Is the Earth Actually Getting Hotter?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 พ.ค. 2024
- ExpressVPN: Get 3 Months FREE of ExpressVPN: expressvpn.com/jordanyt
Watch the full interview with Dr. Patrick Moore • Microplastics, Global ...
Ep. 439
Dr. Peterson's extensive catalog is available now on DailyWire+: bit.ly/3KrWbS8
// LINKS //
All socials: linktr.ee/drjordanbpeterson
Website: jordanbpeterson.com
Events: jordanbpeterson.com/events
Twitter: / jordanbpeterson
Instagram: / jordan.b.peterson
Facebook: / drjordanpeterson
Telegram: t.me/DrJordanPeterson
Newsletter: mailchi.mp/jordanbpeterson.co...
// COURSES //
Discovering Personality: jordanbpeterson.com/personality
Self Authoring Suite: selfauthoring.com
Understand Myself (personality test): understandmyself.com
// BOOKS //
Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life: jordanbpeterson.com/Beyond-Order
12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: jordanbpeterson.com/12-rules-...
Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: jordanbpeterson.com/maps-of-m...
#JordanPeterson #JordanBPeterson #DrJordanPeterson #DrJordanBPeterson #DailyWirePlus
![[TH] VCT Masters Shanghai Playoffs DAY 4 // 100T vs GEN | G2 vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UkTGSxdCUQw/mqdefault.jpg)
Once the "climate emergency" became taxable it lost all credibility for me
My litmus test is does the political response hit the poor disproportionately. Then I know it’s nothing more than a tax
Brilliant, David!!! We have yet to see where all this tax money is being spent toward this so-called climate change. Until we see an accounting sheet and REAL data showing how it's reducing the problem, it's nothing more than Trudeau theft.
Everything can be made taxable. That metric doesn't discredit it. EVs have a higher registration than ICE car (a form of tax) in CA and CA promotes the hell out of EV use, yet the state is still going to get a tax out of them. They tax everything
When the people who claim the loudest to believe in the climate hoax are also the ones who produce the most CO2, it becomes obvious that they know the hoax is a hoax.
Just think how many people we have made filthy rich with this claim.
A tiny percentage of those made filthy rich by fossil fuels. And still you people dance to their tune.
Nobody ever wants to talk about the possibility that the sun might have something to do with the change in climate. Why? Because you can't tax the sun.
That possibility has been researched, but the data doesn't support the sun being responsible for the climate change.
Or make people buy ridiculously expensive cars, or pay twice as much for energy.
The reason people are not talking about the possibility that the sun has something to do with climate change is that scientists already been researched that and the data doesn't support it, but actually exclude it.
Imagine 98.6% of all the mass in the solar system probably plays a bigger part than a trace gas on one of 8 planets.
Ice cores show several ice ages in the last 500,000 years. They show we are probably in a short warming period of up to 11,000 years. We are in the Quaternary ice age. Humans are not helping, but we can't stop it. Increased co2 promotes plant growth. Warmer means more food.
In 9,800 years we will probably be deep in an ice age. Warmer means we live. yes we will all have to move
About 61% of electricity generation is from fossil fuels-coal, natural gas, petroleum, and other gases. About 19% was from nuclear energy, and about 20% was from renewable energy sources. Most of that 20% is water, not solar or wind.
What we can definitely say is the amount of chemicals we dump into the environment and the amount of plastic in the environment is way more concerning to me
But then you touch the action of big pharma, the military industrial complex and energy companies...
@@GTfour01 Not to mention SE Asia. The majority of garbage in the oceans--including those dreaded plastic straws--come from there, not developed Western nations. There are regions of the ocean near the Orient that are so filthy you can't even see the water as you sail through it.
Got it in one. You should be more concerned about it. Pollution is much further up the list of dangers to humanity and the environment than climate change. Climate change as a risk is below world war, pandemic, solar storms, asteroids, pole reversal, famine due to overpopulation and pollution. And probably less harmful.
How many billion tons are dumping into our environment by plants each year?
@@terenceiutzi4003 You mean by decaying plants? A lot. Wich is a good thing.
The language of climate activism is indistinguishable from the language of religious zealots.
Or charasmatic despotic authoritarian politicians…
That's because it's a cult, nothing more, nothing less.
correct. every "science" that needs to defend itself through threats, bullying, silencing, censorship, cancelling, etc ISN"T a science, it is a religion. If you are practicing actual science, then you should be ok with all varying theories and testing of those.
