I wanted to see if there was any R rated I'm On Observation Duty Huge Man fics, after reading a comment on an YT video about the idea, and was thoroughly disappointed, but I did find a beautiful fic where the reader is consoled, falls in love, and marries Huge Man so that's close enough
Sarah is right, I just came across a 100,000 word fanfic romance between Pennywise the Clown and Bill and the worst part of it all is that it was ACTUALLY GOOD.
@@Veralidainai 🤣😂🤣😂 oh god no, I have no idea if I should ask for a link to that story or not. On a related subject of being shockingly good: I heard there was also a fan fiction sequel to Neon Genesis Evangelion called Genocide. It's said to be 800 pages long. I still have yet to read it.
I've read exactly two fanfictions in my whole life: one was a persona 4 fanfiction that ended up being a very deep story about how easy it is to get trapped in an abusive relationship and ignore all the red flags just because you want to be loved, and how it might leave you scarred for live. The other one was My Immortal. So yeah I think I see your point here.
@@channelname7743 I don't have the link anymore cause that was literally 8 years ago but if I remember correctly it was called Sympathy Crime (or Sympathy Crimes?). Major trigger warning for abusive relationship (obviously), sexual assault, suicide/self harm, and grooming too.
I think people tend to misunderstand. Tropes... aren’t always bad. It’s clichés you need to watch out for. If tropes didn’t exist, then stories would be boring and identical to one another because there’s no defining elements to distinguish them from one another.
I'm probably gonna regret this, but I wrote so much fanfiction as a teenager and genuinely thought that was the extent of my writing ability. Now I'm 14 days away from my first published book coming out. Without writing fanfiction, I would not be achieving this goal. I had a lot to learn as a writer, and I learned by having an audience who gave me feedback with every single chapter. I grew from fanfiction and I loved every single moment of it. Honestly, the goal is for people to write fanfiction of my original characters, then it'll feel like I've come full circle.
you mind if the fanfiction is disgusting? like not poorly writen, but utterly entrail shifting you know? with characters commiting sexual crimes against each other, involving very sick normally disturbing kinks. Would you be cool? I mean it doesn't matter if you are bc since there is no gulag for fanfictioners if anybody wants to, they would absolutely be able to. And if you defend fanfiction this is something you must also defend. I really don't see a strong argument in the "i did it for practice" thing. What about limiting yourself to a preestablished set of lore and characters makes it supposedly easier? And if you're going to change everything what help does it provide by calling it a fanfic? Reach? You can always lie, like JK Rowling or Meyer of Gray, you can say something like "hey, if you like One Direction, you will probably like (t̶h̶e̶ ̶f̶a̶n̶f̶i̶c̶ ̶I̶ ̶w̶r̶o̶t̶e̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶w̶i̶c̶h̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶y̶ ̶a̶l̶l̶ ̶f̶u̶c̶k̶ ̶e̶a̶c̶h̶ ̶o̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶n̶ ̶m̶e̶) this completely unrelated story about a boyband that shares a secret love (≖ิ(‿)≖ิ) It'd still be very cringe on the inside, but less so on the outside.
@@roman_dimaggio Hey dude did you actually watch the video? Because it... actually addresses like, most of the stuff you're talking about. Also, congrats OP!! I hope your book does well!
I find wild the "fanfics dont make you do world building" when most of the fics i read are like "so the og author didn't do shit with all this cool stuff so this is my sand pit now and im building this world with my own bare hands"
Or made up a whole new world for the characters in the other media to live in. That's always exciting. And I'm saying this to myself, a self proclaimed fanfiction writer
@@L16htW4rr10r I feel you there, legit some of my favourite fics are Modern AUs where characters are the same but living in our world, probably some of the best Game of Thrones fics I've ever read were 'Westeros is a 21st century first world country now but all the character drama is still there!' type shit XD
This is the Hellsing fandom writing fics that feels longer and more complex than the fucking source material LMAO Hirano kept pushing out these amazing concepts and characters but everything just happens so quickly and the characters don't last or we see them for like 3 chapters, sooooo yeah. So many fandoms are basically just sand pits for fanfic writers, in which the source material is just a bunch of concepts never truly extrapolated upon. I love these types of mangas/books bc then I can just go wild with characters that I love!
I read one Harry Potter fanfic that created so much extra lore, and culture, and added so many more personality to the characters, it was amazing, it was also like 150k words
people say "fanfiction relies on being familiar with already existing characters instead of creating your own" as if that's easy. Do you know how hard it is to know an already existing character so well that your writing feels true to them? Your fic straight up will not succeed unless you have a strong understanding of the character's motivations, fears, and idiosyncrasies. That to me sounds like excellent practice for media analysis.
I would argue that writing fanfic requires a very different skill set from an original book: you need less creativity, but a lot more understanding of a previously written work. You can't come up with stuff as you go along, you have to make sure it fits into someone else's lore or the fans will strangle you.
Not to mention if any kind of media have characters that are meant for the viewers/players/etc. to interpret on their own, nothing is wrong, but the fandom of that media will likely dislike it. U can see this character as kind and polite while others won’t or don’t. Especially if there’s an accepted standard by the fandom how those characters will act. Even if you write something truly amazing, there’ll probably be some or a lot of people commenting and criticizing how you write the characters or a certain character when in the original media, they could be open to any interpretation from anyone
@@archermahou8910 I don't think writing within restrictive parameters inherently makes things less creative. That's the basis behind metered poetry like sonnets and haikus--the restrictions of established form incite their own kind of creativity. I think writing within someone else''s pre-established lore works much the same way--it forces you to find creative ways to make things fit together into a canon rather than just doing whatever. It's not less creative, it's just creative in a different way.
yeah we can blame disney for that they use public domain stuff and make their own version,copyright it,and then extend the copyright law to an unreasonable length
Absolute, 100% agreement. This is what I was going to say as well. Part of why I, a 32-year-old living half a century after the publication of "Carrie," am writing "Who Killed Carrie White?" as a fanfic is that only Stephen King or those with his express permission can write stories about Carrie.
... The person who thinks that all fanfiction is 'light and fluffy' has never read a 'dead dove do not eat' story. God, those are... not light or fluffy in any way.
also dark! AUs exist. (one could say that After is a Dark! Harry Styles fanfic lol) it's incredibly small-minded to think that fanfic can be so easily describable.
Love that framing the divine comedy as fan fiction clearly implies that Dante was a fan of Jesus and Christianity rather than like a believer. ”Yeah I’m a huge jesus fan” feels very distinct from ”I’m a devout Christian to me
It's even funnier because I read Devil May Cry fanfiction, which is based off Inferno. So basically I would be reading fanfiction, of fanfiction, of fucking fanfiction.
@@memethemastermonarch9459 and then you can make the claim that the New Testament is fanfiction of the Old Testament! So fan fiction of fan fiction of fucking fan fiction of bloody fan fiction :).
This actually makes me wonder though. Like I’ve met some religious zealots that might actually be better classified as Jesus fans than Jesus believers lol
To be fair, I think that argument comes less from the biblical setting of the story and more from the fact that Dante wrote himself and his contemporaries into the story.
my first thought with the "Gatsby was problematic" point was not that the people who read it weren't paying attention to the story, but that their teachers wouldn't allow any analysis that criticized America or capitalism. my Gatsby teacher was actually pretty good, but the teacher that introduced Lord of the Flies did so by showing us a documentary on the Stanford Prison Experiment and repeatedly reiterating this was human nature and wouldn't hear any argument to the contrary. Some of it absolutely rests on people simply not paying attention in English class, but others seem like a reaction against an educational system that's chugging along during the failure of an empire that does not allow for more radical readings
I'm glad I had an English teacher who called us oblivious for not noticing the gay subtext, and enlightened us. "He saw me looking with admiration at his car. 'It's pretty isn't it, old sport!' he jumped off to give me a better view. 'Haven't you seen it before?' I'd seen it. Everybody had seen it. It was a rich cream color, bright with nickel, swollen here and there in its monstrous length..." She also used the term slash fic, our theory was that she'd also written some
That's kinda funny because the scientific community (or at least those within with some sense and who has researched it) have actually denounced the Stanford Prison Experiment There's a lot to it but basically: The researchers selectively picked people who had lower empathy and the results were, even then, tampered with by the researchers. If I'm not mistaken, they actually told the "prison guards" to abuse the "prisoners" (the participants didn't know what they were researching) So the experiment is not so much a reflection of human nature but really, the power of authority and the willingness to even do inhumane and cruel stuff when told to by it
@@DrawciaGleam02when the truth is neither of those ends of the pendulum swing, but that the feud is the cause of the problems. They were dumb kids sure but if their families weren’t feuding the dumb kids could have courted openly, then either got married with no drama or broke up and married other people. But because of the feud the only way they could explore their teenage feelings was to double down and as a result 6 people died Thank you for giving me an excuse to monologue about this
It doesn't even matter if fanfictions are badly written. We need to stop associating art with a piece that "holds the potential for artistic significance and great quality" and just... accept that bad art exists. Art as a synonymous for "good art" is something that should have been left behind in the 60s. Just accept the existence of poorly made art.
And I love bad art! Everyone has made bad art before, and people don't have to be good to make art. I hate that young artists feel ashamed to share their work because it's not up to certain standards. Long live bad art!
What annoys me about that quote is that who are you to decide if my fanfic doesn’t “hold the potential of artistic significance and great quality?” Just cause you read furry smut doesn’t mean every fanfic is that, there are plenty of dramatic, mysterious, scary, action packed & funny fanfics but cause someone on the internet read scaly smut one time back in 2008 somehow all fanfics are bad.
@@voidcowboy4327 and furry fics are STILL art. it doesn’t really matter if it’s personal significant to me, but it’s significant to someone and it matters to someone. like, art is art and it’s not up to anyone to decide if it was or not.
It depends on how you define art, that's the problem. If it is defined in a normative way, then art has something to do with an inherent quality that some things possess and some don't. But if it is defined in a descriptive way it is defined by its categories. Literature is then (by definition) art because it isn't anything else. Most people mix both ways of thinking which is unhelpful when discussing art or the definition of it. I don't understand this whole Fanfic Literature dichotomy. Why not both? Why do people always have to take a "side" especially, when it seems so obvious that it doesn't have to be that way?
as an avid book fandom person, boy does the convo about "books vs fanfic being better" make me go 🧍♂️ wild concept: you can read, enjoy, and write both lmao
I always think of Nostalgia Critic's point about how The Last Airbender movie being bad doesn't diminish or destroy ATLA. It's almost a waste of time to get all frothed up over the movie since the series is as good as it ever was. Same with fanfiction vs books - you can like both or prefer one over the other without getting upset that others don't feel the same way.
i love how at 7:58 they were like “you think bakudeku mpreg is good, well you must not know what a narrative foil is” like bakugo and deku literally are narrative foils, how does shipping them mean you don’t understand that?
Exactly! I’ve seen many a Zuko/Aang fanfic in my day and have seen (and rebloged) those same authors incredibly well written analyses of Zuko and Aang’s role as foils
I would watch this but I don’t really watch video essays anymore. They just don’t give me the same satisfaction as the fan made lefttube scripts I read online
I have no clue why fanfic is being touted as some sort of advertising and a “worshipping capitalism”. Wouldn’t anything and everything qualified as advertising then??? From online critics to memes to summary vids to articles regarding the scandals of the creators, if fanfiction (or indeed any fan content) is “free advertising” then anything is free advertising.
I agree it's genuinely confusing because most people searching up fanfiction have already read/watched the fiction that they're looking for fics for anyways so it's not like they're attracting new viewers/readers It's like the people who thought re-releasing Morbius after the memes got big would make people want to see it and then it bombed again because no one wanted to see it meme or no meme
@@Foelhe No since web serials tend to be self published they are quite clearly not capitalism though I suspect the suggestion comes from you not understanding the definition.
Anything you mentioned can be understood as advertising - and oftentimes, it is. Think about how when a person, franchise etc is canceled (as in boycotted), people often ask their communities to stop talking about the thing / person altogether because even if you criticize something you're still giving it your attention, arguably the most valuable good in digitalized capitalism. Like, say somebody hates JKR for being a transphobic ass and stops supporting her financially but still writes, idk, trans!Draco Drarry fanfic with a passion. Then they're simultaneously transforming, maybe even 'reclaiming' the franchise but also keeping it alive and relevant - which JKR technically doesn't profit from directly but it could lead to someone else reading the fanfic, thereby engaging with the fandom and nourishing the fan feels to eventually buy official merchandise or something. But as other commenters have pointed out, it's not always that simple because framing is still part of the equation.
If you complain about hastily written, poorly edited mediocre quality fanfiction using the same washed out tropes again and again, wait until you find out about penny novels or the books you find on Walmart shelves. Any book salesperson knows that those clichéd romance novels with the classic book cover of a white man passionately embracing a white woman sell like hot buns, and nobody holds them to the standard of high art. And they don't have to be!
I kept thinking "do these supposed literary experts not know about pulp novels?". "Low literature" has been around for as long as printing's been cheap enough to sustain them. (And earlier, if you count things like plays.)
I'm a librarian, so fanfiction falls ever so slightly out of my field, but bad printed books absolutely do fall into my job. People have, and will always, love trash and that's FINE. I swear, the amount of little old ladies who read only trope heavy, recycled romance novels is sky high. Not everyone wants to read challenging literature all the time, most of the time people like what they know and they'll keep reading the same thing over and over. Reading can be for entertainment, information, relaxation, enjoyment, and curiosity, it's not just for Big Brain (tm) literary analysis and critique. In 40-50 years, that generation of old readers will still be reading their fanfics.
I feel like you have never met them IRL we absolutely do complain about those books as well. Fanfic isn't inherently worse than published books its just much easier to write bad fanfiction not least because it's often an authors first time writing.
Isn't the "Airport Novel" another vector for what would have been penny novels these days? Hell, when I was a kid I read loads of Trash Generic Fantasy which used the world-building of 'Just DnD' or 'Just Tolkien without the fancy language or history stuff' where you were just supposed to assume that the ruling structure was Medieval England, Magic existed and could Do Things, and Dragon's exist. Some of those would get some creativity sprinkled on it, some wouldn't. Characters were stock, conversations were stilted, but evil wizards got stabbed and dragons were scary. High Art they were not, but easily devourable they were.
I want a Sarah Z video essay where as the video goes on the “drink” she’s holding just gets more and more absurd until she ends the video holding a jug of antifreeze
idk about that. One of my favorite books as a tween involves a character who attempts suicide by drinking antifreeze... great book if anyone knows what I'm talking about.
The profound irony of people holding up Shakespeare in contrast to mass marketed repetitive story telling is that Shakespeare **WAS** mass marketed repetitive story telling. Very few of Shakespeare’s stories were original stories the vast vast majority of his works were adaptations of older works and that’s what people expected. People didn’t go to the Globe Theater to see new original plays by Shakespeare they went to see his take on their favorite stories. It actually took A Midsummer’s Night Dream a couple decades to catch on because it was **too** original. This really gets at a larger question: what actually separates fan fiction from adaptation? What sepeeates Shakespeare rewritibg the *Tragical History of Romeo and Juliet* from someone rewriting Naruto on the internet?
I'd say a pretty rule of thumb definition for fanfiction would be "a work created solely for non-commercial enjoyment that primarily exists within the framework of an existing piece of fiction". And I'd definitely say the only real differences between "fanfiction" and professionally published works are: - Less gatekeeping for better and worse - No profit motive
“This photograph is a shit painting” is such a good way of describing how ppl often want art to approach *them*, on their terms, rather than the other way around…
I think a lot of people just forget: there are a lot of bad fanfics. But there are also a lot of bad books. We just don’t get to read most of them bc they die in the publisher’s office. Edit: I didn’t think people would notice this comment but I guess they did. I wanna emphasize two things: 1, I said “most” die in the publisher’s office. I’m well aware a lot of “garbage” gets published anyway. 2, I don’t really care if someone reads or makes bad art or writing. It exists, and there’s not much I can individually do about it except avoid what I don’t want to read. Even if some of the stuff out there imo should’ve never been posted, like people need to be a bit self aware about the kind of stuff they post **publicly** (if you really wanna delve into a deep rabbit hole of despair, try the mcyt explicit fics on AO3. It’s bleak how many people wrote explicit fics about actual real minors. Like I’m not exaggerating the way people do about MHA characters, I’m being literal).
And also a lot of mediocre to good books started as bad books, they just had years of work with an editor before they were deemed publishable. Fanfics are usually posted the second the author is done with the new chapter.
honestly a lot of the ~Officially Published Canon~ is fucking swill too, lol... the fact that i didnt have to pay to read all those bad fanfics to completion is a great thing, Actually
It's also worth mentioning that there are 'hobby versions' of a loooooot of professional jobs, from jewelry-making to carpentry to hand-sewn clothes, but crucially, most of *those* hobbies aren't able to be posted to a wide audience with no regard for quality. Fanfiction gets the same bad rap that Florida gets. Florida Man is a thing because the privacy laws in Florida are different and we get to know who these people are in ways that don't happen in other states. People can post their fic to FFN or AO3 or Wattpad and it's out there for people to stumble on in a way that bad carpentry or handmade clothes just... aren't.
I think a good counterpoint to "Fanfiction doesn't require you to worldbuild," is that fanfiction has a contrary pressure of needing to write in a way that conforms to people's existing expectations of these characters. If you're writing an original work, for example, then as long as your lead character behaves and thinks consistently within the work, it doesn't make sense for anyone to say they're out of character, while in fanfiction it's entirely possible to write a character in a way that is self-consistent within your work, but will get criticized for having that character act out of character. Even if you want to filter things through a commercial lens, this isn't a bad skill to hone. Given that the original creators behind Superman died over a decade ago, any modern Superman work is necessarily being written by people who didn't originally create him, and yet fans will still have various expectations for who Superman is, and they will respond negatively if you write a Superman who doesn't feel like Superman. In today's world of blockbuster fictional works being built on the foundation of stories and characters who already exist in the public conscious, being able to write a character in an interesting way that still conforms to those kinds of expectations is a very important skill that writing wholly original work will not teach you.
Disclaimer, I'm like 7 mins into the video, but I just wanted to say, if fanfic was a predominately male thing, there would not be this much vitriol for it.
@@Bluerock121 I don’t think anybody did. It’s more like the difference between the way people who get emotional over football are thought of as normal and the people who like K-Pop are fan girls. That sentiment isn’t limited to neckbeards. It’s pretty generalized. Was there generalized vitriol before fanfics became dominated by women?
I would argue fanfiction is GREAT practice if your goal is to be a show writer instead of a novelist. Don't most shows have a team of writers that have to work off of the pre-existing world and characters of the person who actually had the idea for the story?
Yea. Fanfiction can be challenging to write well because of the research needed done for the original work. I tried drafting a simple Persona 5 fic and the amount of dialogue i had to analyze was tough.
@@Bababoey3333 non fanfic writers dont understand the PAIN of trying to analyze every little bit of thr source material. i do pokemon stuff, and i have memorized what most of the berrys do just for fanfic.
