Great video as usual, Tim! The bookmarks of the different topics are excellent. Specifically, thank you for reiterating the difference between Part 107 (commercial) and AMA (non-commercial) use. To me, much of the hubbub around these new regulations is people misunderstanding the application of different rules.
Wait, there are new updates this year besides this? Do you know what they are? Just the topics that have been added, I don't need a full explanation but I just wanna know what to look for
Thank you Tim!!! 9/22/2021 - Passed with 87%(2 days of study/10 hours) For those of you that want to know what I did, here are the video's I've used: **For reviewing 2021 Updated Questions & Materials** - Philosophy of Data Science -- Part 107 Exam April Update: 3 Days, Free Materials, 97% Pass! - Tim McKay -- FAA Part 107 Update Flying at Night and Over People **For Learning Majority of Info** NOTE: Some of the information IS out of date. Reference the 2021 videos! - Tony & Chelsea Northrup -- FREE Drone Certification Study Guide: FAA Part 107 sUAS Test - Better B Roll -- Free FAA Part 107 Drone Test Study Guide - Answers and Explanations Some of the video's have practice tests and review materials. Do as many practice tests as possible! I took 3 and scored in the 80's on all of them. Good luck everyone!
Thank you so much for these two videos on remote ID and categories I’m getting close to the end of my studying for my drone license and I know these two areas are new and are not covered in some of the more lengthy videos on TH-cam with passing the test
Good video. Thanks. To confirm, from FAA website on Part 107 flights over vehicles: "In a change from the NPRM, the final rule permits operations over moving vehicles, provided the small unmanned aircraft operation meets the requirements of Category 1, 2 or 3 and **either** : The small unmanned aircraft must remain within or over a closed- or restricted-access site, and all people inside a moving vehicle within the closed- or restricted-access site must be on notice that a small unmanned aircraft may fly over them; **or** The small unmanned aircraft does not maintain sustained flight over moving vehicles." **I understand that this means a Part 107 pilot can cross over vehicles, even those that may not have been given notice, and are not in a restricted access site (i.e. in public crossing roads, bike paths, etc).
Thanks for the video. It was the 5th one I watched in my self paced studies, which lasted about a week. Today I passed with 98%, which equates to one wrong. It was a question about visibility and ceilings. I selected the answer that did not include an obstruction and only included the cloud deck. This was incorrect because if you're flying indoors there just might be an obstruction instead of clouds. Of course I gave this video a thumbs up.
Very helpful video. Thanks. One possible correction: According the FAA web site, Category 1 drone must "Weigh .55 pounds or less", not under .55 pounds. This is often a point of confusion when it comes to mandatory drone registration.
Question on flying at night, and the "additional online test." I'm currently (April 2023) a recreational flier, my 107 certification exam is scheduled for next week: You stated there's an additional test to fly at night under 107, but this was recorded two years ago, so I'm wondering -- assuming I pass the exam next week, April 2023, and get my certification, is it still required to take the additional test (or has this been incorporated into the newer exams)? Also, can you clarify... it seems that recreational flying at night does not require this extra testing, only certificated flying at night (so the certificated Remote Pilot has additional restrictions over the non-certificated pilot?)? Thanks!
Alan: While I am not 100% sure, I do not think there is any additional test needed under Part 107 for night flying. Rather, as new rules come out they are incorporated into the updated Part 107 test. For recreational flying, there are no additional tests that I am aware of, just the one time TRUST test. Tim
Well didn’t do very well on my first try. I got a lot of questions I never seen before. Example if you’re flying at night and your sUAS seems like it’s moving slow coming towards you, what should you do? What…… and I thought you couldn’t fly your sUAS if you’re in any water based vehicle. Someone please help and thanks.
Very informative video. I've put off getting my initial Part 107 license until the new rules were on the test. I was always confused about Category 1-4 and 11lbs vs. 25 lbs of kinetic energy and it sounds like the manufacturers are responsible for determining that compliance. Wonder how quickly that will happen?
