To say that he is aligned to the church's creeds and confessions (7:26) is such a lie. It is sad when you see someone lying with a straight face like him. He could have said it was the whole point of the topic to learn to pastor Jesus's flock in a polarized world, but he preferred to lie. He was "canceled" because he defends positions that the church's "creeds and confessions" are opposed to.
I’m not in the PCA, but I did observe first-hand the reaction from people in the PCA and other churches of similar theology to the announcement that he was scheduled to speak at the GA. It had nothing to do with his daughter or his criticism of Trump, and everything to do with the fact that his more recent writings have suggested a theological drift away from the Westminster standards.
@@KingoftheJuice18 he’s most recently said that he thinks same-sex marriages should remain legal, which is really out of line with what WCF chapters 23 and 24 say about the role of civil government and about marriage.
@@Metal_Auditor Thanks for your reply. When I read those chapters of the WCF, it seems to me that almost all American members of the PCA would likely be in violation of the doctrine found in chapter 23 which states that magistrates of civil government must insure "that the truth of God be kept pure and entire, that all blasphemies and heresies be suppressed, all corruptions and abuses in worship and discipline prevented or reformed." This doctrine is in direct and manifest contradiction to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, such that all those who affirm the binding character of the Constitution have drifted far from chapter 23. In other words, singling out French for not being in perfect alignment with the WCF-if this is in fact true-is arbitrary and probably motivated by other factors. Your thoughts?
@@KingoftheJuice18 the PCA, and most modern Presbyterian denominations, have followed the 1788 American edition which edited the chapter to be favorable toward religious liberty. You can find it on the PCA’s website.
I believe that in the interest of clarity, the thumbnail should not read “My Church Canceled me”. It assumes that French is currently a member of a PCA church. In fact, it sounds like French canceled the ENTIRE denomination because of the political leanings of SOME PCA church members.
I expected objectivity. For the person who sincerely attempts to think through a matter, I frankly found this very disappointing. Jonah, didn't you think David French opened himself up several times to at least where you should have asked for clarifications? You didn't find French sweeping with a very wide brush at times which is very simplistic and problematic? David French was quite disappointing, because, shouldn't he know better that wide-sweeping generalizations are most often inaccurate and most damaging? Very disappointing.
I can promise that it wasn’t a “Twitter tempest” that got French removed, it was thousands of laypeople and elders that wrote to the stated clerk. This is a prime example of tone-deafness.
I have been a member of three churches over the past 43 years, all PCA. No church is perfect because no person is perfect and people make up the church. But, I have never heard or seen anything that validates the mudslinging from David French (and seemingly endorsed by the host) in this discussion. I came to The Dispatch for news and valuable information. What I am hearing is slander, distortion and no objectivity. I am sure there are two sides to this story. A fair and honest report would present both!
You are wrong. What you are asking for is the fallacy of both-sidesism, and it is often inappropriate for communicating the truth. You saying you have never seen any racism in the PCA is another side of the story. French gets to tell his. We can decide which of you we find more credible, barring any more firm evidence. (Though he seems to have taken many verifiable actions based on his story.) I would think that if you were a member of the PCA, and honest, you would definitely consider a report of racism in the church to be "news and valuable information." Instead you discount it (without evidence) because you don't want to hear negative information.
I used to like David French. I also don't like Donald Trump. I got off the French connection when he made ever one who decided to vote for Trump into a bad no good Christian. Just be gracious man! This is why I can't and never will subscribe to the Dispatch although I do think they produce some good work
But this is David's experience at the hands of certain members of the church. This was not set up as a debate between David French and his critics in the PCA. Did you think that's what it was going to be? Plus, you seem to assume that what he is saying, rather than having a possibility of truth, is, in fact, slander. So you've concluded he's lying, slandering and distorting, BECAUSE he experienced these things!!!! Yet YOU HAVE NO IDEA whether he's incorrect. You just assume he's wrong. Now who's the one with no objectivity?
The PCA is taking the right steps to ensure that they do not go down the same path as the UMC and other Mainline denominations. It starts small, with "nice guys" like French picking at the foundations with seemingly small issues, but the overall result is ordaining homosexuals and denying the veracity of Scripture.
…As if David French is advocating the ordination of gay/lesbian clergy in the PCA. That’s laughable. He dissented from the majority of his fellow PCA peers on a few issues and they basically ostracized him. That’s what cults do.
Ha HA There are more versions of Christians than you can imagine. I am a Christian and I doubt there is one other Christian who believes just what I do. You sound interested. Should explore it a bit.
I attend an Eastern Orthodox parish which is theologically very conservative (though that conservatism would be quite different from a PCA). But the members are quite socially & politically diverse. The Church’s moral norms are clear. How those are received and lived out by individuals is, unless it becomes a case of public scandal, between them, their confessor & God. The Holy Spirit guides us into personal virtue, not worldly patterns of thought & party - though all things in life eventually come under the Lordship of Christ through repentance. But that will make one look increasingly like Christ & His saints, not political & social figures.
