The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict explained on a map

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 7K

  • @GeoHistory
    @GeoHistory  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1019

    I'm back! Sorry for the long delay. Due to the sensitivity of this topic, I spent more time on research. Also, the video is longer than usual, which means more editing work. I hope this video helps you to understand better this complex and controversial topic! Stay respectful in your comments, please. See you soon!

    • @Europeanguy831
      @Europeanguy831 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Glad you're back

    • @oofers_1991
      @oofers_1991 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Every video has amazing quality, take your time. 🙂

    • @EliteYeet
      @EliteYeet 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Hopefully blud doesnt get cancelled after the vid 🙏🙏

    • @turtle3551
      @turtle3551 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The Palestine Hotel (Arabic: فندق فلسطين), often referred to simply as The Palestine, is a 16-story hotel in Baghdad, Iraq located on Firdos Square near from Saadon, across from the Ishtar Hotel. It has long been favoured by journalists and media personnel. The hotel overlooks the Tigris on its eastern bank and is located several hundred metres south of the Baghdad Hotel.
      History

    • @L.internet8
      @L.internet8 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Good luck, my friend.

  • @Aureus07
    @Aureus07 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3682

    This is going to be a very civil and respectful comment section

  • @cabbytabby
    @cabbytabby 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3184

    Important to note: the Phillistines were Greek people, not the present day Palestinians who are arabs.

    • @KeViN-De-Belgium
      @KeViN-De-Belgium 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are Palestinians really Arabs. Because I’ve done some research and it turns out Palestinians are more Levant than Arab.

    • @samuellatu3123
      @samuellatu3123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@KeViN-De-Belgium Palestinians are genetically very close to Jews and other Middle East populations, including Turks (Anatolians), Lebanese, Egyptians, Armenians, and Iranians.

    • @samuellatu3123
      @samuellatu3123 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

      @@KeViN-De-BelgiumLevant is more or less used to describe multiple countries put together through language and culture, similar to how Polynesia is not a county but has countries within them.

    • @Dresden2005
      @Dresden2005 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +271

      I am Palestinian and I am sure that we are Arabs. Palestinians have multiple origins, for example, my family's origin dates back to sudi arabia, my neighbor's origin dates back to Albania, and my other neighbor's origin dates back to the Greeks. We are a diverse people, now we are Arab and we speak Arabic، This is the case with the Israeli people as well

    • @nurkkr
      @nurkkr 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dresden2005 i'm screen-shoting this comment
      you just disproved the palestinian claim and proved the israeli side
      who came to the land from all around the world, yet we sing the same songs, tell the same stories and can basically read texts from 3000 years ago.
      no symmetry to speak of buddy.
      and now, let's tell you why jerusalem is holy for muslims
      seems that a prophecy came about exactly when the temple mound was conquered (700 years after the ch1ldmolester's demise)
      making up a story about a dream he had where he flew on a donkey who's hoof touched the roof of the temple..
      bruh.. islame just makes stuff uo as they go..
      just like palestine.. you are no different then your arab friends all around, stop making israel a lame place like you make EVERY place.

  • @jessegamble5573
    @jessegamble5573 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1281

    This video doesn’t mention Egypt was offered Gaza back with the Sinai Peninsula and they didn’t want it.

    • @MohammadMahmoud-n6h
      @MohammadMahmoud-n6h 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Who offered it? what's your source?

    • @ScythPlayz
      @ScythPlayz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +204

      @@MohammadMahmoud-n6hbruh he’s right it should be common knowledge

    • @MohammadMahmoud-n6h
      @MohammadMahmoud-n6h 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      @@ScythPlayz Well, he has to say who offered and what's his source, if it's that common.

    • @jessegamble5573
      @jessegamble5573 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +204

      @@MohammadMahmoud-n6h @ScythPlayz
      It's the Camp David Accords my friend. In 67 Israel also took the entire Sinai Peninsula which was part of Egypt. In 1978, as part of the Camp David accords, Israel agreed to give back the Sinai Peninsula and tried to make it a package deal including Gaza. Egypt refused the offer, saying Gaza was never part of Egypt.

    • @pugfugly1989
      @pugfugly1989 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They were not offered Gaza, and Gaza was never theirs to take in the first place. Gaza is a part of Palestine, and the Zionists just need to fucking leave and stop their genocide and illegal occupation.

  • @honderddertigkmh5950
    @honderddertigkmh5950 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +262

    Golda was born in Kiev, Arafat was born in Cairo and spoke in a Egyptian accent. One fact was mentioned in this presentation the other was omitted.

    • @JM-yn8mb
      @JM-yn8mb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Which was mentioned?

    • @honderddertigkmh5950
      @honderddertigkmh5950 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@JM-yn8mb timestamp 15:28

    • @JM-yn8mb
      @JM-yn8mb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@honderddertigkmh5950 I agree. Also, one population was ethnically cleansed from their native homeland, one simply moved from other Middle Eastern countries into the land known as Israel.

    • @TM-100
      @TM-100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      You mean the Jews that were ethnically cleansed from Gaza? Or the myriad of Muslim countries? Who are told to "return to Poland" even though they have absolutely no connection to the place? ​@@JM-yn8mb

    • @satiricgames2129
      @satiricgames2129 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@JM-yn8mb😂😂😂😂

  • @tibodeclercq2131
    @tibodeclercq2131 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1424

    Egypt: Palestinians are our brothers in language & faith.
    Also Egypt: co-blockades.

    • @noam7554
      @noam7554 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Egypt hates the Muslim Brotherhood

    • @hassanmady7763
      @hassanmady7763 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +140

      The thing is, as soon as Egypt accepts them, they will never be able to return to their homes again. Eliminating the hope for a Palestinian state.

    • @DutchTunisian
      @DutchTunisian 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Egypt is controlled by z10n1sts (sisi’s government)

    • @johnxina5126
      @johnxina5126 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      ​@@hassanmady7763 same as how the Palestinians in Lebanon,Syria and Jordan are yet to return. People blame the Palestinian diasporas for Black September and the ignition of Lebanese civil war but forget the root cause, Al-Nakba and expulsion of the Palestinians.

    • @hassanmady7763
      @hassanmady7763 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@johnxina5126 they intend to forget. To suit their narrative

  • @TorreFLoeckx
    @TorreFLoeckx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1857

    99% of the comments about how bad the comment section is gonna be lol

    • @MarcTelang
      @MarcTelang 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      and because of that there won't be any terrible comments

    • @chiefmuttonchops8473
      @chiefmuttonchops8473 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Clap your hands everyone, we have a real orignial thinker here.

    • @Hxmar
      @Hxmar 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      1% being about geohistory coming back

    • @isaiahpoulin9710
      @isaiahpoulin9710 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Don't mind if i FREE PALESTINE?

    • @SCOTLANDforEVER12976
      @SCOTLANDforEVER12976 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This is what it call: you focus on who said it instead of focusing of what he actually said

  • @thesunisup_
    @thesunisup_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +601

    And yet another point that is missing is that when Israel made peace with Jordan and Egypt, they refused to take West Bank and Gaza respectively under their control even though they used to occupy these territories before.

    • @christopherkucia1071
      @christopherkucia1071 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      Precisely because it was occupation….

    • @thesunisup_
      @thesunisup_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +107

      @@christopherkucia1071 Jordan literally annexed the entirety of the West Bank, and gave out Jordanian citizenship to all the arabs there. The occupation argument might fly for Gaza which wasn't officially made an Egyptian territory during this war but definitely not for the West Bank.

    • @jumbojumbo6866
      @jumbojumbo6866 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@thesunisup_ i would say the west bank is more over given for palestinians to make their own land rather than just be part of israel this is complicated enough but to give perspective the arab nations would had suceeded if it wasn't for israelites to protest for independence and fight for their country as a nation ive seen mutliple videos before the war showing palestinians throwing rocks at israelites for entering the temple of jerusalem because according to the palestinians its their mosque which was built by the Umayyad caliphate who invaded israel and built the al aqsa mosque for their convenience

    • @pugfugly1989
      @pugfugly1989 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That's the most ignorant bullshit I've ever read. How much did the Jews pay you to make such an absurd claim with zero evidence to support it?

    • @AdamBurstyn-xt9zy
      @AdamBurstyn-xt9zy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have Jordanian and Egyptian friends who say that their respective countries can't stand Palestinians because all they do is cause problems and they align with Iran and Hamas.

  • @jamesnapier3802
    @jamesnapier3802 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +326

    With this video, you may not have made a large contribution to the education of the masses in history, but you've unequivocally answered the question of whether you are an anti-Semite.

    • @ShiaKorchin
      @ShiaKorchin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      I guess, on the whole, this is accurate!

    • @firstlast9384
      @firstlast9384 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

      @@ShiaKorchinno not really, but it is an attempt to make out like Israeli Jews are foreigners, doesn’t explain the Palestinian name doesn’t explain where the Philistines went, or the weapons obtained by the Arab nations, or that the British gave away half of the Judean lands, and that the Jews have always been there but occupied by foreign nations, one of those being Arab (Babylonians) and the other of Islamic powers, the Arabs and the Ottomans

    • @gabrielmarius984
      @gabrielmarius984 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would not call it anti semitism, but biased sure. Fail to mention any palestinian attack on jewish civillians, not a single 1 mentioned, not mentioning their ties to nazi Germany, not mentioning them getting weapons from the soviets, only mentioning everytime jews are buying weapons from someone. Yes biased as hell.

    • @gabrielmarius984
      @gabrielmarius984 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@firstlast9384 agree, but one thing, babylonians were not arabs, the spoke hebrew so they were at least culturaly more related to the ancient jews/israelites/canaanites. But ethnically were different from arabs and from israelites.

    • @amya6556
      @amya6556 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      @@gabrielmarius984Babylonians spoke Akkadian not Hebrew.

  • @yupity
    @yupity 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +664

    small correction, around 800K jews were exiled from arab countries (Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Egypt...), 200k more than the arab refugees.

    • @RP3X7
      @RP3X7 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      When?

    • @MrWaterlionmonkey
      @MrWaterlionmonkey 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

      ​@@RP3X7in the 50's

    • @smittywerbenjaggermanjense672
      @smittywerbenjaggermanjense672 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +80

      Only in Egypt and Jordan they were expelled in the classical sense, amounting to about 100,000 Jews. Most Arab nations in fact banned the Jews from leaving to not strengthen Israel, they may have faced discrimination, but they were not exiles. In some countries, like Algeria and Yemen, they left mainly because of the wars there, which had nothing to do with Israel. In other countries they eventually left when the Israelis negotiated an end to the travel bans or left illegally with the assistance of the Mossad.

