so %2 average increase for such a large power drop for like 40 watts less, damn good job! Also 99.99% of people say the T and I separately instead of saying it like "Tie"
I did it a different way - I reduced my power limit, then used OC Scanner to find an automatic overclock, then added more VRAM speed as the last step. Got my power draw in Unigine Heaven down from 190 W to 158 W at NO performance cost.
I have 550 W PSU, with 5 Lian Li 120mm , 2 160mm , and 1 140 mm fans (8 Total) with 2 CPU fans on my CPU cooler. On top of everything else I’m approximately at low 400 for Watt usage at max according to Pcpartpicker. You probably pull less watts than me and would be more than fine. I get it if you like a comfortable headroom though.
thank you so much, i followed another youtuber's underclock and some games refused to play, but with your underclock with method 2 that's not longer the case
Thank you for the video. Saved me time on using your settings as a starting point to undervolt. Also in the same boat as you, upgraded from the 3060ti FE to 4070 FE
this undervolting is more stable than other undervolting tutorials. I achieved even better performance than stock GPU settings consuming 30w less. Getting 50°C in cyberpunk and mantaining 60°C of the VRAM is insane, cuz I was around 65°C at stock settings. basically 15°C less with even more fps. This is insane
65°C is not critical. My card in sotck setting got like 81°C with hotspot @ 91°C with undervolting and oc i got like 50°C in gaming...some games 64°C and hotspot is under 75°C wich is cool
1:33 Method 2 reduced my 4070 FE by 30W under load. Runs quiter than ever and no performance loss. Nvidia should have this in NVCP but oh well. Thanks for this great simple guide.
I just downgraded my 6950XT to a 4070. Lost about 10-15% performance but also dropped from 330w to 170w. I think it was worth it. Got it for free on a swap with someone I was also sick of the noise and the hot box of a room I was having.
@@Jasontvnd9 I was soooo close to getting a 6950XT but ended up with a 4070 for this reason. Still annoyed at the 40 series prices here in Europe but I figure with time the power saving should make up for it.
I was just looking for some mayby more better improvments ... All i find its exacly the same setup that i have alredy done by my self :D ! hahah Thanks still for video for letting me know its maximum what i can get ^^
Hey, THX for putting this up. In the picture of the computer at the end, the cooler hoses go down to the bottom of the radiator... Not Not Not. Check Gamer Nexus for how to setup a water block. One last thing, 3060 Ti, it's Tee_eye... not tie.
Yeah im at 2550 core curve, +1000 mem, 900mv, Target 110% So far its 5% fps loss but the effiency makes up for it. 278 to 178 watts, 59c @ 30% fan speed. Absolutely amazing stuff! Now I dont need to worry if my 750w psu will hold during any scenario.
@EwanShawcroft it's absolutely wild! 1100 rpm is max speed my fans go. Starfield everything maxed runs no hotter than 59/60c it's awesome! Stock settings it's louder with coil whine
Did you try lowering the voltage even further, whilst keeping similar clocks ? The card should be able to achieve higher overclock at lower voltages - eg +300 at 700mv, +200 at 900mv etc... So I would try limiting voltage to around 950 mv and 2.8 GHz. Or try to go all the way to 900mV and how far the clocks will go.
I made like this:power limit max, température max to 78. Then I took thé left cube(in curve monitor), pressed CTRL and drag it down with mouse(left click). Same with right cube. Then, i took 0.965v and mounted it to 2820mhz. It's works stable. Only in Spider man with Ray traycing crashes, but i just turned of thé raytraycing. So, After thé manipulations, only in re4 eating 150w max with same fps
It seemed to be a good balance between performance and power savings. I could have dropped clocks & mV further but at some point I would go below stock performance. I also tried some curves that used higher clocks & higher mV, but the power savings weren't as good. I decided that slightly higher than stock performance with power savings was the way to go. I ran the Borderlands 3 benchmark and got 2803 MHz AVG at stock, I wanted a value slightly higher than that so I set it to at 2835 (which lands the GPU at 2820 Mhz in most of the games I play). Finding the mV value was trial and error, I tried to get the lowest mV value while being stable in benchmarks and games that I play.
