Should Christians vote for Trump? Eric Metaxas vs David French

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @kathyburg-westberg6531
    @kathyburg-westberg6531 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    June 1, 2022--------How do you feel now David French?

    • @donnabowman1103
      @donnabowman1103 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He still feels the same. He is awful and in my opinion an enemy of Christianity.
      He is in a group called the After Party Christian movement. He is trying to get Christians to go soft on morals and agree with the culture of secularism.
      He is pro Biden.

    • @nicoleanderson8012
      @nicoleanderson8012 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My thoughts exactly!

    • @TheChristineLindsay
      @TheChristineLindsay 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Brilliant, right on David French. So relieved a conservative Christian is speaking against Trump.

    • @thearamsay9578
      @thearamsay9578 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Neither Eric nor David even has mentioned, at least as I’m listening to this has mentioned the fact that Donald Trump made fun of that reporter who had a disability. He has no respect for people with disabilities. He has a nephew that I believe is autistic and the father was Donald Trump’s nephew I guess. Anyway, he asked uncle Don for some money to take care of this disabled son. And Trump was not only unwilling to give it but he said just let him die. Even Trump‘s own family are coming out against him. And now with a project 2025 coming around… The thing is, the world recognizes that this guy is a shyster. When Christian say well, we’re not choosing a pastor, we’re choosing a president, sweeping all this guy,’s moral peccadillos under the carpet like it doesn’t matter, could you imagine the apostle Paul doing that?

    • @TesterBoy
      @TesterBoy หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheChristineLindsayFrench is NOT a conservative

  • @EmmanuelGoldstein74
    @EmmanuelGoldstein74 3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    The debate begins at 10:33 if you want to fast forward the excruciatingly and tedious introduction.

  • @krischampion4435
    @krischampion4435 4 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    You can't vote the Kingdom of God into being. Christ didn't come to earth to save Roman government. That is why character is destiny, and why it is more important than any policy.

    • @lancehaseltine494
      @lancehaseltine494 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      How would you describe the character of a man, like Biden, who supports/defends/excuses the murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent lives? How would you describe the character of a man, like French, who would let someone like Biden rule the country because he can't stand a buffoon? I'd say both sorts of men wallow in the same filth.

    • @dreyvas2
      @dreyvas2 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@lancehaseltine494 Psst. Abortion rates actually declined by 25% under Obama - probably more sharply than under Trump. Trump has not made any progress toward outlawing it. Best case scenario, Roe is overturned and it goes back to the states - the blue states where all the people live will maintain full abortion access, and clinics will probably be built on the borders of red states. Read David's article about this - the winner of this election is not going to impact abortion rates in any substantial way.
      Meanwhile, Trump has almost certainly paid for one of his mistresses/flings to get an abortion at some point. We don't know for sure because his buddy at the National Enquirer literally pays the women Trump bangs for the rights to their stories (with NDAs) and then sits on them so word doesn't get out.
      And I dunno if Trump has killed hundreds of thousands, but he's probably gotten at least a few thousand people killed by holding giant non-masked, non-socially distanced rallies everywhere, discouraging compliance with COVID guidelines, and knowingly lying about the danger of the virus (as caught on tape with Bob Woodward).

    • @Romans8-9
      @Romans8-9 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@dreyvas2 Trump rallies bad. BLM mass protests totally fine I guess?

    • @Puddy777
      @Puddy777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@lancehaseltine494 As I understand Mr Biden is not for abortion but the right for a woman to choose. I don't agree with abortion per se but God gave us choice. We have to be accountable to Him in the end. I believe in God's forgiveness for those who truly want to turn away from wrong doing etc. The emotional, mental and physical pain that women inevitably experience as a result of abortion needs compassion not judgement by those who are not God. Society needs to get back to better Christian values and look at how our young people are looking to early sexual experiences as a way of finding love and affirmation imo. Let's get back to living as Christ would have us live, Spirit filled and putting our hope in Him. I am a flawed Christian and have all the struggles any human has. I fully believe in Christ and his truth and pray we can all find this and follow Him. Wishing all good things to all who read this xxx🙏🌈💐

    • @lancehaseltine494
      @lancehaseltine494 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dreyvas2 Trump has not made any difference? Is that why the liberals, at every chance, threw out every lie, every conspiracy theory (about Russia for example) every innuendo in order to destroy him and his Supreme Court appointees? Your spreading rumors about his possible infidelities are telling. Let's talk about realities. In spite of his crude, rude, sinful behavior, he's actually done things worthy of praise. Your rumor-mongering are worthy of nothing but contempt.

  • @akajefe
    @akajefe 4 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Eric Metaxas: "[The Democrats] don't believe in God or any moral order."
    Also Eric Metaxas: "I'm not aware of [Trump's] faith.
    This tells you everything you need to know about how partisanship controls his views on faith.

    • @DanielPaulAbraham
      @DanielPaulAbraham 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Trump doesn't need to believe in a moral order as long as he is implementing it

    • @kazamareenkurios8197
      @kazamareenkurios8197 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Actually, it sounds like you're looking for a pastor, preacher, spiritual leader? POTUS is pro life, pro religious freedom, pro law & order, pro military, cops etc.. His policies align w/Biblical Values unlike dem. policies. Trump is my president, not my guide to Biblical values. Prove me wrong re dems. Provide some examples re Biden/Harris good luck finding any.

    • @andreabaggett7932
      @andreabaggett7932 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Wow..where to start. Early on David French stated confidently that it was us, the Christians, who put presidentTrump in the White House. One good read in Romans 13 should set this straight. God put Trump in the White House just as He did Obama, and all the presidents that came before. Later in the debate, D.F. also mocks any comparrison christians have made between king David and president Trump. Ok...he's right, Trump never murdered the husband or husbands of the women he had alleged affairs with. No disrespect to king David, who was an amazing man, but also very flawed. French's reason for mocking comparrison is repentence. Repentence is to God, not David French, and also a matter of the heart which D.F. has no idea what the state of Trump's heart is. God has used all sorts of leaders and the reason why is found in Acts 17 as well as other places. David French needs to look over scripture more before he speaks.

    • @martifingers
      @martifingers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@DanielPaulAbraham Hi Daniel. Hi akajefe. From the outside (I am in the UK) it is hard to see how the Trump presidency represents an implementation of a "moral order" or rather it seems a very strange one indeed. Respect for the rule of law, a responsible attitude to power, a merciful approach to social problems. Openness about personal dealings and past mistakes, even as a role model for your children. In your opinion has he demonstrated a moral order in these areas?

    • @phyvo
      @phyvo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@martifingers Hello, as a Christian who is pro-life and believes in traditional marriage, I just wanted to chime in on this and say...
      I think Trump is an anti-Christ. That's how immoral he is.
      Voting for Biden.

  • @davidbeesley3390
    @davidbeesley3390 4 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Skip the first ten minutes. It's an irritatingly long intro. to the evening.

    • @JohnThomasManstis
      @JohnThomasManstis 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ...hum, after That it's 'Double Barreled Harold' 😤

  • @bman11714
    @bman11714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Oh the irony to watch this a year later

    • @user295295
      @user295295 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Two years on and the brink of nuclear war.

    • @markbragg7213
      @markbragg7213 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thinking Eric looks better after time... Biden's not a radical socialist
      that didn't play well over time! Trump didn't handle covid ?

    • @denisegoetz5864
      @denisegoetz5864 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Give it another year and a half 😂😂😂

  • @annbrucepineda8093
    @annbrucepineda8093 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Elizabeth Warren’s children went to private school, I think. So did the children of most Democrats so why shouldn’t there be charter schools, as Dr. Thomas Sowell has explained in one of his last books, in the urban areas for exceptional students?

    • @ChristopherBix2
      @ChristopherBix2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Laughable. Most kids of democrats go to private schools? HA! The fact that public schools exist and people with the means send their kids to them, is NOT an argument to drag government into funding any private school that pops up, nor should it EVER fund any religion based school, no matter what the religion.

  • @MBroam
    @MBroam 3 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    This is even more interesting watching after the election and after the events of Jan 6th.

    • @frtripp
      @frtripp 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's what I am doing. Just found this. Always have had max respect for Metaxas. Here, after the fact, seems like a prophet anticipating the future.

    • @michaelhale867
      @michaelhale867 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And after the Afghanistan debacle

    • @jjalvarez25
      @jjalvarez25 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I was hoping you'd say after Biden's Tyrannical mask has come off

  • @dapperslaps7156
    @dapperslaps7156 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Neither participant laid out a biblical case for why christians should vote one way or the other based on the role and purpose of government office as laid out in scripture.
    Romans 1 is a great place to start - Which party is actively pushing the values that are warned against, beginning in verse 18?
    And in Romans 13, what is the role of the government and which political party best aligns themselves with the purpose as laid out by God.

    • @Ittoramstagram
      @Ittoramstagram 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Couldn't agree more: The goal is life, the goal is love, the goal is blessing the nations THROUGH discipleship to Christ. Let's disagree on how to accomplish those goals, but nevertheless, let's at least agree that those are the goals. And let's respect each other as we converse and push ahead with our rights to vote and have a say in exactly the best way we think these goals will be accomplished.

    • @donnabowman1103
      @donnabowman1103 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just looking at the actions and the party platforms you can never vote for the Democrats.
      When they reform their platform, and their actions with regard to abortion, transgender, freedom of speech, parents rights, and protecting the border maybe you can consider voting for a Democrat.
      Trump's actions line up with Christian people. Bidens don't, and that is the bottom line.

  • @Tj_edin
    @Tj_edin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A kingdom divided against itself can not stand.

  • @bakhop
    @bakhop 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Did Metaxas begin his response with that sexist gross line from Saturday Night Life back in the day? Also, French saying he'll go for a third party, might as well not vote at all. Pro-choice is not pro-abortion, it's letting women control their own bodies and Jesus came to "free the captives".

    • @eman4601
      @eman4601 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Free the captives" doesn't mean you are free to kill your baby inside your womb. Jesus didn't free us to do evil by breaking one of the ten commandments: Thou shalt not kill. Women can control their own bodies by not laying underneath a man. That's where they have complete control. I'm a single woman who has not had a child because I just don't lay under men. Simple as that! I have complete control over my body! And 99% of abortions are done by women who were not raped, nor are they incest victims . And a pregnant woman is not a "captive". She is expecting a human being, who is loved by God, Who is forming him in his mother womb.

    • @eugene3484
      @eugene3484 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You mean letting women choose to abort? Which is murder. What side are you on. That is not biblical or maybe your not a Bible person

  • @robertparsons313
    @robertparsons313 4 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    Eric: Very short game for some gain, high price later.
    David: Long game, hold fast to your values, rewards later.

    • @davidreinhart418
      @davidreinhart418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Except Mr. French’s long game is based on bankrupt principals.

    • @robertparsons313
      @robertparsons313 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@davidreinhart418 The principals at the really low-paying schools?

