Improving Air Flow And Displacement On Our Cheap Cherokee's Straight Six - Trucks! S11, E7

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 462

  • @abovegroundgarage
    @abovegroundgarage 4 ปีที่แล้ว +110

    Sunday morning with Stacey David made my childhood weekends something to look forward too

    • @tonypage1525
      @tonypage1525 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      GEARZ

    • @robblowe8525
      @robblowe8525 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I started watching got rod tv and was a addicted from there

    • @abovegroundgarage
      @abovegroundgarage 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hot rod and Got rod tv are two different things, I think Got rod tv was toward the end of the channel listings

    • @johngeorge4731
      @johngeorge4731 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed! These were my "Saturday morning cartoons"

    • @immelting9834
      @immelting9834 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too.

  • @TwentytenS4B8
    @TwentytenS4B8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    4:58 Engine assembly is a little more than just torque spec and sequence although those are vital. Your bearing and piston clearances matter just as much if not more. Also piston ring end gap depending on your plans. You want to open them up if going with a power adder unless you like busted ring lands. And checking the end gap should be standard in any build unless you like blowby on a new engine. Too much crankshaft thrust clearance? You might end up driving over the crankshaft the first time you give it the beans. Just got your block back from the machine shop after a line hone and overbore? Check the clearances on the pistons and bearings. Never just assume all is copacetic. And don't spin the crankshaft until all the main caps are torqued to spec. The mains are not round until they are torqued and spinning the crank before the mains are torqued means you run the risk of scuffing the bearings and possibly the journals.

    • @corymetzker818
      @corymetzker818 ปีที่แล้ว

      Or maybe everything was already measured and checked before hand........ for television time and such

    • @MeatPez
      @MeatPez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They actually did btw. That aside, those low reving straight sixes are MUCH more forgiving and actually thrive in slightly looser tolerances relative to newer or performance specs.

  • @oby-1607
    @oby-1607 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    We had a 1988 Jeep Cherokee and it took us to all the fishing lakes around us in a 150 mile radius. But the body rusted out and the transmission failed and the engine had countless issues. But we loved it for what it could do.

  • @partsisparts9568
    @partsisparts9568 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    What happened to finishing the 4.6 build? Dyno results? I was interested in finding out how you tuned it with the FI system?

    • @seniorxj2931
      @seniorxj2931 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My thoughts exactly!

  • @Limeyfrog
    @Limeyfrog 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Love XJs. Watching from Europe. I couldn't get this kind of info anywhere else. Love the show. Keep going.

    • @colormesarge
      @colormesarge 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bleepin' Jeep if you haven't come across them yet.

    • @shepardsinsequence
      @shepardsinsequence 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Love y’all from Europe, from Phoenix AZ USA 🇺🇸❤️ Europe

    • @mikedavidson1437
      @mikedavidson1437 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shepardsinsequence q1!!+!q

    • @loganthesaint
      @loganthesaint 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know you love them... I happen to work on them for a living. I don’t have nice things to say. However, I own an Xj.

  • @Godwinsgarage-jackofalltrades
    @Godwinsgarage-jackofalltrades 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    As a hig school student weekend mornings were spent watching speed TV

  • @Timman57
    @Timman57 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    How is it i just watched the last episode and was searching for the next segment and then this finally pops up the day after, talk about lucky

    • @BarnStangz
      @BarnStangz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was thinking the same thing... Good thing for Google's AI.

    • @BobTheStrangeMan
      @BobTheStrangeMan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      SAME

  • @lancemiller6039
    @lancemiller6039 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    thanks for the cost break down! wish all shows did that!

  • @UCMJ_Family_Law_Expert
    @UCMJ_Family_Law_Expert 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    From less than 50 horsepower to a brand new motor. I can only imagine the difference for the owner.

  • @corporalpunishment1133
    @corporalpunishment1133 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You guys are killin it, awesome videos dudes I like the fact it's a budget build not a make 1000hp build keep up the good work. Your video production is excellent I love it.