I've used the same settings as you but I get way higher power consumption during a 1440p Kombuster bench mark (210w stock & 190w undervolted) is that just the difference in GPU? I'm using the gaming X trio model
i just tried a 80% power limit in a game and it ended up using 155 watts and came close to 1.1 volts at some points. turned on one of my undervolt profiles and the wattage dropped to 105 watts at .92 volts. performance was the same... i'd much rather use the undervolt in this case.
Thank you for the guide, very easy to follow. I have a couple of questions about the info shown in GPU-z. GPU-z indicates my Asus 4070 default settings are: GPU Clock 1920 Boost 2520 Memory 1313. Applying +150 to core and +1000 to memory GPU-z indicates setting are 2070/2670/1438. Applying +150 to core and +1000 to memory and following the curve undervolt instructions GPU-z indicates setting are 1845/2445/1438. Is that to be expected?
Never mind undervolt and o/c of 150 not stable with my card. Undervolt method 2 no o/c boosts ~2745 stable same as stock (card runs a bit cooler and watts 30-40 lower depending on game👍)
I'm planning to upgrade to a Gigabyte Gaming OC 4070 which apparently has a max power limit of 320? That seems insanely high, is Afterburner gonna let me do that? if yes, should I?
that's a lot for a 4070, i suppose such a model could overclock better by not hitting the power limit in certain scenarios. but i don't think performance would go up all that much. i only have experience with the FE 4070, which only goes up to 220 watts.
My game crashed at +1000 on the memory and your method 2 version. If I want to improve stability from the core, do I lower the initial increase on method 2, for example, from +150core to +120? Or do I keep +150 but then lower the maximum clock from 2835 mhz to say, 2805. Which way do you think would improve my stability more? I bought my 4070 Windforce OC open box excellent for $480, so I am trying to test for stability as I only have a 14 day return period if I notice issues. Also, my card claims to have a max powerlimit of 108% (216W). However, in various games and benchmarks, it has not gone up higher than 200W. Could this be a defect from the card? Or what is going on?
to test the cards general stability it should be tested at factory settings (no memory overclock or core undervolt), there is nothing wrong with the card if there is no crashing at default settings. it can take a very long time to find a completely stable setting when using an under volt. +150 would definitely crash in my card in some games, and it seems your card already has a factory overclock. for that card i would try dropping down to something like +90, since it already has a factory oc. if that doesn't work try dropping down to +60, eventually it should become stable. also, try testing memory and core oc separately, see if removing the +1000 memory overclock stops the crashing.
+150 core and +300 mem should be the starting point. Any system can do +150 core. From that you want to increase +50 bit by bit until the game become unstable. Then step back by -25.
@@Jakiyyyyy I suppose it depends if you have an OC model or not. If I type +150 it sets it to 2865Mhz not 2835Mhz (they had some sort of small discount, was 5% under the normal price). And I've read all 4070s are the same so just because mine is an OC model it's no more likely to be able to handle 2865Mhz. And there are OC models that are more OCed than mine by default. So just typing +150 might set it to higher than it can handle.
Sorry for butting in, but as an owner of this card and on a 500w PSU, mine paired with an I-12700. Super efficient and achieves amazing scores in 3Dmark and Userbenchmark
@@Cygnus-Phi Personally, I think the 7800x3d doesn't make sense to pair with a 4070. You can get the 7600/b650 combo for around $300, while the 7800x3d platform costs about $600. Just my opinion though. If you want to "future proof" your CPU, then 7800x3d is the way to go. Yeah boot issues are a thing, but new BIOSes that are coming out are helping clear a lot of that up. I don't have any issues with my 7600 anymore. I did at first, but everything is good now :)
@@kotztotz3530 You're completely right on that, especially since AM5 right now is a bit suspect in terms of memory issues it can make very good sense to get a cheap 7600 setup and "later" swap to a better cpu and mobo and new chipsets once they are more matured. Still it's an option and an extremely power efficient one at that. Also, looking at system reqs for Starfield and Cyberpunk Expansion I'd wait with buying anything at all right now, perhaps those games WOULD show a big difference between 7600 and 7800x3d which for me in that case would be a deciding factor.
