I'm back! Sorry for the long delay. Due to the sensitivity of this topic, I spent more time on research. Also, the video is longer than usual, which means more editing work. I hope this video helps you to understand better this complex and controversial topic! Stay respectful in your comments, please. See you soon!
The Palestine Hotel (Arabic: فندق فلسطين), often referred to simply as The Palestine, is a 16-story hotel in Baghdad, Iraq located on Firdos Square near from Saadon, across from the Ishtar Hotel. It has long been favoured by journalists and media personnel. The hotel overlooks the Tigris on its eastern bank and is located several hundred metres south of the Baghdad Hotel. History
@@KeViN-De-Belgium Palestinians are genetically very close to Jews and other Middle East populations, including Turks (Anatolians), Lebanese, Egyptians, Armenians, and Iranians.
@@KeViN-De-BelgiumLevant is more or less used to describe multiple countries put together through language and culture, similar to how Polynesia is not a county but has countries within them.
I am Palestinian and I am sure that we are Arabs. Palestinians have multiple origins, for example, my family's origin dates back to sudi arabia, my neighbor's origin dates back to Albania, and my other neighbor's origin dates back to the Greeks. We are a diverse people, now we are Arab and we speak Arabic، This is the case with the Israeli people as well
@@Drcr200 i'm screen-shoting this comment you just disproved the palestinian claim and proved the israeli side who came to the land from all around the world, yet we sing the same songs, tell the same stories and can basically read texts from 3000 years ago. no symmetry to speak of buddy. and now, let's tell you why jerusalem is holy for muslims seems that a prophecy came about exactly when the temple mound was conquered (700 years after the ch1ldmolester's demise) making up a story about a dream he had where he flew on a donkey who's hoof touched the roof of the temple.. bruh.. islame just makes stuff uo as they go.. just like palestine.. you are no different then your arab friends all around, stop making israel a lame place like you make EVERY place.
@@MohammadMahmoud-n6h @ScythPlayz It's the Camp David Accords my friend. In 67 Israel also took the entire Sinai Peninsula which was part of Egypt. In 1978, as part of the Camp David accords, Israel agreed to give back the Sinai Peninsula and tried to make it a package deal including Gaza. Egypt refused the offer, saying Gaza was never part of Egypt.
They were not offered Gaza, and Gaza was never theirs to take in the first place. Gaza is a part of Palestine, and the Zionists just need to fucking leave and stop their genocide and illegal occupation.
@@hassanmady7763 same as how the Palestinians in Lebanon,Syria and Jordan are yet to return. People blame the Palestinian diasporas for Black September and the ignition of Lebanese civil war but forget the root cause, Al-Nakba and expulsion of the Palestinians.
And yet another point that is missing is that when Israel made peace with Jordan and Egypt, they refused to take West Bank and Gaza respectively under their control even though they used to occupy these territories before.
@@christopherkucia1071 Jordan literally annexed the entirety of the West Bank, and gave out Jordanian citizenship to all the arabs there. The occupation argument might fly for Gaza which wasn't officially made an Egyptian territory during this war but definitely not for the West Bank.
@@thesunisup_ i would say the west bank is more over given for palestinians to make their own land rather than just be part of israel this is complicated enough but to give perspective the arab nations would had suceeded if it wasn't for israelites to protest for independence and fight for their country as a nation ive seen mutliple videos before the war showing palestinians throwing rocks at israelites for entering the temple of jerusalem because according to the palestinians its their mosque which was built by the Umayyad caliphate who invaded israel and built the al aqsa mosque for their convenience
I have Jordanian and Egyptian friends who say that their respective countries can't stand Palestinians because all they do is cause problems and they align with Iran and Hamas.
Slight correction. The northern kingdom of Israel was conquered by the Assyrians. Only later did the southern kingdom of Judah get conquered by Babylonia. So they were not conquered at the same time and not by the same people. Other than that a very objective and unbiased video.
@@nah88Muslims were pretty tolerant for their time. They had heavy taxes, but they wouldn’t have outright genocides. Compared to Europe, the local Jewish population had it decent under the Muslims.
What is the kingdom of David and Solomon? I have never heard that phrase in my life. It's also biblically and historically inaccurate, as David was not even the second king of Isreal. And he wasn't even it's 10th leader
@@honderddertigkmh5950 I agree. Also, one population was ethnically cleansed from their native homeland, one simply moved from other Middle Eastern countries into the land known as Israel.
You mean the Jews that were ethnically cleansed from Gaza? Or the myriad of Muslim countries? Who are told to "return to Poland" even though they have absolutely no connection to the place? @@JM-yn8mb
ALL the PMs of modern Zionland were gifted by their parents with Ashkenazi/Sephardic names. To sound more Semitic,as colonizers, they changed their names to modern-Hebrew identities.
Also at the same time India got it's independence so the British presence in the middle east which had a lot to do with overlooking transports of goods from India was no longer relevant. There was no longer a benefit for them from controlling this land.
With this video, you may not have made a large contribution to the education of the masses in history, but you've unequivocally answered the question of whether you are an anti-Semite.
@@ShiaKorchinno not really, but it is an attempt to make out like Israeli Jews are foreigners, doesn’t explain the Palestinian name doesn’t explain where the Philistines went, or the weapons obtained by the Arab nations, or that the British gave away half of the Judean lands, and that the Jews have always been there but occupied by foreign nations, one of those being Arab (Babylonians) and the other of Islamic powers, the Arabs and the Ottomans
I would not call it anti semitism, but biased sure. Fail to mention any palestinian attack on jewish civillians, not a single 1 mentioned, not mentioning their ties to nazi Germany, not mentioning them getting weapons from the soviets, only mentioning everytime jews are buying weapons from someone. Yes biased as hell.
@@firstlast9384 agree, but one thing, babylonians were not arabs, the spoke hebrew so they were at least culturaly more related to the ancient jews/israelites/canaanites. But ethnically were different from arabs and from israelites.
Actually it's not incorrect but it's the other way around, he talks about and shows the Arab Revolt flag (or flag of Heetzaz). At that time, it did not represent Palestinians but Arab nationalism and pan-arabism. It was later adapted by the PLO.
True, but the only official flag for the region at the time was the Union Jack, he needs a flag to represent the Palestinian Arabs, what else should he use?
@mechamongrel-ir2qt Is it - surely it's no more biased than Geo History. In fact he accepts the Jewish acts, but also clearly states the Arab acts also. Thats not right-wing - goodness Hamas, Palestine is right wing also on that definition.
@@L.internet8 which is why youtube may seek to diminish it's propagation in the first place, they propel the narrative of the mass-media whilst filtering anything that risks scrutinizing said narrative.
@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 first of all, being Hitler’s ally is not trivial. And the second, when you say “Palestine” do you mean “Palestinian arabs”? Because for 1936 saying “Palestine wanted this or that” is pretty vague.
Soooo.... You're literally saying support Palestine, because Israel doesn't do "facts". Zionism is all about lies and propaganda. Oh, and raping babies.
@@drnext5007 false. If you want to know where the facts lie just try to see who has the most incentive to lie, as well as who has the financial means to manipulate your politicians and media. Do you have any idea how much the APAIC lobby spends every year? Do you think it’s a coincidence that Democrats and Republicans disagree on everything except being Pro-Israel? Congratulations your opinion, masqueraded as truth, was bought and paid for.
I know it's a short video so not everything is here, but you forgot to mention that there were jews in Israel the whole time, not all left. Not sure if I missed it when you said they were taken and allowed to return or left during the other times. Also, the arabs didn't arrive in the region (to settle) until the 7th century with the Islamic Conquest. And the only reason why the temple mount is holy to the muslims is because it's in the torah/bible as a holy site. They don't have any connection to it. Originally Mohammad was actually scolded for praying towards Jerusalem instead of towards Mecca. Mecca and the space rock are their holy site. One of the reason they don't have a problem bombing Jerusalem on holidays. Aside from that, I think it was pretty accurate, 98% lol =D
It seems it was much less then that, watch the response video "geo history is 55% wrong" by travelingisrael. Yes, it's made by an Israeli so it's biased but historical facts are just that. Also he pointed out much lying by omission.
Great points, pro-Pali/Hamas people always leave out facts that do not suit them b/c it is deeply uncomfortable for them, it is their ideology, it has nothing to do with facts and truth.
Google Benjamin of Tiberius , he took back Israel in the 7th century for a few months from the Byzantines with 20,000 Jewish soldiers and help from the Sassanids. It was in Jewish hands for a few months. But yes this shows that at the 7th centuries Jews are still very prominent in Palestine.
One more important missing fact is, that to as far as I know, the Jews in Jerusalem have been the largest part of the population throughout history, despite all the expulsions and oppressions
Wouldn't say this is biased, but it DEFINITELY leaves out some important info.... like who rejected each peace deal/cease fire and why, or any mention of thousands of unsuccessful attempts at killing civilians (intent is just as bad as actual murder). Or how the ottomans sold their land as their empire started to fall. But I guess it would take a few more hours to really get everything lol
I hate when Americans say how many times did the Palestinians reject a ceasefire peace treaty. how many times did the Native Indians accept a deal from the Europeans and then they broke the treaty .stop trying to find righteousness & evil Europe. Even the Apostle Paul went to spread the good news to the heathens do you know emperor Nero was . The world is waking up to all you colonizers❤
Why are Palestinians the only group in history that passes down refugee status over multiple generations... you dont see any polish refugees still kicking around from WW2, they moved elsewhere and moved on. However, Palestinians in Gaza are refugees because their great grandparents lived in now Israel 80 years ago... it doesn't make any sense. Other notable things, you refer to the area as Palestine well before there was ever a group of people who called themselves palestinians. It also feels a tad unfair to call out certain israeli extremist actions in detail, while glossing over the countless Palestinan attacks during the Intifada's in a breif sentence.
The area was called Palestina since Roman times, but the Palestinians were considered to be the jews. Only in the 1960 the arabs started calling themselves Palestinians. But i think it's fine to call the region this, as long as it's clear that you refer to the region, and not to the imagined Palestinian state.
the video is unfair in the way it only mentions so called Israeli extremist actions = Dir Yasin was in response of an Arab attack on a Jewish convoy of doctors and nurses that killed many , likewise the murder of those Arabs in Hebron was in response to the murder of a Jewish baby girl .
@@tmpqtyutmpqty4733 someone of Kurdish heritage born in Norway is Norwegian… a child born to Syrian refugees in Canada is Canadian. Palestinians were displaced 70 years ago and they’re still refugees. That’s unprecedented. If they just accepted the existence of Israel they would’ve had a Palestinian state in 1948 but they wanted it all, from the river to the sea as they say.
This was really, truly one of the best videos I have ever seen on this subject. Fantastic work as always! The only notes I felt compelled to make were that at 19:30 there were also Jews from Morocco, Iran, etc. to a total of more than 500,000 that came to Israel. Also, the negotiations at 26:40 didn't merely "fall apart", implied to be by mutual stubbornness. Israel offered Palestinians a state in more than 95% of the West Bank, all of Gaza, and 30 billions dollars in reparations. No counter offer was made, an plans for another intifada were made and eventually acted on.
Hebrew wasn't only used for biblical study. There is plenty of evidence that it was also used to communicate between Jews who lived far apart and spoke other languages as their first language, so was used for trade and similar communication.
@TheAcademyofEuropeanSwor-zy9vq My limited understanding is that, since diaspora, Hebrew language was indeed used primarily for biblical study. This respect for Evrit extends to today where some religious Jews deliberately prefer not to speak the language beyond its sacred use. What are your sources that indicate the language was used for "trade and similar communication"?
@@lyntonm5793 Multiple letters between Jews living in distant countries. Hebrew was a lingua franca for Jews for millennia, while they spoke local languages. Today, only very few Haredi Jews speak Yiddish and use Hebrew for sacral purposes. Practically speaking, , although they mostly use and try to preserve Yiddish, they all know and function in Hebrew as well. This is a minority attitude which is not prevalent.
Your comment is so complex when delved into before I begin, I am not saying what happened to the Jews was not terrible. Politically Russia supports Palestine the enemy of Israel due to being an enemy of USA. Both Israel and Russia are invading foreign countries and support neither.
as a jew i tell you as i would germans. you are not responsible for the sins of your forefathers. the only responsibility descendants of anyone bears is learning from the past and not repeating said sins.
The statement "in Israel, the history of the Jews is mainly inspired by biblical texts" oversimplifies and misrepresents the way history is studied and taught in Israel. Israeli historians and educators use and apply archaeological, scientific, and historical evidence to understand and teach Jewish history which has ethnic histories as well as religious (not only one versus the other - i.e. theological version of Jewish history and the academic ethnic version of Israeli history both exist). Reducing this complex history to biblical inspiration only ignores the rigorous academic research and diverse sources of evidence that provide a more accurate and detailed picture of Jewish ethnicity and history. This misrepresentation distorts what is accepted as historical scholarship in Israel.