@@emjaydark2811 There are Christians who preach another gospel, carrying the virtue signaling values of the Times into the Church. The kingdom of God is not the same thing as the kingdom of the Times but you’d barely understand this by reading and listening to French.
As to the ugliness and racism on the right, I always think of the seminar I took as a grad student at Penn. As a conservative, I was pretty much alone politically at the Graduate School of Education. As one might imagine, I got into a lot of debates with my liberal fellow students. One day, a fellow student said to me "you come by your beliefs honestly and in good faith through academic study, a lot of other Republicans come from uglier places to their views." I dismissed it at the time as left wing garbage. It took seeing how people responded to Trump coming into the picture to realize how right he was.
Until you advocate for outlawing having children because some of those children will grow up and commit crime we all know it isnt actually crime or whatever other excuse you care about. @move_i_got_this5659
@move_i_got_this5659that’s cope, you said “give an example” then when you get it…then you move the goalposts… go look up the lost cause myth and explain to me why so many southern evangelical Christians adhere to the racist “lost cause myth”?
@move_i_got_this5659 Who said it was against the law? Try "it's disgusting." The border is a huge problem. That's not an excuse for people who call themself "Christian" to speak in such a despicable manner.
@@Beerman111980 That there are extremists and nasty people on any side of the isle should not have been a revelation to you. The liberal student wasn’t implying that there are some right wing extremists. She was implying that most Republicans are right wing extremists and that you were an exception. She was wrong then and is wrong now. You aren’t special, and neither is David French. Most of us are just as reasonable as you and him. But yeah, there are extremists, but I would argue that more extreme direction of the left side of the isle has made many on the right more extreme too, as has the rise of Trump. This goes along with history- the rise of the extreme left pushes many to the extreme right in response. If you didn’t realise there are extreme idiots on the right hand side of the isle, then you were very naive. But by far I would argue the biggest problem today is the pervasiveness of the hard left who have basically taken over major institutions like the media and education.
Appreciation for Jonah's "If you had told someone back in...." It's one the best academic and historical exercises for contrafactualism, if you believe in the value of contrafactualism. This contrafactual statement reminds us how quickly things change and how little we can predict what's in front of us and how people, including ourselves, will react.
Honestly, French sees anyone who disagrees with him as Maga... I'm indifferent towards politics... but French is not a man of character who deserves a platform... he's a contrarian for the sake of contrarian stances that the world find palpable.... I mean look at this guy? He cares more about himself, he can't get over himself and his ministry... As a dude in ministry... any Pastor finds everything against him... read Exodus and Moses... Childish leadership at the end of the day...
I understand if you don't like his opinions or how he feels about his experiences. But your accusations that he "cares more about himself, and can't get over himself" ignore the possibility that what he experienced was unjust and unChristian by the church he attended. That doesn't seem to matter to you at all.
@@rogerlau4932 he uses his platform selfishly at the expense of the reputation of the church. There were processes he could have used or… he had other options. Childish, selfish, and self interested. He should never have been invited and his platformed public response to “potentially” being wronged proves he is not a noble leader. “When one of you has a grievance against another, does he dare go to law before the unrighteous instead of the saints? Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? To have lawsuits at all with one another is already a defeat for you. Why not rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be defrauded? But you yourselves wrong and defraud-even your own brothers!” 1 Corinthians 6:1-8 ESV bible.com/bible/59/1co.6.1-8.ESV
@@rogerlau4932 It does matter. But French puts himself forward as a leader... he uses a public platform, His public platform, to his own self interested benefit. His actions and responses publicly are neither noble nor admirable... The response served him at the expense of others and ultimately stem from what seems a self-righteous spirit. He might have experienced what was unjust and unchristian (though not sure what unchristian means if we believe total depravity is the context for needing salvation) actions by the church. But there are processes by which he could have confronted them. Or he could have suffered the wrongs. Instead he, as a public figure and leader (in some sense) chose to drag the churches reputation down for the sake of his own image, ego, narcissism. Because he's puts himself and suggests his advising is necessary for the church... he should hold himself and be held to a higher standard. (TLDR how he was treated does matter, in critiquing his actions and response... it does not) 1Cor:6 If any of you has a dispute with another, do you dare to take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the Lord’s people? 2 Or do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? 3 Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! 4 Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, do you ask for a ruling from those whose way of life is scorned in the church? 5 I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? 6 But instead, one brother takes another to court-and this in front of unbelievers! 7 The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated? My observations, or accusations, concerning his response and actions stand firm.
He should have never been invited to speak. He was not a PCA member, nor attending a PCA church at the time. He left the PCA long before this. Perhaps folks should do more balanced research before drawing (erroneous) conclusions.
@@traceyedson9652 But surely you can grasp the irony of a group whose ostensible purpose is to spread the message of Christ being such a practictioner of the opposite spirit, no? Like, wouldnt a pro-literacy group having members hosting book burnings give you pause? Or a vegan group having frequent pork roasts?
