Don't Let This Happen To YOU! (Our RV Solar Panels Caught on Fire)!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 267

  • @EatSeeRV
    @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ☀ Get $50 off Renogy One products or your monthly subscription with code ONE50 using this link: link.eatseerv.com/renogyone

  • @josephharrell5724
    @josephharrell5724 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    One of the things about solar cells is that they are much more efficient when it is cold vs hot even though there is usually more sun when it is hot. The 3 inches that a rigid solar panel sits above the roof allow air to circulate underneath and cool them. You have just taught me that this is more more than a efficiency issue but is even more of a safety issue. Thanks for showing this because I have never seen this before. We all live and learn and it is so helpful when you share experience like this.

  • @SewingBoxDesigns
    @SewingBoxDesigns ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank goodness I just found this by accident. I'm glad the damage was minimal compared to what it could have been. I think you guys saved a lot of lives w this vid. Thank you!

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We hope so! It was a scary experience

  • @7113cole
    @7113cole ปีที่แล้ว +12

    WOW, you guys were so lucky. Glad the kitties are ok and you still have your RV. Thanks for sharing as I’m sure this will help other RV owners.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely!

  • @mikew2046
    @mikew2046 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    THAT IS SO SCARY....of all the tips ,hints ,and reviews this is one of the best SAFETY AWARENESS vids
    Thanks for sharing and certainly glad you and rig are fine .
    You just proved the roof coating is worth it's weight in gold and made us all aware of hazards of flexible panels thank you for saving a few other souls 😲

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No kidding!

  • @jtnoodle
    @jtnoodle ปีที่แล้ว +2

    From Will Prowses' Mobile Solar website:
    "Flexible Solar Panels? Don't Buy them!
    ​You have been warned:
    Every single flex panel on the market is garbage. I challenge anyone to prove me wrong on this. I have destroyed stacks of these things. The cells crack easily and take out a whole string of cells when the bus bars break. Or they have extreme degradation after a few months of summer. Even the latest "CIGS" panels that I was so excited about, are having delamination problems.
    Do yourself a favor, and avoid the flex panels. None of them are good."
    I am very thankful I went rigid instead with my build 2 years ago.

  • @vincentstouter449
    @vincentstouter449 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    🤔
    The solid panels are warrantee’d for 25+ years, they are less expensive than flex panels, they allow cooling air flow + an air gap below the panel, and lastly solid framed panels may be inclined (if so designed) to optimize the incident angle to the sun (increasing efficiency about 30%).
    Thanks for the valuable OE (Operational Experience). We are very happy for your home and kitties 🐱 🐱 salvation. 👏🙏👍.

  • @henrysmith319
    @henrysmith319 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So out of a 7:59 video more than 1:20 minutes was nothing but an advertisement for Renogy products 😞 As if we don't deluged with ads already

  • @M.Campbell
    @M.Campbell ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you so much for sharing this! I was considering using flexible panels when I get my RV next year. Not any more.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm glad we could sway you toward rigid and learn from our very scary lesson.

  • @pureblood2020
    @pureblood2020 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wow, go with solid panels and let them get some air underneath.

  • @fvrrljr
    @fvrrljr ปีที่แล้ว +1

    photovoltaic/solar thermal technician here: proper terminology is required here. i know we're all in the same page as that they all produce electricity by converting the sun energy.
    monocrsytalline, polycrsytalline and amorphous are the three types of solar panels.
    monocrystalline and polycrystalline are the "rigid ones"
    amorphous is the "flexible panels"
    monocrystslline are more efficient than polycrystalline cells and can be smaller in size for the same output. polycrystalline are less efficient than monocrystalline solar cells and require a larger surface area for the same output. amorphous require twice as much surface area for the same power output as a monocrystalline, they are flexible and can handle higher temperatures better which to me is an oxymoron. handles temperature but not damage hence the fire. amourphous still has it's function i have some too. FYI Mono and Poly solar panels when on fire still are producing electricity and you can be electrocuted.

  • @hugoheykers5826
    @hugoheykers5826 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ALWAYS see that there is some space between the panel and the RV roof (no matter you use flexible panels or not)...for ventilation...so your mounting of the panels was incorrect ! You may be very lucky that the damage is restricted...