1.5 million "refugees", when you add "generational refugees" which is ONLY specific to Arab refugees from 1948. No other refugee group has this status. Not even the 1 million Jewish refugees from ALL the Arab countries. In any other conflict, this would have been settled by mutual transfer, such as Cyprus/Turkey, German/Russian, Muslim/Hindu, etc etc...
This is not only dishnest, it makes no sense! Why should any other region take in a people FORCIBLY (yes, that's what happened-all other narratives have been refuted) removed, and w/ no resources awaiting them! Is this what happened w/ Pakistan? Or was there now a country AWAITING a people? The lived on that land millenia, want to stay-and return-and they should be allowed to do that! As a matter of fact, these are some of the oldest, prophetic regions on earth-why should almost a million people go where they don't want to go? Where's the humanity, human rights and justice in that? You're obviously an adult who can read: why are yu just repeating points? Where the Jews from "Arab" countries really refugees? Or were they flown out, free of charge, w/ land, homes, and jobs awaiting them? Were the ones in Iraq not bribed into leaving? They didn't want to leave-not did the ones in Morocco. You don't know about all this? They are, indeed refugees. Please go read from independent sources, accept there are grave injustices (all historians now admit to a series of massacers and expulsions to removed them from the land), and work for their return and rights!
Arafat who was their Egyptian born leader,convinced the UN crooks to grant the Gaza Arabs lifetime refugee status so they could milk the western countries taxpayers out of billions upon billions in federal foreign aid money. There is no such legal statehood or country named palatine. And there is no such ethic groups of people called Palestinians. These people are Arafat's Arabs mulsins who migrated from Jordan and Egypt and Sylvia during WW1 and WW2 to work in Jordan. The Gaza Arabs are merely squatters on Israel land.
basically a fake refugee then. There is no such thing as a generational refugee. The UN just made that up to justify their support of an entire group and to make sure the issue of refugees would never go away for Israel.
Unfortunately muslim/hindu was not settled, india should have had a population transfer with Pakistan during partition which did not happen and we are suffering now
We can thank the UN and specific UNRWA for perpetuating the victimhood mentality among the Palestinian Arabs, teaching them to hate Jews and Israel and expect that no matter how many times they attack and lose, one day they will succeed in wiping Israel off the map. No other refugees are treated that way, and that's why no other conflict has festered for decades without any resolution.
Zouir Mohsen the first "palestinian" leader - "The Palestinian people does not exist … there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese . Between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese there are no differences. ..."
I'm only one person, and i can't speak for all Palestinian refugees, but I'm willing to give up my right of return if Israel will just give all Palestinians equal rights with Israelis. All of them. West Bank, Gaza strip, and everyone living in diaspora who has Palestinian citizenship. I don't care if the combined country is called Israel. I care that humans are treated as humans, and that holy places which are currently in existence do not get destroyed to build new ones. Especially for a different religion than the original structure was for. That will create more war. We need peace!
And what was the "original structure?" Even according to this video, the Jewish Temple was on that site first, destroyed by the Babylonians, then rebuilt during Roman occupation... This is the problem with all the "originalist" discussions... Most of these start with the presumption that the Dome of the Rock is what was there first, which is false.
The problem is some people on both sides wants to annihilate each other. There will always be an act of violence if both countries did ever unify. That is unless majority people from both sides sees and treat each the same person living in the same nation.
1. You have no right of return 2. If palestinians want the same rights as Israelis they have to take it up with the palestinian government... and stop trying to murder Jews. 3. 1947 was the first time in 1300 years that muslim Arabs weren't able to subjugate Jews. Allowing the palestinians - whose entire culture was invented for and is based solely on Jew hatred and destroying Israel - to become Israeli citizens would be a return to the dhimmitude of the prior 1300 years... at best. Most likely it will be 10/7 for all the Jews in Israel. Neither will ever happen again. Period. 4. I have little doubt you're fully aware of what would happen if Israel allowed the descendants of the Arab refugees to become citizens of Israel which is why you oh, so kindly made your offer. 5. "... holy places which are currently in existence do not get destroyed to build new ones. Especially for a different religion than the original structure was for. That will create more war. We need peace!" That's a rather incredible statement coming from a "palestinian" (muslim). Do you happen to know where Judaism's two holiest sites are? They're called the Foundation Stone and the Holy of Holies. Jews were praying there for 1600 years before the prophet mohammad was born. Go on... guess where the Foundation Stone and Holy of Holies are.
@@someonetooknuggets No. That's not the problem. Side A has been attempting to make peace for 140 years. Side b has subjugated side A since 610CE and only wants Side A to cease to exist.
Pretty hard to make peace if one group of people's faith calls for the extermination of another: «لَتُقَاتِلُنَّ الْيَهُودَ فَلَتَقْتُلُنَّهُمْ، حَتَى يَقُولَ الْحَجَرُ: يَامُسْلِمُ هَذَا يَهُودِيٌّ فَتَعَال فَاقْتُلْه» (You will fight the Jews and will kill them, until the stone will say, `O Muslim! There is a Jew here, so come and kill him.') Muslim recorded that Abu Hurayrah said that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, «لَا تَقُومُ السَّاعَةُ حَتَّى يُقَاتِلَ الْمُسْلِمُونَ الْيَهُودَ، فَيَقْتُلُهُمُ الْمُسْلِمُونَ حَتَّى يَخْتَبِىءَ الْيَهُودِيُّ مِنْ وَرَاءِ الْحَجَرِ وَالشَّجَرِ، فَيَقُولُ الْحَجَرُ وَالشَّجَرُ: يَامُسْلِمُ يَاعَبْدَاللهِ هَذَا يَهُودِيٌّ خَلْفِي فَتَعَالَ فَاقْتُلْهُ إِلَّا الْغَرْقَدَ فَإِنَّهُ مِنْ شَجَرِ الْيَهُود» (The Hour will not start, until after the Muslims fight the Jews and the Muslims kill them. The Jew will hide behind a stone or tree, and the tree will say, `O Muslim! O servant of Allah! This is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.' Except Al-Gharqad, for it is a tree of the Jews.)
10:45 the flag introduced in this part was yet to be invented in 1936. This is the PLO flag created in 1964. But so far that’s the only inaccurate thing Iv’e noticed. Really factual and accurate!
The entire framing of the video is pro Palestinian. The Palestinians are framed at any possible intersection as infentile and lacking agency and responsibility.
that was the flag of the arab revolt with the color order switched, used since the late 1910s and by the Palestine Arab Congress in the 30s. So no, it's not inaccurate
A well made video and for the most part, balanced, compared to a lot of other channels. 32:05 you failed to mention the special refugee status that is passed down. No other refugees have this privilege, inflating that number.
Well they are still refugees. If Jews from around the world can simply demand to return in a country only because of their belief or because their ancestors from hundreds of years ago once lived in this land, then people of Palestinian descent should also be allowed to return in the land where their grandparents and great-grandparents once lived and where they were expelled from in the last 80 years. It should be one rule for all and not only some people benefitting because of their belief, that's literally what an Austrian painter did, classified one group as better and superior than others and look what happened.
@@firstnamelastname6976 I am too lazy to type it all out, but here is a what another person wrote which is pretty on point. “There are two UN refugee agencies: UNHCR and UNRWA. Roughly speaking, the UNHCR oversees ALL refugee resettlement globally while the UNRWA was founded specifically to handle the Palestinian refugees. Over time, they have developed slightly different missions, methods, and operating definitions. The UNHCR only considers those who flee conflict or persecution to be refugees and works to assist resettlement into new communities. The UNRWA - again, remember they only work with Palestinians - considers that refugee status to continue down through the generations until the conflict is resolved and works to aid Palestinians where they are until that point, not resettle. From there, reasonable people could debate which approach is better or more effective at helping people fleeing conflict or persecution. The UNRWA's approach has unnecessarily perpetuated the Palestinian-Israeli conflict by keeping alive the possibility of return to a land they no longer inhabit and have not lived on in their lifetimes or, in some cases, their parent's lifetimes. No other refugee group is allowed this fiction. The UNHCR has assisted others in building new lives elsewhere in diaspora. For this reason and a host of others, the UNRWA should be disbanded and the care and aid of the Palestinian refugees passed to the UNHCR. The Gaza residents who have been displaced by this current war are refugees, but from today's conflict not 1948. They deserve help and aid in both survival and resettlement (should they choose it).” Also keep in mind, some Arab countries don’t even allow Palestinians to achieve citizenship.
@firstnamelastname6976 No, it is true. It’s why there’s two UN refugee organizations: one for >95% of refugees, and one for Palestinians. A Vietnamese refugee who comes to America and has kids does not give birth to refugees, she gives birth to Americans. Meanwhile, there are hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who are the children, grandchildren, even great-grandchildren of those expelled to Gaza and the West Bank during the Nakba who were born refugees and whose future children will also be born refugees.
Information that is omitted. Large numbers of Arabs that entered the territory were migrants who only entered after the establishment of the British mandate. No mention is made of how the approaching Arab armies told tue Palestinian Arabs to evacuate the area until the Jews are defeated. No mention is made of how Arab nations drove out their Jewish communities as punishment for the establishment of Israel. No mention is made of the establishment of the Palestinian people in 1964, a people who had not existed until that time. No mention of how Egypt refused to take back Gaza, no of the horrible conditions Palestinian Arabs suffered during Egypt's control of the region. The state of Palastine is established in 1988. Outright lies: After the withdrawl of Israel from Gaza, the territory recieved huge amounts of international aid.
@@Michikonðéchiuhchad Talks about weapon supply to Israel like obsessed but does not talk about the Soviet weapon and personnel(yes soviet military staff was directly involved in fighting against israel.) to arabs. Just one example out of many. Let me know if you need more.
anywhere there is a dominanted muslim population, there is a war. (especially in asia) 1. israel and palestine conflict. 2. india's kashmir and pakistan occuping illegally. 3. pakistan occupying baluchistan illegally. 4. afghanistan conflict. 5. syria and iraq conflict. 6. muslims occuping north african land illegally.
Don't forget Cyprus. This will happen to the whole european continent,if people don't wake up and stop electing puppets who are getting paid from Qatar for importing massive numbers of muslim population.
Notes: it creates the impression all jews were in europe but significant, ancient (more than europe) communities from morroco to iraq, and Ethiopia existed. After 1947 these communities were persecuted and/or exiled too. (Ethiopia was not as far as i know, not yet) It fails to mention a few pogroms/attacks initiated by arabs during the british mandate and during independence war.
A correction - the population base was closer to 500k rather than 600k when the Balfour Declaration came out, with 70k Christians and somewhere between 85k and 56k Jews (the higher number was from the beginning of WW1, and the lower number was in 1919 - the numbers dropped because the Ottomans were mass deporting Jews).
israeli here, your "israeli taught" history is NOT AT ALL taught as hustory, its taught as bible stories in bible class, we have final tests on ot and a completly seperare history class...
