I totally agree with you. The main advantage to the iPhone is it’s usually in your pocket in any situation. The thing that really annoys me about my full frame and crop Sony system is it is slower and somewhat harder to file transfer and edit, whereas you can literally one click on your phone and make things happen. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had my wife beg me to transfer to her photos on my camera immediately. People are impatient these days.
Nice pics! I also have the a7iv and the 14 pro, of course the a7iv wins but for always having the iphone with me, I love how good they have become over the years!
(bride& groom=bg) (cameraman=c)Reaction be like: bg:what is that, C:this is an iphone, bg: i know what an iphone is, C:okay???, Bg:Wh.why aren't you using a camera,C: this is a camera,an iphone camera,bg: fine, so meaning since its an "iphone" you charge less Wright, Hahaha NOO.
The big difference here is the quality glass you can put on a full size camera and the eye behind it. The iphone falls apart when you want anything resembling artistic or cinematic, or are shooting in low light. Portrait mode fails consistently at detailed objects and even portraits sometimes. I'm sure the iphone will continue to be improved, but a full frame camera with nice glass is still better if you want full artistic control of a video or photograph. The question is, will you have your full sized camera with you when opportunities for nice shots arise?
True, also depends on use case. iPhone is good for most people. But for photographers who do studio work like portraits or products using flash, astrophotography, full frame ist the way to go
Every iPhone that comes out gets the same comparisons. No doubt phone cameras keep improving. The computational photography gets better. But none of these phones ever truly come close to replacing a modern or even older interchangeable lens ff camera system. All the comparisons are with easy shots
Facts. All these TH-camrs doing these „5000$ pro camera vs iPhone 14“ videos and then use the worst photos they just did on a 10-minute walk in front of their house to compare these cameras. I mean, if you own a 5k camera setup, then please use the whole potential of the camera and stop doing basic shots. I’m still waiting for a real professional iPhone vs dslr comparison doing night / astrophotography, or even portraits and product shoots in studio
I think eventually we may get to a peak in camera development just cause of the size limitations on a phone but then again S22 ultra has 108mp and 10x zoom….lol
IMO dedicated cameras shine when using them with wide aperture lenses like 1.4 or 1.2 for portraits or low light photography, or telephoto lenses for portraits (70-200) or wildlife (100-400 or 150-600). Phone cameras can't match dedicated cameras in these regard.
I think the better comparison would be the iPhone 14 Pro to something like a Fuji x100v or some other smaller aps-c body with a wide angle prime strictly due to the practical size differences. I don't want to carry my larger body with me all the time, but if the iPhone is close enough to something like the x100v, that would be pretty gnarly to not have to worry about slinging a camera around for street photography.
I sold my x100v and ordered the 14 pro. As compact as it was, the x100v just isn’t nearly as convenient as my iPhone and it has spent 80% of the year on my shelf or in my bag in my car whereas my iPhone is literally always in my pocket. It’s a cliche but it’s true the best camera is the one you have with you
Great video and comparison. I've been using my cell phone for lots of landscape photos and love the ai editing. My friend and his wife went on a trip to cantaloupe canyon and his wife's iPhone photos looks say better than his nikon ff plus pro lens. For portraits, I still like using the ff mirrorless camera but it's not always about bokeh and more about story telling, which I'm trying hard to do these days. Keep up the great video
Thank you for this comparison. Good work! The portrait shot look very similar in color and everything. But the images are straight out of camera right? Did you use the proraw profile or did you hit reset?
The sensor is too small on the iPhone. It’ll look nice on a 6” XDR screen. Blow those up on a 32” monitor. You will be able to tell the difference then between the phone and the camera.
There are several situations where a iPhone just can't handle the situation. If you try to record a sunset scene with a iPhone it will try to compensate showing the sunset like a 12hs sun washing all colors. A camera with a a proper professional can get the shades, the blacks and reds that completely change the scene. Iphone is nice and do amazing job for a lot of scenarios but in a professional level it lacks in so many areas that is laughable to even consider it's use. Not complaining about iphone, great quality for everyday use, TH-cam and so.