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      We followed the instructions of the panels. They are made to be directly applied. We had air gaps in the flexible panel installation before and they still failed. Flexible panels just not good for RV use.

  • @tCCZebra70
    @tCCZebra70 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    From Ames Description: "Ideal for curved and uneven surfaces. RVs, boats, bus, vans, utilities, golf carts, sewn to heavy duty material such as sun shades" So when they say it isn't their fault, they are 100% wrong. They market them for RVs and therefore if they knew the problem which, obviously they did, they ARE at fault and are financially liable for the damage to your RV and Solar Panels.

    • @independenttntn3276
      @independenttntn3276 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yep. You sir are 100% correct and sadly these two they naively believed every word of Ames story. NO BUSINESS is ever going to willingly admit liability for a fire as that puts them ON THE HOOK for every other event involving their panels.

  • @lindagolden9892
    @lindagolden9892 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Omg 🙀 most definitely a valuable lesson to share. One would think all panels would come with a warning for such.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      AGREED! I'm glad we could share and keep this from happening to others. We had no idea this was a potential risk. So scary!

    • @independenttntn3276
      @independenttntn3276 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They dont come with a warning for such because that is NOT NORMAL. Those panels were faulty.

  • @tombowen9861
    @tombowen9861 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Another factor that comes to mind is the tape around all the edges. If there is differential expansion/contraction between the roof and flexible module this could put a lot of mechanical stress on the solar module and more quickly damage them. Without the tape I'd be worried about wind damage. Tricky situation, glad there's no more damage!

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes glad we upgraded and don't have to worry anymore.

  • @lindamaurice9923
    @lindamaurice9923 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Our flexible panels are SunPower and are on many boats canvas roofs on Georgian Bay. Haven't heard of any issues and they have been around for years so I think it depends on what you buy. So glad you weren't hurt. Take care.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for sharing! We hadn't heard of any fires here either, until we did more digging and found it can happen.

    • @jamesyao9199
      @jamesyao9199 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You should leave some space channels underneath the flexible panels for airflow to avoid the risk of getting fire. I use 3M Dual Lock Reclosable Fastener SJ3870 250 Black to attach on my roof

  • @Erin-Thor
    @Erin-Thor 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Of COURSE the manufacturer says it wasn’t their fault. The fact that there were multiple failures when the panel is called FLEXIBLE but cracks and burns when flexed, is scary. I’m curious if this is common among other flexible manufacturers.

  • @HardIsEasy
    @HardIsEasy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Had Solbian flexible panels develop burn spots on my van as well... and bunch of other problems - switching soon to ridgit

  • @SuperBlobsterMan
    @SuperBlobsterMan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The burning can happen if you don't fuse between panels if you are connecting them in parallel. The solar panel fails but still has voltage across its positive/negative from the other parallel panels. If they are wired in series you will notice much earlier that there is a failure because your entire array will go offline.

  • @termikina
    @termikina ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have been using SunPower flexible solar panels for 7 years, 1200w installation, they are in perfect condition, at the same level as rigid panels with the same years. The panels have been installed on an aluminum frame and brackets, spaced 1.5 inches from the ceiling. The coating of our panels is EFTE, which guarantees resistance to high temperatures much higher than cheap PET. Many manufacturers sell flexible panels such as EFTE being PET. The hot spots suffered by your solar panels is a failure that also occurs in rigid panels, caused by poor construction of the solar panel.

    • @Seaturtle008
      @Seaturtle008 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did you build the frames for the panels? and of course any details. please

  • @danieldunham9978
    @danieldunham9978 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So they are false advertisement because that kind of use is what they claim they are for!