I recently wrote a Gaston x Beast fanfic as an exercise in media analysis. I had recently watched TH-cam video essays looking at Beauty and the Beast through a queer lens (including interpretations of the Beast’s story as an AIDS allegory) and I wanted to explore some of these ideas. I also wanted to write a different relationship dynamic than the one between the Beast and Belle and tackle a potential flaw in the Disney movie, that being the protagonist’s relative lack of an arc compared to the Beast. I thought, “If Gaston was in Belle’s shoes, he would be much more judgemental at first, so him learning to love the Beast would be more satisfying.” I don’t even ship Gaston x The Beast in a traditional sense, I just thought it would be an interesting thing to write about. I wish the anti-fanfic crowd could see fanfiction as its own form of literary analysis and critique. Hell, fanfiction’s tendency to make established straight characters gay serves as its own criticism of the heteronormative mainstream media landscape.
@@bb010g It's called 'No One Loves Like Gaston' and it's on AO3. I tried to link it but I think TH-cam thought it was spam. It's under the username 'Meikakuna' (a name my weeb teenage self chose).
the way 1:17:00 is taken out of context, her next words talk about how classics aren’t often accessible to people who don’t have the tools or teachings to understand them unless they receive a higher education. it’s an excellent point and cutting her off, taking her words out of context, and not even crediting her seems lazy. Not to mention the creator is uncomfortable with you using her tiktoks without her username attached to her face, especially in a negative light and taking the meaning from her words.
It’s not even lazy it’s completely malicious to cut her off before she makes an articulate point about accessibility in literature. Literally manipulating her narrative it’s so disrespectful
One thing I'm not sure if you mentioned was the emotional argument for fanfiction. Sometimes when I finish a book, I need time to say goodbye to the characters, or if the ending isn't how I imagined, that is when I can turn to reading fanfiction. Fanfiction can give the opportunity to resolve outstanding character issues or time to process the grief of a book ending.
Exactly! Pretty much any time a story truly engages me, I look for fanfiction after I am done with it, because I want to see more of its characters, the world, etc.
Roger Ebert is at fault for this and he’s so wrong. His article on it is so dumb because he defines all “traditional games” as not art (Go players disagree but let’s pretend that’s true) he also says that any video games that aren’t games with points and rules are not games and therefore not video games and are something else. Like dude Life is Strange is a video game whether you want to admit it or not.
I feel like the arguments calling fanfic unpaid labour and corporate worship completely ignore why people write fanfic in the first place. It's so creatively healthy to act on inspiration and write what you feel excited about, and very normal to want to share your work with other people
It’s also useful in the sense that it provides a safe place to do so, as by using pre-established places, people, and settings, it takes off some of the pressure of having to wholly come up with these things yourself
I have Dan Olsen's Fifty Shades videos on an endless loop these days and I love the way he phrased it, calling fanfiction an "almost instinctive exercise in creative synthesis" and "naturally what stories pursue, the meeting point between the familiar and the unexpected" and even how he talked about how some characters are their own context (tbh that list is probably longer than a lot of folks want to admit).
Honestly to be blunt it's such an insane take that it doesn't warrant a good faith rebuttal. If fanfic is '"unpaid labor and corporate worship" then so are song covers. If anything the idea that an existing IP is too sacred to be "remixed" and repurposed into something personal comes off more as corporate worship to me. That's without even factoring things like death of the author or the fact that some media is just heavily open to different readings and interpretations. There's just way too many holes in their argument, it really does just come down to elitism.
The Tweet at 6:27 was so overdramatic and ridiculous I just had to laugh. I'm not exaggerating, it literally made me unexpectedly snort-laugh. Hilarious. What an absolutely unhinged take. Acting like fanfiction is some sort of capitalist conspiracy by big IPs to crowd-source unpaid labour is the sad-funniest thing I've ever heard. Sometimes, people enjoy things, and they do things for fun, because they enjoy it. Is that hard to understand? God, that person's life must be utterly joyless. Twitter was a mistake.
Honestly, it reminds me of anti-fun communists; the belief that any amount of enjoyment of life is fundamentally anti-worker, because the only thing that enables social change is discontent, and thus joy as a concept is fundamentally the circuses part of bread and circuses, allowing society to continue as is as opposed to listen to the objective correctness of Marxism. You can usually tell when one of these communists is speaking by other communists rolling their eyes and making wanking motions. There's a reason Disco Elysium's ultimate antagonist is one of these people, despite communism as an idea being presented as actually a good one in comparison to ultraliberalism (their name for capitalist libertarianism).
One thing I wish was mentioned more when fanfic gets critiqued by the traditional book crowd is the fact that “spicy fanfic” is not the only kind of fic that exists. Fic isn’t a genre but a medium with every genre that can be applied to similar to that of traditional media. There’s romance, sure, but there’s also sci-fi fics, drama fics, slice of life fics, fantasy fics- the list goes on and on. Plus fanfiction can give a writer a way to express their unique perspective in ways that traditional media sometimes fails. For example, the whump genre is about a character whom gets physically or emotionally hurt by an event and the story is about their journey through that. Sometimes reading traditional books can trigger a reader who have similar experiences but writing fic helps the author control the narrative and find catharsis. The hurt/comfort genre also has similar themes except with more of a positive ending mostly. It’s kinda funny now that traditional media is sort of in the same boat as fanfic where they have to defend their medium by saying, “Not all books are spicy. People need to explore more than booktok.” Well not all fanfiction contains spice. People need to explore AO3. 😉
I've read some fanfics that made reading them feel ethereal. Yeah, some are bad, but there are many insanely well-crafted fanfics out there--and what's crazy is that a lot of authors are just writing them for fun, because they're so passionate about what they're creating.
There are fanfics that have made me completely rethink my opinion on fanfic genres. You think of them all the same and then someone takes it and makes it a 4 chapter, tens of thousands of words piece of absolute poetry. I've had to rethink how I look at hurt/comfort, enemies to lovers, hell even omegaverse. The passion that is poured into so many fics and defies so many tropes as well as following then in their own lights and perspectives is so beautiful to me, truly amazing.
One thing that I don’t like about the fanfic world is how someone can make a fanfic that people like and then just abandon it without any resolution; like a TV show getting cancelled right after a major cliffhanger.
@@JamesLawner to be fair I've done thar before. It does suck to have a fic you love abandoned, but also these are real people doing this for free. This isn't a paid organized job this is one, maybe two people and sometimes you lose inspiration and don't want to keep going. I I try to think about it this way: if they'd never written it in the first place, I wouldn't have been able to read any of it !! I've had to cut many a series short due to losing interest, qnd most of my fans have reacted that way. It's really good to keep in mind that you lose interest in things over time like every other person, as do they
@@leonineKelter Not to mention that sometimes there is a VERY GOOD REASON for that fic being abandoned. We usually know little to nothing about fic authors and their lives! An author I followed for years through multiple fandoms stopped posting; years later, I discovered that their fics were "abandoned" because they had died. We just have no way of knowing what's going on in people's lives. I try to remind myself that ANY fic, finished or unfinished, is a gift that I never expected to receive; I should be grateful for it, not annoyed that there's not more.
I haven't been reading for fun for YEARS, since university has had me reading so much. I've never read fanfiction before, but fell in to a OFMD fanfic hole and am now deeply invested in a fic that has brought me through two? three? naval battles, hanging, imprisonment, all planned and written out in incredible detail and by an author with such skills in writing dialogue and drama. I think it amounts to around 300 pages that I've consumed within days, glued to my screen, ignoring my thesis. What I'm trying to say is: I don't care if fanfiction is art. I enjoy it, and it has brought back my joy of reading. I've even started a list of books that I want to read when my thesis is finished, and I have the time.
This video made me realize something quite odd: the most analogous medium to fan fiction isn't books, it's video game mods. Both are fundamentally derivative and transformative, both are broadly community driven and have problematic and/or adversarial relationships with their associated capital, and both reward the creator significantly for their ability to operate within a network of pre-existing constraints. Hell, they even both have the same problem having gems of high quality and artistic merit being surrounded by a sea of impossibly horny silliness.
Interesting take, but in my opinion it's a miss. The main reason being, fanfic is compared to books, because it uses written word for storytelling purposes. At it's core both are storytelling. There is a reason, why not all forms of fan creations are fanfiction. That's why I think that Sarah's music analogy fell flat, because in storytelling there is no space for recreating someone else's work, like there is in music. Retellings are not the same as covers.
Holy shit, that is actually such a great way to put it, I feel like a whole new world has revealed itself to me. Both have creators that try to fix the mistakes of the original, those that try to expand upon the existing material, those that are horny, those that try to change the context of the original, and shitposts. After all, how different is a fanfic about Peppa Pig in Dangan Rompa than the mod that replaces the dragons in Skyrim with Thomas the Tank Engine..? My god..... You are a genius...
The flip side of the "fan fic is free, therefore better" argument is that, if we don't consume media in a way that pays writers, eventually that well will dry up. Absolutely, partake of free media. But writers also need to keep bread on the table.
the tiktok used at 1:17:00 was taken out of context and cut down! no where in that video did the original poster say that they hated classics or that people shouldn’t read them :)
in a reaction video she said that they're boring to her, so I'm pretty sure she (and this is totally fine) might prefer fanfiction and modern literature. which most people do. I agree the cutting down was pretty bad though, definitely not something a journalist should do.
@@whoogh she loves classic literature, it's literally what she studied. She wasn't dissing it personally she was literally just saying that people need to be taught how to interpret it in order for them to be seen as interesting reads.
Hey intellectual honesty, that’s a weird way to crop that clip at 1:17:00 when the next sentence is “unless they’ve been given the tools, through something like I don’t know, higher education”
To be fair, out of context means it fundamentally changes the meaning of the statement. This doesn't. In the clip as it was, she says they're inaccessible and lists some reasons. That's just a different reason.
Fanfiction is all about _playing_ with original material. Experimenting. You can write, adhering to strict rules and try to change as little in initial premise as possible other than intended course correction, you can move through stations of canon (and story would still be good), you can go off the rails completely or you can change any number of background and backstory details and still reach the same beginning of the story... to have it diverge wildly again. As long as you understand what you work with and who you write to, original work is more like a draft you can paint anything you want on top of. Some fanfiction stories are downright bizarre and incomprehensible. Some crossovers make no sense and their authors still decided to give them a go. In a way, fanfiction biggest boon is the lack of expectations and ease of relatability. It's hard to sell an original franchise. It's hard to make your characters instantly relatable.
As a fandom musician, I find the conversation about whether fan works as a whole are art or not to be very interestingly inconsistent. There's a lot more debate around fan fiction - no one is saying that what I do *isn't* art. Clearly I rubbed my grubby hands and funny little chords all over these songs, whether or not they're about cartoons (or covers of songs FROM cartoons). They are by nature transformative - but music already has a better culture of acceptance of call backs and references and variations of songs in transformative ways, at least if you take a step back away from the mainstream world (where there are just absurd copyright cases). Jazz, for instance, is just full of references and indeed even whole phrases from songs that came before. I think effectively all art is inherently built on and from what came before, and all art is referential in nature - it's just that some spaces are more accepting of that fact than others.
While you give a good and compelling arguement and reasons fir why you believe one or more certain arguements and, or, narratives, I must disagree with you here or there on a bunch of them. One of the reasons why I do not really trust these so called "pro fanfiction" people, or whatever they name themselves, is somewhat simple: That it is true, that traditionally respected and published mediums and forms of literature are dominated by western, cisgender, hetero-patriarchial, able-bodied and neuro-typical white men, much like how TV shows and forms of animated films and episodic shows were too. However! Having practically all of this fanfiction stuff be heavily created by and consumed, produced and manufactured very majorly and most of the time by the "benevolent" western, more or less, though not always, cisgender, not always hetero patriarchial, not always abled-bodied and neuro-typical white women is ... it is not very assuring about fanfiction, at least from my perspective. I could continue about how I feel and believe that fanfiction is somewhat more vulnerable to forms of biases and bigotry, but then we would be here for far too long.
I find this comment super interesting, and it begs the question of why certain spaces are more accepting. To me, writing doesn't seem like it should be inherently less transformative than music (I mean, all art is, to some extent, transforming certain elements of the world we see around us, and this obviously includes writing). But I'm no scholar, so it's definitely possible that there's a layer of nuance I'm missing.
To say music has an acceptance of callbacks is an understatement. Rap music as a genre has sampling as an integral part of its history. Covers are so common that pretty much everyone's done at least one. I could go on, but the point is already made.
In this case I think it's because it's easier to see the threshold at which music is transformative, to go from repeating the original work in a novel way to effectively being a new work. The middle ground where it is not quite a new thing but definitely not the same is a lot smaller. Maybe it's just that music has far fewer notes than language has words, but vastly more ways of expressing them. Even a quite open phrase like 'so be it' can only have so many emotional tenses put on it, but there's not enough paper to write down all the ways to make the same three descending tones sounds profoundly different.
This is very true! I see comments on fanfiction not being "real writing" but less comments that fanart isn't "real art". People might say it's lesser but they never question the fact that it's art, the way people question if fanfiction is actually "real writing"
I feel like anytime the question of "Is X art?" comes up the unspoken argument being made often boils down to "X isn't art because I don't think it's good enough to be" which to me is just very silly? Like, something can be art and still suck. I don't particularly like fanfiction and I think a lot of the culture surrounding it *is* pretty anti-intellectual, but like... it is an artform lol. Like, it's just writing, which we've all pretty unanimously agreed is art for a pretty long time now.
People who don't regularly engage with art critically often just see declaring something as art as a measure of its quality. Like with Sarah's first example, Fountain, i'd argue that the quality of the work is pretty low. It's litterally just a toilet with a name on it. But its artistic value comes from the statement it makes, critiquing the contemporary art world. And its artistic value only increased when, as if to prove it's point, the art world shunned it, only to realise the value later. So in conclusion: great art, but you'd have a pretty bad sense of interior design if you want to display a toilet in your living room.
I agree, I hate 99% of fanfiction with a burning passion but I feel like it's stupid to say it isn't art. The overwhelming majority of people I have seen trying to gatekeep art don't actually have an (coherent) argument as to why something isn't, most of the time they just don't like how it challenges the artistic status quo.
A lot of people forget that art doesn't necessarily mean _good._ Art is subjective, and anyone can find something good or bad. Bad art exists - we can't have good without bad, after all. Is a 2-year-old's drawing of a dog _good_ art? Probably not, but it's art nonetheless. Art is a creative medium, including writing, which can extend to fanfiction. Is fanart art? Yes. So why would fanfiction not be considered art? It's still created by someone, transformative or not, just in a different medium. An 11-year-old's self-insert fic probably isn't good, but if they took the time to write it, then who's to say whether it's art or not?
I think I remember seeing a comment from comic book writer Mark Waid about fan fiction. He said that the only difference between fan fiction and all the stuff that he has written for marvel and dc is that someone paid him to do it. He didn't create most of the marvel or dc superhero that he has written for, but people still love his comics. He didn't create characters like the flash, but if you ask people "what is the best flash run?" Most will say "mark waid's flash comics." Heck he introduced a lot of concepts that were picked up by other writers, like the speed force.
The "fanfiction just reinforces corporate worship" argument is so weird to me because things like Fix-It Fics exist where the author is deliberately critiquing the original work?!?
one of my favorite fics is a spitefic driven purely by the rage the author felt towards the original work and author. Just a sense of "holy shit this is so bad I HATE IT so much I'm gonna throw my OC I to this setting and wreck evehthing". it's wildly entertaining
It just reeks of the whole "yet you partake in society, curious" argument. At the end of the day, what these corporations provide is necessary, it sucks they have to do it, but we can't just do without.
My favorite movie called Mona Lisa Smile is about a progressive art teacher teaching a class at a conservative college in the 40s. They literally have this moment towards the beginning of the film where the teacher shows a few slides of art. One of them was a snapshot of her mom and she asked, "Is it art?" And the students replied, "It's a snapshot" and the teacher had said that it was taken by a famous photographer. And a student went, "Art isn't art until someone says it is" which has really stuck with me. Sorry for the long ramble, it's one of my favorite movies and I feel like it fits very well with this video.
The phrase you mentioned, “he toed out of his shoes” IS common in published books. It’s common in historical romance. I see so much discussion on tiktok and TH-cam about fan fiction’s idiosyncrasies that’s just like this, where the commentator makes a statement about something that they assume is specific to fan fiction because they haven’t read it anywhere else, but actually, what they’re describing is literally just romance novels. I see complaints about a lot of romance novels “reading like fan fiction” when really they just mean “the book was tropey” (like news flash! Genre fiction is all about the tropes! That’s not specific to fan fiction or romance! It’s literally the point of genre fiction!). This is a pretty minor gripe in an overall great video, but I just see stuff like this all over the internet and it bugs me.
yeah in fairness published works generally don't appear in Google search results so any phrase commonly used in fiction but not outside of it will primarily show fanfiction, surely
@@DetectiveOlivaw Considering that romance novels are THE biggest literature genre and have been that for a while, I would assume it showed up in romance novels first.
I really do think fanfic should be respected for its accessibility. As someone with adhd and autism who had "gifted kid burn out" with books, it's absolutely amazing I can still enjoy reading without undergoing the mental wrestling match of moving my thoughts away from a special interest for what's supposed to be a leisure activity.
yes i have adhd too and i find it pretty hard to read any long text which isn't to do with my hyperfixation when ive tried to read books especially classics i often come out with no idea about the plot/characters/meanings which results in a lot of fanfics the only time i've really got into classics is when ive been hyperfixated on them lol
same!!! with the adhd and autism and burn out with books. I read constantly as a kid, but now I find it so hard to read books. but I still read a ton of fanfic based on my special interest!
Yeah, that is another element to it: writing fanfics (and making other fanworks) can be a really good outlet for neurodivergent people. It is, in effect, a way to turn infodumping about a special interest into an actual creative exercise; I don’t know or particularly care whether or not my old 300k-word slowburn fanfic counts as literature (though technically it DID win a Hugo award...), but I do know that I’ve never in my life felt more confident than I did when I was writing it, haha.
I completely agree with this. I think I would have left reading behind a long time ago if fanfiction didnt exist. The ability to find a hyperfixation in a fan Fic is the reason I still read.
I believe fanfiction should be taken seriously in the sense that it isnt just "steamy stories by teenage girls on wattpat" like its often seen online. I've seen stories that are completely separate to the og canon except for the names of the characters. Ive cried to fanfiction, been conforted, etc. Its more accesible. Its an artform in its own way and a love letter to the og works they derive from.
Again, only about 8 mins in now, but I just want to say as a queer black woman, y'all just started promoting books w characters who are queer, black, and either the main character or in a mostly poc cast like, maybe 5 years ago. And for at least the first 3 of those years about 95% of those books were pretty heavily centered around our trauma around racial abuse and homophobia, as literally every movie, tv show outside of sitcoms or shows where we're pretty much just there to be a mammy/designated black friend for the main character, and so for me personally, the whole "all books are becoming soft wish fulfillment bullshit" argument is so painful to hear because it's like, I'm glad that you are tired of having every character in the world look like you and get everything they want Jonathan, but I just started Almost getting books like that like last year. Fanfiction is by no means always an anti-racist or queer friendly area, like, at all, there are dozens of stories that are "reader inserts" that proceed to describe a blonde haired blue eyed woman who's 115 pounds in every other paragraph, but like at the very least I have the option of going into the original black character tag and knowing that every chapter isn't going to force me to relive trauma. Like it's important to discuss these things of course, but not every impactful book needs to be about suffering. More often than not in the media I've seen it ends up just feeling more like torture porn or a minstrel show than feeling like actual representation. We deserve some books where we get to be the princess too, you know? And denying the fact that fanfic has given a lot of us the space to have that is just dumb Edit: just wanna be clear, this is not directed at Sarah Z or Emily, I just get frustrated with dudebros who think every movie needs to have a torture scene for it to be real horror, you know what I mean??????