    • @yupity
      @yupity 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@smittywerbenjaggermanjense672 sounds like exile with extra steps to me. You can also say that out of the 600k Arabs leaving Israel, most left not out of fear but because they were promised to get back once the Arabs countries will finish with the jews.

    • @revenger211
      @revenger211 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      yea and when did that happen? and how many Palestinians were exiled when Israel took control?

  • @thesunisup_
    @thesunisup_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +275

    10:45
    I think there is an import detail about Amin Al-Hussaini missing that he wasn't exactly acting on its own, he was literally allied with Hitler.

    • @closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0
      @closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Thats trivial.
      Palestine wanted independence in 1936 but were crushed by british imperialists

    • @thesunisup_
      @thesunisup_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

      ⁠@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 first of all, being Hitler’s ally is not trivial. And the second, when you say “Palestine” do you mean “Palestinian arabs”? Because for 1936 saying “Palestine wanted this or that” is pretty vague.

    • @closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0
      @closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @thesunisup_ the majority of palestine wanted independence

    • @thesunisup_
      @thesunisup_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      @@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 again, when you say "Palestine" what population are you referring to? The Jews, the Arabs, all of them together?

    • @closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0
      @closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@thesunisup_ I said the majority.
      And arabs had the majority.
      But they were crushed by the british imperialists

  • @OdinMagnus
    @OdinMagnus 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    I know it's a short video so not everything is here, but you forgot to mention that there were jews in Israel the whole time, not all left. Not sure if I missed it when you said they were taken and allowed to return or left during the other times. Also, the arabs didn't arrive in the region (to settle) until the 7th century with the Islamic Conquest. And the only reason why the temple mount is holy to the muslims is because it's in the torah/bible as a holy site. They don't have any connection to it. Originally Mohammad was actually scolded for praying towards Jerusalem instead of towards Mecca. Mecca and the space rock are their holy site. One of the reason they don't have a problem bombing Jerusalem on holidays.
    Aside from that, I think it was pretty accurate, 98% lol =D

    • @Anton4353f
      @Anton4353f 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It seems it was much less then that, watch the response video "geo history is 55% wrong" by travelingisrael.
      Yes, it's made by an Israeli so it's biased but historical facts are just that.
      Also he pointed out much lying by omission.

    • @SladeL
      @SladeL หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great points, pro-Pali/Hamas people always leave out facts that do not suit them b/c it is deeply uncomfortable for them, it is their ideology, it has nothing to do with facts and truth.

    • @nothing78799
      @nothing78799 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I saw his video too​@@Anton4353f

  • @mdjey2
    @mdjey2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +157

    You could have also mentioned all those times when Russians or Soviets gave weapons to Arabs, but not a single mention of that.

    • @LeaMumof3
      @LeaMumof3 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      For real. Seriously odd he never mentioned Arabs weaponry.

    • @mopthefloorrr
      @mopthefloorrr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      he did mention that

    • @barryklarman2720
      @barryklarman2720 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How about Soviet & Arab weaponization of the United Nations? Still going on now. Zionism is racism has come back from the dead with a vengeance

    • @55was
      @55was 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@mopthefloorrr No Not really more Like one time in a half sentence.

    • @mopthefloorrr
      @mopthefloorrr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@55was if you want

  • @yehoem
    @yehoem 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +412

    15:56 it's incorrect to use this flag while representing Palestinians before the creation of Israel this flag was only adopted in 1964

    • @brianbeag
      @brianbeag 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      Correct! As indeed is the name Palestinians to describe the Muslim Arabs living in the territories!

    • @billykalia9050
      @billykalia9050 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

      Actually it's not incorrect but it's the other way around, he talks about and shows the Arab Revolt flag (or flag of Heetzaz). At that time, it did not represent Palestinians but Arab nationalism and pan-arabism. It was later adapted by the PLO.

    • @falconeshield
      @falconeshield 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@brianbeagArabs have forgotten that they used the hate the name Palestine once because it means invader in Jewish. I wonder why!

    • @dean9261
      @dean9261 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      And Israel's flag, the seal of solomon or star of remphan want used until 1948

    • @aislingclarke4347
      @aislingclarke4347 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      True, but the only official flag for the region at the time was the Union Jack, he needs a flag to represent the Palestinian Arabs, what else should he use?

  • @essasito1919
    @essasito1919 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +539

    Slight correction. The northern kingdom of Israel was conquered by the Assyrians. Only later did the southern kingdom of Judah get conquered by Babylonia. So they were not conquered at the same time and not by the same people. Other than that a very objective and unbiased video.

    • @nah88
      @nah88 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      I wouldn't have called the muslim caliphate tolerant mind.

    • @Sencorer
      @Sencorer 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nah88Muslims were pretty tolerant for their time. They had heavy taxes, but they wouldn’t have outright genocides. Compared to Europe, the local Jewish population had it decent under the Muslims.

    • @NoelNaggis
      @NoelNaggis 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What is the kingdom of David and Solomon?
      I have never heard that phrase in my life.
      It's also biblically and historically inaccurate, as David was not even the second king of Isreal.
      And he wasn't even it's 10th leader

    • @SCOTLANDforEVER12976
      @SCOTLANDforEVER12976 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Who cares its *don't justify invading Palestine*

    • @essasito1919
      @essasito1919 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@SCOTLANDforEVER12976 it is no justification i just tell what jewish tradition is

  • @ald4989
    @ald4989 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +226

    After the six-day war, Israel expected the Arabs to take back the conquered lands in exchange for peace, but the Arabs again refused. Only then did settlers start to settle and Israel’s policy changed.

    • @as_ISR
      @as_ISR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes, because even the arab countries dont like palestinians as they tried to take over Jordan and lead to the destruction of Lebanon, literally anyone who knows the last 80 years of history is like: nah you know what im good.

    • @DickTator6969
      @DickTator6969 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      funny how no one talks about the arab settelers and how islam spread .
      but yep , that's pretty much it , the idea of settelements is not just exclusive to israel and is based on necessity for security
      (to be fair I only support it on two conditions , one when it's our historical lands , two if there are security threats that needed to be dealt with and enemies that should recive consequences and are sitting in another soveirgn territory such as countries but even then I'd rather make their areas uninhabitable and an archeoliogical site as the first option)

    • @donmoufashorhe
      @donmoufashorhe 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can not trust Arabs they promise much but they are not trustworthy people! I feel sorry for the Israeli people about their neighbours!

    • @mohammeduzair7796
      @mohammeduzair7796 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ald4989 source? Why do you think they started war in 1973 it was get back the occupied land
      And last time i checked jordan has recognized Israel long time ago care to explain why west Bank and east Jerusalem are still under israel's occupation?

  • @fhnghifvi12
    @fhnghifvi12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    This video needs to be highly revised 😮‍💨

  • @kito7947
    @kito7947 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +950

    Man was missing for half a year now i get it he was cooking

    • @mohamedomer526
      @mohamedomer526 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      And he delivered

    • @kamodo2299
      @kamodo2299 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      You should really be careful with the 'cooking' metaphor given the subject matter

    • @jimmysaber
      @jimmysaber 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

      Definitely cooking some BS

    • @sagitarriulus9773
      @sagitarriulus9773 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Cookin in the kitchen making stir fry

    • @jumbojumbo6866
      @jumbojumbo6866 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@jimmysaber according to you

  • @OriMoscovitz
    @OriMoscovitz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +63

    Zouir Mohsen the first "palestinian" leader -
    "The Palestinian people does not exist … there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese . Between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese there are no differences. ..."

    • @hueyxz1121
      @hueyxz1121 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      What point is this making? There’s also no difference between English, Irish, Americans, and Canadians. What exactly is that proving?

    • @Nasballim
      @Nasballim 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Britain, Australia, New Zealand, U.S.A, Canada. All the same people right?

    • @Nasballim
      @Nasballim 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You probably think that Africa is a country right 😂

    • @Scorpion.1001
      @Scorpion.1001 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So stupid comment

    • @SladeL
      @SladeL หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hueyxz1121 that there are no Palestinian people. It is a pseudo identity created by Arafat.

  • @mg6md
    @mg6md 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +149

    Correction @28:50: Israel withdrew from Gaza for peace, and installed all necessary infrastructure to house the population there- the blockade occurred after Hamas launched missiles into Israel. The blockade was a result of missiles from Hamas, not the other way around. Hamas also notably destroyed most infrastructure because it was made by Israel.

    • @buy_the_new_samsung_galaxy_A28
      @buy_the_new_samsung_galaxy_A28 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Source:I'm not even gonna try to convince you that this is true

    • @HC-wv9xc
      @HC-wv9xc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      and this supports what I said... biased video and not all correct. No fact finding before allowed to post

    • @anonym-pm6mj
      @anonym-pm6mj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      tell me you are full of shit without telling me you are full of shit😂😂😂

    • @damer3016
      @damer3016 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@HC-wv9xches mostly right which i respect, the stuff he said nefore israels independence are the most accurate

    • @bc_7644
      @bc_7644 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I mean they were still occupying much of palestine at the time

  • @yme9746
    @yme9746 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +303

    Very biased presentation, leaving out many major facts.

    • @foxyreborn
      @foxyreborn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What facts, where should I go to learn more

    • @user-wat-cher105
      @user-wat-cher105 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Go to traveling Israel account ​@@foxyreborn

    • @mechamongrel-ir2qt
      @mechamongrel-ir2qt 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Traveling Israel: "Geohistory's video dissappointed me, here's my right-wing ethno-nationalist version of history..."

    • @alman-world
      @alman-world 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly my thoughts.

    • @alman-world
      @alman-world 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@mechamongrel-ir2qt Is it - surely it's no more biased than Geo History.
      In fact he accepts the Jewish acts, but also clearly states the Arab acts also. Thats not right-wing - goodness Hamas, Palestine is right wing also on that definition.

  • @devanjohnson737
    @devanjohnson737 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +442

    It’s really funny that people say that this is Pro Israel and others that its Pro Palestinian 🤣

    • @tootit.
      @tootit. 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Probably means it's neither

    • @falconeshield
      @falconeshield 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +161

      It's pro facts so people don't like that they're not matching with the lies they're fed on tiktok so clearly the video is wrong!

