Well said by CJI, Article 370 hearing

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2024
  • Well said by CJI, Article 370 hearing
    Source: Supreme Court of India
    Legal Lab Official: / @legallabofficial
    English Language Issue (Part-1) : • English Language Issue...
    Higher Judiciary Exam Unfair Video of Supreme Court: • Video
    विधानसभा सत्र की वजह से Secretary नहीं आ सकेंगी। : • विधानसभा सत्र की वजह स...
    जज साहब ने मांगा SP और DGP से जवाब : • Head Constable का Susp...
    Divorce Petition in Supreme Court: • Divorce Petition | Sup...
    Legal lab official News supreme court affirmative action judge ashutosh kumar patna highcourt Delhi highcourt mphighcourt gujarathighcourt supremecourtofindia justice arya advocate mussoorie learn law matter case uscourt indiancourt patna high court live stream patna high court judge latest judgement latestlaw latestamendment new 2022 trending ias ips sdm police flyingbeast law faculty du llb 3yeargraduate Aibe17 Allindiabarexamination date Aibe2022 Aibe2022examdate Aibe2022examdate aibeexam Ipr copyright Guwahati High court
    📑*Fair Use Policy -*
    Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
    #ashutoshkumar #law
    #mussoorie #advocate #court #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #article370 #article370hearing

ความคิดเห็น • 489

  • @supratimnag7844
    @supratimnag7844 ปีที่แล้ว +276

    It good to see CJI has on the back of his mind understood that peace finally prevailed in J&K

    • @civilmind1589
      @civilmind1589 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Come to jammu and ask people.. media mein toh acha dikhta hai... hum jammu wale bjp ko vote deke ro rahe hai

    • @keshavjha5091
      @keshavjha5091 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@LibraryloversSirf J&K m kyu, poore India k harr state m log ro rhe hain. Toh kya kare sabko alag karde? Sabko ek alag constitution de de ? Mtlb kuchh bhi

    • @Entity777
      @Entity777 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@keshavjha5091
      🙂

    • @SSB...
      @SSB... ปีที่แล้ว

      you are a super idiot @supratimnag7844 ... CJI is doing his work according to the constitution...one of the most important responsibilities of sc is to settle disputes between state and union. j&k is an ut with a legislature like delhi.

    • @wanchooo29
      @wanchooo29 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      ​@@civilmind1589stop misleading people.

  • @surudog4929
    @surudog4929 ปีที่แล้ว +240

    His final words are precious ‘sovereignty was ceded to the union’. Basically he is saying, the state can’t be ABOVE the union when it comes to borders or otherwise.
    End of story.

    • @SoumyaSarkar
      @SoumyaSarkar ปีที่แล้ว +4

      True

    • @ads7506
      @ads7506 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Sahi hai, pants ke upar janghiya nahi pahan sakte except in fantasy 😂

    • @TattvaAurTark
      @TattvaAurTark ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "completely" being the operative word

    • @onlynationalist
      @onlynationalist ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@SoumyaSarkar Kapil Sibal including his full funded whole team would be bowled out in front of the whole stadium! 🇮🇳
      Both articles 370 and 35A were unconstitutional 'ab initio' because both these provisions introduced into the Constitution were secessionist laws. Only one thing is ultimate in India that "Nothing, here means 'nothing' in this Universe can challenge or threaten the Safety & Integrity of India. In any Situation or Condition the Parliament of India Does not/Cannot Cede (surrender) its powers (right to maintain/ensure the Safety & Integrity of our country India, by any means/methods) to any entity in this Universe" FULL STOP! 🤔🇮🇳

    • @surudog4929
      @surudog4929 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      This whole hearing is a useless.
      The decision has been made, everyone will come to terms with it because that is how it should have been in the 1st place. Abrogation of this law just made people of J&K ‘normal’ like anyone else in India. The sad part of this is the passage of this law that made the people of this state ‘special’.
      That specialness has resulted in the mess we see today for the last 50 years.
      Thank you Modi. Time to move on to UCC, 2-child policy, NPR, ban on burqa/hijab, elimination of waqf board and minorities commission, removal of the word ‘minorities’ from constitution and so much more….

  • @NishaChauhan-cl9hd
    @NishaChauhan-cl9hd ปีที่แล้ว +49

    How can they be standing there and not feel ashamed? this is so basic. it was "Temporary".