Each denomination has its own struggles, and even cradle Episcopalians like me sometimes roll our eyes about it, but it is a truth that the American Episcopal church is doctrinally tolerant, to a fault. We struggle, but we don't turn any one away from the altar. I love my home church and I can only imagine how hurt you are. I have a precious miracle 2 year old granddaughter (I expect your child is no longer 2), a similar medical diagnosis to Nancy's, and a subscription to The Dispatch I got because of you. (And cancelled my NYT subscription at about the same time. I did not appreciate that irony.) I recommend Rachel Held Evans' book, Searching for Sunday as timeless and to the point.
Sorry to hear what occurred at your church and with the event you were invited to attend. Personally, I have always wondered how "Never Trump" fit into a biblical person's worldview, considering how the phrase suggests that the person in question is irredeemable. Thank you for the work each of you do and the time you took to put this content together.
Here is a thought. Most "never Trump" people are not saying that should Trump repent in ways that are believable, they would still oppose him. Forgiveness of offenses does not exclude taking their past behavior into account as they move forward, just a victim of abuse may not be able to trust their former abuser and probably should not trust them. I am in that camp. I take his pronouncements seriously as well as his past behavior. I can't ever imagine voting for him but that is a judgement call.
I don't think that anyone is "irredeemable," nor does Never Trump imply any such thing. It simply means that we won't vote for a man who has shown time and time again that he is utterly unfit for any public office. If Trump were to demonstrably, provably, completely change his ways (at the age of 78), perhaps one could reconsider. I'm not holding my breath.
"Irredeemable"? He's running for President, not to stay out of Hell. There are plenty of people in this country who have sinned and who deserve our mercy, that doesn't mean they're qualified to be President. And keep in mind, Trump hasn't shown an OUNCE of remorse for anything he's done, and that's when he's even admitted to doing them. The first step towards redemption is admitting fault. I think a much better question is how a biblical person's worldview squares with SUPPORTING Trump for President, given his profoundly unrepentant immoral behavior.
@@terrycast Suggesting "never" someone means that they can never achieve the fitness required for office. They can't correct, improve, or change (which is what irredeemable means). You say so when you suggest that he must "demonstrably, provably, [and] completely change his ways" for you to reconsider. I know, it's a tough mirror to look into. Hopefully, David will give it a try.
@@richarddean3154 It is one thing to repent and change course, to be redeemed in the eyes of God and one’s community. It does not follow that you reinstate such a person into public office or other position of power. French has demonstrated enough Christian character to convince me he would embrace and support a repentant Trump…not as a candidate for a powerful position, but as a fellow Christian.
Church Pastors and Ministers are very very human. Courageousness is very often the first victim in their character decline. To go into the various reasons why that's so would take hours. Enough to say they have both all the same desires and all the same fears everyone else has. Contrary to the beliefs of some they are not saints. They are someone doing a job they were hired to do that they get payed for doing. They have bosses and those bosses aren't up above. They have to please the bosses if they want to keep their job and continue to get payed. It really isn't hard to understand. You just need to to take the blinders off and get honest with yourself. Integrity is one of the first victims of fear and selfishness. This video sounds like disillusionment occured because of a failure of The PCA to rise above the human nature toward fear and allowing it to cause them to do the wrong thing instead of the right thing. Which is what those same spiritual leaders tell the pew sitters they are to do when faced with such a challenge, but they don't do it themselves. They hide statements like " we made a mistake. We didn't realize. We need to maintain unity. " It's all very predictable if you've stopped kidding yourself about who these people really are. I stopped kidding myself a long time ago. I'll never associate with an Evangelical Church ever again. Evangelical Church is a very large umbrella. I included all of them.
I'm sorry, but David French seems like he enjoys whining and troublemaking. He shouldn't have been invited to that particular panel. They made a course correction, end of story.
I hope you have the opportunity to experience the abuse David French experienced. Hopefully there will be Christians that show you more compassion than you seem unable to do.
When I grew up in a fundamentalist church, that was apolitical. The slogan was speak where the bible speaks and be silent where the bible is silent. I had no idea what politics the members of my church had. Unfortunately, the church later split when John Birchers tried to take over. The reasoning behind the apolitical stance was that politics is inherently morally compromised. Politics is concerned with the ends and religion is concerned with the means. To appeal to a majority, unethical people and morally compromised positions need to be embraced. For example, the republicans in 1860 had to appeal to former know-nothings and some white supremacists (people who opposed slavery but wanted to expel blacks from the US). I am glad you were able to find a good church that has decent values. I am sorry for the persecution of you and your family.
Religion and politics are apples and oranges. Politics is about settling disputes about public laws and policies and administering the results of the compromises with as much justice as can be obtained. Religion is about spiritual truth that transcends anything politics can or should do anything about. It's the reason why church and state have tended to be separated institutionally in the history of Christendom.