Dave: Significant changes are happening, and quickly, with the new (and larger) drones. The folks who make these drones will be on top of this, as they have to for their business. As this is such a central and important issue, I am not too worried about it. I'd say go ahead and get your Part 107 (I did), and you can catch up with on-line courses as the regs change. Tim
SBY: The TRUST (The Recreational UAS Safety Test) is free, for recreational flyers. You have to pay for the FAA Part 107 test, and do a full FAA IACRA application as you will receive an FAA certificate once you pass the Part 107 test. Test is around $150, and you'll have to take it at an FAA testing center. Many videos on this process. Tim
@@TimMcKay56 Ok, thanks for clearing that up. Unfortunately there’s a lot of older information out there, so I’m just trying to get a grasp on the new 2021 changes. Hoping to take my Part 107 test soon. Thanks!
You are wrong about the weight. You said category one states the UAS must weigh LESS than .55lbs - it's actually .55lbs or less since .55lbs is less than 150 grams. Sadly, even the 149g drones such as the Mini 2 would not qualify since they would require a prop guard.
The flying of drones and the associated regulations are all new to me. As such, I have a couple questions that I hope you can answer as someone who seems very familiar with all this. For whatever it's worth, I intend to fly a drone over 250g (.55lb), though I'm still trying to decipher the definitions and requirements of class 2 versus class 3. On a side note, I find it interesting that the CPSC and OSHA both have regulations regarding covers for fan blades, but the FAA just requires a ring around the perimeter and seemingly has no problem with an otherwise exposed blade. So first, I'm reading 107.39, which then makes reference to subpart D. Subpart D makes reference to "assemblies of human beings" and I'm trying to determine what that is. People at a concert, sure. That's obvious. What about 4 people hiking on a trail? They have technically gathered for a common purpose, so are they an 'assembly of human beings'? Any group of two or more people, anywhere, doing anything, could technically fit the classification. Then subpart D makes reference to 89.110 and 89.115, both of which seem to say that some sort of remote ID is needed, and there are further references in 89.115 to sections 89.105, 89.130, and 89.315, at which point I concluded I was spiraling down a never ending rabbit hole of burocratic mumbo jumbo. Second, and probably easier to answer, did these new blade rules just make millions of drones in the US legally unable to fly? Any clarification you could give would be appreciated. The FAA is aiming regulations at novice fliers, but they don't express those regulations in terms a novice can easily understand.
George: These rules are all new, and they will evolve a bit over time, I think, as user start to work with them. First thing is to determine if you are Part 107 or recreational flying. If all you do is fly for fun, then recreational. If your flying helps anyone else (photos for a school, etc.) that Part 107 and you'll need to take an FAA test for your Part 107 certificate. Next is registration, with one registration for all recreational flying, and a separate registration for each plane if Part 107. FAA.gov is helpful with this. As a general rule, just do not fly over people unless you know them and they know what your flight intentions are. The Class 2, 3, etc. are new terms, no one really knows what they mean, manufacturers will take the lead on this. Remote ID still being worked, no required until Sept 2023. Keep in mimd there will be other rules. For example, in a National Park, the National Park Service may prohibit drones for privacy and safety concerns (you see this everywhere in Europe). This is where the new Apps will help a lot, tying all this together. Tim
The classes of drones need to be tested and determined by the manufactures and licensed with the FAA. As of now my understanding is the rules are new and no drone is in compliance yet. just as remote ID seems to be just making it into the system. From the Pilot Institute course I took the FAA has not exactly defined "open-air-assemblies" (OAA), but in determining what an O-A-A is based on determining size of the group of people not associated with the operation of the drone flight and the size of the operational area. Such assemblies are usually in public spaces. Think of sporting events (pro and amateur), political rallies, concerts, art fairs, parades, festivals, parks and beaches during certain events, etc. Now if in a park and just a few people are sitting or playing frisbee on one end and you have a large space to yourself, you would probably be fine. OR if you are wanting to fly on the beach and there aren't many people there, probably fine too. But if that same beach is packed with people, then that would be considered an open air assembly. A few friends playing soccer, you might be ok, but an organized soccer game with people in jerseys and spectators on the sidelines, then consider that an open air assembly. It all goes back to considering the density of people in a given area. 4 random people hiking on a trail is fine as long as you don't fly over them, or have a compliant class drone with remote ID. If those people are part of the operation that I believe is ok too. Or for Class 3, if you have a contained area where people are on notice of sUAV operations taking place and/or have shelters for them in place. Such as a parked vehicle or building. As far as the blades go, you can still fly them but once companies certify their drones to be compliant with certain classes AND they can do remote ID, you can't fly them over people yet. I'm not sure myself if blade guards fulfill the requirement of no moving parts that can lacerate skin.
