Were you expecting the judge to throw out the case against Jay Z? If you’ve watched my previous videos, you would know that there was no way this was going to happen at this point. How do see the case playing out moving forward?
I think Jay Z’s team continues with the rule 11 motion and they proceed according the proper procedures of the court. I think the case is dismissed after the discovery process or in the least Jay Z is taken off as a defendant if he has an irrefutable alibi.
@@shellimendoza7332 This judge is havin' no nonsense.No special treatment.It's how it should be.Thos lady ain't up for their games.She doin' fact checkin'....Besides...the people involved can keep some people quiet sometimes...but not all people quiet all the time.
Or maybe he thinks he’s innocent and is tired of his name being smeared in the media. Nothing about this case, facts, information, adds up other than it’s associated with Daddy, which most y’all are just eating up.
@@Lamont0330 Amen. It's normal for white judges and prosecutors not to care about the truth with a black man. I know lawyers don't want to hear that but I have been on the jury enough and helped pay for family's defense to know what happens in the courtroom. Not every case but two many of them are controlled by twisted thinking people.
It’s crazy to me how someone’s celebrity status automatically exempts them from any wrong doing according to the mentality of the fan. To be an adult and not think objectively because you like a stranger’s music or tv show shows how nonsensical people are.
You’re right. However THIS case is essentially rubbish. If you’ve paid attention and you are logical, and unbiased, you’d understand that this is simply a public embarrassment , a stain that the public won’t ever forget no matter the outcome. It will also affect his further dealings. These things are simply a hunt for certain people. And it’s not how the Judicial system should work.
Yes however she remembered certain things vividly, like the tattoo on a certain celebrity that wasn’t even in the state at the time. You could claim her father was bribed however Jay-z’s lawyer proved with facts that and timeline that her accusation is impossible.
@@composedviewit depends on whats actually inconsistent. Some details really do not matter, others do though. They already know drugs were used as part of the sex trafficking, which is typical, and for the freak-offs. Just let the courts determine. Even if this goes nowhere, Jay Z is still gonna be a suspect because of his association with Diddy. "Birds of a feather flock together" has always been an accurate saying. When you consider the level of crime that is going on, common sense should tell you Diddy did not do all of this by himself. So as things continue to move forward, more info will come to light. It does not look good for Jay Z even if this accuser gets nowhere.
@bradmighells2883 the problem is the public aspect and business aspect, if he loses a 10 million deal he couldn't sue that person for 10 million because she doesn't have it
Lol cuz jay-z really needs that money, right? …if i were innocent i wouldn’t want to deal with the headache and backlash this will bring, even as a public figure.
I just said exactly the same thing and when Jay. Z got with Beyonce, she may have been 18 or whatever but his behavior does establish a direct pattern here. Good 👁.
It’s two women that’s going to take Jay-z down. 1. The alleged victim. 2. The woman that was there watching the alleged rape and settled out of court, the feds are going to subpoena her to testify in court. Jay-z , be careful of what you ask for. That was not the best way to protect your image, this is not a rap song or a script to your rap video, this shit is serious.
@@SuperKillerdog You don’t settle out of court because you are always guilty, sometimes people settle out of court to protect their brand, public perception can destroy you and your brand and everything you stand for. In the end it’s all a game, attorney Buzbee understands how emotions work and how to trip up vulnerable celebrities who live very loose lives. So let’s be clear @SuperKillerdog I’m a Jayz fan, but I’m also a realist. I see like you see, the hunt and money grab for these celebrities 25/7 and I also see the downfall for people who go down a certain path, you see it too. If they find him guilty doesn’t mean he did it, just poor execution on behalf of his attorneys, who is also looking at a money grab. Moral of the story, do not let your emotions get the best of you. 🤫
Thats how all those types of people act, even the youth of that culture when they get in trouble, they can't seem to keep their mouths shut, until they are charged and get in trouble, then they start crying and acting like what they truly are: thugs and babies.
But when u think your billions can speak for itself . They figure they above the law and they attorneys lol 😂😂 self destruction will cost them dearly. And I ain't talking about money.
@@VLS1AriesTrump's power and money allowed him to run for president...so basically the law only works for powerful yt men. Trump should legally be in jail but you have a criminal for president. Nothing new in America.
@@VLS1AriesTrump did not go to jail after his allegations were proven to be true. Yet Americans love him especially yt women. He ended up being your president. The legal system has always vindicated powerful wealthy yt men. JayZs billions means nothing in this yt racist system.
What is the matttr with the girls parents allowing her to go to an adult party, The kid at 13 shouldnt be at those partys. Why did adults at the parties allow kids in there..
There would be a law where rich and poor people are punished the same and where people (victims) cannot get millions to sue somebody. There would be a lot less fake accusations. Most of the victims only want money. The punishment should be jail, and not jail for poor people and jail and paying millions to victims for rich people.
@@frevebe7693 You are 100% correct because when there are false accusations against poor/regular people they get thrown in jail. There’s so many cases like that where the person is exonerated years later AFTER their lives are ruined
@@KelvinMick-q5u But if you are so rich so have a much bigger chance for false accusations. So it is not better. Look at diddy, do you really believe all those people are real victims?
@@Nicki_Nicolexoxo1 I didn't know this but I wouldn't be surprised if its true. Thats why I'm glad these judges are sticking to the normal protocol and not letting them slide because of their status. I would not risk my career or license for people who think they are above the law anyways!
Bc Jay has the right to know who's making these alleged accusations... we see now anybody can get on a stand and make claims of R - and I do believe there's a set up on Jay's behalf. AND IM NO fan... just saying....
You're assuming every rich person will break the law and further get themselves in trouble. If you can ruin someone's life at your word, then you should be known. We never know who is lying for money so that's the price.
No I didn't expect the Judge to dismiss the case nor cause her to b ID simply bc of procedures. I believed JZ told his lawyer to do this even though his lawyer knew it wouldn't get him anywhere. JZ is in it for a possible "LONG FIGHT". HE'LL have to defend himself like "ALL" the rest, "NO" exceptions.
@Ivanblock757 she was 13, autistic with a head injury. She wasn't lying, she got dates wrong, which happens. Her father how would he look as a father not knowing where is 13yr old autism, with a head injury was on a particular night? Anybody that's ever taken care of an autistic r head injured person will tell u different about the fact but dates b messed up.
@ConnieHardge she lied, stop making excuses, she literally imagined an entire event that didn't happen. If she got the dates wrong then she wouldn't have been 13. She lied
@Ivanblock757 if so, the lawyers will hire experts to tell what they know about autism n head injuries ppl. JZ lawyer worked with autism before, so he already knows.
@ConnieHardge what does autism have to do with anything, she imagined talking to people who weren't there and going to house that doesn't exist. Why should we believe anything she says when she imagines stuff that didn't happen
Because you know him? Or believe all the nonsense spouted by Jaguar Wright, who claims to have receipts for years but hasnt provided even one, to get paid by content creators? Whether or not you believe this has 0 to do with the case.
@@Anthonyistheone nothing to do with the case. No such thing as a billionaire who isn’t a jerk. Yet you hold Jay Z to a higher standard than Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates or Trump.
So every rich person will break the law and hurt accusers. If you have the power to ruin someone's life, we need to know who you are, that's the price.
