Devil's Toothpaste Rocket Engine (3D Printed)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 4.8K

  • @integza
    @integza  3 ปีที่แล้ว +411

    Go to NordVPN.com/integza to get a 2-year plan plus 4 additional months with a huge discount!

    • @scienceium5233
      @scienceium5233 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hello

    • @myname-sj7hs
      @myname-sj7hs 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      first

    • @kashy._x
      @kashy._x 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I need a 3d printer cause its too costly for me

    • @olileoli2788
      @olileoli2788 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@whereitallhappens784 bruh

    • @acometsuranian1325
      @acometsuranian1325 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Integza
      it looks like you really like WW2 stuff, soooo , do you play warthunder?

  • @smartereveryday
    @smartereveryday 3 ปีที่แล้ว +615

    It's beautiful

    • @integza
      @integza  3 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      Yes it is 😁

    • @azibros
      @azibros 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nobody is here, just us 5 😉

    • @chucknorris4768
      @chucknorris4768 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Make that 4

    • @azibros
      @azibros 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@chucknorris4768 yessir

    • @damonw7397
      @damonw7397 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Look! It's a man, speaking to another man. :)
      (I am a fan of both... don't tell anyone)

  • @JoelCreates
    @JoelCreates 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2248

    Can I use this to quickly apply regular toothpaste to my toothbrush?

    • @ElJitomateElectrico
      @ElJitomateElectrico 3 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      Lol

    • @integza
      @integza  3 ปีที่แล้ว +510

      Your teeth would shine like the sun 🤣

    • @glowytheglowbug
      @glowytheglowbug 3 ปีที่แล้ว +58

      @@integza XD as his gums get burned off

    • @yashpanchal3013
      @yashpanchal3013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +43

      @@integza if they remain in place 😂😂😂

    • @jurevidovic9660
      @jurevidovic9660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Can you make a steam powered rc car? or fire, like a flame licker engine? Or go for a personal record how far you could get it to go in a straight line

  • @ExplosionsAndFire
    @ExplosionsAndFire 3 ปีที่แล้ว +406

    Very cool mate!! Great to see that porous ceramic catalyst working as well as it did!

    • @integza
      @integza  3 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Sometimes the weird ideas work ahahah

    • @nackduck9700
      @nackduck9700 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@integza frfr

    • @markgeorge447
      @markgeorge447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@integza I guess it's not that weird it's like the catalyst converters inside cars the way it's made is what is weird

    • @etelmo
      @etelmo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Correct me if I'm wrong but without a stabiliser like EDTA or citric acid wouldn't the permanganate break down to manganese dioxide over an hour or so anyway? Like that would be the brown colour seen on the ceramic...
      But then again those very same stabilisers generally prevent metal ions reacting to decompose hydrogen peroxide (that's... Kind of their point), so they would probably interfere with and slow down the reaction?
      It's been ages since I did any related chemistry, I'm just here for Tom, that sexy sexy man.

    • @BackYardScience2000
      @BackYardScience2000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@etelmo yes, a stabilizer would slow the reaction down. But not to the point that it wouldn't work at all. It all really depends on what the stabilizer is and how much it affects the reaction. Manganese dioxide does work as a catalyst, but it's not as fast acting as the permanganate. So you get diminished performance, but not to an extent to where it's not useful. Also, I'm not sure if you're referring to the permanganate breaking down spontaneously over time, or while in the reaction? Yes, it does break down into the manganese dioxide upon reacting, but no it won't break down while sitting there waiting to react with the peroxide. As long as it doesn't come into contact with a fuel, it'll be fine. Those catalyst ceramic pieces could be soaked and dried and stored for long periods if they are kept in air tight bags. If left out, they may degrade slowly over the course of a few weeks..... Maybe.

  • @xylafoxlin
    @xylafoxlin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +101

    This is WAY TOO FUN

    • @AdityaKumar-xp4mw
      @AdityaKumar-xp4mw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yeah kind of

    • @integza
      @integza  3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Thank you Xyla 😁

    • @AdityaKumar-xp4mw
      @AdityaKumar-xp4mw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@integza Im your big fan please reply 🤗

    • @maskedredstonerproz
      @maskedredstonerproz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Integza, Xyla Foxlin, and Smarter Every Day in one place on the internet, now this is something I didn't expect

    • @maskedredstonerproz
      @maskedredstonerproz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Plazma Channel's here too

  • @Weisz
    @Weisz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +741

    I really didn’t think the devils toothpaste recipe would have been so simple, dang. Super cool video!

    • @almightybush9634
      @almightybush9634 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes

    • @integza
      @integza  3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Thank you so much Louis 😁

    • @EzzieMoore
      @EzzieMoore 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Peowcatpeow no wonder

    • @abhishekprasad8151
      @abhishekprasad8151 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      e

    • @Teth47
      @Teth47 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      There are honestly a worrying number of really nasty reactions that are really easy to do. It's amazing things don't explode more often.

  • @TheConjurersTower
    @TheConjurersTower 3 ปีที่แล้ว +263

    "It might explode or it might work really well."
    Spoken like a true rocket scientist.

    • @Jamesdavey358
      @Jamesdavey358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      True ksp player

    • @themuffincat
      @themuffincat 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yep true rocket scientist

    • @Attaxalotl
      @Attaxalotl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      First law of rocketry: always assume that it will explode

    • @Juno101
      @Juno101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's exploding, but gently.