Hamas just hides between Palestinians If Israel attack: it would be called genocide If Israel don't attack: Hamas would irritate Israel and Hamas is teaching young children to be the new Hamas
Problems with the Video: Misrepresentation of Herzl: Claims Herzl founded Zionism due to French antisemitism, ignoring Vienna's influence. Zionism's Origins: Omits Jews' historical connection to the Land of Israel. Omission of Arab Attacks: Ignores Arab violence against Jews in the early 20th century. Arab Migration: Overlooks significant Arab migration to Palestine, focusing only on Jewish immigration. Haganah Formation: Lacks context for the creation of Jewish self-defense groups. Nazi Collaboration: Omits collaboration between Palestinian leaders and Nazi Germany during WWII. Selective "Terrorist" Label: Labels Jewish groups as terrorists but not Arab groups. Partition Plan: Misrepresents the causes and escalation of the 1947-8 conflict. Plan Dalet: Suggests it was for ethnic cleansing without context. Deir Yassin: Emphasizes Jewish violence while minimizing Arab-perpetrated massacres. Jewish Arms Acquisition: Highlights Jewish arms deals while downplaying Arab arms deals. Arab Anti-Israel Sentiment: Fails to address explicit calls from Arab leaders to eliminate Israel. Arafat's Role: Downplays Arafat's terrorism and failure to recognize Israel. Conflict Causes: Attributes conflict to settlements and refugees, ignoring Arab refusal to accept Jewish sovereignty. Terminology: Uses detailed terms for Jewish actions, generalizes Arab actions. Jewish Expulsions: Ignores the expulsion and persecution of Jews from Arab countries. Israeli Military Actions: Frames Israeli responses as aggressive rather than defensive. Arab Pogroms: Downplays the brutality of Arab pogroms against Jews. Jewish Contributions: Fails to acknowledge Jewish development efforts during the British Mandate. British Immigration Policies: Ignores British restrictions on Jewish immigration. Arab Rejection: Omits consistent Arab rejection of a Jewish state. Peace Offers: Does not highlight Jewish leaders' peace offers. Anti-Jewish Incitement: Ignores incitement in Arab media and education. Jewish Expulsions in 1948: Lacks context for Jewish expulsions during the 1948 war. Axis Collaboration: Neglects Arab leaders' collaboration with Axis powers in WWII. Six-Day War: Misrepresents Israel's preemptive actions in 1967. Israeli Actions: Emphasizes Israeli military actions while minimizing Arab aggression. Arab Nationalism: Does not address its role in the conflict. Internal Arab Conflicts: Overlooks their impact on the broader conflict. Historical Continuity: Provides a fragmented narrative. Refugee Issues: Ignores Jewish refugees from Arab countries. Peace Treaties: Does not mention peace treaties showing Arab recognition of Israel. Arab Leadership: Ignores their role in perpetuating the conflict. Rocket Attacks: Does not mention persistent rocket attacks from Gaza. Arab Policies on Palestinians: Overlooks Arab states' treatment of Palestinians. Palestinian Divisions: Ignores internal political divisions among Palestinians. Humanitarian Efforts: Fails to mention Israeli aid to Palestinians. Economic Collaboration: Overlooks instances of Israeli-Palestinian cooperation. Jerusalem: Simplifies the complex status of Jerusalem. Legal Perspectives: Misrepresents international legal views on settlements and borders. Media Bias: Does not address the role of media bias. Israeli Arab Citizens: Ignores their status and perspectives. Security Concerns: Does not address Israel's legitimate security concerns. Jewish Connection: Downplays Jews' historical presence in Israel. Settlement Narrative: Presents settlements as the main obstacle to peace. Peace Process History: Misleads on the peace process, ignoring Palestinian rejections. Regional Alliances: Fails to explore Israel's alliances with Middle Eastern countries. Arab Displacement: Ignores displacement of Arabs by other Arab states. Military Operations: Portrays Israeli operations as aggressive without context. Arab Boycotts: Ignores economic boycotts against Israel. Peace Efforts: Does not cover numerous peace efforts by Israel. Atrocities: Highlights Israeli actions while neglecting Arab atrocities. UNRWA: Omits its role in the Palestinian refugee issue. Leadership Corruption: Does not address Palestinian Authority and Hamas corruption. Jewish State Intentions: Suggests Israel seeks to expand without evidence. Jewish-Arab Cooperation: Fails to mention historical periods of cooperation. Non-State Actors: Ignores threats from groups like Hezbollah. Oslo Accords: Provides a biased interpretation, ignoring Palestinian violations. Rejectionism Post-1967: Does not address the Arab League's "Three No's" policy. Palestinian Propaganda: Does not discuss the role of Palestinian media. Settlement Disputes: Oversimplifies legal and historical complexities. Jewish Expulsions: Ignores mass expulsions of Jews from Arab countries. Historical Timeline: Omits significant events for context. Balfour Declaration: Misleads on international support for a Jewish homeland. Islamist Extremism: Fails to mention its influence. International Actors: Does not cover their involvement and influence. Defensive Strategies: Downplays necessity behind Israeli actions. Gaza Blockade: Simplifies without discussing security threats. Demographic Changes: Ignores significant changes and their impact. Historical Claims: Does not address Jews' historical claims to the land. Camp David Summit: Fails to mention Palestinian rejection in 2000. Rocket Attacks Post-2005: Omits continued attacks on Israeli civilians. Peace Treaties with Arab States: Does not cover recent treaties under the Abraham Accords. Palestinian Militias: Omits their role in perpetuating violence. Security Barrier: Frames it as oppression without context of preventing attacks. Water Resource Issues: Oversimplifies the complexities. Positive Initiatives: Ignores grassroots peace efforts. International Resolutions: Focuses on certain UN resolutions while ignoring others. PA's Role in Incitement: Omits its role in inciting violence. Refugee Issue Complexity: Does not explore its nuanced aspects. Economic Growth in Palestinian Areas: Omits development despite conflict. Jerusalem's Role: Provides a biased view without full significance. Historical Narratives: Uses selective narratives supporting a particular viewpoint. Regional Politics: Does not cover broader Middle Eastern political influence. Humanitarian Assistance: Ignores Israeli aid efforts. Governance Issues: Fails to address Palestinian internal governance problems. Intifadas: Does not provide a balanced account of their causes and consequences. Jewish Presence in Arab Lands: Overlooks historical presence before expulsion. Arab League's Role: Does not mention its role in perpetuating the conflict.
So basically the jewish people were there before the Palestinians but was practically the minority for the last thousand years and the palestine was originally just a roman colony which was never an independent entity for the last thousand years. Oh boy.
modern Palestinians are indigenous to Palestine and they are descendants of all peoples lived in that land and modern israels are not descendants of ancient israelites and even if they were it doesn't gave them right to occupy Palestine now
@@ahmed-F546 What gave the Arabs the right to colonize ancient Israel? Modern "Palestinians" somehow speak Arabic and not a Hittite, Phenician or Cannanite dialect.
Modern day Palestinians are the direct descendants of the Canaanites who were there before the Jewish people. Even before the Roman colonies, the land was still called Palestine, or in Ancient Egyptian: "Peleset". Just about every single country founded here was a colony that never lasted very long. Hell, even ancient Israel only lasted about 400 years. The Egyptians created their vassal state, then the Assyrians, then the Babylonians, then the Egyptians again, then the Babylonians again, then the Achaemenids, then the Jews again with Hasmonean Empire, then the Romans.
People who say Israel has no claim to the land - Which Muslim text talks about anyone great in Islam coming from there? The great Jewish forefathers like David, Soloman, Jesus, Elijah, Elisha, Amos, Isiah ALL WERE BORN AND LIVED THERE. What is Islam's claim other than 'We invaded and settled there when the place had already been conquested to hell and left basically empty'.
Ummm Jesus, Abraham, David, John the Baptist are all messengers/prophets in Islam. But religion isn’t relevant to where the Palestinians came from. DNA and archaeological evidence show that they’re native to the land and are most likely Israelites and Samaritans who converted to Christianity then later Islam.
Just curious…what proof is there that Jesus, Abraham, David, John the Baptist were prophets in Islam? They were Jewish. Excavated proof. I’m not trying to start anything I’m really curious.
Actually Islam I think believes that Muhammad ascended to heaven from the Temple Mount and will not acknowledge that the Jews have a connection there too. Although there again there is excavation proof for the jews to be there too.
@@terdferguson4945 Sorry what archaeological evidence points to an 'Palestinian' State or Ancient people? You can't use DNA to find if people are native to a land, conquesting armies (especially Mohammadian ones) literally r*pe and use the conquered women as sex slaves. If they are native to the land why do they not take care of it and raise livestock and farms there instead of relying on aid and voting for terrorist organisations? There is no link between Islam's Allah and The God of the Jews and Christians. It is a false religion made up by an egotistical rich boy who married a 9 year old.
Imagine how many lives could have been saved if Egypt and other Arab states had granted temporary asylum to Gazan women, children, and the elderly. This would have undermined Hamas' evil human shield strategy.
How can you claim to recount the history of the Israel and Arab/Palestine conflict. Without discussing the massive number of Pograms against the Jews in Palestine before the first Israel-Arab war? You went out of your way to mention the actions/reactions of the Jews without their proper context. Also, you pointed out that the first Arab-Israeli was kicked off by surrounding Arab states invading Palestine. Yet, seemed to question the arms secument by Israel beforehand? Maybe they knew the plans of the Arab's to invade? Seems as if they knew the only way to survive was to have the weapons to defend themselves. Also, and most importantly. You claimed the ceasefire was overtly in favor of the Jews. Without really discussing why. I mean, if it was your country that was invaded by all of your surrounding neighbors and you defeated all the invaders. It's pretty obvious the cease fire would favor those who were invaded and provoked, not the provoakators.
Someone please tell me if this means that current Palestinians who broke no moral nor legal code, should be violently displaced and dispossessed or live under a violent apartheid. Also, what would this mean for people all over the world who were not “first”?
Most of the "palestinians" fled their homes because the arab countries told them to do so, they promised they'll be back soon after Israel is conquered. This fact drastically changes the viewing point of "expelled" or "displaced". there were displacements, like in any war and conquests... but in this case most of the displacement happened on their own fault.
thats a lie most of the arab villages were attacked by Israeli terrorist to ethnicly cleanse the area to create a country with a jewish majority , go read to benny morris about 1948
The biggest failure of this report is CONTEXT. The author mentioned several military actions by Israel without the context that led to the action. For example multiple times Israel has preemptively attacked targets that were preparing to attack them as they have one of the most effective intelligence agencies in the world. Second there is almost a minimizing of the almost constant attacks against Israel on a daily basis which in numbers far outweigh the counter strikes by Israel. It appears the author is almost trying so hard to not offend that he is skipping over the literal thousands of attacks Israel is confronted with on an annual basis and almost one sided view the UN and the Arab world has taken against Israel. I recommend redoing this report and placing actual numbers of attacks, dates, verified numbers of those killed and CONTEXT that lead to those attacks or the actions taken. Another example of CONTEXT missing is the societal elevation of suicide bombers as heroes in Palestine and rewards paid to families and the number of those attacks. The programming of the Palestine society to hate Jews in a similar way as Nazi Germany programmed their population against Jews and lastly the societal mindset that set in causing Israel to want to wall themselves off from Palestine and how when given more ability to control their own society Hamas chose to militarize and even destroy their own infrastructure and economy to build up to attack Israel rather than build their own society. Lastly, the biggest CONTEXTUAL piece to this whole situation you left out which literally makes this report a failure is IRAN and it's influence on the entire situation. It saddens me that this report may lead yet more people to incorrectly view the Palestinian Israeli conflict and delay real help ever reaching the Palestinian people. The only way for peace to occur is for the dismantling of any political entity in Palestine that is calling for war rather than building up the Palestinian society's infrastructure, economy and culture which can only take place after the deradicalization of Palestinian society which can only take place after Iran and other countries are stopped from meddling around in Palestine which means the world has to step in and get their hands dirty and help fix this rather than just criticize Israel. You literally had a society put all of their efforts and finances into preparing to attack Israel for over a decade! Imagine if they were not a radical society and had focused those same efforts on building a jewel of a country with what lands they did have for the last ten years? CONTEXT is everything sir.
Modern day "palestinians" are Ghassinid arabs from Jordan and Egyptians. Also note that Jews have always maintained a presence in the Land of Israel/Palestine
If you actually look at the genetics, Palestinians are much closer to the Canaanites and Phoenicians than any "Israeli" Jew. Palestinians share 60-70% of their DNA with Canaan people and 70-85% with Phoenicans. Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews share less the half of that on average. So your claim is absolutely false.
@@That-gu8dj You know nothing of genetics. Firstly Phenocians are descendants of Canaanites, so are Amalakites, Jewish and Samaritan Israelites, Moabites, Edomites, Amorites and Ammonites. Palestinians are descendants of Edomites and Moabites whos territory was in Jordan their culture and identity has nothing to do with Palestine or Israel. They then became Ghassinids as they were Arabized and with the Byzantines invaded the Israelites territory and killed hundreds of thousands of Jews and Samaritan Israelites and replaced them. Read about the Samaritan and Jewish revolt of the Byzantine in Palestina Prima empire before commenting.
That's ret*rded, no group in that region is pure blooded. Paelstinians are a mixture of the many people that inhabited that region over thousands of years.
This is so biased lol. This paints Israel as terribly as possible while trying to feigh impartiality. Leaves out all the Palestinian wrongdoings, exaggerates Israel's actions or outright uses Arab accusations and treats them as factual. I didn't realize this channel was so pro palestinian.
It is quite obvious that this video is biased in favour of Palestine. And you could say that majority of this video is either wrong or omits many key facts
They omitted Caliphate Umar ibn al-Khattab who conquered jerusalem and built the AL Aqsa mosque ontop of the Temple mount. It was a significant ant moment of the entrance of the Arabs into jerusalem
Its not enough to control the whole world from behind the puppet curtain you freaks have to also act like oppressed victims. Can’t you just be happy no one is really batting an eye that youre committing practical genocide
No mention that during the 1948 war Ben Gurion pleaded with Arabs to stay put in their homes and fight for the young Nation. No mention that Arabs we're told by Arab states to flee their homes so that the Jews could be pushed into the sea. Those who left would become the "Palestinian" refugees. Those that stayed would become the basis for the Arab-Israeli population which is currently over 20% of that country. It is that Arab-Israeli population that today makes up a similar portion of the IDF. And to say that some rockets were fired into Israel beginning in the 2000s., is a gross understatement. These are just but a few of the glaring mischaracterizations of this history. Bottom line you will not know what's going on there unless you get many outside sources other than this one this one is a poor source of History.
@YellowSpaceMarine That Arabs nor Arabic/Islamic culture are not native to Palestine, but rather were introduced via violent conquest and colonization.