No i did not expect the judge to dismiss the case. If you speak of Spiro’s “said” inconsistencies based on a few facts that correcting the year will correct…..well we will see how “great” Spiro’s arguments are
The problem with this whole situation is… The public has been fed so much false information in the past few that it blurred the lines between fact and fiction. Ppl want Jay z to be guilty even if he’s not guilty, bc he’s a billionaire who ppl don’t like. Just beware… One day someone will accuse you of something bc of someone you hang around, and you’re gonna want a fair and equal trial.
The judge has been paid off. We all know how this is going to go. An accuser shouldn’t be able to publicly slander someone’s name in the public while remaining anonymous. It should go both ways until the trial has concluded.
@@Ivanblock757nothing will happen to her. I see the play here the girl. Doesn't even exist. Tony buzbee is satan literally evil man. And also i believe jayz lawyer is in on this Its a shakedown takedown if he doesnt pay
Even if there were inconsistencies in what the accuser said during the interview, that did not negate the fact that, the allegations may have taken place and Jay-Z with his attorney's desperation to get the case thrown out immediately, through attacking the accuser's attorney and as if they orchestrated the whole interview to dismiss the case, would have further warranted/forced the judge to move the case forward, as they are acting extremely suspicious/guilty, like they have something to hide, in my entitled opinion.🙏😭
I can understand why he did the press conference, I just don’t agree with the strategy. The motion to dismiss did not have even a remote chance of being granted.
Would you continue to be a fan of Jay Z the musician and business man if he's found guilty? His music and his business are responsible for the good fortune he's had so far. He and his lawyer used these threats against Piers Morgan and others. This judge sees through it.
Je heb genoeg losers die dat blijven doen, die zijn dan ook voor pedofielen en verkrachter,mensenhandel,drugshandel,........ieder die achter hun smerigheid staat wordt ook vervolgd op welke manier dan ook, de bijbel zegt: wie meent te staan moet zien dat hij niet valt,en vallen zullen ze 😊
That’s a really good and fair question. I haven’t really given it thought, but I tend to separate the art from the people. We’ll cross that bridge if and when we get to it. Are you a fan of his music?
The lyrics of his music are vernacular crude repetitious gibberish.. Isn't the whole rap industry basically fueled by glorifying violence against women, cops and any other group they can victimize. "Big pimpin" is just one of his disgusting songs..Enough for me not to glorify some retired drug dealer and buy what him or his wife are selling.
It’s not hard or easy to believe this allegation but his association with young Aaliyah,beyonce Rihana at a early age and R Kelly and Sean diddy combs raises some eyebrows
I didn’t know court cases took he say-she say cases without evidence first. I’m finding it difficult for her to prove a claim from thirty years ago without DNA.
So if you're an attorney in today's time you're part of the corrupt contract law instead of constitutional law you need to get on the Constitutional side not the contract side
I understand Mr. Carter and his team felt the need to be proactive, however such an action was premature in my opinion, also even though I’m a fan of the artistry of both Sean’s since 1994, I’m pro female and the rights of women, thus I’m hoping the plaintiff gets a fair hearing in court and i can only hope the defendants are indeed innocent of the crimes they are currently facing.
05:24 sir I have great respect for you and I still do?.... however you just retracted what you originally said. I watch all your clips and I'm absolutely sure you said the case has a great chance of being dismissed and will be thrown out.
I really appreciate your approach to the question, honestly. I didn’t actually say that. I said that the judge was not going to dismiss the case at this point. th-cam.com/video/2fNFtNH1YjY/w-d-xo.html&si=etEQd_ri7e_-FpeG
I think the inconsistencies are a problem for the plaintiff, but it’s too premature at this point for the case to be dismissed. But, I think that if the plaintiff cannot sufficiently account for the inconsistencies, then the case probably should be dismissed. I do, however, acknowledge that despite all the inconsistencies, there’s still the possibility that this happened. It probably sounds very back and forth, but that’s just me being honest. Thanks for the thoughtful commentary! 👊🏾
I guess when you're dealing with allegations that has terrible inaccuracies, it can be confusing trying to put the appropriate pieces of the alleged incident in it's proper place. Especially when it's triggered delusionally and false.
As far as the defendent's father conveniently not remembering if he picked up his teenage dgthr up from the gas station, I call bowlchit. She's without her shoes and in a state of emotional upheaval and messy disarray, riding home with her father not saying anything? My father would have interrogated me all the way home! Her father is likely more aware of what could happen to him judging by his dghtr's face, so he feared what might lay ahead if he acknowledges anything he's heard or seen.
It's problematic that our government allows people to bring charges upon someone. Without the person they're suing knows who they are. And the government shouldn't compare the two parties Diddy and Jay Z being the same. It's something about those New York judges I just don't get them judge Ann Marie Donnelly. In New York was foul in R Kelly's case.
@wakanda6547 It's sad for one it's something about those New York and Chicago judges. Something isn't rite about them I've seen how they move in case's. Whenever it comes to black celebrities case's they seems to be biases and not letting certain evidence in.
I thought Spiro's presentation was indeed believable.for Jay Z's case ..but this constant back & forth with Buzbee prolonged this case ..If Spiro wasnt so aggressive its possible the judge wouldve dismissed his case
His presentation was well put together. However, there was no chance the judge was going to dismiss the case, even if there was no back and forth with Buzbee.
@@JamahlKersey and why is that? So now anybody can just accuse anyone of R. Huh? This case sounds suspicious.... idc what anyone says... how there are inconsistencies found. The dad doesn't remember driving 10 hrs to drop and pick up daughter.... mane , I'm no fan of Jay , but I hope he and Spiro keep fighting and win. Bc this is tarnishing Jay's brand family brand.... and now fans and unimportant people coming for Bey as if she has something to do with it.... I saw where folks being cruel on blu.. sh&&÷ crazy
@@daempresssqueenI get where you’re coming from. Just from a legal procedure standpoint, the judge would not have the authority to dismiss the case based on the arguments presented. But as of a couple of days ago there’s new arguments being presented for why the judge should dismiss the case. I’ll break that down soon.
Jay doing too much, he should know that. Almost telling to tell the judge what to do lol that just shows you’ve planned “just incase” and expect a certain treatment/outcome
Me as a parent , if the lawyer wanted to silenced me a day before my daughter's moment , I had to do something as a parent .I believe his lawyer told him the outcome , but he was willing to take his chances .
If they drugged and raped a 13 year old girl back then, while they may not know her name, I am sure that they knew she was underage. They thought that it would eventually just go away! It's going to be extremely interesting to see if/when her identity is revealed. If true, they deserve to lose everything. Remember, "GOD IS NO RESPECTER OF PERSON'S". What's done in the dark will definitely come to the light. Can't wait to see how this plays out. If Jay Z decides to settle rather a jury trial....GUILTY AS SIN but it certainly won't change facts and truth and who cares if she's 37 year's old now!!! Rape is rape...period!!!
If you’re not a woman, you may not understand how physically damaging rape could be. Especially as a child who is likely a virgin. You would be physically injured by something that brutal, especially 2 grown men?!!! I can’t believe, if this happened, she told no one and did not seek medical attention. I mean, she’d be bloody and torn. (Sorry to be graphic.) I had a consensual encounter at age 17 when I was inexperienced, and I was literally ripped and bleeding.