    • @courtneyhoward2758
      @courtneyhoward2758 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Lol "agreed" racism was wrong, yes they believed that in the 50s and sixties but voted and fought against civil rights and segregation. Anglo saxon evangelicals historically have always been on the wrong side of race period. Why would they think its different now. And he's talking about dixiecrats in the 60s

    • @impish22
      @impish22 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidreinhart418 And Mr. French has the audacity to judge Trump? Mr. French is a snake and one of the more pompous individuals I have seen in a long time... sleazy man... every finger he thinks is pointing to Trump is pointing right back at himself

    • @davidreinhart418
      @davidreinhart418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@courtneyhoward2758
      Ding, ding, ding: That is a racist statement. And not very thoughtful.
      It was Anglo Saxons who created the Republican Party and the Underground Railroad for slaves. And the last I checked, many died in the civil war fighting to abolish slavery.

  • @tobiasskogen5699
    @tobiasskogen5699 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Daniel answered and said, Blessed be the name of God for ever and ever: for wisdom and might are his: 21 and he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding.

  • @martifingers
    @martifingers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Knowing what we know now , has anyone changed their mind on this debate?

    • @olabashanda
      @olabashanda 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I found this convincing before the election, even more profound today

    • @jeremydavie4484
      @jeremydavie4484 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I wish I saw this before the election

    • @truthisbeautiful7492
      @truthisbeautiful7492 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      French's argument about photo op in front of a church was debunked. And more people died under biden from covid.

    • @truthisbeautiful7492
      @truthisbeautiful7492 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Also religious liberty was protected by supreme court. And roe vs wade was overturned, and thousands of lives were saved.

    • @nurseg938
      @nurseg938 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@truthisbeautiful7492lives?? You mean the mother’s that died because of forced birth??

  • @rosealexander9007
    @rosealexander9007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    I was a conservative in 1988. Character was important to me then and it still is now! However I’m not a conservative anymore. I’m a centrist! The conservative partly is no longer anything I want anything to do with. I couldn’t ever be a liberal either!!

    • @marksauck8481
      @marksauck8481 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Let's hear this same debate between these two guys after four years of Democrats control in this country. Will the person who attacks Trump be honest enough to say how bad a job Biden and Harris did after four years? Doubt it.

    • @Isaac_L..
      @Isaac_L.. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Or maybe could just do the Christian thing, and pray that God will use Biden (and maybe even Harris nobody is outside of Gods reach) to genuinely help as many people as possible and actually further his kingdom in the same way that God would have used Trump. I understand why you prefer Trump, I don’t understand why you seem to think that God is incapable if using Biden (or anyone on the left) to accomplish anything good.

    • @anubiasnku140
      @anubiasnku140 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Isaac_L.. You are actually balanced dear

    • @rosealexander9007
      @rosealexander9007 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Isaac_L.. I’m actually a Biden and Harris supporter. Where did you think that from the comment I made?🙅‍♀️

    • @rosealexander9007
      @rosealexander9007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @Fbi Agent real Christian of you. I only said that I’m a centrist and you call me a loser.

  • @timcarp1964
    @timcarp1964 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Eric, I think we know the Chevy Chase SNL line. It just wasn't appropriate. C'mon. That was a Trump line.

    • @IamHooter
      @IamHooter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      That was the most cringe worthiest thing I've heard in a long time.

    • @johnfoster4244
      @johnfoster4244 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It was a Dan Akroid line

    • @IamHooter
      @IamHooter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@johnfoster4244 yeah, I know. But in a room full of Christians trying to have a civil conversation, it doesn't make it any less of an awkward introduction.

    • @timcarp1964
      @timcarp1964 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@johnfoster4244 Right you are. Chevy, Dan, Eddie they all run together... It was a different time, but IMO it was inappropriate on SNL and beyond inappropriate here. I think the use of the phrase just made the point about character all the more meaningful. I like Metaxas but he has a strange bed fellow in DJT.

    • @theravagedgrapefruit8190
      @theravagedgrapefruit8190 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dan Akroyd you twit....hater of free speech, just wait until 2022 wave coming....the people in POWER now are as clueless as you!!!

  • @raymondgregory9280
    @raymondgregory9280 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I enjoyed this debate. I am a Christian. I am African American. I didn’t vote for trump and would never vote for trump. My takeaway from this discussion is that you should vote for who you feel is the better candidate. It does affect our witness when we hitch our Christian wagon to either candidate. As a black man in the U.S., the voting rights act was indeed important. Where did those Dixiecrats like Strom Thurman go when they left the Democratic Party, they became Republicans. The Gospel has not changed, go into all the world and preach the Gospel, preach Jesus and him crucified and rose from the dead for our sins.

    • @resilientrecoveryministries
      @resilientrecoveryministries 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Amen.

    • @bluejays2236
      @bluejays2236 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      199 dixiecrats in the House and Senate voted against the 1964 civil rights act. About 10 of them later, not immediately, became Republicans. The other 189 remained in the democratic party for life, many in office into the 80's. Did they become saints of God or did they just devise better racist schemes.

    • @jim6186
      @jim6186 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So you bought into the race tactics deployed by the party that brought you segradation and the kkk?

    • @mreloo
      @mreloo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Christians can't vote for the present socialist demon'crat party...if u voted for biden u must repent...trump is a good president...look how the deep state/FBI/demon'crats/fake news/social media giants...tried to stop him....the people's choice...."they" made it soooo difficult for trump to do his job...but everything he did benefited the American people, our economy did well he got us out terrible things that were sucking tax payers dry....and he did it rather quickly sooo what the hell were all these other president doing....selling America out that's what....

    • @BarbaraSchreiber-o5k
      @BarbaraSchreiber-o5k 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      AMEN 💯

  • @lightangel4422
    @lightangel4422 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Eric is are spot on !!

  • @mifster771
    @mifster771 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Maybe it's just me but based on the first 2 speakers I thought this was a debate revolving around religious beliefs and values. Eric went straight to politics. Seems to me then that for him this was about political power and not religious values, which is what David decried at the outset.

    • @glennpeterson1357
      @glennpeterson1357 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You nailed it. David was trying to put forward the importance of Christian values, where Mataxas was all about the power of politics….I was very unimpressed with him

    • @j7489
      @j7489 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No he wasn’t. He was using an the excuse of values hypocritally to attack trump.

  • @minimoe2807
    @minimoe2807 4 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    So glad to hear Eric make it clear that he does not feel Trunp is a Spirit filled Evangelical Christian. I think some Christians may actually believe he is?!?

    • @shawnjones6749
      @shawnjones6749 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why could he not be?!?!

    • @kevinclayton8284
      @kevinclayton8284 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@shawnjones6749 by his own admission in an interview stating that he had not ever asked for forgiveness because he'd rather just try to live right and make up for it on his own. That's paraphrased btw.

    • @petepeet5174
      @petepeet5174 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@shawnjones6749 "By their fruits ye shall know them"

    • @bluebird635
      @bluebird635 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I doubt many or any do.....

    • @Amick44
      @Amick44 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think that's the least he could do!

  • @tonycarey1735
    @tonycarey1735 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    For me the clear 'winner' of this exchange was David French. Eric Metaxas gave a good rhetorical, secular, defence of Trump but French hit the nail on the head in terms of a Christian response.
    Of course that may say more about the bias I bought to the debate than a more detached assessment, but the real turning point came after their main presentation. French was asked what it would take to vote for Trump and Metaxas was asked what it would take to not vote for Trump.
    Both focussed on moral questions which, surely was the key point of this topic in this forum with this audience.
    French implied that he could vote for Trump if he show some sort of remorse and attempted to change. A classic Christian perspective IMHO.
    Metaxas, on the other hand, imagined a scenario where Trump 'did a Clinton', ie, he had an affair with an intern and tried to cover it up.
    He evoked the appalling behaviour of Clinton as a line in the sand for a Christian's assessment of his moral suitability as a president.
    Giving that his general position was to support voting for Trump, Metaxas clearly felt that Trump hadn't crossed that line.
    At that point Metaxas was 'hoist on his own petard', because Trump's behaviour has been at least as (arguably much more) morally egregious as Clinton's without any sign of the metanoia that French spoke of. At no point, for example, has Trump said, 'I did not have sex with a prostitute and pay to shut her up' let alone, 'I did the wrong thing, I've tried to atone and I will not do it again'.

    • @peli_candude554
      @peli_candude554 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I don't like David French because he is spouting the same nonsense that the left is about Trump and I could see Eric squirming in his seat trying to contain himself.
      I've seen French before and got the same impression from him...he doesn't like Trump and is little more than a shill for the left trying to gaslight Christians into that watered down leftist thinking.
      Win or lose, Trump did exactly what he said he would do...French doesn't like that in a politician because it is what they are supposed to do...just like Christians are supposed to oppose abortion, and lifestyles that are contrary to a strong society.

    • @tonycarey1735
      @tonycarey1735 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@peli_candude554 But surely when it comes down to a moral judgement, 'doing what he said he would do' is not much of a benchmark? It's what he did, having said it or not, that is the benchmark. So, for example, he said he'd build a wall and Mexico would pay for it. A reasonable Christian perspective would question the necessity of a wall.

    • @peli_candude554
      @peli_candude554 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tonycarey1735
      Why? In the old days when a town was subjected to onslaughts from every roaming tribe or army a wall was necessary. If you question the effects of illegal immigration, drug smuggling and human trafficking of sex slaves and child abductions a wall is essential to ensure the safety and control of who gets in and who gets out.
      Heaven has a requirement that we do such and such and believe that Jesus is our Savior just like a gated community. All are welcome under the right circumstances...which means legally immigrate when the country can handle the influx.

    • @tonycarey1735
      @tonycarey1735 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@peli_candude554 In the spirit of the debate, let's go back to first (Christian) principles. How does Christ want us to respond to the downtrodden, the refugee, the lonely, the poor? What if that person 'slaps us on the cheek', figuratively speaking. We respond with compassion, kindness and practical help and we turn the other cheek. There are numerous occasions where Jesus makes this clear. The story of the good Samaritan, for example, would have shocked his listeners at the time because Jesus made it clear that other religious and cultural considerations were secondary to a compassionate, practical response.
      This is a hard truth of the Gospel and is the opposite of a 'gated community'. It's a community that puts itself at risk for the sake of others.
      Does that mean we're not entitled to defend ourselves against 'every roaming tribe or army'? I don't think so.
      But does that reflect the reality of refugees fleeing violence and fear? I don't think so. Overwhelmingly these people are refugees and seeking refuge is not 'illegal'. So, the notion of a 'roaming tribe or army' simply does not apply.
      Of course it's not that simple and we are entitled to protect ourselves from those among the refugees who are a threat and we are entitled to an orderly intake of refugees, but the policy of handling these people, from a Christian point of view, needs to start with first principles.
      Of course there's the morality of promising a wall and not delivering it and the morality of 'making Mexico pay', but that's another topic.

