Film History: Rise of the Studio System - Timeline of Cinema Ep. 2

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @nataliacostard3525
    @nataliacostard3525 10 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Thank you for that. I've been waiting for someone to finally do a series of videos over film's history and now there you are! This was really well done guys :)

  • @dougfinlay7528
    @dougfinlay7528 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Adolph Zukor doesn't get his due credit. Glad he did here. He also lived to a very old age . . durable. It is interesting how things evolve. MGM was the unquestioned king of the studios for several decades. Then was the upheaval in the late 50's and 60.s. By the 70's, MCA/Universal, with a very successful TV production facility took the hill. Warner Brothers, via Time Warner and large cable assets also reigned, while MGM fell into near impotence. Today, Disney, which was once just a niche, also ran, is the powerhouse.

  • @theshawnharrild
    @theshawnharrild 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video guys! I am a high school film teacher and this is better than anything I could do. Truly excellent!

    • @Ministryofcinema
      @Ministryofcinema  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Shawn H Thank you! We have more like this coming this year!

  • @cornishchris8404
    @cornishchris8404 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    very great series, very underrated

  • @ravencell2374
    @ravencell2374 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I really like this series. Danke!

    • @Ministryofcinema
      @Ministryofcinema  7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We're glad you like the series. If you have any suggestions, we're all ears. Thank you!

  • @francescodigiannantonio7899
    @francescodigiannantonio7899 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bravo!

  • @DJayGvids
    @DJayGvids 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    loving this. I just bought a book on this topic but I prefer your video alot more haha.

  • @loganetavernier9679
    @loganetavernier9679 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love it, but if you read that, please the music in the background is too much 😭

  • @jampalwilliamson
    @jampalwilliamson 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great stuff guys!

  • @alexductm
    @alexductm 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi ! Great video ! It helps me a lot for my paper ! Could you give me the sources that you have used for this video ?

    • @Ministryofcinema
      @Ministryofcinema  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Alexandre Wavrant Thank you! There were many sources, but most of the information came from Oxford History of World Cinema.

  • @tsp1999
    @tsp1999 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im pretty sure Potemkin was co-directed by Gregory Alexandrov

  • @hanajoyb
    @hanajoyb 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ❤️❤️❤️

  • @ajwinkler2375
    @ajwinkler2375 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    They are definitely pointing a gun at and making the other guy read cards

  • @razormc954
    @razormc954 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    And now Hollywood has revived it

  • @ananddeepdasgupta6430
    @ananddeepdasgupta6430 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow nothing about Dadasaheb Phalke and Indian Cinema?

    • @sharmisthaandbooks
      @sharmisthaandbooks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's about Hollywood studio system.

    • @ananddeepdasgupta6430
      @ananddeepdasgupta6430 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@sharmisthaandbooks no not entirely. It is about the history of cinema

    • @sharmisthaandbooks
      @sharmisthaandbooks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ananddeepdasgupta6430 the caption says so. Rise of the Studio System

    • @ananddeepdasgupta6430
      @ananddeepdasgupta6430 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sharmisthaandbooks you do know that India too had its studio system? They start the documentary with the history of how films started. Anyways if you think they are right then fine.

    • @sharmisthaandbooks
      @sharmisthaandbooks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ananddeepdasgupta6430 yes we have history of how films started and that's not what we call studio system. Studio System is always referred to Hollywood capitalized studio system. It has a specific definition in Film History and Phalke's contribution is not part of studio system history. Any Film School in India will have elaborate discussion on how was Raja Harishchandra made and how Phalke became father of Indian Cinema. But Studio system is a socio political construction that dominated Hollywood industry and transnational market to oppose that Neo realist independent filmmakers came forward.

  • @aliquewilliams3080
    @aliquewilliams3080 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    No one had "complete control" over anything. You used that phrase about four times in the first two mins of this video. I know using it makes this seem dramatic, which tells an interesting story, but it is also fiction.

    • @Ministryofcinema
      @Ministryofcinema  10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks for the watch and comment Alique! Unfortunately, I can at times be too liberal with my diction. The gradient of control isn't exactly the most defined... if you take a hard deterministic approach, then yeah, nothing--not a people, not an industry, not any agent--has "complete control."

  • @samishahzad6160
    @samishahzad6160 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wonderful and great All Thomas Edison. Adulph zokor producer. DW Griffith And Harry solter Charlie Chaplin. Charles Spencer Chaplin director writer and producer greatest star. I watched movies Charlie Chaplin and Alfred Hitchcock and Garry Cooper little and John Wayne and many more

  • @williamsnyder5616
    @williamsnyder5616 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sirshee Eisenstein? It's Sir-gay....

  • @m1LeyViRuS
    @m1LeyViRuS ปีที่แล้ว

    I know this video is old as fuck, but I just really have to wonder why Americans have to jump at every chance to put nazi ideology next to the soviets as if they weren't complete polar opoosites and the latter hadn't pulverized the first during WWII (while America imported nazis and subtly adopted their ideology, aside from the jew-hating part)

  • @logoarchivecollectioncompa19
    @logoarchivecollectioncompa19 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    400