    • @netaambani
      @netaambani ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Vested want it Permanently

    • @IndianArma
      @IndianArma ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Haha😂 you will tell us what the interpretation should be, I bet you don't know your elbow from your backside.

    • @user-mg5er7um2c
      @user-mg5er7um2c ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's just so simple, right?

    • @NishaChauhan-cl9hd
      @NishaChauhan-cl9hd ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@IndianArma bhai you are in a good hand. Imagine you being a completely separate country how could you manage your economy. Khane k vandhe ho jayenge aur wo us paar se jo hamle hoge wo alag. Don’t you realise all this or are you being paid for all this propaganda?

    • @IndianArma
      @IndianArma ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NishaChauhan-cl9hd bhen I am not kashmiri.

  • @watanabe00738
    @watanabe00738 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Beig from the KASHMIR valley, i agree with cji. Federalism should never exceeds sovereignty.
    May allah bless hum. We are Indian muslims, and will always remain Indians

    • @woozie1637
      @woozie1637 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Are there any hindus left in valley?

    • @sudhakar7889
      @sudhakar7889 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@woozie1637Terrorists drove them away. We can't simply blame the common men of the valley.

    • @woozie1637
      @woozie1637 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sudhakar7889 who is the terrorists working for and which religion they belong to why didn't they hunt down their ummah brother's. Who is the common man who knows which white cap and black tent will go boom ola hu Uber 💥💥. Did they stop terrorists , no and are you asking why their group members kelled hindus and they supported, no you are asking me not to blame the benifiters of genocide who are happy inside. Who are you are you the direct descendant of stupid FK Ghandhi who don't realise how brainwashed his hindus become.

  • @subhadipkar1836
    @subhadipkar1836 ปีที่แล้ว +135

    Those are the actual words ; Sovereignty is the matter which is completely ceded to the union❤
    Sovereignty, territorial integrity and unity should always be maintained and it can go above federalism 👍🙏🇮🇳

    • @deepakkumarjoshi
      @deepakkumarjoshi ปีที่แล้ว +4

      True, and 370 has nothing to do with sovereignty. Is Nagaland not part of India, they also have state constitution?

    • @pranjalsoni1743
      @pranjalsoni1743 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      ​@@deepakkumarjoshiNagaland don't have separate constitution but have some extra rights under 371

    • @royalguy379
      @royalguy379 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@pranjalsoni1743very nice brother

  • @sumantakishoreray8216
    @sumantakishoreray8216 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Nation comes first and rest comes next.

    • @rsssword413
      @rsssword413 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@Winalimpandits comes first

  • @d.kdutta2576
    @d.kdutta2576 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I respect present CJI for his beautiful Judgements. I feel proud his Personality.

  • @deepm7487
    @deepm7487 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The CJI did a great job in countering the arguments with valid points. ❤

  • @pyrology101
    @pyrology101 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    No Kapil Sibal to confuse the bench, then all of a sudden: BOOM !
    _"one thing is very clear: _*_sovereignty was ceded completely to the union of India_*_ "_

    • @rizwandar8025
      @rizwandar8025 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Chomu ceded hota hai

    • @parveshbisht4955
      @parveshbisht4955 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@rizwandar8025aagaya katwa

    • @onlynationalist
      @onlynationalist ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@rizwandar8025 Are you kashmiri shia muslim?

    • @rizwandar8025
      @rizwandar8025 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@onlynationalist no

    • @IndianArma
      @IndianArma ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​​@@onlynationalisteverything is not about Hindu Muslim. The most ant India people see things this way. Are you a chomu?

  • @sandeeprajp
    @sandeeprajp ปีที่แล้ว +79

    Lawyer - I have been paid to let J&K slip back into turmoil again.
    Judge - Dude, am not letting that happen - whatsoever 😊
    PERIOD!!!

  • @subrav43
    @subrav43 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    These people are wasting time. This petition should have been dismissed it away and it should have declared that 370 is gone for ever. What is good for our country cannot be debated. The discussion we find is mostly on procedural matters

    • @Ragsit
      @Ragsit ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bro discussion is good. After this discussion, the matter of 370 is officially dead. Any party bringjng it up in future will become anti national

  • @manjeetsingh-sv2sj
    @manjeetsingh-sv2sj ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Great answer by cji sir g Salute

  • @chittaranjandas7140
    @chittaranjandas7140 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Parliament is Supreme in making law. States can not supersede the power of the Parliament.