    • @peli_candude554
      @peli_candude554 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@tonycarey1735
      Let's not forget that any President of the USA must, as a first responsibility, ensure that the people that he is representing are safe and his country is able to support its' constituents with resources and leadership that will ensure they are put first and foremost.
      Letting mobs of refugees into the country when they have questionable backgrounds and questionable intentions is a surefire way to create situations where the people he is supposed to be protecting are vulnerable.
      That whole media spin of mistreating the children by separating them was covering up the fact that those rules were put in place by the Obama administration and Joe Biden himself was responsible for the cruel cages (according to many).
      It's a tough game to play with being the cold hearted one who builds a wall but if you want to believe these people are all running away from something worse then the bigger question is "why were they allowed to run away"? Or even "what are they running from"?
      Too many variables that were solved by building a wall to help restrict the influx of everyone and allow the USA to get a better handle on who to let in and when.
      The threat to society doesn't have to be armed to the teeth soldiers...it can be a swarm of hungry locusts that chew up an entire supply of food or a bunch of laborers that flood a market already full of illegal workers that are not even contributing to the system they wish to run to.

  • @MarleneBertrand
    @MarleneBertrand 4 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    But David French never answered the question about whether or not he believed Christians should vote for a man who supports pro-choice. I listened intently for his opinion on this. He never answered the question about whether he would vote for Biden or not. It was a yes or no question.

    • @Draezeth
      @Draezeth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Probably because that's where the conversation ends. No Christian should be pro-choice, but all too often that gives Republicans a ticket to do anything they want. Much as it saddens me, for the good of the country, the planet, and even Christendom, we need to put abortion to the side until the Republican party is godly in heart and not just on two issues.

    • @joelkeen3349
      @joelkeen3349 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Then you should probably listen some more. He said that he would not vote for Trump or Biden.

    • @MarleneBertrand
      @MarleneBertrand 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@joelkeen3349 Thank you. When I heard the question, I did not hear the answer directly afterwards. It is possible that I might have misinterpreted or missed his answer. Anyway, thank you.

    • @evanwickham4273
      @evanwickham4273 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      He said he "rejects the binary" and would vote for a third party. That was the point of his story about Roy Moore from Alabama.

    • @earnestlycontendingforthef5332
      @earnestlycontendingforthef5332 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@evanwickham4273 Spiritually wise and obedient Christians will not vote for any candidate, as they may be voting against one whom Almighty God has already chosen to be the next president of the USA.
      "Endure hardness, as a good soldier of Jesus Christ. 4 No man that warreth *entangleth himself with the affairs* of this life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a soldier. 5 And if a man also strive for masteries, yet is he not crowned, except he strive lawfully.
      2 Tim 2:3-5 (KJV)
      Which quite obviously includes the "AFFAIRS" of state.

  • @resilientrecoveryministries
    @resilientrecoveryministries 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Every time I see David, he harps on the same theme: what's good for the goose is good for the gander. In other words if we love free speech for us, we should support it for others; if we think character counts when Dems' character falls short, then it should matter when a republican's character falls short. Hurts. But he speaks the truth

    • @billbecker5357
      @billbecker5357 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And he's never ever critical of Democrats or the "progressive" agenda. Hypocrite.

    • @jean-marcbrand1093
      @jean-marcbrand1093 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@billbecker5357 well, this was a debate about a republican candidate.

    • @anhampton5465
      @anhampton5465 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I got news for you every candidate's character falls short cause their human just like us....we need to vote for ppl who most closely represents the policies we believe in. This isn't a nice guy contest

    • @LoanShoppingExpert
      @LoanShoppingExpert 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@anhampton5465 Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding!

    • @user295295
      @user295295 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Truth, but applied incorrectly. The democrats has not had a presidential nominee for the past 60 years that was not a pervert or a reprobate. Every one of them.
      On every metric, Trump's character is far better than anything to have come previously.

  • @bubbaburke
    @bubbaburke 4 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Mindblowing. Metaxas wrote a wonderful biography of Bonhoeffer. For him to be this confused and dismissive of Trump's "1984" methods is beyond me. A side note. Only 40% of all Christians declare themselves to be Republican (Pew Report). David French did an excellent job.

    • @MALLYGEEZ1
      @MALLYGEEZ1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only 40%? Wow that's interesting. I thought it was higher. That's a great point.

    • @TheManWithNoHands
      @TheManWithNoHands 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The overwhelming majority of white Christians vote Republican, and the overwhelming majority of black Christians vote Democrat. Idk what the numbers are for other groups within Christianity, but if we're counting absolutely all Christians then we're going to look like a much less partisan group until you look at groups within the group.
      There's also Christians claiming only "political affiliation to God," but who vote exclusively Republican and who have even stated they'll never vote Democrat, which is a major ideology for example in my church and many surrounding churches.

    • @dr.m.h.patterson8121
      @dr.m.h.patterson8121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Friend, as a historian, I can tell you that his wonderful book on Bonhoeffer is widely discredited as **hard history.** It feels great. But his citations are sketchy & too few; he makes multiple claims that are widely known among serious historians of the period to already be debunked, & he took liberties which I find heartbreaking, since you don't need to take liberties to uplift the great Dietrich Bonhoeffer. But Metaxas's arrogance knows no bounds. He thinks he - not a trained historian, - is the proper person to write serious books on Christians giants like Luther & Bonhoeffer, which is part of his long campaign to position himself as a massive intellectual. When the truth is, he's an influencer. Believe me, I"ve met him. So I'm confused that you would be surprised. He's a relentless self-promoter. Five minutes into his speech he's mentioned 2 books he's written. Guess what? David French has written way better books but the difference? French is ACTUALLY here for America. Metaxas was here for America.... & Eric Metaxas.

    • @dr.m.h.patterson8121
      @dr.m.h.patterson8121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ...(having said all that... I like your comment otherwise. Really appreciate that you got the greatness of David French's mind. So glad you commented. Be well Sir!

    • @bosmith1820
      @bosmith1820 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Yeah Republicans try and own Jesus and Christianity believing that "conservative values" are one and the same with Christianity. When in reality it is just their version of Christianity that fits into the GOP. Many many many Christians either vote Democrat, 3rd party, are apolitical or are Republican, but not dogmatic and believe the leader of the gop is sent from God.

  • @robertwilliams7742
    @robertwilliams7742 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I agree with several of the folks below. Mr. French clearly took much time and devotion into trying to review his points, spoke about them in regard to the Bible, and even opened up about legitimate claims against his side of the debate. Metaxas spent much of his time raising his voice, quoting headlines from conservative news media, gave often vague references to individuals or event from the past, and went above and beyond the call to indict the Democratic party/Biden Administration while doing virtually nothing to cite concrete measures of improvements under the Trump Administration or refer to his reasoning from the Bible. In fact he seemed very intent on saying some "saucy" words and phrases for dramatic effect or some ill timed attempts at humor. Though I don't think either candidate was or is perfect and should be trusted with our undivided devotion, I simply believe that Mr. French brought up good points about an overall good candidate and knowing some will agree or disagree, I thank God for this platform and freedom to discuss these matters with fellow believers. God bless you all.

  • @WPBruce
    @WPBruce 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The debate is a little troubling because of a lack of clarity. First it should be pointed out that the purpose of the election is not to choose between the moral integrity of the candidates but rather to select the candidate who will best govern the nation. Secondly, Christians will note that while the Bible does not address the United States government directly it does espouse principles of good government. The United States government in particular was formed by Christian principles such as "inalienable rights" which are based upon the fact that people were made in the image of God, a truth taught in Genesis. There are a number of other Biblical principles that I cannot set forth here but the bottom line is that the Christian should be concerned for the propagation of a government given to us by our godly forefathers and should seek a candidate who can protect and continue that godly government. The issue before is that one party seeks to protect the current government of freedom and property rights and one does not but seeks its destruction. Thus the issue of the election should actually be quite clear to the informed Christian.

    • @fredmiddel6070
      @fredmiddel6070 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Funny how in the entirety of the biblical narrative (especially the Old Testament prophets), governments are not really judged on their handing of "freedom and property rights." They are judged on the treatment of the widow, the orphan, and the alien, on their management of justice and mercy, and yes, on moral issues, both individual and culture-wide.

    • @WPBruce
      @WPBruce 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@fredmiddel6070 Some of this is because these terms "property rights" became more familiar to later generations. But the basic idea was always there. (Thou shalt not steal) But like you, I was surprised to find the American concept of "freedom" extracted from Biblical truth. For example, the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia derives its name from a phrase in Exodus: "Proclaim liberty throughout the land …"

    • @fredmiddel6070
      @fredmiddel6070 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@WPBruce The basic idea was always there. It was hardly central. We're taking an American ideal and superimposing it onto the biblical text at the expense of all the other things it says.

    • @WPBruce
      @WPBruce 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@fredmiddel6070 Well, OT Israel had a specific theocracy for civil government but God always intended salvation for those of other nations. The nations were meant to see the wisdom of God's law and His plan for Israel without limiting them to a rigid system of government which even Israel failed to maintain. Our founding fathers believed that their king had violated his charge and therefore rebelled. (see Declaration of Independence). After that they had to set up a new system based upon what they had learned that would allow freedom of conscience to those who wanted to serve God. The Bible including the O. T law is a rich source of principles for civil conduct and the founders used much of what they found. (for example, representative government: Ex. 18:21) True, the nation can drift away from those biblical ideals. Nations are composed of believers and non-believers. We began with the ideal of equal opportunity and now we (through the deception of the devil) are drifting toward equality of outcomes like the French did during the French Revolution. The struggle is inevitable because not all men believe.

  • @themattmchugh
    @themattmchugh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Start at 10:29 if you are looking to skip the intro :)

  • @21initials
    @21initials 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Are you kidding me? There is a day of reckoning for all the Evangelicals & those who knowingly have sold out their faith for selfish reasons. There’s a question in scripture, “what would one give in exchange for his/her soul”? Sadly many believers have sold out for Money, Power, & Prestige! However there is a day of Reckoning! There is a WOE!!!

    • @mariusciobanu2025
      @mariusciobanu2025 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ah yes, a vote for 1 party is a vote for Jesus and a vote for the other party is a vote for Satan, is that right?

    • @bluebird635
      @bluebird635 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      always the lesser of two evils

    • @velmadoo626
      @velmadoo626 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bluebird635 Evil is Evil! There is really no lesser of two evils! If you broke 1 commandment then you have broken all ten. Sin is sin .

    • @bluebird635
      @bluebird635 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@velmadoo626 yes quite true Velma. I was addressing the very real truth -- which is that people sometimes/often "have" to vote for the lesser of two evils. After all --- "all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God." That was so in 2016 as well as in 2020.

  • @woodman6176
    @woodman6176 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Intro painfully long and self focused

    • @onelikeyouber1728
      @onelikeyouber1728 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed

    • @aislingbooks
      @aislingbooks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Agreed, as if he was liking too much the sound of his own voice.

    • @ShikhandiPilla
      @ShikhandiPilla 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I thought I was the only one.

    • @bluebird635
      @bluebird635 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      no --- interesting intro....details about Dem and Rep stances in the past --all good.

  • @marcuscato3599
    @marcuscato3599 4 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    Metaxas minimizing the significance of the alt-right at the end of the debate is astounding.

    • @davidreinhart418
      @davidreinhart418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Is there such thing as the Alt Left?

    • @jacobscott2597
      @jacobscott2597 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@davidreinhart418 No

    • @davidreinhart418
      @davidreinhart418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jacobscott2597
      That’s because the majority of the left’s world view is Alt.