It's true that queer representation in books is recent (there are still classics with queer character but not that many) but I think saying that books with black characters that don't use trauma porn are also new kind of erases the rich literature written by black people globally
@@cosasmalas6896 I am afraid you may have misunderstood some of what the original writer was talking about. Unfortunately, it is either that or you have, some how, intentonally misinterpreted what this author was saying, for some reason.
@Kaylee Jazz I do not really think you are really engaging with what the original writer was trying to say and communicate in the best way, but I do still think you gave some at least interesting food for thought.
My problem with these sort of takes is they don't represent the majority of fandom and fanfiction. The majority is just an amplification of the biases existing in the original work. The most common form of ship in fandom is two light skinned boys, usually one of them being blonde. I get that the diversity of fandom means even if it is niche, you can find the stuff that you want, but idk, the same is somewhat true of classic novels, films, Netflix shows. In all these mediums the unheard are buried but still there if you look for them. I guess I've never found fanfic that spoke to my viewpoint that wasn't in its own way problematic and steeped in hegemonic biases that did not speak for me.
What gets me about the anti fanfiction rhetoric (and some of the pro fic rhetoric that turns its nose up at most published literature) is that almost all of us fic writers got into fanfiction bc we were already bookworms who enjoyed writing and were excited about the idea of writing stories for our favorite texts.
honestly a bit disappointed you didn't get i to the, like, obvious extent to which backlash against fanfiction is rooted in a revulsion to public visibility of deviant sexuality
Like, there’s a reason why they’re always naming omegaverse, smut, and a gay ship as examples of how bad fanfic is. Like no, kinks you don’t like and gay people just happen to exist in fiction, and sometimes in fanfiction.
exactly, fan fiction is predominantly queer because it's mostly people taking something straight or hetero normative and making it queer because that makes it more relatable and interesting to them. Straight couples are normal and represented most often in media, so fan fiction is queer peoples way to do whatever they want with something they appreciate. And, as we all know, the general public hates anything that isn't "normal".
@@AJ-bk5qj and the world hates anything that teen girls like, the most common one I’ve seen recently is Taylor swift. Boys and full grown men are attacking her and her fans for being passionate about her music, yet they never seem to care about the boys that are equally crazy about sports, video games, etc.
I think the idea that fanfiction is “free promotion for corporate products” relies on the assumption that people are just going to stumble unto fanfiction of a specific property and as a result will gain an interest on the original work and that’s just not how it works. The way fanfiction is store nowadays requires that the user has to make an effort to seek it, it’s not like fan art that randomly appears in your twitter feed, you have to actively search for it and if you’re alternative searching for it that probably means you already have an interest in the world. Now I’m not saying no one has ever search for an fanfiction out of curiosity, then enjoyed it so much they decided to check out the original source material, I’m just saying that is not widely indicative of how people consume content on the internet. Like I agree that we live in a landscape where art, media and discussions of said media are dominated by mega corporations and that should stop, but fanfiction is not the cause of it. If you pressed a button that could instantly delete all of fanfiction and prevent new ones from being made that would not lessen the stronghold corporations have in popular culture and viceaversa if the button prevented corporations from producing any art, that would not stop fanfiction.
I think it partially does that job by allowing you to interact with aspects of the product that you probably didn’t so far? Absolutely stupid example but you like idk Stucky and read fics with them where you have a side pairing of Natasha/Bruce and now you realize you might be interested in that as well so you see their movies too. Another option i’ve noticed more often is that it gives people something to occupy their minds during hiatuses. Keeping them interested in the IP longer and more intensely than if they were just trailing off between seasons.
It is if you exclusively read f/f, ime. And ironically I’ve seen that work against IPs as well. RWBY is a notable one where I’ve seen multiple conversations online where someone sees fanart or reads a fic about it and asks if they should check out the source material and they’re strongly encouraged to just stick to the fanworks. Fandom is funny and much more multifaceted than one might initially assume that way.
I will say fanfic has sometimes made me go out of my way to seek out something, and it’s always in the case of crossovers. “I really like this author and all their fics but I’m not familiar with the other fandom used in this crossover, so maybe I’ll check it out to make myself familiar.” In one case it was a TV show that I had to watch on TH-cam (no other means of watching it at the time), and in another case it was video games that I’d heard many of my friends recommend in the first place and/or that were by developers whose other games I’d already enjoyed and had been meaning to check out more of anyway. Otherwise fanart/fic isn’t usually what gets me into something. If someone I follow suddenly starts reblogging/retweeting stuff for a fandom I’m not in, I just blacklist it so I don’t have it taking up my dash, haha.
I really love what you’ve created in the past, but it just doesn’t feel right watching and knowing a video from another person who had no say in the matter was cut down and framed the other person as anti-intellectual, completely reshaping what they were saying instead of leaving the rest of the video where their argument is the strongest. Really not sure how to feel here
@@leon_atrewo in a now removed clip (check the pinned comment) sarah included a tiktok of the creator icaruspendragon. in this video, the clip is cut mid-sentence and it seems this editing on sarah’s part was to make the video better fit her argument that fanfiction is often anti-intellectual even though that was not the point of the original video and was actually about how poor people often are denied the education needed to better understand the classics so they can shine. TLDR, icaruspendragon’s PRO- intellectual argument was made to appear anti-intellectual with selective editing in sarah’s video and people are criticizing this choice in sarah’s part.
@@tsargreene thank you so much for the explanation! It's very sad, I enjoy Sarah's videos, but I have no idea why she would do this. This unfortunately makes it hard for me to trust her arguments in the future :( or enjoy her videos... (there may be a good explanation for this, but I can't imagine what could it possibly be, as for now)
when we were 13, my best friend wrote a fanfic about "In The Night Garden" (a kids bedtime tv show), where Makka Pakka had to win over Upsy Daisy, so she'd leave Iggle Piggle for him and to this day, its the best fanfic I've ever read. True proof of fanfic as art.
Disappointing with how you used IcarusPendragon’s content without permission or credit, and on top of that completely misrepresented her take on fanfiction and classic literature and took it entirely out of context. She has a bit of response on her tiktok, and reiterates how the point of her video was that fanfiction is more accessible than classic literature, not that she’s anti-literature
hey, this was clearly very well researched and well-written, but this is the second time you’ve used someone’s content without crediting them/took them out of context without their permission. i think since you’re spending so much time on research and scriptwriting (plus filming and editing) you should also take the time to do your due diligence when it comes to sources. great video, poor execution of sourcing
@@amentrison2794 they use a tiktoker’s (icaruspendragon) content without crediting them as well as misinterpreting their point in a way to fit their narrative
A far, far better example that really *is* ancient fanfic: The Aeneid. Virgil wrote it specifically because Augustus wanted to connect his ancestry to the Iliad.
Using TikToks with peoples faces without their permission seams a bit weird and cutting them out of context is even weirder I’m a fan of sarahs but taking things out of context doesn’t strengthen her point it detracts from the overall video
As someone who enjoys both books and fanfiction, I personally believe that there is no inherently inferior medium . Although I do agree with some of the arguments made by both sides. Books and fanfics each have their own strengths and weaknesses and what is best for one person might not hold true for another. In the end it comes down to personal preference. It's not productive to shame people for whatever they choose to read or write, as neither medium is completely flawless or superior to another. So I hope that eventually everyone can have a civil discussion and not insult each other over such a harmless topic. This is basically just a long-winded way of saying: Let people read what they want without screaming at each other. P.S. have a great day/night to whoever is reading this.
Thank you. I'm in the same space. Fanficiton among other things, like painting, or music, help and comfort people tremendously when nothing else can, and have all done so for me. Same as fanfiction. Fanwork of all kinds is powerful and important. Not everyone can afford this or that, and in fanwork is this shared little subgroup encouraging each other in something they love, for the sake of loving it. And that joy is easy to access, and you can grow skills in a space you feel safe. Everything has it's downsides and upsides as you've said, every pro and con an outlier or exception. I just... the good parts are so impactful and wonderful, It's so important to me.
@@Cat-fz1uu it never ends, does it? Fanfic vs traditional books, traditional publishing vs self-publishing, planning vs pantsing. So few people these days seem to be able to go “I prefer this, but I’m happy you’ve found what works for you”. Everything has to turn into some aggressive us vs them battle and it’s fucking exhausting. I’ll read something I like and then zoom over to AO3 to see what’s up, it’s not mutually exclusive.
I find the "all or nothing" nature of fandom communities to be absolutely exhausting. I absolutely love some stories and characters, I have tattoos of them, I watch super in depth videos about "every detail you missed" or "what does x mean" after I've consumed some piece of media I really love, and I get it- it's nice to be able to keep interacting and loving the thing actively after the story is over, and it's nice to exist in communities of people who also love that thing.That said, some people truly make these IPs, ships, etc. their entire personality and hitch themselves to it so tight that if you say one thing that could even be slightly construed as negative, they lose it on you. (Identity-wise I'm not talking about legitimate lgbt+, racial, etc. identities, but like the type of people who have an unhealthy obsession with stuff like BBC Sherlock back in the peak Tumblr fandom days. There is a lot to be said about the lack of diversity in published works, although we're seeing progress being made here, and I do think it's beyond words how important accurate and non-tokenised representation is through all forms of media.) When it comes to fanfiction, people are similarly polarized because they develop a love of these stories, characters, and communities so anything outside of them feels bad by comparison. I think most modern readers will look at "the classics" with a similar disinterest or passion across the subject broadly. I fucking hated Lord of the Flies and, to this day, think it's an awful book with awful messaging. That doesn't mean that every single book is that way- look at The Picture of Dorian Grey, a book with gay-coded characters written by a gay man and largely about the dangers of pride, vanity, and avarice. If you don't like the writing style, fine, but the book itself is a great example of actually good classical writing imo, it's just not often taught in schools because of some more mature themes and events (like opium addiction). I was also just talking to a friend about how it's so nice to have published Adult lit today that feels more like a slightly more mature YA style, where that really wasn't a *thing* when I was younger. This is mostly stream of consciousness at this point but tl;dr books are stuffy, books are casual, books are intense, books are boring, books are exciting and books are a medium. Generalizing all fanfiction or all books as one way is immature and short-sighted. There is amazing fanfiction out there that helps to bring attention to societal issues, helps to give people a platform that struggle to gain one, helps the authors explore their own identities and develop a solid writing style, and more. But also My Immortal exists. It's on a massive spectrum.
Hey the clip you use at 1:17:02 is by an awesome tiktok creator (idk if she wants me to share her handle) but that clip is kinda taken out of context of a larger discussion she was having which isn’t acknowledged and she’s not credited here. It might be nice to credit her for the use of her video or at least ask to use it
as an avid fanfic writer and reader, i enjoy the medium because because when i get invested in a new thing, when its done, i still want more. im neurodivergent and get hyperfixated on things easily, but i love reading, sometimes i just want to exist with these characters more in a way that isn't just rewatching/rereading the original media, so that's where my love of fanfiction comes in. fanfic can be fun oneshots or long over 300k pieces of writing that completely reimagine the universe, it cant be judged just because some of them are bad or "cringe"
"You really think Pride and Prejudice is in any way comparable to your 50k word omegaverse high school AU Supernatural BTS crossover fanfiction?" The fact that I understood all of those words is terrifying.
Not sure what valid points you actually made when you skew people's position to invent your own strawmans to refute or use as an example. You cannot redact someone's main point of a video to use as content. You're misleading your audience and intentionally setting up topics for you to win. Taking someone's words out of context like this is like inventing your own sources entirely. I liked your content before this but now it will be entirely viewed with the lens of me questioning what else you've spun, changed, redacted, or removed from it's established context. I hope you enjoyed having an argument with yourself.
You should ask people before using their tik toks in your video. I know it's fair use but it's still disrespectful and at least put up the full tik tok instead of posting on part to fit your narrative.
This is a really GREAT and nuanced take. Both fanfic and published books have their place, and they scratch different itches at different times. I write both fanfic and original content, and again. Different itches. Seeing people bash one or the other pisses me off. I'm also really glad you touched on the Pro-fic/anti-pub crowd completely missing the point of pieces of literature. Like, fuck gatsby, fuck most of the straight white male canon that they use in most schools..... but not every book is like those. There are a LOT of great books out there in every genre. (there are also a lot of bad ones too) and you just have to !!! find the ones you like. anyway thank you for your spendidly spicy hot take, I wish you many bags of salt and vinegar chips and none of the ouchy mouth feeling from eating too many.
Hi. Fanfic author here. I haven't seen the entire video yet, but as someone who's written a Star Wars fic that's longer than the entire Harry Potter series, I'd argue that at the very least, fanfic shouldn't be dismissed. I've no intention on ever getting published, but I do love writing as a hobby, and even for something that's not my own creation, I've put so much time and effort and creativity in crafting a narrative that much of it feels like my own. I think there's a lot of value in taking an existing piece of media and shifting an aspect of it to see what new or different thing can come of it. At the very least, it's an exercise in creativity, and I think that's enough to be respected.
I think a lot of the ire around fanfic is that a lot of writers of it do think that their work is amazing enough that any publisher should want it. I’ve seen so manu fanfic writers over the years get furious when agents and publishers don’t want their stuff. I’ve written fanfic longer than Sarah’s been alive, and was around to witness the change from fanfic being something fun to fanfic being sneered at, and that big jump really came with Fifty Shades. The line really was in taking someone else’s original property (even a dumb one) and trying to piggyback for monetization after doing as little as possible to make anything original. That’s when fanfic took on the rep of being lazy. I write in a niche fandom, but it’s gotten so original that it’s been actually openly debated if my story even counts as fanfic anymore.
I hadn’t read a book in over a decade because my ADHD made it nearly impossible. I love Star Wars and came across some fanfics 2 or 3 years ago and it’s allowed me to read almost every day since then. Now I’m in a few other fandoms too, but finding something I know I like and authors expanding on those ideas or creating their own stories out of characters I already love is something I absolutely cherish. It absolutely deserves respect and I’m so thankful to come across that community.
towards the end of the video i had the thought of "i wonder if anyone in the comments is going to complain that sarah is making a comparison between Fountain and fanfic in this video" before i realized how incredibly ironic that would have been
Tbh, I think the medium of published story telling that most closely resembles fanfic isn’t TV, but comic books. Particularly if we are looking at the superhero genre. Well established, popular characters with no one single definitive cannon. New publications or reboots pick and choose which previous works to build off of and which ones to retcon or pretend never happened. Multiple timelines, crossovers, alternate universes, new interpretations of existing characters…Avengers, anyone?
What I love about the ‘Fountain’ story is the original was lost or destroyed and all that exists in museums are replicas of various vintages. If I owned a gallery, I’d totally have urinals in the bathrooms signed R. Mutt
Per the “couldn’t use it though”, a number of people have attempted to urinate in the remaining commissioned full-sized replicas-some successfully, including notably musician Brian Eno albeit with the technical assistance of a tube.
One thing I'm slightly baffled by with the TikTok "film-bro" credence cited in the video is that I don't think that even fits the culturally recognized definition of a film bro. In my experience, a film bro is someone who boastfully claims unique, eclectic taste as a point of personal superiority when fact is, the films they champion in their canon are still very pedestrian and mainstream and their appreciation (what they consider the peak of depth in cinema) begins and ends with that slim canon. They're not going to watch a 12 hour movie about the Polish government through the eyes of a pigeon because that's beyond the depth of their canon.
you completely missed the point of 1:17:10. the full tiktok explains the want for accessibility and representation in literature which classical literature lacks compared to fan fiction. it seems like you purposefully butchered @icaruspendragon video to get “discourse points”.
the existence of doctor who alone is enough to question what defines a fan fiction. a show that’s spanned numerous executive producers/show runners, writers, main cast members, etc. in it’s nearly 60 year life. plus there’s the expanded media (audios and books) still licensed but not technically canon to the show. how is this show anything other than fan fiction of the first three seasons
I have a neat anecdote from a friend who took screenwriting classes, and while she was a fanfiction writer accustomed to writing in existing IPs, it was surprising to find someone else struggling with that concept.
Star Wars is the same way! Even pre-disney, the EU (now legends) had media that was AU, imo. Any media that is old but continuously popular will have that.
Same with marvel and dc comics. Been published consistently for over a decade. have had hundreds of writers adding to each universe and creating new characters that are in turn written by other people.
i was just thinking about comics the other day in this context. i basically said “it’s crazy how comic writers get to make their ocs canon to marvel/dc/etc”
I still think the Divine Comedy is fanfic, but not because of all the biblical stuff. To me its the “just me and my favorite poet going on an adventure to meet my crush”
kind of weird for you to use someone's video (that shows their face nonetheless) without their permission and take what they say out of context to prove your point (1:17:00). i generally enjoy your content but this is disappointing to see, makes me wonder how many other things you've taken out of context in your videos.
I think the core of fanfic discourse boils down to casting judgment on the fact that fanfic is primarily made by and for teenaged girls, using properties and tropes that teenaged girls like. One can intellectualize that as much as they so desire, but that's the crux of it.
You took IcarusPendragons videos with no credit snd cropped it improperly. They never said classic literature had no value just that it is inaccessible. Which it is. It is very inaccessible to a lot of people.
"Fanfiction doesn't challenge its readers and only serves to make them feel warm and fuzzy!" Looks like someone's never searched for the "hurt no comfort" tag on their third glass of rose saying "let's get messed UP tonight"
Which is just... Wrong? Like so much of it does to that but every Draco Malfoy Fixit Fic I've read genuinely challenges a lot of white readers. And there are tons of examples like it, where they literally just take a bad book and make it a good and challenging book.
Can we talk about how the tagging system in fanfiction which serves as both trigger warning and work description came out of its roots as media-distributed-via-internet and has started being adopted by traditionally-published books? Because that's pretty awesome and great, imo.
I agree it's rad, the tagging system can be super helpful in knowing what you're getting into and there's nothing wrong with using these sorts of tags for published works
Hottake: everything is art. All doodles are art, all writing is art, and any collection of hums is art. Just getting up in the morning is a form of performance art.
@@nonnac1695 that’s the entirety of the modern and post modernist art movement. What is art? Art is completely subjective it can be about skill, creation, process, thought or a mix of everything. While I vehemently despise the modern and post modernist era of art as a whole it’s an interesting concept and argument. Art itself is just a concept with already loose definitions 🤷♀️🤷♀️🤷♀️
Once again I'm reminded that despite how chronically online I am, there will be forever more niches filled with many, many people who need to touch grass as urgently as me. There will always be art snobs who are art snobs, but the online ones give out some pretty unhinged takes, and a good number of the the anti-snobs are just as braindead.
for real dude, almost every online discourse I have ever seen eventually devolves into two rabid extremes so entrenched in their views that there is literally no point to even debating anymore.