    • @deepakkumarjoshi
      @deepakkumarjoshi ปีที่แล้ว

      Can parliament make Uttar Pradesh a union territory? 😂 States also have right, they are not slaves.

    • @hasiasalliedntexamonlinegu7609
      @hasiasalliedntexamonlinegu7609 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@deepakkumarjoshiyes under article 3 up can be made a ut..infact india is an indestructible union of destructible states.

    • @ialone13
      @ialone13 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂😂😂 without kashmir...

    • @mtj9499
      @mtj9499 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@deepakkumarjoshiwhy not? If you produce the bill and get majority in its support

  • @winningleader7911
    @winningleader7911 ปีที่แล้ว +173

    At this point, these lawyers are just racking up consulting fees on hourly basis :)

    • @pkm7776
      @pkm7776 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Question is who are paying the fees. Expenses must be around 1 crore per day

    • @onlynationalist
      @onlynationalist ปีที่แล้ว +9

      No doubt they would get remuneration in different modes through NGOs. You understand which kind of NGOs?

    • @sharadmagdum8421
      @sharadmagdum8421 ปีที่แล้ว

      😂😂

    • @XauUsd.46
      @XauUsd.46 ปีที่แล้ว

      Result should come before 2024 election

    • @catcat63527
      @catcat63527 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@onlynationalistSoros bootlickers. Good for the lawyer to rake in the dollars to our country 😂😂😂

  • @mithunaa3273
    @mithunaa3273 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    How , How calmly Mr.cji was handling?
    I expected a hammer 🔨 throw to the lawyers by
    Mr.Cji.

  • @sreejithalltech
    @sreejithalltech ปีที่แล้ว

    Salute CJI scotching the overhead ordinances.

  • @sandsc791
    @sandsc791 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Best CJI in recent times

  • @satheeshnair3053
    @satheeshnair3053 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    The Kapil sibal Lawyer saying that the concurrence of the Party is required. Means His Highness Raja of J & K has to come ? Bhool jao Kapilji . India and Indians have to decide . For that we have Parliament and elected Government with absolute Majority and a strong judicial system to protect that. Let wisdom prevail . Jai Hind.

    • @kaydee3407
      @kaydee3407 ปีที่แล้ว

      @0:26 soveregnty wasnt ceded to the union of india .it was stolen ....as the accession treaty didnt sign away soveregnty ...but this treaty was rejected by the republic ..giving no protection.guarantee in return ..
      That is theft ( of soveregnty not given to the union ) and fraud...upon the beneficiary of the treaty ie the people of the princley states ..
      This is what we see in godhra, delhi riots, sikh riots in delhi , gangrape in godhra and manipur...people are not safe as they have no written giarantee from a state of protection ...and has thus a licence to commit fraud..
      The CJI admits to this fraud

    • @birajaprasadmohanty2159
      @birajaprasadmohanty2159 ปีที่แล้ว

      This fellows dances according to their Akka

    • @paapkishtwaer
      @paapkishtwaer ปีที่แล้ว +1

      people of jammu kashmir will decide their own future. not you ok. you are nobody to us

    • @jacksonvlogs716
      @jacksonvlogs716 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@paapkishtwaermaiyya chodkr bhaiya paida kr degi Indian Army jyada chuu chaa kiya to😂😂

    • @deepakkumarjoshi
      @deepakkumarjoshi ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@paapkishtwaer👍

  • @ramireddy76
    @ramireddy76 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    CJI u have good understanding of the law.
    If u stop being woke and be India at heart, you will make a lave good Legacy like your father.

  • @rakeshuchula2135
    @rakeshuchula2135 ปีที่แล้ว +94

    Kapil chibal will even twist this by saying we know 1 is not equal 2, but untill and unless 2 says he is not equal to 1,we have to consider 1 is equal to 2,one side maths teacher says 1 is not equal to 2 listen to me but chibal will say no i will not agree because 70 years ago we agreed in our school that 1 is equal to 2,so we have to believe it untill unless 2 says I am not equal to 1😂😂

    • @suhasdhamorikar5890
      @suhasdhamorikar5890 ปีที่แล้ว

      This belief system built up by family run khangress who wants them to believe Gandhi's instead of Firoz Khan's ancestors and on top Brahmin . Only slaves can accept such analogy

    • @sureshrao2695
      @sureshrao2695 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      🤣🤣🤣

    • @p.n.unnikrishnan6659
      @p.n.unnikrishnan6659 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Only Kabil Sibal will understand this.

