Thank you SO much for this video. I'm building my first SFF PC right now with a 4070FE. I am new to undervolting and you helped me so much with this video! Cheers!
По 4000 серии ничего не нашел, на базе этого ролика сделал свой андервольт. Видеокарта Palit4070 Dual OC (по дефолту частота поднималась до 2805-2820MHz, напряжение до 1,085-1,095mV и энергопотребление до 197-199W): 1. В настройках nVidia ограничил частоту кадров не более частоты монитора (у меня 144), так же это сделал в главном окне RivaTuner, карта сразу меньше потреблять стала без просчета большего числа кадров, которые все равно не потянет монитор (Обязательно!!!); 2. По шкале X выбрал напряжение 970mV и потянул кривую вверх, зажав CTRL, до пересечения со шкалой Y до частоты 2790MHz. 3. Выделил всю часть правее нашей точки в пересечении 2790/970 с помощью зажатого SHIFT (получил серую область), начиная с точки правее, которую я поднимал и которая выделена ярким цветом. 4. Выделил самую правую точку, опустил ее до нашей максимально предложенной частоты 2790MHz с зажатой левой кнопкой мыши и подтвердил изменения в основном меню (галочка правее дискеты). Кривая после нашего пересечения стала ровной. Т.е. при частоте 2790MHz будет максимальное напряжение 970mV 5. Затем поднял частоту памяти на +1000 (лучше в ячейке вручную цифрами вписать "+1000", нажать ENTER) и подтвердил изменения в основном меню (Обязательно!!!). 6. Потом включил принудительно портрет человечка "Определение пользователем" ниже шкалы вентиляторов (по дефолту они почти не работают и карта перегревается) и вручную в настройках поставил галочку во вкладке "Кулеры" пользовательский авторежим и настроил кривую оборотов кулеров - до 40гр/30%, 60гр/60%, 80гр/100%. 7. После этого нажал на дискету сохранения профиля и сохранил его (например под цифрой "1"), которая подсветилась синей полоской. 8. Последнее, что сделал после тестов - включил в правом верхнем углу значок виндовс, чтобы программа загружалась вместе с системой и свернул ее. Как итог, карта стала меньше греться 60-63гр, и потреблять 160-167W - это в прожорливом Киберпанке при разрешении 2К, настройки почти все на Ультра со сглаживанием 16Х, отключено DLSS и включено RTX на ультра. Как итог 72-95 кадров. В RDR2 и Last of Us температуры ниже, потребление меньше и кадров больше (80-120). Удивительно, но факт! Снизил еще до таких параметров 2700MHz / 920mV. Карта работает, Киберпанк при загрузке не вылетает. Температура карты упала до 55гр при 96% загрузке, потребление 140-146W, а потеря кадров составила минус 2-3 кадра, да и то, когда резко поворачиваешься или стрельба с кучей народу идет. Всем успехов! Пробуйте! :-)
You can oc vram +1000/1200mhz and same fps us stock and 130-150w stresstest. My 3070 draw 240watts, undervolted to 1785mhz (stock boosted to 1995mhz) its over 200mhz less, and same fps with vram +1000mhz) and 185watts peak.
995mV at 2.8GHz on my Asus Dual 4070 - Played Forza Horizon 5 at 1440p max settings and had no crashes. Temp never exceeded 52C and power consumption was around 150-160W down from about 185-200.
What a wonderful video, looks like all these cards are actually overclocked, they should come undervolted by default from the manufacturer, there is no excuse to pay 33% more wattage just to get 2.5% fps increase. with 130w GPU, you will save tons of cash not just the electricity, but the PSU, UPS and other component prices too.
im not planing to over clock, i want to under clock to reduce power use, not too worried about performance, its way above the 1650 super ive been using for the last 4 years, will try today on my ASUS 4070
@@moh-rd4mmA 200W GPU pair with a 65W CPU will still make your room hot with demanding game, undervolt to ~920w like this guy is the only way to solved that problem.
Have you tried running cinebench r23 gpu test on the lower voltage settings? While .925V may be good for some workloads, rendering ain't one of them at least on my 4070S. For stable cinebench/blender I have to increase the voltage to around .985V. V-Sync also plays important role in the overal power consumption and so has the game resolution and other factors so if you have a game resolution in mind, it's wise to test undervolt/overclock for that particular resolution because the results for other resolutions vary. Totally agree it's ideal to test wide range of SW to be on a safe side.
yeah, testing a good range of software is a good idea. at the time of posting the video i tested a handful of games but later found issues with the +210 undervolt. i havent had issues with the 995 undervolt in the video, but the 920 mv i've since lowered down to 2655 (+150 offset on a 4070 FE), and since lowering ive had no issues in any games ive played or cinebench r24 gpu test...
