MASTER RULE 6

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @iewad8761
    @iewad8761 หลายเดือนก่อน +1061

    These ideas make Konami look like they actually know what they are doing

    • @CMaxoknight31
      @CMaxoknight31 หลายเดือนก่อน +88

      the only time I'm glad they don't listen to the community💀

    • @SaltyMcTilt
      @SaltyMcTilt หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      The deck capacity sounds cool actually

    • @EgoChip
      @EgoChip หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      That really takes some doing.

    • @NeostormXLMAX
      @NeostormXLMAX หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      No konami needs to add damage limits, damage limits would fix the game, because it makes ftks i possible and less pressure to break boards, imagine only being able to deal a maxximum of 1000 damage each turn

    • @NeostormXLMAX
      @NeostormXLMAX หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      2:52 you realize this is exactly how the manga and the original game went right?

  • @Kumo-s6f
    @Kumo-s6f หลายเดือนก่อน +526

    Each player compares the price of their deck. The one with the highest price takes a walk in New York at 6AM.

    • @RESCUEACEygo
      @RESCUEACEygo หลายเดือนก่อน +45

      most sane weather painter enjoyer

    • @jordanshopland0926
      @jordanshopland0926 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well I guess it sucks I live too far away from NY, no 6am walk in NY for me.

    • @FafliXx
      @FafliXx หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RESCUEACEygo We could fix all of YuGiOh by releasing the Weather link 1 that can also use a Weather Spell/Trap as material.

    • @joshrzepka4139
      @joshrzepka4139 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Which part of NY that state is huge

    • @jordanshopland0926
      @jordanshopland0926 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@joshrzepka4139 never said it was huge you muppet I live really far away from NY which was what I said. I'm born and raised a Londoner, too far away from NY. Though it would be nice to walk through Central Park

  • @TsuikeNovaus
    @TsuikeNovaus หลายเดือนก่อน +613

    Master Rule 6: Ritual Monsters are now Extra Deck monsters. The new anime has a Ritual playing protag.

    • @nikodemossowski4621
      @nikodemossowski4621 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      won't happen after they just released nekroz nostalgia bait

    • @UltimateCrusherJoe
      @UltimateCrusherJoe หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      Rituals are unique because they're not in the extra deck

    • @pylon9889
      @pylon9889 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      rush duel moment

    • @calumbishop7082
      @calumbishop7082 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      ... So good news, that is happening, but it's a Rush Duel anime.
      Can we just get Rush Duels internationally already.

    • @Endershock1678
      @Endershock1678 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@UltimateCrusherJoe
      Yeah, and rituals also gain the benefit of playing generic ED tools like Nadir Servant and Pot of Pot of Extravagence.

  • @callumellis8303
    @callumellis8303 หลายเดือนก่อน +198

    3:44 Bro described field spells thinking they cooked

    • @Marco7873908727
      @Marco7873908727 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Field Monsters?

    • @Viarus46
      @Viarus46 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nah, didn't even mention being an archetype ROTA

  • @jaysonking4055
    @jaysonking4055 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

    There was literally 1 idea that was good and 1 that was half good

    • @AdaptiveReasoning
      @AdaptiveReasoning หลายเดือนก่อน +40

      To be fair, a good chunk of them were over the top jokes. Why scheme when you can meme?

    • @TheWhiteDragonEmperor
      @TheWhiteDragonEmperor หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      the monster set unlimit, the old pend come back but they can only ever have 15 ED, and the duel links ban system where okay.

    • @christiansamaroo
      @christiansamaroo หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@AdaptiveReasoning I like how you making it make sense

    • @david92759
      @david92759 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

      That's not very surprising when the point of the video is to show us the funniest answers of them all...

  • @oooblyjooblies7022
    @oooblyjooblies7022 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    'Deck Capacity' is just MTG's 7-Point Highlander in a Yugioh trenchcoat.

    • @Julian-og3ps
      @Julian-og3ps หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      More like 7-Point Highlander is just Magic in a (anime) YuGiOh Trenchcoat

    • @JHZech
      @JHZech หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It's Yugioh The Sacred Cards and Reshef of Destruction in physical form.

    • @ucanbalinalar
      @ucanbalinalar 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Also Provisions in Gwent. You have a 150 Provision limit and strong cards have more Provisions. If you fill your deck with strong cards, you will run out of Provisions before reaching the minimum deck size of 25. NGL I think it's a good mechanic, not sure how that would fit in Yugioh.

  • @JohnnyD1986
    @JohnnyD1986 หลายเดือนก่อน +92

    1:56 coming from a Monarch player

  • @MomirViggwilv
    @MomirViggwilv หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    Serious answer: before turn 1, there is a simultaneous "turn 0" where both players set a number of non-continuous spells/traps from their starting hand depending on who's going first - first turn player can set 1, second turn player can set any number. These traps (or quickplay spells) can be activated from turn 1 onwards as normal, as if set in the previous turn.
    In essence, this rule would kill the idea of hand traps as a classification of cards. Regular traps would be albe to disrupt your opponent's first-turn plays just like handtraps, allowing potentially hundreds of power-crept trap cards (e.g. Lost Wind) to suddenly become viable again. It would also make spell/trap removal competitively viable, since it can be used to remove the set cards your oppenent played turn 0; spell/trap removal would essentially fill the same role as cards like Called By The Grave or Crossout Designator.
    If the existing trap pool provides too unweildy for this rule to work, they can instead print a new class of traps called "Fast Traps," which act as normal traps and are the only ones that can be set during this turn 0. Maybe some old trap cards could be erratad to be Fast Traps.

    • @dudono1744
      @dudono1744 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Dinomorphia players on their way to make Rextrem turn 0.

    • @MomirViggwilv
      @MomirViggwilv หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @dudono1744 Probably would have to ban some of the existing trap decks, yeah. That's one of the reasons I suggested the Fast Traps idea. Although certain trap decks like Traptrix would actually be totally fine under these rules.

    • @luminous3558
      @luminous3558 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Just. Print. Good. Trap. Cards.

    • @MomirViggwilv
      @MomirViggwilv หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      @@luminous3558 You cannot print good trap cards because the fundamental rules of the game makes trap cards bad. The most important part of a Yugioh game is the plays you make turn 1, and a card you set and does nothing until turn 2 will always be weak. This is why they printed Imperm and they're starting to print cards like Dominus Purge: they can be activated from hand turn 1.
      So instead of just adding this line of text at the end of every new trap card... let's just make that a thing.