    • @river.
      @river. ปีที่แล้ว +2

      thats so accurate🤣🤣

    • @dhanapathivarmauddaraju9757
      @dhanapathivarmauddaraju9757 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1 is not equal to zero. 2 is also not equal to zero.
      So, as per article KS-1.2, 1 = 2.
      That's all my lord.

  • @greatgrandindia6352
    @greatgrandindia6352 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Nail in the head by CJI H' Chandrachud. Soverinty is complete in cas of J&k

  • @oshitales4070
    @oshitales4070 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Lawyer - This is the constitutional law.
    Judge - Read the law again in front of me and tell me what you didn't understand.😂

  • @ashutoshdutta821
    @ashutoshdutta821 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The core question whether a state came to GOI with the appeal to save the state from invading army of pakistan and then signing the accession to India which sacrificed the lives of jawans can impose special privilege of 370 and impose 35A to GOI is wholly untenable. That the accession of whole state J & K even after 75 years still remain unfulfilled. The seeker ( J&K ) can't have special privilege after so much sacrifice GOI had to endure . That is gross injustice to all other states willing signed the form of accession.

  • @GUDDU8779
    @GUDDU8779 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very good discussion.Let us wait and watch till the end of hearing

  • @harshalshiravadekar6218
    @harshalshiravadekar6218 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great CJI 🎉 Congradulatioms 🎉

  • @prabodhkumar8917
    @prabodhkumar8917 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    Unfortunately all the councils for petitioner have vested interests but not the national interest, splicing the constitution to bits & pieces. J&K is absolutely peaceful now. The attempt is to reverse it.

    • @birajaprasadmohanty2159
      @birajaprasadmohanty2159 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Who is paying for this. Crores of Rupees??

    • @kanhaiyakumar-vh2un
      @kanhaiyakumar-vh2un ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@birajaprasadmohanty2159 Anti indian congress..

    • @anandakrishnanallendrampil777
      @anandakrishnanallendrampil777 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Once a law is enacted in the parliment it can not be reversed but can only be amended?

    • @anandakrishnanallendrampil777
      @anandakrishnanallendrampil777 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@birajaprasadmohanty2159 Exchequer

    • @adithya67
      @adithya67 ปีที่แล้ว

      Congress, due to election going to conduct next year, congress want to derail the peace in Kashmir, to gain political interest.

  • @user-mg5er7um2c
    @user-mg5er7um2c ปีที่แล้ว +15

    That argument of Art. 252 is a great point

    • @kaydee3407
      @kaydee3407 ปีที่แล้ว

      @0:26 soveregnty wasnt ceded to the union of india .it was stolen ....as the accession treaty didnt sign away soveregnty ...but this treaty was rejected by the republic ..giving no protection.guarantee in return ..
      That is theft ( of soveregnty not given to the union ) and fraud...upon the beneficiary of the treaty ie the people of the princley states ..
      This is what we see in godhra, delhi riots, sikh riots in delhi , gangrape in godhra and manipur...people are not safe as they have no written giarantee from a state of protection ...and has thus a licence to commit fraud..
      The CJI admits to this fraud

  • @Sreeprayag
    @Sreeprayag ปีที่แล้ว

    Good to see CJI's stand on the matter. It should never come back

  • @sachinmehta7082
    @sachinmehta7082 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    CJI wasn't prepared for Kapil Sibal but now he seems to have done his homework and come prepared

    • @falaksharma1
      @falaksharma1 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Nope sibal was just loud and aggressive that's all his points don't stand

    • @kaydee3407
      @kaydee3407 ปีที่แล้ว

      @0:26 soveregnty wasnt ceded to the union of india .it was stolen ....as the accession treaty didnt sign away soveregnty ...but this treaty was rejected by the republic ..giving no protection.guarantee in return ..
      That is theft ( of soveregnty not given to the union ) and fraud...upon the beneficiary of the treaty ie the people of the princley states ..
      This is what we see in godhra, delhi riots, sikh riots in delhi , gangrape in godhra and manipur...people are not safe as they have no written giarantee from a state of protection ...and has thus a licence to commit fraud..
      The CJI admits to this fraud

    • @bindra1731
      @bindra1731 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kapil Sibal is boisterous and his clients too.

  • @sureshsapale8497
    @sureshsapale8497 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explanation of CJI

  • @sreenavenugopalan936
    @sreenavenugopalan936 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is this lawyer saying.. if state has precedence over the Government of India.. what will happen to the country???

