One interesting fact for you Paul: Marmaduke Pickthall, the famous British writer, translator and Muslim convert who was born in 1875 was a "classmate and friend" of Winston Churchill at Harrow School, the prestigious boarding school in England. They both shared a similar "social" status as members of the "upper class", however, they had very different views on politics, religion and culture. Pickthall, being a devout Muslim, was a sympathizer of the Ottoman Empire and also the Indian independence movement (Did Tariq Ali mention this?), while Churchill was a staunch imperialist and colonialist.
@@aftabnaveed lol your name is aftab.. he even gave remarks against Islam and you are supporting him? He was a monster who was fighting against another monster... The another Austrian monster was lesser evil than Churchill because Austrian painter knew about je ews traitors who backed western allies at that time... 3-4 million Bengalis died out of starvation because he diverted essential supplies from the civilians in Bengal to sturdies Europeans... When People writing to him that people are dying he replied why hasn't Gandhi died yet? He compared Indians with animals and he also said that there was nothing wrong in colonization of America Australia he said that a greater race took over another... Is this your favourite?
@Marya2476 the jews came in and bought property legallly in the 1880's... in the 1900's BEFORE The British arrived there were already problems. So there is that.
@@Marya2476 oh marya. must you invent excuses for islam? the reality was the palestine region was not important to the turkish rulers. it was pretty desolate. palestine had 200,000 people. the empire had 20,000,000 people. so a hundred times more.
Ottomans ruled not on basis of other nations but religious confessions. And Yes they were all independent from sultan and islam. Just taxed additionally if no muslim
Apologetics & revisionism (and in essence, a kind of neo-imperialism) for those convinced the Muslim-Arab mind will never open, will never start thinking hard about why the Muslim-Arab world is so messed up.
The British Empire's crimes in Africa alone would bankrupt the Monarchy in retribution. Churchill was one of the top criminals on behalf of the Colonial Crown in the African colonies. 8:518:5
@@skillfuldabestThat plunder and theft by the Brits apply to Palestine, Africa, the aboriginal inhabitants of Australia, New Zealand, the Native Americans, New Zealand and India. Don't forget to return "Kohi Nour" to India. No wonder the English are even loathed by their neighbors in Scotland and the Republic of Ireland. "Living Standard" nonsense after enslaving them you mean.
Following the game plan laid out at the British 1st Imperial Press Conference of 1909, and representing Rothschild interests, J.P Morgan proxies purchased the top 25 most influential publications in the United States in 1915. They then used their editorial control to drive U.S. public opinion into the First World War on the side of the Allied Powers. As a reward, the British cabinet approved the Balfour Declaration promising Baron Rothschild it would endeavor to create a homeland for Jews in Palestine. Now, jump forward to the 1950’s, when the CIA used Operation Mockingbird to penetrate U.S. media, as well as various USG, state, and even certain metropolitan agencies. Today, nearly all U.S. legacy media is controlled by just five conglomerates, all of which are ultimately controlled by the Deep State, which came to power behind the scenes via JFK's assassination in 1963. That is why the JFK assassination is regarded as the Third Rail in American Journalism. The Democratic Party has become its political wing, and the MSM is now little more than its propaganda arm.
Churchill is supposed to have said or written : "Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith." Any comments?
Brilliant i have read the book its fascinating insight of imperialism . He was a ardent racist and imperialist.He hated the working classes and was ready to get the military to kill when they striked in London on the railways! To think of him as anything other than a a racist imperial is astonishing!He was also of the most unpopular pm in England but later became a hero just at the end of war! Everybody should know about how callous he was! Bury my heart at wounded heart is also good to read it has many parallel with what is happening in 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
Tariq Ali Ramadan was not only an ANTISEMITE, very clever with his discourse. Please read "Brother Tariq" by Caroline Fourest (not a Jew) He was the grandson of Hasan al-Banna, Founder of the Muslim Brtotherhood, and the apologist for Jihad.
Anyone criticizes Zionists fascism becomes anti-Semite, as per white askhanazi colonial settlers. When Zionists see truth hurts they fling the anti-Semitic coin. The most funny but inhumanly cruel people on earth are Zionists
I wonder if the esteemed historian who wrote this book about Churchill will write the equivalent book about other leaders of the past. Maybe some historical figure from the Middle East? Not sure why that area came to mind. There must be historically important leaders from there, although none come to mind immediately. Doubtlessly none from there ever did anything ruthless or killed anyone. Very peaceful area after all.
It is my responsibility to aware every one Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤❤
@RussianFans-vn6cj Galatians 5 10 I trust as to you in our Master that you will NOT consider OTHER BELIEFS, but that the one troubling you shall bear the judgment, whoever he may be. xref-2 Galatians 4 9 But now, knowing Elohim, but rather being known by Elohim, how do you turn again to the weak and poor principles to which you desire again to come under their bondage (note) xref-1 These were people who were before patterning pagan cultic practices and now came to faith in YHWH and are now known by YHWH and were turning back to the former pagan practices. Galatians 1 6 I am surprised at how soon you have turned to another good news, away from Messiah who has called you to grace.
Maybe because Churchill is put in a pedestal and Britons are still living in a delusion that they are somehow civilised when in fact then murdered, pillaged and looted more than most other nationalities.
Russia was instrumental in targeting Dresden. The plan was to demoralize a defeated Germany to expand their sphere of influence over Eastern Europe and create the USSR.
I watched that interview with Piers Morgan and he acknowledged that Churchill was flawed, did some bad things. By no means did he portray Churchill as whiter than white as you are suggesting. He spoke to thex3nd world war leadership he provided and acknowledged that. And winning that War was indeed an heroic thing for the people of this country.
As a figurehead he excelled. Unfortunately he fancied himself as a military strategist. Tens of thousands of British servicemen were sacrificed on the altar of his hubris.
@@leslie-annmills-gomez8763 If Britain and the Allies had lost WW2 to Germany,when the Nazis had finished exterminating the Jews they would have exterminated the entire black race too,so there`s that🤣😂🤣😁
Saw this as one of TH-cam's recommends for me. (Hmmm, what did Churchill think about the Zionists and the Arabs of the Palestinian Mandate?) But, after 03:35, I have no further incentive to continue listening since you start out with a bit of nonsense that "bombing civilians [in a total war] is a war crime." No, it isn't. ....And not just because NONE of our bomber crews or their commanders (Arthur Bomber Harris, Curtis LeMay) or our politicians (Churchill, Truman) ever faced the real prospect of war crime prosecutions, or that the very present-day institutions which enforce and adjudicate international tribunals ONLY EXIST because of Allied victories -- made possible by the bombing of whole cities, ....no, ...but because informed and intelligent people understand that the very nature of total war includes attacks on economic infrastructure (i.e. cities -- in which "civilians" live). Total wars (and a war with any totalitarian power or any nation of slavers and murderers is such a war) is not war between armies -- but between NATIONS. In such wars practically the entire civilian population is mobilized to materially support the efforts of those in direct combat. Therefore, they are quite rightly targeted as well. Factories, mines, storehouses, granaries, railways and railyards, harbors, locomotives, ships, trucks -- practically anything that could make anything of value or transport it becomes a target. Blockading the enemy to prevent FOOD and other life essentials from coming into enemy hands becomes legitimate. You simply cannot separate economic infrastructure from PEOPLE. (This is why both sides tried to send their children off to places less likely to suffer bombardment -- such as country farms and small farm towns.) Not only did each side bomb each others' cities in the Second World War, but during the Cold War each side had nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles pointed at each others' POPULATION CENTERS (in addition to critical military targets), then -- all the way up to 1991. A man of your age, Mr. Williams, surely knows this. If you claim that our military planners during the Cold War were planning "war crimes", then you are just plain outing yourself as being a capitulationist in our standoff with the Communist countries. You must have been a supporter of "unilateral disarmament" -- in other words a communist activist. Everyone would understand your true motive, and therefore, your criticism of Churchill would thus be rendered moot. Of course, you hate Churchill; because you sympathized with the enemies Churchill was trying to protect us from. What else? ...Or, you could be just a moron like Gandhi. (Useless all the same!)
hello jm. you are correct. paul is an odd fellow who pretends to be nice like the late mister rogers on tv. why doesn't someone older who grew up with tons of freedoms in a western land denounce hamas, palestinians amd muslims for war crimes and expansionism and going against the morality of their own holy book the quran? i've seen the interrogation video where one hamas soldier admitted that the things he did were immoral and against what muhammad the prophet said.
Arab Christians, Muslims and Jews lived in peace until the end of ww1 as I remember reading various examples of their collaborations for freedom before and during Ww1
@@georgeh8937 Jewish were happy and respectful in the arabic lands, there were no problem at all untill the Zionism project appear under lies and false alligation. then the Zionism made conflict in other arabic countries (such as in Egypt zionism bombed a Jewish cinema and pretend that the arab did it in purpose to obligate the jewish to leave Egypt) to obligate jewish to leave their countries and come to Palestine. as many jewish like other christians and muslems considered that they are living in their countries and did not want to move to Palestine. Even in Palestine there are many strories how the jewish lived side by side with the Muslims and christians like brothers before the Slavians ( Russia, Ukrania and other east and west european jewish) come to Palestine and steal the land and ID as Semitic. take a look in the TH-cam what the real jewish says ( jewish anti zionism, Naturikarta, JVP. etc.
It isn't because of Jewish mistreatment of Arabs that relations between them have changed. And let us not forget that Jews have always had to live as Dimmi (second class citizens) in Muslim lands. It is because a Jewish nation was established within the Muslim Umma that the rage erupted.
No. It''s the fact that Palestinian Lands were confiscated from ordinary Palestinians for the benefit of European Jewish invaders who have treated them disgracefully throughout the past 75 years. Palestinians are actual 2nd class Citizens in israel itself while they are little more than Internees in the lands of the West Bank and Gaza.
Jewish were upper class in the middle east . Unlike the west , they were very well treated in the Muslim countries . It was Eastern European and Western Jews who created Israel , not the Arab Jews . It was not a question of a Jewish state , but question of displacement and ethnic cleansing . If it is racist to have a white and Christian state , why should be there an artificially created Jewish state . What West dont do in thier own countries , why do they support that in Israel .
@@sabrinashahab795 In Muslim tradition, non-believers are considered lower class - their status is Dimmi and they have to pay a special tax. Israel is mostly composed of Jews from Arabic countries who were ethnically cleansed (kicked out) in 1
@@sabrinashahab795 In Muslim tradition, non-believers are considered lower class - their status is Dimmi and they have to pay a special tax (jizzya). Israel is mostly composed of Jews from Arabic countries who were ethnically cleansed (kicked out) of Arab countries in 1947. It is undeniable that Muslim countries who ethnically cleansed their Jews are now ethnically cleansing their Christian populations even as Muslims migrate to traditionally non-Muslim countries in the west. Israel is mostly composed of Jews from Arabic countries and also has a 20% Arabic population as well as a minority of European Jews. Israel has a long history of being a Judean country - the word "Jew" comes from Judean. Many European Jews, who were persecuted for centuries for being Judeans went back to Judea after the holocaust. Dig anywhere in Israel and you will find archeological remnants of Jewish history. And why do Muslims feel that they have a right to create a large and vocal presence in the west but there can't be a single, tiny, country in the middle east that is not Muslim even when that country affords equal rights (not second class citizenship and special taxes) to its Arab citizens?
It was Hitler's actions that led to the Jewish state. Had Hitler not come to power Jews would have continued to live peacefully in Moslem lands and in Palestine alongside their Christian and Moslem brothers and sisters . Before Hitler and the holocaust Zionist aspirations were not taken seriously by most Jews They were happy with the status quo and in many cases it was considered a sacrilege.
There is nothing wrong with being an Imperialist. The British Empire on the whole was a force for good. It dragged many countries forward several hundred years in progress. Ali is writing in the context of morality and life in the 21st century. It has no relevence with the first half of the 20th century.
Every country does and has to look after its own prosperity. Western colonialism had its negatives but also advancements to the occupied countries. It's the occupation of barbaric invasions of Arabian peninsula arabs to some previously great civilizations that brings those occupied countries back to the stone age as it happened to Egypt, Assyria, Persia, North Africa... Even the native languages were changed
First, do you know what imperialism is? Because either you don’t, or you’re inconsiderate of how others would feel. It’s not you or the government who gets to decide whether a nation likes its colonizers or not, it’s them. The incredibly vast majority of opinions in every nation Britain has occupied and stolen resources from didn’t want the Brits in their land, and your justification is advancement?? People from different continents and cultures have their own unique way of civilization, and they are happy with it. Why would you ‘drag them forward’ into cities and cars, thinking that your way of civilization should be forced on people without their consent? That would be the case if they actually pushed these nations forward, but they didn’t. Egypt was already advanced with cities and trains and everything, so why did the Brits colonize it? So it’s not advancement after all? It’s purely for advantage and interest at the expense of others, including the lives of women and children that they didn’t care about because they weren’t white enough. I can clearly see now why Britain has the most horrible, dishonorable, unjustified, and barbaric history of all time, because Churchill was in office after an election by voters carrying uncivilized, supremacist, and superficial opinions, like justifying imperialism, which means extending your borders through colonization and military force to feed your home country, a parasitic behavior. And what exactly didn't have relevance in 21 centuries, is the Palestinian-lsraeli conflict an example of that? A huge ongoing conflict because imperialist Britain decided who to live in the middle east and how others should deal with it? And as the whole conflict is still on going pretty much, you still believe that Britain isn't complicit? Completely sick
Just read again the quote at 19:22. The country needs capital and POPULATION and Jews could provide both” - confirm that the areas that Jews purchased was not populated .
