Kishore Mahbubani - The Chinese Mindset

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 เม.ย. 2023
  • April 11, 2023
    The lecture was titled "Is the Asian Century Really Coming?"
    Link to Orginal Video - • 2023 Pardee Center Jan...

ความคิดเห็น • 466

  • @jacintochua6885
    @jacintochua6885 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    Modernization does not automatically mean westernization. Most westerners don't understand this !

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว

      The scientific fact is since human moderation in the last 300 odd years , western civilisation is equal to modern civilisation, and currently there are no any replacement other civilisation to it , hence western civilisation equal to modern civilisation will continues for the next 200 years in human history .

    • @legpol
      @legpol ปีที่แล้ว

      Jacinto chua: Then what does westernization mean? Was China westernized? I believe China was. As a matter of fact every country was westernized, I believe.

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@legpol they are just in partial westernisation, or transition from ancient civilisation towards modern civilisation. because the objective of western Universities to to train individual adult to have independence critical thinking and able to do logical deduction , and not the process of copying to look like one.
      If the majority of the people and students of that nation , unable to do independence critical thinking and logical deduction thinking , then they are not in the modern civilisation .
      Their mind set still are the ancient civilisation , and ancient civilisation is characterise by repressive mode of social culture.
      Modern/ western civilisation is characterise by the relative freedom of choices, human right respected / protected and democracy mode.

    • @legpol
      @legpol ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ct9245 : Yes, what you have said is quite true. But westernization primarily includes Western sciences and technologies as well as political system. Did China learn any (from the West) ?

    • @legpol
      @legpol ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ct9245 : No, the Western unversities never involved in the independence critical thinking. They were only involved in science and technological training; they taught Chinese science and technologies. They taught you English. You first learned English and then you learned science and technologies in English. You are now reading and writing English. You even have an English name. Without English, Chinese will not be able to westernize. China will remain poor and backward.

  • @KingCocaGold
    @KingCocaGold ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Kishore is BRILLIANT!!

  • @djtan3313
    @djtan3313 ปีที่แล้ว +61

    First class. A First class Professor.

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mr Kishore Mahbubani is a fake professor, because He does Not have a Ph.D.!

    • @manchanang7066
      @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว

      Let me remind you that 30 years after WW2, the Asia 4 dragons, Hongkong, Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, all Chinese ethics in Asia are already rich. Including Japan, all with a similar culture, which is hardworking and thrifty life style. Even those southeast asian countries where Chinese ethics are very small % population, but the business communities are dominated by Chinese ethics. So what happen during the time from 1949-1980???? is that really communism at work? the structural advantage that make the Chinese in mainland China stay as "sick man of asia"?

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@manchanang7066 Why some Chiinese buy and seell their wiiffe-s?
      You said they are rich now, didn't you?
      Maybe they have kiiilleed too many baby girls
      under "one child policy"?

  • @charlesdegaulle2928
    @charlesdegaulle2928 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    I really enjoy listening to Mr Kishore's speech.

    • @GlobalDrifter1000
      @GlobalDrifter1000 ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean Kiswhore?

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mr Kishore Mahbubani is Mr., because He does Not have a Ph.D.!

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GlobalDrifter1000 🤡

    • @oceanwave4502
      @oceanwave4502 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We notice that western medias intentionally ignore Kishore and people like him. Western medias are still more or less dominant in the world, so they have the ability to suppress any non-western ideas.

    • @GlobalDrifter1000
      @GlobalDrifter1000 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@oceanwave4502 is that the Royal We?

  • @garethxue8938
    @garethxue8938 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The top western politicians know China well. It not a framework issue, but not want China be better than them.

  • @Octavus5
    @Octavus5 ปีที่แล้ว +160

    People don't seem to get it. The current dispute between China and the "West" is not the result of misunderstanding or difference in culture. The emerging conflict is deliberate and intentional informed by America's desire to remain #1 and China's perceived challenge to American imperial hegemony. If there were no differences, America would concoct one. The 2 could be identical twins, and it wouldn't matter. A pretext exists for animosity because America desires a pretext. China is essentially dealing with a sociopath looking for a fight. There's no reasoning with such an individual here. The Chinese must be adroit and clever and avoid the crazy-man as long as possible.

    • @hongqi5734
      @hongqi5734 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      You are spot on.

    • @kennyng2289
      @kennyng2289 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      China is not looking for a fight. China wants to make sure that her citizens can have a better lives by developing economically and US is afraid that China will overtake her. It's US that is looking for a fight.

    • @baymax663
      @baymax663 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Well said

    • @everythingandmore5537
      @everythingandmore5537 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@hongqi5734 China copies a lot from the west accept democrasy and human rights. It looks like any other dictatorship. They would copy whatever is necessary to make money accept things that might make the dictatorship loose power. The question is why Kishore cannot grab this. Why is he going round and round in circles trying to please china. I never seen Kishore critic china a tiny bit. The same goes to Singapore Chinese who never critic china a tiny bit . This behaviour needs some investigation.

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Its like the western roman empire and eastern roman empire, both still have to fight until the one as number 1 .

  • @user-st3im5ge7f
    @user-st3im5ge7f ปีที่แล้ว +27

    《五子之歌 - Songs of the Five Sons》translated by James Legge
    民可近,
    The people should be cherished,
    不可下,
    And not looked down upon.
    民惟邦本,
    The people are the root of a country;
    本固邦宁。
    The root firm, the country is tranquil.

  • @alainoki5804
    @alainoki5804 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Guru Kishore analysis is unbiased. Detailed and comprehensive with data... Only that this lady from china need to prepare her question properly and ask... . The master of English between mainland chinese and foreign chinese still have a gap in level of understanding...

    • @manchanang7066
      @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว

      you know nothing about China, that's why you can't compare what he said with the real situation in China.

    • @wyz9815
      @wyz9815 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sometime I think why should people use the language of Anglo-Saxon who colonized them, plundered their wealth and enslaved them? It is the colonizer' s language! Now the colonization is ending, maybe we should stop using it as a world language with which Anglo-Saxon dictate international media platforms, and spread lies and hatred through these platforms.... it is sad, isn't.

    • @NP1066
      @NP1066 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Indians are good at talking.
      Chinese are good at doing.
      (No disrespect to kishore I love him).

  • @newhorizons898
    @newhorizons898 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At the heart of it is, once woken up, its Chinese culture with its flexible pragmatism due to its large population which nearby countries could emulate but without the same degree of enduring success.