Yes he was a victim. Do you believe he has a right to feel angry? Apparently not. If you ever get victimized the way he did, you'd better pray that there are Christians who show you compassion, something that seems sorely lacking in you.
For historical background, the PCA is a theological, not institutional as far as I know, heir of the Southern Presbyterian tradition. It's connected to what was the Presbyterian Church in the Confederate States of America that formed during the Civil War and was clearly led by racists leaders (Dabney, and others). Some Christians also left to Brazil after the Civil War and were known as Confederados (one URCNA pastor I known recounted a descendant of a Confederado referring to a black person as a n----r). The PCA also had segregationists into the mid 1900s. I remember when David was still in the PCA and he would say certain things that revealed his lack of awareness of the PCA's history. I guess he came to know certain things through experience. Conservative (theological and political) Christianity, specifically Reformed confessionalism, is compatible with real racism. The history that includes influential churchmen, along with people that still live, proves it.
Indicative of a satanic maga cult movement within the church. Trump is one of Satan's most useful minions although probably at a lower level than Putin and Xi.
My question to Mr. French would be this: there are plenty of Liberal and Progressive Christian denominations, even leftist Presbyterian Churches to choose from. They all conform to your political ideology. Why not join one of them? Why stick with a conservative church that does not align with your secular political views? You're like someone who goes to a SSPX Church but hates the Latin mass. It's crazy. You're a leftist. That was exposed many years ago. Whether you came to those views over time or always held them and worked among conservative circles for whatever reason, people know who you are now. Go worship with people like you who will accept you for who you are. Trust me, you will be a lot happier than keeping up this facade. And if somehow you really don't understand that you are a leftist, the I pray that God will help you go through some self-analysis to realize who you are; again, you and your family will be a lot happier.
I can't tell if you are uninformed or dishonest. David French has been a staunch conservative for decades. He was invited to speak by the PCA and accepted, as a favor, knowing he would be controversial. Also, the is an immoral position in the 21st Century.
@@ka9fonTrumpism isn’t very “right.” And authoritarianism isn’t “right,” either. One of the difficulties with MAGA is that it’s not politically centered (I don’t mean Center, I mean it’s new & hasn’t gained equilibrium & gravitas.) MAGA drew fro all over the spectrum, so to make it politically located is mis-applied. This is why it took establishment GOP either a long time to tolerate or it hasn’t done so. A mere wave of the hand that it’s This or That won’t add anything to the needed critique. It only seems to prove that the elite & establishment want it to just go away. If you want to add a voice of reason, you’ll need to do the work.
So what you're saying is, "Get out, because theologically conservative churches are for politically conservative Christians." Isn't that the message of his critics at the PCA church? You tell him, "You will be a lot happier if you leave." The truth is, the people asking him to leave would be a lot happier, because they only want people like themselves in their church. I assume that's the same message you'd give to people visiting your church.
@ Well, I’m a lawyer with a lawyer father and 3 lawyer siblings, all of whom married lawyers except for one. I think I can speak w authority in that area.
@rogerlau4932 Nope. But then we don't know that new visitors are bad actors who are being paid by Democrat Party interests to intentionally lie and distort the truth for their political gain either.
To say that he is aligned to the church's creeds and confessions (7:26) is such a lie. It is sad when you see someone lying with a straight face like him. He could have said it was the whole point of the topic to learn to pastor Jesus's flock in a polarized world, but he preferred to lie. He was "canceled" because he defends positions that the church's "creeds and confessions" are opposed to.
@@ffcortial Progressives lie, and unless opposed by good men will destroy a church and denomination.
I’m not in the PCA, but I did observe first-hand the reaction from people in the PCA and other churches of similar theology to the announcement that he was scheduled to speak at the GA. It had nothing to do with his daughter or his criticism of Trump, and everything to do with the fact that his more recent writings have suggested a theological drift away from the Westminster standards.
thank you
That doesn't seem very plausible as the reason he was cancelled. But can you give an example or two of his supposed "drift"?
@@KingoftheJuice18 he’s most recently said that he thinks same-sex marriages should remain legal, which is really out of line with what WCF chapters 23 and 24 say about the role of civil government and about marriage.
@@Metal_Auditor Thanks for your reply. When I read those chapters of the WCF, it seems to me that almost all American members of the PCA would likely be in violation of the doctrine found in chapter 23 which states that magistrates of civil government must insure "that the truth of God be kept pure and entire, that all blasphemies and heresies be suppressed, all corruptions and abuses in worship and discipline prevented or reformed." This doctrine is in direct and manifest contradiction to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, such that all those who affirm the binding character of the Constitution have drifted far from chapter 23. In other words, singling out French for not being in perfect alignment with the WCF-if this is in fact true-is arbitrary and probably motivated by other factors. Your thoughts?
@@KingoftheJuice18 the PCA, and most modern Presbyterian denominations, have followed the 1788 American edition which edited the chapter to be favorable toward religious liberty. You can find it on the PCA’s website.