    • @cameron-er1hk
      @cameron-er1hk 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      agreed this was vry unbiased but i thibnk there was some mis information

    • @Simon_the_penguin
      @Simon_the_penguin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      I’d say it’s pro-history

    • @SteveHill-qm2bz
      @SteveHill-qm2bz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      That seems neutral to me.

  • @ryanb9749
    @ryanb9749 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +81

    The British started to feel the heat and were just like "lol imma head out."

    • @TalRozow
      @TalRozow 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Also at the same time India got it's independence so the British presence in the middle east which had a lot to do with overlooking transports of goods from India was no longer relevant. There was no longer a benefit for them from controlling this land.

    • @KMartin-jf5kw
      @KMartin-jf5kw 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@TalRozowYou’re incorrect. The British agreed with the United Nations that the Jewish people needed their own sovereign state. Hence why the land was given to Israel.

    • @YorenM
      @YorenM 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Only comment that makes sense

  • @unifedgongfu
    @unifedgongfu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +263

    you forgot several important things:
    1. Weizmann McMahon corresponding in 1919.
    2. the fact that the the Nazi amin al Husseini was the 1st to use the term "Palestinians" and in fact created this "people" out of nothing.
    3. the fact that most of those 6000000 Arabs you mentioned were not natives but were workers from surrounding Arab countries.
    4. the fact that the Arabs immigrated into land of Israel from Arabia in the first place under the Muslim conquest.
    5. the Jewish flee from Arab states, de-facto ethnical cleansing.
    6. 1970 black September and Israeli aid to Jordanian king against Syrian army
    7. Arafat never renounced terror for real.
    8. the unique status of "Palestinians" refugee unlike any other in the world.
    9. the place is not A holy place for jews, but in fact THE ONLY REAL holy place for jews. for Islam however it a question of inner Islamic Arabic politics going back to the birth of Islam and first khalifates.
    10. 2002 Israel entered "Palestinians" territories because of major terror attacks, and that is the reason for the wall.
    11. the blockade of Gaza is the outcome of Hamas rocket firing, not vice versa...
    12. while Arabs in Israel are equal citizens, the Arabs want ethnical cleansing in the "territories" ... yeah real peace of course must start with ethnical cleansing...
    13. 2014 of course Israel lunches offensive.. blah blah no.. Israel tried to stop terror rockets from Gaza.. again everything is so "pro Palestinian" in this video.. this is so full of BS.
    14. 2018 "firing on the crowd...." oh stop my tears please again biased lie..
    15. of course not a word about what happens in north Israel these days..
    16. no real numbers about "Palestinian" death and their terror infrastructures in Gaza.. sooooo biased with lies and half trues..
    this video realy underestimating Islamism, and the lie culture.
    this is a very biased video in favor of "peace" and leftwing ignoring history and facts about Islam and the Arab nation.

    • @Unamedblue3
      @Unamedblue3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      I like how no one's even touched your comment because it's so bluntly true they don't wanna see it and can't even refute it. 😂

    • @ThePeacefulIsWillingTo
      @ThePeacefulIsWillingTo 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When Jordanians took east jerusalem and west bank from Israel in 1950, they annex it as Jordan territory, instead of liberating it for Palestinians. They have no interest on the idea of a sovereign Palestinian state other than to expand Jordan more.

    • @Reptiloid5g
      @Reptiloid5g 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Great comment!
      The video is half truth. Half truth is much worse than pure lie

    • @Jazz...
      @Jazz... 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Unamedblue3@unifedgongfu
      I don’t have time to respond to every point but here is some “blunt truth” for you two.
      2. If You’re going to bring up Nazi connections to Arabs then you should probably look at how the Israeli terrorist group, Lehi tried to recruit Nazi’s.
      4. DNA testing shows modern Palestinians genetics correspond to the Canaanites from antiquity. According to Jewish tradition, Abraham the father of Israelites came from the land of Ur, or Eastern Iraq. Palestinians are indigenous to the land but according to Jewish tradition, the Israelites are not.
      6. Under international law, displaced peoples have a right to return. When the UN tried to get Palestinians back in their homes, Israeli terrorists (Lehi) assassinated Folke Bernadotte and his UN delegation to stop these talks.
      The leader of this terrorist organization, Yitzhak Shamir then worked for the Mossad, often using letter bombs as his weapon of choice. His group got in trouble since the bombs killed the wrong people and he resigned in protest.
      Later he created the Herut party, predecessor to the Likud. As a “Zionist Revisionist” party they believe Jews are entitled to all of Palestine and should use any means necessary to acquire all of Palestine.
      He became Israel’s 8th prime minister.
      When Shamir died he was given a state funeral. Seems Israelis celebrate terrorism when it’s on their side.
      9. That isn’t a legal claim to anything. It certainly isn’t a reason for settlers to kill farmers, poison their wells and bulldoze their homes.
      10. The wall is within Palestinian territory. This is illegal.
      11. The total Blockade of Gaza is Collective Punishment and illegal. Starving a population is an obvious major human rights abuse.
      12. Maybe in law but not in practice. Arab Israeli’s frequently get lower education, lower paying jobs and have little representation in the government. Those in the West Bank live in a dystopian nightmare of checkpoints and harassment. One example is the “Red Wolf” program. A facial recognition tool that tracks Palestinians and everyone they know. It’s a modern, digital ‘armband’. Perfect for when the Shin Bet arbitrarily detains Palestinians and often tortures them.
      14. 2018? You mean 1994, Cave of the Patriarchs massacre, where a Zionist Terrorist shot and killed 29 people included children. While many condemned this act, some venerated this terrorist as a “holy martyr”.
      16. The recent death counts are just under 40k at a minimum. The destruction of Gaza is wide spread. This is well documented and unarguable.
      Since 2000, the UN has condemned Israel 49x which is almost as many as ALL other countries combined, 50x. This includes North Korea, Iraq, Russia, etc. Israel is a pariah of international law, full stop.

    • @CedarRoofsOnly
      @CedarRoofsOnly 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lie culture, bribery, cheap, greedy,bribery,politics. Who? Aipac. Epstein, Weinstein, Madoff, Sam Bankman Fried, Opioids: Sacklers, Blackmail Universities: Ackman, Blacrock: Larry Fink (Weapons $$$) Anthony Blinken. All Jewish. Interesting...

  • @larryalvares1369
    @larryalvares1369 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +334

    24 hours later: this video has been age restricted/demonetized for violating TH-cam guidelines

    • @MrSupernova111
      @MrSupernova111 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Has it?

    • @larryalvares1369
      @larryalvares1369 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      @@MrSupernova111 not yet (hopefully, it doesn’t happen)

    • @L.internet8
      @L.internet8 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      We better hope not. It's better than most midia nonsense.

    • @RF_N
      @RF_N 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@L.internet8 which is why youtube may seek to diminish it's propagation in the first place, they propel the narrative of the mass-media whilst filtering anything that risks scrutinizing said narrative.

    • @yubin3669
      @yubin3669 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      4 hr left

  • @micahistory
    @micahistory 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +243

    everyone's talking about the argument in the comment section but I don't see one

    • @outerspace7391
      @outerspace7391 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      It's literally the same situation whenever there's a video about the balkans. Everyone's really looking to just say something

    • @chalep-is-in-youtube-yo1504
      @chalep-is-in-youtube-yo1504 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well, sometimes it's happen in the "newest comment" option really,
      But yet again, sometimes

    • @velcranoxofficials9970
      @velcranoxofficials9970 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's like trying to normalize nazi germany

    • @Joeseanag24
      @Joeseanag24 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same I hate when that happens

    • @hywasnt
      @hywasnt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I found 5

  • @crimsonsusage5617
    @crimsonsusage5617 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Wouldn't say this is biased, but it DEFINITELY leaves out some important info.... like who rejected each peace deal/cease fire and why, or any mention of thousands of unsuccessful attempts at killing civilians (intent is just as bad as actual murder). Or how the ottomans sold their land as their empire started to fall.
    But I guess it would take a few more hours to really get everything lol

    • @holczy0
      @holczy0 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Do you know a video that fully covers the topic and stays mostly unbiased? I have a lot of time on my hands

    • @sasquatchpatrol9317
      @sasquatchpatrol9317 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We need to ask who placed the poison pill in the deal

    • @sasquatchpatrol9317
      @sasquatchpatrol9317 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@holczy0check out the podcast vulgar history they do a good historical breakdown

  • @Curiousscholar-q7y
    @Curiousscholar-q7y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    The statement "in Israel, the history of the Jews is mainly inspired by biblical texts" oversimplifies and misrepresents the way history is studied and taught in Israel. Israeli historians and educators use and apply archaeological, scientific, and historical evidence to understand and teach Jewish history which has ethnic histories as well as religious (not only one versus the other - i.e. theological version of Jewish history and the academic ethnic version of Israeli history both exist). Reducing this complex history to biblical inspiration only ignores the rigorous academic research and diverse sources of evidence that provide a more accurate and detailed picture of Jewish ethnicity and history. This misrepresentation distorts what is accepted as historical scholarship in Israel.

  • @yali12346
    @yali12346 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +100

    10:45 the flag introduced in this part was yet to be invented in 1936. This is the PLO flag created in 1964. But so far that’s the only inaccurate thing Iv’e noticed. Really factual and accurate!

    • @elirantuil5003
      @elirantuil5003 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The entire framing of the video is pro Palestinian.
      The Palestinians are framed at any possible intersection as infentile and lacking agency and responsibility.

    • @JohnPean-xy2ou
      @JohnPean-xy2ou 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kingdom of Hejaz?
      Not a palestinian flag, but it was created before 64

    • @justintruedough03
      @justintruedough03 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      that was the flag of the arab revolt with the color order switched, used since the late 1910s and by the Palestine Arab Congress in the 30s. So no, it's not inaccurate

    • @EvelynVolsi
      @EvelynVolsi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly! I pointed this out too! Using this fake flag is misleading at best

    • @tmpqtyutmpqty4733
      @tmpqtyutmpqty4733 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The flag is from 1925, it predates the Israeli one by a decade.

  • @PershingOfficial
    @PershingOfficial 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +157

    A well made video and for the most part, balanced, compared to a lot of other channels.
    32:05 you failed to mention the special refugee status that is passed down. No other refugees have this privilege, inflating that number.

    • @سيلفرالسبستي
      @سيلفرالسبستي 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Israel does not allow them back, nor recognizes that there were Palestinians past or future on the land it colonized and homes it stole.