    • @Viarus46
      @Viarus46 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@MomirViggwilvThey are able to make good trap cards like Daruma, Impulse and Imperm. What they are unable to do is spend more than like 30% of the card pool on something that isn't monsters. And for some reason they love printing shitty win more traps and archetype traps that never get used for anything but extension and overkill.

  • @sakulugh
    @sakulugh หลายเดือนก่อน +155

    master rule 6: Effects can no longer miss the timing, I hate that on old cards just because of one stupid word ;D

    • @tickledeggz
      @tickledeggz หลายเดือนก่อน

      The missed timing rule is clearly not in the spirit of the game as intended by Takahashi.

    • @arbogast4950
      @arbogast4950 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      I could finally play my Fortune Fairy Quintet deck.

    • @o7_AP
      @o7_AP หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      "But Yang Zings! Paleo's!"
      /s

    • @مؤمنعمرو-ب7ط
      @مؤمنعمرو-ب7ط หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      What about negates and Paleozoic ?

    • @Mr.SilentAizen
      @Mr.SilentAizen หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh Peta q

  • @otterfire4712
    @otterfire4712 หลายเดือนก่อน +94

    Set Flip monsters can flip face up as a quick effect, they effectively function like trap cards. This is a feature exclusive to Flip monsters. Changes to the banlist to accommodate such a change can be made, but I doubt it.
    Bring back separate Pendulum Zones, placing pendulum scales is not considered a spell activation. Vaylantz and similar pendulums that summon to the column refer to the nearest monster zone to the scale

    • @TheWhiteDragonEmperor
      @TheWhiteDragonEmperor หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      rest in piece ghosttricks

    • @Jackinthebox1719
      @Jackinthebox1719 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      So pass turn with 12 Cards on field still isnt enough huh?

    • @otterfire4712
      @otterfire4712 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @Jackinthebox1719 i just love when my opponent flips Anti-Spell to shut out my Symphonic Warrior deck. The fact Vaalmonica completely circumvent activation to avoid the lock out is the inspiration.

    • @yuricahere
      @yuricahere หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@Jackinthebox1719 how do you search and set 6 flip monsters and set 6 spell/ttrap in 1 turn

    • @shaser3684
      @shaser3684 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I like it à lot

  • @obiesenpai3869
    @obiesenpai3869 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    I think the new master rule shouldn't really be a rules update but a card design update. Like, make the cards and card text bigger (I swear I actually need a magnifying glass to read the cards) and implementing keywords unironically would make the game just a little less complex. It would require a shit ton of erratas, but I think it would be beneficial for the game itself.

    • @gabe2237
      @gabe2237 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      While they’re at it they can add full art type cards like pokemon has. Or at least make the artwork leave the box so that it looks cool.

    • @therranolleo468
      @therranolleo468 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Konami would rather go to war, lose it, have half their stock price go down, and go to another war before they even consider adding Keywords to Yugioh

    • @rinoportier556
      @rinoportier556 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      They just simply have to switch to how the ocg writes their cards, with all effects divided and each with their own number. And then at the start of the text there is a phrase that goes like " you can only effects 2 and 3 of this card name once per turn"
      This way you can also easily check which effects are hard once.
      But I doubt they will ever make a change to how cards are written here....

    • @friskydrinklunkybank1108
      @friskydrinklunkybank1108 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If they took the design to be like rush duel it'll be cool

    • @RandomRandomRandomX10
      @RandomRandomRandomX10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you think the text is tiny just take a look at a japanese card

  • @lightningfarronxp8899
    @lightningfarronxp8899 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    the idea of getting rid of the banlist and giving every card in the game a "power level" which cant exceed a specific threshold is actually a really good idea. maybe keep the banlist as well but only cards that are FTK enablers or alternate win conditions that enable games to completely freeze (self destruct button, final countdown etc) stay banned.

    • @finaldivine8235
      @finaldivine8235 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Actually there is a format created for this. İt is called trinity format. You can look it up. The meta is diverse and duels are back and forth.

    • @valonyaver600
      @valonyaver600 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      This mechanic kinda exists in a game called the sacred cards. Every card takes up deck space. And your deck space depends on your level that gets up every time you duel. It's kinda interesting but the values on the some of the cards in the game itself are wack. monsters with 2k defence take up as much as monsters with 2k attack.

    • @aceclover758
      @aceclover758 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yea it’s called “deck cost”
      Older Yugioh games had it like Duelist of the roses and dark duel stories

  • @brightpowder_cena
    @brightpowder_cena หลายเดือนก่อน +49

    We're finally getting 10,000 starting LP, buy up those Ancient Leaf!

    • @Eiji475
      @Eiji475 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      heck yes

    • @jeanpitre5789
      @jeanpitre5789 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Dinomorphia would be busted with a higher differential potential

    • @kristianhsp8411
      @kristianhsp8411 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It would have to be at least 16.000 starting LP to make the otk bullshit stop imo.

    • @livinginadarkworld2808
      @livinginadarkworld2808 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@kristianhsp8411tenpai dragon can put up 16k damage under pot of prosperity which halves damage for the turn so that means under normal circumstances tenpai will punch you for 32k damage and you only have 8k LP 😂 so realistically to stop OTKs it would have to go to 40k LP

    • @PikaMewleMiaouss
      @PikaMewleMiaouss หลายเดือนก่อน

      Then, they errata it to even higher LP requirements as a result before the rule hits.

  • @TidePodChan
    @TidePodChan หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    Okay that set 5 monsters guy is kinda cooking.

    • @RogerVenn
      @RogerVenn หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Tindangle best deck

    • @Jyxero
      @Jyxero หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Dholes on hand discarding Toddler of Torment (If sent to gy from hand or deck, sets itself, and is basically a Fiendish Rhino but on flip) and sending Intruder... 3 monster facedown and your haven't normal summoned / set yet...
      May those dreaded Called by / Ghost Belle / Bystials stay away from your Delaunay resolutions

  • @incakolactm239
    @incakolactm239 หลายเดือนก่อน +45

    “Details need work” 😂😂💀

  • @fatrobin72
    @fatrobin72 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    All tournaments are now 3 days long with a new scoring system that rewards playing as many games as possible within the time. There is no match making or limits on the number of games played.

