Inspiring philosophy, the protestant has already answered most of these objections when it comes to biblical criticism I think the church was right to see it as a threat, and it’s perpetrators has been suspicious at least in many of the times it does seem like some attempt to destroy the faith that is circular and relies on internal evidence. I honestly think that a lot of the scholars really are acting in bad faith like a lot of academia is nowadays….
That sounds like an uncharitable take toward people in academia. I’ve personally found some of IP’s “answers” unsatisfactory but I suppose we’ll have to agree to disagree.
I bet what made it non binding is not binding. Leaves us in a bit of a bind. Just kidding. I am more traditional to my approach to these questions. At the very least, we should still ask the obvious question, why did the church fathers disagree so much with Erhman
Bart ehrman is THE new testament scholar that i glean most of my biblical scholarship from. Most believers dont like him or his beliefs (or disbelief) its nice to hear believers say something positive or nice about him once in a while. Bart is a superstar. Really knows his stuff. Lost his faith over the issue of suffering and an apparently absent god. His books are phenomenal. He gives his "critics" a copy of his manuscripts prior to publishing so they can "counter publish" His book HOW JESUS BECAME GOD and his critics response book HOW GOD BECAME JESUS is required reading for believers and non believers alike!
Papa Benedict was a great pastor, strong faith and strong intellect.
Thanks much for this video.
Thank you
Inspiring philosophy, the protestant has already answered most of these objections when it comes to biblical criticism I think the church was right to see it as a threat, and it’s perpetrators has been suspicious at least in many of the times it does seem like some attempt to destroy the faith that is circular and relies on internal evidence. I honestly think that a lot of the scholars really are acting in bad faith like a lot of academia is nowadays….
That sounds like an uncharitable take toward people in academia. I’ve personally found some of IP’s “answers” unsatisfactory but I suppose we’ll have to agree to disagree.
Do you have any more sources on why the PBC's former declarations concerning traditional authorship are no longer binding?
I bet what made it non binding is not binding. Leaves us in a bit of a bind. Just kidding. I am more traditional to my approach to these questions. At the very least, we should still ask the obvious question, why did the church fathers disagree so much with Erhman
Bart ehrman is THE new testament scholar that i glean most of my biblical scholarship from. Most believers dont like him or his beliefs (or disbelief) its nice to hear believers say something positive or nice about him once in a while. Bart is a superstar. Really knows his stuff. Lost his faith over the issue of suffering and an apparently absent god. His books are phenomenal. He gives his "critics" a copy of his manuscripts prior to publishing so they can "counter publish"
His book HOW JESUS BECAME GOD and his critics response book HOW GOD BECAME JESUS is required reading for believers and non believers alike!
🙏👏👏👏❤