@@CharlieForbes524 CW: This is still a work very much in progress. The FAA is taking the approach with industry, as all of this is quite new, saying "If you have a better idea how to meet this requirement, let's discuss." For the open air assembly, the FAA has decades of experience with this and Part 91 (Cessna recreational) flying. Same for populated and sparsely populated areas. If in doubt, the FAA always has the option of using "careless and reckless operation". Tim
So, all Cat. 2 drones require blade guards? I just purchased a drone that came without the guards. Do I need to add them to fly legally/recreationally?
Terry: No need for a separate test for night operations. Rather, as changes occur the new questions will be included in the latest test. I do not think there is a process yet for somehow "testing" people who took the exam earlier. Tim
@@TimMcKay56 Thanks, Tim. I guess I'm current then. My new strobe light is on its way! I just got my prop guards yesterday. Now I'm just wondering how long it's going to take to get the drones categorized so we can do it!
William: Prohibition on flying over age 65 only for Part 121 operations (the airlines), does not apply to Part 91 (pilots and their Cessna) or Part 107 (drones and RC). Tim
Lee: You can fly at any age under Part 107. The only FAA reg that includes a maximum age for the certificate is Part 121 (scheduled passenger carrying commercial air operations, like Delta or United Airlines) that have a maximum age of 65. Tim
I caught a discussion the YT channel Alien Drone had with a FAA representative. He goes over their pount of view on a lot of this. Recommend those wanting more info to check it out.
Thanks for the video. I have a question maybe you know. So I am still a recreational flyer, I am studying for my test tomorrow. Anyways, I tried to get a LAANC approval last night at a most outer edge of a class C airport (in aloft saying I should be able to get 400ft clearance). During the day I have had zero issue getting approval in an 400ft outer area, last night I was automatically denied because they said they do not allow night operations in class C airspace. Would i have to have a part 107 in aloft for approval to happen? Or is night flying just out of the question in any non class G airspace, and will be automatically denied every time? Thanks.
Don't know for sure on this one. Likely a drone related issue, if pilots have difficulty seeing a drone at night and avoiding for safety of flight. Worth you while to contact the local FAA office and ask. Tim
@@TimMcKay56 OK, I just updated to a new Aloft app. It now specifically calls out that LAANC approval will not be given to airspace requesting it that isn't part 107. No problem I passed yesterday! Thanks for the videos. They did give me about 10 night time questions, your video was very helpful. Thanks.
@@pacificnwaerialviews wow, 10 night time questions -- that's good to know as my exam is scheduled for next week! I guess i need to dive deeper into it because I cannot imagine coming up with that many questions on the topic!
Quick question sir: I'm 57. Considering FAA pilot licenses (private, ifr, all the way to Lear or Honda jet). At 65 would FAA simply refuse to license me? How would they handle this?
I've always considered an aircraft small if it was smaller than the average house. I wonder how many actual aviators work at the FAA. How you doing with the Aeronca C-2/C-3?
