Questions 1. At last review, the state found that Deloitte did not have certain required safety protocols in place, yet the state continued to contract with them. Why? And why is the state continuing to contract with them? 2. It sounds like they're dancing around the issue of Deloitte not paying the hackers, which led to information being released. Deloitte is covering the state's costs, but all we're being given is free credit monitoring (which is free anyway).
Questions
1. At last review, the state found that Deloitte did not have certain required safety protocols in place, yet the state continued to contract with them. Why? And why is the state continuing to contract with them?
2. It sounds like they're dancing around the issue of Deloitte not paying the hackers, which led to information being released. Deloitte is covering the state's costs, but all we're being given is free credit monitoring (which is free anyway).