R/T really tired.... I think the charger actually opted for the Nighttime R/T for the sniffling, sneezing, stuffy head, fever so you can rest R/T medicine...
Those old Torinos could dip into the high 12"s with very little work. I remember a certain guy with an LS-6 Chevelle that spent half a summer trying to best sn ol Yellow Torino with the Drag-pak option. He spent the other half trying to raise enough loot to rebuild his engine.
Dan Myers I was thinking a little higher like 6300 give or take but 7500 no way. I’ve got a big block ford in a 50 f1, and this thing is built and I don’t come any where near 7500, tops is 6900. Also standing on your brakes doing a burnout is lame, any mini van will do the same, if your not heating the tires for a serious run it’s just stupid.
You're right, it wasn't 7,500 RPM's. As a world-renowned expert in estimating engine RPM's, I can confidently state that he was hitting 9,763 rpms right there. It's actually common to rev big blocks over 9,500 RPM's. 😁
Buddy of mine had a 429SCJ Torino, we had a 67 G.T. 500 and a 68 G.T. 350. All were great cars but compared to modern cars felt slow. But, but I still miss those cars, they had character.
I'd say this is high 4000s rpms, not over 5000 for sure. Well, it did kill these skinny old rubber tires tho, props to him. The engine sounds pretty amazing too. One of the few ford's I'd say with confidence I really like it
@@dbc1dc 6k is waaaaay too high for this. My ol' 318 redlines at 4850 and surely sounds like it's over 5500. Sound deceits a lot, but this is surely not over 5k, at least not over 5500
That was my first car and might I add that's a real man's car 💪🇺🇸. I remember laying slabs in my 1970 Torino with a 429 super Cobra jet and then not only will it last slab but it would dig up the asphalt.
@James Bond A friend of mine used to have a 68 Coronet with a home built high compression 413 and that car would rip up the pavement too. With big tires and a little weight in the trunk it would leave two faint marks on the street that looked like burnout marks at a glance but were actually lines where the top layer of tiny rocks were stripped from the pavement.
@@5.9manualzj Thanks, I saw you are messing with a 5.9 Magnum Jeep. Car Craft Magazine listed my car as one of the top ten budget builds of the 2018 Hot Rod Power Tour because I put a 5.9 Magnum in my 68 Satellite and have been daily driving it for years. It has a 4 barrel Holley carb and air gap intake replacing the stock EFI with a lot of custom home porting on the carb and intake both. It also has Hooker headers and a badass cam and valve spring kit with Cloyes double roller timing chain and tensioner from Hughes Engines in Illinois that specializes in Mopar Magnum performance. The cam was selected by Dave Hughes himself to perform as good as possible with my setup. The engine turns over 6K RPM, makes over 400 HP and 450 TQ and pushes my "big" old car to 8.61 in the eighth mile with sub 2 second 60 foot times which puts my low compression home built junkyard small block in the same ballpark as a lot of supercharged modern muscle cars like the factory supercharged 650 HP 2018 ZO6 Corvette which is only about a half a second away depending on who's driving it. I also have a NOS 100 shot kit put away for it too but I want to get my tune as close to perfect as possible first to reduce the chances of catastrophic failures.
@@Impactjunky Hell yeah. That all sounds really sweet! This old Jeep was my first car. Came as a 5.2 base model Laredo. I swapped a 5.9 in because the first engine was trash from the previous owner, and eventually down the road, looked into a whole manual swap. these never came as V8s with a standard shifting transmission. Its rare enough to find a manual with the 4.0, which was produced briefly from around 93-95, but a few other similar vehicles of its time came as manuals with a Magnum V8, in my case, it was the Dodge Dakota. The Nv3500 from specicially 94 Dakotas had the shift tower 7" backward for some reason, and was difficult to source, but fit the closest to stock without any modifications/fabrications aside from the crossmember. it bolted right up to this 5.9 with average parts store parts. It's not the fastest, but it sure does motivate, and its a lot of fun to drive. nothing beats a V8 with manually shifting gears. I love old stories like this because it feels like real racing is all dead now, and everyone just owns a hellcat these days. back in the day, there were still ways to be fast & have fun & be a local legend without having to street over 800hp
I've always had a love for these cars especially the first two generation body types the GT, Cobra Jet, Super Cobra Jet love em all. I like the Clint Eastwood and the Starsky and Hutch Gran Torino body style too to a lesser extent.
