First, thank you for pronouncing Alex Spiro’s name correctly. Secondly, thank you for not sensationalizing the updates. I hope your channel grows so more people can have access to honest and informed content from a REAL lawyer.
See! I’m not above correcting and I pay attention. Yea, there will definitely be major issues that come up that are worth getting excited about, but we’re not there yet. Thank you very much!! 🙏🏾
I’m sure he’s still maintaining his innocence. His lawyer is doing what all good lawyers should do. Try to get it thrown out before spending even more time and money on a trial.
I watched your video on a breakdown of Diddys legal situation and this channel is where I go to for all the latest updates!!! Thank you Jamahl Kersey for keeping up with the facts and breaking it down so we can all undertand step by step the legal process. and I also like your analogies as it compares to cases so we can understand better
buzzbee is no dummy. he is older and wiser. jayz wants this case dismissed too bad he can wait. damage has already been done. he see now why Michael settled. once it is out there it is best to do Damage control before more comes out. And normally it will
Right. And it's not a win until it's granted. They just went about the correct way to proceed in this judges' court per her instructions. They should have done this the first time instead of attacking the court.
Every body is desperate for money, no evidence, the Driver is Deceased no Death Certificate who with any credibility take this case it was dumped by a former lawyer because it was not credible. The person with a Tattoo was not here, her father do not know anything about it. Where is the Limo driver, the P Diddy Drivers used SUV not Limo. She was perhaps taken some where by a Limo driver to a Party but the people accused was not there.
Memories stayed forever, nothing can be removed, and crime is always crimes,no matter how long , especially among the minors, it has to be fair to the victims 🙏 💙
@lovehate8286 Is it the big bucks they are after, not the crime, not the laws of the land, is it that they have the money forgets the victims, even if it's found guilty
The more it drags I think the more severe the punishment if she is proven to be lying. If I was Jay I would keep a tab on how much this is costing and make sure to send Buzbee the bill after this is done. Also whoever is lying/Guilty needs to walk the streets like Circe in GOT while people throw food at them screaming "Shame"..
That is the problem. If she is lying Jay wont get nothing even if he win a civil against her. That is why many celebs do not sue those who lie. The celeb lose the most money even if they win against accusers. Court cost money to defendant. To plaintiffs, they only pay their lawyers if they win. If they lose, they pay hardly nothing or nothing.
Jay-Z and Diddy are accused of statutory r@pe. DMX, Lil Wayne, Eminem, Snoop Dogg, LL Cool J, Nas, Method Man, Nelly and Ludacris have not. Maybe that's because it's only Diddy and Jay-Z who both sure did a lot of songs with R. Kelly 20 years ago and have had a certain reputation for the last 30 years that people thought were just rumors.
The statute of limitations for the Gender-Motivated Violence Act (GMVA) in New York City is nine years from the date of the assault. However, there is a two-year "look-back window" that allows victims to file a claim for incidents that occurred as far back as January 2000. The alleged incident with Jay Z occurred in September 2000. I think the motion to dismiss will be denied, the case will move forward into the discovery phase but be dismissed during pre trial motions unless Buzbee has some hidden evidence.
I didn’t do the research on it, but that would assume the Act applies retroactively, right? The incident predates its enactment. Spiro gave a citation in support of his argument that it does not. Buzbee responded that was merely a trial court decision involving a motion unopposed by a pro se plaintiff-not exactly rock solid precedent. Still I think you’re right, they’ll get through discovery, including some interesting depositions, and it will probably be tough for Plaintiff to survive an MSJ.
He’s guilty as sin. They need to move on to his next crime. Why keep harping on this one? There are millions more. We already know. Guilty until proven innocent. The way J is acting it shows guilt. What about the pneumonia victims that was unalived. Who did that? Was the morgue paid off? Yessir
im actually shocked jay ha snot lost any deals. I mean even beyonce halftime show was a success and even though the mufasa movie premier was a hot mess the movie was a success as well. if he did not do this then i hope he sues the hell out of everyone
I’m honestly glad that someone can present this and not do it from a biased standpoint sensationalizing everything you know, I thought that it wasn’t a big deal. The judge was just trying to grab a hold of everything the bearings of the case because Alex came out so aggressive, which is really the job of the prosecution and not that of a defense attorney but knowing how Jay z is so adamant of this to go away the defense actually came out swinging
If she was a child when this happened and it really happened it shouldn’t be no limitation on no rape case or burden cases these cases should stay open for life
Yeah this is gonna drag. Doesn’t mean it will be dismissed file the motion to be dismissed vs actually being dismissed. This is just her way of giving more time she’s establishing a timeline for the case
The statute of limitation means nothing when a “look back law” or extension was put in place until 2025. This is happening in Democrat states for CIVIL SA cases. Like new York and California. Michael Jackson civil SA case recently approve by a judge. Allegations happened 20 plus years ago. Also, I like this judge. 👩🏻⚖️ She is in control of her courtroom and seems to be fair and ethical. JZ has to go through the same process as everyone else who Grace Judge Torres courtroom. JZ TRIED TO FAST TRACK THIS CASE. SO THE JUDGE HUMBLED ATTY SPIRO. THEY HAVE A HISTORY OF QUESTIONABLE COURT TACTICS. YES YOUR FAVS. ROC NATION HISTORY GOING THROUGH THE JUDICIAL PROCESS AND ALLEGE CONNECTIONS.
I agree! He needs to wait in line like everyone else and people put celebrities on a pedestal they are normal people just with more money they are not more important than you or your family. They don’t even know we exist to them until they need to sell the fans something.
I’ve learned a long time ago, just because you like some one, think they’re sweet, or a nice person, or like their music, dosent mean that they are a good person. You would be surprised some of the things that (So called) Good People Do. I had a guy friend who was the sweetest person in my eyes, and come to find out, he was beating his girlfriend… smh. And also an ex friend who I thought was a good person, tried to rape me. I don’t know if Jay Z did it or not, and I hope he didn’t, But hopefully Justice is done for whatever the truth is 🙏🙏
The inaccuracies, for those of you that are too slow to read a little lawsuit. She claims she left a house full of people naked and ran out on the streets until she found a woman who she asked to call her father. Where’s the woman? No witness. You think nobody would react to a naked child on the streets in the middle of the night? Also, why didn’t that woman call the police if she found a nkd kid running around? She then claims her father came to pick her up but her father lives five hours away. So you mean to tell me her father didn’t call the police? He didn’t ask any questions? Bullshit. And you mean to tell me nobody walked up to that kid for five hours while she waited for her dad? Her father has dismissed her claims and says he doesn’t remember. Then the ”I was drugged” bs. She claims she was in a house full of guests and took a drink from a waitresses tray. The waitress was walking around serving guests. So how was she drugged? She has now admitted that neither of the defendants drugged her because she didn’t get any drink from either of them but took it from a tray, does that mean everyone was drugged? Buzbees claim that she’s not looking for money. read the lawsuit, at the second last page there are several paragraphs stating that she wants monetary compensation. Their dumb tactic to not put a set amount in the lawsuit so that they could claim to people that she’s not looking for money because they know people are too dumb to read a lawsuit, was done for just that reason. In reality it’s explicitly stated that she’s seeking monetary compensation in the lawsuit.