    • @wesleythomas7125
      @wesleythomas7125 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "This will either work F L A W L E S S L Y
      Or it's gonna kill me."
      -The Martian

  • @PlasmaChannel
    @PlasmaChannel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +446

    But did this Devil's toothpaste go down to Georgia, Tomato lord? Or shall I say Rocket Lord?

  • @zeekjones1
    @zeekjones1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    That sludge at the end can be used to line the edges of the reaction chamber, just like a sugar rocket.
    Leaving a hole through the center going straight to the nozzle from the peroxide injector.
    _The nozzle is honestly optional with the sheer pressure coming out; bigger exit, less explosion, more retrys._

  • @marsgizmo
    @marsgizmo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +269

    Love this project! 😎

    • @integza
      @integza  3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Thank you Adrian 😁

    • @lamx9687
      @lamx9687 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Why is integza the only one to reply to this comment

    • @jonahplayscello
      @jonahplayscello 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Love your videos

  • @warzonebeast6254
    @warzonebeast6254 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2604

    Video Idea: now that you have higher a working rocket of sorts, make a big one with multiple output nozzles, or a multi stage rocket!
    Tomatoes are disgusting!! 🍅

    • @lortzo573
      @lortzo573 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      multi stage rocket sounds dangerous, i want to see it!

    • @brytoncathcart7624
      @brytoncathcart7624 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I hope you get the 3d printer!

    • @maxmakez5015
      @maxmakez5015 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Probs doesn't have enough thrust to lift off

    • @acasualblenderer
      @acasualblenderer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Multi stage rocket!!
      ( love that idea)

    • @mechadraws
      @mechadraws 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good idea

  • @jtwarner13
    @jtwarner13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +157

    With your CNC skills improving, you should revisit some of your Tesla projects using more and more metal parts! It would be cool to see the turbines last longer.

    • @jtwarner13
      @jtwarner13 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Jonah lopes cardozo lol same to you! A bit of a rarity

    • @jtwarner13
      @jtwarner13 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Jonah lopes cardozo Lol you too dude! It is a rare name to see

  • @carlogargiulo4101
    @carlogargiulo4101 3 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    Video idea: attach something like an afterburner to the back of the nozzle so that you can use the oxygen from the reaction to boost some type of combustion, maybe even add alcohol in the acid to ignite it in the first chamber.

  • @AkrimaSablosang
    @AkrimaSablosang 3 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    one thing I love is that, the more Integza progresses, the less his engines look like modded water bottle, as they take a much more legit and pro look.

    • @ethan5205
      @ethan5205 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They’re at the laser cannon stage rn

  • @jnplnrvl9581
    @jnplnrvl9581 3 ปีที่แล้ว +147

    the porous ceramic part was such a genius idea.

    • @markgeorge447
      @markgeorge447 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yeah I guess it's inspired by catalyst converters put in cars

    • @LetsDrawDragons
      @LetsDrawDragons 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@markgeorge447 or catalysts used for chemical synthesis

    • @TM-529
      @TM-529 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Actually a poor idea, oxygen peroxide is a rocket fuel in itself (monopropellant) and has been used for decades by nasa as a way to propel small rockets & position satellites. All you need to convert H2O2 into supersonic steam is a silver mesh acting as a catalyst. This is also how the Bell jet pack was propelled.

    • @LetsDrawDragons
      @LetsDrawDragons 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@TM-529 it's not a poor idea it's different

    • @TM-529
      @TM-529 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LetsDrawDragons Different..yes - Genius as the OP stated....far IMHO

  • @raffaeldecarvalhogoncalves1554
    @raffaeldecarvalhogoncalves1554 3 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    Please do a linear aerospike rocket engine

  • @Ididathing
    @Ididathing 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Please brush your teeth with this!

    • @integza
      @integza  3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Is that a dare ?

    • @cezarcatalin1406
      @cezarcatalin1406 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@integza
      oh boi

    • @Benjamin-h5l4w
      @Benjamin-h5l4w 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I take that as a challenge

  • @Yaivenov
    @Yaivenov 3 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    The day Integza made his own pressure fed monopropellant rocket engine. Beautifully done! Next step: internship at JPL.

    • @Yaivenov
      @Yaivenov 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      P.S.: I hope you develop this into a bipropellant engine, Integza. Peroxide and alcohol is a well established combination.

  • @acrylicmarlin6356
    @acrylicmarlin6356 3 ปีที่แล้ว +127

    "We literally made a rocket ship"
    Integza: *It's free real-estate*

  • @nicholasjensen8016
    @nicholasjensen8016 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Instead of using a secondary source to compress the plunger, you could use a small tube to take some of the pressure generated by the reaction. This way it will make the reaction self-sustained once initiated.

  • @pazakkattack
    @pazakkattack 3 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    I'd love to see you revisit some of the older rockets you've made using the hot tips given by people in the comments. There's almost always at least one person with an easy fix that'd make your insane machines work even better and I'd love to see it.

  • @victor9sur768
    @victor9sur768 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    you could try suspending the MnO2 or KMnO4 with the 3d printed ceramic part to particle impregnate the part, and then calcine/anneal the catalyst to the support (around 600C ish). it should prevent the manganese losses and prevent the blockages/high back pressures. the flow through the support should increase the surface contact with the heterogeneous catalyst improving the mass transfer making the reaction go boom boom faster

    • @kaistumer198
      @kaistumer198 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The problem is that would yield Mno2, which way less reactive

    • @harryconover289
      @harryconover289 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice end comment abut the boom boom

  • @LabCoatz_Science
    @LabCoatz_Science 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    What if you used the oxygen created in this case to fuel a hybrid rocket? You could create another gas generator that makes something like hydrogen or acetylene, mix the flammable gas with the oxygen in a combustion chamber, and ignite the mix. If you tuned it right, it might not explode, lol...like if want to see this tried! I might do it on my own channel if Integza doesn't try it first!

