Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC, iOS or Android: 💥 con.onelink.me/kZW6/KG005 💥 Receive a Unique Starter Pack, available only for the next 30 days!
To people wathing this in the future: There are Vatnik and Wumao bots in the comments that history books were telling you about before their regimes collapsed
The British Empire is crumbling. Its premier toilet paper - the $US is increasingly dumped in International Trade. The British Empire will no longer be able to steal the wealth of the world by paying with toilet papers. When you fantasise that Russia is "strapped for cash", you are just coping. Russia has dumped the $US.
Yeh. Alliance of Beast Bear, Dragon and False Prophet. What could go wrong? Next we learn that they fight over capital of Israel... wait? Wasn't Kviv founded by Khazars? Shit...
China/Iran/Russia are not in an alliance with each other. They just simply agree to not get in each other's way and assist one another when mutually convenient.
@tigran-khanabazyan more like, Russia allowed China to do deal with Central Asia, as Putin been "quiet" about the whole meeting, otherwise Moscow would have voiced any concern with a "third party" politician or scholar on a newspaper debate. Since Europe and US already fucked with Russia and their only "friend" at the moment is China who show no hostility or anything, might as well go to the "lesser evil" they deem
@@JuanLegendre-ey9ty The US is responsible for many atrocities and deliberate gut-wrenching destabilization of countries. But even with all it's flaws, it's still less of a devil than Russia, Iran and China.
Iran and China had very close relations since Parthian dynasty in Iran and the Han dynasty in China. Iran guaranteed the western end of the Silk Road and provided a safe land route to the European and Mediterranean market and China’s manufacturing provided the basis of a very lucrative trade route from which all benefited. This relationship only collapsed in recent history when West European countries discovered shipping routes that precluded the land route. Recent relations between Iran and China seek to renew this ancient relationship.
The truth is, in the Malay Archipelago everything was destroyed when the Europeans came, a terrible disaster was experienced by the natives of the Americas and Australia
@@shahesmail313 Many Iranians who followed Yazdgard to China were granted official and noble status and still retained their culture to live in Tang Empire.
You are absolutely wrong about Iran and China not having a historic relationship. The silk road trade was so Successful and important to both countries that Persian became one of the official languages of Yuan Dynasty in China
After the Islamization of Iran, the royal family of Perisa even seek shelter in China and eventually become Chinese officals. This video is totally lack of basic research.
12:57 - the image representing Iran is that of Hassan Rouhani, former president of Iran. His term ended in 2021. The current president is Ebrahim Raisi, but the country's supreme leader is Ali Khameini.
It's so strange seeing actual world history like this happen before my eyes, some people say "history" stopped when the cold war ended, but history is an ongoing story.
@@shykorustotora Russian Shills do not get freedom of speech, because supporting Putin means you do not support free speech. I am only giving you what your morals believe in.
@@shykorustotora Crybaby Orcnik, I can talk bad about Russia all I want, because unlike you I live in a FREE country. The sooner NATO breaks up Russia the better.
The arguments presented against China, Iran, Russia alliance, could be made against any international alliance; take a look at Turkey, Greece, Austria and Hungary, they have been historical rivals for centuries, but united in NATO against the Soviet Union then and Russia now.
@@KatariaGujjar Turkey is a Chameleon state, it's playing a fine line between its NATO alliance while tempering Russia, but if a conflict break out between NATO and Russia, the Bear will crush the Chameleon first, and Erdoğan knows that.
@@KatariaGujjar "in the NATO", and that's the problem, one can't have its cake and eat it too, and that's what Turkey has been doing for the last 60 years, but if a war break out between NATO and Russia, Turkey is the most logical target for Russia. and Erdoğan knows that !!!
DO NOT PLAY Conflict of Nations! It will ruin your life!! Other players can attack you at anytime so the only way to win is to constantly play the game. If you sleep, your entire army may be gone when you wake up so i can't stress this enough: DO NOT PLAY Conflict of Nations!!!
Reminds me of Grepolis, played that game to death when I was young, but I was a little punk then without any responsibilities. Yea don't play any game like that unless you have absolutely no life at all and even then think twice cos the game warps its hand around you without you even noticing it until you start making plans irl that prioritize the game which is very very unhealthy. So thanks, I will never try this game.
All the mobile war games are the same. Freemium that plays on people's nature to compete and then buy all the resources packs to dominate other players. One of the original games that started this genre was Game Of War: Fire Age. In development, MachineZone had a team of psychologists that they consulted to create the game and make it extremely addicting. You see a lot of casino elements in these types of games. Definitely not good if you have an addictive personality. I actually made rent through college running 40 farm accounts in that game and selling resources to the players who would pay a ton of money to get an advantage (whales) so it worked out for me but I saw how addicted these people were.
Chinese people want to ask a question: Has the United States accused Israel of committing human rights violations by slaughtering civilians in Gaza? Has the United States accused Israel of its aggression against Palestine over the years? It's best not to talk about "human rights" every day if you can't achieve equal treatment.
No basis for claims that Israel committed any human rights violations. Palestinians always started the first and got beaten. That is what could happen if you start the war.
multiple sources stated that it was originally India, only after heavy US sanctions for being a customer of Russia, India withdrew its support for BRICS, being replaced by Iran as a main party member.
@@LuoSon312_G8 yea these "multiple sources" are the prime example of misinformation that you may be exposed to, it's basic geopolitics that BRICS is a block of future strong economies and just ask yourself in what universe is Iran a strong or developing economy
Clear western point of view as according to you America has done no wrong instead of destabilising countries and fuelling internal wars to weaken countries and gather them under there influence, How hard is it to understand countries don't want to be bullied by the USA and uk and should be allowed to interact with each other how they see fit! Colonialism is all the proof you need to see how far back this tactic by the west has been going on.
@@TheDanielStrang what has racism got to do with your statement might is right? I was giving you the perfect example of why your statement lacked any credibility mate! Your username couldn't be more apt😉
A "blunder" is when I forget to call my mom on her birthday. When I contrive a mass hysteria about nuclear weapons to justify an invasion and military occupation of Iraq it's called "war crimes and crimes against humanity."
Yeah, lol or the "Unprovoked invasion of Ukraine". I love how the US insists that the Russian invasion of Ukraine was Unprovoked, every time they want to mention it, as if we wouldn't notice. Just a lil bit of research and you'll understand how "Unprovoked" the invasion was.
@@donaldseigel4101 wrong. first Gulf war liberated Kuwait, second Gulf war has nothing to do with Kuwait, they justified the invasion in the "2nd Gulf war" by claiming (lying) that iraq had WMDs all they found though was Oil, gold and a gov change, til this day (they and the Iranians' Mullas) are in control of Iraq check out Ambassador/PM Romanowsky
@@donaldseigel4101 sorry WMDs sounds like nukes to me, either way it doesnt justify the war crimes committed by the US (Al Gharib prison) or their reckless nation building, Iraq is still in taters and even Iraqis would say they prefer the devil they know ( Saddam) than the devil they dont know ( you can make the assumption). If America actually invested properly and developed the nation, built a government... then the democracy Bush promised to deliver would be true. That is not the case unfortunately. But what would you know about your country being destroyed just because another country on the other side of the world wanted to make heavy profit (and they did, US military industrial complex sure did)
@@donaldseigel4101 Stop making excuses for US. They F'd up in Iraq, just like they did in Afghanistan and Lybia, just like they did in Vietnam, just like they did in Hawai and Hondouras..the list is too long of countries the US has invaded' or put in a proxy, US friendly government by overthrowing the current ruler in those countries.
26:52 There is error here. BRICS stands for Brazil,Russia, India, China and South Africa. Just recently Iran joined BRICS along with Saudi Arabia and other such countries like Argentina but the "I" in BRICS is not Iran bruh the editor needs to check twice lol
Honestly a kind of disappointing video, does the United States support democracy when it supports the Saudi government and their war in yemen? How about when they support a facist coup in Bolivia who's leader president is now in jail for massacres of indigenous protesters during their short lived coup government. Does France support democracy when it coerces its former African colonies that democratically decide to loosen the colonial ties that still bind them to France? It's like you have read the US state departments official line without a single ounce of skepticism
Good points, everybody is looking out for their best self interest but you can't deny that the west are the only ones with a modicum of morality. Or at least they feel guilt for the actions they've made in the past
Unfortunately a lot of people use this as an excuse for magical thinking that Russia or China, countries that don't even pay lip service to human rights are better.
Bruh what tf did america do in Bolivia that’s not our business and not our fault no matter what. And until someone invents a way for the US economy to survive without Saudi oil then they can get the weapons, way the world works. You’re confusing democracy with geopolitical influence
These are *regional* powers with overlaping perceived spheres of influence. They are each waiting for the one to face plant to move into each other's backyards. They might be cooperating militarily but China and Iran are already deciding on how to take over Russia's sphere's in Central Asia and Caucuses before someone else like Turkey, India, or the USA moves into some of the countries in those areas. Another problem is that China is on the verge of being a global power, rather than just a regional one. They should be the clear leader of a coalition. But the other two nations will not accept Chinese leadership even though they would naturally should have to be junior partners in comparison with Beijing.