Richard: FAA has reports of over 100 UAS intrusions to commercial air traffic a month. These are in writing, and some of these drones most certainly can damage an airliner. C-3 flies great, see below! Tim th-cam.com/video/6Fgy7EqxsZ0/w-d-xo.html
@@TimMcKay56 I am aware. But it's never that simple, is it? We've been in good stead with the FAA, FCC, and even the EPA until R/C drones came along. I've flown at AMA sanctioned sites (we have several here in Vegas) for over 30 years but no more. I am now a freebooter. Formerly AMA 550442 Now let's have some fun and see the Aeronca fly!
@@richarddarlington1139 Yes, the drone folks add a whole new aspect, will be interesting to see how it all plays out. C-3 flies great, see the video! Tim
@@TimMcKay56 It's been "playing out" for what, ten years, now? And many of the videos, both drones and fixed wing, posted here on You Tube certainly aren't helping. It's a rabbit hole I'd just as soon avoid altogether. I'll just keep building and flying, any way I can. I've seen the video of the Aeronca's maiden. I was wondering if you solved the tip stall problem. Those Dumas kits are nice though, aren't they?
@@richarddarlington1139 The drone guys are going to find out, fairly quickly, that the FAA can impose fines and even jail if the offense is serious enough. The FAA's choice is a crashed B-737 or an upset drone pilot (with Congressional oversight). I added a bit of washout to the C-3 wings, seemed to help a lot. Tim
Great video Tim! Here is a link to detailed information on the four UAS categories www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-F/part-107/subpart-D#p-107.130(a)
![NONT TANONT - คลั่งเธอ (Dopamine) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/imr2dwueUxs/mqdefault.jpg)
Great video as usual, Tim! The bookmarks of the different topics are excellent.
Specifically, thank you for reiterating the difference between Part 107 (commercial) and AMA (non-commercial) use.
To me, much of the hubbub around these new regulations is people misunderstanding the application of different rules.
Monti: Glad you enjoyed it! Tim
I took my test today to get Part 107 certified and I got 83% correct, well above the 70% needed to pass the exam. This video helped.
So glad to hear, and congrats! Part 107 is not an easy test. Tim
Excellent information. I'm studying for the Part 107 right now, and this updated information is invaluable. Thanks Tim! 💚
Good luck on your exam!! Tim
Great video , thank you. Can’t wait for this year 2024 new updates
😊👍🏻 Tim
Wait, there are new updates this year besides this? Do you know what they are? Just the topics that have been added, I don't need a full explanation but I just wanna know what to look for
Thank you Tim, I'm taking my exam in a few days and this is exactly what I was looking for!
Cameron: Best of luck! Tim
Best video on the subject on TH-cam. Thank you !
EM: Wow, thanks! Tim
Thanks for making this video, it offered a lot of helpful information to help me pass the 107 yesterday with an 88%!!
Catherine: Congratulations! Tim
Great info - thank you - I'm taking my test tomorrow
Good luck! Tim
How’d the test go?
Thank you Tim!!!
9/22/2021 - Passed with 87%(2 days of study/10 hours)
For those of you that want to know what I did, here are the video's I've used:
**For reviewing 2021 Updated Questions & Materials**
- Philosophy of Data Science -- Part 107 Exam April Update: 3 Days, Free Materials, 97% Pass!
- Tim McKay -- FAA Part 107 Update Flying at Night and Over People
**For Learning Majority of Info**
NOTE: Some of the information IS out of date. Reference the 2021 videos!
- Tony & Chelsea Northrup -- FREE Drone Certification Study Guide: FAA Part 107 sUAS Test
- Better B Roll -- Free FAA Part 107 Drone Test Study Guide - Answers and Explanations
Some of the video's have practice tests and review materials. Do as many practice tests as possible! I took 3 and scored in the 80's on all of them.