    • @davidreinhart418
      @davidreinhart418 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look it up Jacob. There are definitions for alt left.

    • @promomail1768
      @promomail1768 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@davidreinhart418 No

  • @larrysmith2636
    @larrysmith2636 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The term gaslighting is ringing in my head. I don't know why?

  • @KGTwitty
    @KGTwitty 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I am wondering if David French were to be this critical of Joe Biden, what would he have to say about his moral status. Do we just see less because Biden is not President and not progressive?

    • @ThatClassic70sGirl
      @ThatClassic70sGirl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "Do we just see less because Biden is not President and not progressive?"
      Biden, not progressive? Whatever do you mean?

  • @rogerlau4932
    @rogerlau4932 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    A huge difference between a columnist who researches and writes about what he researches, like David French, and a man who writes, is a radio host and a TV host, like Eric Metaxes.

  • @jonathanbartolomey248
    @jonathanbartolomey248 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow at the end when he spoke about his daughter and the horrible things that they faced from the alt right. No one was moved to say I’m sorry for what your daughter had to face that and that it was wrong to have happened.

    • @ibablo
      @ibablo ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly! That goes to show the depth of most people's devotion to Trump.
      It's called Cultism.
      My heart bleeds when I see how much the enemy has infiltrated the Church and subtly devoured God's people😢

  • @ahealy7457
    @ahealy7457 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Metaxas, in true, Trumpian fashion, pulls out random, ungrounded drivel and calls it 'making a case'. French builds a completely logical, biblical, integrated and sound structure of argument, leaving Metaxas struggling, and lobbing ineffectual adjectives as if he were at the Tower of Babel. This only served to lay bare, as true, French's premise of what it's all really about, when you pull back the Trumpist veneer: It's about fear, fear, and more fear. And all of the flailing, scattershot, intellectually-dishonest and ad hominem argument-fragments in the world don't change that. Clear loss by Metaxas.

    • @zachulrich3965
      @zachulrich3965 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's not biblical to support a party that promotes same-sex marriage and abortion. What was intellectually-dishonest about his arguements? I do agree with you that fear is abused as a form of manipulation.

    • @beemaningi
      @beemaningi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zachulrich3965 I expect we agree that judging, excluding, despising, and fearing are not biblical.

  • @rogerlau4932
    @rogerlau4932 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The question of the debate is "Should Christians vote for Donald Trump?" David French speaks exclusively about Trump, and the problems of moral character, and how Christians should consider it, seeing as it's part of their faith. Eric Metaxes, at 30 minutes in, is talking about how bad the Democratic Party is, how Biden succumbs to his socialist wing, how in the 1860s the Republican Party was the anti-slavery party, and how the Democrats in the 1960s opposed the Civil Rights Act (actually the southern Democrats opposed it; Mr. Metaxes failed to mention that). Mmmmm. Nothing about Trump yet. Did Eric forget the topic of the debte? Also, this is 2024, not 1964 or 1864. Did Eric forget what year it is ? I hope Eric Metaxes gets on track as the debate continues.

  • @bropeter6286
    @bropeter6286 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Why is this even a debate? Voting is a choice and afterwards you will live with the decision you have made. Vote for Jesus Christ and you will always make a good decision and come out a winner!

  • @tainlamar2274
    @tainlamar2274 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    This is debate in the highest level.Both debaters have also maintained great decency . Learnt a.lot.Thankyou

  • @henrimourant9855
    @henrimourant9855 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    What Eric said at 1:38:07 aged horrifically.

    • @mercyaustin854
      @mercyaustin854 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Ironically, Metaxas has tweeted saying that January 6 was a leftist hoax.
      It's saddening to me that he doesn't see the way the alt-right can be just as violent as Antifa and the left can.

    • @trepeterson7752
      @trepeterson7752 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mercyaustin854 because mainly it's the right who is the violent ones

    • @marieweitzel8528
      @marieweitzel8528 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      What David French said at about 16:00 aged horrrifically. LOL

    • @henrimourant9855
      @henrimourant9855 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@marieweitzel8528 Yeah no. That aged fine.

    • @promomail1768
      @promomail1768 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@mercyaustin854 If he said Jan 6 is a leftest hoax that totally discredits him, he is willing to lie to defend his bias. Not Christ he worships.

  • @supershaneman
    @supershaneman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Metaxas had no legitimate rebuttal to French’s opening point, that Christians beat the drum of moral character required in office in 1998 but many shirked their concern with morality in 2016. They voted in a liar, adulterer and reprobate.
    French presented clearly, outlined reasons why Christians should not vote for Trump. Metaxas only presented a blathering of fear-mongering if Democrats should win. French wasn’t arguing for Biden. French won the debate, hands down.

    • @christiansoldier77
      @christiansoldier77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Shane Anderson French makes no valid points at all . Anything Trump did that was bad in his life the democrats have done ten times worse

    • @Romans8-9
      @Romans8-9 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      And Biden isn't reprobate? "Come on man!" He said an 8 year old has the right to decide if he is transgender. Read Romans 1:28-32, then read the Democratic policy on abortion.

    • @supershaneman
      @supershaneman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Romans8-9 The debate was about whether Christians should vote for Trump. Stay on point. French didn’t argue for a Biden vote and explained why he rejects the binary system.

    • @trepeterson7752
      @trepeterson7752 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@supershaneman they're doing the same thing because they can't give reasons because there is no reason to vote for 45. They are hypocritics

  • @israelnitta
    @israelnitta 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    This was not a fruitful "debate" but rather a forum for the personal opinions and ranting of two Christians. The focus of a political conversation on voting, within the context of the church, should transcend politics and move towards the topic of semantics and conscience.
    Semantics in the sense that the word "vote" and the phrase "vote for" should be defined. When someone "votes for" a political candidate are they saying that they agree and support the moral behaviors and policies of a person? Or does "I vote for..." mean that the voter is weighing between two or more candidates and supporting the majority of that candidate's policies without necessarily agreeing to their character and conduct?
    The personal convictions of a person should also be taken into account for to go against their conscience would be an act of sin (1 Corinthians 8 on the principle of faith and conscience). Even after laying out all the best reasons to vote for someone or not vote for someone, each individual must make an informed decision and commitment to what that person feels God is leading him or her to do.

    • @josh_final
      @josh_final 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is so true. The election is a choice of bad or worst. However you make that judgment doesn't define your religious beliefs. Instead, in our day, it simply shows what news organizations you listen to.

    • @dorothygayle9201
      @dorothygayle9201 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I highly recommend Dr. Tony Evans' current sermon series on being a "Kingdom Voter"; I think it speaks exactly to your comment.

    • @johnnyjonsson8064
      @johnnyjonsson8064 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      As a Christian and europé I must say that this man Erik is a morgon! He is taking abort the topic!

  • @glake7525
    @glake7525 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Trust in the Lord to preserve HIS people

    • @philipbrett6590
      @philipbrett6590 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I trust him to be an evil idiot.

  • @denismguitar1552
    @denismguitar1552 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Christians should pray and fast and take that issue to God and seek His wisdom. Period.

    • @earnestlycontendingforthef5332
      @earnestlycontendingforthef5332 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If any truly follow God's Word, then they will obey the instruction not
      to become "Entangled in the AFFAIRS of this life" which logically
      includes 'Affairs of state' .
      The humble and faithful will conscientiously obey, rebels and "false brethren" and sisters, will adamantly refuse to comply.
      " 4 No man that warreth **entangleth himself with the affairs** of this
      life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a soldier......"
      Thus the punishment St. Paul has stated, will surely follow them.
      ".......5 And if a man also strive for masteries, yet is he not crowned, except he strive lawfully.
      2 Timothy 2:4-5 (KJV)
      Plainly put: ."Athletes cannot win the prize unless they follow the rules"
      2 Timothy 2:4-5 (NLT)
      Will not wise Christians faithfully comply....and "WIN THE PRIZE" ?

    • @ramatgan1
      @ramatgan1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Evangelical Christians voting for the most godless president (trump) in history.
      Rank hypocrisy!

    • @earnestlycontendingforthef5332
      @earnestlycontendingforthef5332 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ramatgan1 Spiritually wise and obedient Christians will not vote for any Presidential candidate, as they may be voting against one whom Almighty God has already chosen to be the next president of the USA.
      "Endure hardness, as a good soldier of Jesus Christ. 4 No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a soldier.
      5 And if a man also strive for masteries, yet is **he not crowned, except** he strive lawfully.
      2 Tim 2:3-5 (KJV)
      Which quite obviously includes the "AFFAIRS" of state.

    • @Isaac_L..
      @Isaac_L.. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I disagree. Yes consulting the Lord on problems, personal or communal, is absolutely necessary for any Christian to make God honoring decisions. However it is definitely important that we discuss these issues with both other Christians and those in our communities. How can we be aware of the sufferings of others if we don’t first communicate? The doctor can’t understand the patients pain if the doctor is blind and the patient is mute. Guess what, most of the people that legitimately need the help and love of both the church and the government have no voice. And the church will never be able to meet their needs if they continue to be blinded by Nationalism.

    • @davidreinhart418
      @davidreinhart418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ramatgan1
      Have you read and studied the Bible? God can work through anybody. Saul, who was terrible killer of Christians and one of their biggest enemies later became one of Christians greatest advocates. We don’t condone any of the deplorable things Trump has done or said. But, overall, Trump is the best out of all available for this country.

  • @lucydenzin4905
    @lucydenzin4905 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    I was really looking forward to hearing this debate. I’ve read the Bon Hoffer book and loved it. Unfortunately, I was disappointed in Metaxis’ typical Trumpian untrue talking points and was very put off by his arrogance and condescending remarks. I really expected a more scholarly, well developed argument from someone of his professional stature.

    • @davidreinhart418
      @davidreinhart418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Biden is not the answer.

    • @trepeterson7752
      @trepeterson7752 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@davidreinhart418 neither was 45

    • @andrewcrouch5341
      @andrewcrouch5341 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Frankly my introduction to Metaxas was about 5 months ago when he was screaming about the election, but from what little I know he used to be much more respected than he currently is

    • @Amick44
      @Amick44 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andrewcrouch5341 I don't know what happened to metaxas. The ironic thing is, I do enjoy listening to his radio program at times. He has some really good guests on and seems to have a nice rapport with them.
      He covers spiritual topics as well as current events..
      But I have no idea what has turned him to become an unabashed Trump supporter.

    • @brandybobandy2194
      @brandybobandy2194 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Amick44 Metaxas has always been like this. You're just seeing it clearly now.

  • @martifingers
    @martifingers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And how do we view this debate today?

    • @j7489
      @j7489 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      David French is a hypocrite and Christians are easily shamed into voting for anti-God and anti-family garbage

  • @justinnipko1413
    @justinnipko1413 4 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    I think this is basically a debate between a person's primary new sources.
    Eric = Fox
    David = Anything else

    • @shilohsanders5475
      @shilohsanders5475 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I hope one day the nations primary news source is the Good News of Jesus Christ.