These days, most countries, especially developing worlds, want to be more independent, rather than being controlled or intervened by external powers. China, Russia, Iran, in a general sense, consistently pursue a foreign policy of non-interference in other countries' internal affairs and thus, various countries somehow feel more comfortable to work with these big nations than cooperating with western powers, especially in the areas of trade and investment.
Have you not seen any of the Chinese propaganda and talking points being parroted by the media? China is constantly interfering in internal affairs, our own president is taking bribes from them, movies aren't allowed to criticize China, media isn't allowed to talk about Chinese concentration camps, or how they're harvesting organs from political prisoners to sell on the worldwide organ market.
China does not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, which is written into the Chinese Constitution. Iran is too preoccupied to interfere with other countries. Since the Soviet Union, Russia has only done less in interfering with other countries than the United States, not without doing so. It is just that Russia's economy is declining and its ability to intervene in foreign countries has weakened.
The primary problem with the US is it fails to recognize that societies develop uniquely in diverse circumstances. Imposing democracy on other nations does not guarantee immediate transformation into an American-like society, as it can have devastating consequences and cost lives. While post-WWII changes in Germany, Japan, and Italy were successful, these countries had a long history of development and modernization, unlike the distinct situations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria.
Germany , Japan were different because they lost the war and up till now , I wouldn't even consider them sovereign nations. Just look at the amount of American troops in their country. Part of the reason why Germany and Japan are successful economically is partly due to their culture , bureaucracy and work ethics. On the other hand Italy is not exactly successful, they have a "southern" problem which is an extremely low trust society. Read Francis Fukuyama " Political Order and Political decay" You will get what I mean.
@@wyattcole5452More injustice and corruption occur in Saudi Arabia, where they even murder Western journalists. Why didn't the US military invade there?
22:27 This is a bit niche, but a fact supporting that thesis is that during the very first 24 hours of the full scale invasion, the Chinese Ambassy of Ukraine (if i'm not wrong) advised its citizens to either stay at home instead of evacuating, or proudly display their chinese flag on their car, as if it would grant them some special form of protection. Their advice was taken down and scraped off their intranet within like 2 or 3 days before they advised to the contrary.
Also the bias of state censors on their intranet in the very first 24 hours pointed strongly toward almost arrogant certainty of Ukraine's fast demise. Anti-war publications were taken down within hours while radical ultra-pro-war publications were kept online for days while literally trending.
Of course China knew. Chinese concerns were the reason for the delay of the invasion of Ukraine - to Russia's detriment. So there is one reason this "axis" is flawed from the start.
@Ivan Laplante Not just the first 24 hours of invasion. The staunchly pro Russian stance and censorship of anti war pro ukraine sentiment continued until the successful counter offensive of Kharkiv. Then over night, a few pro ukraine contents started to pop up if you search for it. Even today, pro Russian/ anti west anti NATO narratives get front page trending status while pro ukraine content are just barely allowed. You still have to self censored to a high extent avoid getting banned or worse.
I love how Chinese diplomats tried to claim ignorance on this. Chairman Xi just declared that Beijing has a “No-limits” alliance with Moscow yet they had no idea that Russia would invade Ukraine so they aren’t responsible for not trying to stop it. The world does not trust China because the CCP lies, they’re caught in lies, then they lie again to cover up the original lie.
What a great ideia, lets call the two countries with the biggest losses in the second world war of Axis, despite the fact this losses were fighting the Axis! Its not going to be offensive, its not like millions of Chinese and Russians died
@@Dimitris_Half Japan, Germany and Italy where the Axis, what the first two countries did in the URSS and China was the reason we created the term crime against humanity, soo calling them as Axis is offensive
Wtf does this have to do with anything? The Axis in the first WW1 were pretty much Germany, Austria and Turkey. And the Axis in the second world war were Germany, Italy and Japan. Why tf would anyone be offended because of this? Things change. Alliances change. Turkey was an Axis member once and now is a NATO member. Maybe in the future it would become an Axis member again. Japan was an Axis member and is now a staunch European and US ally. Get your sensitive a** outta here.
It’s your 9 dash line harassment of the Philippines constantly threatening Taiwan and land grabs in buthan and other countries. Also you annexed Tibet. Look even as a US citizen I hate the US. But I’ll be damned if Russia or Iran or even China want to run the world. We aren’t going to revert to an era of kings and dictators. I mean look at your 9 dash line. Do you think that makes any since. Like look at the actual line
They don't reject human rights. They reject the use of human rights issues-genuine or contrived-to justify the undermining or destruction of governments.
😂😂😂Europeans and Americans killed millions of Muslims in the Middle East, slaughtered tens of millions of African blacks and Native Americans, and buried the bodies of aboriginal children underground in Canadian churches. Is it genocide for European Christians to assimilate them?
You should see how many hunter rifles their are here hunting big game with .308 rifles. Remington. 308 pump action with clip. Snipers not even mentioned are here by 100s in northern Canada.inuit best hunters in world.can stand by frozen hole waiting for prey for upto 3 days without moving.not to mention how we hunt out here on east coast Canada
Don't kid yourself, the West has always appeased and collaborated with fascists. The British colonial empire used concentration camps all over the world a 100 years before the German fascists did.
What you forgot to mention is: As their cooperation grows it will push neutral countries to pick a side. Also war in Ukraine pushed EU towards federalization a bit.
China doesn't want to force its partners to pick side, Pakistan has been pro-USA bit China never protest against it, China is much mote realistic and pragmatic, in 200.BC, during Warring States Petiod, the Qin state has always dealed with the 6 nations anti-Qin alliance, so the US anti-China strategy us nothing new and impressive for the Chineses,
@@Emilechen Pakistan is enemy of India. India is enemy of China. Enemy of my enemy is my friend. Expecting good deeds from a country where you can't criticize government is ridiculous.
@@Emilechen Lol Communist China have nothing to do with Qin. The Warring States ruled via divine legitimacy, China rule and acts via Communistic domination. There is zero connection to be made.
One important thing you forgot to mention is Israel's stance on Iran's nuclear programme. In short, the Israeli government sees Iran's nuclear programme as a major threat and they have stated that any further expansion of Tehran's nuclear power will be seen as a cassus beli to which they would respond with a preemptive strike(and not necessarily a bombing strike but a potential nuclear warhead strike, even though Israel denies international claims of their posession of nuclear warheads)
All the more reason for Iran to develop it's nuclear and other defense capabilities then. Because Israel and it's nuclear weapons presents an existential threat to Iran. Because you so casually mentioned using nuclear weapons on a country like it's acceptable behavior.
I am not sure Israel have the international standing or prestige to withstand the backlash of a nuclear first strike. US will more than likely not aquiece at an operational level, the potential fallout of a nuclear arms race in ME, and normalisation of nuclear first strike will create much greater issue for US than it would solve for Israel.
Remember that many people thought the First World War would not happen because everyone was making too much money from trade and would not jeopardize that. Economics is a factor, but the main drivers of war are Fear, Pride, and Self Interest.
War is a fairly natural thing we’ve been fighting since we first formed into tribal groups The main problem we became far far to good at killing men War almost keeps the world fair One power rises becomes fat and lazy only to be ripped apart by a stronger hungrier opposition Ie mongols vikings huns etc Somewhere along the line it all got a bit mixed up Once upon a time if you killed the general you won the war Then commanders started not aiming at each other
Not at all, those are the means by which the rulling class sells to workers that they need to fight other workers in a distant land. War is always about economics. US oil industry benefits a lot of all its wars, not because the lazy analysis of them being robbing oil, is not about that, US has plenty of oil and gas in its own land, but markets are about controlling the prices and by waging war, destroying potential competitors and making countries abide by US rules is the way they control it, selling always high even though the world has plenty to give. How much oil US robbed in Ukraine Russia war? Basically none, but sanctioning an entire and big oil and gas manufactorer that is Russia and selling to all its in need customers already made US oil and gas sector huge gains. The same strategy was used with The Fruit Company, and you cant forgot that US was rich, but after ww2 and their contracts to repair europe, the US construction sector gained huge amounts of money. So there is no such thing as morals and "fears" its the interest of the few at the expense of the many, nothing new.
@@hwg5039 i see a pattern her Non NATO or USA has bases in their country type countries are lauding the effort and praising the channel but we who from other countries see this as western biased! K&G has Run out of Historical content and they dont want to animate battles anymore so they make these videos now and thats the Truth
However you want to flip it (if, indeed, you do), the use of the word 'Axis' is highly prejudicial, and betrays an excessively partisan position incompatible with the historical discourse, as well as, I would argue, with a broader analysis of Russian-Western interaction. It is as I tell my students, if you cannot explore a topic with the necessary balance, change topics (if not career paths).
I think the reason the they are called axis is because Bush called Iran as a partt of the axis of evil and to counter that Iran calls their partisan alliance "the axis of resistance"
This is just "Axis of Evil" stuff rehashed. Love their historical content, but this video and their Cold War channel show it's much easier to break down events with hindsight than contemporary ones.
