The Experiment that Disproved Reality

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2024
  • ========================================
    MATERIALS:
    Magnet Wire: amzn.to/423cBXm
    MOSFETS: amzn.to/3mZW3iY
    Potentiometer: amzn.to/3yVJPup
    Hi Power 50 OHM Resistor: amzn.to/40rw42e
    Capacitors: amzn.to/42lVekK
    Wire Kit: amzn.to/3z0lAew
    DC Power Supply: amzn.to/3YZ4jx6
    ========================================
    High quality & advanced pcb (Rogers, HDI, rigid-flex and aluminum PCB ) : www.pcbway.com/ (Again, a really big thanks to these guys for sponsoring the video 😁, they have been great to work with)
    Andrew Dotson - bit.ly/2KUR7b5 (Check him out! :)
    Information for the Video:
    Bell's Paper: bit.ly/2YrrPUW
    My Paper for the Experiment: keystonesciencewebsite.weebly...
    Minuet Physics/3BlueOneBrown Video: bit.ly/2Xl4WBd
    Join the discord discussion! : / discord
    Refrigerator Vacuum Pump: goo.gl/pvV5Gb
    Arc Glove: goo.gl/vDMskG
    High Voltage Supply: goo.gl/eg6C9s
    Follow me on Twitter! / keyst0nescience
    @Keyst0neScience
    Support me on Patreon to fund better experiments: / keystonescience
    The pen I use was donated by: hobblecreekcraftsman.com
    ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
    Inquires: Sequence01123581321@gmail.com
    ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
    music:
    Broke for free, Night owl ;
    Enthalpy, Rolemusic
    Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
    •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
    Facebook : / keystonescie. . ( I never get on facebook though )
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 754

  • @Scott_C
    @Scott_C 4 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    Probably one of the most mind bending, and mentally stimulating bathroom sessions I've ever had.

    • @dandur7124
      @dandur7124 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      When you said "bathroom", I felt that.

    • @RafaelTopgunStudios
      @RafaelTopgunStudios 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m currently taking a shit too. Knowledge in, shit out.

  • @NotSoCrazyNinja
    @NotSoCrazyNinja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +256

    If a tree falls in the woods and there is nobody to witness it, it does not make a sound, due to power-saving functions of the simulation. If the area is not being used by players (humans), the area does not exist except in a very toned down manner for power-saving reasons. One a player gets close enough, the area is loaded and whatever changes should have happened during the time it was unloaded get performed so it is up to date.

    • @FirstLast-kv1iq
      @FirstLast-kv1iq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      UNIVERSE is a Simulation confirmed

    • @bobedwards8896
      @bobedwards8896 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I hope your just making a reference and dont believe that to be the case. wether or not someone is there to "hear" it dosnt effect what the area does, ie the EXACT same thing as if some1 was there

    • @NotSoCrazyNinja
      @NotSoCrazyNinja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@bobedwards8896 I think you missed the point of my comment lol

    • @kolinevans9127
      @kolinevans9127 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Hmmmm ‘human music’ I like it !

    • @chuckphilpot7756
      @chuckphilpot7756 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is around, it 100% absolutely does not make a sound, because sound is a human construct. What it would most likely do is make a channeled energy beam of a certain frequency 😉

  • @brandonmack111
    @brandonmack111 4 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    "Printed PCB of your circuit"
    "PCB board"
    Yep, managed to get all 3 in there in only two sentences ;)

    • @icyuranus404
      @icyuranus404 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      yep, i came here to say the same thing except to say that he is an idiot. get one of those printed PCB circuit boards printed up on a board with your own circuit on a peeseebee

    • @rokronroff
      @rokronroff 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@icyuranus404 Yeah, clearly he's an idiot, doing that dumb science shit. Truly, what a moron.

    • @theLuigiFan0007Productions
      @theLuigiFan0007Productions 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah it ruined the video for me. I couldn't stop thinking of how dumb that was the entire time, it sounds extremely stupid and unprofessional. Either call it a printed circuit board or a PCB. For the advertisement, I would have said "professionally manufactured PCB of your circuit" or something similar.