How to back to default settings when something get wrong? And if i have the same GPU, can I just copy your settings? Btw I saw you card is by default on 1800 mhz, my 1500 mhz
This video shows that you testing but the result stays same. Game/GPU drivers crash duo to temperature rising and rising electrical resistance. Means your power saving + oc will never work stable. Only way is to reduce core frequency by 10% and power by 20-30% depends on the board + silicon.
I can just overclock which then boosts 2820 stable (underwhelming though as 1080p-5%, 2k-2-3%). If I undervolt using method 2 I can only run at stock which boosts ~2745 stable (card runs a bit cooler and watts 30-40 lower depending on game👍). Not sure if o/c DDR6x is a good idea due to error correcting, I mean I assume Nvidia chose stock frequency for a reason?
@@kalaglow5094 The reason why you can overclock it a bit higher and it work is: The additional tiny higher set voltage/power. Because temperatures in a year are from 10-40°C, this difference cause a temperature difference at the gpu. To ensure that it work always, its set higher. Means, could be at 20°C your overclock works fine but at 40°C room tempature it might crash or if you open a 4K video + play a 3D demanding game, the drivers crash because the power is insufficient to keep all gpu functions running. Also known issue is higher latency, textures load later, causing blurring at textures. My suggestion, dont undervolt it and overclock it, either overclock the highest-core-frequency(not boost) + increase power = stable higher performance OR undervolt it and also reduce the highest-core-frequency(not boost). A combo with overclock and undervolt could work, if you ONLY increase the boost clock, because if the boost is unstable, it mostly jump back to the non-boost clock duo to the missing power (i dont suggest this, cause unstable fps, fps jumps up and down). I also oc-ed once the vram and the result is mostly bad, a tiny oc might work but to find that out isnt worth the time.
this did nothing but completely destroy my system. not one single thing runs like this. not one game, obs has problems. davinci resolve has problems.. fallout 4 crashes every single time... just no.
sad to here it, the OC described in the video works on my Founders Edition in many scenarios. also, I doubt your system is actually destroryed, unstable yes, remove the overclock/undervolt and you're back to normal. i've had many crashes by undervolting too low in the past and never once destroyed anything.
@@Glassboxgames in the video I showed a +150 MHz offset, which could be on the high side, but it does work in many scenarios for me. i.e. didn't destroy all functionality. I don't remember having issues in Divinci Resolve like you have, but every GPU is different, not all can reach the same clocks at the same voltage. If I get to a point where an undervolt crashed for me, I wouldn't run around saying "it doesn't work!", I would lower the clocks or increase voltages till it did work...
Not if you consider Starfiled FPS in 1440p, Ultra, FSR OFF at New Atlantis: RTX2060 SUPER: 25fps RTX3060TI: 32fps RTX4070 OC: 56fps No way a RTX4060Ti could have done almost double the frames of a RTX3060Ti.
so %2 average increase for such a large power drop for like 40 watts less, damn good job! Also 99.99% of people say the T and I separately instead of saying it like "Tie"
I say T I but it is officially 'tie'.
Because Ti stands for Titanium.
who cares how they say it? 99.99% of people are wrong but you dont see us correcting u lmao
@@housemana jensen huang says t i and it has been worded that way since the terms incepton
I did it a different way - I reduced my power limit, then used OC Scanner to find an automatic overclock, then added more VRAM speed as the last step.
Got my power draw in Unigine Heaven down from 190 W to 158 W at NO performance cost.
Could you specify exactly the power limit and vram speed you used?
@@osnofa__ 80%, +600.
Have you tried anything with raytracing to see if it's actually stable?
If you're on a 500 watt PSU, and really want to upgrade to the 4070, but can't change your PSU, this video is a godsend.
