The Story of Bhrikuti and Nepal-Tibet Relation | Prof. Mohan Prasad Khanal | Sushant Pradhan Podcast

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 มี.ค. 2022
  • Watch Full Episode on: • Episode 30: Prof. Moha...
    Prof. Mohan Prasad Khanal is a Harvard published historian and a Retired Professor with the ability to read all of our ancient lipis and manuscripts who has written 30+ books and 300+ research papers. Having been visited all around Nepal in search for stone writings and manuscripts, Prof. Khanal has acquired quite a large value of knowledge regarding our history. His study and expertise in Archeology has also helped him excavate and document ancient proof of Nepal being one of the oldest civilizations in the world.
    For reference American history dates back to 300-400 years but we have documentation back from 3000 years ago.
    This podcast was truly an eye-opener for me and was very emotional on deeper levels.
    For Business Enquiries: podcast@sushantpradhan.com
    PODCAST LINKS :
    Spotify : open.spotify.com/show/6rnayy7...
    Apple Podcast : podcasts.apple.com/np/podcast...
    Google Podcast : podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0...
    SPONSOR :
    The Physique Workshop : thephysiqueworkshop.com
    Conversations spark ideas and ideas lead to actions that drive growth of the society. I believe long and unfiltered deep conversation is a lost art in this near perfectly presented world. And this is my attempt to have real conversations with real minds and present them to you. The goal is to learn from the greatest minds and take you on the journey.
    Do subscribe if you feel this would add value to your life.
    MY SOCIAL MEDIA LINKS :
    My Website : sushantpradhan.com
    Instagram : / sushant_pradhan_
    Twitter : / sushant_tpw
    Facebook : / sushantpradhantpw
    Tiktok : / sushant_pradhan_
    DISCLAMER : The views, information or opinions expressed in the TH-cam Channel and Podcast are solely the views of the individuals involved and by no means represent absolute facts. Opinions expressed by the host and guests can change at any time.
    #MohanPrasadKhanal #StoryofBhrikuti

ความคิดเห็น • 118

  • @gyadre
    @gyadre ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Princess Brikruti and Wenjeng Kongjo is not worshipped but the two Buddha statues each brought to Tibet is worship. At the time of Songsten Gampo (7AD), Tibet was not a Buddhist but Bonpo. Only after 150 years or 4 generations Tibetan king became a Buddhist and still masses were not Buddhist.

  • @lobsangdolma8344
    @lobsangdolma8344 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Bhrikuti was a Nepali princess married to king Srongtsen Gompo of Tibet. She brought not only one of the holiest bhuudha staute but also introduced buddhism to Tibet.

    • @user-cy2eo5ih9h
      @user-cy2eo5ih9h 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She brought many! The holiest one of all was her in his image, of course. 💙❤️💚

  • @khemrajshrestha64
    @khemrajshrestha64 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Bhrikuti lai Green Tara Harit Tara vaninxa sir

    • @bbek9960
      @bbek9960 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its the same thing . Harit is sanskrit term and its green in English.

  • @kk-jb2ei
    @kk-jb2ei 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Araniko is known as aniko in Tibet

  • @lifox29
    @lifox29 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤❤❤

  • @hamroNepaliguru3329
    @hamroNepaliguru3329 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    राज सत्ता आएकै त्यहाँ भारत बाटनै हो , हामी सबैलाई थाहा छ त । एस्मा एत्रो बिस्लेशन गर्न जरुरी छ र । 🤣😂😄
    तर नेपाली समाजलाई राम्रो सँग हेर्नुस् , चिनी तिब्बतअन सन्क्स्रिती र् भारतीय सन्स्किर्ती दुबै को मिस्रन देखिने हो कि ।
    यदपी आज हाम्रो आफ्नै पहिचन छ । नेपाली ।

  • @postman11
    @postman11 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Its Sad we just remembered Sita and Forgot Bhrukuti ( incarnation of Green Tara)
    Roti Beti only narrated with India Not tibet ( today china)

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 ปีที่แล้ว

    हजुरहरू यस्तो सम्बन्धलाई नै International Relation studies. भनिन्छ।
    हजुरहरू सबैलाई धेरै धन्यबाद छ।

  • @ninirema4532
    @ninirema4532 ปีที่แล้ว

    हजुरहरू सबैलाई धेरै धेरै नमस्कार छ।

  • @dara_1989
    @dara_1989 ปีที่แล้ว

    7:50
    1. panini had changed d script of sanskrit from brahmi to devnagri ... in light of that thonmi came to india to learn & create a similar script for tibetan
    ...
    2. songsang gyampo married queens from china & nepal to make peace via d common buddhist heritage of these 3 nations
    ..