  • @VermaRajinder
    @VermaRajinder ปีที่แล้ว +5

    If Parliament cannot make Laws for the Nation what then can it do ??? Appeal to the Ego of some Lawyers and take their Concurrence .... Would lawyers ever agree to anything ??? 😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @nikshrivastava5514
    @nikshrivastava5514 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    CJI is smart. Outsmarted oversmart lawyers.

  • @Happymindsets
    @Happymindsets ปีที่แล้ว

    Kudos to🙏 the CJI.

  • @PKarri
    @PKarri ปีที่แล้ว

    There are too many Indians who do not like a big powerful united Bharat .

  • @khalidbinasim6942
    @khalidbinasim6942 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Honorable CJI knowledge is unbeatable, we have proudly Says "he is a man for centuries"
    Thanks for these arguments

  • @panneerselvam4140
    @panneerselvam4140 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very well to Hygienic judgement for 370,and to save India by the people's Democracy. God provided your idealige to move 🙏 right ✅ way. Amen ♥.

    • @kbdhandapani9479
      @kbdhandapani9479 ปีที่แล้ว

      Soverignity and ambedkarsindian constitution and basicstructure if constitution is more important now and not modijis constitution

  • @cccc2740
    @cccc2740 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    as i have said before, those opposing 370's abrogation dont have problem with abrogation perse, but rather with the fact that modi abrogated it....had congress did it(hypotheticallt ofcourse....they wont antagonise their muslim votebanks ever), very same people would be singing paeans for congress....🤣🤣

  • @ponungpullom4672
    @ponungpullom4672 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Where is kapil chibal the modern jaychand.

  • @manikyarao5910
    @manikyarao5910 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THIS CJI IS PUBLICITY HUNGRY. NOT INTERESTED IN ENFORCING JUDGES ACCOUNTABILITY!

  • @kishormasters264
    @kishormasters264 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why CJI is taking intetest in this matter. He should throw thid case out as there sre many casrs outstanding for years. I have k own some cases are 40 yeats old and hasn"t hearing. So its whom you know. Pappu had his hearing within weeks. Shame on our SC system.

  • @drcmsamy
    @drcmsamy ปีที่แล้ว

    India is first
    State under union of India
    India is one indian laws must be equal to all States.

  • @santoshranjandas1111
    @santoshranjandas1111 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    We cannot understand why the court has accepted the pitition for hearing. It's matter of country,'s interest. J&K joined India after independence and that is final.

    • @GHULAMMUSTAFA-uc9eq
      @GHULAMMUSTAFA-uc9eq ปีที่แล้ว

      Fudamental of Accesion was conditional dude. J & K will stay as an independent Territory with Defence, Finance and Foreign affairs be dealt by the host nation. Rest it was upto the people of Jammu kashmir to decide through plebicite.

  • @vyoshen4563
    @vyoshen4563 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am very glad to see how CJI knows removal of article 370 actually completes the union process of Bharat as one country. And any disturbance would then allow other state break india forces to start murmuring.

  • @ramakantabehuria7397
    @ramakantabehuria7397 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All laws should be as per the national integrity . If no such laws are not there . those should be made. Abrogation of article is in favour of nation. In name of construction permission it should not be restored again.

  • @AjayKumar-ky4yf
    @AjayKumar-ky4yf ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good decision by CJI.

  • @gsnRjy47
    @gsnRjy47 ปีที่แล้ว

    The petitioner and his lawyers must not forget that unification of sovereignty at some stage now the present stage cannot be ignored and procrastinated under a pretentious smoke screen of state concurrence ! What do they mean by state concurrence when the very sustenance of state and its maintainence is by the government treasure for 76 years . The state cannot be treated as a royal princely manner starving other 29 states slogging to support it.

  • @shalinihooda662
    @shalinihooda662 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Salute Sir ..godblessu Ur Honor

  • @aravabc
    @aravabc ปีที่แล้ว +32

    I think all the article/Law should be feed into IndiaGPT using LLM . Courts will immensily benefit during these debates.

    • @archerverse13
      @archerverse13 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Bad idea, bots are biased af, can't use em for serious matters like in courts where one mistake can cost lives. LLMs are probabilistic, we need determinstic AI for courts which can be done with simple rules based classic logic, no need to go for fancy models like LLMs.