No, Hamas claim 32,000 have been killed. Looking at how many combatants they claim killed that would be a 1:1 ratio, that is utterly unheard of. Similar situations like Fallujah suggest 1:9 which means significant amounts of these numbers are actually combatants, given that Hamas is documented as using children as young as 10 as soldiers, and regularly build infrastructure in residential areas such as next to infant schools and hospitals.
In the first minutes, it is clear he starts history after Egypt but does not explain how the Jews arrived in Egypt FROM CANAAN! Since he leaves off the time of Abraham, he also leaves off the promise to Abraham or that Abraham actually purchased a cave to bury Sarah.
all of that is true, but I think it's not really important for the cause of this video. He started by how the jews started to have a kingdom there, which shows the PEOPLE have history of land there, Abraham's promise isn't really relevant here
@@fatbabyd2813it is. Bc abraham is from adam and plays an important part of how jews separated from christians and muslims. All of them have abrahamic god and history. He should address who actually was there first.
Great video. Although I would have like to see a bit more coverage of the northern Israelis who were conquered by the Assyrians a couple hundred years before the the southern Israelis were conquered and taken to Babylon. The southern were returned to Israel when the the Persians conquered the Babylonians, but the northern Israelis; the 10 "lost tribes of Israel", were scattered throughout Mesopotamia and were not returned
A crash course on history of the socalled palestinian state: 1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state 2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state. 4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Arab-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state. 5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state. 6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state. 7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state. 8. Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state. 9. Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state. 10. Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state. 11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state. 12. Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state. 13. Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state. 14. Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state. 15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state. 16. Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state. 17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 18. Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state. 19. Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state. 20. Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE. A little more history for those wanting to 'restore Palestine'. In 132 AD the Emperor Hadrian resolved to stamp the Jews and their religion out of existence. He sold all Jewish prisoners into slavery after the revolt of Bar Kikhba, forbade the teaching of the Torah, renamed the province Syria Palaestina, and changed Jerusalem’s name to Aelia Capitolina. He renamed Israel to wipe out the national identity of Israel and the Jews. So if you are looking to 'restore Palestine to the Palestinians', you need to give it back to the Jews.
This history commences in its narrative long after the Hebrews and plains Canaanites occupied the areas of the Judean Hills, foothills and Plains to the west. Therefore, the mixing of Canaanites with the Hebrew ancestors from Mesopotamia, and later Phillistine and Arab mixing with the Plains Canaanites to form the Palestinian heritage is not given its rightful attention. Hebrew tribe ancestors and Palestinians are cousins. This is the invaluable context that is missing here.
The beginning of the Jewish people didn't start in Egypt. It's started with Abraham moving to canaan as God told him to do. Israelites lived in the land of Israel Many years before living to leave to Egypt because there wasn't enough food in the land of Israel.
Almost! But the muslim pov still lingering 😂 At least you tried your best to be at a neutral stance, but really, minimizing the attrition and offense from the muslim side and maximizing israels retaliation as humanitarian problem is very visible. Bombing israel in a day to day basis also a crime against humanity, not just the palestinian. The jew populace is just as human as the palestine populace🤔
When choosing between the oppressors and the oppressed, if you decide to stay neutral, you're already on the side of the oppressors. Because that's exactly what the oppressors want you to do: look the other way and stay silent.
@@quandangle9397 As far as we are seeing is that Jews are living a nornal life in UAE, Qatar, Kuwait...etc while Arabs are being eliminated in by Israel.
Nope. There's a difference between hebrew in the Torah and hebrew spoken in Israel today. Yes the alphabet and sounds are the same but a lot of words have different meanings today
Hebrew was used throughout History between ashkenazi jews in europe and sefaradi jews in the middle east. Letters from the middle ages were found in egypt comfirming that.
3:56 these next few minutes were kind eye opening to me. Most Jews lived in Polish Lithuanian as tolerated but then got scapegoated by Russian Monarchs? damn sure seems like they are troublesome
that's like saying most Blacks live in the US and were tolerated but also scapegoated by Plantation owners. Damn sure seems like they were troublesome. It's called blaming the victim.
I will make this really simple for everyone. Jews were on this land since ancient times, there have been multiple wars throughout history and with multiple countries claiming this land. Jewish people started to come back there, Muslims started complaining that to many Jews were coming, the UK who was in control of this land played political games and offered the land to everyone, the UN stepped in a divided the land, Jews were okay, Israel officially became a country, Muslims started a conflict, the conflict then turned into a major conflict. The Muslim nations lost, then did it again a few years later, they lost again! And so on and so forth. And with this comes the reality, when you start a war which you loose you cannot expect to keep everything and pretend like nothing happened! Jewish people fought for their freedom and won, period.
@bluaska i don't map to understand some Islamist groups are anti semitic and violent, and guess what? turns out it's also explicable with the map of the Netherlands
You ignore Middle Eastern Judaism such as Babylonian Judaism (Iraq/Persia), North African Judaism that has lived there for over 2200 years and Yemenite Judaism that has lived there for close to 2700 years. and focuses only on Ashkenazim... incorrect! You have a lot of mistakes from Judaism's perspective on history and for some reason claim that the research is right... but the research is fundamentally wrong!
I'm back! Sorry for the long delay. Due to the sensitivity of this topic, I spent more time on research. Also, the video is longer than usual, which means more editing work. I hope this video helps you to understand better this complex and controversial topic! Stay respectful in your comments, please. See you soon!
Glad you're back
Every video has amazing quality, take your time. 🙂
Hopefully blud doesnt get cancelled after the vid 🙏🙏
The Palestine Hotel (Arabic: فندق فلسطين), often referred to simply as The Palestine, is a 16-story hotel in Baghdad, Iraq located on Firdos Square near from Saadon, across from the Ishtar Hotel. It has long been favoured by journalists and media personnel. The hotel overlooks the Tigris on its eastern bank and is located several hundred metres south of the Baghdad Hotel.
History
Good luck, my friend.
Important to note: the Phillistines were Greek people, not the present day Palestinians who are arabs.
Are Palestinians really Arabs. Because I’ve done some research and it turns out Palestinians are more Levant than Arab.
@@KeViN-De-Belgium Palestinians are genetically very close to Jews and other Middle East populations, including Turks (Anatolians), Lebanese, Egyptians, Armenians, and Iranians.
@@KeViN-De-BelgiumLevant is more or less used to describe multiple countries put together through language and culture, similar to how Polynesia is not a county but has countries within them.
I am Palestinian and I am sure that we are Arabs. Palestinians have multiple origins, for example, my family's origin dates back to sudi arabia, my neighbor's origin dates back to Albania, and my other neighbor's origin dates back to the Greeks. We are a diverse people, now we are Arab and we speak Arabic، This is the case with the Israeli people as well
@@Drcr200 i'm screen-shoting this comment
you just disproved the palestinian claim and proved the israeli side
who came to the land from all around the world, yet we sing the same songs, tell the same stories and can basically read texts from 3000 years ago.
no symmetry to speak of buddy.
and now, let's tell you why jerusalem is holy for muslims
seems that a prophecy came about exactly when the temple mound was conquered (700 years after the ch1ldmolester's demise)
making up a story about a dream he had where he flew on a donkey who's hoof touched the roof of the temple..
bruh.. islame just makes stuff uo as they go..
just like palestine.. you are no different then your arab friends all around, stop making israel a lame place like you make EVERY place.
This is going to be a very civil and respectful comment section
You should do stand-up comedy 😂
H
This video doesn’t mention Egypt was offered Gaza back with the Sinai Peninsula and they didn’t want it.
Who offered it? what's your source?
@@MohammadMahmoud-n6hbruh he’s right it should be common knowledge
@@ScythPlayz Well, he has to say who offered and what's his source, if it's that common.
@@MohammadMahmoud-n6h @ScythPlayz
It's the Camp David Accords my friend. In 67 Israel also took the entire Sinai Peninsula which was part of Egypt. In 1978, as part of the Camp David accords, Israel agreed to give back the Sinai Peninsula and tried to make it a package deal including Gaza. Egypt refused the offer, saying Gaza was never part of Egypt.
They were not offered Gaza, and Gaza was never theirs to take in the first place. Gaza is a part of Palestine, and the Zionists just need to fucking leave and stop their genocide and illegal occupation.
You could have also mentioned all those times when Russians or Soviets gave weapons to Arabs, but not a single mention of that.
For real. Seriously odd he never mentioned Arabs weaponry.
he did mention that
How about Soviet & Arab weaponization of the United Nations? Still going on now. Zionism is racism has come back from the dead with a vengeance
@@mopthefloorrr No Not really more Like one time in a half sentence.
@@55was if you want
Egypt: Palestinians are our brothers in language & faith.
Also Egypt: co-blockades.
Egypt hates the Muslim Brotherhood
The thing is, as soon as Egypt accepts them, they will never be able to return to their homes again. Eliminating the hope for a Palestinian state.
Egypt is controlled by z10n1sts (sisi’s government)
@@hassanmady7763 same as how the Palestinians in Lebanon,Syria and Jordan are yet to return. People blame the Palestinian diasporas for Black September and the ignition of Lebanese civil war but forget the root cause, Al-Nakba and expulsion of the Palestinians.
@@johnxina5126 they intend to forget. To suit their narrative
And yet another point that is missing is that when Israel made peace with Jordan and Egypt, they refused to take West Bank and Gaza respectively under their control even though they used to occupy these territories before.
Precisely because it was occupation….
@@christopherkucia1071 Jordan literally annexed the entirety of the West Bank, and gave out Jordanian citizenship to all the arabs there. The occupation argument might fly for Gaza which wasn't officially made an Egyptian territory during this war but definitely not for the West Bank.
@@thesunisup_ i would say the west bank is more over given for palestinians to make their own land rather than just be part of israel this is complicated enough but to give perspective the arab nations would had suceeded if it wasn't for israelites to protest for independence and fight for their country as a nation ive seen mutliple videos before the war showing palestinians throwing rocks at israelites for entering the temple of jerusalem because according to the palestinians its their mosque which was built by the Umayyad caliphate who invaded israel and built the al aqsa mosque for their convenience
That's the most ignorant bullshit I've ever read. How much did the Jews pay you to make such an absurd claim with zero evidence to support it?
I have Jordanian and Egyptian friends who say that their respective countries can't stand Palestinians because all they do is cause problems and they align with Iran and Hamas.
99% of the comments about how bad the comment section is gonna be lol
and because of that there won't be any terrible comments
Clap your hands everyone, we have a real orignial thinker here.
1% being about geohistory coming back
Don't mind if i FREE PALESTINE?
This is what it call: you focus on who said it instead of focusing of what he actually said
A great deal of work involved. Well done, you. It's what I've needed to get a better sense of an extremely confusing situation. Many thanks.
More like a half-baked truth video
Slight correction. The northern kingdom of Israel was conquered by the Assyrians. Only later did the southern kingdom of Judah get conquered by Babylonia. So they were not conquered at the same time and not by the same people. Other than that a very objective and unbiased video.
I wouldn't have called the muslim caliphate tolerant mind.
@@nah88Muslims were pretty tolerant for their time. They had heavy taxes, but they wouldn’t have outright genocides. Compared to Europe, the local Jewish population had it decent under the Muslims.
What is the kingdom of David and Solomon?
I have never heard that phrase in my life.
It's also biblically and historically inaccurate, as David was not even the second king of Isreal.
And he wasn't even it's 10th leader
Who cares its *don't justify invading Palestine*
@@SCOTLANDforEVER12976 it is no justification i just tell what jewish tradition is
Golda was born in Kiev, Arafat was born in Cairo and spoke in a Egyptian accent. One fact was mentioned in this presentation the other was omitted.
Which was mentioned?
@@JM-yn8mb timestamp 15:28
@@honderddertigkmh5950 I agree. Also, one population was ethnically cleansed from their native homeland, one simply moved from other Middle Eastern countries into the land known as Israel.
You mean the Jews that were ethnically cleansed from Gaza? Or the myriad of Muslim countries? Who are told to "return to Poland" even though they have absolutely no connection to the place? @@JM-yn8mb
ALL the PMs of modern Zionland were gifted by their parents with Ashkenazi/Sephardic names. To sound more Semitic,as colonizers, they changed their names to modern-Hebrew identities.
The British started to feel the heat and were just like "lol imma head out."
Also at the same time India got it's independence so the British presence in the middle east which had a lot to do with overlooking transports of goods from India was no longer relevant. There was no longer a benefit for them from controlling this land.
Only comment that makes sense
The old British Empire loves to spill the tea but was never around to clean up the mess…
With this video, you may not have made a large contribution to the education of the masses in history, but you've unequivocally answered the question of whether you are an anti-Semite.
I guess, on the whole, this is accurate!
@@ShiaKorchinno not really, but it is an attempt to make out like Israeli Jews are foreigners, doesn’t explain the Palestinian name doesn’t explain where the Philistines went, or the weapons obtained by the Arab nations, or that the British gave away half of the Judean lands, and that the Jews have always been there but occupied by foreign nations, one of those being Arab (Babylonians) and the other of Islamic powers, the Arabs and the Ottomans
I would not call it anti semitism, but biased sure. Fail to mention any palestinian attack on jewish civillians, not a single 1 mentioned, not mentioning their ties to nazi Germany, not mentioning them getting weapons from the soviets, only mentioning everytime jews are buying weapons from someone. Yes biased as hell.