  • @oyg5341
    @oyg5341 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    kishore highlighted China is closer to USA in terms of mindset than that of Japanese. That is a very rare insight which is not spotted on by many scholars . Kishore spoke spot on

  • @DrPrag
    @DrPrag ปีที่แล้ว +80

    Look at how Singapore (a small island with 75-80% are Chinese ethnic with deep Chinese culture) managed to develop from a fishing village to a strong regional financial centric country especially surrounded by huge Muslim countries. Not to mention Singapore’s military is also the most advanced and powerful in ASEAN too. Now tell me, why would China not be possible to achieve or become the world #1 Superpower.
    It is best that the western countries continue to not understand China, why? If they understand, then they will be able to learn/copy and also able to strike China’s weakness. (Being sarcastic here)

    • @Frisbieinstein
      @Frisbieinstein ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Singapore developed from a fishing village by being a British colony/naval base. It is impressive how it grew after the Brits left.

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The reason is simple. Singapore supports Ukraine and other nation's sovereignty independence and territorial integrity, but Chiina doesn't. So there is NO "Chiina's century", sorry, and we US mean it!

    • @arreydharma5784
      @arreydharma5784 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      I love how US expresses itsnloves for sovereignty like they demonstrate in Syria, iraq, afghanistan

    • @huli7963
      @huli7963 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      @@zackk7175 well, it is not decide by you or even Any country in the world except for china.

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@arreydharma5784 Then Why do you come to a US website?
      To slap in your own face?

  • @kl9518
    @kl9518 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    He didn't answer her question.
    Yes, there should be a new framework for westerners to learn about China.
    Be humble and accept the Chinese culture, not to dictate or analyse what is wrong with China.

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, there is Not a new framework for westerners to learn about China.
      CHiinese needs to learn 1st.

    • @Utube1024
      @Utube1024 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Cause there is no answer to the question. Too much Yin becomes Yang and vice versa. Just managing the balance everything will find its normal path.

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ysw8291 Mr Kishore Mahbubani is Mr., because He does Not have a Ph.D.!
      Don't listen to him, and don't learn from the fool.

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ysw8291 The one virtue of Chiinese is to
      SHuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuutuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuup
      She talked too much and her English is poor.

    • @wyz9815
      @wyz9815 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zackk7175 her English is poor, but your mind is poor.

  • @user-ho1ni1ij1m
    @user-ho1ni1ij1m 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All about mind set by the education made you believe on whatever systems you educated the young generation.

  • @jameswang362
    @jameswang362 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    There's one way the western academics can understand the Chinese mindset: immersion. They can go and live in a Chinese community.

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว

      The western study the chinese mind is to transform the chinese , not just to understand or compassionate to them.
      Just like they transformed the Japanese/ Korean / Taiwanese / Singaporean / Malaysian/ Indonesian /etc into westernise modern societies.

    • @manchanang7066
      @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can you cite some economic policies of CCP that created the speedy development? I don't think anyone can because there is none. The REFORM of Deng(改革开放)means Correction (改革)and Open door to be freed (开放). It means there are no new unique policies but to learn from Western capitalism, where people are allowed to create their own businesses. In other words, China is better without Communism.

    • @jameswang362
      @jameswang362 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree that the development happened by allowing capitalism. At the same time, CCP still retains some communistic/socialistic ideals.

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@manchanang7066 actually Deng done a revolution to Mao policy

    • @caomilo1031
      @caomilo1031 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@manchanang7066 That would be a long essay. CCP's policies since 1949 have been so unique because it managed to merge both the Soviet Union model and western model and with historical Chinese practices. 改革开放 is only part of the policy package. Think about it. Why many countries which also adopted 改革开放 soon lost all their key industries and resources to foreigners and many fell into the mid-income trap? It's much more complicated that you have to fit into the complex context of a country, especially for the one as large as China. If it's so easy, India should be world No.1 decades ago.

  • @phongy45
    @phongy45 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so true

  • @usiohaki295
    @usiohaki295 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wonder how you compare a society that all about individualism vs a society about family values.

  • @rogelee-TW
    @rogelee-TW ปีที่แล้ว +2

    👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏

  • @BL-db6xt
    @BL-db6xt ปีที่แล้ว +68

    The Chinese Democracy defined by this ancient maxim:
    民以食为天 : The mass need food security
    而民以食为天: The King shall take care of the mass. That's the heaven mandate.
    Thus, The King shall provide the best condition for the mass to be prosperous: From radicated abject poverty, elevate living standard, better & better income, with a huge bonus: Greening the desert, also taking care of the wildlife to large extent Y being the greatest Green Energy Generator, despite being the World Factory, China CO2 emission/capita is less than half of the US.
    Nowadays, China gov eradicated the abject poverty, having the greatest mid class in the world, actually, the world largest population of Millionares in the USD term.
    China is trully enjoying the best possible democratic government & remarkedly she achived this without resorting to pillaging the Mid East oil & gas, enslaved the Africa, genocide the native Americans & religious coercion

    • @GlobalDrifter1000
      @GlobalDrifter1000 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you, comrade for that remarkable display of propaganda Babel

    • @platosbeard4449
      @platosbeard4449 ปีที่แล้ว

      An excellent summary of the difference between the cultured China and the barbaric US.

    • @tommohsien888
      @tommohsien888 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol, greatest number of those millionaires are CCP official using their privilege to gather wealth on the backs of common people. It is like any "communist "regine. it has no problem gathering wealth for its members,it always has problem redistributing . This current system is more cut throat than the purest form of capitalism and less socialistic than the most capitalistic nations of today.

    • @GlobalDrifter1000
      @GlobalDrifter1000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Religious coercion yes, the Falun Gong and Muslims couldn’t be happier with the Chinese communist government 😂🤣😂🤡🤡🤡😂

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ysw8291 The one virtue of Chiinese is to
      SHuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuutuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuup
      She talked too much and her English is poor.

  • @hiyukelavie2396
    @hiyukelavie2396 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Every friction between China and the US can be traced back to one simple fundamental difference between them: long term thinking vs short term thinking
    The US doesnt understand long term cause and effect
    If we compare this in terms of human biological development, the US has the restrain and long term planning capacity of a 2 year old toddler
    Everything it has done vis-a-via China in recent years are kneejerk reactions that has or will backfire in the long term
    Take the chip wars for example
    Starving China of advanced microchips sounds like a winning strategy in theory, and it might even work in the short term
    But in the long term all this does is provide impetus for China to develop its own microchip industry, resulting in a game state that is worse for the US than it started off with
    And the funniest part, this isn't even the first time this has happened
    The US tried to cut China off from space. But what look what happened, China just went ahead and developed their own space station
    The US tried to cut China off from advanced jet engines. But look what happened, China just went ahead and developed their own
    And still the US is too dumb to learn. They just aren't capable of understanding cause and effect
    This fundamental difference, long term thinking vs short term thinking, is the source of all frictions between China and the US
    But it is also the reason why China will win

    • @tiewhiongwoon7700
      @tiewhiongwoon7700 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      How can people cut you from this and that since you are a big country with all the natural resources and a huge population😂 ?

