Keep the same standards!
@Bro Hajji, consider updating your shop images, some of the models for shirts show a female with no hijab. You likely have missed this if someone else has done the shop for you.
Good job brother. Please make a video, just a video that contains the strongest argument that Muhammad ibn Abdulwehab was the source of the ISIS. Just one argument that cannot be disputed. Let's make it viral.
Saddam got his ass kicked by Iran, America twice and by his neighbours. Then he got hanged lol that's not what one would call a blessing. He died like a criminal.
@brohajji you use different names for the salafi movement, it gets too confusing. Why not just stick to "the salafi movement" as a name for them. Just sincere advice, thinking with you. Good video by the way
@@sol3406 we're not talking about that, we are talking of those groups as a whole, they are all part of the "Salafi movement", all of them call themselves Salafi
There was always a hesitation to pass Takfir by Saudi Ulema against any Arab rulers because of the snow ball effect on numerous regimes and the chaos which would follow like Qaeda and ISIS.
In fairness to sheikh bin baz, he was only responding to a question about the ruler of Iraq. Except you have another evidence where he said nasr is not a kaafir.
th-cam.com/video/8cOMqFFsROE/w-d-xo.html Ibn Baz refused to call him a kaafir after he died. Why? He was a secularist, socialist who had the same principles as the Baa’th, so why refrain from calling him a kaafir. Would he say the same for Sadaam? Of course not, the political winds was the direction which was followed.
Actually Ibn baz declared the bathists to be kuffar before the iraqi invasion of Kuwait and this is well documented in his fatawa and by the way most of the salafi scholars in the Islamic world including Saudi Arabia declared naser a secularist disbeliever back in the 60’s
th-cam.com/video/8cOMqFFsROE/w-d-xo.html Ibn Baz refused to call Gamal Abdul Nasser a kaafir after he died. Why? He was a secularist, socialist who had the same principles as the Baa’th, so why refrain from calling him a kaafir. Would he say the same for Sadaam? Of course not, the political winds was the direction which was followed.
I am very sure if people asked sheikh ibn baz questions about Jamal abdulnaseer just like how they ask him about sadam Hussein, he (bn Baz) will definitely make tekfri of him just like how he made tekfri of sadam Hussein. Bro Hajj, I will understand you more and believe your analysis to be true, if you can show us where sheikh bn Baz praise Jamal abdulnaseer. You said, he did not make takfir of him, and I understand that to mean sheikh bn Baz must have praise Jamal abdulnaseer perhaps in one of his lectures. Just show us where he praise him, if you can not show us, that means he made tekfri of him and the points you are making is meaningless. My answer to your question is that, had it been people ask questions about Jamal abdulnaseer, sheikh bn Baz will make tekfri of him. There are thousands of people in that time that share the same ideology, it will not make sense if sheikh bn Baz use all his precious time to mention them and make tekfri of them one after the other. So far they have the same attributes, rooted from the same party (bahthi) they are all kaafir after establishment of evidence.
Shaykh Ibn Baz was alive during his time and knew of his ideology. Why does someone need to ask him regarding the kufr of Gamal Abdul Nasser? You’re digressing you can avoid praising someone, it doesn’t mean your making takfeer of them or you disagree with them? This is ridiculous, stop it and accept he followed the political winds of his leaders. Where is the establishment of the evidence for Saddam? Stop talking rubbish, they made quick fire takfeer upon him in order to legitimize them inviting Uncle Sam. He is to be blamed for his close relationship with the rulers, which led him to be used. The Salaf would have opposed Shaykh Ibn Baz: VISITING THE RULERS ACCORDING TO THE SALAF! | DAWAH MAN | SHAMSI | SPUBS th-cam.com/video/7FeLK1_HLOE/w-d-xo.html Why didn’t any Salafi Ulamah from Saudi Arabia during his lifetime make takfeer upon him? His ideology was apparent, his speeches were available, but the absolute truth is that his relationship with Saudi Arabia was mutual, so there conveniently ignored his disbelief, but emphasized on Saddam and his connection to the Baa’th. He followed the political winds of his leaders, and avoided mentioning Gamal Abdul Nasser, even though he was alive during his lifetime. It just shows he avoided it and if Egypt ever decided to invade Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦 the fatwa of kufr would have been placed without hesitation.
Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu Akhi, please teach people about 1.La ilaha il Allah Muhammad ar Rasoolullah 2.Prayer 3.Zakat 4.Fasting 5.Hajj Please akh respectfully
You're lying let's not go to extremes just because of our dislike of the satanic madkhali sect. He said they should leave because they were oppressed and couldn't practice their religion.