    • @icyuranus404
      @icyuranus404 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@rokronroff yep a few french fries short of a happy meal working at the redundant department of the redundancy department of redundancy

  • @AndrewDotsonvideos
    @AndrewDotsonvideos 4 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    I've been purposefully avoiding this topic because it's so hard to explain, but you nailed it! Thanks for the shoutout, means a lot! Maybe I'll try some experimental stuffs one day.

    • @FirstLast-kv1iq
      @FirstLast-kv1iq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yay!!!! my comment worked.

    • @AndrewDotsonvideos
      @AndrewDotsonvideos 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FirstLast-kv1iq ;)

    • @zoltankurti
      @zoltankurti 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      In theory, theory and experiment are equvivalent. But experiments show that this equality is violated.

    • @AG-pm3tc
      @AG-pm3tc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We all saw your "theoretical physicist vs the wild" video, we know your attitude towards experimental stuff ;)

    • @non-inertialobserver946
      @non-inertialobserver946 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Maybe I'll try experimental stuffs one day"
      Hahahaha nice joke

  • @BlueprintScience
    @BlueprintScience 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I remember sitting in a dank classroom being lectured Bell's Theorem. This, like other experiments with light, remind us that classical and quantum mechanics are not unified. It's an exciting time to be a physicist!

    • @LargeTurn1p
      @LargeTurn1p 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I wish I had even one classroom that I would consider "dank"

    • @grantaum9677
      @grantaum9677 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like Nassim Haramein's work as well as the 11d universe. Electric universe is bit too speculative

    • @wesjohnson6833
      @wesjohnson6833 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not going to be unified either. Classical mechanics has failed miserably.

  • @PlasmaChannel
    @PlasmaChannel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    Hey keystone, glad to see a new posting. Interesting stuff!

    • @SystemsPlanet
      @SystemsPlanet 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for your extraordinary effort at planning, procuring, setting up, performing the experiment, capturing, analyzing, videotaping, speaking, editing, uploading, etc. I commend your effort. The enormous amount of time and effort shows.
      I have an Engineering degree and have taken years of Physics and Calculus. But, I have the impression that most of science is not using the "Scientific Method".
      The Scientific Method fails on its very premise that a fallable scientist can control for all variables to isolate just one dependent variable before an experiment counts as "Scientific".
      For example, in your experiment, how do we know if - the dust in the air was causing the light to deflect?
      - cosmic particles were striking the cables in your measuring device?
      - the Brownian Motion of air particles has an impact, or
      - miniscule temperature variations?
      How do we know if aliens on Alpha Century moving around in their flying saucers changes the results? We can't know for sure.
      What am I missing?

  • @ixenroh
    @ixenroh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    Thank you TH-cam Algorithm for finally promoting small cool channels!

    • @mentuemhet
      @mentuemhet 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      he ain't small.

    • @fourtwozero
      @fourtwozero 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      206,000 subscribers isn't small..

    • @Innomen
      @Innomen 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      206k subscribers, and corporate support.... "small" O.o

    • @ixenroh
      @ixenroh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@fourtwozero When I made that comment it was MUCH smaller. I swear. Guess the promotion tactic works. Plus he's still small compared to some major biggons out there

  • @KeystoneScience
    @KeystoneScience  4 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    hey guys! I know it has been a while, I'll try to get some more out soon, but I have been working on something really big (not for a video, but as an experiment/invention) and I have been getting promising results for my first few tests, so I am really excited about it! (if you are curious, it deals with protons ;)

    • @FirstLast-kv1iq
      @FirstLast-kv1iq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Of course we're curious!!! Please tell us more if you can

    • @salabs4222
      @salabs4222 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dude me 2

    • @salabs4222
      @salabs4222 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'll give u my #

    • @zootednative
      @zootednative 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Einsteins THEORIES are just mental gymnastics to throw you off. Magnetism is not what we have been taught. Look up Ken wheeler's magnetism videos on youtube and buy a ferrocell and see for yourself!

    • @asparagusmelontoast
      @asparagusmelontoast 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I read somewhere that light is a governing force and that photons are calibrated locally, but I'm really not sure what that means

  • @4.0.4
    @4.0.4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    I understood everything and nothing at the same time. Is this what Quantum™ science is about?