A cult for some, a well paid career for others. A career that does not depend on the scientific method.
Its ok guys.....I hear taxing Canadians reduces global temperatures. We got this.
Likely to cause another ice age.
Germany is trying the same...
Well, the trick to that is to pay the tax with the same currency that was used a million or so years ago. If it worked then, it should work today. Right?
@@TheVolquard Man Germany is looking bleaker and bleaker as the years march on
Hahaaaha@@Inspired2Teach Good one, Agreed
Its nice to hear intelligent people talk honestly about climate without the poison of politics.
The sad truth is that most of them (real scientists), like Dr. Moore, are getting old and will not be around much longer to fight the climate cult.
It is a popular delusion that man’s effects on the Earth’s climate are significant and dangerous. The carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels are largely beneficial.
Benefits include greening of the planet with increased agricultural yields (main effect) reduced winter heating costs, fewer deaths from hypothermia and postponement of the next glacial maximum.
😂😂😂😂😂😂 Yeah, cause this twat knows more about the climate than a climatologist.
I’ll learnt nothing from this weird conversation. Jordan Peterson is a grifter and the old man was not a climatologist. Why is every continent experiencing record breaking floods? Why is the ocean hotter than any other time in human history? Why is Southeast Asia recording record temperatures? Oh I don’t know, jellyfish and shells. What a joke.
The Deep State Pharma Complex has completely corrupted any science in the USA. Doctors are not even curious about where Covid came from, or the long term effects of the vaccines.
When I was a geology major in college in the mid 1970's, all of my professors talked about the recent dire warnings from scientists of a coming ice age that was going to happen much sooner, and much faster than anyone thought possible. Back then, we called "climate change" weather.
I was just a kid in the 1970s, but I remember the climate alarmism from back then, which is why I don't take the climate alarmism of today seriously.
@@anonygent Exactly! I remember we talked about selling our motorcycles, since we wouldn't be able to ride them in a whole-year winter.
I remember that😮
I remember as a kid in the 70's reading an article in Time magazine about mass immigration predictions.
@@Coastie4 Were those more accurate than the Ice Age predictions?
The spine joke was HILARIOUS from JP!
Over 75% of the Earth's existence has been without ice caps. Saying the ice is melting isn't an argument for man made climate change, so much as it is an argument for the Earth returning to pre ice-age temps.
Nobody can prove the anthropogenic climate change theory using one source of data. They have to use different data sources over time, selectively picking and choosing the data sources that fit the narrative. This is the literal definition of “confirmation bias” and should be refuted.
Are you familiar with the work of Max Planck and Karl Schwarzchild on black body radiation or the Stefan Boltzmann equation.Familiarize yourself with these various observations on the relationship between CO2 and warming and you’ll realize the actual physics accurately predicts what effect on warming CO2 has as atmospheric Co2 concentrations rise and fall.
The entire hypothesis regarding catastrophic anthropogenic CO2 mediated “climate “Armageddon depends on a number of hypothetical positive feedback mechanisms that aren’t anywhere as extreme as imagined by catastrophists,but they’re partially correct regarding the existential destruction we can expect.Unfortunately the catastrophe they predict will come from the idiotic interventions governments have imagined to fight this fantasy.
@@lv4077Black bodies matter.
@@lv4077 give me a prediction by the climate alarmists that has come true
@@JimEdmiston That’s tough since there are none.I was really just pointing out the proven physics that describes exactly how the “green house effect “ works and how far from reality these “predictions “ are and why.
@@lv4077 fair enough. I understand the physics, yes. The Sun is the largest driving factor of climate on Earth. We are living in a “mini ice age” according to mainstream theory, so nobody should be surprised by a warming period. In fact, we should welcome it - so long as we don’t continue cutting down rainforests such as the Amazon in Brazil. I think the biggest threat is killing trees and therefore cutting off our oxygen supply. The big scam is “carbon offsetting” which people like Al Gore and John Kerry say excuses them from guilt. Look into it, it’s another deep rabbit hole of corruption.
More CO2 means more fuel for plant life, which in turn creates more O2 as a result of photosynthesis. A warmer planet means a more friendly environment for plant life and therefore a more friendly environment for the life that depends on photosynthesis.