  • @brantardrey7360
    @brantardrey7360 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I started mechanics in 68 on Stingray bikes and lawn mowers right around 70 I took into machine work in high school and rebuilt a go-kart engine for myself took a year and I was introduced to head porting in 71 and somewhere late 70s I took a hand at it but all through the 80s and 90s I did head work porting on my own and sold heads built things buy and sell engine parts I know that that Jeep engine is capable of 300 horsepower with proper head work and some compression and a cam head porting takes a long time to do a set of V8 heads can take 40 hours if you're doing it right and doing it meticulous and Blueprinting but it sure does make a difference

  • @mitchellpatterson1829
    @mitchellpatterson1829 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One thing I should point out, they kept saying "Cherokee rods" and "Cherokee pistons" this WILL NOT WORK with a 258 crank. The 4.0 has a deck height of 9.45". If you use the 6.125 connecting rods on the 3.895" stroke of the 258 crank it will shove the piston about a quarter inch into the head. The 4.0 piston has a compressed height of 1.601" so you can either use the 258 connecting rods, which will increase your quench height, and make the engine sensitive to fuel, or get custom pistons with a +/- 1.3" compressed height. The second option maintains the total combustion volume, and lets you run the same fuel as a stock 4.0L.

  • @riskybiscuit5594
    @riskybiscuit5594 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You guys really know how to keep me coming back.

  • @Arthagnou
    @Arthagnou 4 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    someone should have designed a tunnel port exhaust style head for the jeep...the 4.0 was so durable because it wasnt powerful enought to hurt itself.

    • @WilliamAaronson
      @WilliamAaronson 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      2j swap the jeep, call it supajeep

    • @GIXXERyan
      @GIXXERyan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Haha exactly! It better last forever it makes low power and doesn’t rev.

    • @chrish5096
      @chrish5096 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Exactly what an Older guy told me when i went to rebuild my ford 300i6. Told me its prolly the best motor i coulda picked to rebuild bc its durable and doesnt have enough hp to do damage to itself if im not perfect with everything

    • @countryjoe3551
      @countryjoe3551 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's typical for all the old Detroit straight 6 engines. They wouldn't turn high enough to hurt themselves. There is really nothing that magical about them.

    • @revolutionday1
      @revolutionday1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Edelbrock makes an aluminum head for this engine.....IF you can find one.

  • @matthemberry
    @matthemberry 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Idk about removing part of the squish band to get back 3 points of compression. Seems like one step forward and two back.

    • @vengeanceizmine9878
      @vengeanceizmine9878 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Optimally, it should have been done with the correct piston. But you are correct. He should have just left it alone. A 9.6 with good quench is better than 9.3 with no quench.. Especially with an iron head and pump fuel.

  • @camthekiller121
    @camthekiller121 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I worked on a mint 2004 4L Cherokee at work today, had an oil leak but that was about it still ran pretty good

    • @shawnbrodrick8673
      @shawnbrodrick8673 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The only longevity issue is the loss of zinc in motor oil,but you can use an additive

  • @Dave5843-d9m
    @Dave5843-d9m 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    David Vizard is the absolute top man for engine breathing. The stuff he did with the Austin A Series (Mini) is stunning.

  • @firstnamelastnameisallowed7943
    @firstnamelastnameisallowed7943 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am still baffled at jeeps decision to discontinue the 4.0L. It was like the cummins of the gasoline engine! Sounds great, awesome torque, would run forever if you dont EVER over heat them! Inline six......ok you get the point. Stock 4 liter is a good engine but the 4.6 like they are building here is just badass!! I have done a few over the years in YJ's and TJ's that had a blown 2.5L so we did the bigboy swap and man its amazing the difference and how happy our customers were. Believe it or not the swap is very simple to do also! Engine mounts are the only welding you need to do and those almost fall into place on their own! Cant wait to see what this engine puts out that they are building!!

    • @billgates1682
      @billgates1682 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Poor efficiency.

    • @sidneysanders5726
      @sidneysanders5726 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Listen to the engine run, you can hear slight misfires not enough to trigger the misfire monitor to pop a DTC but enough to make it fail tighter 2007 emissions standards. Some 4.0Ls run smoother than others, sometimes even with rotor, cap, wires and plug replacements it still runs a little rough. And with that much raw fuel running through the cat, epa felt that it wont pass, the 3.8L V6 used in 2007 to 2010 ran smoother and had a little more horsepower, but the 4.0L was still superior.

  • @RegulerShowTV
    @RegulerShowTV 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I finally realized this is the same guy from the Eastwood Company’s TH-cam, it all makes sense now.