    • @gabe8168
      @gabe8168 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Quantum is a word, why did you put a tm next to it?

    • @JohnStormForge
      @JohnStormForge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Once you realize you understand quantum mechanics you realize you understand nothing.

    • @codejunki567
      @codejunki567 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@gabe8168 Who™ cares™

    • @codejunki567
      @codejunki567 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@gabe8168 Thanks for your input anyway Gabe (not really)

    • @Morrigi192
      @Morrigi192 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics" - Richard Feynmann

  • @brekisolo2378
    @brekisolo2378 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    The craziest part of reality is how subjective it is. We have hardly scratched the outer echelons of this plane of existence.

  • @OldGamerNoob
    @OldGamerNoob 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Personal partial epiphany on the rotating polarization situation while watching this (no real educated mathematical base for this, just concept that came into my mind):
    If the polarization is caused by electrons only being able to vibrate along one axis, maybe they not only just let through photons polarized at a right angle to that axis but when they encounter a photon polarization that is at some angle neither perpendicular nor parallel and photons are quantized, and must be either fully absorbed or not at all, the electrons essentially absorb the parallel component vector of their polarization and re-emit a brand new photon polarized according to the remaining perpendicular component of that photon (or accumulated sum of multiple such photons since quanta are always whole numbers)
    That new photon is then free to interact with the next filter in a non-parallel, non-perpendicular manner.

    • @johnnycash4034
      @johnnycash4034 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Could you repeat that?

    • @OldGamerNoob
      @OldGamerNoob 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ???

    • @marketmakerstreet
      @marketmakerstreet 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      so you mean photon has an intelligent knowing the degree of a slit?

  • @X4Alpha4X
    @X4Alpha4X 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I still dont understand how everyone talking about this just glosses over the idea that the light going through the filter gets changed as it goes through the filter. I mean that idea PERFECTLY explains what's happening here. he said in the video and it is measurable that all light passing through a polarizing filter is now oriented at the same angle as the filter. We can't prove** that the filter changed the light, but we see that all light on the other side is oriented with the filter. so this would easily be explained by the fact that light within a certain margin of the angle of the polarizing filter would get 'redirected' to match the filter and this would perfectly explain what's why light can pass through the three filters and make a 90 degree turn but not 2 filters to make a 90 degree turn.
    I mean referencing the 3bl1br video, they say that light at angle 0 when passing through a 22.5 degree filter, 15% gets blocked and 85% is let through, so now we can measure that all light passing through that filter is now polarized at a 22.5degree offset from the initial reference. So it only makes sense that the next filter would behave exactly the same as the first, but with a new reference, thus leading 60% of the total light remaining and at 45 degrees offset from the initial beam reference.
    Even using entangled photons doesn't disprove this idea because you are only sending the photons through a single filter. thus the % let through matches as if it was only one filter. You need to run this test again but have the entangled light pass through 2 filters. So that PhotonA would pass through filters 0 and 45; or 0 and 90 and photon B pass through filters 0 and 45; or 0 and 90 independently.
    IF there was some spooky action at a distance, then you would expect if PhotonA passed through filter 0 and 45 and PhotonB passed through filter 0 and 90 then you should expect to see PhotonB to pass through filters 0 and 90 25% of the time. But i would bet money that PhotonB would pass through at the % perfection of the filter, since after all i doubt any filter is 100% perfect, so lets assume a filter of 99.999%perfection, you would see PhotonB show up 0.00001% of the time.

    • @MaulikParmar210
      @MaulikParmar210 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly, sometimes basics are lost in very complex thought process.
      Also not to mention entanglement is quantum phenomenon while light acts as field with filter.
      Explain that first why you should assume photons vs waves in first place, you don't want to put your legs in two buckets at once while mesuring two differrnt systems trying to explain molecular and field behaviour altogether and compare the results.
      Both form has it's own properties and set of rules in their respective form.

  • @4.0.4
    @4.0.4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really like your style, your content and your personality. I'm glad you're uploading again and getting sponsorships to keep doing what you do.

