Ranking EVERY L-Mount Lens I've Tried!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
- Footage Graded With Phantom LUT's (Check Them Out!)
transactions.s...
My Photo Preset (Works With Every Image!)
feedmecontent....
THE GEAR I USE:
*Some of the following links are affiliate links, so if you decide to purchase something, I get a very small commission at NO extra cost to you - Thanks in advance for supporting the channel!
CAMERAS:
My Main Cam (Lumix S5IIX)
geni.us/VHW0Kv
My B-Cam (Lumix S5II)
geni.us/Avt5
PRIME LENSES:
Panasonic LUMIX 24mm F1.8
geni.us/AdbkotR
Panasonic LUMIX 35mm F1.8
geni.us/j0l5fn
Panasonic LUMIX 85mm F1.8
geni.us/mZm1TkS
ZOOM LENSES:
Sigma 28-70 F2.8
geni.us/Bd6NL
Panasonic LUMIX 16-35 F4
geni.us/oTkQR
Panasonic LUMIX 70-200 F4
geni.us/RBByZLM
AUDIO SETUP:
Rode NTG4+
geni.us/2jHAaA
Tascam DR60 MKii
geni.us/fXkZU5S
Hollyland Lark 150
geni.us/6tla19
Since I've had the pleasure of trying out a lot of different lenses available for the L-Mount, I thought it would be good fun to rank them using a tier list I made.
I've used multiple different primes, zooms and cine lenses for the L-Mount with my Lumix S5, S5II and S5IIX. I feel like I have a good grasp of what lenses I like, and what ones I don't.
I really hope this video is helpful for you guys, and hopefully it'll help to inform your next purchasing decision!
![[UNCUT] “บอสณวัฒน์” ลากไส้!! ใครหนุนหลัง "แม่ตั๊ก ป๋าเบียร์" I คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ I 30 ก.ย. 67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/QlD7mU2KKRk/mqdefault.jpg)
I've only got the 20-60mm & 70-300mm and I literally love both of them. The 20-60 is just a really useful focal range for a kit lens and that 70-300 is just too good! I never want to take the lens off!!
I have the exact same as you ! Im contemplating the 35mm f1.8 to add
just got the S5 II with the 20-60, ordered the 70-300mm and the new 100mm and now thinking to get the 50mm as well.
Tbh Lumix just launched their 28-200mm Macro O.I.S. so for versatility I'd get that lens if you get the chance!@@joergkampers_photography
My exact setup. I need nothing else at the moment
@@TheScatman89 me too
That was fun! My main change would be adding the 70-200 f4 to god tier. Never tried the 70-300 but the 70-200 is fantastic. Sharp, beautiful rendering, super stable, no breathing, lovely bokeh… love it.
agree, i love my 70-200 f4, 35 1.8, 85 1.8 and thinking now after watching i might have to have the 18mm 1.8 regardless of $. ID LIKE to see a review from JOSH on the Nightwalkers, and all ANamorphics (viltrox, Sirui etc L mounts) and what he'd personally shoot a microbudget film (which L mount lens)
Loved the inputs. With the L mount ecosystem finally flourishing, it is nice to put things in perspective and provide a user feedback on the what is hot and not. I have a 85 mm 1.8 (along with the 20-60) and absolutely love it . I would have loved to have seen the ranking include other 3rd party lenses for L mount ecosystem - Meike lenses/TTartisans too.
Maybe it’s on the cards… third party lens tier list maybe?😜
This is an awesome video man. I keep revisiting it. So comprehensive, yet so concise. Bursting full of info and experience
I appreciate this dude! Thank you!
Also own the 70-300. I replaced the 24-105 after I found 90% of my shots were over 70mm and often cropping in 2X at 105mm. I am very happy with that decision - it's a great lens and my copy seems sharper than my 24-105 did. Also I still own the 20-60 if I ever need anything wider.
