Sprinter 144" vs 170": Does Size Matter?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ม.ค. 2023
  • We get a ton of calls asking if folks should buy a 144" or 170" Sprinter. Here we go through the pros and cons of each van.
    www.owlvans.com

ความคิดเห็น • 111

  • @HalfLapJoint
    @HalfLapJoint 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Very informative and to the point, thank you. Still feel like if I got a 170" I'd wish I had a 144" and if I got a 144" I'd wish I had a 170" 😆

    • @bostonconstruct
      @bostonconstruct 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol, true. I'm getting the 144 I feel like the 170 is just too friggin big.

    • @braxenaeurasiers
      @braxenaeurasiers 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@bostonconstruct hahah try the 170 extended! I dont know how people live full time in anything smaller, esp 2 people and pets!

  • @tontonn9995
    @tontonn9995 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    John - The reason to get the 3500 dually is the increased payload capacity- Higher GVRW
    2500 (all wheelbases) - GVRW 8550 lbs
    3500 GVRW range from 9900 to 11000 lbs

    • @Trunkmonk-lp5pk
      @Trunkmonk-lp5pk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      actually that helps, thanks.

    • @user-hc3ol7nh5e
      @user-hc3ol7nh5e 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thanks. Also been wanting that info

  • @borandell9915
    @borandell9915 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    And one more very important reason to go with the 144. It just looks so much more cooll!!

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Let me offer another perspective, "Smelly van lifer" is what people think when they see a small rig. If occupants dont have rested looks from no room for a toilet, shower, good food or a tall enough bed its hard to pull off the cool vibe. I'll bet its in the eye of the beholder, tiny can be cute too.

  • @TBone830
    @TBone830 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I would respectfully disagree. I have the 170 extended on the 3500 dually chassis and I have taken it in places where I’ve had one wheel off the ground in four wheel drive. I have the AOR RIP kit installed I have never dragged the back end. The added space with 24 feet is a game changer.

  • @cjoneillj
    @cjoneillj 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I have a 144 4x4, when spending time inside I wish it was a 170 but I bought it to spend more time outside not inside. When driving it around San Francisco or really any city I really appreciate the ease of parking and the turning radius. It turns around way sharper than my F-150. 😅

  • @garyjones6994
    @garyjones6994 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For those of you that have, or will be getting a dually, the Oregon Department of Forestry had a video on TH-cam showing how to remove a wedged rock using a tow strap. Pretty slick if you're careful. There's another video showing a hotshot crew using the same technique using a chain, but they're hotshots. ;) Having driven a search & rescue dually van in northern New Mexico, we just check for rocks before re-entering a paved road. My new 170 dually hauls me, my wife, our dog and children and grandchildren. It can also pull our off-road trailer or another vehicle if we see the need. If I wanted a true off-road van, I'd get a Ford Econoline E-350 cutaway from Sportsmobile or Field Vans.

  • @peternelson9865
    @peternelson9865 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Would love to know the turning radius difference between a 144 vs 170

  • @clarencejoseph2917
    @clarencejoseph2917 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Dualy is far superior for towing and also in high winds on the road.

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Owl guys apparently don't carry much gear, to have to learn about tire capacity in dual applications. He did ask for feedback so i hope they take this well. He made a good point on breakover high center changes but tires need a fuller video by true tire experts, as that can be more important on RVs as the weight rises.

  • @802HotDog
    @802HotDog ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I went with a 144 4x4, mostly because it is also my daily driver beside camper. The space is enough for our 2.75 people

    • @mtnride4930
      @mtnride4930 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same here. Plenty of space for the wife and pooch. The dog and I travelled in a VW Westfalia for 14 years, the 144 was like moving to a penthouse.

  • @jamilchavez4592
    @jamilchavez4592 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great notes here. I have 2.5 people (5 year old) in our 2021 4x4 and it’s good, but it does get crammed because of that rear seat needed for our son. I’m thinking about going for a freedman seat to open it up but yeah.. long story short, it’s doable to do 2 adults and a kid comfortably in a 144 but if more space is a priority, go 170

  • @stuffforsale7446
    @stuffforsale7446 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A 144 van. Such as a Revel is barely enough room for a single person, much less 2.

    • @stever8675
      @stever8675 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I have 5.5-foot bed on Tundra with cap is plenty of room for 1 + pet, so going to 144" 11.5feet cargo with high roof (you mean I can stand up now) OFF ROAD break over and departure angle for Beach sand, snow & ice for ski resorts and beach how is 11.5-5.5 extra 6 feet for a bed plus have a Honda pioneer UTV is 48" wide fits inside with camping and skis...Remove everything if you still need a cargo van like a Truck, If you have kids get a 170 but parking is horrible otherwise 144 better package less money keep other toys like my boat, SUV, E-bikes etc...