Say what you like, from the comfort of your armchair. When you are surrounded by murderous neighbours, all the nuances of your history disappear rapidly up your rear end.
The speaker completely ignore at least 2 facts 1) Most of the land, especially in the coast, was not arable, and full of swamps and malaria, and not inhabited or used , which the Jews that came since the end of the 19th century, worked relentlessly to cultivate, draining the swamps and clearing the sand dunes 2) in 1882, there were 200,000 people living in the whole of Palestine, not 700,000. In 1948, there were almost 1.3 million Arabs. This is not due to a crazy birth rate but to vast labor immigration from neighboring countries, because of the development of the land by the Jews and the British, creating a lot of job opportunities. No wonder this is not mentioned
number 1 may be true but it would be hard to verify, but just by reading "Demographic history of Palestine" on wikipedia, it's easy to verify that your 2nd statement is false, and immigration was a small part of population growth. The Jewish agency even stated that between 1914 and 1938, only 23% of overall population growth was due to immigration.
@@wildansyahidillah7978 hello Syahidillah. must muslims spout fake news constantly like the american democratic party? it is a bad habit i see in all comments sections. it is easy to verify the malaria issue but you just spout skepticism instead. wikipedia - Malaria in Mandatory Palestine Malaria was a severe epidemic in parts of Mandatory Palestine in the early 20th century, now located in Israel. The epidemic killed many people from the bible period until it was finally eradicated in the early 1960s. Malaria was originally a large obstacle to Zionist settlement, because it restricted the land that was usable for settlement, and affected the lifestyle of the Jewish settlers in Palestine. muslims should be happy the united nations partition gave them the high land and jews got the low land and not worry about the share not being exactly 50/50.
Has anyone heard of the kafala system? The system in saudi arabia, kuwait, jordan, regions in the middle east...run by muslims who are recruiting poor women from africa and asia. As house workers. Its modern day slavery. Those woman and sometimes children have no rights. The people who bought them take thier passports. They are not allowed phones or to leave the house unless someones with them. These woman gets abused, bought and sold like animals. And kuwait has the best laws towards it in the region. Hopefully that changes some day.
2:59 Britain did not do this first. The Germans bombed Warsaw and Rotterdam as they invaded Poland and the Netherlands. It was only a matter of time before they bombed Britain. The Germans started the war and started the aerial bombing. To lay that at the door of Winston Churchill is absurd and dishonest.
Our uncle served in Palestine after WW2. He said they were not terrified of the arabs but of the terrorists on the other side. The murder of British squaddies and then the booby trapping of their bodies to inflict maximum mayhem and murder had something to do with this but also generally having potshots taken at them constantly. They came out of WW2 having fought Nazism and were exhausted. Why on earth are those squaddies and the ones killed at the King David hotel not commemorated each year on Remembrance Sunday? Britain is losing its sense of self these days.
@@khaledkhatib5116 "I am a Palestinian". In what sense exactly? "The Zionist terror started way before 1948" I know. The terror of buying swamp lands Arabs didn't want at inflated prices, only to then be invaded, raped and murdered by Arab marauders. But let's not call them Arabs. Let's call them "Palestinians". Why not take credit for those murders, as Hamas gleefully did so recently?
Considering Britain's betrayal of the Jews in British created Palestine, who had just seen millions of their own people exterminated in Europe, I'd be a little afraid of the Jews too. There is just so much Jew hate the Jews are going to put up with from antisemitic ingrates. As for the title of this little video screed, no one really used the expression, "the Palestinians and the Jews" during the Mandate, because "Palestinian" was a "national" category invented by Britain, and not really accepted by the Arabs of that time, but embraced by the Jews of the mandate. And of course before the British creation of Palestine, no people ever called itself the "Palestinians". BTW, with all due respect to your dead uncle, the Arabs had committed plenty of violence against the Jews, not just during the mandate but long before, even there in the land of the Jews, i.e., the Land of Israel, as its true indigenous people called it long before the European empire known as Rome imposed the name of another people of European derivation, the Philistines, on the land of the Jews. And as for the use of "Palestinians" to describe the Arabs of Palestine in this video? That's an alleged people was actually invented in the 1960s by the Soviets and the Egyptian, Yasser Arafat.
How much self-hatred could a privileged Westerner have. It’s always amazing to me. Britain (under Churchill) stood alone against Hitler and kept Western Europe free.
😂😂😂😂😂 Hitler didn't wanr to fight britian. What britian should have done was lift ban of jews emigrating to Palestine ww2 while they were busy through bbc radio telling the world about the horrors of what they were suffering. Seems wierd that neither britisn or America did anything to stop it or Russia for that matter who invaded and occupied the other part of poland.
In the interests of fairness we should also recall Winston Churchill's secret fact finding mission to Cyprus in 1907, which upon his return to Britain wrote a secret memo to parliament ('Condition of Cyprus.' Memorandum by Winston Churchill) lambasting the colonial office for the maltreatment of the Cypriots and urging parliament to intervene. His motivation appears to be more about Britain's prestige than the plight of the Cypriots but it's well to know that it was so damning that the memo remained secret for 100 years. It can be found online at the National Archives (UK) if one wants to fact-check what I said.
rather ironic that open borders in Europe has led to unfetter Muslim settling of swathes of countries. Where again the wishes of the existing inhabitants has been ignored and dismissed.
ya great numpty, he just gave you the sorce of his comment which contains the proof. It is nonsecical to then ask him to prove it. To make any sence you need to read it and fact check it in order to counter his claim. What you have done is to ask for proof of the proof when that is as good as it ever gets in the way of proof even in court. Historical documents, first hand accounts, eyewithness reports. History as you know it is build on such that may not even be that good. @@sigmanfloyd7179
Thanks to Churchill we won the war against the nazis. Germans could have surrender early, but they didn't, and the bombing seems to have been necessary. Similarly, after Hamas horrific attack on jews, it was predictable that Israeli will attempt to demolish the military headquarters of Hamas, and warn them in advance so that the civilians could flee, but Hamas made this impossible, and is entirely responsible of the death of the Palestinians, which they simply called "martyr", like in their chart they consider women as martyrs factory. We, europeans and Americans, have to stand up for all democracies when attacked by autocracies, even more so when they have inherited nazism. The chart of Hamas is even worse than "Mein Kampf", if that is possible, as they want to destroy all Christians, and to obliterate the women's right. This video contains many truth, but seems to abstract them from the context, and lack much comparisons with the enemy of the time, and today's.
bombing civilians was still a war crime and Germany was held responsibe at Nuremberg 1946 but the Allies were not held responsible because they won WWII.
@@Utubexpert-kx7ew The Allies were not held mainly because in that particular case, it was the only way to win the war. They would have surrendered, there would have been no need to bombing the German cities. The goal was to win the war, not some retaliation of hate toward German civilians, which have been helped a lot after the war.
At the moment that the first German soldier crossed the border into Poland, Germany was waging a war of aggression (a war crime) and was therefire outside the protection of the Geneva Conventions. This act and many more that followed released the Allies, including Great Britain, from any obligations imposed by Geneva. Or didn't you know that?
its wrong to assume that Churchills views were those of the English workingman, they werent, he was appointed during the war because extraordinary times require extraordinary measures, but when he was elected PM in 1950 and it came down to policies the British public couldn't get rid of him quick enough, i read his biography (or one of them) and he seemed an incredibly self aggrandizing character, I was expecting every chapter to end with, "naturally, I had the last laugh and they were sorry"
These are the views of the British government and laws. This is part of your history all over the world. You believe that you are better than everyone else in the world. Look where your country has been they is miserable conditions xenophobic bigotry racist white supremacy nationalism agenda. America 🇺🇸 Africa, Latin America, Asia and Australia 🇦🇺. Your greed for power enrichment of your country in the name of your racism in the name of god save the king.
You are correct. My late father (1920 - 2016) disliked Churchill for his politics and his class. However, my father begrudgingly accepted that Churchill was the man for the moment in WW2. Its always worth noting that early to mid 20th century Britain was, across all society, racist but not in a violent way more of white Britains are superior sort of way. It was normal. Now things are different.
You forgot about christian Poland, which invited Jews as early as in XII century, and made them welcome for over 700 years, and able to create their own cities (Kazimierz), which means there is more to blame than christianity
I am a serious student of Churchill….not only was he a deep humanitarian but also a founder of the modern welfare state. When he became Prime Minister, in May 1940, he stood alone, not only against the Nazi threat, at a time when Europe was collapsing (the US did not come into the war until December 1941) but also within his own class who wanted to parley with Hitler. Our situation was nothing short of desperate. In case this is not enough to assuage his critics, they should have a look at the eulogies following his death in 1965. They could not be more laudatory and were highly moving. I’m going to quote an extract from Attlee’s tribute. He was Churchill’s deputy in the Coalition Government during the Second World War as well as his great political rival, Churchill losing to him in the 1945 General Election “.......I do not think everybody always recognised how tender- hearted he was. I can recall him with the tears rolling down his cheeks, talking of the horrible things perpetrated by the Nazis in Germany. I can recall, too, during the war his emotion on seeing a simple little English home wrecked by a bomb. Yes, my Lords, sympathy-and more than that: he went back, and immediately devised the War Damage Act. How characteristic! Sympathy did not stop with emotion; it turned into action......... Then I recall the long days through the war-the long days and long nights-in which his spirit never failed; and how often he lightened our labours by that vivid humour, those wonderful remarks he would make which absolutely dissolved us all in laughter, however tired we were......and I recall, too, as the most reverend Primate has said already, that when once the enemy were beaten he had full sympathy for them. He showed that after the Boer War, and he showed it again after the First World War. He had sympathy, an incredibly wide sympathy, for ordinary people all over the world.....He saw himself there as an instrument. As an instrument for what? For freedom, for human life against tyranny. None of us can ever forget how, through all those long years, he now and again spoke exactly the phrase that crystallised the feelings of the nation. My Lords, we have lost the greatest Englishman of our time-I think the greatest citizen of the world of our time. In the course of a long, long life, he has played many parts. We may all be proud to have lived with him and, above all, to have worked with him.....” There are too many examples of the perpetuation of time-honoured myths (often the fault of “copy and paste” writers masquerading as historians), built on the very shaky foundations of ignorance and prejudice and calculated to denigrate the Churchill legacy. It is high time that these myths are laid to rest. Detractors - please note. If anybody should be “judge and jury” of Churchill, it should be Attlee, the much-respected, long-serving Labour leader and Prime Minister (1945/51), who got to know Churchill so well during the war years. Churchill was a colossus in standing up, almost alone, to tyranny, he should therefore be judged a giant no matter what the age. It should always be remembered, though, that his greatness was combined with him being a deep humanitarian - that is why he was (and still is) respected and loved by so many and why I am a crusader in upholding his legacy.
You are an ignoramus. Can I suggest you read Martin Gilbert, Roy Jenkins, Andrew Roberts and others. You are going against the grain of history. What is your reading list? I suspect that you are a woke leftie, who has no respect for history as you don’t want to be deluded by the truth.
Dear brother, could you devote a video to talk to us in some detail about the positions of Arab leaders regarding the plans related to the establishment of Isr ael?
Why don't you just pick uo a book and read it??? Why would they be happy about europan zionists wanting to take their land??? Arab jews were happy living there since the fall of judeah.
The capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, the best and longest road, the main street named after Winston Churchill!🏆 That speaks louder than what you trying to portray about Churchill. I think he was someone who were blessed 🙌 come on he had bitten Nazi and Musoluni 😮🏆👏
Tbh people will make up their own minds and remember him the way they chose he was a man of his day,.like so many before and after him from all nations and faiths.let he who has no sin cast the first stone.or better still don't throw stones in glass houses..
Thanks for the selective history. I notice how quick jihadi apologists are to point out the case of Spain, as if that's supposed to be representative of the larger Arab-Muslim world. In all likelihood Spain was distinct in being the only part of Western Europe conquered into dar al Islam. The Ummayad Caliphate would have had a vested interest in presenting a more tolerant policy there that was different from other areas and probably uncharacteristic when it came to their treatment of the dhimmi minorities given the fact that all Spaniards were ahl al kitab rather than kafirs. It was in their interest to be less brutal.
So ur saying the muslims were less brutal because of the Jizya? 😂 did u also know that if the muslim cant protect them they got to give the Jizya back right?
I have never heard such disrespect regarding the right man for the job for those dark days. Who would you have as the leader of our country at that time? Whatever your thoughts most of the people of our country respect and indeed understand how this man saved our country and the east from being under the Nazi flag.
Winston Churchill lived in an era where in my opinion at that juncture of history, he did what he did to the best of his ability for the benefit of his country. As any patriot would. To the white British he will always be a hero and one cannot blame them. Love him or hate him, he was a military and political genius who gave his all for his nation.