If it does go to court, I don't see how the plaintiff is going to convince the jury that Jay-Z is liable. Bubsy the Lawcat's got to be hiding some majestic evidence behind the scenes to disprove what is already publicly available.
this won't end well for the plantiff or buzbee ...we both know the internet is relentless, the longer this stalemate lasts the more likely someone will leak out the plantiff identity. then things will get very messy quickly. if jane doe has any evidence or witnesses she needs them to be brought forth immediately because this case has too many holes.
The only evidence out there is the interview nothing else people are basing their statements are there comments on the interview that she did no other evidence than that which I agree she doesn't look good. But her lawyer is the pro and I feel like it's a bait-and-switch scenario I think he decided to put a calculated risk to make her look like she doesn't know what she's saying but he secretly has some type of evidence that he's going to pull out in the long run
Hello, could you please advise why Buzbee hasn't amended the complaint to 2003 instead of 2000 since the accuser's story would fit better for 2003 and would make the case more solid? Do you think it's because the accuser didn't live in NY state in 2003 so they have to make her story fit in 2000 somehow?
When the attorney files for dismissal does the judge make her decision based on reviewing all filings submitted and the law about statute of limitations or just the law on statute of limitations?????
The judge will base her decision on the relevant cases cited by both parties, in addition to any cases she finds based on her own research. She’ll be looking at whether that statute applies retroactively, whether the SOL of the NY state law applies versus the GMVA, and the issue whether the GMVA applies given the issue as to whether the incident actually took place in NYC.
JayZ will regret not settling this case with a NDA. He could have prevented the public from ever knowing. His ego is in the way. This won’t go well as his atty is already lying - stating JayZ and Diddy weren’t friends. Bad move.
That man deserves his day in court! I believe this victim needs behavioral health services for many reasons and I do not believe that Mr.Carter did what he is being accused of in this particular case. His counsel is SUPPOSED TO FIND every single angle to preserve his clients resources, freedom, and name. The internet seems to be on an absolute witch-hunt and Im not buying any of this claim. If Spiro came across something like a timed statute - THAT'S HIS JOB! It doesnt mean Mr. Carter is lying or guilty. I means the accusation does not apply based on the evidence provided. Why do people want to destroy other people so bad? You would want your father, son, brother to be PROVEN whatever based on ALL of the evidence. And nothing she said adds up! God bless her and I hope she finds peace and resolve - but I think this claim is invalid.
Look on how many it happened to. Jay isn't the 1st..also this one include diddy!! if it's false for Jay its false for diddy as well!! So lets watch to the end...
So. This whole thing is about money..Civil case., 25 years after. In my opinion, it should NOT be about money, and the accusing side needs to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged incident occurred..and without ridiculous inconsistencies we have seen. On the technical side, except the VAWA included retroactive component covering a particular period, this accuser cannot use VAWA. Full stop.. It is almost becoming nonsensical. Update. VAWA is not retroactive, according to related detail on public record. Prior statutes of limitations law that was active at the time of the alleged incident is what applies.
This has got out of control, lawyer Busby was hoping Jay Z would sign off on $10 million to make this go away. ..this is why he msde it public...Jay-,Z instead bit down on his gum shield....Now Busby is back peddling saying he pickrd up this case from a small law firm who did not do proper due diligence?
I pray Jz didn’t do this because that is terrible for a minor but if he did do it there is a price you have to pay and iam saying now on record do not sleep on Buzzbee he must have evidence because he would not be coming for JZ if he didn’t Buzzbee is well known here in Houston and he wins his cases do your research my money is on Buzzbee
The inaccuracies, for those of you that are too slow to read a little lawsuit. She claims she left a house full of people naked and ran out on the streets until she found a woman who she asked to call her father. Where’s the woman? No witness. You think nobody would react to a naked child on the streets in the middle of the night? Also, why didn’t that woman call the police if she found a nkd kid running around? She then claims her father came to pick her up but her father lives five hours away. So you mean to tell me her father didn’t call the police? He didn’t ask any questions? Bullshit. And you mean to tell me nobody walked up to that kid for five hours while she waited for her dad? Her father has dismissed her claims and says he doesn’t remember. Then the ”I was drugged” bs. She claims she was in a house full of guests and took a drink from a waitresses tray. The waitress was walking around serving guests. So how was she drugged? She has now admitted that neither of the defendants drugged her because she didn’t get any drink from either of them but took it from a tray, does that mean everyone was drugged? Buzbees claim that she’s not looking for money. read the lawsuit, at the second last page there are several paragraphs stating that she wants monetary compensation. Their dumb tactic to not put a set amount in the lawsuit so that they could claim to people that she’s not looking for money because they know people are too dumb to read a lawsuit, was done for just that reason. In reality it’s explicitly stated that she’s seeking monetary compensation in the lawsuit.
I thought the timing of Beyonce's $100,000 donation to the University of Houston Criminal justice dept where Buzbee obtained his law degree was suspicious.
Seeing Beyonce and Blue perform half time show. Blue right in the back of her and when they dance together. I really feel bad for blue. I really hope her dad didn’t do those awful things.
Very interesting, are you a lawyer? So you see where it's all going? Jay Z never said he was innocent instead he went after the attorney...so just because you are granted an order, it still has to be approved by the Judge. Everyone gets a fair chance
Yes, I’m a lawyer, Valerie. Jay Z is doing what he should do and allow his lawyer to speak on his behalf. You’re correct, receiving permission to file a motion does not mean the judge is going to grant it.
he did say he was innocent in his first statement and i would go after the attorney. how you publicly suing someone but cant verify if the event happened
The age is wrong too because if this happened in 2000 when did she make the first claim with the other Lawyers. How old was she when this happened was she 13 or was she younger or older.