Yes, 70-300 better. I have S5ii (50 f1,8. 24-105 f4. and 70-300) 50 1,8. better too
Just 2 day ago bought an S5ii with a Sigma 28-70 2.8 lens. Really just thinking picking an 85 and 24 later down the road and be done with it.
Panasonic Full Frame was my dream camera since the announcement. I could never imagine i would be able to afford it.
What a fantastic video. You’ve helped me so much in transitioning from Fujifilm to Lumix S5ii, you and Matthew Rudderman. Curious what you’d recommend between the Lumix S 16-35 Pro f/4 and the Sigma 16-28 f/2.8. The Lumix is on sale so price is less of an issue. It is more about the Lumix having the more useful range and the Sigma having the aperture advantage. I really focus more on photography and less on video. I’d love to see you do a comparison video between these two lenses. I can’t find much on TH-cam comparing them. Keep up the great work! Really enjoying your channel.
Sigma 24-70 is a certainly 'fantastic' for me. Half the price and 100g less than then (also good) Lumix 24-70.
Great alternative to the 24-105 if you're fine with a bit less reach (+ crop zoom option) but get a full stop of light + AFL button in return!
Hey guys! Thanks for watching this video, it was a fun one to make and PLEASE take my opinions with a pinch of salt. Everyone has different boxes to tick when it comes to what lenses they decided to use, so the things I prioritise may be completely different for you!
Also, thanks for 20K subs! I genuinely appreciate you all for taking the time to watch these videos. It means a lot and makes all of the effort worthwhile 🎉
So is this for video use or photography ? I will never use zoom lenses for photography !
@@cameraprepper7938 What, why?
Zoom lenses have more use in photography than videography, because you generally don't zoom while filming. And if it's a sharpness issue, then you're either pixel peeping beyond what anyone considers reasonable, or you're doing something wrong while shooting.
@@daysandwords Zoom Lenses is expensive, heavy, big and so annoying and boring to use, a prime Lens is like an extension of your mind, most people I talk to only use two focal length od a zoom, so get a wide angle prime Lens and a short tele prime Lens and you can cover just about anything !
Absolutely enjoyed this video!
I heard Samyang's 35-150 is coming to l-mount. Will you be doing a review on that one when it comes out?
I love the S line from LUMIX, I’m always looking for lens and things to film with that camera, I feel that I’m going to grow in this camera for the next couple of years. Thanks for your advice Josh!
Thanks for watching mate!
Great analysis and interesting point of view🙌 as always, appreciate the quality of the content!
Thank you for the kind words! Appreciate you taking the time to watch this video 🙏🏼
my man, Josh! thank you for all that you do!
Thank YOU for watching dude 🙏🏼
Very interesting choices Josh. I would probably keep the 35 1.8 God-Tier and add the 24-105 to the God-Tier as well personally. Same with the 16-28 from Sigma. I would probably have taken the 50 1.8 down a notch to the Fantastic category and that's pretty much it. And probably upgraded the Sirui 50 2.9 to Meh rather than would not recommend. I am hoping they come up with the carbon fibre variant of the 50 2.9, but the rendering from the Sirui 50 2.9 is definitely special and has a place for fiction work, even if not so much for run and gun
Thanks for this "shoot out". Most of us don't get to experience this many lenses, and I trust that gives you some degree of objective viewpoint. Looking at just the range of L mount lenses you have compared here, it's nice to see there is a range of good, to pretty damn good, lenses available. The L mount has gained traction, and I suspect it will continue to do so.
I have the Lumix S 24-70 f2.8, and have to agree it is a heavy lens. I bought the kit lens as a walk around lens, and it works fine for exterior shots.
I use DZOfilm Vespid primes for my video work, but the 18mm f1.8 and 35mm f1.8 primes would be sweet on my gimbal.