Cooperation is the best form of human organisation in all levels. From family to international relations. Humans are social animals and we were like in 'cooperation' with each other then. Or it can be called as 'Fraternity'. According to an Indian leader, B.R.Ambedkar, who was the chief architect of the Constitution of India once stated that 'liberty' and 'equality' exist in a state only when there is 'fraternity' among it's citizens. The great ideals of democracy Liberty, Equality and Fraternity are thus justified.
That is a naive understanding of the west capitalism. As if there was not class warefare in the 'free' democratic world. As if the western capitalism was not hostile towards the worker class.
A good summary of the history between world powers and its relationship with contemporary geopolitics. Being students of history, it's no surprise the Kings and Generals team can navigate politics so readily. After all, history is essentially the story of politics over time... with the occassional natural disaster and pandemic thrown in. We can never discount nature's ability to throw a curve ball at the best laid plans of humankind. I'm enjoying the modern content but also love the historical stuff, so keep up all the good work!
@@alanmalan3819 Ah yes the most pro lgbtq country on the planet with the higest gender equality on the world and strong anti discrimination laws Iceland is definitely the next Axis 😂
@alanmalan3819 I mean, non, not really a new alliance - if that's what you mean... or do you mean to say that the US, EU and Israel have bought / need to buy some new axes?
@leonl4752 I didn't say the COVID-19 pandemic was necessarily a 'natural' occurrence, if that's what you mean, but the COVID family of viruses are certainly natural.
5:00 oh come on man, that is such bullshit. Does USA not interfer in internal affairs of other countries? Did they not violate human rights and right to choose of people if Iran and Afghanistan?
"The values proposed by America and Western Europe essentially based upon primacy of human rights and wellbeing of people over state sovereignty" An Iraqi guy wondering here about 2 million persons killed by these VALUES.
Channel is generally informative but pretty biased. Human rights? Think you're conveniently forgetting Iraq, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Guatemala, Chile, Argentina, false pretenses for war, support of Khmer Rouge, concentration camps, and chemical weapons. No country is without blame, but pretending the West is a shining spectacle of human rights is just propaganda.
@@1HeatWalk Sure, I know and admit this. US helped a lot back then. But US bombed (not invaded, US did not rob any territory from Japan) Japan because japan bombed the US first at the pearl harbor.
@@jonlittle5032 You (U.S., Britain, Canada, Australia, Germany, France...) are the Axis, neo-nazi powers of the world. You are the inheritors of nazis.
@@nobodyherepal3292 Prelude to this war has been initiated much earlier by US ambitions to obtain a strategic and geopolitical advantages over Russia by extending NATO by former Russian allies. Further the situation has gradually become worse and worse until Russian invasion, when exploded. Very simple reason, type of which has been occurring many times in history between different adversaries. Unfortunately...
@@comeniusja6563 you know, NATO wouldn’t have grown, if the people of Poland, the Baltics, Romania, and Bulgaria didn’t feel threatened by the Russians. And this stupid war has proven there fears right.
the axis powers had no common goal, they only came together because they were the only ones willing to work with each other. these countries are being brought together by a shared resentment which is a stronger and scarier bond
Well, Russia invaded Ukraine, China is threatening to invade Taiwan. Hitler invaded Austria, Czechoslovakia etc.WW2 Italy and Japan also did similar things. There are similarities, definitely.
@@akacicaa 180 country in the world acknowledge Taiwan is part of China America following Napoleon n Hitler action n expanding its power to the east And you expect the Russia To Do nothing
@barcelonafame Wasn’t trying be so angry, but stating just how broad the similarities between every alliance in history are. Alliances from the BC era aren’t much different from their 20th and 21st century counterparts.
“Russian commentators welcomed this development, viewing it as a positive shift in the global correlation of power and as an appropriate response to America’s sponsorship of NATO’s expansion. Some even sounded gleeful that the Sino-Russian alliance would give America its deserved comeuppance. However, a coalition allying Russia with both China and Iran can develop only if the United States is shortsighted enough to antagonize China and Iran simultaneously.” ― Zbigniew Brzeziński, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives
Eh,The West and its allies like Japan are still top dog and there are many obstacles to China becoming that powerful. Iran has a crazy theocratix Islamic extremist government and China a one party state,basically.
yes Iran and China had very close relations since Parthian dynasty in Iran and the Han dynasty in China. Iran guaranteed the western end of the Silk Road and provided a safe land route to the European and Mediterranean market and China’s manufacturing provided the basis of a very lucrative trade route from which all benefited. This relationship only collapsed in recent history when West European countries discovered shipping routes that precluded the land route. Recent relations between Iran and China seek to renew this ancient relationship.
History offers a convenient way of sorting things up. But relying too heavily on the historic lens does not necessarily bring one closer to the reality. Take the fear of China as an example. The whole rationale seems to be that simply because of the size of the country and its position as a "rising power", China is bound to represent the opposite in everything and pose existential threat to the "free world". And because of China's close relationship with two enemies of the US (but one never questions China's closer relationships with other countries, like Brazil, Pakistan, or in terms of trade, the EU and Japan), you may easily draw the similarity from the WWII era (when China was the victim!). But given specific path of development, China is unlikely to choose the same kind of aggressive expansive strategy as Russia, or revert to traditionalism like Iran did. China's "close relationships" with these two are largely due to the same logic of "diversifying supply chain" that the West has been pursuing. Both sides are worried that the other side will cut off the supply (for China, it was resources and energy) once relationships become antagonistic. The irony is, because of such "supply-chain security" concerns and the success of de-globalization, the relationships are indeed becoming more and more antagonistic.
@@SHVRWK it's not the same. They are in a similar situation, but not the same. I suggest to check what the axis actually done before giving free sentences. of course the west would depict their enemies like Nazi Germany. Sorry but didn't the USA invased Korea Nicaragua Guatemala Congo Laos Vietnam Cambodia Grenada Lebanon Iran Iraq Afghanistan Somalia Panama Yemen Pakistan Sudan Bosnia Siria Kuwait Libia Guam Guatemala Congo with the help of various nation like United Kingdom France Italy and others ? Wasn't that an axis between the French American and British ?
Belarus is a Russian puppet state, while North Korea is so impoverished that they can't feed themselves. They're so minor that they don't really count.
The more wild US keeps getting, the more close these guys are to forming an alliance, Iran and Saudi even became friends for the same reason The only thorn is how India makes friends with China or Pakistan in forming a stable military alliance,.very difficult but possible.
Everybody has an agenda, when it comes to individual human beings and nations. That doesn’t mean friendships can’t be genuine. As in humans, so in nations
@@KingsandGenerals Oh, sorry if that came across wrong: I’m aware it is a mobile game, and I love playing it! I’m also a huge fan of what you do: your documentaries are great! I was simply joking about the first part. :)
Love your content but a bit biased, simplifying east v west as good v evil. Everyone has interests. As far as Human rights violations NATO is also included (Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc...).
…. Well I am on the good side … I will come and take over your home or @ least 20% of your property and destroy the other 60% or more …. I will not negotiate … your home was my ancestors 300 years … and one of my ancestors had given it away … this is ur home is my home … if I cannot have it … I will destroy it …. I am the victim … the world is against me … I am on the good side … I take what is mine … I am good to … me! And destroy evil… anyone who helps u is evil … glad to help u understand … good and evil …. I am one the side of good … see u at ur next house party … I will bring my best friend utinPay …
It is not simply east v west as there are multiple countries in the “east” which aren’t aligned with either China, Russia or Iran. It is also important to remember that NATO is a defensive alliance, not an offensive one and modern NATO contains many countries (like Poland or the Baltic States) that have a history of being occupied by a colonial power (ie Russia). Of course every one has a bias and that shouldn’t be seen as a problem in and of itself as long as it doesn’t preclude someone making accurate assessments given accurate data. Bias is part of what makes up someone’s personality and constitutes their values. In this the Western bias is a given for Kings and Generals as they are from Canada. I also just want to add that for those who hold democratic values close to hart a western bias is natural extension of that as they are the main democratic block (western doesn’t mean geographically west in this case, Japan and the ROK is classified as west as I mean it) in the world. I am not saying of course that the west is pure good, nor do I think that Kings and Generals is saying that, every country in the west as every other country has bad or even truly awful history which includes many human rights violations. Every country in the West has at some point ignored or put in second place the values which they proclaim to uphold in the name of their interests, though this doesn’t negate the value of ideology. Your response is valuable and I hope you find value in mine. I wanted to point out in a long winded way that bias in and of itself isn’t or shouldn’t be a problem and that ideology still has merit (politics isn’t just realism).
@@pieter-bashoogsteen2283 They may be registered in Canada, but are multi-national, most are not from Canada as far as I could find out. The main writers/producers/editors are: Turgut Gambar (Azerbaijan) Nolan Karimov Kamran Maharramli (Azerbaijan) Ilkin Gambar (Azerbaijan) some others: Arif Hazaimin Bin Azaman Ivan Moran Peter Voller Yagiz Bozan Matt Hollis Murat Can Yagbasan Haider Ali
Western countries such as France Germany and Britain and the United States have never committed any kind of human rights Violations. The Africans enslave themselves, the black shoot themselves, native American Caught smallpox and die. America does not execute drug dealers. The UK no longer occupies your browser. Germany has no more nazis. Germany does not sell weapons to Africa and does not allow Russian ghost to be kidnapped and smuggled to work in Germany as prostitutes.