I did my 4070 Ti from 950 2490 MHz to 900 same speed and my power went down by a good 60 to 80 watts and temps came down 8 to 10 degrees.. the 4070 is a great card to under volt while keeping the stock speed MHz
Disregarding the gpu performance, Does lowering the gpu clock frequency alone (not adjusting volt) lowers the power consumption? Is it possible to lower below 100W?
6:45 me chilling with my 1660 super at a 875mv stock clock speeds.. max power draw is down from 125W to 93W and max temps from 78 to 65 and its completely stable
Nice one...my 4070 asus proart, when monitoring voltage, it is only able to go down to. 910mV. Even if set at 875, i believe it is a set minimum in theese cards. So i run it at 910/2675mhz with mini al fps loss, temps around 50/55celcius. And watt dropped from 195 to 135. Frame generation is great too, but it has its flaws, some games it stutters. And others it crashes to desktop...
This is partly Nvidia's problem... They're making cards with the lowest possible number of cores, so to compensate for the low baseline performance they're pushing the silicon to the limit. Imagine if 4070 had 20% more cores, you could lower the clock to 2.3GHz to get equivalent performance with much lower power consumption.
@@GeneralS1mba 4070 is still massively overpriced in eu... It is more expensive than 7800xt despite being released year ago. If 4070S will sit between base 4070 and 4070ti pricewise it's as useless as both cards.
@@panjak323 I'm in the UK, so the 7800 xt has all the 475 models sold out it's ONLY available at 500 now, but a 4070 is 525 where I'd say it's worth It, but prices definitely vary a lot per region
Amazing efficiency you got on your UV2. How was the stability? Did you notice any crashes like you did on your UV1? I will have to try your new UV2 in games where I don't need the absolute max performance. I've had luck on overclocking my Windforce OC to +220 core / +1,500 mem and it's been 100% stable for the past week across dozens of games and VR games too. I am pretty happy with the performance increase and it doesn't go above 200W (weirdly, despite have the power limits to 108%). My graphics score on Time Spy went from 17,147 to 18,160 Edit: Had to drop to +180 core as I noticed some very minor artifacting in heaven benchmark, was not present in regular gaming however. I was able to squeeze out some extra memory overclock though and managed to get +1.550 on the memory stable (didn't fine tune before, just saw it was stable at +1500 and left it). Weirdly enough, my graphics score on timespy went up to 18,260 and then 18,216 on a second run with Geforce Instant Replay off. Combined score went to 16,844. All of this was with Resizable bar On
I've had no crashes, though I've only been using UV2 for a few weeks. Glad your card is doing well, it's rare to see RTX 4070 go over 200 watts. In my testing I've only seen it happen in Quake 2 RTX and Severed Steel RT on and DLSS disabled (back when I was on higher millivolt values). There is a free demo of Quake 2 RTX on Steam that you could try, I think that game would get you over 200 watts.
@@Superior85 That's good to hear. I tried Quake 2 RTX and it only went up to 200W still. I've read online that it seems to be a problem with the 8 pin 4070s. I wish I could get the advertised 216W though, as that's left out performance. I was incredibly impressed with the lighting on Quake 2 RTX though. I think it looks better than Portal RTX. Can't wait to see what path tracing brings in the next 2 years or so with RTX 5000 series.
Gigabyte Windforce OC Edition - Modern warfare 2022 artifacting like small colorful glint just like rockstar games logo on GTA 5 with police car siren glint. Only if i go above +140 like 180 or so, at 150 rarely happens. Goes away if i do +140.
Good but the key of stability its good motherboard, great efficient and stabiliti 12v section of power supply. My msi z trio lhr got 1785mhz with 800mv and oc vram 1000mhz 0performance difference about 65-70w less than stock. My next gpu probably 6950xt and undervolted about 2100mhz at 0.95mv maybe i think good efficient. Over 200watts only on gpu its too much for me.. heating, noises, and others. And not good for longlife gpu..
Since i'm only do 1080p but want an efficient gpu that will be ok for the next 5-7 years this card seems pretty interesting. Can you tell me the ballpark for 60fps locked 1080p gaming with undervolt ? Thx
so, is it safe for me to run it undervolted using 500w gold PSU? I have 2060s rn and it draws around 150-160w. Acording to your video by underclock the 4070, it only draws 130w so i think i can upgrade to 4070 without the need to buy new PSU.
