My son went to school at OCI and Dan was one of his instructors. He said Dan was a super nice guy. He also said that school was like a maze and very confusing. Someone couldn’t have gotten back to the room Dan was in and back out quickly unless they knew the layout. He said if he went in there today he would’ve gotten confused and lost in the maze. Nancy knew the layout of the school well and a stranger would’ve gotten lost.
Agreed! She knew _EXACTLY_ where to go! I really hope she's found guilty. I don't understand how somebody could get this wrong, given she was seen on camera in her van in that area and the gun was located in her personal items.
This trial is a trip. I stumbled across the trial on TH-cam 1 year ago. At the time that I found this trial I guess I just wasn't getting into it and then I rediscovered it about 3 weeks ago. In my TH-cam feed trial day 21 popped up. I've been hooked ever since and yes I know that's going to come with a caveat😊
Continue to be amazed at the ' abilities " or rather lack of intellect of these lawyers regarding technology . as this detective is VERY precise & clear regarding terms etc that even I can understand .
I think it's not about their understanding. It's their job to make sure the jury understands. I'm not aware of the make up of this particular jury but in general it's safe to say not everybody has the same education, intellect or age. And some of the questions are plane foundational and it's their duty to lay them out for the record.
@@angelwings7930 - I agree. If the evidence builds a coherent picture of the crime, and alternative explanations are not reasonable, it is enough to convict.
Just like Chandler Halderson. Guilty as heck. He should have taken a plea agreement. First degree murder no parole. That's what he was going to get no matter what. Yet he chose to have a trial which is his right. I will never understand why he went to trial. Why put your family through that? The gruesome, deviant, sadistic, things he did to his parents is Beyond comprehension. The definition of true evilness. His attorneys didn't have any type of defense. It was no way to to convince a jury he was innocent. A straight psychopath imo
The ghosts guns cost MORE cuz you are paying for noone being able to trace the fact you bought it or gun’s serial no etc. Unless you are silly enough to keep your laptop with your purchase history, like this defendant. I don’t believe LE are main customers for ghost guns, that would be very scary
That was her original planned murder weapon but she was too incompetent to put it together and had to move to plan B and bought the gun show gun. Then she had to buy the slide and barrel off of eBay so she could switch them out, shoot her husband, swap slide back, get rid of said used slide and give the gun show gun with the clean slide to the cops to show her gun wasn’t used in the murder.
@@VictoriaGirlBC thank you for explaining! Ive watched several videos on this trial and couldn't figure out the time-line & reasoning of the gun purchases.
@@tourdedogue4952 - This isn’t Perry Mason. They don’t have to fit the trial into a one-hour time slot. Sending the jury out allows discussion at length conveniently. It also allows recording of the discussion. I think the judge knows how to conduct a trial.
@@GH-oi2jf The state announced the defense was causing a lot of delays and witnesses had been flown in from other states to testify. A lot of the defense's objections were causing delays in the time period. Yes, they have promised a 6 wks period for jurors, max. Let's hope they do stick to a time frame for everybody's sake.
With the advancement of technology these days and besides being a crime junky, one should be on top of their game to commit a crime! I can almost bet my lifesavers, you will be caught!
Could she build a gun from a kit? If the 8itch can write romance novels.. the 8itch can build a fucking gun. Trust me, I've seen crochet sequences more complex than putting a spring into a frame and mounting a trigger...
@@StellaFl - They were discussing Power Tech Services, which showed up in her searches for gun stores. The problem was, they had learned about PTS from information obtained from Google, which was excluded for some reason we don’t know, because the argument was not published.
I have no problem following it. It doesn’t have to be ideal. All that matters is that everyone in court is able to hear. There is no obligation to provide high quality audio for news media.
Yeah, however, the basic facts have been proven (to me at least), ie. she was in the area and lied about it (opportunity), she has a lot to gain from his insurance (motive) and she had the gun (means). I keep wondering how she will explain the missing slide which imho is the crux of the matter.
IMO what they don’t remember has nothing to do with the case. How is it important that you remember the size of the storage unit or how many boxes there were?