    • @kylehurly6420
      @kylehurly6420 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      YESSS! DO IT INTEGZAAAA!!

    • @BlackBird-nn2yc
      @BlackBird-nn2yc 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      hydrogen peroxide has been used as an oxidizer in hyperbolic rockets (aka the propellant ignites itself when combined). but normally they use Liquid oxygen because you get a higher specific impulse (basically gas milage for rockets)

  • @atrumluminarium
    @atrumluminarium ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok the impregnated ceramic idea was genius tbh

  • @cacaokingdom3122
    @cacaokingdom3122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    For a video idea, saturate your ceramic blocks with silver (colloidal silver?) instead. This is what is used in jetpacks. It flashes to steam and doesn't have the nastiness that elephant toothpaste does as it flashes to pure steam.

  • @jeffmuntz2394
    @jeffmuntz2394 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    7:05 “and to that i have to say: bedankt!” That was weird to hear, never expected him to thank us in dutch haha

    • @habedoudefiant3754
      @habedoudefiant3754 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @koenvn2 je bedoelt alsjeblieft!

    • @rikdekuiper9773
      @rikdekuiper9773 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ja dat was zeker raar toen ik dat hoorde

    • @jeffmuntz2394
      @jeffmuntz2394 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @koenvn2 oh man, wanneer houd dit kansloze ‘gekoloniseerd’ nou eens op..

  • @azibros
    @azibros 3 ปีที่แล้ว +181

    Idea:You should make a liquid cooled engine. like they do in real rockets.

    • @i-muts
      @i-muts 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      real rocket engines pump the superchilled fuels through the nozzle to cool them, its pretty clever.

    • @azibros
      @azibros 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@i-muts ye ik, thats why i suggested, i find it cool too

    • @BlackBird-nn2yc
      @BlackBird-nn2yc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      or ablative cooling, basically have the engine burn away *on purpose*

    • @azibros
      @azibros 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@BlackBird-nn2yc he has done that already lol

    • @vishalpranav9490
      @vishalpranav9490 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@i-muts yup, with the added benefit of getting the fuel warmed up before combustion.

  • @aperturescienceguy2737
    @aperturescienceguy2737 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mark Rober: the recipe is too dangerous
    Integza: N O

  • @ciscoshark
    @ciscoshark 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    As fun as it is to see the reaction as it happens, I recommend that you dedicate a video to experimenting with different materials for an ignition chamber. (Aluminum tubing, thicker PVC, carbon fiber, etc.)

  • @ezrarichardson279
    @ezrarichardson279 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    This was actually a so much more impressive than your past engines! It actually worked better then you expected for once! Now you just need it to be a little more repeatable and it will be great!

  • @reilukeras
    @reilukeras 3 ปีที่แล้ว +76

    Video idea: You should try to weight your next rocket before and after testing it. So you can estimate how much thrust force you should have, velocity at the nozzle... Things like that.

    • @logicbuilder1204
      @logicbuilder1204 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      if you know the weight of the fuel, you could figure out the isp of the rocket engine, which is the measurement of the efficacy of a rocket nozzle. I don't imagine it would be that high, around 60 to 70, but it could be over 200, which is standard for atmospheric rockets.

    • @matheusclarkson3358
      @matheusclarkson3358 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      OMG you are a genius.

    • @MrTheoror
      @MrTheoror 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great idea! And I'm not saying it cuz you payed me

    • @Yaivenov
      @Yaivenov 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@logicbuilder1204 HTP monopropellant tops out in the mid 100's. The efficiency losses with his current experimental assembly probably have it around 20-40. For reference nitrogen cold gas using a modern nozzle design is 90.

    • @logicbuilder1204
      @logicbuilder1204 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Yaivenov makes sense. Nice to see a fellow ksp player.

  • @tswdev
    @tswdev 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Video idea: attach 6 of these in parallel like the Atlas HLV rocket, have the tip contain a CO2 cartridge (this would distribute the pressure by all 6, should be about 9 bar pressure to each and use a vent valve to control output pressure, you dont need all co2 contents, so it doesnt have to be efficient but its lower weight and size, plus the vent will create lots of smoke which is cool for video!). Use a membrane (like the ketchup bottles) to separate the water from the fuel or a burst cap (plastic film?) if its not water proof enough, this should make it all a single component with no need for glue or any other weak points. Bigger == better! That should make an awesome video!

  • @toddvlong
    @toddvlong 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Fire Fighting Nozzle
    Since you play with fire so much I think a fire fighting nozzle would be cool. Something that mixes water and soap together to make a foam for putting out fires.

  • @cacaokingdom3122
    @cacaokingdom3122 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    This is essentially how the classic jetpack works. They use a high concentration hydrogen peroxide with a silver or platinum mesh screen as a catalyst to instantly vaporize the H2O2 into steam.

    • @L39T
      @L39T 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My jetpack runs on hopes and dreams

    • @Mr_Reaps25
      @Mr_Reaps25 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@L39T so it is ruined?

  • @RadioactiveModder
    @RadioactiveModder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I'd be super interested in seeing a video to explore what other kinds of things you can do with those porus ceramic parts. They worked so well in providing a lot of dry contact area for the permanganate.