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm sure the risks are outlined. Just like other products. Not every flexible panel will catch fire. But it can happen. And RV use increases that risk. I totally get it! It's crazy

  • @Hemifan4266
    @Hemifan4266 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a 100ah Renogy lithium battery. The thing is a power brick. I installed it, Turned on everything in the RV, turned on the inverter and started to test it. I used a blow dryer on low for about 20 minutes, turned on the TV, turned one all the lights in the coach, turned on the big ceiling vent fan in the bathroom, turned on the stove hood fan and light and fridge, 2 hours later it was registering 96%. I have an old 100 watt flexible solar panel on the roof that only puts out 30 to 50 watts. I turned everything off, and in about 5 minutes the battery was showing 100%. I am sure it was still charging, but I could easily last overnight with regular usage over an overnight stop. No, you cant use the microwave or A/C. I can use a fan and be fine for a night. I am going to upgrade the solar controller to a Renogy 40 amp unit and a 200 watt Renogy rigid panel. I can see boon-docking for a week with no issues. Renogy rocks.

  • @ruffus8039
    @ruffus8039 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's a good idea to have each panel being fused, If there is an issue with one panel, it'll blow the fuse & not effect the good remaining panels. Cheap cost for additional peace of mind.

  • @MrAlbarry51
    @MrAlbarry51 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I’m so glad nobody was hurt you were able to get you RV repaired. Thank you so much for sharing this information. We own a Renogy portable solar kit and love it. Safe travels!

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      That's great to hear! Thank you for the well wishes.

  • @davidgroves8049
    @davidgroves8049 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ok who in the heck thought it was ok to mount them directly to the roof with no air gap.? thats like common knowledge.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      The panel instructions say they can be attached directly to the roof. We used an air gap previously and they still failed.

  • @PittsWithAPurpose
    @PittsWithAPurpose ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for posting this. I was also favoring the flex panels after we purchase our RV soon. So sorry that this happened. We will be installing rigid now. Again...thanks!

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely the safer choice if your roof allows!

  • @independenttntn3276
    @independenttntn3276 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not to sound brash but are you both really that naive? ""We spoke to the Ames "Technician" and he explained what could have happened; he said it was no fault of Ames whatsoever and that the panels were not faulty blah blah blah...""" OF COURSE they are going to tell you that! Do you really believe they're going to admit liability and take the blame for a fire caused by their panels?" And of course they are going to blame the entire industry and say all flexible panels will do this. If that were true, who in the right mind would sell panels that are likely to catch fire and eventually kill someone? No one. Their panels are junk and dangerous given your experience.
    As someone whose background is Electrical\Electronics Engineering tech my OPIONION given how new those panels are (5 weeks old) is that they're all defective since you said that ALL of the panels showed varying signs of failure. I would be demanding a refund and threatening legal action if that were me. But with that said, I, just like the Ames "Technician," nor anyone else CANNOT make a factual determination as to the cause of failure without physically inspecting the panels. But I can tell you with 100% certainty that those are junk and *dangerous* cheaply made panels.
    Renology is a reputable solar panel supplier ( I am in no way affiliated with them) and one of their staff who uses flexible panels wrote a good piece about busting the myths of flexible solar panels and NOWHERE was it mentioned that they "can catch fire". In fact the article states that the author lives on the road and whatever they're using (they are flexible) look and still function as new after 9 months and 9000 miles of road use. You are literally playing with fire by buying the cheap panels that you are.

  • @RoseOriginals
    @RoseOriginals ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That was super scary! I'm so glad that the damage wasn't worse and that your furbabies are safe! I had no idea they could catch fire. I guess that goes for the suitcase type which is what we'll be having.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Us either! I think the suitcase type is less prone to failure, but I still think I'd get a rigid portable suitcase not flexible.

    • @snowbirdlady8496
      @snowbirdlady8496 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I chose the rigid suitcase type of solar for my small Class C. Main reason was I prefer to camp in National Forest type places where there are more trees. I wanted something I could move around as needed. Plus I was worried about damage from above from all sorts of things. I've been using them for 3 years now and am very happy. Sure glad your situation wasn't worse!

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad you found something that works for you!

  • @OurRoadLessTraveled
    @OurRoadLessTraveled ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GREAT video. We are looking to add solar to our 5th wheel and though about using flexible panel to keep down drag. I had always wondered about the heat buildup and being right on the roof. I think we will go with raised.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      100% go with rigid and raised. We haven't noticed a big difference in drag for wind and is well worth the safety and longevity of the panels. Don't forget to shop for Renogy rigid with our link! 😉

  • @jtandrews3
    @jtandrews3 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If the inverter has arc fault detection, then the inverter can shut down solar production so the panels don't catch fire. Some inverters can have this enabled or disabled as an option. Basically, arc fault detection can detect if there is sparking in the panel or connections.