I think environmentalism has been corrupted by people who seek to confuse us. #NikolaTesla
It goes in cycles it’s been going on for millions of years
Exactly. It's due in great part to cosmic rays hitting the atmosphere and condensing water vapor. Sun activity disrupts the cosmic rays and creates fewer clouds as a result. In turn ocean heat cycles develop that follow the changes in cloud cover and give off stored up heat in a pulse. The AMO and PDO are well studied and their correlation to GMST is much greater than CO2
"Academics could learn from that, Patrick, I would say...the importance of a spine, you might say." Love how Jordan interjects with a troll comment in the midst of a serious conversation, hahaha.
I researched extreme temperature events, and my findings showed that the frequency of record high temperatures over the last 100+ yr is indistinguishable from a steady climate. (Even in a steady climate, there will be record extreme temperature events.)
- During this time, there are periods that definitely were hotter because of an excess number of record high temperatures during that time. These periods include the 1930s and 1980s.
- Also during this time, there are periods that definitely were colder because of a deficiency in record high temperatures and an excess in record low temperatures. The period where this was most notable was the '60s - '70s.
- Since the 1980s, there has been a notable drop off in number or frequency of record low temperature events, but not an excess of record high temperature events. This result suggests that any warming that is occurring manifests itself as temperatures not dropping as far at night (things don't cool off) rather than daytime temperatures getting hotter.
I would have more conclusions, but in the middle of the work, the data sets I was using were altered. The temperature records were changed, and those changes were consistently to make older dates colder and more recent dates warmer. Essentially, the records shifted high temperature events closer to the present which creates the impression of warming that wasn't there before.
I stopped the study because I was convinced the data was corrupted, and that corruption was deliberate falsification. The only motive I can think of for it is to align data to a predetermined narrative. The sad part though is that the unaltered data DID show warming--just not the TYPE of warming that was en vouge.
OK, post a picture of one properly placed Stevenson screen, and I will conseed that you aren't full of shit!
I have been watching a couple of data sources for about 25 years now. Over that time they have progressively been watered down or have gone offline. One can speculate as to the motivation or reasons behind this, but unavailability of original data from most sources is indisputable.
@@terenceiutzi4003 when you learn how to spell people might take you more seriously.
@@phaedrus5904 so you haven't been able to find one either
@@terenceiutzi4003 Data is being corrupted and that's something many eponymous scientists have been saying. There's still no explanation as to why they lowered past temperatures (especially during the 40s) , considering the fact that the urban island effect is now more prominent than ever and not so much back then.
The green devices produce far more emission than the devices they replace.
A petrol car will have to drive 100,000 miles to equal the emissions it takes to produce an ev car. An ev car lasts for 3-8yrs
There are a couple of logical fallacies in your statement. The carbon footprint of manufacturing an electric car is only about 10% more than manufacturing a normal car. The statistic you quote assumes you will scrap your car and replace it with an EV. EV cars last just as long as regular cars, but you have to replace the battery about once a decade.
@@petrhermanadventures9509no.
@@petrhermanadventures9509 Mining, transporting and refining the materials for the batteries is much more damage to the environment and to the people used as slaves to mine those materials. So yes they cut carbon by using slave labor...
It seems you know nothing. You should never speak
@@petrhermanadventures950910% 😳🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Two of the best minds in Canada.
Poor Canada.
Behind Trudeau. What, you ask I am thinking? I'm thinking why do so many people vote for him?
BBC predicted a few months ago that this summer would be the warmest. This morning we are told that it will be the wettest. If we cannot predict 5 months....let's not pretend we know anything.
Hotter, my ass: I have had my heating system on - 8 months/year - for the last cca 10 years... And I live far from the arctic circle!
Yeah they can always find somewhere that it’s record heat is you look long enough.
Lord Monckton also does a fabulous presentation on the potential costing and on why the figures presented to the public are inaccurate
I live in BC and we are told that last year was warmer than the year before. I gauge how warm it is by AC usage and golf! Never used AC once last year and never sweat once while golfing. Previous year AC ran 2 months and had a dozen games over 25 C. Also noticed something odd with the local weather reports. Usually 5 or more degrees warmer than the actual temperature.🤷♂️
Notice how they were crying climate change with the Fraser river being so low right now? But forgot to mention the site c dam is being filled, by the Fraser.
Live in California and we had a very rainy, cool winter and no spring to speak of. Temps didn't warm up till July and it never did get real warm. Found this article dated March of 2023.