They are not dismissing this case. It’s Diddys case Jayz is roped in because he was with Diddy allegedly drugging and raping a child. The public would be outraged if the judge dismissed this case. Jayz will have to prove his innocence in court.
Just because there's public outrage over a case doesn't mean it will affect a judge's decision to dismiss a civil suit. Judges have to follow the law. Plus, if the civil suit is dismissed, the accuser may be able to refile it.
Thanks ❤.....I believe that she should have her day in court just because something happened that day and Jay Z and Diddy know it let alone the female that was just watching... them SA her...ijs
Well, when 'Jane Doe's' dad picked her up from wherever, he told she not to tell him anything of where she was and where she was coming from. Soooooo.......that WOULD be why he doesn't remember anything.
The inaccuracies, for those of you that are too slow to read a little lawsuit. She claims she left a house full of people naked and ran out on the streets until she found a woman who she asked to call her father. Where’s the woman? No witness. You think nobody would react to a naked child on the streets in the middle of the night? Also, why didn’t that woman call the police if she found a nkd kid running around? She then claims her father came to pick her up but her father lives five hours away. So you mean to tell me her father didn’t call the police? He didn’t ask any questions? Bullshit. And you mean to tell me nobody walked up to that kid for five hours while she waited for her dad? Her father has dismissed her claims and says he doesn’t remember. Then the ”I was drugged” bs. She claims she was in a house full of guests and took a drink from a waitresses tray. The waitress was walking around serving guests. So how was she drugged? She has now admitted that neither of the defendants drugged her because she didn’t get any drink from either of them but took it from a tray, does that mean everyone was drugged? Buzbees claim that she’s not looking for money. read the lawsuit, at the second last page there are several paragraphs stating that she wants monetary compensation. Their dumb tactic to not put a set amount in the lawsuit so that they could claim to people that she’s not looking for money because they know people are too dumb to read a lawsuit, was done for just that reason. In reality it’s explicitly stated that she’s seeking monetary compensation in the lawsuit.
@MiR-bp5vx Well, she WAS just 13 and it WAS twenty-four years ago. I wouldn't use that word. You wouldn't have a crystal clear memory, either, Bird Brain.
Would have been cheaper to settle, we never needed to know any of this. Now he needs the trial for his reputation. The problem, even if found innocent, his ties to Combs will haunt him. Being anywhere near Diddy us a problem for his business partners. Ps...l beleive someone wants JZ out the way and the real power players. He is a billionaire on paper and they can take it with the snap of a finger. It can all disappear just like what happened to Kanye and Diddy.
About your P.S. I've been thinking about that myself. It's not gonna just stop w/ these rappers (or rap adjacent dudes). I think Oprah is next... Then, Tyler Perry. Just watch!
If Jay Z is innocent of this allegation and Jay Z win his case does that get Diddy off. This allegation as well since Jay Z and Diddy is accused of this together?
It's hell whenever a person or persons has to fight a state and federal case. The government use statutes of limitations for certain people. I've seen that in R Kelly's case the system plays dirty 🎱.
Diddy is in a RICO case, this civil case is like a fly compared to that one. This case is about money while the other actually has more severe consequences.
I’m sure when Jay z’s case is dropped, Diddy’s will be as well, at least by this accuser. It doesn’t look like anyone is coming forward to corroborate her story. That doesn’t mean it didn’t happen but it means she has too weak of a case. Plus all the inconsistencies.
@rsvpevents6780 That's what I was asking if any accuser comes forward and say Diddy and Jay Z this and that. Together and Jay Z walks well that automatically should drop Diddy unless they was to say Diddy did extra.
First off...there is not gonna be dismissal...you should know that since you're a lawyer...all this does is give him the chance to FILE... doesn't mean it will be dismissed...the only good thing about this is...the judge wont let them know til AFTER the SUPERBOWL...Now Jayz better hope nothing else comes up BEFORE March.
I'm from NY, and we need to look and see if tony buzbee has any relation to this jane doe. He is licensed to practice in upstate NY, and Rochester is in upstate NY. Why is he going so hard to keep his fake client anonymous? hmmmmm, i always said it after the interview he made this up and planted her. Idc what he says now we all heard the interview, and the judge did too. Can't come back from no matter what anyone has to say.
The Judge is fair and unbiased. Your coverage is very biased and it’s okay, no one wants this allegation to be true. It’s only natural that ppl take sides, it’s great for dialogue and banter. I think this Judge will be just in all of her decisions.
The inaccuracies, for those of you that are too slow to read a little lawsuit. She claims she left a house full of people naked and ran out on the streets until she found a woman who she asked to call her father. Where’s the woman? No witness. You think nobody would react to a naked child on the streets in the middle of the night? Also, why didn’t that woman call the police if she found a nkd kid running around? She then claims her father came to pick her up but her father lives five hours away. So you mean to tell me her father didn’t call the police? He didn’t ask any questions? Bullshit. And you mean to tell me nobody walked up to that kid for five hours while she waited for her dad? Her father has dismissed her claims and says he doesn’t remember. Then the ”I was drugged” bs. She claims she was in a house full of guests and took a drink from a waitresses tray. The waitress was walking around serving guests. So how was she drugged? She has now admitted that neither of the defendants drugged her because she didn’t get any drink from either of them but took it from a tray, does that mean everyone was drugged? Buzbees claim that she’s not looking for money. read the lawsuit, at the second last page there are several paragraphs stating that she wants monetary compensation. Their dumb tactic to not put a set amount in the lawsuit so that they could claim to people that she’s not looking for money because they know people are too dumb to read a lawsuit, was done for just that reason. In reality it’s explicitly stated that she’s seeking monetary compensation in the lawsuit.
The inaccuracies, for those of you that are too slow to read a little lawsuit. She claims she left a house full of people naked and ran out on the streets until she found a woman who she asked to call her father. Where’s the woman? No witness. You think nobody would react to a naked child on the streets in the middle of the night? Also, why didn’t that woman call the police if she found a nkd kid running around? She then claims her father came to pick her up but her father lives five hours away. So you mean to tell me her father didn’t call the police? He didn’t ask any questions? Bullshit. And you mean to tell me nobody walked up to that kid for five hours while she waited for her dad? Her father has dismissed her claims and says he doesn’t remember. Then the ”I was drugged” bs. She claims she was in a house full of guests and took a drink from a waitresses tray. The waitress was walking around serving guests. So how was she drugged? She has now admitted that neither of the defendants drugged her because she didn’t get any drink from either of them but took it from a tray, does that mean everyone was drugged? Buzbees claim that she’s not looking for money. read the lawsuit, at the second last page there are several paragraphs stating that she wants monetary compensation. Their dumb tactic to not put a set amount in the lawsuit so that they could claim to people that she’s not looking for money because they know people are too dumb to read a lawsuit, was done for just that reason. In reality it’s explicitly stated that she’s seeking monetary compensation in the lawsuit.