Next week's discussion: how the 7th century Arabs came out of the Arabian peninsula and how they conquered and colonized the Levant, all of North Africa, and southern Spain.
Thereafter no such thing as colonised the levent 😂 Petra,hatra,emesa, dilmon,midyan where all arsb civilisations and kingdom with pagan arab gods in the levent before the advent of prophet muhamed. There were even Roman arab emperor's such as Phillip the Arab, Caracallah,Elagabalus. Sorry to tell you that as an arab myself, I can understand old Hebrew which is another arabic dialect similarly to Sabean/himyar dialect. Also ugarit the old syrian dialect that's another form of old arabic. You westerners no nothing of our region. Yours jealous that our islamic civilisation created Algebra, the basis for darwins theory he git inspired by Aljahith's theory of discovery. Also the great andalusian civilisation we created. While your colonialism was racist and shit ours brought the nations we led a new creative progress civilisation. Most people who visit India go to see the islamic Taj Mahal and the mutual empires work. You guys ruled Africa and brought nothing, ruled India you bought nothing but push the caste system further. You went to the middle east and brought the nazi zionists. Wherever a white man rules a non white nation it's disastrous.
@@theearlybirder-videos Muslims brought hygiene and great poetry and architecture to India. You're foreign tourists go to see the islands icon Taj mahal and mughal arts.
@@enlightenlife2840 So you use the same excuse as the Western colonists, Muslim invasions and taking over other lands by bloodshed because they felt superior and improving on the inhabitants. "By the 4th and 5th centuries, under the Guptas, a renewed Hinduism based on devotion, rather than the management of ritual, began to assert itself.[110] This renewal was reflected in a flowering of sculpture and architecture, which found patrons among an urban elite.[109] Classical Sanskrit literature flowered as well, and Indian science, astronomy, medicine, and mathematics made significant advances.[109] "
Your title is misleading and anachronic. At the time of Churchill, the word palestinian didn't have the same meaning as a Palestinian was an inhabitant of British Mandate Palestine that included Jews.
Muslim world The practice of wearing special clothing or markings to distinguish Jews and other non-Muslims (dhimmis) in Muslim-dominated countries seems to have been introduced in the Umayyad Caliphate by Caliph Umar II in the early 8th century. The practice was revived and reinforced by the Abbasid caliph al-Mutawakkil (847-861), subsequently remaining in force for centuries.[2][3] A genizah document from 1121 gives the following description of decrees issued in Baghdad: Two yellow badges [are to be displayed], one on the headgear and one on the neck. Furthermore, each Jew must hang round his neck a piece of lead weighing [3 grammes] with the word dhimmi on it. He also has to wear a belt round his waist. The women have to wear one red and one black shoe and have a small bell on their necks or shoes.[4]
Tariq Ali is a Pakistani-British political activist and a member of the editorial committee of the New Left Review. Winston Churchill was a British patriot that saved the free world from Nazi tyranny. Paul Williams, the presenter of this video has also presented videos "My journey to Islam", and "Becoming Muslim".
I haven't read the book , but thank you for the presentation . I'm sure that you do , in some detail examine the root connection between the Jewish people and the lands of Judea and Galilee at least , and explain that the nation of Israel is possibly the oldest in the world , it's people's suffering almost complete obliteration after the Ben Kokhba revolt begun against Roman occupation in 132 Ad . The resultant depopulation didn't lead to a cultural or religious loss of identification with the ' chosen land ' . This perhaps is a point often missed by commentators regarding the current suffering of so many people , Palestinian, and Israeli today and recently .
If one goes by 2000 year old records - some touching on Fiction, other religious sects have them too, then it 'pulls the rug from under the feet of the colonials in North America, South America, Australia, NZ. Those lands belong to the NATIVES of those lands and NOT to Colonial Whites ! ?????????
Your understanding of this history is super messed up. Israel is only 75 years old. It is one of the newest nations. It was settled by Europeans. The people who had been living on that land were displaced. Prior to and during the European settlers turning up, starting from the about the turn of the 20th century, the land was controlled by Ottoman and then Britain. There isn't much else to it. Whether the European settlers used to live there or not (thousands of years ago) would be impossible to substantiate. The people who had already been living there may have been, for a very long time, but that's also effectively impossible to prove. Records don't go back that far, and there is no way to know if they were fabricated.
@@ledpupThere are, for example names Judea and Samaria, the Bible, the archeological artefacts and many-many other things. But for people of not Judeo-Christian culture there is "no proof"...
@@Mk-xe2qc I don't think you understand the argument. If we accept that everything in the Bible is true, and all the other evidence you mention is too, how can any particular European settler link their heritage to it without whatever evidence they present (some sort of document that has their family tree going back 2000 years perhaps?) not potentially being fabricated?
My friend, concerning the part where you mentionned Lebanon, Lebanon has existed since since the dawn of time and its name is mentionned 17 times in the bible. Even under the ottoman empire where damascus directly managed by the turcs, Mount Lebanon had its autonomy inside the empire and maronite patriarch at its head. Lebanon has never been part of Syria and there are 2 chains of mountains as high as 3000 meters that sperates them if you have ever been in the region and the relation of Mount Lebanon with France are since the 12th century.
actually the whole middle east was whole until Britain and france decided to break it apart and each took a piece of the cake. Britan had this rule always, divide and conquer and they followed it to the t.
Never liked the man, dispensing judgment, on people and event, the result of which nobody could ever had imagined. But the reason i detest him the most is that he finds compelled to dismember, (so to speak) the leader of a nation that educated him, and choose to reside in, for his intellectual self gratification, when all he stated as facts can be reasonably challenged. ONE QUESTION: WHY THIS FOUNTAIN OF KNOWLEDGE LIVE IN THE UK, AND NOT IN HIS NATIVE SUPER INTELLECTUAL PACKISTAN? NOBODY WOULD MISS HIM.
@@HS-dw5ee Many tribes divided and conquered over and over there. And other ancient kingdoms. There was always war there. People just always seem to talk about the light skinned people differently.
This is very deep. It was very slow process and now it's impossible to reverse things. But all is possible for Allah. Thank you br. Paul for sharing this gem info.
It is my responsibility to aware every one Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤❤
I dont know if he was a hero, but given the choices available he was the right leader at the right time. I base this opinion mainly on his roll during WW2. A lesser known thing about bombing in WW2 is Naples, Italy. I read in a biography of Churchill that the allies bombed Naples Italy every day for one year. I realize the strategic importance of the Bay of Naples, I believe its a deep water port, but the impact on the non combatants was pretty horrible. If there was a hero in that war, in my opinion it was the Russian army. I would hate like hell to say anything good about Stalin, but Russia's importance to the VE day cannot be over estimated, in my opinion. What amazes me about Churchill is that he was an amazingly functional drunk. In that same bio I read that Churchill said he drank one bottle of champagne every day.
Mr. Tarique Ali is using 21st century standards to judge a 19th century man. Yes, Churchill was an imperialist. In Churchills’ time, most European leaders were imperialists.
He's also pointing out things that are true that most people don't know. Also, many people in Churchill's own time disliked his attitudes and actions. What about the objections to the East India Company and ti slavery in the 18th and 19th centuries? What standards were they using?
Not really, when history is controlled by the ruling class, not much history gets out. Consequentially, when that true history becomes known, it's not judging by a standard that did not exist before . It's simply allowing the truth to be known, and speak for itself. You can't judge what was unreported or unknown. That's sort of like judging Leopold who slaughter millions by 21st century standards. It's not, the same moral standard existed when he did it. Those of the latter centuries just didn't know it. When they found out, they simply let it be known. That's what happened in the USAMERICA when folks started using the net to research some of those confederate statues. They found out the inscriptions beneath the statues were entire false. BTW, I'm not in favor of removing these monuments, as long as you prints some of the real truths beneath them.
Pero muchos lo recuerdan como un héroe y punto. Y hay que recordarlo como un imperialista y un racista también. Y no como uno cualquiera, sino como uno destacadísimo en su desprecio. Y este video es también para esclarecer sobre los origenes racistas del Sionismo y su vigencia
hey nijad. rather than blame the brits ask why didn't the arabs in the mandate start planning for statehood? after twenty years was any arab group ready to form a government? quote "In December 1920, Palestinian Arabs at a congress in Haifa established an executive committee (known as the Arab Executive) to act as the representative of the Arabs. It was never formally recognized by the British and was dissolved in 1934. However, the platform of the Haifa congress, which set out the position that Palestine was an autonomous Arab entity and totally rejected any rights of the Jews to Palestine, remained the basic policy of the Palestinian Arabs until 1948." seems like arabs wasted decades trying to keep jews out of the region rather than build a functioning government.
Yes nothing impartial about Tariq Ali nor for that matter this revisionist historian. Pretty clear to me that there is a hidden agenda that is not very well hidden in this video.
@@johnxxx5085 Hmmmm .... guess you deny the historical fact that in 1891 in Palestine, Jews owned only 1% of the land and Arabs-Palestinians owned 99% of the land. Guess you deny that in about 1900 there was a tiny Jewish population in Palestine and that 96+% of the population was Arabic-Palestinian. Those are just historical facts. Moreover, the Jews and the Arabs lived in relative peaceful co-existence in 1891 and 1900 in Palestine. The basic root cause of the never ending war in Palestine is that the Palestinians have had their land taken from them and mostly reallocated to Jews. One doubts that you would accept such if it happened to you personally.
@@coreyham3753 A crash course on history of the PALESTINIAN STATE: 1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state. 2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state. 4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Arab-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state. 5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state 6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state. 7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state. 8. Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state. 9. Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state. 10. Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state. 12. Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state. 13. Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state. 14. Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state. 15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state. 16. Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state. 17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 18. Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 19. Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state. 20. Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE.
Since England was fighting Nazism it only stands to reason that Churchill would take a pro Jewish stance at that time. You have to read between the lines of political rhetoric. The fact that the Arabs themselves where mainly nomadic tribes also figured in Britain 's and Churchill's decision to back a Jewish homeland that would also act as an ally in the region.
err i think England had some help from Wales, Scotland Northern Ireland, Free Poles, Free French, ANZACS, Indians, South Africans, the Gurkhas.... all there from the start. The main consideration was Oil and it is fair to say that the post WWII terrorism in Palestine probably rushed the decision and the settlement. But remember that Britain had already screwed the Arabs after WWI so they had already lit the tinderbox before they poured the petrol on.
Ali is from Pakistan and of Muslim heritage. His loyalty is certainly not to the DIS-UK, so as far as I'm concerned, his comments are totally irrelevant, as those of a foreign agent! Thank God for Churchill, his warts and all. War is evil, but sometimes to beat an aggressor, one has to fight in a less than sterile way.
It is my responsibility to aware every one Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤
@@RussianFans-vn6cj Not true . . . it is a fraud just like Moo . . . Jesus said "I am the way the truth & the light" . . . he was God. Moo was merely a prophet . . . for an old tired Arab god, who was one of many.
@@RussianFans-vn6cj Never understood why every religion of lokal origins is pushing their agenda for the rest of the world as the only one and only right one and everyone has to obey them....?
I'm all for this provided folks from other 'cultures' turn the lens upon their own barbarous histories too. As for the remarkable Churchill? We can give him a pass for any transgressions because of the abuse he suffered at the hands of his extremely neglectful parents. That 'get out of jail free card' seems available for the feral youth of the inner cities, lets be sure to apply it equally.
Absolutely no excuse for the continuous callous decision making that marked Churchill's life. Like today's recalcitrant youths poor upbringing should not be used for their humanity - it should make them (or made Churchill) into a more compassionate soul.
You want to compare a grown man in power & privilege to inner city kids? 😅 And you refer to mass murder as "transgressions". Would you refer to the loss of British lives as mere "transgressions".
The British Empire was using aerial warfare in Kurdistan and Waziristan before WW2. Channel 4 produced a documentary called 'Birds of Death' so it must be true.
A couple of facts of relevance: 1. Winston Churchill was the first vice-president of the racist and elitist Eugenics Education Society, founded by Charles Darwin's cousin Francis Galton and son Major Leonard Darwin. 2. The eugenics doctrines had profound influence on the treatment of dark-skinned people and indigenous people in all the British colonies. 3. Churchill, like the British Monarchs George v and VI, was a Freemason.
David Irvine's books have great insight into Churchils funding during the wilderness years when he was not in parliment and his paymasters (handlers) , his alcoholism .And also his attempt to bomb germany with anthrax .A great insight and excellent read . especialy the abdication of the king and refusal to let anyone read the offer of peace from the NSDAP .
David Irving has been totally discredited as a historian. He is a known NAZI sympathizer and has had judicial judgements that found he manipulated/obscured or just plain lied to present the NSDAP in a good light.
David Irvine is wrong, Churchill was without a seat in parliament for a very short time, lost his original seat and picked up a seat in a bye election not long after
@@gregsutton6258 Following the Tory electoral defeat in 1929, Churchill lost his seat and spent much of the next 11 years out of office, mainly writing and making speeches 1929 to 1939 is a decade how long do you think is a very long time in a political career vacation 🤣 Did you even read Irvines book ? In fact have you EVER READ A BOOK 🤣
@@gregsutton6258 Really ? Following the Tory electoral defeat in 1929, Churchill lost his seat and spent much of the next 11 years out of office, mainly writing and making speeches
Listening to this fellow, It is possible to understand why London and the UK go to the seed. It is not about Churchill, it is about woke ideology and its application to the history and daily practice. Cry the beloved country.