National Weather Service Science Operations Officer John Dumas said "Winter temperatures tied the daily high average of 60 degrees. We've had a lot of systems dropping down out of the Gulf of Alaska area. Instead of moving quickly through our area like a normal cold blow will do - they normally move from west to east pretty rapidly - they've been persistent. They've been hanging out in the area for quite a long time. It's not just a California phenomenon, it's gone on across the country. That's why we've had some long cold snaps, really long extended periods of snow or rain for the country."
Who needs instrumentation when we have anecdotes.
@@MelissaR784North of you so good news for us too. The drought that has been creeping up (from south to north) the Pacific westcoast is perhaps relenting.
Are you kidding? I live in BC too, and it was 🤬ing blistering. We also had record wildfires. There were extremely low snowpack across most of the Province - and this year, its worse already. The higher North you go, the worse the changes are.
If the globe is getting warmer, then Australia is now into its sixth year of [edit] (MASSIVELY) bucking that trend!
It's been a cool, wet summer.
But I bet it was the hottest on record!
@@alanjm1234 🤣 exactly! 😁
Can you give me some more details please mate?
I'm trying to build a picture up from around the world to fight this bollocks.
I know our summers in the UK are nearly disappearing but they always say that it's getting warmer in other places though.
I think this is BS too.
@@bobuk161 all you have to do is google Australian BOM. Although they generally read higher than actual temperature in the locale they claim to be representing*, they will show quite a drop compared to the previous decade/average.
I know and know of farmers whose families records go back up to 150 years. They show “no discernible change” in average temps. As opposed to the BOM, who “homogenised” data from the past to cooler than recorded, so they could show rising temperatures.
My birth town used to have it’s official temperature taken at the old gaol. It was barely half a mile from my childhood home. My father has 60 years of records at the same spot. They show no average rise. And the recordings from each, though slightly different, were both consistent to each other, give or take a degree. The “old gaol” BOM records changed around the late 90’s, early 2000’s. *The official recording from then on, became taken approximately 20-25km away on the other side of a small mountain and hill range. this has produced discrepancies of up to 11 degrees C. I first noticed this in late winter 2007. I was staying at my parents, where regular overnight frosts of -4c were occurring, but the TV news showing official BOM figures of 7c. They say their “algorithm” for charting the differences, are accurate! They ARE NOT.
@bobuk161 I'm from Victoria, Australia. Last summer not one day over 40c and very few days over 30c. So bloody rare and cold. And very similar weather for summers before last summer, though one 40c day.
The understanding of scale of time, the enourmous periods and phases of our planet evolving is key to have any kind of reflection worthwhile of what is happening at the moment...if anything is happening at all. Thank God for the intelligence of these two gentlemen
Billions of years is nonsense. The sun would be too close to the earth for anything to live. Everything is exactly where it needs to be for there to be life on earth. Billions of years ignores other sciences.
Things posited by actual science, are not presnted as irrefutable fact.
Climare change started with a conclusion, and disavows questioning!
How scientific!
Wow
That is a whole lot of inconvenient truth.
The highest temperature registered in Iceland: 30, 5 degrees C, in 1939.
Sweden had the highest in 1933, 38 C
All the proof I need that climate crisis is real and we all need to live in a cave. BAAAAA
It's the temperature trend that matters, not cherry picked highs and lows.
@@pshehan1and it's identifying if there's actually a trend at all and secondly what is the cause. Human caused climate change is not categoric fact currently
@@BryJovi17 There is a statistically significant warming trend and the amount 0f warming matches that predicted by the causal theory of anthropogenic global warming.
In testimony before Congress by skeptic Judith Curry, satellite temperature data was declared the "gold standard" and "best we have" and RSS data was sworn by when skeptics were claiming a temperature pause from 1998 to 2015.
The first IPCC report in 1991 gave the most likely temperature rise with each doubling of CO2 concentration, the equilibrium climate sensitivity or ECS as 3 C.
RSS satellite temperature trend from 1979 to February 2024
Trend: 0.210 °C/decade
The temperature change for the 4.5 decades is 0.95 C
Mauna Loa CO2 concentration rise for that time period is 338 to 422 ppm
So according to the logarithmic relationship between temperature and CO2 concentration, for the period in question
0.95 = k ln(422/338)
Solving the equation gives the proportionality constant, k= 4.26
So the temperature rise with doubling of CO2 concentration (ECS)
4.26 x ln2 = 4.26 x 0.693
= 3.0 C
Data matching the predictions of theory is the best kind of scientific evidence that the theory is correct.