    • @albnorragibi
      @albnorragibi 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well they are still refugees. If Jews from around the world can simply demand to return in a country only because of their belief or because their ancestors from hundreds of years ago once lived in this land, then people of Palestinian descent should also be allowed to return in the land where their grandparents and great-grandparents once lived and where they were expelled from in the last 80 years.
      It should be one rule for all and not only some people benefitting because of their belief, that's literally what an Austrian painter did, classified one group as better and superior than others and look what happened.

    • @firstnamelastname6976
      @firstnamelastname6976 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It is not true. every refugee is the same.

    • @PershingOfficial
      @PershingOfficial 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@firstnamelastname6976
      I am too lazy to type it all out, but here is a what another person wrote which is pretty on point.
      “There are two UN refugee agencies: UNHCR and UNRWA. Roughly speaking, the UNHCR oversees ALL refugee resettlement globally while the UNRWA was founded specifically to handle the Palestinian refugees. Over time, they have developed slightly different missions, methods, and operating definitions. The UNHCR only considers those who flee conflict or persecution to be refugees and works to assist resettlement into new communities. The UNRWA - again, remember they only work with Palestinians - considers that refugee status to continue down through the generations until the conflict is resolved and works to aid Palestinians where they are until that point, not resettle.
      From there, reasonable people could debate which approach is better or more effective at helping people fleeing conflict or persecution. The UNRWA's approach has unnecessarily perpetuated the Palestinian-Israeli conflict by keeping alive the possibility of return to a land they no longer inhabit and have not lived on in their lifetimes or, in some cases, their parent's lifetimes. No other refugee group is allowed this fiction. The UNHCR has assisted others in building new lives elsewhere in diaspora. For this reason and a host of others, the UNRWA should be disbanded and the care and aid of the Palestinian refugees passed to the UNHCR. The Gaza residents who have been displaced by this current war are refugees, but from today's conflict not 1948. They deserve help and aid in both survival and resettlement (should they choose it).”
      Also keep in mind, some Arab countries don’t even allow Palestinians to achieve citizenship.

    • @effix9097
      @effix9097 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      @firstnamelastname6976 No, it is true. It’s why there’s two UN refugee organizations: one for >95% of refugees, and one for Palestinians.
      A Vietnamese refugee who comes to America and has kids does not give birth to refugees, she gives birth to Americans. Meanwhile, there are hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who are the children, grandchildren, even great-grandchildren of those expelled to Gaza and the West Bank during the Nakba who were born refugees and whose future children will also be born refugees.

  • @RichardChappell1
    @RichardChappell1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    A correction - the population base was closer to 500k rather than 600k when the Balfour Declaration came out, with 70k Christians and somewhere between 85k and 56k Jews (the higher number was from the beginning of WW1, and the lower number was in 1919 - the numbers dropped because the Ottomans were mass deporting Jews).

    • @minhnguyenphanhoang4193
      @minhnguyenphanhoang4193 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      And most of those migrated from other arabs countries 50 years before hand for work. They didn't live in Palestine at that time.

  • @mohamedalmoayad4985
    @mohamedalmoayad4985 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    What program/software is used to make these? I'm a history teacher and I love this format of showing geopolitical history

    • @JesusIsTheOnlyWayTruthLife
      @JesusIsTheOnlyWayTruthLife 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Are you going to revise the history this video is showing, using the same software? 🤔

    • @simonrespeto
      @simonrespeto 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@JesusIsTheOnlyWayTruthLifehe means hed love to use the program for educational use

    • @abanoubmorcos318
      @abanoubmorcos318 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      so what is the software

    • @avivtelcomms
      @avivtelcomms 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@abanoubmorcos318 maybe adobe after effects

    • @KlezHistory
      @KlezHistory 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      it's not a program, he animates using after effects and premiere

  • @Wargasm54
    @Wargasm54 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +121

    If you’re gonna pick a side, do it based on facts. I truly don’t care what side you fall on. Just form your alliance based on truth.

    • @sano2698
      @sano2698 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      STOP REFERRING TO THE ZIONIST OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE AS A CONFLICT

    • @pugfugly1989
      @pugfugly1989 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Soooo.... You're literally saying support Palestine, because Israel doesn't do "facts". Zionism is all about lies and propaganda. Oh, and raping babies.

    • @jackvanlierop6090
      @jackvanlierop6090 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Allied with the truth, I like it!

    • @drnext5007
      @drnext5007 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

      the facts point towards being pro israel, but if you are a leftist, "fact" isn't a word in your dictionary

    • @samiabe8686
      @samiabe8686 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@drnext5007 false. If you want to know where the facts lie just try to see who has the most incentive to lie, as well as who has the financial means to manipulate your politicians and media. Do you have any idea how much the APAIC lobby spends every year? Do you think it’s a coincidence that Democrats and Republicans disagree on everything except being Pro-Israel? Congratulations your opinion, masqueraded as truth, was bought and paid for.

  • @luimackjohnson302
    @luimackjohnson302 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    I thank and commend the gentleman who did a quick research of Israeli land and I share with you:
    1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state 2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state. 4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Arab-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state. 5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state. 6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state. 7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state. 8. Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state. 9. Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state. 10. Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state. 12. Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state. 13. Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state. 14. Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state. 15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state. 16. Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state. 17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 18. Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 19. Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state. 20. Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE.

    • @steveknight878
      @steveknight878 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      But there have been Arabs there for a very long time. What do you call them?

    • @luimackjohnson302
      @luimackjohnson302 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@steveknight878 The Almighty God gave the "Promised Land" to Israel so who is mankind that is molded out of clay with its fasle religions & false gods to challenge The Almighty God? He has destroyed Sodom & Gomorrah and billions of people during the Great Flood & even civilizations when their evil, corruption & wickedness reached high levels! So any mankind that wishes to challenge The Almighty God please be my guest! Greetings from Papua New Guinea!

    • @luimackjohnson302
      @luimackjohnson302 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@steveknight878 I kindly suggest you do some basic history of the Israeli land in Middle East, this may open up your knowlege and mind in these matters. Anyway, The Almighty God thousands of years ago, gave the "Promised Land" to Israel. Which mankind that is molded out of clay with its false religions & false gods that wish to challenge The Almighty God? If you or anyone including the terrorist who are as we speak & write they will be neutralized & destroyed! There is no two ways about that! As in the days of Sodom & Gomorrah & in the Days of the Great Flood so too it shall be in the Last Days! It Is Written! We all need to repent, respect, follow Instructions of The Almighty God & HE Will spare our lives! Not one person knows the hour or the Last Day, not even the Heavenly Spiritual Beings, not any human beings amongst mankind on earth knows the Last Day, not even The Almighty God's son Yeshua knows the Last Day but ONLY the Father knows the Last Day and HE will crush and destroy all evil, corruption, all goverments, kingdoms and install his Kingdom here on earth and His son which HE Has appointed will run His KIngdom here on earth Paradise.

    • @FleuretteSchwartz
      @FleuretteSchwartz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@steveknight878 Arabs!

    • @Justnothing467
      @Justnothing467 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ok just rename Palestine into Ottomon, Ummayad, Abbasids etc... anything and return the land to Arabs who belongs to this land including Arab Jews except Zionist

  • @ДеннисЧернышевский
    @ДеннисЧернышевский 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +118

    I'm sorry how we in Russia treated Jews!

    • @deathrone6662
      @deathrone6662 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Your comment is so complex when delved into before I begin, I am not saying what happened to the Jews was not terrible. Politically Russia supports Palestine the enemy of Israel due to being an enemy of USA. Both Israel and Russia are invading foreign countries and support neither.

    • @Aariz981
      @Aariz981 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

      You didn't do it yesterday, yet you yourself did nothing you don't represent you country

    • @tentwoXII
      @tentwoXII 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      as a jew i tell you as i would germans. you are not responsible for the sins of your forefathers. the only responsibility descendants of anyone bears is learning from the past and not repeating said sins.

    • @alihassan-e1l3d
      @alihassan-e1l3d 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Genocide supporter

    • @achilles7607
      @achilles7607 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      You are absolutely not to blame, however your words means a lot.

  • @DougVandegrift
    @DougVandegrift หลายเดือนก่อน

    The research that goes into these videos is stunning!

  • @retrictumrectus1010
    @retrictumrectus1010 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    My favorite history channel when it comes to war is back!
    I have yet to watch the video, but I expect no sugarcoating like the videos before.

  • @renoits06
    @renoits06 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    awesome information. People need to know the history before commenting on the conflict. context is everything.

  • @TheSvRoma
    @TheSvRoma 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +282

    Very unprofessional, skewed and biased.

    • @lindawilliamson4245
      @lindawilliamson4245 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I take it you’re a Muslim sympathiser

    • @CedarRoofsOnly
      @CedarRoofsOnly 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lie culture, bribery, cheap, greedy,bribery,politics. Who? Aipac. Epstein, Weinstein, Madoff, Sam Bankman Fried, Opioids: Sacklers, Blackmail Universities: Ackman, Blacrock: Larry Fink (Weapons $$$) Anthony Blinken. All Jewish. Interesting...

    • @Michikonðichþuhchad
      @Michikonðichþuhchad 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      How??

    • @TheSvRoma
      @TheSvRoma 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@Michikonðichþuhchad Talks about weapon supply to Israel like obsessed but does not talk about the Soviet weapon and personnel(yes soviet military staff was directly involved in fighting against israel.) to arabs. Just one example out of many. Let me know if you need more.

    • @Michikonðichþuhchad
      @Michikonðichþuhchad 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@TheSvRomaI don’t see how that is biased.

  • @MrStuay
    @MrStuay 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    So ive read comments that this video is bias towards Palestine and comments that its bias towards Israel.
    I would take that as a compliment

    • @falconeshield
      @falconeshield 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      56% of the population has been convinced by TikTok that America bad, so anything America likes or supports is bad.

    • @Brisum
      @Brisum 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      is being bias stating facts?

    • @Brisum
      @Brisum 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      jews want to be victims so badly, they spread propaganda that are treated as facts

    • @Matty9
      @Matty9 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I mean at it’s better to offend everyone then just one group 😅

    • @retrictumrectus1010
      @retrictumrectus1010 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think it depends on the amount of information someone knows. Those who are in favor of Palestine knows more information that favors the Palestinian narrative. Those who are in favor of Israel knows more information that favors the Israeli narrative. The video missed out many of the things from both sides. If the video fails to mention what they already know, it means the video is biased against their position.
      That's what I realized after watching the video. I know some pro-Palestine info and plenty of pro-Israel info that were not mentioned. I have a pro-Israel bias because I hate Islam and Marxist Communism and that's why I know more information that favors the Israeli narrative than the Palestinian narrative.