  • @ericjohnson8001
    @ericjohnson8001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow. That first successful test really surprised me! I expected a reaction, but to see the skateboard actually take off was very satisfying. Proof of concept is a nice fuzzy feeling.

  • @philippreuner2508
    @philippreuner2508 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Video idea:
    Try making a turbo pump for your liquid fueled monoprop engine.
    That would replace the syringes and could give you (in theory) a much higher chamber pressure and therefore more thrust.
    Don't know if the current design can handle this kind of loads though and you might need a larger nozzle due to increased expansion of the exhaust gas

    • @lairdcummings9092
      @lairdcummings9092 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      In the news, next week:
      "Local inventor sends tomato into low earth orbit."

    • @afoxwithahat7846
      @afoxwithahat7846 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I though about that too, turbines should manage the pressure much better

    • @Consequator
      @Consequator 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In other words, look up the ME163 Komet engine.

    • @Ender240sxS13
      @Ender240sxS13 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So unnecessary and over complicated, a pressure fed monoprop engine like this can make sooo much more thrust than he's currently making, his design is good, just needs to work on the materials a bit more so it stops blowing up and leaking

    • @TheWizardGamez
      @TheWizardGamez 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lairdcummings9092 inventor said “fuck the tomatoes, hope they freeze dried well. Whoops I mean by to say freeze died

  • @ryant1626
    @ryant1626 3 ปีที่แล้ว +130

    You should have millions of viewers. You always release awesome content, and always, on a consistent basis, I genuinely laugh out loud during the duration of the videos. Every video. Thank you, sir, for always making my day better when I watch your videos. In the future, I know that you will have a huge audience. Millions. People who do not subscribe eat raw tomato sandwiches. Eww

    • @kingmasterlord
      @kingmasterlord 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      just a matter of time.

    • @kingmasterlord
      @kingmasterlord 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Meisya Denia why do you think that works on anyone but post middle-aged men?

    • @tonyhussey3610
      @tonyhussey3610 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kingmasterlord haha doesn't work on us either... Doesn't matter the age...just the IQ..

    • @kingmasterlord
      @kingmasterlord 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tonyhussey3610 just cuz you one of the real ones doesn't mean they're in a high proportion of jackasses in your age group. the jackasses in mine fall for different shit than this is what I'm saying.

    • @tonyhussey3610
      @tonyhussey3610 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kingmasterlord just cuz you know your age group well , does this imply you know my age group well too 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @walterer7077
    @walterer7077 3 ปีที่แล้ว +211

    Use high pressure water pipes with standard fittings and stop use glue everywhere! These will withstand much more pressure ᕦ(✰ω✰)ᕤ
    #suggestion for new videos
    P.S.
    You are making amazing progress!

    • @siamsurf
      @siamsurf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Stuff blowing up is a big part of the fun making/watching these videos. :-)

    • @TheWizardGamez
      @TheWizardGamez 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      We’re here for explosions, I don’t think he has a test field so metal parts moving at high speed aren’t exactly… great for you neighborhood bomb maker

    • @Null8fuenf10
      @Null8fuenf10 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Siri, how to build a 'pipe bomb':
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    • @Tom-ku8bu
      @Tom-ku8bu 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      He just needs a bigger nozzle. So that the pressure can get out instead of building up

    • @lightningxx
      @lightningxx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah if you want to make bombs

  • @Trupen
    @Trupen 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awesome project

  • @jorockgalvan
    @jorockgalvan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    i would love to see this project revisited with the use of epoxy and maybe even carbon fiber for the structural support you need

    • @LogoMasterWT
      @LogoMasterWT 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like this idea

    • @Nobe_Oddy
      @Nobe_Oddy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      i like metal pipes better, no offence

    • @LogoMasterWT
      @LogoMasterWT 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Nobe_Oddy I would just take a steel tube and done not translucent but

  • @IoCalisto_
    @IoCalisto_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    AH yes, accidentally making pipebombs, my favorite youtube series

  • @alden1132
    @alden1132 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I've always wanted to see someone build a solar-oven, solar water heater, or solar panel that tracks the sun automatically. I have a few ideas for how to make it work, but I currently lack the resources or space to test my ideas. I would be very interested to see how YOU would approach the challenge, and what solutions you would come up with.

    • @zuthalsoraniz6764
      @zuthalsoraniz6764 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I remember seeing something that used simply four light sensors controlling two motors driving an altazimuth mount, and a shade that will just barely shield those if it is pointing straight at the sun. If it is pointing slightly off, one or two of the sensors will receive sunlight, and thus cause the motors to turn the contraption until it is pointed directly at the sun.

    • @alden1132
      @alden1132 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@zuthalsoraniz6764 That's a clever idea. It's similar in concept to one of my own imagined possible solutions, and seems like it's relatively cheap and simple. Thanks for sharing the idea! One of my ideas was for a more "passive" solution, like calculating (using math that's currently beyond **me**, personally) whether or not there is an "optimal" shape for a parabolic mirror that can be aligned with the "arc" the sun describes as it moves through the sky, so that *less* effort is needed to keep it in the optimal position.