@@francis2339 There is no simple answer to that. You will not see a professional production, dozens of people involved in a shooting using a iPhone to have a risk of ruining that and have to remake incurring in costs superior of 10 iPhones just in personal expenses. it's just like take a passenger car to a F1 race. If the person are a TH-cam guy alone making content a iPhone is fine. For some contentes iphone just can't deliver the quality expected. Example, se the 'flying Dutchman' TH-cam channel focused on nature, it's just impossible to get that 4k results with that colors on a iPhone. I am not complaining about iphone, it's a amazing product for it's intended use and the go choice for 90% of TH-cam channels that the content is more important than image excellence. it's impossible to shoot 8hs straight with a phone, battery, ergonomics, lack of attachments, sound etc.
Hello, Alex. The Straw Image: You are showing IMG_059, but in dropbox is IMG_058, and it's perfect. No jagged edges on 58, verified with four programs. Maybe somethng wrong with 59?
I came here for the information, education and review, but I replayed because of Alex's hair, eyebrows, beard, brilliant white teeth, broad shoulder and form fitting shirt! Alex, sir, you are a stud! Thanks for doing this video!
Nicely done! This comparison was clear and concise ( I like the speed and tone of voice ) - I just recently debated between iPhone 14 and Sony RX100 VII. My main use case was traveling- I have an a7iii and bunch of lenses but that along is another bag to carry around plus I am not a photographer that get paid doing this. I needed something small , reliable, good and easy to share my my content. iPhone 14 pro was my choice. I could not agree more with computational photography on cameras (Sony) that would be game changer. This video validated my decision.
2 different devices used for a different purposes, I don't know why people keep comparing a pocket camera with a professional one, I get it smart phones are getting better but not at a level of a full frame sensor and f1.2 prime lens. Thanks for the video anyway.
to be honest, this comparison is far from good. there's so many aspects it did not cover. for most mirrorless camera owners, they will apply adjustment to maximize the poential of the RAW/ dynamic range, and the result can be very different, even in good light. the computed bokeh on iphone is much worse. in low light condition, iphone can barely do any good photo. for a lot of general users who don't do postprosessing to photos and only eager to share the photo asap, iphone is a good choice. but whenever you saw some good good on the instagram/social media, they mostly come from drone or camera with big sensor and good lense. im not a professional, but the photo iphone captured is not good enough even for me.(it's not iphone can't take good photos, but it has too much limitation)
Does the iphone 14 have a dual capture mode that can record 4k ? My motorola edge has dual capture which allows me to put my mug in picture in picture mode but only 1080p, whereas with the front and back camera it can do 4k alone.
A7c with tamron 20-40 f2.8 and sony 85mm f1.8 with nd filter. 2 compact lenses for your trip. Remember to modify the sony colors before leaving. If there is space left in your bag and money in your pocket, get a 50mm f1.8 and youll be set. I went to europe with a7c with 24mm f2.8G, 40mm f2.5G. And 85mm 1.8. Loved the compactness but next time ill get bigger camera bag and try to have at least a 1.4 lens. 80% of my pics are similar to my friend's pictures with their cell phone. For that other 20%, it was worth the hassle of lugging a camera bag
one is a phone with some computing - the other one a real camera with a FULL size sensor - not such a toy sensor of a smartphone. So for photo and video sony. For calling your family the iphone
for me still sony is a far better. i know for someone iphone wins because it's always ready in a pocket but for me this is not important. quality is better, video is better and i'm always know what i want to see in editing, before i take a shoot
The professional cameras of course cannot be compared to the Iphone However, the portability, mobility, and ease of use of the Iphone is it’s primary power. It’s light, convenient, user-friendly. You can bring it pretty much everywhere and it’s most likely with you at all time. There’s also so many apps for the Iphone like Snapseed, lightroom, blackmagic app and others that let you customise the settings of your iphone cameras like ISO, Aperture, and even shutter speed giving you full control of your phone just like a pro camera Unless you really want top notch quality or shooting for weddings or other events that request top notch quality, Iphone wins most of the time However, as a professional photographer or videographer using Iphone is not acceptable because you make yourself look unprofresional This is because almost everyone has an Iphone and they would think they can do the same thing you did, especially if you charge thousands of dollars for a shoot. I have seen so many people using Iphones and even old Iphone like Iphone XR, and with external lenses you can buy for Iphones online, it can take a pretty good pictures where people would think taken by a mirrorless camera. Also the fact that the camera body cost more than 2k and a good lenses would cost another 500-2k I would expect heavenly differences
Excellent comparison, would be good to see how much latitude there is in processing the proraw file, how much sharpening or colour refinement it could support etc.
this happens a lot, this camera is used for video capture and later processing and editing. Point, shot and share are way easier with iphone. Good news: easy to sell a sony camera to order a iPhone.