I also upgraded to a RTX 4070 and Ryzen 7 5800x3D with my 500 watt PSU and have no problems at all under full load even without undervolting.
@@pl3ut That's good to hear. I'm thinking about getting one.
@@pl3ut that is good to know, I'm planning on using the same combo
I'm on 400W PSU and using 4070 nicely. And today also with undervolt. Thanks.
I have 550 W PSU, with 5 Lian Li 120mm , 2 160mm , and 1 140 mm fans (8 Total) with 2 CPU fans on my CPU cooler. On top of everything else I’m approximately at low 400 for Watt usage at max according to Pcpartpicker. You probably pull less watts than me and would be more than fine. I get it if you like a comfortable headroom though.
2024 and still this guide just hits the spot. My gpu is now 8-10degC lower in full load 🤯
Damn the efficiency is crazy impressive on this card. Good vid!
thank you so much, i followed another youtuber's underclock and some games refused to play, but with your underclock with method 2 that's not longer the case
This video is a goldmine, especially for us europeans right now 😂 cheers
I'm also upgrading from a undervolted 3060 ti to a 4070. This is the perfect video for me and masterfully explained. Many thanks!
Thank you for all the information shared in the video!
Thank you for the video. Saved me time on using your settings as a starting point to undervolt. Also in the same boat as you, upgraded from the 3060ti FE to 4070 FE
I also upgraded from a 3060 ti FE
this undervolting is more stable than other undervolting tutorials. I achieved even better performance than stock GPU settings consuming 30w less.
Getting 50°C in cyberpunk and mantaining 60°C of the VRAM is insane, cuz I was around 65°C at stock settings.
basically 15°C less with even more fps. This is insane
65°C is not critical.
My card in sotck setting got like 81°C with hotspot @ 91°C
with undervolting and oc i got like 50°C in gaming...some games 64°C
and hotspot is under 75°C wich is cool
Wow. From 200W power drain to 140~150W on Superposition bench. This is massive!!!
Bought a 4070 super Yesterday. Great Video will do an UV too when it arrives. Ty for the Video!
1:33 Method 2 reduced my 4070 FE by 30W under load. Runs quiter than ever and no performance loss. Nvidia should have this in NVCP but oh well. Thanks for this great simple guide.
Need to sell my 3080 and get a 4070. The cost of power in the UK is insane
I just downgraded my 6950XT to a 4070.
Lost about 10-15% performance but also dropped from 330w to 170w.
I think it was worth it.
Got it for free on a swap with someone
I was also sick of the noise and the hot box of a room I was having.
@@Jasontvnd9 I was soooo close to getting a 6950XT but ended up with a 4070 for this reason.
Still annoyed at the 40 series prices here in Europe but I figure with time the power saving should make up for it.
@@JASHIKO_ how much do you save on a monthly basis?
@@Hiiiro Honestly couldn't tell you but just going off the undervolt and already low amount it's worth it.
I used this video for my 4060ti. Achieved pretty similar results. Now it pulls around 100w instead of 130w, same clock and framerate
Nice result, glad it worked.
Wish you added memory clock basics to the presentation. Nicely explained however
This video was exactly what I needed to see. Thank you for being precise
Yea Method 2 definitely helps with "effective clock speeds" which is super beneficial.
I was just looking for some mayby more better improvments ... All i find its exacly the same setup that i have alredy done by my self :D ! hahah Thanks still for video for letting me know its maximum what i can get ^^
Hey, THX for putting this up. In the picture of the computer at the end, the cooler hoses go down to the bottom of the radiator... Not Not Not. Check Gamer Nexus for how to setup a water block.
One last thing, 3060 Ti, it's Tee_eye... not tie.
It was very helpful, thanks bro 👍
Thank you! ❤
Thank you very much. Can you please tell me if is possible to choose the maximum GHZ i want to the CPU?
Good instructions!
Thank you for showing this. I do use MSI Afterburner but I can’t stand Nvidia
Yeah im at 2550 core curve, +1000 mem, 900mv, Target 110%
So far its 5% fps loss but the effiency makes up for it.