There is a lot of guilt by association following Jay Z. And if he’s innocent it would be understandable that he is concerned this could damage his career and possibly even his family life. But with all that said. The one thing that is unbelievable is that that he didn’t realize how bad those parties were. For most people who believe that type of behavior is disgustingly as Jay Z has proclaimed it would seem unlikely they would feel so close to them. So it must not feel as awful to him as he claims. No one is naive to things these rappers did years ago when they were in the life. But it seems like most of them cling to that life even when they are lucky enough to escape it
It’s not that the case should not be thrown out, or won’t eventually be thrown out, it’s just that now is not the appropriate time, from a legal procedure standpoint.
There should be a time frame when you can press charges. People can’t remember after 15 and 10 years ago. If Jane doe was drugged or intoxicated at 13 years old. She wouldn’t remember all she remembers is that she woke up and she didn’t feel right. She knows that something happened. Question where were her parents. Personally, when children are involved this is serious and justice must be served. I want to see how this plays out in court and see what the jury decides.
Based on her own words. The story changed from what she reported to what she said in interview yet she is standing on when it happened and who she talked too!
@@crystalscott9948 sooo inconsistencies based on the interviews? The inconsistencies matter the most if its from the discovery of physical evidence and testimonies from other witnesses. Inconsistencies from her own words is not enough to dictate whether it is true or not, thats why we use multiple forms of evidence. Going off of what she has said in interviews is not reliable, especially if they are not asking her the questions that should be asked. We already know that some interviewers will ask or pressure people to admit to things that never even happened.
@@Camille_Janai granted we haven’t gotten to discovery, you, like me and every other somebody that is commenting, is going off what WE already know which is what she reported in her official lawsuit AND what she said in her interview, why what she said in her interview not hold up in court when it’s suppose be HER words? They may not have asked her certain questions or what ever you think that should have been deemed legal but nothing about her interview that we saw showed she was being manipulated they allowed her to tell her story and as far as witnesses are concerned if there is more I guess we will know more about them too in discovery, if her dad( witness) had of corroborated her story would he still be a witness, or is his account not valid because he didn’t say what most wanted him to say?
@ all that you just said...does not change my point at all. Once again, that is why we use multiple forms of evidence, not just her words. What I said isn't even based off of her case specifically, its general fact. It applies to any case. So if all we have is her words so far....you need to hush and let the courts do their job lol. My point still stands. This is normal protocol, they were not going to dismiss her case at this point anyways. They may dismiss it later on when they have looked at MORE EVIDENCE, but as of now, they are not dismissing it. Thats what you all do not get when this is basic stuff.
@ I have no problem what so ever about letting this play out in court, as far as her word that’s how we got here, also what I said still stands, I don’t need you to explain to me this is protocol I am also very well aware this case wasn’t going to be dismissed this early, as we haven’t made it to discovery! I’m still till entitled to my opinions!
He definitely hasn’t gotten on her good side with all of this. In fairness, he hasn’t exactly lost anything either, because that motion never had any chance of being granted in the first place. You’re welcome, and thanks so much for watching! 🙏🏾
I got to be 100, I thought the case would be thrown out due to the “ victim’s inconsistent statements!! She better be ready to go if this case goes to trial , the cross examination is going to be brutal!!
I appreciate the honesty! You’re not alone. I’m sure there were a bunch of folks who thought it was going to be dismissed, but that’s just not how the process works. Very rarely are cases thrown out like that. But yes, if it gets to trial, they will have quite the field day with her on cross…
Buzzbee knows what he is doing. On that interview he just exposed to the public that she is autistic. That's all that interview was about. Even you can tell that something happened to you years ago and have many inconsistencies. That doesn't mean it didnt happen. Remember, she is autistic. Look up the laws concerning victims with disabilities.
The issue is once u settle.. then other girls can try to use the same tactic as a money grab, so then Jay will have to settle with others that will look at it as an opportunity to get money.. like those kids did with Micheal jackson
No need for making it bigger than it is, nor sensationalizing it. Just want to give it to you straight! Thanks Debrah! Unique spelling of your name. I’ve never seen it spelled that way!
She lied on every single point. The crooked judge still keeping this BS case around. I don't hate people I don't know but I can't wait to meet you people.
@@JamahlKersey , so you are stating that even though the judge knows every part of her story was false, it has to go through the whole process to the end? Maybe another year or two and smear an innocent man's name Further?
@@LT-em1vu um, courts have protocols they have to follow regardless of whether a random civilian like you thinks it is true or false. This is to ensure that they do their job thoroughly, and make sure nothing is rushed and any important details are not missed. Rushing the process is not beneficial for the accuser OR Jay Z. We do not have access to ALL the information that the jury, attorneys, and the judge have to go through. We don't see every piece of info that the Feds have. We don't know every plan/step that they are going to take yet. This is normal protocol and some of you all are still too ignorant to realize that. This is how cases like this operate
No! I knew the female judge would give the disabled victim in a situation that's debilitated her for life to at least present her case. I think the case will give us unexpected surprises. Crazy Diddy's minding his own business& not engaging in this case. 😅😅
Even if Jane Doe were not autistic, the judge would not have dismissed this case. There will almost surely be some surprises and revelations. Diddy and his lawyers would be smart to just keep quiet throughout this process.
Yeah I know! The judge hasn’t denied the motion to dismiss the case! That is what am saying. The judge only granted the motion to for the “fake Jane doe” to remain anonymous!
Let's say the judge had agreed to throw out the Jay Z case before it went to trial, then lots of people would be outraged and would think he was guilty and had got away with it. So by the judge insisting that the case goes ahead, Jay Z has the chance to definitively prove he is innocent, and that will silence his critics. So far the case against him seems remarkably weak from the Jane Doe claims so far, as there seems to be no evidence to support her and her claims are full of mistakes. There is a massive lesson one can learn from Michael Jackson, he had false accusers, but he paid them off for a quiet life. But he regretted that, as it just opened doors for other false accusers. Diddy has tons of accusers, so far Jay Z just has this one. I dont think he would make such a public stand if he was guilty, but if he was guilty I think he would have quietly had talks with Buzbee and paid off the accuser, like possibly celebrity B has done. I think Buzbee thought Jay Z would do a Michael Jackson, and pay up just for a quiet life, even though he was innocent. Unless there is film, it is just the word of hers against his, and it may well turn out she is just another lying opportunist, like Jag, Mesha, copying other real victims experience and pretending it is hers. The you realise the "victims" are the predators, and the "predators" are actually the victims.
I WANT THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OPEN THE CASE FOR JZ SON HE DENIES & THE DEATH OF HIS MOTHER & HER AGE WHEN SHE WAS INPREGNATED & THE AGE OF JZ AT THE TIME🤨🤨🤨 JUSTICE FOR JZ SON🙏🏾🧚🏾♀️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
So if your friend is a theif. He/she has a habit of going around stealing cars , taking batteries out of parked cars. Now, By that being your friend. Associate. Does that make you accomplice to those crimes?
the law says that anyone accused of a crime has the right to face their accuser in the court of law so whats going on here?is it straight up extortion???