It makes sense that states with similar governments would be cooperative with one another, especially those ostracized from the global economic order. I hope we can manage to peacefully coexist one of these days. Thank you for the informative video. God be with you out there everybody. ✝️ :)
people do not need to agree ideologically inorder to work together. What they need is respect. To respect that the other people have their own way of doing things. Work together where you can, and respect each others borders and ways of doing things within those borders.
Agreed that the ideological foundation for the Three Nations has been loose, but cannot ignore China's instrumental effort on Iran-KSA reconciliation that may change the Mid-East geopolitical landscape eventually
@tigran-khanabazyan We saw your order. Vietnam, which was an ally of the United States, was bombed day and night and 3 million civilians were killed. The United States had promised that NATO would not go to the east, but immediately forgot its promise. The United States unilaterally withdrew from the JCPOA. So, this is your order, where is this order?
Really off the mark title, and video content, between this and the Ukraine war videos I get the feeling that the channel is either getting some money from western state backed organizations, the script writers can't keep their biases in check, or they are being extremely disingenuous or all three at once. In any case for me this just means I'll be unsubscribing, maybe I'll watch some of the medieval or ancient history videos, but the modern stuff is very bad.
Play Conflict of Nations for FREE on PC, iOS or Android: 💥 con.onelink.me/kZW6/KG005 💥 Receive a Unique Starter Pack, available only for the next 30 days!
dang it looks like its from 2010 tho
To people wathing this in the future: There are Vatnik and Wumao bots in the comments that history books were telling you about before their regimes collapsed
The British Empire is crumbling. Its premier toilet paper - the $US is increasingly dumped in International Trade. The British Empire will no longer be able to steal the wealth of the world by paying with toilet papers. When you fantasise that Russia is "strapped for cash", you are just coping. Russia has dumped the $US.
Too many Vatniks and Wumaos in the comments section
Yeh. Alliance of Beast Bear, Dragon and False Prophet. What could go wrong?
Next we learn that they fight over capital of Israel... wait? Wasn't Kviv founded by Khazars? Shit...
China/Iran/Russia are not in an alliance with each other. They just simply agree to not get in each other's way and assist one another when mutually convenient.
@tigran-khanabazyan more like, Russia allowed China to do deal with Central Asia, as Putin been "quiet" about the whole meeting, otherwise Moscow would have voiced any concern with a "third party" politician or scholar on a newspaper debate. Since Europe and US already fucked with Russia and their only "friend" at the moment is China who show no hostility or anything, might as well go to the "lesser evil" they deem
All 3 nations lust for the global hegemony enjoyed by United States.
same with the west
AKA loose alliance
@@JuanLegendre-ey9ty The US is responsible for many atrocities and deliberate gut-wrenching destabilization of countries.
But even with all it's flaws, it's still less of a devil than Russia, Iran and China.
"And as the United States commited several strategic blunders in Iraq and Afghanistan..."
That's a polite way of putting it.
Blunders with millions killed and many many Americans getting rich.
some can now debate afghanistan was US playing 6D chess since taliban might go to war with iran.
@@davidty2006 taliban will never go to war with Iran while US is still around......they are not that stupid
Okay, okay, they did a load of murderous, corrupt crap!!! Are you happy now???
I would say the "US orchestrated a series of self-inflicted disasters." That sounds a little better.
Iran and China had very close relations since Parthian dynasty in Iran and the Han dynasty in China. Iran guaranteed the western end of the Silk Road and provided a safe land route to the European and Mediterranean market and China’s manufacturing provided the basis of a very lucrative trade route from which all benefited. This relationship only collapsed in recent history when West European countries discovered shipping routes that precluded the land route. Recent relations between Iran and China seek to renew this ancient relationship.
In sassanid era too. In arab invasion 3.Yazdgard went to china for asking help and china sent his army
The truth is, in the Malay Archipelago everything was destroyed when the Europeans came, a terrible disaster was experienced by the natives of the Americas and Australia
@@shahesmail313 Many Iranians who followed Yazdgard to China were granted official and noble status and still retained their culture to live in Tang Empire.
@@auron7361Yup, I'm a descend of Javan exiles. The Dutch enslaved us
@陈一搏 like the Uighurs in concentration camps?
You are absolutely wrong about Iran and China not having a historic relationship. The silk road trade was so Successful and important to both countries that Persian became one of the official languages of Yuan Dynasty in China
After the Islamization of Iran, the royal family of Perisa even seek shelter in China and eventually become Chinese officals. This video is totally lack of basic research.
啊？元朝才多长时间
That crazy
The sassanids traded with china a lot
波斯王子曾经在唐朝帮助下收复国土
12:57 - the image representing Iran is that of Hassan Rouhani, former president of Iran. His term ended in 2021. The current president is Ebrahim Raisi, but the country's supreme leader is Ali Khameini.
They all look quite similar indeed
@@zarategabe elaborate please
he is not hassan rouhani , i dont know this mullah but and never saw him
im from iran
i hope all mullahs go to hell
He is not Hassan Rouhani. I am from Iran
My name EFREM
It's so strange seeing actual world history like this happen before my eyes, some people say "history" stopped when the cold war ended, but history is an ongoing story.
@@shykorustotora Sit in the corner Orcnik.
@@shykorustotora Russian Shills do not get freedom of speech, because supporting Putin means you do not support free speech. I am only giving you what your morals believe in.
@@shykorustotora Crybaby Orcnik, I can talk bad about Russia all I want, because unlike you I live in a FREE country. The sooner NATO breaks up Russia the better.
@@shykorustotora Aha. One side bias. I really want to get the side of the side killing children in Ukraine. I’m sure they have a their own side.
The replies here are the perfect representation of "freedom" as envisioned by the West.
AKA: rules for thee but not for me
SEATO is a good example of how an alliance might collapse simply because you don't share the same security concerns.
I shudder in hindsight
they share same security concerns, that demon across the atlantic.
@@125discipline2 warmongering ccp?
@@Cam-nq8brwarmongering? Please, name one war the last 50 years
Vietnam
as a Persian-Russo-Chinese person, I am the physical embodiment of the axis powers
Lol 😂
how come lol，are you of middle asia origin？
LOL, which is the favorite part of yours?
Are you Xianbei? or Yenesian?
Shame on you 😂
The arguments presented against China, Iran, Russia alliance, could be made against any international alliance; take a look at Turkey, Greece, Austria and Hungary, they have been historical rivals for centuries, but united in NATO against the Soviet Union then and Russia now.
Turkey is obviously going to side with Russia.
Lol you think Turkey is against Russia now? 😂😂 Turkey is the centrepoint of Russia's sanction-evading tactics.
@@KatariaGujjar Turkey is a Chameleon state, it's playing a fine line between its NATO alliance while tempering Russia, but if a conflict break out between NATO and Russia, the Bear will crush the Chameleon first, and Erdoğan knows that.
@@alistairbest3622
Turkey is the most Russia-friendly country in NATO. It's nonsensical to think Russia will crush Turkey first. 🤦♂️
@@KatariaGujjar "in the NATO", and that's the problem, one can't have its cake and eat it too, and that's what Turkey has been doing for the last 60 years, but if a war break out between NATO and Russia, Turkey is the most logical target for Russia. and Erdoğan knows that !!!
DO NOT PLAY Conflict of Nations! It will ruin your life!!
Other players can attack you at anytime so the only way to win is to constantly play the game. If you sleep, your entire army may be gone when you wake up so i can't stress this enough: DO NOT PLAY Conflict of Nations!!!
But it's fun 🥺
Lol you must have had some traumatic experiences with that game
Reminds me of Grepolis, played that game to death when I was young, but I was a little punk then without any responsibilities. Yea don't play any game like that unless you have absolutely no life at all and even then think twice cos the game warps its hand around you without you even noticing it until you start making plans irl that prioritize the game which is very very unhealthy.
So thanks, I will never try this game.
All the mobile war games are the same. Freemium that plays on people's nature to compete and then buy all the resources packs to dominate other players. One of the original games that started this genre was Game Of War: Fire Age. In development, MachineZone had a team of psychologists that they consulted to create the game and make it extremely addicting. You see a lot of casino elements in these types of games. Definitely not good if you have an addictive personality. I actually made rent through college running 40 farm accounts in that game and selling resources to the players who would pay a ton of money to get an advantage (whales) so it worked out for me but I saw how addicted these people were.
@@KokosNaSnehu2 yeah😢 I can relate with him
Chinese people want to ask a question: Has the United States accused Israel of committing human rights violations by slaughtering civilians in Gaza? Has the United States accused Israel of its aggression against Palestine over the years?
It's best not to talk about "human rights" every day if you can't achieve equal treatment.
No basis for claims that Israel committed any human rights violations. Palestinians always started the first and got beaten. That is what could happen if you start the war.
