ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- In this video, I talk about Starfield and why it is genuinely brilliant. If you're a fan of sci-fi games this is a must play, and is an out-of-this-world gaming experience, one you should definitely play before the Shattered Space DLC comes out.
#starfield #starfieldgame #starfieldgameplay #starfieldupdate #starfieldreview #xbox
Let's get one thing straight, this game is far from perfect. There are a fair few things that are wrong with the game, as there are with a lot of games, and there are somethings that admittedly are flat out unacceptable in a modern day release. But in an overall sense, this is one of the most fun games I have played in a really long time. One that I would argue is quintessentially Bethesda.
To be perfectly honest, I first played this game right when it was available on game pass. As a fan of Fallout 4 (another controversial opinion I know), I figured if what bethesda was selling was a Fallout game but in space, it would be a perfectly good way of passing the time. And since it was on xbox game pass I didn't have to spend any more money that I wasn't already spending.
However the more I played, the more I understood that this game is a slow burn, all the things that I initially saw as boring, such as the questing just got better and better the more I played the game. Even the ship combat which I vowed I would do as little as possible at the start of my play through became so much more fun the more I progressed the game with different ships, perks, and just larger scale combat. The general combat also got more fun as I got more perks, powers and guns.
It turned out Starfield is Genuinely Brilliant!
You’re genuinely a moron
Shut up you dork
For giving his opinion?
Tf? Weirdos these days
@@solarpoweredafricanvegansp178 shiieeeeet fr fr ONG unc then crackas wilin
@@solarpoweredafricanvegansp178 shiieeeeeeet fr fr ong unc you str8 up spittin
pin of shaaaaaaaaaaaameee.
I had never played a Bethesda game previous to this year, yet I’m having a blast playing Starfield. It’s a game for a more mature audience as there isn’t much sex, cursing, or drugs (from what I’ve seen), and it’s a really nice change of pace for someone like myself who also enjoys GTA. In Starfield the world isn’t out to get you, it’s waiting for you to explore it by meeting new people, forging new relationships, and getting thrown into unique situations. The choices I make during a quest-line have an affect on the outcome of the situation and also what other people believe or don’t believe, like the Terrormorph questline. Also, you receive exclusive spaceships, spacesuits, clothes, accessories, and official titles by completing these quests.
Just checked my stats and I have played Starfield for a collective amount of 11 days and 13 hours (277hrs) and been having a blast. Did all of the main and faction quests, did most if not all of the side content, made some cool ships and outposts, I even NG+ a couple of times. Now with that being said, how is anyone able to play a game for 500 hours or more and still not like it? I understand not feeling it within the first 2-5 hours and put it down but to trudge through a game that you don't even like for that long is crazy! Just rage playing the game, not even enjoying what they're doing
It is a mystery although I think a lot of people claim hours that they didn't actually play.
I’m one of the few who fell in love with this game from day one. In fact, I’m one of the few weirdos who thought the lack of mini-maps enhanced the experience. So glad I played through it before those got added.
I’m still finding new stuff almost a year and hundreds of hours later. I think time will be incredibly kind to Starfield.
Hahaha you are definitely unique 😅. I do agree with the last statement, evenually with DLC and modding its gonna be a game that people spend thousands of hours on.
@@TahmidHOI completely understand why people were frustrated with the lack of maps. Ideally, a toggle to enable/disable them would have been available at launch - but for me their absence complemented the core themes of exploration and discovery in a profound way.
It forced me to engage with the world in a manner I've never quite experienced in a game before. I wasn't just going from A to B - I was learning the city and remembering directions to points of interest as I played. Not just in the usual form of muscle memory that comes from repetitive play, but active observation of the world around me.
Again - 100% get how that wouldn't interest most people, but it was an essential part of my experience with Starfield.
The one thing I strongly feel needs to be fixed and very well could be is smarter NPC. It completely breaks immersion when you can freely draw your weapon and no reaction from any NPC.
I agree. There are some more immersion tweaks that the game needs tbh. It would really round out the experience.
@@TahmidHOexactly. I wish there were consequences for dialogue choices too. I feel like you as a player can’t really change the narrative no matter what dialogue you choose. Take the Ron Hope quest for example. I really wanted to throw that asshole in prison but instead had to off him and his guards lol
@@MexiRambo It's funny you mention that specific quest because there's actually several different options you have for resolving it. I understand the sentiment, "I wish I could throw him in jail" but the fact that he attacks you instead of willingly being arrested is not really immersion breaking.
In that quest you could simply accept his bribe, Keep Rons secret without the bribe which is essentially the same as before without money.
Then you can choose not to keep his secret which considering the character of Ron Hope sort of makes sense why he would rather kill you out right than sit there and go quiet to jail.
In this aspect I would say this game was better than Skyrim but worse than Fallout 4 and 3.
Glad you like it but how is exploration in this one better than their previous titles? Previous games every dungeon was hand crafted and had little details of their own to uncover. That's what made me fall in love with BGS games, the exploration. In starfield you get repeat locations a lot. Like abandoned UC listening post, and abandoned lab. Each time the locations- down to corpse placement, lootable boxes, enemy locations, even notes are identical. So i cant see how exploring the same 20 or 30 locations over and over is better exploration than hundreds of unique locations that feel slightly samey but are all unique. Especially the notes/terminals/journals being the same every time man that really killed it for me.
Think your looking at previous games with rose tinted glasses. Almost every draugr ruin was practically the same thing. This game at the very least has varied terrain due to the fact it's not shoehorned into having one "theme". I.e it doesn't need to all be the snowy ruins of Skyrim or Post apocalyptic of fallout
@@TahmidHOno offense, but you’ve got no clue what you’re talking about, so I’m assuming you’re new to Bethesda games and don’t know how to play them.
Essentially you start walking, and get sidetracked by a billion other incredibly fun things along the way. Everything tells a story, and if you believe it all looks the same, then you aren’t wise or curious enough to piece together the subtle storytelling.
You ever stumble upon a dilapidated hotel full of robots, where you solve a murder mystery in the style of Clue? Or find a pirate ship filled with engines, attempting to fly across Boston?
Those are the random things Starfield couldn’t fix with 10 years of modding. They built a snooze fest of a game.
@@gingerd2098 From what your saying I'm gonna assume you've never actually played starfield and just are blindly regurgitating everything you've read online.
The best part about this game is that there are so many quests, and points of interest. It was a point I mentioned heavily in my own video when I talked about Neon.