Jamahl, good afternoon! Listen I understand that in the normal filing procedure of a law suit, Mr Buzby feels that his undertaking was proper in asking JZ for a confidential mediation. It appears to me that Mr Buzby knowing the status of JZ, he would have just sent JZ a letter of presentment, stating the allegations a client of his is making against him. Therefore, by apprising JZ of the possibility of a future law suit, JZ's attorneys would have saw the allegations as that, allegations and not "extortion." So do u see Mr Buzby as wrong by not giving "deference" to JZ? Thank you!
Hii. Change your TH-cam name to: J. Kersey Law - easier to find and remember. Otherwise informative and nice video. (My first and only comment on TH-cam PERIOD! 😂)
@Ivanblock757 why is it you people call a person Karen when they speak the truth for your concern? i am a black woman, not a Karen and all the evil things lots of these rich people did from in their past just coming back to haunt them, the truth is an offense to criminals but the truth will always remain the truth, GOD love the truth and I am not being biased I be watching Jayz Diddy Tupac R kelly Mary J Blige all of these rappers artists and actors actresses i always loved watching them i loved all my black people i don't carried grudge for any but when you did evil to any human beings u will not go unpunished remember doesn't matter how long it takes GOD sits high and HE looks low and GOD will give everyone what they all deserve if you did good you will reap good and if you did bad you will reap bad seriously it's the truth, you will always get back whatever you did to other human beings your rewards is always great in whatever you did good or bad..
@@Ivanblock7570:01 You are all over the net calling ppl names and racist innuendos. This community is respectful with those whose opinions differ, take a hike bully!
So here's a connection that is 🧐.....Joel Madden , ok, Cameron Diaz is his wife. She has a movie out with Jaime Fox now. She left Hollweird fir a reason. Fox has said Diddy tried to off him. Everyone's tied together.
Were you expecting the judge to throw out the case against Jay Z? If you’ve watched my previous videos, you would know that there was no way this was going to happen at this point. How do see the case playing out moving forward?
I think Jay Z’s team continues with the rule 11 motion and they proceed according the proper procedures of the court. I think the case is dismissed after the discovery process or in the least Jay Z is taken off as a defendant if he has an irrefutable alibi.
But it’s not a made up story until proven otherwise
Bad
We watched, and now you’re switching up. You said this case was pretty much frivilous, not normal and etc. Now your foot is in your mouth, we see you
@@JamahlKersey now that the gangsta unprofessional behavior has been called out let the evidence speak for itself.
When money makes you think you’re better than the rest 😂😂
That's your perspective. The Fake News makes you think that when most people with money have no time to waste thinking like that.
She said Spiro was wasting judicial resources, not Tony Buzbee.
Please let’s be accurate.
Exactly!
@ it’s no good being disingenuous with what was being said by the judge because it is based off of what she was inundated with.
If I didn’t say his name, I was referring to Spiro.
@@absolutedivineNYC spool coming like a bull
@@absolutedivineNYChe coming like a Bull
The judge aint playing with Jay z !!😮
Love the judge
Not at all…
@@shellimendoza7332 This judge is havin' no nonsense.No special treatment.It's how it should be.Thos lady ain't up for their games.She doin' fact checkin'....Besides...the people involved can keep some people quiet sometimes...but not all people quiet all the time.
EXACTLY
The judge must not like baby oil 😂
Jay-Z think he's entitled and above the law I'm so glad the judge decided to speak.
You believe these crooked people. Lol. The crooked Judge and the lying accuser on every single point. Weak minds stay together
@@LT-em1vuso correct !!!
Or maybe he thinks he’s innocent and is tired of his name being smeared in the media. Nothing about this case, facts, information, adds up other than it’s associated with Daddy, which most y’all are just eating up.
@@Lamont0330 Amen. It's normal for white judges and prosecutors not to care about the truth with a black man. I know lawyers don't want to hear that but I have been on the jury enough and helped pay for family's defense to know what happens in the courtroom. Not every case but two many of them are controlled by twisted thinking people.
Me too
It’s crazy to me how someone’s celebrity status automatically exempts them from any wrong doing according to the mentality of the fan. To be an adult and not think objectively because you like a stranger’s music or tv show shows how nonsensical people are.
You’re right. However THIS case is essentially rubbish. If you’ve paid attention and you are logical, and unbiased, you’d understand that this is simply a public embarrassment , a stain that the public won’t ever forget no matter the outcome. It will also affect his further dealings. These things are simply a hunt for certain people. And it’s not how the Judicial system should work.
@ And you are EXACTLY who i’m talking about. Smh.
@@composedviewwe was kangz and sheitt
@ritamix33 are you serious, the accuser lied, got caught lying
@@ritamix33 how so? Pls elaborate because I don’t understand what you mean
The fact she was drugged that night gives her an excuse to have inconsistencies. Smh this isn’t looking good though.
Fact? Says who? Her? Well facts are you don't have critical thinking skills.
Yes however she remembered certain things vividly, like the tattoo on a certain celebrity that wasn’t even in the state at the time. You could claim her father was bribed however Jay-z’s lawyer proved with facts that and timeline that her accusation is impossible.
Was her father drugged ??
Allegedly
@@composedviewit depends on whats actually inconsistent. Some details really do not matter, others do though. They already know drugs were used as part of the sex trafficking, which is typical, and for the freak-offs. Just let the courts determine. Even if this goes nowhere, Jay Z is still gonna be a suspect because of his association with Diddy. "Birds of a feather flock together" has always been an accurate saying. When you consider the level of crime that is going on, common sense should tell you Diddy did not do all of this by himself. So as things continue to move forward, more info will come to light. It does not look good for Jay Z even if this accuser gets nowhere.
Jay z requests alone are suspicious in itself
In fairness, if you’re innocent, you would want this to go away asap. I suppose you’d want the same even if you weren’t innocent.
@JamahlKersey wrong cause if your found innocent you can then sue the accuser and depending on how your treated in court the lawyer and or judge.
@bradmighells2883 the problem is the public aspect and business aspect, if he loses a 10 million deal he couldn't sue that person for 10 million because she doesn't have it
@@bradmighells2883that’s a big if tho
Lol cuz jay-z really needs that money, right? …if i were innocent i wouldn’t want to deal with the headache and backlash this will bring, even as a public figure.
Great analysis!
Much appreciated. Hope y’all are doing well! 👊🏾
The JUDGE KNOWS there are tapes!
She wouldn't know. They haven't even gotten into discovery yet.
Rhiana was 15 ,Foxy Brown was 15 .... Wanda Satterwaite....was 15/16 yrs old when Rymir Satterwaite was born.Do we see a repeat pattern here?
Do you have proof of any of this?
Pls stop being ridiculous
I just said exactly the same thing and when Jay. Z got with Beyonce, she may have been 18 or whatever but his behavior does establish a direct pattern here. Good 👁.
@@SuperKillerdogobviously the judge saw something that made her not want to throw the case out
That is not how it works! You have to file the lawsuit before you present evidence! The judge hasn’t seen anything yet!
The Judge stood on the law. Jay Z team lost this round because they didn't follow the law.
That she certainly did.
It’s two women that’s going to take Jay-z down. 1. The alleged victim. 2. The woman that was there watching the alleged rape and settled out of court, the feds are going to subpoena her to testify in court. Jay-z , be careful of what you ask for. That was not the best way to protect your image, this is not a rap song or a script to your rap video, this shit is serious.
This not movie dog
@@shermanw711 if you innocent you can move like that
You watch too much movies! If you are NOT guilty of anything why would you settle! This is the dumbest take.