    • @chrish5096
      @chrish5096 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And LMC truck!

    • @Trials-and-Tribulations
      @Trials-and-Tribulations 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He started with Power Nation first, remember this was made in 2007 I saw this when it was first aired on tv. You can buy this on dvd They just upload the video this year. Look at the date its uploaded lol

  • @whitey2shotpewpew825
    @whitey2shotpewpew825 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Check the throttle body as well. On the newer 4.0's it tapers down bad on the bottom side. Not sure about the older ones.

  • @cherylmartin4050
    @cherylmartin4050 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was at a FC Jeep Jamboree in IA. There was a mail Jeep truck with a Volvo B-20 red block with turbo conversion. It was super cool, lots of power. Pulled me in the seat- awesome

  • @Timman57
    @Timman57 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Looking forward to doing something similar with a jeep 2wd 5 speed in my 71 gremlin

    • @Brock_Landers
      @Brock_Landers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As much crap as Gremlins always seem to get, I'd still love to have one and build a turbo 4.6 stroker and take it to the strip.

    • @Timman57
      @Timman57 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Future-Preps35 yeah that has been popping up but haven't quite checked it out, I have a spare 401 laying around for my 74 javelin amx that if I go as far as spending some big money on the 6, im just going to use some bulltear mounts and throw the 401 in the gremlin

    • @Timman57
      @Timman57 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Brock_Landers would be great! I also have a 92 Nissan 240sx that I took the 2jz out of and I have it sitting and waiting for a project, I expressed the idea of a 2jz and t56 in my gremlin on some forums and people thought the straight 6 tuner power plant sounded rad, and then a guy stole my idea so I kinda lost interest because I was trying to be the first 2j gremlin but I should have kept my mouth shut. Plenty of late 70s z28s I'm sure got embarrassed at the red light by a few gremlin Xs back in the day with a good ol 258 under the hood, the torque is there and you gotta love that amc 6 reliability.

    • @johnsheetz6639
      @johnsheetz6639 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sweet!! I think that would be Peppy

    • @watrousmark401
      @watrousmark401 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Make the effort to use OBD II intake, head, and wiring. The intake flows so much better and you can access the ECU with HP tuners, ask me how I know.

  • @glengillham5428
    @glengillham5428 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When using Plastigage and soft bearings like 77 style, it is important to measure and torque \ compress the Plastigage in a warm area. The plastigage is actually harder than the 77 bearing in cold weather and will dent the bearing and give a false reading

  • @williamwilde9867
    @williamwilde9867 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where’s the rest of this series, wanted to see the the house and torque gains

  • @johnsheetz6639
    @johnsheetz6639 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Xjs are the 5.os of the 4x4 world I love'em

  • @jeanjeudi1111
    @jeanjeudi1111 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Great to see this build going forward and I like the way you are holding the cost down. I like to keep the engine bay clean and neat as well but prefer a light color since it's much easier to see everything. Good work, good info

  • @andoniades
    @andoniades 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great vids!
    Could you guys create a Playlist for the Project XJ?
    I've been purchasing some of the products you've mentioned.
    Thanks!

  • @Thelongmanable
    @Thelongmanable 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    *_Who takes compression out of a low hp engine oh that's right NO POWERNATION!!!_*

    • @juhomaki-petaja
      @juhomaki-petaja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Or NO PENETRATION

    • @Thelongmanable
      @Thelongmanable 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Lol 😂😂😂

    • @juhomaki-petaja
      @juhomaki-petaja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@WhiteG60 You are so right!

    • @JohnDeer49
      @JohnDeer49 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Came here looking for this comment

    • @streetsmart1164
      @streetsmart1164 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      (Tim)"What are you doing to that Jeep engine, cylinder head, AL ?
      (AL) "Tim, ...I'm lowering it's comprehension ratio and power"
      (Tim) "OOOHHAAAH ??!!!"

  • @domthebomb420big_jucie5
    @domthebomb420big_jucie5 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I’m so happy I see my favorite TH-cam channel using O’Reillys stuff cause I work at O’Reillys good ole store 6382 keep up the amazing videos

  • @Joeameturexpert
    @Joeameturexpert 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    9.6:1 is just fine for 87octane. If your worried just knock 2* of timming out of it

    • @TwentytenS4B8
      @TwentytenS4B8 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This was my thoughts. They could safely run 87 octane pump gas on 9.6:1 unless they planned on using a power adder in the future which almost always requires premium anyway regardless of compression ratio.