I like this discussion because it reminds me of a similar thing that happened about a decade ago in the video game community. There was a relatively new genre of game that was gaining popularity, dubbed the "walking simulator", with games like Gone Home and Dear Esther. These games were quite controversial at the time, considered by many to not be "real games." They focused more on narrative and storytelling rather than exciting gameplay and flashy visuals, and this was just something you didn't really see before then - yes there were the famous audio logs and whatnot in games like Bioshock, but that was never the real focus of these games. So it shouldn't come as a surprise that these games that were basically all about the audio logs and lore notes you could find were initially mocked relentlessly for supposedly being too simplistic and not worth the money. I remember a video of a guy who managed to "complete" Gone Home in just about 60 seconds after which he started staring directly into the camera for another few minutes as reviews from people praising the game were mockingly presented next to his face implying: "How could anyone like a game that is so short and easy?" Nowadays the stigma against these games is pretty much gone, although they're still quite niche. I really enjoy games like What Remains of Edith Finch that expertly combine a strong narrative with gameplay elements that tie directly into the story being told. You even have masterpieces like Outer Wilds which are also kind of "walking simulators" but that take the concept much further. I hope the medium of fanfiction can also break out of this stigma and people will just allow it to be its own thing rather than seeing it as a danger to the literary medium as a whole. Anyways, that was my Ted talk for today.
I know this comment is over a year old but, man, Gone Home is so fucking good. I 100% it a few months ago, it's on steam and they added achievements. There are exactly 3 that acknowledge the fact you can beat the game as fast as you can. 1. Homerunner - Complete the game in less than 1 minute with no Modifiers enabled. 2. Speedreader - Complete the game having found all 24 journal entries, without Modifiers, in less than 10 minutes. 3. Behind the Scenes - Activate all Commentary Nodes with the Developer Commentary Modifier enabled. The third one, with all the developer commentary, includes the devs themselves talking and laughing about how interesting people were about speedrunning the game- they loved and appreciated the creativity behind it! There are so many reasons why this game fucks, and honestly trying to downplay it by showing you can beat it fast is such a strange concept of the past, like you said. I'm glad it's become more accepted and understood, I guess it's part of out culture growing up and expanding.
My general definition of art is "if someone made it, it can be classified as art (even if it isn't typically)". So yes, to me fanfiction is art. Food is art. Buildings are art. This video essay is art. Art is all around us, art is what we create, art is the act of creating, art is everywhere.
your writing this comment and my unnecessary addition is art as well, my reality is entirely subjective and specific to me, the moon is both a cold maiden with skin bedight in alabaster and the rock that orbits our wonderful terra, "pee poop" is higher art than anything Da Vinci would have ever, with his polygotal, rarified intellect could've dreamed if I will it so! (That is to say, high art is made up and I adore and am delighted by seeing people dedicate their finite mortal life artificial constructs !!! ;)
I agree that any creative expression is art, but there has to be some actual agency or intent in the process. Even the worst photo, or just thumbs or darkness, is still art if you hit the shutter with the intent to capture something. If you don't understand what a camera is and hit the button by accident, the result is not art even if it is very nice. Leaving a canvas near a paint spill hoping it drips onto the canvas counts, arguably even if the paint never drips - but your paint leaking on a canvas by accident does not. But things that are not art can be made art by the process of framing, displaying, editing - an accident may not be art but by treating it, framing it, or displaying it in a context can convert it to art by adding intent so the final thing has intent to it. Or even by taking things away - an accidental photo cropped or desatured in post is explicitly art. It's a very low threshold, suitably, but I do think it has to exist or it distracts from the creation and the expression that make up creative expression.
@@UnreasonableOpinions That’s the perfect second rule to art: 1) it’s made, and 2) it’s intended as is. Maybe that drip was intentional, or you made it into art by saying, “Hold on, I like that,” and running with it, but the final act of framing is what makes it intentional. This is arguably why conservation is such a big part of art.
Okay, so I'll admit it, I'm one of the "The Divine Comedy is fanfic" crowd with a... Varying degree of sincerity. But I do NOT say that because "oh Dante took characters from the Bible, therefor it's Bible fanfic." No no, I argue it's (again, somewhat sarcastically but also not really because art is complicated) fanfic because it's a work in which the author teams up with his all-time favorite writer on a journey to be with his crush in heaven while simultaneously dunking on DOZENS of people-both fictional and real-and institutions that he didn't like, up to and including multiple Popes and the Catholic church in general. Yes it's a masterful work that basically invented the concept of world building and defined the Christian view of the heaven, hell, and everything in between for literal centuries, but it's also a work where the phrase "VIRGIL-SENPAI I'M YOUR BIGGEST FAN!! :D" could be put in a modern adaptation and a very much non-zero number of literary critics would just laugh their asses off because of how accurate yet absurd it is. It can be both, that's perfectly fine and plausible, because art-just like the people who make it-can be both incredibly insightful and amazing while not precluding the possibility of being stupid or hilarious. I think part of the main problem is that people tend to lump art into categories like "the classics" and "high art" and "modern art" and treat those labels like they're some immutable box that creates a magical almighty hierarchy. Shakespeare had dick and fart jokes, Virgil wrote the Aeneid as propaganda while taking potshots at Emperor Augustus, Aristophanes was basically the South Park of ancient Athens, Dante wrote the Divine Comedy in part so he could tell people he hated to LITERALLY go to hell. It's foolish to think that a work is "better" than another just because it's in a textbook or valued as worth so much compared to the effort put into it that it's probably less art than a lazy money laundering scheme, when there are just as many works in categories like fanfic that work just as well but simply aren't as well known or don't have the same cultural influence built up around them.
I definitely unironically think the divine comedy is fanfiction for many of the reason states above and you mentioned vigil's the Aeneid which I also think is fanfiction because it's taking taking the Trojan war epic cycle and adding onto it kinda like some fanfictions. And don't get me wrong the Aeneid is really good, it's the first ever Latin poetry that I had read and it's just fascinating to read. I feel like you can also argue that the entirety of the Trojan war epic cycle is in some form or another fanfiction because many authors were taking this already established story that was spread through word of mouth and they wrote in the popular stuff but each author also added in there own stuff but that's a bit more of a stretch. It's just that since there was no copyright in the ancient world people just wrote the same characters in different situations or expanded on more of the story
it's the 'self insert protagonist that has cool/horrible things happen to them involving some celebrity or historical figure' trope that makes me think it's a fanfic lol. then again i don't know the book that well
The thing that sealed it for me is Argenti, the" brute" that Dante knew in real life and he places in hell, and how it really reads like the nerd taking his catharsis out on a bully. It's kind of funny.
100% agree with everything said here. I also think--- and I know we've talked about this a bajillion times before-- it continues to be relevant that most distate for fandom and fan culture is pretty directly linked to a distate for teenage girls and anything teenage girls like. Fanfiction is wrapped up in this. It's seen as anti-intellectual because a revialed demographic loudly enjoys it, and then is it any surprise that said demographic doubles down and attempts to return the fire by devaluing published literature?
I generally enjoy your videos but this is kind of a dishonest move that you pulled. Can you edit the video to at least put the Tiktokers name in it since your using their content without their permission? Or maybe not edit their point? Would be a little less scummy.
Some of the creators of these tiktoks feel uncomfortable with the fact you not only used their videos in general, but you also hid their usernames? If you're gonna monetize their content, at least give them some credit.
The editor cut off the watermarks so the ops wouldn’t get harassed; it’s a common practice and not nearly as malicious as people are acting like it’s so stupid
1) Monetization is not the same thing as "here are some examples of people talking about my current subject topic". Using a thumbnail of a video is not the same as using a significant portion of that video. 2) As M Jade stated, usernames are often removed to prevent harassment. 3) I'm sorry that people are feel that Sarah Z has misrepresented their tweet/video by lumping them together to illustrate examples. Genuinely. However "they feel misrepresented" doesn't actually explain what the relevant issues are. There are quite a lot of videos used in Sarah Z's video essay; which have users that are claiming to have been misrepresented? Were the videos used generally appropriately in terms of how they broadly illustrated Sarah Z's topic, or were the videos stating completely opposite things to Sarah Z's usage of them?
@@mjade1097 Yeah, I’m scrolling through these comments trying to figure out what people are talking about, and it’s giving me flashbacks to the modder drama of my own youth (Morrowind mods, to flex my aging millennial bona fides) Idk much about Tik Tok culture, and it seems like maybe online harassment isn’t as bad as it used to be? But as far as I know, it’s still considered basic decency if you have a large audience to blur out identifying info of people so they don’t get flooded with (almost always malicious, no matter the content creator’s intentions) unsolicited attention. Kinda seems like people are getting agitated w/ Sarah over nothing, but maybe there’s something I’m missing? Help me out here, these comments are all so vague
Right, if someone could actually explain what the original tiktok’s point was maybe we could see how Sarah misrepresented it but the hundreds of these comments none with an explanation is pretty sus. What the fuck was she actually saying then? If you can’t tell us maybe she just doesn’t like her content being used by someone who disagrees and she wasn’t actually misrepresented
In regards to many people saying they just can't read most published fiction, there is another element; Many Neurodivergent people do in fact experience this, where the standard structure of writing that is ubiquitous in publishing since its standard just flat out doesn't make any sense. A couple Self published authors I know off have said they also had struggled with this and it was painful, and a lot of them said it was also a major factor in their choice to pursue self publishing; With self publishing they could honestly tell their editors that the changes that they suggested flat out made it so they, the AUTHORS of the work, could not understand their own work anymore, whereas standard publishing would've forced the changes among other things. These authors also say they regularly get comments and messages from fans saying they loved their books precisely because they could actually read it and it was the first things they could read in years and that they thought they were stupid because they couldn't read anymore etc.
I would like to nitpick the meme shown at 49:30. Wicked is absolutely fanfiction. It's fanfiction soup to nuts. The guy who wrote it was not an "established literary titan" in any way shape or form. Wicked was his breakout success. This is a man who literally went to the state school in my city, and dated my friend's mom. He's a townie. Like legit. If he's "established" enough when Wicked was published to make that book not fanfic, then none of my friend's fanfic is fanfic either. Because she's a literature professor with a few unsung children's books under her belt and that's literally the same credentials Gregory Maguire had when Wicked was published. I know this is pure pedantry, and as someone who doesn't need fanfic to be art in order to enjoy it, I have no dog in this fight. But I had to say it or it was going to annoy me all day.
On the other hand, I don't think that the Oz books are still under copyright, so it's not fanfiction. It's reusing public domain characters. That is valid and happens a lot. It's not fanfiction when you're writing a Sherlock Holmes novel (there are loads of new ones, from good to bad) and publish it. "Wicked" is not fanfiction.
@@cayreet5992 but how many works that are currently under copyright would be back in the public domain by now if not for disney? it's not literally the exact same as fanfiction, sure, but if the only criteria is that the original work can no longer be under copyright, then that means a lot of things that are currently fanfiction eventually won't be. i mean, if something goes into public domain and someone who wrote a fanfiction about it decades ago decides to publish that work now that it's public domain, that's not fanfiction? oh, and not to mention modern fanfiction made of things that aren't copyrighted at all and never have been. but that is still seen as fanfiction because it uses someone else's characters and wasn't published for money
@@Zabe_B There is a difference between fanfiction and, as mentioned in the video, derivative works. Yes, a lot of characters and whole books under copyright could be used well if they had public domain status (I myself would love to add to the Fantomas canon, but it's under copyright). Even stories in public domain can be fanfiction. There's loads of Sherlock Holmes and Dracula fanfiction out there and both are in public domain. There is also derivative works of material under copyright, if the writer has obtained the okay to use it from the rights holder. I think the form of publication plays a role. There used to be privately-printed fanfiction that was sold for essentially the price of printing at conventions. Printing and selling it didn't make it something else (although some rights holders did act against it). Official publication for money is an indication for it being derivative without being considered fanfiction (hence the whole aspect of 'filing off the serial numbers'). You can simply publish a new Sherlock Holmes or Dracula story, if you wish to (there might be slight hiccups about Sherlock Holmes, that one has a complicated copyright background), as there is no legal way to stop you. If you simply publish a new book for the Twilight series, though, you'll be in trouble. Fanfiction about the labours of Hercules is still fanfiction, but you can use the topic in a book you sell (there are 12 short-stories about Hercules Poirot which are written as his 12 labours by Agatha Christie and there's "The Twelve Labours of ... eh ... Brian", to name two). One aspect of fanfiction is that you want to share it with other fans. Whether that happened several centuries ago or whether it happens today doesn't make a change there. Derivative works are you as the author using a pre-existing thing in your own work, usually to make money. Fanfiction is part of derivative works, but not all derivative works are fanfiction.
It's not about being established. Every author has a first book out. The fact is that it's a regular published work which is not really affiliated with the original content. Yes, the Wicked Witch of the West exists in Oz, but that doesn't make it a fanfic. The same way that Jim C. Hines 'Princess series is not fanfic, simply because he uses fairy-tale characters. By the time Wicked was published, all of the Oz stories were already in public domain, so all which Maguire did was use publicly available characters to tell a story. Very much like, unfortunately, Moffat's "Dracula" miniseries isn't fanfiction but his own take on Dracula. It might also surprise you, M Paul, but most authors are 'just some guy' or 'just some girl' and still live off writing.
Usually I'm keen to watch ur videos but the way u removed usernames, cropped out the tiktok to misrepresent their context to buffer up ur points really makes me hesitant to continue consuming ur content. U make heavy use of sharing other ppls content to bolster and negate conversation points ("Score internet points" as u describe it) and idk how i can trust what u create now.
"... As a Buffy fan I would argue that half of the Buffy fandom's conversations are about which parts of the show they hate and how much they hate the creator..." I have observed that there is very little that Harry Potter fanfic writers hate more than the Harry Potter series.
@@JackedThor-so I was much happier once I "realized" that the original book, _Game of Thrones,_ actually never had any sequels. Such a shame it ended on a cliffhanger. OH WELL.
Tried testing out sarah's theory that I can find fanfiction of anything and ended up reading nathan for you fanfic for an hour :(
HONEY where is it??!?!?!?!! I want Nathan for me.
I wanted to see if there was any R rated I'm On Observation Duty Huge Man fics, after reading a comment on an YT video about the idea, and was thoroughly disappointed, but I did find a beautiful fic where the reader is consoled, falls in love, and marries Huge Man so that's close enough
Oh, ok
Sarah is right, I just came across a 100,000 word fanfic romance between Pennywise the Clown and Bill and the worst part of it all is that it was ACTUALLY GOOD.
@@Veralidainai 🤣😂🤣😂 oh god no, I have no idea if I should ask for a link to that story or not. On a related subject of being shockingly good: I heard there was also a fan fiction sequel to Neon Genesis Evangelion called Genocide. It's said to be 800 pages long. I still have yet to read it.
I've read exactly two fanfictions in my whole life: one was a persona 4 fanfiction that ended up being a very deep story about how easy it is to get trapped in an abusive relationship and ignore all the red flags just because you want to be loved, and how it might leave you scarred for live. The other one was My Immortal. So yeah I think I see your point here.
WOW
Quite the contrast
XD
can i please have a link to the Persona 4 one if possible
@@channelname7743 I don't have the link anymore cause that was literally 8 years ago but if I remember correctly it was called Sympathy Crime (or Sympathy Crimes?). Major trigger warning for abusive relationship (obviously), sexual assault, suicide/self harm, and grooming too.
@@channelname7743 oh and also it has quite a lot of smut. Forgot to put that in the tw
@@philippon_ wow, thank you
"Real books don't have Tropes" is the most hilarious attempt at elitism I have ever seen oh my god.
Serious "only liberals have pronouns" energy lmao
My book doesn't only have no tropes, it doesn't even have words!
#real books 😎
I think people tend to misunderstand. Tropes... aren’t always bad. It’s clichés you need to watch out for. If tropes didn’t exist, then stories would be boring and identical to one another because there’s no defining elements to distinguish them from one another.
Where do they think tropes come from lol
REAL BOOKS DON'T HAVE TROPES!!! REAL BOOKS HAVE BLACK COFFEE AND BEER!!!
I'm probably gonna regret this, but I wrote so much fanfiction as a teenager and genuinely thought that was the extent of my writing ability. Now I'm 14 days away from my first published book coming out. Without writing fanfiction, I would not be achieving this goal. I had a lot to learn as a writer, and I learned by having an audience who gave me feedback with every single chapter. I grew from fanfiction and I loved every single moment of it. Honestly, the goal is for people to write fanfiction of my original characters, then it'll feel like I've come full circle.
Congratulations!
what’s ur book called, and who’s the author (obvi u but i mean the name on it so i can find it)? i would rly love to read it!!
@@Caroline-d2y 'Do You Ship Us?' By Claire Rosalind. It's only available for pre-order at the moment but it's release date is the 20/8/22
you mind if the fanfiction is disgusting? like not poorly writen, but utterly entrail shifting you know? with characters commiting sexual crimes against each other, involving very sick normally disturbing kinks. Would you be cool? I mean it doesn't matter if you are bc since there is no gulag for fanfictioners if anybody wants to, they would absolutely be able to. And if you defend fanfiction this is something you must also defend. I really don't see a strong argument in the "i did it for practice" thing. What about limiting yourself to a preestablished set of lore and characters makes it supposedly easier? And if you're going to change everything what help does it provide by calling it a fanfic? Reach? You can always lie, like JK Rowling or Meyer of Gray, you can say something like "hey, if you like One Direction, you will probably like (t̶h̶e̶ ̶f̶a̶n̶f̶i̶c̶ ̶I̶ ̶w̶r̶o̶t̶e̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶w̶i̶c̶h̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶y̶ ̶a̶l̶l̶ ̶f̶u̶c̶k̶ ̶e̶a̶c̶h̶ ̶o̶t̶h̶e̶r̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶n̶ ̶m̶e̶) this completely unrelated story about a boyband that shares a secret love (≖ิ(‿)≖ิ) It'd still be very cringe on the inside, but less so on the outside.
@@roman_dimaggio Hey dude did you actually watch the video? Because it... actually addresses like, most of the stuff you're talking about.
Also, congrats OP!! I hope your book does well!
I find wild the "fanfics dont make you do world building" when most of the fics i read are like "so the og author didn't do shit with all this cool stuff so this is my sand pit now and im building this world with my own bare hands"
God I've read some fanfics that would make Lord of the rings and the Silmarillion jealous with their world building
Or made up a whole new world for the characters in the other media to live in. That's always exciting. And I'm saying this to myself, a self proclaimed fanfiction writer
@@L16htW4rr10r I feel you there, legit some of my favourite fics are Modern AUs where characters are the same but living in our world, probably some of the best Game of Thrones fics I've ever read were 'Westeros is a 21st century first world country now but all the character drama is still there!' type shit XD
This is the Hellsing fandom writing fics that feels longer and more complex than the fucking source material LMAO
Hirano kept pushing out these amazing concepts and characters but everything just happens so quickly and the characters don't last or we see them for like 3 chapters, sooooo yeah. So many fandoms are basically just sand pits for fanfic writers, in which the source material is just a bunch of concepts never truly extrapolated upon. I love these types of mangas/books bc then I can just go wild with characters that I love!
I read one Harry Potter fanfic that created so much extra lore, and culture, and added so many more personality to the characters, it was amazing, it was also like 150k words
people say "fanfiction relies on being familiar with already existing characters instead of creating your own" as if that's easy. Do you know how hard it is to know an already existing character so well that your writing feels true to them? Your fic straight up will not succeed unless you have a strong understanding of the character's motivations, fears, and idiosyncrasies. That to me sounds like excellent practice for media analysis.