    • @MysticKenji2
      @MysticKenji2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Duelist Cup but IRL

    • @jeanpitre5789
      @jeanpitre5789 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I can smell this idea

    • @Stinkoman87
      @Stinkoman87 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Instead of w/l players wager points; first 4-8 to get the right number of points go to the finals.

    • @shapular
      @shapular หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      All tournaments are 3 weeks long but you have to win enough games to assemble a set of locator cards that tell you where the finals are taking place.

    • @jeanpitre5789
      @jeanpitre5789 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @shapular love it. Make it happen!

  • @CHA0SBLEEDS
    @CHA0SBLEEDS หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So my friends and I play with this rule which seemed kind of broken at first, but it actually turned out to be pretty cool for the way we play (no ban list and up to 6 players)
    Basically your Extra deck can be up to 30 cards, but you can only use 15 cards out of it per duel. Some of our friends hated the rule at first, but it actually made the games so much more fun as they could use more cards from their collection, and allowed for more creative/flexible deck building.

  • @Eltanin
    @Eltanin หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    Editor using Under Night soundtracks. I'm now convinced with how much that game's been used as the BGM of so many video essays that more people have listened to it from video essays instead of the actual fighting game.

    • @TarosTheVoid
      @TarosTheVoid หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The trauma I get from hearing Night Walker from Under Night knowing it has been tainted by TH-cam essayists
      (Real talk Under Night music is very damn good, I wish Under Night welcomed me tho, I usually leaned more into Guilty Gear or Blazblue)

    • @Endershock1678
      @Endershock1678 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I play the game (Phonon main), and I definitely think the music is probably too good for the game. Like, the game is good, but the music is like… god tier.

  • @tuphatz7119
    @tuphatz7119 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    The shuffle decks together idea low key should be special event on MD. 😂

    • @NinjaXFiles
      @NinjaXFiles หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      It's scary and funny at the same time lmfao

    • @Jyxero
      @Jyxero หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Imagine playing a deck that relies on a one off like Floo, only to losing it due to skill issue (Aka opponent got it)
      Seems fun in concept, but goddamn would be a mess to witness...

    • @tuphatz7119
      @tuphatz7119 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@Jyxero Fill your deck full of cards with negative effects on the controller. lol

  • @crunchy687
    @crunchy687 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I would like for pendulums to count as both as a spell and monster in the hand to make my tier 17 pet deck more playable and work with the hypothetical support I've been cooking for them to get.

    • @Jackinthebox1719
      @Jackinthebox1719 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mr. Flameberge: I can help you becoming a spell my friend, but it will be permanent.

  • @BREEZE-ROADS
    @BREEZE-ROADS หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    When are we getting the shadow realm? I wanna condemn my opponent to an actual eternity in darkness

    • @Jyxero
      @Jyxero หลายเดือนก่อน

      Isn't that the game plan of the decks these days? "Blinding" opponent from the light of their Dragonmaid Parlor resolving with negates, only to give a merciful end with the following OTK?
      ...Or are you talking about Runick stun? Even Marik would tremble under such torture...

    • @BigSillyOrangeCat
      @BigSillyOrangeCat หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Jyxeroreal… master rule 6 should make maids un-negatable…

  • @eldavid8774
    @eldavid8774 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It’s very strange how much Yugioh players fantasize about master rule 6 and new mechanics, like haven’t you guys go into a a rage induced frenzy everytime konami made a change or added mechanics to the game? Why the change now?

  • @suppahfreak4084
    @suppahfreak4084 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I actually liked that idea about side decking once. It kinda put more focus on siding for the match-up itself, rather than whether you're going first or second.

    • @yslei2855
      @yslei2855 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Siding only once per match is only fine before game 1 IMO. Imagine if your opponent won game 1 and decided to side for game 3 and give up game 2, while you do not have that freedom since you needed to win game 2.

    • @jeanpitre5789
      @jeanpitre5789 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Better suggestion. Master rule 6: eliminate side decking and make the game a best of 2 just like Lorcana is. This eliminates garbage side deck BS and significantly reduces time needed at tournaments.

    • @Jyxero
      @Jyxero หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jeanpitre5789The declist on tournaments is public knowledge? If so, it seems worth, as you should prepare properly (Aka the supposed use of sidedecking... Not preparing the cards that ONLY works turn 1/2)

    • @jeanpitre5789
      @jeanpitre5789 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Jyxero the fact that decklists ARE public knowledge is even MORE reason to eliminate side decking and make it a best of 2 instead of 3. It means there's no CREDIBLE reason a player should be blindsided by their opponent going first/second and not having the proper responses anywhere in your deck. Ideally, it'd be exactly like master duel except each player gets a chance to go first, meaning you have to build your deck with a wide majority of matchups in mind when deck building, and doesn't give an automatic free win to someone who can side-deck out a perfect counter after wining game 1. It's entirely unfair as is because the vast majority of the time players winning round 1 are winning the match because they know what you're playing, your likely counters, and can side-deck against it, or if not, will scoop round 2 to assure their deck is properly optimized to win round 3.
      A best of 2 with NO side-deck eliminates ALL OF THIS, plus the problems of tournaments running overly long. No one will scoop because scooping means at best you tie and in tournaments you can't afford to tie and settle for 1 point. Lastly it's a better show of deck-building jn and of itself. As the game stands now, a massive amount of matches don't come down to skillful deck-buiding but skillful side-decking, weather that be a massive amount of floodgates, handtraps or board breakers for the specific situation. Anyone who's ever played a game without side-decking knows that it's much more balanced competitively and leads to more well rounded deck-building as opposed to heavily aggressive deck-building with the side-deck bridging the defensive capabilities of the deck once you know the matchup.

  • @waylaymaster6198
    @waylaymaster6198 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    As a kid we used to actually do the combine deck and shuffle and play before. Its just silly and funny.