  • @mountainhunter3340
    @mountainhunter3340 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I noticed from the pics it seems like there does not seem to be any provisions for air flow between the RV roof and the flexible solar panels that burned. Due to limited data, I am not sure if that is the root cause or not, but solar panels can create high heat temps.

  • @TimGauntlett
    @TimGauntlett 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:25 - curtting DC cables with shears in broad daylight? What are you doing? You shouldn't do cut live DC cables even when you do have the proper kit.

  • @aroundthegarden539
    @aroundthegarden539 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Actually, it is the Solar Panel company's fault. Those panels are cheap. The copper wiring is cheap. With a nice RV like yours, you should have gone CIGS panels. See Hobotech review and year after review. The copper wiring is thicker.

  • @n2bigu
    @n2bigu ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Renogy A1

  • @djwaffle
    @djwaffle ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm about to put 5 panels on my roof. My friend kept telling me to get flexible and this is the proof that I won't be following that suggestion. Since my roof is rubber I'm going to use aluminum Unistrut on a slight stand off and a bunch of lap sealant into the roof studs. Thanks for the great video.

  • @DavidDavid25365
    @DavidDavid25365 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Same thinf has happen to my 6month flexible panel but on a small level. 4 dime size. Wasnt sure what or when this happen but panel still works because is has 48 blocking diodes and its on a ladder rack so not on my roof. I think a tree limb may have fallen on it

  • @Mike-01234
    @Mike-01234 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't like flexible solar panels buy residential rooftop panels they are UL certified. Also, NEC requires arc fault detection over 80V good idea to follow same standards when installing them on an RV even though not required. IMO RV is even worse if you have a fire then a home with the propane, and gasoline. The UL certifed inverters have arc and ground fault detection built in.

  • @Erin-Thor
    @Erin-Thor ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I watched a TH-cam video a while back discussing the different Solar Panel types, one what’s the flexible flush mount panels that you have. I believe the examples in the video was on an airstream, but one thing that they made clear, they produce heat, having space between the panels and the roof was critical, not just for heat dissipation, but for panel longevity as well. Heat makes things more brittle, roofs get hail, and heat flexes them too. Watching your installation one thing is clear… YOU NEED ABOUT AN INCH GAP BETWEEN THE ROOF AND THE PANELS. It did NOT look like you had that in your video. Be safe! ❤

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We had the air gap on our first ones that failed. They actually recommend installing them directly to the roof. We followed their instructions.

    • @Erin-Thor
      @Erin-Thor ปีที่แล้ว

      @@EatSeeRV - I’m no expert, but the point they made was the air gap was for heat dissipation. If you don’t want the heat transferred to your RV, a gap is needed. I’d consider a little research before assuming their recommendation was correct. Trust but verify is a good motto. Good luck!

  • @Cymaphore
    @Cymaphore 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Put XPS / Styrofoam or other insulation directly on the bottom skin of a rigid panel and you will see similar faults - not as immediate, because rigid panels are usually covered by glass on top and more heat resistive silicone on the bottom. However, this will reduce lifetime dramatically. Putting panels directly on an thermal insulated surface is always a bad idea.

  • @mikamika2508
    @mikamika2508 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Okay i know i am wrong but the crispy cats was hilarious 😆😆😆😆 i am sorry...

  • @user-dy9ux5dc6e
    @user-dy9ux5dc6e 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are you sure it had nothing to do with the panel quality? Renogy has flexible panels and people swear by them - they look alot tougher then your AIMS.. Or the new CIGS panels that claim hurricane force hail resistance.