  • @kbgirel6965
    @kbgirel6965 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    So ignorant, Vrikuti was married to them an independent Tibet umpire not in China

    • @ntrop8022
      @ntrop8022 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True, Tibet was way more powerful back then and controlled a huge empire threatening China.

  • @whyamihere2250
    @whyamihere2250 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    TIBET HO CHIN HAINA JAI TIBET BHOD GYALO

  • @krtuladhar9394
    @krtuladhar9394 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Tibetans did not come to Nepal to learn Tibetan script. This is false. There was no Tibetan script in Nepal at that time. Tibetan King Songtsen Gampo sent a man named Sambhota to India to learn Devanagari, and he created a script based on it which is suitable to the Tibetan language. Posting such false videos on the web will misinform students.

  • @ngawangsonam6850
    @ngawangsonam6850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Aba tapai haru hami bhanera hami janajati lai chai exclude garyo jasto lagyo because I am a Nepali and my ethnic language is similar to tibetan and so does most of the ethnic minorities of the country. And we also have been living in this country for centuries. Just an disagreement with the point he made about our language doesn’t match with tibetans.

    • @sonam1959_
      @sonam1959_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      No, most people in Nepal are not related to Tibetans unless they are from Mustang, Manang, Dolpo, Gyirong or Jumla. Tharu, Rai, Magar, Limbu, Kirati, Sunuwar, Lepcha, etc are NOT Tibetan, so how do you make such a bold claim saying "most ethnic minorities of the country are similar to Tibetan"?? As a Tibetan, do not make a comment like that, it's false. Nothing the guy said was wrong, Nepal and India has close relations, and so does Nepal and Tibet, Tibet has close relations with both India and Nepal, so all nepalis have close ties with India regardless of ethnicity. You should listen more, the point he made was that Nepali is closer to Hindi than to Chinese, which is a fact obviously.

    • @ngawangsonam6850
      @ngawangsonam6850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sonam1959_ please try to understand what Im saying and Why Im saying.
      First of all, I have only disagreement with the part where he said we have no cultural or language similarities. This comment is the only thing that im against of.
      Secondly, are you trying to say that people from dolpa, mustang etc are not Nepali???
      I don't know If you understand the problem of people like us faces is that everyday the refuse to recognize our community and recognize us as Nepali. Because of it, everytime whenever people make comments like the one in this video, people like us get offended. Again its not for fun. It feels frustrating and you seem to know a lot which is good. But you seem to think that you know everything which is very wrong. My language and my ancestral history is directly derived from tibet. So does many people from sherpa and Tamang community. Despite our ancestors being from tibet, we now recognize ourselves as Nepali. Because our homeland has been here for many centuries and during that time it was of neither tibet or Nepal.
      I don't think you speak hyolmo,tamang,or sherpa language. Ask any people for these community whether their language is similar to Tibetans or not.
      And I said most, not all.

    • @ngawangsonam6850
      @ngawangsonam6850 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sonam1959_ and also why are making an exception on people from mustang, manang, dolpa, jumla etc.
      This shows that you misunderstood everything what I was trying to say. I didn't said every ethnic minorities, I said most in which includes people from Tatopani, solukhumbu,manang, mustang etc I did not said everyone is related to Tibetans.
      You're just trying to find some unwritten problem to go against.

    • @sonam1959_
      @sonam1959_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ngawangsonam6850 Yes, no doubt Tamangs may have Tibetan heritage, it's obvious, however their language again does not have sufficient research done to fully prove this . You're mistaken, while you may believe your Tibetan lineage is unbroken, decades of living in Nepal has altered that, you called yourself a "janajanti" which means indigenous yet you claim you're a direct descendant of Tibetans. I ONLY mentioned Mustang, Jumla, Manang to prove these are settlements and regions with the closest relation to Tibet int terms of proximity and culture.