Just ordered the 28-70, Selling the 20-60 to offset price. I think I will land around $500 net so not bad. The 20-60 and the 50 1.8 both came with my S5ii package for $2095. I am feeling good with all of it...I still have my G9 for my M43 fix ... all lumix for me now.
Ouch on the Sigma 14-24 F2.8! 😔 That's my daily workhorse for RE photography and I love it!
Love your input though! I agree on quite a few of your choices!
I got the 24-105 as my first lens after watching your reviews and really couldn't be happier. The ois is so good - if i accidentally flip it off, i notice immediately. Im personally really happy with the sharpness on my copy and i use the semi-macro all the time. For documentary and travel type shooting, it really is a jack of all trades with few compromises.
Someday, maybe I'll grab a prime or a tele-zoom like the 70-300 or 100-400. But for now, i think I'm set.
Is the dual IS (body + lens) really on a gimbal level?
If u put it to 50mm and walk for example
I heard people dont even bother with gimbals for this combo of body and lens and I wanna figure out if Its a lens worth buying for the IS
@@borborcarcar I've never owned a gimbal but I think it depends on what kind of camera movement you're doing. Walking? No. At least not just with a bare rig. If you have cage and sidehandles, and a bit of weight on the camera like a monitor and such it would probably be very close. For a simple crane type shot or short dolly-in/dolly-out you're probably good for anything subtle.
Nice video. I'm picking up an S5 and have started shopping for additional lenses to the kit lens. Love the channel!
Hey Josh, fantastic video. I fully agree on the 35mm f/1.8 "god tier" status, it is indeed a very nice lense. The lighter and more compact design is a huge plus, especially when compared to the bulkier Sigma 35mm f/1.4. It's impressive how Panasonic managed to maintain optical quality while making the lens more portable.
He downgraded it though - the 35mm. Personally I love mine partially because it's such a useful focal length.
@@HGQjazz He actuelly did, I think I missed that :D
Panasonic really had a home run with the 1.8 primes, and it’s actually incredible how much quality they packed into such a small,lightweight profile.
The only reason I demoted the 35mm F1.8 is because it doesn’t get as much use as it once used to, so therefore I was thinking more about my urge to reach for it; but that doesn’t take away from how amazing it is!
I’m just a spoiled kid in a sweet store with too many options 🤣
I could not really see the difference in image, when shooting the 28-70 with 35mm 2.8 or above, compaired with the 35 1.8, shooting from 2.8
As I did not like the bokeh from the 35 mm when shooting under 2.8, I sold it and never looked back.
hi which one would you recommend sigma 35mm f/1.4 or lumix 35mm f/1.8?
This is the video I needed in my life rn.
🙏🏼🙏🏼
Surprised at how much Panasonic you emphasized and how little Sigma. Sigma 40mm F1.4 (used is super cheap), Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN, Sigma 105mm F1.4, Sigma 135mm F1.8 are all some of the best and most unique lenses out. A 35 or 50mm F1.8 is nice, but it's about the least special specs humanly possible for a prime lens.
Sorry I am only now seeing this excellent video!! Given the lenses that were available 1 year ago, my only change would be to put the 35mm f/1.8 back up to row one "God Tier" as this is my go-to lens on my L-mount. Thank you!!
I got the 50mm 1.4 S pro and 70-300. Both are god tier indeed. My 70-300 is very sharp, so lightweight, compact and very fun. The 50mm 1.4 is razor sharp and allows for full use of the S1R megapixels, cropping it is like I have a 50-150mm zoom.
Wow! You really shocked me with the ranking of the Sigma 14-24 DG DN lens - for me this is in the GOD TIER category, as it is optically one of the best wide angle zoom lenses ever made, and I have tried really many. And most lenses under 15mm have bulky front elements, so You can't use filters on most of them.
The 70-200mm f2.8 is the best lens I ever had. Is heavy, yes but for now there are nothing comparably choice. I prefer deal with the weight. I will keep it forever and if not use it I will put in my office for collection.