Our church has courts. If you had people in the church being overtly racist towards your family why did you not resolve it through church discipline?
I believe that in the interest of clarity, the thumbnail should not read “My Church Canceled me”. It assumes that French is currently a member of a PCA church. In fact, it sounds like French canceled the ENTIRE denomination because of the political leanings of SOME PCA church members.
I expected objectivity.
For the person who sincerely attempts to think through a matter, I frankly found this very disappointing.
Jonah, didn't you think David French opened himself up several times to at least where you should have asked for clarifications?
You didn't find French sweeping with a very wide brush at times which is very simplistic and problematic?
David French was quite disappointing, because, shouldn't he know better that wide-sweeping generalizations are most often inaccurate and most damaging?
Very disappointing.
I can promise that it wasn’t a “Twitter tempest” that got French removed, it was thousands of laypeople and elders that wrote to the stated clerk. This is a prime example of tone-deafness.
I have been a member of three churches over the past 43 years, all PCA. No church is perfect because no person is perfect and people make up the church. But, I have never heard or seen anything that validates the mudslinging from David French (and seemingly endorsed by the host) in this discussion. I came to The Dispatch for news and valuable information. What I am hearing is slander, distortion and no objectivity. I am sure there are two sides to this story. A fair and honest report would present both!
You are wrong. What you are asking for is the fallacy of both-sidesism, and it is often inappropriate for communicating the truth.
You saying you have never seen any racism in the PCA is another side of the story. French gets to tell his. We can decide which of you we find more credible, barring any more firm evidence. (Though he seems to have taken many verifiable actions based on his story.)
I would think that if you were a member of the PCA, and honest, you would definitely consider a report of racism in the church to be "news and valuable information." Instead you discount it (without evidence) because you don't want to hear negative information.
I used to like David French. I also don't like Donald Trump. I got off the French connection when he made ever one who decided to vote for Trump into a bad no good Christian. Just be gracious man! This is why I can't and never will subscribe to the Dispatch although I do think they produce some good work
But this is David's experience at the hands of certain members of the church. This was not set up as a debate between David French and his critics in the PCA. Did you think that's what it was going to be? Plus, you seem to assume that what he is saying, rather than having a possibility of truth, is, in fact, slander. So you've concluded he's lying, slandering and distorting, BECAUSE he experienced these things!!!! Yet YOU HAVE NO IDEA whether he's incorrect. You just assume he's wrong. Now who's the one with no objectivity?
The PCA is taking the right steps to ensure that they do not go down the same path as the UMC and other Mainline denominations. It starts small, with "nice guys" like French picking at the foundations with seemingly small issues, but the overall result is ordaining homosexuals and denying the veracity of Scripture.
…As if David French is advocating the ordination of gay/lesbian clergy in the PCA. That’s laughable. He dissented from the majority of his fellow PCA peers on a few issues and they basically ostracized him. That’s what cults do.
I wish David would be more descriptive about the race issue and his daughter. Who, when, what was said?
It seems to me that more liberal Christians and more conservative Christians can't both be Christians. How can they be the same religion?
Ha HA There are more versions of Christians than you can imagine. I am a Christian and I doubt there is one other Christian who believes just what I do. You sound interested. Should explore it a bit.
I attend an Eastern Orthodox parish which is theologically very conservative (though that conservatism would be quite different from a PCA). But the members are quite socially & politically diverse. The Church’s moral norms are clear. How those are received and lived out by individuals is, unless it becomes a case of public scandal, between them, their confessor & God. The Holy Spirit guides us into personal virtue, not worldly patterns of thought & party - though all things in life eventually come under the Lordship of Christ through repentance. But that will make one look increasingly like Christ & His saints, not political & social figures.
@@emjaydark2811 There are Christians who preach another gospel, carrying the virtue signaling values of the Times into the Church. The kingdom of God is not the same thing as the kingdom of the Times but you’d barely understand this by reading and listening to French.
As to the ugliness and racism on the right, I always think of the seminar I took as a grad student at Penn. As a conservative, I was pretty much alone politically at the Graduate School of Education. As one might imagine, I got into a lot of debates with my liberal fellow students. One day, a fellow student said to me "you come by your beliefs honestly and in good faith through academic study, a lot of other Republicans come from uglier places to their views." I dismissed it at the time as left wing garbage. It took seeing how people responded to Trump coming into the picture to realize how right he was.
@move_i_got_this5659 Uh, maybe start with so-called "Christians" referring to David's daughter by the n-word.
Until you advocate for outlawing having children because some of those children will grow up and commit crime we all know it isnt actually crime or whatever other excuse you care about. @move_i_got_this5659
@move_i_got_this5659that’s cope, you said “give an example” then when you get it…then you move the goalposts… go look up the lost cause myth and explain to me why so many southern evangelical Christians adhere to the racist “lost cause myth”?