  • @realhuman0101
    @realhuman0101 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:51 look how wet they are underneath, moisture was getting in and not getting out, moisture and electricity don't mix

  • @Back-countrysolar
    @Back-countrysolar ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, that sucks. It's important to understand that this is a crystalline style flexible solar panel. The kind that are most abundant. They claim they can be bent to 30 degrees and whatnot. There is also another technology for flexible solar panels called CIGS. It's a much better design with longer life solar panels, big flexibility, and more efficient.
    The crystalline style solar panels are just a bad idea on the top of your RV. But for a mobile style solar system they work very well. Just keep in mind that not all flexible solar panels are built the same.

  • @jxpat
    @jxpat 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Install fuses inline with the solar panels. This would have prevented the fire.

  • @noneyabusinessyoushouldbes7924
    @noneyabusinessyoushouldbes7924 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Flexible solar panels aren't the problem, the problem is "flexible" crystalline solar panels, crystalline cells don't tolerate any flexing for very long, your new ones will also be flexing and WILL develop micro fractures due to vibrations. You would be better off with CIGS solar panels, you'll also get more power because they aren't as dependent on perfect sun conditions. Another option is Amorphous Silicon panels, but you'd need to cover a much larger area for the same amount of power.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the tips!

  • @funcarsforyou
    @funcarsforyou 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is because you stick them with out air gap underneath

  • @jerryphillips7330
    @jerryphillips7330 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well, that was one big ad. I hope Renogy gave you free panels.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We bought the panels but did partner with Renogy for this video. Sorry you felt it was one big ad. We did the best job we could explaining what happened, why, and what we're doing to fix it.

  • @tonysitko2540
    @tonysitko2540 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wondered about those no air underside to cool.

  • @v1-vr-rotatev2-vy_vx31
    @v1-vr-rotatev2-vy_vx31 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So glad I have the aluminum framed glass type that allows for air circulation underneath, Have eight 200 watt panels with for 6 years now, with flawless operation on RV, however the MPPT charge controllers all sucked with voltage fluctuation, found small voltage regulators online with heat sinks and adjustable amperage and adjustable voltage and digital readout for only $10 each and utilized two for superb voltage consistency charging and low cost lithium titanate bundled batteries at 13.5 volts each.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Good tips and glad you have a situation that is safe and works for you!

  • @davidsalvador8989
    @davidsalvador8989 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a curious question. I have seen that these flexible panels have been melting like this also. But my question is, is the spray armor conductive or non conductive? Curious.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We haven't had any other issues with flexarmor burning with other applications on the roof. The issue is the flexible panels.

  • @operatorsix6933
    @operatorsix6933 ปีที่แล้ว

    use an air gap,...you wont have a fire.

  • @stevewoods8116
    @stevewoods8116 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just 2 minutes in and you probably answer this and I will keep watching. But what did the manufacturer say about this type of mounting? Asking now because I might have to pause video and not come backfor an hour.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The manufacturer says you should adhere it to the roof tightly so no air can get in (tape on the sides isn't enough). But from further research that can cause hot spots since there's no breathability underneath the panel and can cause a fire that way. They simply aren't worth the risk!

    • @stevewoods8116
      @stevewoods8116 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@EatSeeRV Thanks!!!! I thought you used them outside their scope, but you didn't. I was thinking where is the cooling effect, (breathability). These people need put out of business before they kill someone. I hope you pursue a settlement from them!

  • @rebeccaj5252
    @rebeccaj5252 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great information on WHY not to use flex panels on the roof...fortunately my little Airstream Basecamp comes with a solar charging port for the portable panels so that helps along with 180 watts on the roof, factory install

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Just keep an eye on them!

  • @Calamiti999Fine
    @Calamiti999Fine ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The rumor is that rigid panels are safer for rv roof applications….might be the reason that the Bplus Mfrs like Leisure changed to rigid panels. Glad you guys were ok.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, it may be! I hope manufacturers get rid of this as an option for RVers. It's just not safe!

  • @lindagolden9892
    @lindagolden9892 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would you please share info regarding the added roof protection you’ve added on, approx cost for such or a link where I might obtain info. 🚌

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      For the FlexArmor Roof? Sure thing you can see our video here: th-cam.com/video/xBAcvIqFtKc/w-d-xo.html Cost is determined by the length of your RV. But the website will give you a free quote based on your specific rig.