  • @user-hc3ol7nh5e
    @user-hc3ol7nh5e 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks for your input and all who commented. Enjoyed taking many worthy notes

  • @davismatson10
    @davismatson10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome context and thoughts, thanks so much for making this!

  • @Affordableframe
    @Affordableframe 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I’ve seen a lot of sprinters, outfitted, looked way too heavy not to have duel wheels

  • @Justin-bp1hq
    @Justin-bp1hq ปีที่แล้ว +4

    For 3.5 kids, the Airstream 24x is a solid option on the dually chassis. 15k+ GCWR. Not going where the 144 is going but it’s bringing more stuff and can tow toys. 🤙🏼

  • @DeanoKelley
    @DeanoKelley ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good review. I had a 2006 158", then bought a 2018 170" and wow, so much more room inside. We weren't using them for overlanding, but that extra space is amazing. Always enjoy watching your videos John.

  • @ChargedPulsar
    @ChargedPulsar 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for the video, it was very helpful!

  • @ianpatrick23
    @ianpatrick23 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you for this great explanation

  • @becauseiwanttoseecommentsb984
    @becauseiwanttoseecommentsb984 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is very good informative video. I initially thought when I saw the title it will be a regurgitation of 'well duh' things, but I'm glad I watch it anyway because contain some interesting info.
    The dual rear tire thing in particular is fortuitous, because I just wacth an ad for off-road conversion van with dual rear as one the feature they claimed and I thought that looks really neat, so it was really nice to see someone talk about the drawbacks of dual.

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dual has more benefits than drawbacks mentioned for my needs, it's the one part of this video i disagreed with.

  • @mattkrea
    @mattkrea ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I've done some completely irresponsible off-roading in my 170 and, provided you've got the VC lift and maybe some skid plates, you'll do just fine. If you're a potential buyer that is concerned about the space in a 144 just get the 170 because I promise you'll be happy with it. You're already going to run into problems with the height of these vehicles alone that the differences between the 170 and 144 otherwise are trivial in my opinion.

    • @PhilChern
      @PhilChern 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I am currently deciding between the 144 and 170, slightly leaning towards 170. Never owned a "longer" vehicle. Any other issues that the 170 may have that the 140 doesn't?

    • @mattkrea
      @mattkrea 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@PhilChern The only other noteworthy thing is that it is about 300 pounds heavier meaning 300 pounds less cargo capacity but I would choose a 170 again without even thinking about it.

    • @Arcticfox7
      @Arcticfox7 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Taking something so narrow, tall and top heavy off-road sounds ridiculous to me.

    • @mattkrea
      @mattkrea 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Arcticfox7 Well it works out just fine if you know what you're doing. No it doesn't feel like my Gladiator and no I don't want to be 30 degrees off camber but you can still get to many places that others can't which is the whole reason I chose the lifted Sprinter.

    • @user-hc3ol7nh5e
      @user-hc3ol7nh5e 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Suggestion. Do test drives with a 30’ rv, then the 170 and 144. That way you’ll know what it feels like to drive them
      I’ve driven 30’ and 40’ motorhomes
      The 170 is my choice, or possibly the ext 170.
      Just heard a bit ago- 170ext inside living floor space is 15-1/2’ -mentioned by FreedomVans. Solo senior female with a cat. Space for full time use is important to me.

  • @drewpaterson502
    @drewpaterson502 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great info, thank you very much!

  • @VanlilfewithDaleandBailey
    @VanlilfewithDaleandBailey 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks, that was really useful.

  • @harrytraction1380
    @harrytraction1380 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I first bought my Dually, 3500 I was traveling on the 10th through Riverside getting blown all over the road. I purchased the falcon suspension kit which made a huge difference, with upgraded off-road tires and wheels, especially the stability when we’re towing our boat or box trailer or anything else. My 2023, 170 Dually all-wheel-drive Also does great off-road. Of course I don’t go crazy climbing over things are getting myself in areas that I shouldn’t be using common sense. Just got back from Baja and it was great off-road. I personally couldn’t imagine getting a 144 with just my wife and I, it just seems too compact and cramped. It would never work for us. No regrets.🤙🏼

  • @charles.aweida
    @charles.aweida 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What this video fails to disclose is the most important aspect of the dulley which is the significantly increased payload of 5,000 vs 3,500 lbs + beefed up frame which makes a huge difference with an overloaded camper van

    • @owlvansengineering
      @owlvansengineering  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The 3500 has larger leaf springs not a "beefed up frame" These are unibodies and both the 2500 and the 3500 are the same. Once built into to a campler both need additional spring rate.