@move_i_got_this5659 Who said it was against the law? Try "it's disgusting." The border is a huge problem. That's not an excuse for people who call themself "Christian" to speak in such a despicable manner.
@@Beerman111980 That there are extremists and nasty people on any side of the isle should not have been a revelation to you. The liberal student wasn’t implying that there are some right wing extremists. She was implying that most Republicans are right wing extremists and that you were an exception. She was wrong then and is wrong now. You aren’t special, and neither is David French. Most of us are just as reasonable as you and him. But yeah, there are extremists, but I would argue that more extreme direction of the left side of the isle has made many on the right more extreme too, as has the rise of Trump. This goes along with history- the rise of the extreme left pushes many to the extreme right in response. If you didn’t realise there are extreme idiots on the right hand side of the isle, then you were very naive. But by far I would argue the biggest problem today is the pervasiveness of the hard left who have basically taken over major institutions like the media and education.
Appreciation for Jonah's "If you had told someone back in...." It's one the best academic and historical exercises for contrafactualism, if you believe in the value of contrafactualism. This contrafactual statement reminds us how quickly things change and how little we can predict what's in front of us and how people, including ourselves, will react.
This is the saddest thing that I've watched in awhile. I can't believe the American church has come to this.
Honestly, French sees anyone who disagrees with him as Maga... I'm indifferent towards politics... but French is not a man of character who deserves a platform... he's a contrarian for the sake of contrarian stances that the world find palpable.... I mean look at this guy? He cares more about himself, he can't get over himself and his ministry... As a dude in ministry... any Pastor finds everything against him... read Exodus and Moses... Childish leadership at the end of the day...
I understand if you don't like his opinions or how he feels about his experiences. But your accusations that he "cares more about himself, and can't get over himself" ignore the possibility that what he experienced was unjust and unChristian by the church he attended. That doesn't seem to matter to you at all.
@@rogerlau4932 he uses his platform selfishly at the expense of the reputation of the church. There were processes he could have used or… he had other options. Childish, selfish, and self interested. He should never have been invited and his platformed public response to “potentially” being wronged proves he is not a noble leader. “When one of you has a grievance against another, does he dare go to law before the unrighteous instead of the saints? Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if the world is to be judged by you, are you incompetent to try trivial cases? Do you not know that we are to judge angels? How much more, then, matters pertaining to this life! So if you have such cases, why do you lay them before those who have no standing in the church? I say this to your shame. Can it be that there is no one among you wise enough to settle a dispute between the brothers, but brother goes to law against brother, and that before unbelievers? To have lawsuits at all with one another is already a defeat for you. Why not rather suffer wrong? Why not rather be defrauded? But you yourselves wrong and defraud-even your own brothers!”
1 Corinthians 6:1-8 ESV
bible.com/bible/59/1co.6.1-8.ESV
@@rogerlau4932 It does matter. But French puts himself forward as a leader... he uses a public platform, His public platform, to his own self interested benefit. His actions and responses publicly are neither noble nor admirable... The response served him at the expense of others and ultimately stem from what seems a self-righteous spirit. He might have experienced what was unjust and unchristian (though not sure what unchristian means if we believe total depravity is the context for needing salvation) actions by the church. But there are processes by which he could have confronted them. Or he could have suffered the wrongs. Instead he, as a public figure and leader (in some sense) chose to drag the churches reputation down for the sake of his own image, ego, narcissism. Because he's puts himself and suggests his advising is necessary for the church... he should hold himself and be held to a higher standard. (TLDR how he was treated does matter, in critiquing his actions and response... it does not)
1Cor:6 If any of you has a dispute with another, do you dare to take it before the ungodly for judgment instead of before the Lord’s people? 2 Or do you not know that the Lord’s people will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? 3 Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! 4 Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, do you ask for a ruling from those whose way of life is scorned in the church? 5 I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers? 6 But instead, one brother takes another to court-and this in front of unbelievers!
7 The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated?
My observations, or accusations, concerning his response and actions stand firm.
He should have never been invited to speak. He was not a PCA member, nor attending a PCA church at the time. He left the PCA long before this. Perhaps folks should do more balanced research before drawing (erroneous) conclusions.
First of all, that's the church's fault. Secondly, THAT is your takeaway from this? Not that there is a real problem with racism in the PCA? It's ?!
Why are pca members so hateful?
@@arthurswanson3285selection bias
@@arthurswanson3285probably the same reason humans in every other group are.
@@traceyedson9652 But surely you can grasp the irony of a group whose ostensible purpose is to spread the message of Christ being such a practictioner of the opposite spirit, no?
Like, wouldnt a pro-literacy group having members hosting book burnings give you pause? Or a vegan group having frequent pork roasts?
Why not PCUSA as a new Church?
I just have so much respect and love for David and Nancy French. They have been so principled and courageous through all of this.
This is a problem of an individual PCA church. Don't tar all PCA churches with the same brush.
