Its crazy how few overviews there are for the 24-105 STM even now in mid 2016. In case anyone is trying to decide like I was, between this version and the f4L... I went for this STM version as it was significantly cheaper for a brand new copy with warranty from Amazon than even a used L lens. I am liking the lens a lot, I appreciate its relatively low weight, good sharpness and fast focussing. Unless you are shooting sports, the autofocus is not going to be an issue, and if you *are* shooting sports, you would want a faster lens anyway. I picked up a 3rd party lens hood for a couple of quid on ebay, as the canon copy is a massive rip off. Anyway, just want to update people that this lens does seem to make sense in 2016 as an inexpensive alternative over the L lens. I think the only real reason to go with the L lens is for weather sealing at this point.
Yeah, its a nice lens but its a crowded segment with the sigma and canon 24-105 and plenty of 24-70s. I picked it up brand new for under £300, which is a great price in my opinion, and justifies its existence among the more expensive options.
My copy of the 24-105 STM is very sharp and the equal to my 24-105 L in sharpness. The STM lens was the kit lens when I purchased my 6D otherwise I would not have it.
I purchased the EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 as an additional STM lens for my C100 MKII. As a one man production for our Bible study class, I need good autofocus. This lens functions with the C100 MKII’s limited facial focus feature. The STM is super quiet and works quickly. Only the STM zooms & 35mm macro STM unlock this feature on the old workhorse C100 MKII. I recently purchased an R6 MKII and adapted this lens to it. The 24-105mm f3.5-5.6 works brilliantly on my mirrorless camera. I also have the (L) series USM 24-105mm but I like the STM better for video. Thanks for an amazing review that is informative & entertaining.
Awesome review, I',m buying a refurbished canon 24-105 f/4 for $600 from B&H, i'de rather have the constant f/4 for both video and low light on my new 70D and besides most videos can be sinked with sound so who cares about a little focussing sound.
I use my camera mostly for video (5D Mark 3). I am considering this lens for VIDEO, but debating between this and the L. My shots are mainly still when filming my sewing videos, but I do talkin head shots and use a field monitor to focus on my face. For my TH-cam and sewing classes what do you recommend between the two?
The only real advantage to this lens would be if you were using with a body that can autofocus during video (not your 5D3). I would probably recommend the L version unless you get this one a lot cheaper.
Is $200 cheaper worth it? I also want to invest in a 24mm prime and a battery grip, which is the only reason Im trying to be frugal, otherwise Id easily go for the L, but if you say the L is the much better investment, Ill take your word for it. I dont mind investing, I like the security.
Sew Chic Tv If you don't mind waiting a bit, Canon is about to release a new version of L lens. There might be a lot of sales on the existing lens if you are patient.
Thanks for the review, although you are forgetting that one of the first STM lens introduced by Canon was a full frame 40mm lens. Also Canon used to make a EF 28-135mm variable aperture zoom lens(offered as a kit with original 7D), so may be a replacement for that lens and may be a new kit lens for upcoming full frame Canon SLRs.
I was wondering if this could be re-evaluated, after the near "universal condemnation" of the new 24-105mm F 4.0 L IS USM II? Curious to see how the cheap" STM lens hold up to the new L lens optically? You can find the STM as a white box item now pretty cheap ($299.00 US at times). I know there is a lot on your plate, but still could be an interesting thought exercise.
That's a valid point. I think this lens is looking better now. Canon seems to have dropped the ball on the new 24-105 II (though I haven't tested it yet), which is a shame considering what a key lens it is.
Now that I've just bought the 6DII which has DPAF, this lens makes perfect sense! Actually now I regret not getting the kit offering. Believe it or not, but I'm gonna get rid of my 24-70/2.8 Tamron lens and get this one instead. It'll also replace my Canon 80D + 18-135 Nano-USM which I got only for their great video capabilities. It was akward to have 6D + 80D (only for video). Now I'm back to full-frame only, and for those great photos I'll still have all my other lenses. So, yes, you were absolutely right in this video in that this lens would make more sense in the future :)
Hi I 'm using a Canon EOS 550D and would like to buy a new lens, but not quite sure which one of the following, the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L l IS USM or the Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM. I was thinking about the 24-105mm f/4L, but since I have the 550D is it wrought it ?? Thanks
tonizuz Interesting question. Do you intend to continue to use a crop sensor camera? If so, you would probably be better off getting the 18-135mm STM instead.