@@TahmidHO hold this L
starfield is not great, it’s not bad. starfield is starfield. it’s exactly how a game made by bethesda ultimately would be. that’s really it.
To be honest this is a far more sensible take than the people who built up their own idea of Starfield in their heads and then got disappointed by it later on.
@@TahmidHOthis. exactly this. 99% of the hate i see online is from people who overhyped it to be something they never promised it would be and then got upset it wasn’t what they imagined
@@TahmidHO starfield being a game made by bethesda and the expectations with that is the worst thing about the game. We did not want dated graphics, tons of loading screens, mediocre story, bad facial animations and models, be gunplay, horrible melee combat, and like bethesda fashion, removing simple systems that were implemented in previous games. You cant swim in starfield but you could in skyrim. Guards reacted to your shouts but now they dont even react to bullets flying at their feet. And thats just their own game im talking about. you compare it to any heavy hitter game that came out recently and you can see why people were disappointed with the game. If you think the game is genuinely brilliant then your expectations are in the gutter. Starfield should have came out 1 year after skyrim. Then it might have seemed good. You are excusing things by saying "its a bethesda title".
Except missing everything that bethesda was famous for. Handcrafted worlds that are fun to explore? Nope. Immersive worldbuilding? Nope.
@@Pixx2266 simply not true. fallout 3 and fallout 4 world building is a massive heap of mess.
One of few games I actually finished main story in quite some years :D Can't say it's very good but it's alright
Love this game, I continue to play it to this day, vehicle transportation will soon be added too so that will make traversing the planets even better. My only real complaint about starfield is that points of interest can be repeatedly found in every planet.
My nitpickiness is that I would like to be able to travel from planet to planet manually, AND having the chance to find random events in space.
Being a fan of fallout 4 is a controversial opinion? That’s crazy I loved the game and so do all my other friends that love fallout. If there are a lot of people out there that don’t like it, that’s weird to me.
You would be surprised.
It sold like hotcakes, but it isn't fashionable to like it. You aren't supposed to like any of the BGS Fallouts. That's WrongFun!
@@atticusgalt10 Haha! 25 million total sales last I saw, its one of the best selling games of all time yet people refuse to acknowledge that it was a very fun experience. Even for me who is a cult like follower of the whole Fallout series (you can check my latest video for proof), I still stand by the fact that modded Fallout 4 is an all time great gaming experience.
I agree. It's not perfect. I'd argue it's not even finished yet. And I don't like how they are using monetization (or rather over monetization).
However, what I've played: I have enjoyed thoroughly
I lost interest after about 200 hours during it's release. And treated it much like I did Skyrim: I'll play a little each year. Watch how the game evolves, what modders do to it, see what DLC's add, and watch it grow.
This was not a great game on day one. Rather, it created a foundation for a great game to be built upon. Time will tell if that comes to fruition.
Honestly, I assumed pretty early on that my problem with the game is exactly that it's the quintessential Bethesda game, which I enjoyed up until around like 2016 but eventually I just grew bored of it, open worlds games just don't do it for me anymore. I can't bring myself to play Oblivion, Skyrim or any of the Fallout games after 2 anymore, but what usually gets me is the writing, Bethesda's style of writing is very... Bland and descriptive, which in turn doesn't give the voice actors a lot to work with, so you just sit there listening to NPCs talk in an almost monotone voice for several minutes while doing nothing, and shit, I got high tolerance for lengthy dialogue, both when it comes to listening or reading, after all, CRPGs are my favorite types of games, but Starfield just couldn't hold my attention, add to that a very "outdated" core gameplay for the lack of a better word and the game lost my interest very quickly.
Thankfully I wasn't really hyped for Starfield so I didn't really get disappointed when I didn't end up enjoying the game. I truly hope Bethesda learn some lessons from Starfield in order to make TES6 an amazing game, I may not enjoy Skyrim's gameplay or Bethesda's game design in general anymore, but TES' lore still holds a special place in my heart and I will probably end up playing it anyways.
Very brilliant game
Crimson fleet was the best faction quest
truly among Bethesda's best quests ever
Bro I somehow left that one for the end and did almost everything else before that one 😭😭 Now you guys hyped me up about it.
ngl crimson fleet is top 1 BGS quests of all time
Neon is literally a road, a single road, how is this an interesting world full of detail lmao.
There is a whole underbelly if you take one of the side roads. From there there are two distinct levels and then you can go all the way down as well and fight fish in the water. You could also go all the way up and explore the whole rooftops and domes of Neon. Far from "a single road"
Furthermore within that road there are several buildings a lot of which have multiple levels and their own respective quest chains. If they for example made the road zig zag instead, would it be more or less entertaining in your opinion?
@@TahmidHO it’s the underbelly lot the literal road, and it’s just as unimpressive. I don’t want a road that zig zags, I want a city. They’re hyping neon as this crime filled city, and all we get is sterile shit and looney tunes dancer with a whack night club.
just play cyberpunk for example and stop embarrassing yourself with your takes
I pre-order and have played Cyberpunk since launch. It's probably why I have a higher tolerance for all the issues with Starfield. It's also why I am willing to look past them, especially with how good modding has become in Starfield. Cyberpunk still clears this game btw don't get me wrong. It's in my top 5 favorite games of all time but Starfield is still fun.
Love the fact that Eddard Stark took the time off his day to write this comment
@@Giggles_iJest without a head, even
Yeah and cyberpunk was perfect at launch? It wasnt, and its still a buggy mess. Would choose starfield over cyberpunk any day, hell even minecraft is better.
@Forest762 lol keep being delusional.yeah cyberpunk was a buggy mess no one is denying that, but behind bugs was a game with good characters, dialogues, story, impact full choices and beautiful graphics.starfield has souless and sterilized story written by ChatGPT, boring one dimensional characters, elementary school level dialogues, ugly characters whihc look like they are on crack and extremely boring world.none of this is getting fixed while emilo and todd are working in bethesda
It’s a stretch to call this game brilliant. No brilliant game kept me hating myself the whole 80 hours I put into it lol
Why would you play it 80 hours if you hated every second of it?
@@dabgoldstein9823 he's mentally deficient after being bullied in high school
@@dabgoldstein9823 I was trying to force myself to like the game, I wanted to, but I couldn’t lol
Was not impressed. They way overhyped the game and released a very broken mess. I struggled through playing the entire main storyline and all of the side quests. When it was over (started again) I was not at all compelled to continue. The FPS part wasn't bad and the character interaction was ok, but for a space game it was extremely easy to fast travel everywhere and not ever deal with space at all. Might as well have been all on the same planet. Just didn't work for me.
