Nothing wrong with Trent XWB-97 as it`s had lots of new orders recently because of feedback from airlines that have been running that engine for some years i.e. Qatar, Cathay, BA, Virgin etc. We all know one airline exec who`s been very vocal against it but others understand this engine is at the cutting edge of high power at low SFC for that power so durability may take a hit particularly at hot & high sand dust airports. RR are spending billions over time to improve this engine & other Trents but in the meantime all Trents including -97 have an incredible despatch reliability that would be the envy of any turbine manufacturer.
on the topic of ever increasing bypass ratio to increase efficiency. I get the argument if the fan blade diameter get too large, you will have ground clearance issue and tip speed reaching supersonic. But wouldn't be easier to just have a second engine less propeller nacelle run off power transmission of nearby engine. Effectively you split the power to multiple propeller from a single engine without needing to worry about tip speed and ground clearance, and effectively double the bypass ratio. There might be downside of needing transmission mechanism to draw a secondary propeller and increase complexity. But there are earlier airplane design with less powerful engine that need to transmit power to multiple props via a belt mechanism in order to generate enough thrust. And helicopter with turboprop already have similar power transmission mechanism to tail rotor. So technology precedent wise, it's not that out of question to power split a engine to multiple propeller in order to increase bypass ratio further. So why haven't mainstream jet start adopting this paradigm, seems lot easier with existing aerodynamic and exist off shelf component.
Competition is a good thing. Without Boeing the entire industry would suffer. I hope Boeing recovers from their mistakes and regains the reputation they used to have.
I love the a330
Me too
i received notify
Thanks Paul for the passion that pushes all limits.
Airbus : Engineer describing the video
Boeing : Sales Executive describing the video
I hope the success we have seen with this Trent Engine also will be seen in the A350-1000's engines
Nothing wrong with Trent XWB-97 as it`s had lots of new orders recently because of feedback from airlines that have been running that engine for some years i.e. Qatar, Cathay, BA, Virgin etc. We all know one airline exec who`s been very vocal against it but others understand this engine is at the cutting edge of high power at low SFC for that power so durability may take a hit particularly at hot & high sand dust airports. RR are spending billions over time to improve this engine & other Trents but in the meantime all Trents including -97 have an incredible despatch reliability that would be the envy of any turbine manufacturer.
Airbus a350 forever ❤❤❤❤❤❤Airbus fans here ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
It’s a bus a A I R B U S 🛫🛩️
I love air bus ❤❤❤350
this is airbus a330 lol 😂
Love Aribus
Excellent video
Nice video, great engine 👍🏻
It looks beautiful
FIREEEEEE! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Make a340 neo
YES!!!!!!!
They did. It's called the A350.
A350 is 2 engine plane
@@19000_ft .....you completely missed my point. how old are u...?
A340 neo probably won't even get to a330 ceo for efficiency.. a330 neo or a350 is just much better
Awesome aircraft ❤❤❤❤❤
i'm ATR 72 fan
I hope that KLM also chose for RR under the new A350 in 2025 fist Q.
A350 only has RR engines & KLM have ordered A350-900 & -1000 so they will have Trent XWB -84 & XWB -97 respectively.
AIRBUS BREAKDOWN
Por favor me ajude a buscar conhecimento nessa área, Como faço para fazer parte dessa empresas?
Bring back airbus a380!
on the topic of ever increasing bypass ratio to increase efficiency. I get the argument if the fan blade diameter get too large, you will have ground clearance issue and tip speed reaching supersonic. But wouldn't be easier to just have a second engine less propeller nacelle run off power transmission of nearby engine. Effectively you split the power to multiple propeller from a single engine without needing to worry about tip speed and ground clearance, and effectively double the bypass ratio.
There might be downside of needing transmission mechanism to draw a secondary propeller and increase complexity. But there are earlier airplane design with less powerful engine that need to transmit power to multiple props via a belt mechanism in order to generate enough thrust. And helicopter with turboprop already have similar power transmission mechanism to tail rotor. So technology precedent wise, it's not that out of question to power split a engine to multiple propeller in order to increase bypass ratio further. So why haven't mainstream jet start adopting this paradigm, seems lot easier with existing aerodynamic and exist off shelf component.
Airbus, if u read this what do you think the next airbus beluga concept would be?
Airbus is way better than Boeing, and I really want to work for Airbus Aerospace (Airbus>>>>>>>>Boeing) A330
Competition is a good thing. Without Boeing the entire industry would suffer. I hope Boeing recovers from their mistakes and regains the reputation they used to have.
@@Tevon93 they will, just wait. and yeah i still love Boeing. also awesome comment! Being positive instead of negative!
Be proud of an mechanical engineer why because lean things about jet engines
👍
Plz dont retire the a380 and a320 (a380 1 incident a320 180 incidents)
TEAM AIRBUS
👇
EU>US
Background music is very annoying; it makes it very difficult to understand what he's saying.
Okay
Airbus i want to PROPULSION SYSTEMS ENGINEER PLEASE HIRE MEE AFTER MY EDUCATION IS COMPLETED ❤❤❤❤❤❤ AT 2032
They should have stayed with A380 instead of A330.
Day 106 of asking airbus to give me a free A350-1000
Boeing is better bus A330 is my 2nd fav