The warming is not due to the sun as solar intensity has been declining for decades toward the Grand Solar Minimum.
Also, if the temperature rise was caused by increasing solar radiation, the troposphere and stratosphere would both warm.
If caused by an increase in greenhouse gases, the troposphere would warm and the stratosphere would cool.
That was predicted in1967, and has been shown to be what is happening by satellite data. Syukuro Manabe, the surviving scientist who made the prediction (his collaborator Richard Wetherald had since died) was awarded the Nobel prize in physics in 2021.
The alarmist position is, "But it's happening too fast!" (Chicken-sound, chicken-sound!) "Evolution can not keep up with the rapid change in CO2 and the temperature spike!"
Never mind that polarbears have doubled in population, and coral is flourishing (it happens to like warm water; what it doesn't like is harsh storm waves).
As to plants, the atmosphere with 2,000 ppm of CO2 will produce lusher plant growth.
In any case, the temperature at the end of the Younger Dryas went up by 10.5° C over a mere ten years.
Couple that with the earth had no ice caps for more than half of the last half billion years...
Someone is cherry-picking scary start dates. Why do sea ice data sets start in 1979? Because if they started in 1969 (yes, there WAS satalite data), what we have now would be perfectly normal. Can't scare up funds with normal...
Most cities have air quality affecting everyone that Governments, media and Corporations ignore.
The US many years ago lowered highesy speeds and it saved fuel. And less exhaust.
Ontario Canada they are raising speed on highwsys.
But the Premier was airlifted in by special interests and it shows.
Glad I saw this, have heard others in Science talk different also about the temperature.
Correlate the rise in CO2 levels with the increase in the global currency supply. Monetary inflation causes economic waste
You are partially right but only in that excessive over consumption of resources to satisfy human greed has driven global warming.
Yes, as the climate crisis advocates know - correlation DOES equal causation.
Thank you Jordan. Blessings
Spinning rock around a light source that grows in size… rock gets warmer, add atmosphere to retain heat. Got about 1 billion years to get it figured out folks
Way to complex for me BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Astrophysicists opine that in one billion years the sun will become sufficiently luminous to occasion the gradual loss of Earth’s water into space. This process will commence when the mean surface temperature reaches 47 degrees centigrade and will take 30 million years.
Nope these are just the birthing pains you have until 2033 before the first major conjunction of mercury & venus causes the new moon to pull the oceans out & around the planet east to west as in the days of Noah.
Truth is the leaven of the father of lies pharisee/pharaohs.
It's all been about preparing for these the birthing pains of this the millennium of climate change end times due to the earth's orbits passing between the two energies of the Sun's OOrt cloud magnetosphere for the next millennium. Precession of the equinoxes of the Great Year or Mystery of the 7 star crossings Jesus held in his hand.
Love cures a multitude of sins. Let the dead bury the dead. Our battle isn't against flesh & blood.
Come to Jesus if you love humanity & want to have life & life more abundantly for this crossing will be worst than the last.
Sooo do I have to pay the power bill or not?
The fingerprints of an increased greenhouse effect tells us that the Sun is not responsible.
Loved this!
We need much more of these types of conversations to be happening. The loud extreme gloom and doom factions need to be kept at bay by logic scientific facts and real provable research.
Thankyou gentlemen!
Air, water, and land pollution is a far more important crisis to tackle.
But you can't deny CO2 is a greenhouse gas right.
I had to write an assignment in favor of this BS. Unis are truly fucked.
A book entitled “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds “ was written in the 19th century.
It is a popular delusion that man’s effects on the Earth’s climate are significant and dangerous.
It is a popular delusion that transitioning to non fossil fuel energy sources will be cheap and easy. It is a popular delusion that nuclear power plants are unsafe.
Popular delusions are dangerous and can lead to economic ruin, war and genocide.
Brilliant Men and Carrier experts with Honourable Mentorship in their Sciences.
In oz they speak of carbon capture,pretty sure that's been solved. it's called trees
Then they cut down thousands of trees for a solar farm.