The title is disingenuous tbh. The Jews Arabs and Christians who lived in the territory of Palestinie were all Palestinians. The labels we apply to these groups today give a misleading impression of the reality of that
It's astonishing how the British press and Media refuse to discuss the Balfour declaration that has put the Palastenians and the Jewish people on a 75 year collision course. Not a single Journalist. TV channel or newspapaer wants to discuss it.
It's actually often brought up but usually just in passing because they realize that most people won't have the patience or interest in learning about the entire history in all of its details, and prefer to stick to their preferred narratives.
How strange, that after eight minutes you haven't mentioned the collapse of the ottomans and a real need for an analysis of what areas were capable of "self rule" and which would collapse into murderous chaos in the vacuum.
Churchill having died in 1965, he is unlikely to have spoken about Palestinians. It was only a bit later that Arafat and the OLP introduced for political convenience the notion of a Palestinian people, of a nation. Before that, everybody, themselves included, talked of Arabs. Palestine only meant the region that had been administered by Great Britain, inhabited by all sorts of people.
U r absolutely right. So called “Palestinian people” was invented by theKGB in late 60s when the Soviets learned that the State of Israel took western side in the Cold War.
Your logic is crazy. If there is a region called Palestine then the obvious term for the people would be Palestines or Palestinians. Churchill wasn't 5 years old at the time...he kind of had a handle on things. And did you know that a huge part of Europe was Germanic and Germany was known as a German region ...but its only been a sovereign state since the late 1800s ?? Or did I miss your point ? And what is OLP ?
@@andycallaghan5975 beside Arabs there are Jews ,Cherkesses , Druses, Shomrones - all leaving in region that you call Palestine. Nobody calls himself Palestinian only Muslim Arabs do. Nobody tries to kill or expel or rob or rape the others, only Muslim Arabs do. And no country , even Arab countries, wants to help them, even when Israelis make them pay for the evil they are and the horror they did.
@@andycallaghan5975 , the name of Palestine goes back to biblical times. The Arabs only colonized the region in the 7th c. CE. Since then, the name of Palestine applied to regional borders that changed over time, and never to any specific people inhabiting the region. As late as the 1920's, some Arabs wanted to call the region Southern Syria. Since Arab conquest and colonization there never was a single ethnic group living there, nor was any particular group known as Palestinians. Churchill could never have spoken of a Palestinian people. He would speak, as everybody else, of Palestinian Arabs, Jews, Christians, Druzes, Samaritans, Turks, Greeks, etc. OLP = PLO, being used to both acronyms in various languages. Regarding Germany and Germans, if we go back to Roman Germania, it referred to lands inhabited by many different Germanic tribes. They were not Germans but spoke various Germanic languages, same way we are discussing now in a Germanic language (English) without being Germans. The German people(s) and nation(s) slowly started to develop and set during the Middle Ages, before any clear national identity. Ask Austrians whether they are Germans and you would obtain different answers even as the Anschluss was taking place. Ask the German speaking Swiss or Alsacians: they will obviously deny being Germans. You simply cannot call Germans all the German speaking peoples, much less everybody living within your imaginary German region. Germanic tribes swept all of western Europe and even northern Africa. According to your logic, we should extend the Roman notion of Germania to all of Europe and northern Africa, regard all as "Germans", and ask anybody unhappy about that to please stop being a racist colonizer and please go home, somewhere else.
@@andycallaghan5975 my logic maybe crazy but yours looks academic but actually. blood thirsty anti Semitic there is a region called French Riviera. Never heard of people called French rivierians and the demand for their own state led by murder and distraction. On the other hand, there is Curdistan and 30 million curds collapsing under Turkish brutal attacks. Where did “European values” disappear? What about Coptic Christians in Egypt? They are periodically slaughtered but no intl help delivered. This is a long list of real nations before this bunch of criminals and murderers led by Hamas beasts. Which now are paying the price of death and distraction they brought on October 7th. To the last of them monsters and beyond!
I only just got to you mentioning how Churchil allowed the bombing of civilian areas in Germany. Haven't the Germans done the same? By the way, it was only considered a war crime since the Geneva convention in 1949. That's 4 years after WWII has finished. And what's Ali's opinion of Hamas and Hizballa shooting missiles into civilian Israeli areas on purpose? Is that ok?
Imagine raving alongside the biggest concentration camp on Earth, and then imagine still claiming victimhood after you had massacred almost 40 times, and wounded almost double that, more of the people you have been holding in apartheid prison for decades prior? Many Jews are also standing up to what Israel is doing, perfectly aware of the fact that Holocaust (committed by Europeans, by the way) is being used to justify the ongoing Gaza Genocide.
The Church of Rome; the facade for the continuing colonial Empire of Rome, has quite a lot to answer for. So many countries down the years have carried out it's premise and still do: It is about time it came to an end.
@thedragonflygate4587, What a maroon. What a complete numbskull troll. I suppose according to you it's the "Church of Rome " that's bombing, slaughtering and genociding the people pf Palestine. You are as ridiculous as Hertzog with his Amazon in Arabic "Mein Kamp" found on the "body of a Hamas fighter" in pristine condition, no dust and so on. You guys are desperate. Netanyahu, Hertzog and Gallant are all Catholics. The Pope is a member of Hamas. The Pope blew up the Nordstream Pipeline. The Pope overthrew the elected government of Ukraine in 2014. The Pope and Putin are card playing buddies. O, and yes JFK who was murdered sixty years ago tomorrow committed suicide because he was a member of the Roman Empire?
We all have a view on history and have the freedom to state it so I will record mine. Churchill was a man of his time and, for me, the greatest man of the 20th century. My mind will not be swayed by the utterings of revisionists.
Churchil did what needed to be done to stop Hitler. There is nothing more to say about it. War is ugly, innocent people die and suffer. This is why tha blame falls on the one who starts it.
There is a small island community in the Atlantic Ocean. This small island community saved the lives of many Englishmen during World War II. Winston Churchill said something that unfortunately seems to have been forgotten. He said we will never forget you*****-******** What was the name of the wonderful island community that Winston Churchill was so proud of?
@@busterbiloxi3833 No Unfortunately. You are going in the wrong direction. The Azores are located around Portugal. I am talking about the island community located at 62 degrees north latitude. This must have been forgotten in history since no one knows what it is except me. I know because I am a native of the isolated island community in the Atlantic Ocean
Unless I misheard, England and America didn't bomb Dresden until very late 1944 / early 1945. This was several years after Hitler ferociously bombed England in the so-called Battle of Britain. In other words, Hitler and Germany started everything, including WWII.
Tariq Ali forgets to mention that the Jews who came from Europe purchased the lands from the absentee landlords in Syria while the local Arabs were only tenants on the land.
What a bizarre way you have of describing someone having basic morality and humanity and being free of racism and thus believing that it is wrong for white European Christians and white European Jewish Zionists to conspire to steal the land of Palestinians and drive them into prison camps and into exile so that white European Jewish Zionists can occupy that Palestinian land thus letting white European Christians and white European Jewish people no longer have to deal with each other. When you think that believing that non-white people deserve basic rights and to be safe from colonialist invasion apartheid and oppression is somehow "religious extremism" then you display your racism and religious extremism.
Rather than this one-sided and uninformed presentation, I recommend that all read or listen to a podcast by a real historian with a balanced and wide view, Walter Russell Mead. He has written a new book on the problems in the Middle East.
It doesn't help that the Quran specifically calls for the eradication of the Jews (and Christians), and Islamic Fundamentalists, take that call seriously. Religious texts, and their interpretation or misinterpretation, have caused more death than any other conflict in history.
My mistake in the video: the author of the book is Tariq Ali not Tariq Ramadan!
Love you bro
That was an honest mistake, I believe. Thank you for the clarification brother.
Music. Imes from the auditory memory as does language.
I believe you interviewed him also not long ago.. which was another brilliant discussion on the future of Muslims in Europe.
Perhaps you could put a correction insert in the video, every time the Tariq Ramadan is mentioned.
One interesting fact for you Paul: Marmaduke Pickthall, the famous British writer, translator and Muslim convert who was born in 1875 was a "classmate and friend" of Winston Churchill at Harrow School, the prestigious boarding school in England. They both shared a similar "social" status as members of the "upper class", however, they had very different views on politics, religion and culture. Pickthall, being a devout Muslim, was a sympathizer of the Ottoman Empire and also the Indian independence movement (Did Tariq Ali mention this?), while Churchill was a staunch imperialist and colonialist.
Churchill was the butcher of Bengal, watch the video of Dr Shashi Tharoor regarding Britain's crime
Churchill often had to choose between the lesser of two evils. Of the two men, it is Churchill who will be remembered.
@@QamruddinKhan-hf4dn so whatever Shashi Tharoor says is right? Famine happened in 1942 and Churchill was fighting world war II against a monster.
@@aftabnaveed lol your name is aftab.. he even gave remarks against Islam and you are supporting him? He was a monster who was fighting against another monster... The another Austrian monster was lesser evil than Churchill because Austrian painter knew about je ews traitors who backed western allies at that time... 3-4 million Bengalis died out of starvation because he diverted essential supplies from the civilians in Bengal to sturdies Europeans... When People writing to him that people are dying he replied why hasn't Gandhi died yet? He compared Indians with animals and he also said that there was nothing wrong in colonization of America Australia he said that a greater race took over another... Is this your favourite?
@@paulamarsh1 for me Churchill was worst than hit ler...
6:05 Why was the Ottomon Empire good but the Britiah Empire bad? Did the Ottomons ever consider giving a state/self rule? I didnt think so.
The Ottomans respected private property and did not seek to displace them with a Turkish population…
Bruh the british were like a snake devilsh
@Marya2476 the jews came in and bought property legallly in the 1880's... in the 1900's BEFORE The British arrived there were already problems. So there is that.
@@Marya2476 oh marya. must you invent excuses for islam? the reality was the palestine region was not important to the turkish rulers. it was pretty desolate. palestine had 200,000 people. the empire had 20,000,000 people. so a hundred times more.
Ottomans ruled not on basis of other nations but religious confessions. And Yes they were all independent from sultan and islam. Just taxed additionally if no muslim
Apologetics & revisionism (and in essence, a kind of neo-imperialism) for those convinced the Muslim-Arab mind will never open, will never start thinking hard about why the Muslim-Arab world is so messed up.
Really important video in context to Mohammed Hijab's recent debate.
Yo my namesake
Yh he should research more into him. He didn't know the figures well enough in the debate with Schmoly
@@anneeq008 At least he did not make it up like Unholy Scmuly.
it shows when people do not know real history. Muslim people have always been in Europe!
I’m not a big fan of church hill because of things done in India
The British Empire's crimes in Africa alone would bankrupt the Monarchy in retribution. Churchill was one of the top criminals on behalf of the Colonial Crown in the African colonies. 8:51 8:5
The African crimes in Africa would result in doing the crimes committed against them.
@@jrutt2675How many human beings died in War 1 and War II?
Absolute nonsense. The standard of living and GDP only went up due to British colonialism in Africa.
@@skillfuldabest very true!
@@skillfuldabestThat plunder and theft by the Brits apply to Palestine, Africa, the aboriginal inhabitants of Australia, New Zealand, the Native Americans, New Zealand and India. Don't forget to return "Kohi Nour" to India. No wonder the English are even loathed by their neighbors in Scotland and the Republic of Ireland. "Living Standard" nonsense after enslaving them you mean.
Following the game plan laid out at the British 1st Imperial Press Conference of 1909, and representing Rothschild interests, J.P Morgan proxies purchased the top 25 most influential publications in the United States in 1915. They then used their editorial control to drive U.S. public opinion into the First World War on the side of the Allied Powers. As a reward, the British cabinet approved the Balfour Declaration promising Baron Rothschild it would endeavor to create a homeland for Jews in Palestine.
Now, jump forward to the 1950’s, when the CIA used Operation Mockingbird to penetrate U.S. media, as well as various USG, state, and even certain metropolitan agencies.
Today, nearly all U.S. legacy media is controlled by just five conglomerates, all of which are ultimately controlled by the Deep State, which came to power behind the scenes via JFK's assassination in 1963. That is why the JFK assassination is regarded as the Third Rail in American Journalism. The Democratic Party has become its political wing, and the MSM is now little more than its propaganda arm.
an excellent explanation of events
Churchill is supposed to have said or written :
"Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith."
Any comments?
Sounds like the Baptist!
Brilliant i have read the book its fascinating insight of imperialism . He was a ardent racist and imperialist.He hated the working classes and was ready to get the military to kill when they striked in London on the railways! To think of him as anything other than a a racist imperial is astonishing!He was also of the most unpopular pm in England but later became a hero just at the end of war! Everybody should know about how callous he was! Bury my heart at wounded heart is also good to read it has many parallel with what is happening in 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
really Muslims were always in Europe ! Shame you don’t know historical facts!
