These GPUs are cracking and the company REFUSES to warranty them!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 มิ.ย. 2023
  • Gigabyte 30 Series GPUs have started cracking and Gigabyte REFUSES to warranty them! This needs to be addressed and possible sued! Check out Louis Rossmann's video here • Gigabyte's response to...
    Get your JayzTwoCents Merch Here! - www.jayztwocents.com
    ○○○○○○ Items featured in this video available at Amazon ○○○○○○
    ► Amazon US - bit.ly/1meybOF
    ► Amazon UK - amzn.to/Zx813L
    ► Amazon Canada - amzn.to/1tl6vc6
    ••• Follow me on your favorite Social Media! •••
    Facebook: / jayztwocents
    Twitter: / jayztwocents
    Instagram: / jayztwocents
    SUBSCRIBE! bit.ly/sub2JayzTwoCents
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 4.2K

  • @drock3332
    @drock3332 ปีที่แล้ว +2545

    WRONG. Please be more careful when doing measurements. it is easily readable @ 8:34 that the pcb is 1.6mm thick. I paused the video here - I can only imagine how skewed this is going to be.
    For the record, I love your videos Jay, I just know that this is probably already in the comments or will be for certain in the future.

    • @Jayztwocents
      @Jayztwocents  ปีที่แล้ว +1777

      Good catch! I pinned this comment so that people can see the correct measurement. Either way, the flex is still real.

    • @macgeek2112
      @macgeek2112 ปีที่แล้ว +119

      The notch/gap above the tab is much larger on the Gigabyte card. That small radius on the ASUS card just looks stronger.

    • @meangreen3386
      @meangreen3386 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      @@Jayztwocents jay dont take video down. LOL but i can here him now Dammit i did it again. I quit! LOL

    • @stoddern
      @stoddern ปีที่แล้ว +156

      @@Jayztwocents Also the ASUS card has a backplate mount right next to the tab which totally stiffens and supports that area of the PCB.

    • @briant9251
      @briant9251 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I was about to make a similar comment but seen this one so just gave your comment a thumbs up.

  • @SpottedHares
    @SpottedHares ปีที่แล้ว +2492

    So building bigger and bigger cards while shaving down construction to save money turns out was a bad idea?

    • @jaggsta
      @jaggsta ปีที่แล้ว +109

      actually smart idea for manufacturer to sell more GPUs once current broken.

    • @MichaelArlt
      @MichaelArlt ปีที่แล้ว +43

      Just for the customer since companies refuse to rma them anyway 🤣

    • @Rspsand07
      @Rspsand07 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      It's not a bad idea if they don't cover the warranty anyways

    • @naomardros
      @naomardros ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Isn't that how the auto industry went down the toilet?

    • @thecon_quererarbitraryname6286
      @thecon_quererarbitraryname6286 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@naomardros Yeah one really loves those brittle BMW plastics in the engine bay or the very shitty silicate cylinder walls of failing mercedes pieces of shit... (There are many, many , many more examples from way to cheap electrics to very thin timing chains, to half baked transmissions in not so smart smart cars or exploitable key systems in hyundais)

  • @jakenikolia1453
    @jakenikolia1453 ปีที่แล้ว +490

    with how big graphics cards are getting i think its time for a new industry standard of how they mount to the motherboard or a case

    • @adreanmarantz2103
      @adreanmarantz2103 ปีที่แล้ว +94

      Might be time to make the gpu THE motherboard, and mount your cpu on to it instead.

    • @xynonners
      @xynonners ปีที่แล้ว +10

      ​@@adreanmarantz2103 we need something like a sxm2 socket (big gpu m.2 slot like thing) on mobos, with a mounted cooler

    • @vt6020
      @vt6020 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I've always worried about the way gpus are mounted to mobos. Old school video game consoles have a stronger connection than gpus to mobos.

    • @patrickkilduff5272
      @patrickkilduff5272 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      agreed...this is why I have moved to vertical mount (plus it looks cool)

    • @rambobrod
      @rambobrod ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah same but was not a choice my sata plug was blocking my gpu to fully plug in , but at the end i was like it look way more cool this way and i can see all the led from the gpu (4070 msi gamingX)

  • @DBKarel
    @DBKarel ปีที่แล้ว +80

    Can we just stop and admire how absolutely huge these cards are? Of course they're flimsy, they' re TOO BIG.

    • @RuruFIN
      @RuruFIN ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My Powercolor 6700 XT gets absolutely dwarfed by these monsters.

    • @oliknow
      @oliknow ปีที่แล้ว +2

      it is just the cooling requirement. every pc has a different layout, you can't put in a bracket that fits every PC anyway. why would they?

    • @tomtemple69
      @tomtemple69 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's why u always use GPU brackets, anything bigger than a 3070 or 6700xt, I use a support bracket to hold it up

    • @darianbarber3763
      @darianbarber3763 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@RuruFIN Same gpu gang LoL

  • @SpeedyTubaGuy
    @SpeedyTubaGuy ปีที่แล้ว +259

    Will miss having a brand like EVGA that stands by their products in the GPU space

    • @drakomus7409
      @drakomus7409 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

      Asus voids warranties for dust on fans, they sure void warranty for pcb damage. meanwhile over at EVGA buy a GTX 660($50) bstock and they sent me a 1060 6gb($150).
      Help me EVGA-kenobi, you are my only hope.

    • @Jasontvnd9
      @Jasontvnd9 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Ironically the best GPU vendor right now seems to be Sapphire and they only make AMD cards.

    • @PineyJustice
      @PineyJustice 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@Jasontvnd9 Sapphire has just always been the best though, yes, even better than EVGA.

    • @mikel9656
      @mikel9656 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sapphire had a time when they were kind of jank, but this was wayyyyy back in the day like think ATi 9700Pro. But I've had plenty of Power Color and Sapphire cards and have been happy with both.@@PineyJustice

    • @fluchtigziege3202
      @fluchtigziege3202 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      aaaand now you know why EVGA couldn't afford to keep making cards lol

  • @WillisKeeper
    @WillisKeeper ปีที่แล้ว +161

    I wonder if the people that made the physical specs of the PCI bus ever imagined that there would be cards with that monster weight.

    • @Shawn_White
      @Shawn_White ปีที่แล้ว +22

      What's ironic is that when the ATX standard was created expansion cards were at their smallest. If you go back to the IBM XT there was nothing onboard except CPU, RAM and the Keyboard controller. Expansion cards were LONG like the length of a 104-key keyboard long. IBM had retaining clips on the front of their cases to physically support long expansion cards.
      So this was a problem that was thought to have been solved by the time the ATX standard became a thing.

    • @szlatyka
      @szlatyka ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Shawn_White Some notes:
      1. Cards were big, yes, but they weighted next no nothing compared to modern graphics cards thank to not having a kilogram or two of heatsink on them.
      2. Computer cases back then rarely were towers so cards were way better supported.

    • @Shawn_White
      @Shawn_White ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@szlatyka And despite points 1 & 2 the IBM PC had slots in the front of the case that could easily have solved the GPU sag problem had they remained part of the spec while modern PC's don't.

    • @Azlehria
      @Azlehria ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@szlatykaThat was also the era when HDDs were large, optional accessories, and sometimes mounted directly on the add-in controller card. So big, heavy cards _did_ exist back then.

    • @jessefisher1809
      @jessefisher1809 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Shawn_White You also needed an expansion card for fricken everything.

  • @magma2050
    @magma2050 ปีที่แล้ว +177

    In comparison to the other card in this video, the one that is cracking has a larger, squarer notch with sharper corners. That's well-known to concentrate stress fractures - it was a contributing factor to the de Havilland Comet aircraft disasters of the 1950's.

    • @bunkermagnus
      @bunkermagnus ปีที่แล้ว +6

      This was my thought too.

    • @ChoppyChof
      @ChoppyChof ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Nice connection to the Comet ✈️

    • @Operational117
      @Operational117 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Solid deduction! That's why all airplanes started to make rounded corners for their windows. I really, *really* hope that both first- and third-party GPU manufacturers take note.