    • @chiragjobanputra1
      @chiragjobanputra1 ปีที่แล้ว

      …and one day a smart hacker will extract biased outcome once the system starts fully using it

    • @atishbhattacharya3473
      @atishbhattacharya3473 ปีที่แล้ว

      It can definitely help the judges, and speed up the process but LLMs on their own can be very unpredictable and biased. So with human supervision it can act as an advisor to the judges and Lawers.

    • @archerverse13
      @archerverse13 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@atishbhattacharya3473 exactly but a normal deterministic software will definitely help. Whole constitution infact is predicate logic based which can be encoded in a computer program I believe. There are already research papers on this, only problem is interpretation part.

    • @UPAKHOSALA
      @UPAKHOSALA ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@archerverse13 then according to u
      The whole world is investing in Advancing as well as implementing latest AI ,Machine learning
      LLM ,
      BLOCK CHAIN TECHNOLOGY
      ECT ARE ALL FANCY
      And these western companies
      Some of them r investing
      In double digit billions of US Dollars
      So they r all stupid
      SINCE THESE R PROBABLISTIC
      SO THEY MAY TAKE ERRONEOUS
      DESCISION
      ?.

  • @hrishirajrabha5415
    @hrishirajrabha5415 ปีที่แล้ว

    INC backed petitioners talking of Referendum in Jammu& Kashmir, Sovereignty of Jammu&Kashmir.
    What has this Party turned into fgs.

  • @priyadarshiDas-cx7sc
    @priyadarshiDas-cx7sc ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Article 370 is a TEMPORARY provision of Constitution of India and it is a matter of Indian Constitution not the Constitution of JK and entire part of Indian Constitution (excluding Basic Structure) is amendable following due amendment procedure of Parliament, as such, Article 370 may also be amended.

  • @ExMuslimZulfikarali
    @ExMuslimZulfikarali ปีที่แล้ว

    His all decisions are excellent 👍👍👍 he is better than today whole Govt

  • @RuksanaAli-sh6zq
    @RuksanaAli-sh6zq ปีที่แล้ว

    Well

  • @supriyaghosh427
    @supriyaghosh427 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    If any agreement, identity of any community either challenges the sovereignty of India or does not allow the sovereignty to take decision for the betterment of the larger section of the society then that agreement will cease to continue and that community will be taught to become Indian.

  • @ramaraocheepi7847
    @ramaraocheepi7847 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    some judges keep cherry picking by their interpretation is really not conducive for healthy delivery of justice which keep getting delayed.CJI rightly clarified the apt posn crystal clear,is comprehended easily by commoners even.

  • @syedwasiq1744
    @syedwasiq1744 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its right to apply 370 article back for sovereignty of the valley

  • @obviousbuthidden
    @obviousbuthidden ปีที่แล้ว

    Post 1947, when Pakistanis & Tribals were banging J&K left & Right & Srinagar was to be lost to raiders, It had two options be sovereign & Get Banged up by Raiders or be with India, let go of Sovereignty & Save your people.
    Once you are Saved, now you want Sovereignty. Shame on These So Called Lawyers advocating for reinstating of Article 370.

  • @eng.anwaaralawi7790
    @eng.anwaaralawi7790 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good discussion ❤

  • @anujsinghbhatti
    @anujsinghbhatti ปีที่แล้ว

    Definitely well said Sir, CJI

  • @ChainofLight2024
    @ChainofLight2024 ปีที่แล้ว

    When they agreement between india and JK is on only three issues, foreign affairs, communication, and defense. Then how can a parliament redefine the matter related to sovereignty without the Concurrence of state legislature?

  • @vinay0928
    @vinay0928 ปีที่แล้ว

    CJI completely flattened anti *********

  • @satishbhanse7454
    @satishbhanse7454 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even if case fails they are paid in crores... By showing their faces we all came to know who are against and who are in favour...

  • @baajey
    @baajey ปีที่แล้ว

    The CJI is a rational person, not influenced by political ideologies and their subsequent policies

  • @dr.kantarajtavaneadvocate1906
    @dr.kantarajtavaneadvocate1906 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Simple, there can not be two sovereign in one boundary.

  • @sarabjitsingh5327
    @sarabjitsingh5327 ปีที่แล้ว

    Final will be
    Removal method was illegal but.........
    Extension of ED chief was illegal but........
    What happened in maha is illegal but........
    Same as previous rulings.