@@Rabbi-Jill-kews yeah I did and he made a fatwa calling on Palestinians to leave West Bank, nothing about "mass takfir". So either you have some evidence that is hidden from the world which you need to share or OP needs to delete this lie.
Brother you say Allah have mercy on ibn baaz but not Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab Who done so much good so much of people were quided through his dawa Allah have mercy on his soul middle bath is hard but correct way
Lol, 1 was declare kaafir because he was asked directly. It was a question and answer. It will be fair if the question was asked about Jamal too. Be fair bro, bring evidence
فائدة من رد الشيخ ابن باز على رأيه في جمال عبدالناصر - الشيخ صالح المغامسي th-cam.com/video/8cOMqFFsROE/w-d-xo.html via @TH-cam Gamal Abdul Nasser did not publicly repent from his socialist ideology, and Ibn Baz would not make takfeer of him, when asked about him, but Saddam was labeled a Kaafir 😂
Just unsubscribed, this guy makes assumed things. Bring books by Muhammed AW where he preached what written in dawah najdiya else you have no evidence to back up what was said about him that says he said. Funny guy!
@Tawheed_Taqwa_Tawakkul bro icl u wrote all that, and said a whole lot of nothing. I asked for the difference and you couldn’t provide any evidence. Also are you hating on sheikh bin baz RA?
@Tawheed_Taqwa_Tawakkul Yh and it’s normal for you to send 3 messages and Quranic verses and Hadiths about replying to the salam, just bc I didn’t see ur original salam? Like you couldn’t just tell me I didn’t reply to ur salam without adding these subtle remarks pal.
@Tawheed_Taqwa_Tawakkul guys lecturing me because I didn’t see his salam?😂😂I literally returned the salam as soon as you pointed it out to me. Stop going so deep into this thinking ur some scholar g
Saddam invaded Kuwait after failing against Iran, so they made takfir of him to justify fighting him.
Well was he not a Muslim though?
@@embraceislamandeventuallyy1006 the question isnt whether he was a Muslim or not, the question is why was he made takfir of and not Nasser. Nasser never attacked a Muslim state but was fighting zionism. This is why Bro Hajji is making the link between Saddam's takfir and him going against Arab interests rather than him actually nullifying his Islam. It is very plausable that the takfir ruling was forced on Bin Baaz to legitimise fighting him. Sheikh Al Albani famously refused to make takfir of Saddam because at the end of the day he prayed and went to hajj, and didn't want to make the wrong call. Both Saddam and Nasser were ruling from other than Quran and Sunnah so some scholars say that that can nullify one's Islam. Allahualim.
Iraq didn't fail ahaha Khomeini decided to stop the war because they lost and Iraq took Iranian cities until 1990 then they retreated you don't know history so don't talk about things you don't know
@@eyeofeagle9518 lol Saddam wanted to invade Iran and he failed and Iran was slapping Iraq around until it ran out of ammunition while Iraq was praying Iran would stop, despite being armed by the world. Saddam failed in his objective and Iranians succeeded, and got a lot of war booty from Iraq as a result. What cities did Iraq get till 1990? Lol you do know the war is well documented so making lies up wont help you. Iraq held khorramshahr early in the war which Iranians liberated very quickly after, most of the war after 1982 was fought in Iraq till the end. Please don't comment on things you dont know about, especially to people who have studied it. 🙂
@@abdul-hadidadkhah1459 ahaha it's so obvious you don't know history :) you can say how much you want but this doesn't change the fact that Iran lost the war and Allah knows that :) Saddam Fred the Fao in 2 hours and Soleimani cried as you are crying seeing your lies ahaha you can't change history, you can try as much as you want but all the world knows the winner :) bye bye
May Allah reward you bro Hajji for your Jihad by word against those secular Pharaohic kufri rulers apologists
Ameen
Lmao sharia created hell on earth😂😂😂😂😂
Anyone who doubts what hajji has said should go listen to the words of sheikh khisk, one of the great ulema of Egypt at the time, who gave an eye witness testimony on how the baathist tortured not just him but other hufaaz,
What is Nasheed in beginning
Also Saeed Qutub RA and Zainab Al Ghazali RA estughfir Allah. There is a book translated into English called Return of the Pharoah, a very difficult read, due to hearing what happened to these pious people under the despotic regime. Actually written by Zainab Al Ghazali AR
Good
The Ba’ath did right by crushing islamism
@@DhukuAC WHATTTTTTTT????????????