    • @magma2050
      @magma2050 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@TevisC That's right, it's a common misconception that the windows were the failure point - it was actually some square cutouts elsewhere in the fuselage for other equipment.

    • @Troppa17
      @Troppa17 ปีที่แล้ว

      Every AIB other than Asus used this design as well and their RTX 30X0 PCBs didn't cracked. I think the problem is that hole of the GPU mount is very close to the notch as on boards of other vendors. But Gigabyte doesn't use the backplate as the other vendors do and only depends on the PCB for the one cooler screw behind the notch on the Gaming and Vision models. In other words Gigabyte failed at the card design and seemingly failed again to recognising it themselves.

  • @ericimi
    @ericimi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This just happened to me with my 4080 waterforce that comes pre installed with a waterblock gigabyte is sending me a replacement card with no questions asked. I have a feeling your video is why this process seems to be going smoothly for me . Please keep making these types of videos to keep them accountable.

  • @Mancupcake
    @Mancupcake ปีที่แล้ว +56

    This is not the first time Gigabyte has done something like this either. They released 30 series cards with their "Waterforce" coolers that mixed aluminum and nickel [I think?] during the cooling process which caused the whole thing to corrode itself and die.

    • @nitehawk9270
      @nitehawk9270 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      My Gigabyte 1080 TI would freeze on default clocks, needed underclocking to not lock up. Never buying a gigabyte product again, add this and the exploding PSU's, bad caps in the past. Not worth rolling the dice.

    • @bettycocker2226
      @bettycocker2226 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nitehawk9270 I like my Aorus MOBO. its a B450 tho. lots of companies have gone downhill after covid it seems. cutting corners to make up for lost revenue i think.

    • @SaraMorgan-ym6ue
      @SaraMorgan-ym6ue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it's good to see that an asus gpu is a good card even though it sucks that the gigabyte gpu is bad

    • @Grimmwoldds
      @Grimmwoldds 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Aluminum water path and copper for the coldplate. Guaranteed massive amounts of galvanic corrosion with chunks of the aluminum block floating around in your loop as it breaks apart.

    • @rodiculous9464
      @rodiculous9464 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh man now i am worried about my giga 1080 aio, its served me well all this time. Was going to pick up most likely a giga 7900 xtx but this is turning me away.

  • @mhn3773
    @mhn3773 ปีที่แล้ว +417

    I sometimes feel like we are heading into another tech dark age.

    • @DrFlyingRhombusAgain
      @DrFlyingRhombusAgain ปีที่แล้ว +15

      No kidding

    • @emsj86
      @emsj86 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      When was the last one ?

    • @emsj86
      @emsj86 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I think it’s more everything cost so much no one cares to work and this quality is lost

    • @ghastous
      @ghastous ปีที่แล้ว

      We are already there. Big companies are just cutting corners to save money for share holders and making shoddy cards and it will only get worse because whales will always go out and buy there trash. I stopped using gigabyte years ago because they was starting to make cheap componants like there Mobos and no ASUS are joining in on the party and there have gone in the trash aswell.

    • @ocelotxp
      @ocelotxp ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Except this has been an ongoing problem with Gigabyte's products. I no longer buy Gigabyte anything.

  • @HIghlordBalkan
    @HIghlordBalkan ปีที่แล้ว +92

    Working at a PC repair center and while myself or my coworkers have not seen this, this is definitely good to know about going forward. As for Gigabyte themselves, we have had so much of their product coming back with defects and other issues that it's only reinforced my distrust and dislike for them. I've had both good and bad experiences with all the other major component manufacturers however only one has been consistently problematic over the last few years and that has been Gigabyte. From my own personal experiences with their hardware to what I have to deal with in the service center, I don't think I've seen so many different SKUs of product from a single manufacturer come back as Gigabyte has. From their monitors to their PSUs to their GPUs and mainboards, we've seen them all.

    • @countercorps
      @countercorps ปีที่แล้ว +3

      who deserves the consumer’s trust the most?

    • @RAZGR1Z
      @RAZGR1Z ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@countercorps Nobody, not even themselves.

    • @HIghlordBalkan
      @HIghlordBalkan ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RAZGR1Z honestly not wrong. Over the last while we've had a massive uptick in everything from everyone coming back with defects

    • @macking104
      @macking104 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      repair wiki has instructions on “Repairing a Cracked Gigabyte 30 or 40 series”

    • @DevilbyMoonlight
      @DevilbyMoonlight ปีที่แล้ว +5

      yup I stopped stocking anything of that brand years ago the z68 chipset boards were the last straw for me just like many of of their p35 boards I had many returns that would forget memory settings and refuse to boot which always overvolted the ram compared to what the bios reported as well as boot loop, or have other hard to track down intermittent warm boot issues, a long time ago gigabyte had a name for rock solid stability.. but since the p35 boards came out the failure rate is a bit too high for my liking...

  • @5mf1nc
    @5mf1nc ปีที่แล้ว +8

    One thing to remember: if it can't bend it will break ---- Having flex in that GB card is more likely because they learned the lesson: no screw-hole nearby, seemingly not much traces around the tab.
    Rigid parts are more likely to break -- that Asus has a lot of traces/vias around the tab (that also can make it stiffer -- having copper inside vs. only the FR4 -- but if it is functional copper and breaks it can short or cut parts out) and the mounting post is very close (albeit not as close as in the pics from the broken cards)

  • @sirflimflam
    @sirflimflam ปีที่แล้ว +12

    PCB's are a composite of fiberglass and resin, and these tabs were designed in a time where these cards weighed many times less than they do now. It's kind of absurd that there haven't been more problems than this up until now.

    • @SaraMorgan-ym6ue
      @SaraMorgan-ym6ue 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      why use solder when hot glue works just fine🤣🤣🤣

  • @blarghmcblarghson1903
    @blarghmcblarghson1903 ปีที่แล้ว +267

    This is one of those situations where I doubt I'll ever run into the problem, but I'm still going to avoid the brand because they've cultivated such a bad reputation about their customer service that I don't even want to risk it. Good job, Gigabyte.

    • @adreanmarantz2103
      @adreanmarantz2103 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Of all my builds I've ever only had one part fail in short order, a Gigabyte MB. sure it could happen to anyone but it was the first (and last) that i purchased from them.

    • @IIGrayfoxII
      @IIGrayfoxII ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Who are you going to go with?
      Asus?
      Not after their motherboard firmware issue
      Gigabyte?
      Not after this issue
      EVGA?
      They dont do NVIDIA anymore
      MSI?
      Galax?

    • @longnguyencaotuan2267
      @longnguyencaotuan2267 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@IIGrayfoxII asus gpu is still good, only their mb have a problem

    • @blvkoz3538
      @blvkoz3538 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      ​@@IIGrayfoxII Asrock

    • @RomanNumeral04
      @RomanNumeral04 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@longnguyencaotuan2267 it's not about did a brand have or did not have a problem with said product. It's about how they handled the problem.

  • @Jason-ir5ig
    @Jason-ir5ig ปีที่แล้ว +197

    Another thing to consider is the geometry of the perimeter. Sharp angles tend to be where stress concentrates, making them the first place to fail. The ASUS card you showed was rounded and didn't extend as far from the rest of the pcb. Those two factors combined should make it both more rigid and less prone to strain at any single point

    • @winstonsmith84
      @winstonsmith84 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I was thinking that too. That's why plans and ship have rounded windows and doors.

    • @xpyr
      @xpyr ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@winstonsmith84 *planes

  • @rustyshakelford1466
    @rustyshakelford1466 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Every card this size should come with a support bracket with actual thought put into mounting. I have seen this done even in the more value offerings from other brands, so there is no excuse at this class of GPU. What is actually happening is cost cutting from Gigabyte. Gigabyte cards gained lots of traction in previous years because they offered larger, triple fan coolers on many budget cards while maintaining a very low price, maybe the best cost to cooler ratio in the business. But cards were smaller back then, and even then they had a bad habit of pushing those same coolers onto hotter GPUs where despite looking big they were not appropriate. That trend of basically making their high end with cheap cut corners that only works in a very budget space has persisted.