For future folk: 160-170w is what it draws for me in Cyberpunk 2077 patch 2.1 at high settings with ray tracing and dlss and 1440p internal resolution. It's insanely efficient! Forgot to mention I have the OC version so XD
@@Superior85 I see, thanks. Btw, a small correction, on min 2:20 the volt is not the reason why the memory clock drops, but because of the gpu clock, for my rtx 3090, looks like 1545hz is the min you can do without dropping the memory clock, this lets you do pick any voltage like 731mv/1545 and still prevents the memory clock from dropping, with this value, my rtx 3090 runs with 230w, ~ 340fps on furmark 720p no msaa vs stock 540fps with 420w on my evga.
RTX 4070 is efficient GPU. Why would you ever want to undervolt it? Just enjoy your graphic card, losing -5° of the temperature at the cost of the performance is merely not worth of it.
@@iyaramonk something what is efficient from the beginning, can't become more efficient. Once again, RTX 4070 is not something you should bother undervolting.
There are NO undervolt videos as clear , simple and easy to follow as this one
Thank you SO much for this video. I'm building my first SFF PC right now with a 4070FE. I am new to undervolting and you helped me so much with this video! Cheers!
По 4000 серии ничего не нашел, на базе этого ролика сделал свой андервольт.
Видеокарта Palit4070 Dual OC (по дефолту частота поднималась до 2805-2820MHz, напряжение до 1,085-1,095mV и энергопотребление до 197-199W):
1. В настройках nVidia ограничил частоту кадров не более частоты монитора (у меня 144), так же это сделал в главном окне RivaTuner, карта сразу меньше потреблять стала без просчета большего числа кадров, которые все равно не потянет монитор (Обязательно!!!);
2. По шкале X выбрал напряжение 970mV и потянул кривую вверх, зажав CTRL, до пересечения со шкалой Y до частоты 2790MHz.
3. Выделил всю часть правее нашей точки в пересечении 2790/970 с помощью зажатого SHIFT (получил серую область), начиная с точки правее, которую я поднимал и которая выделена ярким цветом.
4. Выделил самую правую точку, опустил ее до нашей максимально предложенной частоты 2790MHz с зажатой левой кнопкой мыши и подтвердил изменения в основном меню (галочка правее дискеты). Кривая после нашего пересечения стала ровной. Т.е. при частоте 2790MHz будет максимальное напряжение 970mV
5. Затем поднял частоту памяти на +1000 (лучше в ячейке вручную цифрами вписать "+1000", нажать ENTER) и подтвердил изменения в основном меню (Обязательно!!!).
6. Потом включил принудительно портрет человечка "Определение пользователем" ниже шкалы вентиляторов (по дефолту они почти не работают и карта перегревается) и вручную в настройках поставил галочку во вкладке "Кулеры" пользовательский авторежим и настроил кривую оборотов кулеров - до 40гр/30%, 60гр/60%, 80гр/100%.
7. После этого нажал на дискету сохранения профиля и сохранил его (например под цифрой "1"), которая подсветилась синей полоской.
8. Последнее, что сделал после тестов - включил в правом верхнем углу значок виндовс, чтобы программа загружалась вместе с системой и свернул ее.
Как итог, карта стала меньше греться 60-63гр, и потреблять 160-167W - это в прожорливом Киберпанке при разрешении 2К, настройки почти все на Ультра со сглаживанием 16Х, отключено DLSS и включено RTX на ультра. Как итог 72-95 кадров. В RDR2 и Last of Us температуры ниже, потребление меньше и кадров больше (80-120).
Удивительно, но факт! Снизил еще до таких параметров 2700MHz / 920mV. Карта работает, Киберпанк при загрузке не вылетает. Температура карты упала до 55гр при 96% загрузке, потребление 140-146W, а потеря кадров составила минус 2-3 кадра, да и то, когда резко поворачиваешься или стрельба с кучей народу идет.
Всем успехов! Пробуйте! :-)
Как с вами связатся
You can oc vram +1000/1200mhz and same fps us stock and 130-150w stresstest. My 3070 draw 240watts, undervolted to 1785mhz (stock boosted to 1995mhz) its over 200mhz less, and same fps with vram +1000mhz) and 185watts peak.
didn't think i'd learned so much from a video with such little views, like deserved. btw is there any easy way to just copy your undervolt settings?
995mV at 2.8GHz on my Asus Dual 4070 - Played Forza Horizon 5 at 1440p max settings and had no crashes. Temp never exceeded 52C and power consumption was around 150-160W down from about 185-200.