@@hoppy6141 I agree with you. She's clearly trying to discredit the witnessess by showing the jury they don't know some things and this doesn't fly in my opinion. She just sounds irrelevant and lacking arguments.
@@StellaFl maxfield turns on the “aw shucks” attitude so much - I don’t remember what you said, I didn’t get that exhibit, I can’t find that page, I’m gun stupid, I always think it’s morning, etc. When she cross examined the SAIF investigator, she turned nasty. I’m sure the jury sees this and I wonder if they dislike her as much as I do.
New defense attorney? That tiny table hardly has room for him. Why not erect a little stand up spot to ask questions. Like, show some confidence by standing up.
The third defense attorney was a specialist, hired to argue a specific point about admissibility of evidence. He was just there for a few minutes. There was no reason to make special arrangements for him.
@@GH-oi2jf you have wayyyy too much time on your hands with the amount of condescending comments you have just on this trial. Good lord, get a hobby. Preferably one that doesn't involve trying to act like a know it all on youtube 🙄
dang. At about 3 mins in, the new defense attorney guy, held up his watch and he was checking. Like he had somewhere else to go. Pretty tacky when a woman's life is on the line.
@@MashaRistova lol, yes! It's just that, people don't normally make a point of raising their arm and checking their watch for the time, like they are impatient. That move looks dramatic to me, like he's too important to be there with his precious time. Have you not studied this movement in a serious situation?
Please tell me this newly added defense guy didn’t just use Willy nilly in his argument, lol 😂nice try but no she’s guilty. Mr Overstreet didn’t lie, cheat or steal here and he doesn’t spend over a thousand dollars on Starbucks yearly.
I'm slated for Portland Oregon Jury Duty starting on 04/25/22... I just want to defer it.. I'm easily excluded from Jury selection upon being questioned by the attorneys in charge of the case. Besides, I just started a new night job at intel... gotta keep my presence there at the moment.
Thanks for allowing us to witness this important trial
My son went to school at OCI and Dan was one of his instructors. He said Dan was a super nice guy. He also said that school was like a maze and very confusing. Someone couldn’t have gotten back to the room Dan was in and back out quickly unless they knew the layout. He said if he went in there today he would’ve gotten confused and lost in the maze. Nancy knew the layout of the school well and a stranger would’ve gotten lost.
Agreed! She knew _EXACTLY_ where to go!
I really hope she's found guilty. I don't understand how somebody could get this wrong, given she was seen on camera in her van in that area and the gun was located in her personal items.
Finally. I couldn’t find any new video on this trial. Thanks for posting this.
The prosecutor is excellent, great job!
She really almost got away with murder. Thank God for cameras and computers they catch them everything.
She hasn't been convicted yet!
@@tourdedogue4952 facts
@@simaturna9765 Wait, it hasn't been proven yet. We haven't even heard the defense's argument.
Yes. I too already believe she did it. Sometimes it’s so bloody obvious.
Why did she KEEP the computer and gun kit?
The defense wants to skip the next witness 'til tomorrow because they aren't prepared. They don't even hide the fact. Gosh, they're whine-y.
They are doing their job.
Someone should inform everyone, that we can all hear the whispering, & it’s beyond ANNOYING!
This trial is a trip.
I stumbled across the trial on TH-cam 1 year ago. At the time that I found this trial I guess I just wasn't getting into it and then I rediscovered it about 3 weeks ago.
In my TH-cam feed trial day 21 popped up.
I've been hooked ever since and yes I know that's going to come with a caveat😊
Omg! This is painful to watch. This officer doesn’t understand the questions…
Continue to be amazed at the ' abilities " or rather lack of intellect of these lawyers regarding technology .
as this detective is VERY precise & clear regarding terms etc that even I can understand .
I think it's not about their understanding. It's their job to make sure the jury understands. I'm not aware of the make up of this particular jury but in general it's safe to say not everybody has the same education, intellect or age.
And some of the questions are plane foundational and it's their duty to lay them out for the record.