Definitely agree, I've always been a Ford Lover, mainly the Mustangs. But recently I've been really falling in Love with the 70 Torino Cobra, that Cobra front end is so Sinister Looking to me, and i like the Cobra Taillights much better than the Very Long GT,s and regular Torino's. I'm really looking into one day getting one as a nice Cruiser for the Weekends, i really would like a Drag Pak Optioned one with the SCJ, Top Loader 4-Speed, Detroit Locker with 4.30,s Just for i nice Cruiser, maybe a few trips to the Dragstrip, i already got a dedicated Car for the Dragstrip already, Not to Street Friendly anymore, But i Definitely need Another BBF Powered Toy, but More Streetable, and Still be able to Go Low 12,s in the 1/4 we'll see. I'm really liking the Torino's, like yourself.
Outstanding burnout, car and engine - no question about it. 7500 rpm? that's click bait. 7500-8000 rpm was full race Pro/Stock rpm for those engines in their day. Educated guess I'll say 6000 - 6200 max.
If your engine was factory original, then 7500 rpm was impossible. The valves would float, and the lack of blueprinting and balancing would cause it to explode like a grenade. I might believe 6,000 rpm in stock form.
To every person that Comments "Definitely Not 7500 rpm" Who freaking cares everyone. Everyone thinks there a Human Tachometer. And to everyone else saying the "Rods will be on the ground" and "No Way it can turn that rpm" To everyone that thinks all This, You're All Dead Wrong and Obviously never owned a 429 or 460 Based Big Ford. Cause there one of the most Durable Engines produced in that era, they definitely weren't the Big Horsepower or Torque Kings, But a Strong Durable Engine that was just designed to be well over 500 cubes From the factory. Just look at the Bore Spacing, Deck Height, Enormous Room in the Bottom End. To me the 429-460 Fords are one of the Best Foundations to build something strong, something that'll last, and something that'll make big power.
0:32 she said "I can't believe he treats it like that" shhhhhit I'd be doin the same shit in my Camaro if I was sure the engine wouldn't blow up are you fuckin kiddin me LOL
More like 5800-6000 rpm power brake, with the valve float rev limiter. Not a burnout, and definitely not 7500 rpm the asphalt would have a fresh oil bath, if it got even close to 7500.
A 429 SCJ will definitely rev to 7500 without leaving a "fresh oil bath" it's got a nice Solid Lifter Cam, and a somewhat decent valvetrain from the Factory. I've turned my BBF up to 7200 All the time at the Strip, Definitely Not during a Burnout, There's No reason to.
@@badass6.0powerstroke10 with a measly 375 hp at only 5600 rpm peak even with a fairly high 11.3:1 compression ratio. Turning a scj more than 6k is just making noise and trying to window the block. It sure as hell isn’t making any power up there. And those old ferds were famous for oiling down the asphalt.
The guy in this Super Cobra Jet Torino must spend a lot of money on rear tires??? I don't know, I'm not really impressed with burnouts. Beautiful car though.
@@kuiper6926 The 1970 Ford 460 was rated @ 365 HP My right foot told a different story, just glad that when I saw the two long tire marks in the rear view mirror that posi-traction axle was a surprise added to my second hand Mark III . That was 50 years ago, but it seems like yesterday!
Tough act for that Charger to follow.
R/T really tired.... I think the charger actually opted for the Nighttime R/T for the sniffling, sneezing, stuffy head, fever so you can rest R/T medicine...
One of the best looking Ford's ever built...period.
The Mad Max Falcon interceptor looks like the evil twin to that Torino !
Yes and the 66 Galaxy 500 XL ! Great looking beautiful cars !…….
Seen a million burnouts and done many but never as smooth as that . When "Burnout" is looked up this should be the definition .
Look up Australian Burnouts
@@DriftBrah86 yes but it never looks this good and is never stock . This came from the factory pretty close to this .
Car is to heavy for the rear to want to pass the front thats why its stable.
👍😎
Yep you never meet an Australian huh
pure american muscle that charger didn't have a chance with that 429 cobra
Guaranteed the driver of the charger had on skinny jeans.