So if you have any other racist type answers come back with something more tangible fool!
@@atlasto9052You can worship your false gods. But Muslims were already in northern Europe since the Viking period.
exactly they were already trading with the arabs! Man its funny how these so called keyboard warriors no very little but first to hate!!!
you wouldn't be in Europe either without the Muslims who fought your WW2. you have a lot to be thankful to the Muslims for @@atlasto9052
Tariq Ali Ramadan was not only an ANTISEMITE, very clever with his discourse. Please read "Brother Tariq" by Caroline Fourest (not a Jew) He was the grandson of Hasan al-Banna, Founder of the Muslim Brtotherhood, and the apologist for Jihad.
He made a correction on his mistake - the book was written by Tariq Ali NOT Tariq Ramadan.
Anyone criticizes Zionists fascism becomes anti-Semite, as per white askhanazi colonial settlers. When Zionists see truth hurts they fling the anti-Semitic coin. The most funny but inhumanly cruel people on earth are Zionists
Thank you for your information. ☑️ clarifies things…. 🙏
Tariq classic hypocrisy
@@nickstone3113 as said by a Western European askhanazi hypocrite
I wonder if the esteemed historian who wrote this book about Churchill will write the equivalent book about other leaders of the past. Maybe some historical figure from the Middle East? Not sure why that area came to mind. There must be historically important leaders from there, although none come to mind immediately. Doubtlessly none from there ever did anything ruthless or killed anyone. Very peaceful area after all.
It is my responsibility to aware every one
Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤❤
@RussianFans-vn6cj Galatians 5
10 I trust as to you in our Master that you will NOT consider OTHER BELIEFS, but that the one troubling you shall bear the judgment, whoever he may be. xref-2
Galatians 4
9 But now, knowing Elohim, but rather being known by Elohim, how do you turn again to the weak and poor principles to which you desire again to come under their bondage (note) xref-1
These were people who were before patterning pagan cultic practices and now came to faith in YHWH and are now known by YHWH and were turning back to the former pagan practices.
Galatians 1
6 I am surprised at how soon you have turned to another good news, away from Messiah who has called you to grace.
Maybe because Churchill is put in a pedestal and Britons are still living in a delusion that they are somehow civilised when in fact then murdered, pillaged and looted more than most other nationalities.
Your comment just proves your lack of education
Yes, that area was peaceful until Europeans...anything "wyte" people touch gets destroyed. They are the literal authors of confusion
Battle of Britain=1940
Bombing of Dresden=1945
It is a vicious slander to suggest that Britain targeted German cities first.
Russia was instrumental in targeting Dresden. The plan was to demoralize a defeated Germany to expand their sphere of influence over Eastern Europe and create the USSR.
I watched that interview with Piers Morgan and he acknowledged that Churchill was flawed, did some bad things. By no means did he portray Churchill as whiter than white as you are suggesting. He spoke to thex3nd world war leadership he provided and acknowledged that. And winning that War was indeed an heroic thing for the people of this country.
Stalin defeated the Germany too, does it make him a good person? Unbelievable argument.
As a figurehead he excelled. Unfortunately he fancied himself as a military strategist. Tens of thousands of British servicemen were sacrificed on the altar of his hubris.
Well he wasn't great for black people so who exactly is he a hero to?
@@leslie-annmills-gomez8763 If Britain and the Allies had lost WW2 to Germany,when the Nazis had finished exterminating the Jews they would have exterminated the entire black race too,so there`s that🤣😂🤣😁
Saw this as one of TH-cam's recommends for me. (Hmmm, what did Churchill think about the Zionists and the Arabs of the Palestinian Mandate?)
But, after 03:35, I have no further incentive to continue listening since you start out with a bit of nonsense that "bombing civilians [in a total war] is a war crime."
No, it isn't. ....And not just because NONE of our bomber crews or their commanders (Arthur Bomber Harris, Curtis LeMay) or our politicians (Churchill, Truman) ever faced the real prospect of war crime prosecutions, or that the very present-day institutions which enforce and adjudicate international tribunals ONLY EXIST because of Allied victories -- made possible by the bombing of whole cities, ....no, ...but because informed and intelligent people understand that the very nature of total war includes attacks on economic infrastructure (i.e. cities -- in which "civilians" live).
Total wars (and a war with any totalitarian power or any nation of slavers and murderers is such a war) is not war between armies -- but between NATIONS.
In such wars practically the entire civilian population is mobilized to materially support the efforts of those in direct combat. Therefore, they are quite rightly targeted as well. Factories, mines, storehouses, granaries, railways and railyards, harbors, locomotives, ships, trucks -- practically anything that could make anything of value or transport it becomes a target. Blockading the enemy to prevent FOOD and other life essentials from coming into enemy hands becomes legitimate. You simply cannot separate economic infrastructure from PEOPLE. (This is why both sides tried to send their children off to places less likely to suffer bombardment -- such as country farms and small farm towns.)
Not only did each side bomb each others' cities in the Second World War, but during the Cold War each side had nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles pointed at each others' POPULATION CENTERS (in addition to critical military targets), then -- all the way up to 1991.
A man of your age, Mr. Williams, surely knows this. If you claim that our military planners during the Cold War were planning "war crimes", then you are just plain outing yourself as being a capitulationist in our standoff with the Communist countries. You must have been a supporter of "unilateral disarmament" -- in other words a communist activist. Everyone would understand your true motive, and therefore, your criticism of Churchill would thus be rendered moot. Of course, you hate Churchill; because you sympathized with the enemies Churchill was trying to protect us from. What else? ...Or, you could be just a moron like Gandhi. (Useless all the same!)
hello jm. you are correct. paul is an odd fellow who pretends to be nice like the late mister rogers on tv. why doesn't someone older who grew up with tons of freedoms in a western land denounce hamas, palestinians amd muslims for war crimes and expansionism and going against the morality of their own holy book the quran? i've seen the interrogation video where one hamas soldier admitted that the things he did were immoral and against what muhammad the prophet said.
Arab Christians, Muslims and Jews lived in peace until the end of ww1 as I remember reading various examples of their collaborations for freedom before and during Ww1
Not true. Many criminal acts perpetrated by both
no noona. under turkish rule muslims would fight with the jewish minority and the turks would not intervene.
@@georgeh8937 Jewish were happy and respectful in the arabic lands, there were no problem at all untill the Zionism project appear under lies and false alligation. then the Zionism made conflict in other arabic countries (such as in Egypt zionism bombed a Jewish cinema and pretend that the arab did it in purpose to obligate the jewish to leave Egypt) to obligate jewish to leave their countries and come to Palestine. as many jewish like other christians and muslems considered that they are living in their countries and did not want to move to Palestine. Even in Palestine there are many strories how the jewish lived side by side with the Muslims and christians like brothers before the Slavians ( Russia, Ukrania and other east and west european jewish) come to Palestine and steal the land and ID as Semitic. take a look in the TH-cam what the real jewish says ( jewish anti zionism, Naturikarta, JVP. etc.
That's false. Might wanna do more research.
@@elisabethmeziane5003 Was it a crime to kill Jesus for no reason?
His comments wouldn't have raised an eyebrow during his time. Right or wrong, attitudes and standards were different in his era.
Yes you could speak your mind in those days!
But his comments did draw objections in his own time. By no means did everyone agree.
It isn't because of Jewish mistreatment of Arabs that relations between them have changed. And let us not forget that Jews have always had to live as Dimmi (second class citizens) in Muslim lands. It is because a Jewish nation was established within the Muslim Umma that the rage erupted.
No. It''s the fact that Palestinian Lands were confiscated from ordinary Palestinians for the benefit of European Jewish invaders who have treated them disgracefully throughout the past 75 years. Palestinians are actual 2nd class Citizens in israel itself while they are little more than Internees in the lands of the West Bank and Gaza.
Jewish were upper class in the middle east . Unlike the west , they were very well treated in the Muslim countries . It was Eastern European and Western Jews who created Israel , not the Arab Jews . It was not a question of a Jewish state , but question of displacement and ethnic cleansing . If it is racist to have a white and Christian state , why should be there an artificially created Jewish state . What West dont do in thier own countries , why do they support that in Israel .
@@sabrinashahab795 In Muslim tradition, non-believers are considered lower class - their status is Dimmi and they have to pay a special tax. Israel is mostly composed of Jews from Arabic countries who were ethnically cleansed (kicked out) in 1
@@sabrinashahab795 In Muslim tradition, non-believers are considered lower class - their status is Dimmi and they have to pay a special tax (jizzya). Israel is mostly composed of Jews from Arabic countries who were ethnically cleansed (kicked out) of Arab countries in 1947. It is undeniable that Muslim countries who ethnically cleansed their Jews are now ethnically cleansing their Christian populations even as Muslims migrate to traditionally non-Muslim countries in the west. Israel is mostly composed of Jews from Arabic countries and also has a 20% Arabic population as well as a minority of European Jews. Israel has a long history of being a Judean country - the word "Jew" comes from Judean. Many European Jews, who were persecuted for centuries for being Judeans went back to Judea after the holocaust. Dig anywhere in Israel and you will find archeological remnants of Jewish history. And why do Muslims feel that they have a right to create a large and vocal presence in the west but there can't be a single, tiny, country in the middle east that is not Muslim even when that country affords equal rights (not second class citizenship and special taxes) to its Arab citizens?
It was Hitler's actions that led to the Jewish state. Had Hitler not come to power Jews would have continued to live peacefully in Moslem lands and in Palestine alongside their Christian and Moslem brothers and sisters . Before Hitler and the holocaust Zionist aspirations were not taken seriously by most Jews They were happy with the status quo and in many cases it was considered a sacrilege.
There is nothing wrong with being an Imperialist. The British Empire on the whole was a force for good. It dragged many countries forward several hundred years in progress. Ali is writing in the context of morality and life in the 21st century. It has no relevence with the first half of the 20th century.
Every country does and has to look after its own prosperity. Western colonialism had its negatives but also advancements to the occupied countries. It's the occupation of barbaric invasions of Arabian peninsula arabs to some previously great civilizations that brings those occupied countries back to the stone age as it happened to Egypt, Assyria, Persia, North Africa... Even the native languages were changed
Not all is RELATIVE fools
First, do you know what imperialism is? Because either you don’t, or you’re inconsiderate of how others would feel. It’s not you or the government who gets to decide whether a nation likes its colonizers or not, it’s them. The incredibly vast majority of opinions in every nation Britain has occupied and stolen resources from didn’t want the Brits in their land, and your justification is advancement?? People from different continents and cultures have their own unique way of civilization, and they are happy with it. Why would you ‘drag them forward’ into cities and cars, thinking that your way of civilization should be forced on people without their consent? That would be the case if they actually pushed these nations forward, but they didn’t. Egypt was already advanced with cities and trains and everything, so why did the Brits colonize it? So it’s not advancement after all? It’s purely for advantage and interest at the expense of others, including the lives of women and children that they didn’t care about because they weren’t white enough. I can clearly see now why Britain has the most horrible, dishonorable, unjustified, and barbaric history of all time, because Churchill was in office after an election by voters carrying uncivilized, supremacist, and superficial opinions, like justifying imperialism, which means extending your borders through colonization and military force to feed your home country, a parasitic behavior. And what exactly didn't have relevance in 21 centuries, is the Palestinian-lsraeli conflict an example of that? A huge ongoing conflict because imperialist Britain decided who to live in the middle east and how others should deal with it? And as the whole conflict is still on going pretty much, you still believe that Britain isn't complicit? Completely sick
Just read again the quote at 19:22. The country needs capital and POPULATION and Jews could provide both” - confirm that the areas that Jews purchased was not populated .
Say what you like, from the comfort of your armchair. When you are surrounded by murderous neighbours, all the nuances of your history disappear rapidly up your rear end.
Conveniently, you have obviously overlooked the many Zeppelin bombing raids of British cities during the First World War
He saved the World, this guy never would have been born if it wasn’t for WC😊
Bollocks
lol, you need to educate yourself
The speaker completely ignore at least 2 facts
1) Most of the land, especially in the coast, was not arable, and full of swamps and malaria, and not inhabited or used , which the Jews that came since the end of the 19th century, worked relentlessly to cultivate, draining the swamps and clearing the sand dunes
2) in 1882, there were 200,000 people living in the whole of Palestine, not 700,000. In 1948, there were almost 1.3 million Arabs. This is not due to a crazy birth rate but to vast labor immigration from neighboring countries, because of the development of the land by the Jews and the British, creating a lot of job opportunities.
No wonder this is not mentioned
number 1 may be true but it would be hard to verify, but just by reading "Demographic history of Palestine" on wikipedia, it's easy to verify that your 2nd statement is false, and immigration was a small part of population growth. The Jewish agency even stated that between 1914 and 1938, only 23% of overall population growth was due to immigration.
@@wildansyahidillah7978 hello Syahidillah. must muslims spout fake news constantly like the american democratic party? it is a bad habit i see in all comments sections. it is easy to verify the malaria issue but you just spout skepticism instead. wikipedia -
Malaria in Mandatory Palestine
Malaria was a severe epidemic in parts of Mandatory Palestine in the early 20th century, now located in Israel. The epidemic killed many people from the bible period until it was finally eradicated in the early 1960s. Malaria was originally a large obstacle to Zionist settlement, because it restricted the land that was usable for settlement, and affected the lifestyle of the Jewish settlers in Palestine.
muslims should be happy the united nations partition gave them the high land and jews got the low land and not worry about the share not being exactly 50/50.