This guy defense attorney is very defensive. He also makes zero sense. He shouts and speaks gobbledygook.
I thought he was quite clear. More to the point, he was brought in for a specific purpose and he accomplished his purpose.
I didn't understand a word he said. His testimony disappeared in my head.
@@tourdedogue4952 attorneys testimony???
@@mariamaria2751 lol - oops. His spiel.
Why did they need a special attorney just for that?
I’m mystified how mrs brophy can even have a defense: they have her on video
Everyone accused is entitled to a defense. It is a circumstantial case.
@@GH-oi2jf Circumstancial is fine, with enough of that sort of evidence it’s as tight as any other sort of trial.
@@angelwings7930 - I agree. If the evidence builds a coherent picture of the crime, and alternative explanations are not reasonable, it is enough to convict.
Just like Chandler Halderson. Guilty as heck. He should have taken a plea agreement. First degree murder no parole. That's what he was going to get no matter what. Yet he chose to have a trial which is his right. I will never understand why he went to trial. Why put your family through that? The gruesome, deviant, sadistic, things he did to his parents is Beyond comprehension. The definition of true evilness. His attorneys didn't have any type of defense. It was no way to to convince a jury he was innocent. A straight psychopath imo
Wouldn’t the gun she provided to the officers, same day and a few hours after DB being shot, have smelled of gun powder?
She changed out the slide & barrel, so the gun she gave the police appeared unused.
The ghosts guns cost MORE cuz you are paying for noone being able to trace the fact you bought it or gun’s serial no etc. Unless you are silly enough to keep your laptop with your purchase history, like this defendant. I don’t believe LE are main customers for ghost guns, that would be very scary
oh man, not another entire afternoon without volume up. wth. And, not even CC
As long as the jurors, attornies and judge can hear everything, it’s good.
I'm hearing it very well thru my hearing aids
@@GH-oi2jf no, gosh darn, all us armchair TH-camrs want to solve this at home!
Volume seems fine to me.
What is the purpose of a ghost gun kit did this get explained to the jury?
That was her original planned murder weapon but she was too incompetent to put it together and had to move to plan B and bought the gun show gun. Then she had to buy the slide and barrel off of eBay so she could switch them out, shoot her husband, swap slide back, get rid of said used slide and give the gun show gun with the clean slide to the cops to show her gun wasn’t used in the murder.
@@VictoriaGirlBC thank you for explaining! Ive watched several videos on this trial and couldn't figure out the time-line & reasoning of the gun purchases.
This judge!!! 😳
Judge Ramras is doing his job properly and well.
Why does he send the jury out every time there's an issue. What happened to side-bars?
@@tourdedogue4952 - This isn’t Perry Mason. They don’t have to fit the trial into a one-hour time slot. Sending the jury out allows discussion at length conveniently. It also allows recording of the discussion. I think the judge knows how to conduct a trial.
This judge is leaps and bounds better than the judge in William Husel. That judge is a disgrace.
@@GH-oi2jf The state announced the defense was causing a lot of delays and witnesses had been flown in from other states to testify. A lot of the defense's objections were causing delays in the time period. Yes, they have promised a 6 wks period for jurors, max. Let's hope they do stick to a time frame for everybody's sake.
With the advancement of technology these days and besides being a crime junky, one should be on top of their game to commit a crime! I can almost bet my lifesavers, you will be caught!
This judge is leaning for the defence not fair
No, he is not. I have watched the whole thing. He has been completely objective throughout. And dispassionate.
@@GH-oi2jf "Sorry, what was the question?"
The 8itch is guilty, Quit f-ing around with search parameters from an HDD index...
Could she build a gun from a kit? If the 8itch can write romance novels.. the 8itch can build a fucking gun. Trust me, I've seen crochet sequences more complex than putting a spring into a frame and mounting a trigger...
She had a kit and chose not to try to build it. It required more than just assembly.
ohh, whoa. We get to watch what her foot is going to do..
Wow! She has access to a good defense. They needed a defense expert just to keep her searches suppressed. Damn! Bad prosecution! Bad!