  • @KapKen
    @KapKen 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Glad I saw your video. I just laid 2 of them on my camper van that I am building. I was hoping to keep a low profile without the panels being noticeable. But, possible fire is not worth it. Would it be worth trying a fire resistant something under the panels?

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Everyone says air gap but we were told by the manufacturer not to do that because it breaks the membranes with wind 🍃 we recommend hard panels

  • @clintstinytrailerconversio5560
    @clintstinytrailerconversio5560 ปีที่แล้ว

    crappy expensive flexible panels.

  • @silntklr
    @silntklr ปีที่แล้ว

    Cheap Chinese build is my guess.

  • @notme751
    @notme751 ปีที่แล้ว

    Your videos more like a commercial

  • @mikej-i5e
    @mikej-i5e 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah don't use flexibles. Dont last very long in the first place and regular glass ones are very affordable now and last 25 years

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed

  • @moore_2_explore
    @moore_2_explore ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We are so glad the result was not worse!! You are right, for us flexible panels are not worth considering for any RV or mobile application.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely! Thank you

  • @JefferyRoberts-h5s
    @JefferyRoberts-h5s 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Were they Renogy flexible panels ? Seem your promoting Renogy so I guess they were.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No they were not flexible panels from Renogy it was another company. But as I mentioned in the video it doesn't matter who the company is the science behind it in this use doesn't work well.

  • @rvnut1133
    @rvnut1133 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is insane!!! Wow! I am glad you didn't lose your home.

  • @efrenmoreno7706
    @efrenmoreno7706 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why do they get so hot

  • @healeybob1
    @healeybob1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thats why I use rigid panels and mount them up off the roof.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely what we recommend!

  • @piniped
    @piniped ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ve been reading about flex panels. Glad you and kitties are ok.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Us too! I don't think the pro of flexibility or lighter weight is worth the risks. Rigid all the way!

  • @robertchrisrowe
    @robertchrisrowe ปีที่แล้ว

    you had no air pocket between the panel and the roof it would have been getting super hot,not the panels fault,the fault of the installer in a nut shell

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      We followed instructions for installation by the manufacturer. We had an air gap before on our flexible panels before these and they failed too.

  • @kennethgardner3090
    @kennethgardner3090 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video could save me and others. Thank you, big time.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely! Wish we didn't have to learn the hard way but hey.

  • @ladikmk
    @ladikmk ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whoa!!! So glad you’re ok; it could have been much, much worse. I read through all the comments and based on this video and those comments, I’d never use flexible solar panels. Not happening!

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      For sure couldn't agree more.

    • @jascaf1503
      @jascaf1503 ปีที่แล้ว

      they are great for portable fold outs; would never mount to RV or any other surface.

  • @sandras1524
    @sandras1524 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Holy cow. Soooo glad the final outcome was positive. Keep safe and happy.

  • @allenbaxter5180
    @allenbaxter5180 ปีที่แล้ว

    YE HAW Technology don't ya just love it

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Wild for sure

  • @thomassmith8143
    @thomassmith8143 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi interesting video i was going to buy 4 Renogy flexible solar panels for my van so are you saying all flexible solar panels are not worth it including the renogy flexible panels?
    As im in two minds now what panels to use
    Renogy say there flexible solar panels are ok for RV use

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would not buy flexible panels at all no matter than brand unless my RV roof was oddly shaped and it was the only solution.

    • @thomassmith8143
      @thomassmith8143 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@EatSeeRV hi again
      thanks I'm gonna go with the rigid soler panels from Renogy uk
      thank you for your video and advice keep driving and smiling
      all the best tom

  • @noahriding5780
    @noahriding5780 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have lately been wondering if there's like an anti fire material layer that could be put between panels and a roof, either for houses or RVs?
    Also, I'm curious... this problem specifically is happening to many people. So is it happening because of the guage of wire being wrong... the panel using concentrators/concentration too much?? or What? There must be a reason that most of the fires are happening at the panels instead of on the wires themselves or at the charge controller... ?
    If someone uses too low rating of wiring going from panel to charge controller this can be an issue. So can charge controller being too weak, unable to deal with the power, if the battery gets overcharged and its lithium that can be fire too. BUT what these people didn't tell you is that the fault being from different places means the fire and burnage would be in different places. NOT the same place.
    ...
    You can also check if the guage of the wire that's carrying your power load from the panels to your system is rated high enough for all the load its carrying. This is important. Like 10 guage wire is built for 30 amps typically. A lot of people are putting more than 30 amps through, which is roughly 4 100 watt panels.