    • @christiansamaroo
      @christiansamaroo หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Same

    • @jamaldavis2480
      @jamaldavis2480 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh hell no.... the fuckers would have 100% tried to steel my Blue-Eyes. lol

  • @GleamingGarmore
    @GleamingGarmore หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    1:32 no joke, ive played several tcgs in the “communal deck” format and it IS very funny

    • @seduq
      @seduq หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      *our cards comrade*

  • @presorts
    @presorts หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    6:00 must be a ghostrick enjoyer

  • @acesw6124
    @acesw6124 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Contextual banlist and material errata for generic bossmonsters like Baronne de Fleur
    Banned bossmonster X can be used in its original archetype at 1 example Savage Dragon

    • @dragonliniko-rr8in
      @dragonliniko-rr8in หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      This wouldn't work for many reasons,for starters how would you determine what a rokket deck is

    • @tonyshen8543
      @tonyshen8543 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dragonliniko-rr8inI would argue 50% is a great way to evaluate

    • @Honest_Mids_Masher
      @Honest_Mids_Masher หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Boooo

    • @tickledeggz
      @tickledeggz หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem is there are 10,000+ cards, and some archetypes are not designed to be a solo deck e.g Invoked. But even the more complete archetype were clearly designed with generic support in mind, e.g rokkets really struggle to put up a board pure, but add a few Chaos dragons and suddenly Dragon link is a deck.

    • @L_O_V_E_L_A_I_N
      @L_O_V_E_L_A_I_N หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dragonliniko-rr8in Also these cards aren't treated as problems in OCG/Master Duel, and TCG-only errata would be a bad idea in itself.

  • @jdanilozuluagap2981
    @jdanilozuluagap2981 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    MR6:
    At the first Draw Phase each player can choose up to 3 cards in their starting hand, shuffle back to the deck and draw the same amount
    At the Draw Phase each player compared the number of cards in field and hands, if the turn player has less cards in total he draws 2 instead of 1
    Maybe create a new category named "Boss monster" whit it own list and each player can only summon 3 Boss Monsters per turn, a lot of Link 1 and most of Link 2 will not considered Boss Monsters but Link 3 Or Higuer will be considered(ie Promethean Princess,selene,etc..) and some Monsters in the Main deck will be considered Boss Monsters (ie Fenrir, eldlich,Flamberge, ultimate, conductor tyrano, Gryphon ryder, Diabellstar Black Witch) and some Link 2 will be considered Boss Monsters( ie Spright elf(he could comeback),i:p, s:p, verte anaconda(could comeback), electrumite, isolde, halqifibrax, heavinly spheres, etc,..) and the same apply with extra monsters ( with some considered boss monsters as (phoenix enforcer, dragoon,toadally awesome,) but the important is that not all extra deck monsters are considered boss monsters for example intermedium synchro monsters(Rciela,Silvera) but of course Diabell queen of the WF will be , etc.
    What do you think guys?

  • @TayyabTV
    @TayyabTV หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    bro, the 100% guy was cooking, that would be a really interesting way to balance the game tbh

    • @OatmealCreamPie
      @OatmealCreamPie หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I am a big fan of it, cuz it makes deckbuilding even more of a consideration of "I want this busted ass card, but I can't make a deck that will be equally as cracked." or "I want a deck that can function like a well oiled machine and may not be the craziest, but it can survive a good beating." it's genuinely a great idea!

    • @AoyagiMei
      @AoyagiMei หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So many games implement this kind of system. It would definitely work, just needs some work.

    • @Petsinwinter2
      @Petsinwinter2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's a cute idea, but it's really hard to implement and police in paper play.

    • @TayyabTV
      @TayyabTV หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Petsinwinter2 agreed it would be harder to police than the current system but I still think that tournament play would be more or less fine. People would undoubtedly pick up on cheaters, especially with decklists being submitted before hand. Plus the net positive on the game would be really good imo.

  • @MrNoob_11
    @MrNoob_11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The benefit of the duel links ban systems is the argument that "[insert busted tech card] is necessary to give the the rogue decks a chance against the meta decks" actually has some relevance. The meta decks will have their engine pieces limited so the busted tech cards can only be used by rogue decks. With the current ban system, these cards would need to be banned since the meta decks can abuse them too.

  • @mateusrp1994
    @mateusrp1994 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Just let us Pendulum Summon without link zones, no strings attached. Pendulum sucks ass as is, there's no need to continue limiting it.

    • @HawaiianForgeStudios
      @HawaiianForgeStudios หลายเดือนก่อน

      Okay but then they need to hit the Amorphage deck day one because the entire deck is floodgates with a hard tribute cost that hits them even harder due to the current MR for links.

    • @Honest_Mids_Masher
      @Honest_Mids_Masher หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@HawaiianForgeStudiosAmorphage won't be meta or even close to it.

    • @uuh4yj43
      @uuh4yj43 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Honest_Mids_Masher it doesnt have to be meta, it just has to be very unfun. i played n/r amorphage on ladder and before i had tributed my whole board on turn 5, my opponent had only normal summoned or set cards, didnt play the game at all. and thats a bad amorphage deck.

    • @Honest_Mids_Masher
      @Honest_Mids_Masher หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@uuh4yj43 Fair enough

    • @pi_xi
      @pi_xi หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mateusrp1994 This would make Dinomist significantly better, but still not broken.

  • @jeanpitre5789
    @jeanpitre5789 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Lmfao the shuffling both decks and dealing them like poker is not only fucking hilarious but it would also definitely slow the game down substantially 😂 just good luck getting your cards back 😂

    • @JohnnyMacs19
      @JohnnyMacs19 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Right? Oh you’re playing a stun deck versus a kash let’s combine the decks this will work flawlessly…. 🤣

    • @jeanpitre5789
      @jeanpitre5789 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @JohnnyMacs19 getting home and then noticing your pristine copy of Fenrir is nowhere to be seen but you randomly have a TCBOO now.

  • @T3Gibbler
    @T3Gibbler หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This was the most fun video I've seen on ygo in a while lmao

  • @cd767
    @cd767 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ok so based on comments we can all agree, it would be fun as a side format
    >Limited Gy
    >Unlimited setting of monsters
    >More extra deck (maybe 20?)
    >Maybe a turn 0 to make traps less shit
    Something something pendulums nerfed or buffed
    Something something Speed flip summon

  • @urbanshadowgaming3559
    @urbanshadowgaming3559 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    for master rule 6:
    1.- after choosing how goes first, at the start of the duel both players can mouligan cards in their hands
    2.- extra deck goes from 15 to 20 slots
    3.- certain cards can go up to 4 cards per deck (just to see what happens)
    beyond that, i don't think a new summoning mechanic is necessary since everything is pretty much covered, perhaps a tuner xyz that can substract the levels of a monster (like the dark synchros - i think -)

    • @alexandreblossom6461
      @alexandreblossom6461 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why not but i think the master Rule 5 is good, I think just that konami must stop the 1 card combo too strong

    • @urbanshadowgaming3559
      @urbanshadowgaming3559 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @alexandreblossom6461 well, those cards are the money makers so....