  • @namgilesile6224
    @namgilesile6224 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    This was really, truly one of the best videos I have ever seen on this subject. Fantastic work as always! The only notes I felt compelled to make were that at 19:30 there were also Jews from Morocco, Iran, etc. to a total of more than 500,000 that came to Israel. Also, the negotiations at 26:40 didn't merely "fall apart", implied to be by mutual stubbornness. Israel offered Palestinians a state in more than 95% of the West Bank, all of Gaza, and 30 billions dollars in reparations. No counter offer was made, an plans for another intifada were made and eventually acted on.

    • @namgilesile6224
      @namgilesile6224 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @bullman.09 it was? Israel was occupying it. It offered to stop.

    • @ofir_al_
      @ofir_al_ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@bullman.09you clearly don't understand how power works. If the Arabs had power there will be no Israel. So they thank you

  • @SladeL
    @SladeL หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A lot of misinformation in this video.

  • @doolerz81
    @doolerz81 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    It is quite obvious that this video is biased in favour of Palestine. And you could say that majority of this video is either wrong or omits many key facts

    • @ndadikpa
      @ndadikpa หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They omitted Caliphate Umar ibn al-Khattab who conquered jerusalem and built the AL Aqsa mosque ontop of the Temple mount. It was a significant ant moment of the entrance of the Arabs into jerusalem

    • @Eulogy466
      @Eulogy466 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Its not enough to control the whole world from behind the puppet curtain you freaks have to also act like oppressed victims. Can’t you just be happy no one is really batting an eye that youre committing practical genocide

  • @jollyroger7624
    @jollyroger7624 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Being biased in favor of the annihilation of non believers is abhorrent.

  • @tunaking1
    @tunaking1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    All I've learned is today is just another page in the book. We're just here now but who knows how long it will go.

  • @zilllaisl9076
    @zilllaisl9076 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Video:is about Israel and Palestine
    *Sighs, opens the comments section*

    • @SlothGamingYt
      @SlothGamingYt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ikr thats what i was thinking!

    • @Asmaa-wc6xj
      @Asmaa-wc6xj 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      how complicated can it be ? a genocide recognized by the UN is going on. How complicated is this for you ?

  • @stereo.romance
    @stereo.romance 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Lot of half truths here

  • @Sara-vn2kz
    @Sara-vn2kz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I'm only one person, and i can't speak for all Palestinian refugees, but I'm willing to give up my right of return if Israel will just give all Palestinians equal rights with Israelis. All of them. West Bank, Gaza strip, and everyone living in diaspora who has Palestinian citizenship. I don't care if the combined country is called Israel. I care that humans are treated as humans, and that holy places which are currently in existence do not get destroyed to build new ones. Especially for a different religion than the original structure was for. That will create more war. We need peace!

    • @ThomasPrattEsq
      @ThomasPrattEsq 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And what was the "original structure?" Even according to this video, the Jewish Temple was on that site first, destroyed by the Babylonians, then rebuilt during Roman occupation... This is the problem with all the "originalist" discussions... Most of these start with the presumption that the Dome of the Rock is what was there first, which is false.

    • @someonetooknuggets
      @someonetooknuggets 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The problem is some people on both sides wants to annihilate each other. There will always be an act of violence if both countries did ever unify. That is unless majority people from both sides sees and treat each the same person living in the same nation.

    • @Macumber773
      @Macumber773 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1. You have no right of return
      2. If palestinians want the same rights as Israelis they have to take it up with the palestinian government... and stop trying to murder Jews.
      3. 1947 was the first time in 1300 years that muslim Arabs weren't able to subjugate Jews. Allowing the palestinians - whose entire culture was invented for and is based solely on Jew hatred and destroying Israel - to become Israeli citizens would be a return to the dhimmitude of the prior 1300 years... at best. Most likely it will be 10/7 for all the Jews in Israel. Neither will ever happen again. Period.
      4. I have little doubt you're fully aware of what would happen if Israel allowed the descendants of the Arab refugees to become citizens of Israel which is why you oh, so kindly made your offer.
      5. "... holy places which are currently in existence do not get destroyed to build new ones. Especially for a different religion than the original structure was for. That will create more war. We need peace!" That's a rather incredible statement coming from a "palestinian" (muslim). Do you happen to know where Judaism's two holiest sites are? They're called the Foundation Stone and the Holy of Holies. Jews were praying there for 1600 years before the prophet mohammad was born. Go on... guess where the Foundation Stone and Holy of Holies are.

    • @Macumber773
      @Macumber773 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@someonetooknuggets No. That's not the problem. Side A has been attempting to make peace for 140 years. Side b has subjugated side A since 610CE and only wants Side A to cease to exist.

    • @turnercommunicationsgroupLLC
      @turnercommunicationsgroupLLC 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Pretty hard to make peace if one group of people's faith calls for the extermination of another:
      «لَتُقَاتِلُنَّ الْيَهُودَ فَلَتَقْتُلُنَّهُمْ، حَتَى يَقُولَ الْحَجَرُ: يَامُسْلِمُ هَذَا يَهُودِيٌّ فَتَعَال فَاقْتُلْه»
      (You will fight the Jews and will kill them, until the stone will say, `O Muslim! There is a Jew here, so come and kill him.') Muslim recorded that Abu Hurayrah said that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said,
      «لَا تَقُومُ السَّاعَةُ حَتَّى يُقَاتِلَ الْمُسْلِمُونَ الْيَهُودَ، فَيَقْتُلُهُمُ الْمُسْلِمُونَ حَتَّى يَخْتَبِىءَ الْيَهُودِيُّ مِنْ وَرَاءِ الْحَجَرِ وَالشَّجَرِ، فَيَقُولُ الْحَجَرُ وَالشَّجَرُ: يَامُسْلِمُ يَاعَبْدَاللهِ هَذَا يَهُودِيٌّ خَلْفِي فَتَعَالَ فَاقْتُلْهُ إِلَّا الْغَرْقَدَ فَإِنَّهُ مِنْ شَجَرِ الْيَهُود»
      (The Hour will not start, until after the Muslims fight the Jews and the Muslims kill them. The Jew will hide behind a stone or tree, and the tree will say, `O Muslim! O servant of Allah! This is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.' Except Al-Gharqad, for it is a tree of the Jews.)

  • @RainbowSheep2010
    @RainbowSheep2010 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is probably the most informative video i'll see on the topic. You did too good for the comment section to be bad.

  • @ChiefOren
    @ChiefOren 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    1.5 million "refugees", when you add "generational refugees" which is ONLY specific to Arab refugees from 1948. No other refugee group has this status. Not even the 1 million Jewish refugees from ALL the Arab countries. In any other conflict, this would have been settled by mutual transfer, such as Cyprus/Turkey, German/Russian, Muslim/Hindu, etc etc...

    • @handsanitiser9832
      @handsanitiser9832 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is not only dishnest, it makes no sense! Why should any other region take in a people FORCIBLY (yes, that's what happened-all other narratives have been refuted) removed, and w/ no resources awaiting them! Is this what happened w/ Pakistan? Or was there now a country AWAITING a people? The lived on that land millenia, want to stay-and return-and they should be allowed to do that! As a matter of fact, these are some of the oldest, prophetic regions on earth-why should almost a million people go where they don't want to go? Where's the humanity, human rights and justice in that? You're obviously an adult who can read: why are yu just repeating points? Where the Jews from "Arab" countries really refugees? Or were they flown out, free of charge, w/ land, homes, and jobs awaiting them? Were the ones in Iraq not bribed into leaving? They didn't want to leave-not did the ones in Morocco. You don't know about all this? They are, indeed refugees. Please go read from independent sources, accept there are grave injustices (all historians now admit to a series of massacers and expulsions to removed them from the land), and work for their return and rights!

    • @alicethegreat3742
      @alicethegreat3742 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Arafat who was their Egyptian born leader,convinced the UN crooks to grant the Gaza Arabs lifetime refugee status so they could milk the western countries taxpayers out of billions upon billions in federal foreign aid money. There is no such legal statehood or country named palatine. And there is no such ethic groups of people called Palestinians. These people are Arafat's Arabs mulsins who migrated from Jordan and Egypt and Sylvia during WW1 and WW2 to work in Jordan. The Gaza Arabs are merely squatters on Israel land.

    • @simonphoenix3789
      @simonphoenix3789 หลายเดือนก่อน

      basically a fake refugee then. There is no such thing as a generational refugee. The UN just made that up to justify their support of an entire group and to make sure the issue of refugees would never go away for Israel.

    • @vmuthukrishna
      @vmuthukrishna 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Unfortunately muslim/hindu was not settled, india should have had a population transfer with Pakistan during partition which did not happen and we are suffering now

  • @michaelturner4457
    @michaelturner4457 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    And I thought Palestine was the evil emperor in Star Wars.

    • @relo999
      @relo999 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

      Hamas is. Palastine isn't.

    • @achilles7607
      @achilles7607 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@relo999
      Palestine doesn't exist.
      But yeah... Hamas is evil.

    • @4CelciusDegree
      @4CelciusDegree 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Did we watch the same video? It's crazy how brainwashed you are

    • @RTcomments-lj8nx
      @RTcomments-lj8nx 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hamas just hides between Palestinians
      If Israel attack: it would be called genocide
      If Israel don't attack: Hamas would irritate Israel
      and Hamas is teaching young children to be the new Hamas

    • @p00bix
      @p00bix 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

      In case anyone doesn't get this reference, the main antagonist of the Star Wars Movies is "Emperor Palpatine".

  • @wonderfulworld2475
    @wonderfulworld2475 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    So basically the jewish people were there before the Palestinians but was practically the minority for the last thousand years and the palestine was originally just a roman colony which was never an independent entity for the last thousand years. Oh boy.

  • @paysonfox88
    @paysonfox88 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    29:40 -- I know what side the narrator is on based on the language he is using here. "occupied territories" instead of "militarily conquered and legitimate land of the country." He probably calls the entire USA and England "occupied territories" too. Given that the ancient Brittans were colonized by Rome, then conquested on by a ton of other peoples including the Vikings throughout the years,..... and given the USA was 10000 different native tribes fighting and conquesting each other for thousands of years... oh wait! That's every country!!!!
    Refer to land conquered by a people as "their new land that they earned in blood" if you want to remain impartial.

