Murder trial of romance novelist and accused killer Nancy Brophy continues | Day 5
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 เม.ย. 2022
- The Nancy Brophy murder trial began in the afternoon on Monday, April 11, 2022 due to weather issues in the Portland area. The state continued calling witnesses to the stand.
Full story: www.kgw.com/article/news/loca...
Subscribe: / kgwnews8
Watch the latest KGW newscast: www.kgw.com/watch
Get the KGW app: kgw.com/appredirect - บันเทิง
“He’s not having a good week!” Wow! Who rattles on about rummage sales and jokes with police during a death notification and murder investigation? A sociopath that’s who.
Bingo!😐
Not only that, when asked permission to search Dan's truck she said "clean up all the trash in there!" Seriously, woman?!
Then when she does "cry", it sounds so fake. Five short donkey honks and then she's magically back to speaking clearly and cackling again.
@@WobblesandBean This is the BEST comment on here! 😂 “donkey honks” 😂
@@WobblesandBean She was way more choked up when talking about her brother dying. I think Dan was the only man willing to put up with her. Sometimes being a loving,caring, compassion person could get you killed. Evil witch
Her snorting drove me nuts , also using her hands to demonstrate the simplistic of questions .
"Here's the weird thing.."....yes, Nancy.... please tell us what is weird
When she said ‘he’s not having a good week’ I was just 😮. Like who tf says that when their husband has just died?? Surely the detectives thought that was weird - the whole conversation is weird . She is so evil .
My god, even when she's being told her husband was murdered, she NEVER SHUTS UP! "I already knew my husband was dead before you told me, you see I'm so smart I deduced it with my superior writer's brain. I know I'm cackling and telling jokes at his expense, but yeah, I'm totally upset or whatever. Now allow me to ramble about absolutely nothing of interest for an hour while failing to shed a single tear.
Oh and by the way, I don't care who shot him, so don't bother trying to look for the killer. Seriously, don't."
Must be really interesting for her to sit through this trial listening to each nail in her coffin get hammered in
The detectives were so kind and compassionate with her in the car. Class act all the way
Very impressive. It must be awful to be the person to give the news, but he was perfect in this.
I would NOT want to sit this close to the murderer. I cannot believe the tables were arranged this way.
She doesn't have a gun. She kills for monetary gain and only when she thinks she won't be found out. Everyone's safe in court.
I’m shocked too , it’s so insensitive to the witnesses to have her just there.
Yes I don’t think I’ve ever seen a courtroom with this layout. It looks like the choice is near the witnesses or the jury. Wonder why it’s set up that way.
Agreed. I thought the courtroom was poorly designed in the Alex Murdaugh trial - but this seems worse. How uncomfortable for anyone having to sit there
I agree , arrangements should have been made, the courtroom wasn’t packed , they could have removed 2 front row of pews and moved the defense and prosecution tables back . She stares down anyone testifying against her . Weird . Must be this court house doesn’t have many trials .
Wow!! This recording audio was quite revealing!!! Was she laughing at some point??? Using past tense already? Unbelievable! This is gold for the prosecution
Far be it from me to defend Nancy, but facts is facts, and she speaks of Dan in the present tense almost the whole interview. Kind of surprised me actually.
What is most wild about this is that Nancy honestly believes that she sounds innocent and relatable. She finds her responses and behavior entirely normal.
Right?? It's so bizarre! Who on earth says "I don't care who murdered my husband"? She may as well have said "Please don't investigate this murder." Also, the way she's cackling and cracking jokes at his expense right after learning her husband was murdered is nine kinds of messed up.
Ehhhh I've watched the testimony and cross examination both at least 20 times each... Idk what about this case I'm so interested about. But anyways... There is a shift in her demeanor once she starts her cross examination. Granted that's the 22nd day I believe. But once she gets questioned about certain things, you can tell she knows she's fucked . She starts looking more and more uncomfortable, and she even gets a little attitude.. she wouldn't stop looking at her attorney as if to stop the madness. Haha. But I agree her and her lawyer on day 21 were laughing and joking like it's all a big joke to them. Super disturbing. All cuz she wanted to travel and Dan didn't want too, also they were broke.