Hi Dustin, thank you for your video. I am thinking about buying a 6D with a 24-105 and there is a big difference in the price between the EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM and the 24-105 f/4L IS USM. The STM is way cheaper! I am using them for timelapse photography and on a limited budget. Do you think the STM one would be great for timelapse? I am not using them for video, just for photography! Is there any difference with picture quality and sharpness in the images? Thank you!
+Emeric Le Bars If you are concerned about price, then either lens is pretty good. I do prefer the overall performance and build of the L lens, though.
+Emeric Le Bars The image quality is fairly close on both lenses. Other factors are more important, like the build and the method of focus, which I like better on the 24-105L
I will be buying the 6D in a couple weeks and saw the option to either get the camera body with the 24-105L or this STM lens.. and hands down I will be going for the L option.
Looking at this or the 24-105L lens. brand new in my part of the world there is less than 150 USD difference (L series o fcourse is the more exp lens). I use a Canon 60D so i know STM is no advantage to me really. Apart from the slightly cheaper price is there any real reason i should use this - or in your opinion should i fork the extra little cash for it? Is the L series lens that much better?
Callum, in all honesty I would spend the extra money and buy the L series lens. There is nothing wrong with this lens, but it does nothing really better than the L series lens and doesn't have as robust a build.
marioplus321 In my opinion, yes, I vastly prefer a well executed USM to STM. I pretty much detest trying to make manual focus adjustments to STM lenses.
marioplus321 I do most manually focus recording video, with the exception of when I use the 70D body with AF Servo. I record most of my sound externally, so the clicking is less of an issue for me. My biggest issue with STM lenses is that I despise the way they manually focus.
Well, to tell you the truth I despise setting the focus manually while filming. Nevertheless,I reckon both sides of the story have their good points:) best of luck to you:)
Zizi Possi Marquinhos Vital It is more of a general purpose lens, but will work well on a 70D body. Just know that 24mm isn't particularly wide on a crop sensor.
thanks. ive been using the canon 40mm to my canon 70d, i like it specially caise i dont have so much room for shooting... but now im just looking forward to get an upgrade lens, that can give nice and sharper pictures, but still can work in a small room like mine... Would you suggest me any lens for this specific case? thanks very much Dustin
If you want a crop sensor lens for general purpose try the 18-135mm STM. A more expensive choice, but better for portraits, will be the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8. It has a wide (f/1.8) aperture at all focal lengths.Zizi Possi Marquinhos Vital
Hi Dustin. Good analysis. I am soon moving from 70D to C100 Mark II but not sure if I go for 24-105 STM or 24-105 USM II. Although cost of USM II is high but I may decide to spend it if I think it is worth it. My main concern is noise during autofocus as I attach mic with camera. STM noise is pretty silent but I am not aware of USM noise levels for autofocus or during image stablization. Considering my requirement can you suggest (1) Is STM version better for me or USM II version. (2) How much video quality of USM lens is better in comparison to STM lens. Assuming that due to more price video quality should be better.
I am overhelmed by STM lenses. The thing to overcome is which to buy:ef-s18-135STM or ef 24-105 STM ?The one will be paired with C70D. The latter is more expensive. STM lenses work great during video shots.
Thanks for sharing.... I am hoping to jump into a full frame 6d by the end of the year and this helped alot. 6D no autofocus during video so I was like, why do I need STM... Well... more to say, but I too am likely going with the f4L lens. Now, I am just being greedy, but I was really hoping for a kit that included the f4L and an ef 85 mm/f1.8 with the 6d but no luck so far. Thanks again for sharing.
Great review of this lens! Im about to buy my very first camera- a canon c100 mkii and I was recomended to get this lens I was also looking at a really high quality art lens such as Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM lens for canon whch is alot more expensive but im told is a very nice lens. Now the lens you reviewed covers more range and is cheaper but the latter is a higher quality. Which would you say would be the best to get the most out of my camera and also if my budget stretches to both lenses is it worth getting both of them or are they just covering the same ground and thus not worth it? Would love your thoughts on this. Thanks alot!
Dustin Abbott Thanks for this. If i got both lenses would they be different enough? If i wanted to compliment the sigma with a cheaper complimentary lens which would u recommend?
These type lenses are not my favorite for event work as they need a lot of light. I would recommend a used 24-105 f/4L over this one to give you the constant f/4 aperture. A lens like the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 might be even better.