  • @evildrmainstream...6767
    @evildrmainstream...6767 4 ปีที่แล้ว +109

    Nice to see mini cody's lab is uploading again 😅

    • @luongmaihunggia
      @luongmaihunggia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "Mini cody's lab"

    • @RelianceIndustriesLtd
      @RelianceIndustriesLtd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      cody appeals to kids and normies who can't digest complicated concepts

    • @Mp57navy
      @Mp57navy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@RelianceIndustriesLtd Oh look here, it's Mr. Iamverysmart.

    • @lazar2175
      @lazar2175 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@rauankaldybaev4770 Cody is a geologist, and he is very good at chemistry.
      This dude is good at physics.
      Everyone is different.

  • @thewingedpotato6463
    @thewingedpotato6463 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like how there's a completely serious 10 minute build up then it jumps to an experiment where you're shooting lasers at a device that looks like a pair of those googly-eyed-glasses with the big -nose, wearing a second pair of goggles for safety.
    Glad to see you back and making videos again :)

  • @trulyinfamous
    @trulyinfamous 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It seems that wherever I check on a channel that i haven't watched in a long time and see they haven't posted in a while, they post a video in a few days! That's happened twice this week. Great content as always.

  • @redfishervictoria
    @redfishervictoria 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Close very close, as there is one major element missing in this interesting problem. Rotation. Not only does energy have compression and rarification as taught as waves, alternating dielectric and magnetic fields, it inherently also rotates.
    The rotation through the substrate causes an interesting result. The light shifts slightly in rotation and is therefor slightly different in rotational angle than before it entered. The middle polarizer does the same which results in the light further shifting which is seen as light passing through the last polarizer.
    All energy inherently rotates and this is known as the Lamar frequency.

  • @Skumfucc
    @Skumfucc 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for providing the links in the description. Very useful resource!

  • @cheyennereynoso4116
    @cheyennereynoso4116 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You just earned yourself a new subscriber! 😄 Great video!

  • @inventorbrothers7053
    @inventorbrothers7053 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow you put a lot of work into this video! Thanks, this was awesome to see!

  • @mbk0mbk
    @mbk0mbk 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really liked the practical instruments used and the whatever available instruments you got, very cool.

  • @dangitsandy1745
    @dangitsandy1745 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your videos are perfect for home experimenting and I plan on building some of your projects!!

  • @dmach314159
    @dmach314159 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glad to see another post. Getting over my head, but got most of it. Don't stop. Works as an excellent filter.
    Wouldn't getting unexpected results on such an experiment imply that there are local hidden variables that we are as yet unaware?

  • @jkg6211
    @jkg6211 4 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    Did you edit the video to make it seem like you don't need to breathe, or do you exchange gas through your skin?
    Gills maybe?

    • @abhishekgourav6144
      @abhishekgourav6144 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Cutaneous respiratory system a next big leap into human evolution

    • @CakeDragon924
      @CakeDragon924 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yuh, dude is moving so quick. Just started the vid and have to keep pausing to see all the cool stuff.

    • @orlock20
      @orlock20 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Skilled singers can sing and breath in through their nose at the same time. Maybe he has such a skill.

  • @mickyr171
    @mickyr171 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks, i really needed that headache lol

  • @jacktheninja
    @jacktheninja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    No explosions? *oh wait this is keystone science and not electroboom*-

    • @mitesh8utube
      @mitesh8utube 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There aren't any explosions on electroboom either, if you don't confuse sparks with explosions.

  • @JDStirlingGames
    @JDStirlingGames 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A Photon checks into a hotel. The Clerk asks if it needs help with its luggage. The Photon says, “No thanks, I’m traveling light.”

  • @MrMcyeet
    @MrMcyeet 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Me: "Im pretty smart"
    This Dood: SCIENCE!
    Me: 0_o wut

  • @Skhillz_FN
    @Skhillz_FN 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude i don't how long it takes to get your videos up
    Extremely descriptive just the way i like it
    Most importantly your linking papers in the description

  • @jeffvader811
    @jeffvader811 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'm starting my A-Level physics course in a few months, couldn't be more excited!

    • @jeffvader811
      @jeffvader811 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @basil fawlty
      Fair enough, it's not everyone's cup of tea. Then again, you must be somewhat interested to watch this video?