@@FcK_YoU_20her shift in demeanor and voice was so spooky
Right .That's what I said. She has no self-awareness, and truly think's she's a likable person.
@@FcK_YoU_20So, the best part was that the prosecutor on day 1 purposely came off and kinda clueless, mainly to let her think she had the upper hand. On Day 2 he came out SWINGING, and was not dealing with her bullshit. I think she tried to gloss over the case really fast, and her lawyer let her, but, the prosecutor came in and slowed the train down quite a bit, and wanted to get into the details of things. That's when her story fell apart.
Wow. She is being questioned by police about her husband and not once she is like "why are you asking me all this ? What happened to my husband?" She knew she knew. Because she did it! Guilty
"I already deduced he was dead, because I'm _SOOO_ smart. I didn't need you to tell me, you know. Never mind that I was laughing and joking with you two minutes ago, despite knowing my husband died. Now allow me to ramble for five minutes straight about random things that has nothing to do with my husband's murder. Also, please ignore the fact that I haven't shed a single tear."
They always forget to act surprised
Quote from Scott (TCL)..."RAMBLING LIKE A MURDERER"
I love that channel so much
Brophy’s lawyers are EXCRUCIATING.
He’s not having a good week! And then she says under her breath, oh that sounded bad. 😬
She looks like ahe wants to crawl under the table listening to this.
How can anyone be so self
Unaware!
Disgusting!
The recording of the death notification starts at about the 2:00:00 mark. 14 minutes later, the detective tells Nancy that it's probably her husband who was killed, in the meantime she has NOT asked a single question about what happened. She says she assumed it was Dan since everyone was giving her the sad look but she hasn't asked a SINGLE question (it bears repeating!) weird to say the least. Edited to add: she spends 16 minutes answering questions and laughing with the detective and only then does she ask what happened. And when she hears he was shot, she asks "Was it an R-15?" , not did he suffer or anything. This is getting weirder and weirder.
The laughing is so weird that I get goosebumps in a bad way. Came for this comment!
thank you for sharing the timestamp
@@mlee_wood3778 You're very welcome
@@StellaFl Yes indeed! Thank you Stella! 🙏🏼!..You’re a peach, & this woman, is very creepy! ..✌🏼🇨🇦
Shes chatting and almost flirting with the officer.. Truly bizarre
Her sociopath behavior during the interview. They were in debt. Plus the insurance policies she took out on him, plus the way that she got her name on the deed for the house prior to his death, plus the romance novels she wrote on how to kill your husband. Dan hated guns, Nancy bought the gun, not Dan. And she bought an extra barrel and slide from Ebay. She had been researching how to buy "Ghost guns" on her computer. Ghost guns are used in murders when the murderer doesn't want a traceable weapon. She lied about being at home when indeed she was on video passing by the school around the time of the murder. There's more, but that's enough for now. Nancy's guilty. She has no moral conscious. Like I said... I worked for her, I knew Dan too.
She could have made contact with Dan at his work, then shot him in the back.
Did you like her as a person or was she as arrogant and nasty as she comes across in the trial ?
@@erinw8787 Honestly Erin, she was ok. It wasn't until this trial that I could see what I hadn't seen before. But then again, I only worked for her three or four occasions. It was the norm for the local catering companies to hire culinary students. And if you were close to one of the teachers, you could get a really sweet decent paying part time job. I had a closer relationship with Dan as a teacher than I did with Nancy. I did my internship at the culinary institute and worked closely with the teachers.
@@frankyzee I’m so sorry for the loss of your friend Dan xxx
@@erinw8787 Thank you for your concern Erin. Dan was a good solid guy.
2:34:14 I know everyone reacts differently to traumatic news- but in 25 years in healthcare, I have never seen a spouse respond this benignly to the news of unexpected death.
Dan sounded like such a dear man. I can only hope his last vision was not his wife aiming that gun at him. All for money. Hurts my heart.
Her voice just goes right through me, she sounds so whiny and then her regular voice on top of that is just awful. That sweet grandma baby voice she’s putting on for these officers 🙄 I bet she thought they would never suspect her because she’s old.
Yes exactly
How was she not a suspect after this death notification?