What I understand is that trees absorb carbon to grow. I also understand that volcanic activity like that in Iceland create hundreds of square kilometers of heat sinks that produce severe high temperatures that heat the atmosphere. And that sub-surface volcanoes in the Arctic and in Ant-Arctic warm the oceans with their huge sub-surface heat productions. To say that humanity can control the temperature on a global scale is LUDICROUS! We can always irrigate the arid zones but we cannot grown crops on an ice shelf.
Big fan dr Jordan Peterson sir😇🌈
I went to the Maldives for my honeymoon because it was somewhere i wanted to visit before it was underwater due to climate change as it only had 10 years left. That was 18 years ago and funny enough its still there and stronger than ever😂
No scientists ever claimed it would be. What they said was the Maldives would be at greater risk floods from storm surges, and increased salinity in ground water. The Maldives do increasingly have to import fresh water in tankers.
@@juvenalsdad4175 no they never said it would be at greater risk they said it would be no more, it would be underwater. Our waiter who was a local even said that when the Maldives is no more he was hoping to go to Australia as he was told of the climate change or as it was called at the time GLOBAL WARMING. It's like the guy who cried wolf.
@@tonyrobson6457 " no they never said it would be at greater risk they said it would be no more, it would be underwater". Who is 'they'? I'm guessing tabloid news stories or similar misrepresenting actual science.
A waiter, with all due respect to that excellent profession, is probably not a reliable source of scientific information.
@@juvenalsdad4175 who are they? They are same people on the news claiming to be experts who are saying the same things today as they we're 18 years ago🤦 I'm afraid your climate god that you worship isn't real and hopefully one day your realize when all the things they telling you today don't happen as well. Wakey wakey
@@tonyrobson6457 Thought so. No actual science then. Just made-up stuff and condescending projections involving religion.
Thanks!
I say it’s not only getting hotter - but the days are getting longer where I live! 😂
The 400K, 200K 100K 10K and 1K geologic record shows that just on the verge of an ice age the temperatures rise to a point of 3d. over average and then cascade by nine d., hence the coming of an ice age,.
The earth was doing well before we got here and will do just as well when we are gone.
Of course she does it naturally from time to time. Has done for 4.5 Billion years or so....
Interesting. Nice video. Thanks.
If you check American newspapers all the way back to the 1920s and '30s it becomes quite clear that the world today is no hotter than it was back then...
Anyone who seriously looks into CC will discover that the earth's climate is such an incredibly complex systems involving hundreds of different variables (which is why the models are so wrong so often) that this idea that temperature completely depends on the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is absurd, when we know from historical data that the 400ppm of CO2 is very small compared to past times when there was over 3000ppm and yet it was much colder than now even with 5x the amount of CO2.
Yes, very complex. It's almost as if it was created by an intelligent designer 😉
Are you referring to the late Ordovician ice age?
The hottest period historically coincided with a spike in oxygen levels, from what I remember.
@@anonygent The PETM?
@@Richard482 Apparently that coincided with a drop in O2. I was thinking of the early Carboniferous, when high O2 levels and high temperatures led to vast rainforests and huge insects. Later in the same period, O2 levels dropped and the world froze, wiping out the rainforests.
If Earth is getting hotter, it is also getting wetter. That means more food production.
But, there's no money and control in the truth ! They "need" the Scare stories !
"We" were not around 250m years ago.
Googled "when was the last ice age" - 115000 to 117000 years ago. Been getting warmer ever since. Highly doubtful humans ended that ice age or caused the warming since.
You mean the last full glaciation (as we are in an ice age). That ended due to the Milankovitch Cycles and the associated increasing GHG concentrations. The planet is currently warming at a rate of 30x what is would when naturally coming out of a full glaciation. According to Milankovitch theory, the planet should be cooling very slowly towards the next full glaciation, not rapidly warming.
Why would we think now would be different that no lies are intermixed for an objective that's outside of a centered one? Who thinks like that?
I live in Nova Scotia and the last 20 years it has gotten colder and colder
The big change is the minimum temperatures increasing. Which to me indicate Urban Heat Island effect, which is _not_ a factor of CO2. The more telling way to track temperature trends would be three yearly/monthly averages minimum, maximum and average for the period. But that probably doesn't fit the "Narrative".
Approx. 3% of Earth is covered with cities that could be warmer than the surrounding countryside. Even if that were not taken into account (and it is) the heat island effect would be negligible. Further, how come the oceans are warming where there are no cities. Similarly the most dramatic warming has been at high northern latitudes where there are no big cities.
