EK-50 Entertainer Keyboard: Overview (part 1)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ค. 2024
  • This is part 1 of a two-part video overview of the EK-50 Entertainer Keyboard: In this video we’ll take a brief look at the main features and functions that make the Ek-50 so much fun to play.
    For more information:
    www.korgek50.com
    www.korg.com/ek_50/
    Like/Follow us:
    USA
    / korgusa
    / korgusa
    / korgofficial
    UK
    / korguk
    / korguk
    JAPAN
    / korgjp
    / korg_inc
  • เพลง

ความคิดเห็น • 79

  • @jackcimino8822
    @jackcimino8822 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Is this the first entry level keyboard Korg released since the SAS 20 from 1983?

  • @djba
    @djba 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the video. I am very curious if the action on the EK-50 is more like the action on the Korg B2 or the action on the Korg I3.

  • @PhreaSpirit
    @PhreaSpirit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So many hate comments. For a price and for what it is (budget auto accompaniment keys for home) it's a nice one.

  • @marciojardim8318
    @marciojardim8318 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hi I was wondering which GM sounds bank does this keyboard uses… I’ve been using a vintage Korg IS40 and all of my arrangements our playback’s are in Midi set to the original GM
    Which GM as this Korg…

  • @pixzel1899pix
    @pixzel1899pix 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can voices in the accompaiment be transposed and can effects by apply to the accompaniment?

  • @richardarsto4580
    @richardarsto4580 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does it have 1/4 tone for Oriental or middle eastern music ? Thank

  • @zoltanfarkas9252
    @zoltanfarkas9252 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could anyone tell how to switch off the annoying flashing of the "Tap tempo" + the screens' "keyboard and sound, demo, etc.."??? It is really disturbing for me to have the flashings all the times! Thank you for your help!

  • @geridad8581
    @geridad8581 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    how to access sounds category order of korg ek 50 which is more than 700 voice?

  • @havenneak8846
    @havenneak8846 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's kind the songs should I play the style?

  • @Musicgirl708
    @Musicgirl708 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still can’t figure out how record on ek50. Please help?!

  • @richardabraham5576
    @richardabraham5576 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please let me know how to format USB on EK-50. I'm stuck with inserting USB in EK-50. It is not getting detected. Can someone please help me?

  • @pixzel1899pix
    @pixzel1899pix 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    effects can by apply to the accompaniment?

  • @nedoscarsandfishingvideos5500
    @nedoscarsandfishingvideos5500 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is a same software like pa 50 MicroKorg arranger

  • @jiwanji1
    @jiwanji1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir how to edit tone ek 50 korg

  • @claudestein9418
    @claudestein9418 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I just bought one and love it but I need a teacher to guide me through the features. Is there anyone out there? Many thanks for a great sounding keyboard

  • @geridad8581
    @geridad8581 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    how can i access the other voice name and other style indicated in the voice name list pdf file

  • @jackcimino8822
    @jackcimino8822 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2:30 So I can load Doom songs on it?

  • @pixzel1899pix
    @pixzel1899pix 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    or only to sound banks?

  • @satyanpatel6403
    @satyanpatel6403 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is geared towards hotel lobbies and cruise ships you guys. Quite possibly weddings as well. This isn't the next electribe or Kronos. 😉

  • @NostalgiaMusicGlobal
    @NostalgiaMusicGlobal 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where is the #layer #button?

  • @mandeman9558
    @mandeman9558 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where are 41 drum kits?
    I see only 10 drum kits from 141 ti 151.......

  • @user-lf3zz9tx4x
    @user-lf3zz9tx4x 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    niec

  • @happyswissjoe
    @happyswissjoe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Got ours today

  • @joykundukulangara4012
    @joykundukulangara4012 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    1. How to save voice in set bank without style in korg ek 50 ?
    2. How to change voice in fast while playing style in korg ek50 ?