She immediately started setting up that alibi and spitting allllll the information she worked out in her brain as soon as she got with the detectives. You'd think for a writer - even if she's a lousy one - she'd know the script! Shut up, cry, act like a grieving widow! She didn't feel the slightest bit of guilt, she just wanted to be so, so helpful!
She was jealous of the life that man had , he knew his calling , she hated that because she was a failed writer ….. and she wanted the money
I agree
Audrey shearer and she probably knew or had a hunch Dan was going to split from her! Just a thought!
Exactly, jelaousy combined with greed...
She bought the gun that was used to shoot him, she was there at the time of the murder. Insurance up the wazoo. She killed him. Guilty.
Nancy has a way with words especially the word “ah”.
Omg I know.. its so irritating
I just cannot believe she would laugh and joke around. She is diabolical.
She's as horrible a human as they come. Cold, mean, lazy, entitled, conceited, ugly, pathetic...I could go on for days but she can rot in prison where she belongs.
And it says a lot about a man who gets up at the crack of dawn because he cares enough for his beloved dogs & his chickens to see they're tended to. 🐶🐓💓 RIP Daniel Brophy.❤🌹
@@isabellind1292 you make a lot of common sense! Your a breath of fresh air 😊
@@KJintheRAY You are too!. 😊👍👍
Right?? _Cracking jokes at his expense, no less!_ She is always criticizing and belittling him, even in death. Then she says "I don't care who shot him". Real subtle, Nancy. 🙄
He WAS a fun guy, he WAS really nice. They hadn’t even told her he died at that point, just that he was shot.
I hope if I'm ever on trial for something, that you aren't on the jury. At the beginning she says that she had been told/heard there was a shooting with one fatality. Whether that's true or not is separate issue.. but she informing the police she had heard there was a fatality and a short time later (before saying he WAS fun/nice) the police confirmed it was Dan.
@@trevordonaldson7634 It was still too soon to use the past tense. It is a long process to be able to start using "he was" when it's somebody you love.
@@trevordonaldson7634 yea most ppl have hope there love one is a alive not oh there dead an no one calls there love ones mom or dad saying ur kid is dead without fucking knowing
If I was being told my husband was shot and murdered, I wouldn't be rambling on and half laughing...I'd be asking a million questions while crying my eyes out...she pretty disgusting...she didn't deserve him and he didn't deserve his ending..cold cold heart
Isn't it chilling? "Dan isn't having a good week. Oops, that sounded bad..." 😒 Really, Nancy?! Then she slags him for being messy and asking the cops to throw out all the trash in his car when they search it. Wow.
And this woman earnestly thinks she's smarter than everyone else and can talk her way out of this flawlessly.
My fiancé was shot right in front of me during a home invasion 5yrs ago. I held him as he took his last breath. I COULD NOT SPEAK until the next day. Could not answer questions. I was in shock to say the least. It devastated me! My mind couldn’t reconcile with him being gone. For 18hrs all that ran though my mind was, “Glenn is gone.” “You’ll never see him again.” “Glenn is not coming back.” Over and over. That was the ONLY thoughts I had so I don’t get this woman. How can she even catch her breath to speak. Smfh🥹💔
Wanted to know if he was shot with an AR 15, geez. That using the bathroom a couple of weeks before was her checking the place out....
Don’t y’all think that if the door was locked that he just let her in? And then she shot him when she came in. Cause she even said but the door is always locked, yeh but he knew you and let you in.
The body language they are to her being notified of Dan's killing is priceless.
Her attorney looks like she wishes she was anywhere else but in the courtroom.
Nancy appears for the first time to be very self aware of how she comes across.
I think .. I really don't know. But you know that cringey feeling you get when you hear your own voice?
She looks pretty mortified.
Probably wished she handled that whole situation very very differently.
She's a wretched woman.
I got the same feeling. She was hiding her face with her hand at times. One of the few times she appears self-aware.
Life without the possibility of parole
It wouldn’t matter if she were convicted and were eligible for parole, because the minimum would be 25 years.
Pro tip: if you're a babbler, don't murder anyone.