    • @legpol
      @legpol ปีที่แล้ว

      Hiyuke La Vie : You are right on the point with the "long term thinking vs short term thinking". The US should have started from the late 18th century when they funded the establishment of the universities in China. They missed. Then in the 19th century, and in the 20th century, they were still training Chinese students by the millions. They, the Americans, have no long term thinking. They 惹火燒身。The China fire of course will have no mercy.

    • @hiyukelavie2396
      @hiyukelavie2396 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@legpol The US didn't just train Chinese students. Students from all over the world studied in the US
      More importantly, the US benefitted greatly from this, with many students who studied in the US staying there and becoming major contributors in various sectors
      There's a reason why universities all over the world, not just the US, want to attract foreign students
      Literally allows their country first pick at the most promising talents

    • @legpol
      @legpol ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hiyukelavie2396 : Yes, the US was benefitted greatly by foreign students.
      Did any foreign students benefit their own country? From the universal nature of the English language I believe every country in the world was benefitted by the US or the West. Among them China was the biggest benefitted. Now
      China hated the US the most.

    • @alany.9366
      @alany.9366 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@legpol Hahaha...China hated the US the most? It actually depends on which groups of Chinese people you are talking about I guess. I don't think most of Chinese people hate US, including those elite wealthy Chinese people, since many of them are either trying to send or have sent their assets and kids to US. Even many of the family members of CCP leaders have been in US. For ordinary Chinese people, they don't even bother to hate US since US is far beyond their reach. They only care about what happens in their daily life.
      The core of the Sino-American conflicts has always been about national interests, which in many ways, based on fundamental differences of ideology and value systems. To me, that will be an issue for foreseeable future and co-existence is the only way out for both countries.

  • @johnyossarian9059
    @johnyossarian9059 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Many Americans believe that their political system and social values are the very best in the world exactly like how their forefathers believed Christianity is the one true religion.
    And just like their forefathers who believed they had a duty to spread Christianity all over the world, Americans today also believe they must spread their system and values.
    And just like their fundamentalist Christian forefathers who saw non-Christians as threats, Americans today also view anybody who rejects American political system and social values as a threat that needs to be converted through force. Or at least to be weakened so much that they no longer represent a threat.
    This faith in the superiority and truth of their system and values blind Americans today to the reality of China

  • @leecheelek
    @leecheelek ปีที่แล้ว +1

    From young, most Chinese people are taught the fundamentals of business, trade, risk taking, perseverance, hard work, saving, fraternity, innovativeness, culture, customs etc. So ask yourself what about the other races and nationalities whether they are Western or not. What do their Leaders, Govt., political parties, religious or ideological preachers etc teach their younger generations or how to equip them for a better future?
    It's difficult to understand the Chinese until you live and mix with their community and understand their long long handed down heritage, culture, philosophies etc and how they life should be lived for the future generations to follow.
    Generalizing the Chinese according to Western Media narratives or propaganda thru the lens of their medias, rhetorics, academicians, stories, perceptions, fables is the first mistake to make as the wrong judgement is already made in the mind even before one starts.
    A better source to start would be to ask those people of Nations who have interacted with the Chinese since ancient times via the various trade routes and their generations today eg Persians, Arabs, Central Asians, SE Asians etc.

  • @lincolnteh1963
    @lincolnteh1963 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Socialism with chinese characteristics has proven its worth and ever evolving with changing time in perpetuity (like water).

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      Socialism is a total failure in 20 century. Even CCP doesn't believe it.

  • @lorenzkraus6888
    @lorenzkraus6888 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Who is the lady who asked the question? I want to read her books. She has a list of things in mind.

  • @thngthng5592
    @thngthng5592 ปีที่แล้ว

    We can only understand China with Chinese perspective. 😊

  • @NuestraPatriaGrande
    @NuestraPatriaGrande ปีที่แล้ว +19

    The Eastern mentality, like our Western mindset, is an evolutionary process that is 100 % human like ours. But humanity in the East has gone through critical common sense trials and errors that make the East very different from Western Societies. There was a time that China and the West had similar polytheistic belief systems, for example. There were high gods, war gods, and gods of rivers and mountains. In the West, these beliefs have evolved into a monotheistic belief system that may have started with the faith in a SUN GOD, ACKNATON in Egypt, to a holistic faith in Yahweh, the former War God of The Canaanites, who wound up becoming the god of the Jews, Christians, and Moslems. This evolution was borrowed from Persia, Egypt, Babylon, and Europe. The Eastern belief system may have begun with Indian Vedas that formed the basis for Hinduism, Brahmanism, and the Buddhism of Gautama Siddhartha. These religious transitions also underwent changes that kept the THEORY OF CAUSATION as a core, whether it became monastic or a religion of lay practitioners.
    Consequently, people in the East tend to take responsibility for what happens to them rather than think that others are to be blamed for their failures. When a person from the East is in HELL, it is a life state that, in modern terms, is equated with depression. The Eastern person knows that their practice will help them surpass the state of hell so that happiness will reign in their lives again. When a Western person is depressed( HELL), THEY GIVE in TO THEIR SUFFERING OR GO TO A PSYCHIATRIST. Eastern philosophy in China is of a type called MAHAYANA BUDDHISM. Whether a person lives in Japan or China, they feel that it is up to them to make the lives of their parents and their children better. In the West, we are more disconnected from our families as we must pursue our dreams and aspirations. In China, a scholar named CONFUCIUS gave China a way of life that incorporated the idea that we are all children of heaven(GOD?) and that there was a need for fielty to the heavens by the ruler(THE EMPEROR OR THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY) as there is a responsibility of the ruler for the happiness of the people(education, health, and welfare). This fielty and virtue traveled to the Chinese family structure. It started with observing a cultural protocol that began with fielty and integrity and responsibility for the patriarch(grandfather and grandmother) to parents and then to children by their respective ages. It is surprising to observe that today Confucianism and Buddhism still thrive at the core of the lives of 1.4 billion people. We in the West think that individual human rights and voting for a candidate chosen for us make us a democracy. The Chinese know that we are wrong to believe in this manner. To a Chinese person, governance must take into account performance. If the government does not yield results for the people's education, health, and welfare, IT IS NOT DEMOCRATIC. The selection of leaders must be based on merit and competence rather than on popularity. TODAY THERE ARE NO CHINESE THAT WOULD TRADE PLACES WITH A PERSON IN THE US. Would any sane person prefer JOE BIDEN to XI JINPING? Do Anthony Blinken and Jake Sullivan compare with WANG YI AND QIN GANG?
    Of greater importance are the policies of war and the policies of peace. For the next one hundred years, China will continue to be a proponent of peaceful development. Eventually, China will become a modern social democratic meritocracy. Or, it will continue to try to grow economically, culturally, politically, and socially. It will outpace the US and India. Presently, China must figure out that Taiwan must not continue to block its progress by continuing to be a US pawn in the containment of China within the First Island Chain. Though THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE has been successful, China has not perfected alternative routes for the resources it needs. The US knows that eventually, the US will not be able to stop China. The US will continue to provoke war by using Taiwan as a pawn and a proxy. China is neutralizing the US in the Philippines. China must also settle all SOUTH CHINA SEA conflicts. The dynamics in Taiwan are changing. Taiwan does not want to end up as rubble, and China has every incentive to work with everybody and anybody in Taiwan to get the KMT into power once more. If China is able to find a peaceful arrangement with Taiwan, it will be able to bypass the US hostilities with more success.WE LIVE IN VERY DANGEROUS TIMES.