    • @ngawangsonam6850
      @ngawangsonam6850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@sonam1959_ nothing is proven right or wrong because no one has done an unbiased research on this subject. Our only source are verbal and some rare written history passed down to generation.
      And I am saying this on behalf of the people from manang, dolpo etcetera. when the professor said our language and culture does not match with tibetan I got offended because people like me( mustang,jumla,mukhum,etc) does have similarities.

  • @suryaprakashshrestha3438
    @suryaprakashshrestha3438 2 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Chin hoina Tibet

  • @taidelek9994
    @taidelek9994 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's Tibet not China.

  • @NABINRAII
    @NABINRAII ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Guffadi professor . Alik ramro research garnu .

  • @milarepa9756
    @milarepa9756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Are you sure this guy knows the history or trying to rewrite his own way?

    • @prabingole7397
      @prabingole7397 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mandale historian haru yestai ho bro

    • @user-pp8wc4hm8d
      @user-pp8wc4hm8d 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This guy is hidding Kirat history and only polishing Licchavi history.

    • @uchihajunaf4201
      @uchihajunaf4201 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-pp8wc4hm8d agree dude

    • @pratik4157
      @pratik4157 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@user-pp8wc4hm8d Talk about history not fairy tale

  • @jmahadevshah4231
    @jmahadevshah4231 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    खनाल भने पछी मैंले केही बिस्वास गरीन है ।। खानल ले खनाल कै पोष्छ नी त ।।

  • @Rohan-by1qm
    @Rohan-by1qm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nepal Bhasa is combination of multiple Chinese languages and Tibetian that was spoken some 1000 years ago. Our culture has similarity as its written in Rites of Zhou that was passed down by Shang Dynasty which they also track back to Yellow River Civilization. The historical narrative set by dinosaurs of Panchayat time is just retarded. These historians need to do more research in languages of old civilization before talking about Nepal Valley Civilization.
    As for Arniko, his name was pronounced as Ka Ni, whose family name was recorded as Zhu, so his name is Ni Ka Zhu while his father name was recorded as La Kha Zhu.

    • @ngawangsonam6850
      @ngawangsonam6850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's the problem of our country
      Our so Called historian of this country only recognize Aryan as Nepali while any similarities and relation between Tibet and Nepal are discarded

    • @Rohan-by1qm
      @Rohan-by1qm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ngawangsonam6850 Well if we have to free our history from these racist-fascist we need our own media houses. BTW does the name ngawang means 5 Kings?

    • @sonam1959_
      @sonam1959_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Newari language is most certainly not related to Chinese or Tibetan, the language itself doesn't even have much research done to make any definitive comments like the one you've made. Any connection between china and the newars would have been very recent and minimal, and that is because Tibet shielded Nepal from China and most of the Chinese settlements and civilizations were all seashore or way on the east near the Korean and Vietnamese borders and fringes. As a Tibetan, it's strange to see all sorts of Nepalese tribes and people claim to have Tibetan heritage, also next time refrain from using the word "r****ted", it's unacceptable. The only ethnic groups who have the right to call themselves even remotely Tibetan or tied to Tibetan history are people from Jumla, Manang, Mustang and Gyirong. As for the Aranikos name, it was definitely sinicized, the name speaks for it self.

    • @sonam1959_
      @sonam1959_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@ngawangsonam6850 Tibet has had historical ties with both Western India and western Nepal for eons, the guy explaining this in the podcast said absolutely nothing wrong, he explained it perfectly and even acknowledged Tibet's sovereignty and corrected the host, you seem to be looking for a problem just for the fun of it. The term "Aryan" is very sacred to Tibet, and India and Nepal, Tibet has had close relations with Khas aryans for centuries and a shared culture, this is why in western Nepal you will find people in Jumla, Humla, near Uttarakhand who are followers of the Tibetan Bon religion which is similar to the Zoroastrianism. Please don't write comments about Tibet if you aren't Tibetan, no one has ever discarded Nepal and Tibets historical relation, even Tibet and India's historical relationship is not denied, and the proof of that is Ladakh, Kashmir and Himachal Pradesh.

    • @sonam1959_
      @sonam1959_ 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Rohan-by1qm This podcast was insightful and far from racist or fascist, do you know the implications of those words, if you think your history is even remotely racist, then you are funny.