Yeah I got my panasonic s5 mk1 with 20-60 and 50mm f1.8 for 1,749 from amazon brand new
i go hiking with the pana s24-70 and the pana s pro 70-200 f2.8😅. its a really good exercise and you def. dont need any gym membership. you'll be ripped just by using tue 70-200 everywhere
Great comments. Please review more Sigma dg dn 1.4 lenses (like the 24mm, small light @1.4, the 35 and 50 also spectacular performers and value for money).
for the moment i got 2 basic lenses with my S5ii offer pack , 20-60mm kit lens & 50mm f1.8 prime lens , next i would like to add 1> sigma 85mm f1.4/ lumix 85mm f1.8 , 2> sigma 28-70mm f2.8 , 3> lumix 35mm f1.8 4> panasonic upcoming wide to telezoom like 24-200mm something like this
Wish sigma would release a dg dn version of the 105mm 1.4
great list Josh! We are spoiled with a video over 10 mins! 🤣I
I may have to start doing more videos that last longer than 30 seconds 😭😂
You should redo this after the new lumix compact zoom and the sigma 2.8 24-105 are released 😀
All very understandable. For non-pros, I think the 20 60 for filming is great at the price.
The 20-60 is a solid kit lens; maybe I was a bit harsh 😳 it’s just the variable aperture for me, but for the price, it’s pretty damn good!
Amazing video and good to see a longer runtime!! I'm proud to only own "God Tear" lenses
Thanks mate! Only god tier lenses for Ed and his RED 🤣
For me, 24-105mm is a very good run'n'gun lens (sadly there are no f/2.8 options for it), also, I think you should test Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3
Will see if I can grab that lens for testing! If they made a 24-105 f2.8 with O.I.S then it’s game over 😳
Josh, can't put the 70/200. 2.8 so down on the tier, cmon. Is it Heavy?, of course, is it costly? sure. But that is a Once in a lifetime lense. For conferences, for concerts for anything you need on a tripod it's a beast. I miss on the Tier the 7artisans, would you suggest invest on Them? or on the Lumix prime? For video mainly. Coz I am looking for some prime Lenses. Thanks again. Love your Channel
where would you put the new telephoto lens 28-200mm ?
would love to see the comparision between
sigma 90mm f2.8 vs lumix 85mm f1.8
sigma 50mm f2 vs lumix 50mm f1.8
Would love Part 2 to this video even though I always find myself returning to this video
Maybe I'll make that soon!
Invaluable video! Thank you! I am new in Panasonic. I just bought SE S5 mark ii with Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 and I am very pleased. I am about to buy another lens and I am happy to know that the 18mm f1.8 and 70-300mm are in your God tier! One of those will be mine. Thank you again. have
The 85mm 1.4 Sigma on my S5 is maybe my favorite lens I've ever used on any body (close second is the Voigtlander 17.5 f0.95 on my G9)
Nice video, Josh. I wonder how you'd like the S PRO 50mm F/1.4, I own this and the regular 50 1.8 and I very much prefer the look of the Pro (though I'm not entirely convinced about that price difference being worth it). Cheers!
I’ve actually never tried the S Pro 50mm, but I’d love to. My only issue is the size… that puts me off a bit! Since one of my priorities is packing/travelling light for shoots!
The Panasonic 24-70 f2.8 needs some love - a seriously impressive lens. My #1 god tier lens. But I reckon much of this list is spot on - especially that 35mm f 1.8
Watching you argue with yourself on this video was loads of fun!
The best L mount lens? SL24/90. Near perfection.
i love watching people being genuinely excited talking about things they love hahaha
"no i'm locking it in. it's god tier for me! *bangs table*" hahaha
😂thanks for watching dude! ✌🏻
Off topic, I'd hazard a guess you play MCOC. That compariosn tier system looks familiar. 😀
I can’t choose between 24105 and 70300. Halp. I don’t want to switch lenses or carry several with me. I love zoom but then again sometimes I just need wide angle. Did I just answer my own question? I just love the 70300 so much man I instantly fell in love when I used it at CES last year
I have the PS 20-60mm, the PS 50mm f1.8 the PS 85mm f 1.8. I got really happy when my 85 went to fantastic 😂 I was about to cry since its my newest purchase.