    • @jondeur2686
      @jondeur2686 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You are clueless. You have absolutely no clue how condescending and stupid your comment is. You also have no clue that you have illustrated the reasons for Fox News’ dominance for the last 25 years.
      Oh, and it’s news sources, not new sources. Ever heard of proofreading?

    • @sarahmcbeth9156
      @sarahmcbeth9156 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Eric was truly pathetic.

    • @LizaFan
      @LizaFan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Metaxas foments violence and is irrevocably removed from reality. He doesn't just purvey disinformation. He gleefully and forcibly violates the truth.

    • @robertwilliams7742
      @robertwilliams7742 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jondeur2686 You mentioned proofreading as you typed your response but did you "heart read" your response, too? You have used name calling, hyperbolic and derogatory language, and beat the drum of Fox News. Am I wrong or was this debate not to determine who was smarter or more popular but instead how might those who have been changed from the inside out by the person of Jesus Christ should consider the former president, something that by comparison is going to be totally irrelevant in just a few years? Just a thought. God be with you all.

  • @rickbish01
    @rickbish01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    But French never said that he would actually vote for Biden-and never said why not. I would image that he didn’t commit to voting for Biden, for many of the same reasons he won’t vote for Trump, mainly--character. But French did elude to voting for a third-party candidate, but stated nothing clearly. Also, French, never said anything philosophically about how the two parties differ in their approach, to say, the Constitution, per se. I think he knew that the most low-hanging fruit for the debate was attacking Trump’s character-which I agreed with, in general. After the debate, I was thinking more about what David French didn’t say, more than what he actually said.

    • @bethcutler1196
      @bethcutler1196 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not in this debate, but Mr. French has clearly articulated that he will not vote for a Democrat.

    • @bryantlash6035
      @bryantlash6035 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, so he implied (though admittedly didn't state here, he did say so elsewhere in articles) that he won't be voting for biden due to the second of his two disqualifying factors (rough paraphrase "both these conditions need to be met before I vote for either...moral standing or general policy alignment")

    • @AcumenTV
      @AcumenTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not voting or throwing your vote away on a third party because the candidates are beneath you is cowardly. Like Obama voting “Present” all the time when he was a senator. Afraid to go on record making a stand. No conviction about anything. Then you become a critic of those who do have convictions and the guts to walk them out. Talk about a lack of character. Trump is a bull dog, David is a French poodle in comparison.

  • @RosinaMarie6
    @RosinaMarie6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Thank you David French for your wise discourse and knowledge. And Eric Metaxas for reminding us of Fox's talking points.

    • @bman11714
      @bman11714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Would be interesting to hear your perspective a year later

    • @RosinaMarie6
      @RosinaMarie6 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@bman11714 no change in my perspective, I relistened to confirm that. How about any changes to your perspective?

    • @bman11714
      @bman11714 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@RosinaMarie6 He was completely wrong on several of his accusations of Trump as well as what he said Biden wouldn’t do

    • @billbecker5357
      @billbecker5357 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      French is a socialist.

    • @RosinaMarie6
      @RosinaMarie6 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@billbecker5357 French is a christian.

  • @EvaleeWorld
    @EvaleeWorld 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    One-issue voters (of any party) is a plague on our the country.

    • @alexjackson6211
      @alexjackson6211 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I agree. I am a Christian, and it is so frustrating that so many of my family members/friends are voting for him because he is pro-life. That is the ONLY reason. Trump was pro-choice for YEARS. He knew in saying he was pro-life, he would get the Christian vote. He has called Christians “dumb- a**es” I am not voting for Trump because he does not live like Jesus at all. He does not represent the values that I have.

    • @richardnixon8742
      @richardnixon8742 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@alexjackson6211 you are a very smart woman and may God bless you for it falling into the Christian trump trap

    • @anubiasnku140
      @anubiasnku140 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@alexjackson6211 Does the Democratic party represent your Christian values ??

    • @karenmiller6987
      @karenmiller6987 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@anubiasnku140 no but neither does the republican party

    • @promomail1768
      @promomail1768 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@anubiasnku140 Yes, more than Republicans by a long shot. But that’s not the entire purpose of politics.

  • @zolibako4816
    @zolibako4816 3 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    46 minutes in, I've seen enough. French makes reasonable, well articulated arguments while Metaxas is mostly operating with political buzzwords and not very coherent rants.

    • @impish22
      @impish22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mr. French is pompous and condescending and believes we still have freedom of speech...

  • @annbrucepineda8093
    @annbrucepineda8093 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I live in El Salvador. There’s a saying here about lawyers. David French, if he is a lawyer, certainly is an example which proves the point.

  • @wadegray2069
    @wadegray2069 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    I am a "conservative" and I will vote for Trump, but it isn't easy for me. President Trump presents so often with such caustic language and attitude...such juvenile behavior on the tweeter, it's so disheartening. He is to proud, arrogant, braggadocios, to "we're the best and everyone else sucks"....now, I certainly am not perfect, but I'm not in line for the presidency either.
    It's just unfortunate that "our system" operates in a way that our two choices are Trump or Biden. And enough with all the Christian evangelicals that act like DT is such a fine example....just say you'd rather have Trump than Biden, but to put on like DT is some spiritual leader we need in the White House is ridiculous. IMO. I'm only considering his fruit in my assessment, which is all any of us can really do.
    But, at least with Trump, he wears it on his sleeve.....Biden, IMO, is just another not so slick career politician who's sold out to special interest and will ultimately do their bidding.....although it wouldn't surprise me if Trump wasn't doing a bit of that as well.....uuuggghhh..... Just so happy that my salvation isn't in the hands of man and that, as a Christian, I can choose to live in a different kind of Kingdom.... I have to be in the world, but not of the world.
    And at the end of the day, with all the political back and forth, with all "our problems", we here in the U.S. should count it a blessing and not squander it, as we really do have it about as good as it gets. Ultimately, lets pray for Trump, lets pray for Biden, and for all those out there truly hurting during these unusual times.

    • @Puddy777
      @Puddy777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I agree prayers are needed for both men, that they will be open to God's Holy Spirit and be honest, have integrity, admit their failings, and the rest. I hope for God's best outcome for the process. 🙏🌈🌍☀️

    • @allenscheider9817
      @allenscheider9817 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If you have a teenage daughter, please keep her at least 50 ft away from Trump. I just read how he called Michael Cohen's 15-year-old daughter a "Hot piece of ass" as she was walking by him - TEN FEET AWAY! and Michale Cohen was sitting nearby. He is beyond the pale. The most unpresidential, non-Christian president of all time. I would not want my children to look up to him as any sort of role model and think it's okay to call women "Pigs" or "Sluts" and mock the disabled or overweight people, etc. and basically just be a cruel bully.

    • @ritacheatham9048
      @ritacheatham9048 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@allenscheider9817 Now this is why I insist that people listen to what he says and not the news which is distorted for mass appeal. Listen to him and then try to objectively look at the accomplishments he claims to have made and verify them.
      You should listen to how Metaxas, Hukabee and pastors on TBN as well as the channel itself is literally geared towards encouraging it's viewers to support Trump if they are Christians. Hukabee is literally attached to Trump's behind and he is utterly convinced that Trump can do Nothing wrong and every one of his statements have superior and Christian merit.
      I can't even listen to him for five minutes, it is so biased and places Trump on a pedestal.

    • @Actuary1776
      @Actuary1776 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Allen scheider Interesting Cohen only discloses something like this AFTER a fallout with Trump, AFTER he’s been convicted of crimes, all while cashing in on a book deal. But yeah, gobble it all up without any kind skepticism.

    • @allenscheider9817
      @allenscheider9817 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Actuary1776 Similarly Trump was singing Cohen's praises for many years and then all of a sudden this "Brilliant attorney" as Trump once called him is now a "Dumb loser" Typical behavior for Trump. He praises people and then if they look at him sideways, he makes up lies as to why you were really so horrible. Trump hired all of these people. Shows he is a poor manager if he doesn't know how to hire good people or keep good people/.

  • @anthonyspeta2181
    @anthonyspeta2181 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "Evil is Evil. Lesser, greater, middling… Makes no difference. The degree is arbitary. The definition’s blurred. If I’m to choose between one evil and another… I’d rather not choose at all." I think what Christian's look past in this election process is that we aren't called to choose the lesser evil, we are supposed to bring Christ's love and light to this world. There should be a movement among Christians seeking justice and virtue among either party for righteous leadership or starting their own. But instead, too many Christians are willing to compromise or they put policy over morality. Both Biden and Trump are morally decrepit figures and both should be rejected in search of true leadership.

    • @Jointknight
      @Jointknight 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      AMEN

    • @55joelem
      @55joelem 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think you mean sin is sin. It is written anyone who says he is without sin is a liar. Certainly your not claiming to be with out sin lest you be a liar. BTW everyone has made the claim. So I guess we're all liars. Sin is evil. Sin is cosmic treason against God. So when exactly did you discover evil? Did you pull yourself up by your moral bootstraps and suddenly overcome the sin nature you were born with? Was Jesus' morality diminished when he ate with tax collectors and spoke with prostitutes? May be a news flash to you, but there is no moral man well apart from Jesus. It is written none do good, not one! You won't find justice or virtue in any man, not one. OK, true you might find some bits here and there. but to whose credit? If it were possible for any man to fulfill the requirements of God by keeping all His law and to "be perfect" there would be no need for Jesus' sacrifice on the cross. The Pharisees were uncompromising and in their own minds perfect keepers of the law. But we see what Jesus said to them by calling them hypocrites and worse. Today we call it hate speech, but it was the truth. The Pharisees hated Him for that. In search of true leadership? Jesus isn't on the ballot and He is not planning to run. He simply will take what is rightfully His. Furthermore we don't get to vote for Him, He votes for us and did so even before the foundations of the earth were laid. So you can identify evil. Even Satan can identify evil. But you believe in God! Yes Satan believes in God too. So far that make you equal with Satan. The real question is, who do you say Jesus is?

    • @anthonyspeta2181
      @anthonyspeta2181 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@55joelem Of course no one is righteous in the eyes of God w/o the blood of Christ, but that doesn't mean God has not called believers to leadership. Jesus called Peter 'the rock on which I will build my church'. Peter was a sinner, and yet he had a calling from God to lead the church. It's not unimaginable that God would call a believer to be the 'rock on which I will build this country', or similar. Abraham Lincoln was a man of God who did a great and incredible thing, freeing many of God's people from the shackles of slavery. Or we can go further to King David, a man after God's own heart who led with integrity. There are leaders out there who will lead with honour and pursue virtue, and as Christians we ought to vote for them.