Was definitely a hard act to follow.
@@Sandhill1988
LOL! Yes, his name is Jamie Bond.
Those old Torinos could dip into the high 12"s with very little work. I remember a certain guy with an LS-6 Chevelle that spent half a summer trying to best sn ol Yellow Torino with the Drag-pak option.
He spent the other half trying to raise enough loot to rebuild his engine.
Cool but I have been around drag racing all my life and that was not “7000 rpm”. Sounded more like 5-6000 maybe.
Dan Myers I was thinking a little higher like 6300 give or take but 7500 no way. I’ve got a big block ford in a 50 f1, and this thing is built and I don’t come any where near 7500, tops is 6900. Also standing on your brakes doing a burnout is lame, any mini van will do the same, if your not heating the tires for a serious run it’s just stupid.
@@GeorgeMcKinley. bruh thinks doing a burnout is stupid 😂🤮
You're right, it wasn't 7,500 RPM's. As a world-renowned expert in estimating engine RPM's, I can confidently state that he was hitting 9,763 rpms right there. It's actually common to rev big blocks over 9,500 RPM's. 😁
And that noisy valve train, as we sit judging in armchairs looking at glowing cube sucking in our brains
@@HighlanderNorth1 I've done some sampling of the recording on a spectrum analyzer, I believe you have the correct answer
All metal, full power
Buddy of mine had a 429SCJ Torino, we had a 67 G.T. 500 and a 68 G.T. 350. All were great cars but compared to modern cars felt slow. But, but I still miss those cars, they had character.
Haha that charger was pitiful after watching that big block cobra shred a set of bf Goodrichs!!! Lol
I'd say this is high 4000s rpms, not over 5000 for sure. Well, it did kill these skinny old rubber tires tho, props to him. The engine sounds pretty amazing too. One of the few ford's I'd say with confidence I really like it
I was thinking between 5-6k, definitely not 7500. That would launch the rods right through the oil pan.
@@dbc1dc 6k is waaaaay too high for this. My ol' 318 redlines at 4850 and surely sounds like it's over 5500. Sound deceits a lot, but this is surely not over 5k, at least not over 5500
That was my first car and might I add that's a real man's car 💪🇺🇸. I remember laying slabs in my 1970 Torino with a 429 super Cobra jet and then not only will it last slab but it would dig up the asphalt.
@James Bond A friend of mine used to have a 68 Coronet with a home built high compression 413 and that car would rip up the pavement too. With big tires and a little weight in the trunk it would leave two faint marks on the street that looked like burnout marks at a glance but were actually lines where the top layer of tiny rocks were stripped from the pavement.
@@Impactjunky 😎👍
@@Impactjunky love stories like this haha
@@5.9manualzj Thanks, I saw you are messing with a 5.9 Magnum Jeep. Car Craft Magazine listed my car as one of the top ten budget builds of the 2018 Hot Rod Power Tour because I put a 5.9 Magnum in my 68 Satellite and have been daily driving it for years. It has a 4 barrel Holley carb and air gap intake replacing the stock EFI with a lot of custom home porting on the carb and intake both. It also has Hooker headers and a badass cam and valve spring kit with Cloyes double roller timing chain and tensioner from Hughes Engines in Illinois that specializes in Mopar Magnum performance. The cam was selected by Dave Hughes himself to perform as good as possible with my setup. The engine turns over 6K RPM, makes over 400 HP and 450 TQ and pushes my "big" old car to 8.61 in the eighth mile with sub 2 second 60 foot times which puts my low compression home built junkyard small block in the same ballpark as a lot of supercharged modern muscle cars like the factory supercharged 650 HP 2018 ZO6 Corvette which is only about a half a second away depending on who's driving it. I also have a NOS 100 shot kit put away for it too but I want to get my tune as close to perfect as possible first to reduce the chances of catastrophic failures.