French is such a drama queen 😂
Does his dramatic recalling of injustice by his church at all suggest that it was injustice? Or would you just tell him to suck it up?
Each denomination has its own struggles, and even cradle Episcopalians like me sometimes roll our eyes about it, but it is a truth that the American Episcopal church is doctrinally tolerant, to a fault. We struggle, but we don't turn any one away from the altar. I love my home church and I can only imagine how hurt you are. I have a precious miracle 2 year old granddaughter (I expect your child is no longer 2), a similar medical diagnosis to Nancy's, and a subscription to The Dispatch I got because of you. (And cancelled my NYT subscription at about the same time. I did not appreciate that irony.) I recommend Rachel Held Evans' book, Searching for Sunday as timeless and to the point.
Sorry to hear what occurred at your church and with the event you were invited to attend. Personally, I have always wondered how "Never Trump" fit into a biblical person's worldview, considering how the phrase suggests that the person in question is irredeemable. Thank you for the work each of you do and the time you took to put this content together.
Here is a thought. Most "never Trump" people are not saying that should Trump repent in ways that are believable, they would still oppose him. Forgiveness of offenses does not exclude taking their past behavior into account as they move forward, just a victim of abuse may not be able to trust their former abuser and probably should not trust them. I am in that camp. I take his pronouncements seriously as well as his past behavior. I can't ever imagine voting for him but that is a judgement call.
I don't think that anyone is "irredeemable," nor does Never Trump imply any such thing. It simply means that we won't vote for a man who has shown time and time again that he is utterly unfit for any public office. If Trump were to demonstrably, provably, completely change his ways (at the age of 78), perhaps one could reconsider. I'm not holding my breath.
"Irredeemable"? He's running for President, not to stay out of Hell. There are plenty of people in this country who have sinned and who deserve our mercy, that doesn't mean they're qualified to be President. And keep in mind, Trump hasn't shown an OUNCE of remorse for anything he's done, and that's when he's even admitted to doing them. The first step towards redemption is admitting fault. I think a much better question is how a biblical person's worldview squares with SUPPORTING Trump for President, given his profoundly unrepentant immoral behavior.
@@terrycast Suggesting "never" someone means that they can never achieve the fitness required for office. They can't correct, improve, or change (which is what irredeemable means). You say so when you suggest that he must "demonstrably, provably, [and] completely change his ways" for you to reconsider. I know, it's a tough mirror to look into. Hopefully, David will give it a try.
@@richarddean3154 It is one thing to repent and change course, to be redeemed in the eyes of God and one’s community. It does not follow that you reinstate such a person into public office or other position of power. French has demonstrated enough Christian character to convince me he would embrace and support a repentant Trump…not as a candidate for a powerful position, but as a fellow Christian.
Church Pastors and Ministers are very very human. Courageousness is very often the first victim in their character decline. To go into the various reasons why that's so would take hours. Enough to say they have both all the same desires and all the same fears everyone else has. Contrary to the beliefs of some they are not saints. They are someone doing a job they were hired to do that they get payed for doing. They have bosses and those bosses aren't up above. They have to please the bosses if they want to keep their job and continue to get payed. It really isn't hard to understand. You just need to to take the blinders off and get honest with yourself. Integrity is one of the first victims of fear and selfishness. This video sounds like disillusionment occured because of a failure of The PCA to rise above the human nature toward fear and allowing it to cause them to do the wrong thing instead of the right thing. Which is what those same spiritual leaders tell the pew sitters they are to do when faced with such a challenge, but they don't do it themselves. They hide statements like " we made a mistake. We didn't realize. We need to maintain unity. " It's all very predictable if you've stopped kidding yourself about who these people really are. I stopped kidding myself a long time ago. I'll never associate with an Evangelical Church ever again. Evangelical Church is a very large umbrella. I included all of them.
I'm sorry, but David French seems like he enjoys whining and troublemaking. He shouldn't have been invited to that particular panel. They made a course correction, end of story.
BS
I hope you have the opportunity to experience the abuse David French experienced. Hopefully there will be Christians that show you more compassion than you seem unable to do.
When I grew up in a fundamentalist church, that was apolitical. The slogan was speak where the bible speaks and be silent where the bible is silent. I had no idea what politics the members of my church had. Unfortunately, the church later split when John Birchers tried to take over.
The reasoning behind the apolitical stance was that politics is inherently morally compromised. Politics is concerned with the ends and religion is concerned with the means. To appeal to a majority, unethical people and morally compromised positions need to be embraced. For example, the republicans in 1860 had to appeal to former know-nothings and some white supremacists (people who opposed slavery but wanted to expel blacks from the US).
I am glad you were able to find a good church that has decent values. I am sorry for the persecution of you and your family.
Religion and politics are apples and oranges. Politics is about settling disputes about public laws and policies and administering the results of the compromises with as much justice as can be obtained. Religion is about spiritual truth that transcends anything politics can or should do anything about.
It's the reason why church and state have tended to be separated institutionally in the history of Christendom.