  • @dharvell
    @dharvell 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have heard of this experiment, extensively, but this is the first time I have actually seen it explained. Even in its abbreviated state, the explanation of what to look for and the processes involved was incredibly done. Great job on this!

    • @dingleberries360
      @dingleberries360 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yea right. He proved nothing and showed a middle school Lazer experiment. If you can't explain something using real life scenarios then what is the point of trti f to explain it at all. Reality isn't theory.

    • @dharvell
      @dharvell 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dingleberries360 I think you have a little research in theoretical sciences to do. Reality, theoretically speaking, is only as real as our perception of it

  • @georgeindestructible
    @georgeindestructible 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    From my understanding, there were never hidden variables anyway, it's just instantaneous energy redistribution in space happening and the reason why it's instantaneous is that otherwise, the universe would probably collapse if it didn't correct the energy mismatch.
    You can notice the same exact pattern/mechanism in atoms with electrons that jump between energy levels, they do it too instantaneously, again for the same reason, energy balance due to the 1st law of thermodynamics(and if that is true, then the universe is closed system too).
    The very exact mechanism at its core? That's a bit tougher to figure out.

  • @unqualifiedkaotix
    @unqualifiedkaotix ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You're relevant! I just took a while to get myself together, but you are relevant. We have so much to teach people!

  • @BBQDad463
    @BBQDad463 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for this video. I wish that I had watched it before the Bourbon kicked in. I will have to watch it again.
    Subscribed.

  • @gabeisatool
    @gabeisatool 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!!! This is an awesome way to demonstrate such a complicated/ non-intuitive idea.

  • @ace1122tw
    @ace1122tw 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So this is where quarternion numbera come into play. Figuring out the vectors that you were talking about in the first half. Interesting that I would learn about those yesterday and then come across this video to really understand what you were talking about.

  • @spacetruckin6555
    @spacetruckin6555 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This video showed up in my feed along side my usual gun, motorcycle, and female MMA fight videos. I watched the whole video, beginning to end, and understood ZERO of what you were trying to explain. I'll just take your word for it. So, reality isn't as we perceive it, or just light? Someone give me the "Barney The Dinosaur" version of it please. Your enthusiasm is obviously authentic, and appreciated.

  • @skepticalexicon3534
    @skepticalexicon3534 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Imagine your eyes could detect all particals, waves and all other spacial phenomenon like gravity instead of just photons.

    • @skepticalexicon3534
      @skepticalexicon3534 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Immortal Bentron I wouldn't have thought it would even be a useful traight to be honest just spit balling.

  • @alenfocic4930
    @alenfocic4930 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Really interesting topic.

  • @Draakdarkmaster6
    @Draakdarkmaster6 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    this was a really cool and informative video, cant wait to see future content

  • @DracaNova
    @DracaNova 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Could the photomultiplier be somehow skewing test results when it changes the photon(s) into an electrical signal?

  • @ImNotACatLawyerButIPlayOneOnTV
    @ImNotACatLawyerButIPlayOneOnTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    9:40 "Now with the general understanding out of the way.."
    Me: Yeah.. understanding.. haha..ha..ha..
    *I UNDERSTOOD NOTHING*

  • @dannydts1501
    @dannydts1501 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I'm still trying to figure out if you are 18 or 45

  • @saddoggy2440
    @saddoggy2440 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for the new video.

  • @stranded_mariner7695
    @stranded_mariner7695 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Two questions:
    1) did you stop to take a breath while making that video?
    2) are you good at reading tongue twisters?

  • @kinghoffbeers4221
    @kinghoffbeers4221 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your so smart and good at getting the information across. Keep making awesome videos!! 😁👍👍

  • @yasurikressh8325
    @yasurikressh8325 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love experiments involving lasers. I hear people say that laser content on youtube becomes repetitive and boring however, this video shows that that's just not the case.

  • @PsychicHybrid
    @PsychicHybrid ปีที่แล้ว

    It's amazing how many people rush through the explanation of this. It is one of the most important concepts of all time. Calm down, take a breath now and then, and relax lol

  • @KyleBoise
    @KyleBoise 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seriously love the oldschool video game music!

  • @20ola02
    @20ola02 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice to get a upload from you again! How is the fusor reactor you and cody is working on going?