    • @mitchellpatterson1829
      @mitchellpatterson1829 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Really depends on the quench height too. You can get away with lower octane at higher compression with a tight quench. That can be difficult to do though mixing and matching parts for a stroker.

  • @andycampbell6032
    @andycampbell6032 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    how come no follow up with power numbers?

  • @trefontaine
    @trefontaine 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What do you do if your crankshaft main bearing clearance isn’t in spec? Every time I’ve seen you guys do this, it’s always perfect.

    • @ironsticksportinggoodsllc2417
      @ironsticksportinggoodsllc2417 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Get the crankshaft reground if you have verified the correct size bearings are being used.

  • @theartistdiamond9397
    @theartistdiamond9397 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've done this to shovelheads. But you do want to polish those surfaces after grinding.

    • @TwentytenS4B8
      @TwentytenS4B8 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yup, there will be too much turbulence in the airflow.

  • @chipthemechanic4127
    @chipthemechanic4127 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys should post a link to the full build, that way people can follow it. I'm thinking about doing this for my jeep, and don't really know where to find info on stroking it. Thanks

  • @edwardbrodie2190
    @edwardbrodie2190 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anyone know what episode number the next in this series was? I want to see the dyno results after the build but can't find it.

  • @larrykenyonkeeplearning619
    @larrykenyonkeeplearning619 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice build and really on the cheep side.. can't wait for the dyno 100%

  • @soggyspaghetty5799
    @soggyspaghetty5799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve seen all types of engine’s on this channel the only one I haven’t seen is a Chrysler 318 it would be cool to see one pushed to the max

  • @rncboy2
    @rncboy2 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I tell people all the time when rebuilding any type of engine balancing the rod weights just like you guys stated and then balancing the crankshaft is the life of the engine and the oil is its blood. Without the first results in a short life for a engine then they tend to hate on companies and or machine shops when in reality it was the one who decided that rebuilding a engine was a good idea for their first time.

  • @7t2z28
    @7t2z28 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I"m a little disappointed that you didn't degree the cam. You can't always trust that the timing is where it's supposed to be. Don't have to do each lobe, but it's a good idea to check number 1 intake and exhaust. I've found cams to be off by about a tooth or two.

  • @jacobvanhalteren7452
    @jacobvanhalteren7452 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    wouldn't the larger cam reduce dynamic compression making it possible to run 9.6:1?

    • @juhomaki-petaja
      @juhomaki-petaja 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is no difference between 9.3 and 9.6. From fuel perspective.

    • @jacobvanhalteren7452
      @jacobvanhalteren7452 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@juhomaki-petaja Depends on engine design. Certain cylinder head shapes or piston shapes can change where the hot spots are in the cylinder changing what fuel might need to be run. There's no real "use premium at this compression ratio and regular at this one". Every engine is different. An engine with a good cooling system might easily get away with 10:1 compression like the LT1 with reverse cooling where other engines with the exact same geometry (IE earlier small blocks with similar cam) would probably need premium to run 10:1. Smaller cam = lower compression or higher fuel grade since the compression is not being relived by cam overlap IE Dynamic compression.

    • @v.e.7236
      @v.e.7236 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      A cam has no affect on CR? That's pre-determined by your choices in piston, combustion chamber size and gasket thickness, deck height, etc.

    • @jacobvanhalteren7452
      @jacobvanhalteren7452 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@v.e.7236 there are 2 types of compression ratio
      1. Static Compression Ratio - what most people think of and what you have described
      2. Dynamic Ratio - Depending on the cam, the intake valve may hang open momentarily as the piston begins the power stroke effectively reducing the stroke and therefore compression
      see more here - www.enginebasics.com/Advanced%20Engine%20Tuning/Static%20vs%20Dynamic.html#:~:text=Dynamic%20Compression%20Ratio%20(DCR)%20is,concept%20in%20high%20performance%20engines.&text=Definition%3A%20The%20Compression%20Ratio%20(CR,to%20the%20combustion%20chamber%20volume.