I think you should include a linger video with all possibilities, canon, sigma, Leica, etc. Maybe have a guest to help out.. you know who
why not the 24-70 panasonic
Hi, Would you please talk a bit more about the Lumix 24-70mm., f/2.8, that you have you used in one of your previous videos? Thank you : )!!!
Of course! Will make a video soon covering this lens!
I have all yours Meh, so the 70-200 f2.8 is so fuking good that I haven't notice the weight, the Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 is perfect for interiors and artificial lights but in exterior you have to correct aberrations. I also have the 24-70mm f2.8 which is the best lense I have ever used, big and heavy but is the most near to a 5k leica lens, no aberration, very sharp, smooth focus, no breathing, fast and I think the only missing thing for the price is stabilization, it beat the 20-60mm so far and the 24-105mm too.
where is the Panasonic LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm f/2.8 Lens?
I have to completely disagree with putting the 14mm f1.4 in "Meh", esp with the reason given here. It is kind of saying that a Ferrari is "Meh" compared to a Corolla because it is heavy and expensive. Well duh, it is designed for a special purpose: to shoot at ultra-wide angle and still at fast aperture. And since it mostly cater to the astrophotography crowd / to be used at low light landscape situation in general, the lens needs to be designed specifically for low light performance (e.g., chromatic aberration), which lead to its size and price. This is never supposed to be a lens that you carry with you on your SL all the time. I do agree that it is indeed expensive and heavy, but honestly should we really expect otherwise for a full-frame 14 1.4 lens?
I don't own many L-mount lenses. Most of mine are M-mounts, which are much much smaller and lightweight. Many of the vintages lenses I own are also much cheaper as well. But that doesn't automatically make another lens that is heavy and expensive meh. It is a fantastic lens for low-light situation.
Sure, opinions are opinion, but then why make this video? It will really only help someone if you establish your criteria. For example, are you ALWAYS going to take price into account? Is the chart primarily about best value? Is optical perfection more important? Apparently not, because you hardly mention optics, where the difference in distortion between similar lenses might make a significant ranking difference. Finally, I wonder how can zooms and primes be compared when they suit such different photography styles and situations?
Set some constraints and criteria... or it's just arbitrary.
But if you want my opinion, the Panasonic 35mm and 85mm are God Tier. Both more useful than the 50mm focal length. I would never consider paying more and carrying a heavier lens, just to go from f/1.8 to f/1.4 at that focal length. In fact my other God tier 85mm is the Contax Zeiss Sonnar, which only goes to f/2.8. Doesn't stop it from taking excellent photos.
I would put the Lumix kit zoom in Fantastic because... do you know of a better kit lens?
So that my opinions make sense, I declare my criteria: weight & size, optical quality, and the fact I hate zooms. 🙂
may not have the greatest aperture but goddamn does the 20-60mm has good quality glass for a kittens
my favourite sigma 105 2.8 macro isn't in this list
I purchased 70-300mm because of your GOD tier review!.
I hope you're enjoying it! Love that lens :)
@@JoshCameron I have the 70-300 (got it for 250 euros, which was insane and basically forced me to get it). I love the lens, but my use case currently is mostly making short videos about the Spanish civil war (riding around Spain on my Triumph), so I use the 18mm, 50mm, and 85mm quite a bit. I sometimes use the 20-60mm but not as much as I thought I would as changing out lenses on my RS3 gimbal is just so easy with the primes. I'll usually use the 18mm and the drone for some establishing shots (and the 18mm works well for peering out from bunkers and walking through trenches). Between the 18mm, drone, and 50mm I cover about 70% of what I shoot. When I'm with my kids I like to have the 20-60mm because who the hell knows what I'll need with them. But I always bring the 85mm 1.8 because the photos of them come out so wonderful. I'm really trying to work the 70-300 but I just don't have as much experience or imagination on how to use it for what I'm doing and here in the city (Madrid). I can see myself using it this summer at the beach for dolphin pods, sailboats, and fishing boats (or the kids playing in the wash from afar). But for my civil war stuff I just don't know.