  • @naythar1238
    @naythar1238 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice piano my man

  • @zaidalyassi6795
    @zaidalyassi6795 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there preset Arabic scale?

  • @Soryt
    @Soryt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Please make a better sounding recording like you did on part 2 , this video sounding like a 10 year old casio keyboard.

    • @Simon-ui6db
      @Simon-ui6db 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      sorry but I had a 10 year old casio wk keyboard at the time this video was made, it blew the korg out the water this thing is a pile of junk!

  • @devanunni_sunil
    @devanunni_sunil 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Price????

  • @edwinkubwa3113
    @edwinkubwa3113 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why when ifix usb not responding

  • @motiramholgade1055
    @motiramholgade1055 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cost?

  • @kompilasi-eh5uw
    @kompilasi-eh5uw 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    can the style edit

  • @HemanGohil
    @HemanGohil 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    First to like and comment.
    No pitch band?? 🤐
    Oh yes, you've part two.. Great.

    • @maxthompson4363
      @maxthompson4363 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pitch bend and mod joystick on the left side next to the keyboard. Watch part two.

    • @HemanGohil
      @HemanGohil 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@maxthompson4363 yup.. Checked it and became first too.. Heheh

  • @user-KORG
    @user-KORG 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    А кто нибудь из русских смотрят ролики?

  • @daeone1514
    @daeone1514 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is korgs competition to casios ctx line up. I want the simple 700 because it has a mice piano. casio has stepped their game up so bad that korg had to level next to them cause the ctx series is too dope and that's obviously messi g with what they have going on. So korg is just being smart. They made a keyboard very similar to casio since casio has broke the bar so now casio users can afford a korg. It's all bout sales. in actual reality, korg knows better than to make such a standard keyboard but someone is doing too much with the little simple shit they make. So korg says hey, let us make something simple too

  • @FKU7777
    @FKU7777 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice Bontempi

  • @CarlosCuevasCantautor
    @CarlosCuevasCantautor 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Korg CTK series.

    • @giorgosboultadakis4592
      @giorgosboultadakis4592 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hahaha yes! I still got my old CTK 671, lol

    • @CarlosCuevasCantautor
      @CarlosCuevasCantautor 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@giorgosboultadakis4592 wow. That was one of my favorites Casio keyboards. Full of dsp effects, sequencer, good speakers, synthesizer function, everything in a beautiful platinum form. Good times.

    • @giorgosboultadakis4592
      @giorgosboultadakis4592 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CarlosCuevasCantautor Can't argue with that! It actually has so many DSP effects and very good sounds! I never got to know how to use the sequencer since I have no manuals of it, sadly. I actually had been using this keyboard on any gigs that a drummer was included, since it had better sounds than my (back then) better keyboard!

  • @davidshakthi1599
    @davidshakthi1599 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    GREAT DRAW BACK, SET LIST IS ONLY 4 REGISTRATION, COULD HAVE INCREASED TO 8, WE CANT USE THE INSTRUMENTS INSTATNTLY MORE THAN 4 IN LIVE PERFORMANCE. DEAR KORG MANUFACTURERS PLEASE DO THE NEEDFUL IN FUTURE VERSIONS.

  • @robfriedrich2822
    @robfriedrich2822 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seems to be a limited PA 50 in a new housing

  • @supremelc3667
    @supremelc3667 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Korgcasio! 😂

  • @leeviandtheleavingsslowed2515
    @leeviandtheleavingsslowed2515 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Was searching about Ek-50 and wasn't excpecting FRANK TEDESCO to talk about it...

  • @talenthunter385
    @talenthunter385 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why it's piaNo sounds a Little rough than that of yamha

  • @TheSunshineGroup
    @TheSunshineGroup 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Looks like 1991 all over again

    • @TheSunshineGroup
      @TheSunshineGroup 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just kidding I was born in 1993 idk what I'm talking about

    • @TheSunshineGroup
      @TheSunshineGroup 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      But I do know this looks like every used keyboard I see on Craigslist

  • @nahummartinez1849
    @nahummartinez1849 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5 años que salio y no han podido crear una aplicacion para crear rirmos

  • @BojanBojovic
    @BojanBojovic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Incredible. Korg sells Pa80 after 15 years.