@@mdjey2ethnic cleansing apologist, the world isn’t stupid
@@mdjey2what start did you mean? isnotreal lives on land belonging to Palestine
@@mdjey2😅You're blind
@@Lightwing2001 Oh you totally convinced me.🤦♂
We, the people of Africa are tired of Western Axis. 😂😂😂😂
IKR I'm sure the entirety of South America, Middle East and most Asian countries feel the same too.
Third world Africa....you left that out 🤦♂️...... wonder HOW MANY people like this person are on boats trying to get to Europe
Why don’t you guys go to Russia,Iran,North Korea,and China?
@@theskeptic3214
cuz we didn't all those bloody SLAVERY n COLONIALISM to them FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS
@@BT-qs7id
wo wo Wo WO hold it right there
DIDN'T U WESTOIDS START THIS B$ BY "trying to get to AFRICA on boats” AKA “TRIANGULAR TRADE" ?
Correction to the video audio: the BRICS members have been incorrectly stated (Iran instead of India)
get india out put iran in
multiple sources stated that it was originally India, only after heavy US sanctions for being a customer of Russia, India withdrew its support for BRICS, being replaced by Iran as a main party member.
@@LuoSon312_G8 yea these "multiple sources" are the prime example of misinformation that you may be exposed to, it's basic geopolitics that BRICS is a block of future strong economies and just ask yourself in what universe is Iran a strong or developing economy
@@LuoSon312_G8 Regardless of how true that is, the map still shows India rather than Iran so it's most likely an error of audio.
It was definitely India in BRICS at the start
Clear western point of view as according to you America has done no wrong instead of destabilising countries and fuelling internal wars to weaken countries and gather them under there influence, How hard is it to understand countries don't want to be bullied by the USA and uk and should be allowed to interact with each other how they see fit! Colonialism is all the proof you need to see how far back this tactic by the west has been going on.
Yes we don see any wrong when 800000 nonwite people die
Might is Right.
@@TheDanielStrang slavery!
@@andrewgauchi7271 Racism!
@@TheDanielStrang what has racism got to do with your statement might is right? I was giving you the perfect example of why your statement lacked any credibility mate! Your username couldn't be more apt😉
A "blunder" is when I forget to call my mom on her birthday. When I contrive a mass hysteria about nuclear weapons to justify an invasion and military occupation of Iraq it's called "war crimes and crimes against humanity."
Not calling your mom on her birthday is far worse
Yeah, lol or the "Unprovoked invasion of Ukraine". I love how the US insists that the Russian invasion of Ukraine was Unprovoked, every time they want to mention it, as if we wouldn't notice. Just a lil bit of research and you'll understand how "Unprovoked" the invasion was.
@@donaldseigel4101 wrong. first Gulf war liberated Kuwait, second Gulf war has nothing to do with Kuwait, they justified the invasion in the "2nd Gulf war" by claiming (lying) that iraq had WMDs all they found though was Oil, gold and a gov change, til this day (they and the Iranians' Mullas) are in control of Iraq check out Ambassador/PM Romanowsky
@@donaldseigel4101 sorry WMDs sounds like nukes to me, either way it doesnt justify the war crimes committed by the US (Al Gharib prison) or their reckless nation building, Iraq is still in taters and even Iraqis would say they prefer the devil they know ( Saddam) than the devil they dont know ( you can make the assumption). If America actually invested properly and developed the nation, built a government... then the democracy Bush promised to deliver would be true. That is not the case unfortunately. But what would you know about your country being destroyed just because another country on the other side of the world wanted to make heavy profit (and they did, US military industrial complex sure did)
@@donaldseigel4101 Stop making excuses for US. They F'd up in Iraq, just like they did in Afghanistan and Lybia, just like they did in Vietnam, just like they did in Hawai and Hondouras..the list is too long of countries the US has invaded' or put in a proxy, US friendly government by overthrowing the current ruler in those countries.
26:52 There is error here. BRICS stands for Brazil,Russia, India, China and South Africa. Just recently Iran joined BRICS along with Saudi Arabia and other such countries like Argentina but the "I" in BRICS is not Iran bruh the editor needs to check twice lol
Classic "The enemy of my enemy is my friend".
this is a byzantine proverb..
the proverb is as stupid as "if our enemies do not like something, then we are doing everything right"
Stalin thought that and learned better to his sorrow.
And howd that work out for them@@kartalpencesi2000
@@kaiser9109 their empire lasted 1000 years, try again you mongrel
Honestly a kind of disappointing video, does the United States support democracy when it supports the Saudi government and their war in yemen? How about when they support a facist coup in Bolivia who's leader president is now in jail for massacres of indigenous protesters during their short lived coup government. Does France support democracy when it coerces its former African colonies that democratically decide to loosen the colonial ties that still bind them to France? It's like you have read the US state departments official line without a single ounce of skepticism
Good points, everybody is looking out for their best self interest but you can't deny that the west are the only ones with a modicum of morality. Or at least they feel guilt for the actions they've made in the past
Unfortunately a lot of people use this as an excuse for magical thinking that Russia or China, countries that don't even pay lip service to human rights are better.
Bruh what tf did america do in Bolivia that’s not our business and not our fault no matter what.
And until someone invents a way for the US economy to survive without Saudi oil then they can get the weapons, way the world works.
You’re confusing democracy with geopolitical influence
@@ntf5211
Big difference between being barley involved in some countries coup and a full blown invasion it’s a stupid comparison
Guilty? Moral? Like in Palestine?😂@@nathanmacdonnell5422
These are *regional* powers with overlaping perceived spheres of influence. They are each waiting for the one to face plant to move into each other's backyards. They might be cooperating militarily but China and Iran are already deciding on how to take over Russia's sphere's in Central Asia and Caucuses before someone else like Turkey, India, or the USA moves into some of the countries in those areas.
Another problem is that China is on the verge of being a global power, rather than just a regional one. They should be the clear leader of a coalition. But the other two nations will not accept Chinese leadership even though they would naturally should have to be junior partners in comparison with Beijing.
China is not on the verge of being a global power. It already is one.
That is assuming winnie ze furher's regime doesn't collapse alongside all of its paper mache infrastructure.
Finally someone who understands 👌🏻
Tbh Caucuses already did fall to Turks. If Russia falls from power next war might happen in Iran for south Azerbaijan
Well said !
These days, most countries, especially developing worlds, want to be more independent, rather than being controlled or intervened by external powers. China, Russia, Iran, in a general sense, consistently pursue a foreign policy of non-interference in other countries' internal affairs and thus, various countries somehow feel more comfortable to work with these big nations than cooperating with western powers, especially in the areas of trade and investment.
Have you not seen any of the Chinese propaganda and talking points being parroted by the media? China is constantly interfering in internal affairs, our own president is taking bribes from them, movies aren't allowed to criticize China, media isn't allowed to talk about Chinese concentration camps, or how they're harvesting organs from political prisoners to sell on the worldwide organ market.
Russia is constantly interfering in other countries affairs. What are you talking about?
China does not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, which is written into the Chinese Constitution. Iran is too preoccupied to interfere with other countries. Since the Soviet Union, Russia has only done less in interfering with other countries than the United States, not without doing so. It is just that Russia's economy is declining and its ability to intervene in foreign countries has weakened.
美国的对外政策就是控制不了的就毁掉 免得成为威胁
Russia is so uninterested in not interfiring in other nations that they invaded Ukraine, Georgia, Syria, Chechnya and many otherd just for fun
The primary problem with the US is it fails to recognize that societies develop uniquely in diverse circumstances. Imposing democracy on other nations does not guarantee immediate transformation into an American-like society, as it can have devastating consequences and cost lives. While post-WWII changes in Germany, Japan, and Italy were successful, these countries had a long history of development and modernization, unlike the distinct situations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria.
@@wyattcole5452 Bush said so himself lol
Germany , Japan were different because they lost the war and up till now , I wouldn't even consider them sovereign nations. Just look at the amount of American troops in their country. Part of the reason why Germany and Japan are successful economically is partly due to their culture , bureaucracy and work ethics. On the other hand Italy is not exactly successful, they have a "southern" problem which is an extremely low trust society. Read Francis Fukuyama " Political Order and Political decay" You will get what I mean.
@@chosk80 you're spot on. I'm aware of the southern problem, my point is different.
@@wyattcole5452More injustice and corruption occur in Saudi Arabia, where they even murder Western journalists. Why didn't the US military invade there?
@wyattcole5452
Whether things were better or not before is irrelevant. Hussein's regime was their target.
22:27 This is a bit niche, but a fact supporting that thesis is that during the very first 24 hours of the full scale invasion, the Chinese Ambassy of Ukraine (if i'm not wrong) advised its citizens to either stay at home instead of evacuating, or proudly display their chinese flag on their car, as if it would grant them some special form of protection.
Their advice was taken down and scraped off their intranet within like 2 or 3 days before they advised to the contrary.
Also the bias of state censors on their intranet in the very first 24 hours pointed strongly toward almost arrogant certainty of Ukraine's fast demise. Anti-war publications were taken down within hours while radical ultra-pro-war publications were kept online for days while literally trending.
Of course China knew. Chinese concerns were the reason for the delay of the invasion of Ukraine - to Russia's detriment. So there is one reason this "axis" is flawed from the start.