My unscientific take is that maybe it's not so much warming as it is getting less cold. I grew up in Minnesota during the 60s and the winters seemed much colder, but today the summers don't seem hotter. Now I live in the San Diego area and this last May seemed the coolest I can remember in the last 25 years.
If you look at the entire time frame from the origin of multicellular life (the last 650,000,000 years), you see that the current climate is an anomaly. The Earth's normal temperature (80% of that time) is 23°C. Fortunately, as long as Panama stays right where it is, we will continue to enjoy our current frozen climate for millions more years. UNfortunately, within the next 20,000 years, there WILL be a two-mile-thick sheet of ice covering all of Canada, most of the northern US, most of northern Europe, half of Siberia and every mountain range on the planet. Barring some celestial event, it's a 100% absolute certainty.
The simple truth is that mankind (as a whole) is fearful of losing what we perceive we "have now". The fear is of a deterioration in wealth, living standards and convenience in the western world etc. It is indisputable that the planet changes over time and we humans will need to adapt to change with it or, we too, will become extinct like the 99% or more of all previous species. What we should really be concerned about is the finite nature of the materials we use to support our 21st century way of life. Oil, gas, coal etc are all finite. We live in a world of plastics that are almost exclusively oil based. We will chase ourselves into extinction long before we adapt to a changing planet.
The simple answer in NO, in fact it is getting colder.
Dr Peterson. Just saw you with my 15 year old son in Phoenix. The prospective you provide to both parents and children is priceless and a gift. We thank you. You keep talking about Carbon dioxide, but isn’t the concern carbon monoxide?
Mother Earth gonna Mother Earth no matter what we do.
There is only one problem on this planet: human beings, cold or hot...we have to fix ourselves first
My personal observation is that the last 20 summers have been crappy. Cool and not nice weather.
WOW, and I can't even tell you accurately what I did yesterday.
People that talk about anything 500millon years ago are immediately irrelevant
^^^ That's what a closed mind looks like.
I love this! The coma kid is giving environmental evaluations even though he is a psychologist and environmental science isn't his field of expertise. I can't wait for my mechanic to be able to give medical advice. Keep at it Jordy if this keeps you off the benzies!
If you study how the seasons evolve and how the sun is responsible, you're looking at spans of thousands of years.
A lot of ice has melted in the last 12000 years and we did not start it back then for sure.
"There are huge non climate effects of carbon dioxide which are overwhelmingly favorable which are not taken into account. To me that's the main issue that the earth is actually growing greener. This has been actually measured from satellites the whole earth is growing greener as a result of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. So it's increasing agricultural yields, it's increasing the forests, it's increasing all kinds of growth in the biological world and that's more important and more certain than the effects on climate." ~Freeman Dyson, Institute of Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey.
As long as there have been old men, they have been talking about how strange the weather is. This is also about the time of one 1/2 of the long solar cycle.
Earth climate change has been in constant flux since it was created.....I am far more concerned with the actual pollution we create...plastics, chemicals, toxins being dumped....
Amen Marc...
Lord Moncton Speech at the Mises Institute, department of Physics Oxford University. A good hour spent. He did the numbers.
Wow, no blue box declaring youtube's distain for truth is under this video yet. Maybe I got here too early.
none of this will matter to us when the solar flares and CMEs' obsolete electricity.
The real question is: does CO2 and methane etc really affect the weather/climate. (Its the Sun...)
Please interview Tony Heller.
I believe the sun is getting hotter. This may not be scientific, but, to me, it feels hotter on my skin when I am in direct sunlight. Even when the air temperature is in the upper 70's-low 80's I feel "the burn" that I used to feel 400 miles further south from where I live. Could that be what's really happening and they are hiding it from us?
It is very gradually becoming hotter. In one billion years it will be 10% more luminous. At this time it will occasion the gradual loss of Earth’s water into space. This will commence when the mean surface temperature reaches 47 degrees centigrade and will take 30 million years.
When kids used to paint a picture years ago, they painted the sun yellow. And we all saw / assumed a yellow sun. Look outside now and the sun, to my eyes, is definitely whiter. And whiter means hotter. Is it just me?
"I believe the sun is getting hotter. This may not be scientific, but, to me, it feels hotter on my skin when I am in direct sunlight".
And let me guess , you also believe monkeys will fly out of your butt.