That's an unfair comparison, you miss that the iPhone 14 Pro has a 3.5x crop factor, so f/6.3 would be a better fair comparison. Stop down from 1.4 to 6.3 that lens can give you LOTS of extra detail than 1.4.
The entire video is an unfair comparison and intentionally misleading. He put a crappy Sigma asp-c lens on a beautiful full frame camera, instead of a FE G master lens, then shot it in auto mode, and, made them look as bad as he could to prove a non-existent point just to get views. This type of click bait comparison videos have been dead for a long time. There's a reason.
the ipnone 14 pro sensor has nearly the same size as sony rx100 AND a very good fast sharp prime instead of a slow not very sharp zoom lens. even without computational ph. iphone takes much bettes pics than a 1 inch sony.
I currently have the 13 pro max and an unboxing video of it on my channel, I have it in white. I think ima sit this one out and upgrade next year and I want the black one!!
Smart phone camera getting more better. I think 5 years more Professional camera going to vanish the same like old square Television, Its technology getting better now.
Agreed, point and shoots were supposed to kill photographers blah blah blah...people still want someone who knows what they're doing so they can just enjoy the event and have someone else worry about capturing it. It is nice to see the quality up but yeah, still not a replacement. I mean jeesh, is the movie industry RED, Arri worried about iphones?
The iPhone sensor is 12 mb pixels with computation they multiplicate it by 4 making it artificially 48.... this is misleading as customer think they get a 48mb sensor when in fact they get a 12
11:05 you're contradicting yourself: sensor size doesn't matter, as camera phones have proven... BUT, if you carry a REAL camera it has to have a very large sensor to compete with iphones very small sensor?? How does that make sense? Sensor size clearly doesn't matter, as you've shown here. So why is that your conclusion?? Why exactly is APS-C the cutoff? Only phones can have small sensors that perform well? And if that's the case, why don't cameras just do what phones do? You're not making any sense.
![[Gegagedigedagedago] NEW Help Gegagedigedagedago Nugget escape from Nikocado Avocado Challenge](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hJWnwRC2Fz8/mqdefault.jpg)
I totally agree with you. The main advantage to the iPhone is it’s usually in your pocket in any situation. The thing that really annoys me about my full frame and crop Sony system is it is slower and somewhat harder to file transfer and edit, whereas you can literally one click on your phone and make things happen. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had my wife beg me to transfer to her photos on my camera immediately. People are impatient these days.
If you're a professional photographer the iPhone has no advantages though. Quick? Yes. Pro photos? No.
Nice pics! I also have the a7iv and the 14 pro, of course the a7iv wins but for always having the iphone with me, I love how good they have become over the years!
"iPhone is equally better than a pro camera". That's all true until your wedding photographer comes in with a bunch of iPhones at your wedding. 🤣
(bride& groom=bg) (cameraman=c)Reaction be like: bg:what is that, C:this is an iphone, bg: i know what an iphone is, C:okay???, Bg:Wh.why aren't you using a camera,C: this is a camera,an iphone camera,bg: fine, so meaning since its an "iphone" you charge less Wright, Hahaha NOO.
🤣💯
@fikfact2157😬
The big difference here is the quality glass you can put on a full size camera and the eye behind it. The iphone falls apart when you want anything resembling artistic or cinematic, or are shooting in low light. Portrait mode fails consistently at detailed objects and even portraits sometimes. I'm sure the iphone will continue to be improved, but a full frame camera with nice glass is still better if you want full artistic control of a video or photograph. The question is, will you have your full sized camera with you when opportunities for nice shots arise?
True, also depends on use case. iPhone is good for most people. But for photographers who do studio work like portraits or products using flash, astrophotography, full frame ist the way to go
Every iPhone that comes out gets the same comparisons. No doubt phone cameras keep improving. The computational photography gets better. But none of these phones ever truly come close to replacing a modern or even older interchangeable lens ff camera system. All the comparisons are with easy shots
Facts. All these TH-camrs doing these „5000$ pro camera vs iPhone 14“ videos and then use the worst photos they just did on a 10-minute walk in front of their house to compare these cameras. I mean, if you own a 5k camera setup, then please use the whole potential of the camera and stop doing basic shots. I’m still waiting for a real professional iPhone vs dslr comparison doing night / astrophotography, or even portraits and product shoots in studio
I think eventually we may get to a peak in camera development just cause of the size limitations on a phone but then again S22 ultra has 108mp and 10x zoom….lol
@@mauricemotors8207 again I’d like to see a pro shoot a pro soccer game at night with that Samsung 10x zoom 108 mp phone or even a full wedding.