Starfield has a lot of problems but being a "broken mess" is not one of them. It's the most polished Bethesda game ever imo.
That's fair.
Starfield is genuinely Brilliant ??? No it isn't, stop it ! it's a decent game and fun to play, but it's not brilliant or a masterpiece or anything like that. You are being disingenuous and gaslighting us now. Don't be fake and lie to your viewers bro.
I think that's a matter of opinion. I argued why I think the game is brilliant if beyond that you think I am wrong that's a subjective decision.
@@TahmidHO Yes, yes I heard your arguments and they were dog sh*t. That's why I said you were being disingenuous and gaslighting us. I don't think you really believe what you said in your video, but whatever. Anyhow, Mass Effect is way better. Mass Effect already showed people how to make a compelling space game back in 2007. You don't need or want big procedurally generated planets. You need witty banter, engaging combat, solid lore, and a believable and powerful threat to tackle. Starfield has none of these things. It's like they wanted to be a walking simulator or a more boring version of No Man's Sky. In No Man's Sky, at least you could fly around on the planet and land wherever you felt like. No Man's Sky was not a fun game, ever. Why they tried to emulate their game genre, in a worse way, is totally beyond me. To everyone out there watching this review this is totally a disingenuous review by "@TahmidHO" just stick to playing Mass Effect games instead guys, If you have not played any of these games yet. Trust me.
@@Mr.Davs2216 I mean I don't know how to convince you otherwise but I truly love this game
Look how upset you are because someone enjoys a video game that you don't. Are you an insecure control freak irl too? Or are you just a fckng weirdo? Maybe both eh?
@@JC23783 Not angry just pushing back on a false and disingenuous review. You can enjoy and have fun with a game, but that doesn't make it a brilliant or a masterpiece of a game. I said it was a decent game and fun to play, but no way is it a brilliant game, because that's just not true and it's a disingenuous review by the uploader. Starfield is just a testament to the idea that bigger or a lot more planets doesn’t always mean better. They went for "Quantity over Quality." Fallout 76’s entire marketing campaign was “it’s bigger AND better” and that game was complete shit. Pretty much the same thing with fallout 4, only except that game wasn’t COMPLETE shit, only MOSTLY shit. So counting Starfeild, that’s their last THREE games in the past almost NINE years. That’s NINE years of overselling and jank. So yeah, Bethesda as a company is a testament to the idea that “bigger doesn’t always mean better” since all they have been trying to do is make a bigger Fallout/Skyrim for almost a decade now. If you like Todd-slop and you are a fanboy follower of this channel just say so. Now be gone child.
Forgot this game even existed.
Haha, I did too for a while.
Unfortunately we live in a game climate where it’s fun to shit on everything lol “this game is not perfect” tell me what game is this game is fun as hell sure it has its down sides but as far as outer space exploration games this is top 10
You're a breath of fresh air. Man, the worst thing you can do is say your opinion may be "controversial"; opinions are not controversial, they're just opinions. The toxic culture of gaming and our social media obsessed society in general wants to make us feel bad for expressing our opinions if they are not "popular", like somehow it's lame to love a game that "everyone" hates. I love a lot of unpopular games and I'd never for a moment feel embarrassed about that. I think Fallout 4 is the best of the entire Fallout franchise and I think Starfield is even better than Fallout 4, and I couldn't give a flying rat's ass if anyone agrees with me on that or not. Great video liked and shared keep up the good work!
Thank you that means a lot!
I agree with the majority of your points, however, I don't understand how you can say this game has the best exploration and world building of all Bethesda games... This is literally Bethesda's worst attempt at exploration due to the copy/paste points of interest and empty worlds...
He did say Bethesda and to point Fallout 4 was the best they had to offer. BUT if you are going to procedurally generate planets on this scale you do at least 1k poi unique from each other. Not just "mine" or oh look, "caved in mine" or just "cave" that looks like every other "cave" on every other planet. Bethesda's strengths were their "hand drawn" locations even to the gnomes and mannequins they did in Fallout 4. Yeah sure they did the "Kid in the Fridge" fiasco but the rest was fairly competent.
The coherence and world building of Starfield is the best in Bethesda's history. Every weapon, part of your ship, suits, food, cities, faction and even planets has tons of lore and information. Do not blame the game if you were to lazy to search all this. Everything was there just awaiting to be discovered.
@@manuelsaizdiaz3873 Not really some things have logical fallacies that diminish the isolation of some star systems. The fact you have more "spacers" in the game than settled colonies is one of them and these spacers "live" in an area w/o oxygen "in" a space suit with infinite oxygen flying around ships with infinite fuel to a moon/planet with a temple next to an outpost.
Starfield's exploration is trash if you want well made, unique explorations. But if you want more of a time waster on a hamster wheel, it has enough quantity to keep the wheel going. At the end of the day, it really comes down to if you want quality, or quantity.
@@qinlongfei Fallout 4 was more fun w/o ever playing the main quest as long as you had fun mods.
The only thing that breaks the game for me is leaving and landing on the planets, vehicles and flying in space . I wish it was more like no man's sky in that sense
If it were like no man’s sky or elite dangerous, it would have to be a story-light sandbox-type game. Fortunately, it is not.
I’ve been playing starfield for like a week straight now and I’m enjoying it
Glad to hear it!
I feel like they could just add some dynamic events and really make some sort of weather system. Play tornadoes, better storms, it would be so much better
100%.
I downloaded a mod which just slightly increases how often the weather changes. Already an improvement. But yeah, proper storms, tornados, blizzards, volcanos?!
@@skyriminspace yeah I really wish they would revamp the weather. It's so needed.
This sounds great. I think I did see a mod that randomizes battles/encounters more. Like enemies will call for reinforcements more often - and you'll also stumble across far more battles between factions. I even saw it may have regular POIs suddenly get invaded by opposing factions as well so you aren't the ONLY guy in the galaxy trying to loot a place and it makes it feel more alive. The POI system was simply not filled out enough. It was almost like they created a base for modders to create masterpieces with. However, it's taken a long ass time to start arriving at more content like this that I wish we could have just had from launch!
@@gsimon123 yeah that's what I need. It's a lot more variety when you land on planets. Honestly I think helldivers too is pretty perfect when it comes to atmosphere
I disagree. I think the game is terrible. It has improved in some quality of life ways, but I don't think it fixed the core problems. That said, I enjoyed seeing what you liked about it. I did not find the writing or worldbuilding interesting or immersive but I did like Neon better than other areas. To me it fails even in comparison to most Bethesda games. The side content is definitely where it is at though! I found that avoiding random radiant quests and locations and focussing on the sidequests improved my experience a lot.