  • @GospelKennyG
    @GospelKennyG 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sounds like Casio 2 decades ago!

  • @dunc1959
    @dunc1959 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hope it's cheap because it certainly sounds it.

    • @FK_TRUMP
      @FK_TRUMP 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Duncan Simons I heard it was $400.

  • @GordonBraicks
    @GordonBraicks 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Show the Lambada preset as first demo, really?

    • @LeonelMartinez150
      @LeonelMartinez150 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      When i saw the Lambada preset I just had to learn it so I can play it at any time

  • @andrewsoto1861
    @andrewsoto1861 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    These guys need to make more stuff like the Korg PS60 and the Kross 2 and lower that 700$ price tag to 550$ or 600$ not everyone has a spare 3000$ lying around to buy a Kronos

    • @rickygarcia7400
      @rickygarcia7400 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Andrew Soto get the new yamaha modx6 it's sweet synth I had mine for a month now woint leave it alone.

  • @dmomcilovic9185
    @dmomcilovic9185 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Like Casio keyboard form late 80s lol

  • @user-cu9yo5kc9l
    @user-cu9yo5kc9l ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ТААЛАГДЛАА ШҮҮ

  • @a8fashion
    @a8fashion 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think the marketing of the Korg company is wrong. It does not win against the similar Yamaha 473, but even loses! Kogg doesn't have an arpeggiator, there aren't even sound labels on the Korg EK-50! Was there not enough paint? Laughter! It was also necessary to add that Yamaha has 473 and a little more. And they would only buy Korg! It was necessary to make not only a Korg for playing musicians, but also a bit of a studio instrument! Add everything for the studio programmatically without spending a lot of money!

  • @gabrielelostia7225
    @gabrielelostia7225 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mi servono le istruzioni in Italiano

  • @MrShaico1
    @MrShaico1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    the price will be the issue...

  • @rickygarcia7400
    @rickygarcia7400 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow what's happening to korg and roland these are damb Kmart keyboards that you got in the 90s these two were the king of the 80s sound now there making keyboards for kids jezz Evan yamaha is doing good with there new modx6 synth.

    • @LeonelMartinez150
      @LeonelMartinez150 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is a keyboard for beginners who are starting to play. Plus the yamaha mod x6 is over 1,000 dollars. This keyboard is under 500 dollars and you can't compared the two. Plus you can add your own styles from korg microranger the pa50 and korg liverpool. Good thing korg is coming back to compete in this prices range. I playe on the korg n264/364 korg Triton le Korg tr and those coast way more and yet again they have the sounds from those keyboards like synth, bass, trumpets, musset accordion, Korg n264/364 fresh air, choir from the famous korg M1, harmonica, M1 organs, M1 flutes and a bunch of other sounds and those keyboards came out a long time ago. Good piano for the prices. Sure is messing some key features like making your own style like the korg pa600 throw pa4x and a mic input but for the prices is better then some other cheap accompaniment piano's.

  • @peluzza7
    @peluzza7 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    sorry guys the power conection break down and imposible to get or buy any were it is cost 135.00 dolars only the power sale by someone in korg company it is lock like he pocket his own,,,jejejejej another lekeleke boys sorry , good song but complicated..have piano now no power only work with pilas.. jejejej litle powers cost 1 dolar..each..

  • @bobfrode
    @bobfrode 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    geee... i think ill stick with my kronos....

    • @dunc1959
      @dunc1959 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      me too

  • @projectgoatse
    @projectgoatse 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I literally loled right after he hit the first chord. What a piece of junk. This isn't 1997 anymore.