This woman is pure evil. "Dan isn't having a good week. Oops, that sounded bad..." Wtf, Nancy?! Then she slags him for being messy, and asks the cops to throw out all the trash in his car when they search it. Unbelievable.
Not a tear. Mindblowing.
Pointless questions by the defense to these witnesses! So aggravating! Where there is no defense, ask stupid questions 😡
It’s ongoing worthless questions (like how many pressure cookers were in their basement!)…just wait for the defense’s case-they’ll go on and on and on.
The death notification is striking to me not only for the fact she doesn’t react like a grieving wife, but she also doesn’t seem like a cold blooded killer either. The jovial, small talk and banter with the detectives is unnerving and what makes sociopaths, as Dan’s son said in is impact statement, go undetected for years. 😢
For those catching up - At 2:03 - you can hear the recording in the police van of NB on the morning of the murder when she went downtown to see what was up.
She seems to be just filling the air speaking with police. She could be talking about anyone, neighbor, the guy at the bank. I wouldn't be able to be very coherent if my spouse was found murdered. Just yakking away.
No tears no trauma nothing
Wonder what “notes “ she was taking 😂🤡
I can't get past her asking for a letter that says she's no longer a suspect when she wasn't yet a suspect, to give to the insurance company.
Not so smart after all.
About as dumb as they come 🤦🏻♀️
And that was the only company that asked for that AND it was the smallest policy but she was so greedy she wanted every last penny .
Good thing she did. I’m sure that request solidified their suspicions with her.
I wonder if she got any insurance payouts. I hope not I heard on here that she did get June , July and August’s workman’s comp payments ( approx $2800 a month) they did reverse Septembers .
She easily talked to the detectives about Daniel in the past tense. Id think youd be in denial and refer to them as still alive
I’m sorry. The defendant does does not look like a wonderful person. She looks guilty as hell in fact.
2:48:00. "I feel a lot calmer now." I'll bet she is! She got through the whole interview, and they don't suspect her. Everything's going according to plan.
She did apparently a bad research to be a writer. Surveillance cameras? Cellphone pings? Not in her novels maybe. Good för her husband who didn't have the opportunity to enjoy life. Hope he gets justice.
Honestly everyone thus far in this trial has been so kind and warm; even the defense attorney who isn't very good at her job comes across as someone you'd want as a neighbor. I feel so bad for everyone having this darkness brought into their part of the map by Bobbi Hill I mean Nancy Brophy. I wish nothing but for the best for them all.
Her voice is so annoying to me. It's very whiney .
I like how the detective kind of corrects the guy's use of calling people "indigents" and "transients" into calling them "houseless people". Pure class
“Indigent” is accurate, though.
@@GH-oi2jf To say "There were indigents around the institute..." is technically accurate, it whittles down away the humanity of the individual and melds them down into the financial state they are currently in. When the detective states "houseless people", he is defining them as people who are currently houseless, not defining them as a whole by the state of there housing have or not, or finances they have, or not. They are people, regardless of their circumstances.
I know it may seems like a minor thing, and some may cry "snowflake" for me to even mention this, but my career is working closely with different populations from all walks of life, financial situations, cultures, etc. One of the things we are taught is you always think of the person, not the state they currently find themselves in (homeless, addicted, having issues with mental health), and by simply changing the way you refer to their situation: homeless vs houseless persons, it helps you to keep them from becoming another number or task to deal with. It helps us to have empathy for the condition they find themselves in right now, rather then pegging this as a permanent state of being, of who they are at their core. I don't know if I've explained this in a way to get the point across that I was trying to, but, yeah.
@@peacebc6582 You did an excellent job at explaining that, thank you.
@@peacebc6582 I will never understand how certain ppl can lack compassion & empathy for anyone who have nothing in this world. One missed paycheck, getting laid off, becoming sick an not being able too work can leave a person without the ability to pay rent, buy food. In one blink of an eye you can lose everything you worked for. If you don't have family to help you out until things get better what other options or choice does anyone have? Look at all the ppl who have mental illness & the hundreds and hundreds of veterans who are homeless. Through no fault of their own they have to live on the streets. Some ppl need to stop looking down on ppl BC you can wakeup in the same exact predicament. SMH beyond words!