@@SuperKillerdog You don’t settle out of court because you are always guilty, sometimes people settle out of court to protect their brand, public perception can destroy you and your brand and everything you stand for. In the end it’s all a game, attorney Buzbee understands how emotions work and how to trip up vulnerable celebrities who live very loose lives. So let’s be clear @SuperKillerdog I’m a Jayz fan, but I’m also a realist. I see like you see, the hunt and money grab for these celebrities 25/7 and I also see the downfall for people who go down a certain path, you see it too. If they find him guilty doesn’t mean he did it, just poor execution on behalf of his attorneys, who is also looking at a money grab. Moral of the story, do not let your emotions get the best of you. 🤫
@@SuperKillerdogright people are dumb I would never settle if I was innocent
Diddy and Jayz need to let their lawyers handle the case and stop making them look crazy
Thats how all those types of people act, even the youth of that culture when they get in trouble, they can't seem to keep their mouths shut, until they are charged and get in trouble, then they start crying and acting like what they truly are: thugs and babies.
But when u think your billions can speak for itself . They figure they above the law and they attorneys lol 😂😂 self destruction will cost them dearly. And I ain't talking about money.
@ Truth….money cannot buy everything.
@@VLS1AriesTrump's power and money allowed him to run for president...so basically the law only works for powerful yt men. Trump should legally be in jail but you have a criminal for president. Nothing new in America.
@@VLS1AriesTrump did not go to jail after his allegations were proven to be true. Yet Americans love him especially yt women. He ended up being your president. The legal system has always vindicated powerful wealthy yt men. JayZs billions means nothing in this yt racist system.
The judge tore Spiro a new arse yesterday. She said he wasn’t doing anything that would help his client
It was pretty strong language in her written order.
@@JamahlKersey yeah it’s very obvious she wasn’t impressed with their conduct
You know, he might be GUILTY!😂😂
Definitely. Her attorney is no fool. That interview was a whole strategy.
And he may NOT be guilty ! There are too many inconsistencies in her story ..
Unless he has mastered time travel and imaginary worlds he is not.
U think
What is the matttr with the girls parents allowing her to go to an adult party, The kid at 13 shouldnt be at those partys. Why did adults at the parties allow kids in there..
There has to be some type of laws put in place to where people can’t just make up stories and file civil suits against you. This is crazy.
There would be a law where rich and poor people are punished the same and where people (victims) cannot get millions to sue somebody. There would be a lot less fake accusations. Most of the victims only want money. The punishment should be jail, and not jail for poor people and jail and paying millions to victims for rich people.
@@frevebe7693 You are 100% correct because when there are false accusations against poor/regular people they get thrown in jail. There’s so many cases like that where the person is exonerated years later AFTER their lives are ruined
Jay-Z is foul. Mimicked biggie, bought biggies crown and put it on blue ivy. I’m sick of Jay-z bullshit.
@@VegasNights702you sound so hurt over someone you’ve never met 😂
@@KelvinMick-q5u But if you are so rich so have a much bigger chance for false accusations. So it is not better. Look at diddy, do you really believe all those people are real victims?
Didn’t Tory Lanez dad said at the verdict that roc nation influence the judge and juror
@@Nicki_Nicolexoxo1 I didn't know this but I wouldn't be surprised if its true. Thats why I'm glad these judges are sticking to the normal protocol and not letting them slide because of their status. I would not risk my career or license for people who think they are above the law anyways!
Why does the public need to know the identity especially against a high profile person that has the resources to threaten them. I applaud the Judge!!
Bc Jay has the right to know who's making these alleged accusations... we see now anybody can get on a stand and make claims of R - and I do believe there's a set up on Jay's behalf. AND IM NO fan... just saying....
@@daempresssqueen I see your point but this is different due to the age of the alleged assault just my opinion.
@@karenbragg4066 she's 36
@@daempresssqueen I know she’s an Adult now, but was a minor at the alleged time that’s what the case is about
You're assuming every rich person will break the law and further get themselves in trouble. If you can ruin someone's life at your word, then you should be known. We never know who is lying for money so that's the price.
No I didn't expect the Judge to dismiss the case nor cause her to b ID simply bc of procedures. I believed JZ told his lawyer to do this even though his lawyer knew it wouldn't get him anywhere. JZ is in it for a possible "LONG FIGHT". HE'LL have to defend himself like "ALL" the rest, "NO" exceptions.
Jay z doesn't have to do anything, she already got caught in multiple lies.
@Ivanblock757 she was 13, autistic with a head injury. She wasn't lying, she got dates wrong, which happens. Her father how would he look as a father not knowing where is 13yr old autism, with a head injury was on a particular night? Anybody that's ever taken care of an autistic r head injured person will tell u different about the fact but dates b messed up.
@ConnieHardge she lied, stop making excuses, she literally imagined an entire event that didn't happen. If she got the dates wrong then she wouldn't have been 13. She lied
@Ivanblock757 if so, the lawyers will hire experts to tell what they know about autism n head injuries ppl. JZ lawyer worked with autism before, so he already knows.
@ConnieHardge what does autism have to do with anything, she imagined talking to people who weren't there and going to house that doesn't exist. Why should we believe anything she says when she imagines stuff that didn't happen
Thanks!
Thank you so much Rosetta!! 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Nobody’s above the law ! Do the crime do the time ……….!!!!!!
JZ NOT A GOOD PERSON
Do you know him personally?
He's def a snake and money over everything.
You know him?
Because you know him? Or believe all the nonsense spouted by Jaguar Wright, who claims to have receipts for years but hasnt provided even one, to get paid by content creators?
Whether or not you believe this has 0 to do with the case.
@@Anthonyistheone nothing to do with the case. No such thing as a billionaire who isn’t a jerk. Yet you hold Jay Z to a higher standard than Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates or Trump.
Thank you for breaking this down.
You’re welcome! Thanks for watching, Susan!
Unless the judge suspects that they will harass the person or have them killed, so there’s that !!!
So every rich person will break the law and hurt accusers. If you have the power to ruin someone's life, we need to know who you are, that's the price.
No i did not expect the judge to dismiss the case. If you speak of Spiro’s “said” inconsistencies based on a few facts that correcting the year will correct…..well we will see how “great” Spiro’s arguments are
That’s the danger of playing such a strong hand like that. I doubt he really wanted to do that. We’ll see…
JayZ and Diddy past behaviors and actions are going to ruin their entertainment reputations and family relations with serious scars.
Thanks for giving your legal commentary on this subject! Very informative.
Thanks for the supportive feedback, Gwen! 🙏🏾
Jay never flat out said he didn't do it.
Unless the alleged victim got the dates mixed up,it probably didn't happen. I gave you a sub
The problem with this whole situation is…
The public has been fed so much false information in the past few that it blurred the lines between fact and fiction.
Ppl want Jay z to be guilty even if he’s not guilty, bc he’s a billionaire who ppl don’t like.
Just beware…
One day someone will accuse you of something bc of someone you hang around, and you’re gonna want a fair and equal trial.
The judge has been paid off. We all know how this is going to go. An accuser shouldn’t be able to publicly slander someone’s name in the public while remaining anonymous. It should go both ways until the trial has concluded.