Has anyone heard of the kafala system? The system in saudi arabia, kuwait, jordan, regions in the middle east...run by muslims who are recruiting poor women from africa and asia. As house workers. Its modern day slavery. Those woman and sometimes children have no rights. The people who bought them take thier passports. They are not allowed phones or to leave the house unless someones with them. These woman gets abused, bought and sold like animals. And kuwait has the best laws towards it in the region. Hopefully that changes some day.
Yes, disgusting.
Source: trust me bro
2:59 Britain did not do this first. The Germans bombed Warsaw and Rotterdam as they invaded Poland and the Netherlands. It was only a matter of time before they bombed Britain. The Germans started the war and started the aerial bombing. To lay that at the door of Winston Churchill is absurd and dishonest.
The title of the book is bold and blunt saying (his crimes). that's seriously shocking. It's a public accusation.
Our uncle served in Palestine after WW2. He said they were not terrified of the arabs but of the terrorists on the other side. The murder of British squaddies and then the booby trapping of their bodies to inflict maximum mayhem and murder had something to do with this but also generally having potshots taken at them constantly. They came out of WW2 having fought Nazism and were exhausted. Why on earth are those squaddies and the ones killed at the King David hotel not commemorated each year on Remembrance Sunday? Britain is losing its sense of self these days.
I am a Palestinian 🇵🇸. I lost my uncle in the king David hotel in 1946. Rip. The Zionist terror started way before 1948
@@khaledkhatib5116 "I am a Palestinian". In what sense exactly? "The Zionist terror started way before 1948" I know. The terror of buying swamp lands Arabs didn't want at inflated prices, only to then be invaded, raped and murdered by Arab marauders. But let's not call them Arabs. Let's call them "Palestinians". Why not take credit for those murders, as Hamas gleefully did so recently?
Considering Britain's betrayal of the Jews in British created Palestine, who had just seen millions of their own people exterminated in Europe, I'd be a little afraid of the Jews too. There is just so much Jew hate the Jews are going to put up with from antisemitic ingrates. As for the title of this little video screed, no one really used the expression, "the Palestinians and the Jews" during the Mandate, because "Palestinian" was a "national" category invented by Britain, and not really accepted by the Arabs of that time, but embraced by the Jews of the mandate. And of course before the British creation of Palestine, no people ever called itself the "Palestinians". BTW, with all due respect to your dead uncle, the Arabs had committed plenty of violence against the Jews, not just during the mandate but long before, even there in the land of the Jews, i.e., the Land of Israel, as its true indigenous people called it long before the European empire known as Rome imposed the name of another people of European derivation, the Philistines, on the land of the Jews. And as for the use of "Palestinians" to describe the Arabs of Palestine in this video? That's an alleged people was actually invented in the 1960s by the Soviets and the Egyptian, Yasser Arafat.
An inconvenient truth for the “only” victims of World War II
How much self-hatred could a privileged Westerner have. It’s always amazing to me. Britain (under Churchill) stood alone against Hitler and kept Western Europe free.
All backed by the Vatican
😂😂😂😂😂 Hitler didn't wanr to fight britian. What britian should have done was lift ban of jews emigrating to Palestine ww2 while they were busy through bbc radio telling the world about the horrors of what they were suffering. Seems wierd that neither britisn or America did anything to stop it or Russia for that matter who invaded and occupied the other part of poland.
In the interests of fairness we should also recall Winston Churchill's secret fact finding mission to Cyprus in 1907, which upon his return to Britain wrote a secret memo to parliament ('Condition of Cyprus.' Memorandum by Winston Churchill) lambasting the colonial office for the maltreatment of the Cypriots and urging parliament to intervene. His motivation appears to be more about Britain's prestige than the plight of the Cypriots but it's well to know that it was so damning that the memo remained secret for 100 years. It can be found online at the National Archives (UK) if one wants to fact-check what I said.
Churchill was a child molestor
~ "...his motive appears to be..."
Can you prove that? If not, please keep your theories to yourself.
@@sigmanfloyd7179 Have you read the document? If not, please keep your ignorance to yourself.
rather ironic that open borders in Europe has led to unfetter Muslim settling of swathes of countries. Where again the wishes of the existing inhabitants has been ignored and dismissed.
ya great numpty, he just gave you the sorce of his comment which contains the proof. It is nonsecical to then ask him to prove it. To make any sence you need to read it and fact check it in order to counter his claim. What you have done is to ask for proof of the proof when that is as good as it ever gets in the way of proof even in court. Historical documents, first hand accounts, eyewithness reports. History as you know it is build on such that may not even be that good. @@sigmanfloyd7179
Thanks to Churchill we won the war against the nazis. Germans could have surrender early, but they didn't, and the bombing seems to have been necessary. Similarly, after Hamas horrific attack on jews, it was predictable that Israeli will attempt to demolish the military headquarters of Hamas, and warn them in advance so that the civilians could flee, but Hamas made this impossible, and is entirely responsible of the death of the Palestinians, which they simply called "martyr", like in their chart they consider women as martyrs factory. We, europeans and Americans, have to stand up for all democracies when attacked by autocracies, even more so when they have inherited nazism. The chart of Hamas is even worse than "Mein Kampf", if that is possible, as they want to destroy all Christians, and to obliterate the women's right. This video contains many truth, but seems to abstract them from the context, and lack much comparisons with the enemy of the time, and today's.
Who's we?
@@karlgreene2177 We the people belonging to secular democracies.
bombing civilians was still a war crime and Germany was held responsibe at Nuremberg 1946 but the Allies were not held responsible because they won WWII.
@@Utubexpert-kx7ew The Allies were not held mainly because in that particular case, it was the only way to win the war. They would have surrendered, there would have been no need to bombing the German cities. The goal was to win the war, not some retaliation of hate toward German civilians, which have been helped a lot after the war.
Churchill zionist controlled false opposition to Jewish communists that killed 100 million people worse than nazism
At the moment that the first German soldier crossed the border into Poland, Germany was waging a war of aggression (a war crime) and was therefire outside the protection of the Geneva Conventions. This act and many more that followed released the Allies, including Great Britain, from any obligations imposed by Geneva. Or didn't you know that?
its wrong to assume that Churchills views were those of the English workingman, they werent, he was appointed during the war because extraordinary times require extraordinary measures, but when he was elected PM in 1950 and it came down to policies the British public couldn't get rid of him quick enough, i read his biography (or one of them) and he seemed an incredibly self aggrandizing character, I was expecting every chapter to end with, "naturally, I had the last laugh and they were sorry"
These are the views of the British government and laws. This is part of your history all over the world. You believe that you are better than everyone else in the world. Look where your country has been they is miserable conditions xenophobic bigotry racist white supremacy nationalism agenda. America 🇺🇸 Africa, Latin America, Asia and Australia 🇦🇺. Your greed for power enrichment of your country in the name of your racism in the name of god save the king.
You are correct. My late father (1920 - 2016) disliked Churchill for his politics and his class. However, my father begrudgingly accepted that Churchill was the man for the moment in WW2. Its always worth noting that early to mid 20th century Britain was, across all society, racist but not in a violent way more of white Britains are superior sort of way. It was normal. Now things are different.
Churchill zionist traitor to Germany Europeans Americans controlled false opposition to Jewish communists
You forgot about christian Poland, which invited Jews as early as in XII century, and made them welcome for over 700 years, and able to create their own cities (Kazimierz), which means there is more to blame than christianity
Is that why Poland disappeared from the map for quite a while prior to ww1?
I am a serious student of Churchill….not only was he a deep humanitarian but also a founder of the modern welfare state. When he became Prime Minister, in May 1940, he stood alone, not only against the Nazi threat, at a time when Europe was collapsing (the US did not come into the war until December 1941) but also within his own class who wanted to parley with Hitler. Our situation was nothing short of desperate.
In case this is not enough to assuage his critics, they should have a look at the eulogies following his death in 1965. They could not be more laudatory and were highly moving. I’m going to quote an extract from Attlee’s tribute. He was Churchill’s deputy in the Coalition Government during the Second World War as well as his great political rival, Churchill losing to him in the 1945 General Election “.......I do not think everybody always recognised how tender- hearted he was. I can recall him with the tears rolling down his cheeks, talking of the horrible things perpetrated by the Nazis in Germany. I can recall, too, during the war his emotion on seeing a simple little English home wrecked by a bomb. Yes, my Lords, sympathy-and more than that: he went back, and immediately devised the War Damage Act. How characteristic! Sympathy did not stop with emotion; it turned into action......... Then I recall the long days through the war-the long days and long nights-in which his spirit never failed; and how often he lightened our labours by that vivid humour, those wonderful remarks he would make which absolutely dissolved us all in laughter, however tired we were......and I recall, too, as the most reverend Primate has said already, that when once the enemy were beaten he had full sympathy for them. He showed that after the Boer War, and he showed it again after the First World War. He had sympathy, an incredibly wide sympathy, for ordinary people all over the world.....He saw himself there as an instrument. As an instrument for what? For freedom, for human life against tyranny. None of us can ever forget how, through all those long years, he now and again spoke exactly the phrase that crystallised the feelings of the nation. My Lords, we have lost the greatest Englishman of our time-I think the greatest citizen of the world of our time. In the course of a long, long life, he has played many parts. We may all be proud to have lived with him and, above all, to have worked with him.....”
There are too many examples of the perpetuation of time-honoured myths (often the fault of “copy and paste” writers masquerading as historians), built on the very shaky foundations of ignorance and prejudice and calculated to denigrate the Churchill legacy. It is high time that these myths are laid to rest. Detractors - please note.
If anybody should be “judge and jury” of Churchill, it should be Attlee, the much-respected, long-serving Labour leader and Prime Minister (1945/51), who got to know Churchill so well during the war years.
Churchill was a colossus in standing up, almost alone, to tyranny, he should therefore be judged a giant no matter what the age. It should always be remembered, though, that his greatness was combined with him being a deep humanitarian - that is why he was (and still is) respected and loved by so many and why I am a crusader in upholding his legacy.
Lloyd George was the PM who brought in the pension will before Churchill's time and i think that's clearly the beginning of welfare.
@nickgent9949 Very, very beautifully written. Thank you.
He copied the "welfare state" from the Nazis
You are deluded, incorrect and should start again, seeking truth.
You are an ignoramus. Can I suggest you read Martin Gilbert, Roy Jenkins, Andrew Roberts and others. You are going against the grain of history. What is your reading list? I suspect that you are a woke leftie, who has no respect for history as you don’t want to be deluded by the truth.
Dear brother, could you devote a video to talk to us in some detail about the positions of Arab leaders regarding the plans related to the establishment of Isr ael?
Why don't you just pick uo a book and read it??? Why would they be happy about europan zionists wanting to take their land??? Arab jews were happy living there since the fall of judeah.
The capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, the best and longest road, the main street named after Winston Churchill!🏆
That speaks louder than what you trying to portray about Churchill.
I think he was someone who were blessed 🙌 come on he had bitten Nazi and Musoluni 😮🏆👏
Tbh people will make up their own minds and remember him the way they chose he was a man of his day,.like so many before and after him from all nations and faiths.let he who has no sin cast the first stone.or better still don't throw stones in glass houses..
Thanks for the selective history. I notice how quick jihadi apologists are to point out the case of Spain, as if that's supposed to be representative of the larger Arab-Muslim world. In all likelihood Spain was distinct in being the only part of Western Europe conquered into dar al Islam. The Ummayad Caliphate would have had a vested interest in presenting a more tolerant policy there that was different from other areas and probably uncharacteristic when it came to their treatment of the dhimmi minorities given the fact that all Spaniards were ahl al kitab rather than kafirs. It was in their interest to be less brutal.
So ur saying the muslims were less brutal because of the Jizya? 😂 did u also know that if the muslim cant protect them they got to give the Jizya back right?
"Some Arabs hated Jews". So what? That doesn't change history or make Zionism better.
I have never heard such disrespect regarding the right man for the job for those dark days. Who would you have as the leader of our country at that time? Whatever your thoughts most of the people of our country respect and indeed understand how this man saved our country and the east from being under the Nazi flag.
Winston Churchill lived in an era where in my opinion at that juncture of history, he did what he did to the best of his ability for the benefit of his country. As any patriot would. To the white British he will always be a hero and one cannot blame them. Love him or hate him, he was a military and political genius who gave his all for his nation.
Following watching the video that’s your genuine conclusion?
Next week's discussion: how the 7th century Arabs came out of the Arabian peninsula and how they conquered and colonized the Levant, all of North Africa, and southern Spain.
And murdered those who refused to convert to Islam.
And east to India.
Thereafter no such thing as colonised the levent 😂 Petra,hatra,emesa, dilmon,midyan where all arsb civilisations and kingdom with pagan arab gods in the levent before the advent of prophet muhamed. There were even Roman arab emperor's such as Phillip the Arab, Caracallah,Elagabalus.