    • @pi_xi
      @pi_xi หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@urbanshadowgaming3559 Ursarctic already uses that Dark Synchro mechanic.

    • @urbanshadowgaming3559
      @urbanshadowgaming3559 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pi_xi i mean synchro with an xyz monster

    • @iwilljaryou495
      @iwilljaryou495 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If u choose to moligan, u lose a card
      So card of destruction but for every1

  • @unamusedrowlett6303
    @unamusedrowlett6303 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1. Banlist rotation: once every 2 months, cards that are banned go down to limited and go back to be replaced with other banned cards.
    2. Flip effect upgrades: Flip effect monsters can be flipped up on the opponents turn the same way you can flip up Traps or quick play spells

  • @absoul112
    @absoul112 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    3:08 that’s oddly specific.

  • @Tealmaker
    @Tealmaker หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    “Cool…you’re an idiot”
    I felt that

  • @TouhouEXPolaros
    @TouhouEXPolaros หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I honestly think it would be nice for Konami to make more official formats like Magic does. I feel like it would be good for players to choose their favorite way to play YUGIOH.

    • @alexandreblossom6461
      @alexandreblossom6461 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yes, better idea, more official format and all the players Will be Happy.

  • @victordanailov5933
    @victordanailov5933 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Each time he quotes a post, I immediately get flashbacks in my head with images of people who I know, that visit the LCS I work at.
    Then people wonder why some players quit YGO... - they just don't want to communicate with such nonsensical beings anymore!

  • @laby1827
    @laby1827 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    6:20 I love this idea, this makes Pendulum less combo heavy on generic extra deck monsters, and instead give them more grind by allowing them to summon back all their monsters
    7:16 This is a really nice idea too I think. It makes siding more focus on helping your matchup instead of focusing on blowout cards

  • @ixenqidansecor5412
    @ixenqidansecor5412 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He did say "give me your worst" after all.

  • @n0namehunter
    @n0namehunter หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Why in gods name am I getting this as a short. Mate that's not a short, it's a long 💀 This is a whole Video without the damn full-screen option

  • @richardstamm2144
    @richardstamm2144 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Turn 0 for simultaneous setting spells/traps
    All draw phase is pick up 2, add 1 to hand and the other to the bottom of the deck.
    Hand size check at the start of turns
    Limit Pool. You can have X (6-10) cards in your main deck from the Limit Pool. Hand traps and overly generic consistency goes here.
    Ace deck of 5 cards. 1/your mp, you can add one to your hand. You cannot have an ace card in your main deck

  • @PhilipMonsos
    @PhilipMonsos หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    MR4 revisions were far from a "fix" for Yugioh. As much as you might think the master rule 4 revision was good, it was actually a big mistake for the game. It facilitates a lot of degenerate combos. We should revert back to the original MR4. There might be more that needs to be done, but the remaining issues can most likely be solved with banlists, instead of adding yet another rule.

    • @alexandreblossom6461
      @alexandreblossom6461 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mr 4 its gouki u, spyral but yes not degenerate combo indeed

  • @loremipsum1199
    @loremipsum1199 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i think we just need to limit the number of special summon, like around 6 times/turn.

  • @kriskych
    @kriskych หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The dice dude has played too much Dungeon Dice Monsters, I ain't gon lie.

  • @mattevans1643
    @mattevans1643 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Doubling the size of the extra deck would be a nightmare, terrible idea. You mean i get 15 more cards and can fit in all this stuff that before was kinda maybe, but didn't make the cut and now i don't have to worry about it.

  • @SystemYTP
    @SystemYTP หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I don’t like many of these ideas as well, but this community is soooo aggressive when it comes to rating suggested new rules.

  • @sebastianjobson1696
    @sebastianjobson1696 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    At the start of the game, both players burn the bottom three cards of their deck face down to make an emergency hand. The player going second can call a judge after drawing their opening hand and declare that they bricked. If the judge agrees that the hand is trash, they can replace their hand with the emergency hand, but must show their new hand to their opponent. The bricked hand is banished face down

  • @shadowspector3611
    @shadowspector3611 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    We’re in MR 4 2020 Revision. We haven’t gotten to MR 5 yet.

    • @idosarts_and_krafts
      @idosarts_and_krafts หลายเดือนก่อน

      ........holly fck you're right

    • @baoo7642
      @baoo7642 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Still waiting for the Pendulum Summoning un-nerf. People dont realise Links did all the crimes that they think pend did 😭

    • @Trujones
      @Trujones หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Like Windows 9, we don't talk about MR 5. We just skip it

    • @Gatchu137
      @Gatchu137 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      ​@@baoo7642 Pend was a genuinely broken mechanic, and nobody was confusing link shenanigans with pend shenanigans.

    • @TheBeastlyBomber
      @TheBeastlyBomber หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@Gatchu137incorrect

  • @Onyxs
    @Onyxs หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    None of you are allowed to cook

  • @TILR
    @TILR หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Here's my idea: Ritual Monsters can be placed in either the Main or Extra Deck

  • @AKASyx
    @AKASyx หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think the only ones that make sense as being doable, but reversible if they suck, are limiting special summons, making everything a hard once, and/or providing a type of mulligan

  • @LT_I_AM
    @LT_I_AM หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    I like the hand trap limiters. All they would have to do is use the banlist to now hit the unbreakable boards and be careful with releases

    • @alexandreblossom6461
      @alexandreblossom6461 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And as that all the deck Will do of ftk, no the problem, its the one card combo in the game

  • @SilverioFamilyforChrist
    @SilverioFamilyforChrist หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    As for what the Duel Links forbidden list does on a practical level, it allows the ban list makers to more easily target troubling decks without harming the weaker decks as much or to the same extent. Example: Set Ash Blossom to limit 3 along with two or more cards from a strong archetype like Snake-Eyes/Fire King, forcing the player to forgo consistency for possible interruptions or keep consistency with no hand traps. Another weaker archetype with no limit 3 on its main archetypal cards would not suffer and could slot in the 3 Ash Blossoms no problem. This feels so much better than what the current TCG has.

