Why is a bridge problematic between Bolivar and Galveston?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 มี.ค. 2023
  • Welcome to Galveston Unscripted!
    We explore the question of why there isn't a bridge connecting Galveston and Bolivar, and discuss why it isn't as easy as it sounds. We dive into the logistics of where the bridge would start, how long it would have to be, and the potential cost of building the bridge. We also discuss potential delays due to the bridge's construction and possible interference with vessel traffic. Finally, we discuss the potential maintenance costs and lifespan of a bridge. Join us as we explore what it would take to build a bridge connecting Galveston and Bolivar!
    Get this shirt: www.galvestonunscripted.com/s...
    Podcast: galvestonunscripted.com/podcast
    Audio Tour: galvestonunscripted.com

ความคิดเห็น • 32

  • @311stylin
    @311stylin 28 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    There is no incentive. It would only benefit a few thousand people that live there and the beach goers. If there was large infrastructure and/or manufacturing/petrochemical on Boliver, that bridge would have already been built a long time ago.

  • @brittseverence7221
    @brittseverence7221 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What's the point of a bridge? Obviously, it's to move cars with people...not freight. Therefore, not worth it. People versus freight. Freight should always remain the priority in Houston. It's the fate of location and the reality of investment in global distribution. Forget the bridge. People who wish to live in these areas shoukd by flying cars.

  • @prestonstephens7719

    So $1 billion, for upper middle class to go to their $350,000-million dollar Bolivar beach houses. 😂😂😂

  • @rickcarey3820

    Idea 01 - Tunnel as mentioned already. If Maryland can figure out to cross the Chesapeake, then we can to. Idea 02 - Combine a road and the Ike Dike into one. At the swing gates, make them drivable. Sure the gates will be open often for ships, but it certainly beats waiting hours on the ferry. Idea 03 - Combination Ike Dike road and tunnel under the swing gates. There are plenty of options, however, the road block (literally) is that there is nothing of significant value over on Bolivar that warrants a billion dollar + highly engineered water crossing. Sure there are some nice expensive homes over in Bolivar but those don't justify the expense. Idea 04 - Make, and put into service, more ferry boats and build MUCH larger ferry landings to accommodate the traffic load.

  • @joemeyer6876

    Until Bolivar has a seawall, there’s no sense in building a bridge to it.

  • @glenn6292

    A bridge has been suggested for decades and it makes absolutely no sense, economically or logistically. There's not enough reason or demand for it except to get residents and tourists from Galveston to Boliver. If you don't like the wait simply don't go. Sorry, life's tough, taxpayers shouldn't be on the hook for your pleasure and convenience. If there's truly a need (there isn't) then add a couple of ferries. They won't do that because, well...see above.

  • @Critical-Thinker895

    As a lifelong Texan I can certify ... No doubt who would pay for it. Taxpayers. Next question?

  • @julliandaniels9864

    Not gonna lie but mentioning using the SS Selma is a disgusting disgrace to its history and heritage Texas already has an issue with the lack of artificial reefs and structures.

  • @joanngrayson1095
    @joanngrayson1095 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I would rather sit and wait for the ferry. I do not like bridges especially if they are high and over water. I would take the way from Kemah which would take even longer for me.

  • @nozrep

    because it’s too long or too far I had always supposed

  • @American_patriot08

    I feel like it would have to land ether north or south of fort Travis park as it’s a historical site

  • @Johnson48ize

    I agree with everything said. The major bridge issue would be tropical systems. They’d have to close the bridge when the winds got to a certain speed. Plus what if there’s a wreck on the bridge

  • @cameraman655

    Personally, I would fight against a bridge (frankly high bridges freak me out and I still avoid the Rainbow Bridge and the Sam Houston Tollway bridge over the Ship Channel), I love the ferry, there are times when I just want to think and a few hours going back-n-forth getting some sea air, does the trick.

  • @Johnson48ize

    They’d have to totally rebuild the pelican island bridge for that idea to even work. That would take years plus cost a lot as well

  • @texantraveler456
    @texantraveler456 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not completely certain, but it's a federal/State project, both would have to pitch in. Federal waterway, and Texas, Guessing the federal approp, would be block granted/allocated to the state. Good question for Congressman Randy Weber's office or Senator Cruz. Senator Mayes Middleton would also be a good resource on this.

  • @theoutdoorslifetv3200

    Go around if you don't have time to wait for the ferry.

  • @charlesjackson1279
    @charlesjackson1279 12 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Forget it. Keep the ferry.

  • @AirRider44

    It shouldn’t be a bridge, it should be a tunnel. We could leverage TBMs or the dredge and sink method.

  • @jphellify
    @jphellify 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The Boring Co