Sorry to tell you that as an arab myself, I can understand old Hebrew which is another arabic dialect similarly to Sabean/himyar dialect. Also ugarit the old syrian dialect that's another form of old arabic. You westerners no nothing of our region.
Yours jealous that our islamic civilisation created Algebra, the basis for darwins theory he git inspired by Aljahith's theory of discovery. Also the great andalusian civilisation we created.
While your colonialism was racist and shit ours brought the nations we led a new creative progress civilisation.
Most people who visit India go to see the islamic Taj Mahal and the mutual empires work.
You guys ruled Africa and brought nothing, ruled India you bought nothing but push the caste system further. You went to the middle east and brought the nazi zionists.
Wherever a white man rules a non white nation it's disastrous.
@@theearlybirder-videos Muslims brought hygiene and great poetry and architecture to India. You're foreign tourists go to see the islands icon Taj mahal and mughal arts.
@@enlightenlife2840 So you use the same excuse as the Western colonists, Muslim invasions and taking over other lands by bloodshed because they felt superior and improving on the inhabitants. "By the 4th and 5th centuries, under the Guptas, a renewed Hinduism based on devotion, rather than the management of ritual, began to assert itself.[110] This renewal was reflected in a flowering of sculpture and architecture, which found patrons among an urban elite.[109] Classical Sanskrit literature flowered as well, and Indian science, astronomy, medicine, and mathematics made significant advances.[109] "
you should judge any person by the laws of time when that person lived. It is not proven yet that the norms of our time are irreproachable.
Thanks!
Your title is misleading and anachronic. At the time of Churchill, the word palestinian didn't have the same meaning as a Palestinian was an inhabitant of British Mandate Palestine that included Jews.
Belfour declaration is a Jewish mandate used Europeans
Belfour declaration joo mandate
Muslim world
The practice of wearing special clothing or markings to distinguish Jews and other non-Muslims (dhimmis) in Muslim-dominated countries seems to have been introduced in the Umayyad Caliphate by Caliph Umar II in the early 8th century. The practice was revived and reinforced by the Abbasid caliph al-Mutawakkil (847-861), subsequently remaining in force for centuries.[2][3] A genizah document from 1121 gives the following description of decrees issued in Baghdad:
Two yellow badges [are to be displayed], one on the headgear and one on the neck. Furthermore, each Jew must hang round his neck a piece of lead weighing [3 grammes] with the word dhimmi on it. He also has to wear a belt round his waist. The women have to wear one red and one black shoe and have a small bell on their necks or shoes.[4]
Source: trust me bro
1:47, 4:11, 22:30, "Tariq Ramadan" is said where "Tariq Ali" was meant.
oops!
You conveniently forget that Hitler and Himler were into Black magic, drugs, and death camps.
Tariq Ali is a Pakistani-British political activist and a member of the editorial committee of the New Left Review. Winston Churchill was a British patriot that saved the free world from Nazi tyranny. Paul Williams, the presenter of this video has also presented videos "My journey to Islam", and "Becoming Muslim".
Merci, ça m’éclaire!
I haven't read the book , but thank you for the presentation . I'm sure that you do , in some detail examine the root connection between the Jewish people and the lands of Judea and Galilee at least , and explain that the nation of Israel is possibly the oldest in the world , it's people's suffering almost complete obliteration after the Ben Kokhba revolt begun against Roman occupation in 132 Ad . The resultant depopulation didn't lead to a cultural or religious loss of identification with the ' chosen land ' . This perhaps is a point often missed by commentators regarding the current suffering of so many people , Palestinian, and Israeli today and recently .
If one goes by 2000 year old records - some touching on Fiction, other religious sects have them too, then it 'pulls the rug from under the feet of the colonials in North America, South America, Australia, NZ. Those lands belong to the NATIVES of those lands and NOT to Colonial Whites ! ?????????
Your understanding of this history is super messed up. Israel is only 75 years old. It is one of the newest nations. It was settled by Europeans. The people who had been living on that land were displaced. Prior to and during the European settlers turning up, starting from the about the turn of the 20th century, the land was controlled by Ottoman and then Britain.
There isn't much else to it. Whether the European settlers used to live there or not (thousands of years ago) would be impossible to substantiate. The people who had already been living there may have been, for a very long time, but that's also effectively impossible to prove.
Records don't go back that far, and there is no way to know if they were fabricated.
@@ledpupThere are, for example names Judea and Samaria, the Bible, the archeological artefacts and many-many other things. But for people of not Judeo-Christian culture there is "no proof"...
@@Mk-xe2qc I don't think you understand the argument. If we accept that everything in the Bible is true, and all the other evidence you mention is too, how can any particular European settler link their heritage to it without whatever evidence they present (some sort of document that has their family tree going back 2000 years perhaps?) not potentially being fabricated?
@@ledpup your ignoring ancient history and archaeology ..unless your in deliberate denial of it , or , both sources of knowledge are false
My friend, concerning the part where you mentionned Lebanon, Lebanon has existed since since the dawn of time and its name is mentionned 17 times in the bible. Even under the ottoman empire where damascus directly managed by the turcs, Mount Lebanon had its autonomy inside the empire and maronite patriarch at its head. Lebanon has never been part of Syria and there are 2 chains of mountains as high as 3000 meters that sperates them if you have ever been in the region and the relation of Mount Lebanon with France are since the 12th century.
When you say 2 chains of mountains, is that Lebanon and anti-Lebanon? I never understood 'anti-Lebanon'.
actually the whole middle east was whole until Britain and france decided to break it apart and each took a piece of the cake. Britan had this rule always, divide and conquer and they followed it to the t.
Never liked the man, dispensing judgment, on people and event, the result of which nobody could ever had imagined. But the reason i detest him the most is that he finds compelled to dismember, (so to speak) the leader of a nation that educated him, and choose to reside in, for his intellectual self gratification, when all he stated as facts can be reasonably challenged. ONE QUESTION: WHY THIS FOUNTAIN OF KNOWLEDGE LIVE IN THE UK, AND NOT IN HIS NATIVE SUPER INTELLECTUAL PACKISTAN? NOBODY WOULD MISS HIM.
@@HS-dw5ee Many tribes divided and conquered over and over there. And other ancient kingdoms. There was always war there. People just always seem to talk about the light skinned people differently.
@@JessJoanneyeah! The White interlopers. Lol
This is very deep. It was very slow process and now it's impossible to reverse things. But all is possible for Allah. Thank you br. Paul for sharing this gem info.
It is my responsibility to aware every one
Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤❤
@@RussianFans-vn6cj Mohamed . . . you are confused !
I dont know if he was a hero, but given the choices available he was the right leader at the right time. I base this opinion mainly on his roll during WW2. A lesser known thing about bombing in WW2 is Naples, Italy. I read in a biography of Churchill that the allies bombed Naples Italy every day for one year. I realize the strategic importance of the Bay of Naples, I believe its a deep water port, but the impact on the non combatants was pretty horrible. If there was a hero in that war, in my opinion it was the Russian army. I would hate like hell to say anything good about Stalin, but Russia's importance to the VE day cannot be over estimated, in my opinion. What amazes me about Churchill is that he was an amazingly functional drunk. In that same bio I read that Churchill said he drank one bottle of champagne every day.
@@MartinJoyceUFOConspiracy OK brother the jews by themselves said they are killing the Palestinians and the jews betrayed France in ww1
Speaking as an alcoholic I can say a bottle of champers every day wouldn`t even touch the sides if he was a real alkie lol
Is that why WC starved millions of Indians during WWII?
He suffered from manic depression. He called it his "black dog"
Hitler on the other hand was a teetotalling vegetarian, our image of those two men is wholly manufactured rather akin to fairground mirrors.
Mr. Tarique Ali is using 21st century standards to judge a 19th century man. Yes, Churchill was an imperialist. In Churchills’ time, most European leaders were imperialists.
He's also pointing out things that are true that most people don't know. Also, many people in Churchill's own time disliked his attitudes and actions. What about the objections to the East India Company and ti slavery in the 18th and 19th centuries? What standards were they using?
Not really, when history is controlled by the ruling class, not much history gets out.
Consequentially, when that true history becomes known, it's not judging by a standard that did not exist before .
It's simply allowing the truth to be known, and speak for itself.
You can't judge what was unreported or unknown.
That's sort of like judging Leopold who slaughter millions by 21st century standards.
It's not, the same moral standard existed when he did it. Those of the latter centuries just didn't know it. When they found out, they simply let it be known.
That's what happened in the USAMERICA when folks started using the net to research some of those confederate statues. They found out the inscriptions beneath the statues were entire false.
BTW, I'm not in favor of removing these monuments, as long as you prints some of the real truths beneath them.
Pero muchos lo recuerdan como un héroe y punto. Y hay que recordarlo como un imperialista y un racista también. Y no como uno cualquiera, sino como uno destacadísimo en su desprecio. Y este video es también para esclarecer sobre los origenes racistas del Sionismo y su vigencia
....and there you have it, NONE OPPOSED. Those who could would not, those who would, could not.
The same holds true (mostly) today.
GB played a double game promising a nation for both sides in same area and when shit hit the fans they bailed out saying it isn't their problem.
hey nijad. rather than blame the brits ask why didn't the arabs in the mandate start planning for statehood? after twenty years was any arab group ready to form a government? quote "In December 1920, Palestinian Arabs at a congress in Haifa established an executive committee (known as the Arab Executive) to act as the representative of the Arabs. It was never formally recognized by the British and was dissolved in 1934. However, the platform of the Haifa congress, which set out the position that Palestine was an autonomous Arab entity and totally rejected any rights of the Jews to Palestine, remained the basic policy of the Palestinian Arabs until 1948." seems like arabs wasted decades trying to keep jews out of the region rather than build a functioning government.
Thank God for Churchill. Without him it would never have been possible for this rubbish to have been published.
Yes nothing impartial about Tariq Ali nor for that matter this revisionist historian. Pretty clear to me that there is a hidden agenda that is not very well hidden in this video.
@@johnxxx5085 Hmmmm .... guess you deny the historical fact that in 1891 in Palestine, Jews owned only 1% of the land and Arabs-Palestinians owned 99% of the land. Guess you deny that in about 1900 there was a tiny Jewish population in Palestine and that 96+% of the population was Arabic-Palestinian. Those are just historical facts. Moreover, the Jews and the Arabs lived in relative peaceful co-existence in 1891 and 1900 in Palestine.
The basic root cause of the never ending war in Palestine is that the Palestinians have had their land taken from them and mostly reallocated to Jews. One doubts that you would accept such if it happened to you personally.
@@coreyham3753where do Jews come from?
@@Grock66 ok, why don't you tell me.
@@coreyham3753 A crash course on history of the PALESTINIAN STATE:
1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state.
2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state.
4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Arab-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state.
5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state
6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state.
7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state.
8. Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state.
9. Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state.
10. Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state.
12. Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state.
13. Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state.
14. Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state.
15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state. 16. Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state.
17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
18. Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
19. Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state.
20. Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE.
Since England was fighting Nazism it only stands to reason that Churchill would take a pro Jewish stance at that time. You have to read between the lines of political rhetoric. The fact that the Arabs themselves where mainly nomadic tribes also figured in Britain 's and Churchill's decision to back a Jewish homeland that would also act as an ally in the region.
err i think England had some help from Wales, Scotland Northern Ireland, Free Poles, Free French, ANZACS, Indians, South Africans, the Gurkhas.... all there from the start. The main consideration was Oil and it is fair to say that the post WWII terrorism in Palestine probably rushed the decision and the settlement. But remember that Britain had already screwed the Arabs after WWI so they had already lit the tinderbox before they poured the petrol on.
Ali is from Pakistan and of Muslim heritage. His loyalty is certainly not to the DIS-UK, so as far as I'm concerned, his comments are totally irrelevant, as those of a foreign agent! Thank God for Churchill, his warts and all. War is evil, but sometimes to beat an aggressor, one has to fight in a less than sterile way.
Paul I'd like to thank you for this channel and this lesson.
Alhamdulillah
It is my responsibility to aware every one
Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤
@@RussianFans-vn6cj Not true . . . it is a fraud just like Moo . . .
Jesus said "I am the way the truth & the light" . . . he was God.
Moo was merely a prophet . . . for an old tired Arab god, who was one of many.
@@BloggingTheologyremember the Luftwaffe bombed Warsaw before the RAF bombed German cities.
@@RussianFans-vn6cj
Never understood why every
religion of lokal origins is pushing
their agenda for the rest of the
world as the only one and only
right one and everyone has to
obey them....?
I'm all for this provided folks from other 'cultures' turn the lens upon their own barbarous histories too. As for the remarkable Churchill? We can give him a pass for any transgressions because of the abuse he suffered at the hands of his extremely neglectful parents. That 'get out of jail free card' seems available for the feral youth of the inner cities, lets be sure to apply it equally.
yeah their own barburus histories lol as if it is comparble and they wouldve done the same thing
Absolutely no excuse for the continuous callous decision making that marked Churchill's life. Like today's recalcitrant youths poor upbringing should not be used for their humanity - it should make them (or made Churchill) into a more compassionate soul.
You want to compare a grown man in power & privilege to inner city kids? 😅
And you refer to mass murder as "transgressions". Would you refer to the loss of British lives as mere "transgressions".