    • @v.e.7236
      @v.e.7236 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jacobvanhalteren7452 You may be confusing cylinder pressure w/ compression ratio. While there may be a slight drop in cylinder pressure, due to valve position, the compression ratio actually increases as RPMs increase w/ overlap. There is a scavenging effect that comes into play w/ that cam design w/ that creates this increase. There is some myth and some science behind what you hear and read about. Be well, sir.

  • @solarflare1008
    @solarflare1008 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice job and if possible I want to see this job but in six double overhead cam engine. Thanks.

  • @chrismason598
    @chrismason598 4 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    The jeeps intake :"i cant breathe"

    • @bryantcurtis2665
      @bryantcurtis2665 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Chris Mason Bubba Wallace:I can’t drive🐒💨💨💨

    • @sethh8892
      @sethh8892 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bryantcurtis2665 George Floyd: I can't breath

    • @PhantomPhaze
      @PhantomPhaze 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      4.0L Lives Matter

  • @Aladinscave
    @Aladinscave 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    If you are going to spend time and money on building a performance motor why would you lower the compression? Especially if it’s only 9.6 to 1 .....

    • @swhite209
      @swhite209 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      At around the 9:55 mark, said it was to avoid the extra cost of Premium fuel. Probably lowered it a touch more to give a bigger window to avoid knocking from premature ignition.

    • @Aladinscave
      @Aladinscave 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      swhite209 my point is why run the low octane when you chase power, maybe they don’t have high octane fuel available all the time or maybe his pockets are empty after the build? Lol

    • @nicholasrhodes4550
      @nicholasrhodes4550 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@Aladinscave If you're gonna offroad it, you don't want an engine dependent on premium fuel. You might need to borrow fuel to get back out or use backroad gas stations-which won't have premium...
      Sounds like he thought this through a bit.

    • @swhite209
      @swhite209 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Not to mention you have people like where I live who would still run it as a daily driver from what I've seen. This is the first video on the project I've watched so I don't know the whole plan.

    • @404_unavailable_69
      @404_unavailable_69 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      To avoid using higher octane fuel. Its still a stock head . Maybe if it was an aluminum head they would of left it alone .

  • @markchidester6239
    @markchidester6239 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Prime time to pull the wiring harness out for inspection repair and or replacement. It's a Chrysler product, definitely needs some repair at a minimum.

  • @richardeberline3585
    @richardeberline3585 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Quick question? When installing the cam bearing is it true that touching the bearings where it contacts with cam without gloves on, the oil from finger ruins the integrity of bearing because the oil will not properly protect the bearing do to the oil on fingers!

    • @mitchellpatterson1829
      @mitchellpatterson1829 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Skin oil is salty, it's just a good practice not to get salt on bearing, or sealing surfaces.

  • @alloyspeed1889
    @alloyspeed1889 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did they put a holley efi on this or something? How do you tune these engines with a stock computer?

    • @beastlydookie81
      @beastlydookie81 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They’ll probably cover that when they upload the next part

  • @johnnon6583
    @johnnon6583 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didn’t you remove the squish band when you increased the cc’s of the head?

  • @kuhndog-1196
    @kuhndog-1196 4 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Help it breath with a turbo.

    • @vengeanceizmine9878
      @vengeanceizmine9878 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A turbo doesn't help it breathe better, as it doesn't gain any airflow through a port. Kinda know what you were getting at though..

    • @kuhndog-1196
      @kuhndog-1196 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Someone on oxygen is having more air forced in per breath, effectively helping them breathe better. So they should strap a big ass snail lung on that puppy and let it force it's way to better breathing. 🤣🤣

    • @vengeanceizmine9878
      @vengeanceizmine9878 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kuhndog-1196 Technically untrue as well lol. With a comment like that, you would think you understood how a turbo, or oxygen tank worked? Lol.

    • @kuhndog-1196
      @kuhndog-1196 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is always one of you haha. Have to make yourself feel big and bad. Do you feel like a big man now? 😂

    • @vengeanceizmine9878
      @vengeanceizmine9878 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kuhndog-1196 Nope. My intentions are solely aimed at helping. People read comments like yours, and get mislead to believe misinformation. Your response, however, tells a lot. My bad that your ego won't let you accept someone trying to help. Welcome to the internet...

  • @lawrencenicolaides2361
    @lawrencenicolaides2361 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I6 the best

  • @johnhill484
    @johnhill484 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone else disappointed that the video wasn't finished. I wanted to see them put it back on the dyno!

