@乙乇ᗪㄖ几Ꮆ爪卂ㄖ Mao people are traders. They only know how to make cheap product and earn $. Basically oppresses working class and advocates bourgeois. China has powerful middle-class which made them 2nd largest economy. Mao people only thinks about trade
Sir, I disagree. And people from Bengal are called Bengali’s. And people from Bengal are smart and very creative. Are doing much better than West Pakistan
I'm from Pakistan, defence day is just another day for me too, We've always heard it was India to infiltrate first with the famous "aaj ka nashta Lahore mein kry ge"dialogue, Kashmir infiltration is never discussed. Wars always bring destruction, I hope peace and friendship prevails between atleast the common public on both sides, and we keep on watching each other's content on youtube. ❤👍
Brother in reality it is exactly opposite pakistani generals first sent jhadis into kashmir and then launched full scale ops aginst india....and it was actually pakistani generals who told that we will do our dinner at lal kila.....
@@farahead157 why were you retreating on kashmir sector? This is the question you should ask your commanders. And why you doesn't capture lahore which is almost 10km away. This should be asked
@@muhammadfawad1505 we didn't retreat from kashmir we just distracted pakistani forces towards punjab so that our backup force can reach kashmir once they reach kashmir India managed to recapture akhnoor let me ask you a question why pakistan failed to capture Kashmir cause it was the main aim to start the war we failed to capture lahore because we lost battle of chawinda the Australian newspaper you remember was about that but when losses were accounted India captured more pakistani territory than pakistan captured indian with sustaining less losses than pakistan but iaf lost more jets than paf hope you understand
@@farahead157 i am glad to see first indian who is talking logically. Anyhow Pakistan aim was not to capture kashmir. Field marshal asked several time UN to resolve the kashmir issue. Even your own country was willing to give kashmir to Pakistan if gujrat is taking our side. But your forces then capture gujrat by force and then your leadership was confident to take stance. Pakistan and India both don't have technology to make machine including tanks aircraft or navy this is quite clear. Pakistan bought 15 days ammunition from USA this is also cleared to the world. Pakistan aim was not capture kashmir but to make skirmishes inorder to bring this matter to the table in UN and Pakistan would have sufficient 15 days ammunition to defend rest of the country. Please don't count losses from wikipedia this is the most easy information to be manipulated
In 1965, we were inferior on all fronts. Yet we retained Kashmir and reached Lahore, so how is it incompetence of Indian forces. Incompetence of a Mr Nehru for sure to leave the army in such ill-equipped situation.
I want people to understand that during 1965 war, pak economy was doing better than india, they had better armors, faar better jets & at top of all they had support of US lobby. India was slow on all the fronts, india had no support of western world (except USSR that too because we used to buy jets from them) & india suffered major defeat in indio-china war of 1962 + we had a very humble PM & talks were about congress going to sack him (Sastri ji). In that environment, if india could keep kashmir & look into eyes of pakistan, it was very commendable. (in 1965 world media placed it's bet on Pak, it turned out more to be a draw than anything in pak favor) Pak learnt that If they couldn't take kashmir in 1965, they could never. And that's why they started jihaad policy in kashmir soon after.
It seems you are also studying for UPSC or state exams that's why you can decide or write about 65'swar ...as far as you mentioned Jehad ...its political fight....was it fight for Islam then my brother who servers for India army 7RR and my father is working in jk police and presently both are working for Indian flag and constitution ...but my ideology which is different from there's because I believe our sovereignty have been dissolved by your country...three persons three ideology but common thing we never related it with religion... hum to afwah pey khoon baha detay hai.... Socho agar baat Islam ki hote to tera key hashar hota
@@asifmir9604 bro, 90% you are hindu converts. If you had to do something then do it, don't make excuses. Give a 100%. If you want a Jihad then do it, leave india join Pak army and launch another war. We will See you at the battle ground. But thia constant "tamasha", of ohh it wasn't a real Islamic war is getting boring now. It's like communists, when ever communism collapsed, all the communist used to say "this isn't real communism ". As an excuse to save their ideology in the face of shamefull defeat.
@@Manish_Kumar_Singh so true brother these Islamists do every harm to others for their religion, these morons think they are Arabs or Persians but the fact is they are 90% Hindu converts during the Islamic invasions of India.
India not just defended Kashmir, but went ahead and captured territory in pok including haji peer. We made huge gains in Sialkot. Defeated Pakistan's offensive in Punjab ( Khem karan). Made a dash to Lahore but halted because ceasefire was to be signed. Overall we captured 4 times more land than Pakistan. It was a handsome victory for India. If the war had continued for few more days, Pakistan would have signed instrument of surrender at Lahore fort. Summary of the war - Kashmir lene chale they, nahi mila, ulta Lahore bachane ke liye UN ke paas bhagna padha.
If I remember correctly we threw the kitchen sink at Akhnoor Chammb sector and dug in by preventing a Pakistani breakthrough and in order to relieve the pressure on the Jammu sector we opened up a new front and the Pak Army shot themselves in the foot by changing their commander who spearheaded Op Grandslam thereby throwing away the momentum gained
@@animeshkaushik6938 bro Google par jo stories ha wo mostly Indian writers ki ha so we need to depend on international media . Look Australian news paper of 1965.
@Jancy Varghese dear pak defeat india badly in 1965 you can look Australian news paper of 1965 as a evidence. On Google mostly stories are written by Indian writers. India have great influence on TH-cam Google Twitter or Facebook
Abhinandan is BACK, this time with normal mustache as those extra wings on his mustache is demolished....."UDNAY K BAAT PARINDAY KAR TAY HAIN TUUTEY HOA PAR NAI"
11:31 - Factually wrong. Muslims landed in Gibraltar but it had nothing to do with the crusades. It was the invasion of Spain and formation of Al Andalus which would centuries later end with the Reconquista
The Abbisad empire invaded europe from Africa (from Algeria to Spain) And captured most of the christan Kingdom of Visgoth and formed Al Andalus and later the islamic expansion was stopped by the famous Charles Martel of France ( founder of France and Germany). The Spanish was able to slowly outsed the islamic invaders from spain by 500 years ( Reconquestia) Not same as Crusades. Edit: Abbasid
"War never solves a problem, only leads to another war" Well said sir, couldn't agree more. I hope our armies realize that one day. Love from Faisalabad, Pakistan.
First step- gandu came to capture chandu's house... 2nd step- chandu kidnapped gandu's sister... Gandu panicked and aborted the mission to capture chandu's house.. Now gandu claims - we won😂😂
Abhinandan is BACK, this time with normal mustache as those extra wings on his mustache is demolished....."UDNAY K BAAT PARINDAY KAR TAY HAIN TUUTEY HOA PAR NAI"
@@shaheer316 This is reality. Your army run away in kargil without accepting the body of your own solider. Your army can't fight. Your army generals are nothing but land grabbers.
@@akhtarhussain3051 Do you even know it is India which exports rice, tomatos, major life saving medicines and many other things to pakistan? You probably don't, because your madrasa and mosques teach only "how to become a jihadi" nothing productive to human kind.
The war was imposed on India through Operation Gibraltar when Pakistani soldiers were infiltrated with arms. India attacked the International border and almost reached to Lahore. It was a stalemate after a couple of weeks of the war. Finally, Tashkent settlement happened and PM Shastri lost his life due to an unknown reason.
you always speak truth and we tell a lie! some times you should see around instead of watching and reading your fools! www.pakistanarmy.gov.pk/1965-war.php
@@MrWasim100100 ha bhai 65 71 99 tumhi logo ne jeeta ab pak chand pe bhi pahuch gaya hai or abhi USA ko har sal $ 5 billion as a aid bhi deta hai !! khush bhai ..
No one gives value to post independence history in India in Pakistan they sugarcoat everything and celebrate like mads don't know why the BJP too sometimes try to contain history like congress on 15 Aug 1947
India won in shakaragarh, haji peer pass, went deep into pak land capturing barki and chawinda philora and close to pasrur which was 25 km deep into pak.
Put ur facts right and listen to him. Pakistan had upper hand in chamb sialkot chawinda and ran of kach. But yes Ayub Khans main objective to conquer kashmir failed. Please read battle of chawinda on wikipedia..It says decisive Pakistan victory. Dont distort facts.
ahmedyar khan lol these are the facts what was your army doing when we went deep into 25 km chawinda and phillora. Thats a fact pak army defended chawinda but had the un ceasefire not called in second assualt on chawinda and pasrur would have led india to take over sialkot and also lahore too. You guys were dreaming of taking kashmir ended up running like dogs to save your own cities when india open up second front in sailkot and lahore. Had the the war gone on for some more days it would have been decisive indian victory but still this was still a victory since India defended Kashmir but also made inroads in punjab pakistan.