    • @weirdno.1uniqueno.173
      @weirdno.1uniqueno.173 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      While i do agree with many things you posted, but there is something that i will disagree.
      We in the East do not believe in a thing called "abrahamic monotheist god", there was/is no comparison between our believe system to any of the abrahamic system. Tian(天) has nothing to do with the monotheist god, there's no need to find something to force the compatibility between the two.
      Confucius never give the idea that Chinese were the children of god, no such thing. Confucius said stay away from supernatural beings(whether those are god(s) or demon(s)). Hundred school of thought in ancient China do not taught/teach and denied the existence of a single monotheist god like those of abraham, the Chinese since the ancient were smart enough not to believe in such monotheist god that was/is full of logical fallacy and contradictions upon contradictions.
      And abrahamic religions are religions of prophecy, while Dharmic religions are religions of mysticism, and Chinese traditional believes are religions of wisdom, there are no relations and similarity between religions that depends on prophets from middle east with religions of mysticism from South Asia or religions of wisdoms from China.

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Eastern mentality has failed in recent 200 years.
      And even Chiina abandoned confucian 50 years ago

    • @weirdno.1uniqueno.173
      @weirdno.1uniqueno.173 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@zackk7175 China never abandoned Confucianism, in fact, Confucianism moral and ethics can be found on every day lives on virtually majority of Han Chinese and many non Han Chinese as well. And i'm not even mentioning that the CPC actually promotes Confucianism in this modern era.

    • @whatswhite110
      @whatswhite110 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      儒家只是一种理念,并不是宗教,我们能在几十年蓬勃发展,是抓住了机遇,有外因,但的确也有内因。我们没有把理念宗教化,我们没有天天把信仰挂在嘴边,我们是实用主义者,我们的信仰之所以没有吸纳基督教,那是因为基督教不实用。马克思主义对中国的影响很大,儒家思想也影响大,西方的科技和理论第一的精神,也影响很大。只要对我们生活改善有利的,我们都会接纳。西方的制度没有问题,有问题的是西方的人,早30年前,西方社会选举并没有政治献金,我们读书的时候,宣传西方选举是一人一票,谁都可以参选。而且媒体是独立观点。但看看现在整个西方社会,越来越不像样。这才是问题的根本。现在西方,是选民,是人,出了问题。快乐教育让整个西方的人变蠢了。

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@weirdno.1uniqueno.173 Are you a Chiinese? Did you ever hear about
      culture revolution in 1960s? If Not, then shuuuuuuuuuuuuuuutuuuuuuuuuuuuuuup

  • @jonathanlee5520
    @jonathanlee5520 ปีที่แล้ว

    "SELL" it to Wash DC ! 😂
    They ll be like, *"O yeah, so ?"*

  • @kevingptan1
    @kevingptan1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Go visit, live and mingle with China and Chinese. Seeing is believing. When you do that, you see from your own eyes, no BS.

  • @geinikan1kan
    @geinikan1kan ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The West understands China the way it understands China. China understands the West the way China understands the West. The idea that the West is wrong about China assumes there is a right and wrong way to understand something like a complete nation (or a bunch of nations) and it would just take a simple adjustment for everyone to understand each other correctly. How about if we start off wit the assumption that understanding takes compromise and a willingness to go out of your own culture in order to understand the other. We are all in the same boat. First, let's stop saying the "West."
    Does China understand India?

    • @NP1066
      @NP1066 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In every objective measure China understands the West better than the West understands China.
      Otherwise it would have remained a failed third world country.
      The way it advanced is a testament that it knew how to utilize the world order and adapt to Western dominated globe in an efficient way.
      The West now is panicking. Which is a testament that it's incapable of fully reading China.

    • @geofferytanmingchun426
      @geofferytanmingchun426 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So by your logic, which part of the West has been right about China?

  • @mygumybear
    @mygumybear ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fundamentally their are two way to approach this school of thought. It’s either a civilisation comes from a repressive history, oppressive environment and finally finds itself harmonious and democratic. Every civilisation has its own journey towards harmony and prosperity. The west has its own repressive/oppressive history which it has learned and now deem itself as a more coherent to democratic and harmonic society values. However China has similarly gone through the same phases during its dynasties and now have found harmony and prosperity using a centrally controlled system without loosing democratic values in its own way. This works for them. So there will never be a situation where either side west or east to see eye to eye on these principles as each find merit in their own system. The only way is live and let live. So which one you want to take?

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ancient civilisation are repressive society , Modern civilisation is freedom and democratic.
      Many Asian’ societies are in the transition of ancient civilisation towards modern civilisation. Many still in ancient civilisation in fact .

    • @arash4712
      @arash4712 ปีที่แล้ว

      Don't accept your argument that the west has found peace. It hasn't, evidently, and its not willing to look, see and learn. The world is hostage to western "values" and often hegemony.

  • @1bhaihay
    @1bhaihay ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Japanese are from Mars. The Chinese try to understand what it is to be human, to achieve inner peace & try to get along with everyone.

    • @terryanderson5148
      @terryanderson5148 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Julian Craze One thing you ought to learn from Japan. It should benefit you - disembowelment.

    • @manchanang7066
      @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Do you think speedy economic development is unique to China? let me remind you that before WW2, Japan, and Germany use 40 years to become a world power. After losing the war, with the heavy burden of war debts, Japan use 25 years to become 2nd largest economy in the world. Japan and Germany are small countries with very little, even zero natural resources. China is very poor in performance when compared with them. What kind of political systems they have? They achieve economic miracles after democratizing the countries.

    • @terryanderson5148
      @terryanderson5148 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@manchanang7066 Bravo ! Bravo !

    • @wyewye6375
      @wyewye6375 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@manchanang7066 Keep going, what happened after that!?

    • @manchanang7066
      @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว

      you are right about the Chinese trying to understand what is to be human, BUT NOT CCP. CCP is anti-ancient-Chinese, CCP destroys Chinese culture and traditional philosophy.

  • @whyh
    @whyh ปีที่แล้ว +2

    王者以民为天,民以食为天,能知天之天者,斯可矣。

  • @robertrichard6107
    @robertrichard6107 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ' surprised to hear Mr. Mubhabe use the John Birch term Chinese Communist Party CCP, instead of the correct Communist Party of China, CPC name/ acronym, which red baiters often use. Very few people know what's really going on in Washington DC though, it is Japanese Kabuki Theater.