(Also Arasaka and Ryujin both take their inspiration from classic cyberpunk writing which was full of 1980s economic fears about the power and influence of a strong Japan.)
Ahhh that makes a lot of sense about why all Cyberpunk cities have some japanese evil corp. Thanks for the comment!
Same here. I love Starfield, even with its flaws.
Love the game as well. Agreed hands down to your synopsis.
This has to be satire
What makes you say that?
@@TahmidHO How can someone play starfield for 100 hours without undergoing significant brain damage.
@@arnavprakash7991 If you played the game instead of relying on their Internet to form all your thoughts and opinions you might be able to figure it out.
@@TahmidHO I bought this game on release, loved the intro even though the loading screens and inability to fly around to anywhere really upset me.
From there it was a sharp decline, I forgot I still have this game in my library.
For a game that took years of development, using cutting edge technology, thousands of experienced developers, and cost hundreds of millions of dollars this is what we get??? And your telling me this is justified. We should be happy?
I just started playing it and I’m actually enjoying it quite a bit. It’s not perfect by any means, but I like it enough to solely focus on it
Thank you for making this video bc this game gets such a bad rep and it’s the reason I didn’t play it for such a long time. I’m a nerd who’s obsessed with astronomy and I was excited to check this game out. But when I finally got my Xbox Series X and I heard all the bad reviews, I decided not even bother. Then one day while another game was updating, I saw I had some extra space, so I said what the hell. The best decision I’ve made this year. I absolutely LOVE this game. I’ve had it for maybe 3 weeks and I’ve put it over 55 hours. It’s football season and I rather play this game than watch football. I abandon my own family during football season, and now I rather play Starfield. Just to give people perspective lol. So that’s why I can’t understand for the life of me some of the complaints this game has received. How can people say there’s nothing to do lmaoooo. There is nothing BUT things to do. You can’t even finish a mission without stumbling into 2 other missions you can do later. Love the customization. Love the variety of missions so you can mix it up. The details and lore are impeccable as well. Is the game perfect?? No. But the potential for this game is endless. They have built the foundation to add on to this game for years to come. 1000 worlds they can continue to build onto???? Can’t wait to see what more they come up with #TeamStarfield
I love the gameplay but I hate the world. Everything about it feels wrong. Like how the Free Star Collective must have billions of citizens, but the Freestar Rangers is composed of five people and they have the owner of a strip mall space station on their council of governors. The game should have been set right after the evacuation of Earth, after an apocalypse that killed 99% of the population (that would still leave 100 million people) or more. That would be a perfect setting for pirates, poverty, and settlement building.
Would have been nice for sure. I think you can blame that on Bethesda and using such an outdated engine that they simply can't do things like that. And their reliance on people to just mod these things in.
@@TahmidHO What, what would does anything I said have to do with an older engine?
@@Dennis-nc3vw My bad I interpreted what you said as a lack of NPCs in the world.
I dont think they were trying to go with the apocalyptic scenario, cuz thats already what Fallout is about. This is supposed to be a sci-fi universe. Its their 3rd universe created. You have Elder Scrolls Uni, Fallout Uni, and now Starfields Uni.
@@LxrdGhxulProductions That's my point, they weren't trying to do it, but that's how it came out.
I love Starfield. Home run in my book. Have over 500 hours in it
Can't wait to get back into it once the dlc is out and space vehicles :)
Same, took a break for Elden Ring DLC haha.
Thank you for making a passionate video on starfield. Way too much hate on this game.
Funnily I had the same experience as you did. Tried it, didn’t like it, put it aside and forgot about it until I watched a video. Tried it again and suddenly fell in love. It’s far from perfect but I had a lot of fun in this game in the end!
Thanks for sharing!
It isn't.
How come?
Starfield is by no means perfect, but it isn't nearly as bad as people make it out to be.
The main quest is where it falls flat for me, but that's the case for every Bethesda game imo. starfield's main quests really makes you think towards the end before the unity, it gives you a choice of morality which i really enjoyed and wished there was more of. The UC vanguard quest/Ryujin/Crimson fleet questlines are all great and blew me away on first playthrough, and they really felt like the true Bethesda styled questlines, and reminded me so much of old Bethesda games.
the gameplay is easily the best out of all Bethesda games, gunplay/ship battles feel great. and ship building is phenomenal.
My only complaint there being that melee kinda sucks, and the gun variety is poor.
I really liked the addition of the "persuade" in dialogue but it feels like they focused too much on that and let go of a lot of other dialogue features that i miss.
starfield is by no means perfect, but it is not a bad game either, its a solid 7/10 for me, with potential to grow higher with future dlcs. as all Bethesda games start to shine with their dlcs In my opinion.
skyrim with no dlc wouldnt be nearly as fun for me, same with oblivion and fo4.
Well said!
I honestly keep going back to it. I can say that I’ve never wasted money on a Bethesda game. When you compare what some other developers are offering at the same price point, but that’s his games have always been a bargain in my opinion. I have returned to Skyrim fallout and Starfield all this year and have pumped in another 2 to 3 dozen hours into the games. I hardly ever do that with other games. Not only do I like to return to the atmospheres that they have created, but to see what mods or updates have done to the game progressively just keeps the replay value far greater than other games. For single player atmospheric games I think Bethesda still offers the absolute best for your money.
It's trash.
Upon release, I thought the game was meh. I rushed through the whole game to see this "New Game+". I didn't spend enough time anywhere to appreciate aspects of the game, and I let the internets opinion of this game ruin my own.. But...
I'm currently 200 hours into my second playthrough, and I feel so incredibly immersed in this game and have not grown tired of it. Incredible story lines and characters, a well thought out universe, and some INCREDIBLY beautiful planets if you are willing to give exploration a chance.
Once this game started getting hate, for things like 30fps on console at launch, no seemless launching/landing off of worlds, and IMO the MISUNDERSTANDING that all planets are barren of content, people just ran with the hate and it snowballed. I think many of us who love the game now were influenced by this hate at launch. This game wasn't given a fair chance and I hope after a few DLCs people come back and just play the game for what it is, I think they will thoroughly enjoy it
That's what I say: STAY WAY FROM HYPETUBERS. Yesm the kind that will jump on the bandwagon and point whatever direction the hype wind is blowing.
The same happened with Cyberpunk on release. Had tons of problems but I had IMMENSE fun with it even then. But if you listened to influencers, one would think it was the worst game ever.