@Muhammad Akram pakistan in conflitcs against india 1947 - kicked from rajouri ,poonch,uri and sriningar 1965- misadventure and kicked out from kashmir 1971 -surrendered lost half their nation shamlessly 1984- lost siachen ,tried 5 times to take it but failed shamlessly each time 1999-kicked out from kargil this is your armed forces lol ,such a brave army lol
The lesson he did not discuss was the incompetence of civilian governments in all the wars except 1999 war. In 1962 and 1965 our PMs were desperate for ceasefire at the earliest. And in both these wars if fight would have continued for 4~5 more days the result would have been in India's favor. And in 1971 Mrs Gandhi did not understood that Bhutto was not interested in release of 93000 Pakistani prisoners. Bhutto's only interest was return of Pakistan land occupied by Indian forces during the war. In 1999 Bajpayee did not agreed for any negotiations or ceasefire before Pakistan withdrew its forces. Pakistani soldiers died like cowards while retreating under constant firing and bombing by Indian forces. Offcourse Pakistani forces haven't learned a single lesson. They always works through their real or dummy proxies first and back them with their regular army. Only thing is Pakistani soldiers wasted their lives at the alter of their generals while Indian were martyred in all those wars defending their country.
@@biswajit1407 Truth is not anti-Indian, it's just truth. ‘History should be uncomfortable. If you are not uncomfortable reading history, then you are not reading history, you are reading propaganda.’ Instead of attacking the Print, attack their arguments to prove that you are right.
as a Pakistani I want to say We celebrate 1965 not because it was a magnificent victory against India . But rather because of the decisive defensive strategical victory of Pakistan ( that’s why DEFENCE DAY ) . Ayub khan wanted Kashmir . Though he failed the operation . INDIA wanted a powerful retaliation coz of this operation! And there main objective was to capture Lahore completely. However they failed in capturing Lahore . Also Guineas world record was made in battle by a Pakistani M.M.Alam ( u can google ) he shot down 5 Indian jets under 30 seconds . On other hand India was able to capture a number of small towns on the border sides and gained area on Pakistan. However the War was a naval + Air victory for Pakistan .
@@wallingnaga6563 dude Pakistan lost Operation Gibraltar and yes lost Kashmir battle in Operation Gibraltar . But India intiated war in Punjab Rajasthan area to attack and capture Pakistani cities . India lost badly in Failing to capture Pakistani areas and lost reven Rann of Kutch permanently ...hence India won operation Gibraltar and Pakistan won 1965 defensive war
Shekhar sahib ...a great storyteller . Some fascinating facts..thank you. 1. Why did Operation Gibraltar fail. Why didnt India take Neelam Valley and Skardu in 1965. 2. Why did Yahya Khan fail to take Jammu in 1965 3. Why didnt India capture any strategic spots in 1971 that made Chamb vulnerable. why didnt India take Neelam Valley and Skardu in 1971. Israel took Golan Heights didnt they ? 4. I was born in 1947 and I had the best education India had to offer . ( IIT in 1963 etc etc then USA in 1968..Berkeley ) I had never heard of Tawi river ( Or Chakki River ) until Internet and Google Earth ( 2002 ) India education leaves many gaps. Why didnt India educated people know in early 1945 that China will certainly take Tibet.
IIT == 💩💩💩 I say that cause I'm from one. Old age retards engaging in relentless copy paste for 4 excruciating years. Zero innovation, zero originality, zero R&D, zero creativity. No wonder we are a failed nation in many parameters. While Singapore, China etc flourish.
Curse your own lack of wisdom, low IQ, cowardice etc etc is all I want to say to the previous generation especially one's who let Pakshitstain go nuclear.
1965, won by Indian army’s in side of Lahore was Indian army’s all war lost by Pakistan 1958,1962,1965,1971,1999, kargal war 1999,Pakistan lost all there stock files , they lost everything
My great uncle fought in the war. He passed away a long time ago but he use to tell me stories about the wars but he never showed any hate towards Indians. Just felt he was doing his job fighting for his country. To be fair he gave credit to his enemy combatants.
September 1: Pakistan attacked kashmir September 6: India attacked lahore. India captured 1800square km of Pakistan. Pakistan capture 504square km of India. But in Pakistani books Pakistan won😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
WE( PAKISTAN) CLEARLY WON THE WAR WE KILLED 2000 indian soldiers and pakistan lost only 400......we still have the most hightest peak from which we can attack tiger and other peaks.......PAKISTAN ZINDABAD......ur own army general said we didnt won the war actually
@@adilrajpoottv0196 was his comment against any pakistani... Common tell me... U have a problem when we show respect to our soldiers... Common.. Tell me... Such a inhiman moron you are... The guy above didnt even mention anything about pak and u started barking... Remember u are celebrating a air battle🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂whereas, for conclusion... Look the whole video and cry... Bcoz someone may win a battle and someone else may win the war... Now dont ask me to differentiate between them.... Btw.. U are such type of person who spreads hate even in a normal situation... In simple words, u are a disgrace and a slap to humanity🙏🤦♂🤦♂
Here I am quoting wikipedia: India had the upper hand over Pakistan when the ceasefire was declared. Although the two countries fought to a standoff, the conflict is seen as a strategic and political defeat for pakistan as it had not succeeded in fomenting an insurrection in Kashmir and was instead forced to shift gears in the defense of Lahore.
No , Neutral sources says that Pakistan lost the war . Even their own Pakistani generals claimed that they lost the war . And Indians don't teach those Indo Pak wars in their history textbooks .
@@porkistan93ksurrenderedarm57 My son that time I was captain in army and fought at Muna- bao front Sindh. It is also said by neutral war analysts that final punch could not be hit by either side. War started alway by political sides and ultimately army involved. If there is no politicians and army in the world, world is a paradise. I am witness, war is horrible for each side.
An wonderful analysis of 65 war. Objective & realistic. With a more wonderful conclusion that war never solves a problem, it only leads to another in some points of time. Would the Politicians & Generals of both the countries come to their senses?.
Gilbraltar is derived from Tariq Al Jabr , and was founded AFTER islamic conquest of Spain not before like you mentioned. Also Crusades were launched from Messina Italy not Gibraltar.
Gibraltar is a narrow channel that connects Mediterranean sea with Atlantic Ocean, and in the video he simply mention that this channelwas used by Islamic Army's to attack and capture Spain during Crusaders times( the time of Christians and Islamic conflicts ) So he talked about in general things and not chronological History....and it's foolish to give such comment on a general idea to understand the perspective
The main culprit of the Indian defeat against the Chinese did not resign. He gave 50 bullets per slodier for an old bolt driving gun 303. The soldiers did not have winter clothing and proper boots. This culprit was --NEHRU.
27:48 Because Akhter Hussain Malik was a genius. He was the most respected general in the Pak army at that time even more than General Ayub himself. And that was the main reason why General Ayub was afraid about his position and thought he might had become the chief of staff. General Ayub was jealous of his capabilities. He didn't want the credit of winning Kashmir go into Akhter's basket. Pakistan was very near to take Kashmir had that swapping of generals would not occured.
A very balanced account of 1965 ops. Shekhar, it would be great if you can do a CTC on Lt Gen Sagat Singh PVSM, a brilliant General who never ever lost!
Real Humiliation is 1971 tearing apart and making 2 Nation. India to pakistan- take your East Pakistan first then kashmir 😂😂😂. Pakistan should celebrate 16 December to add 1 more nation to world map!!!
1. Pakistan celebrates 6th day for defense of Lahore. 2. War started with Pak's operation Gibraltar, India just opened the new theatres. 3. Pak failed to get anything in Kashmir which was the main purpose, India couldn't get anything substantial in Lahore and Sialkot sectors where sole Pakistani purpose was the defense. 4. Pak had technical superiority esp with fighter planes and Pak did have a slight edge when it came to some sort of air superiority. The main things which came up in that war, far away from propaganda of our local media (I am sure Indians have their own propaganda stories), were that Pak army just didn't have that cutting edge to defeat India and couldn't fight a full-scale long battle and most importantly, India could always throw more bodies in war just like USSR did in WW2 against Nazis.
Unless pakistan has more superior military technology than india, it could never challenge india. India is by default or by purpose is superior to pakistan in every aspects- resource, finance, personnel, equipments etc. Only thing which neutralised this advantage of india is pakistan's nuclear capability. Pakistan should not be swayed away by fanatical beliefs of mediaval era like gazwa e hind and jihad- these ideas are great recipe for defeats ex arab Israeli war.
I wait for these episodes every day. Great content, detailed and very accessible. I would recommend you also share some additional readings and links in your description each day for those who want to learn and read further. For example the link to MIT press journal paper on India/Pak relations was a great read in addition to the video after 370 abrogation. More of that please.
My great uncle fought in the war. He passed away a long time ago but he use to tell me stories about the wars but he never showed any hate towards Indians. Just felt he was doing his job fighting for his country.
Brilliant Positive analysis of the 65 War Hats off, very rational and realistic It is true that wars don't solve anything, they sow the seeds of yet another .
Bappu's ahimsa philosophy had been so ingrained in the blood of our armed forces and the leaders that first aggression from our side was never attempted in any of the wars after Independence. In war this paints a losers picture but in peace it more than compensates making India a hero in contrast to the villainish looks of our perpetual enemy...
I have never read more nonsensical stuff in my life. Bapu’s ideals is what india makes strong. Even Bapu encouraged armed conflicts when faced with barbarians. This can be seen when he supported the war against nazis, not because he was a British agent (falsely claimed by Hindu talibanis) but because he knew that barbarians don’t understand anything except violence.
And then came PM Modi and he changed the entire equation of Kashmir and called of nuclear bluff and that's why to this date after taken over J&K paktn not able to launch any war 😂😂
The Rastafari Heights Sometimes I wonder whether they really have a nuclear arsenal or it’s another piece of fake news. Their entire country is run on fake news where their press keeps on force feeding the dumbfuck population loads and loads of horseshit everyday.
