Studies show that our genetics affect our personality/behavior by 20-30%. We are a mix of nature & nurture. These archetypes refer to both & how that affects our social structure. As expected the predator archetypes are getting a bit triggered. Love yall!
@@caveofmystery After reading the first sentence, I suspect I understand the cause of confusion. This isn’t a gotcha, I request you try to stick with me. “Heritable” in scientific terminology does not mean what most people think. It is actually quite unintuitive and causes a ton of confusion for layman. Are you aware of how scientific definition differs?
this isn't bro science, it's just understanding that social development informs our habits/behavior which then encode into our nervous system. it's not a justification for bad behavior/suffering- it's an explanation for inherited trauma and informs us that we can alter these biosocial proclivities! We can recondition the nervous system to embrace oneness and dissolve what post-colonial power structures have programmed and encoded into our bodies. i believe that this is the best explanation we have for hive mind, desires to categorize and differentiate humans into groups, etc.... you're exactly right, don't let these youtube comment buffoons make you feel small
Actually pretty good take. But also it's up to the individual to assess their environment and through will power attempt to change their innate biology (how they perceive, act, think, react). So that it may possibly change just enough so that their offspring are better suited for the environment. And can thus populate more greatly due to that new adaptation.
Yes. It puts more emphasis on the parent's responsibility of not passing on their toxic traits to the next. Also for us to recognize our our issues and refuse to impart them to the next generation.
Allow me to flip it a little bit. I completely understand what you're saying, and I agree to an extent, but I think it works both ways. So basically it's based upon perception and interpretation. If someone already has a pre-existing belief structure or model of reality that is based upon being a "prey" or a "victim" then they may be more likely to interpret external stimuli in a way that aligns with that belief, even if it was not meant that way. Like a lens, or filter on the world. If you keep having it repeatedly drilled into you how oppressed you are and how much people of another race have it in for you, that's going to be your unconscious bias explanation for every dirty look you get, every slight bad thing that someone else does to you who happens to be from another race - will now be attributed to racism where it may not have been anything to do with race. Everyone is doing this allllll the time, with everything in life. People look for patterns based on prior beliefs and experiences and then construct an internal narrative that makes sense based upon our expectations.
@@aeixo2533 I agree with this take, but let's just say that it does more harm than good for something within the archetype of prey to not recognize when they're in danger/being preyed upon (Dodo bird example). A negative is that it may trigger false alarms, which I do agree with, but that's a prey response in itself. Its made for survival, not accuracy.
So, psychological eugenics? I understand the motivation behind the conviction, but attempting to explain away racism with epigenetics is shaky at best. Your framework is grossly uninformed to the myriad of factors involving human epigenetics in the realm of psychological mechanisms and behavior.
In my own personal anthropology studies, I've found it that genetics has an almost zero percent change in behavior. Nurture is vastly more important than nature. I think Nelson is talking about 'insider and outsider perspective' 11:32 hes correct, and in this video he is mostly correct but the actual "genetics" is off base. Think about it more-so like generational trauma rather than hard-wired genetics.
Interesting video but I have to ask, how much influence does the parents who went through oppression have on their children in terms of teaching them their old habits and beliefs? I’m just curious to know if this is replicable in a scenario where the child who was born into an oppressed family tree was sent to a far off land during infant years, a land where certain races oppressing others does not exist or at the very least the oppressive roles are different. Would the child unconsciously view certain skin colors as potential threats in this instance?
I like this. I have a part 2 on this out now, but to answer that last part, I think it would manifest in them simply being more afraid, paranoid, or cautious. This is if it manifests at all. We receive 20-60% from our genetics as far as personality goes.
This is like saying "I'm a fat loser because of epigenetics" and then feeling good about yourself. You started off well, talking about an interesting concept but then began yapping about generational trauma and lost me.
@@bozoku_boss how do you conclude that epigenetics is the primary or perhaps the only factor determining one's life? ever heard about something called, personal responsibility?
@@IUSEMYTIMEINAMEANINGFULWAY-v7c personal responsibility and free will are pseudoscientific and to this day still undefined, theres no consensus on what those things even mean. We are all slaves to our subconscious desires/fears, genetics and environment
![จบจนได้ ! | Black Myth: Wukong #007 [ตอนจบ?]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DSqvWndF0sw/mqdefault.jpg)
Studies show that our genetics affect our personality/behavior by 20-30%.
We are a mix of nature & nurture.
These archetypes refer to both & how that affects our social structure.
As expected the predator archetypes are getting a bit triggered. Love yall!