    • @peterjohnson9438
      @peterjohnson9438 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      as long as you place the device in a completely clear area, you can create a simple bit of control software where the logic goes something like this... For initial startup, rotate entire assembly for the full range of motion, at a 45 degree elevation. The angle where you get the highest voltage out of your cells is the sun position. Rotate assembly to that and sweep through elevation from 0 to 90 degrees, record the highest voltage, rotate to that. Done, you're facing the sun. Following that, every 5 minutes, sweep the device left to right by a small amount (like +/- 10 degrees) and record the highest voltage, lock to that, then adjust elevation.
      Sleep for 8 hours if voltage drops below a certain threshold or unless the threshold is tripped again - that's your night mode. Once night mode ends, revert to initial startup.
      You can make this logic work with a cheap Arduino. You'll also need a car battery, two motors and two motor controllers, some solar panels and a bunch of metal to build the rotating frame out of. Keep all the electronics (including battery) as part of the mobile assembly, Run a long extension cord. Use a free-rotation extension cord if you can.
      Good luck, the project is pretty easy but will require some bumbling around with the code and the welding.
      (The reason you do a full sweep at wakeup/startup is to avoid accidentally tracking local maxima such as a reflection from a window or someone's driveway light. With algorithms, sometimes dumber is better.)

  • @MudakTheMultiplier
    @MudakTheMultiplier 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why have I never seen you channel before!? Time to go watch as many of your videos as I feasibly can.

  • @julien2658
    @julien2658 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Imagine a pyromaniac with a heavy Portuguese accent who hates tomatoes and loves Nicolas Tesla…
    And I love it

  • @chasecortes2385
    @chasecortes2385 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    jet japck integza jetpack do itttttt

  • @donaldfarmer9932
    @donaldfarmer9932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    My suggestion is…a “Best of Integza” video, featuring those “learning” moments. I’m sure there is enough to create a number of “learning” moments!!!

  • @superrouter
    @superrouter ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This dude builds everyhing except regular rocket engines

  • @wellensgamingodds3228
    @wellensgamingodds3228 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I highly recommend changing out the plastic for metal parts to deal with the pressure, as is we've seen enough of the combustion, its time you made something for long term repeated use.

    • @Nworthholf
      @Nworthholf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ....or use transparent aluminum!
      (not sure about its chemical resistance tho)

    • @wellensgamingodds3228
      @wellensgamingodds3228 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Nworthholf If not for the fact that its yet to become a mass produced item, that would work to some degree; so to expansive at this time, so hopefully in a few decades then.

  • @archie4521
    @archie4521 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    This would be *incredibly* inefficient _but_ it would be interesting to see how much electricity you can generate when using that reaction to shoot the gases into a closed mill that's hooked up to a small motor. Or something similar.

    • @zangryomani1257
      @zangryomani1257 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Meisya Denia Get out of here

    • @zangryomani1257
      @zangryomani1257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      tesla devil turbine

    • @archie4521
      @archie4521 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zangryomani1257 That's a good name lol

    • @zangryomani1257
      @zangryomani1257 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@archie4521 thanks, but if he makes this, he should employ built in disk spacers, but there on the outer perimeter, and they deflect the moving fluid toward the center, similar to the second version of his tesla turbine, but there on the outside. this would also give it more tourqe, and should be used to try and make a steam engine

  • @tyrelgoshorn7863
    @tyrelgoshorn7863 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Wow. Great idea using the ceramic as a substrate for the catalist. Also, Jackie Chan is awesome, and tomatoes are delicious.

  • @clarkkent5442
    @clarkkent5442 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Because this is rocketry I say you take it the next step further. Because one of the byproducts of this reaction is oxygen gas, and you have a ceramic 3D printer I have a suggestion. After the reaction occurs you should build a chamber the gases can collect. Within this chamber add an ignition source and print out a coned nozzle that can compress the exhaust outwards. You'll of course have to use steel as a housing for the oxygen induced fireball chamber and a steel reinforcement for the ceramic exhaust port. But, if you put all of that together. Between the compressed air shot from hydrogen peroxide to potassium permangenate and the ignited oxygen chamber you should be able to get an actual rocket off the ground. Though this would be a whole lot more dangerous, it would still be amazing to see.

  • @plumfive6505
    @plumfive6505 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I wouldn't recommend using plastic gloves when burning things, if a hot flame or a drop of hot liquid, in fact, if anything hot reaches your gloves, the latex will melt and you'll have a great tale to tell when you go camping with your friends and family. Other than that, great video as always.

  • @AurumEquus
    @AurumEquus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    When you pushed the syringe out with compressed air it was such a satisfying POP sound ^^

  • @jacobholoway3574
    @jacobholoway3574 3 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    Video idea: You should do a “hand tool only challenge” rocket build with a budget of $30 and only allowed to use hand tools. Keep up the great work!

    • @halogeek6
      @halogeek6 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean a pcb pipe a hacksaw some duck tape and whatever you can get your hands on for fuel. Boom make shift rocket for less then 30 bucks made from hand tools.

    • @TheWorstBridger
      @TheWorstBridger 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@halogeek6 a source of KNO3 (65pt) and granulated sugar (35pt) and oxidiser (if you want this is not required)

  • @kyo8390
    @kyo8390 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    integza is like the Electroboom of engineering
    or is electroboom the integza of electrical engineering....
    the question of life

  • @sleuthyz
    @sleuthyz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Video Idea: Now strap it to a Rocket (but reinforce the dang thing to withstand those pressures) , who cares if NASA wasn't built in 2 days, Integza Space Program was.

    • @drakinkoren
      @drakinkoren 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Built in 2 days... of 3D printing!