THANK YOU!!!!!!!! I hope and Pray , Jay is found innocent, and sue the pants of Tony and that Accuser.... ‼️‼️
But she’s not anonymous. Both parties know who she is. WE, the messy, nosey public doesn’t know who she is. Why do WE need to know her identity?
@ Because Jay Z’s identity was made public.
@@k.f.3390 Wrong. The plaintiffs identity is NOT known to the defence at this point.
Jay Z should be held accountable if he participated in any crime!!
Should she go to prison if she lied, oh we already know she lied
@@Ivanblock757nothing will happen to her. I see the play here the girl. Doesn't even exist. Tony buzbee is satan literally evil man. And also i believe jayz lawyer is in on this Its a shakedown takedown if he doesnt pay
@eva agreed.
@Ivan I believe there needs to be serious consequences for false accusations of rape-they can destroy a person’s life and cost them their freedom.
Jay z twin of Diddy so guilty your honor
Even if there were inconsistencies in what the accuser said during the interview, that did not negate the fact that, the allegations may have taken place and Jay-Z with his attorney's desperation to get the case thrown out immediately, through attacking the accuser's attorney and as if they orchestrated the whole interview to dismiss the case, would have further warranted/forced the judge to move the case forward, as they are acting extremely suspicious/guilty, like they have something to hide, in my entitled opinion.🙏😭
I can understand why he did the press conference, I just don’t agree with the strategy.
The motion to dismiss did not have even a remote chance of being granted.
Well in that industry..it's best to keep hidden until the day
The inconsistencies are more problematic than the jealous, hating, racist goofy people in the comments section
Would you continue to be a fan of Jay Z the musician and business man if he's found guilty? His music and his business are responsible for the good fortune he's had so far. He and his lawyer used these threats against Piers Morgan and others. This judge sees through it.
Je heb genoeg losers die dat blijven doen, die zijn dan ook voor pedofielen en verkrachter,mensenhandel,drugshandel,........ieder die achter hun smerigheid staat wordt ook vervolgd op welke manier dan ook, de bijbel zegt: wie meent te staan moet zien dat hij niet valt,en vallen zullen ze 😊
That’s a really good and fair question. I haven’t really given it thought, but I tend to separate the art from the people. We’ll cross that bridge if and when we get to it. Are you a fan of his music?
The lyrics of his music are vernacular crude repetitious gibberish.. Isn't the whole rap industry basically fueled by glorifying violence against women, cops and any other group they can victimize.
"Big pimpin" is just one of his disgusting songs..Enough for me not to glorify some retired drug dealer and buy what him or his wife are selling.
What do you listen to? Have you heard every rap song to backup that statement?
It’s not hard or easy to believe this allegation but his association with young Aaliyah,beyonce Rihana at a early age and R Kelly and Sean diddy combs raises some eyebrows
I didn’t know court cases took he say-she say cases without evidence first. I’m finding it difficult for her to prove a claim from thirty years ago without DNA.
So if you're an attorney in today's time you're part of the corrupt contract law instead of constitutional law you need to get on the Constitutional side not the contract side
Old cases can’t go no where 🤦♂️
I understand Mr. Carter and his team felt the need to be proactive, however such an action was premature in my opinion, also even though I’m a fan of the artistry of both Sean’s since 1994, I’m pro female and the rights of women, thus I’m hoping the plaintiff gets a fair hearing in court and i can only hope the defendants are indeed innocent of the crimes they are currently facing.
Best comment yet
05:24 sir I have great respect for you and I still do?.... however you just retracted what you originally said. I watch all your clips and I'm absolutely sure you said the case has a great chance of being dismissed and will be thrown out.
I really appreciate your approach to the question, honestly.
I didn’t actually say that. I said that the judge was not going to dismiss the case at this point.
th-cam.com/video/2fNFtNH1YjY/w-d-xo.html&si=etEQd_ri7e_-FpeG
I think the inconsistencies are a problem for the plaintiff, but it’s too premature at this point for the case to be dismissed. But, I think that if the plaintiff cannot sufficiently account for the inconsistencies, then the case probably should be dismissed. I do, however, acknowledge that despite all the inconsistencies, there’s still the possibility that this happened. It probably sounds very back and forth, but that’s just me being honest.
Thanks for the thoughtful commentary! 👊🏾
Facts
I guess when you're dealing with allegations that has terrible inaccuracies, it can be confusing trying to put the appropriate pieces of the alleged incident in it's proper place. Especially when it's triggered delusionally and false.
Great explanation. Thank you. 😊
Thank you!! 🙏🏾
As far as the defendent's father conveniently not remembering if he picked up his teenage dgthr up from the gas station, I call bowlchit. She's without her shoes and in a state of emotional upheaval and messy disarray, riding home with her father not saying anything? My father would have interrogated me all the way home! Her father is likely more aware of what could happen to him judging by his dghtr's face, so he feared what might lay ahead if he acknowledges anything he's heard or seen.
IM SO HAPPY I FOUND YOUR CHANNEL!❤
Me too! Thanks for checking me out, Shandra! 🙏🏾
It's problematic that our government allows people to bring charges upon someone. Without the person they're suing knows who they are. And the government shouldn't compare the two parties Diddy and Jay Z being the same. It's something about those New York judges I just don't get them judge Ann Marie Donnelly. In New York was foul in R Kelly's case.
If the case was to be dismissed I'm willing to bet that they gonna make Jay Z spend a lot of 💰 first.
@@rayjohnson7886
Spiro said he will not name her this time, so he ought to know who she is.
@wakanda6547 It's sad for one it's something about those New York and Chicago judges. Something isn't rite about them I've seen how they move in case's. Whenever it comes to black celebrities case's they seems to be biases and not letting certain evidence in.
@@wakanda6547 Spiro has no idea who she is. The court made it clear that she was able to remain anonymous at this point in the process.
Thanks for sharing. inconsistencies doesn't mean the assault didn't occur
Thank you Karineka! You’re absolutely right.
Thank you for explaining this
My pleasure! Glad it was informative!
Thank you dear Attorney for your great analysis!!!! 🙏🏻❤
I appreciate the support, Sofia! 🙏🏾
Must investigate.
I thought Spiro's presentation was indeed believable.for Jay Z's case ..but this constant back & forth with Buzbee prolonged this case ..If Spiro wasnt so aggressive its possible the judge wouldve dismissed his case
His presentation was well put together. However, there was no chance the judge was going to dismiss the case, even if there was no back and forth with Buzbee.
@@JamahlKersey and why is that? So now anybody can just accuse anyone of R. Huh? This case sounds suspicious.... idc what anyone says... how there are inconsistencies found. The dad doesn't remember driving 10 hrs to drop and pick up daughter.... mane , I'm no fan of Jay , but I hope he and Spiro keep fighting and win. Bc this is tarnishing Jay's brand family brand.... and now fans and unimportant people coming for Bey as if she has something to do with it.... I saw where folks being cruel on blu.. sh&&÷ crazy
@@daempresssqueenI get where you’re coming from. Just from a legal procedure standpoint, the judge would not have the authority to dismiss the case based on the arguments presented. But as of a couple of days ago there’s new arguments being presented for why the judge should dismiss the case. I’ll break that down soon.
Jay doing too much, he should know that. Almost telling to tell the judge what to do lol that just shows you’ve planned “just incase” and expect a certain treatment/outcome
Me as a parent , if the lawyer wanted to silenced me a day before my daughter's moment , I had to do something as a parent .I believe his lawyer told him the outcome , but he was willing to take his chances .
listen dude this chick was 13 but she is 37 now stop the bs fr.