    • @55joelem
      @55joelem 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@anthonyspeta2181 In my reply I concluded with, "who do you say Jesus is?" The rock that Jesus builds his church on is NOT Peter. It is on the solid rock understanding in Peter's answer to Jesus when Jesus asked.. "Who do you say I am?" and Peter answered "you are the Messiah, the Son of the living God. It is upon that understanding that the foundation rock of the church is formed, furthermore led by Jesus Christ not Peter.
      Yes God is sovereign and may use his creatures in any way He chooses to accomplish His purposes including speaking through a donkey. I am rather convinced that God chooses useful tools and may choose a moral man such as a Mormon, Muslim, Hindi or Atheist. Oh, you say these are not the moral men you had in mind. Clearly, none would make a claim to know Christ in the way Peter did. Yet they are moral men by every other measure and therefore acceptable for the office. Likewise God may use a morally corrupt man like JF Kennedy. I would preferred simply do my civic duty and with a clear conscience before God vote within the circumstances He has laid before me. For me it's a matter of deciding which candidate might be the more useful tool for God. There, I've done my duty and God is more than able to handle the rest.

    • @amattson6578
      @amattson6578 ปีที่แล้ว

      I get what youre saying but if one lesser evil is standing up for pro-life, marriage, and other christian values then christians should vote for that because if all christians chose not to vote than the left would rule over all and our rights would quickly be taken away.

  • @brettself
    @brettself 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I made some comments as I listened. Feel free to judge, disassemble or dissemble. French won the debate if only for being the most gracious and (don't read this David) humble in his responses. You know, character of Christ stuff.
    Metaxas said opposing Trump is 'demonic', like, a year ago. Yikes. I read "If You Can Keep It", one of his books, and thought it was great. I did not realize he was such a jerk, though.
    Joe and Jill Biden made less than $400K in 2016 (last 22 years of available tax returns). The $16M they're worth now is almost entirely from speaking engagement and book sales. That's a career of corruption? Go, Joe. He was one of the poorest guys in Washington for decades. I thought Metaxas was savvier than this. Trump doesn't even pay his bills. I'd like to be rich, too. Wouldn't you?
    This isn't new, though. Metaxas seems to have a habit of making claims that fit his beliefs. In 2012, the National Catholic Reporter referred to him as 'dangerous' because of his unsubstantiated claims about Obama, even though Obama "seem(ed) as though his running mate was Planned Parenthood". Not a fan of Obama, the Reporter still noticed a lie when it heard one.
    "Solipsism" was a jab, an insult. God's grace shines through. Why shift from respectful to condescending? One of the great risks in becoming well-known and respected is how you begin to develop an exaggerated perspective of your own opinion. "AOC, who was a bartender 15 minutes ago..." THAT'S AMERICA ERIC. You can be elected to Congress at 25.
    Essentially, Metaxas calls black democrats morons for not voting Republican because of what the Democrat Party USED TO BE.
    "That's an extremely vague question. You have to be specific." Get smart. Ask a follow-up question if you don't understand. Geez, you're a radio host.
    Eric, the last American battleship was built in 1944. No one is 'coming at us with a battleship'.
    I want a list of "all the black people (Eric) know(s)", if only because white dudes that think they know what it is to be black say things like this on a regular basis. I know, like, four and I'm just a guy who only knows a few people.
    Unable to help himself, Eric even tells David that he can't compare Trump to King David in order to change his mind and experience pause regarding whether or not he would change his perspective. Really? Metaxas wants you to agree with him, but he wants you to agree with him his way. I guess French doesn't believe in the same Jesus.
    "He's not Joe Biden"? THAT'S why we should vote for Trump? Many people have shifted to Biden because he isn't Trump. Isn't opposing Trump "demonic", like you said in your Franklin Graham interview? "He's not Biden" doesn't stand when not voting for Trump is the stuff of Satan himself. Double yikes.
    Trump is unable to speak for the working class American, as Metaxas says he is. He's never worked for anyone but himself (and his father, though that hardly qualifies him as ever having been anyone's employee). Metaxas doesn't even reflect knowing the history of the man.
    Trump knows how to speak to people and sell himself as a product. It's not the same thing. Trump was a mistake as President, but he was the eventuality. For fun, read Stuart Steven's "It Was All a Lie, How the Republican Party Became Donald Trump." (Stevens' career was as a Republican campaign manager or something like it).
    Trump's main issue with China isn't what Metaxas thinks it is. China doesn't recognize American sovereignty in any respect, not for our global policies, not our intellectual property laws, not our civil liberties. Given the choice, MAGA products were made in China. China doesn't think in American ways when it thinks about America, but it can return a product in bulk in one month with nothing but a drawing whereas the same thing takes 2 years here. Newsflash, no countries think about America the way America sees itself.
    Biden understands what a true global economy is. He understands that you can't stiff arm China. Heck, even Nixon knew that.
    Don't even quote Reagan ("Tear down this wall"). Everyone who took govt/econ knows better at this point. When the wall fell, Putin went into action (He was stationed in E Berlin at the time).
    ***quick online background of these two guys*** (I only watched because my dad loves Metaxas and I'd never actually heard him speak before. Boy, was I surprised.)
    Metaxas has honorary doctorates from colleges that agree with him, but he's earned only a bachelors in English, though from Yale University (if Hillman offered me an honorary I wouldn't take it, place is a propaganda machine worthy of Charlie Kirk). French graduated from David Lipcomb University, which is Church of Christ, and went on to get his Juris Doctorate cum laude from Harvard Law. French lives in Tennessee. Metaxas, Manhattan. Metaxas is famous, while French turned down the idea of politics because he thought he wouldn't succeed.
    PS, faith is not a complicated thing, as Eric said (maybe he wasn't prepared for the question). Scripture states it has been made simple so that we can understand it and Jesus made faith simple, so we could have it. I liked "If You Can Keep It" and I highly recommend it, but buy it used. Eric's making enough already if he lives in Manhattan.

    • @ThatClassic70sGirl
      @ThatClassic70sGirl 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      "French graduated from David Lipcomb University, which is Church of Christ, and went on to get his Juris Doctorate cum laude from Harvard Law. "
      That explains his position and beliefs, then.

  • @jenihendrix3927
    @jenihendrix3927 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I’m frustrated with the host...his intro is soooo long. I didn’t click on this to hear him!

    • @hiawathasbrother
      @hiawathasbrother 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Completely agree -- that guy needs to learn when to shut up, which is immediately.

  • @jessewightman4317
    @jessewightman4317 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    At the end of the day, Yahweh Elohim is in control of it ALL. He controls whomever is in the oval office. As Christians, we need to quit making politics an idol making it an existential crisis every four years. We need to get our eyes back on Jesus Christ. IMO, the body of Christ in America needs a revival so idols can be laid at the altar and we can return to true worship of the King of Kings. Our mission statement as Christians is to know Christ and make Him known in a fallen world. Saying ALL Christians have to vote for President Trump is implying that if believers don't fall in line - we must question your faith, your patriotism, your love of America etc. Where does being a true follower of Christ have anything to do with which political candidate I vote for? We are letting politics of the short term influence our world view instead of having a long term view of what God has in store. Christians know that a works based performance mindset towards the President or anyone else doesn't hold water. At first, it was defense of him being a baby Christian and now it is as if his supporters don't care just as long as he does what the voters expect. We do what we do out of love what God did for us on the cross at Calvary and NOT for earning anyone's vote or favor. When Christians bicker, gripe and complain about politics, we bring Yahweh Elohim low and we exhibit a total lack of trust. We must not forget that Jesus Christ is coming one day to wipe away ALL evil. We can change the American culture today by carrying out the Great Commission given by Jesus Himself in Matthew 28. We change the culture one person, one neighbor, one community, one town, one city at a time. IMO, Christians taking the fight to social media against the socialist hordes does no good. Which is more important - changing our American culture or witnessing to that lost person at the workplace who could die tonight and end up in hell? Right now, the devil is loving the discourse between Christians because it is creating divisions. Let's focus on what unites us and not on what divides.

    • @4knewt505
      @4knewt505 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      My heart! yes! The move towards idolatry of man and party is alarming. What happened to spreading the gospel and loving the lost? I've seen posts of fellow Christians calling protestors or people of other parties witches and demons. The enemy comes to steal, kill, and destroy and the distraction is in the idolatry running rampant right now behind every bumper sticker and political party flag. There is no purism in either party. Salvation and Righteousness is not sanctioned by any political party.

    • @Puddy777
      @Puddy777 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most sense on here

  • @rick4400
    @rick4400 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your website Captcha validation is not working properly. On TH-cam I just came across "Should Christians vote for Trump? Eric Metaxas vs David French" and want to thank you for your efforts to bring lively and meaningful debate to the world. I was surprised to notice this debate happened 2 years ago, yet I'm already a subscriber. It's my intention to keep a closer watchful eye on your content. May The Lord continue to richly bless you all! Rick Miller

  • @FrostinthePines
    @FrostinthePines 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Wow, David French knocked it out of the park!

    • @ryanordmandy
      @ryanordmandy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Brain Enormous Out of curiosity, what liberal policies has he argued for, and which of those policies were contrary to biblical principles? I'm not aware of what they are.

    • @Iamwrongbut
      @Iamwrongbut 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Brain Enormous I would like to know as well. And when you list them can you explain why Jesus would disagree with those specific policies?

    • @lilanigunaratnam4200
      @lilanigunaratnam4200 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      TDS

  • @Trove_8551
    @Trove_8551 4 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    I gave this a thumbs up because of the clear minded, reality-based statements from David French. That other guy Eric Metaxas just makes up information and spits it out, which makes sense that he supports trump.

    • @theravagedgrapefruit8190
      @theravagedgrapefruit8190 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You’re brainwashed and clearly hate freedom congrats. Unity huh? Lol just wait huge red wave coming in 2022. You’re on the wrong side of history!

    • @Iamwrongbut
      @Iamwrongbut 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@theravagedgrapefruit8190 wrong side of history? Because we support pro-environment policies? I think when water levels cover New Orleans that you might rethink that statement.

    • @waynebeath8154
      @waynebeath8154 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Eric is a big fan of his own voice.

    • @harrysonke1907
      @harrysonke1907 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would say that these nearly 4 years of Biden’s Administration have proven Metaxis right and David French naive at best. Biden is the 3rd term of Obama who instead of bringing America together was a worst divisive force than Woodrow Wilson who brought segregation back into the White House

  • @PeterOzanne
    @PeterOzanne ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Do anything and say anything to get elected" described Trump exactly Eric!! lol

  • @deborahmccray9841
    @deborahmccray9841 4 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    David French thinks so much for thoroughly illuminating the questions in a non-partisan way.
    Eric seems to be quite the Trump sycophant.

    • @davidreinhart418
      @davidreinhart418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Partisan is needed when arguing against corrupt.

    • @stefanhall3219
      @stefanhall3219 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Eric does not seem. Eric IS!

    • @Rabbinicphilosophyforthewin
      @Rabbinicphilosophyforthewin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Interesting. All I heard from DF is name calling. The man doesn’t know how to construct an argument.

    • @lilanigunaratnam4200
      @lilanigunaratnam4200 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      TDS

  • @cadrelvinc.2665
    @cadrelvinc.2665 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you for providing this format of discussion.

  • @vincenzo8399
    @vincenzo8399 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Eric Metaxas was right in that the old Democrats (Dixiecrats) of the South hated the Civil Rights Act of 1965 enacted by a southern Democratic president, Lyndon B Johnson. The next part of that story that Eric left out was that the southern Democrats then went to the REPUBLICAN party as a protest movement to what they felt the Democratic party was turning into (ala civil liberties). Since the mid-60's the Republican party has moved to harsher conservative ideals that cared little for civil rights. KNOW YOUR FACTS and tell the full story!