  • @3ziz1981
    @3ziz1981 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am not an auto mechanic but I would know why lowering the compression ratio and gain more power?

  • @beargibson3100
    @beargibson3100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My question is why you kept the renix efi?

  • @utahcountypicazospage5412
    @utahcountypicazospage5412 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I wouldn’t cut the chambers down at all 9-6 to 1 is nothing in compression and would make the motor snappy want to lose some compression get a bigger camshaft

    • @frankdehne1949
      @frankdehne1949 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think 9.6 to 1 was my factory compression on my 87 Wrangler with a 258 and I loved the way it ran I did have to use premium fuel though. It really came alive when I dumped the Carter carburetor and put on I think it was like a motorcraft two barrel and ditched all the emissions and computer

    • @tommylyeah
      @tommylyeah 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Deshrouding is the way to go. I woulda just got a thicker HG if I was only tryna lower the static CR. 9.6:1 is nuthin'.

  • @autohog
    @autohog ปีที่แล้ว

    Do we ever find out the dyno results of 2200 spend?

  • @Jgriffin0808081
    @Jgriffin0808081 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is gold, thank you for making this vid :)

  • @swakage13x
    @swakage13x 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is the kind of stuff I need to do when I get my hands-on my own motor But I want the possibility of being a little closer 2 350 horse power Before slapping a turbo on it

  • @glowhdvideos1004
    @glowhdvideos1004 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    why is bearing tolerances very important with plasty gauge?

  • @thetreblerebel
    @thetreblerebel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So...what if your tolerances are not within spec? Is it back to the machine shop? Return your bearings?

    • @TwentytenS4B8
      @TwentytenS4B8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If the tolerances are off in the negative, then yes back to the machine shop. If they are positive well time for a new block. You can always take material off but you really can't put it back on. So if they hogged out your mains too much, you need to see if they have an oversize bearing to take up the difference. If not, the block is junk. Same with crankshaft journals. If they spec out too much in the negative and there is no oversize bearing, the crank is junk. Or it could be you ordered the wrong bearings. This is why it's important to check clearances even after getting a block back from the machine shop.

  • @trevorthomas6043
    @trevorthomas6043 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Usually 140 thousand is nothing for a 4.0,however if not maintained any engine can be ruined.

    • @MrTheHillfolk
      @MrTheHillfolk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      My daily going on 7yrs and about 25k for mileage without an oil change.
      Why bother on a 1200$ car, but I'm obviously not doing it any favors.
      It's fun to see how long it'll live.

    • @trevorthomas6043
      @trevorthomas6043 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      MrHillfolk if your daily has an oil leak and you add when it’s low you should be fine lol

    • @MrTheHillfolk
      @MrTheHillfolk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@trevorthomas6043
      It doesn't really leak it , but about every 8 months or so the teapot light comes on when I rip a corner hard.
      So I add like 2.5 qts to it's approximately 4 qt capacity and it's good for a while 🤣🤣

  • @jayh9635
    @jayh9635 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Drop the pre 2000 log intake and get yourself the later intake. 20 free hp without any machine work.

  • @immelting9834
    @immelting9834 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    " were going to pick up a fair amount of HP" - quote after head work and gasket matching everything. Ok, well how much ??

  • @gupp22
    @gupp22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where did you get the beaker with valve used in determining head combustion chamber cc’s.

  • @Clearanceman2
    @Clearanceman2 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Seems like a throttle body would have been a good choice too.

  • @kodylehman6289
    @kodylehman6289 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the part number for the crank shaft

  • @watrousmark401
    @watrousmark401 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    No mention of the cam being used or the machining necessary for high lift valve springs 🤔

    • @shawnbrodrick8673
      @shawnbrodrick8673 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Comp cam,probably the only cam they make for that motor

  • @johnj2496
    @johnj2496 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The 99+ "octopus 🐙" intake flows better

  • @burblegobble
    @burblegobble 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    you mention the importance of checking bearing clearance for crank and pistons, but you don't say what to do if it's OUT of tolerance.

  • @Toolery357
    @Toolery357 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lookin good gents! Cant wait to see the dyno sheet!

  • @greglawson740
    @greglawson740 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what about the ECM tune?? who's doing that?