    • @jacobisbell9388
      @jacobisbell9388 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It is neat but remember that duel links is a digital only format, so tracking the restrictions on a deck is really easy. You put that into a paper format and it becomes a nightmare to keep track of.

    • @rebareon4749
      @rebareon4749 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@jacobisbell9388They should definitely do this with master duel though. It'd fix a lot of problems real quickly if they would do stuff like have every card used by stun at 3 or every pot at 1

    • @SilverioFamilyforChrist
      @SilverioFamilyforChrist หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jacobisbell9388 That's a very fair critique. Management would be the most difficult factor to control. Perhaps someone can crack that puzzle though my hunch is that it hasn't been done because it is just too practically hard to do. Still, I liked the idea in theory lol

    • @saigaryuu7565
      @saigaryuu7565 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@SilverioFamilyforChristinstead limit 3,if banlist DL have same idea for Master Rule i will erase limit 1 and limit 2 and introduce limit 4 and 5 instead.
      Example all current limit 1 in MR become limit 3,limit 2 in MR become limit 4,and limit 5 we can experiment either handtrap or omni negate

    • @christiansamaroo
      @christiansamaroo หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@SilverioFamilyforChrist it’s easy to manage it. If you caught breaking the rules, you lose the match. It’s just like if you were caught playing ban cards.

  • @arcthesavior
    @arcthesavior หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    deck capacity sounds similar to what old yugioh video games used to have which is kinda interesting

  • @LadyTsunade777
    @LadyTsunade777 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Master Rule 6: Timing is fixed, ALL "when" are now errata'd to "if". Also, you can normal Summon/Set once per Main Phase.
    Fixing Pends: Pends are free from MR4 (can Pend Summon to any zone, regardless of Links), you can use any Spell/Trap zone as Pend Zone (but only up to two at a time), and if a Pend card is in a Spell/Trap zone as a continuous spell or continuous trap (ex if your opponent put one of your monsters there with a Snake-Eye effect) then it counts as being scaled.
    Fixing Floodgates: All generic and semi-generic floodgates are banned. TCBOO, Gozen, Rivalry, Skill Drain, Anti-Spell, Secret Village, D.Shifter, D.Fissure, Macro, Pachy, Boarder, Amano Iwato, etc
    Fixing Tokens: Tokens can't be used as material for any Special Summon, unless specifically listed as materials (card has to say specifically the word "token" in the materials)
    Fixing Rituals: Rituals are now ED monsters. ED is expanded to 20 to compensate.

  • @Ltp1305
    @Ltp1305 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "You are allowed to set any number of monsters"
    Subterror players be like

  • @shadowgale11
    @shadowgale11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Honestly want a new summoning archetype that focuses on the attribute of monsters. Make Elementsabers meta!

    • @oooblyjooblies7022
      @oooblyjooblies7022 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      'Kindred Monsters' that require materials that share an Attribute or Monster Type perhaps?

    • @richardgriffin96
      @richardgriffin96 หลายเดือนก่อน

      to continue the powercreep trend its: if you control a monster you can use this monster a monster that shares its level and type/attribute from your deck to summon this kindred monster

  • @levrienthebaconlord9776
    @levrienthebaconlord9776 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Obviously most of these are unplayable, but they'd be interesting events in Master Duel

  • @neusyns
    @neusyns หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Master rule 6:
    Side decks are now exclusively for handtraps and are included in each duel like the extra deck.
    At the start of the duel: Turn 1 player draws from main deck, Turn 2 draws from side deck
    Shift roles per turn player shift
    This eliminates bricking, limits each deck to 15 hand traps, and gives each nonturn player draw a guranteed form of interaction while turn player draws guaranteed engine

  • @ReijiTsugikuni0626
    @ReijiTsugikuni0626 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As much as I wouldn't want most of these in game, they're great ideas for TH-camrs and people irl to do as challenges

  • @MrDigly
    @MrDigly หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    A maintenance turn before the 1st turn where both players can set any number of cards from their hands.

    • @raven_knight_076
      @raven_knight_076 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Honestly after playing a little bit of pokemon tcg I've been wondering what a turn 0 for both players in yugioh would look like. Probably absolutely horrendous without heavy restrictions, but there might be a way to make it work.

    • @LT_I_AM
      @LT_I_AM หลายเดือนก่อน

      Floodgates go brrrr

  • @zephshoir
    @zephshoir หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What I am surprised they haven't tried out yet is new types of Spells/Traps, something different from the usual Continous/Quick-Plays in a fundamental way that wouldn't and couldn't be explained within the text box. Heck, I would love more Counter traps that didn't just negated effects and summons.
    Also, fundamental rule changes could be explored by making them their own format.
    On the other hand, please no more Extra-Deck card types...

  • @TheLordTash
    @TheLordTash หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "Hand Traps go in the side deck" is pretty similar to an idea I had for a new extra deck mechanic. They're just monsters that summon themselves for free, even during your opponent's turn, if certain conditions are met. The trade-off is that each also has a "cost" that you have to pay by attaching cards from your hand face-down to it, and the attached cards return to your hand when your opponent removes the monster from the field (the cards get banished if its removed from the field any other way).
    So like there could be Not-Ash Blossom that triggers when the opponent searches a card and interrupts it, but it costs 1 card from your hand. Then your card is just stuck on that monster until the opponent decides to get rid of it, so they have to think carefully about the timing of destroying that monster. Could also be used for things besides hand traps, like an extender that costs 2 cards to use and only summons if your opponent has an extra deck monster on the field.

    • @dudono1744
      @dudono1744 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I had a similar idea, but free and once per turn by game mechanics. Also the condition would always be based on what your opponent controls.

    • @Viarus46
      @Viarus46 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe they could be backrow cards that set themselves first as a warning akin to YOU'RE FINISHED

    • @jeanpitre5789
      @jeanpitre5789 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Gorz and Battle Fader: "look what they need to mimic a fraction of our power"

  • @kingcrimson4504
    @kingcrimson4504 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3:31 it's funny that there are technically extra deck "hand traps" like numeron dragon that can reverse wipe your opponent's field if you get wiped

  • @artrix5092
    @artrix5092 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    That power % at the end seems interesting.