  • @fernandomiranda4714
    @fernandomiranda4714 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    French said that he tends to trust the communities of America regarding voting, except "white" evangelical community (his words). All communities know about policy, character, etc. Except white evangelicals. Who is the racist again?

    • @Ericviking2019
      @Ericviking2019 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You will know them by their fruits

    • @cuphalffull8278
      @cuphalffull8278 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      My thoughts exactly. He's hard ro listen to. Trump derangement at it's core.

    • @Bowdaddy4truth
      @Bowdaddy4truth 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually that's not racism. Racism is a strong word that is extremely damaging for people based on their race. It is NOT bias, or predudice of a particular segment of a DOMINANT demographic of a country. Please refrain from you using the term as a catchall to refute an argument. White people in America have never experience true racism. It can only take place by a race that has the POWER to impact another race.

  • @monicamurphy1792
    @monicamurphy1792 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Eric Metaxas' judgement is on display in the first words out of his mouth.

    • @elisabethhouseknecht202
      @elisabethhouseknecht202 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It was a reference to a classic SNL skit. I’m a loyal Metaxas listener and his humor is unique...but he probably regrets opening with that line. 🤦‍♀️

    • @tbone6735
      @tbone6735 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Eric Metaxas brought the whole Fox News package with him for sure!

    • @monicamurphy1792
      @monicamurphy1792 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@elisabethhouseknecht202 Yes, I am aware of the Dan Akroyd line. I am of a similar age as both of these guys. It spoke volumes to me, though, that he thought this was the right way to open. It shows that he doesn't have a serious case, only a jester routine.

    • @caterinaplatt9811
      @caterinaplatt9811 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@monicamurphy1792 Actually, I took it as an attempt to lighten things up. I know I laughed.

    • @SilverHour23
      @SilverHour23 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@monicamurphy1792i agree with you on this, the proofs in the pudding right away.. greetings from NL x

  • @kandmtrip
    @kandmtrip 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Haven’t heard much in the way of biblical application to our voting options. All I heard was 2 dudes trying to debate for the presidential nominees, which seems like a waste of time as the nominees have the opportunity to debate for themselves.

    • @omogaju
      @omogaju 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You’re absolutely right. The only part I could say has biblical applications would be the opening statements from David French.

  • @mariafuentes6083
    @mariafuentes6083 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    This debate does not give me a Christian perspective based on biblical truths.

    • @sandyforro826
      @sandyforro826 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      NO DISRESPECT BUT THEN JUST READ YOUR BIBLE AND GOD WILL GIVE YOU THE ANSWERS YOU NEED TO KNOW

    • @nivrags
      @nivrags 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Biblical truth states that GOD put Donald Trump into office, not Christians as David stated. He obviously doesn’t even know that so how can anyone listen to his democrat/Marxist comments at all. He is a leftist narcissist, which most democrats are; narcissists attribute what they are doing to their opposition. It is SOOO devious and detrimental to any society! If you are a Christian, you MUST vote for President Trump because Abortion is the democrat party’s RIDE OR DIE policy! They will sell out to anyone to keep murdering the MOST vulnerable and innocent ones happening! They are despicable!

    • @kylecarpenter1
      @kylecarpenter1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@nivrags This is the second craziest thing I have read this week!

    • @Av1on1cs
      @Av1on1cs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      After listening to the first speaker, some cannot see how Trump falls short of the Bible principles that 'Christians' claims to read. MLK, said during America's involvement in Vietnam, "I hear God saying... you're too arrogant... I will rise up and break the back bone of your power".

    • @llettsome8639
      @llettsome8639 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's right. It feels that it's their own personal bias & opinions.

  • @veggiet2009
    @veggiet2009 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    First disagreement with Metaxas: "It's a choice between two." It may be that probability and populism in our country has lead us to a point where only two candidates will be, and it may be that the democrats are a "bad side" (I'm not saying it is, but granting it for the sake of the argument) even if the democrats are a bad side. It doesn't mean that the other side is automatically a "good" side. Both sides can be bad and I don't have to vote for it if I don't agree with either side.

    • @veggiet2009
      @veggiet2009 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is actually a problem I have with both Metaxas and French, because as I listen to this I hear how French is Defending Biden (which is an nice perspective.) I particularly like his answer about how he supported Biden in a decision in the 90s but that that decision had negative consequences, it's a realistic viewpoint. But I still say there needs to be room for a third voice, and room to descent and disagree with both sides from a Christian perspective. And I think that's what I was surprised this debate didn't go over, was the christian perspective on both candidates.

  • @PeterOzanne
    @PeterOzanne ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Eric Metaxas, "Trump isn't cruel"? Lmao. And then he drags up the old history of how the parties behaved differently generations ago. Pretty desperate!

  • @terriergal
    @terriergal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I'm listening to Metaxas and going... wait now... who is he talking about again? Isn't that what Trump does??? Has done ALL HIS LIFE? Literally any argument they can make against Biden applies to Trump so much more. (note, I didn't vote for either one, but Biden is at least not as hateful a person).

  • @robcarr4397
    @robcarr4397 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    A question: If America had to wait for a candidate with character that was sufficiently godly, would America ever have a president? And is Biden and what he plans to do, not so evil that he needs to be rejected absolutely, at all costs?

  • @PeterOzanne
    @PeterOzanne ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'd love to see what Metaxas says NOW, post Jan 6, post Trump's attempt to prevent the LAWFUL transfer of power after the election. I think he's not dumb, but I think he might eat his words, recant his support for Trump, or just be "stumm"!

    • @vowelsounds6312
      @vowelsounds6312 ปีที่แล้ว

      J6 was a protest that deteriorated into a riot due to incitement by people planted in the crowd by democrats. A false flag event staged for CNN’s cameras.

  • @OcicatStudio
    @OcicatStudio 4 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    David French won this debate hands down.

    • @dreamstever
      @dreamstever 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@tyronegrant9290 Yeah. Eric got handled badly.

  • @peli_candude554
    @peli_candude554 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    *Jesus said if you love me you must hate your family.* Was that because Jesus wanted division or was it because Jesus wanted them to focus on ways to destroy the enemy? There must be division in order to have sides in any battle and if you want Trump to be nice and play fair with people who would do the despicable things that the Democrats have been doing to try to gain the power seat then you are literally laying down in front of them and baring your neck for them to see that you will let them do as they please.
    To criticize Donald Trump for doing pretty much what it takes to expose them and open our eyes to the evil they are doing to destroy our society and our nations then you are simply encouraging the Democrats to keep doing what they are doing.
    This cannot be won by being nice and playing strictly by the rules. it requires someone who understands how their game works, attacking their game (like they did with the coronavirus and impeachment and all the other dirty tricks) and demonstrating that you are not backing down.
    TRUMP -2020 and more- ..2022...Let's Go Branden
    He is not the Messiah but he certainly is working for the side of those who value life, liberty, and the American way...

  • @dr.m.h.patterson8121
    @dr.m.h.patterson8121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Right on schedule, w/in only the 1st 5 or so minutes, relentless Self-Promoter Eric Metaxas has mentioned his 2 books. Both of which are yummy for Christians to read & feel awesome about, but hard historians can't believe the scholarly sloppiness. He takes criminal imaginative liberties in his Bonhoeffer book alone. David French? Hard, precise scholarship. Zero ego. And I've met Metaxas. 100 bucks Metaxas stays for a while & has serious heart-to-heart chats w/ women who want to come speak to him... & French ducks out early to go back to his hotel & call his wife & kids. That's the difference between these two men.

  • @yvieart
    @yvieart 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Just started watching this - so before I finish watching it, as a believer in God because of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, this is what I believe: I am not looking for a Saviour, King, etc. on earth. I am not looking for heaven on earth. As believers in Christ, we KNOW this would be not only futile, but wrong. However, we have a moral obligation to do the right thing. We are all sinners, "there is not ONE righteous, no! not one". Vote for the party that have policies that advocate a belief in God. It's astounding the number of Christians who appear to not have the ability to see what's going on in the Here and Now. God often uses the most unusual people to do His will.

    • @martifingers
      @martifingers 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      " It's astounding the number of Christians who appear to not have the ability to see what's going on in the Here and Now. God often uses the most unusual people to do His will."
      Lets say I am an atheist socialist and I think you are mistaken. How can I or anyone else know if God has not somehow chosen me to say that as I would seem to be a very unusual choice? Or does God only chose right wing actors for his Work?

  • @hildaben3220
    @hildaben3220 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    He that is without sin, let him cast the first stone @ the President. If it wasn't for God's grace, where would we all be?

    • @Blurb777
      @Blurb777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hilda Ben - We'd all be bowing down to the UN troops as the New World Order finally makes headway as it has tried for decades. That's where we'd be. Remember Bush Sr., Kissinger, Biden, Obama, Clinton all waxed poetic about the New World Order and Obama wanted to send in UN troops and do away with our police force but met up with such blowback, he decided to scrap his idea - well, not his, but the UN's? They're trying it again with the "Defund Police" chant which is not original with BLM, but the UN and the NWO. Eliminating guns - same thing. The NWO is afraid to gain headway here just yet because people still have guns and the NWO is still slightly afraid of us. We'll see how long Trump can hold out. He's buying time for us right now.

    • @AnthonyLTaylor
      @AnthonyLTaylor 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The reason it is hypocrisy because you were not saying that when Obama was President.

    • @omogaju
      @omogaju 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      So character does not matter anymore? You twist the word of Christ simply to win an argument. Do you recall the John the Baptist was committed to prison and beheaded because he pointed out the sins of Herod, the king of Israel under Roman rule at the time.

    • @hildaben3220
      @hildaben3220 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@omogaju I'm not twisting anything. I'm simply saying that we're all sinners (some of us saved by grace) & shouldn't be judging. And, like some one else pointed out, if we waited for a perfect candidate, we would never get to elect anyone.

    • @Blurb777
      @Blurb777 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AnthonyLTaylor Whom are you talking to and how do you know what was said by whom when Obama was president?

  • @Greg-il8by
    @Greg-il8by 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You couldn't host debates at Yale or Harvard?? That's news to the alumni and students of the Yale Divinity School. Or the Yale Center for Faith and Culture.

    • @mistimoser2213
      @mistimoser2213 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmmm....would love to see that happen!

  • @Jointknight
    @Jointknight 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Biden isn't the subject of this debate, Metaxas and half the commentators seem to not understand that.

    • @christiansoldier77
      @christiansoldier77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Jointknight Biden is part of the subject. You cant ask "should you vote for Trump?" without examining the alternative

    • @Jointknight
      @Jointknight 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@christiansoldier77 Yes, actually you can. Also you can have a conversation by not making Biden the central focus, hence the title.

  • @controlclerk
    @controlclerk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Now French is talking about our First Amendment rights being stronger than ever during Obama's final year in office. Tell that to the bakery in Colorado.