  • @epokheintonarumori3992
    @epokheintonarumori3992 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But, is it analog? lol

  • @santoshpss
    @santoshpss 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Important Fact:
    Standing Bodies Of Water are *always* level (level means no elevation or deviation from a given point to any other given point). This is a scientific fact because this is observable, testable, repeatable, measurable, demonstrable by every single human being alive. This fact alone destroys the mathematical concept and religious idea known as the "heliocentric model". More specifically, this fact alone makes it impossible for us to live on an exterior of a pear-shaped sphere spinning at fantastical speeds going nowhere.
    Just before you start to attach straw man fallacies on to me, keep in mind these important things:
    There are three different sciences:
    Natural Science (which deals with the Objective World)
    Social Science (deals with societies and the relationship between people in societies)
    Formal Science (deals with languages such as mathematics which bares no connection to the Objective World)
    "What is the shape of the earth I stand upon?" this is a Natural Science question.
    Science does not belong to an institution or a group of people. It belongs to every single human being alive.
    We live in the present. Not in the past or the future. History can never be considered as a fact of reality in any way shape or form because of obvious reasons. We can't directly experience the past or the future.
    Just observing something is not a fact that something exists. We need observable, testable, repeatable, measurable, demonstrable practical facts for something to be considered as a part of the Objective World. This is also known as the Scientific Method.
    There is a difference between the corporeal world (the physical world) and the visible world. The reason why we can't conclude something as a fact based on our observations is because we know things get smaller based on how far they're from us when we see them through our eyes. If I see a railroad, the lines look like they're converging, but we know that's impossible because people measured the lines, and the lines are parallel. The lines don't actually meet in real life, it's just how we see things. Our eyes are spherical, we see euclidean (planar) world through spherical eyes.
    Without physically testing, repeating, measuring, and accessing something in full three dimensions, it's impossible to know exactly what it is that we're trying to quantify.
    Looking up at the sky does not give you measurable proof of the earth you stand upon. It's like looking up at the light in your room and then measuring the floor based on that light. It's absurd.
    Images and videos are never considered as scientific facts because of obvious reasons. Images and videos can be manipulated, they're not tangible. We can't directly experience them.
    Mathematical equations bare no relation to the Objective World. Mathematics is just a language, like English. Just because something is mathematically correct does not mean it's real. It's like saying "I'm flying!", even though the sentence is grammatically correct, I'm obviously not flying right now.
    "Gravity" is a mathematical concept, it's pseudoscience. It does not have any practical facts. Magical pulling forces don't exist in the Objective Reality. Motion only happens if something presses on something else (pressure variants). Pull is just a term for taking something closer to someone.
    Things falling down has got nothing to do with the shape of the earth. In the simplest sense, things that weigh more than air fall, and things that weigh less than air float. Why do things even fall? No one has any practical facts for why things even have weight. The mathematical theorists are making assumptions about why things are falling, but understand that those are just assumptions, not facts.
    The sky, the Moon, the Sun, and the Stars are all intangibles. If every single human being can't observe, test, repeat, measure, demonstrate something in a practical fashion, it is considered a belief, or pseudoscience. Can every single human being access these lights in the sky? Obviously not. Not to mention stars look like flashing lights when looked through a Nikon COOLPIX P900 (It's still not a fact of anything because we can't move around them in full three dimensions and use our senses).
    Admitting to yourself that you truly don't know something is the most honest realization you could have, it is how you progress further. For example, I do not know what the Sun is. The mathematical theorists are making assumptions of what the Sun is, and where it is located. They don't know what the Sun actually is, or where it is located. Unless I could move around the Sun in full three dimensions, the only possible stance I can have is "I don't know". Anything beyond that will be a belief. The only thing I know is that it's a light in the sky moving in a straight line across the sky (because of how our eyes work it looks like the Sun is moving in an arc across the sky, but the Sun is actually moving across the sky in a straight line).