  • @cryptoinside8814
    @cryptoinside8814 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4000 Years of China and 200 years of America....I think that says it all.

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      One belong to ancient civilisation , one is western civilisation equal to modern civilisation.

    • @cryptoinside8814
      @cryptoinside8814 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ct9245 Modern homelessness and lawlessness while other longer developed “ancient” civilization is actually “civil” and law abiding.

    • @cryptoinside8814
      @cryptoinside8814 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ct9245 Modern = less developed civilization with mass shootings, theft, robbery, smash-and-grab, racists and racial attacks, drug abuse, uneducated citizens who can barely do math and science, homelessness, political instability and on and on. It’s rapidly declining with old, poor infrastructures (so much for modern 🙄….potholes everywhere).

    • @cryptoinside8814
      @cryptoinside8814 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ct9245 Less developed civilization is still stuck in barbarism with violence and mass shootings every week (actually every day) and children are shot up in schools. Civility takes time. You can take caveman out of their caves, but you can’t take barbarism out of caveman. All those un-evolved body hair and odor won’t lie to you 🙄 Still Neanderthals 🤔

    • @cryptoinside8814
      @cryptoinside8814 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ct9245 America’s Latest Teen Mass Shooter - so much for news headlines on the “modern” civilization 🤔

  • @fengjikangqiang
    @fengjikangqiang 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The only monumental similarity of 3000yrs of Chinese history is 1 ruler takes all. All national resources are at his disposal. Everyone exist to serve the ruler. That was what Confucius was preaching about which is also why he was elevated to sage status by every royal court of every dynasty. What the west got wrong is that they keep thinking it's a republic when its internal society n political circles clearly know it's a kingdom.

  • @manchanang7066
    @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Let me remind you that 30 years after WW2, the Asia 4 dragons, Hongkong, Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, all Chinese ethics in Asia are already rich. Including Japan, all with a similar culture, which is hardworking and thrifty life style. Even those southeast asian countries where Chinese ethics are very small % population, but the business communities are dominated by Chinese ethics. So what happen during the time from 1949-1980???? is that really communism at work? the structural advantage that make the Chinese in mainland China stay as "sick man of asia"?

  • @kanpakloykan7105
    @kanpakloykan7105 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Kishore, the 3000 over year had made the Chinese to respect what they had suffered & strive for the rest for the good of humanity. Unlike the US & the west, due to only few hundred year of of new found prosperity & bullying the west thought that it is the god given rights to them to be aarrogant & look down on other few thousand years of humanity & thought they r supreme being. Thus their stupidity gets them to the present state. What can mankind sayto them but they deserve it.

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว

      The fact that 3000 histories are ancient civilisation , ancient civilisation are based on repressive societies . Modern civilisation is freedom and democratic .

    • @newhorizons898
      @newhorizons898 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's all a part of long, long, long learning process over many, many, many generations!

  • @andrewchtan
    @andrewchtan ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Kishore said " ...China 4,000 years of history ..."
    The American do not have ...

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      4000 history does not mean any things , although the ancient chinese has the concept of 大同世界 which means universal harmony , the 4000 history unable to achieve it .
      But small state such as Singapore using English Language to run its state , took only 50 odd years and achieved the universal harmony / 大同世界 in its state.

  • @bt9087
    @bt9087 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nothing about cultural difference, in any culture u can see who is misbehaving...
    If u don't stand up to a bully the bully will bully more.

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is no secret in human cultural or civilisation different , it is just only an excuse .
      The religious text ( christianity , buddhist , islam , etc ) can be translated in all languages , could transcend culture , language , nations , and still able to achieve it result to produce saints and sages .
      The ancient Indian able to transmit Buddhist text and teachings to the Chinese civilisation and transform them , hence similarly from Indo European sources , the western civilisation can eventually transform the Chinese / Japanese / Korean / Vietnamese too.

  • @dunzhen
    @dunzhen ปีที่แล้ว

    based girl. we love a non colonized asian

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว

      In the past, the Mongol and Machu also practice colonisation

  • @daning9764
    @daning9764 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This video is deliberately darken, why?

  • @dariomendoza191
    @dariomendoza191 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ECONOMIC Prosperity for all Nations!! no just for the so callled superior Anglosaxons the Usa and their Motherland-==England greetings from Mexico Whole ASia ..China!!!

    • @manchanang7066
      @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you think speedy economic development is unique to China? let me remind you that before WW2, Japan, and Germany use 40 years to become a world power. After losing the war, with the heavy burden of war debts, Japan use 25 years to become 2nd largest economy in the world. Japan and Germany are small countries with very little, even zero natural resources. China is very poor in performance when compared with them. What kind of political systems they have? They achieve economic miracles after democratizing the countries.

  • @nimeshpatel6006
    @nimeshpatel6006 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What is her question? I'm so confused.

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      with Poor English

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Watch again, Kishore understood it

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@accountantthe3394 Mr Kishore Mahbubani is Mr., because He does Not have a Ph.D.!
      Fake professor!

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zackk7175 😂🤡 Yet published books and gave talks in Harvard

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@accountantthe3394 😂🤡 Hitller published his book and gave many talks!

  • @xrc5540
    @xrc5540 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    He was thrown a very good question but could only answer in the same way as he often does. The issue at heart was the view of China by academics from the wrong end of the bottle, superficial and framed in liberal democratic terms. As such research goes off in a tangent. Mahbu did not answer the question .

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, her English is poor

    • @xrc5540
      @xrc5540 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@zackk7175 I understood her completely.

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@xrc5540 Asking one question doesn't need 2 minutes.

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว

      The issues of the civilisation conflict came from the Chinese language , they are not logical , hence unable to produce modern legal law, democratic and modern science .
      Unlike indo-european languages which are very logically based , which produce modern civilisation , build on logical legal law framework, democratic parliament, modern maths and science .

    • @newhorizons898
      @newhorizons898 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      One is a bottom up approach, the other is a top-down approach. The one who master both and uses it wisely has the advantage.

  • @wesleyclayton1168
    @wesleyclayton1168 ปีที่แล้ว

    Western scholars will obviously define china from western perspective

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว

      The issue is that the Chinese themselves also unable to list out clearly and scientifically on their thoughts for the world to study upon .
      Just like the Chinese TCM ( traditional medicine ) , the Chinese also unable to list out scientifically for the world to understand what is it about ? If it is ready a scientific / logically based ?

  • @walterwu164
    @walterwu164 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The question to ask Prof Kishore is what is the CCP mindset and what is their political ideology?

    • @arash4712
      @arash4712 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Mindset about what? As l understand it, it is to live and let live. American mindset is live and dominate.