Great video as usual. I'm thinking of getting an "as new" lens here in the UK, for just over £300 / $400, to use with new-old-stock Canon 80D and a 6D Mk2... Would it be a sound investment in December 2021?... In advance, thank you very much for your time.
Hi. I am looking for a wide lens - besides my prime lens 50 1.4 and 85 1.8. on 6d. I am hesitating between this stm 24-105 or a tamron 28-75 2.8. Which do you prefer? My main purpose is the sharpness. Thanks, Dustin.
+DSO PH I liked the 28-75 in its day, but it isn't nearly as sharp as the modern lens. I think this lens would be the better choice for what you are looking for. You have the wider aperture glass for the times you need that.
Thank you for the great video. I am on the fence as I get ready to switch from a t3i to a 6d. I am currently using the zuiko 24mm f2.8 and zuiko 50mm f1.4 almost exclusively over the kit lense. I am still unsure what direction to go since buying one of these lenses packaged with the 6d is a great deal but not sure if I 'really' need it.
Resford Rouzer I see. If you can get it in a kit with a 6D, I'd still go for the 24-105L. It's a proven performer and I've got a ton of great images taken with it.
Dustin Abbott That is sort of the way I am leaning. The 24-105L in a kit is about $600. A quick search KEH.com didn't have used ones for much better. I am also still fairly new to photography, about 3 years now, so still a little weary of buying used lenses without the knowledge of what to look for. Thanks
Resford Rouzer The good news about getting the lens in a kit for around $600 is that you can always get every penny back out of it if you decide to go a different route.
I bought one for $200 from a dude who got it as a kit with a 6D and didnt like it. The lens aint mind blowing but I was happy to get it for that price. Still a fair performer with a silent motor. Aperture is an issue but i only use this as a walk around (I mostly use primes when i work)
Now in my country , this thing cost like 280 usd new & 210 used . Worth it ? Definitely yes , it's hard to find anything could beat it's p/p in this price range , but don't expect much from a variable aperture lower end zoom .
£995 for Canon 6D and the STM lens, or £1130 with the USM lens, what do you recommend? I like the idea of the image stabilisation because I want to shoot a lot of video on the camera, but I notice a lot of people on youtube recommend the USM over the STM. P.S this is my first DSLR I'm used to shooting 35mm film, want a full frame for making films and shooting street/general use photography. I'd appreciate any advice
OneWanAndHisDog The biggest problem with STM technology is that the body you are buying can't take advantage over it at all. A USM lens like 24-105L will focus more quickly on a 6D than the STM lens will. The IS is better on the STM lens, but you will also be dealing with a slower aperture over a good portion of the focal range. At the moment my recommendation would still be the kit with the 24-105L.
Dustin Abbott Thanks, another question, what about the 70d? or maybe 760d? would you recommend the USM lens for those cameras too? Will they take sharper images and focus faster? Also isn't f/4 not a lot of light to let in?
OneWanAndHisDog Either of those can take advantage of STM, but 24-105 isn't an amazing crop sensor focal length. The 18-135 STM would be a better choice there.
I will still save up 700$ for used 24-70 F4 with sharper image, smaller body and macro function. Second choice would be 24-105 F4 L, which is another 100$ cheaper.
Thanks. This video answers all my questions (although more sample images would have been nice). If I ever decided to buy a 6D mrk 2 (which I probably won't), this lens might well be my choice.
If you play with gimbals, STM and AF for video will be usefull Also lightweight is another factor But, The price of 24-105mm STM doesnt justify people to get on STM and better second L lenses
Regular price of L version is ca 4000PLN in PL nowadays. The one of OEM version of revised lens is ca1250PLN. A box version is ca 2000PLN. That's the difference.
Good Review Dustin, as knowing 2 years ago already, the only thing - you do look as if you have had for real too much coffee into the Morning, no offense. I am fine with this Lens.
I appreciate the information. But most people just want to see the image quality of the lens and how fast the autofocus is. Too long to get to the point
I have all three, (L) 24-105, (STM) 24-105, & (STM) 18-135. Use them with my 5D MK IV, C100 MKII, & 90D. For video, the STMs are church mouse quiet. The 24-105 STM works great on my full frame 5D MKIV. Images are razor sharp on the MKIV with your exposure right.