@@duchessdame150 feel sad that a white woman lie holds more weight in this country than a Black man’s truth. This case bout to be dismissed real quick and buzbee gonna be sounding like Ralph Kamden
I have a question about the statute of limitations. The example you gave is making chewing gum “illegal” but rape and having sex with a minor was already illegal I’m 2000. I would like to know about how statute of limitations pause or nullification impacts this case. Also someone mentioned in another podcast a case that allows children and people with cognitive limitations a four or five year window of when a crime event occurred. So this podcaster said that the circumstances surrounding the allegations make sense that they may have happened in 2003 not 2000 but due to the age and the cognitive limitations of the alleged victim this is acceptable. The podcaster noted a case against the Catholic Church by minors. Do you know anything about this? Can you do a video maybe expounding upon these 2 questions? Thank you
C'mon, people ain't no way a child fought off two grown men after being drugged and sexually violated. Diddy is a monster, and Jay Z is a jerk, but I think they're innocent of the alleged crime.
That's my opinion and I'm not explaining it. If grown men who allegedly were drugged and violated, how could a female child who was allegedly drugged and violated fight them off and escape?
For me the fact that all of them in the music industry chase after young girls this is a common thing not even just in the music industry but also in the movie and TV industry Jay z hung around people who were pedophiles and sexual deviance an r Kelly himself said he would hook Jay-Z up with girls young girls Jay-Z's baby mothers we're all underage that's why he's avoiding to take a DNA test and he paid off the other two daughters that he had Jay-Z's behaviors are very suspicious and I would not trust that man around my teenage daughter what is a 30-year-old man doing talking to a 1617 year old girl over the phone stop thinking with fan eyes.
She's giving him another opportunity because she realized her emotions got the best of her she chastised an attorney who is vigorously defending a client who doesn't know the accuser. She knows the case is fake news ... Politics as usual
Well if she has a case on this and the lawyer think she has one whether it 10 years or 20 that means she can go to court remember Donald Trump has to pay a woman right now in New York for this same thing
IF YOU WANT MONEY AND NEVER ASKED FOR ARREST YOUR A LIAR, NEXT, YOU DON'T HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO BUY MY CHILD AND IF YOU TAKE THE BAG YOU HAVE MADE YOUR KID A TRICK 100
First, thank you for pronouncing Alex Spiro’s name correctly. Secondly, thank you for not sensationalizing the updates. I hope your channel grows so more people can have access to honest and informed content from a REAL lawyer.
See! I’m not above correcting and I pay attention.
Yea, there will definitely be major issues that come up that are worth getting excited about, but we’re not there yet.
Thank you very much!! 🙏🏾
@@JamahlKersey free diddy
This comment 👀
I appreciate your professional analysis. You present well!
Thank you very much d.n.r.! I really appreciate the support. It means a lot! 🙏🏾
Instead of maintaining his innocence, Jay Z is now looking for technicalities to get the case thrown out.
It worked for trump
@@Sole-Survivor😂😂😂
I’m sure he’s still maintaining his innocence. His lawyer is doing what all good lawyers should do. Try to get it thrown out before spending even more time and money on a trial.
@@rsvpevents6780 once its thrown out he can file for defamation and mental and financial damages.
@@rsvpevents6780precisely.
There should never be a statue on rape, or sex with a minor
There’s no statute for sa on minors. This is a money grab
I watched your video on a breakdown of Diddys legal situation and this channel is where I go to for all the latest updates!!! Thank you Jamahl Kersey for keeping up with the facts and breaking it down so we can all undertand step by step the legal process. and I also like your analogies as it compares to cases so we can understand better
I appreciate the support. Thank you!! 🙏🏾
buzzbee is no dummy. he is older and wiser. jayz wants this case dismissed too bad
he can wait. damage has already been done.
he see now why Michael settled. once it is out there it is best to do Damage control before more comes out. And normally it will
@@Dr.Neicy-rs6gjNo, Alex Spiro is doing what he is supposed to do e doing for his client.
I came across your channel & let me just say I love it! Very articulate, very informative! Keep up the great work 🎉
Thank you Toya!! I appreciate the kind words!
A technical win is still a win but an innocent person fights the merits of the case as the first resort therefore standing firm on innocence.
Right. And it's not a win until it's granted. They just went about the correct way to proceed in this judges' court per her instructions. They should have done this the first time instead of attacking the court.
Appreciation to tell us in detail 😊
I don't believe a statue of limitations should be placed on these types of alleged crimes. People waited to speak because they feared their lives
Jane Doe deserves her day in court
Every body is desperate for money, no evidence, the Driver is Deceased no Death Certificate who with any credibility take this case it was dumped by a former lawyer because it was not credible. The person with a Tattoo was not here, her father do not know anything about it. Where is the Limo driver, the P Diddy Drivers used SUV not Limo. She was perhaps taken some where by a Limo driver to a Party but the people accused was not there.
Memories stayed forever, nothing can be removed, and crime is always crimes,no matter how long , especially among the minors, it has to be fair to the victims 🙏 💙
It is far to victims.
But it’s a lot harder for liars and corrupt attorneys looking for a quick buck.
Funny how the victim in the case is Jay Z and Puff 😂😂😂. But no one seem to believe the victim. Oh the irony
@lovehate8286 Is it the big bucks they are after, not the crime, not the laws of the land, is it that they have the money forgets the victims, even if it's found guilty
The more it drags I think the more severe the punishment if she is proven to be lying. If I was Jay I would keep a tab on how much this is costing and make sure to send Buzbee the bill after this is done.
Also whoever is lying/Guilty needs to walk the streets like Circe in GOT while people throw food at them screaming "Shame"..
That is the problem. If she is lying Jay wont get nothing even if he win a civil against her. That is why many celebs do not sue those who lie. The celeb lose the most money even if they win against accusers. Court cost money to defendant. To plaintiffs, they only pay their lawyers if they win. If they lose, they pay hardly nothing or nothing.