    • @Abu_Brandino
      @Abu_Brandino 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sapphire cards come with a support bracket that screws directly into the PCIe brackets on the case. Was so impressed to find that included when I switched to the 7900XTX Nitro+

    • @LuPy532
      @LuPy532 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I built a brand new gaming pc two months ago with an MSI RTX 4070Ti SUPRIM and in the box of the gpu I got a support bracket and a mouse pad so.. there are good companies who think about those type of things.

  • @TsunamicBug
    @TsunamicBug ปีที่แล้ว +4

    How far this company has fallen. I have a "Gigabyte GV-N950OC-2GD" GTX 950 (stupid naming) and it still works perfectly almost 8 years later

  • @Psychx_
    @Psychx_ ปีที่แล้ว +71

    The base PCB materials are fiberglass and resin. There are different qualities of fiberglass (i.e. regarding the length and thickness of the fibers), and the material properties can be adjusted by using different fiberglass to resin ratios. The orientation of the stacked fiberglass layers can have an impact aswell, as you want to rotate them relative to each other in order to improve tensile strength in every direction.
    The whole issue could be a cost-saving thing, an engineering/assembly oversight or a source materials quality issue.

    • @ckitching2
      @ckitching2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      In this case, it's probably not a difference in PCB material but rather the fact the Asus card has a standoffs that connects the rear heat sink to the front heat sink on either side of the PCIe connector. That'll do a lot to make the card significantly more rigid in those two spots because you'd need to flex not only the PCB but also the entire cooling solution. I get the feeling that this was probably an intentional design decision because all their cards since the 10 series (or earlier) have these same heat sink mounting points.

    • @coopercummings8370
      @coopercummings8370 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is also likely a design issue. The gigabyte one is using a non-standard tab that is thinner and has sharper corners, which will both result in weaker parts. If you look at the comparison between the tabs the Asus one uses a stronger shape for the tab.

    • @woopsserg
      @woopsserg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Adding solid copper fill to all layers would make more difference to strength and rigidity than the flavor of FR-4 that was used. Actually I'm surprised that manufacturers generally don't use copper fill on internal layers in the tab area (obvious as it passes the light). Not to say it would not cost anything at all as copper foil is already there and is etched during manufacturing, not added. Also I totally agree with @ckitching2.

  • @STKev88
    @STKev88 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Got rid of Gigabyte immediately once I found their software sucks and their RMA process is absolute trash. Now this, I ain't surprised.

    • @Haskellerz
      @Haskellerz ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Gigabyte ships literal malware in their motherboard software and UEFI BIOS
      UEFI Vulnerability in 2023
      CosmicStrand rootkit in 2022
      AvosLocker Ransomware in 2021
      RobbinHood Ransomware in 2020

    • @Slane583
      @Slane583 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Haskellerz That's actually quite sad. When I first built my computer back in 2019 I started off with a Gigabyte Aorus B450 Pro WiFi motherboard. It worked perfectly fine (and still does) with my Ryzen 1700. But when I updated the bios to give further cpu support so I could upgrade my system with the 3700X I bought it did nothing but blue screen afterward.
      Come to find out through another TH-camr because of a setting in the bios my board just absolutely hated the 3700X I was trying to upgrade to. So I just said screw and used that as an opportunity to buy my current MSI X570 MPG Gaming EDGE WiFi. I've done repeated bios updates to it over the years and have had absolutely no problems with it.
      So for me as far as hardware goes with the current problems floating about MSI and ASRock seem to be the most reliable of the few as far as AMD goes. For Intel that's going to be EVGA, MSI and ASRock. As nice as ASUS's boards look I can't trust them with the BIOS crap they were trying to pull.

    • @bwabbel
      @bwabbel ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Haskellerz not trying to defend gigabyte here but at least cosmicstrand hit asus as well. You also make it sound like they do this on purpose. Maybe they should indeed check thwir security since it seems to keep happening, but i'm honestly glad that they didn't just hide those problems like other companies do (didn't have a gigabyte board so i might also be wrong, but that's how it looks to me)

    • @RonnieMcNutt666
      @RonnieMcNutt666 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry to say but every aibs software is a bloated nightmare

    • @cv507
      @cv507 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      msi since i thought id knead a ps2 pört ähGäin ^??^

  • @stevensims3342
    @stevensims3342 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    6:50 the reduced flex on that part of the ASUS board is due to that screw pillar being fastened nearby. A nice design touch to add some support to the PCB in that key area really.

  • @glbernini0
    @glbernini0 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Sounds like all cards could use a support! I've been using the small piece of high density foam that cards come packed in for years as a "BETTER SAFE THAN SORRY" solution.

    • @RuruFIN
      @RuruFIN ปีที่แล้ว

      I could do that as well since I put an aftermarket cooler (Raijintek Morpheus II) on my 6700 XT and I see a little sag now.

    • @rave6577
      @rave6577 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My MSI 3060 ti came with a weight support which worked great

  • @hikerdude5265
    @hikerdude5265 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I think the take-away from this is:
    - Gigabyte isn't covering warranty for this issue.
    - Gigabyte is showing up at the repair shop more than any other matching card. (Not sure this is factual yet)
    - Try installing and removing card while case is on it's side to avoid torqueing.
    - Support ANY 30 or 40 series brick in your case at all costs!
    I doubt if vertical mounting will show the same result but, It's obvious that the card sizes are gown beyond the PCIe 16 connection or location on the MOBO. More dialog is needed, I 'thinks'. Thanks, Jay, for bringing this up! 😉

  • @rustler08
    @rustler08 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    1. Unless you have to, don't pull calipers off when measuring. Otherwise you get this error
    2. You can see ASUS braced near the retention tab, which will help prevent that massive flex.
    3. Here's another benefit of vertical mounting with a riser cable.

  • @josephoberlander
    @josephoberlander ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I always try to make sure that the video card has a zip tie attached to handle the weight. Some CPU cooler towers are similar and bend the board from their weight. A simple strap to keep it in place against gravity is an easy fix for this. An even simpler option is to simply lay the whole thing on its side so that weight is a moot point. With the advent of bottom PSU cases with the intake for it up against carpet, this also will lower PSU heat considerably.

  • @TitanLeaf9536
    @TitanLeaf9536 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi Jay. Currently a RTX 4090 Aorus Master for sale on EBay Australia. Same issue cracked PCB at the retention lug. Looks like it's going to be an ongoing issue. Maybe the design of this lug was never designed to handle the weight of modern GPUs. Keep up the good work.

  • @llogansteiner3390
    @llogansteiner3390 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    I dont understand why offer a warrantee if your not going to honor it man these company's need to just own up to this

    • @SomeGirth
      @SomeGirth ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Typical Gigabyte. A smd fell off of my X570SI during normal operation but apparently their poor manufacturing is my fault.

    • @1337Ox
      @1337Ox ปีที่แล้ว +9

      all these companies shooting themselves in leg, I dont get it

    • @gokublack8342
      @gokublack8342 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Because they want it to be just extra money in their pocket they don't wanna actually do anything for it

    • @user-neo71665
      @user-neo71665 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      A warranty is nothing but a selling point and to make the buyer feel good. Companies often include so many loopholes they can legally deny it at the end of the day it's only as good as the worthless paper it's printed on.

    • @federicocatelli8785
      @federicocatelli8785 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I miss the long and upgradable evga warranty

  • @nick-dogg
    @nick-dogg ปีที่แล้ว +341

    I’m still amazed how huge these GPUs are and how it’s even acceptable

    • @somedude9316
      @somedude9316 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Great Value Bleach Those cards also didn't weigh like 3 lbs either. Edit: My Xfx Merc is closer to 5 lbs.