    Another example, "I know the full dimensions of earth" is also a belief because I never explored the whole world to know the full dimensions. Remember, something only becomes a fact if it's observable, testable, repeatable, measurable, demonstrable by every single human being alive. In this case, each and every individual should explore the Objective World to its fullest extent, listening to "authorities" is just a belief. The world "map" is also a concept, because every single human being didn't explored the whole world to verify or falsify the map. People are believing in complete strangers and thinking the official "world map" is true and there is nothing more to explore because they see a blue sphere on their TV.
    Just because the majority of the population are believing something exists doesn't mean something actually exists in the Objective World. Once again, we need OTRMDPFs for something to be considered as a fact of the Objective Reality.
    Letters before your name does not mean anything. Direct experience is the most important thing. If we can't experience something directly then most of the time it's useless for us.
    I can only represent myself. Personalities are OUT of the question.
    If I drop a brick on my head I know what's going to happen. The objective reality does not change based on your subjective opinions or beliefs. It is what it is.
    Why is this important? Well, the government and its associations are BLATANTLY lying about our existence, the shape of the world, and the dimensions of the world. What's more important than finding out how far the world extends? Full exploration is needed for further understanding of life's most important questions: where are we, why are we here, and what does it all mean. Without knowing where we are everything we do is just a concept. And the government claims resources are "limited". How come?
    For example, if I give you a board, and without giving you any instructions or rules, I want you to play a game, what game are you going to play?
    The government and its associations are telling you what you're suppose to do, what's expected of you, what you're not suppose to do. Who agreed to their "law" book? I certainly did not. How is it fair that the government and its associations (the police and the military) are imposing their subjective rules onto the human beings? Everyone has different rules about different things, subjective rules are PERSONAL, they're NOT objective. Just because some guy on the TV babbles on about his subjective opinions and rules doesn't mean they're OBJECTIVE. Forcefully imposing someone's subjective rules onto others is nothing short of tyranny.
    Why can't we freely explore the objective world as much as we like? Why is there a physical, and mental restriction by the police, the military, and by psychopaths known as the governments?
    Remember, no one rules if no one obeys.
    Another analogy: if I erase your memory and put you in a confinement, what is the first thing you're going to look for? Where's the exit. But if I put some actors to distract you by showing you books and telling you there is no exit, then you'll never try to even think about the exit, there will be other brainwashed people just like you who'll brainwash you even more. Then some other actors will tell you what to do, what's expected of you, what you're not suppose to do, and what's the punishment for breaking their god-given "law" book, some other brainwashed people will also have weapons so that common people like you will forcefully follow my law book, which makes my job incredibly easy by making you a slave if that's what I was ever up to.
    Why should we accept slavery? Why should we accept strangers imposing their subjective versions of what's good and what's bad onto us?
    If you have OTRMDPFs (Observable, Testable, Repeatable, Measurable, Demonstrable Practical Facts) that large Standing Bodies Of Water can bend (sounds absurd to even think about it), please feel free to email me at MysteriousPlane@pm.me, but understand that I should be able to demonstrate your claims in a practical fashion, because that's how the Objective World works. No offense, but If your claims have no relation to the Objective World, then I'm afraid I have to conclude that you're either blatantly lying or you're really stupid (Or for some reason you want to defend your religious beliefs, because the Earth being a sphere is a religious belief, a mathematical concept, it has no facts, it has no relation to the Objective World).
    I understood the facts of the Objective Reality thanks to Del from Beyond the imaginary curve: th-cam.com/channels/vswlgeHodOejVN21TWweLw.html

  • @alixxworkshop846
    @alixxworkshop846 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Buy used PA50 and enjoy amateuer keyboard....This is just a toy like Casio CTK,It's not worth It😉

  • @TascamTascam
    @TascamTascam 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like a piece of junk

  • @Frontdesk99
    @Frontdesk99 หลายเดือนก่อน

    MONO VIDEO trying to sell a keyboard. SMH