India almost lost its part of Punjab when the Pakistanis were close to capturing Amritsar, even a retired Indian army general wrote in his book that the Indian army *was asked to leave the Indian Punjab in fear of heavy losses and further intrusion* Who won the war? Even though it wasn’t concluded The answer is clear and sound - that’s why we celebrate *”defence day”* not as an observance of Pakistani victory but to honour a successful defence of our homeland 🇵🇰 - this is further proved by Indian, Australian, American unbiased news reports of the incident (But the past is in the past we need to think of the future, put this military shit behind us and focus on science, technology and economy - and cultural collaboration) 🇮🇳 💕 🇵🇰
Pakistani people are not made for war it's not in their blood they haven't won anything since their creation, and even if you look down in history there wasn't any famous king or warrior from Pakistani region apart from Hindus and Sikhs These people have no will to fight otherwise they wouldn't have surrendered with over 1 lakh soldiers Very shameful
@@apurvbhardwaj1494 Bruhhh I’ve read biology as well as history and “fighting” never comes from the “blood or history” lmfao 🤣🤣🤣 What are you trying to prove when you say there was no famous king?? Like wtf dude if there was never any king, how tf does that relate to modern day warfare? Yes 93,000 soldiers was very shameful but that happened in 1971 (more than 50 years ago) Let’s think of some modern example 🤔 Ohhhhhh yesssssss *FEB 27TH 2019!* the teas is fantasticccxxc 😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤍
@@Zecos why I am saying this is because I have researched closely regarding the battle tactics of Pakistani army and the kind of milatey blunder they have done proves that these people have neither will power for physical war nor any sort of mental tactical strength operation Gibraltar or kargil war are prime example of it what I observed was that the Pakistani army extremely underestimates their enemy which led them to the downfall in every war Lack of any achivement force them to celebrate worthless things such as capture of a soldier
Defence day is another such thing made for pakistani army to fool their people I mean your target is cutting the supply route to kashmir and at the end talking control over whole kashmir and you end up trying to somehow defend the city of Lahore and then when the war ends you celebrate because you think you won as you defended lahore Ridiculous!
I think you have covered it pretty well bar 2,3 things which are probably tough for an Indian to admit for obvious reasons. 1. Like you said in the video, Pakistan doesn’t accept Kashmir as part of India so in national perspective of Pak, we never started the war. India crossed the international border on 6th September hence India started the war, not Pakistan. 2. The objectives of attack on Lahore wasn’t limited to simply expanding the fight to stretch Pakistan army. If that was the purpose, India would have attacked multiple fronts like Sialkot, Narowal, Cholistan and other border towns at same time. India wanted to capture the heart line of Pakistani Punjab to have better position at negotiation table after the war. 3. Pakistan has the technological advantage while India could throw almost 3 bodies for 1 Pakistan soldier everywhere in the border which was the decisive factor at that time. Pakistan’s army was never meant to be an attacking force in nature and generals at that time thought that they could force the soldiers to pull off Kashmir against their core training. I would never understand why Pakistan waited 3 years to try their hand at that which could have been done in a better way in 1962 when India was plummeted by Chinese.
@@TheALbibo this bs! Go get yourself educated before spewing baseless nonsense. He literally explains why pakistan attacked FIRST but somehow you just can't hear it.
Just because pakistan doesn't recognize kashmir as a part of India it doesn't change the reality, it legally ours and it was your army who actually helped in doing so when they attacked kashmir so, blaming us for your mess doesn't make any sense.
@@TheALbibo paks 1 dollar keyboard warrior coming with a fake name under the disguise of Indian muslim. Come over here an Indian muslim will kick you out in the same way you were kicked out in rest of the wars.
Overall good analysis and the wonderful message at the end. It's really unfortunate to see war hysteria between the nations who are most compatible when meet in foreign countries.
Pakistan had taken most of the area in kargil war but because of our bribe taker prime minister....pak army had to come back but we still killed more soldiers of indian army and we did alot of damage to u guys.......Pakistan Zindabad..
Pakistan has always had brotherly relations with Afghanistan; it's India that has fomented trouble. Pakistan's issues with India are because the latter wants to be dada of region and Pak refused to accept. The day Pak bows her head like losers Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Bhutan that day all problems will stop
In 1965, Pakistan lost the war against India, They did not achieve a single objective just because of greedy and self-centered so-called Field Martial Ayub and unprofessional general.
First of all Pakistan objectives were defensive coz they didn't initiated this war to capture your land and they defended themselves amazingly and pushed Indians back many kilometers inside India.
Main purpose of Pakistan attack was to occupy kashmir and failed to do so. At end they have to defend own territory. So it was a clear lost war for Pakistan.
@@mryoutube4399 bcoz Pakistan began the attack in India and India repulse them and bring them on talk table."technically"may be the wrong choice of word but ya morraly India won.
Sir you are one of my favorite ace journalists as you are so precise, as if you are vidur of Mahabharata that one has to just listen to what truth is, you are an ace sir, endless river you are like pink Floyd as you set the flow in such a smooth way. Amazing.
Shekhar how about a piece on Shastri and what happened in Tashkent. And why we relinquished the lands, which we had famously annexed. Shahstri chapter would make for an interesting story. Thanks!!!
Didnt pakistani army capture Jawahar Tunnel (Banihal pass)? my Father used to say,in Marathi..."naak daable ki tond ughadte" meaning if we press nose,mouth opens...hope kashmiris realise,pakistanis love Lahore more than kashmir.
If I can recollect we were given the impression that we won the war. I was in my teens studying in school. We never felt we last a war,unlike the chines war 1962. I remember my father let us not to celebrate Deepavali as the jawans were dying in dead cold in Himalayas. I think he was refering to ladhak, not Arunachala Pradesh.
In 1965 surprisingly attacked in Surat n Pakistan were having upper hand initially but Shastriji was suggested to open multiple fronts so we went to Lahore...At that US supplied Tanks were there...they got scared when we entered Lahore n When Hamid destroyed many tanks...so this 1965 surprise was taken revenge in 1971 by destroying Karachi...
I conclude that the people of both countries want peace instead of war. War is solution to no issue. We should settle our mutual disputes in an amicable way.
You says what we gained why we celebrate this day. The name of the day is called "Defence Day" means we successfully defended our borders. That's a win when you are peaceful and only objective is to defend your homeland. Further most of Indians think that they could easily capture Pakistan 1965 war was proof that its impossible.
@@MrWasim100100 first we stand with india in their crisis, secondly to answer your question in war the damage is done on both side further no region was captured by indian army. We were only defending that's it's called defense day not attack day to if we were only defending then it was success for us to successfully defended our region.
Good message in the end. However, I believe that both India and Pakistan have a religion problem where religion is more important than State, neighbor, friend etc. This importance of religion ensures that the root of the problem will continue till our generations are actively taught tolerance.
No.India doesn't. India isn't a country defined by religion. Pakistan is. However India is fuelled now by an ethnic religious politics which is an ideology and not religion.
@@ftckaplan213 i have checked the news except for a few idiots causing trouble nobody is systemically oppressing muslims in India all religious groups including Muslims are thriving in India
Nehru kept Indian army weak fearing he will lose power to generals. That's why we though more powerful lost war to China and could not clean up Pakistan. Nehru-Gandhi family, except Rahul Gandhi, ensured India's failure for 70 years. Rahul Gandhi by his mere presence in politics helped India chose an alternative. Lets see how it goes.
Amazing analysis. It’s just shame the Pak armed forces did not allow to write the history. Pakistan came close twice to take Kashmir. Pakistani’s celebrate 6th Sep as defence day because India did succeed in taking Lahore but war did not start on the 6th Sep as you have rightly pointed out. I also agree with you there were no Victors only great many good soldiers died on both sides.
Those who are celebrating 'defence day' for saving Lahore from Indian army forget that Lahore was in no danger to begin with.It were Pakistani generals like Ayub and politicians like Bhutto who provoked a needless intrusion in Kashmir ,totally misreading Indian counter attack.India not only opened front in Punjab but also captured four times more territory than Pakistan.Paksitan paid for their follies and their rulers gave their citizenry a lollipop in the form of defence day. Oye Lahore tou bacha bachaya tha...Kashmir tou Mila nahi ultra Lahore bachane ke laaley padh gaye...This has been a recurring theme in Pakistani history ..Of false heroes and false bravado.
The only incompetence India has had is with politicians on the diplomacy table who frittered away the strategic advantage gained from military victories. If they had seen Pakistan through a cultural lens and not just Kashmir. Pakistan would have been a done deal
@@MrWasim100100 I don't know y u give urself so much importance 😂. World is not even spitting on you. They just remember you as their debtor, nothing more than that.