  • @jrtanker2271
    @jrtanker2271 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I love how when he figures out to use the old syringes and that pirates of the Caribbean esc music starts playing, the syringe popping out is a near perfect octave Above the key of the piece making it a perfect last note to the phrase.

  • @daily3ddesign
    @daily3ddesign 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I have to be honest, I didnt even know what the video was about but when I saw that Integza uploaded I knew it was going to be good and I immediately clicked

  • @nominalnostalgia1347
    @nominalnostalgia1347 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm fairly certain that gac is a cheaper catylist for this. Using a coffee filter is a cheap and easy way to essentially transform your h202 into a mesh. Just by allowing it to soak. Impregnating the resin was cool combining it with sugar would allow the entire thing to disolve quickly.
    You should do a video that takes advantage of the oxygen release. And your previous sugar based solid fuel designs.
    Mostly because this could create a staged rocket that could provide oxidation to enhance the sugar burning method used earlier.
    With good oxidation creating a flight this way would totally reduce the weight and calibre of sparker needed to ignite the solid fuel upper stage. What's more is you could make a custom a pressure relief valve and a custom one way valve attached to a switch to start the sparker as soon as the stored O2 from the previous reaction starts flowing.
    Thus you have a two stage rocket you could use a bladder that holds the fuel (balloon) to separate the stages.
    Since the ignition would take place at altitude you would want to launch in an isolated area. Or over water.
    I really want a 3d printer to launch my own channel someday. In no way competitive with yours so hopefully you love this concept.

  • @curtisslemieux7063
    @curtisslemieux7063 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    On i feel like making this out of steel for the “combustion chamber” would work quite well and you may be able to seal it better with threaded ends. That one way valve would be able to thread in and it wouldnt be able to jump off

  • @Alaparus
    @Alaparus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This reminds me of "water bottle rockets" that simply push water out using compressed air.
    Maybe try pressurising the air and peroxide in the same bottle before pushing it through the catalyst, removing the need for the syringe entirely.
    Bearing in mind the system is gravity fed if you plan on using a horizontal test bed.
    I want to see your motors make something fly!

    • @Yaivenov
      @Yaivenov 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This would work. It is done in real rockets too where there is no bladder/liner inside the propellant tank to keep pressurant separated from propellant. It just adds the requirement for ullaging to settle the propellant in the tanks. Apollo did this using the smaller rcs engines to apply a little forward thrust, the bipropellants for the AJ10-137 thus settled to the bottom of the tank.
      So yeah, omitting the syringe and pressurizing the perozide container directly should work just fine.

    • @CharlieSolis
      @CharlieSolis 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not a bad idea. Even just having a water section after the hydrogen peroxide/steam nozzle that the pressure built up forces the water out. Having the heavier mass be thrusted backwards will give a much higher impulse.

    • @Yaivenov
      @Yaivenov 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CharlieSolis that would be less efficient. You want your exhaust gasses/reaction medium coming out the nozzle to be as low mass and high velocity as possible.

  • @InservioLetum
    @InservioLetum 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Mark Rober is literally a rocket engineer. He would have absolutely no problem getting his hands on PURE peroxide, as this is in fact a rocket fuel type still in use today. A very FUN fuel type in fact.

    • @Krustable
      @Krustable 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      get your hands on a pipe, add kerosene, a little bit of peroxide, and ignite using a radio controller..
      *you've successfully made a chemical pipe bomb !!!*

  • @magikben
    @magikben 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    This was an great result. On each of these I would be curious how much of the thrust is accounted for by the energy put into the system by the pressurized air or whatever else is used to move the materials. I am also voting Integza as “Most Likely To Blow Himself Up”. Don’t want to see that of course but man o man I cringe at times! For the science!

    • @chris-graham
      @chris-graham 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hello fellow racer!

    • @SeanBZA
      @SeanBZA 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would say the air input only accounts for a tiny bit at the beginning, the plunger does keep it well separate from the chamber. Most of the thrust here is from the reaction making steam, just like the Heinkel rocket plane did with the same fuel combinations.

    • @magikben
      @magikben 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SeanBZA In this video I agree that the additional energy is minimal but in others it is significant

  • @slycooper1001
    @slycooper1001 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    a easy fix for your issue is simply add struts between the hydrogen injection chamber and the catalyst engine like a couple of double sided bolts and pin the injector in place and since you have a 3d printer you might be able to just print a stabilizing mount that wraps around the failure point to help stop the issue

  • @kesakhan
    @kesakhan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    So your KMnO4 is reacting with the H2O2 to make KOH (lye) and MnO2. The MnO2 that it makes will be super fine and have a massive amount of surface area which then the H2O2 can decompose on. Pretty cool stuff.

    • @lunachable1
      @lunachable1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I like you funny words, magic man

    • @Alsry1
      @Alsry1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      KOH isn’t lye, NaOH is.

    • @kesakhan
      @kesakhan 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Alsry1 yes and no. If you're a chemist lye refers to the leachate of wood ash/pot-ash (this is where the name potassium comes from) which is predominantly KOH, so historically lye referred to KOH and not NaOH. You are correct though that lye now more so refers to NaOH as it is far cheaper to produce and has replaced KOH as the "household" alkali salt.

    • @Mr_Reaps25
      @Mr_Reaps25 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lunachable1 beat me to it

    • @lunachable1
      @lunachable1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Mr_Reaps25 beat meat to it

  • @MrMartinSchou
    @MrMartinSchou 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    At this point you're into plumbing, which can be tricky. Thankfully TH-cam has a fantastic certified plumber who can probably help. And he also has a bit of a thing for rockets, which might be helpful.
    What I'm trying to say is that you should definitely look into doing a collaboration with Colin Furze about the next step :D

  • @PommyDragon2525
    @PommyDragon2525 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Seeing a video comparing the weight of different rocket engines before and after thrust would be cool. Show how much mass is released in the exhaust of the rocket and factor how that changes the thrust as it gets lighter.