    • @TheTeremaster
      @TheTeremaster ปีที่แล้ว +19

      tbh we're at a stage where things HAVE to get bigger for cooling purposes. like most of a 90 series is just cooling infrastructure to make sure the damn thing doesn't overheat and die. Like all the new CPUs are hitting a ceiling decided by their IHS, not any integral part of the chip

    • @portman8909
      @portman8909 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      These aren't your average consumer GPU's though...

    • @ZergRadio
      @ZergRadio ปีที่แล้ว +2

      My pc weighs in at 25 kgs :)

    • @MrMOGHammer
      @MrMOGHammer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@TheTeremastercomon there is 3060s sold with this fan configuration, and 3090s sold with just a dual fan setup and they work just fine. It’s a gimmick to sell you overpriced cards that don’t perform much better in the temp department. Best cooling is water cooling anyways

  • @bryanobrien2726
    @bryanobrien2726 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The obvious differences in the Asus card that makes it stronger at the tab is that it has a screw down brace slightly forward and up from the tab and , not only does the Gigabyte card not have that brace , but it has a huge cut out of material right there making the tab weaker still .

  • @billwiley7216
    @billwiley7216 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Pretty much current GPU's really should be supported on the outer corner area.
    I also agree that the rear panel area that attaches to the case should be physically attached to the cooler as well to increase rigidity and support.
    I have a 3090ti (different brand) and my PC case came with the ability and needed adjustable parts to support the GPU on the off case end.
    As expensive an heavy as these cards are now I cannot understand anyone not wanting to give these cards additional support as a safeguard against damage.
    We need to start thinking of these gpu's as being more fragile and subject to damage the same we do when handling a CPU and the pins on one of those.

  • @Badtzism
    @Badtzism ปีที่แล้ว +61

    As a gamer working in an institute focused on reliability of microelectronics, this and the last couple years just hurt my heart badly. Especially as (gaming) pc hardware that seems to struggle so much lately is one of the very few consumer products that have rarely to never reached our institute. Really makes it seem like they don't give a ...

    • @tlfearofthedarkhun387
      @tlfearofthedarkhun387 ปีที่แล้ว

      Welcome to the post covid era, 2020s. Really sad, history repeats itself.

  • @PeterTaylor1
    @PeterTaylor1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Reminds me of issues we used to have with slot CPUs back in the day, mostly due to the weight of the coolers.

  • @tedgreen1650
    @tedgreen1650 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    @jayztwocents 14:10 something important to note is the amount of space between the tab and the rest of the PCB. The gigabyte card has a very large gap between the tab and pcb, whereas the other card has significantly less of a gap. The large square cutout makes the gigabyte card have a longer lever at that point, but the small cutout on the other card is much smaller, therefore a shorter lever. Like pushing on a door from the handle vs near the hinge. Hopefully what I’m saying makes sense. The fact that it feels stronger despite the thinner material points to this being a physics issue.

    • @NytronX
      @NytronX 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This was my first thought as well. At 6:50 you can see the Asus has a metal pillar there to add strength. A 3d printed snap in gusset would solve this issue I think

  • @toleth88
    @toleth88 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    I'd assume the extra rigidity of the asus card comes from the posts mounted close to the tab, reducing the length of the board that can bend. Sort of like having 2 sticks of equal thickness, one being 2ft long the other being 2 inchs, one will be easier to break than the other, even though they are identical thicknesses.

    • @Gurthang85
      @Gurthang85 ปีที่แล้ว

      That detail that you point out added to the screws that fix the cooler to the rear support plate indicates that Asus has better engineering applied in terms of card support stability

    • @eddieb7721
      @eddieb7721 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for pointing this out I was hoping I would find this in the comments.
      I’d like to add that the notch (for lack of a better term) is also somewhere where stress concentration will increase due to the change in geometry. The higher Kt associated with the change in geometry will increase the likelihood of a stress fracture. That post in the other GPU not only provides stability against the cantilever force but also helps minimize the effects of the notch geometry by providing stability closer to point of issue.
      I’m not a mechanics guy but I’d also suspect a graphics card with the copper traces mixed with other material may perform non-monotonically. My day job is lighting stuff on fire so take the last paragraph with a grain of salt

    • @keithvsmith
      @keithvsmith ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I saw that too, but not only that, the Gigabyte card has a big section of the PCB above the tab cut away as well. Leaving less PCB material and making the tab "longer" if you get what I mean.

    • @JungleJeffarnold
      @JungleJeffarnold ปีที่แล้ว

      My asus tuf sags don't know if it's enough to break it eventually . . . .
      Propped it up level with an old smint tin 😂

  • @TheSickness
    @TheSickness ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Awareness of issues is a good thing, it's not all 'TikTok-brain' drama. Knowledge and shining light on issues can enable change, fanboi'ism and coverups do F*all. We must know and remember how companies deal with issues. Thanks Jay and team

  • @Mark_Dailey
    @Mark_Dailey 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hey what about the anti-sag bracket that ships with thoes gigabyte cards? I have the 4080 version of that card and the included anti sag bracket seems to fix the triangulation issue you mentioned. It mounts to the motherboard standoffs and does a pretty good job.

  • @orinokonx01
    @orinokonx01 ปีที่แล้ว

    As someone looking at building a new PC for the first time in 20 years (last build was a Pentium 4 in late 2003!), I really appreciate you bringing this to attention. I do not want (and cannot afford) for my new PC to fall apart with no backup!

  • @myblujl7503
    @myblujl7503 ปีที่แล้ว +93

    I wonder how many of these cracked GPU's are in pre-built rigs? The stress of going through shipping is amazing! I have seen entire PCIE slots ripped out of the botherboard. Even if you brace the GPU's with packing foam, it could still take a lot of stress from a bump.

    • @gregburzenchenko1363
      @gregburzenchenko1363 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was going to say this, I've also seen quite a few Gigabyte Eagle series in prebuilts too.

    • @churblefurbles
      @churblefurbles ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Lenovo 3060 I checked has 3 screws through the backplate edge over the slot area, and two more at the ends along the edge, and an additional screwed down end bracket, so its just a design thing.

    • @flyingtentacle7631
      @flyingtentacle7631 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's not specifically a shipping issue. I own an electronic repairs shop and we've had about 400 of these gigabyte cards since the 30 series released. Out of those, 7 were ship to home units. I don't doubt that shipping could be a factor in broken cards, but usually that will be taken care of by the seller warranty, also not a lot of pre-builts use Gigabyte cards. While I haven't seen this issue with any card that isn't Gigabyte, I can't say if that's because other cards aren't cracking, or if other manufacturers are just honoring their warranty unlike Gigabyte. Either way, to core lesson is still the same, don't buy a gpu from Gigabyte. Honestly just avoiding Gigabyte in general isn't a bad idea based on their response to major issues in the past few years.

    • @bmwguy2009
      @bmwguy2009 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@flyingtentacle7631 Don't buy GPU, don''t buy anything from Gigabyte. PSU on fire, and motherboards fail and crappy usb that don't work.

    • @RuruFIN
      @RuruFIN ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bmwguy2009 No problems with my B550 board though. And I used many of their graphics cards until 1080 Ti and every single of them worked perfectly fine.

  • @erikhendrickson59
    @erikhendrickson59 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    6:00 I've had some *_VERY_* weird problems with chassis fitment over the past few years. Not only for GPUs but for coolers and radiators as well. Specific to this discussion, I've seen PC cases where the PCIe slots (COVERS REMOVED, YES!) on the rear of the chassis actually not to bent outwards to accommodate the GPU properly.

  • @HarimaKentaro
    @HarimaKentaro ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have Gigabyte RTX 4090, it comes with GPU support [anti-sag] brackets. So, I am wondering, did people not use them or this cracking of PCB is despite using those support brackets?

  • @davidowen7600
    @davidowen7600 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Woah, how did you miss that measurement while editing. It was ridiculously clear... Steve from GN's gonna make a video about you next :P

  • @slimeds
    @slimeds ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I was scrolling through eBay about a month ago and I kept coming across listings of Gigabyte GPUs that were for parts or not working. Back then I personally thought nothing of it but now this video has really shed some light on a lot of those listings!