  • @endeavour2968
    @endeavour2968 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve had 4x 100w flexi panels on roof of my steel boat for the passed 4.5 years in full sun and the only fault I have is they have gone slightly cloudy, not so much as to look off but don’t look like new any more and output hasn’t dropped. PPS mine have been walked on a number of times, usually when one looses balance and this has not degraded the panels. I do think what you pay for panel can effect quality, for me I use them as don’t produce wind noise or can’t get things caught on them. But then my roof is 4mm thick steel, but does get hot enough to rain water to instant steam.

  • @b-sanddog4149
    @b-sanddog4149 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Safety and application are Paramount with flexible solar panels. I’m adding several 200 W renogy panels the new style but I’m gonna have a 3/8” air gap running under each one with a drain area for water. Technically they’re not touching the roof and I won’t be ( taping the edges ), air circulation is Paramount using 3M-VHB 62 to hold down. 😎😎😎😎😎

  • @shelribelin8144
    @shelribelin8144 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    WOW!! How Crazy!! I am so glad your furry friends and you guys are okay. We will be purchasing a RV next year and planned on getting solar. I was really leaning toward flat / flexible panels like what you had on your RV. I had no idea they could catch fire like that. Thank you so very much for sharing your story. Thanks Again and Safe Travels.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm glad we could help you make a more informed decision. We had no idea this was even a risk when we were choosing! So scary. Congrats on the purchase and wishing you all well. - Liz

  • @DavidTharp-y2e
    @DavidTharp-y2e ปีที่แล้ว

    This should be entitled, "How to write a commercial" for TH-cam. Yeah, it's bad this happened, but the point here is for you to use their link to buy this product.

  • @andymeow7324
    @andymeow7324 ปีที่แล้ว

    another disadvantage is that its life will be surprisingly shorten when exposing to rains. Mine is foldable CIGS, and it stopped working in few months after working a couple times under rain.

  • @heatherwilkins7228
    @heatherwilkins7228 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow!! So glad you and your family, is safe. But thankyou for showing us this damage.

  • @charlesd3376
    @charlesd3376 ปีที่แล้ว

    For what its worth, here is a quote from DOE "Design flaws, component defects, and faulty installation generally cause solar rooftop fires." This same info is quoted by a company in the UK, I believe in April 22 after a fire was reported as caused by solar panels.

  • @Handirifle
    @Handirifle ปีที่แล้ว

    One reason I went with rigid panels. Not expecting fire, but with no cooling capabilities, they are less effecient.

  • @MrMROSCAR22
    @MrMROSCAR22 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent information, thank you very much for sharing your experience with us.. cordial greetings and continue enjoying your adventures!!

  • @kj22601
    @kj22601 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is highly recommended that anyone setting up a off grid/vehicle power system that you should invest in a thermal camera. Not just to inspect your solar panels but your electrical connections, batteries and wiring. Inspect at least least every 6 months. In a RV or mobile power station you should check more often. The panels you installed could catch fire in the same way the flex able ones did. All it takes is something falling on them witch is much more likely in a vehicle than a stationary array where you can negate most threats.

  • @trevortrevortsr2
    @trevortrevortsr2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Flexable panels are far frailer than ridged - with a clear plastic insulator to the front and no circulation from the back the heat poured in with no way to get out - failure was inevitable eventually - the only effective solution is ridged panels mounted so air circulates under - I use rec twin peak on my RV and they work flawless - some of the tiled types are even better

  • @billeidaho871
    @billeidaho871 ปีที่แล้ว

    It sure sounds like a panel defect to me!

  • @billtuckjr2834
    @billtuckjr2834 ปีที่แล้ว

    You do Fantastic Commericals. I hope you go Big Time.