    • @IamHandsome4u
      @IamHandsome4u 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wtever their mindset is, it is for their country not for anyone. So u shouldnt be worried.

    • @arash4712
      @arash4712 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I can tell you their political ideology is live and let live. The west ideology is live, plunder, rape, colonise, commit genocide, organise coup detat, install puppet regimes, cause war, test harmful bio-chemicals on own people, use orange agent on Vietnamese, blockade other countries, sanction, torture prisoners.. and then say: America is exceptional. My leg!

  • @johnm7267
    @johnm7267 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It is this lack of understanding the Asian mindset that will get them into trouble in Taiwan

  • @JonKino828
    @JonKino828 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    She studied Theology. That's where her biasness come from.
    If you are into Theology, you'll never be open minded.

  • @user-yo8jt9kf7u
    @user-yo8jt9kf7u ปีที่แล้ว

    There is no Asian Century, only the East Asian Century.

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They means including India, Australia and Asean

  • @malita354
    @malita354 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, I am the Honorable Coward😅

  • @ImagesOfCountries
    @ImagesOfCountries ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "..... You have to UNDERSTAND China on Chinese terms....." ... well said, Prof Mahbubani...
    The civilisational divide is not easy, if not impossible, to reconcile.

  • @legpol
    @legpol ปีที่แล้ว

    Does Mr. Kishore Mahbubani know 战争是中华世纪的产婆? In the Chinese mindset there is only Chinese Century (to be realized by means of war). In the Chinese mindset, there is no Asian Century.

    • @tristramfuller
      @tristramfuller ปีที่แล้ว

      To begin with, he is PROF Kishore Mahbubani, not Mr. We don't see China going to war often in the recent century, at least not as much as the Americans, so where did you get that idea from?

    • @legpol
      @legpol ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tristramfuller :If you meant 战争是中华世纪的产婆, you will get it by searching on the internet. It was a long read. It stated that China will use war to build a world empire after conquering the North America and possibly Australia. It is completely different from Prof. Kishore Mahbubani's idea that an Asian Curtury will be built peacefully by a loving China. He was dreaming all the time.

    • @wyewye6375
      @wyewye6375 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@legpol The one who has been dreaming is more likely to be you! Where were you when the Americans were in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria etc? Where were you when the Europeans were in the continent of Africa, shipping out people as slaves, especially to the so called New World? Where were you when there was an empire called the great Britain which always divided and ruled the colonised locals? Where were you when the Japanese were all over Asia, on the ground, with all the torturing depots? You must be having a very long dream while the rest are having their nightmates!

  • @kevinthant2952
    @kevinthant2952 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nobody wants govt repression, everyone wants to live in peace of mind and dignity. Those are universal values, transcending beyond cultures. If you want to see the fine balance between western values such democracy and Chinese culture, look no further than in Taiwan. Taiwan preserves Chinese culture well better than mainland China where CCP destroyed a lot of Chinese cultural values starting with Cultural Revolution under Mao Zedong. It is pathetic to see Kishore always being an apologist for the CCP authoritarian regime.

    • @Giles20
      @Giles20 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bro, the Republic of China (Taiwan) literally genocided the native Taiwanese (biologically and culturally) during the last 50 years. Far worse than what the CCP ever has done to its minorities. To this day, even if you include the political repression in Xinjiang and Tibet, they will wont be worse that what the ROC did during the White terror.

  • @onnbhaialihusseingandhi2139
    @onnbhaialihusseingandhi2139 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    .K.M now sleeping with yellow skin

  • @physika
    @physika ปีที่แล้ว

    Weird to read American history not in English.😂

  • @stanley5679
    @stanley5679 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pretend not to understand China, which stands for peace and economic growth with a fair equal world rule base order( developed, developing n under developed).

  • @goonhoongtatt1883
    @goonhoongtatt1883 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lady, keep your speech short. Where's the question?

  • @Hermit-Crab
    @Hermit-Crab ปีที่แล้ว

    The question wearies me.....I hope that's not the Chinese mindset.

  • @michaelmou
    @michaelmou ปีที่แล้ว +5

    suggest the girl should write down question on paper, be prepare; and take deep breathe to calm down.

  • @user-ym7zs9kl1h
    @user-ym7zs9kl1h ปีที่แล้ว

    "Foreigner" is not a nice word when referring to someone.

    • @tristramfuller
      @tristramfuller ปีที่แล้ว

      As long as you are not a local, you are a foreigner. How's that "not nice"? 🤔

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว

      in Japan and Korea, they are known as alien ( Gaijin / 外人) ,
      主客有別, in any nation , the citizen are the owner ( host ) , and the foreigner is foreign guest ( 外客) ,
      Which needs to distinguished clearly , even you visit your relative place , you still have to observe well your manner as you are still a guest .

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว

      In China they are even joked as 歪果仁 , funny nuts .
      homophonic form of "外国人" ,which means foreigners.

    • @tristramfuller
      @tristramfuller ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ct9245 I agree with your point in regards to 主客有别. 歪果仁 is just making fun, just as Chinese in general were being made fun of as "Chings" or "Chongs", sometimes "Ching Chongs", in a few Western countries. Words like 鬼子 is "not nice", other than that, 外人 is fine.

    • @ct9245
      @ct9245 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tristramfuller 外客/foreign guest is already a polite word, key word is who is the 主/ owner

  • @edmondshum4116
    @edmondshum4116 ปีที่แล้ว

    Misguided world

  • @jstasiak2262
    @jstasiak2262 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    While it is definitely true that Chinese culture and history is vastly different than Western culture and history, this video gives no information whatsoever on the nature and relevance of that difference.
    Chinese culture is hierarchical, paternalistic and mercantilist. This is reinforced by 5,000 years of Chinese history. Singapore is similarly hierarchical, paternalistic and mercantilist. Moreover, for all its festooning as a “democracy,” Singapore is, in fact, a police state that places strong constraints on freedom of expression and behavior. Singapore will execute one of its citizens this week for trafficking just over1 Kg of cannabis. Most Americans would find such a society and culture stifling and intolerable. Moreover, it should be abundantly evident by now that “freedom” and “democracy” are not requisites for a prosperous, stable and happy society. Most Americans cannot fathom that fact.
    It is insufficient to point out that Chinese and Western culture are “different.” That is belaboring the obvious. It is necessary to delineate precisely the nature of that difference and its relevance to the present discussion.

    • @ckokloong
      @ckokloong ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I dont think knowing the difference is important. Too much work. Important is respecting the difference.

    • @jstasiak2262
      @jstasiak2262 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ckokloong
      In order to respect the difference, you first have to know that it exists and what it is.

    • @angxiang3186
      @angxiang3186 ปีที่แล้ว

      The West is too Almighty n Arrogance to appreciate Eastern values/culture ~ ask a British = best meal is fish n chips.