    • @XnathOW
      @XnathOW ปีที่แล้ว

      Gigashite having GPUs melting over unlocked fps has been a thing for a while..

  • @meangreen3386
    @meangreen3386 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    Hey Jay, great video to bring awareness to this issue! However I believe the Asus card may have felt stiffer due to it having a cooler support right next to the locking tab. In the video you can see the Gigabyte flexing at a much farther point into the pcb than the Asus due to it not having that support. Just thought you may want to look at this. Appreciate you!

    • @Hagop64
      @Hagop64 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yep there is a support post on the Asus card right next to the tab which would cause the tab to feel more rigid. The gigabyte pcb is flexing over a long distance of pcb.

    • @killer01ws6
      @killer01ws6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Hagop64 First think I noticed too.

    • @bobbygetsbanned6049
      @bobbygetsbanned6049 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly, that support for the cooler adds a bunch of rigidity and it also has more material on the PCB where the Gigabyte card is all notched out, putting a lot of leverage on the tab. The Gigabyte card doesn't even have PCB material where that brace is on the ASUS card.

    • @DimkaTsv
      @DimkaTsv ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Actually, interesting physics nuance
      .
      Higher rigidity technically increases risk of cracking due to outside factor/pressure, as it is opposite to plasticity and flexibility. And that is issue of proper support engineering.
      Sag deepness and outside forces are what you need to look for. Who knows what these people did to cards before cracks appeared. In masses consumers aren't even close to being as advanced and knowledgeable as enthusiasts.

    • @darkhymn
      @darkhymn ปีที่แล้ว

      Asus also has a long history as a premium manufacturer, whereas gigabyte has built their reputation on being cheap and probably good enough.

  • @MSJChem
    @MSJChem ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I've seen a couple of ASUS Tuf Gaming 4080/4090s with the retention tab snapped completely off so don't think it is only one manufacturer's problem. GPUs are getting ridiculously heavy and perhaps the PCB material is not strong enough to support the weight of the card.

    • @jebes909090
      @jebes909090 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      My rog strix came with this adjustable pole thingy because the card is ginormous and wieghts a ton.

    • @ethanieldude1
      @ethanieldude1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah my TUF 4070 came with an adjustable rod. I feel like this issue is happening because people don't want to use that support.

    • @sinkfire
      @sinkfire 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ethanieldude1 btw if you unscrew the rod and pull it out there's a screwdriver inside

  • @MarioP495
    @MarioP495 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Two things of note, the PCB should be the same thickness on each card and the physical design is responsible for that extra flex. The locking cutout is much smaller on asus and adds to board rigidity

    • @VoldoronGaming
      @VoldoronGaming ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes. The larger notch is easier to flex than a smaller one.

    • @hugoalejandro27
      @hugoalejandro27 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@VoldoronGaming Exactly!

    • @TheMrLapidus
      @TheMrLapidus ปีที่แล้ว

      Structural rigidity is achieved on the ASUS card by the screw right above the tab. Adding thos screws create additional assembly steps, screwing has to be controlled, there is a higher ppm (rejection) on the line. So at the end it will be a little bit expensive. So when people are buying cards from the lowest price tags they are actually taking small risks where corners were cut. I'm dealing with serial care. The manufacturer obviously going to deny warrenty. I mean cracking that tab could have been caused by assembly or disassembly and PCB strain is a typical silent killer.

  • @Jito463
    @Jito463 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Having had to remove hundreds of video cards over the years, one trick that I've found is that sometimes I need to push the card down into the slot in order to get the release tab to actually release. It seems counter-intuitive, but by pushing down it lessens some of the tension on the tab. You just have to be careful not to push too hard that you could damage the MoBo.

    • @mire873
      @mire873 ปีที่แล้ว

      So you would push down while pushing on the release tab ?

    • @Jito463
      @Jito463 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mire873 Yeah, I've found that sometimes I need to push the card down into the slot while I simultaneously push on the release tab. Not always, but sometimes it just catches and won't release otherwise.

    • @Trikipum
      @Trikipum ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Jito463 I remember this with older boards, but my last 3 or 4 boards barely strapped the thing -

  • @torcheddreadnought899
    @torcheddreadnought899 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for making this video Jay and Co. I'm going to have a look at my 4080 and its seating after work.

  • @frankhunyadi9279
    @frankhunyadi9279 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Jay, at the start of your video you mention gpu defects that Diablo 4 and New World 'exploit'.
    I own a Gigabyte RTX4080 and have had a few black screen instances....not an ongoing issue or a pattern of it occurring playing certain games.....does this mean the 4080 I purchased will eventually fail or the black screen issues become more frequent until an eventual bricked gpu?

  • @ljs2476
    @ljs2476 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    That Asus card has a mechanical reinforcement right by the tab by way of the really long standoff that looks to be tying the cooler face plate to the backplate which ties the PCB to the backplate at that point providing more stiffness.

    • @jamessnyder3807
      @jamessnyder3807 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not sure how much the standoff would help but the curve radius where the tab joins is also larger on the ASUS which would distribute stress over a wider area. Corners/sharp edges are going to break first.

    • @bobbygetsbanned6049
      @bobbygetsbanned6049 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jamessnyder3807 The brace on the ASUS card makes a huge difference.

  • @SFCDaddio
    @SFCDaddio ปีที่แล้ว +8

    It's the radius to a straight line, you're losing a lot of strength compared to the double radius on the other card. And as long as that straight is, you're looking at the long and slender condition modifier coming into play.

  • @WayneRandall
    @WayneRandall ปีที่แล้ว

    Fun fact: The Louis Rossmann video you referenced was the video that introduced me to you. :)

  • @docshay7328
    @docshay7328 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The funny thing is... most of the 4090 cards that were cracked in the NorthRidgeFix video were actually the ASUS RTX 4090's vs the Gigabyte RTX 4090's. Also, the bendability of the Gigabyte cards might be keeping it from being as brittle in the same tab cracking conditions that some of these cards are experiencing...

  • @THeBoZZHoGG
    @THeBoZZHoGG ปีที่แล้ว +27

    There is a standoff right next to the bracket on the ASUS card therefore you have a shorter distance to bend, so while it might be thinner it is a much shorter and thus harder to bend area

    • @majorschemer4872
      @majorschemer4872 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's the thing that I noticed right away. It's more than likely the reason why it's not flexing so much.

    • @kurappu
      @kurappu ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@majorschemer4872 I agree

  • @RandomTechG
    @RandomTechG ปีที่แล้ว +17

    As mentioned in several other comments, it does appear that the difference in flex is due to the mount located really close to the edge on that other card.

    • @manofwar556
      @manofwar556 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think so too.

    • @johnarat8711
      @johnarat8711 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I dont think manufacturers use different materials aswell

  • @TYB4NDS
    @TYB4NDS ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hey Jay, I think the reason the tab is more flexible when you bend it on the Gigabyte card is because it is not supported as much as the other card. Just look how the tab connects to the whole card itself. I'm no engineer but with the circle cut underneath the tab on the other card and the tab being in closer is just looks like it would be more sturdy.

    • @MS-gc7rb
      @MS-gc7rb 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you’re right. on top of that, the radius around the tab corners are too small. this can create a large stress around the edge of the tab when the tab is being flexed. thicker tab would would not make it harder to bend when the neck is too long. In fact it creates more stress when a thicker tab is being bent. overall its just a bad design comparing with the Asus one.

  • @Machistmo
    @Machistmo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nice to see Jay worried about people not getting their buttons pressed all the way @ 6:02 ish

  • @jameslmathieson
    @jameslmathieson ปีที่แล้ว +49

    The extra flex is likely due to the different shapes of the PCB around the tab. The Gigabyte design creates a much larger cantilever than the Asus design. That's probably the defect right there. That shape probably can't withstand normal handling more than a few cycles.

    • @Alonne1
      @Alonne1 ปีที่แล้ว

      Any idea to how we could avoid the pcb to break?