Hahaha
How is it bs when she was assaulted at 13.
If they drugged and raped a 13 year old girl back then, while they may not know her name, I am sure that they knew she was underage. They thought that it would eventually just go away! It's going to be extremely interesting to see if/when her identity is revealed. If true, they deserve to lose everything. Remember, "GOD IS NO RESPECTER OF PERSON'S". What's done in the dark will definitely come to the light. Can't wait to see how this plays out. If Jay Z decides to settle rather a jury trial....GUILTY AS SIN but it certainly won't change facts and truth and who cares if she's 37 year's old now!!! Rape is rape...period!!!
If you’re not a woman, you may not understand how physically damaging rape could be. Especially as a child who is likely a virgin. You would be physically injured by something that brutal, especially 2 grown men?!!! I can’t believe, if this happened, she told no one and did not seek medical attention. I mean, she’d be bloody and torn. (Sorry to be graphic.) I had a consensual encounter at age 17 when I was inexperienced, and I was literally ripped and bleeding.
lol no you stop
There is a lot of guilt by association following Jay Z. And if he’s innocent it would be understandable that he is concerned this could damage his career and possibly even his family life. But with all that said. The one thing that is unbelievable is that that he didn’t realize how bad those parties were. For most people who believe that type of behavior is disgustingly as Jay Z has proclaimed it would seem unlikely they would feel so close to them. So it must not feel as awful to him as he claims. No one is naive to things these rappers did years ago when they were in the life. But it seems like most of them cling to that life even when they are lucky enough to escape it
Well said
Thank you!
IF THIS ISN'T WORTHY OF BEING TOSSED WHAT IS?
Im guessing there’s more the public doesn’t know
It’s not that the case should not be thrown out, or won’t eventually be thrown out, it’s just that now is not the appropriate time, from a legal procedure standpoint.
There should be a time frame when you can press charges. People can’t remember after 15 and 10 years ago. If Jane doe was drugged or intoxicated at 13 years old. She wouldn’t remember all she remembers is that she woke up and she didn’t feel right. She knows that something happened. Question where were her parents. Personally, when children are involved this is serious and justice must be served. I want to see how this plays out in court and see what the jury decides.
Yeah..if diddy does jail time...his jhonson will be busy. 😮
Inconsistencies based on a television interview or discovery physical evidence, & testimonies ? ? ?
Based on her own words. The story changed from what she reported to what she said in interview yet she is standing on when it happened and who she talked too!
@@crystalscott9948 sooo inconsistencies based on the interviews? The inconsistencies matter the most if its from the discovery of physical evidence and testimonies from other witnesses. Inconsistencies from her own words is not enough to dictate whether it is true or not, thats why we use multiple forms of evidence. Going off of what she has said in interviews is not reliable, especially if they are not asking her the questions that should be asked. We already know that some interviewers will ask or pressure people to admit to things that never even happened.
@@Camille_Janai granted we haven’t gotten to discovery, you, like me and every other somebody that is commenting, is going off what WE already know which is what she reported in her official lawsuit AND what she said in her interview, why what she said in her interview not hold up in court when it’s suppose be HER words? They may not have asked her certain questions or what ever you think that should have been deemed legal but nothing about her interview that we saw showed she was being manipulated they allowed her to tell her story and as far as witnesses are concerned if there is more I guess we will know more about them too in discovery, if her dad( witness) had of corroborated her story would he still be a witness, or is his account not valid because he didn’t say what most wanted him to say?
@ all that you just said...does not change my point at all. Once again, that is why we use multiple forms of evidence, not just her words. What I said isn't even based off of her case specifically, its general fact. It applies to any case. So if all we have is her words so far....you need to hush and let the courts do their job lol. My point still stands. This is normal protocol, they were not going to dismiss her case at this point anyways. They may dismiss it later on when they have looked at MORE EVIDENCE, but as of now, they are not dismissing it. Thats what you all do not get when this is basic stuff.
@ I have no problem what so ever about letting this play out in court, as far as her word that’s how we got here, also what I said still stands, I don’t need you to explain to me this is protocol I am also very well aware this case wasn’t going to be dismissed this early, as we haven’t made it to discovery! I’m still till entitled to my opinions!
I think it's obvious that Spiro has succeeded only in pissing off the judge with all these motions. Not a great start. Thank you for these videos..
He definitely hasn’t gotten on her good side with all of this. In fairness, he hasn’t exactly lost anything either, because that motion never had any chance of being granted in the first place.
You’re welcome, and thanks so much for watching! 🙏🏾
I got to be 100, I thought the case would be thrown out due to the “ victim’s inconsistent statements!! She better be ready to go if this case goes to trial , the cross examination is going to be brutal!!
I appreciate the honesty! You’re not alone. I’m sure there were a bunch of folks who thought it was going to be dismissed, but that’s just not how the process works. Very rarely are cases thrown out like that.
But yes, if it gets to trial, they will have quite the field day with her on cross…
She will be treated as a hostile witness
Buzzbee knows what he is doing. On that interview he just exposed to the public that she is autistic. That's all that interview was about. Even you can tell that something happened to you years ago and have many inconsistencies. That doesn't mean it didnt happen.
Remember, she is autistic. Look up the laws concerning victims with disabilities.
If the allegations are true ,no one knew her name back then , would that count for anything?
She said Jay's lawyer is too agressive...this is sounding like a one sided, biased judge
He probably was. So much is at stake for Jay Z.
They all in cahoots to make jayz give up his money this is a take down shake down.
At this point who cares if she stays anonymous or not that nbc interview is going to be the nail in the coffin for her let this dumb stuff play out
I know drama sales and some of us are at home praying on hateful 💩. But there isn't any case?
Ok you did the follow up. Thanks
You’re welcome! 👊🏾
The bad press is just not worth it. I’m not saying he should have settled out of court, but….I just don’t know.
Tough call.
The issue is once u settle.. then other girls can try to use the same tactic as a money grab, so then Jay will have to settle with others that will look at it as an opportunity to get money.. like those kids did with Micheal jackson
Thank you for making it plain.
No need for making it bigger than it is, nor sensationalizing it. Just want to give it to you straight! Thanks Debrah! Unique spelling of your name. I’ve never seen it spelled that way!
Keep Going!
That’s the plan, King. Thank you! 👊🏾
She lied on every single point. The crooked judge still keeping this BS case around. I don't hate people I don't know but I can't wait to meet you people.
The judge is not crooked. There was no possible way the case was going to be dismissed at this point no matter who the judge was.
@@JamahlKersey Wasn't the Duke lacrosse rape case thrown out at this point because accusers story didn't make sense?
@@JamahlKersey , so you are stating that even though the judge knows every part of her story was false, it has to go through the whole process to the end? Maybe another year or two and smear an innocent man's name Further?
@@LT-em1vu um, courts have protocols they have to follow regardless of whether a random civilian like you thinks it is true or false. This is to ensure that they do their job thoroughly, and make sure nothing is rushed and any important details are not missed. Rushing the process is not beneficial for the accuser OR Jay Z. We do not have access to ALL the information that the jury, attorneys, and the judge have to go through. We don't see every piece of info that the Feds have. We don't know every plan/step that they are going to take yet. This is normal protocol and some of you all are still too ignorant to realize that. This is how cases like this operate
Great Judge👏👏
Good for the judge
They know who it is keep it real
I’m not jumping to that conclusion.