Why is cultures in inverted commas? What is that supposed to insinuate?
True......Hitler had a terrible childhood 😢
The British Empire was using aerial warfare in Kurdistan and Waziristan before WW2. Channel 4 produced a documentary called 'Birds of Death' so it must be true.
The painting of Islam and Muslims here as guiltless and victims is disingenuous, at best.
Tariq Ali's writings border on propaganda.
Jewish empire royals are actually Jewish Rothchild
@Raelven source: trust me bro
A couple of facts of relevance:
1. Winston Churchill was the first vice-president of the racist and elitist Eugenics Education Society, founded by Charles Darwin's cousin Francis Galton and son Major Leonard Darwin.
2. The eugenics doctrines had profound influence on the treatment of dark-skinned people and indigenous people in all the British colonies.
3. Churchill, like the British Monarchs George v and VI, was a Freemason.
Not a crime to be a Freemason.
The Germans did it to the French first but apparently this geezer is ignoring that
No youre wrong. Dresden was the first city.
David Irvine's books have great insight into Churchils funding during the wilderness years when he was not in parliment and his paymasters (handlers) , his alcoholism
.And also his attempt to bomb germany with anthrax .A great insight and excellent read . especialy the abdication of the king and refusal to let anyone read the offer of peace from the NSDAP .
David Irving has been totally discredited as a historian. He is a known NAZI sympathizer and has had judicial judgements that found he manipulated/obscured or just plain lied to present the NSDAP in a good light.
David Irvine is wrong, Churchill was without a seat in parliament for a very short time, lost his original seat and picked up a seat in a bye election not long after
@@gregsutton6258 oh dear was he also wrong about the alcoholic part and the anthrax or the refusal to let parliment read the suit for peace ?
@@gregsutton6258 Following the Tory electoral defeat in 1929, Churchill lost his seat and spent much of the next 11 years out of office, mainly writing and making speeches
1929 to 1939 is a decade how long do you think is a very long time in a political career vacation 🤣 Did you even read Irvines book ? In fact have you EVER READ A BOOK 🤣
@@gregsutton6258 Really ? Following the Tory electoral defeat in 1929, Churchill lost his seat and spent much of the next 11 years out of office, mainly writing and making speeches
Listening to this fellow, It is possible to understand why London and the UK go to the seed. It is not about Churchill, it is about woke ideology and its application to the history and daily practice. Cry the beloved country.
did you watch more than a few minutes of this 30 minute thing?
The title is disingenuous tbh. The Jews Arabs and Christians who lived in the territory of Palestinie were all Palestinians. The labels we apply to these groups today give a misleading impression of the reality of that
Brother paul my Allah bless you and your family
Wow no comments yet except for one? Last time I was this early, Israel was still Palestine.
It's astonishing how the British press and Media refuse to discuss the Balfour declaration that has put the Palastenians and the Jewish people on a 75 year collision course. Not a single Journalist. TV channel or newspapaer wants to discuss it.
It's actually often brought up but usually just in passing because they realize that most people won't have the patience or interest in learning about the entire history in all of its details, and prefer to stick to their preferred narratives.
Being that "Palestinians" were only concocted in 1964, relegates your proposal to nothingness.
How do you know being an American?
excellent point... how many conflicts are a direct result of arbitary lines drawn up by imperial powers to suit their own purposes... too many.
It is astonishing how you would make a statement with no basis in fact whatsoever, and declare it with zero proof.
How strange, that after eight minutes you haven't mentioned the collapse of the ottomans and a real need for an analysis of what areas were capable of "self rule" and which would collapse into murderous chaos in the vacuum.
Churchill having died in 1965, he is unlikely to have spoken about Palestinians. It was only a bit later that Arafat and the OLP introduced for political convenience the notion of a Palestinian people, of a nation. Before that, everybody, themselves included, talked of Arabs. Palestine only meant the region that had been administered by Great Britain, inhabited by all sorts of people.
U r absolutely right. So called “Palestinian people” was invented by theKGB in late 60s when the Soviets learned that the State of Israel took western side in the Cold War.
Your logic is crazy.
If there is a region called Palestine then the obvious term for the people would be Palestines or Palestinians.
Churchill wasn't 5 years old at the time...he kind of had a handle on things.
And did you know that a huge part of Europe was Germanic and Germany was known as a German region ...but its only been a sovereign state since the late 1800s
?? Or did I miss your point ?
And what is OLP ?
@@andycallaghan5975 beside Arabs there are Jews ,Cherkesses , Druses, Shomrones - all leaving in region that you call Palestine. Nobody calls himself Palestinian only Muslim Arabs do. Nobody tries to kill or expel or rob or rape the others, only Muslim Arabs do. And no country , even Arab countries, wants to help them, even when Israelis make them pay for the evil they are and the horror they did.
@@andycallaghan5975 , the name of Palestine goes back to biblical times. The Arabs only colonized the region in the 7th c. CE. Since then, the name of Palestine applied to regional borders that changed over time, and never to any specific people inhabiting the region. As late as the 1920's, some Arabs wanted to call the region Southern Syria.
Since Arab conquest and colonization there never was a single ethnic group living there, nor was any particular group known as Palestinians.
Churchill could never have spoken of a Palestinian people. He would speak, as everybody else, of Palestinian Arabs, Jews, Christians, Druzes, Samaritans, Turks, Greeks, etc.
OLP = PLO, being used to both acronyms in various languages.
Regarding Germany and Germans, if we go back to Roman Germania, it referred to lands inhabited by many different Germanic tribes. They were not Germans but spoke various Germanic languages, same way we are discussing now in a Germanic language (English) without being Germans. The German people(s) and nation(s) slowly started to develop and set during the Middle Ages, before any clear national identity. Ask Austrians whether they are Germans and you would obtain different answers even as the Anschluss was taking place. Ask the German speaking Swiss or Alsacians: they will obviously deny being Germans. You simply cannot call Germans all the German speaking peoples, much less everybody living within your imaginary German region.
Germanic tribes swept all of western Europe and even northern Africa. According to your logic, we should extend the Roman notion of Germania to all of Europe and northern Africa, regard all as "Germans", and ask anybody unhappy about that to please stop being a racist colonizer and please go home, somewhere else.
@@andycallaghan5975 my logic maybe crazy but yours looks academic but actually. blood thirsty anti Semitic there is a region called French Riviera. Never heard of people called French rivierians and the demand for their own state led by murder and distraction. On the other hand, there is Curdistan and 30 million curds collapsing under Turkish brutal attacks. Where did “European values” disappear? What about Coptic Christians in Egypt? They are periodically slaughtered but no intl help delivered. This is a long list of real nations before this bunch of criminals and murderers led by Hamas beasts. Which now are paying the price of death and distraction they brought on October 7th. To the last of them monsters and beyond!
From 21:07 to - 22:32 - LISTEN TO THIS STATEMENT - of the reason to just ignore the Palestinians' longtime (millenia) residence in THEIR land.
I only just got to you mentioning how Churchil allowed the bombing of civilian areas in Germany. Haven't the Germans done the same? By the way, it was only considered a war crime since the Geneva convention in 1949. That's 4 years after WWII has finished. And what's Ali's opinion of Hamas and Hizballa shooting missiles into civilian Israeli areas on purpose? Is that ok?
Only when you have different standards towards Israel and the Jews of course.
Imagine raving alongside the biggest concentration camp on Earth, and then imagine still claiming victimhood after you had massacred almost 40 times, and wounded almost double that, more of the people you have been holding in apartheid prison for decades prior? Many Jews are also standing up to what Israel is doing, perfectly aware of the fact that Holocaust (committed by Europeans, by the way) is being used to justify the ongoing Gaza Genocide.
The Church of Rome; the facade for the continuing colonial Empire of Rome, has quite a lot to answer for. So many countries down the years have carried out it's premise and still do: It is about time it came to an end.
@thedragonflygate4587, What a maroon. What a complete numbskull troll. I suppose according to you it's the "Church of Rome " that's bombing, slaughtering and genociding the people pf Palestine. You are as ridiculous as Hertzog with his Amazon in Arabic "Mein Kamp" found on the "body of a Hamas fighter" in pristine condition, no dust and so on. You guys are desperate. Netanyahu, Hertzog and Gallant are all Catholics. The Pope is a member of Hamas. The Pope blew up the Nordstream Pipeline. The Pope overthrew the elected government of Ukraine in 2014. The Pope and Putin are card playing buddies. O, and yes JFK who was murdered sixty years ago tomorrow committed suicide because he was a member of the Roman Empire?
The same can be said of the current Synagogue of Satan.
Rome was destroyed but the SPIRIT OF ROME IS TRULY ALIVE
We all have a view on history and have the freedom to state it so I will record mine. Churchill was a man of his time and, for me, the greatest man of the 20th century. My mind will not be swayed by the utterings of revisionists.
Churchil did what needed to be done to stop Hitler. There is nothing more to say about it. War is ugly, innocent people die and suffer. This is why tha blame falls on the one who starts it.
Churchill zionist used Europeans controlled false opposition to Jewish communists. British royals are actually Jewish deceived Europeans
Tariq Ali, good old British name eh 😂😂😂
There is a small island community in the Atlantic Ocean. This small island community saved the lives of many Englishmen during World War II. Winston Churchill said something that unfortunately seems to have been forgotten. He said we will never forget you*****-******** What was the name of the wonderful island community that Winston Churchill was so proud of?
Azores.
@@busterbiloxi3833 No Unfortunately. You are going in the wrong direction. The Azores are located around Portugal. I am talking about the island community located at 62 degrees north latitude. This must have been forgotten in history since no one knows what it is except me. I know because I am a native of the isolated island community in the Atlantic Ocean
@@Leon-jp7ch tell me tell me?
@@robtherub Winston Churchill said never forget the Faroe Islands. That is exactly what the English have forgotten.
@@Leon-jp7ch ah ha, i shall have to look them up on both a map and the history books. Care to tell me more? How is it there? Why did Winston say that?
Unless I misheard, England and America didn't bomb Dresden until very late 1944 / early 1945.
This was several years after Hitler ferociously bombed England in the so-called Battle of Britain.
In other words, Hitler and Germany started everything, including WWII.
The light of god always eliminates darkness. No matter how dark it always overcomes darkness.
Sounds familiar to the Australian story. Where the English mentioned that there is nobody living on Australian soil
This was the best I heard för a long time. Thank you Sir
Churchill infamously referred to Mahatma Gandhi as "half naked fakir".
Being a drunk was of no help to Winnie.
Tariq Ali forgets to mention that the Jews who came from Europe purchased the lands from the absentee landlords in Syria while the local Arabs were only tenants on the land.
He didn't forget to mention it; he purposely omitted to mention it because it interferes with what he wants people to believe.
Churchill was very smart! He knew what he was talking about!
He was smart enough to cosy up to Stalin.
@@menacetohighsocietyA guy who killed more Christians than AH killed in total in the camps. Top bloke.
This esteemed author should see how the African people messed up South Africa: Self-enrichment of the leaders, inefficiency, corruption and crime.
Your reading is very lucid. Thank you.
"They will carry their burdens on the Day of Resurrection"
🔥🔥🔥🔥
Paul again proving how much he has progressed in Jihadi curriculum😂
Urine drinker is not allowed here 😂😂😂
Bastard
What a bizarre way you have of describing someone having basic morality and humanity and being free of racism and thus believing that it is wrong for white European Christians
and white European Jewish Zionists to conspire to steal the land of Palestinians
and drive them into prison camps and into exile so that white European Jewish Zionists
can occupy that Palestinian land thus letting white European Christians
and white European Jewish people no longer have to deal with each other.
When you think that believing that non-white people deserve basic rights
and to be safe from colonialist invasion apartheid and oppression
is somehow "religious extremism" then you display your racism
and religious extremism.
Before 1935 The Jews were called Palestinians and the Arabs were called ....... Arabs or the places they came from: Egyptian Arabs or Syrian Arabs.
Much appreciate your positive affirmation of Winston Churchill, deeds not words.
History is rarely as simple as we are lead to believe.
Thank you for your great content and interviews on your program. I've been following sometime.
Glad you like them!
Rather than this one-sided and uninformed presentation, I recommend that all read or listen to a podcast by a real historian with a balanced and wide view, Walter Russell Mead. He has written a new book on the problems in the Middle East.
"Some call it Marxism. I call it Judaism."
- Rabbi Stephen Wise
and they say USSR was bad... lol
Fake quote! Context?
The point is not to find the truth, but to have the heart power to embrass it.
I'm not Muslim but I really like your comment. Peace
Who are you going to vilify next, Roosevelt?
Or Mahatma Ghandi? Or Nelson Mandela?
It doesn't help that the Quran specifically calls for the eradication of the Jews (and Christians), and Islamic Fundamentalists, take that call seriously. Religious texts, and their interpretation or misinterpretation, have caused more death than any other conflict in history.
Not found it anywhere in Quran. It says do not argue "your religion is yours and mine is mine". Fighting only allowed in defense when under attack.
are you also condemning the jews who think Palestine is them because of their books? Or is it only important to look what the Quran says
Tariq Ali -British writer?😂😂😂