Pretty sure once the hate fog finally settles many people will be able to enjoy Starfield for what it's worth, regardless of its (big) flaws.
Also, if someone does something after being told it's sh1t, anything bad will be perceived 10x worse than it would if they just went in with no biases involved.
@@R.a.f.a.e.l. That was my experience with Cyberpunk too lol. Glad to see there are like-minded gamers out there
@@yesteryearr Rushing into NG+ was something I was told to avoid through a video by CohhCarnage back at launch and I’m glad I listened lol. Rushing the game means that you miss out on so many things due to trying to NG to “get things done” ASAP rather than organically playing the game. I’ve heard of a lot of people that rushed NG+ and were super disappointed with the game.
That said, I’m glad you are enjoying it! I’ve been an enjoyer since day one, and even though the game does have some flaws (and plain poor/bad aspects), there is a lot of fun to be had. Not listening to the hate train TH-camrs and doofuses on Reddit helped me to see the game through my own eyes and not someone else’s. Can’t wait for Shattered Space!
@@thelvadam5113 I totally agree and think that this is one of the bigger flaws of the games. It turned me off upon release, and I've since learned to just accept it, as when playing on the Series X, the loading doesn't take too long. I do wish they are about to change it in a future update but I doubt it. I do have many gripes with the game and think Bethesda missed the mark in a few areas. But nevertheless it's a much more enjoyable game than people make it out to be.
How am I supposed to give exploration a chance when there’s fucking nothing to explore outside of the main towns other than quite literally copy and pasted locations.
Been through the Unity 24 times, presently at level 242. Still loving the gameplay. Waiting patiently for Shattered Space DLC. The people that can't stand for others to have their own opinions are the trolls here, Melvin.
Hahah well said
I was a bit meh with starfield, after the rev8 update I hopped back in. I changed the difficulty to make enemies really strong, but also me really strong, so enemies aren't spongy. I also removed enemy markers and most of the hud. Now I have to play really tactically. A mod to change planet gen and up the amount of flora. Now forests feel like real forests. I'm having a great time now!
I really love the game now, when I first started the game a year ago I almost rage quit at least a dozen times, it was so buggy and was really trying to melt my CPU. But they fixed it, runs great now, not perfect but darn good. I'm kinda a space geek though, grew up with a dad who worked for an aerospace company so my whole bedroom was covered in space stuff. I spent hours drawing spaceships and battles, so this game just reached that inner child and instead of drawing soaceships im making them and exploring and having space battles. I have no doubt got my money's worth and now with modders this game will just get better and better like most of their games
Thanks for sharing, glad you enjoyed!
For me, not having a map helped highlight the amazing job they did with the in-game directions. Knowing i want to go somewhere (like the trade authority), finding a kiosk that will tell me which district its in, then using the signs to find my way there, slowly memorizing the city layout, in my mind, is so much better than placing a marker and following the big glowy thing.
This is not to excuse not having a map though. Just because i liked it is no excuse for not having one in a game about exploration in 2023.
Its an ok game. The real problem is that with the sheer amount of time they had to work on this game. I just expected a more refined experience on par with Skyrim. Better armor crafting, weapon crafting aesthetically speaking. Dragonborn 2.0 powers didnt look or sound more unique in terms of magic space powers to LOOK more cool and have more impactul gameplay. Not be weaker than a single bullet.
Another issue is the vast majority of NPC's are all preachy as hell, and no real way to be who you want your character to be. IE good or bad Starborn which the game explicitly says you should do what you want. But every scripted reaction is always negative almost always. Nothing like Skyrims nuance with Dark brotherhood and thieves guild with actual rewards
My final real issue is just the starborn items themselves and how just... Mediocre but cool looking they are. Its like they intentionally developed 99% of the games armor and ships to look meh, but the ONE cool upgrades arent good statewise and cant even be upgraded without replaying the game 10x over, and they STILL get less than ideal stats even at max playthroughs
Talk about a stick without a carrot.
Its a fine game to waste time in if you have nothing else. But I will never call this game brilliant tbh
Fair enough to be honest. I cant say I don't get where your coming from, but for me personally the rest of the game was so fun and it delivered on the Bethesda sandbox experience I wanted so those issues werent a problem.
And cue the heel face turn lmao
I think we're going to see more and more reviews like this. But yeah, I've loved Starfield since it released.
Can't blame them when I admit in the video I had the same reaction 🤣
About time this game gets a love review this game is fantastic and I love it
Lots of others I am not definitely not the first, its just the fact that hating is more popular so a lot of people play the game with their minds made up to begin with.
I'm glad that you enjoyed this game. It's so cool that everyone can have such different opinions about the same game.
That being said, I disliked this video cause starfield is poopy from a butt.
Fair enough 😂
beautiful game, i absolutely loved every second of it. i genuinely dont understand the hate
The like to dislike ratio really just shows how people can't take a different opinion these days when it comes to gaming. So what if he likes Starfield? I really like it personally but I'm not gonna go disliking every video critical of it or hate on anyone. Heck, I watched another video just now that was very critical of it but well thought out and funny. Did I disagree with some points? Certainly, but he was entitled to his opinion too.
Yes. Its brilliant. ❤
Thank you for a video!
Thank you for the comment!
Its a great game. I very much enjoyed the first play through.
The glitches during some missions sucked tho an the side quests were pretty cool.
Ship building is fun once youre high enough leveled up
Outposts are new to me, so I may get into those next play through.
Just started on outposts it's not that much better than FO4 and arguably worse. Mods have helped a lot after tho.
I've been in it since early release, about 1200 hrs so far. Mod baby mod. Like a commenter on another video that said Starfield is going to become our Skyrim where you fire up Starfield to play your mods, I am there. I'm deep into the Darkstar mods. Simply satisfying.
People being mad that someone enjoys a videogame is just wild to me. So many people in the comment section crying and having a meltdown because you actually enjoy Starfield, if I hate a game I simply never think about it again, not hang around starting fights with people in comment sections under videos about said game lol that’s some serious basement dwelling virgin energy. Anyways I absolutely adore this game, I think if people just hop into the side content a lot of minds would be changed.
What song did you use for the video? it's fire!
The Neon background song
After returning to SF since I've last played it at the start of '24, I'm noticing that people are still complaining about all the things this game isn't, instead of appreciating that Bethesda really tried something new and imo did something special. Yes, there are bugs, but that's expected from a BGS title honestly, and it's been this way for at least 15 years; aka it's something that likely won't change. But SF offers something that so many players seem to be completely unaware of: It takes its' time to unfold.