  • @Docbell60
    @Docbell60 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always love some work of a fellow Bell.

  • @savag3salad813
    @savag3salad813 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You will never understand just how much I need that painting of Albert Einstein in my life

  • @jbenkidu
    @jbenkidu 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video, well done.

  • @brianmcquain3384
    @brianmcquain3384 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    A fun thought to ponder is conceptual quality of movement, say if you move in a dream your not actually moving, but the concept retains itself as such as movement.

  • @justinleewhite7945
    @justinleewhite7945 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Y...E..A.H "I think I've got all that". 🤔

  • @TheStoffl96
    @TheStoffl96 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    0:55 A ruler that is a Printed Circuit Board Board. Nice.

  • @hercules71185
    @hercules71185 ปีที่แล้ว

    If your into is correct and accurate to how your channel is. You earned a subscriber from that first 30 seconds.
    I never really subscribe to channels but anyone who can demonstrate experiments for me to learn. I'm on it!

  • @kaysidegamer5996
    @kaysidegamer5996 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    11:51 Hussah! A man of quality!

  • @simont3686
    @simont3686 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for a new video! Instantly clicked. Sadly your videos get fewer and fewer. I am always looking forward to your videos.

  • @sakib7094
    @sakib7094 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This guy should be up there with backyard science, king of random and etc

  • @haikiri2011
    @haikiri2011 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Everytime someone talks about entanglement I think: isn't it just because light has no time? Even if for us we can count time and interact with light in different moments, for the light existence is only one moment. So if we interact with a photon now and change one of it's characteristics, we are essentially changing it's entire existence, which can seem like it's in the past but it's not.
    A way to make sure is to split the photon in 2 and then take one and split again. Check if all 3 still seem entangled. If so, we could set a yes or no switch and activate it with a split electron and take it away and flip it on and off with 0 lag by interfering with the other half of the electron.

  • @andchip.s
    @andchip.s 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Well scientists have yet to prove the biggest question know to human kind which is:
    *How my wallet is always empty and my rubbish bin is always full?*

    • @capnbilll2913
      @capnbilll2913 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm sensing a connection.

    • @danklyf4202
      @danklyf4202 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Your wallet is always empty BECAUSE your trash bin is always full.
      😉

    • @andchip.s
      @andchip.s 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @James Mines If a rabbits foot is meant to be lucky, whats a whole rabbit worth? Vegus hear I come woohooo!!

    • @andchip.s
      @andchip.s 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @James Mines To late, now I owe money to some guy called Big Bob, and he is collection in the morning. Martini?

    • @andchip.s
      @andchip.s 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @James Mines James, I just had a call from Big Bob and he is coming over with his "Business partners" Mr Martillo and Mr Pala, I have a felling he is going to break my knees and bury me in the desert. I'm in Highballs sound great!

  • @scottytherambler6919
    @scottytherambler6919 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    could PCB way create a pcb that would act as a hub for wiring on a dirt bike that makes engine plug, battery, voltage reg, and discharge control signal output a simple interface?
    or is this a question better posed to them?

  • @mattandmegandiercks8809
    @mattandmegandiercks8809 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude I understood what you were talking about you should be paid well for your efforts

  • @MysteryD
    @MysteryD 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "PCB board"
    Oh, those are cool, like PIN numbers and RAM memory, or CD discs.

  • @andreimarin6586
    @andreimarin6586 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It looks less like a rig to measure photons, and more like you built a time machine :)

  • @Zman2024
    @Zman2024 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Keystone Science: *posts video
    (Everyone Liked That)

  • @johnniewalker6236
    @johnniewalker6236 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    U have changed so much u are grown now :) nice video

  • @Boysonfromthe319
    @Boysonfromthe319 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brain overload....lol but a really cool and interesting video! Keep up the good work!!

  • @theRhinsRanger
    @theRhinsRanger 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Can you do the double slit experiment on the Halve photons?

  • @TheQooDude
    @TheQooDude 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got confused at the 6.00min mark. Just before this, you explained the polarizing filters filter out all but one polarity. Now, those same filters rotated at 45deg suddenly let proportional polarized light thru. I am failing to build my understanding because this foundational concept is left unclear for me. Which is it: all or proportional - can anyone clarify please?