Just ask Warner Bros DC Comics writers how easy that "writing with existing characters is easy" is
I would argue that writing fanfic requires a very different skill set from an original book: you need less creativity, but a lot more understanding of a previously written work. You can't come up with stuff as you go along, you have to make sure it fits into someone else's lore or the fans will strangle you.
Not to mention if any kind of media have characters that are meant for the viewers/players/etc. to interpret on their own, nothing is wrong, but the fandom of that media will likely dislike it. U can see this character as kind and polite while others won’t or don’t. Especially if there’s an accepted standard by the fandom how those characters will act. Even if you write something truly amazing, there’ll probably be some or a lot of people commenting and criticizing how you write the characters or a certain character when in the original media, they could be open to any interpretation from anyone
@@willslawson9675 Shots fired.
@@archermahou8910 I don't think writing within restrictive parameters inherently makes things less creative. That's the basis behind metered poetry like sonnets and haikus--the restrictions of established form incite their own kind of creativity. I think writing within someone else''s pre-established lore works much the same way--it forces you to find creative ways to make things fit together into a canon rather than just doing whatever. It's not less creative, it's just creative in a different way.
“This photo is a shit painting” is such a fantastic summary of the whole debate.
Hot take: we probably wouldn't be having this conversation if things still entered the public domain at a reasonable rate
yeah we can blame disney for that
they use public domain stuff and make their own version,copyright it,and then extend the copyright law to an unreasonable length
And you can thank Disney
Absolute, 100% agreement. This is what I was going to say as well. Part of why I, a 32-year-old living half a century after the publication of "Carrie," am writing "Who Killed Carrie White?" as a fanfic is that only Stephen King or those with his express permission can write stories about Carrie.
Very true. Copyright shouldn’t surpass the original creator’s lifetime
So true
... The person who thinks that all fanfiction is 'light and fluffy' has never read a 'dead dove do not eat' story. God, those are... not light or fluffy in any way.
Oh god, yes. Fanfic can make innocent cartoons, or a throwaway line into a character's traumatic backstory and I live for it.
also dark! AUs exist. (one could say that After is a Dark! Harry Styles fanfic lol) it's incredibly small-minded to think that fanfic can be so easily describable.
@@deaf-tomcat Dark aus! Sometimes that just scratch that itch!
@@rivermaxwell3834 ikr?? i love dark aus so much.
The person who thinks that all fanfiction is "light and fluffy" has never read Autotomy by GoldenThreads (I will forever be traumatized)
Of course you should read more than just fanfiction, it gives you more context and material for fanfics!
The more original works you experience, the more robust your literary vocabulary is for when you write your own fanfic.
Exactly!
XDD not at all wrong. All my fanfic starts to devolve into Jane Austin tropes if it goes on too long XD
I know right, I wish to read books only to improve my writing in fanfictions
Yeah, I always take a break from writing fanfic and reading it when I feel like I need to refresh with original works
I’m a fanfiction purist. Everything is a fanfiction. If it has words, it’s a fanfic of the dictionary.
Op your brain
Everything is fanfiction of life
The chad we don’t deserve
dictionaries are just fanfics of speaking.
biographies are just rpf 🤨
Love that framing the divine comedy as fan fiction clearly implies that Dante was a fan of Jesus and Christianity rather than like a believer. ”Yeah I’m a huge jesus fan” feels very distinct from ”I’m a devout Christian to me
It's even funnier because I read Devil May Cry fanfiction, which is based off Inferno. So basically I would be reading fanfiction, of fanfiction, of fucking fanfiction.
@@memethemastermonarch9459 and then you can make the claim that the New Testament is fanfiction of the Old Testament! So fan fiction of fan fiction of fucking fan fiction of bloody fan fiction :).
This actually makes me wonder though. Like I’ve met some religious zealots that might actually be better classified as Jesus fans than Jesus believers lol
well yeah, isn't that what being a devout christian is?
To be fair, I think that argument comes less from the biblical setting of the story and more from the fact that Dante wrote himself and his contemporaries into the story.
my first thought with the "Gatsby was problematic" point was not that the people who read it weren't paying attention to the story, but that their teachers wouldn't allow any analysis that criticized America or capitalism. my Gatsby teacher was actually pretty good, but the teacher that introduced Lord of the Flies did so by showing us a documentary on the Stanford Prison Experiment and repeatedly reiterating this was human nature and wouldn't hear any argument to the contrary. Some of it absolutely rests on people simply not paying attention in English class, but others seem like a reaction against an educational system that's chugging along during the failure of an empire that does not allow for more radical readings
I'm glad I had an English teacher who called us oblivious for not noticing the gay subtext, and enlightened us.
"He saw me looking with admiration at his car.
'It's pretty isn't it, old sport!' he jumped off to give me a better view. 'Haven't you seen it before?'
I'd seen it. Everybody had seen it. It was a rich cream color, bright with nickel, swollen here and there in its monstrous length..."
She also used the term slash fic, our theory was that she'd also written some
Agree. Like for a while Romeo & Juliet was praised at this perfect romance story....
..now people are bashing the stupidity of the main characters.
I still thought Gatsby was problematic, and we were reading it in the context of the American dream, and wheter it wad achievable or not.
That's kinda funny because the scientific community (or at least those within with some sense and who has researched it) have actually denounced the Stanford Prison Experiment
There's a lot to it but basically: The researchers selectively picked people who had lower empathy and the results were, even then, tampered with by the researchers. If I'm not mistaken, they actually told the "prison guards" to abuse the "prisoners" (the participants didn't know what they were researching) So the experiment is not so much a reflection of human nature but really, the power of authority and the willingness to even do inhumane and cruel stuff when told to by it
@@DrawciaGleam02when the truth is neither of those ends of the pendulum swing, but that the feud is the cause of the problems. They were dumb kids sure but if their families weren’t feuding the dumb kids could have courted openly, then either got married with no drama or broke up and married other people. But because of the feud the only way they could explore their teenage feelings was to double down and as a result 6 people died
Thank you for giving me an excuse to monologue about this
It doesn't even matter if fanfictions are badly written. We need to stop associating art with a piece that "holds the potential for artistic significance and great quality" and just... accept that bad art exists. Art as a synonymous for "good art" is something that should have been left behind in the 60s. Just accept the existence of poorly made art.
Yep exactly
And I love bad art! Everyone has made bad art before, and people don't have to be good to make art. I hate that young artists feel ashamed to share their work because it's not up to certain standards. Long live bad art!
What annoys me about that quote is that who are you to decide if my fanfic doesn’t “hold the potential of artistic significance and great quality?”
Just cause you read furry smut doesn’t mean every fanfic is that, there are plenty of dramatic, mysterious, scary, action packed & funny fanfics but cause someone on the internet read scaly smut one time back in 2008 somehow all fanfics are bad.
@@voidcowboy4327 and furry fics are STILL art. it doesn’t really matter if it’s personal significant to me, but it’s significant to someone and it matters to someone. like, art is art and it’s not up to anyone to decide if it was or not.
It depends on how you define art, that's the problem. If it is defined in a normative way, then art has something to do with an inherent quality that some things possess and some don't.
But if it is defined in a descriptive way it is defined by its categories. Literature is then (by definition) art because it isn't anything else.
Most people mix both ways of thinking which is unhelpful when discussing art or the definition of it.
I don't understand this whole Fanfic Literature dichotomy. Why not both? Why do people always have to take a "side" especially, when it seems so obvious that it doesn't have to be that way?
as an avid book fandom person, boy does the convo about "books vs fanfic being better" make me go 🧍♂️
wild concept: you can read, enjoy, and write both lmao
Or prefer one to the other but acknowledge that others liking the other more is fine.
I always think of Nostalgia Critic's point about how The Last Airbender movie being bad doesn't diminish or destroy ATLA. It's almost a waste of time to get all frothed up over the movie since the series is as good as it ever was. Same with fanfiction vs books - you can like both or prefer one over the other without getting upset that others don't feel the same way.
the way i saw your icon and went "................is that aftg or am i just wanting to see it everywhere... no its aftg"
Seriously
I like fanfics because I liked a book
Exactly, all of this arguing over which is better is so ridiculous. Just let people enjoy what they want, why is that so hard lmao
i love how at 7:58 they were like “you think bakudeku mpreg is good, well you must not know what a narrative foil is” like bakugo and deku literally are narrative foils, how does shipping them mean you don’t understand that?
Exactly! I’ve seen many a Zuko/Aang fanfic in my day and have seen (and rebloged) those same authors incredibly well written analyses of Zuko and Aang’s role as foils
I would watch this but I don’t really watch video essays anymore. They just don’t give me the same satisfaction as the fan made lefttube scripts I read online
Hey! You’re one of the people who made the video!
i got called out before the video was even public, damn
@@eggnogthespacecadet3392 She "edited" (i.e. co-wrote) it.
i love the dissertations where every major point is decided based on a series of reader polls
It's that lady. Emily, I think her name is.
I have no clue why fanfic is being touted as some sort of advertising and a “worshipping capitalism”. Wouldn’t anything and everything qualified as advertising then??? From online critics to memes to summary vids to articles regarding the scandals of the creators, if fanfiction (or indeed any fan content) is “free advertising” then anything is free advertising.
I agree it's genuinely confusing because most people searching up fanfiction have already read/watched the fiction that they're looking for fics for anyways so it's not like they're attracting new viewers/readers
It's like the people who thought re-releasing Morbius after the memes got big would make people want to see it and then it bombed again because no one wanted to see it meme or no meme
@@angelfox8 Its still a form of IP worship. I read a ton of web serials and serial publication of original work is clearly the best of both worlds.
@@aquilamflammeus5569 Was the serial publication not sold for money? Is that not capitalism?
@@Foelhe No since web serials tend to be self published they are quite clearly not capitalism though I suspect the suggestion comes from you not understanding the definition.
Anything you mentioned can be understood as advertising - and oftentimes, it is. Think about how when a person, franchise etc is canceled (as in boycotted), people often ask their communities to stop talking about the thing / person altogether because even if you criticize something you're still giving it your attention, arguably the most valuable good in digitalized capitalism.
Like, say somebody hates JKR for being a transphobic ass and stops supporting her financially but still writes, idk, trans!Draco Drarry fanfic with a passion. Then they're simultaneously transforming, maybe even 'reclaiming' the franchise but also keeping it alive and relevant - which JKR technically doesn't profit from directly but it could lead to someone else reading the fanfic, thereby engaging with the fandom and nourishing the fan feels to eventually buy official merchandise or something. But as other commenters have pointed out, it's not always that simple because framing is still part of the equation.
If you complain about hastily written, poorly edited mediocre quality fanfiction using the same washed out tropes again and again, wait until you find out about penny novels or the books you find on Walmart shelves.
Any book salesperson knows that those clichéd romance novels with the classic book cover of a white man passionately embracing a white woman sell like hot buns, and nobody holds them to the standard of high art. And they don't have to be!
I kept thinking "do these supposed literary experts not know about pulp novels?". "Low literature" has been around for as long as printing's been cheap enough to sustain them. (And earlier, if you count things like plays.)
Even though filet mignon is a phenomenal dish, there'll always be a market for a good ol' McDonald's hamburger.
I'm a librarian, so fanfiction falls ever so slightly out of my field, but bad printed books absolutely do fall into my job. People have, and will always, love trash and that's FINE. I swear, the amount of little old ladies who read only trope heavy, recycled romance novels is sky high. Not everyone wants to read challenging literature all the time, most of the time people like what they know and they'll keep reading the same thing over and over. Reading can be for entertainment, information, relaxation, enjoyment, and curiosity, it's not just for Big Brain (tm) literary analysis and critique. In 40-50 years, that generation of old readers will still be reading their fanfics.
I feel like you have never met them IRL we absolutely do complain about those books as well. Fanfic isn't inherently worse than published books its just much easier to write bad fanfiction not least because it's often an authors first time writing.
Isn't the "Airport Novel" another vector for what would have been penny novels these days?
Hell, when I was a kid I read loads of Trash Generic Fantasy which used the world-building of 'Just DnD' or 'Just Tolkien without the fancy language or history stuff' where you were just supposed to assume that the ruling structure was Medieval England, Magic existed and could Do Things, and Dragon's exist. Some of those would get some creativity sprinkled on it, some wouldn't. Characters were stock, conversations were stilted, but evil wizards got stabbed and dragons were scary. High Art they were not, but easily devourable they were.
I want a Sarah Z video essay where as the video goes on the “drink” she’s holding just gets more and more absurd until she ends the video holding a jug of antifreeze
Pls. PLS let Sara see this
That would be a good bit for an April Fool’s essay about incoherent nonsense.
Alternatively - a boba tea where the straw starts swapping to weirder and weirder angles to where it pierces the cup
Thanks for making me bark out a stupidly loud laugh at legit 4AM. If my neighbours complain, I'll sic 'em on you.
idk about that. One of my favorite books as a tween involves a character who attempts suicide by drinking antifreeze...
great book if anyone knows what I'm talking about.
The profound irony of people holding up Shakespeare in contrast to mass marketed repetitive story telling is that Shakespeare **WAS** mass marketed repetitive story telling. Very few of Shakespeare’s stories were original stories the vast vast majority of his works were adaptations of older works and that’s what people expected.
People didn’t go to the Globe Theater to see new original plays by Shakespeare they went to see his take on their favorite stories. It actually took A Midsummer’s Night Dream a couple decades to catch on because it was **too** original.
This really gets at a larger question: what actually separates fan fiction from adaptation? What sepeeates Shakespeare rewritibg the *Tragical History of Romeo and Juliet* from someone rewriting Naruto on the internet?
I'd say a pretty rule of thumb definition for fanfiction would be "a work created solely for non-commercial enjoyment that primarily exists within the framework of an existing piece of fiction".
And I'd definitely say the only real differences between "fanfiction" and professionally published works are:
- Less gatekeeping for better and worse
- No profit motive
late but yeah fanfic is basically just the equivalent of fan films
@@jadenbryant9283I think those count as a subtype of fanfic.
“This photograph is a shit painting” is such a good way of describing how ppl often want art to approach *them*, on their terms, rather than the other way around…
I think a lot of people just forget: there are a lot of bad fanfics. But there are also a lot of bad books. We just don’t get to read most of them bc they die in the publisher’s office.
Edit: I didn’t think people would notice this comment but I guess they did. I wanna emphasize two things: 1, I said “most” die in the publisher’s office. I’m well aware a lot of “garbage” gets published anyway. 2, I don’t really care if someone reads or makes bad art or writing. It exists, and there’s not much I can individually do about it except avoid what I don’t want to read. Even if some of the stuff out there imo should’ve never been posted, like people need to be a bit self aware about the kind of stuff they post **publicly** (if you really wanna delve into a deep rabbit hole of despair, try the mcyt explicit fics on AO3. It’s bleak how many people wrote explicit fics about actual real minors. Like I’m not exaggerating the way people do about MHA characters, I’m being literal).
Yeah. Also, art does not, in fact, have to be good to be art. Bad art is everywhere, it's more common than good art.
And also a lot of mediocre to good books started as bad books, they just had years of work with an editor before they were deemed publishable. Fanfics are usually posted the second the author is done with the new chapter.
honestly a lot of the ~Officially Published Canon~ is fucking swill too, lol... the fact that i didnt have to pay to read all those bad fanfics to completion is a great thing, Actually
And the deciding factor in traditional publishing isn't usually "is this good?" but rather "is this sellable?"
It's also worth mentioning that there are 'hobby versions' of a loooooot of professional jobs, from jewelry-making to carpentry to hand-sewn clothes, but crucially, most of *those* hobbies aren't able to be posted to a wide audience with no regard for quality. Fanfiction gets the same bad rap that Florida gets. Florida Man is a thing because the privacy laws in Florida are different and we get to know who these people are in ways that don't happen in other states. People can post their fic to FFN or AO3 or Wattpad and it's out there for people to stumble on in a way that bad carpentry or handmade clothes just... aren't.
I think a good counterpoint to "Fanfiction doesn't require you to worldbuild," is that fanfiction has a contrary pressure of needing to write in a way that conforms to people's existing expectations of these characters. If you're writing an original work, for example, then as long as your lead character behaves and thinks consistently within the work, it doesn't make sense for anyone to say they're out of character, while in fanfiction it's entirely possible to write a character in a way that is self-consistent within your work, but will get criticized for having that character act out of character.
Even if you want to filter things through a commercial lens, this isn't a bad skill to hone. Given that the original creators behind Superman died over a decade ago, any modern Superman work is necessarily being written by people who didn't originally create him, and yet fans will still have various expectations for who Superman is, and they will respond negatively if you write a Superman who doesn't feel like Superman. In today's world of blockbuster fictional works being built on the foundation of stories and characters who already exist in the public conscious, being able to write a character in an interesting way that still conforms to those kinds of expectations is a very important skill that writing wholly original work will not teach you.
Great point that’s on point. Couldn’t agree more.
Also, some fanfiction does world build despite this, or fleshes out the existing world to a point where it becomes "fanon."
Wonderful point, damn
Disclaimer, I'm like 7 mins into the video, but I just wanted to say, if fanfic was a predominately male thing, there would not be this much vitriol for it.
I would add cishet male to that, but yeah, definitely.
Men tend to find great joy in originality and often find themselves acting obvious. Writing obvious as well.
It’s worse than that. They get published. There’s a whole section of what is essentially fan fiction in the SciFi/Fantasy section in B&N.
I don’t think it’s fair to frame all criticism of fan fiction as neck beards getting angry
@@Bluerock121 I don’t think anybody did. It’s more like the difference between the way people who get emotional over football are thought of as normal and the people who like K-Pop are fan girls. That sentiment isn’t limited to neckbeards. It’s pretty generalized. Was there generalized vitriol before fanfics became dominated by women?
I would argue fanfiction is GREAT practice if your goal is to be a show writer instead of a novelist. Don't most shows have a team of writers that have to work off of the pre-existing world and characters of the person who actually had the idea for the story?
Yea. Fanfiction can be challenging to write well because of the research needed done for the original work. I tried drafting a simple Persona 5 fic and the amount of dialogue i had to analyze was tough.
@@Bababoey3333 non fanfic writers dont understand the PAIN of trying to analyze every little bit of thr source material.
i do pokemon stuff, and i have memorized what most of the berrys do just for fanfic.
i literally want to be screenwriter so you’re so right
I recently wrote a Gaston x Beast fanfic as an exercise in media analysis. I had recently watched TH-cam video essays looking at Beauty and the Beast through a queer lens (including interpretations of the Beast’s story as an AIDS allegory) and I wanted to explore some of these ideas. I also wanted to write a different relationship dynamic than the one between the Beast and Belle and tackle a potential flaw in the Disney movie, that being the protagonist’s relative lack of an arc compared to the Beast. I thought, “If Gaston was in Belle’s shoes, he would be much more judgemental at first, so him learning to love the Beast would be more satisfying.” I don’t even ship Gaston x The Beast in a traditional sense, I just thought it would be an interesting thing to write about. I wish the anti-fanfic crowd could see fanfiction as its own form of literary analysis and critique. Hell, fanfiction’s tendency to make established straight characters gay serves as its own criticism of the heteronormative mainstream media landscape.
This sounds fascinating. Is it published online? I'd love to check it out.
Would love to see it, if published :)
Same! I'd be interested in reading this.
@@bb010g It's called 'No One Loves Like Gaston' and it's on AO3. I tried to link it but I think TH-cam thought it was spam. It's under the username 'Meikakuna' (a name my weeb teenage self chose).