Guilty, omg, she just said he’s not having a good week. Wow clean up the trash in his truck ha ha. Wow she’s faking that cry
It is shocking to me that this woman doesn’t ask one question about about how her husband is. She drives down to the school because she’s worried but doesn’t ask about him? She’s laughing? My mother died and I don’t think I even smiled for months, never mind within the hour? Then she suddenly starts historically crying and within seconds, completely calm.
I can’t imagine anyone reacting to a loved ones death in this manner. “Having a bad week” ???? Utterly disgusting thing to say minutes after your husband of 25 years of marriage dies.
Mind you, this is what she referred to on the stand as the police "hammering her" with high-pressure interrogation tactics. Yeah Nancy, gently telling you that they're here for you and offering their support, they're really giving you the third degree 🙄
Yes , she said “ hammer Hammer, hammer” . I didn’t get that impression listening to the death notification . They were VERY compassionate .
Still at the 1 hour mark - why were the first two witnesses called? How is their testimony relevant????
I’m lost on the relevance of the questions….
Ditto
Exactly ! I'm sure there must be some revelence but I just don't get it
@@dianefranklin4661 just to get her to talk about nothingness... you can learn a lot from those conversations they know that.
Just watching this woman in court, I expect her to pull put knitting needles and starting making something. She is just so bored and not the least bit worried.
Good one I like it
That didn’t sound good. He’s not having a good week. Omg
Nancy looks like George Washington
She reminds of Kathy Bates in that movie about the romance writer Misery I think. He voice is eerily cringy
@@sharonloves - that’s a really good comparison
She has the heart and soul of that brutal Cathy Bates character
"It took me four and a half years to marry me."
Actually, my understanding is that he was ALREADY married when she went after him. It took her four and a half years to wreck his marriage. This woman is trash. Hope she's rotting in prison.
She literally just found out her husband is dead.
She wanted to point out the stitches on his left hand because she believes that that is what anyone looking over his body would notice and be curious about, not all of the bullet holes ín his torso.
It's just too much... Jesus Christ....
And she says "I don't care who shot him!". Cackling over the rooster picture....I can't stand her 😠
Why is the defence going into the details of the ex culinary students work ethic?? Weird and irrelevant!
And the rambling unrelated storytelling during the police interview….that’s very telling.
I have no idea why we are hearing all these details about culinary training and field trips etc with regards the case but nevertheless finding it all extremely interesting.
Just to show how caring of an instructor and person Dan was.
The prosecution wants ro build a picture not metely of the crime, but of the people involved in the crime. In a circumstantial case they need to assemble all the pieces into a coherent, consistent picture that the jury understands.
@@kathyhooker4968 He was an excellent instructor
I do not understand what restaurant operations has anything to die with the murder. To me, it demonstrates that both sides have no clear, concise vision of their case and are throwing as many darts as many places as possible. I also don’t understand why the attorneys are asking questions they have no idea what the answers are.
Part of her justification for the hun purchase was Dan went on extremely dangerous mushroom foraging.
So they were trying to defuse that point.
It's not dangerous. He refused the idea of bringing the gun along.
Did anyone notice…nancy was embarrassed to have such an old car. (11 year old minivan)
She immediately explained…They’re both paid for. I’d rather dive an old car that’s paid for.
Who cares??
I bet she misses her old minivan. Now she travels in a prison van.
Guilty!!!
The detectives were so compassionate but it was all wasted on her. Selfish and narcissistic in the extreme she is. And calling homeless people mutants?? My God.
First time I hear this tonight. Wow. She’s a murderer. Poor Dan
The defense strategy is to bore and confuse the jury with so many irrelevant details that they acquit because they are completely baffled. And I fear that it’s going to work.
They have nothing else they can use. This team of women (plus Nancy) is a deplorable team. I think they actually believe her. It’s crazy.
@carey you may be correct. They come across as old lesbian friends.
A take away I personally got from the defense team and Nancy is they appeared to me to be 3 lesbian gal pals.
I worked for Nancy in 1995 and Dan Brophy was one of my instructors. She's guilty. She did it for the insurance money. No remorse in her voice whatsoever. Guilty as hell.
Why do you think she did it?