Good! Glad he didn’t throw it out and will see his wrong doing through!
Thank goodness the case was not dropped. Who knows what would happen to her? Her life is in danger.
No! I knew the female judge would give the disabled victim in a situation that's debilitated her for life to at least present her case. I think the case will give us unexpected surprises. Crazy Diddy's minding his own business& not engaging in this case. 😅😅
Even if Jane Doe were not autistic, the judge would not have dismissed this case.
There will almost surely be some surprises and revelations.
Diddy and his lawyers would be smart to just keep quiet throughout this process.
There is no justice system in the usa.
Did she deny to throw out the case or Deny motion for the “victim” to remain anonymous? Which one is it?
She denied the motion to dismiss. She granted “Jane Doe’s” motion to proceed anonymously.
That’s not what I read in judge response, she said she can proceed anonymously!
@@SuperKillerdog
The fact is, it's continuing and we all will find out.
I can't wait.
@@SuperKillerdog The judge (granted) plaintiff's motion to remain anonymous for now, until discovery is presented.
Yeah I know! The judge hasn’t denied the motion to dismiss the case! That is what am saying. The judge only granted the motion to for the “fake Jane doe” to remain anonymous!
If they committed the crime, they know who it is. She might have gotten the date wrong. She was thirteen.
That’s a very big “if”, but yes, if they did it, they should very well know who it is.
Judges aren't going to entertain anyone on the list
3rd appearance is the due date
Let's say the judge had agreed to throw out the Jay Z case before it went to trial, then lots of people would be outraged and would think he was guilty and had got away with it. So by the judge insisting that the case goes ahead, Jay Z has the chance to definitively prove he is innocent, and that will silence his critics. So far the case against him seems remarkably weak from the Jane Doe claims so far, as there seems to be no evidence to support her and her claims are full of mistakes. There is a massive lesson one can learn from Michael Jackson, he had false accusers, but he paid them off for a quiet life. But he regretted that, as it just opened doors for other false accusers. Diddy has tons of accusers, so far Jay Z just has this one. I dont think he would make such a public stand if he was guilty, but if he was guilty I think he would have quietly had talks with Buzbee and paid off the accuser, like possibly celebrity B has done. I think Buzbee thought Jay Z would do a Michael Jackson, and pay up just for a quiet life, even though he was innocent. Unless there is film, it is just the word of hers against his, and it may well turn out she is just another lying opportunist, like Jag, Mesha, copying other real victims experience and pretending it is hers. The you realise the "victims" are the predators, and the "predators" are actually the victims.
LMAO, HES GUILTY ALREADY. REMEMBER Aaliyah, she was 14, he was 20.
All those years ago .she didn't come forth she shouldn't have a case where was her mom did she go to hospital or doctor if not she has no case❤
All those years ago celebrity B watching didn't report it to law enforcement..
@wakanda6547 They should be Arrested ,if it's true ..
Great voice, great analysis, great suit 😊
Check, check, and check! Thanks Lisa! 😉
@@JamahlKersey 💕
I WANT THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM OPEN THE CASE FOR JZ SON HE DENIES & THE DEATH OF HIS MOTHER & HER AGE WHEN SHE WAS INPREGNATED & THE AGE OF JZ AT THE TIME🤨🤨🤨 JUSTICE FOR JZ SON🙏🏾🧚🏾♀️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Nothing to open, that adult MAN need to go and find his real dad! He has been clout chasing.
I believe he’s guilty. Birds of a feather.
So if your friend is a theif. He/she has a habit of going around stealing cars , taking batteries out of parked cars. Now, By that being your friend. Associate. Does that make you accomplice to those crimes?
So if your friend is into sucking toes that means u are into it too??
the law says that anyone accused of a crime has the right to face their accuser in the court of law so whats going on here?is it straight up extortion???
It could be for her protection. Remember Jay Z said he would do ANYTHING to clear his name. Let's call this an exigent circumstance.
It's for protection that never came to your mind
Witness protection of course.. these thugs murder people.
Jay Z has not been charged with any crime. He is, however, accusing Buzbee of extortion and now defamation.
@@JamahlKersey
He bout to run into a wall with that one.
That decision speaks volumes. Check.
Respectfully, to me it doesn’t, because the motion never had a chance of being granted in the first place.
@@JamahlKersey That was my point.
Jamahl, good afternoon! Listen I understand that in the normal filing procedure of a law suit, Mr Buzby feels that his undertaking was proper in asking JZ for a confidential mediation.
It appears to me that Mr Buzby knowing the status of JZ, he would have just sent JZ a letter of presentment, stating the allegations a client of his is making against him.
Therefore, by apprising JZ of the possibility of a future law suit, JZ's attorneys would have saw the allegations as that, allegations and not "extortion."
So do u see Mr Buzby as wrong by not giving "deference" to JZ? Thank you!
Hii. Change your TH-cam name to: J. Kersey Law - easier to find and remember.
Otherwise informative and nice video. (My first and only comment on TH-cam PERIOD! 😂)
I appreciate the suggestion, Marie! Wow, first and only, and you used it to help me. That means a lot. Thank you! 🙏🏾
Great voice.
Thanks Marije! 🙏🏾
@JamahlKersey 😉
Looks like Jay Finally got that 100th Problem
Aww man… 😅
Am coming from the number 1 spot😂
I heard this in Ludacris’ voice! 😆
Im so tired of the description of these clicks use false info to get you to watch them. Come on youtube can we change this please?😢😢
What are you talking about? There’s nothing false about what I said.
@@JamahlKerseylol some people just SMH you are doing a great job keep it up
Expected...
I truly believed Jayz is guilty because he was Diddy best friends, and they were all doing things together..bird of feathers flocks together
He truly don't care what you think, never have, never will
@Ivanblock757 it doesn't matter . If he cares what I think, it's just the truth and all facts..
@VelmaStephenson ok Karen, go ahead and think you know it all
@Ivanblock757 why is it you people call a person Karen when they speak the truth for your concern? i am a black woman, not a Karen and all the evil things lots of these rich people did from in their past just coming back to haunt them, the truth is an offense to criminals but the truth will always remain the truth, GOD love the truth and I am not being biased I be watching Jayz Diddy Tupac R kelly Mary J Blige all of these rappers artists and actors actresses i always loved watching them i loved all my black people i don't carried grudge for any but when you did evil to any human beings u will not go unpunished remember doesn't matter how long it takes GOD sits high and HE looks low and GOD will give everyone what they all deserve if you did good you will reap good and if you did bad you will reap bad seriously it's the truth, you will always get back whatever you did to other human beings your rewards is always great in whatever you did good or bad..
@@Ivanblock7570:01
You are all over the net calling ppl names and racist innuendos.
This community is respectful with those whose opinions differ, take a hike bully!
So here's a connection that is 🧐.....Joel Madden , ok, Cameron Diaz is his wife. She has a movie out with Jaime Fox now. She left Hollweird fir a reason. Fox has said Diddy tried to off him. Everyone's tied together.
That is wild.
I love your content.
I appreciate that. Thanks for watching! 🙏🏾