@Ivan Laplante Not just the first 24 hours of invasion. The staunchly pro Russian stance and censorship of anti war pro ukraine sentiment continued until the successful counter offensive of Kharkiv. Then over night, a few pro ukraine contents started to pop up if you search for it. Even today, pro Russian/ anti west anti NATO narratives get front page trending status while pro ukraine content are just barely allowed. You still have to self censored to a high extent avoid getting banned or worse.
In less than 24 hours, I`m a Chinese.
I love how Chinese diplomats tried to claim ignorance on this. Chairman Xi just declared that Beijing has a “No-limits” alliance with Moscow yet they had no idea that Russia would invade Ukraine so they aren’t responsible for not trying to stop it.
The world does not trust China because the CCP lies, they’re caught in lies, then they lie again to cover up the original lie.
What a great ideia, lets call the two countries with the biggest losses in the second world war of Axis, despite the fact this losses were fighting the Axis! Its not going to be offensive, its not like millions of Chinese and Russians died
@@Dimitris_Half Japan, Germany and Italy where the Axis, what the first two countries did in the URSS and China was the reason we created the term crime against humanity, soo calling them as Axis is offensive
@@Mmm230496 No. They act like one, they're that one
Their past can't be a justification for their future crime
Act like a dick, be called a dick.
@@G.A.C_Preserve So US is also axis now?
Wtf does this have to do with anything?
The Axis in the first WW1 were pretty much Germany, Austria and Turkey.
And the Axis in the second world war were Germany, Italy and Japan.
Why tf would anyone be offended because of this? Things change. Alliances change. Turkey was an Axis member once and now is a NATO member. Maybe in the future it would become an Axis member again. Japan was an Axis member and is now a staunch European and US ally.
Get your sensitive a** outta here.
你猜文化，民族，语言，完全不同的三个国家，为什么会团结？就是因为你们，我们必须保卫自己的祖国。
说的很不错
It’s your 9 dash line harassment of the Philippines constantly threatening Taiwan and land grabs in buthan and other countries. Also you annexed Tibet. Look even as a US citizen I hate the US. But I’ll be damned if Russia or Iran or even China want to run the world. We aren’t going to revert to an era of kings and dictators. I mean look at your 9 dash line. Do you think that makes any since. Like look at the actual line
Defend your government that oppresses you?
@@Ben-M112 says someone learned about China solely from youtube
@@Ben-M112 Defend themselves from the west, as an Arab person, I support China.
They don't reject human rights. They reject the use of human rights issues-genuine or contrived-to justify the undermining or destruction of governments.
China does not deny human rights particularly strongly in concentration camps for Uyghurs
😂😂😂Europeans and Americans killed millions of Muslims in the Middle East, slaughtered tens of millions of African blacks and Native Americans, and buried the bodies of aboriginal children underground in Canadian churches. Is it genocide for European Christians to assimilate them?
@@БогданБеркут Your use of the term "concentration camps" suggests you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
@@БогданБеркут what about USs concentration camps?!
@@alanfriesen9837 oh sorry, "reeducation resort"?
"America is not at war, the Marine Corps is at war, America is at the mall."
There are still malls around?
@@conspicuouslyinconspicuous5638 I can barely find a parking spot at my local mall; it's so over crowded.
I'm still a Marine at age 70, but they tell me I'm to old to fight.
You should see how many hunter rifles their are here hunting big game with .308 rifles.
Remington. 308 pump action with clip.
Snipers not even mentioned are here by 100s in northern Canada.inuit best hunters in world.can stand by frozen hole waiting for prey for upto 3 days without moving.not to mention how we hunt out here on east coast Canada
Don't kid yourself, the West has always appeased and collaborated with fascists. The British colonial empire used concentration camps all over the world a 100 years before the German fascists did.
Seems like a propaganda video
What you forgot to mention is: As their cooperation grows it will push neutral countries to pick a side. Also war in Ukraine pushed EU towards federalization a bit.
China doesn't want to force its partners to pick side,
Pakistan has been pro-USA bit China never protest against it,
China is much mote realistic and pragmatic,
in 200.BC, during Warring States Petiod, the Qin state has always dealed with the 6 nations anti-Qin alliance,
so the US anti-China strategy us nothing new and impressive for the Chineses,
@@Emilechen Pakistan is enemy of India. India is enemy of China. Enemy of my enemy is my friend. Expecting good deeds from a country where you can't criticize government is ridiculous.
@@Emilechen Pakistan people a anti-american now - they support Imran Khan against american puppet goverment
@@Emilechen Lol Communist China have nothing to do with Qin. The Warring States ruled via divine legitimacy, China rule and acts via Communistic domination. There is zero connection to be made.
What do you mean? Ukraine pushed EU towards federalization? explain plz.
26:49 I found a script error. You say Iran instead of India.
India's real name is actually rundia
@Ballu Lallu no india is from hendi ..hendi is persian name ...orginally name of this land indian people was bharat
@@User50981Pakistan is Randistan
@@User50981randistan Pakistan
One important thing you forgot to mention is Israel's stance on Iran's nuclear programme. In short, the Israeli government sees Iran's nuclear programme as a major threat and they have stated that any further expansion of Tehran's nuclear power will be seen as a cassus beli to which they would respond with a preemptive strike(and not necessarily a bombing strike but a potential nuclear warhead strike, even though Israel denies international claims of their posession of nuclear warheads)
We can't really trust people who believe in fairy tales and 72 virgins some huge freaking boom boom.
Israel would bomb the shit out of Iran if it could find a reason to
All the more reason for Iran to develop it's nuclear and other defense capabilities then. Because Israel and it's nuclear weapons presents an existential threat to Iran. Because you so casually mentioned using nuclear weapons on a country like it's acceptable behavior.
I am not sure Israel have the international standing or prestige to withstand the backlash of a nuclear first strike. US will more than likely not aquiece at an operational level, the potential fallout of a nuclear arms race in ME, and normalisation of nuclear first strike will create much greater issue for US than it would solve for Israel.
and Iran can feign strategic ambiguity with the existence of its own nuclear weapons, Israel is trying to play an impossible game here
The logo of SCO at 26:31 was mirrored, in case you didn't recognize Chinese or Russian texts.
Remember that many people thought the First World War would not happen because everyone was making too much money from trade and would not jeopardize that. Economics is a factor, but the main drivers of war are Fear, Pride, and Self Interest.
Also, when one is making a lot of money one wants even more.
tbh Racism is also a massive factor especially in Japan
War is a fairly natural thing we’ve been fighting since we first formed into tribal groups
The main problem we became far far to good at killing men
War almost keeps the world fair
One power rises becomes fat and lazy only to be ripped apart by a stronger hungrier opposition
Ie mongols vikings huns etc
Somewhere along the line it all got a bit mixed up
Once upon a time if you killed the general you won the war
Then commanders started not aiming at each other
@@AbdulRahman-uw4ndWell US takes the cake regarding that
Not at all, those are the means by which the rulling class sells to workers that they need to fight other workers in a distant land.
War is always about economics.
US oil industry benefits a lot of all its wars, not because the lazy analysis of them being robbing oil, is not about that, US has plenty of oil and gas in its own land, but markets are about controlling the prices and by waging war, destroying potential competitors and making countries abide by US rules is the way they control it, selling always high even though the world has plenty to give.
How much oil US robbed in Ukraine Russia war? Basically none, but sanctioning an entire and big oil and gas manufactorer that is Russia and selling to all its in need customers already made US oil and gas sector huge gains.
The same strategy was used with The Fruit Company, and you cant forgot that US was rich, but after ww2 and their contracts to repair europe, the US construction sector gained huge amounts of money.
So there is no such thing as morals and "fears" its the interest of the few at the expense of the many, nothing new.
Honestly, you should stick with making historical videos, instead of geopolitics.
This is history in the making and I think K&G did a great job explaining the shifting alliances happening around the world.
Well most of the viewers are from NATO countries so they do what their viewers want!
Its all for money through YT after all for this channel!
For real.
@@hwg5039 i see a pattern her Non NATO or USA has bases in their country type countries are lauding the effort and praising the channel but we who from other countries see this as western biased! K&G has Run out of Historical content and they dont want to animate battles anymore so they make these videos now and thats the Truth
However you want to flip it (if, indeed, you do), the use of the word 'Axis' is highly prejudicial, and betrays an excessively partisan position incompatible with the historical discourse, as well as, I would argue, with a broader analysis of Russian-Western interaction. It is as I tell my students, if you cannot explore a topic with the necessary balance, change topics (if not career paths).
well said and true
Axis is highly appropriate for these totalitarian regimes.
I think the reason the they are called axis is because Bush called Iran as a partt of the axis of evil and to counter that Iran calls their partisan alliance "the axis of resistance"
This is just "Axis of Evil" stuff rehashed. Love their historical content, but this video and their Cold War channel show it's much easier to break down events with hindsight than contemporary ones.
Would tripartite be a better descriptor? Or new triple alliance? What would be the most appropriate in your opinion then?