Its crazy how few overviews there are for the 24-105 STM even now in mid 2016. In case anyone is trying to decide like I was, between this version and the f4L... I went for this STM version as it was significantly cheaper for a brand new copy with warranty from Amazon than even a used L lens. I am liking the lens a lot, I appreciate its relatively low weight, good sharpness and fast focussing. Unless you are shooting sports, the autofocus is not going to be an issue, and if you *are* shooting sports, you would want a faster lens anyway. I picked up a 3rd party lens hood for a couple of quid on ebay, as the canon copy is a massive rip off.
Anyway, just want to update people that this lens does seem to make sense in 2016 as an inexpensive alternative over the L lens. I think the only real reason to go with the L lens is for weather sealing at this point.
I'm afraid the lack of reviews reflects how unexcited a lot of people were about the release of this lens, though yes, it is a solid lens.
Yeah, its a nice lens but its a crowded segment with the sigma and canon 24-105 and plenty of 24-70s. I picked it up brand new for under £300, which is a great price in my opinion, and justifies its existence among the more expensive options.
I hope it still makes sense in December 2021! 👍🏻
My copy of the 24-105 STM is very sharp and the equal to my 24-105 L in sharpness. The STM lens was the kit lens when I purchased my 6D otherwise I would not have it.
Nice. Glad it worked out well for you.
I purchased the EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 as an additional STM lens for my C100 MKII. As a one man production for our Bible study class, I need good autofocus. This lens functions with the C100 MKII’s limited facial focus feature. The STM is super quiet and works quickly. Only the STM zooms & 35mm macro STM unlock this feature on the old workhorse C100 MKII.
I recently purchased an R6 MKII and adapted this lens to it. The 24-105mm f3.5-5.6 works brilliantly on my mirrorless camera. I also have the (L) series USM 24-105mm but I like the STM better for video.
Thanks for an amazing review that is informative & entertaining.
That’s a cool application for what is now an older lens
Its speculated the eventual 6D mark II will have the same AF system as the 70D and 7D mII..
That wouldn't surprise me. It's a good system but wouldn't threaten the better one in the 1Dx, 5D3, or 5DS
Dustin Abbott That and the 6D was always intended as a entry level camera to the full frame market.
Awesome review, I',m buying a refurbished canon 24-105 f/4 for $600 from B&H, i'de rather have the constant f/4 for both video and low light on my new 70D and besides most videos can be sinked with sound so who cares about a little focussing sound.
Hello Dustin, Can you do a review on the new 24-105mm f4 IS II?
I'm scheduled to do it, but the non-kit lens hasn't shipped yet. It is only shipping in kit form with the 5D Mark IV
I use my camera mostly for video (5D Mark 3). I am considering this lens for VIDEO, but debating between this and the L. My shots are mainly still when filming my sewing videos, but I do talkin head shots and use a field monitor to focus on my face. For my TH-cam and sewing classes what do you recommend between the two?
The only real advantage to this lens would be if you were using with a body that can autofocus during video (not your 5D3). I would probably recommend the L version unless you get this one a lot cheaper.
Is $200 cheaper worth it? I also want to invest in a 24mm prime and a battery grip, which is the only reason Im trying to be frugal, otherwise Id easily go for the L, but if you say the L is the much better investment, Ill take your word for it. I dont mind investing, I like the security.
Sew Chic Tv
If you don't mind waiting a bit, Canon is about to release a new version of L lens. There might be a lot of sales on the existing lens if you are patient.
Thanks for the review, although you are forgetting that one of the first STM lens introduced by Canon was a full frame 40mm lens. Also Canon used to make a EF 28-135mm variable aperture zoom lens(offered as a kit with original 7D), so may be a replacement for that lens and may be a new kit lens for upcoming full frame Canon SLRs.
Thanks for the feedback. I actually specifically mention 40mm pancake as the only previous full frame lens with STM in the review.
I was wondering if this could be re-evaluated, after the near "universal condemnation" of the new 24-105mm F 4.0 L IS USM II? Curious to see how the
cheap" STM lens hold up to the new L lens optically? You can find the STM as a white box item now pretty cheap ($299.00 US at times). I know there is a lot on your plate, but still could be an interesting thought exercise.
That's a valid point. I think this lens is looking better now. Canon seems to have dropped the ball on the new 24-105 II (though I haven't tested it yet), which is a shame considering what a key lens it is.