Did not know the Presbys swallowed the Trump Kool-aid.
So sad.
Those in the PCA, yes. Those in the Presbyterian Church USA, no.
My parents are in the cult. It’s sad.
@@thenewunderground8692PCUSA definitely swallowed a kool-aid.
@@traceyedson9652 not the kind that results in shunning people from congregations because of mindless devotion to a bronzer painted lunatic.
David didn't bend the knee in front of The Mad King how dare you.
Damn dude, PCA people in the comments here are not giving their denomination a good look.
Finally! Someone noticed that!
Are they more loyal to the PCA than biblical justice and Christian responbility? Could be.
Views to comment ratio
To disagree with French is seen as malicious. He is a pathetic and angry victim constantly.
Yes he was a victim. Do you believe he has a right to feel angry? Apparently not. If you ever get victimized the way he did, you'd better pray that there are Christians who show you compassion, something that seems sorely lacking in you.
Are you US PRESIDENT CANDIDATE? Again Trump? When?? And you are a PCA???
No wonder they cancelled you!!!!
For historical background, the PCA is a theological, not institutional as far as I know, heir of the Southern Presbyterian tradition. It's connected to what was the Presbyterian Church in the Confederate States of America that formed during the Civil War and was clearly led by racists leaders (Dabney, and others). Some Christians also left to Brazil after the Civil War and were known as Confederados (one URCNA pastor I known recounted a descendant of a Confederado referring to a black person as a n----r). The PCA also had segregationists into the mid 1900s.
I remember when David was still in the PCA and he would say certain things that revealed his lack of awareness of the PCA's history. I guess he came to know certain things through experience.
Conservative (theological and political) Christianity, specifically Reformed confessionalism, is compatible with real racism. The history that includes influential churchmen, along with people that still live, proves it.
Who knew that Trump could take away the joy of adopting a child from Africa?
Indicative of a satanic maga cult movement within the church. Trump is one of Satan's most useful minions although probably at a lower level than Putin and Xi.
Look up Russian black icon Jesus
I see a lot of United Riech folks on here
My question to Mr. French would be this: there are plenty of Liberal and Progressive Christian denominations, even leftist Presbyterian Churches to choose from. They all conform to your political ideology. Why not join one of them? Why stick with a conservative church that does not align with your secular political views? You're like someone who goes to a SSPX Church but hates the Latin mass. It's crazy. You're a leftist. That was exposed many years ago. Whether you came to those views over time or always held them and worked among conservative circles for whatever reason, people know who you are now. Go worship with people like you who will accept you for who you are. Trust me, you will be a lot happier than keeping up this facade. And if somehow you really don't understand that you are a leftist, the I pray that God will help you go through some self-analysis to realize who you are; again, you and your family will be a lot happier.
French is a traditional, center right conservative. Trumpism is not GOP but extreme right, some borderline fascist and dominionist.
I can't tell if you are uninformed or dishonest. David French has been a staunch conservative for decades. He was invited to speak by the PCA and accepted, as a favor, knowing he would be controversial.
Also, the is an immoral position in the 21st Century.
@@ka9fonTrumpism isn’t very “right.” And authoritarianism isn’t “right,” either. One of the difficulties with MAGA is that it’s not politically centered (I don’t mean Center, I mean it’s new & hasn’t gained equilibrium & gravitas.) MAGA drew fro all over the spectrum, so to make it politically located is mis-applied. This is why it took establishment GOP either a long time to tolerate or it hasn’t done so. A mere wave of the hand that it’s This or That won’t add anything to the needed critique. It only seems to prove that the elite & establishment want it to just go away. If you want to add a voice of reason, you’ll need to do the work.
@@brianstacey2679 He claims he’s a victim when anyone pushes back against his efforts to remake institutions into his left-leaning image.
So what you're saying is, "Get out, because theologically conservative churches are for politically conservative Christians." Isn't that the message of his critics at the PCA church? You tell him, "You will be a lot happier if you leave." The truth is, the people asking him to leave would be a lot happier, because they only want people like themselves in their church. I assume that's the same message you'd give to people visiting your church.
French - typical disingenuous lawyer.
It's nice to know you don't subscribe to stereotyping.
@ Well, I’m a lawyer with a lawyer father and 3 lawyer siblings, all of whom married lawyers except for one. I think I can speak w authority in that area.
You got canceled. That’s all. Why are you whining? Victim?
I’ve never seen any group more whiny than conservative, white, male boomers.
I bet that's what the Jewish religious leaders thought when they saw the man beat up on the road, in the Parable of the Good Samaritan.
AWESOME!! Cancelled this fake conservative and deservedly so, I might add. Keep your Leftist politics out of the church, champ.
Do you grill new visitors to your church with this filtering system?
@rogerlau4932 Nope. But then we don't know that new visitors are bad actors who are being paid by Democrat Party interests to intentionally lie and distort the truth for their political gain either.