    • @bobbygetsbanned6049
      @bobbygetsbanned6049 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That plus the ASUS card has the PCB braced to the cooler right next to the tab. The Gigabyte card has that whole area notched out where ASUS has more PCB material and a brace.

    • @jameslmathieson
      @jameslmathieson ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Be careful? More substantively what Gigabyte could do is to send customers a stiffening kit consisting of an adhesive backed piece of FR4 (PCB material) that bridges over that square gap and the area that keeps cracking. Customers would stick that to their still working board to protect it. That's a fairly cheap solution that would prevent a flood of RMAs.

    • @DimkaTsv
      @DimkaTsv ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@Alonne1 use support standoffs. No sag = no flex = no stress = no PCB cracking. At least in theory.

    • @rookm13
      @rookm13 ปีที่แล้ว

      or because it has a standoff for the cooler, the mounting of that doesnt allow the extra flex because it provides structural rigidity

  • @adrastoso9727
    @adrastoso9727 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is why I have a GPU holder just in case and to give the card the most support possible as it will sit there for years.
    When insisting and extraction you should always get a hand in the card when the card is not secured to the case just to help keep pressure off the card because these are heavy, especially the 4090.

  • @beefnuts2941
    @beefnuts2941 ปีที่แล้ว

    really thankful for my vertical mounted case right about now

  • @Druid_Plow
    @Druid_Plow ปีที่แล้ว

    From my experience back in the early 2000's most PCBs were fiberglass. I'm sure modern boards are still 80%+ resin, so the issue likely falls to the the resin mixture itself, or the tensioner material wheather it is glass filiment or anything else.

  • @CP-fm7zy
    @CP-fm7zy ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Just noticed something from the thumbnail, the G/B PCB has a larger inset cutout by the tab (meaning less actual PCB structure in the area) that looks like it would make it more succeptable to stress fractures, which is probably why the Asus feels sturdier as well.

    • @umutcetinkaya5078
      @umutcetinkaya5078 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      same.

    • @pezcore350
      @pezcore350 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The ASUS also has a post that attaches to the cooler that looks like it's helping with rigidity

  • @wile-e-coyote7257
    @wile-e-coyote7257 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thanks for bringing this issue to our attention, Jay - and crew!

  • @HappyBeezerStudios
    @HappyBeezerStudios ปีที่แล้ว

    There is a reason why I have my cards tied up since basically forever. Even as far back as my HD 4870 back in the day.
    And full length (12.5'') cards used to be also mounted at the other end of the card towards the front of the case. Mainly a server thing, but the same connector, so they also worked just as well in desktop machines.

  • @LeJimster
    @LeJimster 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    A local retailer is selling Asus 40 series cards with cracks that had apparently happened during transit, so it's not just limited to Gigabyte. Definitely an issue that has been around a couple of generations now.

  • @Dr.RichardBanks
    @Dr.RichardBanks ปีที่แล้ว +9

    There's nothing in this world that doesn't flex if you push hard enough -Jay. This is the old world philosophy I'm here for.

  • @davidsimpson2967
    @davidsimpson2967 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    GPU sag can cause BGA failure, most typically on the memory modules closest to the PCIE slot and occasionally the GPU core itself. The pcie tab cracking is caused almost universally by movement in shipping in a prebuilt, which can also cause BGA failure. All heavy cooler cards are susceptible to this, but Gigabyte's 3080-3090ti has a cooler screw hole very close to the locking tab creating an area especially susceptible to cracking over and above that found in other GPUs. They effectively did the opposite of reinforcing an inherent weak point. They then compounded this by routing small and critical traces through the area, where other AIBs have not. I recently repaired an MSI 3080 Suprim with a crack in at the PCIE locking tab, it had three faulty memory modules, almost certainly BGA damage caused at the same time as the pcie locking tab crack. I replaced the modules and the card works fine now, it's still got the pcie locking tab crack, and it's a worse crack than on the GB 3080ti pic of mine (the one ground down through the layers prior to repair attempt) featured in Louis' original video on this subject.

  • @davidcsokasy5451
    @davidcsokasy5451 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Hey @Jayztwocents, most PCB are made from FR4 (8:57). In case you were wondering FR4 is a flame retardant material made from epoxy and woven glass fibers.
    I have a Gigabyte RTX 3080 Vision OC at home. I have it mounted horizontal, and installed a Cooler Master RGB GPU support bracket because I was concerned about mechanical stress on the PCB. I'll update this comment later today with feedback on whether I see signs of cracking.
    Update: My Gigabyte RTX 3080 Vision OC (approx. 1.5 years old) doesn't show any signs of cracking. Prior to installing the GPU support bracket there was a surprising amount of sag on GPU. The main reason I bought the support was because it seemed like there was a significant amount of stress on the PCB. My guess is the cracking is purely mechanical as alluded to in the video, and thermal fatigue/expansion plays little to no role since mine shows no signs of the issue, and has been supported the majority of the time.

    • @WavveBoi
      @WavveBoi ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you have the bracket actually holding it up its going to be fine. When I uninstall my gpus I lay the computer flat, use a screw drive to depress the locking tab (big man hands) and pull straight up. No cracks so far on several large cards.

    • @bags4649
      @bags4649 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WavveBoi I do the same, for the same reason, big man hands...

    • @davidcsokasy5451
      @davidcsokasy5451 ปีที่แล้ว

      @WavveBoi I figured my card would be a good indicator if the problem was mechanical, or a problem with thermal fatigue/expansion.

    • @WavveBoi
      @WavveBoi ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidcsokasy5451 I don't think FR4 suffers from alot of heat stress. Like it might take decades for that material weaken sufficiently. I could definitely be wrong though. This seems like an issue of big heavy cards with not enough support on a section of PCB. With some cost cutting thrown in.
      I've been hearing alot of long term quality issues with Nvidia cards and I'm wondering if I should trade my 3090 for a 7900xtx.

    • @WavveBoi
      @WavveBoi ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bags4649 I got the long L shaped screw driver with a noctua cooler and I've been using it for years. It's my favorite PC screwdriver.

  • @Milnoc
    @Milnoc ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Aren't we overdue to create a new interface format for graphics cards? These beasts now need to be packaged in their own separate box!

  • @KratosxD
    @KratosxD ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Jay, see if you can use a precision pressure test gauge to see how much lb you pushing onto that tab to get it to flex. This way we can at least see how much is needed to get to flex and inevitably crack.

  • @keiz_
    @keiz_ ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Its also been happening to MSI cards, in particular I've seen it a lot for the Ventus cards. MSI puts on that same red arrow dot, and denied warranty claims.
    Has happened recently with some brands old 2080 supers I've been seeing too.

  • @nimmer4749
    @nimmer4749 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video came out 9 days ago and the mats are ALREADY gone? Listen, I just discovered you, and I have to say... those original mats are STUNNING!!! Please restock!

  • @Th3Silverhand
    @Th3Silverhand ปีที่แล้ว

    Just bought a 4070 Windforce from Micro Center. Really happy they talked me into the store warranty now

  • @chincemagnet
    @chincemagnet ปีที่แล้ว +35

    Jay, you guys and other tech-tubers, are like the heros of the tech world, using your popularity and influence to point out anti consumer practices to shame these companies into doing the right thing, you have my respect sir, and gratitude

    • @-vedana
      @-vedana ปีที่แล้ว

      Heroes not hero's.
      Hero's = hero is

    • @chincemagnet
      @chincemagnet ปีที่แล้ว

      @@-vedana 😆 of course, I’m pretty sure that was autocorrect

  • @VanishingImage
    @VanishingImage ปีที่แล้ว +4

    one reason ive gone vertical mount. either way it can still break but id rather not allow possible sagging being an issue. does not excuse poor design or structuring of parts.

  • @watchingdanny
    @watchingdanny ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I built my PC in a case that holds the motherboard horizontally. I never liked how vertical motherboards (tower PCs) hold everything sideways. No issues other than it having a slightly larger footprint on my desk. Totally worth it. Heat also leaves straight up and away from the motherboard instead of heat travelling along side the motherboard where some devices might contribute to the heating of another.

