@@San-lh8uswhat does that matter? The opponent still blundered the knight with normal play. I used activated to mean literally not on the starting square
Simp trading literally his only usable piece besides the king is definitely not a good plan, there is no way he can force a check before the opponent just takes all his pieces
@@mitchratka3661 If the opponent knows what's going on they might do that. They have no reason to avoid checks. It's a plan, whether it's a good one depends on whether you consider draw a good outcome.
@@cathsaigh2197 but simp has made it very clear that HE considers drawing from a disadvantaged position a win of sorts, he even said it in the video, so while I may disagree, that is the standard of this channel, not to mention that while the opponent COULD just randomly check since they have no reason not to, they also don't have a reason TO either, they would most likely attack random pieces then take them when simp can't move it, it's not about what's possible, it's about what's MOST LIKELY
@@mitchratka3661 And if the opponent is just attacking whatever piece they can and the King has moved out in the open attacking the king is a LIKELY option.
@@cathsaigh2197 yea it is, but it's not about likely, it's about MOST likely; in my opinion, the tunnel vision on capturing pieces is higher for the average 100-rated player
The testosterone way to play this is to go Leroy Jenkins with your king, taunting him to check you with every piece. It's not like a 200 rated player is going to be able to checkmate you in the center of the board anyway! Challenge idea: chess, but you're playing Chaturanga / Shatranj / medieval chess: 1. pawns only move one square, 2. woman is Adviser, only moves one square diagonally, 3. bishop is Elephant, only moves exactly two squares diagonally, 4. no new-fangled moves like castling or en passant.
I don't think trading queens is a bad move here. You get rid of his queen, he doesn't resign, and then he might actually proceed to check you with other pieces
I'd argue that unless the challenge specifically requires you to lose or draw in a certain way (e.g. achieve a stalemate while being down at least 10pts of material), then you have to win the game while adhering to the condition of a challenge. Otherwise you could just offer the draw at any point... (coward?)
I'd argue that Simp is usually literal in his interpretation of the rules (except in cases where he completely misinterprets them). There's no reason to add implied rules to any challenge. Simp plays by the "If it's technically correct, that's the best kind of correct" ruleset.
@@fatsquirrel75 2000 rating in duck chess means very little. I have 1900 there and 2100 in spell chess but my regular chess rating for Blitz games is still just 1200.
"Sounds absolutely impossible" My good sir, you keep making me richer. Bettin' it all on you, man! *after watching* *SPOILERS* Aaaaaand that's a new yacht paid for!
Chess, but you’ve invented the telegraph. A piece (not a pawn) can only capture a piece (not a pawn) on squares it is returning to. To be clear, not a square it has visited any time previously, but the last square it was on.
Kinda understandable decision at the end, but it's always very anticlimatic, you shouldn't call that a "mission accomplished". Besides, you weren't losing, could have stalled for a bit longer and seen it through. You'd probably even have chances for the very same position repetition again.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 89 | คู่เอก "ยอดไอคิว vs คิริลล์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z3vYkHJ_5Ig/mqdefault.jpg)
Draw by repetition is hardly a demonstration of testosterone.
All of his pieces are testosteroneless
Repetition is probably the MOST testosterone filled way to draw
@@Sang_Akrobatis most manly femboys
That was not much testosteron
Yeah he is a complete coward
Failing to win and calling it a win what a low T move
My first thought was "for a challenge like this, make good use of the pawns". Simp goes "for a challenge like this, push the king"
0:28 You cannot prove he is not Magnus Carlson, though
2:30 I was expecting him to say: “or even worse Magnus Carlsen”
@@skilledgaming2287 me too
I thought that he was supposed to be Magnum Carlos. 😀
This 100 guy actually played well. Only really lost a pawn
And hung a knight like one move after playing it when the only activated piece from his opponent was a queen
did you and 75 other people have your eyes closed when the knight was blundered AND when the bishop wasted a turn?
@@ChaseJonas75 but he had no way of knowing his opponent was doing a challenge
@@San-lh8uswhat does that matter? The opponent still blundered the knight with normal play. I used activated to mean literally not on the starting square
@theendofthestart8179 ah yes,someone below 200 making a few blunders. Yeah,we must be blind to say that he played decently for his elo.
Should've traded queens when you had the chance. Forced them to let you activate other pieces.
And risk the opponent sliding across the bottom two rows, gobbling everything up without giving a check.
tbh i don't blame the draw when the opponent hardly used any pieces besides the bishop and the queen. good game.
“A draw with a disadvantage is a win.” - Some Coward
Took the draw, what a COWARD
Anti-spoiler barrier
anti spoiler comment to
just don't go in the comments before watching vid
@@tcyb If you watch on the phone it shows you a sample comment that your eyes are naturally drawn to.
And then other comments stated popping up under the 'first comment'
Appreciate the thought though.
Thanks. Also works as a reminder to put the video full screen so I can't see the other comments either.
One of the better opponents in a while
2:42 trade queens, push king, and force him to develop other things?
Simp trading literally his only usable piece besides the king is definitely not a good plan, there is no way he can force a check before the opponent just takes all his pieces
@@mitchratka3661 If the opponent knows what's going on they might do that. They have no reason to avoid checks.