    • @appl2597
      @appl2597 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ckokloong I agree that most ordinary people won't have the time to research the differences, but she's talking about academics and thinkers in the US. It's the least they can do if they want to pass themselves off as China experts in western academia..

    • @ckokloong
      @ckokloong ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@appl2597 The "China expert" in Western academia she refers to are people that US government support because those experts align to Western narrative. Western expert with balance view usually not prominent in the media.

  • @tlwchan3073
    @tlwchan3073 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wasting time! Those people don't even know how to ask a question. Level too low!

    • @manchanang7066
      @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว

      those clever questions are not broadcasted because he can't answer

  • @michaelpang4856
    @michaelpang4856 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excruciatingly difficult to listen through the questioner's ask; probably because she had learnt English by focusing on trying to grasp the accent but failing to truly understanding the language...

    • @wyewye6375
      @wyewye6375 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's alright. I overheard a Chinese struggling to speak English with an Australian and humbly apologied for that. The Australian said not to worry about that because he was worse, he couldn't speak a word of Chinese 😊.

  • @johnsan6645
    @johnsan6645 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Does he knows how Taiwanese people think also? According to him, living in Singapore makes him understand how Chinese minds work? Chinese in race or nationality??? He is Indian and does that make him thinks like an Indian National or he thinks like a Singaporean ???

    • @stevenliew2507
      @stevenliew2507 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Listen carefully to what he was saying. That will answer your question.

    • @johnsan6645
      @johnsan6645 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stevenliew2507 honestly, after hearing him saying he understands how Chinese minds work because he is living in Singapore, I didn’t want to hear any further, I just can’t.

    • @angxiang3186
      @angxiang3186 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      U r biased, I m a Singaporean ~ we live n interact with multi racial society. We done National Service ~ army conscription to 2 active service n another 10 years of reservist training. We, fight n depend on my platoon/squad mates; irregardless of race/religion/colour. He speaks/thinks more like a Singaporean Chinese than an Indian. Of course, I would also enjoy a roti prata/nasi briyani with him - likewise, he would appreciate dim sum n tea with us, Chinese.

    • @johnsan6645
      @johnsan6645 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@angxiang3186 or it is you that’s bias? I’m singaporean too, and did all the things you’ve done for our country, but that doesn’t mean I’m not allowed to disagree with a statement he made. Of course I do enjoy Muslim and indian food, but whether he’ll do the same for dim sum or not is he’s choice and I don’t condemn anyone who doesn’t. A wise man to me he’s definitely is, once said: I’m not an American, nor a European, I’m Chinese, BUT Singaporean !
      It is a totally different thing between race and nationality, therefore we don’t blindly mixed them together as the same thing. You don’t sing praises to any other country by using the majority of the population of your own country is of certain ethnic and race as a reason to do that. You do so it is because you choose to for whatever reasons you have or want.

    • @stevenliew2507
      @stevenliew2507 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@angxiang3186 All those critics are sour grapes.
      In Singapore, one can erk out a decent living by being hardworking, diligent and being disciplined.
      Not many Western Countries will have such opportunities for their citizens.

  • @JuanSanchez-tu3dc
    @JuanSanchez-tu3dc ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don't speak Chinese. I don't read Chinese. I just watch China so I'm an expert.

    • @RagaJustwatching
      @RagaJustwatching ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He also live in a Chinese environment in Singapore...thus he not just know but understand ..The West Knowledge seems zero about China and Asian..

    • @j4rey989
      @j4rey989 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He is a Singaporean, and he is an ambassador. Singapore has a good relations with China. And notice he never talks about China's domestic policies but his analysis is more with regards to China's Foreign relations and especially China's relationship with ASEAN countries.
      Yeah, He is an expert because he has experience as an ambassador, and his experience dealing with China and ASEAN.

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RagaJustwatching Mr Kishore Mahbubani is a fake professor, because He does Not have a Ph.D.!

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@j4rey989 Since when A Singaporean Can Judge Chiina?!

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ysw8291 Mr Kishore Mahbubani is a only Mr., because
      1) He does Not have a Ph.D.
      2) He got his master degree from a Canadian
      private University ranked 250 in the world.
      3) He never lived in main land Chiina!!
      How come he suddenly becomes an expert on Chiina?!
      Plz suit me by defamation! I'm familiar with US civil laws!

  • @GlobalDrifter1000
    @GlobalDrifter1000 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This lady talks too much.

    • @zackk7175
      @zackk7175 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      with Poor English

    • @philipchin6802
      @philipchin6802 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why watch?

    • @GlobalDrifter1000
      @GlobalDrifter1000 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@zackk7175 her English is excellent. Perhaps ,a little unpracticed.

    • @GlobalDrifter1000
      @GlobalDrifter1000 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@philipchin6802 why are you here,Chinny Chin Chin?

    • @vincenttay2812
      @vincenttay2812 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@zackk7175 Freedom of speech. Can you speak Mandarin?? The pot calling the kettle black

  • @babyspidey9627
    @babyspidey9627 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:20 WTF is she rambling about? Tiring to hear her going on and on….

  • @johnsan6645
    @johnsan6645 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You live in Singapore and therefore you know how the Chinese minds work??? Wow………

    • @robertcwchin5872
      @robertcwchin5872 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      because the vast majority of Singapore's population is also Chinese.

    • @superchargerone
      @superchargerone ปีที่แล้ว

      lol so you are saying that it is not possible to know how a society and its people are through observation? You must be some kind of dum because everyone else knows how another society is by using their eyes to see and ears to hear what they say and do. no? hahah perhaps you should try using your eyes to read something other than .... lol

    • @johnsan6645
      @johnsan6645 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@robertcwchin5872 As in race, not nationality, that’s different, and therefore think and work totally different. Many countries have Chinese, in race, eg Malaysia, Thailand, USA, Europe, do they all have the same type of mentality and behaviour? Even he is not the same as an Indian in Singapore compared to India Indians.

    • @merryweather4988
      @merryweather4988 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@johnsan6645 It doesn't matter where he lives, weather in Singapore or the artic circle or what nationality or cred. What matters is what he said. It is facts or just fake news, lies and propaganda as most western mainstream media does which even Pompeo himself admitted to.

    • @johnsan6645
      @johnsan6645 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@merryweather4988 Yes, even their politicians admit so, but never will those in the east, not only politicians but to the normal citizens, many until blindly following and singing out praises.

  • @manchanang7066
    @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kishore Mahbubani is very very wrong about Chinese future is determined by 4000 years of Chinese culture, because the old Chinese culture, the ancient Chinese philosophy is no longer popular in China today, the old philosophy are not taught in school, except those in College specialize in ancient philosophy. In fact, the ancient Chinese philosophies are found in Japan, South Korea, HK and Taiwan.