It seems to me that more and more people are unwilling or unable to take their time with something and appreciate it. Starfield won't work for someone who only wants instant gratification and results or who doesn't understand subliminal storytelling - or both. SF isn't Fortnite, it's not No Man's Sky, Star Citizen or Escape from Tarkov either. Hell, it's not even as close to Skyrim as so many people think it is. Skyrim itself is only remembered so fondly because there's a billion mods for it that lengthened the llife-cycle of that game. To me, it has always been pretty boring, I was always more of a Fallout fan tbh. But it doesn't matter here.
What I'm trying to say is that in order to understand and appreciate Starfield, you have to take your time with it and let it sink in. The storytelling and quest system, while not flawless, is still deeper than what any of the previous modern Bethesda have offered so far. The fact that it's not something you're going to rush through to get your hourly dopamine hit is something that we should be thankful for, especially in the gaming world of today where most AAA-games aren't much more than giant microtransaction advertisements.
Well said. While I don't agree with what you said entirely- I do think that Bethesda did drop the ball in some aspects of this game- it's like I said in the video, the game is a slow burn.
@@TahmidHO Yeah, and I appreciate your pov as well, but many people won't. And sure, BGS is not an angel in this industry with their applied business practices. But at least they tried to do something new which is more than you can say about other franchises. ^^
I hate rpg games normally, I tried fallout 4 when it came out and hated it despite playing for over 30-40 hours waiting for it to get fun, and later I tried Skyrim and felt the same. I got Starfield off game pass and I put in over 200 hours and I have had fun. There’s things that could be better for sure but I agree it’s a good game. Personally I found it way more enjoyable than fallout and Skyrim but I think it just depends what you’re interested in.
I always loved Starfield but it's probably b/c I had no expectations & no need to play it but all the videos (majority the bad ones) mad me want to try it when it came out free on gamepass. Man I had a blast & right now it fits into how I would play games after I completed them but didn't want to start over. I would make my own missions in my head. Like even gta 5 I played a lot of hours after I had completed the game. I was basically just a tow truck driver with Franklin or I would do supply runs with Trevor. Same with saints row 2. I did every u can do mission & faction wise & even activity wise. The main thing that hooked me was the UC faction quest. The factions were damn near games by themselves. I've went into damn near every system in the game. Not solar but things u can do. I never thought I would get into ship bubuilding b/c it looked to difficult but then at a time seeing everyone's ships on youtube made me want to invest time & skill points into ship building & piloting. It's krazy b/c that journey of becoming a pilot & master ship building along. So doing these things in between was just like living my life & working b/c the main mission doesn't pay u like that. I invested in the commerce skill. I was master weapon building, working on suit building, b4 I stopped. But the shattered space dlc made me come back to get back used to the game. Now ive been sucked into surveying planets & having a ball...KRazy how ive only been back 5 to 6 days & they've added the buggy so I dont have to jetpack everywhere to get resources
Starfield is amazing, dont let people who copy all their opinions from youtubers tell you otherwise 😂
If you think it's amazing then you're either coping or you need to play better games...
@@denzeltron which youtuber gave you that opinion?
@@denzeltron nyeayy
@@denzeltron or perhaps they just have a different taste in games than you? You probably buy every COD game every year
can you fly seamlessly into space or to other planets >?
"a youtuber i respect quite a bit: fextralife"
certified bruh moment
Fextra puts out a TON of content for the community, what am I missing here?
@@RavageTV_ he is a clickbaity variety streamer that lets his minions churn out awful wikis.
they contain tons of false info and are barebones overall, and for some reason they show up higher on google than real wikis.
What's wrong with fextralife 🥲
@@TahmidHO He literally bots views on Twitch.
@@RavageTV_ A lot of people dislike Fextralife for their unmaintained wiki. They were infamous with a lot of gaming communities but this didn't come to people's attention until the last few years. For example, with BG3, Fextralife's wiki used information from the tabletop game instead of actual in-game data. Fextralife also has a tendency to abandon their wikis after the FOTM period is over - this results in the aforementioned barebones wiki full of empty templates, incorrect/outdated information, etc.
Some people also simply dislike them for embedding their Twitch stream on the wiki so they can pad viewers. It's not against Twitch's rules, but it comes across as disingenuous. That, and Fextralife's wiki tends to top community-made wikis in search results. Traffic that could've gone to an actually maintained wiki ends up going to Fextralife and that doesn't sit well with a lot of people.
That has to he a fucking joke
Unfortunately not.
The game is fine, not Bethesda's best but their games tend to get better as time goes on. The hate is way too overblown
Agreed. Not Bethesda's best but it's still pretty freaking awesome. Still I am partial to fallout 4.
Space setting still sucks
Starfield isn’t brilliant have you even played the other games this is most lackluster one even more than 76 at lauch honestly you might like it now but give it time it will fall off wouldn’t think twice abu finishing it next time or exploring the planets or doing certain quests ain’t worth it
I’m ok with someone liking this game but they always make excuses for the game justifying it’s flaws when it lauch it got a lot criticism and people calling this the best game of the year that should get award and was being told that this was the next Skyrim not even close and no the factions and consequences are not like Fallout new Vegas your off your gourd with that one
Played Starfield on launch and been playing again using the gameplay options they added and some soft mods. So far it's being one of the best experience in games I ever had. I recommend changing the combat to extreme damage from enemies and easy for player, so the combat feels more strategic.
So skew it more as a hard-core mode?
@@MikeJones-mf2fwyeah just like fo4's survival difficulty. Depending on the enemy type it can just be a question of who shoots first wins!
I also use a mod which removes red marks for enemies from the compass, & enemy health bars. Way more tactical.
Hating an inanimate object because other people enjoy it is beyond stupid but that’s where we are at today. I find starfield enjoyable the mods are pretty awesome so far too and the dlc is coming soon so I’m excited for what’s next. I wouldn’t let the people the people with a raging hate boner for the game ruin my experience, good on you for making actual content that’s not someone crying about starfield not being like fallout or no man’s sky. 👍
Thank you!
@@TahmidHO nah thank you for the content.
Starfield has the potential to be BGS best game. I hit NG+ 1, set my lvl 80 character up with all the best gear, 900,000 creds & a smugglers outpost with over 300,000 worth of contraband and turned it off about 5 months ago. Being lvl 80 I’ve pretty much seen all it has to offer so I’m not going back until the games actually “Finished” with land vehicles & DLC so It’ll feel like a fresh new game
I agree, I don't want to pick it up again until land vehicles are added.