@@caveofmystery can I get a source for that? I struggle to imagine any personality researcher saying that.
@@thoughtsuponatime847 i did a Google search just now and several articles came up.
"do genetics play a role in personality"
@@caveofmystery I have read several of them. This is why i am skeptical of what you said.
@@thoughtsuponatime847 Here's one of the articles that comes up:
www.nature.com/articles/s41380-018-0263-6
@@caveofmystery After reading the first sentence, I suspect I understand the cause of confusion. This isn’t a gotcha, I request you try to stick with me.
“Heritable” in scientific terminology does not mean what most people think. It is actually quite unintuitive and causes a ton of confusion for layman. Are you aware of how scientific definition differs?
Sounds like broscience
this isn't bro science, it's just understanding that social development informs our habits/behavior which then encode into our nervous system. it's not a justification for bad behavior/suffering- it's an explanation for inherited trauma and informs us that we can alter these biosocial proclivities! We can recondition the nervous system to embrace oneness and dissolve what post-colonial power structures have programmed and encoded into our bodies. i believe that this is the best explanation we have for hive mind, desires to categorize and differentiate humans into groups, etc....
you're exactly right, don't let these youtube comment buffoons make you feel small
I just walked into the wrong room again
Thank you, Nelson!
Actually pretty good take. But also it's up to the individual to assess their environment and through will power attempt to change their innate biology (how they perceive, act, think, react). So that it may possibly change just enough so that their offspring are better suited for the environment. And can thus populate more greatly due to that new adaptation.
Yes. It puts more emphasis on the parent's responsibility of not passing on their toxic traits to the next. Also for us to recognize our our issues and refuse to impart them to the next generation.
Allow me to flip it a little bit. I completely understand what you're saying, and I agree to an extent, but I think it works both ways.
So basically it's based upon perception and interpretation.
If someone already has a pre-existing belief structure or model of reality that is based upon being a "prey" or a "victim" then they may be more likely to interpret external stimuli in a way that aligns with that belief, even if it was not meant that way.
Like a lens, or filter on the world.
If you keep having it repeatedly drilled into you how oppressed you are and how much people of another race have it in for you, that's going to be your unconscious bias explanation for every dirty look you get, every slight bad thing that someone else does to you who happens to be from another race - will now be attributed to racism where it may not have been anything to do with race.
Everyone is doing this allllll the time, with everything in life. People look for patterns based on prior beliefs and experiences and then construct an internal narrative that makes sense based upon our expectations.
@@aeixo2533 I agree with this take, but let's just say that it does more harm than good for something within the archetype of prey to not recognize when they're in danger/being preyed upon (Dodo bird example).
A negative is that it may trigger false alarms, which I do agree with, but that's a prey response in itself. Its made for survival, not accuracy.
So, psychological eugenics?
I understand the motivation behind the conviction, but attempting to explain away racism with epigenetics is shaky at best. Your framework is grossly uninformed to the myriad of factors involving human epigenetics in the realm of psychological mechanisms and behavior.
You attribute far too much to genetics. Similar to the essentialism underlying racism.
In my own personal anthropology studies, I've found it that genetics has an almost zero percent change in behavior. Nurture is vastly more important than nature. I think Nelson is talking about 'insider and outsider perspective' 11:32 hes correct, and in this video he is mostly correct but the actual "genetics" is off base. Think about it more-so like generational trauma rather than hard-wired genetics.
Interesting video but I have to ask, how much influence does the parents who went through oppression have on their children in terms of teaching them their old habits and beliefs? I’m just curious to know if this is replicable in a scenario where the child who was born into an oppressed family tree was sent to a far off land during infant years, a land where certain races oppressing others does not exist or at the very least the oppressive roles are different. Would the child unconsciously view certain skin colors as potential threats in this instance?
I like this. I have a part 2 on this out now, but to answer that last part, I think it would manifest in them simply being more afraid, paranoid, or cautious. This is if it manifests at all. We receive 20-60% from our genetics as far as personality goes.
This is like saying "I'm a fat loser because of epigenetics" and then feeling good about yourself. You started off well, talking about an interesting concept but then began yapping about generational trauma and lost me.
How do you not make the connection?
@@bozoku_boss how do you conclude that epigenetics is the primary or perhaps the only factor determining one's life? ever heard about something called, personal responsibility?
@@IUSEMYTIMEINAMEANINGFULWAY-v7c personal responsibility and free will are pseudoscientific and to this day still undefined, theres no consensus on what those things even mean.
We are all slaves to our subconscious desires/fears, genetics and environment