'I recently wrote a Gaston x Beast fanfic as an exercise in media analysis.' is not something I expected to read today
the way 1:17:00 is taken out of context, her next words talk about how classics aren’t often accessible to people who don’t have the tools or teachings to understand them unless they receive a higher education. it’s an excellent point and cutting her off, taking her words out of context, and not even crediting her seems lazy. Not to mention the creator is uncomfortable with you using her tiktoks without her username attached to her face, especially in a negative light and taking the meaning from her words.
It’s not even lazy it’s completely malicious to cut her off before she makes an articulate point about accessibility in literature. Literally manipulating her narrative it’s so disrespectful
also she didn't ask for consent which just makes it worse
@@alleckeyhearst3117 consent? It's a youtube video, not BDSM. it's fair use.
@@ya9ya10 ...you think consent is only needed for kinky sex?
@@ya9ya10 it’s actually not. She stole that clip from tik tok without permission from the creator.
One thing I'm not sure if you mentioned was the emotional argument for fanfiction. Sometimes when I finish a book, I need time to say goodbye to the characters, or if the ending isn't how I imagined, that is when I can turn to reading fanfiction. Fanfiction can give the opportunity to resolve outstanding character issues or time to process the grief of a book ending.
Exactly! Pretty much any time a story truly engages me, I look for fanfiction after I am done with it, because I want to see more of its characters, the world, etc.
This "Fanfiction isn't literature" thing gives me the same vibes as "Videogames are not art".
especially when novels were considered a poor mans theatre!
Roger Ebert is at fault for this and he’s so wrong. His article on it is so dumb because he defines all “traditional games” as not art (Go players disagree but let’s pretend that’s true) he also says that any video games that aren’t games with points and rules are not games and therefore not video games and are something else. Like dude Life is Strange is a video game whether you want to admit it or not.
I like fanfiction but I personally wouldn't call all of it literature lol. Idk it just feels wrong to call it that for me lmao
But video games aren’t art - they’re at best at their ‘cinema of attractions’ stage. Craft, for sure, but not art
@@Mixtil22 the graphic designers, music department, concept artists, character designers and animators reading this: 👁👄👁
I feel like the arguments calling fanfic unpaid labour and corporate worship completely ignore why people write fanfic in the first place. It's so creatively healthy to act on inspiration and write what you feel excited about, and very normal to want to share your work with other people
It’s also useful in the sense that it provides a safe place to do so, as by using pre-established places, people, and settings, it takes off some of the pressure of having to wholly come up with these things yourself
I have Dan Olsen's Fifty Shades videos on an endless loop these days and I love the way he phrased it, calling fanfiction an "almost instinctive exercise in creative synthesis" and "naturally what stories pursue, the meeting point between the familiar and the unexpected" and even how he talked about how some characters are their own context (tbh that list is probably longer than a lot of folks want to admit).
Honestly to be blunt it's such an insane take that it doesn't warrant a good faith rebuttal. If fanfic is '"unpaid labor and corporate worship" then so are song covers. If anything the idea that an existing IP is too sacred to be "remixed" and repurposed into something personal comes off more as corporate worship to me. That's without even factoring things like death of the author or the fact that some media is just heavily open to different readings and interpretations. There's just way too many holes in their argument, it really does just come down to elitism.
The Tweet at 6:27 was so overdramatic and ridiculous I just had to laugh. I'm not exaggerating, it literally made me unexpectedly snort-laugh. Hilarious. What an absolutely unhinged take. Acting like fanfiction is some sort of capitalist conspiracy by big IPs to crowd-source unpaid labour is the sad-funniest thing I've ever heard. Sometimes, people enjoy things, and they do things for fun, because they enjoy it. Is that hard to understand? God, that person's life must be utterly joyless. Twitter was a mistake.
Twitter hot take brain worms
And they shared this anti corporate message on a website owned by a corporation
@@thepinkestpigglet7529 literally about to be (or maybe not anymore who knows?) owned by the richest man in the world
Honestly, it reminds me of anti-fun communists; the belief that any amount of enjoyment of life is fundamentally anti-worker, because the only thing that enables social change is discontent, and thus joy as a concept is fundamentally the circuses part of bread and circuses, allowing society to continue as is as opposed to listen to the objective correctness of Marxism.
You can usually tell when one of these communists is speaking by other communists rolling their eyes and making wanking motions. There's a reason Disco Elysium's ultimate antagonist is one of these people, despite communism as an idea being presented as actually a good one in comparison to ultraliberalism (their name for capitalist libertarianism).
That's twitter for you
One thing I wish was mentioned more when fanfic gets critiqued by the traditional book crowd is the fact that “spicy fanfic” is not the only kind of fic that exists. Fic isn’t a genre but a medium with every genre that can be applied to similar to that of traditional media. There’s romance, sure, but there’s also sci-fi fics, drama fics, slice of life fics, fantasy fics- the list goes on and on. Plus fanfiction can give a writer a way to express their unique perspective in ways that traditional media sometimes fails.
For example, the whump genre is about a character whom gets physically or emotionally hurt by an event and the story is about their journey through that. Sometimes reading traditional books can trigger a reader who have similar experiences but writing fic helps the author control the narrative and find catharsis. The hurt/comfort genre also has similar themes except with more of a positive ending mostly.
It’s kinda funny now that traditional media is sort of in the same boat as fanfic where they have to defend their medium by saying, “Not all books are spicy. People need to explore more than booktok.”
Well not all fanfiction contains spice. People need to explore AO3. 😉
I've read some fanfics that made reading them feel ethereal. Yeah, some are bad, but there are many insanely well-crafted fanfics out there--and what's crazy is that a lot of authors are just writing them for fun, because they're so passionate about what they're creating.
There are fanfics that have made me completely rethink my opinion on fanfic genres. You think of them all the same and then someone takes it and makes it a 4 chapter, tens of thousands of words piece of absolute poetry. I've had to rethink how I look at hurt/comfort, enemies to lovers, hell even omegaverse. The passion that is poured into so many fics and defies so many tropes as well as following then in their own lights and perspectives is so beautiful to me, truly amazing.
@@leonineKelter you can't just say that and go on to not give reccs😏
One thing that I don’t like about the fanfic world is how someone can make a fanfic that people like and then just abandon it without any resolution; like a TV show getting cancelled right after a major cliffhanger.
@@JamesLawner to be fair I've done thar before. It does suck to have a fic you love abandoned, but also these are real people doing this for free. This isn't a paid organized job this is one, maybe two people and sometimes you lose inspiration and don't want to keep going. I I try to think about it this way: if they'd never written it in the first place, I wouldn't have been able to read any of it !! I've had to cut many a series short due to losing interest, qnd most of my fans have reacted that way. It's really good to keep in mind that you lose interest in things over time like every other person, as do they
@@leonineKelter Not to mention that sometimes there is a VERY GOOD REASON for that fic being abandoned. We usually know little to nothing about fic authors and their lives! An author I followed for years through multiple fandoms stopped posting; years later, I discovered that their fics were "abandoned" because they had died. We just have no way of knowing what's going on in people's lives. I try to remind myself that ANY fic, finished or unfinished, is a gift that I never expected to receive; I should be grateful for it, not annoyed that there's not more.
I haven't been reading for fun for YEARS, since university has had me reading so much. I've never read fanfiction before, but fell in to a OFMD fanfic hole and am now deeply invested in a fic that has brought me through two? three? naval battles, hanging, imprisonment, all planned and written out in incredible detail and by an author with such skills in writing dialogue and drama. I think it amounts to around 300 pages that I've consumed within days, glued to my screen, ignoring my thesis. What I'm trying to say is: I don't care if fanfiction is art. I enjoy it, and it has brought back my joy of reading. I've even started a list of books that I want to read when my thesis is finished, and I have the time.
Hey, can you tell me the name of the fic ? ^^
This video made me realize something quite odd: the most analogous medium to fan fiction isn't books, it's video game mods. Both are fundamentally derivative and transformative, both are broadly community driven and have problematic and/or adversarial relationships with their associated capital, and both reward the creator significantly for their ability to operate within a network of pre-existing constraints. Hell, they even both have the same problem having gems of high quality and artistic merit being surrounded by a sea of impossibly horny silliness.
Amazing analogy. Imagine if these bestseller authors took the Gabe Newell or id Software approach and actually made these fanfictions canon 😂😂😂😂😂
Oh that's such a cool comparison!
Interesting take, but in my opinion it's a miss.
The main reason being, fanfic is compared to books, because it uses written word for storytelling purposes.
At it's core both are storytelling. There is a reason, why not all forms of fan creations are fanfiction.
That's why I think that Sarah's music analogy fell flat, because in storytelling there is no space for recreating someone else's work, like there is in music. Retellings are not the same as covers.
Holy shit, that is actually such a great way to put it, I feel like a whole new world has revealed itself to me.
Both have creators that try to fix the mistakes of the original, those that try to expand upon the existing material, those that are horny, those that try to change the context of the original, and shitposts.
After all, how different is a fanfic about Peppa Pig in Dangan Rompa than the mod that replaces the dragons in Skyrim with Thomas the Tank Engine..?
My god..... You are a genius...
TH-cam needs a "save" feature for comments like Reddit has; really don't want to lose track of this write-up.
The flip side of the "fan fic is free, therefore better" argument is that, if we don't consume media in a way that pays writers, eventually that well will dry up. Absolutely, partake of free media. But writers also need to keep bread on the table.
You honestly can be surprised at time how much amazing stories you can find through fanfiction.
the tiktok used at 1:17:00 was taken out of context and cut down! no where in that video did the original poster say that they hated classics or that people shouldn’t read them :)
in a reaction video she said that they're boring to her, so I'm pretty sure she (and this is totally fine) might prefer fanfiction and modern literature. which most people do. I agree the cutting down was pretty bad though, definitely not something a journalist should do.
@@whoogh she loves classic literature, it's literally what she studied. She wasn't dissing it personally she was literally just saying that people need to be taught how to interpret it in order for them to be seen as interesting reads.
Hey intellectual honesty, that’s a weird way to crop that clip at 1:17:00 when the next sentence is “unless they’ve been given the tools, through something like I don’t know, higher education”
Omg fr!!!
Where’s the clip?
@@leostootired the clip has been edited out now
@@smallcrabfrog5008 ok thanks
To be fair, out of context means it fundamentally changes the meaning of the statement. This doesn't. In the clip as it was, she says they're inaccessible and lists some reasons. That's just a different reason.
Fanfiction is all about _playing_ with original material. Experimenting. You can write, adhering to strict rules and try to change as little in initial premise as possible other than intended course correction, you can move through stations of canon (and story would still be good), you can go off the rails completely or you can change any number of background and backstory details and still reach the same beginning of the story... to have it diverge wildly again. As long as you understand what you work with and who you write to, original work is more like a draft you can paint anything you want on top of.
Some fanfiction stories are downright bizarre and incomprehensible. Some crossovers make no sense and their authors still decided to give them a go. In a way, fanfiction biggest boon is the lack of expectations and ease of relatability. It's hard to sell an original franchise. It's hard to make your characters instantly relatable.
As a fandom musician, I find the conversation about whether fan works as a whole are art or not to be very interestingly inconsistent. There's a lot more debate around fan fiction - no one is saying that what I do *isn't* art. Clearly I rubbed my grubby hands and funny little chords all over these songs, whether or not they're about cartoons (or covers of songs FROM cartoons). They are by nature transformative - but music already has a better culture of acceptance of call backs and references and variations of songs in transformative ways, at least if you take a step back away from the mainstream world (where there are just absurd copyright cases). Jazz, for instance, is just full of references and indeed even whole phrases from songs that came before.
I think effectively all art is inherently built on and from what came before, and all art is referential in nature - it's just that some spaces are more accepting of that fact than others.
While you give a good and compelling arguement and reasons fir why you believe one or more certain arguements and, or, narratives, I must disagree with you here or there on a bunch of them.
One of the reasons why I do not really trust these so called "pro fanfiction" people, or whatever they name themselves, is somewhat simple:
That it is true, that traditionally respected and published mediums and forms of literature are dominated by western, cisgender, hetero-patriarchial, able-bodied and neuro-typical white men, much like how TV shows and forms of animated films and episodic shows were too. However! Having practically all of this fanfiction stuff be heavily created by and consumed, produced and manufactured very majorly and most of the time by the "benevolent" western, more or less, though not always, cisgender, not always hetero patriarchial, not always abled-bodied and neuro-typical white women is ... it is not very assuring about fanfiction, at least from my perspective.
I could continue about how I feel and believe that fanfiction is somewhat more vulnerable to forms of biases and bigotry, but then we would be here for far too long.
I find this comment super interesting, and it begs the question of why certain spaces are more accepting. To me, writing doesn't seem like it should be inherently less transformative than music (I mean, all art is, to some extent, transforming certain elements of the world we see around us, and this obviously includes writing). But I'm no scholar, so it's definitely possible that there's a layer of nuance I'm missing.
To say music has an acceptance of callbacks is an understatement. Rap music as a genre has sampling as an integral part of its history. Covers are so common that pretty much everyone's done at least one. I could go on, but the point is already made.
In this case I think it's because it's easier to see the threshold at which music is transformative, to go from repeating the original work in a novel way to effectively being a new work. The middle ground where it is not quite a new thing but definitely not the same is a lot smaller. Maybe it's just that music has far fewer notes than language has words, but vastly more ways of expressing them. Even a quite open phrase like 'so be it' can only have so many emotional tenses put on it, but there's not enough paper to write down all the ways to make the same three descending tones sounds profoundly different.
This is very true! I see comments on fanfiction not being "real writing" but less comments that fanart isn't "real art". People might say it's lesser but they never question the fact that it's art, the way people question if fanfiction is actually "real writing"
I feel like anytime the question of "Is X art?" comes up the unspoken argument being made often boils down to "X isn't art because I don't think it's good enough to be" which to me is just very silly? Like, something can be art and still suck. I don't particularly like fanfiction and I think a lot of the culture surrounding it *is* pretty anti-intellectual, but like... it is an artform lol. Like, it's just writing, which we've all pretty unanimously agreed is art for a pretty long time now.
People who don't regularly engage with art critically often just see declaring something as art as a measure of its quality. Like with Sarah's first example, Fountain, i'd argue that the quality of the work is pretty low. It's litterally just a toilet with a name on it. But its artistic value comes from the statement it makes, critiquing the contemporary art world. And its artistic value only increased when, as if to prove it's point, the art world shunned it, only to realise the value later.
So in conclusion: great art, but you'd have a pretty bad sense of interior design if you want to display a toilet in your living room.
I agree, I hate 99% of fanfiction with a burning passion but I feel like it's stupid to say it isn't art. The overwhelming majority of people I have seen trying to gatekeep art don't actually have an (coherent) argument as to why something isn't, most of the time they just don't like how it challenges the artistic status quo.
A lot of people forget that art doesn't necessarily mean _good._ Art is subjective, and anyone can find something good or bad. Bad art exists - we can't have good without bad, after all. Is a 2-year-old's drawing of a dog _good_ art? Probably not, but it's art nonetheless. Art is a creative medium, including writing, which can extend to fanfiction. Is fanart art? Yes. So why would fanfiction not be considered art? It's still created by someone, transformative or not, just in a different medium. An 11-year-old's self-insert fic probably isn't good, but if they took the time to write it, then who's to say whether it's art or not?
I think I remember seeing a comment from comic book writer Mark Waid about fan fiction. He said that the only difference between fan fiction and all the stuff that he has written for marvel and dc is that someone paid him to do it. He didn't create most of the marvel or dc superhero that he has written for, but people still love his comics. He didn't create characters like the flash, but if you ask people "what is the best flash run?" Most will say "mark waid's flash comics." Heck he introduced a lot of concepts that were picked up by other writers, like the speed force.
The "fanfiction just reinforces corporate worship" argument is so weird to me because things like Fix-It Fics exist where the author is deliberately critiquing the original work?!?
one of my favorite fics is a spitefic driven purely by the rage the author felt towards the original work and author. Just a sense of "holy shit this is so bad I HATE IT so much I'm gonna throw my OC I to this setting and wreck evehthing". it's wildly entertaining
I could buy that it makes the corporations more powerful, but it really is an outlet for coping with mainstream art's flaws.
It just reeks of the whole "yet you partake in society, curious" argument. At the end of the day, what these corporations provide is necessary, it sucks they have to do it, but we can't just do without.
@@TallulahWard hand it over
Silence, weeb.
My favorite movie called Mona Lisa Smile is about a progressive art teacher teaching a class at a conservative college in the 40s. They literally have this moment towards the beginning of the film where the teacher shows a few slides of art. One of them was a snapshot of her mom and she asked, "Is it art?" And the students replied, "It's a snapshot" and the teacher had said that it was taken by a famous photographer. And a student went, "Art isn't art until someone says it is" which has really stuck with me. Sorry for the long ramble, it's one of my favorite movies and I feel like it fits very well with this video.
The phrase you mentioned, “he toed out of his shoes” IS common in published books. It’s common in historical romance. I see so much discussion on tiktok and TH-cam about fan fiction’s idiosyncrasies that’s just like this, where the commentator makes a statement about something that they assume is specific to fan fiction because they haven’t read it anywhere else, but actually, what they’re describing is literally just romance novels. I see complaints about a lot of romance novels “reading like fan fiction” when really they just mean “the book was tropey” (like news flash! Genre fiction is all about the tropes! That’s not specific to fan fiction or romance! It’s literally the point of genre fiction!). This is a pretty minor gripe in an overall great video, but I just see stuff like this all over the internet and it bugs me.
yeah in fairness published works generally don't appear in Google search results so any phrase commonly used in fiction but not outside of it will primarily show fanfiction, surely
But did the romance writers get it from fanfiction, or did the fanfiction writers get it from romance? Chicken or egg?!
*someone who has only read fan fiction reading a historical romance* "Getting a lot of fan fiction vibes from this..."
@@DetectiveOlivaw Considering that romance novels are THE biggest literature genre and have been that for a while, I would assume it showed up in romance novels first.
wtf is "toeing out of your shoes"? Taking your shoes off with no hands?
I really do think fanfic should be respected for its accessibility. As someone with adhd and autism who had "gifted kid burn out" with books, it's absolutely amazing I can still enjoy reading without undergoing the mental wrestling match of moving my thoughts away from a special interest for what's supposed to be a leisure activity.
yes i have adhd too and i find it pretty hard to read any long text which isn't to do with my hyperfixation when ive tried to read books especially classics i often come out with no idea about the plot/characters/meanings which results in a lot of fanfics
the only time i've really got into classics is when ive been hyperfixated on them lol
mood, adhd gang unite
same!!! with the adhd and autism and burn out with books. I read constantly as a kid, but now I find it so hard to read books. but I still read a ton of fanfic based on my special interest!
Yeah, that is another element to it: writing fanfics (and making other fanworks) can be a really good outlet for neurodivergent people. It is, in effect, a way to turn infodumping about a special interest into an actual creative exercise; I don’t know or particularly care whether or not my old 300k-word slowburn fanfic counts as literature (though technically it DID win a Hugo award...), but I do know that I’ve never in my life felt more confident than I did when I was writing it, haha.
I completely agree with this. I think I would have left reading behind a long time ago if fanfiction didnt exist. The ability to find a hyperfixation in a fan Fic is the reason I still read.