IMO dedicated cameras shine when using them with wide aperture lenses like 1.4 or 1.2 for portraits or low light photography, or telephoto lenses for portraits (70-200) or wildlife (100-400 or 150-600). Phone cameras can't match dedicated cameras in these regard.
I think the better comparison would be the iPhone 14 Pro to something like a Fuji x100v or some other smaller aps-c body with a wide angle prime strictly due to the practical size differences. I don't want to carry my larger body with me all the time, but if the iPhone is close enough to something like the x100v, that would be pretty gnarly to not have to worry about slinging a camera around for street photography.
I sold my x100v and ordered the 14 pro. As compact as it was, the x100v just isn’t nearly as convenient as my iPhone and it has spent 80% of the year on my shelf or in my bag in my car whereas my iPhone is literally always in my pocket. It’s a cliche but it’s true the best camera is the one you have with you
Totally agree. Even a compact camera (e.g. Ricoh GR) has to be considered mindfully to take with you.
Imagine if apple made camera with lenses and their software 🔥🔥
That would be incredible!
They would put all the others out of business.
@@TheKimNeeper I would love it for the competition and innovative stuff.
Oh my God 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔😱😱😱😱😱
You absolutely right
A recent smartphone and a good full frame camera is everything you need. Compact cameras and also lot of APS-C have been made obsolete.
Great video and comparison. I've been using my cell phone for lots of landscape photos and love the ai editing. My friend and his wife went on a trip to cantaloupe canyon and his wife's iPhone photos looks say better than his nikon ff plus pro lens. For portraits, I still like using the ff mirrorless camera but it's not always about bokeh and more about story telling, which I'm trying hard to do these days. Keep up the great video
Thank you for this comparison. Good work! The portrait shot look very similar in color and everything. But the images are straight out of camera right? Did you use the proraw profile or did you hit reset?
Pro Raw Profile. I believe that’s the only one that takes advantage of Apples computational photography
The sensor is too small on the iPhone. It’ll look nice on a 6” XDR screen. Blow those up on a 32” monitor. You will be able to tell the difference then between the phone and the camera.
So why buy the a7 iv? What is the point of dslr anymore?
There are several situations where a iPhone just can't handle the situation. If you try to record a sunset scene with a iPhone it will try to compensate showing the sunset like a 12hs sun washing all colors. A camera with a a proper professional can get the shades, the blacks and reds that completely change the scene. Iphone is nice and do amazing job for a lot of scenarios but in a professional level it lacks in so many areas that is laughable to even consider it's use. Not complaining about iphone, great quality for everyday use, TH-cam and so.
@@maisummarceneiroumdemuitos8037 so for TH-cam «cinematic» videos an iPhone is perfect and it’s a waste to get a dslr?
@@francis2339 There is no simple answer to that. You will not see a professional production, dozens of people involved in a shooting using a iPhone to have a risk of ruining that and have to remake incurring in costs superior of 10 iPhones just in personal expenses. it's just like take a passenger car to a F1 race. If the person are a TH-cam guy alone making content a iPhone is fine. For some contentes iphone just can't deliver the quality expected. Example, se the 'flying Dutchman' TH-cam channel focused on nature, it's just impossible to get that 4k results with that colors on a iPhone. I am not complaining about iphone, it's a amazing product for it's intended use and the go choice for 90% of TH-cam channels that the content is more important than image excellence. it's impossible to shoot 8hs straight with a phone, battery, ergonomics, lack of attachments, sound etc.
Hello, Alex. The Straw Image: You are showing IMG_059, but in dropbox is IMG_058, and it's perfect. No jagged edges on 58, verified with four programs. Maybe somethng wrong with 59?
I came here for the information, education and review, but I replayed because of Alex's hair, eyebrows, beard, brilliant white teeth, broad shoulder and form fitting shirt! Alex, sir, you are a stud! Thanks for doing this video!
Nicely done! This comparison was clear and concise ( I like the speed and tone of voice ) - I just recently debated between iPhone 14 and Sony RX100 VII. My main use case was traveling- I have an a7iii and bunch of lenses but that along is another bag to carry around plus I am not a photographer that get paid doing this. I needed something small , reliable, good and easy to share my my content. iPhone 14 pro was my choice.