Remember only one country has used nuclear bombs against civilians and it wasn't Russia, China, or Iran.
There are no allies or foes, just interests.
For now, Iran, China, and Russia, share close interests.
Same goes for all other allies
Cooperation is the best form of human organisation in all levels. From family to international relations. Humans are social animals and we were like in 'cooperation' with each other then. Or it can be called as 'Fraternity'. According to an Indian leader, B.R.Ambedkar, who was the chief architect of the Constitution of India once stated that 'liberty' and 'equality' exist in a state only when there is 'fraternity' among it's citizens. The great ideals of democracy Liberty, Equality and Fraternity are thus justified.
Well said
That is a naive understanding of the west capitalism. As if there was not class warefare in the 'free' democratic world. As if the western capitalism was not hostile towards the worker class.
The world belongs to the whole world, not to the United States and the West
I agree, I'm disgusted with this country. I would never fight if there was a draft. This country is trash and not worth fighting for.
We saw the western version of human rights in Middle East and Afghanistan. No, thank you. We don't need that
My comment is here before someone says "bEttEr tHaN cHiNa tAkInG oVeR"
@@I_hu85ghjo China has no interest in taking over, China will just focus on doing business because they don't have the ideological appeal
26:51 BRICS stands for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. There is no IRAN in it. In case you missed it.
But Iran is always invited
It is now 😊
India also is emerging as a very independent force, neither dependent on western democracies while having good relations with Iran and Russia
India has horrible relations with China. So there's a huge problem in India joining such an Axis.
and nukes
And pretty good relations with the US
And will never go to war with anyone except with Pakistan and China
'also'? India is pretty much independent yes, but Russia is becoming a chinese puppet
A good summary of the history between world powers and its relationship with contemporary geopolitics. Being students of history, it's no surprise the Kings and Generals team can navigate politics so readily.
After all, history is essentially the story of politics over time... with the occassional natural disaster and pandemic thrown in. We can never discount nature's ability to throw a curve ball at the best laid plans of humankind.
I'm enjoying the modern content but also love the historical stuff, so keep up all the good work!
US, NATO/EU and Israel new axes
@@alanmalan3819
Ah yes the most pro lgbtq country on the planet with the higest gender equality on the world and strong anti discrimination laws Iceland is definitely the next Axis 😂
@alanmalan3819 I mean, non, not really a new alliance - if that's what you mean... or do you mean to say that the US, EU and Israel have bought / need to buy some new axes?
@leonl4752 I didn't say the COVID-19 pandemic was necessarily a 'natural' occurrence, if that's what you mean, but the COVID family of viruses are certainly natural.
The world needs the China - Russia - Iran axis.
🤡
Xia - persia - ruthenia alliance
western values:
>respect for human rights.
funny story bro
The slogan of human rights was created by the neo-western colonialists to secure their own interests against the weak nations and the third world
5:00 oh come on man, that is such bullshit. Does USA not interfer in internal affairs of other countries? Did they not violate human rights and right to choose of people if Iran and Afghanistan?
🤣🤣🤣
1:34 - Why does the Russian Army guy look like 2003 Brock Lesnar? 😂
You guys are stepping on the toes of TLDR News.
The US is acting more like an Axis. This guys need to do better research.
How
An axis of evil with like ~30 other countries?
"The values proposed by America and Western Europe essentially based upon primacy of human rights and wellbeing of people over state sovereignty"
An Iraqi guy wondering here about 2 million persons killed by these VALUES.
why not "A New Allies?"
Pro west propaganda
Channel is generally informative but pretty biased. Human rights? Think you're conveniently forgetting Iraq, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Guatemala, Chile, Argentina, false pretenses for war, support of Khmer Rouge, concentration camps, and chemical weapons. No country is without blame, but pretending the West is a shining spectacle of human rights is just propaganda.
Suddenly, I became an Aixs country citizen, although China defeated Japan in WW2.
With the help from the U.S. who invaded japan and dropped 2 nukes.
@@1HeatWalk
Sure, I know and admit this.
US helped a lot back then.
But US bombed (not invaded, US did not rob any territory from Japan) Japan because japan bombed the US first at the pearl harbor.
Italy and Germany are in NATO, Japan supports NATO
Because US said so…
@@1HeatWalk
U.S. were at war with Japan, and the Chinese were holding on to a million japanese soldiers.
"unprovoked"
"western idea of expansion of democracy"-
dislike
Cry more vatnik
Axis does not mean enemy or adverse . It refereed specifically to Berlin - Italy as far as war goes .
@@jonlittle5032 You (U.S., Britain, Canada, Australia, Germany, France...) are the Axis, neo-nazi powers of the world. You are the inheritors of nazis.
@@jonlittle5032west are a Democratic order 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Free Julian Assange
26:50 - Howdy Kings and Generals, the I in BRICS is for India (shown in infographic), not Iran.
Did you talk about who pushed the Russian, china and Iran closer and closer?
"No, we're not saying we're sponsored by war itself" I roared at that ngl
Mom we want Axis.
We have Axis at Home.
:Axis at Home:
LMFAOOO
😂😂😂😂
Thanks for the content this channel is gallus cheers m8 .watching from Scotland peace and love to all
U.S got these guys relying on the power of friendship😂
@@shykorustotora and Iran is a hamster trying to pass as a dog, Russia is a poodle with gangrene and China is a shi tzu that keep shiting itself.
Deadly trio ❤️❤️
weren't happy K&G turning into geopolitics channel
And we weren’t happy with Russia starting the largest land war in Europe since WW2, and forcing us to take sides….
@@nobodyherepal3292 Prelude to this war has been initiated much earlier by US ambitions to obtain a strategic and geopolitical advantages over Russia by extending NATO by former Russian allies. Further the situation has gradually become worse and worse until Russian invasion, when exploded. Very simple reason, type of which has been occurring many times in history between different adversaries. Unfortunately...
@@comeniusja6563 you know, NATO wouldn’t have grown, if the people of Poland, the Baltics, Romania, and Bulgaria didn’t feel threatened by the Russians.
And this stupid war has proven there fears right.
@@comeniusja6563 those countries can decide for themselves.... and allies you mean old conquered land?
the axis powers had no common goal, they only came together because they were the only ones willing to work with each other. these countries are being brought together by a shared resentment which is a stronger and scarier bond
It would be interesting to see the similar video about "New Allies".
"New"
GLOBALISM
The New Allies is nothing new, except Germany and Japan switched sides now.
@@alvinite9164
Only Italy stayed loyal smh...
@@firstnamelastname4249 What do you mean stayed loyal? Lol as far as I know Italy was one of the founding members of NATO.
*26:51* BRICS is an Economic cooperation between Brazil, Russia, Iran, China and South Africa
_India laughing in the corner_
A new Axis? C'mon Kings and Generals. You guys make awesome content, it doesn't need to go to "clickbatey" territory
Well, Russia invaded Ukraine, China is threatening to invade Taiwan.
Hitler invaded Austria, Czechoslovakia etc.WW2 Italy and Japan also did similar things.
There are similarities, definitely.
@@akacicaaThere’s literally similarities between almost every fucking alliance in history, not just WW2.
@@akacicaa 180 country in the world acknowledge Taiwan is part of China
America following Napoleon n Hitler action n expanding its power to the east
And you expect the Russia To Do nothing
@barcelonafame Wasn’t trying be so angry, but stating just how broad the similarities between every alliance in history are. Alliances from the BC era aren’t much different from their 20th and 21st century counterparts.
“Russian commentators welcomed this development, viewing it as a positive shift in the global correlation of power and as an appropriate response to America’s sponsorship of NATO’s expansion. Some even sounded gleeful that the Sino-Russian alliance would give America its deserved comeuppance. However, a coalition allying Russia with both China and Iran can develop only if the United States is shortsighted enough to antagonize China and Iran simultaneously.”
― Zbigniew Brzeziński, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives
Eh,The West and its allies like Japan are still top dog and there are many obstacles to China becoming that powerful. Iran has a crazy theocratix Islamic extremist government and China a one party state,basically.
Trump nearly did that
yes Iran and China had very close relations since Parthian dynasty in Iran and the Han dynasty in China. Iran guaranteed the western end of the Silk Road and provided a safe land route to the European and Mediterranean market and China’s manufacturing provided the basis of a very lucrative trade route from which all benefited. This relationship only collapsed in recent history when West European countries discovered shipping routes that precluded the land route. Recent relations between Iran and China seek to renew this ancient relationship.
And it will and be successful for current times. Congratulations.
History offers a convenient way of sorting things up. But relying too heavily on the historic lens does not necessarily bring one closer to the reality.
Take the fear of China as an example. The whole rationale seems to be that simply because of the size of the country and its position as a "rising power", China is bound to represent the opposite in everything and pose existential threat to the "free world". And because of China's close relationship with two enemies of the US (but one never questions China's closer relationships with other countries, like Brazil, Pakistan, or in terms of trade, the EU and Japan), you may easily draw the similarity from the WWII era (when China was the victim!). But given specific path of development, China is unlikely to choose the same kind of aggressive expansive strategy as Russia, or revert to traditionalism like Iran did. China's "close relationships" with these two are largely due to the same logic of "diversifying supply chain" that the West has been pursuing. Both sides are worried that the other side will cut off the supply (for China, it was resources and energy) once relationships become antagonistic. The irony is, because of such "supply-chain security" concerns and the success of de-globalization, the relationships are indeed becoming more and more antagonistic.
