They are called wave multipliers because they multiply the apparent frequency of the signal you pass through them, some fuzz pedals that have an "octave up" effect do so through wave multiplying/folding. One is an aural descriptive name, the other a visual. But yeah, most people and most modern manufacturers of these type of modules call them wave folders. Love the audio rate cv-ing.
I have watched both of these videos and they are good tutorials. Your voice over audio is lower on this video compared to the first one especially at the start. My understanding of the Serge Wave Multiplier (having never owned one or patched one so what do i know! ) is the top section will give you more control with the second and third sections. The second section will react differently depending on the level of input signal . You went straight into the second section. If you went into 1 and then into 2 you could tweak the level on 1 and not just get an attenuated result but a different fold as well. Maybe you can try this and see if its true? Or you go straight into 2 then out into 1 and then out of 1 into the second input of 2 and 1 will give you to control of the feedback level going into 2. I have never used Serge so i cant say any of this with confidence.
They are called wave multipliers because they multiply the apparent frequency of the signal you pass through them, some fuzz pedals that have an "octave up" effect do so through wave multiplying/folding. One is an aural descriptive name, the other a visual. But yeah, most people and most modern manufacturers of these type of modules call them wave folders. Love the audio rate cv-ing.
The top section is a vca/saturator
I have watched both of these videos and they are good tutorials. Your voice over audio is lower on this video compared to the first one especially at the start. My understanding of the Serge Wave Multiplier (having never owned one or patched one so what do i know! ) is the top section will give you more control with the second and third sections. The second section will react differently depending on the level of input signal . You went straight into the second section. If you went into 1 and then into 2 you could tweak the level on 1 and not just get an attenuated result but a different fold as well. Maybe you can try this and see if its true? Or you go straight into 2 then out into 1 and then out of 1 into the second input of 2 and 1 will give you to control of the feedback level going into 2. I have never used Serge so i cant say any of this with confidence.