    • @ftu2021
      @ftu2021 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What a full of bs, speaking of philosophy, China is by far the most traditional. Taiwan, Sk and japan are too Americanized

    • @manchanang7066
      @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ftu2021 what kind of Traditional you are talking about in China? do they know Taoism? Confucius? Do they know Buddis?

    • @manchanang7066
      @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ftu2021 Let me remind you that China almost lost their traditional Chinese holidays. Those old Chinese holidays revived only recently......what a fool you are?!?!?!

    • @manchanang7066
      @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ftu2021 hoy, let me tell you that during the Mao era, China don't have 中秋节,端午节,etc.

    • @ftu2021
      @ftu2021 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@manchanang7066 yeah China does have them wtf are you smoking

  • @IIVVBlues
    @IIVVBlues ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So, Chinese are different than westerners. We already knew that. How about some insightful examples of how they are different? This video told us nothing.

    • @brianlowe3529
      @brianlowe3529 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Could be you are different

    • @ganboonmeng5370
      @ganboonmeng5370 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      To understand..u to live there for few years..study their history....culture...
      A SIMPLE EXAMPLE..WILL BE ....CHINESE TREASURE HARMONY...ABOVE PERSONAL RIGHTS !
      Social disciple over..individual rights !

    • @ChibiKeruchan
      @ChibiKeruchan ปีที่แล้ว

      one example is Children there are not spoiled brats like you. they get spank when they did something wrong. that spank right there make them tough physically and mentally. which explains why kids there don't get easily offended and do mass shootings. 😂😂
      that also explains why grand parents there are not a burden to their children. there are more grand parents in China like how the west do, but only the west have lots of lots of demand for caregivers. Chinese grandparent are tough and can take care of themselves.

    • @eveleung8855
      @eveleung8855 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have another western scholar introduce it to you, his name is Pascal Coppens, he did a full comparison between the western thinking and the Chinese thinking, that was truly insightful! You can Google him or run a search on TH-cam about his work.

    • @eveleung8855
      @eveleung8855 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      A tip, the majority of the westerners are linear thinking, right or wrong, black and white, up or down etc. The majority of the Chinese are spherical thinking - possibilities, not necessary one way or the other, this also connected to our writing system, the Alphabetical writing system is associated with the left atmosphere of the human brain, photography writing system is more to the right atmosphere of the human brain, let me introduce a book for casual reading, the name of the book is - Alphabet verses Goddess by Leonard Shlain, it is not about Chinese writing, but the difference ancient writing system in general, it proposed an interesting theory about the writing system that often shape who we are

  • @tommohsien888
    @tommohsien888 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It is great that people are interested in how a Chinese thinks and its culture but keep in mind that has little to do with Chinese governance as peple have no say in how CCP conducts itself. Also keep in mind that most people you speak to in the US are in fact elites of the Chinese society as around only 5% to 10% of Chinese have the priveledge to travel,nevermind the money to afford university education or talk to people like Kishore. The perfect example mix of Japanese, American and Chinese culture at a mocro level are the Taiwanese . Taiwanese people loves American,Japanese but Chinese not so much. Keep in mind most of the Taiwanese have visited mainland and millions are working there,albeit many are currently pulling out, but really Taiwanese mass have figured out that being 'Chinese" in the current form is not that great.

    • @merryweather4988
      @merryweather4988 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I disagree. The mass of Taiwanese is being brainwashed into becoming a slave and puppet to the West and the US in particular. Even so, they voted overwhelmingly in the last election to remain Chinese and to keep the status quo. The way the present Taiwanese leadership kowtowing to the US like a dog is so cringingly embrassing. The way Taiwan throws their citizens hard earned money into buying stupid, outdated weapons from the US is sickening. Let's just hope those idiots in Taiwan r not as stupid as those in Ukraine and let Taiwan become a proxy and battleground for the US.
      As to the CCP and it's governance - well, they r doing just fine. There r 1.4 billion Chinese. Even if only 10% of the population r elites that's already a number bigger than the population of most countries in the world.

    • @wingkeungkong415
      @wingkeungkong415 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You are incorrect all Chinese has the ability to visit other country
      Including The Old Man and woman living in poor village

    • @tommohsien888
      @tommohsien888 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@wingkeungkong415 lol, In the US meaning you need visa and be able to afford plane ticket. Poor villager can theoretically illegally cross to US southern border from Ecuador without visa which many Chinese are doing but villagers can't afford to pay the smuggling fee. Other than Chinese elites there are Chinese who work from back of Chinese restaraunt in Monterey Park,CA where I frequent. I have no ideal how those guys got here but they are not integrated into the American society at all and stay in their corners of Chinese concentrated areas.

    • @angxiang3186
      @angxiang3186 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is to love about America ~ colour of white over black over yellow. Don’t u know early days where public swimming pools r open to white after cleaning, then allotted days later to blacks and then the “dirtied” water days to yellow ~ Asians. Is it not evident that racial discrimination exists even after law is passed. Anti Asian sentiment motivation by Trump.
      What is to love about Japanese??? The war atrocities of WW2 n comfort woman issue ~ has Japan make all the compensation n apologies. Every Jap President still visit the Yasukuni Shrine ~ bastards of WW2 atrocities. Abe advocating/endorsing of unit 731.

    • @wingkeungkong415
      @wingkeungkong415 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@tommohsien888 all Chinese can go to other Asia country to visit as tourists
      I live in Hong Kong
      Chinese tourists has biggest spending power in hong kong

  • @user-hq3fg1wb4q
    @user-hq3fg1wb4q ปีที่แล้ว

    Someone said put the Chinese in Mar and they will build a colony

  • @shazamman8153
    @shazamman8153 ปีที่แล้ว

    The woman asked if a revolution could happen to overthrow Communist Party, but the guest speaker didn't answer the question.

  • @manchanang7066
    @manchanang7066 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you cite some economic policies of CCP that created the speedy development? I don't think anyone can because there is none. The REFORM of Deng(改革开放)means Correction (改革)and Open door to be freed (开放). It means there are no new unique policies but to learn from Western capitalism, where people are allowed to create their own businesses. In other words, China is better without Communism.

    • @tristramfuller
      @tristramfuller ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean, USA is running under pure Democracy? No, most of the countries in the world have a mix of different political structure. Of course, pure Communism is not ideal for the current world, so CCP is learning along the way and introducing a different model over time.
      AND of course China has economic policies. That's how China grew to become a contender to be the World leader. Is that good? Only time can tell.

  • @talkthetalk3798
    @talkthetalk3798 ปีที่แล้ว

    这个结结巴巴的英语有些够呛啊!

  • @wynetsang
    @wynetsang ปีที่แล้ว

    There are 53,700 US military stationing in Japan. Therefore, Japan is a colony of US. Even though Japan is culturally more different than China to US but Japan obey US and China does not. Therefore, US has to use force to get China to obey just like Japan, South Korea, Germany, Italy, etc.