@@firstlast9384 agree, but one thing, babylonians were not arabs, the spoke hebrew so they were at least culturaly more related to the ancient jews/israelites/canaanites. But ethnically were different from arabs and from israelites.
@@gabrielmarius984Babylonians spoke Akkadian not Hebrew.
It’s really funny that people say that this is Pro Israel and others that its Pro Palestinian 🤣
Probably means it's neither
It's pro facts so people don't like that they're not matching with the lies they're fed on tiktok so clearly the video is wrong!
agreed this was vry unbiased but i thibnk there was some mis information
I’d say it’s pro-history
That seems neutral to me.
15:56 it's incorrect to use this flag while representing Palestinians before the creation of Israel this flag was only adopted in 1964
Correct! As indeed is the name Palestinians to describe the Muslim Arabs living in the territories!
Actually it's not incorrect but it's the other way around, he talks about and shows the Arab Revolt flag (or flag of Heetzaz). At that time, it did not represent Palestinians but Arab nationalism and pan-arabism. It was later adapted by the PLO.
@@brianbeagArabs have forgotten that they used the hate the name Palestine once because it means invader in Jewish. I wonder why!
And Israel's flag, the seal of solomon or star of remphan want used until 1948
True, but the only official flag for the region at the time was the Union Jack, he needs a flag to represent the Palestinian Arabs, what else should he use?
Very biased presentation, leaving out many major facts.
What facts, where should I go to learn more
Go to traveling Israel account @@Shroom420
Exactly my thoughts.
@mechamongrel-ir2qt Is it - surely it's no more biased than Geo History.
In fact he accepts the Jewish acts, but also clearly states the Arab acts also. Thats not right-wing - goodness Hamas, Palestine is right wing also on that definition.
@mechamongrel-ir2qt
Geo does not repeat history very accurately.
And that's the issue. More balanced work should have been done
Man was missing for half a year now i get it he was cooking
And he delivered
You should really be careful with the 'cooking' metaphor given the subject matter
Definitely cooking some BS
Cookin in the kitchen making stir fry
@@jimmysaber according to you
24 hours later: this video has been age restricted/demonetized for violating TH-cam guidelines
Has it?
@@MrSupernova111 not yet (hopefully, it doesn’t happen)
We better hope not. It's better than most midia nonsense.
@@L.internet8 which is why youtube may seek to diminish it's propagation in the first place, they propel the narrative of the mass-media whilst filtering anything that risks scrutinizing said narrative.
4 hr left
10:45
I think there is an import detail about Amin Al-Hussaini missing that he wasn't exactly acting on its own, he was literally allied with Hitler.
Thats trivial.
Palestine wanted independence in 1936 but were crushed by british imperialists
@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 first of all, being Hitler’s ally is not trivial. And the second, when you say “Palestine” do you mean “Palestinian arabs”? Because for 1936 saying “Palestine wanted this or that” is pretty vague.
@thesunisup_ the majority of palestine wanted independence
@@closetglobe.IRGUN.NW0 again, when you say "Palestine" what population are you referring to? The Jews, the Arabs, all of them together?
@@thesunisup_ I said the majority.
And arabs had the majority.
But they were crushed by the british imperialists
What program/software is used to make these? I'm a history teacher and I love this format of showing geopolitical history
Are you going to revise the history this video is showing, using the same software? 🤔
@@JesusIsTheOnlyWayTruthLifehe means hed love to use the program for educational use
so what is the software
@@abanoubmorcos318 maybe adobe after effects
it's not a program, he animates using after effects and premiere
If you’re gonna pick a side, do it based on facts. I truly don’t care what side you fall on. Just form your alliance based on truth.
STOP REFERRING TO THE ZIONIST OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE AS A CONFLICT
Soooo.... You're literally saying support Palestine, because Israel doesn't do "facts". Zionism is all about lies and propaganda. Oh, and raping babies.
Allied with the truth, I like it!
the facts point towards being pro israel, but if you are a leftist, "fact" isn't a word in your dictionary
@@drnext5007 false. If you want to know where the facts lie just try to see who has the most incentive to lie, as well as who has the financial means to manipulate your politicians and media. Do you have any idea how much the APAIC lobby spends every year? Do you think it’s a coincidence that Democrats and Republicans disagree on everything except being Pro-Israel? Congratulations your opinion, masqueraded as truth, was bought and paid for.
everyone's talking about the argument in the comment section but I don't see one
It's literally the same situation whenever there's a video about the balkans. Everyone's really looking to just say something
Well, sometimes it's happen in the "newest comment" option really,
But yet again, sometimes
It's like trying to normalize nazi germany
Same I hate when that happens
I found 5
I know it's a short video so not everything is here, but you forgot to mention that there were jews in Israel the whole time, not all left. Not sure if I missed it when you said they were taken and allowed to return or left during the other times. Also, the arabs didn't arrive in the region (to settle) until the 7th century with the Islamic Conquest. And the only reason why the temple mount is holy to the muslims is because it's in the torah/bible as a holy site. They don't have any connection to it. Originally Mohammad was actually scolded for praying towards Jerusalem instead of towards Mecca. Mecca and the space rock are their holy site. One of the reason they don't have a problem bombing Jerusalem on holidays.
Aside from that, I think it was pretty accurate, 98% lol =D
It seems it was much less then that, watch the response video "geo history is 55% wrong" by travelingisrael.
Yes, it's made by an Israeli so it's biased but historical facts are just that.
Also he pointed out much lying by omission.
Great points, pro-Pali/Hamas people always leave out facts that do not suit them b/c it is deeply uncomfortable for them, it is their ideology, it has nothing to do with facts and truth.
Google Benjamin of Tiberius , he took back Israel in the 7th century for a few months from the Byzantines with 20,000 Jewish soldiers and help from the Sassanids. It was in Jewish hands for a few months. But yes this shows that at the 7th centuries Jews are still very prominent in Palestine.
One more important missing fact is, that to as far as I know, the Jews in Jerusalem have been the largest part of the population throughout history, despite all the expulsions and oppressions
@Landofisraelforever this is crucial information. where can i find more?
Put hatred aside, embrace loving kindness
a way of living together will become possible
It'll never happen, but yeah.
Wouldn't say this is biased, but it DEFINITELY leaves out some important info.... like who rejected each peace deal/cease fire and why, or any mention of thousands of unsuccessful attempts at killing civilians (intent is just as bad as actual murder). Or how the ottomans sold their land as their empire started to fall.
But I guess it would take a few more hours to really get everything lol
Do you know a video that fully covers the topic and stays mostly unbiased? I have a lot of time on my hands
We need to ask who placed the poison pill in the deal
@@holczy0check out the podcast vulgar history they do a good historical breakdown
I hate when Americans say how many times did the Palestinians reject a ceasefire peace treaty. how many times did the Native Indians accept a deal from the Europeans and then they broke the treaty .stop trying to find righteousness & evil Europe. Even the Apostle Paul went to spread the good news to the heathens do you know emperor Nero was . The world is waking up to all you colonizers❤
Why are Palestinians the only group in history that passes down refugee status over multiple generations... you dont see any polish refugees still kicking around from WW2, they moved elsewhere and moved on. However, Palestinians in Gaza are refugees because their great grandparents lived in now Israel 80 years ago... it doesn't make any sense.
Other notable things, you refer to the area as Palestine well before there was ever a group of people who called themselves palestinians. It also feels a tad unfair to call out certain israeli extremist actions in detail, while glossing over the countless Palestinan attacks during the Intifada's in a breif sentence.
The area was called Palestina since Roman times, but the Palestinians were considered to be the jews. Only in the 1960 the arabs started calling themselves Palestinians. But i think it's fine to call the region this, as long as it's clear that you refer to the region, and not to the imagined Palestinian state.
This isn't true. A son of a Kurd is a Kurd. He doesn't become "Norwegian" by moving to Norway.
@@tmpqtyutmpqty4733 no but if the son of a Kurd is adopted by a Norwegian he becomes a Norwegian , so your wrong
the video is unfair in the way it only mentions so called Israeli extremist actions = Dir Yasin was in response of an Arab attack on a Jewish convoy of doctors and nurses that killed many , likewise the murder of those Arabs in Hebron was in response to the murder of a Jewish baby girl .
@@tmpqtyutmpqty4733 someone of Kurdish heritage born in Norway is Norwegian… a child born to Syrian refugees in Canada is Canadian.
Palestinians were displaced 70 years ago and they’re still refugees. That’s unprecedented. If they just accepted the existence of Israel they would’ve had a Palestinian state in 1948 but they wanted it all, from the river to the sea as they say.
This was really, truly one of the best videos I have ever seen on this subject. Fantastic work as always! The only notes I felt compelled to make were that at 19:30 there were also Jews from Morocco, Iran, etc. to a total of more than 500,000 that came to Israel. Also, the negotiations at 26:40 didn't merely "fall apart", implied to be by mutual stubbornness. Israel offered Palestinians a state in more than 95% of the West Bank, all of Gaza, and 30 billions dollars in reparations. No counter offer was made, an plans for another intifada were made and eventually acted on.
@bullman.09 it was? Israel was occupying it. It offered to stop.
@bullman.09you clearly don't understand how power works. If the Arabs had power there will be no Israel. So they thank you
Hebrew wasn't only used for biblical study. There is plenty of evidence that it was also used to communicate between Jews who lived far apart and spoke other languages as their first language, so was used for trade and similar communication.
@TheAcademyofEuropeanSwor-zy9vq
My limited understanding is that, since diaspora, Hebrew language was indeed used primarily for biblical study. This respect for Evrit extends to today where some religious Jews deliberately prefer not to speak the language beyond its sacred use. What are your sources that indicate the language was used for "trade and similar communication"?
@@lyntonm5793 Multiple letters between Jews living in distant countries. Hebrew was a lingua franca for Jews for millennia, while they spoke local languages. Today, only very few Haredi Jews speak Yiddish and use Hebrew for sacral purposes. Practically speaking, , although they mostly use and try to preserve Yiddish, they all know and function in Hebrew as well. This is a minority attitude which is not prevalent.
I'm sorry how we in Russia treated Jews!
Your comment is so complex when delved into before I begin, I am not saying what happened to the Jews was not terrible. Politically Russia supports Palestine the enemy of Israel due to being an enemy of USA. Both Israel and Russia are invading foreign countries and support neither.
You didn't do it yesterday, yet you yourself did nothing you don't represent you country
as a jew i tell you as i would germans. you are not responsible for the sins of your forefathers. the only responsibility descendants of anyone bears is learning from the past and not repeating said sins.
Genocide supporter
You are absolutely not to blame, however your words means a lot.
The statement "in Israel, the history of the Jews is mainly inspired by biblical texts" oversimplifies and misrepresents the way history is studied and taught in Israel. Israeli historians and educators use and apply archaeological, scientific, and historical evidence to understand and teach Jewish history which has ethnic histories as well as religious (not only one versus the other - i.e. theological version of Jewish history and the academic ethnic version of Israeli history both exist). Reducing this complex history to biblical inspiration only ignores the rigorous academic research and diverse sources of evidence that provide a more accurate and detailed picture of Jewish ethnicity and history. This misrepresentation distorts what is accepted as historical scholarship in Israel.
archeologists have uncovered so many Jewish buildings and coins in the lands of israe,l that's proof enough for me
Thanks!
Thank you for your support !
1.5 million "refugees", when you add "generational refugees" which is ONLY specific to Arab refugees from 1948. No other refugee group has this status. Not even the 1 million Jewish refugees from ALL the Arab countries. In any other conflict, this would have been settled by mutual transfer, such as Cyprus/Turkey, German/Russian, Muslim/Hindu, etc etc...
This is not only dishnest, it makes no sense! Why should any other region take in a people FORCIBLY (yes, that's what happened-all other narratives have been refuted) removed, and w/ no resources awaiting them! Is this what happened w/ Pakistan? Or was there now a country AWAITING a people? The lived on that land millenia, want to stay-and return-and they should be allowed to do that! As a matter of fact, these are some of the oldest, prophetic regions on earth-why should almost a million people go where they don't want to go? Where's the humanity, human rights and justice in that? You're obviously an adult who can read: why are yu just repeating points? Where the Jews from "Arab" countries really refugees? Or were they flown out, free of charge, w/ land, homes, and jobs awaiting them? Were the ones in Iraq not bribed into leaving? They didn't want to leave-not did the ones in Morocco. You don't know about all this? They are, indeed refugees. Please go read from independent sources, accept there are grave injustices (all historians now admit to a series of massacers and expulsions to removed them from the land), and work for their return and rights!