    • @MrGshinobi
      @MrGshinobi หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Could work for a digital game, not for a physical one

    • @Nothing2Say
      @Nothing2Say หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      instead of having formats like goat, edison etc. you could make power % formats, where for example only decks are allowed that have a specific power % or lower.
      if you know pokemon showdown, we could have tiers such as uber (no banlist), ou (top meta, current format), uu (rogue decks) nu (meme decks) etc.
      if a meta deck wants to participate in a lower format than it belongs to it wouldve to remove all staples such a handtraps for example.
      however you would have to give every single card in the game a power rank which would make this pretty much impossible.

    • @L_O_V_E_L_A_I_N
      @L_O_V_E_L_A_I_N หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It feels based off the point system used for Canadian Highlander (fanmade MTG format). I don't hate the concept but I think it should be its own separate thing, not the main YGO format.

    • @artrix5092
      @artrix5092 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Nothing2Say a yugioh format like that already exists, it is called kuchen

  • @KumiStellari
    @KumiStellari หลายเดือนก่อน

    Flip effect monsters now act upon their "Flip" typing. they are placed face-down vertically in the zone (like a trap in the monster zone), and can be flipped at any time during the main phase as a quick effect, and when flipped this way, choose their battle position while being flipped.

  • @13silentpoets
    @13silentpoets หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    3 suggestions:
    1. When a player special summons their opponent draws 1 card (permanent reciprocal Maxx C) (allows for board breakers/ hand traps to be played in fewer quantities + assures some disruption every game)
    2. Can NORMAL summon NORMAL monsters as many times per turn as you would like (garnets now become extenders/ extra damage + Gemini is back baby)
    3. Remove the 'summoned properly' restriction on ED/ritual cards. If I want to 'monster reborn' 'Demise king of Armageddon', just let me.

    • @13silentpoets
      @13silentpoets หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am taking no criticism

    • @Stinkoman87
      @Stinkoman87 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Your suggestion might make normal monsters playable again. They could serve as a summon engine but not an advantage engine. I think that rule is actually pretty fair.

  • @Barit555
    @Barit555 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Farfa asked for the craziest cooks, and then proceeds to tell people how their idea isn't actually helpful. You asked for jokes my man.

  • @warzoneguy6089
    @warzoneguy6089 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    New master rule - Master Duel gets a best of 3 format with side decks. That’s it.

    • @RamixTheRed
      @RamixTheRed หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This format exists its the Master Duel Meta tournaments

  • @xcmasterrunner
    @xcmasterrunner หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    After watching this...Never doubt Konami again.
    but for real me and some friends made a new format since we didn't want to limit our card pool to GOAT, and it's been going pretty well.
    [LSSN Format]
    Limited Summons:
    1 Normal Summon/Set and 1 SS (+ an additional SS per turn played) each turn, keeping track of the count via dice; limit excludes Extra Deck monsters.
    [ e.g. First turn: 1 Normal / 2 SS; Turn 4: 1 Normal / 5 SS ]
    Limited Negates:
    1 Negate effect each player's turn; limit excludes Counter Trap cards.
    Players start with 6 cards, but don't draw for their first turn.
    Extra Decks have 20 cards.
    I recommend giving it a try. Gives Mirror Force, Raigeki/Dhole, Solemns, Forbidden spells, and other older cards some new light, as well as just being a lot of fun.

  • @conflagads5238
    @conflagads5238 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    My farts power jets

  • @tomogotchi9140
    @tomogotchi9140 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Extra monster zone is limited to it's use once-per-turn, would greatly slow down link climbing, but wouldn't limit summons due to co-linking and thus making the zone much more vital.

  • @Homarid
    @Homarid หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    one view, eight likes... bro fell off 💔💔

    • @pheesheggs4615
      @pheesheggs4615 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What does fell off mean?

    • @WhipLash42o
      @WhipLash42o หลายเดือนก่อน

      “I’m autistic” in farfa viewer speak.

  • @Neo_Seraphi
    @Neo_Seraphi หลายเดือนก่อน

    Activating a Pendulum Scale is a hard once per turn. So you can only activate one Pendulum Scale named "Lunalight Tiger" or "Performage Plushfire" per turn. (You can still set multiple scales as long as they all have different names)
    Cards cannot miss timing

  • @bej4987
    @bej4987 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Let trap cards be activated in main phase 2 if set in main phase 1.
    Reduce the extra deck to 10 cards.
    2 normal summons.
    Level 7+ monsters can be summoned with one tribute.

    • @thecomedymask9089
      @thecomedymask9089 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      You make me thankful that Konami made the rules

    • @amazinglazy1058
      @amazinglazy1058 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Floo Best deck lets goooo

    • @Gatchu137
      @Gatchu137 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@bej4987 Definitely wanna see what would happen with a 10-card extra

    • @aciesara5444
      @aciesara5444 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The first-turn deck will become crazier if it is straight up 2 normals.
      There is a past video like this suggesting 1 normal for each MP, which I really like. This means the first turn player only gets 1 normal while the second turn player can use BP to help break the opp board and still have a chance to build their own board during MP 2.

  • @JoshyyBear_
    @JoshyyBear_ หลายเดือนก่อน

    • Five more extra deck spaces
    • Hand traps and board breakers should only consist of 25% of your entire deck.

  • @boydthames1460
    @boydthames1460 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    0:22 worst decision they ever made, please bring back MR 4

    • @Psyckonautic
      @Psyckonautic หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      L Opinion

    • @AdriW-sq4gd
      @AdriW-sq4gd หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nice try Trif

    • @Haaaaaaaaahe
      @Haaaaaaaaahe 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Link focused deck detected

  • @tcoren1
    @tcoren1 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    6:25 this MFer REALLY wants to resolve treebound hound

  • @aquaenjoyer1612
    @aquaenjoyer1612 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    the more i think about it, the more the "hand size grave" idea doesnt sound too bad. u want to abuse snow? then u have to also banish some cards from hand or field. want to have grave followup? u have to chose what cards u want. it wont break the game since most of the times (unless u play tear) the grave is just filled with pots, imperms and ashes so u can just banish those and keep the important card, but still, i really ike it.