Jay-Z and Diddy are accused of statutory r@pe. DMX, Lil Wayne, Eminem, Snoop Dogg, LL Cool J, Nas, Method Man, Nelly and Ludacris have not. Maybe that's because it's only Diddy and Jay-Z who both sure did a lot of songs with R. Kelly 20 years ago and have had a certain reputation for the last 30 years that people thought were just rumors.
The statute of limitations for the Gender-Motivated Violence Act (GMVA) in New York City is nine years from the date of the assault. However, there is a two-year "look-back window" that allows victims to file a claim for incidents that occurred as far back as January 2000.
The alleged incident with Jay Z occurred in September 2000. I think the motion to dismiss will be denied, the case will move forward into the discovery phase but be dismissed during pre trial motions unless Buzbee has some hidden evidence.
I didn’t do the research on it, but that would assume the Act applies retroactively, right? The incident predates its enactment. Spiro gave a citation in support of his argument that it does not. Buzbee responded that was merely a trial court decision involving a motion unopposed by a pro se plaintiff-not exactly rock solid precedent.
Still I think you’re right, they’ll get through discovery, including some interesting depositions, and it will probably be tough for Plaintiff to survive an MSJ.
Awesome present of nuances of criminal 👌. Thanks 👍 I have to watch your other videos.
He’s guilty as sin. They need to move on to his next crime. Why keep harping on this one? There are millions more. We already know. Guilty until proven innocent. The way J is acting it shows guilt. What about the pneumonia victims that was unalived. Who did that? Was the morgue paid off? Yessir
While this case drag on JayZ will not have any control over his image. 2 - 3 months is long..... not the 24hours they hoped for
Which is absolutely terrible, assuming this didn’t happen.
im actually shocked jay ha snot lost any deals. I mean even beyonce halftime show was a success and even though the mufasa movie premier was a hot mess the movie was a success as well. if he did not do this then i hope he sues the hell out of everyone
I’m honestly glad that someone can present this and not do it from a biased standpoint sensationalizing everything you know, I thought that it wasn’t a big deal. The judge was just trying to grab a hold of everything the bearings of the case because Alex came out so aggressive, which is really the job of the prosecution and not that of a defense attorney but knowing how Jay z is so adamant of this to go away the defense actually came out swinging
If she was a child when this happened and it really happened it shouldn’t be no limitation on no rape case or burden cases these cases should stay open for life
I understand where you’re coming from.
Yeah this is gonna drag. Doesn’t mean it will be dismissed file the motion to be dismissed vs actually being dismissed. This is just her way of giving more time she’s establishing a timeline for the case
Jay has two daughters.
JZ does not want to settle or win a Child SA case. He wants it rejected in the clearest possible terms.
He has 3 daughters. The oldest he doesn’t take care of.
@@jswann721the alleged eldest is an adult.
@jswann721 I was just thinking about this. However, he has made it right with his oldest daughter. Now, he supports her & her mom financially.
Jay-Z have a lot of explaining to do to his daughters, about his mom sleeping and marrying a woman.
& 2 sons! He should give the oldest a DNA test (his mom was 15 when she became pregnant with him)
The statute of limitation means nothing when a “look back law” or extension was put in place until 2025. This is happening in Democrat states for CIVIL SA cases. Like new York and California. Michael Jackson civil SA case recently approve by a judge. Allegations happened 20 plus years ago.
Also, I like this judge. 👩🏻⚖️ She is in control of her courtroom and seems to be fair and ethical. JZ has to go through the same process as everyone else who Grace Judge Torres courtroom. JZ TRIED TO FAST TRACK THIS CASE. SO THE JUDGE HUMBLED ATTY SPIRO. THEY HAVE A HISTORY OF QUESTIONABLE COURT TACTICS. YES YOUR FAVS. ROC NATION HISTORY GOING THROUGH THE JUDICIAL PROCESS AND ALLEGE CONNECTIONS.
I agree! He needs to wait in line like everyone else and people put celebrities on a pedestal they are normal people just with more money they are not more important than you or your family. They don’t even know we exist to them until they need to sell the fans something.
I’ve learned a long time ago, just because you like some one, think they’re sweet, or a nice person, or like their music, dosent mean that they are a good person. You would be surprised some of the things that
(So called) Good People Do. I had a guy friend who was the sweetest person in my eyes, and come to find out, he was beating his girlfriend… smh. And also an ex friend who I thought was a good person, tried to rape me.
I don’t know if Jay Z did it or not, and I hope he didn’t, But hopefully Justice is done for whatever the truth is 🙏🙏
Sadly, you’re right. I’m sorry to hear about what happened.
@@JamahlKersey Thank you
@@conswallab1065of course. 🙏🏾
Sorry you experienced that and unfortunately people we perceive as “good” people are compromised and do terrible things
The inaccuracies, for those of you that are too slow to read a little lawsuit.
She claims she left a house full of people naked and ran out on the streets until she found a woman who she asked to call her father. Where’s the woman? No witness. You think nobody would react to a naked child on the streets in the middle of the night? Also, why didn’t that woman call the police if she found a nkd kid running around? She then claims her father came to pick her up but her father lives five hours away. So you mean to tell me her father didn’t call the police? He didn’t ask any questions? Bullshit. And you mean to tell me nobody walked up to that kid for five hours while she waited for her dad? Her father has dismissed her claims and says he doesn’t remember.
Then the ”I was drugged” bs. She claims she was in a house full of guests and took a drink from a waitresses tray. The waitress was walking around serving guests. So how was she drugged? She has now admitted that neither of the defendants drugged her because she didn’t get any drink from either of them but took it from a tray, does that mean everyone was drugged?
Buzbees claim that she’s not looking for money. read the lawsuit, at the second last page there are several paragraphs stating that she wants monetary compensation. Their dumb tactic to not put a set amount in the lawsuit so that they could claim to people that she’s not looking for money because they know people are too dumb to read a lawsuit, was done for just that reason. In reality it’s explicitly stated that she’s seeking monetary compensation in the lawsuit.