    • @freelancer1499
      @freelancer1499 ปีที่แล้ว

      WHat case do u use?

    • @watchingdanny
      @watchingdanny ปีที่แล้ว

      @@freelancer1499 ThermalTake cube. I don't know the exact model but they have a bunch. In black and white.

    • @freelancer1499
      @freelancer1499 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@watchingdanny Thanks!

    • @josephoberlander
      @josephoberlander ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Originally PCs were all built like this, but the "desktop" form factor refused to go beyond a certain size since ATX boards were all that was available. Today, though, a small micro-ATX case can almost be used as a monitor stand. The model mentioned is the Thermatake V21. But a more traditional case on its side will also work, especially if it is like the SAMA IM01 which has the sides as a mesh as well. The Silverstone GD09B is a more expensive option. But any small case with a glass side can be put horizontal and used as a monitor or speaker stand. Some even allow you to simply remove the glass and install a screen (nice DIY project)

    • @justsayin2085
      @justsayin2085 ปีที่แล้ว

      i still use my Rv01 silverstone tower case, it holds the gpu vertically and has a brace for the gpu included.

  • @churblefurbles
    @churblefurbles ปีที่แล้ว

    Its the backplate, some have a lot of screws right at the edge where it needs reinformcement. The shrunken pcb of newer cards has them skimping on mount holes.

  • @someonekiri161
    @someonekiri161 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    There's a screw point being used for the cooler closer to the notch on the Asus card, where the Gigabite one has none, which may be helping on the tension of the PCB itself.

    • @netsudro
      @netsudro ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I couldn't say it better myself.

  • @kcfish4862
    @kcfish4862 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I am quite curious whether if it's because the radius being too small, I've worked with a few designs in another industry where the small radius caused high stress concentration, ultimately forming cracks

    • @nyalex392
      @nyalex392 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good point.. the classical « scale » issue ? 👍🤔
      Too often from small to big, or big to small, very often it gives different results.. either in manufacturing, in science, in design.. whatever fundamental application domain you look in.. 😗

  • @EricDIW
    @EricDIW 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I used to have a bunch of GPU installed and when you go to remove them that hook can be hard to unlatch. Not sure if that was part of their thought process in having the latch very clear? maybe?

  • @whalex8390
    @whalex8390 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey Jayz, I know you’re probably not going to see this comment but I thought I’d let you know that I experienced an issue 2 days ago now with my Gigabyte 3080ti that randomly shut my computer down out of the blue. It didn’t post and kept coming up with a white vga light on my asus x570-f. I tried all the usual fixes, cmos + cleaning the pcie slot of dust and remounting it back in, but it did not fix the issue. Brought it into the local shop today in Australia and they told me the card was definitely gone, but couldn’t deduce what it was. I got referred this video by a friend and I definitely feel like this is what happened to my card, minding that I’ve only had this card since August last year and it’s been completely fine up until two days ago. Thank you for making this video and I’m going to try to get this thing RMA’d somehow.

  • @Fallacy99
    @Fallacy99 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Jay, this possibly occurs when one removes the power cable from the card while it is installed in the pci-e slot on the mainboard. One needs to brace the rear of the card with opposing force when removing the power cable.

    • @overtherenowaitthere
      @overtherenowaitthere ปีที่แล้ว

      @@garetht677 blame nvidia for making powerhungry and hot cards that can only be cooled by a solution almost the size of a midtower case.

  • @Slane583
    @Slane583 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Looking at your close-up's of the two cards it looks like the ASUS card is more rigid in that same spot because it has a nice tall stand-off that's part of the air cooler. Which is a big help. The Gigabyte card doesn't have that extra rigidity of any extra support. It's disappointing that Gigabyte is screwing over customers when it comes to warranty because I really love the looks of the Gigabyte AERO cards. The white and silver matches my build. :)

    • @sarges1712
      @sarges1712 ปีที่แล้ว

      I noticed that too. I'm not an engineer, but that additional rigidity can't hurt. Also the PCB doesn't have that slight cutout above the tab giving it a little more material and less room to flex. As for the cracking, just like electricity, once pressure is mounted the path of least of resistance is going to be where it splits, and that's going to be the trace.

    • @mattg8593
      @mattg8593 ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely! Pretty ridiculous they completely overlooked that standoff right next to the tab

    • @Slane583
      @Slane583 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mattg8593 I can't really blame Jay too much for missing it. He was more than likely focused more on showing the differences in flex versus seeing the details that made the ASUS card more rigid. When you have a concern over a product with a problem known by the manufacturer and you want to inform viewers who might have bought it you tend to gloss over the small details that make the competitors card more rigid.

    • @Slane583
      @Slane583 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sarges1712 I'm no engineer or rocket scientist either. But when I saw Jay's close-up's I picked up the different between the two immediately.
      My job consists of fulfilling customer orders on a daily basis. So I have to be more observant than the average person. If I don't catch things it could mean a messed up order and a very unhappy customer.
      I'm not surprised about the traces getting messed up. There's quite literally nothing there to begin with making it work in the first place.
      It's the same problem when restoring vintage electronics. The protective masking coat on the PCB will get ruined over time and the copper traces will get destroyed from corrosion. Bad enough to where the same technique of using tiny wire to rebuild the trace is required.
      What makes this situation worse is it's on a brand new $2,000 graphics card and not a 30+ year old game console. To top that the maker is well aware of the problem existing but doesn't want to give a refund when the problem happens.

  • @vidfreak56
    @vidfreak56 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thats why you always install your cards vertically and make sure its solid at the screw points before y ou flip the case horizontally. There should be very little pressure on that tab if done correctly.

  • @linuxMaggott
    @linuxMaggott ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is good time for PC Case designers to come up with an idea to mount the new generation of heavy grfx cards and reduce the stess on both the pci-x slot and the locking tab and not rely on the expanse mounting bracket. May some sort of clamp that grabs the body of the grfx card and transfers the weight to the case and then use a riser cable. PS. I hate the locking clamp on the mobo most the time I break it off depending on the access and system build. This is from prior experience I did break the same tab off of AGP card back it the day and the lucky card still worked.

    • @josephoberlander
      @josephoberlander ปีที่แล้ว

      It's called a horizontal case and they already exist. Most PC components are designed and tested with the motherboard flat/horizontal and work far less efficiently turned on their side. (especially cooling towers)

  • @DirkBelig
    @DirkBelig ปีที่แล้ว +20

    My Gigabyte 4080 came with a support bracket which had an L-shaped piece which attached to the motherboard holes (via standoffs that replaced the screws) and a part that attaches to the end of the GPU which then screws into the L-brace. Rock solid.
    Prior to that, I'd used Jay's tip to shim the backplate of my ASUS 3070 Ti to stop that flex in addition to using the GPU prop rod that came with my ASUS mobo.

    • @jacobartzavia6096
      @jacobartzavia6096 ปีที่แล้ว

      I dont get why ppl wont use anything to prevent their gpus from sagging

    • @RyTrapp0
      @RyTrapp0 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@jacobartzavia6096 Because most people assume that they shouldn't have to. Which certainly isn't unfair.

    • @enjoiadrian
      @enjoiadrian ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Confirming my gigabyte 4080 came with the same bracket, and is rock solid with it installed correctly.
      And yes, I don't think it's unfair for people to assume they shouldn't have to use one, but by the same token, if it's in the box, why wouldn't you? 😅

    • @mr.guillotine3766
      @mr.guillotine3766 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So, to me, this tells me they knew it was an issue on the previous gen, so they included this bracket to help deal with it...unless they included a similar bracket in the 30 series? Even then, they really need to be explicit that you need to install the bracket to minimize the risk of it cracking.