@@WhatInTheHellWisconsin Her sociopath behavior during the interview. They were in debt. Plus the insurance policies she took out on him, plus the way that she got her name on the deed for the house prior to his death, plus the romance novels she wrote on how to kill your husband. Dan hated guns, Nancy bought the gun, not Dan. And she bought an extra barrel and slide from Ebay. She had been researching how to buy "Ghost guns" on her computer. Ghost guns are used in murders when the murderer doesn't want a traceable weapon. She lied about being at home when indeed she was on video passing by the school around the time of the murder. There's more, but that's enough for now. Nancy's guilty. She has no moral conscious. Like I said... I worked for her, I knew Dan too.
@@WhatInTheHellWisconsin money
@@WhatInTheHellWisconsin insured for 1.25 million she paid £1000 per month in insurance
I’m just getting to the part where the cops have notified her of his death and yeah she is showing very little emotion. SMH
What ive been noticing is the defense calls witnesses and asks wuestions that are irrelevant to a murder case ... I don't understand what their goal was by asking all these irrelevant questions.
What a cold,cold gal. No emotion even listening to this recording of the death notice. You'd think it would bring some kind of emotion back just reliving the episode and the information. But....if there was no remorse and she thinks job well done, then it could explain her lack of feeling now. She appears to show her boredom well enough....
She professes to having done research on guns…claims to have been somewhat obsessed in her research….but right away she tells detectives there’s still a band on the “shooter thing” on the gun she said she & Dan bought….really???
Odanata - it's spelled, O-d-a-n-a--t-a. oh, right name - Got it! So detailed. Hell of a memory for the morning of the day of the murder. Oh, and the jokes. 'I'm so calm...thank you for being calm..' I hope the jury listens to this again.
She talked and talked and showed her guilt. She was a good actress but not believable. The way she talked and acted was not normal for a woman who just lost her husband.
In the car she's rambling on. I know, people react differently to shock, but she shows no sign of sorrow, even laughs and giggles.
I'd expect a lot of questions about, what happened, did he suffer, where is he now and so forth.
Also she provides far too many unnessesary details, that could be a sign of guilt.
Or rehearsed. She hits on all points she thinks will rule her out, but it’s just too much extra detail.
When my boyfriend OD'd and was found dead I was completely numb, just completely zoned out. Until they started asking me questions when I just cried and cried and cried. It took months for me to be able to smile again, let alone laugh and giggle.
@@Sarah24871 when I’m sad I laugh but it’s the out control laugh not oh that’s cute
It is a sign of guilt
Wish i had those police for when my sister was murdered...i got nothing..no help no resources nothing :( i miss her so much
I'm so sorry for you loss.😞
That is so sad 💔
Oh no. Thats horrible. I hope your sister and you find justice some day.
👏🇬🇧🇬🇧
When the love is gone in a relationship and it can be traded for hundreds of thousands of dollars from a life insurance payout, this makes perfect sense.
Some of these things about commercial kitchen work doesn't seem to relate at all to the case.
Where the heck is this Defence going with this questioning? Doesn’t look like she has any idea of what she is doing. I would not want to depend on her for my freedom🤷♀️
Not even crying wow
2:24:07 Freudian slip: "this isn't wrong"!
She so nearly got away with this. If she had never mentioned the gun she would never have become a suspect. She was her own undoing.
Nahhh...I think they were wondering about her as soon as they saw her vehicle on surveillance. Esp after saying she was home. Detective then took pic of her van same day as shooting.
My goodness she is already referring to Dan in past tense in this interview! Awful!
I wish I could see video of this interview.
Did the cops suspect her at this time?
How could she laugh? How could she bring up other topic like a trip taken in 2003?
"I don't care who shot him?" Who says that in the immediate aftermath of a shooting?
Did they swab Nancys hand for gun powder?
No. They should have.
I can't find the trial on live stream today. What's going on? I don't want to miss her lying testimony.
She’s not going to testify. They are still on the states case.