Good luck everyone!
Steven: Well done and congrats!! Tim
Thank you so much for these two videos on remote ID and categories I’m getting close to the end of my studying for my drone license and I know these two areas are new and are not covered in some of the more lengthy videos on TH-cam with passing the test
You’ll do fine on the test, good luck! Tim
@@TimMcKay56 thanks! i watched the video twice and made flash cards i understood it all great presentation! got ya subbed! stay awesome!
Will do and many thanks! Tim
Good video. Thanks. To confirm, from FAA website on Part 107 flights over vehicles:
"In a change from the NPRM, the final rule permits operations over moving vehicles, provided the small unmanned aircraft operation meets the requirements of Category 1, 2 or 3 and **either** :
The small unmanned aircraft must remain within or over a closed- or restricted-access site, and all people inside a moving vehicle within the closed- or restricted-access site must be on notice that a small unmanned aircraft may fly over them; **or**
The small unmanned aircraft does not maintain sustained flight over moving vehicles."
**I understand that this means a Part 107 pilot can cross over vehicles, even those that may not have been given notice, and are not in a restricted access site (i.e. in public crossing roads, bike paths, etc).
Duncan: Correct. And this just for Part 107, not recreational flyers. Tim
Thanks for the video. It was the 5th one I watched in my self paced studies, which lasted about a week. Today I passed with 98%, which equates to one wrong. It was a question about visibility and ceilings. I selected the answer that did not include an obstruction and only included the cloud deck. This was incorrect because if you're flying indoors there just might be an obstruction instead of clouds. Of course I gave this video a thumbs up.
CS: congrats on your Part 107 exam, and thanks for checking in! Tim
Thank you for this update!
Anytime! Tim
great explanation, much appreciated!
Yasmin: Glad it was helpful! Tim
Great, clear content. Taking my test today, thank you!
Good luck!! Tim
@@TimMcKay56 I passed with 90%! Your video was very helpful in this.
@@MattLeitholt Congrats!! Tim
Thank you 😊
Dennis: You're welcome 😊 Tim
Very informative! Please do an update. Thanks!
Will do! Tim
I'm surprised that the FAA would permit flying anything over people recreational even with remote ID in category 1.
Interesting to see the policy evolve. Tim
I have my test tm thanks for the really helpful video👍👍👍
Evan: Great news, congrats!! Tim
thanks Tim! very informative
AM: Glad it was helpful! Tim
Great video, thanks, sir.
Luis: Glad you liked it! Tim
Awesome 👍 thank you so much 👍
👍🏻 Tim
Very helpful video. Thanks.
One possible correction: According the FAA web site, Category 1 drone must "Weigh .55 pounds or less", not under .55 pounds. This is often a point of confusion when it comes to mandatory drone registration.
Paul: Good point, thanks! Tim
Clarification on the weight of Category 1 drones. Category 1 drone must weigh .55lbs or less NOT less than .55lbs.
👍🏻 Tim
Thanks!
Thank you sir-
👍🏻✈️ Tim
If these rules and changes rolled out in 2021, how come the study guide that’s put out by FAA hasn’t been updated since 2016?
No idea. Tim
Muito bom,obrigado.
Abraço.
👍🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
👍 Tim
Great video!
Derek: Thanks for the visit! Tim
I’m glad we can fly drones over people now 😎😎
👍🏻 Tim
Question on flying at night, and the "additional online test." I'm currently (April 2023) a recreational flier, my 107 certification exam is scheduled for next week: You stated there's an additional test to fly at night under 107, but this was recorded two years ago, so I'm wondering -- assuming I pass the exam next week, April 2023, and get my certification, is it still required to take the additional test (or has this been incorporated into the newer exams)? Also, can you clarify... it seems that recreational flying at night does not require this extra testing, only certificated flying at night (so the certificated Remote Pilot has additional restrictions over the non-certificated pilot?)? Thanks!