I could not agree more with computational photography on cameras (Sony) that would be game changer.
This video validated my decision.
2 different devices used for a different purposes, I don't know why people keep comparing a pocket camera with a professional one, I get it smart phones are getting better but not at a level of a full frame sensor and f1.2 prime lens. Thanks for the video anyway.
to be honest, this comparison is far from good. there's so many aspects it did not cover. for most mirrorless camera owners, they will apply adjustment to maximize the poential of the RAW/ dynamic range, and the result can be very different, even in good light. the computed bokeh on iphone is much worse. in low light condition, iphone can barely do any good photo.
for a lot of general users who don't do postprosessing to photos and only eager to share the photo asap, iphone is a good choice. but whenever you saw some good good on the instagram/social media, they mostly come from drone or camera with big sensor and good lense.
im not a professional, but the photo iphone captured is not good enough even for me.(it's not iphone can't take good photos, but it has too much limitation)
Does the iphone 14 have a dual capture mode that can record 4k ? My motorola edge has dual capture which allows me to put my mug in picture in picture mode but only 1080p, whereas with the front and back camera it can do 4k alone.
Idk but i can’t wait for my 14 pro in deep purple to come in im moving from a SE 2020 lol
I’m going to Europe in December and deciding to upgrade to iPhone 14 Pro Max (I have the 12 Pro Max) or the Sony A7C. Thoughts?
Going to Europe is a big deal. I would get the A7c for the best quality
A7c with tamron 20-40 f2.8 and sony 85mm f1.8 with nd filter. 2 compact lenses for your trip. Remember to modify the sony colors before leaving. If there is space left in your bag and money in your pocket, get a 50mm f1.8 and youll be set. I went to europe with a7c with 24mm f2.8G, 40mm f2.5G. And 85mm 1.8. Loved the compactness but next time ill get bigger camera bag and try to have at least a 1.4 lens. 80% of my pics are similar to my friend's pictures with their cell phone. For that other 20%, it was worth the hassle of lugging a camera bag
one is a phone with some computing - the other one a real camera with a FULL size sensor - not such a toy sensor of a smartphone. So for photo and video sony. For calling your family the iphone
for me still sony is a far better. i know for someone iphone wins because it's always ready in a pocket but for me this is not important. quality is better, video is better and i'm always know what i want to see in editing, before i take a shoot
I think I will skip iPhone 14 or even iPhone 15 next year. Carry a Ricoh GRiii or Ricoh GRiiix with me will be enough.
You can use old DSLR apcs with 16 mpx and from afar, it will look identical to Sony and iPhone.
Great video! Can you also compare under lowlight and use android phones? There are much better cameras in some android phones than the Iphone!
Okay cause my s23 is unstoppable.
A recent Sony Rx100 will still crush any phone in zoom quality
The professional cameras of course cannot be compared to the Iphone
However, the portability, mobility, and ease of use of the Iphone is it’s primary power.
It’s light, convenient, user-friendly. You can bring it pretty much everywhere and it’s most likely with you at all time.
There’s also so many apps for the Iphone like Snapseed, lightroom, blackmagic app and others that let you customise the settings of your iphone cameras like ISO, Aperture, and even shutter speed giving you full control of your phone just like a pro camera
Unless you really want top notch quality or shooting for weddings or other events that request top notch quality, Iphone wins most of the time
However, as a professional photographer or videographer using Iphone is not acceptable because you make yourself look unprofresional
This is because almost everyone has an Iphone and they would think they can do the same thing you did, especially if you charge thousands of dollars for a shoot.
I have seen so many people using Iphones and even old Iphone like Iphone XR, and with external lenses you can buy for Iphones online, it can take a pretty good pictures where people would think taken by a mirrorless camera.
Also the fact that the camera body cost more than 2k and a good lenses would cost another 500-2k
I would expect heavenly differences
Excellent comparison, would be good to see how much latitude there is in processing the proraw file, how much sharpening or colour refinement it could support etc.
*I regret buying a camera [my first camera the A7IV]. I wish I just bought an iPhone and easily transferred files with airdrop.*
Then you're using your camera wrong.