If it does go to court, I don't see how the plaintiff is going to convince the jury that Jay-Z is liable. Bubsy the Lawcat's got to be hiding some majestic evidence behind the scenes to disprove what is already publicly available.
this won't end well for the plantiff or buzbee ...we both know the internet is relentless, the longer this stalemate lasts the more likely someone will leak out the plantiff identity. then things will get very messy quickly. if jane doe has any evidence or witnesses she needs them to be brought forth immediately because this case has too many holes.
i low key dont think it will go that far. I think thats why jay z wants the accusser revealed . I really feel that woman is older then 38
The only evidence out there is the interview nothing else people are basing their statements are there comments on the interview that she did no other evidence than that which I agree she doesn't look good. But her lawyer is the pro and I feel like it's a bait-and-switch scenario I think he decided to put a calculated risk to make her look like she doesn't know what she's saying but he secretly has some type of evidence that he's going to pull out in the long run
@@sherylsutherland1183😂😂that sounds ridiculous
@@sherylsutherland1183if he was a pro then why didn't he vet his own client
Hello, could you please advise why Buzbee hasn't amended the complaint to 2003 instead of 2000 since the accuser's story would fit better for 2003 and would make the case more solid? Do you think it's because the accuser didn't live in NY state in 2003 so they have to make her story fit in 2000 somehow?
A excellent breakdown of the case
Thank you!
As a lawyer i know you don't believe this dumb shit
I don’t believe it at this point. But I’m also not so stubborn-biased as to not be convinced should the evidence dictate otherwise.
What happened to the lie detector test that she was supposed to take Busby said she was taking it this week
Right!!! The woman did say she would take lie detector test! I trust anything about Buzybee.
When the attorney files for dismissal does the judge make her decision based on reviewing all filings submitted and the law about statute of limitations or just the law on statute of limitations?????
The judge will base her decision on the relevant cases cited by both parties, in addition to any cases she finds based on her own research. She’ll be looking at whether that statute applies retroactively, whether the SOL of the NY state law applies versus the GMVA, and the issue whether the GMVA applies given the issue as to whether the incident actually took place in NYC.
JayZ will regret not settling this case with a NDA. He could have prevented the public from ever knowing. His ego is in the way. This won’t go well as his atty is already lying - stating JayZ and Diddy weren’t friends. Bad move.
Would you give money to someone who’s making up shit about you?
THAT MONSTER NEEDS TO TAKE ACCOUNTABILITY FOR HIS ACTIONS!
Which actions? Nothing has been proven yet.
That man deserves his day in court! I believe this victim needs behavioral health services for many reasons and I do not believe that Mr.Carter did what he is being accused of in this particular case. His counsel is SUPPOSED TO FIND every single angle to preserve his clients resources, freedom, and name. The internet seems to be on an absolute witch-hunt and Im not buying any of this claim. If Spiro came across something like a timed statute - THAT'S HIS JOB! It doesnt mean Mr. Carter is lying or guilty. I means the accusation does not apply based on the evidence provided. Why do people want to destroy other people so bad? You would want your father, son, brother to be PROVEN whatever based on ALL of the evidence. And nothing she said adds up! God bless her and I hope she finds peace and resolve - but I think this claim is invalid.
Nawl Mia!! JayZ and Diddy are going to jail.
The fact that the law will entertain this is crazy. It seems like anybody can say any fraudulent claim about you when you have any form of wealth.
Look on how many it happened to. Jay isn't the 1st..also this one include diddy!! if it's false for Jay its false for diddy as well!! So lets watch to the end...
It’s evident which content creators are die-hard FANS.
And it’s evident which comments are from people full of hate
A dismissal IS NOT going to happen! Come on Buzzbee the king Bee!!!
So. This whole thing is about money..Civil case., 25 years after. In my opinion, it should NOT be about money, and the accusing side needs to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the alleged incident occurred..and without ridiculous inconsistencies we have seen. On the technical side, except the VAWA included retroactive component covering a particular period, this accuser cannot use VAWA. Full stop.. It is almost becoming nonsensical.
Update.
VAWA is not retroactive, according to related detail on public record. Prior statutes of limitations law that was active at the time of the alleged incident is what applies.
Why wasn't the case presented in a timely manner? Was the allegations before now
Good question!
jay and tony been suing each other since novemeber i think.
Button smashed 🇯🇲 DIDDLER vs GAYZ 😅
This has got out of control, lawyer Busby was hoping Jay Z would sign off on $10 million to make this go away. ..this is why he msde it public...Jay-,Z instead bit down on his gum shield....Now Busby is back peddling saying he pickrd up this case from a small law firm who did not do proper due diligence?
Thank you
Thank you!
I’m intrigued by the username! 😉
I pray Jz didn’t do this because that is terrible for a minor but if he did do it there is a price you have to pay and iam saying now on record do not sleep on Buzzbee he must have evidence because he would not be coming for JZ if he didn’t Buzzbee is well known here in Houston and he wins his cases do your research my money is on Buzzbee
The inaccuracies, for those of you that are too slow to read a little lawsuit.
She claims she left a house full of people naked and ran out on the streets until she found a woman who she asked to call her father. Where’s the woman? No witness. You think nobody would react to a naked child on the streets in the middle of the night? Also, why didn’t that woman call the police if she found a nkd kid running around? She then claims her father came to pick her up but her father lives five hours away. So you mean to tell me her father didn’t call the police? He didn’t ask any questions? Bullshit. And you mean to tell me nobody walked up to that kid for five hours while she waited for her dad? Her father has dismissed her claims and says he doesn’t remember.
Then the ”I was drugged” bs. She claims she was in a house full of guests and took a drink from a waitresses tray. The waitress was walking around serving guests. So how was she drugged? She has now admitted that neither of the defendants drugged her because she didn’t get any drink from either of them but took it from a tray, does that mean everyone was drugged?
Buzbees claim that she’s not looking for money. read the lawsuit, at the second last page there are several paragraphs stating that she wants monetary compensation. Their dumb tactic to not put a set amount in the lawsuit so that they could claim to people that she’s not looking for money because they know people are too dumb to read a lawsuit, was done for just that reason. In reality it’s explicitly stated that she’s seeking monetary compensation in the lawsuit.
you right
so is Tony. it will take until March to get it taken care of
this lawyer doesn't have enough experience for me
Deep & V interesting
Many thanks as always.. 🦁
Much appreciated Timothy!
trying to get into the game and it is clear, you are not ready
Different states different laws
I thought the timing of Beyonce's $100,000 donation to the University of Houston Criminal justice dept where Buzbee obtained his law degree was suspicious.
I hope things work out in JayZ's favor
Same. Puff too. I do hope this did not happen.
You serious!!!!!!