278 to 178 watts, 59c @ 30% fan speed. Absolutely amazing stuff!
Now I dont need to worry if my 750w psu will hold during any scenario.
Is that with a 4070 ti? 278W is close to that cards 280W rating. That's a huge difference and definitely worth the 5% lost FPS!
@EwanShawcroft it's absolutely wild! 1100 rpm is max speed my fans go. Starfield everything maxed runs no hotter than 59/60c it's awesome!
Stock settings it's louder with coil whine
@@liquidsunshine697 Awesome work! Undervolting is criminally underrated
Did you try lowering the voltage even further, whilst keeping similar clocks ? The card should be able to achieve higher overclock at lower voltages - eg +300 at 700mv, +200 at 900mv etc... So I would try limiting voltage to around 950 mv and 2.8 GHz. Or try to go all the way to 900mV and how far the clocks will go.
would this apply to the windforce 4070 as well? would like to just lazily swipe ur settings
Consice and well presented, thank you for not wasting 10 minutes with nonsense.
Unable to change my voltage on my RTX 4070 Super, even after unlocking the voltage controls.
I made like this:power limit max, température max to 78. Then I took thé left cube(in curve monitor), pressed CTRL and drag it down with mouse(left click). Same with right cube. Then, i took 0.965v and mounted it to 2820mhz. It's works stable. Only in Spider man with Ray traycing crashes, but i just turned of thé raytraycing. So, After thé manipulations, only in re4 eating 150w max with same fps
How do you find your desired voltage ? Is the 995 arbitrary?
Nice video but you didn't tell us how you pick the mV and the frequencies. Why 995mV and why 2835MHz ?
It seemed to be a good balance between performance and power savings. I could have dropped clocks & mV further but at some point I would go below stock performance. I also tried some curves that used higher clocks & higher mV, but the power savings weren't as good. I decided that slightly higher than stock performance with power savings was the way to go.
I ran the Borderlands 3 benchmark and got 2803 MHz AVG at stock, I wanted a value slightly higher than that so I set it to at 2835 (which lands the GPU at 2820 Mhz in most of the games I play).
Finding the mV value was trial and error, I tried to get the lowest mV value while being stable in benchmarks and games that I play.
Now I'm not a gamer but I use CAD programs for rendering. Do I need an other setting?
I've used the same settings as you but I get way higher power consumption during a 1440p Kombuster bench mark (210w stock & 190w undervolted) is that just the difference in GPU? I'm using the gaming X trio model
I get around 190 watts in that test as well.
Test out the power consumption in various games and you should see a good reduction vs. stock.
The trio edition I think has a tdp of 220w out of the box.
on the 4000 series Undervolt is not needed - they are already cold enough, and to reduce the voltage just make power limit 80
i just tried a 80% power limit in a game and it ended up using 155 watts and came close to 1.1 volts at some points.
turned on one of my undervolt profiles and the wattage dropped to 105 watts at .92 volts.
performance was the same... i'd much rather use the undervolt in this case.
How do you drag the right of the curve down without bringing the whole thing down? Tried holding shift and selecting right
Thank you for the guide, very easy to follow. I have a couple of questions about the info shown in GPU-z. GPU-z indicates my Asus 4070 default settings are: GPU Clock 1920 Boost 2520 Memory 1313. Applying +150 to core and +1000 to memory GPU-z indicates setting are 2070/2670/1438. Applying +150 to core and +1000 to memory and following the curve undervolt instructions GPU-z indicates setting are 1845/2445/1438. Is that to be expected?
Never mind undervolt and o/c of 150 not stable with my card. Undervolt method 2 no o/c boosts ~2745 stable same as stock (card runs a bit cooler and watts 30-40 lower depending on game👍)
Amazing video , thanks for the explanation, this is mean 550W Gold PSU is good enough for RTX 4070
950 mv 2700 mhz rock stable
Memory +800
Asus 4070 dual oc
In an itx case 😊
Hi! Have you tried the Port Royale Benchmark? The second method of undervolting is not stable for me there. It crashes no matter the Mhz or mV.
