These 2 episodes had me on the edge of my seat. To me we solve it but didn’t catch all the terrorist. Based on what they showed the hospital was the terrorist objective. The way I saw it was the random murders like they were connecting it was just the push to be able to what they wanted. I mean they can definitely try again but they’re too organized so it may take time. I don’t know if I’m explaining myself right lol but loved your reaction
@mynameisalice01 Throughout the episode, multiple characters said Kate reminds them of Hayley. So Kate dying, and Hotch being so close yet unable to help/save her, kind of foreshadows what happened to Hayley
Just a reminder everyone you can only talk about this episode or episodes before. No spoiling future episodes this includes hyping up an episode or season
7:14 he was also taught to follow orders without question, both by the Marines, and by the police. So, more than likely, he wanted to be there to help, it’s just his training, and what he has been told, prevented him from doing what he wanted to do the most.
Also, you may want to have them alive, because as you saw in this, he was a part of a cell, and you would want to try and get the rest of the cell so you could prevent the spread.
The "you all had to wait a year to find out" is what i say to friends who are only now joining the fandom. Yes, we had to wait an entire year to find out whose car exploded.
It's weird it took me a moment to remember what the bigger plan was in this episode but once I did I was like oh yeah it's that one oh boy are you in for it you don't trust anyone because you shouldn't.
One critique that I’ve had over this scene in this episode, is before Morgan ran out there with the ambulance being there. He should’ve grabbed their jump bag and brought it too Hotch so that way he could’ve started treatment.
Like, I totally hear you and understand your opinion on terrorists. But it's literally written into the constitution that everyone has a right to a fair trial. I totally get it if you don't agree, but that's why. Also trying to write something like absolute death sentences for a specific kind of criminal is nearly legally and legislatively impossible. Also, how would you decide if someone is a terrorist without a trial of some kind? No hate, just genuine questions. I love how you foster debate within your community. It's nice to hear all sides.
A terrorist is without a doubt obvious. You know who is an who isn't a terrorist. It is not a question who a terrorist is. And you can absolutely do that. Laws can absolutely be made and you can 100% lose all your rights. Especially when you're not a citizen acting upon terrorism.
Yeah you do kinda need to confirm someone’s crimes before you convict them. Plus the fact there are many acts under that umbrella. But not everyone is willing to understand nuance and most people don’t need to, it’s the people in power who need to understand the nuance of situations.
@@SimpleReactions Real world example: in Russia, a Chechen woman-suicide bomber changed her mind the day before her attack and surrender to police. She got 20 or 30 years in a labor prison. Opinion?
Too short unless she gave up names of terrorists/people she worked for and or other potential target. Also don't know if that was her first attempt or if she had participated in acts prior.
@@SimpleReactions There is no "second time" for a suicide bomber :) She fully cooperated, told everything she could and this was her first terrorist act. What do you think would be an appropriate punishment?
You can absolutely commit terroristic acts multiple times. A suicide bombing is not the lone way of terrorism. She could have had previous acts of terrorism. I would need more information for a sentencing. Let alone she is an accomplice to the terrorist organization. If she was involved with them previously and people died she is also responsible for those deaths.
@@SimpleReactions I think a dog being put down should be treated as more of a human than someone who actually deserves to suffer; that was what I meant by compassion.
Not only that, but taking someone alive means intel and/or leverage.
Day Made... Not only did I actually sleep(which is rare), but I get Bones & Criminal Minds back to back with my coffee❤❤❤
These 2 episodes had me on the edge of my seat. To me we solve it but didn’t catch all the terrorist. Based on what they showed the hospital was the terrorist objective. The way I saw it was the random murders like they were connecting it was just the push to be able to what they wanted. I mean they can definitely try again but they’re too organized so it may take time. I don’t know if I’m explaining myself right lol but loved your reaction
Now that I think about it….. Kate’s death is kind of….foreshadowing
wdym?