Alan: While I am not 100% sure, I do not think there is any additional test needed under Part 107 for night flying. Rather, as new rules come out they are incorporated into the updated Part 107 test. For recreational flying, there are no additional tests that I am aware of, just the one time TRUST test. Tim
Thank you for this information. Could you send me the link for night flying.
Not sure of a link to night flying. A Google search best, things change.
Well didn’t do very well on my first try. I got a lot of questions I never seen before. Example if you’re flying at night and your sUAS seems like it’s moving slow coming towards you, what should you do? What…… and I thought you couldn’t fly your sUAS if you’re in any water based vehicle. Someone please help and thanks.
Not an easy test! 😖😳 Tim
Very informative video. I've put off getting my initial Part 107 license until the new rules were on the test. I was always confused about Category 1-4 and 11lbs vs. 25 lbs of kinetic energy and it sounds like the manufacturers are responsible for determining that compliance. Wonder how quickly that will happen?
Dave: Significant changes are happening, and quickly, with the new (and larger) drones. The folks who make these drones will be on top of this, as they have to for their business. As this is such a central and important issue, I am not too worried about it. I'd say go ahead and get your Part 107 (I did), and you can catch up with on-line courses as the regs change. Tim
I believe you miss spoke and said to renew your certification every 24 year's. I assume you meant 24 months without looking up this information.
You are correct, 24 months. Tim
So, just to be clear, the Part 107 Exam is now free and online? Do you have a link to the test website? Thanks!
SBY: The TRUST (The Recreational UAS Safety Test) is free, for recreational flyers. You have to pay for the FAA Part 107 test, and do a full FAA IACRA application as you will receive an FAA certificate once you pass the Part 107 test. Test is around $150, and you'll have to take it at an FAA testing center. Many videos on this process. Tim
@@TimMcKay56 Ok, thanks for clearing that up. Unfortunately there’s a lot of older information out there, so I’m just trying to get a grasp on the new 2021 changes. Hoping to take my Part 107 test soon. Thanks!
👍🏻 Tim
You are wrong about the weight. You said category one states the UAS must weigh LESS than .55lbs - it's actually .55lbs or less since .55lbs is less than 150 grams. Sadly, even the 149g drones such as the Mini 2 would not qualify since they would require a prop guard.
Thanks! Tim
Did you mean to say “is less than **250** grams”?
@@montithered4741 You are correct, should be "less than 250 grams." Thanks! Tim
The flying of drones and the associated regulations are all new to me. As such, I have a couple questions that I hope you can answer as someone who seems very familiar with all this. For whatever it's worth, I intend to fly a drone over 250g (.55lb), though I'm still trying to decipher the definitions and requirements of class 2 versus class 3. On a side note, I find it interesting that the CPSC and OSHA both have regulations regarding covers for fan blades, but the FAA just requires a ring around the perimeter and seemingly has no problem with an otherwise exposed blade.
So first, I'm reading 107.39, which then makes reference to subpart D. Subpart D makes reference to "assemblies of human beings" and I'm trying to determine what that is. People at a concert, sure. That's obvious. What about 4 people hiking on a trail? They have technically gathered for a common purpose, so are they an 'assembly of human beings'? Any group of two or more people, anywhere, doing anything, could technically fit the classification. Then subpart D makes reference to 89.110 and 89.115, both of which seem to say that some sort of remote ID is needed, and there are further references in 89.115 to sections 89.105, 89.130, and 89.315, at which point I concluded I was spiraling down a never ending rabbit hole of burocratic mumbo jumbo.
Second, and probably easier to answer, did these new blade rules just make millions of drones in the US legally unable to fly?
Any clarification you could give would be appreciated. The FAA is aiming regulations at novice fliers, but they don't express those regulations in terms a novice can easily understand.