Arafat who was their Egyptian born leader,convinced the UN crooks to grant the Gaza Arabs lifetime refugee status so they could milk the western countries taxpayers out of billions upon billions in federal foreign aid money. There is no such legal statehood or country named palatine. And there is no such ethic groups of people called Palestinians. These people are Arafat's Arabs mulsins who migrated from Jordan and Egypt and Sylvia during WW1 and WW2 to work in Jordan. The Gaza Arabs are merely squatters on Israel land.
basically a fake refugee then. There is no such thing as a generational refugee. The UN just made that up to justify their support of an entire group and to make sure the issue of refugees would never go away for Israel.
Unfortunately muslim/hindu was not settled, india should have had a population transfer with Pakistan during partition which did not happen and we are suffering now
We can thank the UN and specific UNRWA for perpetuating the victimhood mentality among the Palestinian Arabs, teaching them to hate Jews and Israel and expect that no matter how many times they attack and lose, one day they will succeed in wiping Israel off the map. No other refugees are treated that way, and that's why no other conflict has festered for decades without any resolution.
Zouir Mohsen the first "palestinian" leader -
"The Palestinian people does not exist … there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians, and Lebanese . Between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese there are no differences. ..."
What point is this making? There’s also no difference between English, Irish, Americans, and Canadians. What exactly is that proving?
Britain, Australia, New Zealand, U.S.A, Canada. All the same people right?
You probably think that Africa is a country right 😂
So stupid comment
@@hueyxz1121 that there are no Palestinian people. It is a pseudo identity created by Arafat.
I'm only one person, and i can't speak for all Palestinian refugees, but I'm willing to give up my right of return if Israel will just give all Palestinians equal rights with Israelis. All of them. West Bank, Gaza strip, and everyone living in diaspora who has Palestinian citizenship. I don't care if the combined country is called Israel. I care that humans are treated as humans, and that holy places which are currently in existence do not get destroyed to build new ones. Especially for a different religion than the original structure was for. That will create more war. We need peace!
And what was the "original structure?" Even according to this video, the Jewish Temple was on that site first, destroyed by the Babylonians, then rebuilt during Roman occupation... This is the problem with all the "originalist" discussions... Most of these start with the presumption that the Dome of the Rock is what was there first, which is false.
The problem is some people on both sides wants to annihilate each other. There will always be an act of violence if both countries did ever unify. That is unless majority people from both sides sees and treat each the same person living in the same nation.
1. You have no right of return
2. If palestinians want the same rights as Israelis they have to take it up with the palestinian government... and stop trying to murder Jews.
3. 1947 was the first time in 1300 years that muslim Arabs weren't able to subjugate Jews. Allowing the palestinians - whose entire culture was invented for and is based solely on Jew hatred and destroying Israel - to become Israeli citizens would be a return to the dhimmitude of the prior 1300 years... at best. Most likely it will be 10/7 for all the Jews in Israel. Neither will ever happen again. Period.
4. I have little doubt you're fully aware of what would happen if Israel allowed the descendants of the Arab refugees to become citizens of Israel which is why you oh, so kindly made your offer.
5. "... holy places which are currently in existence do not get destroyed to build new ones. Especially for a different religion than the original structure was for. That will create more war. We need peace!" That's a rather incredible statement coming from a "palestinian" (muslim). Do you happen to know where Judaism's two holiest sites are? They're called the Foundation Stone and the Holy of Holies. Jews were praying there for 1600 years before the prophet mohammad was born. Go on... guess where the Foundation Stone and Holy of Holies are.
@@someonetooknuggets No. That's not the problem. Side A has been attempting to make peace for 140 years. Side b has subjugated side A since 610CE and only wants Side A to cease to exist.
Pretty hard to make peace if one group of people's faith calls for the extermination of another:
«لَتُقَاتِلُنَّ الْيَهُودَ فَلَتَقْتُلُنَّهُمْ، حَتَى يَقُولَ الْحَجَرُ: يَامُسْلِمُ هَذَا يَهُودِيٌّ فَتَعَال فَاقْتُلْه»
(You will fight the Jews and will kill them, until the stone will say, `O Muslim! There is a Jew here, so come and kill him.') Muslim recorded that Abu Hurayrah said that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said,
«لَا تَقُومُ السَّاعَةُ حَتَّى يُقَاتِلَ الْمُسْلِمُونَ الْيَهُودَ، فَيَقْتُلُهُمُ الْمُسْلِمُونَ حَتَّى يَخْتَبِىءَ الْيَهُودِيُّ مِنْ وَرَاءِ الْحَجَرِ وَالشَّجَرِ، فَيَقُولُ الْحَجَرُ وَالشَّجَرُ: يَامُسْلِمُ يَاعَبْدَاللهِ هَذَا يَهُودِيٌّ خَلْفِي فَتَعَالَ فَاقْتُلْهُ إِلَّا الْغَرْقَدَ فَإِنَّهُ مِنْ شَجَرِ الْيَهُود»
(The Hour will not start, until after the Muslims fight the Jews and the Muslims kill them. The Jew will hide behind a stone or tree, and the tree will say, `O Muslim! O servant of Allah! This is a Jew behind me, come and kill him.' Except Al-Gharqad, for it is a tree of the Jews.)
10:45 the flag introduced in this part was yet to be invented in 1936. This is the PLO flag created in 1964. But so far that’s the only inaccurate thing Iv’e noticed. Really factual and accurate!
The entire framing of the video is pro Palestinian.
The Palestinians are framed at any possible intersection as infentile and lacking agency and responsibility.
Kingdom of Hejaz?
Not a palestinian flag, but it was created before 64
that was the flag of the arab revolt with the color order switched, used since the late 1910s and by the Palestine Arab Congress in the 30s. So no, it's not inaccurate
Exactly! I pointed this out too! Using this fake flag is misleading at best
The flag is from 1925, it predates the Israeli one by a decade.
My favorite history channel when it comes to war is back!
I have yet to watch the video, but I expect no sugarcoating like the videos before.
In summary modern jews are European immigrants who took land by force from Arabs 😅😅😅😅😅
A well made video and for the most part, balanced, compared to a lot of other channels.
32:05 you failed to mention the special refugee status that is passed down. No other refugees have this privilege, inflating that number.
Israel does not allow them back, nor recognizes that there were Palestinians past or future on the land it colonized and homes it stole.
Well they are still refugees. If Jews from around the world can simply demand to return in a country only because of their belief or because their ancestors from hundreds of years ago once lived in this land, then people of Palestinian descent should also be allowed to return in the land where their grandparents and great-grandparents once lived and where they were expelled from in the last 80 years.
It should be one rule for all and not only some people benefitting because of their belief, that's literally what an Austrian painter did, classified one group as better and superior than others and look what happened.
It is not true. every refugee is the same.
@@firstnamelastname6976
I am too lazy to type it all out, but here is a what another person wrote which is pretty on point.
“There are two UN refugee agencies: UNHCR and UNRWA. Roughly speaking, the UNHCR oversees ALL refugee resettlement globally while the UNRWA was founded specifically to handle the Palestinian refugees. Over time, they have developed slightly different missions, methods, and operating definitions. The UNHCR only considers those who flee conflict or persecution to be refugees and works to assist resettlement into new communities. The UNRWA - again, remember they only work with Palestinians - considers that refugee status to continue down through the generations until the conflict is resolved and works to aid Palestinians where they are until that point, not resettle.
From there, reasonable people could debate which approach is better or more effective at helping people fleeing conflict or persecution. The UNRWA's approach has unnecessarily perpetuated the Palestinian-Israeli conflict by keeping alive the possibility of return to a land they no longer inhabit and have not lived on in their lifetimes or, in some cases, their parent's lifetimes. No other refugee group is allowed this fiction. The UNHCR has assisted others in building new lives elsewhere in diaspora. For this reason and a host of others, the UNRWA should be disbanded and the care and aid of the Palestinian refugees passed to the UNHCR. The Gaza residents who have been displaced by this current war are refugees, but from today's conflict not 1948. They deserve help and aid in both survival and resettlement (should they choose it).”
Also keep in mind, some Arab countries don’t even allow Palestinians to achieve citizenship.
@firstnamelastname6976 No, it is true. It’s why there’s two UN refugee organizations: one for >95% of refugees, and one for Palestinians.
A Vietnamese refugee who comes to America and has kids does not give birth to refugees, she gives birth to Americans. Meanwhile, there are hundreds of thousands of Palestinians who are the children, grandchildren, even great-grandchildren of those expelled to Gaza and the West Bank during the Nakba who were born refugees and whose future children will also be born refugees.
Information that is omitted.
Large numbers of Arabs that entered the territory were migrants who only entered after the establishment of the British mandate.
No mention is made of how the approaching Arab armies told tue Palestinian Arabs to evacuate the area until the Jews are defeated.
No mention is made of how Arab nations drove out their Jewish communities as punishment for the establishment of Israel.
No mention is made of the establishment of the Palestinian people in 1964, a people who had not existed until that time.
No mention of how Egypt refused to take back Gaza, no of the horrible conditions Palestinian Arabs suffered during Egypt's control of the region.
The state of Palastine is established in 1988.
Outright lies:
After the withdrawl of Israel from Gaza, the territory recieved huge amounts of international aid.
Very unprofessional, skewed and biased.
I take it you’re a Muslim sympathiser
Lie culture, bribery, cheap, greedy,bribery,politics. Who? Aipac. Epstein, Weinstein, Madoff, Sam Bankman Fried, Opioids: Sacklers, Blackmail Universities: Ackman, Blacrock: Larry Fink (Weapons $$$) Anthony Blinken. All Jewish. Interesting...
How??
@@Michikonðéchiuhchad Talks about weapon supply to Israel like obsessed but does not talk about the Soviet weapon and personnel(yes soviet military staff was directly involved in fighting against israel.) to arabs. Just one example out of many. Let me know if you need more.
@@TheSvRomaI don’t see how that is biased.
anywhere there is a dominanted muslim population, there is a war. (especially in asia)
1. israel and palestine conflict.
2. india's kashmir and pakistan occuping illegally.
3. pakistan occupying baluchistan illegally.
4. afghanistan conflict.
5. syria and iraq conflict.
6. muslims occuping north african land illegally.
Lie culture, bribery, cheap, greedy,bribery,politics. Who? Aipac. Epstein, Weinstein, Madoff, Sam Bankman Fried, Opioids: Sacklers, Blackmail Universities: Ackman, Blacrock: Larry Fink (Weapons $$$) Anthony Blinken. All Jewish. Interesting...
Don't forget Cyprus. This will happen to the whole european continent,if people don't wake up and stop electing puppets who are getting paid from Qatar for importing massive numbers of muslim population.
Notes: it creates the impression all jews were in europe but significant, ancient (more than europe) communities from morroco to iraq, and Ethiopia existed. After 1947 these communities were persecuted and/or exiled too. (Ethiopia was not as far as i know, not yet)
It fails to mention a few pogroms/attacks initiated by arabs during the british mandate and during independence war.
A correction - the population base was closer to 500k rather than 600k when the Balfour Declaration came out, with 70k Christians and somewhere between 85k and 56k Jews (the higher number was from the beginning of WW1, and the lower number was in 1919 - the numbers dropped because the Ottomans were mass deporting Jews).
And most of those migrated from other arabs countries 50 years before hand for work. They didn't live in Palestine at that time.
israeli here, your "israeli taught" history is NOT AT ALL taught as hustory, its taught as bible stories in bible class, we have final tests on ot and a completly seperare history class...
The research that goes into these videos is stunning!
And I thought Palestine was the evil emperor in Star Wars.
Hamas is. Palastine isn't.
@@relo999
Palestine doesn't exist.
But yeah... Hamas is evil.
Did we watch the same video? It's crazy how brainwashed you are
Hamas just hides between Palestinians
If Israel attack: it would be called genocide
If Israel don't attack: Hamas would irritate Israel
and Hamas is teaching young children to be the new Hamas
In case anyone doesn't get this reference, the main antagonist of the Star Wars Movies is "Emperor Palpatine".
Video:is about Israel and Palestine
*Sighs, opens the comments section*
ikr thats what i was thinking!
how complicated can it be ? a genocide recognized by the UN is going on. How complicated is this for you ?
Problems with the Video:
Misrepresentation of Herzl: Claims Herzl founded Zionism due to French antisemitism, ignoring Vienna's influence.
Zionism's Origins: Omits Jews' historical connection to the Land of Israel.
Omission of Arab Attacks: Ignores Arab violence against Jews in the early 20th century.
Arab Migration: Overlooks significant Arab migration to Palestine, focusing only on Jewish immigration.
Haganah Formation: Lacks context for the creation of Jewish self-defense groups.
Nazi Collaboration: Omits collaboration between Palestinian leaders and Nazi Germany during WWII.
Selective "Terrorist" Label: Labels Jewish groups as terrorists but not Arab groups.
Partition Plan: Misrepresents the causes and escalation of the 1947-8 conflict.