@@Impactjunky Hell yeah. That all sounds really sweet! This old Jeep was my first car. Came as a 5.2 base model Laredo. I swapped a 5.9 in because the first engine was trash from the previous owner, and eventually down the road, looked into a whole manual swap. these never came as V8s with a standard shifting transmission. Its rare enough to find a manual with the 4.0, which was produced briefly from around 93-95, but a few other similar vehicles of its time came as manuals with a Magnum V8, in my case, it was the Dodge Dakota. The Nv3500 from specicially 94 Dakotas had the shift tower 7" backward for some reason, and was difficult to source, but fit the closest to stock without any modifications/fabrications aside from the crossmember. it bolted right up to this 5.9 with average parts store parts. It's not the fastest, but it sure does motivate, and its a lot of fun to drive. nothing beats a V8 with manually shifting gears. I love old stories like this because it feels like real racing is all dead now, and everyone just owns a hellcat these days. back in the day, there were still ways to be fast & have fun & be a local legend without having to street over 800hp
Old muscle cars never die!!
Regardless of rpm, it's a very good burnout.
Ohhh Yess Old School Muscle
Nice to see someone that hates tires as much as I do.
That charger was embarrassing😂
I've always had a love for these cars especially the first two generation body types the GT, Cobra Jet, Super Cobra Jet love em all. I like the Clint Eastwood and the Starsky and Hutch Gran Torino body style too to a lesser extent.
Definitely agree, I've always been a Ford Lover, mainly the Mustangs. But recently I've been really falling in Love with the 70 Torino Cobra, that Cobra front end is so Sinister Looking to me, and i like the Cobra Taillights much better than the Very Long GT,s and regular Torino's. I'm really looking into one day getting one as a nice Cruiser for the Weekends, i really would like a Drag Pak Optioned one with the SCJ, Top Loader 4-Speed, Detroit Locker with 4.30,s Just for i nice Cruiser, maybe a few trips to the Dragstrip, i already got a dedicated Car for the Dragstrip already, Not to Street Friendly anymore, But i Definitely need Another BBF Powered Toy, but More Streetable, and Still be able to Go Low 12,s in the 1/4 we'll see. I'm really liking the Torino's, like yourself.
@@badass6.0powerstroke10 I dig your plan.👍🏽
Like we said in the Navy "Smoke em if you got em".
A mans mans car
Outstanding burnout, car and engine - no question about it.
7500 rpm? that's click bait.
7500-8000 rpm was full race Pro/Stock rpm for those engines in their day.
Educated guess I'll say 6000 - 6200 max.
On my 72 Torino 351CJ with Polyglas H 70 14's my burnout no line lock i put down a 96 foot rubber mark.
Yes, no way 7500 rpm. The engine can probably do 7500 but that wasn't 7500 and that cam would certainly not peak at that kind of rpm.
I agree from what I can see on the specs that motor redlines at 6000. Pretty rare motor to push that hard for a burnout.
Put that Dodge in the garage
Ford 429 SCJ engines were highly underrated HP for insurance reasons. True HP was 450+
You God Damn Right, the Boss 351 in 1971 was another highly underrated Ford Canted Valve Monster.
Actually, more like 410 or so max horsepower at around 5000 rpm. Their strong suit was torque, around 480 lb/ft.
@@1965l88 My '70 429 SCJ had 460 HP on the engine dyno after I did a mild rebuild.
@@sergeantmasson3669 "mild rebuild" with a 279 duration cam, nothing special
@@kuiper6926 Try again. Ford 429 SCJ engine, 300 degrees duration and 506 lift camshaft.
Mean machine!
Those valves are like hey bud idk if we got your back on this one hehehe
If your engine was factory original, then 7500 rpm was impossible. The valves would float, and the lack of blueprinting and balancing would cause it to explode like a grenade. I might believe 6,000 rpm in stock form.
Love torino,s ❤❤❤
Talk about holding it straight. Daang😅❤
Sounds like 5,000 rpm.
I just don't understand why the Ford with the hi rpms don't win on race day
That's awesome
Murica F'Yeah!
Look up Australian burnouts and re evaluate
@@jimmyj2563 you guys are good down under, i appreciate seeing the 351 cleveland aussie style✌🏎
My first car was a 71 torino gt I paid 500 dollars for it at 35 dollars a week. One of the best cars I ever had.
Wish I could afford to do that.
Getting it done
Pointless unless you’re running slicks. Really only about 5000 rpm. But a good show nonetheless.
What are you a human Tachometer ? And what do Slicks have anything to do with doing a Burnout at a Car Show ? C'mon man are you serious ?