The second undervolt works like a charm for an Asus dual 4070, the difference in Wattage and temps are night and day!
Hey! I also have an Asus Dual 4070, and having trouble with this. Do you have any tips or a guide of sort?
Looking forward to applying these to my new 4070 in my SFF case!
1:33 frequency ~ 2800MHz
6:47 920mV lowest recommended value for UV curve
What a wonderful video, looks like all these cards are actually overclocked, they should come undervolted by default from the manufacturer, there is no excuse to pay 33% more wattage just to get 2.5% fps increase. with 130w GPU, you will save tons of cash not just the electricity, but the PSU, UPS and other component prices too.
im not planing to over clock, i want to under clock to reduce power use, not too worried about performance, its way above the 1650 super ive been using for the last 4 years, will try today on my ASUS 4070
Amazing how you can go from 190 Watts to 130 watts with more performance
Lower performance.
@@krecikowi wow u crying over 5-10 fsp????
@@moh-rd4mmA 200W GPU pair with a 65W CPU will still make your room hot with demanding game, undervolt to ~920w like this guy is the only way to solved that problem.
Have you tried running cinebench r23 gpu test on the lower voltage settings? While .925V may be good for some workloads, rendering ain't one of them at least on my 4070S. For stable cinebench/blender I have to increase the voltage to around .985V. V-Sync also plays important role in the overal power consumption and so has the game resolution and other factors so if you have a game resolution in mind, it's wise to test undervolt/overclock for that particular resolution because the results for other resolutions vary. Totally agree it's ideal to test wide range of SW to be on a safe side.
yeah, testing a good range of software is a good idea. at the time of posting the video i tested a handful of games but later found issues with the +210 undervolt. i havent had issues with the 995 undervolt in the video, but the 920 mv i've since lowered down to 2655 (+150 offset on a 4070 FE), and since lowering ive had no issues in any games ive played or cinebench r24 gpu test...
Great video, bro, and crazy efficient card. It seems it will be interesting for people on another 2-5 years)
I bought one yesterday :D
Perfect video. Thank you!
Nice videos// keep going bro!
I did my 4070 Ti from 950 2490 MHz to 900 same speed and my power went down by a good 60 to 80 watts and temps came down 8 to 10 degrees.. the 4070 is a great card to under volt while keeping the stock speed MHz
Disregarding the gpu performance, Does lowering the gpu clock frequency alone (not adjusting volt) lowers the power consumption? Is it possible to lower below 100W?
I think -60% is the limit so yes around 90w. You can do it without UV but performance will be horrible.
6:45 me chilling with my 1660 super at a 875mv stock clock speeds.. max power draw is down from 125W to 93W and max temps from 78 to 65 and its completely stable
what a gem video, thanks!
Nice one...my 4070 asus proart, when monitoring voltage, it is only able to go down to. 910mV. Even if set at 875, i believe it is a set minimum in theese cards.
So i run it at 910/2675mhz with mini al fps loss, temps around 50/55celcius. And watt dropped from 195 to 135.
Frame generation is great too, but it has its flaws, some games it stutters. And others it crashes to desktop...
Would this work with the 4070 Super?
I can get mine to run at 2820 mhz / 950mv, max power consumption drops to like 150-155w from 200, typical from 190 to 140ish.
This is partly Nvidia's problem... They're making cards with the lowest possible number of cores, so to compensate for the low baseline performance they're pushing the silicon to the limit. Imagine if 4070 had 20% more cores, you could lower the clock to 2.3GHz to get equivalent performance with much lower power consumption.
a "4070 super" is "leaked" to have about 20% more cores, at a 10% higher power usage, if it actually comes it should be very efficient once tweaked :)
@@GeneralS1mba but it will cost more...
@@panjak323 probably around $600-650 :( seeing 4070 for about 525 on sales and they are probably 550 permanently now
@@GeneralS1mba 4070 is still massively overpriced in eu... It is more expensive than 7800xt despite being released year ago.
If 4070S will sit between base 4070 and 4070ti pricewise it's as useless as both cards.