Plan Dalet: Suggests it was for ethnic cleansing without context.
Deir Yassin: Emphasizes Jewish violence while minimizing Arab-perpetrated massacres.
Jewish Arms Acquisition: Highlights Jewish arms deals while downplaying Arab arms deals.
Arab Anti-Israel Sentiment: Fails to address explicit calls from Arab leaders to eliminate Israel.
Arafat's Role: Downplays Arafat's terrorism and failure to recognize Israel.
Conflict Causes: Attributes conflict to settlements and refugees, ignoring Arab refusal to accept Jewish sovereignty.
Terminology: Uses detailed terms for Jewish actions, generalizes Arab actions.
Jewish Expulsions: Ignores the expulsion and persecution of Jews from Arab countries.
Israeli Military Actions: Frames Israeli responses as aggressive rather than defensive.
Arab Pogroms: Downplays the brutality of Arab pogroms against Jews.
Jewish Contributions: Fails to acknowledge Jewish development efforts during the British Mandate.
British Immigration Policies: Ignores British restrictions on Jewish immigration.
Arab Rejection: Omits consistent Arab rejection of a Jewish state.
Peace Offers: Does not highlight Jewish leaders' peace offers.
Anti-Jewish Incitement: Ignores incitement in Arab media and education.
Jewish Expulsions in 1948: Lacks context for Jewish expulsions during the 1948 war.
Axis Collaboration: Neglects Arab leaders' collaboration with Axis powers in WWII.
Six-Day War: Misrepresents Israel's preemptive actions in 1967.
Israeli Actions: Emphasizes Israeli military actions while minimizing Arab aggression.
Arab Nationalism: Does not address its role in the conflict.
Internal Arab Conflicts: Overlooks their impact on the broader conflict.
Historical Continuity: Provides a fragmented narrative.
Refugee Issues: Ignores Jewish refugees from Arab countries.
Peace Treaties: Does not mention peace treaties showing Arab recognition of Israel.
Arab Leadership: Ignores their role in perpetuating the conflict.
Rocket Attacks: Does not mention persistent rocket attacks from Gaza.
Arab Policies on Palestinians: Overlooks Arab states' treatment of Palestinians.
Palestinian Divisions: Ignores internal political divisions among Palestinians.
Humanitarian Efforts: Fails to mention Israeli aid to Palestinians.
Economic Collaboration: Overlooks instances of Israeli-Palestinian cooperation.
Jerusalem: Simplifies the complex status of Jerusalem.
Legal Perspectives: Misrepresents international legal views on settlements and borders.
Media Bias: Does not address the role of media bias.
Israeli Arab Citizens: Ignores their status and perspectives.
Security Concerns: Does not address Israel's legitimate security concerns.
Jewish Connection: Downplays Jews' historical presence in Israel.
Settlement Narrative: Presents settlements as the main obstacle to peace.
Peace Process History: Misleads on the peace process, ignoring Palestinian rejections.
Regional Alliances: Fails to explore Israel's alliances with Middle Eastern countries.
Arab Displacement: Ignores displacement of Arabs by other Arab states.
Military Operations: Portrays Israeli operations as aggressive without context.
Arab Boycotts: Ignores economic boycotts against Israel.
Peace Efforts: Does not cover numerous peace efforts by Israel.
Atrocities: Highlights Israeli actions while neglecting Arab atrocities.
UNRWA: Omits its role in the Palestinian refugee issue.
Leadership Corruption: Does not address Palestinian Authority and Hamas corruption.
Jewish State Intentions: Suggests Israel seeks to expand without evidence.
Jewish-Arab Cooperation: Fails to mention historical periods of cooperation.
Non-State Actors: Ignores threats from groups like Hezbollah.
Oslo Accords: Provides a biased interpretation, ignoring Palestinian violations.
Rejectionism Post-1967: Does not address the Arab League's "Three No's" policy.
Palestinian Propaganda: Does not discuss the role of Palestinian media.
Settlement Disputes: Oversimplifies legal and historical complexities.
Jewish Expulsions: Ignores mass expulsions of Jews from Arab countries.
Historical Timeline: Omits significant events for context.
Balfour Declaration: Misleads on international support for a Jewish homeland.
Islamist Extremism: Fails to mention its influence.
International Actors: Does not cover their involvement and influence.
Defensive Strategies: Downplays necessity behind Israeli actions.
Gaza Blockade: Simplifies without discussing security threats.
Demographic Changes: Ignores significant changes and their impact.
Historical Claims: Does not address Jews' historical claims to the land.
Camp David Summit: Fails to mention Palestinian rejection in 2000.
Rocket Attacks Post-2005: Omits continued attacks on Israeli civilians.
Peace Treaties with Arab States: Does not cover recent treaties under the Abraham Accords.
Palestinian Militias: Omits their role in perpetuating violence.
Security Barrier: Frames it as oppression without context of preventing attacks.
Water Resource Issues: Oversimplifies the complexities.
Positive Initiatives: Ignores grassroots peace efforts.
International Resolutions: Focuses on certain UN resolutions while ignoring others.
PA's Role in Incitement: Omits its role in inciting violence.
Refugee Issue Complexity: Does not explore its nuanced aspects.
Economic Growth in Palestinian Areas: Omits development despite conflict.
Jerusalem's Role: Provides a biased view without full significance.
Historical Narratives: Uses selective narratives supporting a particular viewpoint.
Regional Politics: Does not cover broader Middle Eastern political influence.
Humanitarian Assistance: Ignores Israeli aid efforts.
Governance Issues: Fails to address Palestinian internal governance problems.
Intifadas: Does not provide a balanced account of their causes and consequences.
Jewish Presence in Arab Lands: Overlooks historical presence before expulsion.
Arab League's Role: Does not mention its role in perpetuating the conflict.
Epic comment!
Now make a video.🙂
@marveloussoftware4914 there is a video of a blogger israeli tour guide
@@Reptiloid5g where?
@@marveloussoftware4914 @Travelingisraelinfo
So basically the jewish people were there before the Palestinians but was practically the minority for the last thousand years and the palestine was originally just a roman colony which was never an independent entity for the last thousand years. Oh boy.
modern Palestinians are indigenous to Palestine and they are descendants of all peoples lived in that land and modern israels are not descendants of ancient israelites and even if they were it doesn't gave them right to occupy Palestine now
@@ahmed-F546it doesnt give the right for arabs to terrorize and attack the jews just bcuz the jews started migrating as a response to GENOCIDE
A roman colony? Where did you heard that? Never heard that before
@@ahmed-F546 What gave the Arabs the right to colonize ancient Israel? Modern "Palestinians" somehow speak Arabic and not a Hittite, Phenician or Cannanite dialect.
Modern day Palestinians are the direct descendants of the Canaanites who were there before the Jewish people. Even before the Roman colonies, the land was still called Palestine, or in Ancient Egyptian: "Peleset". Just about every single country founded here was a colony that never lasted very long. Hell, even ancient Israel only lasted about 400 years. The Egyptians created their vassal state, then the Assyrians, then the Babylonians, then the Egyptians again, then the Babylonians again, then the Achaemenids, then the Jews again with Hasmonean Empire, then the Romans.
People who say Israel has no claim to the land - Which Muslim text talks about anyone great in Islam coming from there? The great Jewish forefathers like David, Soloman, Jesus, Elijah, Elisha, Amos, Isiah ALL WERE BORN AND LIVED THERE. What is Islam's claim other than 'We invaded and settled there when the place had already been conquested to hell and left basically empty'.
Ummm Jesus, Abraham, David, John the Baptist are all messengers/prophets in Islam. But religion isn’t relevant to where the Palestinians came from. DNA and archaeological evidence show that they’re native to the land and are most likely Israelites and Samaritans who converted to Christianity then later Islam.
Just curious…what proof is there that Jesus, Abraham, David, John the Baptist were prophets in Islam? They were Jewish. Excavated proof. I’m not trying to start anything I’m really curious.
Actually Islam I think believes that Muhammad ascended to heaven from the Temple Mount and will not acknowledge that the Jews have a connection there too. Although there again there is excavation proof for the jews to be there too.
@@terdferguson4945 Sorry what archaeological evidence points to an 'Palestinian' State or Ancient people? You can't use DNA to find if people are native to a land, conquesting armies (especially Mohammadian ones) literally r*pe and use the conquered women as sex slaves.
If they are native to the land why do they not take care of it and raise livestock and farms there instead of relying on aid and voting for terrorist organisations?
There is no link between Islam's Allah and The God of the Jews and Christians. It is a false religion made up by an egotistical rich boy who married a 9 year old.
Anyone who buys a land legally has a claim with merit . Produce a bill of sale instead producing nonsensical delusional fairy tales
Imagine how many lives could have been saved if Egypt and other Arab states had granted temporary asylum to Gazan women, children, and the elderly. This would have undermined Hamas' evil human shield strategy.
How can you claim to recount the history of the Israel and Arab/Palestine conflict. Without discussing the massive number of Pograms against the Jews in Palestine before the first Israel-Arab war? You went out of your way to mention the actions/reactions of the Jews without their proper context.
Also, you pointed out that the first Arab-Israeli was kicked off by surrounding Arab states invading Palestine. Yet, seemed to question the arms secument by Israel beforehand? Maybe they knew the plans of the Arab's to invade? Seems as if they knew the only way to survive was to have the weapons to defend themselves. Also, and most importantly. You claimed the ceasefire was overtly in favor of the Jews. Without really discussing why. I mean, if it was your country that was invaded by all of your surrounding neighbors and you defeated all the invaders. It's pretty obvious the cease fire would favor those who were invaded and provoked, not the provoakators.
Someone please tell me if this means that current Palestinians who broke no moral nor legal code, should be violently displaced and dispossessed or live under a violent apartheid. Also, what would this mean for people all over the world who were not “first”?
This video needs to be highly revised 😮💨
All I've learned is today is just another page in the book. We're just here now but who knows how long it will go.
they'll probably be writing about this in like 80 years time. Arabs vs Jews. so much blood shed over a tiny strip of land.
Honey,wake up Geo History has uploaded
Thanks
Thank you for your support !
Most of the "palestinians" fled their homes because the arab countries told them to do so, they promised they'll be back soon after Israel is conquered.
This fact drastically changes the viewing point of "expelled" or "displaced". there were displacements, like in any war and conquests... but in this case most of the displacement happened on their own fault.
Not to mention the global picture of new countries and/or adjusted borders. India & Pakistan have a lot in common
Where did you get this story from?.Honestly,where oh lord.
You are so clueless about a whole race of people. They are the Palestinians. Yep don't ever forget.
thats a lie most of the arab villages were attacked by Israeli terrorist to ethnicly cleanse the area to create a country with a jewish majority , go read to benny morris about 1948
@@feliciacarter4686the Palestinians were invented from the Latin word for phillistines, Palestina.
The biggest failure of this report is CONTEXT. The author mentioned several military actions by Israel without the context that led to the action. For example multiple times Israel has preemptively attacked targets that were preparing to attack them as they have one of the most effective intelligence agencies in the world. Second there is almost a minimizing of the almost constant attacks against Israel on a daily basis which in numbers far outweigh the counter strikes by Israel. It appears the author is almost trying so hard to not offend that he is skipping over the literal thousands of attacks Israel is confronted with on an annual basis and almost one sided view the UN and the Arab world has taken against Israel. I recommend redoing this report and placing actual numbers of attacks, dates, verified numbers of those killed and CONTEXT that lead to those attacks or the actions taken. Another example of CONTEXT missing is the societal elevation of suicide bombers as heroes in Palestine and rewards paid to families and the number of those attacks. The programming of the Palestine society to hate Jews in a similar way as Nazi Germany programmed their population against Jews and lastly the societal mindset that set in causing Israel to want to wall themselves off from Palestine and how when given more ability to control their own society Hamas chose to militarize and even destroy their own infrastructure and economy to build up to attack Israel rather than build their own society. Lastly, the biggest CONTEXTUAL piece to this whole situation you left out which literally makes this report a failure is IRAN and it's influence on the entire situation. It saddens me that this report may lead yet more people to incorrectly view the Palestinian Israeli conflict and delay real help ever reaching the Palestinian people. The only way for peace to occur is for the dismantling of any political entity in Palestine that is calling for war rather than building up the Palestinian society's infrastructure, economy and culture which can only take place after the deradicalization of Palestinian society which can only take place after Iran and other countries are stopped from meddling around in Palestine which means the world has to step in and get their hands dirty and help fix this rather than just criticize Israel. You literally had a society put all of their efforts and finances into preparing to attack Israel for over a decade! Imagine if they were not a radical society and had focused those same efforts on building a jewel of a country with what lands they did have for the last ten years? CONTEXT is everything sir.
This is probably the most informative video i'll see on the topic. You did too good for the comment section to be bad.