I do not have access to that benchmark, unfortunately.
Are those setting saved after a restart, even when Afterburner isn't startet? Or do I have to start Afterburner everytime to make the settings work?
there is a little windows icon in the top right of the MSI afterburner UI, toggling that icon on allows the overclock to apply at startup.
I'm planning to upgrade to a Gigabyte Gaming OC 4070 which apparently has a max power limit of 320? That seems insanely high, is Afterburner gonna let me do that? if yes, should I?
that's a lot for a 4070, i suppose such a model could overclock better by not hitting the power limit in certain scenarios. but i don't think performance would go up all that much.
i only have experience with the FE 4070, which only goes up to 220 watts.
You can't even max out the 10% powerlimit increase of the FE modell, before it becomes unstable. 3Ghz+ is possible, but not very likely.
please, make a video of extreme UV on 4070, this will be really interesting)
Sure thing, the video is coming soon.
@@Superior85 thanks for your work, bro)
Kombustor version? I get 4400 at stock with 2700 clock and 110% power limit usage
Version 4. v4.1.19.0
Could you do an extreme undervolt vid? I think we can go further and sacrifice a small margin of performance/
Sure, I'll post something soon...
@@Superior85 awesome! I know I could maybe do it myself but it's nice to have someone like yourself do it
what is the buttons combination to curve??? to drag down the line???
I made these changes with my GPU in silent mode. Do you think I should switch it to normal mode first and then redo the changes?
it shouldn't matter.
My game crashed at +1000 on the memory and your method 2 version. If I want to improve stability from the core, do I lower the initial increase on method 2, for example, from +150core to +120? Or do I keep +150 but then lower the maximum clock from 2835 mhz to say, 2805. Which way do you think would improve my stability more? I bought my 4070 Windforce OC open box excellent for $480, so I am trying to test for stability as I only have a 14 day return period if I notice issues.
Also, my card claims to have a max powerlimit of 108% (216W). However, in various games and benchmarks, it has not gone up higher than 200W. Could this be a defect from the card? Or what is going on?
to test the cards general stability it should be tested at factory settings (no memory overclock or core undervolt), there is nothing wrong with the card if there is no crashing at default settings.
it can take a very long time to find a completely stable setting when using an under volt.
+150 would definitely crash in my card in some games, and it seems your card already has a factory overclock. for that card i would try dropping down to something like +90, since it already has a factory oc. if that doesn't work try dropping down to +60, eventually it should become stable.
also, try testing memory and core oc separately, see if removing the +1000 memory overclock stops the crashing.
@@Superior85 Thanks so much for your quick response man! I subbed!
Hey nice video, should i always put +150 on mv in aferburner?
Try +50 increments at a time until your tests and games become unstable
+150 core and +300 mem should be the starting point. Any system can do +150 core. From that you want to increase +50 bit by bit until the game become unstable. Then step back by -25.
@@Jakiyyyyy I suppose it depends if you have an OC model or not. If I type +150 it sets it to 2865Mhz not 2835Mhz (they had some sort of small discount, was 5% under the normal price). And I've read all 4070s are the same so just because mine is an OC model it's no more likely to be able to handle 2865Mhz. And there are OC models that are more OCed than mine by default. So just typing +150 might set it to higher than it can handle.
What cpu would you pair this with to get the best performance but the lowest power usage and how low could you have it go?
Sorry for butting in, but as an owner of this card and on a 500w PSU, mine paired with an I-12700. Super efficient and achieves amazing scores in 3Dmark and Userbenchmark
I'd go with a Ryzen 7600. Or if you really want to go cheaper a Ryzen 5600 would still be great.
@@kotztotz3530 yeah that or the 7800x3d. Problem is AM5 memory/boot issues but it seems there is a solution for it.
@@Cygnus-Phi Personally, I think the 7800x3d doesn't make sense to pair with a 4070. You can get the 7600/b650 combo for around $300, while the 7800x3d platform costs about $600. Just my opinion though. If you want to "future proof" your CPU, then 7800x3d is the way to go.