@mynameisalice01 Throughout the episode, multiple characters said Kate reminds them of Hayley. So Kate dying, and Hotch being so close yet unable to help/save her, kind of foreshadows what happened to Hayley
@@ghinanaeem5723 right, makes so much sense
9:06 that would mean that if anyone gets labeled a terrorist would be shot and killed... whether they were one or not.
Just a reminder everyone you can only talk about this episode or episodes before. No spoiling future episodes this includes hyping up an episode or season
7:14 he was also taught to follow orders without question, both by the Marines, and by the police. So, more than likely, he wanted to be there to help, it’s just his training, and what he has been told, prevented him from doing what he wanted to do the most.
Also, you may want to have them alive, because as you saw in this, he was a part of a cell, and you would want to try and get the rest of the cell so you could prevent the spread.
The "you all had to wait a year to find out" is what i say to friends who are only now joining the fandom. Yes, we had to wait an entire year to find out whose car exploded.
It's weird it took me a moment to remember what the bigger plan was in this episode but once I did I was like oh yeah it's that one oh boy are you in for it you don't trust anyone because you shouldn't.
One critique that I’ve had over this scene in this episode, is before Morgan ran out there with the ambulance being there. He should’ve grabbed their jump bag and brought it too Hotch so that way he could’ve started treatment.
Yea that injury scene always gets me
Like, I totally hear you and understand your opinion on terrorists. But it's literally written into the constitution that everyone has a right to a fair trial. I totally get it if you don't agree, but that's why. Also trying to write something like absolute death sentences for a specific kind of criminal is nearly legally and legislatively impossible. Also, how would you decide if someone is a terrorist without a trial of some kind?
No hate, just genuine questions. I love how you foster debate within your community. It's nice to hear all sides.
A terrorist is without a doubt obvious. You know who is an who isn't a terrorist. It is not a question who a terrorist is. And you can absolutely do that. Laws can absolutely be made and you can 100% lose all your rights. Especially when you're not a citizen acting upon terrorism.
Yeah you do kinda need to confirm someone’s crimes before you convict them. Plus the fact there are many acts under that umbrella. But not everyone is willing to understand nuance and most people don’t need to, it’s the people in power who need to understand the nuance of situations.
They may not have caught all the terrorists, but they at least saved the target and stopped their plan.
That is Navid Shirazi From 90210!
18:14 ..."you always have been" 🎶
Taylor Swift anyone? 😂
Omg was waiting for this one 🎉
6:40 - what if a person planned to be a suicide bomber and changes his mind and gave himself up to police? What punishment you would consider fair?
Too vague of a question too much more information needed.
@@SimpleReactions Real world example: in Russia, a Chechen woman-suicide bomber changed her mind the day before her attack and surrender to police. She got 20 or 30 years in a labor prison. Opinion?
Too short unless she gave up names of terrorists/people she worked for and or other potential target. Also don't know if that was her first attempt or if she had participated in acts prior.
@@SimpleReactions There is no "second time" for a suicide bomber :) She fully cooperated, told everything she could and this was her first terrorist act.
What do you think would be an appropriate punishment?
You can absolutely commit terroristic acts multiple times. A suicide bombing is not the lone way of terrorism. She could have had previous acts of terrorism. I would need more information for a sentencing. Let alone she is an accomplice to the terrorist organization. If she was involved with them previously and people died she is also responsible for those deaths.
I'm a mets fan 🥲.
Love your reaction regardless ❤
As someone that lives near Boston, I agree with you! #BostonStrong
Diseased dogs are shown compassion when they're being put down. I don't think the same should go for terrorists.
Its not really the compassion its more of the nonhuman treatment aspect.
@@SimpleReactions I think a dog being put down should be treated as more of a human than someone who actually deserves to suffer; that was what I meant by compassion.
I agree
the boston bomber been tried and sentenced to death. what are you talking about ?
Hes still alive and making many appeals what are you talking about.
Might as well just watch the episode..
I did