So basically the joos came in and “LOOK AT ME, IM THE CAPTAIN NOW”
Modern day "palestinians" are Ghassinid arabs from Jordan and Egyptians. Also note that Jews have always maintained a presence in the Land of Israel/Palestine
If you actually look at the genetics, Palestinians are much closer to the Canaanites and Phoenicians than any "Israeli" Jew. Palestinians share 60-70% of their DNA with Canaan people and 70-85% with Phoenicans. Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews share less the half of that on average. So your claim is absolutely false.
@@That-gu8dj You know nothing of genetics. Firstly Phenocians are descendants of Canaanites, so are Amalakites, Jewish and Samaritan Israelites, Moabites, Edomites, Amorites and Ammonites. Palestinians are descendants of Edomites and Moabites whos territory was in Jordan their culture and identity has nothing to do with Palestine or Israel. They then became Ghassinids as they were Arabized and with the Byzantines invaded the Israelites territory and killed hundreds of thousands of Jews and Samaritan Israelites and replaced them. Read about the Samaritan and Jewish revolt of the Byzantine in Palestina Prima empire before commenting.
That's ret*rded, no group in that region is pure blooded. Paelstinians are a mixture of the many people that inhabited that region over thousands of years.
i love lying for a genocidal ethnostate
@@That-gu8dj the claim to land doesn't come from genetics, so what's your point?
I think he deliberately left many important historical details, so people can eat each other in the comments section 😂
To add all detail I think would make a 5 hour series. 😂
One of the more accurate and even-handed overviews I've seen on youtube.
The video talk about every terror attack committed by Jew but non of the terror attack committed by Palestinians (that are far more common).
Important correction: The Palestinian flag was created at 1964. it's a mistake to show this flag on the presentation before this year.
Rong
Peace for both israel and palestine 🇮🇱🇵🇸☮️
Sadly impossible.
This is so biased lol. This paints Israel as terribly as possible while trying to feigh impartiality. Leaves out all the Palestinian wrongdoings, exaggerates Israel's actions or outright uses Arab accusations and treats them as factual. I didn't realize this channel was so pro palestinian.
It is quite obvious that this video is biased in favour of Palestine. And you could say that majority of this video is either wrong or omits many key facts
They omitted Caliphate Umar ibn al-Khattab who conquered jerusalem and built the AL Aqsa mosque ontop of the Temple mount. It was a significant ant moment of the entrance of the Arabs into jerusalem
Its not enough to control the whole world from behind the puppet curtain you freaks have to also act like oppressed victims. Can’t you just be happy no one is really batting an eye that youre committing practical genocide
No mention that during the 1948 war Ben Gurion pleaded with Arabs to stay put in their homes and fight for the young Nation. No mention that Arabs we're told by Arab states to flee their homes so that the Jews could be pushed into the sea. Those who left would become the "Palestinian" refugees. Those that stayed would become the basis for the Arab-Israeli population which is currently over 20% of that country. It is that Arab-Israeli population that today makes up a similar portion of the IDF.
And to say that some rockets were fired into Israel beginning in the 2000s., is a gross understatement.
These are just but a few of the glaring mischaracterizations of this history.
Bottom line you will not know what's going on there unless you get many outside sources other than this one this one is a poor source of History.
no he got a lot right but yeah did miss a lot of stuff that make the jew good
If you can say that, please say it. I'm listening
You forgot to talk about how Arabs got the Levant
They used force like Christians did, yet for some reason you don't call people to talk about the legality of Europe or America.
keep it at making shorts
@@tmpqtyutmpqty4733 Oh the IRONY
why is that relevant to this video? What is wrong with you?
@YellowSpaceMarine That Arabs nor Arabic/Islamic culture are not native to Palestine, but rather were introduced via violent conquest and colonization.
It’s like watching football teams with a good defense and offense and no team can score a touchdown
so basically the 1st half of SBLIII
syria: builds canal to knock off israel's canal
israel: i'll take that, thank you
No, Hamas claim 32,000 have been killed. Looking at how many combatants they claim killed that would be a 1:1 ratio, that is utterly unheard of. Similar situations like Fallujah suggest 1:9 which means significant amounts of these numbers are actually combatants, given that Hamas is documented as using children as young as 10 as soldiers, and regularly build infrastructure in residential areas such as next to infant schools and hospitals.
In the first minutes, it is clear he starts history after Egypt
but does not explain how the Jews arrived in Egypt FROM CANAAN!
Since he leaves off the time of Abraham, he also leaves off the promise
to Abraham or that Abraham actually purchased a cave to bury Sarah.
all of that is true, but I think it's not really important for the cause of this video. He started by how the jews started to have a kingdom there, which shows the PEOPLE have history of land there, Abraham's promise isn't really relevant here
@@fatbabyd2813it is. Bc abraham is from adam and plays an important part of how jews separated from christians and muslims. All of them have abrahamic god and history. He should address who actually was there first.
Great video. Although I would have like to see a bit more coverage of the northern Israelis who were conquered by the Assyrians a couple hundred years before the the southern Israelis were conquered and taken to Babylon. The southern were returned to Israel when the the Persians conquered the Babylonians, but the northern Israelis; the 10 "lost tribes of Israel", were scattered throughout Mesopotamia and were not returned
So geohistory spends more time on research and this is what they come up with ?? Most of the video tells lies by omission
A crash course on history of the socalled palestinian state:
1. Before Israel, there was a British mandate, not a Palestinian state
2. Before the British Mandate, there was the Ottoman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
3. Before the Ottoman Empire, there was the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, not a Palestinian state.
4. Before the Islamic state of the Mamluks of Egypt, there was the Ayubid Arab-Kurdish Empire, not a Palestinian state.
5. Before the Ayubid Empire, there was the Frankish and Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem, not a Palestinian state.
6. Before the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, not a Palestinian state.
7. Before the Umayyad and Fatimid empires, there was the Byzantine empire, not a Palestinian state.
8. Before the Byzantine Empire, there were the Sassanids, not a Palestinian state.
9. Before the Sassanid Empire, there was the Byzantine Empire, not a Palestinian state.
10. Before the Byzantine Empire, there was the Roman Empire, not a Palestinian state.
11. Before the Roman Empire, there was the Hasmonean state, not a Palestinian state.
12. Before the Hasmonean state, there was the Seleucid, not a Palestinian state.
13. Before the Seleucid empire, there was the empire of Alexander the Great, not a Palestinian state.
14. Before the empire of Alexander the Great, there was the Persian empire, not a Palestinian state.
15. Before the Persian Empire, there was the Babylonian Empire, not a Palestinian state.
16. Before the Babylonian Empire, there were the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, not a Palestinian state.
17. Before the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah, there was the Kingdom of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
18. Before the kingdom of Israel, there was the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, not a Palestinian state.
19. Before the theocracy of the twelve tribes of Israel, there was an agglomeration of independent Canaanite city-kingdoms, not a Palestinian state.
20. Actually, in this piece of land there has been everything, EXCEPT A PALESTINIAN STATE.
A little more history for those wanting to 'restore Palestine'.
In 132 AD the Emperor Hadrian resolved to stamp the Jews and their religion out of existence. He sold all Jewish prisoners into slavery after the revolt of Bar Kikhba, forbade the teaching of the Torah, renamed the province Syria Palaestina, and changed Jerusalem’s name to Aelia Capitolina. He renamed Israel to wipe out the national identity of Israel and the Jews.
So if you are looking to 'restore Palestine to the Palestinians', you need to give it back to the Jews.
Babes what 💀
You are a complete idiot lol.
A few historical inaccuracies. Egypt was part of the British Empire and had full control of the Suez Canal from 1885-1954(56).
Travelling Israel has destroyed your video
The Israeli sock puppet didn't do anything
This history commences in its narrative long after the Hebrews and plains Canaanites occupied the areas of the Judean Hills, foothills and Plains to the west. Therefore, the mixing of Canaanites with the Hebrew ancestors from Mesopotamia, and later Phillistine and Arab mixing with the Plains Canaanites to form the Palestinian heritage is not given its rightful attention. Hebrew tribe ancestors and Palestinians are cousins. This is the invaluable context that is missing here.
I think five guys is the best fast food burger.
Fight me
cant fight you there
Five guys isn't the best fast food burger
I will not fight you
I've never eaten
@hyumiliatedbs3355 No, you're wrong
@@Kdub09swm five guys is not a burget, it is a restoran chain
The beginning of the Jewish people didn't start in Egypt.
It's started with Abraham moving to canaan as God told him to do. Israelites lived in the land of Israel Many years before living to leave to Egypt because there wasn't enough food in the land of Israel.
Almost! But the muslim pov still lingering 😂
At least you tried your best to be at a neutral stance, but really, minimizing the attrition and offense from the muslim side and maximizing israels retaliation as humanitarian problem is very visible. Bombing israel in a day to day basis also a crime against humanity, not just the palestinian. The jew populace is just as human as the palestine populace🤔
the only reason for this war is 15:00
when you were greedy,you lost more than you want to take.period
I have no opinion about this conflict and recognize everyone equally.
When choosing between the oppressors and the oppressed, if you decide to stay neutral, you're already on the side of the oppressors. Because that's exactly what the oppressors want you to do: look the other way and stay silent.
@@asif6786 Yeah the arab world is so peaceful and friendly towards jews right??
@@quandangle9397 As far as we are seeing is that Jews are living a nornal life in UAE, Qatar, Kuwait...etc while Arabs are being eliminated in by Israel.
@asif6786 I see zero consequences of your comment starting a war in the replies at all /s
You chose the🇨🇭 strategy
The 11th commandment says: fight with random ppl in yt comment section with a bad arguments and do mothing to resolve the problems
You’re wrong
yes this is what god taught us
@@kennypowers17 he's joking
Resolve the problem?
We have no power
@@polska_gurom1918 lol so was I!!! I was starting a fight in the comment section 😂
awesome information. People need to know the history before commenting on the conflict. context is everything.
Imagine fighting a war for thousands of years over a fictional book.
There was never a state called Palestine it was the British mandate Palestine and that name came from the Philistines not even arabs
"Palestine" is the Roman gift to the Jew haters
oh nice. it was the british mandate of PALESTINE. not ISRAEL. so israel is illegitimate in its state.
hebrew was alyays spoken, it is that nobody spoke it as their first language
It wasn't and you can look it up on Wikipedia
Nope. There's a difference between hebrew in the Torah and hebrew spoken in Israel today. Yes the alphabet and sounds are the same but a lot of words have different meanings today
Yep, Hebrew existed back in the time of the Phoenicians and ancient paleo-hebrew was used in old hebrew manuscripts.
@@Sandel99456Wikipedia 😂
Hebrew was used throughout History between ashkenazi jews in europe and sefaradi jews in the middle east. Letters from the middle ages were found in egypt comfirming that.
All the comments are full of people pulling stuff out of their ass
3:56 these next few minutes were kind eye opening to me. Most Jews lived in Polish Lithuanian as tolerated but then got scapegoated by Russian Monarchs? damn sure seems like they are troublesome
Ashkenazi Jews
that's like saying most Blacks live in the US and were tolerated but also scapegoated by Plantation owners. Damn sure seems like they were troublesome. It's called blaming the victim.
I’m still as confused as I was before I watched the video…
its okay if you have a learning disability. I feel you .
@@ChildOfChrist84 and you have that "Christian compassion" that describes your church cellars so well
Rick was right, this is such a complicated topic.
IM A PICKKE MORTY
It's not
What the fuck is complicated about not stealing land
@@Soap010 Well, the US took over 50% of Mexico, so it must be really complicated.
@@610Hobbies the whole of us land was stolen genius It just was like a million years ago
I will make this really simple for everyone. Jews were on this land since ancient times, there have been multiple wars throughout history and with multiple countries claiming this land. Jewish people started to come back there, Muslims started complaining that to many Jews were coming, the UK who was in control of this land played political games and offered the land to everyone, the UN stepped in a divided the land, Jews were okay, Israel officially became a country, Muslims started a conflict, the conflict then turned into a major conflict. The Muslim nations lost, then did it again a few years later, they lost again! And so on and so forth. And with this comes the reality, when you start a war which you loose you cannot expect to keep everything and pretend like nothing happened! Jewish people fought for their freedom and won, period.
muslims start the conflict in response for something maybe, why do you think jews were kick from every coutry they went ?
Why explain on a map a conflict which is not about territory??
You cannot understand it without the map. And it is about the territory and reversing of the Islamid conquest.
@bluaska i don't map to understand some Islamist groups are anti semitic and violent, and guess what? turns out it's also explicable with the map of the Netherlands
Learned a lot here, well done.
There is little to no evidence of the Kazar theory
Lot of half truths here
I was always taught a half truth was a whole lie.
You ignore Middle Eastern Judaism such as Babylonian Judaism (Iraq/Persia), North African Judaism that has lived there for over 2200 years and Yemenite Judaism that has lived there for close to 2700 years. and focuses only on Ashkenazim... incorrect!
You have a lot of mistakes from Judaism's perspective on history and for some reason claim that the research is right... but the research is fundamentally wrong!