@@panjak323 I'm in the UK, so the 7800 xt has all the 475 models sold out it's ONLY available at 500 now, but a 4070 is 525 where I'd say it's worth It, but prices definitely vary a lot per region
Amazing efficiency you got on your UV2. How was the stability? Did you notice any crashes like you did on your UV1? I will have to try your new UV2 in games where I don't need the absolute max performance. I've had luck on overclocking my Windforce OC to +220 core / +1,500 mem and it's been 100% stable for the past week across dozens of games and VR games too. I am pretty happy with the performance increase and it doesn't go above 200W (weirdly, despite have the power limits to 108%). My graphics score on Time Spy went from 17,147 to 18,160
Edit: Had to drop to +180 core as I noticed some very minor artifacting in heaven benchmark, was not present in regular gaming however. I was able to squeeze out some extra memory overclock though and managed to get +1.550 on the memory stable (didn't fine tune before, just saw it was stable at +1500 and left it). Weirdly enough, my graphics score on timespy went up to 18,260 and then 18,216 on a second run with Geforce Instant Replay off. Combined score went to 16,844. All of this was with Resizable bar On
I've had no crashes, though I've only been using UV2 for a few weeks.
Glad your card is doing well, it's rare to see RTX 4070 go over 200 watts. In my testing I've only seen it happen in Quake 2 RTX and Severed Steel RT on and DLSS disabled (back when I was on higher millivolt values). There is a free demo of Quake 2 RTX on Steam that you could try, I think that game would get you over 200 watts.
@@Superior85 That's good to hear. I tried Quake 2 RTX and it only went up to 200W still. I've read online that it seems to be a problem with the 8 pin 4070s. I wish I could get the advertised 216W though, as that's left out performance. I was incredibly impressed with the lighting on Quake 2 RTX though. I think it looks better than Portal RTX. Can't wait to see what path tracing brings in the next 2 years or so with RTX 5000 series.
Gigabyte Windforce OC Edition - Modern warfare 2022 artifacting like small colorful glint just like rockstar games logo on GTA 5 with police car siren glint. Only if i go above +140 like 180 or so, at 150 rarely happens. Goes away if i do +140.
undervolting has adverse effects on ada though no? or is that only the 80/90
Good but the key of stability its good motherboard, great efficient and stabiliti 12v section of power supply. My msi z trio lhr got 1785mhz with 800mv and oc vram 1000mhz 0performance difference about 65-70w less than stock. My next gpu probably 6950xt and undervolted about 2100mhz at 0.95mv maybe i think good efficient. Over 200watts only on gpu its too much for me.. heating, noises, and others. And not good for longlife gpu..
You might not be getting those actual clocks due to clock stretching. Heard it’s pretty bad on the 4090 and 4080
Since i'm only do 1080p but want an efficient gpu that will be ok for the next 5-7 years this card seems pretty interesting. Can you tell me the ballpark for 60fps locked 1080p gaming with undervolt ? Thx
1080p with 60hz lock its going to be way more power efficient - maybe will consume like 50-80w
Should I change the core voltage%? Does it even do anthing if i do? (I got a RTX 4070)
when under volting I don't think that slider does anything.
so, is it safe for me to run it undervolted using 500w gold PSU? I have 2060s rn and it draws around 150-160w. Acording to your video by underclock the 4070, it only draws 130w so i think i can upgrade to 4070 without the need to buy new PSU.
Yes, it should be fine.
Thank you.
For future folk: 160-170w is what it draws for me in Cyberpunk 2077 patch 2.1 at high settings with ray tracing and dlss and 1440p internal resolution. It's insanely efficient! Forgot to mention I have the OC version so XD
Why did you have to overclock the mem by 1000?
I didn't have to, I just thought it would be a good idea to do since some games could benefit from it.
@@Superior85 I see, thanks.
Btw, a small correction, on min 2:20 the volt is not the reason why the memory clock drops, but because of the gpu clock, for my rtx 3090, looks like 1545hz is the min you can do without dropping the memory clock, this lets you do pick any voltage like 731mv/1545 and still prevents the memory clock from dropping, with this value, my rtx 3090 runs with 230w, ~ 340fps on furmark 720p no msaa vs stock 540fps with 420w on my evga.
i used UV2 and dying light 2 crashes at startup
try lowering the mhz by 60 to 2640 at 920 mv, see if that works.
@Socianxious update on your UV2 settings?
@@Superior85 why 60mhz? updates on the UV profile? it isnt stable for you too?
RTX 4070 is efficient GPU. Why would you ever want to undervolt it? Just enjoy your graphic card, losing -5° of the temperature at the cost of the performance is merely not worth of it.
It's efficient when you undervolt it. It has pretty bad diminishing returns on the high end.
But more importantly it runs quiet after undervolt.
@@iyaramonk something what is efficient from the beginning, can't become more efficient. Once again, RTX 4070 is not something you should bother undervolting.
rtx 4070 max undervolt is best gpu ever.