I agree, no way that was 7500rpm
To every person that Comments "Definitely Not 7500 rpm" Who freaking cares everyone. Everyone thinks there a Human Tachometer. And to everyone else saying the "Rods will be on the ground" and "No Way it can turn that rpm" To everyone that thinks all This, You're All Dead Wrong and Obviously never owned a 429 or 460 Based Big Ford. Cause there one of the most Durable Engines produced in that era, they definitely weren't the Big Horsepower or Torque Kings, But a Strong Durable Engine that was just designed to be well over 500 cubes From the factory. Just look at the Bore Spacing, Deck Height, Enormous Room in the Bottom End. To me the 429-460 Fords are one of the Best Foundations to build something strong, something that'll last, and something that'll make big power.
Use to do all the time leaving stop signs with my 455 stage 1 without using the brakes 😁😁😁😁
Oh wow using Line Lock brake on a burn out.
0:32 she said "I can't believe he treats it like that" shhhhhit I'd be doin the same shit in my Camaro if I was sure the engine wouldn't blow up are you fuckin kiddin me LOL
More like 5800-6000 rpm power brake, with the valve float rev limiter. Not a burnout, and definitely not 7500 rpm the asphalt would have a fresh oil bath, if it got even close to 7500.
We should have seen asphalt ripped up
A 429 SCJ will definitely rev to 7500 without leaving a "fresh oil bath" it's got a nice Solid Lifter Cam, and a somewhat decent valvetrain from the Factory. I've turned my BBF up to 7200 All the time at the Strip, Definitely Not during a Burnout, There's No reason to.
@@badass6.0powerstroke10 with a measly 375 hp at only 5600 rpm peak even with a fairly high 11.3:1 compression ratio. Turning a scj more than 6k is just making noise and trying to window the block. It sure as hell isn’t making any power up there. And those old ferds were famous for oiling down the asphalt.
@@prestonrieger8410 if you say so, i Never had any of those issues with my Fords. Shit, mine don't even leak any drips of oil.
he needs to try that burnout with a set of 14x32'' goodyear slicks
Damn
Well.......You better believe it! (Lady in the back ground)
sounds like a chainsaw on my cellphone
Rods stayed in it!
Of course, it is a Ford. Maybe your just use to the GM Stuff. There bottem ends like to see Daylight more often than a 429 SCJ. Dr. Olds.
Nice ride, but that must have 3:18 gears and a 1800 stall.
The Charger burnout was pretty sad !……
Nothing like a high Rev cam...music
The guy in this Super Cobra Jet Torino must spend a lot of money on rear tires???
I don't know, I'm not really impressed with burnouts. Beautiful car though.
429 SCJ arn’t meant for high rpms
That is what 500 Horsepower looks and sounds like !
Truly not lmao, around 410 gross. Ford had a bad habit of overrating their power outputs
@@kuiper6926 The 1970 Ford 460 was rated @ 365 HP My right foot told a different story, just glad that when I saw the two long tire marks in the rear view mirror that posi-traction axle was a surprise added to my second hand Mark III . That was 50 years ago, but it seems like yesterday!
That's not a burn out. That is power braking.
What’s been done to that 429?
That 4 door charger was wimpy👎
Why are people obsessed with burnouts ?
It's fun
ford burnout +1
mopar burnout -1
You're not comparing a base v8 modern charger to a torino on skinny tires and a big block are you?
@@kuiper6926 the wheels on both cars have the original dimensions !
@@kuiper6926 and the newer charger have a 5.7 hemi. this thing have power !
@@a.k.a.A.E. the 5.7 is weak, not to mention its driven by a 5spd auto with long ratios
Does anybody have a spare set of tires,?
Also should’ve grabbed another
7,500?
New muscle sucks compared to the old it's all about Horsepower now That Torino had something they call Torque and Horsepower !!!
“I can’t believe he treats it like that” - Women it’s built for that MAGA
Should have put it in second
Ain`t no 7500.
7500 rpm my ass.
Not even close to 7500, maybe 5500 maybe.
dude,put the car in drive.jesus.
Bullshit!.... nowhere near 7500....that engine is NOT capable of twisting that high. Guaranteed.
There's no way that was 7500 rpm those pistons would have went pop maybe 5500 or 6000...
In one spot sucks
That junk Ford couldn't rev to 7 Grand