I don’t think the prosecution is bad. They seem to me to have done a thotough job.
That didn't look good indeed. I wonder what she was seaching for.
@@StellaFl - They were discussing Power Tech Services, which showed up in her searches for gun stores. The problem was, they had learned about PTS from information obtained from Google, which was excluded for some reason we don’t know, because the argument was not published.
@@GH-oi2jf Thank you!
This is impossible to follow as the volume is
so low.
Court TV was carrying this trial, but J. Depp case took its place.
I have no problem following it. It doesn’t have to be ideal. All that matters is that everyone in court is able to hear. There is no obligation to provide high quality audio for news media.
My volume is great 👍🏻
Touch my camera through the fence!
I hope she doesn’t get away with murder. The prosecution witnesses so far have seemed a little weak. Most of them can’t remember much of anything.
Yeah, however, the basic facts have been proven (to me at least), ie. she was in the area and lied about it (opportunity), she has a lot to gain from his insurance (motive) and she had the gun (means). I keep wondering how she will explain the missing slide which imho is the crux of the matter.
IMO what they don’t remember has nothing to do with the case. How is it important that you remember the size of the storage unit or how many boxes there were?
@@hoppy6141 I agree with you. She's clearly trying to discredit the witnessess by showing the jury they don't know some things and this doesn't fly in my opinion. She just sounds irrelevant and lacking arguments.
@@StellaFl maxfield turns on the “aw shucks” attitude so much - I don’t remember what you said, I didn’t get that exhibit, I can’t find that page, I’m gun stupid, I always think it’s morning, etc. When she cross examined the SAIF investigator, she turned nasty. I’m sure the jury sees this and I wonder if they dislike her as much as I do.
New defense attorney? That tiny table hardly has room for him. Why not erect a little stand up spot to ask questions. Like, show some confidence by standing up.
The third defense attorney was a specialist, hired to argue a specific point about admissibility of evidence. He was just there for a few minutes. There was no reason to make special arrangements for him.
@@GH-oi2jf gee, thanks
@@GH-oi2jf you have wayyyy too much time on your hands with the amount of condescending comments you have just on this trial. Good lord, get a hobby. Preferably one that doesn't involve trying to act like a know it all on youtube 🙄
Internet explorer?🤣
dang. At about 3 mins in, the new defense attorney guy, held up his watch and he was checking. Like he had somewhere else to go. Pretty tacky when a woman's life is on the line.
lol or... maybe he was just checking the time? damn you are dramatic
@@MashaRistova lol, yes! It's just that, people don't normally make a point of raising their arm and checking their watch for the time, like they are impatient. That move looks dramatic to me, like he's too important to be there with his precious time. Have you not studied this movement in a serious situation?
@@MashaRistova There was a big clock on the wall as you look toward the witness. Without making reference to checking the time. C'mon.
@@MashaRistova and her life tho , so who cares
Please tell me this newly added defense guy didn’t just use Willy nilly in his argument, lol 😂nice try but no she’s guilty. Mr Overstreet didn’t lie, cheat or steal here and he doesn’t spend over a thousand dollars on Starbucks yearly.
I'm slated for Portland Oregon Jury Duty starting on 04/25/22... I just want to defer it.. I'm easily excluded from Jury selection upon being questioned by the attorneys in charge of the case. Besides, I just started a new night job at intel... gotta keep my presence there at the moment.
JAJAJAJAJA EVIL EYES
Judge all trials do these computer searches - why object it’s wrong
You don’t understand the legal point on which the objection was based, because we don’t have the original argument about the Google warrant.
@@GH-oi2jf judges state the google search was illegal. Was the whole search thrown out?
Oregon didn’t get the memo about masks. They must like wearing them.
What's the deal with the mask wearing?
Where have you been for the last couple of years?
Uhm, indoors, close quarters. State office building requirement.
Masks aren’t required anywhere now. The virus is gone.
Because this isn’t Alabama or Florida.
Why is the judge wearing a stupid useless mask??
He possibly gives a shit about his life and those around him ….
Oregon…