@@DhukuAC estughfir Allah
Saddam invaded kuwait becuase he had just fought a war with iran defending arabia and due to the cost of the war iraq was in financial decline, saddam reached out to kuwait in the arab league meeting highlighting this and requesting they slow down oil pumping and raise the price so that iraq can also benefit as oppose to pumping alot of oil for cheap for america to buy it up. Long story short kuwait sided with usa and rejected sadams request this left him with no choice but to invade to take the oil fields by force and diplomacy did not work, this is when ibn baz made takfir on him affraid that saudi was next then he used the hadith of battle of hunayn when rasulAllah(ﷺ) requested to loan weapons from safwan to fight the tribes at taif, he used this as evidence to seek support from usa which then culminated in usa bases being set up across the arab peninsula and was used as a launch site for us bombers bombing iraq in the first and second gulf war, spilling the blood of muslims or so called "athiests" according to ibn baz fatwa
Keep going Bro Hajji', you're doing an amazing job highlighting these charlatons
MADKHALI MURJIAH RUWAYBIDAH!!!!
Madkhalis and Takfeerism , what a combination....
Assalamu Alaykum,
I m just curious , I want to know why salafi dislike ikhwanul Muslimeen.
An Egyptian imam ( a friend of Sheikh uthman ibn farooq) praised Mubarak and wished him in power. He would rather see Mubarak in power than morsi.
And again today we see these pseudo salafi's religiously defend Baath rule in Syria.
It is a clear display of how a "Hukm" can change depending on the whims of corrupt regimes.
Narrated Abu Musa:
Some people asked Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), "Whose Islam is the best? i.e. (Who is a very good Muslim)?" He replied, "One who avoids harming the Muslims with his tongue and hands."
Sahih al-Bukhari 11
Book 2, Hadith 4
ASK YOURSELF FOR 10 SECONDS BROTHERS AND SISTERS !!!!
IS THIS BENEFICIAL KNOWLEDGE, CALLING TO ALLAH AND HIS MESSENGER(PBUH) AND HELPING YOU GET TO JANNAH??
Did this video increase you in Eeman, did it get you closer to Allah ?????
Pause for "10" seconds now and ask yourself that?
Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa Barakatuhu
This bro haji is sick and tired of Salafiyyah.
May Allah guide him, ameen.
It Absolutely increases the Iman and Ihsan by spreading the TRUTH and condemning and standing up to a zalim. THIS IS ISLAM! Alhamdulillah for brother Hajji may Allah swt reward him.
NOW brother let us ask you..IS IT BENEFICIAL TO HIDE THE TRUTH FROM MUSLIMS? IS IT BENEFICIAL TO LIE TO THEM and WILL THIS PREVENTING OF TRUTH TO BE SPREAD TAKE YOU TO JANNAH?
Pause for 10 seconds and ASK YOURSELF, by hiding the truth and appeasing these secular betraying so called rulers, WHO DO YOU SERVE? DOES YOUR IMAN INCREASE BY DOING THIS?!
Wa alaikumu salaam may Alah swt remove the cowardice from you and make you strong as our Prophet saws, sahaba and salihin. Amin
@@Salafiyyah73 you are sick in love with murtadeen secular betraying rulers. STAND UP FOR ISLAM and be BRAVE. May Allah swt guide you away from your cowardly weak heart with a conviction of a candle in the wind
Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Amr:
The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "A Muslim is the one who avoids harming Muslims with his tongue and hands. And a Muhajir (emigrant) is the one who gives up (abandons) all what Allah has forbidden."
Sahih al-Bukhari 10
Book 2, Hadith 3
الله يحفظك وبارك الله فيك وفي عاءلتك
بارك الله فيك
Saddam is a shaheed. There shouldn’t be any doubt about that.
Akhi what are your general thoughts on sadam hussein and do you think he was sincere in his last moments when he said the shahada? Allahu alem
Allahu musta’an
Wa Alaykumassalam Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuh
Brother Hajji may you please look into the narration and clarification of the work and business practice of Sayidah Khadijah that the modern imaams and feminists keep on voicing out.
Salam walkume, can you show how faris defended uae and Israel ties. Look it up!!!!
In all fairness, Nasir was an Arab Nationalist but he also increased the number of Masjids substantially in Egypt. Many Ulema gave him an excuse of ignorance, because he was vehemently against the Ikhwan Muslimeen but accommodated Islam under his regime.
What is Nasheed in beginning
Saddam never repented from baathism, while the Qur'an states that the tawbah of such public figures needs to be done openly. Bin Baz was right about Saddam, and anyone consistent will say the same about Nasser. MIAW is the forefather of IS, and IS also made takfir on Saddam and all Iraqi leaders since the Republic was established.