    • @demeburtini
      @demeburtini 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      wtf are you saying. Those areas are called occupied tarritories by the UN. The UN recognizes the 1967 border between Israel and Palestine, therefore all the land in Palestine occupied by israeli settlers has been recognized by the UN as illegal settlments, condemned many times

  • @MomentsGap
    @MomentsGap 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Notes: it creates the impression all jews were in europe but significant, ancient (more than europe) communities from morroco to iraq, and Ethiopia existed. After 1947 these communities were persecuted and/or exiled too. (Ethiopia was not as far as i know, not yet)
    It fails to mention a few pogroms/attacks initiated by arabs during the british mandate and during independence war.

  • @geometrydash-d3008
    @geometrydash-d3008 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Geo History is the best!

    • @makkroww6097
      @makkroww6097 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      no way a fellow gd player????

    • @solelak
      @solelak 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      shocker

    • @Arrowgu4
      @Arrowgu4 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      hi gd players

    • @timmy-wj2hc
      @timmy-wj2hc 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      At Western Propaganda. He skipped the International Law violations of the 👃 and their soon indictment at the ICJ, led by South Africa.

    • @ፋክዩ
      @ፋክዩ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@timmy-wj2hc I can't believe my nose committed international law violations and got indicted at the ICJ, led by South Africa.

  • @gabrielmarius984
    @gabrielmarius984 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Bruh lying by omission is still lying. It is crystal clear this is a one-side representation... forgetting to show all the palestinian attacks on jews, only showing the fewer ones of the jews and not mentioning why they took the offense. This is only one example along many others. At least be consistent. This is as biased as it could get.

  • @610Hobbies
    @610Hobbies 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    Rick was right, this is such a complicated topic.

    • @jonsnoff5369
      @jonsnoff5369 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      IM A PICKKE MORTY

    • @ghst4487
      @ghst4487 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It's not

    • @Soap010
      @Soap010 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What the fuck is complicated about not stealing land

    • @610Hobbies
      @610Hobbies 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Soap010 Well, the US took over 50% of Mexico, so it must be really complicated.

    • @Soap010
      @Soap010 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@610Hobbies the whole of us land was stolen genius It just was like a million years ago

  • @roddbrindley2991
    @roddbrindley2991 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great video. Although I would have like to see a bit more coverage of the northern Israelis who were conquered by the Assyrians a couple hundred years before the the southern Israelis were conquered and taken to Babylon. The southern were returned to Israel when the the Persians conquered the Babylonians, but the northern Israelis; the 10 "lost tribes of Israel", were scattered throughout Mesopotamia and were not returned

  • @jollyroger7624
    @jollyroger7624 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Support for terrorists, countries or organizations in any form is abhorrent. There is absolutely no place in a civilized world for people who support the annihilation of all people who do not worship as they do. This also applies to TH-cam content providers.

  • @Inter-stelar
    @Inter-stelar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    Problems with the Video:
    Misrepresentation of Herzl: Claims Herzl founded Zionism due to French antisemitism, ignoring Vienna's influence.
    Zionism's Origins: Omits Jews' historical connection to the Land of Israel.
    Omission of Arab Attacks: Ignores Arab violence against Jews in the early 20th century.
    Arab Migration: Overlooks significant Arab migration to Palestine, focusing only on Jewish immigration.
    Haganah Formation: Lacks context for the creation of Jewish self-defense groups.
    Nazi Collaboration: Omits collaboration between Palestinian leaders and Nazi Germany during WWII.
    Selective "Terrorist" Label: Labels Jewish groups as terrorists but not Arab groups.
    Partition Plan: Misrepresents the causes and escalation of the 1947-8 conflict.
    Plan Dalet: Suggests it was for ethnic cleansing without context.
    Deir Yassin: Emphasizes Jewish violence while minimizing Arab-perpetrated massacres.
    Jewish Arms Acquisition: Highlights Jewish arms deals while downplaying Arab arms deals.
    Arab Anti-Israel Sentiment: Fails to address explicit calls from Arab leaders to eliminate Israel.
    Arafat's Role: Downplays Arafat's terrorism and failure to recognize Israel.
    Conflict Causes: Attributes conflict to settlements and refugees, ignoring Arab refusal to accept Jewish sovereignty.
    Terminology: Uses detailed terms for Jewish actions, generalizes Arab actions.
    Jewish Expulsions: Ignores the expulsion and persecution of Jews from Arab countries.
    Israeli Military Actions: Frames Israeli responses as aggressive rather than defensive.
    Arab Pogroms: Downplays the brutality of Arab pogroms against Jews.
    Jewish Contributions: Fails to acknowledge Jewish development efforts during the British Mandate.
    British Immigration Policies: Ignores British restrictions on Jewish immigration.
    Arab Rejection: Omits consistent Arab rejection of a Jewish state.
    Peace Offers: Does not highlight Jewish leaders' peace offers.
    Anti-Jewish Incitement: Ignores incitement in Arab media and education.
    Jewish Expulsions in 1948: Lacks context for Jewish expulsions during the 1948 war.
    Axis Collaboration: Neglects Arab leaders' collaboration with Axis powers in WWII.
    Six-Day War: Misrepresents Israel's preemptive actions in 1967.
    Israeli Actions: Emphasizes Israeli military actions while minimizing Arab aggression.
    Arab Nationalism: Does not address its role in the conflict.
    Internal Arab Conflicts: Overlooks their impact on the broader conflict.
    Historical Continuity: Provides a fragmented narrative.
    Refugee Issues: Ignores Jewish refugees from Arab countries.
    Peace Treaties: Does not mention peace treaties showing Arab recognition of Israel.
    Arab Leadership: Ignores their role in perpetuating the conflict.
    Rocket Attacks: Does not mention persistent rocket attacks from Gaza.
    Arab Policies on Palestinians: Overlooks Arab states' treatment of Palestinians.
    Palestinian Divisions: Ignores internal political divisions among Palestinians.
    Humanitarian Efforts: Fails to mention Israeli aid to Palestinians.
    Economic Collaboration: Overlooks instances of Israeli-Palestinian cooperation.
    Jerusalem: Simplifies the complex status of Jerusalem.
    Legal Perspectives: Misrepresents international legal views on settlements and borders.
    Media Bias: Does not address the role of media bias.
    Israeli Arab Citizens: Ignores their status and perspectives.
    Security Concerns: Does not address Israel's legitimate security concerns.
    Jewish Connection: Downplays Jews' historical presence in Israel.
    Settlement Narrative: Presents settlements as the main obstacle to peace.
    Peace Process History: Misleads on the peace process, ignoring Palestinian rejections.
    Regional Alliances: Fails to explore Israel's alliances with Middle Eastern countries.
    Arab Displacement: Ignores displacement of Arabs by other Arab states.
    Military Operations: Portrays Israeli operations as aggressive without context.
    Arab Boycotts: Ignores economic boycotts against Israel.
    Peace Efforts: Does not cover numerous peace efforts by Israel.
    Atrocities: Highlights Israeli actions while neglecting Arab atrocities.
    UNRWA: Omits its role in the Palestinian refugee issue.
    Leadership Corruption: Does not address Palestinian Authority and Hamas corruption.
    Jewish State Intentions: Suggests Israel seeks to expand without evidence.
    Jewish-Arab Cooperation: Fails to mention historical periods of cooperation.
    Non-State Actors: Ignores threats from groups like Hezbollah.
    Oslo Accords: Provides a biased interpretation, ignoring Palestinian violations.
    Rejectionism Post-1967: Does not address the Arab League's "Three No's" policy.
    Palestinian Propaganda: Does not discuss the role of Palestinian media.
    Settlement Disputes: Oversimplifies legal and historical complexities.
    Jewish Expulsions: Ignores mass expulsions of Jews from Arab countries.
    Historical Timeline: Omits significant events for context.
    Balfour Declaration: Misleads on international support for a Jewish homeland.
    Islamist Extremism: Fails to mention its influence.
    International Actors: Does not cover their involvement and influence.
    Defensive Strategies: Downplays necessity behind Israeli actions.
    Gaza Blockade: Simplifies without discussing security threats.
    Demographic Changes: Ignores significant changes and their impact.
    Historical Claims: Does not address Jews' historical claims to the land.
    Camp David Summit: Fails to mention Palestinian rejection in 2000.
    Rocket Attacks Post-2005: Omits continued attacks on Israeli civilians.
    Peace Treaties with Arab States: Does not cover recent treaties under the Abraham Accords.
    Palestinian Militias: Omits their role in perpetuating violence.
    Security Barrier: Frames it as oppression without context of preventing attacks.
    Water Resource Issues: Oversimplifies the complexities.
    Positive Initiatives: Ignores grassroots peace efforts.
    International Resolutions: Focuses on certain UN resolutions while ignoring others.
    PA's Role in Incitement: Omits its role in inciting violence.
    Refugee Issue Complexity: Does not explore its nuanced aspects.
    Economic Growth in Palestinian Areas: Omits development despite conflict.
    Jerusalem's Role: Provides a biased view without full significance.
    Historical Narratives: Uses selective narratives supporting a particular viewpoint.
    Regional Politics: Does not cover broader Middle Eastern political influence.
    Humanitarian Assistance: Ignores Israeli aid efforts.
    Governance Issues: Fails to address Palestinian internal governance problems.
    Intifadas: Does not provide a balanced account of their causes and consequences.
    Jewish Presence in Arab Lands: Overlooks historical presence before expulsion.
    Arab League's Role: Does not mention its role in perpetuating the conflict.

    • @Reptiloid5g
      @Reptiloid5g 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Epic comment!

    • @marveloussoftware4914
      @marveloussoftware4914 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Now make a video.🙂

    • @Reptiloid5g
      @Reptiloid5g 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @marveloussoftware4914 there is a video of a blogger israeli tour guide

    • @marveloussoftware4914
      @marveloussoftware4914 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Reptiloid5g where?

    • @Inter-stelar
      @Inter-stelar 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@marveloussoftware4914 @Travelingisraelinfo

  • @TheAcademyofEuropeanSwor-zy9vq
    @TheAcademyofEuropeanSwor-zy9vq 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hebrew wasn't only used for biblical study. There is plenty of evidence that it was also used to communicate between Jews who lived far apart and spoke other languages as their first language, so was used for trade and similar communication.