Aare bhai tumara main moto tha kashmir capture karna naki lahor ko defend karna.india ne lahor ko attack karke kashmir ko defend karliya. You can read neutral history in internet
@@ManojSahu-th2xu hamari me kaha jata ha 'jung 'khel nahi hota jananiyo ka' zarai si baat ha lahore border ke bohat nazdekh hein hundustani fooj karebi shr pr hi kabze ki kohish krte us waqat pakistan ki fooj itni bari nai ke 2 mahaz pr jung lrti phir bhi pakistan is lahhore aur sialkot ka dawafa kr ke khem karan munabao apne pas rakha cease fire tak dwarka ko naval strike se taba kiya second largest tank battle since world war 2 held in sialkot woh bhi pakistan ne jeeta inho chand bunyadi points ke balbute pr pakistan ki jeet hoi zaruri nai jang shru krne walli side hare agar nazi berlin ka dafa kr lete tw wo bhi jette is liye defence of lahore and sialkot and victory in khem karan is vital for pakistan aur bulo na pak hind se 3 guna chota mulk tha us waqt but i admit pakistan fulfilled zeros goals but still it will be known as defensive victory
@@RaiZayd 1st of all you don't understand the definition of war .war starts with a goal that who 1st attacks they have goal if they achieve that goal then they win the war.your goal to achieve kashmir militarily starts with operation galbator .the war does not decide on soldiers deaths or aircraft loss or tanks loss.its about to achieve your goal.the war doesn't depend on process its depend on results. My father was in indian army and he fought kargil war and he gave me the definition of war.its doesn't matter the process and who cares how many soldiers died.your aim to achieve the goal if you achieve it then you win .
@@RaiZayd and if india wants to defend kashmir then india definitely loss the war. Because of pakistan military superior at that region.thats why they attack lahor not to capture but change the direction of war.
@@ManojSahu-th2xu i know war enough i am from bhatti clan Sir Major Aziz Bhatti you can google him if you want was from our clan he is my hero my mentor and mainly our elder who gave his life to defend lahore and he did succeed in his job but with a price they may failed in the liberation of kashmir but we protected our mother land from you about kashmir their spirit and passion will never die for freedom one day or another it will be independent there are countless wars which ended without territorial changes and if pak achieved nothing then ind also get nothing but deaths and kashmiri conflict is not ended yet many freedom fighters are still active there mean while pakistani gilgit and azad kashmir regions enjoying peace
Good journalism needs support from smart people like you. Subscribe to ThePrint here: theprint.in/subscribe/
HERE IS YOUR ARMY SURRENDER BY CHINESE IN 2021 th-cam.com/video/DgaVfzz1gEQ/w-d-xo.html
Biased journalist
MM Alam destroyed 5 indian planes in less than a minute in 1965
The Pakistan Army almost captured delhi in 1965
@@khawiify yeah, biased against India.
17:44 "wagah where the nonsensical parade takes place" best thing you've said in the video.
Waghah is such a stupidity.Atleast India has to stop this.This stupidity we shall reserve for Pakistan .Let them continue. No matter.🙏
@乙乇ᗪㄖ几Ꮆ爪卂ㄖ Mao people are traders. They only know how to make cheap product and earn $. Basically oppresses working class and advocates bourgeois. China has powerful middle-class which made them 2nd largest economy. Mao people only thinks about trade
That parade in Wagha should be closed .
th-cam.com/video/Qt61oCfIZe8/w-d-xo.html
Watch this
Truly nonsensical should be stopped immediately.
1971 war did solve one problem. It eliminated the threat from India’s eastern border. That is a big deal
For a short time, yes. Now Bangslus how figured out India their hatred is renewed again. Why everyone in region hates India?
Sir, I disagree. And people from Bengal are called Bengali’s. And people from Bengal are smart and very creative. Are doing much better than West Pakistan
Right Bangladesh is friend of India
They just became illegal immigrants
Yes that's called real Surgrical Strike a country cut into two.
I'm from Pakistan, defence day is just another day for me too, We've always heard it was India to infiltrate first with the famous "aaj ka nashta Lahore mein kry ge"dialogue, Kashmir infiltration is never discussed.
Wars always bring destruction, I hope peace and friendship prevails between atleast the common public on both sides, and we keep on watching each other's content on youtube. ❤👍
true!!
Well its rare to get such sane comments, hate mongering is too common, thanks for the practical comment
Level of brainwashing is unprecedented.
👏👏
Brother in reality it is exactly opposite pakistani generals first sent jhadis into kashmir and then launched full scale ops aginst india....and it was actually pakistani generals who told that we will do our dinner at lal kila.....
Thanks
Hero of Asal uttar "Paramvir Saheed Abdul Hamid". Who alone destroyed 7 American Patton Tanks.
Also read about battle of chawinda on wikipedia.
with a fucking gun💀
Man had ball of steel
MM alam. 5 planes 30 seconds
@@Brownniga
Bullshit by bullshit specialists
@@Brownniga fake jameen me toh 2 he plane mile the wo bhi vampire plane jo sabse kamzor the
Before the war-pak:-we are going to take kashmir from india
After the war-pak:-we stopped india entering lahore
😂😂😂
You were retreating from kashmir sector and open new front on lahore to pull the Pakistan army from kashmir to defend Lahore
@@muhammadfawad1505 that is called a good military strategy
@@farahead157 why were you retreating on kashmir sector?
This is the question you should ask your commanders.
And why you doesn't capture lahore which is almost 10km away.
This should be asked
@@muhammadfawad1505 we didn't retreat from kashmir we just distracted pakistani forces towards punjab so that our backup force can reach kashmir once they reach kashmir India managed to recapture akhnoor let me ask you a question why pakistan failed to capture Kashmir cause it was the main aim to start the war we failed to capture lahore because we lost battle of chawinda the Australian newspaper you remember was about that but when losses were accounted India captured more pakistani territory than pakistan captured indian with sustaining less losses than pakistan but iaf lost more jets than paf hope you understand
@@farahead157 i am glad to see first indian who is talking logically.
Anyhow Pakistan aim was not to capture kashmir.
Field marshal asked several time UN to resolve the kashmir issue.
Even your own country was willing to give kashmir to Pakistan if gujrat is taking our side.
But your forces then capture gujrat by force and then your leadership was confident to take stance.
Pakistan and India both don't have technology to make machine including tanks aircraft or navy this is quite clear.
Pakistan bought 15 days ammunition from USA this is also cleared to the world.
Pakistan aim was not capture kashmir but to make skirmishes inorder to bring this matter to the table in UN and Pakistan would have sufficient 15 days ammunition to defend rest of the country.
Please don't count losses from wikipedia this is the most easy information to be manipulated
In 1965, we were inferior on all fronts. Yet we retained Kashmir and reached Lahore, so how is it incompetence of Indian forces. Incompetence of a Mr Nehru for sure to leave the army in such ill-equipped situation.
Bhai mere nehru died in 1964
@@vinayaksuresh7507 he is talking about aksai chin
india had nearly 3 times more tanks and men you delusional hindutva
@@StreetDrilla Indian army had inferior weapons you idiot
@@shubhamsagarsingh9451 so you are saying that the armies were of equal strength?
I want people to understand that during 1965 war, pak economy was doing better than india, they had better armors, faar better jets & at top of all they had support of US lobby. India was slow on all the fronts, india had no support of western world (except USSR that too because we used to buy jets from them) & india suffered major defeat in indio-china war of 1962 + we had a very humble PM & talks were about congress going to sack him (Sastri ji). In that environment, if india could keep kashmir & look into eyes of pakistan, it was very commendable. (in 1965 world media placed it's bet on Pak, it turned out more to be a draw than anything in pak favor)
Pak learnt that If they couldn't take kashmir in 1965, they could never. And that's why they started jihaad policy in kashmir soon after.
Hats off .Super.
It seems you are also studying for UPSC or state exams that's why you can decide or write about 65'swar ...as far as you mentioned Jehad ...its political fight....was it fight for Islam then my brother who servers for India army 7RR and my father is working in jk police and presently both are working for Indian flag and constitution ...but my ideology which is different from there's because I believe our sovereignty have been dissolved by your country...three persons three ideology but common thing we never related it with religion... hum to afwah pey khoon baha detay hai.... Socho agar baat Islam ki hote to tera key hashar hota
@@asifmir9604 bro, 90% you are hindu converts.
If you had to do something then do it, don't make excuses.
Give a 100%.
If you want a Jihad then do it, leave india join Pak army and launch another war. We will See you at the battle ground.
But thia constant "tamasha", of ohh it wasn't a real Islamic war is getting boring now.
It's like communists, when ever communism collapsed, all the communist used to say "this isn't real communism ". As an excuse to save their ideology in the face of shamefull defeat.
@@Manish_Kumar_Singh so true brother these Islamists do every harm to others for their religion, these morons think they are Arabs or Persians but the fact is they are 90% Hindu converts during the Islamic invasions of India.
The proxy war started in 1947_48 itself.
Wasn't it???
India not just defended Kashmir, but went ahead and captured territory in pok including haji peer. We made huge gains in Sialkot. Defeated Pakistan's offensive in Punjab ( Khem karan). Made a dash to Lahore but halted because ceasefire was to be signed. Overall we captured 4 times more land than Pakistan. It was a handsome victory for India. If the war had continued for few more days, Pakistan would have signed instrument of surrender at Lahore fort.
Summary of the war - Kashmir lene chale they, nahi mila, ulta Lahore bachane ke liye UN ke paas bhagna padha.