I believe fanfiction should be taken seriously in the sense that it isnt just "steamy stories by teenage girls on wattpat" like its often seen online. I've seen stories that are completely separate to the og canon except for the names of the characters. Ive cried to fanfiction, been conforted, etc. Its more accesible. Its an artform in its own way and a love letter to the og works they derive from.
Again, only about 8 mins in now, but I just want to say as a queer black woman, y'all just started promoting books w characters who are queer, black, and either the main character or in a mostly poc cast like, maybe 5 years ago. And for at least the first 3 of those years about 95% of those books were pretty heavily centered around our trauma around racial abuse and homophobia, as literally every movie, tv show outside of sitcoms or shows where we're pretty much just there to be a mammy/designated black friend for the main character, and so for me personally, the whole "all books are becoming soft wish fulfillment bullshit" argument is so painful to hear because it's like, I'm glad that you are tired of having every character in the world look like you and get everything they want Jonathan, but I just started Almost getting books like that like last year. Fanfiction is by no means always an anti-racist or queer friendly area, like, at all, there are dozens of stories that are "reader inserts" that proceed to describe a blonde haired blue eyed woman who's 115 pounds in every other paragraph, but like at the very least I have the option of going into the original black character tag and knowing that every chapter isn't going to force me to relive trauma. Like it's important to discuss these things of course, but not every impactful book needs to be about suffering. More often than not in the media I've seen it ends up just feeling more like torture porn or a minstrel show than feeling like actual representation. We deserve some books where we get to be the princess too, you know? And denying the fact that fanfic has given a lot of us the space to have that is just dumb
Edit: just wanna be clear, this is not directed at Sarah Z or Emily, I just get frustrated with dudebros who think every movie needs to have a torture scene for it to be real horror, you know what I mean??????
It's true that queer representation in books is recent (there are still classics with queer character but not that many) but I think saying that books with black characters that don't use trauma porn are also new kind of erases the rich literature written by black people globally
@@cosasmalas6896 they literally did not say that???
@@cosasmalas6896 I am afraid you may have misunderstood some of what the original writer was talking about.
Unfortunately, it is either that or you have, some how, intentonally misinterpreted what this author was saying, for some reason.
@Kaylee Jazz I do not really think you are really engaging with what the original writer was trying to say and communicate in the best way, but I do still think you gave some at least interesting food for thought.
My problem with these sort of takes is they don't represent the majority of fandom and fanfiction. The majority is just an amplification of the biases existing in the original work. The most common form of ship in fandom is two light skinned boys, usually one of them being blonde.
I get that the diversity of fandom means even if it is niche, you can find the stuff that you want, but idk, the same is somewhat true of classic novels, films, Netflix shows. In all these mediums the unheard are buried but still there if you look for them.
I guess I've never found fanfic that spoke to my viewpoint that wasn't in its own way problematic and steeped in hegemonic biases that did not speak for me.
What gets me about the anti fanfiction rhetoric (and some of the pro fic rhetoric that turns its nose up at most published literature) is that almost all of us fic writers got into fanfiction bc we were already bookworms who enjoyed writing and were excited about the idea of writing stories for our favorite texts.
honestly a bit disappointed you didn't get i to the, like, obvious extent to which backlash against fanfiction is rooted in a revulsion to public visibility of deviant sexuality
Like, there’s a reason why they’re always naming omegaverse, smut, and a gay ship as examples of how bad fanfic is. Like no, kinks you don’t like and gay people just happen to exist in fiction, and sometimes in fanfiction.
exactly, fan fiction is predominantly queer because it's mostly people taking something straight or hetero normative and making it queer because that makes it more relatable and interesting to them. Straight couples are normal and represented most often in media, so fan fiction is queer peoples way to do whatever they want with something they appreciate. And, as we all know, the general public hates anything that isn't "normal".
i would also add that it is rooted in misogyny, as participation in fandom is largely perceived as a “teenage crazy girl” behavior lol
@@AJ-bk5qj and the world hates anything that teen girls like, the most common one I’ve seen recently is Taylor swift. Boys and full grown men are attacking her and her fans for being passionate about her music, yet they never seem to care about the boys that are equally crazy about sports, video games, etc.
The tik toker at 1:17:03 is Icaruspendragon btw, don't know why it was blurred especially since they weren't asked and was cropped (:
I think the idea that fanfiction is “free promotion for corporate products” relies on the assumption that people are just going to stumble unto fanfiction of a specific property and as a result will gain an interest on the original work and that’s just not how it works.
The way fanfiction is store nowadays requires that the user has to make an effort to seek it, it’s not like fan art that randomly appears in your twitter feed, you have to actively search for it and if you’re alternative searching for it that probably means you already have an interest in the world.
Now I’m not saying no one has ever search for an fanfiction out of curiosity, then enjoyed it so much they decided to check out the original source material, I’m just saying that is not widely indicative of how people consume content on the internet.
Like I agree that we live in a landscape where art, media and discussions of said media are dominated by mega corporations and that should stop, but fanfiction is not the cause of it.
If you pressed a button that could instantly delete all of fanfiction and prevent new ones from being made that would not lessen the stronghold corporations have in popular culture and viceaversa if the button prevented corporations from producing any art, that would not stop fanfiction.
I think it partially does that job by allowing you to interact with aspects of the product that you probably didn’t so far?
Absolutely stupid example but you like idk Stucky and read fics with them where you have a side pairing of Natasha/Bruce and now you realize you might be interested in that as well so you see their movies too.
Another option i’ve noticed more often is that it gives people something to occupy their minds during hiatuses. Keeping them interested in the IP longer and more intensely than if they were just trailing off between seasons.
It is if you exclusively read f/f, ime. And ironically I’ve seen that work against IPs as well. RWBY is a notable one where I’ve seen multiple conversations online where someone sees fanart or reads a fic about it and asks if they should check out the source material and they’re strongly encouraged to just stick to the fanworks. Fandom is funny and much more multifaceted than one might initially assume that way.
I will say fanfic has sometimes made me go out of my way to seek out something, and it’s always in the case of crossovers. “I really like this author and all their fics but I’m not familiar with the other fandom used in this crossover, so maybe I’ll check it out to make myself familiar.”
In one case it was a TV show that I had to watch on TH-cam (no other means of watching it at the time), and in another case it was video games that I’d heard many of my friends recommend in the first place and/or that were by developers whose other games I’d already enjoyed and had been meaning to check out more of anyway.
Otherwise fanart/fic isn’t usually what gets me into something. If someone I follow suddenly starts reblogging/retweeting stuff for a fandom I’m not in, I just blacklist it so I don’t have it taking up my dash, haha.
At 1:17:03, I remember seeing the og video, why did you crop the vid out of context?
I really love what you’ve created in the past, but it just doesn’t feel right watching and knowing a video from another person who had no say in the matter was cut down and framed the other person as anti-intellectual, completely reshaping what they were saying instead of leaving the rest of the video where their argument is the strongest. Really not sure how to feel here
Can you please tell me what the story is? I want to be informed. Thank you very much in advance :)
@@leon_atrewo in a now removed clip (check the pinned comment) sarah included a tiktok of the creator icaruspendragon. in this video, the clip is cut mid-sentence and it seems this editing on sarah’s part was to make the video better fit her argument that fanfiction is often anti-intellectual even though that was not the point of the original video and was actually about how poor people often are denied the education needed to better understand the classics so they can shine. TLDR, icaruspendragon’s PRO- intellectual argument was made to appear anti-intellectual with selective editing in sarah’s video and people are criticizing this choice in sarah’s part.
@@tsargreene thank you so much for the explanation! It's very sad, I enjoy Sarah's videos, but I have no idea why she would do this. This unfortunately makes it hard for me to trust her arguments in the future :( or enjoy her videos... (there may be a good explanation for this, but I can't imagine what could it possibly be, as for now)
@@tsargreene I read her apology. And... It doesn't feel like an apology. Ouch :(
@@leon_atrewo It does make you wonder how many times she's done this before. Very dishonest
when we were 13, my best friend wrote a fanfic about "In The Night Garden" (a kids bedtime tv show), where Makka Pakka had to win over Upsy Daisy, so she'd leave Iggle Piggle for him and to this day, its the best fanfic I've ever read. True proof of fanfic as art.
Oh my god someone else who watched that show as a kid!!! Hello
@@voidify3not OP but yes, I never hear anyone talk about it even though I watched it so much as a kid! That show was a core memory istg
Disappointing with how you used IcarusPendragon’s content without permission or credit, and on top of that completely misrepresented her take on fanfiction and classic literature and took it entirely out of context.
She has a bit of response on her tiktok, and reiterates how the point of her video was that fanfiction is more accessible than classic literature, not that she’s anti-literature
hey, this was clearly very well researched and well-written, but this is the second time you’ve used someone’s content without crediting them/took them out of context without their permission. i think since you’re spending so much time on research and scriptwriting (plus filming and editing) you should also take the time to do your due diligence when it comes to sources. great video, poor execution of sourcing
I completely agree! Out of curiosity, what was the other time?
@@kozzumes ty!!!
Where do they do that in this video?/gen
@@amentrison2794 they use a tiktoker’s (icaruspendragon) content without crediting them as well as misinterpreting their point in a way to fit their narrative
@@amentrison2794 my response comment keeps getting deleted 💀
A far, far better example that really *is* ancient fanfic: The Aeneid. Virgil wrote it specifically because Augustus wanted to connect his ancestry to the Iliad.
Using TikToks with peoples faces without their permission seams a bit weird and cutting them out of context is even weirder I’m a fan of sarahs but taking things out of context doesn’t strengthen her point it detracts from the overall video
She cut icaruspendragon off mid sentence and twisted her words.
she took the tiktok and made @icaruspendragon look like an anti-intellect which is not what they were saying at all
This is what I came here to say. I am usually a fan of Sarah’s work, but was really disappointed to see this.
She's also deleting comments about them, and she didn't even ask. Turns out she has a habit of doing this. Can't say I'm a fan anymore tbh
@@Rick-fn5qg My first comment is gone.
As someone who enjoys both books and fanfiction, I personally believe that there is no inherently inferior medium . Although I do agree with some of the arguments made by both sides.
Books and fanfics each have their own strengths and weaknesses and what is best for one person might not hold true for another.
In the end it comes down to personal
preference.
It's not productive to shame people for whatever they choose to read or write, as neither medium is completely flawless or superior to another.
So I hope that eventually everyone can have a civil discussion and not insult each other over such a harmless topic.
This is basically just a long-winded way of saying: Let people read what they want without screaming at each other.
P.S. have a great day/night to whoever is reading this.
Agreed 👍
I read and write both and the gatekeeping people have in the writing/literature world is ridiculous
Thank you. I'm in the same space. Fanficiton among other things, like painting, or music, help and comfort people tremendously when nothing else can, and have all done so for me. Same as fanfiction. Fanwork of all kinds is powerful and important. Not everyone can afford this or that, and in fanwork is this shared little subgroup encouraging each other in something they love, for the sake of loving it. And that joy is easy to access, and you can grow skills in a space you feel safe.
Everything has it's downsides and upsides as you've said, every pro and con an outlier or exception.
I just... the good parts are so impactful and wonderful, It's so important to me.
Edit: deleted because I accidentally responded to the wrong thread. Have a nice day.
yeah, all of it is writing, and writing can vary.
@@Cat-fz1uu it never ends, does it? Fanfic vs traditional books, traditional publishing vs self-publishing, planning vs pantsing. So few people these days seem to be able to go “I prefer this, but I’m happy you’ve found what works for you”. Everything has to turn into some aggressive us vs them battle and it’s fucking exhausting. I’ll read something I like and then zoom over to AO3 to see what’s up, it’s not mutually exclusive.
I find the "all or nothing" nature of fandom communities to be absolutely exhausting. I absolutely love some stories and characters, I have tattoos of them, I watch super in depth videos about "every detail you missed" or "what does x mean" after I've consumed some piece of media I really love, and I get it- it's nice to be able to keep interacting and loving the thing actively after the story is over, and it's nice to exist in communities of people who also love that thing.That said, some people truly make these IPs, ships, etc. their entire personality and hitch themselves to it so tight that if you say one thing that could even be slightly construed as negative, they lose it on you. (Identity-wise I'm not talking about legitimate lgbt+, racial, etc. identities, but like the type of people who have an unhealthy obsession with stuff like BBC Sherlock back in the peak Tumblr fandom days. There is a lot to be said about the lack of diversity in published works, although we're seeing progress being made here, and I do think it's beyond words how important accurate and non-tokenised representation is through all forms of media.) When it comes to fanfiction, people are similarly polarized because they develop a love of these stories, characters, and communities so anything outside of them feels bad by comparison.
I think most modern readers will look at "the classics" with a similar disinterest or passion across the subject broadly. I fucking hated Lord of the Flies and, to this day, think it's an awful book with awful messaging. That doesn't mean that every single book is that way- look at The Picture of Dorian Grey, a book with gay-coded characters written by a gay man and largely about the dangers of pride, vanity, and avarice. If you don't like the writing style, fine, but the book itself is a great example of actually good classical writing imo, it's just not often taught in schools because of some more mature themes and events (like opium addiction). I was also just talking to a friend about how it's so nice to have published Adult lit today that feels more like a slightly more mature YA style, where that really wasn't a *thing* when I was younger.
This is mostly stream of consciousness at this point but tl;dr books are stuffy, books are casual, books are intense, books are boring, books are exciting and books are a medium. Generalizing all fanfiction or all books as one way is immature and short-sighted. There is amazing fanfiction out there that helps to bring attention to societal issues, helps to give people a platform that struggle to gain one, helps the authors explore their own identities and develop a solid writing style, and more. But also My Immortal exists. It's on a massive spectrum.
Hey just wondering why you took IcarusPendragon’s tik tok out of context and then blurred out the name on the tik tok?!?!
Literally every time Sarah says “an all or nothing situation,” or some permutation thereof, I imagine that picture popping up, you know the one
Hey the clip you use at 1:17:02 is by an awesome tiktok creator (idk if she wants me to share her handle) but that clip is kinda taken out of context of a larger discussion she was having which isn’t acknowledged and she’s not credited here. It might be nice to credit her for the use of her video or at least ask to use it
as an avid fanfic writer and reader, i enjoy the medium because because when i get invested in a new thing, when its done, i still want more. im neurodivergent and get hyperfixated on things easily, but i love reading, sometimes i just want to exist with these characters more in a way that isn't just rewatching/rereading the original media, so that's where my love of fanfiction comes in. fanfic can be fun oneshots or long over 300k pieces of writing that completely reimagine the universe, it cant be judged just because some of them are bad or "cringe"
"You really think Pride and Prejudice is in any way comparable to your 50k word omegaverse high school AU Supernatural BTS crossover fanfiction?"
The fact that I understood all of those words is terrifying.
Not sure what valid points you actually made when you skew people's position to invent your own strawmans to refute or use as an example. You cannot redact someone's main point of a video to use as content. You're misleading your audience and intentionally setting up topics for you to win. Taking someone's words out of context like this is like inventing your own sources entirely.
I liked your content before this but now it will be entirely viewed with the lens of me questioning what else you've spun, changed, redacted, or removed from it's established context.
I hope you enjoyed having an argument with yourself.
You should ask people before using their tik toks in your video. I know it's fair use but it's still disrespectful and at least put up the full tik tok instead of posting on part to fit your narrative.
This is a really GREAT and nuanced take. Both fanfic and published books have their place, and they scratch different itches at different times. I write both fanfic and original content, and again. Different itches. Seeing people bash one or the other pisses me off.
I'm also really glad you touched on the Pro-fic/anti-pub crowd completely missing the point of pieces of literature. Like, fuck gatsby, fuck most of the straight white male canon that they use in most schools..... but not every book is like those. There are a LOT of great books out there in every genre. (there are also a lot of bad ones too) and you just have to !!! find the ones you like.
anyway thank you for your spendidly spicy hot take, I wish you many bags of salt and vinegar chips and none of the ouchy mouth feeling from eating too many.
Hi. Fanfic author here. I haven't seen the entire video yet, but as someone who's written a Star Wars fic that's longer than the entire Harry Potter series, I'd argue that at the very least, fanfic shouldn't be dismissed. I've no intention on ever getting published, but I do love writing as a hobby, and even for something that's not my own creation, I've put so much time and effort and creativity in crafting a narrative that much of it feels like my own. I think there's a lot of value in taking an existing piece of media and shifting an aspect of it to see what new or different thing can come of it. At the very least, it's an exercise in creativity, and I think that's enough to be respected.
congratulations on the sheer volume of creation
I think a lot of the ire around fanfic is that a lot of writers of it do think that their work is amazing enough that any publisher should want it. I’ve seen so manu fanfic writers over the years get furious when agents and publishers don’t want their stuff. I’ve written fanfic longer than Sarah’s been alive, and was around to witness the change from fanfic being something fun to fanfic being sneered at, and that big jump really came with Fifty Shades. The line really was in taking someone else’s original property (even a dumb one) and trying to piggyback for monetization after doing as little as possible to make anything original. That’s when fanfic took on the rep of being lazy. I write in a niche fandom, but it’s gotten so original that it’s been actually openly debated if my story even counts as fanfic anymore.
I hadn’t read a book in over a decade because my ADHD made it nearly impossible. I love Star Wars and came across some fanfics 2 or 3 years ago and it’s allowed me to read almost every day since then. Now I’m in a few other fandoms too, but finding something I know I like and authors expanding on those ideas or creating their own stories out of characters I already love is something I absolutely cherish. It absolutely deserves respect and I’m so thankful to come across that community.
damn that is so impressive man congrats
Sarah Z discussing Duchamp’s Fountain as an intro for an hour and a half long video about fanfiction is truly a work of contemporary art in its own
towards the end of the video i had the thought of "i wonder if anyone in the comments is going to complain that sarah is making a comparison between Fountain and fanfic in this video" before i realized how incredibly ironic that would have been
Exactly...
Tbh, I think the medium of published story telling that most closely resembles fanfic isn’t TV, but comic books. Particularly if we are looking at the superhero genre. Well established, popular characters with no one single definitive cannon. New publications or reboots pick and choose which previous works to build off of and which ones to retcon or pretend never happened. Multiple timelines, crossovers, alternate universes, new interpretations of existing characters…Avengers, anyone?
So why’d you take and use TikTokers videos out of context and remove their @s without permission?
What I love about the ‘Fountain’ story is the original was lost or destroyed and all that exists in museums are replicas of various vintages. If I owned a gallery, I’d totally have urinals in the bathrooms signed R. Mutt
DuChamp made suitcases full of miniature versions of his work, I saw one inna museum once and yes it had a mini urinal. You couldn't use it though.
Anyone with an etsy store should just make transparent stickers with his signature. Pretty sure DuChamp would have gotten a kick out of it.
Per the “couldn’t use it though”, a number of people have attempted to urinate in the remaining commissioned full-sized replicas-some successfully, including notably musician Brian Eno albeit with the technical assistance of a tube.
Americans seeing movies from Russia/Poland/Brazil/Thailand exist: "what is this film snobbery"
Every country has rom-coms (probably)
@@kierenkowe Am Polish (kurwa kiełbasa 2137), can confirm, we have rom-coms.
A bit late but, Americans hearing non-American accents and complaining.