Now that I've just bought the 6DII which has DPAF, this lens makes perfect sense! Actually now I regret not getting the kit offering. Believe it or not, but I'm gonna get rid of my 24-70/2.8 Tamron lens and get this one instead. It'll also replace my Canon 80D + 18-135 Nano-USM which I got only for their great video capabilities. It was akward to have 6D + 80D (only for video). Now I'm back to full-frame only, and for those great photos I'll still have all my other lenses.
So, yes, you were absolutely right in this video in that this lens would make more sense in the future :)
Hi I 'm using a Canon EOS 550D and would like to buy a new lens, but not quite sure which one of the following, the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L l IS USM or the Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM. I was thinking about the 24-105mm f/4L, but since I have the 550D is it wrought it ?? Thanks
tonizuz Interesting question. Do you intend to continue to use a crop sensor camera? If so, you would probably be better off getting the 18-135mm STM instead.
Dustin Abbott Thanks Dustin, I will surely us your advice ! thanks and keep it up with the good work.
nice audio
For video uses, would this be better then the old 24-105?
I'm also interested to see how the new one compares.
Very helpful even after so many years from the shooting of your video .
Thanks and greetings !
Fabio
That's great to hear.
Hi Dustin, thank you for your video. I am thinking about buying a 6D with a 24-105 and there is a big difference in the price between the EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM and the 24-105 f/4L IS USM. The STM is way cheaper! I am using them for timelapse photography and on a limited budget. Do you think the STM one would be great for timelapse? I am not using them for video, just for photography! Is there any difference with picture quality and sharpness in the images? Thank you!
+Emeric Le Bars If you are concerned about price, then either lens is pretty good. I do prefer the overall performance and build of the L lens, though.
+Dustin Abbott what about quality of the pictures?
+Emeric Le Bars The image quality is fairly close on both lenses. Other factors are more important, like the build and the method of focus, which I like better on the 24-105L
I will be buying the 6D in a couple weeks and saw the option to either get the camera body with the 24-105L or this STM lens.. and hands down I will be going for the L option.
That would be my choice, particularly if you are are buying a 6D.
Dustin Abbott then I could sell the 24-105L and buy the Tamron 24-70 2.8 vc
Brian Michael
Even better ;)
You could also buy the EF 24-70/2.8L USM Mark II if you can afford it. ;-) I don't.
Looking at this or the 24-105L lens. brand new in my part of the world there is less than 150 USD difference (L series o fcourse is the more exp lens). I use a Canon 60D so i know STM is no advantage to me really. Apart from the slightly cheaper price is there any real reason i should use this - or in your opinion should i fork the extra little cash for it? Is the L series lens that much better?
Callum, in all honesty I would spend the extra money and buy the L series lens. There is nothing wrong with this lens, but it does nothing really better than the L series lens and doesn't have as robust a build.
Dustin Abbott
Thanks
Will this lens work on the canon rebel models or just the 5d and 60d?
+Jonny Brooks It absolutely will work on the Rebels, and the newer models can take advantage of the STM motor in video capture.
Really like your reviews, superb.
Thanks, Jon. Appreciate it
Dustin, did I get it right?You say USM is better than STM ?
marioplus321 In my opinion, yes, I vastly prefer a well executed USM to STM. I pretty much detest trying to make manual focus adjustments to STM lenses.
marioplus321 I do most manually focus recording video, with the exception of when I use the 70D body with AF Servo. I record most of my sound externally, so the clicking is less of an issue for me. My biggest issue with STM lenses is that I despise the way they manually focus.
Well, to tell you the truth I despise setting the focus manually while filming. Nevertheless,I reckon both sides of the story have their good points:)
best of luck to you:)
hi thanks for the video, would you suggest me to use this lens with my canon 70d? photographing people is my segment... thanks
Zizi Possi Marquinhos Vital It is more of a general purpose lens, but will work well on a 70D body. Just know that 24mm isn't particularly wide on a crop sensor.
thanks. ive been using the canon 40mm to my canon 70d, i like it specially caise i dont have so much room for shooting... but now im just looking forward to get an upgrade lens, that can give nice and sharper pictures, but still can work in a small room like mine... Would you suggest me any lens for this specific case? thanks very much Dustin
If you want a crop sensor lens for general purpose try the 18-135mm STM. A more expensive choice, but better for portraits, will be the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8. It has a wide (f/1.8) aperture at all focal lengths.Zizi Possi Marquinhos Vital
Great review
Thank you.