If I remember correctly we threw the kitchen sink at Akhnoor Chammb sector and dug in by preventing a Pakistani breakthrough and in order to relieve the pressure on the Jammu sector we opened up a new front and the Pak Army shot themselves in the foot by changing their commander who spearheaded Op Grandslam thereby throwing away the momentum gained
Plz wake up it's not Bollywood film
@@danialdanial3897 Please search it on Google about haji peer and where it was located before 1965 :)
@@animeshkaushik6938 bro Google par jo stories ha wo mostly Indian writers ki ha so we need to depend on international media .
Look Australian news paper of 1965.
@Jancy Varghese dear pak defeat india badly in 1965 you can look Australian news paper of 1965 as a evidence.
On Google mostly stories are written by Indian writers.
India have great influence on TH-cam Google Twitter or Facebook
Best way to avoid war is " Be so powerful that enemy don't dare to attack you example china"
Rupak Mahto It will eat up much money that poor people deserve.
Yet loosing trade war.
Abhinandan is BACK, this time with normal mustache as those extra wings on his mustache is demolished....."UDNAY K BAAT PARINDAY KAR TAY HAIN TUUTEY HOA PAR NAI"
Remember USSR and what happened to it's economy? It is matter time for China. No Country is invisible, Great Britain, USSR,USA,China......
@@AB_learn russia too loose the cold war
11:31 - Factually wrong. Muslims landed in Gibraltar but it had nothing to do with the crusades. It was the invasion of Spain and formation of Al Andalus which would centuries later end with the Reconquista
stupid statement idiot
@@vegnes79 What's your problem friend? How is it a stupid statement?
The Abbisad empire invaded europe from Africa (from Algeria to Spain)
And captured most of the christan Kingdom of Visgoth and formed Al Andalus and later the islamic expansion was stopped by the famous Charles Martel of France ( founder of France and Germany).
The Spanish was able to slowly outsed the islamic invaders from spain by 500 years ( Reconquestia)
Not same as Crusades.
Edit: Abbasid
@@Paws.of.Justice It's Abbasid not Abbisad, must've been a typo. I'm confused as to who @v m called stupid though, me Or the journalist?
@@thepixelwizard01 Ignore.
Thanks!
"War never solves a problem, only leads to another war" Well said sir, couldn't agree more. I hope our armies realize that one day. Love from Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Your feedback is valuable to us. Thank you and keep watching ThePrint's TH-cam channel.
U won't agree with truth
Tum punjabion ne ye sari harkatein ki hen Bhosri walon Jung b khud krte ho Army me tm hukumat me tum aur phir Jab har jaye to Land choopna shuru
@@blacksheep61741948, 1965,1971,1999 me koun hara tha...🤣🤣🤣🤣🐷🇵🇰💩🖕?
and when that day will come!
First step- gandu came to capture chandu's house...
2nd step- chandu kidnapped gandu's sister...
Gandu panicked and aborted the mission to capture chandu's house..
Now gandu claims - we won😂😂
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
India only uses 14% of there arms and ammo but Pakistan lost 90% of the ammo..
Abhinandan is BACK, this time with normal mustache as those extra wings on his mustache is demolished....."UDNAY K BAAT PARINDAY KAR TAY HAIN TUUTEY HOA PAR NAI"
@@navneetdbg hahahahah...wtever makes you happy
@@shaheer316 This is reality. Your army run away in kargil without accepting the body of your own solider. Your army can't fight. Your army generals are nothing but land grabbers.
@@avinashbhoir3618 tera baap
@@shaheer316 we will never use 100% of our military strength if we do so , pak will disappear from world map
Book Mentioned : War Despatches - Indo Pak Conflict 1965 by Lt. Gen. Harbakhsh Singh. (12:24) & (21:54)
Really 🙁🙏
Pakistan has always achieved one thing..... 0
i.e. Nothing
suman lata nope that’s also an achievement of India.
India should try achieving little more food for its malnourished soldiers.
@@akhtarhussain3051 Do you even know it is India which exports rice, tomatos, major life saving medicines and many other things to pakistan? You probably don't, because your madrasa and mosques teach only "how to become a jihadi" nothing productive to human kind.
wt about half kashmir and abhinandan
@@akhtarhussain3051 Yes we trying not like pakistan which is begging for food everywhere international bikhari
The war was imposed on India through Operation Gibraltar when Pakistani soldiers were infiltrated with arms. India attacked the International border and almost reached to Lahore. It was a stalemate after a couple of weeks of the war. Finally, Tashkent settlement happened and PM Shastri lost his life due to an unknown reason.
you always speak truth and we tell a lie! some times you should see around instead of watching and reading your fools! www.pakistanarmy.gov.pk/1965-war.php
@@MrWasim100100 ha bhai 65 71 99 tumhi logo ne jeeta ab pak chand pe bhi pahuch gaya hai or abhi USA ko har sal $ 5 billion as a aid bhi deta hai !!
khush bhai ..
@@MrWasim100100 use Wikipedia
@@MrWasim100100 that is the government website
@@MrWasim100100 link you provided is fake
Why we need Guptaji when we have Raja Babu Dhruv Rathee who is lawyer, journalist, doctor, everything lol
The last 7 words reminded me of Jhonny Sins job description 😂
dhruv taati fan 🤣🤣🤣😂
@@urincubus7222 Do you understand sarcasm or your IQ is limited?
Even India don't celebrate 71 Victory!
No one gives value to post independence history in India in Pakistan they sugarcoat everything and celebrate like mads don't know why the BJP too sometimes try to contain history like congress on 15 Aug 1947
First time in my life true story about 1965 war thanks gupta jee
India won in shakaragarh, haji peer pass, went deep into pak land capturing barki and chawinda philora and close to pasrur which was 25 km deep into pak.
Put ur facts right and listen to him. Pakistan had upper hand in chamb sialkot chawinda and ran of kach. But yes Ayub Khans main objective to conquer kashmir failed. Please read battle of chawinda on wikipedia..It says decisive Pakistan victory. Dont distort facts.
ahmedyar khan lol these are the facts what was your army doing when we went deep into 25 km chawinda and phillora. Thats a fact pak army defended chawinda but had the un ceasefire not called in second assualt on chawinda and pasrur would have led india to take over sialkot and also lahore too. You guys were dreaming of taking kashmir ended up running like dogs to save your own cities when india open up second front in sailkot and lahore. Had the the war gone on for some more days it would have been decisive indian victory but still this was still a victory since India defended Kashmir but also made inroads in punjab pakistan.
Muhammad Akram search battle of shakargarh where india won the decisive batlle upto bara pind and cutting shakargarh
@Muhammad Akram
en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › I...
Web results
Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts - Wikipedia
@Muhammad Akram pakistan in conflitcs against india
1947 - kicked from rajouri ,poonch,uri and sriningar
1965- misadventure and kicked out from kashmir
1971 -surrendered lost half their nation shamlessly
1984- lost siachen ,tried 5 times to take it but failed shamlessly each time
1999-kicked out from kargil
this is your armed forces lol ,such a brave army lol
The lesson he did not discuss was the incompetence of civilian governments in all the wars except 1999 war.
In 1962 and 1965 our PMs were desperate for ceasefire at the earliest. And in both these wars if fight would have continued for 4~5 more days the result would have been in India's favor.
And in 1971 Mrs Gandhi did not understood that Bhutto was not interested in release of 93000 Pakistani prisoners. Bhutto's only interest was return of Pakistan land occupied by Indian forces during the war.
In 1999 Bajpayee did not agreed for any negotiations or ceasefire before Pakistan withdrew its forces.
Pakistani soldiers died like cowards while retreating under constant firing and bombing by Indian forces.
Offcourse Pakistani forces haven't learned a single lesson. They always works through their real or dummy proxies first and back them with their regular army.
Only thing is Pakistani soldiers wasted their lives at the alter of their generals while Indian were martyred in all those wars defending their country.
I think india has also started proxy wars in pakistan.like pakistan did.
Afghan Defeats you guyz then Persians and many more bhai app last 1000 years Main Kab war win kiay hoo. Bhai peace ko support karain bass
Lolzzz lolzzzz bollywood hijra🤣
Ur entire lecture is accepting the defeat in 1965, your each word is embracing of defeat. U r very simple shoul dear Mr Print
The print is always anti-indian.
He stated facts. What's wrong with that? No one won that war.
@@biswajit1407 Truth is not anti-Indian, it's just truth.
‘History should be uncomfortable. If you are not uncomfortable reading history, then you are not reading history, you are reading propaganda.’
Instead of attacking the Print, attack their arguments to prove that you are right.
as a Pakistani I want to say We celebrate 1965 not because it was a magnificent victory against India . But rather because of the decisive defensive strategical victory of Pakistan ( that’s why DEFENCE DAY ) .
Ayub khan wanted Kashmir . Though he failed the operation . INDIA wanted a powerful retaliation coz of this operation! And there main objective was to capture Lahore completely. However they failed in capturing Lahore .
Also Guineas world record was made in battle by a Pakistani
M.M.Alam ( u can google ) he shot down 5 Indian jets under 30 seconds .
On other hand India was able to capture a number of small towns on the border sides and gained area on Pakistan. However the War was a naval + Air victory for Pakistan .
5 jet claim is false even in practice it never happens plus on ground wreakage of 2 jets was found.