  • @rick9021090210
    @rick9021090210 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    the universe and the moon is there and working because there is an observer outside us little humans that makes everything exist... science tries to work around it but eventually it will get to the conclusion that he exists.
    cheers!

    • @godlover9096
      @godlover9096 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It is insane how they try to get around this. Currently the only answers they have are based on speculations that can not be tested (and thus can not even be called science.) Currently we are at a point where you have to chose what you have faith in. The unprovable speculations of man or the necessity of a creator.

    • @grantaum9677
      @grantaum9677 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Science: give us one free miracle and we'll explain the rest
      -Terence Mckenna

    • @grantaum9677
      @grantaum9677 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ we need better words for this 👍

    • @TheGoldenWildcat
      @TheGoldenWildcat 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ Nor God is a she!

    • @mastervel7210
      @mastervel7210 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      DΣҒIΠIΠG & GΩD ( ΔS IΠ GΩD IS ΩR IS ΠΩT ______ GΣΠDΣR ) ΩΠLΨ SΣRVΣS TΩ HIGHLIGHT THΣ ҒUTILITΨ ΩҒ UΠDΣRSTΔΠDIΠG ΩR CΩΠVΣRSΣLΨ THΔT THΣ SUβJΣCT IS IΠҒΔCT IΠVΔLID.

  • @thepoeet
    @thepoeet 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you please link where i can buy your white board markers please!!!! omg i used to have the same one that i used in my old Trig class! lol

  • @FirstLast-kv1iq
    @FirstLast-kv1iq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How goes College? good to see you back

  • @friedmule5403
    @friedmule5403 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Great video! Here may be a thought for you. :-)
    According to Einstein, photons do travel at the speed of light and time plus distance stops at the speed of light. That means that from a photons point of view no time is gone from its creation til its death and it hasen't moved. So according to a photon, it exists simultaneously on every spot, the whole way, at the same time. Also every split, bounce and so on is the photon at different states at same time the same place. In other word, a photon do exist everywhere in every state the entire time.

    • @sideswipe147
      @sideswipe147 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fried Mule That certainly is an interesting theory and I might like to see that tested. It certainly might explain a lot. Though after a moments thought I doubt it is the case because then to me it seems a laser pulsed on then off again would display to infinity minus the attenuation from it's magnitude over distance instantaineously ignoring the speed of light entirely.

    • @friedmule5403
      @friedmule5403 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sideswipe147 Thanks for your great reply! :-)
      My comment was not clear enough but it was all from the photons point of view. On the other hand, Einstein did say that both point of views is equal and true.
      I think that the photon "experience" everything instantly, if spacetime is zero at light speed. :-)

  • @stumbling
    @stumbling ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow! I never thought of rotating the polarizer as equivalent to rotating the basis vectors of the system.

  • @timetraveler_0
    @timetraveler_0 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Polarizer only blocks light, right? Then how did the middle polarizer at 6:10 let those 45 degrees light to pass through when there were none of those present to begin with?

  • @noahmonfrinineedhands1714
    @noahmonfrinineedhands1714 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Buddy i shouldn't exist is what doctors have told me my whole life yet im here.

    • @noahmonfrinineedhands1714
      @noahmonfrinineedhands1714 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      that guy with the stye. I will. Just found out about hackerapace today thanks to @strangeparts
      And its only 15miles away so i can take the lime i loopholed not hacked just looped and i use that for a vehicle ever since my car was illegally repoed :/ just got out of a bad engagement but im so exited about hacker space i cant wait to go see it.

    • @noahmonfrinineedhands1714
      @noahmonfrinineedhands1714 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      #Osoul can i make the moon disaapear he said....i say yeah i just put on pants.

  • @ambulocetusnatans
    @ambulocetusnatans 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I keep clicking the bell but when I come back, it's not clicked.

    • @TheQooDude
      @TheQooDude 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was wondering what those dings were...

  • @GregManCZ
    @GregManCZ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    First!! Just kidding xD just stopped by to tell you that I love your videos and you are the reason I like physics :D

  • @MrJuuustin28532
    @MrJuuustin28532 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!