    • @charles.aweida
      @charles.aweida 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@owlvansengineering by "frame" im referring to the longitudinal frame member as its described in the Mercedes Body and Equipment Guideline. You will notice the 3500 frame member is twice as thick and hardly tapers compared to the smaller 2500 frame members (page 102/103). In addition to the larger frame members, the 3500's have a full floating rear axle, the differential is beefier and they have larger vented rear disk brakes all to handle the additional GVWR.

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@charles.aweidathanks Charles and Owl for raising the topic and facts around this subject. This video is a good start and now with knowledgable thoughtful comments it becomes a greater resource for all! I have tremendous experience w dual wheel, frame, suspension and tire enhancements on a Class C but the audience here helped me know i am making the right decision to go w a 170'' dual for a new van. Btw i offroad plenty deep in a 25' class C E450. Then my motorcycles off the back take me further and faster than even a rock crawler could imagine. Glad we are all out there together too. Every rig there gets respect and help from the community when in need. Thanks again, happy trails.

  • @ShaneGoddard1
    @ShaneGoddard1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great information!

  • @tranquilitybase6417
    @tranquilitybase6417 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Love my 144. Can park it anywhere

    • @luzbel4469
      @luzbel4469 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But you can´t travel the world living a normal live as if you had have a bigger Sprinter.
      A) If you want a house and be comfortable with your family and pets ---> 170"
      b) If you want to go to fishing and return to your home with some fishes--->144"

  • @camptaji901
    @camptaji901 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done!!

  • @thechappie
    @thechappie ปีที่แล้ว

    That bumper 🤤!!! I see that it has different provision for the light hoop… will this be an Owl exclusive? Should I wait?

  • @headinghome1644
    @headinghome1644 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You definitely do not have dually's wrong, especially on a van. And the HOA consideration is real when dealing with the B Vans. I barely squeaked mine in a pretty tight HOA golf course community. If it looks like a motorhome, many HOA's say "no go".

  • @PezRacer
    @PezRacer ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just a FYI, the Sprinter 3500 is available in SRW or Dually.

  • @stephenlocker9883
    @stephenlocker9883 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Carrying capacity vs off road capability = liveability vs adventure capability. You said it, whithout the dual wheels you lose payload capacity, around 1,000 lbs less. In a conversion van of course payload = outfitting & gear. so if you want an offroader for weekends or very light gear hauling the 144" is the one. If you want an "RV", then 170/170 EXT.

    • @MichaelWilliams-ro9bm
      @MichaelWilliams-ro9bm 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We added a leaf spring to our 170 for $600. Works fine.

  • @tristandelahoya
    @tristandelahoya 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Very informative, would have been great to touch base on the height difference though

  • @cowboy6591
    @cowboy6591 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    One thing I know from experience. You can't beat duallys for driving in the mud. They stand above the rest for that. However, wedging rocks and airing up the tires are a no-go for me. Just don't go to "Burning Man" in the rain with singles.

    • @owlvansengineering
      @owlvansengineering  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good to know. We don't get a lot of mud out here so we don't have a lot of experience with it.

  • @thehundredthmonkey5972
    @thehundredthmonkey5972 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    man that 144 looks good

  • @renel1455
    @renel1455 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I use both 144 and 170 usually get both city and off road routes at Amazon, cant wait to get started with my own van… honestly i cant feel much of a difference between both vans

  • @residenttouristprod
    @residenttouristprod 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a modest self built Ford E350 Ext Body 22" van with 10-11" of clearance. Can't speak to Jeep trails; but have done plenty of service roads, rutted, washboards, and questionable off-pavement in dry conditions. I want a taller roof line and a table while still easily storing my longboard surfboards. Looking at the Revel concerns me fast despite it being one and done with likely having to hang storage off the back. Anyone advise a builder and model of a 170?

  • @paulkajtna7799
    @paulkajtna7799 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please make a similar video comparing to the 170 non-extended.

  • @davidrosen4951
    @davidrosen4951 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the great information. Question: With a suspension upgrade including increased ground clearance, would the 170 extended be able to get off the pavement to some extent? I'm thinking of dirt roads that are at least somewhat maintained...might include some ruts and other issues but nothing too extreme. What do you think?

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Since no one answered I'll off my limited advice. I say yes go 170, but my experience is in the E450 chassis. i have a 158"wb class C with a 11' overhang in the rear. It is lifted by 2" in the rear and I have pulled into some of the knarliest staging areas, steep entrances that always seem to have a ledge/step up obstacle, and it does great. Also the dual wheel traction gets me through/up/over terraign that surprised me over the 20 years with it. The only nemisis can be deepish sand so check the depth first in those desert washes and keep it rolling if you get surpised. Btw, I'm shopping for a 170" van myself now so I'm banking on that too.