Even if MM Alem shoot down 10000000 Indian jets it won’t have mattered !! Your main objective ie to Captured Kashmir failed
@@wallingnaga6563 dude Pakistan lost Operation Gibraltar and yes lost Kashmir battle in Operation Gibraltar . But India intiated war in Punjab Rajasthan area to attack and capture Pakistani cities . India lost badly in Failing to capture Pakistani areas and lost reven Rann of Kutch permanently ...hence India won operation Gibraltar and Pakistan won 1965 defensive war
Shekhar sahib ...a great storyteller . Some fascinating facts..thank you.
1. Why did Operation Gibraltar fail. Why didnt India take Neelam Valley and Skardu in 1965.
2. Why did Yahya Khan fail to take Jammu in 1965
3. Why didnt India capture any strategic spots in 1971 that made Chamb vulnerable.
why didnt India take Neelam Valley and Skardu in 1971.
Israel took Golan Heights didnt they ?
4. I was born in 1947 and I had the best education India had to offer . ( IIT in 1963 etc etc then USA in
1968..Berkeley )
I had never heard of Tawi river ( Or Chakki River ) until Internet and Google Earth ( 2002 )
India education leaves many gaps.
Why didnt India educated people know in early 1945 that China will certainly take Tibet.
IIT == 💩💩💩
I say that cause I'm from one. Old age retards engaging in relentless copy paste for 4 excruciating years. Zero innovation, zero originality, zero R&D, zero creativity. No wonder we are a failed nation in many parameters. While Singapore, China etc flourish.
Curse your own lack of wisdom, low IQ, cowardice etc etc is all I want to say to the previous generation especially one's who let Pakshitstain go nuclear.
1965, won by Indian army’s in side of Lahore was Indian army’s all war lost by Pakistan 1958,1962,1965,1971,1999, kargal war 1999,Pakistan lost all there stock files , they lost everything
Lolzz
India should have occupied Lahore in 1965, but it did not because of Shashtri. Indian navy was neutralized by Shashtri too.
We dont let the thieves in and if they try to do so we show them the doors.. poor Indians
We have a history of serving Indians with fantastic tea and fantastic breakfast.
jai hind, best wishes from Afghanistan.
Jai Afghan jai hind🇮🇳❤🇦🇫
Now Taliban...
Nothing lasts forever don’t be so arrogant
My great uncle fought in the war. He passed away a long time ago but he use to tell me stories about the wars but he never showed any hate towards Indians. Just felt he was doing his job fighting for his country. To be fair he gave credit to his enemy combatants.
He lost, didn’t want to embarrass you.
September 1: Pakistan attacked kashmir
September 6: India attacked lahore.
India captured 1800square km of Pakistan. Pakistan capture 504square km of India.
But in Pakistani books Pakistan won😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
WE( PAKISTAN) CLEARLY WON THE WAR WE KILLED 2000 indian soldiers and pakistan lost only 400......we still have the most hightest peak from which we can attack tiger and other peaks.......PAKISTAN ZINDABAD......ur own army general said we didnt won the war actually
My uncle fought in the war he was missing in this war
Abdul Hamid - Legend Indian Tiger of 1965 War 🙏🇮🇳🙏
Jai Hind 🙏🇮🇳🙏
Vande Matram 🙏🇮🇳🙏
Jai Shree Ram 🚩🇮🇳🙏
Captain sher khan 😍
M. M. Alam. Who capture ur 5 jet in 1 minute h distroyed tem😍
Do u remember?
@@adilrajpoottv0196 Chal be Kuch bhi Matlab Proff de Tab Manu apne Mann se kuch bhi Story bana lete ho 😡
@@adilrajpoottv0196 was his comment against any pakistani... Common tell me... U have a problem when we show respect to our soldiers... Common.. Tell me... Such a inhiman moron you are... The guy above didnt even mention anything about pak and u started barking... Remember u are celebrating a air battle🤦♂🤦♂🤦♂whereas, for conclusion... Look the whole video and cry... Bcoz someone may win a battle and someone else may win the war... Now dont ask me to differentiate between them.... Btw.. U are such type of person who spreads hate even in a normal situation... In simple words, u are a disgrace and a slap to humanity🙏🤦♂🤦♂
@@adilrajpoottv0196 Arab ke tatte abhi bhi Hindu surname use kar raha hai. Gullam kide.
Here I am quoting wikipedia:
India had the upper hand over Pakistan when the ceasefire was declared. Although the two countries fought to a standoff, the conflict is seen as a strategic and political defeat for pakistan as it had not succeeded in fomenting an insurrection in Kashmir and was instead forced to shift gears in the defense of Lahore.
Thats doesnt make sense. If india had the upper hand why would they sign the ceasefire?
@@manjeetgill1 because of international pressure.
Half an hour? At 1 at night? I'm going to sleep.
In Pakistan’s text books, they won.
In India’s text books, India won.
No , Neutral sources says that Pakistan lost the war . Even their own Pakistani generals claimed that they lost the war . And Indians don't teach those Indo Pak wars in their history textbooks .
@@porkistan93ksurrenderedarm57
Read Australian news newspaper
Dated September 11, 1965.
@@abdulmalik3437 Sir , those international newspapers that show Pakistan victory are about the Battle of Chawinda not whole of 1965 war .
@@porkistan93ksurrenderedarm57
My son that time I was captain in army and fought at Muna- bao front Sindh.
It is also said by neutral war analysts that final punch could not be hit by either side.
War started alway by political sides and ultimately army involved.
If there is no politicians and army in the world, world is a paradise.
I am witness, war is horrible for each side.
An wonderful analysis of 65 war. Objective & realistic. With a more wonderful conclusion that war never solves a problem, it only leads to another in some points of time. Would the Politicians & Generals of both the countries come to their senses?.
100,000 indian troops Surrender in 1965:
th-cam.com/video/8BS3Z6LXdQE/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/oeCuislSYPU/w-d-xo.html
Now some Pakistani military propagandist will start celebrating, just by looking at thumbnail.
@@newsupdates3622 so true
Gilbraltar is derived from Tariq Al Jabr , and was founded AFTER islamic conquest of Spain not before like you mentioned. Also Crusades were launched from Messina Italy not Gibraltar.
Who gives a fook, Spain smashed them in the end, and now it has the union J flying high...
Whatever pakistan can dream
Gibraltar is a narrow channel that connects Mediterranean sea with Atlantic Ocean, and in the video he simply mention that this channelwas used by Islamic Army's to attack and capture Spain during Crusaders times( the time of Christians and Islamic conflicts )
So he talked about in general things and not chronological History....and it's foolish to give such comment on a general idea to understand the perspective
Fuck u Jabr andvur Pig Religion.
Reconquista is related to gilbatar. Which happened in Spain.
Waiting for Chandrayaan2 pray for successful soft landing
Gya kaam se vikram.bas orbiter h.
@Mahesh Shende it was hard mission.only11 were successful out of total 30 attempts till now.
I really wanted it to be successful.
@Mahesh ShendeLets just say it's a partial success.
Praying? What has prayer got to do with it? And guys, this video is about the 65 war. What's wrong with you chaps!
Sir, you are brilliant reporter, brilliant person who can analyse so wisely
Thank you for your feedback. Please subscribe.
1965 nepali POWs and 1965 indian sikh POWs are still in Pakistan
1965 India won the war 100%
The main culprit of the Indian defeat against the Chinese did not resign. He gave 50 bullets per slodier for an old bolt driving gun 303. The soldiers did not have winter clothing and proper boots. This culprit was --NEHRU.
27:48 Because Akhter Hussain Malik was a genius. He was the most respected general in the Pak army at that time even more than General Ayub himself. And that was the main reason why General Ayub was afraid about his position and thought he might had become the chief of staff. General Ayub was jealous of his capabilities. He didn't want the credit of winning Kashmir go into Akhter's basket.
Pakistan was very near to take Kashmir had that swapping of generals would not occured.
A very balanced account of 1965 ops. Shekhar, it would be great if you can do a CTC on Lt Gen Sagat Singh PVSM, a brilliant General who never ever lost!
That would be insightful
indian army surrendered in 1965: th-cam.com/video/oeCuislSYPU/w-d-xo.html
MM Alam destroyed 5 indian planes in less than a minute in 1965
th-cam.com/video/xh4ur9FXKOY/w-d-xo.html
1965 nepali POWs and 1965 indian sikh POWs are still in Pakistan
Real Humiliation is 1971 tearing apart and making 2 Nation.
India to pakistan- take your East Pakistan first then kashmir 😂😂😂.
Pakistan should celebrate 16 December to add 1 more nation to world map!!!
Waiting for '71 now....Jai Hind
1. Pakistan celebrates 6th day for defense of Lahore.
2. War started with Pak's operation Gibraltar, India just opened the new theatres.
3. Pak failed to get anything in Kashmir which was the main purpose, India couldn't get anything substantial in Lahore and Sialkot sectors where sole Pakistani purpose was the defense.
4. Pak had technical superiority esp with fighter planes and Pak did have a slight edge when it came to some sort of air superiority.
The main things which came up in that war, far away from propaganda of our local media (I am sure Indians have their own propaganda stories), were that Pak army just didn't have that cutting edge to defeat India and couldn't fight a full-scale long battle and most importantly, India could always throw more bodies in war just like USSR did in WW2 against Nazis.
Unless pakistan has more superior military technology than india, it could never challenge india. India is by default or by purpose is superior to pakistan in every aspects- resource, finance, personnel, equipments etc. Only thing which neutralised this advantage of india is pakistan's nuclear capability. Pakistan should not be swayed away by fanatical beliefs of mediaval era like gazwa e hind and jihad- these ideas are great recipe for defeats ex arab Israeli war.