Yeah boot issues are a thing, but new BIOSes that are coming out are helping clear a lot of that up. I don't have any issues with my 7600 anymore. I did at first, but everything is good now :)
@@kotztotz3530 You're completely right on that, especially since AM5 right now is a bit suspect in terms of memory issues it can make very good sense to get a cheap 7600 setup and "later" swap to a better cpu and mobo and new chipsets once they are more matured.
Still it's an option and an extremely power efficient one at that. Also, looking at system reqs for Starfield and Cyberpunk Expansion I'd wait with buying anything at all right now, perhaps those games WOULD show a big difference between 7600 and 7800x3d which for me in that case would be a deciding factor.
"Tie" 🤣
Call this overamping.
Can i try this with 4070 ti?
yes
How to back to default settings when something get wrong?
And if i have the same GPU, can I just copy your settings?
Btw I saw you card is by default on 1800 mhz, my 1500 mhz
there is a reset button in MSI afterburner.
if you copy my settings, its important for you to do stability testing...
This video shows that you testing but the result stays same.
Game/GPU drivers crash duo to temperature rising and rising electrical resistance.
Means your power saving + oc will never work stable. Only way is to reduce core frequency by 10% and power by 20-30% depends on the board + silicon.
I can just overclock which then boosts 2820 stable (underwhelming though as 1080p-5%, 2k-2-3%). If I undervolt using method 2 I can only run at stock which boosts ~2745 stable (card runs a bit cooler and watts 30-40 lower depending on game👍). Not sure if o/c DDR6x is a good idea due to error correcting, I mean I assume Nvidia chose stock frequency for a reason?
@@kalaglow5094 The reason why you can overclock it a bit higher and it work is: The additional tiny higher set voltage/power.
Because temperatures in a year are from 10-40°C, this difference cause a temperature difference at the gpu. To ensure that it work always, its set higher.
Means, could be at 20°C your overclock works fine but at 40°C room tempature it might crash or if you open a 4K video + play a 3D demanding game, the drivers crash because the power is insufficient to keep all gpu functions running. Also known issue is higher latency, textures load later, causing blurring at textures.
My suggestion, dont undervolt it and overclock it, either overclock the highest-core-frequency(not boost) + increase power = stable higher performance OR undervolt it and also reduce the highest-core-frequency(not boost). A combo with overclock and undervolt could work, if you ONLY increase the boost clock, because if the boost is unstable, it mostly jump back to the non-boost clock duo to the missing power (i dont suggest this, cause unstable fps, fps jumps up and down). I also oc-ed once the vram and the result is mostly bad, a tiny oc might work but to find that out isnt worth the time.
this did nothing but completely destroy my system.
not one single thing runs like this.
not one game, obs has problems. davinci resolve has problems..
fallout 4 crashes every single time...
just no.
sad to here it, the OC described in the video works on my Founders Edition in many scenarios.
also, I doubt your system is actually destroryed, unstable yes, remove the overclock/undervolt and you're back to normal.
i've had many crashes by undervolting too low in the past and never once destroyed anything.
@@Superior85 of course its not physically destroyed.
it destroys ALL functionality. i dare you to try this with a VR headset... dont open your eyes.
@@Glassboxgames in the video I showed a +150 MHz offset, which could be on the high side, but it does work in many scenarios for me. i.e. didn't destroy all functionality. I don't remember having issues in Divinci Resolve like you have, but every GPU is different, not all can reach the same clocks at the same voltage.
If I get to a point where an undervolt crashed for me, I wouldn't run around saying "it doesn't work!", I would lower the clocks or increase voltages till it did work...
The Real RTX 4060TI
Not if you consider Starfiled FPS in 1440p, Ultra, FSR OFF at New Atlantis:
RTX2060 SUPER: 25fps
RTX3060TI: 32fps
RTX4070 OC: 56fps
No way a RTX4060Ti could have done almost double the frames of a RTX3060Ti.
@@SirTE0why aren't you showing real 4060ti numbers then ? It's like 10% faster than 3060ti.