  • @sling247
    @sling247 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Ya, French is much more thoughtful and genuine. Metaxas comes across very conservative cliche with very old arguments that have been regurgitated for years. No real innovators in the conservative world. I'm conservative but re evaluating. Metaxas is so concerned about this world while his religion boasts of the greatness of the next. His faith is in his political party.

  • @mariafuentes6083
    @mariafuentes6083 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Do I vote for known and proven corruption in Biden x 47 yrs , or vote for someone who has been working to keep the promises he made during his campaigning in 3.5 yrs. Their faith is between them and God. All we have to go on are the policies.

  • @RaphaeLoh01
    @RaphaeLoh01 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I was wondering why this debate was almost 2 hours like... 5 minutes in, I realised why! Just skip the first 8 and a half minutes...

  • @jcbnica
    @jcbnica 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Great debate, it was like watching a pro vs an amateur. David French's arguments were solid, unfortunately Mr. Eric Metaxas had to resort to anger and sarcasm making Trump proud for sure.

    • @davidreinhart418
      @davidreinhart418 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Sorry but the majority voted for Trump. I love you but you can’t see the truth.

    • @promomail1768
      @promomail1768 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Not true. Trump lost popular vote.

    • @peli_candude554
      @peli_candude554 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In retrospect it is obvious who was right snd who was left being wrong.
      If you loved Biden and don’t see he lied then you’re loving under false pretenses.
      That’s typical in a childhood puppylove.

    • @MultiBigAndy
      @MultiBigAndy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@davidreinhart418 It baffles me that these guys that are against Trump don't even research what Marxism/Communism does to the public.
      Joe Biden tries to go that route and people just don't see the truth.

    • @davidreinhart418
      @davidreinhart418 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MultiBigAndy
      Most cannot see the truth and when the truth is introduced into their lives it creates cognitive dissonance. Like tuning guitar strings with harmonics. The object is to get two strings to vibrate at the same frequency. But cognitive dissonance the truth vibrates at a different frequency than their beliefs. It’s very uncomfortable for them. So how do we help change the frequency of their strings?

  • @discipleofthegreatteacher2422
    @discipleofthegreatteacher2422 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I was once a regular pioneer with Jehovah's Witnesses, and I left that organization. Toxic organizations like the watchtower can do great harm to people of good faith. But I have not stopped believing in the bible. Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Father of mercy and God of all consolation. 2 Corinthians chapter 1, verse 3.

    • @rebekahvoigt2548
      @rebekahvoigt2548 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Praise God you left! From my understanding they believe Jesus is subordinate to God.

    • @discipleofthegreatteacher2422
      @discipleofthegreatteacher2422 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rebekahvoigt2548I was once a regular pioneer with Jehovah's Witnesses, and I left that toxic organization (Watchtower, the so-called Jehovah's Witnesses). But I have not stopped believing in the bible.
      Then Jesus went on to say to the Jews who had believed him: if you remain in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. John chapter 8: verse 31-32 . If you want, you are invited to subscribe to my channel, Biblical studies, bible movies and Bibles in Spanish, English, French, German and Italian.

    • @discipleofthegreatteacher2422
      @discipleofthegreatteacher2422 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rebekahvoigt2548 Then Jesus went on to say to the Jews who had believed him: if you remain in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. John chapter 8: verse 31-32 . If you want, you are invited to subscribe to my channel, Biblical studies, bible movies and Bibles in Spanish, English, French, German and Italian.

  • @MichaelSlattery-sh8vl
    @MichaelSlattery-sh8vl 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That, is up too the individual!💯%😁❤️😉😎👍🙏❤️

  • @Toby-asdf
    @Toby-asdf 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Metaxas confused his role.... instead of giving a defense of Trump he just did an impression.

    • @jhohn211
      @jhohn211 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Metaxas is a blowhard, arrogant and overrated.

    • @jondeur2686
      @jondeur2686 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yer an idjit

    • @ashasonu9620
      @ashasonu9620 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is no christian defece for Trump. One can pray that he will come to repent and have a encounter with Jesus that would change him. Not use the Bible or religion to gain votes.

    • @Amick44
      @Amick44 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ashasonu9620 exactly. What defense is there?

    • @ashasonu9620
      @ashasonu9620 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Amick44 some christians have supported him because he has been anti-abortion and stopped lgbt persecution of e'.g.bakers who refused to bake a cake for a gay couple.

  • @daylightmarch9966
    @daylightmarch9966 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Thank you, David French for your thoughtful and Christ like insights! You have my vote 210%

    • @impish22
      @impish22 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Mr. French is pompous and condescending

    • @peli_candude554
      @peli_candude554 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So we csn thank Mr French for the mess that Biden created with his idiotic policies and for decidinng, finally, to do what Trump was doing?

  • @ayubumar4642
    @ayubumar4642 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First consider two mothers, both harlots, fighting over a living child. The case is brought before the judge. Then consider two political parties, fighting over a nation. And the case is brought before the judge. ----- Now hear the judge ----- And the king said, Bring me a sword. And they brought a sword before the king. And the king said, Divide the living child in two, and give half to the one, and half to the other. Then spake the woman whose the living child was unto the king, for her bowels yearned upon her son, and she said, O my lord, give her the living child, and in no wise slay it. But the other said, Let it be neither mine nor thine, but divide it. Then the king answered and said, Give her the living child, and in no wise slay it: she is the mother thereof. - 1 Kings 3:24-27 Ultimately, the judge will see your heart, truth and lies will be revealed. Do you pridefully fight, or humbly surrender the child that it may live? Please take this seriously, and pray about this as if it were judgement of your own living child, or a nation, that was being fought over. Seek mercy. Seek forgiveness. By which manner you judge, you shall also be judged. Do you want to be also cut in two? Repent and turn back to God. Humble your will, and allow God's will to be done. Be silent before the king, and thankful for His great wisdom to do judgement, humbly seeking forgiveness and mercy for the child. We must all first be humbled before the Lord, for the healing of our land to come. Trust in the Lord. If Solomon judged in this manner, would not Solomon also be judged in this same manner? You may think you have been given great wisdom and knowledge to judge, and perhaps you can rightfully discern truth from lies. But still yet, I say humble yourself and let the sword of the King of kings fall upon you. The very word of God. Because by which manner you judge, you shall also be judged. And so I say unto Solomon, that a greater is here, even Jesus, and so I am humbly praying and seeking forgiveness and mercy for you, that you may live, that God's peace could be restored unto you, and unto all the land. If the sword of truth were upon you, would you repent and seek forgiveness and mercy for yourself? Or for your living child? Solomon withdrew the sword and showed mercy unto the living child, and restored the child to it's rightful mother. The wisdom of God was in him, to do judgement. I recommend that you read this entire story of Solomon's judgement, 1 Kings 3:16-28.

  • @dentonknight4327
    @dentonknight4327 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Feel embarrassed for Eric Metaxas in this... He's so out of touch with anyone on the other side of the political spectrum from himself.

  • @mnelisi
    @mnelisi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Voting based on your religious values alone isn't enough though. Those values are broken and upheld on both sides. Voting based on who violates those values the most or least is subjective. So any Christian would also have to look at their socioeconomic situations and vote accordingly, and those in privileged situations (whites males) will not vote the same way as those oppressed the most by the system (black women) even if both are Christians. So it's pretty easy for a white man to sit there and say vote for Joe and other white man says vote Trump, their privilege allows them

    • @djuliano4484
      @djuliano4484 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Way to make someone an oppressor simply because of their gender and race- sounds like racism and sexism to me. I haven’t made up my mind on voting yet but this type of comment fits right into Eric’s argument.

  • @psongman9536
    @psongman9536 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great debate, wish i had found it earlier, but will send it to all who need the Truth!

    • @Amick44
      @Amick44 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's a lot of people!

  • @duanegoodine6709
    @duanegoodine6709 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    One side has verifiable information, the other side not so much. Persecution complex overload. Nones will boom in America ; )

  • @mariafuentes6083
    @mariafuentes6083 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Raised my children with veggie tales!

  • @dimassilva6822
    @dimassilva6822 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I live in Brazil, but I'm informed enough to say that Mr. Metaxas said too many falacies and some lies in his intro, that took me away from the debate. Thought it was serious. Should be aware that would not be after praying in the introduction.

  • @Nikich103
    @Nikich103 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I wonder what Metaxas would say now about the people electing the President and respecting the will of the American voter.

    • @brandybobandy2194
      @brandybobandy2194 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He still supports and shills for Stop the Steal.

    • @allthesmallthings1041
      @allthesmallthings1041 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Are you referring to the rigged election?

    • @tylerctrotter
      @tylerctrotter 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Conveniently, he is an election denier.

  • @joemendiuk5683
    @joemendiuk5683 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Well it wasn't entirely a waste of time watching this y'all!

  • @deborahreed5311
    @deborahreed5311 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow, I hope people will listen to this today.

  • @bassplayinpapa
    @bassplayinpapa 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Alright. A real, respectful, articulate debate. Thank you!

    • @dianedonohue9855
      @dianedonohue9855 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Serious discussion.
      Please think about this long and hard.
      Remember the GOP leaders like Lindsey Graham, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, the Bush family, Ronald Regan's family, Nikki Haley, Kelly Anne Conway, Rick Perry and many, many others all called him a "Liar and unfit for office," until the electoral college, NOT the American people, voted him in. (She got 2.87Million more votes from the American people. Not me!)
      Where did character and morals go from the Christian Right?
      Would Jesus promote a filandering, lying, narricistic, cheating, divisive man who does not pay his fair share in taxes? Who made his money "on the backs of poor people?"
      Would Jesus promote an immigrant hating, dictator loving, "pussy grabbing" man who undermines our American military generals, our CIA and FBI? Would Jesus vote for a man who tweets hatred, while bullying others? Could Jesus support a man who said more than once, "I've never asked God for forgiveness." "Why do I have to repent if I'm not making mistakes?"
      Would Jesus choose a man who scorns immigrants and yet was married 3x, and cheated on his current wife who was an "illegal" immigrant, (she broke immigration laws)?
      A man who chose to marry a nude model, 25 years younger as First Lady?
      A boastful, egocentric who said, "I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose any votes, ok?"
      Hmm.
      Hard one, huh?
      Not for me.
      All lives matter, not just fetus or black lives!!
      We've paid a heavy price to have this man in office.
      We have lost the respect of the world.
      No one ever has been protested more. Why?
      Because hatred and fear are so easy to see and we will not be manipulated!
      We live in Faith, Hope and Love. Truth NOT Tweets!
      Vote alternatives, there are a few to choose from.
      Send the message- we won't be manipulated again by a man who has deceived the good righteous Christian people of America!
      Don The Con, as they call him in NY- has to go!
      💜dd

  • @Volmire1
    @Volmire1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    I thought the beginning speaker was never going to stop.

    • @mumstheword8851
      @mumstheword8851 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I actually fell asleep

    • @mumstheword8851
      @mumstheword8851 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can't believe what I missed. This man is dangerous in his misjudgments and his idle use of the Name of Jesus. I don't get him and I don't know who he's talking about

    • @nathanwood6707
      @nathanwood6707 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I could be wrong, but I think he’s talking about the moderator.