  • @minklmank
    @minklmank 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice - you basically built a H2O2 based monopropellant rocket engine! Though your thrust in this design is capped by your maximum chamber pressure, which is limited by your maximum injection pressure which in this case is 4 bar due to your "fuel pump" design - which if i recall correctly has been used in the past by I think soviet rockets. (top of the tank as a piston head to pressurize the fuel above using pressurized gas as a driving force). A very simple and elegant solution.
    With your Ethanol / H2O2 / Permanganate experiments you by the way almost had a replica of a WW2 German V2 Rocket engine. Using H2O2 via Permanganate catalyst to drive a turbo pump that feeds an Ethanol / Water mixture and Liquid Oxygen into the chamber of the engine (water was added to reduce exhaust temperature because of problems with nozzle disintegration)

  • @azibros
    @azibros 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    *Idea: You should extract hydrogen from water* *and use it as fuel.*

  • @caz0011666
    @caz0011666 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Video idea: Could you do something with laminar flow! Always find it super interesting, and I wonder if you could print a laminar flow nozzle that would work for a light up display (to send a rocket through at some point!)

  • @willwahlberg1890
    @willwahlberg1890 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is so awesome. You should totallu try making a radial engine using similar ingredients as your turbo jet engine. I want to attempt to make my own jet engine in the future. Your videos have been a great resource!

  • @Matt_Barnes
    @Matt_Barnes 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    As someone who knew very little about rocketry when I started watching your channel, it's exciting to see the progression of your rocket designs! Can't wait to see the next iteration of your devil's toothpaste rocket, or DTR, which given the initials I think you should henceforth refer to as Dietrich.

  • @alexiaaddictiv-ink1898
    @alexiaaddictiv-ink1898 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    At this rate, I'm thinking you will have a running rocket suit prototype by next year this time 😉
    Love your dedication.
    Keep up the good work.

  • @WendellRust
    @WendellRust 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Video idea: workshop tour including the types of machines and 3d printers you use. Anyway love your videos and keep up the great content.

  • @isaiahwarriner1344
    @isaiahwarriner1344 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I just bought my first 3d printer. I'm trying to learn everything I can so hopefully I'll be inventing and experimenting as well!

    • @Nobe_Oddy
      @Nobe_Oddy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      i was thinking of getting one myself, but can I get a good one for about $200??? prolly not :(

    • @isaiahwarriner1344
      @isaiahwarriner1344 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Nobe_Oddy creality ender 3pro

  • @maxrichards2295
    @maxrichards2295 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A beautiful example of a monopropellant engine! If I am not mistaken, the same method of decomposing hydrogen peroxide is used by orbital class rockets to power their reaction control system (R.C.S) thrusters.

  • @justinmolina4557
    @justinmolina4557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Integza your rocket it producing lots of O2, add fuel and a 3D printed nozzle and BOOM a rocket or possibly a large explosion. Either way it will be cool.

    • @Mr.Paulo.
      @Mr.Paulo. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I was just thinking about that, the problem though is that most of this O2 is saturated with water vapor, so igniting it would be really hard, maybe if he could dry out the exhausted vapors it could turn into a legit combustion rocket engine

    • @justinmolina4557
      @justinmolina4557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Mr.Paulo. that’s the thing gasses do not care about moister. Just look at when a propane vessel is on fire. No amount of water will put it out.

    • @Mr.Paulo.
      @Mr.Paulo. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@justinmolina4557 never thought about that, so he can just mix the engine's oxygen output with some propane and make basically a flamethrower? That's some freaking cool idea to try out

    • @justinmolina4557
      @justinmolina4557 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Mr.Paulo. my thought is that it would be a really high pressure exhaust. If he can contain the force it would be a a serious rocket.

  • @vorderma
    @vorderma 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I remember when I was younger, I was consistently rinsing an item in hydrogen peroxide. I eventually set out a dish of hydrogen peroxide which I would drop the item into then retrieve it and use the same dish of hydrogen peroxide later. As young kids do, I forgot about it and went several days without using that bowl. When I finally used it again, it immediately burned (not flammably) the skin on my fingertips. The only logical assumption is that water evaporated and increased the concentration of the hydrogen peroxide. Why not try slowly evaporating hydrogen peroxide or using low heat to distill water off of it?

    • @abhimaanmayadam5713
      @abhimaanmayadam5713 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      By that point, the peroxide should have decomposed into water.

  • @notan_marko7314
    @notan_marko7314 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Make a front well drive bicycle

  • @christopherbull3467
    @christopherbull3467 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A larger check valve seems obvious I guess but im super glad you put in a direction change like that mid video! Totally made me what to follow allong more.

  • @joespinoza6599
    @joespinoza6599 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Tom from explosions and fire 🔥 is the shit he is legitimately one of the smartest youtubers that’s underrated cuz he’s a bit of a pyro 🧨 haha

    • @SegwayBossk
      @SegwayBossk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Him and StyroPyro are geniuses

    • @monkemonke9048
      @monkemonke9048 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SegwayBossk yo wnna roast some marshmallows in my laser oven?