George: These rules are all new, and they will evolve a bit over time, I think, as user start to work with them. First thing is to determine if you are Part 107 or recreational flying. If all you do is fly for fun, then recreational. If your flying helps anyone else (photos for a school, etc.) that Part 107 and you'll need to take an FAA test for your Part 107 certificate. Next is registration, with one registration for all recreational flying, and a separate registration for each plane if Part 107. FAA.gov is helpful with this. As a general rule, just do not fly over people unless you know them and they know what your flight intentions are. The Class 2, 3, etc. are new terms, no one really knows what they mean, manufacturers will take the lead on this. Remote ID still being worked, no required until Sept 2023. Keep in mimd there will be other rules. For example, in a National Park, the National Park Service may prohibit drones for privacy and safety concerns (you see this everywhere in Europe). This is where the new Apps will help a lot, tying all this together. Tim
The classes of drones need to be tested and determined by the manufactures and licensed with the FAA. As of now my understanding is the rules are new and no drone is in compliance yet. just as remote ID seems to be just making it into the system.
From the Pilot Institute course I took the FAA has not exactly defined "open-air-assemblies" (OAA), but in determining what an O-A-A is based on determining size of the group of people not associated with the operation of the drone flight and the size of the operational area. Such assemblies are usually in public spaces. Think of sporting events (pro and amateur), political rallies, concerts, art fairs, parades, festivals, parks and beaches during certain events, etc. Now if in a park and just a few people are sitting or playing frisbee on one end and you have a large space to yourself, you would probably be fine. OR if you are wanting to fly on the beach and there aren't many people there, probably fine too. But if that same beach is packed with people, then that would be considered an open air assembly. A few friends playing soccer, you might be ok, but an organized soccer game with people in jerseys and spectators on the sidelines, then consider that an open air assembly. It all goes back to considering the density of people in a given area.
4 random people hiking on a trail is fine as long as you don't fly over them, or have a compliant class drone with remote ID. If those people are part of the operation that I believe is ok too. Or for Class 3, if you have a contained area where people are on notice of sUAV operations taking place and/or have shelters for them in place. Such as a parked vehicle or building.
As far as the blades go, you can still fly them but once companies certify their drones to be compliant with certain classes AND they can do remote ID, you can't fly them over people yet. I'm not sure myself if blade guards fulfill the requirement of no moving parts that can lacerate skin.
@@CharlieForbes524 CW: This is still a work very much in progress. The FAA is taking the approach with industry, as all of this is quite new, saying "If you have a better idea how to meet this requirement, let's discuss." For the open air assembly, the FAA has decades of experience with this and Part 91 (Cessna recreational) flying. Same for populated and sparsely populated areas. If in doubt, the FAA always has the option of using "careless and reckless operation". Tim
@@TimMcKay56 Cat 1 - Is
@@CharlieForbes524 Yup, all very new terms, specifics to be determined! Tim
So, all Cat. 2 drones require blade guards? I just purchased a drone that came without the guards. Do I need to add them to fly legally/recreationally?
Not sure really on the guards. Very good question, more to follow on the various categories as they apply to drones. Tim
If you fly it at a local AMA sanctioned field, I would bet you'd be ok, if your club approves it.
I recently took the online course and update exam. Did I understand you to say there is a separate exam to take for night operations?
Terry: No need for a separate test for night operations. Rather, as changes occur the new questions will be included in the latest test. I do not think there is a process yet for somehow "testing" people who took the exam earlier. Tim
@@TimMcKay56 Thanks, Tim. I guess I'm current then. My new strobe light is on its way! I just got my prop guards yesterday. Now I'm just wondering how long it's going to take to get the drones categorized so we can do it!
Good luck! Tim
Please show me where rules stop me from flying commercially over 65 years of age)
William: Prohibition on flying over age 65 only for Part 121 operations (the airlines), does not apply to Part 91 (pilots and their Cessna) or Part 107 (drones and RC). Tim
Did I hear your right; If you are over the age of 65, you can't fly commercially under 107?