I think the criticism is the timing of the fatwa of takfir, it's too convenient. When they were funding Saddam to wage a horribly intense war against Iran, the people weren't vocal about it.
th-cam.com/video/8cOMqFFsROE/w-d-xo.html
Ibn Baz refused to call him a kaafir after he died. Why? He was a secularist, socialist who had the same principles as the Baa’th, so why refrain from calling him a kaafir, he never repented from socialism and secularism?
Keep the same standards!
The irony is that Saudi Arabia itself has been made takfir of by eminent scholars for not being consistent in their ruling solely by the shari'ah.
Hahaha shut up your ksa king since the beginning of their life allied with USA you don't know nothing
Wow u serious. Dude was in jail
@Bro Hajji, consider updating your shop images, some of the models for shirts show a female with no hijab. You likely have missed this if someone else has done the shop for you.
Good job brother. Please make a video, just a video that contains the strongest argument that Muhammad ibn Abdulwehab was the source of the ISIS. Just one argument that cannot be disputed. Let's make it viral.
May Allah bless saddam indeed he died as an hero
Saddam got his ass kicked by Iran, America twice and by his neighbours. Then he got hanged lol that's not what one would call a blessing. He died like a criminal.
@brohajji you use different names for the salafi movement, it gets too confusing. Why not just stick to "the salafi movement" as a name for them. Just sincere advice, thinking with you. Good video by the way
@@sol3406 we're not talking about that, we are talking of those groups as a whole, they are all part of the "Salafi movement", all of them call themselves Salafi
There was always a hesitation to pass Takfir by Saudi Ulema against any Arab rulers because of the snow ball effect on numerous regimes and the chaos which would follow like Qaeda and ISIS.
Didn't Muqbil make takfir on Jamal Nasr ??
Where is your Proof that they didnt declare the other one as well as a Kafir?
why do u say rahimahullah if u dont like sheikh bin baz
In fairness to sheikh bin baz, he was only responding to a question about the ruler of Iraq. Except you have another evidence where he said nasr is not a kaafir.
th-cam.com/video/8cOMqFFsROE/w-d-xo.html
Ibn Baz refused to call him a kaafir after he died. Why? He was a secularist, socialist who had the same principles as the Baa’th, so why refrain from calling him a kaafir.
Would he say the same for Sadaam? Of course not, the political winds was the direction which was followed.
Actually Ibn baz declared the bathists to be kuffar before the iraqi invasion of Kuwait and this is well documented in his fatawa and by the way most of the salafi scholars in the Islamic world including Saudi Arabia declared naser a secularist disbeliever back in the 60’s
th-cam.com/video/8cOMqFFsROE/w-d-xo.html
Ibn Baz refused to call Gamal Abdul Nasser a kaafir after he died. Why? He was a secularist, socialist who had the same principles as the Baa’th, so why refrain from calling him a kaafir.
Would he say the same for Sadaam? Of course not, the political winds was the direction which was followed.
@@BroHajji so are you saying Ibn baz refrained from calling him a kafir to please the ruler?
May Allah guide bro haji,
He is deviant, Allahul Musta’an
I am very sure if people asked sheikh ibn baz questions about Jamal abdulnaseer just like how they ask him about sadam Hussein, he (bn Baz) will definitely make tekfri of him just like how he made tekfri of sadam Hussein.
Bro Hajj, I will understand you more and believe your analysis to be true, if you can show us where sheikh bn Baz praise Jamal abdulnaseer. You said, he did not make takfir of him, and I understand that to mean sheikh bn Baz must have praise Jamal abdulnaseer perhaps in one of his lectures. Just show us where he praise him, if you can not show us, that means he made tekfri of him and the points you are making is meaningless.
My answer to your question is that, had it been people ask questions about Jamal abdulnaseer, sheikh bn Baz will make tekfri of him. There are thousands of people in that time that share the same ideology, it will not make sense if sheikh bn Baz use all his precious time to mention them and make tekfri of them one after the other. So far they have the same attributes, rooted from the same party (bahthi) they are all kaafir after establishment of evidence.
Shaykh Ibn Baz was alive during his time and knew of his ideology. Why does someone need to ask him regarding the kufr of Gamal Abdul Nasser?
You’re digressing you can avoid praising someone, it doesn’t mean your making takfeer of them or you disagree with them? This is ridiculous, stop it and accept he followed the political winds of his leaders.