I'm not wishing on a downfall of Jay Z. a mogul brother... over allegations with inconsistencies & no proof
@@JamahlKersey Puff?!?! You gots to be kidding yourself 😮
Seeing Beyonce and Blue perform half time show. Blue right in the back of her and when they dance together. I really feel bad for blue. I really hope her dad didn’t do those awful things.
Very interesting, are you a lawyer? So you see where it's all going? Jay Z never said he was innocent instead he went after the attorney...so just because you are granted an order, it still has to be approved by the Judge. Everyone gets a fair chance
We don't know what Jay is saying - the only info about his case publicly known is what his lawyer says
Yes, I’m a lawyer, Valerie. Jay Z is doing what he should do and allow his lawyer to speak on his behalf.
You’re correct, receiving permission to file a motion does not mean the judge is going to grant it.
he did say he was innocent in his first statement and i would go after the attorney. how you publicly suing someone but cant verify if the event happened
He did say he was innocent in the very first statement he dropped
Only comments with woman names make these weird comments 😂😂😂😂. Just something I notice
The age is wrong too because if this happened in 2000 when did she make the first claim with the other Lawyers. How old was she when this happened was she 13 or was she younger or older.
They are not dismissing this case. It’s Diddys case Jayz is roped in because he was with Diddy allegedly drugging and raping a child. The public would be outraged if the judge dismissed this case. Jayz will have to prove his innocence in court.
The public being outraged is not a valid point at law😂😂😂😂
Jay & r Kelly has a song called guilty until proven innocent. He’s guilty I believe back I
In the 90s young girls were preyed upon
Just because there's public outrage over a case doesn't mean it will affect a judge's decision to dismiss a civil suit. Judges have to follow the law. Plus, if the civil suit is dismissed, the accuser may be able to refile it.
@ 2 black men raping a white girl allegedly. Yeah ok
Now Jayz is being roped in because he was allegedly drugging and raping a child? WOW. Site your source please
Naw for first degree rape is until the victim is 55
Nia, the only thing is, this is a civil matter at this point, not a criminal charge for rape.
Thanks ❤.....I believe that she should have her day in court just because something happened that day and Jay Z and Diddy know it let alone the female that was just watching... them SA her...ijs
Well, when 'Jane Doe's' dad picked her up from wherever, he told she not to tell him anything of where she was and where she was coming from. Soooooo.......that WOULD be why he doesn't remember anything.
The inaccuracies, for those of you that are too slow to read a little lawsuit.
She claims she left a house full of people naked and ran out on the streets until she found a woman who she asked to call her father. Where’s the woman? No witness. You think nobody would react to a naked child on the streets in the middle of the night? Also, why didn’t that woman call the police if she found a nkd kid running around? She then claims her father came to pick her up but her father lives five hours away. So you mean to tell me her father didn’t call the police? He didn’t ask any questions? Bullshit. And you mean to tell me nobody walked up to that kid for five hours while she waited for her dad? Her father has dismissed her claims and says he doesn’t remember.
Then the ”I was drugged” bs. She claims she was in a house full of guests and took a drink from a waitresses tray. The waitress was walking around serving guests. So how was she drugged? She has now admitted that neither of the defendants drugged her because she didn’t get any drink from either of them but took it from a tray, does that mean everyone was drugged?
Buzbees claim that she’s not looking for money. read the lawsuit, at the second last page there are several paragraphs stating that she wants monetary compensation. Their dumb tactic to not put a set amount in the lawsuit so that they could claim to people that she’s not looking for money because they know people are too dumb to read a lawsuit, was done for just that reason. In reality it’s explicitly stated that she’s seeking monetary compensation in the lawsuit.
@MiR-bp5vx Well, she WAS just 13 and it WAS twenty-four years ago. I wouldn't use that word. You wouldn't have a crystal clear memory, either, Bird Brain.
Would have been cheaper to settle, we never needed to know any of this. Now he needs the trial for his reputation. The problem, even if found innocent, his ties to Combs will haunt him. Being anywhere near Diddy us a problem for his business partners.
Ps...l beleive someone wants JZ out the way and the real power players. He is a billionaire on paper and they can take it with the snap of a finger. It can all disappear just like what happened to Kanye and Diddy.
About your P.S. I've been thinking about that myself. It's not gonna just stop w/ these rappers (or rap adjacent dudes). I think Oprah is next... Then, Tyler Perry. Just watch!
Why would he settle if he didn’t do it? Would you pay someone who made a false claim against you?
If Jay Z is innocent of this allegation and Jay Z win his case does that get Diddy off. This allegation as well since Jay Z and Diddy is accused of this together?
It's hell whenever a person or persons has to fight a state and federal case. The government use statutes of limitations for certain people. I've seen that in R Kelly's case the system plays dirty 🎱.
Diddy is in a RICO case, this civil case is like a fly compared to that one. This case is about money while the other actually has more severe consequences.
I’m sure when Jay z’s case is dropped, Diddy’s will be as well, at least by this accuser. It doesn’t look like anyone is coming forward to corroborate her story. That doesn’t mean it didn’t happen but it means she has too weak of a case. Plus all the inconsistencies.
diddy still has his federal cases but if jay wins a lot of diddy stuff does go away with these lawsuits
@rsvpevents6780 That's what I was asking if any accuser comes forward and say Diddy and Jay Z this and that. Together and Jay Z walks well that automatically should drop Diddy unless they was to say Diddy did extra.
First off...there is not gonna be dismissal...you should know that since you're a lawyer...all this does is give him the chance to FILE... doesn't mean it will be dismissed...the only good thing about this is...the judge wont let them know til AFTER the SUPERBOWL...Now Jayz better hope nothing else comes up BEFORE March.
It sounds like you didn’t listen to the first few seconds of the video… 🤷🏾♂️
I'm from NY, and we need to look and see if tony buzbee has any relation to this jane doe. He is licensed to practice in upstate NY, and Rochester is in upstate NY. Why is he going so hard to keep his fake client anonymous? hmmmmm, i always said it after the interview he made this up and planted her. Idc what he says now we all heard the interview, and the judge did too. Can't come back from no matter what anyone has to say.
The Judge is fair and unbiased. Your coverage is very biased and it’s okay, no one wants this allegation to be true. It’s only natural that ppl take sides, it’s great for dialogue and banter. I think this Judge will be just in all of her decisions.
What about the children we need people to talk about the kids
The inaccuracies, for those of you that are too slow to read a little lawsuit.