Lee: You can fly at any age under Part 107. The only FAA reg that includes a maximum age for the certificate is Part 121 (scheduled passenger carrying commercial air operations, like Delta or United Airlines) that have a maximum age of 65. Tim
I caught a discussion the YT channel Alien Drone had with a FAA representative. He goes over their pount of view on a lot of this. Recommend those wanting more info to check it out.
CW: Great update, appreciate the reminder! Tim
Thanks for the video. I have a question maybe you know. So I am still a recreational flyer, I am studying for my test tomorrow. Anyways, I tried to get a LAANC approval last night at a most outer edge of a class C airport (in aloft saying I should be able to get 400ft clearance). During the day I have had zero issue getting approval in an 400ft outer area, last night I was automatically denied because they said they do not allow night operations in class C airspace. Would i have to have a part 107 in aloft for approval to happen? Or is night flying just out of the question in any non class G airspace, and will be automatically denied every time? Thanks.
Don't know for sure on this one. Likely a drone related issue, if pilots have difficulty seeing a drone at night and avoiding for safety of flight. Worth you while to contact the local FAA office and ask. Tim
@@TimMcKay56 OK, I just updated to a new Aloft app. It now specifically calls out that LAANC approval will not be given to airspace requesting it that isn't part 107. No problem I passed yesterday! Thanks for the videos. They did give me about 10 night time questions, your video was very helpful. Thanks.
@@pacificnwaerialviews Glad to hear! Tim
@@pacificnwaerialviews wow, 10 night time questions -- that's good to know as my exam is scheduled for next week! I guess i need to dive deeper into it because I cannot imagine coming up with that many questions on the topic!
Quick question sir: I'm 57. Considering FAA pilot licenses (private, ifr, all the way to Lear or Honda jet). At 65 would FAA simply refuse to license me? How would they handle this?
Joe: You are good to go. Only age restriction from the FAA is Part 121, age 65. All other flying no age limit. Tim
You can fly cargo but not people over 65 yo or can fly for fun
I've always considered an aircraft small if it was smaller than the average house.
I wonder how many actual aviators work at the FAA.
How you doing with the Aeronca C-2/C-3?
Richard: FAA has reports of over 100 UAS intrusions to commercial air traffic a month. These are in writing, and some of these drones most certainly can damage an airliner. C-3 flies great, see below! Tim
th-cam.com/video/6Fgy7EqxsZ0/w-d-xo.html
@@TimMcKay56
I am aware.
But it's never that simple, is it?
We've been in good stead with the FAA, FCC, and even the EPA until R/C drones came along.
I've flown at AMA sanctioned sites (we have several here in Vegas) for over 30 years but no more. I am now a freebooter.
Formerly AMA 550442
Now let's have some fun and see the Aeronca fly!
@@richarddarlington1139 Yes, the drone folks add a whole new aspect, will be interesting to see how it all plays out. C-3 flies great, see the video! Tim
@@TimMcKay56
It's been "playing out" for what, ten years, now?
And many of the videos, both drones and fixed wing, posted here on You Tube certainly aren't helping.
It's a rabbit hole I'd just as soon avoid altogether.
I'll just keep building and flying, any way I can.
I've seen the video of the Aeronca's maiden.
I was wondering if you solved the tip stall problem.
Those Dumas kits are nice though, aren't they?
@@richarddarlington1139 The drone guys are going to find out, fairly quickly, that the FAA can impose fines and even jail if the offense is serious enough. The FAA's choice is a crashed B-737 or an upset drone pilot (with Congressional oversight). I added a bit of washout to the C-3 wings, seemed to help a lot. Tim
Good work Tim.
Fred: Glad you enjoyed it! Tim
Great video Tim! Here is a link to detailed information on the four UAS categories www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-F/part-107/subpart-D#p-107.130(a)
Jacob: Many thanks! Tim