I wait for these episodes every day. Great content, detailed and very accessible. I would recommend you also share some additional readings and links in your description each day for those who want to learn and read further.
For example the link to MIT press journal paper on India/Pak relations was a great read in addition to the video after 370 abrogation. More of that please.
th-cam.com/video/oeCuislSYPU/w-d-xo.html
This is what you call independent journalism
Please please please make another video on 1971 war
@Akupara like you were in 1947...?
This was amazing, thank you. As a northern european writing a paper on this war - this video helped immensely
Hey, please contribute towards putting Pakistan in FATF black list
My great uncle fought in the war. He passed away a long time ago but he use to tell me stories about the wars but he never showed any hate towards Indians. Just felt he was doing his job fighting for his country.
Brilliant
Positive analysis of the 65 War
Hats off, very rational and realistic
It is true that wars don't solve anything, they sow the seeds of yet another .
th-cam.com/video/oeCuislSYPU/w-d-xo.html
Mostly the “lost” wars when you are the losers. Yes, causes more wars. Ever considered morals?
Bappu's ahimsa philosophy had been so ingrained in the blood of our armed forces and the leaders that first aggression from our side was never attempted in any of the wars after Independence. In war this paints a losers picture but in peace it more than compensates making India a hero in contrast to the villainish looks of our perpetual enemy...
I have never read more nonsensical stuff in my life. Bapu’s ideals is what india makes strong. Even Bapu encouraged armed conflicts when faced with barbarians. This can be seen when he supported the war against nazis, not because he was a British agent (falsely claimed by Hindu talibanis) but because he knew that barbarians don’t understand anything except violence.
100,000 indian troops Surrender in 1965:
th-cam.com/video/8BS3Z6LXdQE/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/oeCuislSYPU/w-d-xo.html
And then came PM Modi and he changed the entire equation of Kashmir and called of nuclear bluff and that's why to this date after taken over J&K paktn not able to launch any war 😂😂
The Rastafari Heights Sometimes I wonder whether they really have a nuclear arsenal or it’s another piece of fake news. Their entire country is run on fake news where their press keeps on force feeding the dumbfuck population loads and loads of horseshit everyday.
India almost lost its part of Punjab when the Pakistanis were close to capturing Amritsar, even a retired Indian army general wrote in his book that the Indian army *was asked to leave the Indian Punjab in fear of heavy losses and further intrusion*
Who won the war? Even though it wasn’t concluded The answer is clear and sound - that’s why we celebrate *”defence day”* not as an observance of Pakistani victory but to honour a successful defence of our homeland 🇵🇰 - this is further proved by Indian, Australian, American unbiased news reports of the incident
(But the past is in the past we need to think of the future, put this military shit behind us and focus on science, technology and economy - and cultural collaboration) 🇮🇳 💕 🇵🇰
Pakistani people are not made for war it's not in their blood they haven't won anything since their creation, and even if you look down in history there wasn't any famous king or warrior from Pakistani region apart from Hindus and Sikhs
These people have no will to fight otherwise they wouldn't have surrendered with over 1 lakh soldiers
Very shameful
@@apurvbhardwaj1494
Bruhhh I’ve read biology as well as history and “fighting” never comes from the “blood or history” lmfao 🤣🤣🤣
What are you trying to prove when you say there was no famous king?? Like wtf dude if there was never any king, how tf does that relate to modern day warfare?
Yes 93,000 soldiers was very shameful but that happened in 1971 (more than 50 years ago)
Let’s think of some modern example 🤔
Ohhhhhh yesssssss *FEB 27TH 2019!* the teas is fantasticccxxc 😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤍
@@Zecos why I am saying this is because I have researched closely regarding the battle tactics of Pakistani army and the kind of milatey blunder they have done proves that these people have neither will power for physical war nor any sort of mental tactical strength operation Gibraltar or kargil war are prime example of it what I observed was that the Pakistani army extremely underestimates their enemy which led them to the downfall in every war
Lack of any achivement force them to celebrate worthless things such as capture of a soldier
Defence day is another such thing made for pakistani army to fool their people
I mean your target is cutting the supply route to kashmir and at the end talking control over whole kashmir and you end up trying to somehow defend the city of Lahore and then when the war ends you celebrate because you think you won as you defended lahore
Ridiculous!
I think you have covered it pretty well bar 2,3 things which are probably tough for an Indian to admit for obvious reasons.
1. Like you said in the video, Pakistan doesn’t accept Kashmir as part of India so in national perspective of Pak, we never started the war. India crossed the international border on 6th September hence India started the war, not Pakistan.
2. The objectives of attack on Lahore wasn’t limited to simply expanding the fight to stretch Pakistan army. If that was the purpose, India would have attacked multiple fronts like Sialkot, Narowal, Cholistan and other border towns at same time. India wanted to capture the heart line of Pakistani Punjab to have better position at negotiation table after the war.
3. Pakistan has the technological advantage while India could throw almost 3 bodies for 1 Pakistan soldier everywhere in the border which was the decisive factor at that time.
Pakistan’s army was never meant to be an attacking force in nature and generals at that time thought that they could force the soldiers to pull off Kashmir against their core training.
I would never understand why Pakistan waited 3 years to try their hand at that which could have been done in a better way in 1962 when India was plummeted by Chinese.
Why do u every time bring ur dad in between? U lost in 65,71,99 and counting.
Ur dad lost 3 slaves for 1 brave indian soldier in the recent clashes.
Very good observation indeed we indian Muslim know the truth ...!!
India never won any war with Pakistan !!!
India always attacks first !!
@@TheALbibo this bs!
Go get yourself educated before spewing baseless nonsense.
He literally explains why pakistan attacked FIRST but somehow you just can't hear it.
Just because pakistan doesn't recognize kashmir as a part of India it doesn't change the reality, it legally ours and it was your army who actually helped in doing so when they attacked kashmir so, blaming us for your mess doesn't make any sense.
@@TheALbibo paks 1 dollar keyboard warrior coming with a fake name under the disguise of Indian muslim. Come over here an Indian muslim will kick you out in the same way you were kicked out in rest of the wars.
Anyone else watching at 1.5x?
Overall good analysis and the wonderful message at the end. It's really unfortunate to see war hysteria between the nations who are most compatible when meet in foreign countries.
100,000 indian troops Surrender in 1965:
th-cam.com/video/8BS3Z6LXdQE/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/oeCuislSYPU/w-d-xo.html
Brilliant as always. Thank you
Very well articulated and based upon facts and not chest thumping. I loved your way of storytelling. Big thumbsbup👍
Pakistan had taken most of the area in kargil war but because of our bribe taker prime minister....pak army had to come back but we still killed more soldiers of indian army and we did alot of damage to u guys.......Pakistan Zindabad..
Instead of watching pork channels read real articles
Pakistan and north Korea is almost same.
Korea has two issues u.s.a and south Korea
Pakistan has two issues India and
Afghanistan
Pakistan has always had brotherly relations with Afghanistan; it's India that has fomented trouble. Pakistan's issues with India are because the latter wants to be dada of region and Pak refused to accept. The day Pak bows her head like losers Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Bhutan that day all problems will stop
@@malihabadi0 lolll you are truly brainwashed..
@@malihabadi0 very funny 😁😁😁😁
Brotherly relation that's why bin Laden was in Pakistan.
@@Baargu but when you don't even have somthing Called Brain.to be washed though. Pity.
And India have Issues with every neighbour such as Pakistan China. Nepal. Srlnka. Such a bad neighbour
In 1965, Pakistan lost the war against India, They did not achieve a single objective just because of greedy and self-centered so-called Field Martial Ayub and unprofessional general.
They lose but we don't win... Big words superb analysis
First of all Pakistan objectives were defensive coz they didn't initiated this war to capture your land and they defended themselves amazingly and pushed Indians back many kilometers inside India.
Lol pak ne pahle start kiya tha yah war aur hum Lahore tak le gaye the
@@amoghsawant3801 nai
@@AhsanNadeem ha articke dekh neutral
Main purpose of Pakistan attack was to occupy kashmir and failed to do so. At end they have to defend own territory.
So it was a clear lost war for Pakistan.
Yes.1965 was a war of mutual incompetence.Both sides did failed to capitalize on their advantages.
No.india won technically.
@@themeta_human How did India win technically if the war ended in a ceasefire and not a formal surrender?
@@mryoutube4399 bcoz Pakistan began the attack in India and India repulse them and bring them on talk table."technically"may be the wrong choice of word but ya morraly India won.
A very fair and correct assessment of the 1965 India- Pakistan war.
Sir you are one of my favorite ace journalists as you are so precise, as if you are vidur of Mahabharata that one has to just listen to what truth is, you are an ace sir, endless river you are like pink Floyd as you set the flow in such a smooth way. Amazing.
I think I am addicted to cut the clutter.
We're glad to hear that. Thank you and keep watching ThePrint's TH-cam channel.
Shekhar how about a piece on Shastri and what happened in Tashkent. And why we relinquished the lands, which we had famously annexed. Shahstri chapter would make for an interesting story. Thanks!!!