  • @urgenlama5418
    @urgenlama5418 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir lai taha xaina jasto xa 8th century samma Tibet ma Bauddha dharma chireko ni thiyena kaha bata Lama (Guru) aauxa vanera sapana dekhexa? Dosro Lichhavi haru Varat bata Nepal aaunu aghi nai Bauddha vai sakeka thiye ra teti bela Bauddha dharma matra byapta thiyo Upatyeka ma.Khai kina ho Bauddha itihaas lai chai lukainey , xopiney ra kurai garna nachahaney itihaas bidh haru derai dekhinxa.

    • @user-pp8wc4hm8d
      @user-pp8wc4hm8d 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its because Nepalese people are brainwashed by Indian culture for centuries; especially from Hindu culture of India. But I believe Hindu and Buddist religion's core concept is same.

    • @urgenlama5418
      @urgenlama5418 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@user-pp8wc4hm8d They both agree that gyan "realization" of reality as it is , cut the adidhya which will cut through the chain of death and birth. But what is the stage of gyan is different in both . "Aatma gyan"(realisation of unchanging eternal self ) is considered gyan in Hinduism whereas, Buddhism consider Aanatma gyan ( realisation of there is no such unchanging eternal self ) is the state of Nirvana .

    • @urgenlama5418
      @urgenlama5418 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Saijal Shakya Black Buddhism vaneko chai k ho bro? Tibet ma BON (Jhakri) manthyo Black Buddhism hoina.Paxi Buddhism Tibet pugey paxi BON sanskriti sanga mix garera Tibetian Buddhism janmiyeko ho.

    • @urgenlama5418
      @urgenlama5418 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Saijal Shakya Little knowledge is dangerous bro.Black Buddhism vanney kahiley pani thiyena , Shakyamuni Samyaksambuddha agadi kashyap Buddha hunu hunthyo waha ko sikhxya purna roopley haraye paxi ra derai antaral paxi matra Shakyamuni ko janma vayeko ho. Ra Ganesh ,Vishnu, Shiva ,Bhrama naam sunney bitikai Hindu sochnu galat ho. Buddhism ma 31 realms ko kura garinxa ra jaslai 3 loka ma badinxa kaamdhatu , Roop dhatu ra Aroop dhatu ko loka haru ra kamdhatu ma 6 deva lok xaan jasma Gadesh, Indra, Rudra,Shiva, vishnu, haru 33 koti( Buddhism ma Trayatimsa bhuwan ) ka devata haru hun.Vagwan Buddha sanga Kaamdhatu devata ka ra kehi Roop dhatu lok ka Brahma haru aayera sikheka ra Indra sahit lakhau devata haru srotapanna vayeko kura Tri pitak ma ullekh xa. Ra paxi pani Anya Buddhist Mahasiddha haru ley pani derai devi devata lai Buddha dharma ma lagayera Buddha margi haru lai Rakhya garney vanera pran khuwaunu vayeko xa ra tehi devi devata haru lai Bauddha margi haru ley Dharmapala (Dharma ko Rakhshak) ko roop ma linxa naki Sristikarta ko roopna.

    • @urgenlama5418
      @urgenlama5418 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Saijal Shakya @Saijal Shakya Bro i don't know where you get these kind of information.Rule of Buddha Dharma sasana is until and unless previous Samyak sambuddha teachings are completely lost another SamyakSambuddha don't come to this world. Hence, if there were still teachings of Kashyap Buddha then there won't be Shakyamuni's teachings forget about Dipankara's Buddha teaching , he was Buddha 3 immeasurable eons ago. And Vajrayana is a part of Mahayana teachings. There is a way of Arhants (Shravakyana eg. Theravada)and way of Boddhisattva (Mahayana).There are two kinds of Mahayana (Sutrayana (teachings based on Sutra) eg. Zen ) and Tantrayana ( eg, Tibetan Vajrayana) Nepal Mandal Vajrayana in no different from Nepal Mandal Vajrayana as Many Vajrayana masters went to Tibet from Nepal or Many Tibetian used to come to Nepal to learn and went to Nalanda, Vikramasila, Sompuri etc Mahaya vihara for further study.Tibetian Buddhism too practice Hevarja Tantra, Guhya samaj Tantra etc. only difference is cultural part.

  • @santoshmaharjan2556
    @santoshmaharjan2556 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hawa research garnu ramri

  • @irengurung3404
    @irengurung3404 ปีที่แล้ว

    history already became a history . achel vannya ra sunaunay sap fake jasto lagcha .