  • @fcguy7
    @fcguy7 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can anyone tell me if keeping the compression high for high altitudes would be a good idea? Like driving the rig from Denver at 6000 ft and getting on trails going up all the way to 12000ft.

  • @israelcardona5170
    @israelcardona5170 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm confused? Isn't higher compression better for N/A? So why get rid of it?

    • @coreycarter8469
      @coreycarter8469 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So they can put shit gas in it lol

    • @Timman57
      @Timman57 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They want to run the cheaper gasoline and the lower compression ratio will help keep it from needing the more expensive gasoline, to put it simply

    • @omegarugal9283
      @omegarugal9283 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      installing the 4.2 crank makes the compression too high for regular gas, even premium...

    • @Timman57
      @Timman57 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@omegarugal9283 he mentioned the chamber porting would drop the compression ratio from 9.6 to 9.3, all within standard octane ratings. Getting into 10 to 1 and 11 to 1 is where you start entering race gas, but even around me you can get 110 at the pump.

    • @omegarugal9283
      @omegarugal9283 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Timman57 depends on how agressive the timing is

  • @Joe.Dillion
    @Joe.Dillion 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So are the 4.0 pistions wrist pin stock location ?

  • @terrylittlejohn
    @terrylittlejohn 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have a 05 4.0l wrangler with the keyway cam gear! can i use the older pin style cam timing chain set with cam bolt button ?? i`m doing a cam swap and it`s going to take 3 months to get the keyway newer style cam from comp! i can`t wait that long!! any help please!

  • @jennBourne
    @jennBourne 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Haha, this episode aired in like 2015. Sorry to those who thought it was new. It's still great though. I miss those guys.

    • @basshead.
      @basshead. 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      2009

    • @jennBourne
      @jennBourne 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@basshead. damn, I'm old I didnt think it had been that long lol

    • @thetreblerebel
      @thetreblerebel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's funny tho, these builds are actually getting more and more popular among younger enthusiast. Maybe not the really older engines but the 4.0L is a Jeep guys LS

  • @cesarprieto8279
    @cesarprieto8279 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you know what head you used? 0630 or 7120?

  • @agoodandy1
    @agoodandy1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I’d have kept or got more compression the more it is the more horsepower, as these engines made low numbers of horsepower. All you would have to use is a better grade of gas. When I do mine I want 10:1.

  • @MrMatQ
    @MrMatQ 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What amount of force is required to tighten connecting rod bearing and main one in Jeep Grand Cheroke 4.0?

  • @DarkkLestat
    @DarkkLestat 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did they ever say how much it cost them to get the head work done??

    • @TwentytenS4B8
      @TwentytenS4B8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That cost was added up in the machine shop work totals they gave. The port matching they did themselves so the only thing that cost them was time.

  • @Tshizzle42o
    @Tshizzle42o 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can only imagine thebamount of wear in my engine. 2004 grand cherokee 4.0 240000mi. Makes all kinds of noise when its cold

  • @kowpow2259
    @kowpow2259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I could never bring myself to grinding the cylinder head away for a .3 decrease in compression. I'd just put the higher octane fuel in it. Not worth your time.

  • @tchrishoward
    @tchrishoward 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    My question is will this (4.2 crankshaft) work in a 2002 4.0L coil pack engine? My concern is crank position sensor not picking up and timing/ignition issues. Thanks for any help

    • @tchrishoward
      @tchrishoward 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I have a 1978 4.2L engine that's toast that i can get the crank from (for core), and a 2002 4.0L coil pack engine that needs rebuilt.

    • @TwentytenS4B8
      @TwentytenS4B8 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your crank position sensor picks up signals from the reluctor wheel that is mounted on the crankshaft. So if the 4.2 crank has the same size reluctor and the same amount of teeth, you should be golden. Just make sure you time the crank and cam properly. This means you need to make sure you can mount the reluctor from the 4.0 crank on the 4.2 one.

  • @brandonhobbs1435
    @brandonhobbs1435 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great build, been building one myself for a little over a year, dual purpose

  • @bgjohn3rd
    @bgjohn3rd 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    how often do you calibrate the torque wrenches?

  • @ubroberts5541
    @ubroberts5541 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    A light tack coat done first promotes adhesion and helps prevent fish eyes. Has little to do with runs.