Where is the establishment of the evidence for Saddam? Stop talking rubbish, they made quick fire takfeer upon him in order to legitimize them inviting Uncle Sam.
He is to be blamed for his close relationship with the rulers, which led him to be used. The Salaf would have opposed Shaykh Ibn Baz:
VISITING THE RULERS ACCORDING TO THE SALAF! | DAWAH MAN | SHAMSI | SPUBS
th-cam.com/video/7FeLK1_HLOE/w-d-xo.html
Why didn’t any Salafi Ulamah from Saudi Arabia during his lifetime make takfeer upon him? His ideology was apparent, his speeches were available, but the absolute truth is that his relationship with Saudi Arabia was mutual, so there conveniently ignored his disbelief, but emphasized on Saddam and his connection to the Baa’th.
He followed the political winds of his leaders, and avoided mentioning Gamal Abdul Nasser, even though he was alive during his lifetime. It just shows he avoided it and if Egypt ever decided to invade Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦 the fatwa of kufr would have been placed without hesitation.
Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu
Akhi, please teach people about
1.La ilaha il Allah Muhammad ar Rasoolullah
2.Prayer
3.Zakat
4.Fasting
5.Hajj
Please akh respectfully
Be careful akhi may Allah protect you
albani Mass takfir of people living in West bank 1993 is very interesting
You're lying let's not go to extremes just because of our dislike of the satanic madkhali sect. He said they should leave because they were oppressed and couldn't practice their religion.
Yeah can we have some evidence and source, please?
@@Rabbi-Jill-kews yeah I did and he made a fatwa calling on Palestinians to leave West Bank, nothing about "mass takfir". So either you have some evidence that is hidden from the world which you need to share or OP needs to delete this lie.
Still waiting on the source OP...
@@Rabbi-Jill-kews there is nothing on youtube or on Google, burden of proof is on you. He made no mass takfir, you're a liar in front of Allah.
It seems to me that a few salafis are upset with this video, 😂😂😂
Brother you say Allah have mercy on ibn baaz but not Muhammad ibn
Abdul Wahab
Who done so much good
so much of people were quided through his dawa
Allah have mercy on his soul
middle bath is hard but correct way
Iv been saying this for years
Please go back to bin baz's sellout fatwas please
Lol, 1 was declare kaafir because he was asked directly. It was a question and answer. It will be fair if the question was asked about Jamal too. Be fair bro, bring evidence
فائدة من رد الشيخ ابن باز على رأيه في جمال عبدالناصر - الشيخ صالح المغامسي th-cam.com/video/8cOMqFFsROE/w-d-xo.html via @TH-cam
Gamal Abdul Nasser did not publicly repent from his socialist ideology, and Ibn Baz would not make takfeer of him, when asked about him, but Saddam was labeled a Kaafir 😂
The filthy murjia nadakhila are not from the blessed daʿwah najdiyyah.
Just unsubscribed, this guy makes assumed things. Bring books by Muhammed AW where he preached what written in dawah najdiya else you have no evidence to back up what was said about him that says he said. Funny guy!
Bye Bye, don’t let the door hit you on the way out 😂
Cross fit certificate 😂😂😂
From the way you talk, it seems that you are the only one who is right and all other misguidance apart from you is to fear Allah.
Get some live bro haji,
Wallahi i feel sorry for you.
You are not a salafi, know that!
MIAW is my sheikh, and everyone that follows him is my brother
@Tawheed_Taqwa_Tawakkul what's DSH?
@Tawheed_Taqwa_Tawakkul what are you talking about?
This guy is obsessed with these “pseudo salafis”😭😭
@Tawheed_Taqwa_Tawakkul explain the difference between the so called “najdi dawah” and salafiyyah?
@Tawheed_Taqwa_Tawakkul bro icl u wrote all that, and said a whole lot of nothing. I asked for the difference and you couldn’t provide any evidence.
Also are you hating on sheikh bin baz RA?
@Tawheed_Taqwa_Tawakkul walaikum assalam
Chill out g I didn’t see your salam. Stop acting weird.
@Tawheed_Taqwa_Tawakkul Yh and it’s normal for you to send 3 messages and Quranic verses and Hadiths about replying to the salam, just bc I didn’t see ur original salam?
Like you couldn’t just tell me I didn’t reply to ur salam without adding these subtle remarks pal.
@Tawheed_Taqwa_Tawakkul guys lecturing me because I didn’t see his salam?😂😂I literally returned the salam as soon as you pointed it out to me. Stop going so deep into this thinking ur some scholar g
Faris hammadi the type to snitch and get you locked up😂😂😂I get that vibe from him