@@KL-pd7cr Where can I see it? I've been watching then all of a sudden it's gone. Jury won't like that she's not going to testify after Defense says she is. I also think.its so disrespectful to have the witnesses sit so close to her especially his parents so she can gawk at them with her nonremorseful eyes, & since when does a judge allow a defendant to turn around , & wave at people in the gallery while smiling like nothing ever happened? Unbelievable. Prayers go out to his precious parents, & loved ones. Hope she gets life without any possibility of parole, & hope his life insurance didn't go to her. Too bad if she sold the house, & land & reaped that money. A whole different degree of evil in this world.
@@kayleiasierra2251 I’ve seen the videos uploaded on this channel. The jury doesn’t have all the same info we do, so if she doesn’t testify they won’t know that she had planned to. She might still testify. The judge can’t control the room layout. That’s just how it was built. She’s in custody and that door next to the witness box. If convicted, she legally has to be sentenced to 25 years and has to serve all 25 years. So even if she is given the possibility of parole, she’d probably die before that given her age
@@kayleiasierra2251 that door next to the witness box is where the in custody defendants come out of and they are supposed to sit at the table closest to that door. She won’t get life insurance money because of something called the slayer statute. Insurance won’t pay out money to a beneficiary if they killed the insured person.
@@KL-pd7cr but did they pay out before she was arrested? It was 3 months later 🤔
Can someone explain to me why they ask so many questions about the students and instructing etc.?
Damn she tried to make him seem dumb, antisocial . Like he’s only nice cause he’s naïve well I guess he explains why he married her he didn’t see that she was a big snake in the grass
I’m sorry but I would have said I am not saying a darn thing until I see my husband, now. I would not believe it until I shook him and saw it for myself. Rip Dan.
But you killed him
Her fake cry at 2:36:00 is so cringey.
She was a huge liability to Dan! How do you run a catering business and NOT cook? Bragging about hiring someone when your expenses weigh too much is NOT a flex. She had no kids with him, she wasn’t the talent in the marriage, and just listening to her novel summaries lets me know she isnt a great writer. Nancy, what DID you do to deserve Dan?
Ok after watching several days of this trial I think I hear a regional tone of voice. Everyone's quiet. Low talkers. Whispery. Not to mention a verbal style that is low-vibe and casual. It's a strange contrast to the hi-drama reason everyone's there.
In her pebble mind she thinks she’s part of the lawyer 🧐🤔 so she gives that beady mean evil looks.👁👁👀 …….👨🍳
She’s such a bad actress, too.
There seems to be strong circumstantial evidence but weren’t any witnesses to the crime. No cameras in the school @ the time. Maybe the state’s proving everyone knew him to be the same way w/ passion for what he did & well respected.
There’s almost NEVER direct evidence via a witness or video/audio of the actual murder! That’s what frustrates me- like Casey Anthony - all the evidence is equally valid and if it all points at her…guilty!
I thought about that too. No witnesses. Just wondering if her lies about her location during the crime will be enough to convict?
That this naive and sickening plot is being defended with "Nancy endless love to Dan" is even more sickening.
Detective Posey sounds like a sweetheart.
She is sharper than nail, when she got the illness that she couldn't remember?!!!!
House less…is that a new term? Is it less offensive than homeless?
the girl who knew too much...... in... deed.
Did she have a spare key for the school to get in?
I don’t think they have determined how she got in. Maybe her husband left the door unlocked when he went in.
I assume she probably did since she would take things down there that he forgot or needed from home, & doubt he would leave a class to go open the door for her throughout the years. If by chance she unbelievably didn't I have NO doubt she would have found a way to get a duplicate made from his keys. GUILTY N THE 1ST DEGREE IMHO.
It’s implied she entered though the open garage door into the storage room. It’s a puzzle why he left it open though!
@@hoppy6141 she said he parks in door some times to unload stuff , so maybe he was doing that . Plus he’s been doing this for long time a felt safe in that area
Portland sounds just as awful as it looks on the news.
Houseless, that's a new one.
Why didn't she have any questions about how he was shot or she didn't want to talk about herself I don't know maybe just my opinion or maybe because of the kind of questions the detectives were asking her. She did sound like she was rattled and shaking and not clear minded.
Because it’s rehearsed
She smacked him in public just for saying hi to me back.
Did you tell the state? You should!
Wow
R u serious? I hope you came forward and told the police or the prosecution.