I love my Sigma 24-70!
835g is still okay and for the money IT IS A GODTIER BEAST
Perfect guidance bro . Thanx so much as must don’t cover l mount you are a gem bro
Thanks dude! Appreciate it!
Now you've got me thinking of that 14mm 1.4...
Frankly inferior zooms from f4 should be at the bottom, not at the top of the table.
With a variable focal length, only 150-600 dg dn os sport makes sense, the rest are better with a fixed focal length, including manual ones, like laowa 12 f2.8 or 90 f2.8, which will give more than plastic from sigma or panasonic.
Although sigma 85, 35, 20 with f1.4 are quite good....
Thank you so much for the vídeo. But, i change my bag if i could, becouse today the most important thing is weith. Love hike, so. i put two lenses in my back pack. The 18mm because is light, good, and you can do excelent night sky photos. the second will be the 24-105 f4 and thats all. Nothing more. I have nikon camras too and i miss so much this focal lens 24-120mm. It is sooo good you go further than 105mm anyway... I prefer almost everything in Panasonic. Colors, dynamic range... video. One more lens stay with me, but not for hike, but for landscape photos. it is the 100-400mm from sigma. versátil lens. well. Sorry about my english. From Brazil 😅. thanks
If you are going to own only one lens out of all these. It definitely has to be the Sigma 28-70 F2.8
Why is that?
thanks bro,, and I can't wait for 28-200
Just what I was looking for
what about the 14-28mm? I love that lens 🥺
Crushed between the 70-200 f4 & 70-300 by Panasonic
Me too.
Thanks for the insight, some surprises there. Very curious where the Lumix 14-28mm would be on this!
Sigma 16-28 + 28-70, Lumix 70-200 f4, Leica 24-90, all ‘Fantastic’ and every day lenses for me. The 24-90 would be ‘God’ if it was either smaller & lighter, or f2.8 constant aperture (because both might be asking too much!). If I had to pick just one and done, Sigma 28-70 and waiting for a 70-180 to replace both the Leica and the Lumix 70-200 on size & weight.
I follow your god tier all the way 50/28-70 sigma/20-60/85 sigma but for wideangle still debate 18 and 16-28 sigma which one to choose
Between the 16-35mm and 24-105mm, which do you think is sharper over the overlapping range? I will be doing primarily landscape and architecture photography, and I usually stay at the wider end of the zoom range.
The Leica 24-90 mm f2.8-4 SL is an amazing lens, but it weighs about the same as a dustbin filled will ball bearings. Since I'm getting on a bit and am not a weightlifter I sold it recently. I'm now looking for a suitable L mount lens to replace it. The Sigma 28 - 70 looks really tempting. I'd prefer a wider angle at the lower end, but 24-70 f2.8s tend to be quite heavy, as you say. Maybe I should pair it with the 16-28 f2.8? I love the Panny 20-60 as a walk around lens, and I don't really need anything wider, but sometimes one needs a larger aperture. Any suggestions are welcome (well, almost any).
I’m curious to know your thoughts on the s pro 50mm f1.4. Not many people show good examples on TH-cam..
I’ve used the 50 1.4, and it takes stunning photos. It works well with video too.
Awesome lens, this one and the 24-70mm S Pro are the best L moubt lenses from Lumix.
@@bestinkamloops how’s the af with the new s5ii?
@@Iamtongue it seems to be working well for me. However I don’t have experience with Canon or Sony cameras to compare.