    • @lyntonm5793
      @lyntonm5793 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @TheAcademyofEuropeanSwor-zy9vq
      My limited understanding is that, since diaspora, Hebrew language was indeed used primarily for biblical study. This respect for Evrit extends to today where some religious Jews deliberately prefer not to speak the language beyond its sacred use. What are your sources that indicate the language was used for "trade and similar communication"?

  • @SWOBIZ
    @SWOBIZ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Imagine how many lives could have been saved if Egypt and other Arab states had granted temporary asylum to Gazan women, children, and the elderly. This would have undermined Hamas' evil human shield strategy.

  • @mattitenney2914
    @mattitenney2914 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    You forgot to talk about how Arabs got the Levant

    • @tmpqtyutmpqty4733
      @tmpqtyutmpqty4733 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      They used force like Christians did, yet for some reason you don't call people to talk about the legality of Europe or America.

    • @I_hu85ghjo
      @I_hu85ghjo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      keep it at making shorts

    • @y.o.2478
      @y.o.2478 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@tmpqtyutmpqty4733 Oh the IRONY

    • @YellowSpaceMarine
      @YellowSpaceMarine 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      why is that relevant to this video? What is wrong with you?

    • @jackboxer7537
      @jackboxer7537 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@YellowSpaceMarine That Arabs nor Arabic/Islamic culture are not native to Palestine, but rather were introduced via violent conquest and colonization.

  • @lonelycubicle
    @lonelycubicle 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you for this informative, easy to understand and seemingly fair, summary.

  • @ACColorado
    @ACColorado 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The October 7 attack from Hamas was orchestrated to be so horrible and despicable as to anger Israel into a massive response, drawing the entire region into a larger war. They got the massive response, but the rest of the Arab countries are mostly sitting this one out. Iran's response is more subtle that I expected.

  • @kelly4187
    @kelly4187 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    No, Hamas claim 32,000 have been killed. Looking at how many combatants they claim killed that would be a 1:1 ratio, that is utterly unheard of. Similar situations like Fallujah suggest 1:9 which means significant amounts of these numbers are actually combatants, given that Hamas is documented as using children as young as 10 as soldiers, and regularly build infrastructure in residential areas such as next to infant schools and hospitals.

  • @HeriAramburoRodriguez
    @HeriAramburoRodriguez 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    The 11th commandment says: fight with random ppl in yt comment section with a bad arguments and do mothing to resolve the problems

    • @kennypowers17
      @kennypowers17 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re wrong

    • @PLC_Mapping
      @PLC_Mapping 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      yes this is what god taught us

    • @PLC_Mapping
      @PLC_Mapping 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@kennypowers17 he's joking

    • @KrypandeNej1
      @KrypandeNej1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Resolve the problem?
      We have no power

    • @kennypowers17
      @kennypowers17 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@PLC_Mapping lol so was I!!! I was starting a fight in the comment section 😂

  • @Osss-u2g
    @Osss-u2g 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    If Arabs accepted the initial partition in 1947 then Arabs overall would’ve gotten 101,000 km2 of lands which is 87% of all British mandate, and Jews would get just 13% of all the lands. Why? Because Jordan was also in this British mandate and all the lands of today’s Jordan were given to Arabs. By the way, all the lands that should’ve been Jews’ after 1 initiated partition by UN, were in a bad shape: deserts, swamps, malaria infested, sh1t water… But Jews made the impossible: turned the sh1t into the diamond. What Arabs did in those years? Spent billions on weapons and tunnels, killings, murderings, etc. of Jews.

    • @secrets.295
      @secrets.295 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Lol. You are so pathetic. The lands were not in a bad shape. It was very fertile and the most fertile land in Palestinia. Stop lying.

    • @Osss-u2g
      @Osss-u2g 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@secrets.295 I am not lying. Take the statistics from Britains: google malaria-infested lands in Mandatory Palestine. According to the very first partition plan in 1937 Israel would get the most malaria infested lands with deserts. Later Jews made these lands the best on Earth. Arabs made 0 progress, to compare.

  • @onlylexus
    @onlylexus 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What do you mean when you say in the middle of your film "Palestine" there was no such place or country, although the word was in use for ducumental purposes, passports etc. There was no Palestine as a country!

  • @BrandonBernal-ju6vg
    @BrandonBernal-ju6vg 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Peace for both israel and palestine 🇮🇱🇵🇸☮️

  • @MrCPShipley
    @MrCPShipley 5 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    The biggest failure of this report is CONTEXT. The author mentioned several military actions by Israel without the context that led to the action. For example multiple times Israel has preemptively attacked targets that were preparing to attack them as they have one of the most effective intelligence agencies in the world. Second there is almost a minimizing of the almost constant attacks against Israel on a daily basis which in numbers far outweigh the counter strikes by Israel. It appears the author is almost trying so hard to not offend that he is skipping over the literal thousands of attacks Israel is confronted with on an annual basis and almost one sided view the UN and the Arab world has taken against Israel. I recommend redoing this report and placing actual numbers of attacks, dates, verified numbers of those killed and CONTEXT that lead to those attacks or the actions taken. Another example of CONTEXT missing is the societal elevation of suicide bombers as heroes in Palestine and rewards paid to families and the number of those attacks. The programming of the Palestine society to hate Jews in a similar way as Nazi Germany programmed their population against Jews and lastly the societal mindset that set in causing Israel to want to wall themselves off from Palestine and how when given more ability to control their own society Hamas chose to militarize and even destroy their own infrastructure and economy to build up to attack Israel rather than build their own society. Lastly, the biggest CONTEXTUAL piece to this whole situation you left out which literally makes this report a failure is IRAN and it's influence on the entire situation. It saddens me that this report may lead yet more people to incorrectly view the Palestinian Israeli conflict and delay real help ever reaching the Palestinian people. The only way for peace to occur is for the dismantling of any political entity in Palestine that is calling for war rather than building up the Palestinian society's infrastructure, economy and culture which can only take place after the deradicalization of Palestinian society which can only take place after Iran and other countries are stopped from meddling around in Palestine which means the world has to step in and get their hands dirty and help fix this rather than just criticize Israel. You literally had a society put all of their efforts and finances into preparing to attack Israel for over a decade! Imagine if they were not a radical society and had focused those same efforts on building a jewel of a country with what lands they did have for the last ten years? CONTEXT is everything sir.

  • @avigalp1249
    @avigalp1249 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Important correction: The Palestinian flag was created at 1964. it's a mistake to show this flag on the presentation before this year.

  • @MarcTelang
    @MarcTelang 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    So you made this again? Nice

    • @noahbladen5451
      @noahbladen5451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I believe the first one was focused on Arab conflict overall.

    • @naslialtorik1411
      @naslialtorik1411 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah first one was focused after the ottoman collapse

  • @yonatancohenhope
    @yonatancohenhope 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    cherry picking is a compliment for what you have did in this video.

  • @albirrugia595
    @albirrugia595 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Honey,wake up Geo History has uploaded

  • @is.this.a-real-thing
    @is.this.a-real-thing 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great synopsis and visuals to go with it. thank you.

  • @smoothbeak
    @smoothbeak 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Learned a lot here, well done.

  • @petertja6427
    @petertja6427 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The land of Israël ha been populated by the Jewish people since 2000 BC. Here"s the timeline,in case you did't know it's their homeland,as designated by Lord Jesus Christ,and long before he was born. 1900 BC: Abraham chosen by God as the father of the Jewish nation. 1900 BC: Isaac,Abraham"s son,rules over Israël. 1850 BC: Jacob,son of Issac,rules over Israël.1400BC: Moses leads the people out of Egypt and back to Israël. 1010 BC: King David unites the 12 tribes into one nation. 970 BC: King Salomon,son of David,builds the first temple structure in Jeruzalem. 930 BC: Israël is devided into two kingdoms,the kingdom of Israël and the kingdom of Judah. 800 BC: The rise of the prophets,God's messengers. 722 BC: Kingdom of Israël is conquered by Assyrians. 605 BC: Kingdom Judah is conquered by the Babylonians. 685 BC: Salomon;s temple is destroyed by the Babylonians. 539 BC: Persians conquer the Babylonians and take control of Israël. 538BC: The Jews return to Israël from exile. 520 BC: The temple is rebuild. 450 BC: Reforms made by Ezra and Nehemiah. 433 BC: Malaxhi is the end of the prophetic age. 432 BC: The last group of Jews return from exile. 333 BC: The Greeks conquer the Persian empirer. 323 BC: The Egyptian and the Syrian empire teke over Israël. 167 BC: Hasmonean;s recapture Israël, and the Jews are ruled independently. 70 BC: Romans conquer Israël. 20 BC: King Harod builds tht "second"temple. 6 BC: Jesus Christ is born in Bethlehem. 70 AD: Romans destroy the temple after that,the people were captives to the Romans,Byzantines,Arabs,and Crusaders. Though all of these ,the Jewish people continued to live in Israël. There were more or less of them,depending on the centuries,but thrhe was never a time when the Jews didn't live in the land. They stayed,they build their communities,they raised their families,practice their faith and they suffered at the hand of many outside rulers,but they always kept their faith. It is what sustains them,even now. In 1848 the UN established the state of Israël,the nation of the jews. Don;t buy the Palestinian lies that they are intitled to the land. It is simply not true. God will also provide a way for his chosen people to lve in Israël,as he has for thousands of years. Pray for the people of Israël. IT:S CALLED ISRAËL,NOT PALESTINE, ISRAËL WANTS PEACE: 1947: The Zionist movement accepted the UN partition plan. 1957: Israeli unilaterally withdrew from Sinai pininsula. 1979: Israëli-Egyptian peace agreement signed. 1993: Oslo peace accords with the PLO. Israël agrees to withdraw from many Palestinian towns and cities in Judea and Samaria. 1994:Israël and Jordan sign peace treaty. 2000: Israël withdraw fro Lebanon. 200: Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak offered to create a Palestinian state in all of Gaza and almost 100% of Judea & Simeria'2005: Israël completed its unilateral withdraw from the Gaza strip,removing every single soldier and citizen. 2008: Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmer offered a two state solution. 2016: Prime minister Netanyahu invited Abu Mazen to dicuss peace. 2019: U.S. launching Israeli-Palestinian peace plan-immediately rejected by the palestinianAuthorety. Israël has taken a barren land and made it bloom again. It;s taken an ancient language,the hebrew of the bible,and made it speak again. It;s taken the west;s oldest faith and made it young again. It's taken a tattered,shattered natio and made it live again. Israël is the country wgose national anthem,Hatikva,means "hope". Israël is the home of hope. ( The world hates a jew who hits back. The world loves us only when we are to be pitied. GOLDA MEIR) Israël doesn't occupy the land. They own it. (genesis 15:18-21.) WE'RE DONE EXPLAINING OUR RIGHT TO EXIST!!!