  • @darrenporsch
    @darrenporsch 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you stroke a 4.0l straight 6 don't usually stroke it to a 4.6 l?

    • @juhomaki-petaja
      @juhomaki-petaja 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      0,04” overbore +4,2L crank =~4,6L

    • @davej3487
      @davej3487 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      A bigger 4.2 stroke in a stock 4.0 block is like 4.35L. So with no overbore you gain 350cc's. There are 667cc per stock cylinder so not quite the size of a 7 cylinder.
      A 0.030 overbore is 4.475L. A 0.040 over bore is 4.6L, still short of having 7 stock cylinders. A 0.060 overbore is 4.7L. You can get a bore and stroke for this 4.0 to make it a 5.0L I6.
      0.060 over may get a few soft spots in the bore and a sleeve will be needed.
      We went this route. 1991 4.0L Larado with a 4.7 combo. A warm cam, ported stock head, MAP sensor adjustor and 4wheel High it will smoke most stock 4.6 Mustangs.

    • @juhomaki-petaja
      @juhomaki-petaja 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dave J:
      4.0(242) bore: 98,4mm
      4.2(258) stroke: 98,9mm
      =4512cc
      Add .030” overbore=4582cc
      I got dimensions from Wikipedia

  • @peterjames2004
    @peterjames2004 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i thought the rear and front main seal had to be fitted with 1 side lower than the other so it didnt leak

  • @jakehelmkamp2784
    @jakehelmkamp2784 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Speaking words of wisdom let it breathe

  • @parttimetourist
    @parttimetourist 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why PR instead of OHC?

  • @woowocgwhwrehvcb
    @woowocgwhwrehvcb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question: What do you do if the Plastigauge measures out of spec?

    • @tedm6618
      @tedm6618 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      On new parts probably return. If used then it's time to replace - according to the factory. It might work a while longer though

    • @davej3487
      @davej3487 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      If the measurement is too tight the crank needs a slight hone. If too loose the crank needs to be turned under and new matching bearing sized to fit.

  • @seniorxj2931
    @seniorxj2931 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does anybody know what the new dyno results are?

  • @bigredracer7848
    @bigredracer7848 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    412👍's up guys thanks again for have fun working for us all

  • @LandonRoy-cv9rt
    @LandonRoy-cv9rt 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Who in the hell wants lower compression? Unless you’re over pump gas octane rating? Do all that work spend all that money to get less HP?

    • @thebigpicture2032
      @thebigpicture2032 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They said it was to run on cheap gas but I would have taken the win and gone for premium gas.

    • @dazednconfused3171
      @dazednconfused3171 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Cause these guys are retarded everything they do sucks lol never seen them ever do something right or build something that actually makes power

    • @juhomaki-petaja
      @juhomaki-petaja 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      9,6:1 is normal CR today. Or it was already in 1970s here in Europe

    • @bigboreracing356
      @bigboreracing356 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It's a jeep Engine who cares if they lost five hp

    • @jeepnutnh
      @jeepnutnh 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Right? Wtaf....

  • @phantomwalker8251
    @phantomwalker8251 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    why no flat tops.?.

  • @_.incredible_magnum._291
    @_.incredible_magnum._291 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mans was snatching those crank barrings out bruh😂😂

  • @claytonargo3085
    @claytonargo3085 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You NEVER mention that bearing cap mating surfaces MUST BE ABSOLUTELY CLEAR of any lube prior to final torquing down. I mean if you’re trying to help out DIYers.

  • @drtb69
    @drtb69 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maybe power wash under the hood the, engine and undsrneath well before you pull the engine the power wash again then cleaners before you paint it ..will be much vetter .

  • @saviervazquez436
    @saviervazquez436 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had a question for you guys I'm looking to buy jeep cherokee sport what year is the best year to buy and how much Is the average price for OK condition in the PA area

    • @RobertBreckenridge13
      @RobertBreckenridge13 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oklahoma condition Jeeps are hard to find in Pennsylvania.

  • @ziadkadi
    @ziadkadi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice work. Wish I never sold my2 door xj

  • @arnearne12345
    @arnearne12345 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    cool to see these builds but personally i don't understand the appeal with black engine bays it's just hard to see what you are doing and where the fecking one cable is going

  • @dbepic6996
    @dbepic6996 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    WHERE IS PART TWO