    • @SegwayBossk
      @SegwayBossk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@monkemonke9048 hell yeah

  • @SarahGreyWolf
    @SarahGreyWolf 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Definitely looking forward to one day seeing you attempt a variable thrust engine and mounting it to a model airplane or something

  • @vsharma6586
    @vsharma6586 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    *VIDEO IDEA FROM IKIA*
    Connect a mini canon to your turbo boosted jet with a Seal in between when there is enough pressure of exhaust the seal will break yeeting the load 👍

  • @OAikoT
    @OAikoT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you remember your compressed air engine video Integza? You should try and make an RC plane that uses one and make it fly. If your going to go for a CO2 propellant maybe try adding some pressure regulating valve so that it doesn't come out as fast and without solid chunks of CO2 while also having it at a slight downward angle and use the bigger 88g CO2 cartridge instead of the small 12g you have used before. Alternatively maybe a metal steel container that you could compress air into. I remember Slingshot channel making insane contraption that could take huge amounts of air pressure safely, thought it is heaver so you might need glider size wings to be able to lift that.

  • @CodockDraconin
    @CodockDraconin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Maybe find a slightly slower, steady reaction to produce the steam and use the steam to run a Tesla turbine powering a propeller. If you can make a light enough high pressure catalyst container, you may be able to get a longer running engine than just the short blast rocket engine.

  • @patrickstarbed
    @patrickstarbed 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow, this really shows how powerful Devil's toothpaste is, even at such a small level. Lots of respect to both of you!

  • @Orionrobots
    @Orionrobots ปีที่แล้ว +3

    With the catalyst on those highly porous blocks, it almost feels like a hybrid engine. I'd love to see this made into an actual rocket now.

    • @Sniperboy5551
      @Sniperboy5551 ปีที่แล้ว

      There was an early jet pack that used damn near the same method

    • @ClassySloth
      @ClassySloth 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Sniperboy5551do you know what he does to make the potassium permanganate a liquid

  • @TrikeRoadPoet
    @TrikeRoadPoet 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Use peroxide rocket to push a small boat, putting the rocket force against the water for a stronger reaction, and using the water's back pressure to allow for the chemicals more time to react in the chamber before being expelled.

  • @trailswithtyler7427
    @trailswithtyler7427 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I got an idea for a future project. You should use one of your rocket engines and actually make a rocket that flys.

  • @galestaffsylleianor3215
    @galestaffsylleianor3215 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Why not try printing a gas powered nozzle capable of accelerating air through the speed of sound, you could then combine such a nozzle with most of your other rocket or jet exhaust allowing you to greatly increase the exit velocity and so improve the amount of thrust produced. A way to do this would be to take a compressor fan/centrifugal fan like the one you used for the afterburner and use it in much the same way as in that video to produce a stream of higher pressure air, then pass this into a sufficiently converging nozzle, this will take you up to the speed of sound. The harder part is then to get the diverging nozzle on the other side to expand at the correct rate leading to supersonic flow through the bell, and then maybe some nice images of some mach diamonds out the back.

    • @sergeykuznetsov3692
      @sergeykuznetsov3692 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The idea is good, but it wouldn't work with any commercial EDF and most DIY centrifugal fans cause De-Laval nozzles start working at pressure ratios of at least 2.5 (Chamber Pressure / Ambient Pressure), but EDF's can't go beyond 0.1 atm overpressure. To get the required pressure ratio you would need a multistage axial compressor like in a real turbo-jet engine.

    • @m.sierra5258
      @m.sierra5258 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Idea is good, but first the chamber / plumbing has to stop blowing up :D I think you are skipping ahead here

  • @jaydenb2558
    @jaydenb2558 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Video idea💡: You should make some project's related to Arduino.
    Arduino ➕Rockets🚀=🤯🤯
    And yeah: Tomatoes are disgusting 🤢🤢

  • @simonstastny9097
    @simonstastny9097 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Project Idea: Maybe try to make a "professional" water rocket before building a chemical one, something that would fly hundreds of meters, you could even test it with an aerospike nozzle (or hydrospike?)!. I think it would help you develop the final version of a chemical rocket.

  • @denisvalentin7966
    @denisvalentin7966 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Video idea : now that you have mastered the art of devil's toothpaste, you can build a canon out of it. Quite the same setup as this video except that the chamber is standing still while shooting something ! (Like tomatoes for example 😈)

  • @Bakamoichigei
    @Bakamoichigei 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "This is not safe." - _A madman intent on gleefully continuing what he is doing._

  • @jwil6902
    @jwil6902 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nothing would excite me more than seeing the result of Integza, Mark Rober, Stuff Made Here, Smarter Every Day, Colin Furze and Nile Red being locked down on the MIT campus for a month.

  • @michaelaguilar9751
    @michaelaguilar9751 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Fires! Explosions! Questionable safety! And a little bit of success. Thoroughly enjoyed, and as always, I enjoy watching you get better.

  • @m0011v
    @m0011v 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    you should 3d print a 3d printer:)

  • @yrmoma
    @yrmoma 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Catalyzer sounds like a serum that some evil genius (named, ohhh, I dunno, Integza) developed to turn people into cats. Maybe that should your next video: developing the catalyzer.

    • @one_b
      @one_b 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      "This Integza guy thinks he can beat my Catinator with his Catalyzer?? Ha! Perry the Platypus? Where did you come from?" - Dr. Doofenschmirtz

  • @madlikeff2496
    @madlikeff2496 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3:31 Integza just developed an addiction 😂.