  • @aasimbillah953
    @aasimbillah953 ปีที่แล้ว

    Zaffar sahab the great....

  • @KuchNahiBasAiseHi
    @KuchNahiBasAiseHi ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The way Vikas Divyakirti sir explained cleared this issue long back.

  • @GoldSpot-pf1yb
    @GoldSpot-pf1yb ปีที่แล้ว

    Already removed. State has moved on. Waste of time legal hearing. Too late.

  • @ISC101
    @ISC101 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good

  • @vinodkumar-tg4xe
    @vinodkumar-tg4xe ปีที่แล้ว

    When accession happened in 1947 with India was unconditional and 370 was not there at that time.

  • @ankurjain1352
    @ankurjain1352 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seeing the current J&K situation, peace and prosperity, why these opposition buggers are opposing abbrogtion of article 370, just for there personal interest

  • @shalinihooda662
    @shalinihooda662 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sir u have given us a very important lesson .."that arm ur argument with rationale,logic,reason,and intellect and know ur text and u r invincibilly just "thanku sir I learnt a valuable lesson ..godblessu Sir

  • @suvarapu1959
    @suvarapu1959 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where these people has gone when AP was separated.
    These big people where they are?

  • @MiniManMK13
    @MiniManMK13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    CJI is a sensible nationalist who is driven to serve citizens of India within the purview of the constitution. My prediction is this verdict will go in favour of BJP government but he will urge to conduct elections soon.

  • @dilthebeatingheart
    @dilthebeatingheart ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a waste of money and time

  • @s.t.chandrasekharbabu132
    @s.t.chandrasekharbabu132 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This became a issue of union of India sovereignty vs article 370.

  • @prabirdas8579
    @prabirdas8579 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now we are thinking supreme court is emeni of nation why not country interest first?

  • @rupamkose7663
    @rupamkose7663 ปีที่แล้ว

    Long live mr Chandrachud ❤️❤️❤️
    The true saviour of this beautiful country

  • @josyulabhaskarashastry1790
    @josyulabhaskarashastry1790 ปีที่แล้ว

    Honourable CJI Sir,
    One should have guts for removing the article 370. It was done. Kindly dont entertain to reverse that. I request you to clear the path to get even POK. With Regards...

  • @sheshachalacv2489
    @sheshachalacv2489 ปีที่แล้ว

    Law makers of parliment who are the will of countrymen are the one who decide about artical 370, not through courts or lawyers.

    • @pc-vv8tj
      @pc-vv8tj ปีที่แล้ว

      Well I mean it was a petition law is already cemented it's a petition to undo it

  • @lingasamykalirajan213
    @lingasamykalirajan213 ปีที่แล้ว

    What's going on in SC, when the matter was already settled in parliament. Parliament is the supreme body and court has no power to revoke the law and if there is any ambiguity in implementation, court can suggest measures without hampering the spirit of the law for parliment attention. Validity of the law in the light of constitution should not be questioned by the S.C.

  • @rajeevjayaram4981
    @rajeevjayaram4981 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I am just wondering what would be the State of India if Sibal is the CJI

    • @Deshabakht
      @Deshabakht ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I also thought like that yesterday if Kapil Sibel were CJ and the case before him. I did yoga for an hour and prayed almighty such thoughts do not come to my mind.

    • @ajitkumarmahapatra3714
      @ajitkumarmahapatra3714 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ha ha ha....its very simple . what india was before 1947 , the same will b d fate of india

    • @atishbhattacharya3473
      @atishbhattacharya3473 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The horror..

    • @raghukash
      @raghukash ปีที่แล้ว

      If only Sibbal was CJI, INDIA have had only slaves of " The dynasty
      SIBBAL would have slave leader.

  • @akashshah8180
    @akashshah8180 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I was there in chief court ....arguments from both side were excellent

    • @SantoshSatvikL
      @SantoshSatvikL ปีที่แล้ว

      I don't see any videos for the supporting side. Were they not recorded?

    • @kaydee3407
      @kaydee3407 ปีที่แล้ว

      @0:26 soveregnty wasnt ceded to the union of india .it was stolen ....as the accession treaty didnt sign away soveregnty ...but this treaty was rejected by the republic ..giving no protection.guarantee in return ..
      That is theft ( of soveregnty not given to the union ) and fraud...upon the beneficiary of the treaty ie the people of the princley states ..
      This is what we see in godhra, delhi riots, sikh riots in delhi , gangrape in godhra and manipur...people are not safe as they have no written giarantee from a state of protection ...and has thus a licence to commit fraud..
      The CJI admits to this fraud

  • @narendraarya6479
    @narendraarya6479 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why the constiturnt assembly of j&k didn't clear its stand on article 370 making it permanent. The assembly ceased to exist keeping article 370 temporary.