    • @jacobartzavia6096
      @jacobartzavia6096 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RyTrapp0 I dunno man. Just seeing that being uneven drives me nuts. To me it's like getting into a boat that's tilting one way and getting mad it sunk

  • @socas_nic
    @socas_nic ปีที่แล้ว +17

    It all depends on the geometry behind the tab. As you see the Asus card has a more circular design whereas the gigabyte card has a more squared off design. The circular design distributes the load evenly. The squared off design however, that creates stress points on the corners. That can be proved by the fact that that's exactly where the crack starts at the inside corners of the pcb behind that tab

    • @MyAmazingUsername
      @MyAmazingUsername ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That make me relieved. I have the Asus rog strix 3090 oc. It doesn't have the power chips burning out issue thanks to using good power design, so it won't burn out from games. And now this with the circular tabs. What a relief...

    • @boyinpyjamas
      @boyinpyjamas ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MyAmazingUsername lol as a poor guy i couldn't sleep if I somehow had gigabyte version and worry about it cracking.

  • @jimflagg4009
    @jimflagg4009 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is great. Love the video. I wish they would apply brackets to the Coolers in addition to the the one on the card so you can screw down the cooler too. Since they are now 3 to 4 slots wide now why not have a single slot brace on the cooler too. I would want it to be separate from the card slot brackets to be clear. You might be able to do a mod to a cooler to add a bracket. Have not tried one because I am water cooled.

  • @brandonbeasley1825
    @brandonbeasley1825 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 14:14, you can see there's a tie-in point on the ASUS card where you're checking the rigidity of the PCB. Maybe if there we more contact points following the perimeter of the PCB as well as reinforcements in that tab area, along with tying in the bracket on the back of the GPU then the issue(s) would be resolved. Contrary to popular belief, I've never liked putting figurines or other memorabilia on top of my GPU, and something like that could also contribute to this issue if you're adding extra weight on top of the card when it's already exhibiting severe sagging issues.
    Great video Jay! Always love the content.

  • @wtrojanow
    @wtrojanow 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi there @Jayztwocents,
    I've just ordered Gigabyte Windforce RTX 4070 OC 12GB and after seeing your video, I'm going to return it once it's delivered. But before that I'd like to know if you had a chance to test Windforce version. It's smaller so the risk of PCB cracks is lower but I have a doubt if it can crack anyway during e.g installing it in PCIE port due to poor PCB quality Gigabyte could have used in the card I've just bought.

  • @purringc5552
    @purringc5552 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    At this point, any build I do has to use an anti-sag bracket. Gigabyte/Aorus is providing a bracket with their 40 series cards. At least as low as the 4070 Ti that I know of. Lian LI also has a bracket they sell. They mention it for their Lancool II Mesh case, but it'll work in any case.
    Graphics cards are just really heavy these days. All graphics card manufacturer's should be providing a solution. And in my opinion, one that is elegant, simple, and doesn't offend the senses.

    • @CGVan420
      @CGVan420 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same here. I only have a 3060ti and i picked up one for it. It's like cheap insurance for our GPU investment. If we're going to spend hundreds.... or into the thousands for a card, forking out an extra $20 for a bracket is a no brainer.

    • @kylesuarez5071
      @kylesuarez5071 ปีที่แล้ว

      I got a 4090 gigabyte and after setting up the bracket I realized the mount doesn’t work with my MSI motherboard x670e carbon fiber the lengths were way off so I had to go buy a third party bracket kinda sucked because I bought gigabyte for the mounted bracket incentive

    • @purringc5552
      @purringc5552 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kylesuarez5071 Yeah, that sucks man. Nothing seems to work in all situations. I had some issues even with the ones I mentioned. Maybe case manufacturer's should try to come up with a solution.

    • @CommandoTM
      @CommandoTM ปีที่แล้ว

      Even on the RX 580 I had which was also GIGABYTE, I had to install an anti-sag bracket, as the PCIe contacts on the top side of the card got worn bad, most likely due to vibration. Bottom side is all good and clean.
      It was causing freezes or black screens whenever I plug a cable or someone walks by.

  • @admiralbenbow1232
    @admiralbenbow1232 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I feel like the main problem is the size of the cutout for the lock. It's a lot smaller on the ASUS card than the Gigabyte one. Gigabyte skimped on like 1 cm^2 of PCB material and now their heavy cards are breaking because of it

    • @alexhajnal107
      @alexhajnal107 ปีที่แล้ว

      FYI, PCBs are milled from rectangular boards. Any "skimped" portions of the board were cut away (i.e. no cost savings). As others have commented the real problem is poor geometry/mechanical design.

  • @skaarraven
    @skaarraven ปีที่แล้ว

    I have the same weird issue of black screen, fans full speed and its so RANDOM, no issues in any tests, furmark. It happens once a month usually, i have a ups, changed PSU. Stumped.

  • @MrMichaelBCurtis
    @MrMichaelBCurtis ปีที่แล้ว

    the "stiffer" board is anchored, right next to the flex point. SEE attached post on the thinner card.

  • @plebbsquad5102
    @plebbsquad5102 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    the biggest thing you missed is between that gigabyte card and the asus card, is the asus card has an upright right beside the locking piece that allows a screw to hold it nice and snug, where as the gigabyte card doesnt. that alone will increase structural integrity out the wazoo

    • @bexx1868
      @bexx1868 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Totally agree

  • @SKHYJINX
    @SKHYJINX ปีที่แล้ว +110

    Gigabyte boycott in 3...2...1

    • @GamingNinja4633
      @GamingNinja4633 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I've been avoiding Gigabyte for a decade, they regularly have the most RMA's, they just don't do any QA to save costs, that's why they tend to be the cheapest. Cheap and nasty!

    • @pascalfilion3518
      @pascalfilion3518 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The Canada computer guy show their rma room with 90% gigabyte products 🤦🤦🤦 avoid at all cost

    • @stuartfury3390
      @stuartfury3390 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@GamingNinja4633 theyre far from the cheapest

    • @gokublack8342
      @gokublack8342 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      At this rate we're gonna have to boycott all of the companies 😂

    • @helium5912
      @helium5912 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      or use a gpu support. Or have a Mobo that has extra support.

  • @thedoctor7158
    @thedoctor7158 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is why, since I first got a 2070 super, I have been using brackets to support the weight or doing a vertical mount. PCI-e slots were never designed to hold this kind of weight.

  • @midnightwolf7417
    @midnightwolf7417 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is this still a problem? Because I’m thinking of going with the Gigabyte gaming OC 4090, but I have also looked at the Asus tuf and strix but I hear those have problems with coile whine

  • @patrice6373
    @patrice6373 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Concerns like this are why I went with the MSI 3070ti. It came with a GPU support arm. And the arm ACTUALLY works. Zero sag, even reduced what little vibration that was occurring with previous cards.

    • @SwingArmCity
      @SwingArmCity 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How's that 8gb of vram? Haha

  • @ntzt2150
    @ntzt2150 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    It's funny how the larger size of the card gives you confidence in it's construction and yet it just makes it break more easily.

    • @AlfaPro1337
      @AlfaPro1337 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      People should throw that fallacy logic that bigger = better, or similar.

    • @BoraHorzaGobuchul
      @BoraHorzaGobuchul ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I remember the early days of GPUs with great fondness. When mid-range cards where affordable to middle-class families, and cards were about as big and heavy as today's larger NICs :)

    • @ThisIsMeArnold
      @ThisIsMeArnold ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AlfaPro1337 The bigger the card, the more cooling it's able to provide. It's not difficult to understand.

    • @AlfaPro1337
      @AlfaPro1337 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ThisIsMeArnold There are AIO cards, which are smaller and it's provide even better cooling.
      See, fallacy logic.
      We aren't even talking about cooling solution, this is about build quality.

    • @ThisIsMeArnold
      @ThisIsMeArnold ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AlfaPro1337 So you're just going to deflect and make the conversation about something completely different, some exception?

  • @JTNBottles
    @JTNBottles ปีที่แล้ว

    That stand off near the tab on the Asus card is giving added rigidity to that area also.

  • @bmwg35
    @bmwg35 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Look at the size of them!!! Its not a surprise that support braces and brackets are now becoming a thing, I dont really know why they dont have a fold out adjustable arm to support them built in.