  • @steveminton1099
    @steveminton1099 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had flex panels for the same reason - weight. They lasted 3 months in southern Georgia Sun.

  • @robintyde5441
    @robintyde5441 ปีที่แล้ว

    This happened to my friend who loves solar panels. He installed them himself. It took over a year to get his RV fixed. Still is a big fan. Others have had this problem which is kept quiet.

  • @ogremgtow990
    @ogremgtow990 ปีที่แล้ว

    Never buy flexible solar panels .

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely the moral of the story!

  • @TheDaztheraz
    @TheDaztheraz ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a reason the cables from the panels are so short, wouldn't it be neater to either have longer cables or plug directly into the panels?

  • @mrwonderfullgj
    @mrwonderfullgj ปีที่แล้ว

    Live and learn. Thanks for sharing. Good luck with the new ones.

  • @platinumbenzman
    @platinumbenzman ปีที่แล้ว

    I just wanted to know were they recently pressure washed? it can do it too.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They've never been pressure washed

    • @sunjayjay240
      @sunjayjay240 ปีที่แล้ว

      Is it alright to cover with epoxy temp resistant covering entire glass to stop of any ingress of moisture water?
      cost if 550W panel is 100$
      cant just throw like that
      But risk is there for any fire???
      Although I connected all 5 panels + 3 slightly damaged in series got 300V +
      just for experiment
      But if I coonect permanently on the rooof what dangers can i expect??

  • @miketiong8441
    @miketiong8441 ปีที่แล้ว

    Possible a cheap brand

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe? The company is pretty reputable.

  • @keithmanningbocodjkaraoke7259
    @keithmanningbocodjkaraoke7259 ปีที่แล้ว

    Glad to hear all is Ok n no more seriously issues happened prayers n May God Bless ya ll again n the new ones 😗😗🙏

  • @nguyenngoibmintcvet2785
    @nguyenngoibmintcvet2785 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't believe this is happening. Could be a scam on youtube to advertise for Renogy. I had 3 flex panels on the roof of my RV and they are working fine. Firecrackers accidentally felt on the RV? OR Products MADE IN CHINA

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes I burnt a hole in my panels and RV roof for fun. 😣 Glad yours are working well! We've had 2 sets fail now and 1 catch fire. So we shared our experience here.

  • @bobabooie6389
    @bobabooie6389 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍🇺🇲

  • @redpandabus-adventuresinlife
    @redpandabus-adventuresinlife ปีที่แล้ว

    I don't think Renogy did you any favors. You shouldn't have to pay a monthly fee for monitoring while other brands do it for free, and 100 watt panels are the cheapest ones to buy and honestly you should have gone with 350 to 450 panels. 100 ones won't do much for you. Sorry.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We chose those for weight and length. We wanted 200 but they were too large for our usable space (without shade and shadows from other units on the roof). Also the monthly fee can be paused and goes far beyond just monitoring your batteries and panels alone. For weekend warriors or people who do longer trips (not full time) that's really nice!

  • @JarheadAndGingersJourney
    @JarheadAndGingersJourney ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh wow. That is scary. Crazy you'd only had the panels 5 weeks.

  • @markelkins8432
    @markelkins8432 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ouch!
    Two things - you seemed to have a lot of unused roof - yet only installed 3 x 100Watts. Later on - you seem to admit that 300Watts is not enough for all your needs - why didn't you add more PV's or simply try and cover the roof with PV panels. Could have gotten the extra threaded studs installed on the roof quite easily!
    And - you wired up the three panels in parallel - which suggests you are using a PWM device between PV's and Batteries. I would have though running a number of panels in series (as long as shade is not a problem) and feeding that through an MPPT controller would be more efficient and give you a slightly longer charging period per day.
    I'd also check that the panels have by-pass diodes - which helps with partial shading and could reduce issues with a bad cell.

    • @EatSeeRV
      @EatSeeRV  ปีที่แล้ว

      300 watts was more than enough for our needs. We had 300 before and never had to turn our generator on. It was that a chassis charger alone was not enough for our needs.

  • @vinboughton4751
    @vinboughton4751 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow God Bless you guys , That was a close one