@@hosnimubarak8869 No. Just you.
@@maxcordell1There has been a change in the ratio of Hydrogen to Helium production in the Sun over recent years that support your observations.
I enjoy these unique perspectives and not the global political (e.g. flat earth) mentalities. What extinction defense against political thinking and who should survive.
4.5 billion years ago the Earth evolved. 62 years ago Jordan Peterson emerged.
The core of the climate alarmism lies in the fact that people have the primordial fear of change and the fear of lack of agency. The latter would explain the need for e.g. a rain dance and an omnipotent god so that we could somehow change the outcome of an event that we have absolutely no control over.
One of the main prime drivers of climate is carbon dioxide concentrations. Something we do have control over, as we have increased the CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere by 50% since the industrial revolution.
Now I’m glad that that is cleared up. So a,,, what church do you go to?
the burning question we all want to know, when were the lobsters?
Thanks for that briefing. This whole climate change story is so unreasonable that it would not be around if it weren’t for the anaesthesia delivered to the cortex by the fearful amygdala actuated by the fantasies of the Armageddon resulting from runaway temperatures.
A runaway greenhouse effect scenario will never happen. However a doubling of CO2 concentrations from pre-industrial levels will take the planet back to the pliocene.
@@Richard482 Yes the weatherman struck out again today by 5°C. I expect he’ll do much worse for decade and century forecasts. The Great Oxidation event over 2 billion years ago saw phototrophs take over earth’s climate, (Venus and Mars, both with >90% CO₂ compared with our 0.04% thanks to the Gaia Effect.) Photosynthesis is never given credit for its major effects on our climate because it ruins the IPCC narrative.
Same people pushing Global warming are not that concerned about Nuclear Winter
That would be bad too. And a lot quicker
Jordan needs to speak to Australian biologist Jeremy griffith
If you go to a really arid place near or in the tropics, you can experience 50 C daytime temperatures and freezing nighttime temperatures. You can actually make ice at night there on the ground in the open. This demonstrates that the CO2 in the atmosphere is having virtually no effect as a so called greenhouse gas. The IR just passes back to space. However, if you add humidity the H2O does act as a greenhouse gas and keeps the heat in; you can see that at the same latitudes where there is humidity. CO2 is a function of air breathing life, that has to be above freezing to live. That is the connection that Al Gore asked, "Do you think there is a connection".
No. It’s actually getting colder.
Most people seem to not realize the weakening geomagnetic field, what is the effect of it having weakened by some 15% (+/_) since 1850c
My favorite part if you listen to how he believes things began and what started 1st, sounds a lot like Genesis...Given he didn't say it was God but the order that he names them is in order...
Moore + Peterson ....... I can wait to see full interview
I wouldn't listen to a word Moore says. He says it's safe to drink weed killer.
@@christophersnedekerReally? Where does he say that?
@@GTfour01 th-cam.com/video/AjJCHQ_Igq4/w-d-xo.html
If the government REALLY cared about the climate why would they make us drive the longest most economical way to any destination?
actually fire needs oxygen not CO2!
Timescales of millions of years are utterly irrelevant to current warming. Much bigger factors which move on far longer timescales than concern us dominate e.g. continental drift, evolution of species, change in intensity of the sun. Really Patrick Moore should know that. We are concerned with a sudden change in temperature over a couple of centuries.
Really interesting conversation! This is the depth that climate activists lack. It's really important to see climate change from a longer perspective. After all, we are expriencing a period after a relatively recent ice age.
15,000 years ago the Sahara was a savannah, for example. Now it's a desert because the ice age ended.
10,000 years ago, Canada was covered with an ice sheet. Funny how that never comes up in discussions.
Wasn’t that long ago the Thames froze over and they had market stalls on it
Why does it get cold in the desert at night. Because water vapor is by far the dominant green house gas in our atmosphere. This is easily explained by the large permanent dipole moment that water has and CO2 does not.
Yes it is and that is great 👍
Somehow it seems like 'computer modelling' (simulations) just isn't very accurate. They're still useful tools, however,
.............if you want to get people to believe something.
...only for some, within.
It's not just Mother Nature who controls the weather.
Nothing is just anything.
True! It's your ev use and tax contribution too! Blessed observation comrade.
Exactly. We've had ionospheric heaters and other exotic technology for more than 3 decades now.
True, our sun and moon too.
@@solrubrum and geo engineering.