She claims she left a house full of people naked and ran out on the streets until she found a woman who she asked to call her father. Where’s the woman? No witness. You think nobody would react to a naked child on the streets in the middle of the night? Also, why didn’t that woman call the police if she found a nkd kid running around? She then claims her father came to pick her up but her father lives five hours away. So you mean to tell me her father didn’t call the police? He didn’t ask any questions? Bullshit. And you mean to tell me nobody walked up to that kid for five hours while she waited for her dad? Her father has dismissed her claims and says he doesn’t remember.
Then the ”I was drugged” bs. She claims she was in a house full of guests and took a drink from a waitresses tray. The waitress was walking around serving guests. So how was she drugged? She has now admitted that neither of the defendants drugged her because she didn’t get any drink from either of them but took it from a tray, does that mean everyone was drugged?
Buzbees claim that she’s not looking for money. read the lawsuit, at the second last page there are several paragraphs stating that she wants monetary compensation. Their dumb tactic to not put a set amount in the lawsuit so that they could claim to people that she’s not looking for money because they know people are too dumb to read a lawsuit, was done for just that reason. In reality it’s explicitly stated that she’s seeking monetary compensation in the lawsuit.
🔥🔥🔥🔥
I hope he gets an affidavit from the girl’s father
The inaccuracies, for those of you that are too slow to read a little lawsuit.
She claims she left a house full of people naked and ran out on the streets until she found a woman who she asked to call her father. Where’s the woman? No witness. You think nobody would react to a naked child on the streets in the middle of the night? Also, why didn’t that woman call the police if she found a nkd kid running around? She then claims her father came to pick her up but her father lives five hours away. So you mean to tell me her father didn’t call the police? He didn’t ask any questions? Bullshit. And you mean to tell me nobody walked up to that kid for five hours while she waited for her dad? Her father has dismissed her claims and says he doesn’t remember.
Then the ”I was drugged” bs. She claims she was in a house full of guests and took a drink from a waitresses tray. The waitress was walking around serving guests. So how was she drugged? She has now admitted that neither of the defendants drugged her because she didn’t get any drink from either of them but took it from a tray, does that mean everyone was drugged?
Buzbees claim that she’s not looking for money. read the lawsuit, at the second last page there are several paragraphs stating that she wants monetary compensation. Their dumb tactic to not put a set amount in the lawsuit so that they could claim to people that she’s not looking for money because they know people are too dumb to read a lawsuit, was done for just that reason. In reality it’s explicitly stated that she’s seeking monetary compensation in the lawsuit.
S attacking a minor should be against the law and not be based on when and where. WTH?
Then they should’ve filed criminal charges
@inblackamericaradio5409 If something hasn't happened to you its easier to draw up conclusions. You are so clueless i feel sad for you
@@duchessdame150 feel sad that a white woman lie holds more weight in this country than a Black man’s truth. This case bout to be dismissed real quick and buzbee gonna be sounding like Ralph Kamden
Attorney k 👍.
Hey Pamela!
Personally puffy is not going to go down by myself..he is going to tske everyone with him...and JZ is going to spend alot of MONEY..
I have a question about the statute of limitations. The example you gave is making chewing gum “illegal” but rape and having sex with a minor was already illegal I’m 2000. I would like to know about how statute of limitations pause or nullification impacts this case. Also someone mentioned in another podcast a case that allows children and people with cognitive limitations a four or five year window of when a crime event occurred. So this podcaster said that the circumstances surrounding the allegations make sense that they may have happened in 2003 not 2000 but due to the age and the cognitive limitations of the alleged victim this is acceptable. The podcaster noted a case against the Catholic Church by minors.
Do you know anything about this? Can you do a video maybe expounding upon these 2 questions?
Thank you
C'mon, people ain't no way a child fought off two grown men after being drugged and sexually violated.
Diddy is a monster, and Jay Z is a jerk, but I think they're innocent of the alleged crime.
Do you know either one or them personally?
Has either one of these guys done something to you or someone you personally know?
How do you know he’s a jerk? He’s barely even seen let alone speaks
That's my opinion and I'm not explaining it.
If grown men who allegedly were drugged and violated, how could a female child who was allegedly drugged and violated fight them off and escape?
@heavybear8107
You made a statement of fact, but now it's just your opinion?
For me the fact that all of them in the music industry chase after young girls this is a common thing not even just in the music industry but also in the movie and TV industry Jay z hung around people who were pedophiles and sexual deviance an r Kelly himself said he would hook Jay-Z up with girls young girls Jay-Z's baby mothers we're all underage that's why he's avoiding to take a DNA test and he paid off the other two daughters that he had Jay-Z's behaviors are very suspicious and I would not trust that man around my teenage daughter what is a 30-year-old man doing talking to a 1617 year old girl over the phone stop thinking with fan eyes.
👌💯💯💯👌
Thanks Kevin!! 👊🏾
@JamahlKersey
No problem Brother, you keeps it band💯
He & wifey have already been convicted in the court of public opinion & imo that’s worse.
THANK GOD THERE IS A JUDICIAL COURT SYSTEM PROCESS THE VICTIMS SHOULD BE PROTECTED.
I believe puff got the footage from 20 years ago and he snitching for less time
Precis.....
She's giving him another opportunity because she realized her emotions got the best of her she chastised an attorney who is vigorously defending a client who doesn't know the accuser. She knows the case is fake news ... Politics as usual
Not an ounce of evidence and you still are going after Jay Z, envying his money and succes.
Well if she has a case on this and the lawyer think she has one whether it 10 years or 20 that means she can go to court remember Donald Trump has to pay a woman right now in New York for this same thing
Jay Z is not going out without a fight...he prepared for this although to me, his legal team look soft idk. This Jane Doe is a liar! Clearly 😌
I can't wait until he goes after buzbee with the defamation suit
IF YOU WANT MONEY AND NEVER ASKED FOR ARREST YOUR A LIAR, NEXT, YOU DON'T HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO BUY MY CHILD AND IF YOU TAKE THE BAG YOU HAVE MADE YOUR KID A TRICK 100
Man im about to go watch My guy Bruce the criminal Lawyer. Dude is a corny cuz he so square. Plane language, your law degree in word Salad!
Peace✌🏾
It would have been dismissed, if it does Feds picking it up, and he's going to prison
That's. Not not it works. The Feds, if they ha anything, would have already picked it up.
Free diddy 😤 🙏
No retroacrive. Thas not justice