Clear
The Chinese are literally involved in border disputes with nearly all their neighbors. They are demonstrating aggressive intentions.
Calling it axis is pretty excessive
It's not, since they're pretty authoritarian.
@@SHVRWK it's not the same. They are in a similar situation, but not the same. I suggest to check what the axis actually done before giving free sentences. of course the west would depict their enemies like Nazi Germany. Sorry but didn't the USA invased Korea Nicaragua Guatemala Congo Laos Vietnam Cambodia Grenada Lebanon Iran Iraq Afghanistan Somalia Panama Yemen Pakistan Sudan Bosnia Siria Kuwait Libia Guam Guatemala Congo with the help of various nation like United Kingdom France Italy and others ? Wasn't that an axis between the French American and British ?
It's not
@@alizamani1196 it is yes. At least did you know why the axis born in the first place ? The real axis ?
@@jeremy9416 You say it's not an axis and yet you ask me if I know why it was born?
In Iran, you can feel that Axis actually operating
I and millions support the rights of each country to define its political system
Now I have to question all the history stuff coming out of this channel
很明显是美国的宣传机器
Me laughing at whole usa And democracy along with human right 😂😂😂
I'm surprised that North Korea and Belarus aren't included.
they are like Hungary or Romania in WW2
Belarus is a Russian puppet state, while North Korea is so impoverished that they can't feed themselves. They're so minor that they don't really count.
@@romanpopyk Where are the other 3 comments?
@@mr.normalguy69 the TH-cam algorithm deletes a lot of comments.
Both are effectively buffer satellite totalitarian states at this point, even if one of them can wield nukes as best as much as the Iranians could.
Seriously???
Yes
It’s like living in the dipshit Bush era all over again.
excellent work and analysis, thanks ❤
Russia,China, Iran and North Corea are number 1 / World ❤
I also condemn US and EU for supporting apartheid state of Israel
Swede here. Fully agree.
Keep Dreaming, we all know that the Holy Land belong to an united holy land, free from any form of ethnics divides
@@chinchilla415you guys are about to see what's real apartheid is like when Ethnic Swedes become a minority 😁
The US and EU has said they disagree with the actions done by isreal.
@@100500daniel Russian designed scary propaganda
The more wild US keeps getting, the more close these guys are to forming an alliance, Iran and Saudi even became friends for the same reason
The only thorn is how India makes friends with China or Pakistan in forming a stable military alliance,.very difficult but possible.
Joke of the century
agreed !
US wild? they're not being agressive. what are you smoking dude??
@@Maplelust
How many countries have the US invaded/attacked the last 20 years?
And how many have Russia?
Not wild you mean tyrannical
Everybody has an agenda, when it comes to individual human beings and nations. That doesn’t mean friendships can’t be genuine. As in humans, so in nations
Being sponsored by war itself: now there’s a concept. 😂
It is a mobile game
@@KingsandGenerals Oh, sorry if that came across wrong: I’m aware it is a mobile game, and I love playing it! I’m also a huge fan of what you do: your documentaries are great! I was simply joking about the first part. :)
Pooh, Piglet & Eeyore had enough of Christopher Robin and agreed to a honey-based economy that was fair to them all
Rocket Man is like - "what about me?"
At 26:49 its India not Iran.
(BRICS includes Brazil, Russia, India, China & South Africa. Iran is not part of BRICS.)
yes/Iran became a member of the BRICS a month ago.
Love your content but a bit biased, simplifying east v west as good v evil. Everyone has interests. As far as Human rights violations NATO is also included (Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam etc...).
…. Well I am on the good side … I will come and take over your home or @ least 20% of your property and destroy the other 60% or more …. I will not negotiate … your home was my ancestors 300 years … and one of my ancestors had given it away … this is ur home is my home … if I cannot have it … I will destroy it …. I am the victim … the world is against me … I am on the good side … I take what is mine … I am good to … me! And destroy evil… anyone who helps u is evil … glad to help u understand … good and evil …. I am one the side of good … see u at ur next house party … I will bring my best friend utinPay …
It is not simply east v west as there are multiple countries in the “east” which aren’t aligned with either China, Russia or Iran. It is also important to remember that NATO is a defensive alliance, not an offensive one and modern NATO contains many countries (like Poland or the Baltic States) that have a history of being occupied by a colonial power (ie Russia).
Of course every one has a bias and that shouldn’t be seen as a problem in and of itself as long as it doesn’t preclude someone making accurate assessments given accurate data. Bias is part of what makes up someone’s personality and constitutes their values. In this the Western bias is a given for Kings and Generals as they are from Canada.
I also just want to add that for those who hold democratic values close to hart a western bias is natural extension of that as they are the main democratic block (western doesn’t mean geographically west in this case, Japan and the ROK is classified as west as I mean it) in the world. I am not saying of course that the west is pure good, nor do I think that Kings and Generals is saying that, every country in the west as every other country has bad or even truly awful history which includes many human rights violations. Every country in the West has at some point ignored or put in second place the values which they proclaim to uphold in the name of their interests, though this doesn’t negate the value of ideology.
Your response is valuable and I hope you find value in mine. I wanted to point out in a long winded way that bias in and of itself isn’t or shouldn’t be a problem and that ideology still has merit (politics isn’t just realism).
@@pieter-bashoogsteen2283 They may be registered in Canada, but are multi-national, most are not from Canada as far as I could find out. The main writers/producers/editors are:
Turgut Gambar (Azerbaijan)
Nolan Karimov
Kamran Maharramli (Azerbaijan)
Ilkin Gambar (Azerbaijan)
some others:
Arif Hazaimin Bin Azaman
Ivan Moran
Peter Voller
Yagiz Bozan
Matt Hollis
Murat Can Yagbasan
Haider Ali
Western countries such as France Germany and Britain and the United States have never committed any kind of human rights Violations. The Africans enslave themselves, the black shoot themselves, native American Caught smallpox and die. America does not execute drug dealers. The UK no longer occupies your browser. Germany has no more nazis. Germany does not sell weapons to Africa and does not allow Russian ghost to be kidnapped and smuggled to work in Germany as prostitutes.
Russian girsl
Mistake!!! 💥
BRICS is not include Iran, Its India
At 26:50
26:50 the I in BRICS stands for India not Iran. You displayed all the countries in BRICS correctly visually, but you said Iran instead of India.
It makes sense that states with similar governments would be cooperative with one another, especially those ostracized from the global economic order. I hope we can manage to peacefully coexist one of these days. Thank you for the informative video.
God be with you out there everybody. ✝️ :)
Just insufferable listening to him say unprovoked invasion of Ukraine.
Dude how can you put a "new axis" this is just wrong at all levels.
Makes sense. 3 authoritarian regimes teaming up against the free world. Sounds like axis to me
because its american
Italy and germany are in nato and japan supports nato
Probably because they behave like the previous axis powers. Authoritarian dictatorships which aggressive and expansionist tendencies.
@@benghiskahn3673 reminds me of UK and US. Us expanded to the midwest thru military means killing natives. They also invaded mexico
I want this guys voice over when I'm having to explaining why I'm out late like an ally cat
North Korea wondering why it was left out even though it worked so hard.
They are propped up by China and would starve to death if left to it's own devices.
@abc1def269who is stronger? Iran or North Korea ?
@@punchyMiddleEarth who is stronger? Iran or North Korea ?
who is stronger? Iran or North Korea ?
@@AS-fn3qk I would say Iran.
people do not need to agree ideologically inorder to work together. What they need is respect. To respect that the other people have their own way of doing things. Work together where you can, and respect each others borders and ways of doing things within those borders.
Agreed that the ideological foundation for the Three Nations has been loose, but cannot ignore China's instrumental effort on Iran-KSA reconciliation that may change the Mid-East geopolitical landscape eventually
Love Russia China and iran ❤❤❤
So you love authoritarian regimes. 👏
@@BanCommies_Fascistsand you are with the fascist western LGBQT regimes 👏👏
@@BanCommies_Fascists So you like the Anglo Saxon colonial brainwashing group?
China, Iran, Russia, North Korea
Iran ❤ Russia ❤ China
We strive for a multipolar world, not a world dominated by one country
We will see who will die, two 5000 year old civilizations or a bunch of fake countries
@tigran-khanabazyan We saw your order. Vietnam, which was an ally of the United States, was bombed day and night and 3 million civilians were killed. The United States had promised that NATO would not go to the east, but immediately forgot its promise. The United States unilaterally withdrew from the JCPOA. So, this is your order, where is this order?
Really off the mark title, and video content, between this and the Ukraine war videos I get the feeling that the channel is either getting some money from western state backed organizations, the script writers can't keep their biases in check, or they are being extremely disingenuous or all three at once.
In any case for me this just means I'll be unsubscribing, maybe I'll watch some of the medieval or ancient history videos, but the modern stuff is very bad.