  • @leaves11
    @leaves11 ปีที่แล้ว

    India is a union of state and federal in nature....
    Modi has done enough to make it centralised.

  • @madhusoodananunniyattil9421
    @madhusoodananunniyattil9421 ปีที่แล้ว

    Court should finally declare that no more petitions are welcome by any means and everything is scrapped !

  • @CupcakeAndMuffins
    @CupcakeAndMuffins ปีที่แล้ว

    Yeah we are not federal country. His last words summarises everything. Only union government is sovereign not state govt.

  • @Deshabakht
    @Deshabakht ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Moreover, all the people must settle down in Kashmir so that Muftis and Abdullahs will keep quite. Kashmir does not belong to Kashmiris alone. It is integral part of India and anyone can settle there.

  • @kmh9817
    @kmh9817 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I just Studied Polity for State PSC but I feel like I have more understanding then these Lawyers arguments.

  • @trivedihari5629
    @trivedihari5629 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes pl cji hand it over

  • @gaursircarrierpointkishang2825
    @gaursircarrierpointkishang2825 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    कोर्ट अभी भी अंग्रेजी से मुक्त नहीं हो पाए हैं।

    • @madeforyou2398
      @madeforyou2398 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      English main explanation jyada asan hota Hain dusro ko samjana Hindi main jyada bolna padata hain jaise ki tuze samjana 😅 #modibhakt

  • @ManjuSingh-io6ix
    @ManjuSingh-io6ix 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What does he mean Kashmir was never an integral part of India this man is a villian !!

  • @VasanthKumar-mu2qu
    @VasanthKumar-mu2qu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Waste of time
    Waste of time
    Waste of time

  • @umadevi8431
    @umadevi8431 ปีที่แล้ว

    This could have argued 2019 ,
    Why now? Ias officer withdrew his
    Petition every way kashmir developing it's economy tourism
    Kids going regular schools and colleges life is much better than
    Past years

  • @klkaul2162
    @klkaul2162 ปีที่แล้ว

    CJI and infact all participants forget that the State was independent of British suzerainty even before India was granted independence. The Instrument of Accession is thus a Treaty, and any change in the relationship has to be by mutual agreement and not unilateral

  • @vjsethi7213
    @vjsethi7213 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What should not be lost is the will of the people.
    The soul of any amalgamation is joining of hearts
    One can play with words ad infinitum
    Of steam rolling agendas we want no part

    • @bindra1731
      @bindra1731 ปีที่แล้ว

      Will of the people? No where in history of human kind has this been etched permanently.

    • @vjsethi7213
      @vjsethi7213 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bindra1731
      In the transient world nothing is permanent but God's will
      Faith moves mountains and those who just wont sit still
      It's the stay at home sons of the soil
      Who let the world pass them by
      But a true seeker is not confined to narrow spaces
      Will find a way to maks wings and will fly

  • @gulshankahol7338
    @gulshankahol7338 ปีที่แล้ว

    CJI is right

  • @vatsalaramadoss
    @vatsalaramadoss ปีที่แล้ว

    Ram Ram
    When the parliament abrogated law 420 and joined Kashmir with India, why the Indian judiciary thr Supreme Court is discussing this issue, is it not correct to join Kashmir with the mainstream India? I do not understand the Indian judiciary?
    Ramadoss

  • @bonelaself-harmrao8895
    @bonelaself-harmrao8895 ปีที่แล้ว

    When the abrogation of article 370 had become a law after the President 's sig what is the need of accepting the challenging petition by our SC and prolonging the hearing for so many days? Is it only for benifitting the traitor Kapil Sibbal?

  • @brijeshbarthwal1005
    @brijeshbarthwal1005 ปีที่แล้ว

    Five judges are engaged in technical aspects for fortnight. Later deliberation on Delhi Service Act will take place & so on. Meanwhile high profile case like bail to Teesta, Rahul will be heard. It is high time seprate appointment be made for exclusive dedicated bench shall be prescribed for such cases. In one day, a judge may dispose 50 cases also. Public has lost faith on judiciary. More than 3 cr cases are pending for +10 yrs.