  • @hindsight2022
    @hindsight2022 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Spooky action at a distance is referring to entangled pairs . and yes it is spooky and yes information does travel faster than light

  • @katiekumcgil
    @katiekumcgil 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks for great vid hon, giggles sadly we should be forgetting the reality and distractions ,and concentrating on our own conciousness ,and remembering who and where our true Mother is ,
    As when we are only seeing a week shadow of the real reality ,our results are corrupt..

  • @veyev4320
    @veyev4320 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is amazing! awesome!

  • @inspireonex
    @inspireonex 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Me: scrolling YT for whatever
    Also Me: slams on brakes when sees a New Keysone Science vid

  • @hustler539
    @hustler539 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Complicated as hell! But very interesting.

  • @ronaldlogan3525
    @ronaldlogan3525 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is truly amazing how much you can prove with nothing but smoke and mirrors

  • @satanandneptuneunite
    @satanandneptuneunite 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The whole point of this story is that, when a tree falls in the forest, it doesn’t make a sound OR sound waves! The tree never fell in the first place either. When someone comes to the forest, universal procedural algorithms are performed and that location’s rendering “catches up” with the environment and events around it. This is most likely for power optimization. Our consciousness, in it’s current state may be the trigger for universal generation, or “rendering”. However, our consciousness does not currently have any power in this process.

  • @jancerny7831
    @jancerny7831 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video

  • @weerobot
    @weerobot 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome...

  • @Arbotm
    @Arbotm 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Could you use the sun as a source? Could you assign a musical value to each observable photon and listen to the bit stream live?

  • @RedesCat
    @RedesCat 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The beings controlling this simulation: *nervous sweating*

  • @galvanizeddreamer2051
    @galvanizeddreamer2051 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question: Does light retain the momentum of the object it is emitted from? This may account for some things as the Earth is in motion relative to a absolute universal center. I am aware this phenomenon appears in the likes of Redshift/Blueshift, but I am curious as to if it is applicable to the "c" in and of itself. Something else, is if it is not applicable to c, one could determine the stated motion relative to universal center. I could have also just completely misunderstood your experiment and results, in which I would like to hear how so that I may better my listening skills.
    Regardless, good stuff.

  • @BarryKort
    @BarryKort ปีที่แล้ว

    The violation of Bell's Inequality doesn't disprove state variables. Rather it reveals that state variables must necessarily include a time-varying term (manifestly true of photons) and that time-keeping is local. Gravitational gradients (which are undeniably, present in our cosmos) give rise to gravitational time dilation so that Bell's integration step should have employed a gravitational path integral. Had he done so, his presumptive state variable would not have vanished, but would have yielded a non-vanishing "beat frequency" term that also explains one of the causes of decoherence in qubits. Had Bell taken into consideration General Relativity (i.e. gravitational time dilation), he would not have been able to justify his untenable simplifying assumption that time ticks at the same rate everywhere and everywhen in the cosmos. Without that unrealistic and untenable simplifying assumption, his derivation runs into a brick wall. In short, time-itself is at the root of the hidden variable.

  • @mastormind1
    @mastormind1 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Variable may be in 3d physics, as in the wave function is essentially in all directions and particle may just be bouncing and spiraling thru... Just a thought TY love the vids

    • @hansjorgkunde3772
      @hansjorgkunde3772 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      If particles even exist and its not all energy waves. Chasing shadows ...

  • @MrKelaher
    @MrKelaher 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The universe is non-local, but only in very limited ways that do not violate relativity and conservation/symmetry which is why at a macro level we do not "notice" is my interpretation

  • @user-um3jy1tv4f
    @user-um3jy1tv4f 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Дружище, ты просто молодец, очень увлечённый рассказ! Спасибо за популяризацию науки) Желаю тебе успехов!

  • @tomaims
    @tomaims 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great experiment at some point over my head . But after the video it came clearer and entertaining. My final is "WTF" .

  • @Gerry926
    @Gerry926 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you go from describing light as a byproduct of electromagnetism, as a waveform pulse... to a "photon" which implies a particle? Seems like light might be the result of an electromagnetic expression.

  • @omarkhaledk11
    @omarkhaledk11 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hooray, keystone uploaded a video!