  • @daytonasayswhat9333
    @daytonasayswhat9333 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How about driving and handling?

  • @Gallardo6669
    @Gallardo6669 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does the smaller sprinter have solar panels on the hood???cool.

  • @keitha.9788
    @keitha.9788 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is the difference in gas mileage / on the road performance???

  • @JustAnotherSchmuck
    @JustAnotherSchmuck 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Super Singles are available now.

  • @toughtimes721
    @toughtimes721 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a 2003 170 that I'm currently extending a meter.

  • @voyageforever03
    @voyageforever03 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi John. A question from France. Sorry for this question not directly linked to your vidéo. We heard, at least in Europe, Mercedes stops the production of the Sprinter due to many orders. Have you heard something equivalent in the US ? Do you have more information ?

    • @owlvansengineering
      @owlvansengineering  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Im sorry, I have not heard of this.

    • @ericdanielson4177
      @ericdanielson4177 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      There is a stop on sales of the vans that need the "park" issue fixed (apparently some vans roll when put in park and no parking brake is engaged). Just got mine done by the dealer yesterday. The fix just came out and there will be a huge back log of vans and MB-based chassis RVs needing to be fixed before they can be sold, according to my service advisor.

    • @voyageforever03
      @voyageforever03 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ericdanielson4177 Thanks Eric

    • @mtnride4930
      @mtnride4930 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ericdanielson4177 Hey my van does this; it does not move a lot, but it does roll. Goin to MB to get it checked out. THANKS

  • @k9projectworks
    @k9projectworks ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation! What is your take on 4x4 short roof 144 vs. 4x4 high roof 144 for off-roading?

    • @owlvansengineering
      @owlvansengineering  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If you're talking purly off road perfomrnace the low roof will be superior. It is lighter and more importantly has a lower center of gravity.

    • @k9projectworks
      @k9projectworks ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@owlvansengineering Yes! Thanks for following up! I really enjoy your content. Keep up the good work!

  • @travisnelson8921
    @travisnelson8921 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Damn. Im torn. I found a great deal on new duely winnebago adventerour for only $106000.

  • @hireanattorneyattorneyatla9345
    @hireanattorneyattorneyatla9345 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Been contemplating purchasing one of these sprinters here as recently my buddy brought it to my attention that these can be written off taxwise if that's possible how so?? is there some special tax code out there that allows RVs / Luxury RVs to be allowed as a business write off.??

    • @ConquerCollin
      @ConquerCollin 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You should get an accountant to help you out with that since many people are committing tax fraud when they do and will regret it when they get the IRS asking questions

  • @Reedith
    @Reedith 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I need a 3500 because the extra towing capability but I don't want the dually and I know that I can swap out with aftermarket parts just as strong if not stronger
    So I'm wondering if you even need a 3500 or if the extra towing capacity literally just comes from those dually tires and no other frame infrastructure that they put in there if a 2500 is the same frame then you should be able to put on aftermarket wheels aftermarket tires and get the same towing capability as the 3500 ?

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Read Charles' comment on the "frame" subject where he qoutes the factory specs sheet, much different between the two. Plan on crawling under the two chassis at the dealer lot or show lot and you will learn first hand what he is talking about. Talk to the factory reps not sales people. Look for leaf springs, axle sizes, rear diff size, frame extension or supports if any that leads to the hitch. Good luck, you will need to know this first hand.

  • @fvingerhoed
    @fvingerhoed 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    you left out the 170 EXT ... ;-(

  • @aerobic247
    @aerobic247 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    only 3 sizes? in Europe we have 4, the SWB 128, MWB 144, LWB 170 and the extended body 170 is the SWB not avalanche in the USA?

    • @owlvansengineering
      @owlvansengineering  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      As far as we know we do not have the 128 in the US. We like things big :)

    • @gruberra
      @gruberra ปีที่แล้ว

      @@owlvansengineering the 128" with low roof would be great for offroading but small inside 🤔

  • @sevenohnine
    @sevenohnine 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would assumed that the longer wheelbase 170 is more stable and ride better on the hwy than the shorter wheelbase 144? However, the additional 330lbs of metal eating into the vehicle's payload, and ease of parking are deal breakers for me .... 😢

    • @christiankamal7549
      @christiankamal7549 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Never had any issue whatsoever with the sprinter 144, low roof driving at full speed with strong winds that flipped big rigs.