I literally just finished editing my new MFT lens tier list and now you come out with this! What are the odds?
Great minds think alike 😳😂
What do you think of the 28-200 released in the meantime? IMHO it's a great lens.
Just noticed your "The NEW Lumix 28-200 - All You Could Ever Need?" video :)
It's a fantastic lens, I love it so much - genuinely my absolute favourite for travel!
Should try out the Laowa 58mm f2.8 2X. I have had mine about a month and absolutely LOOOOOVE it!
I actually think I own this lens haha! Should have included it!
@@JoshCameron Where would it slide into the list?
You’ve really got my wanting that 18mm now!
I wonder how the Sigma 50 1.4 competes with LUMIX 50 1.8
Hi Josh, realise it was not covered in your review but what's you view on the 14-28 f4-5.6 macro lens? My 20-60 has proved a very versatile lens so wondering what advantages this would offer over it.
Hey Josh, thanks for another great video😊 what about the LUMIX 14-28 f4-5.6 that was released earlier this year?
I haven’t tried it! …. Yet 😜
@@JoshCameron I hope you will try it and give us a review😊 I am curious about this one.
I have the 70-200 f2.8 and I hardly ever use it purely because of the weight. Pretty much to the point if you travel internationally with it, you are going to be hit with excess baggage. The 70-300 looks like better value to quality ratio.
Image quality is not as good (I had both), the local contrast is much better on the 70-200mm. But the size and weight are a real problem.
You know, you should also rank the lenses within each tier 🙂
What lens would you recommend for real estate videography? Leica L
Thanks for the great review. I'm interested in your opinion, will the sigma 35/1.2 be worse in terms of color? Because, despite the much higher light power and good sharpness, it is the sigma optics in conditions of dimming that the color of the skin tones seems to lose more saturation than the optics of Panasonic, Canon, Nikon.
How to use E lens to L mount body camera pls give me suggestions
Legend as always
No opinion on the Sigma 100-400mm f/5.0-6.3?
i regret buying the 24-70 sigma. its heavy as hell . 28-70 would have been great .
Not too late to sell and switch?😜
@@JoshCameron it's not easy in India . Can't get a decent buyer. And the new one is is lot expensive than in the western countries
Btw what do you recommend for vlogs and run and gun videos
Sigma 16-28 or lumix 18 prime
Appreciate the input and your thoughts about the lenses and the list was pretty helpful! Where would you put the 35 -50 and 80mm T2.0, 7Artisans lenses?
Where does the new 100mm place? God tier?
Good work and nice reccomendations.
Thanks Nick!
If you could only get one, which zoom would you you choose between 70-300macro , 24-105 Macro, 70-200 2.8? 😅
8:46 its no the SH1 markt II 🤔🤔🤔🤫🤫? Hahahahah good video
Josh, going out to Utah and Colorado where the vistas are grand. I also need to keep my kit light for the flight. I have the S5MII. Should I use the 16-35mm 4.0 Pro or consider acquiring the 24mm 1.8?
The 16-35 f4 is a much more versatile lens, and I don’t think you’ll be needing the low aperture unless you’re planning on shooting something different from the landscapes and scenery :) the 16-35 will do you just fine, but I’d also try to cover the closer range too in case you want to pick out details!
@@JoshCameron Thank you! I’ve had good luck with the 50mm for closer in. I’m just not wanting to carry the 24-105 all day. Enjoy your channel!!
how about sigma 28-70 vs sigma 18-50 vs sigma 16-28 for the first lens to buy, which u recommend?
What about the Sigma 24-70 2.8
Hey Josh,
I have Probably used 4 of your God Tiers 35,50,70-300 I wants to but the 28-70 when I have thé founds ans the 18mm...
What software are you using to rank these? Love the idea.
Just a website. Easy to google
Ever use the 14-28 macro? If so where would that go for you?