Yeah, the A7IV is too much for you if you can do same stuff you normally do with an iPhone 14.
this happens a lot, this camera is used for video capture and later processing and editing. Point, shot and share are way easier with iphone. Good news: easy to sell a sony camera to order a iPhone.
if u regret then professional camera is not for you, you are just taking photos for leisure
Shooting 50-55mm on a full frame camera is when the viewer easily starts to see the huge difference between “real” camera vs a iPhone
That's an unfair comparison, you miss that the iPhone 14 Pro has a 3.5x crop factor, so f/6.3 would be a better fair comparison. Stop down from 1.4 to 6.3 that lens can give you LOTS of extra detail than 1.4.
The entire video is an unfair comparison and intentionally misleading. He put a crappy Sigma asp-c lens on a beautiful full frame camera, instead of a FE G master lens, then shot it in auto mode, and, made them look as bad as he could to prove a non-existent point just to get views. This type of click bait comparison videos have been dead for a long time. There's a reason.
thank you for that video - exactly what i was looking for. Would have liked to see it in some sort of product photography setting as well though:)
Nice comparison, thank you for doing it. Notice your head is slightly tilled to the side, may want to get your back check out.
… thx for sharing, great comparison! 👍🏻
the ipnone 14 pro sensor has nearly the same size as sony rx100 AND a very good fast sharp prime instead of a slow not very sharp zoom lens. even without computational ph. iphone takes much bettes pics than a 1 inch sony.
I currently have the 13 pro max and an unboxing video of it on my channel, I have it in white. I think ima sit this one out and upgrade next year and I want the black one!!
Amazing video! You think iphone 13 pro need to be change for the iphone 14 or its not worthy
It’s a small update! If you are part of an upgrade program it’s worth it.
Thanks for the comparison!
Such a clean set up! I’m in love with it
it's 3 15 MP cameras stitched together to form a single image.
Great video! Computational photography is getting insane.
In great light I prefer my iPhone 14 Pro Max over my Lumix S5 with the kit lens... 🤯
You can't beat the new DG DN glass 🙌
It's great you give link to photos
Congrats for your iphone.. Using for sports, birding, wedding etc.. Lol
I had to put the video in 1.5x 😂
Smart phone camera getting more better. I think 5 years more Professional camera going to vanish the same like old square Television, Its technology getting better now.
You compare it with a mediocre lens. How about you compare with 85 f1.4, 105, 135 and above? Let's see the difference
Jeśli uważasz, że są tak blisko to czas iść do okulisty, albo nauczyć się robić zdjęcia tą alfą.
Great Video, Thanks :)
Agreed, point and shoots were supposed to kill photographers blah blah blah...people still want someone who knows what they're doing so they can just enjoy the event and have someone else worry about capturing it. It is nice to see the quality up but yeah, still not a replacement. I mean jeesh, is the movie industry RED, Arri worried about iphones?
focus eyes to falcon flies to 250 Miles per hour…..
For my huawei y9 screen both are same😕😐
Any photo with someone's face in it just doesn't look right on the iPhone. Skin just looks like wax on the iPhone.
Yeah but the stupid fixed battery on any phones/devices are the downfall compare to a real camera with extra batteries!!!
its like consolw an pc iphone=console
photographer camera=pc iphone winning
Ant vs Elephent
I'd say in case of your wife you should be happy with any kind of skin tones, dude
So almost no reason to bring my 4000 Dollar kit into play 😩
The iPhone sensor is 12 mb pixels with computation they multiplicate it by 4 making it artificially 48.... this is misleading as customer think they get a 48mb sensor when in fact they get a 12
It’s the opposite, the sensor is 48mp.
If u used lens for iPhone got Better picture
As if traditional camera bodies aren’t receiving upgrades lol. So much cap in this video.
Can you please point out any of the computational updates Canon, Sony and Nikon have done?
@@ABarrera I feel that Sony Nikon should make sensors for smarts phones and sell them idk if it’s a good idea but some dash cams have Sony sensors
Well all Sony footage looks like cell phone footage so this is accurate lol
11:05 you're contradicting yourself: sensor size doesn't matter, as camera phones have proven... BUT, if you carry a REAL camera it has to have a very large sensor to compete with iphones very small sensor?? How does that make sense? Sensor size clearly doesn't matter, as you've shown here. So why is that your conclusion?? Why exactly is APS-C the cutoff? Only phones can have small sensors that perform well? And if that's the case, why don't cameras just do what phones do? You're not making any sense.