It's a plan, whether it's a good one depends on whether you consider draw a good outcome.
@@cathsaigh2197 but simp has made it very clear that HE considers drawing from a disadvantaged position a win of sorts, he even said it in the video, so while I may disagree, that is the standard of this channel, not to mention that while the opponent COULD just randomly check since they have no reason not to, they also don't have a reason TO either, they would most likely attack random pieces then take them when simp can't move it, it's not about what's possible, it's about what's MOST LIKELY
@@mitchratka3661 And if the opponent is just attacking whatever piece they can and the King has moved out in the open attacking the king is a LIKELY option.
@@cathsaigh2197 yea it is, but it's not about likely, it's about MOST likely; in my opinion, the tunnel vision on capturing pieces is higher for the average 100-rated player
Cowardly draw, take the pawn and see where it goes
This is actually a really hard challenge.
Wins pawn. Takes draw. Low T behavior.
Very cowardly, didn't even try to get checked by anything else. Which is strange because that would probably lead to a lot of blunders.
Are you sure that isn't Magnus Carlsen?
Chess, but you recognize the plight of the proletariat: you may not capture enemy pawns.
coward ending
If Simp puts his king in a light square the opponent will check with the bishop.
The testosterone way to play this is to go Leroy Jenkins with your king, taunting him to check you with every piece. It's not like a 200 rated player is going to be able to checkmate you in the center of the board anyway!
Challenge idea: chess, but you're playing Chaturanga / Shatranj / medieval chess: 1. pawns only move one square, 2. woman is Adviser, only moves one square diagonally, 3. bishop is Elephant, only moves exactly two squares diagonally, 4. no new-fangled moves like castling or en passant.
they didnt make any serious blunders so it could be the magnus carlsen of 100 rated players
Should've moved more pawns during the "middle game" to open up the king and actually try to get checked (not by the enemy queen, of course)
**RANDOM MOVE LETA GO**
Fast cat and good outro the world is sane again
That was a smurf alright.
I don't think trading queens is a bad move here. You get rid of his queen, he doesn't resign, and then he might actually proceed to check you with other pieces
lol he might not have been Magnus Carlsen, but he just might've been Anish Giri
No my cat is faster than yours because I am already subscribed
Perhaps it was his younger brother, Micrus Carlsen
its obviously the king
Can't believe Simp drew against Magnum Carlos
I usually dislike when you make stretches like draw=win, but honestly, this game is how I would have played so +1 and +engagement
wow he drawed against Mangum Carlos, what a lad
What happened to Carl Magnusson?
What's the song in the video that is played during the match?
It's in the description
@@drawmanbr7008 Thanks, I forgot how to read.
I'd argue that unless the challenge specifically requires you to lose or draw in a certain way (e.g. achieve a stalemate while being down at least 10pts of material), then you have to win the game while adhering to the condition of a challenge.
Otherwise you could just offer the draw at any point...
(coward?)
I'd argue that Simp is usually literal in his interpretation of the rules (except in cases where he completely misinterprets them). There's no reason to add implied rules to any challenge. Simp plays by the "If it's technically correct, that's the best kind of correct" ruleset.
He was, indeed, Magnus Carlsen
Bongcloud!!
Draws are always kind of disappoing ngl
is it really a drawback if the opponent is 100 rated...
Norway woo!
Does chess simp play against 2000? Anytime?
that would still be smurfing
In, Im better than my viewers, he has played some highly ranked challengers. And recent duckchess vid the player is very close to 2k.
@@fatsquirrel75 2000 rating in duck chess means very little. I have 1900 there and 2100 in spell chess but my regular chess rating for Blitz games is still just 1200.
"Sounds absolutely impossible"
My good sir, you keep making me richer. Bettin' it all on you, man!
*after watching*
*SPOILERS*
Aaaaaand that's a new yacht paid for!
How can you sure oppo is not Magnus Carlsen?
Video 185 of asking simp to play fps chess
Not very high testosterone, a little bit coward tbh
Excellent work as always
No-spoiler barrier comment
1:19 misgendered
Plot Twist... Simp is Magnus Carlson in disguise.
-
-
-
(Spoiler alert)
no testo ._.
lol
Wow first 7 minutes 288 views
Chess, but you’ve invented the telegraph. A piece (not a pawn) can only capture a piece (not a pawn) on squares it is returning to. To be clear, not a square it has visited any time previously, but the last square it was on.
Hey ma boi are you trying to get checked or what homie?
Many won't know where this is from anyway
Kinda understandable decision at the end, but it's always very anticlimatic, you shouldn't call that a "mission accomplished". Besides, you weren't losing, could have stalled for a bit longer and seen it through. You'd probably even have chances for the very same position repetition again.
*ANTI-SPOILER BARRIER*
(for mobile users)
Boooooooooo!
hi
5:09 "Draw by 3 MOVE repetition." I don't think so. It's draw by 3 time repetition of the same POSITION.
Day 45
Chess, but the game must end in a bishop and knight checkmate
Surely that would never happen. The opponent would resign way too early