Hi Dustin. Good analysis. I am soon moving from 70D to C100 Mark II but not sure if I go for 24-105 STM or 24-105 USM II. Although cost of USM II is high but I may decide to spend it if I think it is worth it. My main concern is noise during autofocus as I attach mic with camera. STM noise is pretty silent but I am not aware of USM noise levels for autofocus or during image stablization. Considering my requirement can you suggest (1) Is STM version better for me or USM II version. (2) How much video quality of USM lens is better in comparison to STM lens. Assuming that due to more price video quality should be better.
The new 24-105L II is much improved in noise levels while doing video AF. It still isn't quite as quiet as STM, but is workable
This video helped me so much
+Samore Love TV❤ Glad to hear it!
I am overhelmed by STM lenses. The thing to overcome is which to buy:ef-s18-135STM or ef 24-105 STM ?The one will be paired with C70D. The latter is more expensive. STM lenses work great during video shots.
I have the 18-135 is stm, so I have this range covered. Is the 24-105 any better?
Beverly Evans Not if you are shooting a crop sensor body like you are. This focal length is optimized for a full frame body.
Thanks for sharing.... I am hoping to jump into a full frame 6d by the end of the year and this helped alot. 6D no autofocus during video so I was like, why do I need STM... Well... more to say, but I too am likely going with the f4L lens. Now, I am just being greedy, but I was really hoping for a kit that included the f4L and an ef 85 mm/f1.8 with the 6d but no luck so far. Thanks again for sharing.
Great review of this lens! Im about to buy my very first camera- a canon c100 mkii and I was recomended to get this lens
I was also looking at a really high quality art lens such as
Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 DC HSM lens for canon whch is alot more expensive but im told is a very nice lens.
Now the lens you reviewed covers more range and is cheaper but the latter is a higher quality. Which would you say would be the best to get the most out of my camera and also if my budget stretches to both lenses is it worth getting both of them or are they just covering the same ground and thus not worth it?
Would love your thoughts on this.
Thanks alot!
Hi Christina, since you are going video-centric, I would recommend the Sigma. It's a favorite of many cine shooters.
Dustin Abbott Thanks for this. If i got both lenses would they be different enough? If i wanted to compliment the sigma with a cheaper complimentary lens which would u recommend?
Will this lens work just as good with Canon t3i? Everyone says stuff only about 60d
Lilpandaa96 Absolutely. Any lens that will work on a 60D will work on a T3i
hi, can you recommend this lens for events photography. I am thinking to buy the tamron, but I can save some money for extra lens. please your advice.
These type lenses are not my favorite for event work as they need a lot of light. I would recommend a used 24-105 f/4L over this one to give you the constant f/4 aperture. A lens like the Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 might be even better.
Dustin Abbott thanks, appreciate your response and usual support.
Great video as usual.
I'm thinking of getting an "as new" lens here in the UK, for just over £300 / $400, to use with new-old-stock Canon 80D and a 6D Mk2...
Would it be a sound investment in December 2021?...
In advance, thank you very much for your time.
That sounds like good value
Hi. I am looking for a wide lens - besides my prime lens 50 1.4 and 85 1.8. on 6d. I am hesitating between this stm 24-105 or a tamron 28-75 2.8. Which do you prefer? My main purpose is the sharpness. Thanks, Dustin.
+DSO PH I liked the 28-75 in its day, but it isn't nearly as sharp as the modern lens. I think this lens would be the better choice for what you are looking for. You have the wider aperture glass for the times you need that.
+Dustin Abbott Thanks a lot
28-75 2.8 是 A09吗？
Thank you for the great video. I am on the fence as I get ready to switch from a t3i to a 6d. I am currently using the zuiko 24mm f2.8 and zuiko 50mm f1.4 almost exclusively over the kit lense. I am still unsure what direction to go since buying one of these lenses packaged with the 6d is a great deal but not sure if I 'really' need it.
Resford Rouzer I see. If you can get it in a kit with a 6D, I'd still go for the 24-105L. It's a proven performer and I've got a ton of great images taken with it.
Dustin Abbott That is sort of the way I am leaning. The 24-105L in a kit is about $600. A quick search KEH.com didn't have used ones for much better. I am also still fairly new to photography, about 3 years now, so still a little weary of buying used lenses without the knowledge of what to look for.
Thanks
Resford Rouzer
The good news about getting the lens in a kit for around $600 is that you can always get every penny back out of it if you decide to go a different route.
so is it only for full frame cameras or can I use it with my EOS 600D?