100,000 indian troops Surrender in 1965:
th-cam.com/video/8BS3Z6LXdQE/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/oeCuislSYPU/w-d-xo.html
1965 was a default of Pakistan
India defend Kashmir that time
So technically India won That war
Didnt pakistani army capture Jawahar Tunnel (Banihal pass)? my Father used to say,in Marathi..."naak daable ki tond ughadte" meaning if we press nose,mouth opens...hope kashmiris realise,pakistanis love Lahore more than kashmir.
Sir you are a true, unbiased and the most mature journalist..respect for you.
th-cam.com/video/xh4ur9FXKOY/w-d-xo.html
Nice explanation. Always wanted to know more about the '65 war.
🇮🇳 🇵🇰
1965 - your army went to Lahore. LAHORE IS STILL IN PAKISTAN
@@TheJoker8311 lol toh ind ke part bhi hai un ne nahi lene diya
@@amoghsawant3801 Delusional
@@amoghsawant3801 LAHORE IS ONLY PART OF PAKISTAN
@@amoghsawant3801 1999 - HALF OF KASHMIR IS IN PAKISTAN. 1947 - your country was broken into 2 pieces
The war started when compromising became less important than being thankful with negotiations.😊
If I can recollect we were given the impression that we won the war. I was in my teens studying in school. We never felt we last a war,unlike the chines war 1962. I remember my father let us not to celebrate Deepavali as the jawans were dying in dead cold in Himalayas. I think he was refering to ladhak, not Arunachala Pradesh.
Ignorant
100,000 indian troops Surrender in 1965:
th-cam.com/video/8BS3Z6LXdQE/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/oeCuislSYPU/w-d-xo.html
Are you an idiot?
Guptaji you forget that Pakistani logistics had failed. If India had continued Pakistan would have collapsed.
In 1965 surprisingly attacked in Surat n Pakistan were having upper hand initially but Shastriji was suggested to open multiple fronts so we went to Lahore...At that US supplied Tanks were there...they got scared when we entered Lahore n When Hamid destroyed many tanks...so this 1965 surprise was taken revenge in 1971 by destroying Karachi...
I conclude that the people of both countries want peace instead of war. War is solution to no issue. We should settle our mutual disputes in an amicable way.
how can you clap with one hand!
War Despatches - 1965...
Another book for me to read........
You says what we gained why we celebrate this day. The name of the day is called "Defence Day" means we successfully defended our borders. That's a win when you are peaceful and only objective is to defend your homeland. Further most of Indians think that they could easily capture Pakistan 1965 war was proof that its impossible.
you should question him where your 500 tanks gone in 1965 (by the way Russians must be terrified to hear that!) against our lightly armed infantry!
@@MrWasim100100 first we stand with india in their crisis, secondly to answer your question in war the damage is done on both side further no region was captured by indian army. We were only defending that's it's called defense day not attack day to if we were only defending then it was success for us to successfully defended our region.
@@Truth_Seeker97 actually they say india had less resources than pakistan in 1965 war and they say Pakistan attacked first which is a bare lie...
1 brigade of india vs 5 brigade of Pakistan 😮 . Strength doesn't matter what matters is the execution of plan and moral of soldiers. Jai Hind ki SENA
Wow . What a wonderful episode
Good message in the end. However, I believe that both India and Pakistan have a religion problem where religion is more important than State, neighbor, friend etc. This importance of religion ensures that the root of the problem will continue till our generations are actively taught tolerance.
No.India doesn't. India isn't a country defined by religion. Pakistan is. However India is fuelled now by an ethnic religious politics which is an ideology and not religion.
Omar, you are right on.
I am being honest its Pakisthan which has that problem not India
@@ashwinvk4124 you might want to check the news
@@ftckaplan213 i have checked the news except for a few idiots causing trouble nobody is systemically oppressing muslims in India all religious groups including Muslims are thriving in India
I am Pakistani by origin and must say your content is very informative. Albeit I must say there was skewed bias towards India, but that is tolerable.
6 sep.. defence day.. tolerable???
Where was the bias exactly?
BRILLIANT ANALYSIS SALUTE FROM PAKISTAN
Nehru kept Indian army weak fearing he will lose power to generals. That's why we though more powerful lost war to China and could not clean up Pakistan. Nehru-Gandhi family, except Rahul Gandhi, ensured India's failure for 70 years. Rahul Gandhi by his mere presence in politics helped India chose an alternative. Lets see how it goes.
What India 's failure ?
The only indian youtube chanel i follow as a pakistani, the analysis is so logical and the journalism is highly commendable!
th-cam.com/video/xh4ur9FXKOY/w-d-xo.html
Amazing analysis. It’s just shame the Pak armed forces did not allow to write the history. Pakistan came close twice to take Kashmir. Pakistani’s celebrate 6th Sep as defence day because India did succeed in taking Lahore but war did not start on the 6th Sep as you have rightly pointed out. I also agree with you there were no Victors only great many good soldiers died on both sides.
Those who are celebrating 'defence day' for saving Lahore from Indian army forget that Lahore was in no danger to begin with.It were Pakistani generals like Ayub and politicians like Bhutto who provoked a needless intrusion in Kashmir ,totally misreading Indian counter attack.India not only opened front in Punjab but also captured four times more territory than Pakistan.Paksitan paid for their follies and their rulers gave their citizenry a lollipop in the form of defence day. Oye Lahore tou bacha bachaya tha...Kashmir tou Mila nahi ultra Lahore bachane ke laaley padh gaye...This has been a recurring theme in Pakistani history ..Of false heroes and false bravado.
The only incompetence India has had is with politicians on the diplomacy table who frittered away the strategic advantage gained from military victories. If they had seen Pakistan through a cultural lens and not just Kashmir. Pakistan would have been a done deal
Great explanation.... Thanks for posting.... Really The Print is doing great... Can you post a video about 1971 war!!!
We appreciate your feedback. Thank you and please subscribe.
yeah yeah write a book sell it and earn a lot of money! from these lies! coz this narrative sells a lot in world against us!
@@MrWasim100100 I don't know y u give urself so much importance 😂. World is not even spitting on you. They just remember you as their debtor, nothing more than that.
Pakistan fought stupidly but still managed to capture khem karan and munabao lol
Aare bhai tumara main moto tha kashmir capture karna naki lahor ko defend karna.india ne lahor ko attack karke kashmir ko defend karliya. You can read neutral history in internet
@@ManojSahu-th2xu hamari me kaha jata ha 'jung 'khel nahi hota jananiyo ka' zarai si baat ha lahore border ke bohat nazdekh hein hundustani fooj karebi shr pr hi kabze ki kohish krte us waqat pakistan ki fooj itni bari nai ke 2 mahaz pr jung lrti phir bhi pakistan is lahhore aur sialkot ka dawafa kr ke khem karan munabao apne pas rakha cease fire tak dwarka ko naval strike se taba kiya second largest tank battle since world war 2 held in sialkot woh bhi pakistan ne jeeta inho chand bunyadi points ke balbute pr pakistan ki jeet hoi zaruri nai jang shru krne walli side hare agar nazi berlin ka dafa kr lete tw wo bhi jette is liye defence of lahore and sialkot and victory in khem karan is vital for pakistan aur bulo na pak hind se 3 guna chota mulk tha us waqt but i admit pakistan fulfilled zeros goals but still it will be known as defensive victory
@@RaiZayd 1st of all you don't understand the definition of war .war starts with a goal that who 1st attacks they have goal if they achieve that goal then they win the war.your goal to achieve kashmir militarily starts with operation galbator .the war does not decide on soldiers deaths or aircraft loss or tanks loss.its about to achieve your goal.the war doesn't depend on process its depend on results. My father was in indian army and he fought kargil war and he gave me the definition of war.its doesn't matter the process and who cares how many soldiers died.your aim to achieve the goal if you achieve it then you win .
@@RaiZayd and if india wants to defend kashmir then india definitely loss the war. Because of pakistan military superior at that region.thats why they attack lahor not to capture but change the direction of war.
@@ManojSahu-th2xu i know war enough i am from bhatti clan Sir Major Aziz Bhatti you can google him if you want was from our clan he is my hero my mentor and mainly our elder who gave his life to defend lahore and he did succeed in his job but with a price they may failed in the liberation of kashmir but we protected our mother land from you about kashmir their spirit and passion will never die for freedom one day or another it will be independent there are countless wars which ended without territorial changes and if pak achieved nothing then ind also get nothing but deaths and kashmiri conflict is not ended yet many freedom fighters are still active there mean while pakistani gilgit and azad kashmir regions enjoying peace
One of the best and thought provoking review of 65
Hats off
yeah yeah write a book sell it and earn a lot of money! from these lies! coz this narrative sells a lot in world against us!
@@MrWasim100100 lol wasim bhai why dont you counter him with evidence?
100,000 indian troops Surrender in 1965:
th-cam.com/video/8BS3Z6LXdQE/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/oeCuislSYPU/w-d-xo.html
yahyah khan attended a wargame at US in 1964 where pak turned out victorious. So he mistook wargame with reality
6 sep "Defence Day" means they defended indian attack, so if they successfully defended then they won the war.
Pakistan started the war not India we were defending ourself
Pakistan attacked Kashmir and they ended up defending Lahore how was it a win ?🧐
@@wallingnaga6563 😂😂😂
Talking about the PEACE is the best option.