One thing I'm slightly baffled by with the TikTok "film-bro" credence cited in the video is that I don't think that even fits the culturally recognized definition of a film bro. In my experience, a film bro is someone who boastfully claims unique, eclectic taste as a point of personal superiority when fact is, the films they champion in their canon are still very pedestrian and mainstream and their appreciation (what they consider the peak of depth in cinema) begins and ends with that slim canon. They're not going to watch a 12 hour movie about the Polish government through the eyes of a pigeon because that's beyond the depth of their canon.
you completely missed the point of 1:17:10. the full tiktok explains the want for accessibility and representation in literature which classical literature lacks compared to fan fiction. it seems like you purposefully butchered @icaruspendragon video to get “discourse points”.
the existence of doctor who alone is enough to question what defines a fan fiction. a show that’s spanned numerous executive producers/show runners, writers, main cast members, etc. in it’s nearly 60 year life. plus there’s the expanded media (audios and books) still licensed but not technically canon to the show. how is this show anything other than fan fiction of the first three seasons
I have a neat anecdote from a friend who took screenwriting classes, and while she was a fanfiction writer accustomed to writing in existing IPs, it was surprising to find someone else struggling with that concept.
It's like the paradox of the ship of Theseus applied to fanfics, the fanfic of Theseus
Star Wars is the same way! Even pre-disney, the EU (now legends) had media that was AU, imo. Any media that is old but continuously popular will have that.
Same with marvel and dc comics. Been published consistently for over a decade. have had hundreds of writers adding to each universe and creating new characters that are in turn written by other people.
i was just thinking about comics the other day in this context. i basically said “it’s crazy how comic writers get to make their ocs canon to marvel/dc/etc”
I still think the Divine Comedy is fanfic, but not because of all the biblical stuff. To me its the “just me and my favorite poet going on an adventure to meet my crush”
kind of weird for you to use someone's video (that shows their face nonetheless) without their permission and take what they say out of context to prove your point (1:17:00). i generally enjoy your content but this is disappointing to see, makes me wonder how many other things you've taken out of context in your videos.
Why did you take take the clip of Icaruspendragon out of context and blur out her username for her tiktok?
I think the core of fanfic discourse boils down to casting judgment on the fact that fanfic is primarily made by and for teenaged girls, using properties and tropes that teenaged girls like. One can intellectualize that as much as they so desire, but that's the crux of it.
You took IcarusPendragons videos with no credit snd cropped it improperly. They never said classic literature had no value just that it is inaccessible. Which it is. It is very inaccessible to a lot of people.
"Fanfiction doesn't challenge its readers and only serves to make them feel warm and fuzzy!"
Looks like someone's never searched for the "hurt no comfort" tag on their third glass of rose saying "let's get messed UP tonight"
Or the case fics, or angst, or slow burns, or major character death or tragedy or the long fics that revolve around reshaping and analizing canon
@banana bread issa joke lol not a serious take on the intellectual merit of fanfic
Which is just... Wrong? Like so much of it does to that but every Draco Malfoy Fixit Fic I've read genuinely challenges a lot of white readers. And there are tons of examples like it, where they literally just take a bad book and make it a good and challenging book.
@@nicolecampos4153 ACE ATTORNEY CASE FICS HAVE SHATTERED ME
Those serve to make you feel better by contrasting you with misery of others.
Can we talk about how the tagging system in fanfiction which serves as both trigger warning and work description came out of its roots as media-distributed-via-internet and has started being adopted by traditionally-published books? Because that's pretty awesome and great, imo.
I agree it's rad, the tagging system can be super helpful in knowing what you're getting into and there's nothing wrong with using these sorts of tags for published works
Hottake: everything is art. All doodles are art, all writing is art, and any collection of hums is art. Just getting up in the morning is a form of performance art.
Then what’s the point of labeling something as art? The term becomes meaningless
@@nonnac1695 Yep. Art is usually defined by having some significant meaning, and not everything does. That doesn't mean it's bad.
oh love this take
@@nonnac1695 or maybe it could inspire you to look for meaning in the smaller part of life?
@@nonnac1695 that’s the entirety of the modern and post modernist art movement. What is art? Art is completely subjective it can be about skill, creation, process, thought or a mix of everything. While I vehemently despise the modern and post modernist era of art as a whole it’s an interesting concept and argument. Art itself is just a concept with already loose definitions 🤷♀️🤷♀️🤷♀️
Once again I'm reminded that despite how chronically online I am, there will be forever more niches filled with many, many people who need to touch grass as urgently as me. There will always be art snobs who are art snobs, but the online ones give out some pretty unhinged takes, and a good number of the the anti-snobs are just as braindead.
for real dude, almost every online discourse I have ever seen eventually devolves into two rabid extremes so entrenched in their views that there is literally no point to even debating anymore.
@@jimjimson6208 The majority of us end up in the middle going "Wow, check out these Takes™ huh? Wild"
I like this discussion because it reminds me of a similar thing that happened about a decade ago in the video game community. There was a relatively new genre of game that was gaining popularity, dubbed the "walking simulator", with games like Gone Home and Dear Esther. These games were quite controversial at the time, considered by many to not be "real games." They focused more on narrative and storytelling rather than exciting gameplay and flashy visuals, and this was just something you didn't really see before then - yes there were the famous audio logs and whatnot in games like Bioshock, but that was never the real focus of these games. So it shouldn't come as a surprise that these games that were basically all about the audio logs and lore notes you could find were initially mocked relentlessly for supposedly being too simplistic and not worth the money.
I remember a video of a guy who managed to "complete" Gone Home in just about 60 seconds after which he started staring directly into the camera for another few minutes as reviews from people praising the game were mockingly presented next to his face implying: "How could anyone like a game that is so short and easy?"
Nowadays the stigma against these games is pretty much gone, although they're still quite niche. I really enjoy games like What Remains of Edith Finch that expertly combine a strong narrative with gameplay elements that tie directly into the story being told. You even have masterpieces like Outer Wilds which are also kind of "walking simulators" but that take the concept much further. I hope the medium of fanfiction can also break out of this stigma and people will just allow it to be its own thing rather than seeing it as a danger to the literary medium as a whole.
Anyways, that was my Ted talk for today.
What remains of Edith Finch was great.
I know this comment is over a year old but, man, Gone Home is so fucking good. I 100% it a few months ago, it's on steam and they added achievements. There are exactly 3 that acknowledge the fact you can beat the game as fast as you can.
1. Homerunner - Complete the game in less than 1 minute with no Modifiers enabled.
2. Speedreader - Complete the game having found all 24 journal entries, without Modifiers, in less than 10 minutes.
3. Behind the Scenes - Activate all Commentary Nodes with the Developer Commentary Modifier enabled.
The third one, with all the developer commentary, includes the devs themselves talking and laughing about how interesting people were about speedrunning the game- they loved and appreciated the creativity behind it!
There are so many reasons why this game fucks, and honestly trying to downplay it by showing you can beat it fast is such a strange concept of the past, like you said. I'm glad it's become more accepted and understood, I guess it's part of out culture growing up and expanding.
@@BiDisaster327Hahaha I love that from the devs. I should go back to that game some time.
My general definition of art is "if someone made it, it can be classified as art (even if it isn't typically)". So yes, to me fanfiction is art. Food is art. Buildings are art. This video essay is art. Art is all around us, art is what we create, art is the act of creating, art is everywhere.
your writing this comment and my unnecessary addition is art as well, my reality is entirely subjective and specific to me, the moon is both a cold maiden with skin bedight in alabaster and the rock that orbits our wonderful terra, "pee poop" is higher art than anything Da Vinci would have ever, with his polygotal, rarified intellect could've dreamed if I will it so!
(That is to say, high art is made up and I adore and am delighted by seeing people dedicate their finite mortal life artificial constructs !!! ;)
Yes!! I'm a big believer that all human creation is art
I agree that any creative expression is art, but there has to be some actual agency or intent in the process. Even the worst photo, or just thumbs or darkness, is still art if you hit the shutter with the intent to capture something. If you don't understand what a camera is and hit the button by accident, the result is not art even if it is very nice. Leaving a canvas near a paint spill hoping it drips onto the canvas counts, arguably even if the paint never drips - but your paint leaking on a canvas by accident does not. But things that are not art can be made art by the process of framing, displaying, editing - an accident may not be art but by treating it, framing it, or displaying it in a context can convert it to art by adding intent so the final thing has intent to it. Or even by taking things away - an accidental photo cropped or desatured in post is explicitly art.
It's a very low threshold, suitably, but I do think it has to exist or it distracts from the creation and the expression that make up creative expression.
@@UnreasonableOpinions That’s the perfect second rule to art: 1) it’s made, and 2) it’s intended as is.
Maybe that drip was intentional, or you made it into art by saying, “Hold on, I like that,” and running with it, but the final act of framing is what makes it intentional. This is arguably why conservation is such a big part of art.
Can something that somebody didn’t be considered art? Would non human creations be able to be classified as art?
Okay, so I'll admit it, I'm one of the "The Divine Comedy is fanfic" crowd with a... Varying degree of sincerity. But I do NOT say that because "oh Dante took characters from the Bible, therefor it's Bible fanfic." No no, I argue it's (again, somewhat sarcastically but also not really because art is complicated) fanfic because it's a work in which the author teams up with his all-time favorite writer on a journey to be with his crush in heaven while simultaneously dunking on DOZENS of people-both fictional and real-and institutions that he didn't like, up to and including multiple Popes and the Catholic church in general. Yes it's a masterful work that basically invented the concept of world building and defined the Christian view of the heaven, hell, and everything in between for literal centuries, but it's also a work where the phrase "VIRGIL-SENPAI I'M YOUR BIGGEST FAN!! :D" could be put in a modern adaptation and a very much non-zero number of literary critics would just laugh their asses off because of how accurate yet absurd it is. It can be both, that's perfectly fine and plausible, because art-just like the people who make it-can be both incredibly insightful and amazing while not precluding the possibility of being stupid or hilarious.
I think part of the main problem is that people tend to lump art into categories like "the classics" and "high art" and "modern art" and treat those labels like they're some immutable box that creates a magical almighty hierarchy. Shakespeare had dick and fart jokes, Virgil wrote the Aeneid as propaganda while taking potshots at Emperor Augustus, Aristophanes was basically the South Park of ancient Athens, Dante wrote the Divine Comedy in part so he could tell people he hated to LITERALLY go to hell. It's foolish to think that a work is "better" than another just because it's in a textbook or valued as worth so much compared to the effort put into it that it's probably less art than a lazy money laundering scheme, when there are just as many works in categories like fanfic that work just as well but simply aren't as well known or don't have the same cultural influence built up around them.
I definitely unironically think the divine comedy is fanfiction for many of the reason states above and you mentioned vigil's the Aeneid which I also think is fanfiction because it's taking taking the Trojan war epic cycle and adding onto it kinda like some fanfictions. And don't get me wrong the Aeneid is really good, it's the first ever Latin poetry that I had read and it's just fascinating to read. I feel like you can also argue that the entirety of the Trojan war epic cycle is in some form or another fanfiction because many authors were taking this already established story that was spread through word of mouth and they wrote in the popular stuff but each author also added in there own stuff but that's a bit more of a stretch. It's just that since there was no copyright in the ancient world people just wrote the same characters in different situations or expanded on more of the story
the thing about dante being guided by virgil is that that's a common feature of the literary device called dream vision
TOBY: (hears the term Bible fanfiction) I feel like becoming relevant again!!
it's the 'self insert protagonist that has cool/horrible things happen to them involving some celebrity or historical figure' trope that makes me think it's a fanfic lol. then again i don't know the book that well
The thing that sealed it for me is Argenti, the" brute" that Dante knew in real life and he places in hell, and how it really reads like the nerd taking his catharsis out on a bully. It's kind of funny.
100% agree with everything said here. I also think--- and I know we've talked about this a bajillion times before-- it continues to be relevant that most distate for fandom and fan culture is pretty directly linked to a distate for teenage girls and anything teenage girls like. Fanfiction is wrapped up in this. It's seen as anti-intellectual because a revialed demographic loudly enjoys it, and then is it any surprise that said demographic doubles down and attempts to return the fire by devaluing published literature?
I generally enjoy your videos but this is kind of a dishonest move that you pulled. Can you edit the video to at least put the Tiktokers name in it since your using their content without their permission? Or maybe not edit their point? Would be a little less scummy.
Some of the creators of these tiktoks feel uncomfortable with the fact you not only used their videos in general, but you also hid their usernames? If you're gonna monetize their content, at least give them some credit.
I'd also add some are feeling pretty misrepresented in your video
The editor cut off the watermarks so the ops wouldn’t get harassed; it’s a common practice and not nearly as malicious as people are acting like it’s so stupid
1) Monetization is not the same thing as "here are some examples of people talking about my current subject topic". Using a thumbnail of a video is not the same as using a significant portion of that video. 2) As M Jade stated, usernames are often removed to prevent harassment. 3) I'm sorry that people are feel that Sarah Z has misrepresented their tweet/video by lumping them together to illustrate examples. Genuinely. However "they feel misrepresented" doesn't actually explain what the relevant issues are. There are quite a lot of videos used in Sarah Z's video essay; which have users that are claiming to have been misrepresented? Were the videos used generally appropriately in terms of how they broadly illustrated Sarah Z's topic, or were the videos stating completely opposite things to Sarah Z's usage of them?
@@mjade1097 Yeah, I’m scrolling through these comments trying to figure out what people are talking about, and it’s giving me flashbacks to the modder drama of my own youth (Morrowind mods, to flex my aging millennial bona fides)
Idk much about Tik Tok culture, and it seems like maybe online harassment isn’t as bad as it used to be? But as far as I know, it’s still considered basic decency if you have a large audience to blur out identifying info of people so they don’t get flooded with (almost always malicious, no matter the content creator’s intentions) unsolicited attention.
Kinda seems like people are getting agitated w/ Sarah over nothing, but maybe there’s something I’m missing? Help me out here, these comments are all so vague
Right, if someone could actually explain what the original tiktok’s point was maybe we could see how Sarah misrepresented it but the hundreds of these comments none with an explanation is pretty sus.
What the fuck was she actually saying then? If you can’t tell us maybe she just doesn’t like her content being used by someone who disagrees and she wasn’t actually misrepresented
In regards to many people saying they just can't read most published fiction, there is another element; Many Neurodivergent people do in fact experience this, where the standard structure of writing that is ubiquitous in publishing since its standard just flat out doesn't make any sense. A couple Self published authors I know off have said they also had struggled with this and it was painful, and a lot of them said it was also a major factor in their choice to pursue self publishing; With self publishing they could honestly tell their editors that the changes that they suggested flat out made it so they, the AUTHORS of the work, could not understand their own work anymore, whereas standard publishing would've forced the changes among other things. These authors also say they regularly get comments and messages from fans saying they loved their books precisely because they could actually read it and it was the first things they could read in years and that they thought they were stupid because they couldn't read anymore etc.
I would like to nitpick the meme shown at 49:30. Wicked is absolutely fanfiction. It's fanfiction soup to nuts. The guy who wrote it was not an "established literary titan" in any way shape or form. Wicked was his breakout success. This is a man who literally went to the state school in my city, and dated my friend's mom. He's a townie. Like legit. If he's "established" enough when Wicked was published to make that book not fanfic, then none of my friend's fanfic is fanfic either. Because she's a literature professor with a few unsung children's books under her belt and that's literally the same credentials Gregory Maguire had when Wicked was published. I know this is pure pedantry, and as someone who doesn't need fanfic to be art in order to enjoy it, I have no dog in this fight. But I had to say it or it was going to annoy me all day.
On the other hand, I don't think that the Oz books are still under copyright, so it's not fanfiction. It's reusing public domain characters. That is valid and happens a lot. It's not fanfiction when you're writing a Sherlock Holmes novel (there are loads of new ones, from good to bad) and publish it. "Wicked" is not fanfiction.
@@cayreet5992 but how many works that are currently under copyright would be back in the public domain by now if not for disney? it's not literally the exact same as fanfiction, sure, but if the only criteria is that the original work can no longer be under copyright, then that means a lot of things that are currently fanfiction eventually won't be. i mean, if something goes into public domain and someone who wrote a fanfiction about it decades ago decides to publish that work now that it's public domain, that's not fanfiction?
oh, and not to mention modern fanfiction made of things that aren't copyrighted at all and never have been. but that is still seen as fanfiction because it uses someone else's characters and wasn't published for money
@@Zabe_B There is a difference between fanfiction and, as mentioned in the video, derivative works.
Yes, a lot of characters and whole books under copyright could be used well if they had public domain status (I myself would love to add to the Fantomas canon, but it's under copyright). Even stories in public domain can be fanfiction. There's loads of Sherlock Holmes and Dracula fanfiction out there and both are in public domain. There is also derivative works of material under copyright, if the writer has obtained the okay to use it from the rights holder.
I think the form of publication plays a role. There used to be privately-printed fanfiction that was sold for essentially the price of printing at conventions. Printing and selling it didn't make it something else (although some rights holders did act against it). Official publication for money is an indication for it being derivative without being considered fanfiction (hence the whole aspect of 'filing off the serial numbers'). You can simply publish a new Sherlock Holmes or Dracula story, if you wish to (there might be slight hiccups about Sherlock Holmes, that one has a complicated copyright background), as there is no legal way to stop you. If you simply publish a new book for the Twilight series, though, you'll be in trouble.
Fanfiction about the labours of Hercules is still fanfiction, but you can use the topic in a book you sell (there are 12 short-stories about Hercules Poirot which are written as his 12 labours by Agatha Christie and there's "The Twelve Labours of ... eh ... Brian", to name two). One aspect of fanfiction is that you want to share it with other fans. Whether that happened several centuries ago or whether it happens today doesn't make a change there. Derivative works are you as the author using a pre-existing thing in your own work, usually to make money. Fanfiction is part of derivative works, but not all derivative works are fanfiction.
Yup, wicked in 100% fanfic. My mom worked with the author (unrelated to writing), and he’s just some guy.
It's not about being established. Every author has a first book out. The fact is that it's a regular published work which is not really affiliated with the original content. Yes, the Wicked Witch of the West exists in Oz, but that doesn't make it a fanfic. The same way that Jim C. Hines 'Princess series is not fanfic, simply because he uses fairy-tale characters. By the time Wicked was published, all of the Oz stories were already in public domain, so all which Maguire did was use publicly available characters to tell a story. Very much like, unfortunately, Moffat's "Dracula" miniseries isn't fanfiction but his own take on Dracula.
It might also surprise you, M Paul, but most authors are 'just some guy' or 'just some girl' and still live off writing.
Usually I'm keen to watch ur videos but the way u removed usernames, cropped out the tiktok to misrepresent their context to buffer up ur points really makes me hesitant to continue consuming ur content. U make heavy use of sharing other ppls content to bolster and negate conversation points ("Score internet points" as u describe it) and idk how i can trust what u create now.
"... As a Buffy fan I would argue that half of the Buffy fandom's conversations are about which parts of the show they hate and how much they hate the creator..."
I have observed that there is very little that Harry Potter fanfic writers hate more than the Harry Potter series.
And the Game of Thrones fans... by God, those poor people.
@@JackedThor-so I was much happier once I "realized" that the original book, _Game of Thrones,_ actually never had any sequels. Such a shame it ended on a cliffhanger. OH WELL.
Yeah harry potter fan i hate most harry Potter fanfiction