There’s land vehicles now
I spent LOTS OF TIME in STARFIELD & ELITE ODYSSEY ...............
I haven't play BOTH for such a long time , BUT
I am sure , I SHALL back to ODYSSEY , but I may not return to STARFIELD ,
REASON is simple ( for me ) .......
When i play STARFIELD , I am going through a story of somebody ,
When I paly ODYSSEY , I am creating my OWN STORY !!!!
BUT one thing I have to be honest : even I upgrade my GPU and Mon to 2K standard ,
ODYSSEY's graphic is not as good as STARFIELD !!!!
sad .....................
My first game that really made me feel like i was the character. I love the traits, story and character creation. The amount of things to explore, the lore, and detail in my opinion are out of this world. The game is so damn fun! Ive also been playing on the hardest difficulty - this really helps with immersion!
bot
I think my biggest pet peeve is how life supporting planets are a dime a dozen in Starfield. In real life NASA freaks out at when they think they found another planet with liquid water.
I'll say it again. I love the gameplay but hate hate HATE the world.
Bought this game a week ago and i take my time exploring everything. Just landed on Mars and the underground city called Cydonia or something looks incredible with so much going on I don't even know who to talk to first 😅
It's way bigger than it seems.
I thought the game was incredible when I started too. The best is immediately evident, the bad stuff starts to grow more irritating the longer you play.
The size of the cities was definitely cool.
@@Dennis-nc3vw just curious... whats the bad stuff? Thinking about gettin this game, but cant deside yet
@vladimirshishkov3846 probably the procedurally generated planets with the same generic quests. I don't have a problem with them personally because there are still enough hand crafted quests and in a few days the new huge DLC.
3:03 Just started this quest line yesterday for the first time. Was great, I’m just about to start the daughter father questline
Starfield exploration is dogshit comapared to skyrim, heck even Minecraft is a better game for exploration.
I've loved Starfield since day one...preordered, had my work computer's wallpaper as Starfield concept art for a year or more leading up to launch, have a Starfield t-shirt, etc. I still love the game and it is among my favorites, but it's not without its flaws and downright bad aspects. Despite its flaws, I have over 250 hours in the game and I'm looking forward to going back and playing it again once Shattered Space drops.
I've been saying for 6+ months that we're going to start seeing more "Starfield is underrated" type videos coming out as time goes on, and it looks like that has started as I've come across 3 videos like this one in the last couple weeks. Good video, and I'm glad you're enjoying the game!
That's amazing!!
I want to get back into Starfield. A lot of beautiful planets to explore... I just wish Bethesda wasn't so incompetent when it comes to writing.
I feel that!
Mfs that never played cyberpunk 2077
I played it for about 100 hours but I just don't like the art direction, I prefer starfeilds art direction, loading screens are not too bad,skyrim had those too
@@sammuslu2992 Skyrim will be a teenager in a few months.
cyberpunk is on another league. bad comparison lol
@@sixx2683 shouldn’t even be a comparison. Two completely different games. Cyberpunk has rpg elements but it’s not an rpg. Your role is basically chosen for you from the start. Never understood people comparing these two games. Apples to oranges.
@@jamesadvincola9687 cyberpunk has choices unlike bethesda games so its also an rpg. In every bethesda game your role is also choosen from the start
Lost me at 3:47
You're entitled to your opinion and personal experience, but I personally found neon to be one of the most underwhelming and poorly constructed major environments, and questlines, in any Bethesda title. Aside from the railroad in fallout 4 (what even was that)
The on-the-rails Benjamin bayu questline. Mundane parcel packing job, for no reward at the end of the quest. Just some drab dialogue from the bartender. I had the most fun infiltrating the place to do the thing...
This game has strengths, but the god awful quest design, world structure, and writing are it's greatest downfall. Amongst other drawbacks.
My praise goes to it's surprisingly satisfying gunplay. Fun ship building mechanic (which I cheesed by playing as a cube). Everything else is just insultingly lazy. Todd can suck it.
Just started playing the other day, this game sucks but it’s cool, don’t know how else to explain it.
Technically it's really difficult to enjoy (load time, graphics). But if you consider it like your playing an older release its pretty sick, just sucks that they couldn't modernize this game.
@@TahmidHO yea traversal doesn’t really feel organic or natural, just one loading screen after another.
@@thebatmane2220 what I disliked most was space travel, sure I didn't expect a whole galaxy but they have these cinematic load screen at times that if they used more would make the game so much immersive.
Honestly, I enjoyed a lot of aspects of this game. The questing is a step up from their previous titles. The worlds tend to feel very undercooked, especially compared to their previous titles where the entire thing was handcrafted. Major cities are cool, but their immediate surroundings are not, and that sense of wonder from exploration is, ironically, the weakest in this game out of any of their previous titles because of that. This _should_ be the game with the best exploration, but it's actually the shallowest when it comes to that.
The procedural generation tools they created for this game are genuinely impressive, especially after giving the Creation Kit a look, it's very powerful stuff and creates very convincing worlds, albeit barren ones. The random outposts and points of interest do not have enough variations to justify the vast majority of the game being procedurally generated. I would've preferred 5-10 small planets with way more handcrafted points of interest than what we ended up getting.
Thanks man... Finally some content that is not just trashing the game saying that is the worse game of this decade... I've playing Starfield since de Launch and, yes it's not perfect, but the good parts of it are absolutely Majestic... Companions are great, even Sarah, that can bother sometimes, has a great side quest... The updates helped the game to get better and better, and the new dlc has a lot of potential... Starfield is actually a really good game, that i think now can be called Underrated...
Great video❤
I really love starfield but i have to say Bethesda could've done a much better job with making exploration or conversations more immersive.
On the surface, starfield doesn't look that much interesting but the depth of stories and missions made me really love the game. They need to learn from larian and CDPR and improve those aspects of their games which they lacked on starfield.
Fair enough!
This is the one of the few rare games that I've put over 100+ hour into (the other being Zelda Breath of the Wild)
This was when the internet was telling me that rhe game is "terrible"🙄
This is why people should form their own instead of listening to clickbaiting youtubers and influencers
Tf are you on about, everyone on the internet says breath of the wild is great, the game has a 97/100 metascore, and it’s user reviews are stellar, on top of being one of the most sold games of the last generation. In what world do you live?