  • @Bootchair
    @Bootchair 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    It’s like watching football teams with a good defense and offense and no team can score a touchdown

    • @KSATSpotting
      @KSATSpotting 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      so basically the 1st half of SBLIII

  • @Revolutionized
    @Revolutionized 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Just Simply Outstanding! This is why, TH-cam has become such a powerful learning source.

  • @Fr33zeBurn
    @Fr33zeBurn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    People who say Israel has no claim to the land - Which Muslim text talks about anyone great in Islam coming from there? The great Jewish forefathers like David, Soloman, Jesus, Elijah, Elisha, Amos, Isiah ALL WERE BORN AND LIVED THERE. What is Islam's claim other than 'We invaded and settled there when the place had already been conquested to hell and left basically empty'.

    • @terdferguson4945
      @terdferguson4945 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Ummm Jesus, Abraham, David, John the Baptist are all messengers/prophets in Islam. But religion isn’t relevant to where the Palestinians came from. DNA and archaeological evidence show that they’re native to the land and are most likely Israelites and Samaritans who converted to Christianity then later Islam.

    • @ginaturney7068
      @ginaturney7068 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just curious…what proof is there that Jesus, Abraham, David, John the Baptist were prophets in Islam? They were Jewish. Excavated proof. I’m not trying to start anything I’m really curious.

    • @ginaturney7068
      @ginaturney7068 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually Islam I think believes that Muhammad ascended to heaven from the Temple Mount and will not acknowledge that the Jews have a connection there too. Although there again there is excavation proof for the jews to be there too.

    • @Fr33zeBurn
      @Fr33zeBurn 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@terdferguson4945 Sorry what archaeological evidence points to an 'Palestinian' State or Ancient people? You can't use DNA to find if people are native to a land, conquesting armies (especially Mohammadian ones) literally r*pe and use the conquered women as sex slaves.
      If they are native to the land why do they not take care of it and raise livestock and farms there instead of relying on aid and voting for terrorist organisations?
      There is no link between Islam's Allah and The God of the Jews and Christians. It is a false religion made up by an egotistical rich boy who married a 9 year old.

    • @philipkozely3768
      @philipkozely3768 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Anyone who buys a land legally has a claim with merit . Produce a bill of sale instead producing nonsensical delusional fairy tales

  • @mecurian485
    @mecurian485 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Information that is omitted.
    Large numbers of Arabs that entered the territory were migrants who only entered after the establishment of the British mandate.
    No mention is made of how the approaching Arab armies told tue Palestinian Arabs to evacuate the area until the Jews are defeated.
    No mention is made of how Arab nations drove out their Jewish communities as punishment for the establishment of Israel.
    No mention is made of the establishment of the Palestinian people in 1964, a people who had not existed until that time.
    No mention of how Egypt refused to take back Gaza, no of the horrible conditions Palestinian Arabs suffered during Egypt's control of the region.
    The state of Palastine is established in 1988.
    Outright lies:
    After the withdrawl of Israel from Gaza, the territory recieved huge amounts of international aid.

  • @werewolflover8636
    @werewolflover8636 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I will make this really simple for everyone. Jews were on this land since ancient times, there have been multiple wars throughout history and with multiple countries claiming this land. Jewish people started to come back there, Muslims started complaining that to many Jews were coming, the UK who was in control of this land played political games and offered the land to everyone, the UN stepped in a divided the land, Jews were okay, Israel officially became a country, Muslims started a conflict, the conflict then turned into a major conflict. The Muslim nations lost, then did it again a few years later, they lost again! And so on and so forth. And with this comes the reality, when you start a war which you loose you cannot expect to keep everything and pretend like nothing happened! Jewish people fought for their freedom and won, period.

  • @Rui6zero
    @Rui6zero 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Almost! But the muslim pov still lingering 😂
    At least you tried your best to be at a neutral stance, but really, minimizing the attrition and offense from the muslim side and maximizing israels retaliation as humanitarian problem is very visible. Bombing israel in a day to day basis also a crime against humanity, not just the palestinian. The jew populace is just as human as the palestine populace🤔

  • @ohadish
    @ohadish 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    israeli here, your "israeli taught" history is NOT AT ALL taught as hustory, its taught as bible stories in bible class, we have final tests on ot and a completly seperare history class...

  • @imperify7671
    @imperify7671 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    the real solution is to just restore the kingdom of jerusalem

  • @nadebob1519
    @nadebob1519 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I think he deliberately left many important historical details, so people can eat each other in the comments section 😂

    • @GOODJMR
      @GOODJMR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      To add all detail I think would make a 5 hour series. 😂

  • @berniefynn6623
    @berniefynn6623 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Besides them, many Arab sources confirm the fact that the Holy Land was still Jewish by population and culture in spite of the Diaspora:
    ·In 985 c.e. the Arab writer Muqaddasi complained that in Jerusalem the large majority of the population were Jewish, and said that "the mosque is empty of worshippers..." .
    ·Ibn Khaldun, one of the most creditable Arab historians, in 1377 c.e. wrote:
    "Jewish sovereignty in the Land of Israel extended over 1400 years... It was the Jews who implanted the culture and customs of the permanent settlement".
    After 300 years of Arab rule in the Holy Land, Ibn Khaldun attested that Jewish culture and traditions were still dominant. By that time there was still no evidence of "Palestinian" roots or culture .
    ·The historian James Parker wrote: "During the first century after the Arab conquest [670-740 c.e.], the caliph and governors of Syria and the [Holy] Land ruled entirely over Christian and Jewish subjects. Apart from the Bedouin in the earliest days, the only Arabs west of the Jordan were the garrisons".
    Even though the Arabs ruled the Land from 640 c.e. to 1099 c.e., they never became the majority of the population. Most of the inhabitants were Christians (Assyrian and Armenian) and Jews.

  • @afek6570
    @afek6570 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    There was never a state called Palestine it was the British mandate Palestine and that name came from the Philistines not even arabs

    • @TM-100
      @TM-100 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "Palestine" is the Roman gift to the Jew haters

  • @איציקסימןטוב-ת3ז
    @איציקסימןטוב-ת3ז 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The beginning of the Jewish people didn't start in Egypt.
    It's started with Abraham moving to canaan as God told him to do. Israelites lived in the land of Israel Many years before living to leave to Egypt because there wasn't enough food in the land of Israel.

  • @cliftontorrence839
    @cliftontorrence839 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Well Done ! IMO this is a Great video Effort.

  • @lakshmankarunaratne3541
    @lakshmankarunaratne3541 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for your clear explanation. Greatly appreciate it.

  • @DasaHink
    @DasaHink หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Excuse me this is very biased. You only me Zion half of the story. What about Arab violence, Arabs purchasing weapons and starting wars? You really shouldn’t portray yourself as a serious channel for unbiased history

  • @Mer1912
    @Mer1912 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This video is lacking a lot of information. But at least y’all tried

    • @christerry1773
      @christerry1773 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Such as?

    • @C0ntrasteBr
      @C0ntrasteBr 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@christerry1773 Granada Massacre agains the Sphardic Jews in 1066 commited by Muslims.

    • @Gozenhal
      @Gozenhal 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@christerry1773the so called Israel is not a country crap

    • @christerry1773
      @christerry1773 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Gozenhal then what is?

  • @arbanni1
    @arbanni1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    As is always the case, when providing Gazan casualties, no mention is ever made as to how many were fighters.

    • @steveknight878
      @steveknight878 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think it is reasonable to assume that the children were not fighters, and most (if not all) the women were not fighters, and that not all the men were fighters.

  • @laureven
    @laureven 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Video like this one should have "Sources" included in it. I'm not a historian, but many will not agree with what You are presenting, and it would be nice to have the possibility to go throw Your sources and create their own interpretation / agree with You. Regards.

  • @satoru.nakata
    @satoru.nakata 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    anywhere there is a dominanted muslim population, there is a war. (especially in asia)
    1. israel and palestine conflict.
    2. india's kashmir and pakistan occuping illegally.
    3. pakistan occupying baluchistan illegally.
    4. afghanistan conflict.
    5. syria and iraq conflict.
    6. muslims occuping north african land illegally.

    • @CedarRoofsOnly
      @CedarRoofsOnly 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lie culture, bribery, cheap, greedy,bribery,politics. Who? Aipac. Epstein, Weinstein, Madoff, Sam Bankman Fried, Opioids: Sacklers, Blackmail Universities: Ackman, Blacrock: Larry Fink (Weapons $$$) Anthony Blinken. All Jewish. Interesting...

    • @thanostnt
      @thanostnt หลายเดือนก่อน

      Don't forget Cyprus. This will happen to the whole european continent,if people don't wake up and stop electing puppets who are getting paid from Qatar for importing massive numbers of muslim population.

  • @Kdub09swm
    @Kdub09swm 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I think five guys is the best fast food burger.
    Fight me

    • @Arrowgu4
      @Arrowgu4 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      cant fight you there

    • @hywasnt
      @hywasnt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Five guys isn't the best fast food burger

    • @Joeseanag24
      @Joeseanag24 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I will not fight you
      I've never eaten

    • @Kdub09swm
      @Kdub09swm 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @hyumiliatedbs3355 No, you're wrong

    • @hywasnt
      @hywasnt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kdub09swm five guys is not a burget, it is a restoran chain

  • @adjepson
    @adjepson 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    A few historical inaccuracies. Egypt was part of the British Empire and had full control of the Suez Canal from 1885-1954(56).

  • @kenide55
    @kenide55 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    These videos are great as summeies. But they need disclaimers that some pertinent info can often be left out and they people should still do further research to cross verify what they learn here and help them find their own conclusions. Cuz some situations and the nuances of the tensions behind them are not fully expressed here. Like I said, great summery, but people gotta take the talking points you mention, and dig deeper I to them still to find further truth and accuracy as to why things happened and how they retreated each other etc. Thanks though, keep uo the great work! 👍