  • @Jyxero
    @Jyxero หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    8:40 Blackwing - Vata the emblem of wandering:

  • @thomasdogkas2618
    @thomasdogkas2618 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No Joke I have been thinking little bit of it and the more i think the more I like the old idea of boss monsters. That's how I would imagine working thought :
    1) You have one from start to finish
    2) The will have some eff that will help your strategy
    3) Most important of every boos master would interact in a way with how you build the deck for example:
    -A specific boss monsters if you wanna play Skystriker for example would have some beneficial effect of course but woul require you to play for example a 40 size deck with 25 spells and not traps making you play more boardbreaker aproach
    - Example 2 monster heavy boss would require you to play 1 atribute or type having boss monsters helping those kind of decks
    - For a multitype and multi atribute decks their might be specific archetypical boss monsters with other restrictions
    The basic idea is to make boss monsters that restrict and slow the game down in a way and push the idea of more diverse deck building. The cam even make it more like 3 categories of boss monsters like how other games have colours with specific deck building requirement and specific restriction to each type and printing different boss monsters for each specific category where the ristrictions would be there but the for the category and but the effect would differ.

  • @StinkyBread96
    @StinkyBread96 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Something with Pendulums. Please. We're getting shit on out here. 😊

  • @lordfa9
    @lordfa9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I kinds like the ruling where setting a monster doesn't use your normal summon.
    Doesn't break non-fusion ED summoning, buffs flip monsters within reason and it's a secret buff for my pet deck (Glad Beast)

  • @IndeedFlute
    @IndeedFlute หลายเดือนก่อน

    to make it simpler, from more important to least important
    winged Pendulum scales.
    optional extra deck rituals start in extra deck, but if later down the line got returned to hand (compulse), or recovered (avarice) it goes to hand/ main deck respectively.
    all when effects are treated as if effects, but have priority in chain link. (so they don't miss timing, but you have to activate optional when before optional IF)
    you can pendulum summon in unlinked zones equal to 15- Extra deck cards you started with this duel.
    15 Extra means non, 13 extra means 2 per turn, etc.

  • @Captain_Cloud
    @Captain_Cloud หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    3:29 Just have a surgeon remove a kidney, sell it on the black market, then use this money to get more surgeons to get more kidneys.

  • @blackview1285
    @blackview1285 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2 normal summons instead of 1.
    ED size: 15 for >=40 cards deck,, 16 for >=45,, 17 for >=50,, 18 for >=55 and 19 for 60
    who got to start 2nd gets 6 cards in hand
    all spell/trap zones can be used as a pend scale so in tag duels u can put my scale if my partner put a card in the regular ones

  • @SlaytonSlaytonSlayton
    @SlaytonSlaytonSlayton หลายเดือนก่อน

    Trap phase: The player going second gets to set traps that can be activated that turn before the duel starts.

  • @VegetaPOAS100
    @VegetaPOAS100 หลายเดือนก่อน

    To help bricking. Going first draw 5 draw 5 more. You can keep 1 hand the other will go to the bottom of deck no shuffle. Game starts. Now for going second instead of 5 like normal draw 6 draw 6 more put one at the bottom of deck no shuffle. Neither going first or second draws a card. This way going second will know if it's even possible to win and not need to wait for your opponent to finish to know if that 1 card you draw helps.

  • @MrDavidRicketts
    @MrDavidRicketts หลายเดือนก่อน

    Took the most popular reasonable submissions along with my own and compiled them.
    All hand traps go to 1 each.
    Hand traps go the Extra Deck.
    Ritual monsters go to the Extra Deck.
    Extra Deck goes up to 20.
    Both players can mulligan after deciding who goes first.

  • @TectonicImprov
    @TectonicImprov หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like how a lot of these proposed rule changes read more like video game mechanics than things that would be remotely feasible in a paper card game.

  • @smithclone
    @smithclone หลายเดือนก่อน

    The one rule I wish was implemented in pretty much all card games is the chess clock rules. Each player got their set amount of time and if you run out you lose. This solves issues of going to time rules and no need to call judge over slow play ever again.

  • @villar2702
    @villar2702 หลายเดือนก่อน

    New monster type which would be summoned with tribute summons and be summoned into spell/trap zones with some sort of powerful field card effect which affects both players. If they get destroyed, they go back to the hand.

  • @T3Gibbler
    @T3Gibbler หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Honestly as some one that used to play competitively and swapped to playing casual i think the game is way too fast and complicated. You literally have to read a memoir on any deck or combo you want to do. I'm in favor of and will come back to the game if they implement any thing that slows the game down. I'm sure there's some paint eaters that will say "OMG no the fun is 50 card combos and winning bc your opponent doesn't draw a hand trap against my 1 card 8 negate board it's so much fun" and to you i say you are entitled to your opinion but id rather play literally any other card game bc of that which is sad bc i love ygo

  • @justalyx7952
    @justalyx7952 หลายเดือนก่อน

    - You can Tribute Summon in addition to a Normal Summon/Set.
    - Link Monsters cannot use lower ratings to link up (No dumping Prom Princesss for Masq)
    - Must use linked monsters or Link Monsters to link up (Materials must point to arrows)
    - If a Link is in the EMZ, Other extra deck monsters must be summoned to it's arrows (Only when its there)
    - During the End Phase, if you did not activate an effect or all effects were negated or fizzled you can draw 1 more card (A bit of a stretch but we need some sort of balancing for "unbreakable boards" that isn't just printing more spell speed 4 cards and hand traps)

    • @Stinkoman87
      @Stinkoman87 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Would link-1s be impossible to play without using a link-2+ as material?

  • @GunnarWahl
    @GunnarWahl หลายเดือนก่อน

    New master rule: alchemy monsters are introduced, they’re made of 2 or more face down monsters by default with more specific rules on the card. They exist in the extra deck but are two sided cards, one side a dark red and the other a bright blue. The dark red side is the “face down” defense and bright blue the “face up” attack position. They always count as face up monsters in the extra deck. And when alchemy summoned, they’re made to always start in face down red color side (which like links, only has a defense stat and no attack stat, other side is opposite.)

  • @fabriciocastrovizzotto9106
    @fabriciocastrovizzotto9106 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Master rule 6: the timing rule stops existing, all when triggers are errata'd as if triggers

  • @Grasschamp01
    @Grasschamp01 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would say Special Summons outside of the Extra Deck could be as many as possible, but you can only Summon 2 Monsters from the ED a turn. Card effects like Numeron Calling would still work, but then your ED Summons are used up. For some cards that work in the Hand like Ash, Imperm and Evenly Match would have a clause where they're given a special printed text that labels them as a special card where only one can be used per turn (think if it like Pokemon's Support cards).