The problem I think people have is they expected the game to be something that it isn’t. This game isn’t made for everyone. But the audience that it is made for do really enjoy it. I personally love a lot about the game and I 100% agree with the criticism that is valid. Yes the exploration can be better and the main story could be better but damn man it’s a pretty good Bethesda game at the end of the day. I occasionally will return to this game every so often when I get the urge. The soundtrack is super underrated too.
I think that’s one of the best reviews I’ve seen for Starfield. You hit every point right on the head.
Based
I think the reviewer was hit in the head. That's for sure.
@@bradydavis5791cope harder
i agree and i actually like the game i liked it at launch and got my moneys worth out of it despite the issues. its not nearly as bad as people say and with mods and updates its getting better.
I decided to play a new game after running through mass effect again, and I'm far far more addicted to SF than ME (which is a fantastic time). I cannot stop playing it and am loving the hell out of starfield all over again. I know the internet says I'm supposed to hate it, but no. No, it is incredible.
Exploring is so much more fun now with the rover
For real! I can't believe how much time I wasted traversing terrain before the rover.
Seeing a lot of videos like this coming out now!
It took me about 10 hours to get a feel for starfield & having loved fo4 & skyrim so much in the past, i was disappointed not to just jump in & love it from the first second.
Then i decided to stop projecting what the game "should" be & just let it tell me what type of game it actually was.
Unfinished in many areas yes, but overlooking those flaws, it's actually a really good game & doubtless will become great in time through dlc.
Exactly my thoughts, the game doesn't have the same heroic and dramatic start as all other Bethesda games, but it certainly still gives you that power fantasy later on. It takes a while but it becomes brilliant
@skyriminspace who are you bro
What do you mean doubtless? What do you mean great? What do you mean time? Please elaborate
@@azaansayed2002 uh oh, looks like we've got another keyboard warrior who wants to try & tell me my subjective opinion is wrong.
@@skyriminspace keyboard? Warrior? Please elaborate
I really enjoyed my time with this game as I'm a big fan of sci-fi and space.
My personal opinion is starfield is the skyrim replacement. Since the pre-order early access started I haven't wanted to play skyrim anymore. Only BGS game I've been playing since it's release.
After the fallout show I wanted to play fallout 4, arguably my favorite fallout experience due to the gameplay even though New Vegas has a special place in my heart
@TahmidHO yeah the show was great, gave me the fallout bug for a bit but didn't last long. Fantasy and SiFi are my favorite to genres post apocalyptic would be third on my list. Now Bethesda offers a game to scratch all 3 for me.
haha Skyrim sold more than starfield over the holidays and Skyrim currently has double the live players. Starfield isn't replacing anything.
@numberonedad been playing skyrim since launch, starfield is the first game to keep me from going back to skyrim. So yeah starfield has replaced skyrim for me. Now when elder scrolls 6 comes it will most likely replace all other BGS games for me.
I really really want to love Starfield but I just can't. I'm not able to develop feelings for this game. I just don't care about it. It was my most anticipated release the last years and I really had to force myself to keep playing. Deinstalled and installed it like 5 times already. Every 3 weeks or so I want to give it another chance because maybe I just was not in the right mood the last time but there's nothing everytime I start it. Started my 15th or so Skyrim run like 3 weeks ago and everyday I spent hours exploring Skyrim even tho I know everything already. Starfield does not give me that in the slightest. The comparison to Skyrim is a harsh one I know but Starfield just did not give me anything. Right now I'm installing it again to give it another try and I will keep on doing so until I have the fun I expected to have. But Starfield to me personally just feels somehow shallow and I doubt this will change over time. I was excited for the modding community to have a great impact on the game but Bethesda does not want modders to improve their games anymore. Various actions by Bethesda over the last years prove this. Overall Starfield shattered all my hopes and deams about The Elder Scrolls 6. I still can't really put in words my feelings towards Starfield. One word that comes to my mind is sad. I really don't want to ruin the game for the people that enjoy it. Just know I really envy you and wish I would've had the same experience you guys had
honestly this video made me decide to actually re install starfield and give it another try.
“ItZ heCkin GenUINELY BRILLYANT CHAT!! REDDIT 100 sneed video essay momentum”
It's a great game indeed.
I honestly believe that most of the internet haters haven't actually played the game and are going by e-celeb videos bashing the game. Some people genuinely tried and didn't like it, and that's fine, but most of the complaints i see in some comments are simply too vague or completely imprecise about what the game is.
People claiming that the game is very buggy or broken is a dead giveaway to me that someone didn't play the game.
Couldn't agree more.
@@Augusto9588 your raving played it you need counselling after those quests the npcs was so dull it felt like work not a game , pure POTATO'S
@@majorlouis956 Your comment and grammar make no sense. Spend some more time in school instead of tracking down videos of a game you don’t like and leaving unintelligible comments.
I played over a hundred hours and yeah the game is still trash in every way
I put the game down last year after 123 hours. I enjoyed it, for what it was. It's really interesting to hear you say that Neon was one of the best parts of it: I never went there, after all of my hours in the game. I'm really looking forward to playing it again once Shattered Space releases. I wonder if there's an "alternate start" mod, like I remember Skyrim having. It would be really cool to start on Neon, which would be totally new to me, without so much as a ship to get me off world. It would be really cool to have to earn that.
Alt start mod: Yes. There is.
These are the types of reviews I enjoy. Most reviewers literally live off of playing games so obviously, if a game isn't 100% perfect they won't like it. But, as a casual player myself, seeing reviews from other casual players helps me make my decision on whether or not I should get it. This is brilliant!
I enjoyed it too. I think people played it expecting it to be something different. Also, Bethesda has earned a bad reputation in recent years. But to me Starfield is a fun game
Think Bethesda's bad rep is justified. At the end of the day Starfield did under deliver, despite how fun and enjoyable it is. As I said in the video Bethesda can't keep making games that are half-baked and expect modders to do the rest.
The lesson of this story: Don't listen to losers like Puke Stephens who go out of their way to hate on anything Bethesda.
The game has always been pretty good, it just needed more fine tuning; admittedly, the main story is still rather bland. But now that the CK is out and modders can work their magic this game is the bomb!
@@elimpoluto9952 I agree with you brilliantly
@@elimpoluto9952 but I think your IQ is a bit low
nah the moral is don't listen to losers like todd
@@numberonedad Or losers like you?
Felt the same around that 100 hr mark, but play another 100 and let me know if you change your mind.
I am at the 300 hour mark now, just like previous Bethesda games I finished the campaign plus a large part of the side quests and then went into another game fully modded and I am ready to put in another 300 hours.