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I hear jeep guys say this about 144 vans too. I see this as a spread on spectrum of "comfort". The van will work well for me when its built out but still carrying mountain bikes/ hike trip but i have to lock them inside so it's a 170" for that reason alone. Some days I also might carry a motorcycle on the hitch so its a non extended...

  • @braxenaeurasiers
    @braxenaeurasiers 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the things you point out, but I must say your review is based on the van not being your full time home, rather it being a fun off road toy. I just bought a 3500 ext dually and I am by myself, but I plan to live in it full time, travel the usa, and go off road. Not off road like your video examples, but dirt road I guess, lol. Was bummed to hear you say dually and extended says you never want to leave the pavement, I hope you are wrong as I want to go down dirt roads.

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can go down plenty of dirt roads in the longer rigs...i do. And plan to carry self- recovery gear on any size rig you get.

    • @braxenaeurasiers
      @braxenaeurasiers 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jr.6199 Would that be a winch?

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@braxenaeurasiers depends on terrain and if there's anything to winch to. First I'd recommend traction boards, short handled shovel, 20'+ tow strap w shoft shackles (for helpful strangers to pull you out). If around trees then carry a small light hand saw. Your brain is the best tool so sharpen it by watching experts like Ronny Dahl, etc. Measure the clearance of your intended vehicle as that is the first limiter, 4x4 AWD is not necessary but better if you have the budget. Buy a bike to get you further out from where you set up base camp.

  • @Reedith
    @Reedith 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you convert a dually to a regular wheel setup?

    • @owlvansengineering
      @owlvansengineering  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not easily. You can go super single if you wanted a simple solution

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Super single is the factory option but i would not convert it based on John's comment in the video. Read more dually owners comments here too.

  • @toughtimes721
    @toughtimes721 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a lwb high roof dually extended.i agree with you and not agree with you.i think it comes down to think about where your going

  • @gruberra
    @gruberra ปีที่แล้ว

    I got a 144" here in Europe with a rooftop so there is enough Space for 4 people 😉

    • @gruberra
      @gruberra ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrJedi5150 yes, II have a rooftop tent integrated in my Sprinter..
      cdn.nettikaravaani.com/live/2019/10/24/6df258ba686a4d9a-large.jpg

  • @batmanaerm7649
    @batmanaerm7649 ปีที่แล้ว

    review car please

  • @lyfandeth
    @lyfandeth 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THE DEADLINE: DO YOU WANT TO PARK IN A CITY?
    Municipal parking spots are 18, sometimes 19, feet long.
    If you buy the 170 or any extended Sprinter, you are not going to park in lots or metered spots.
    End of story.

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Be creative, i find overhang options with my 25' rig. Lots can be private property too so no laws are broken but be kind and look for posted rules to follow there.

  • @MyKharli
    @MyKharli 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dualies drift better when unloaded .

    • @owlvansengineering
      @owlvansengineering  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great point, I should have kept that in mind. Duallies for the win! :)

  • @boru1326
    @boru1326 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    4 dogs = 170

  • @ashketchum1953
    @ashketchum1953 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ayooo, does Size matter

  • @chasx7062
    @chasx7062 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Du-lies? are Great, it means you have two extra wheels on the ground instead of carrying one around , which is doing nothing but be extra weight and taking up space.

  • @missmothertrucker
    @missmothertrucker ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Honey, I’m a woman and I’m here to tell you size does matter lol

  • @usualsuspectsfor1k
    @usualsuspectsfor1k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Duallies are antiquated???? Really?
    Anyone who tows regularly or carries heavy payloads (or buildouts) has entered the chat.....
    That statement needs clarification. Without it, you just lost credibility with a ton of potential customers.

    • @owlvansengineering
      @owlvansengineering  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      For towing 20,000lbs trailers I agree, but for Adventure Vans that will never get near that weight, we don't belive duallies are necessary

    • @usualsuspectsfor1k
      @usualsuspectsfor1k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@owlvansengineering Do some reading on towing, stability and duallies. Your statement is so far out of whack it's nuts. For your market - probably most buyers are not experienced towers - they need to discard your statements and seek knowledgeable input.
      Sincerely, a lifelong tower.

  • @cristianm-uv9up
    @cristianm-uv9up ปีที่แล้ว

    170 is 330lbs heavier than the 144, therefore less payload.

    • @MichaelWilliams-ro9bm
      @MichaelWilliams-ro9bm 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We added a leaf spring to our 170. ( 1000 lb capacity)

    • @jr.6199
      @jr.6199 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Read the GVWR to be sure and get all steel belted and steel sidewalls for more tire load capacity.