Any full frame lens can also be used on a crop sensor body, so no problem!
ok thanks a lot! :)
I bought one for $200 from a dude who got it as a kit with a 6D and didnt like it. The lens aint mind blowing but I was happy to get it for that price.
Still a fair performer with a silent motor. Aperture is an issue but i only use this as a walk around (I mostly use primes when i work)
At that price you got a steal.
Now in my country , this thing cost like 280 usd new & 210 used . Worth it ? Definitely yes , it's hard to find anything could beat it's p/p in this price range , but don't expect much from a variable aperture lower end zoom .
That's a lot of lens for the price. Nice!
£995 for Canon 6D and the STM lens, or £1130 with the USM lens, what do you recommend?
I like the idea of the image stabilisation because I want to shoot a lot of video on the camera, but I notice a lot of people on youtube recommend the USM over the STM.
P.S this is my first DSLR I'm used to shooting 35mm film, want a full frame for making films and shooting street/general use photography.
I'd appreciate any advice
OneWanAndHisDog The biggest problem with STM technology is that the body you are buying can't take advantage over it at all. A USM lens like 24-105L will focus more quickly on a 6D than the STM lens will. The IS is better on the STM lens, but you will also be dealing with a slower aperture over a good portion of the focal range. At the moment my recommendation would still be the kit with the 24-105L.
Dustin Abbott Thanks, another question, what about the 70d? or maybe 760d? would you recommend the USM lens for those cameras too? Will they take sharper images and focus faster? Also isn't f/4 not a lot of light to let in?
OneWanAndHisDog
Either of those can take advantage of STM, but 24-105 isn't an amazing crop sensor focal length. The 18-135 STM would be a better choice there.
I will still save up 700$ for used 24-70 F4 with sharper image, smaller body and macro function. Second choice would be 24-105 F4 L, which is another 100$ cheaper.
If you don’t mind the smaller focal range, that sounds like a solid choice.
Thanks. This video answers all my questions (although more sample images would have been nice). If I ever decided to buy a 6D mrk 2 (which I probably won't), this lens might well be my choice.
+Lau Bjerno It's a capable lens in its own right. I'm not really any more blown away by the new 24-105L II.
So is this lens good for taking sports photos, like boxing?
If there is very good lighting. It's aperture isn't very fast on the long end.
If you play with gimbals, STM and AF for video will be usefull
Also lightweight is another factor
But,
The price of 24-105mm STM doesnt justify people to get on STM and better second L lenses
Well, the new 24-105L II wasn't a huge improvement, so this lens doesn't look so bad, now, particularly at a discount price.
Can someone please tell me if this will work on a 20d?
+Courtland Harris Absolutely. It will work on any Canon camera with an EF mount, including film bodies.
+Dustin Abbott thanks so much dustin
This lens will begin to shine with the 6D Mark II and its versatile capabilities in stills and video mode.
I'm hoping that is the case.
Great review, Thanks a lot! :)
DuligallFilms Glad to share!
...that belongs on a shirt...
"...everything feels light after a Zeiss..."
+mage tv Get it trademarked...quick!
agreed for the silence!!! Yet , for a cropped sensor camera? I 'm not sure.... :) Thank you!
I think STM will be the futur best focus system, very fast and silent!!
Most mirrorless lenses utilize some version of STM.
Now when it is 1/3 of L version I consider it worth purchasing.
That’s true. Price changes a lot of other factors.
Regular price of L version is ca 4000PLN in PL nowadays. The one of OEM version of revised lens is ca1250PLN. A box version is ca 2000PLN. That's the difference.
Good Review Dustin, as knowing 2 years ago already, the only thing - you do look as if you have had for real too much coffee into the Morning, no offense. I am fine with this Lens.
That's pretty bad since I don't actually drink coffee :)
+1 dustin. :) I do, mostly...and Water, Tea.
I appreciate the information. But most people just want to see the image quality of the lens and how fast the autofocus is. Too long to get to the point
Just get a 18-135stm cheaper and you have wide n telephoto
If you have APS-C, yes, but this is a full frame lens.
I have all three, (L) 24-105, (STM) 24-105, & (STM) 18-135. Use them with my 5D MK IV, C100 MKII, & 90D. For video, the STMs are church mouse quiet. The 24-105 STM works great on my full frame 5D MKIV. Images are razor sharp on the MKIV with your exposure right.
too much talk and not much action
what a gas bag. i'd love to see photos of his beanie baby collection