Ole boy had this set up in a TBucket roadster back in the 90's I tuned it up and my mistake was taking a ride with him ,no seat belt nor roll cage he scared me! I've always been a Drag Racer knowing safety comes first,I'll never ride in one again, Also built a 427 or 430 for a jet boat I tuned it at the lake rhen grabbed my timing light and little red tool box and jumped out and said have fun I don't ride anymore! Nice Engine!!
Pining the rocker arm studs will not work small journal crank I hope you use some good rod bolts and always trim that water pump gaskets much cleaner look.
Look, I have no clue why you would say that SBC rocker arm studs can't be pinned? While it is considered a low budget option vs screw in studs it works, My guess is that sometime in the mid 1960's the heads were rebuilt and/or used for some high RPM activities like circle track and the owner didn't want to see his valve train explode every time he hit 7000rpm longer than 5 seconds. They didn't have screw in studs for sale on Ebay in 1964 so you use what works. There are some classes of racing now that require stock heads and pinning is allowed while screw in studs and guide plates are not. WTF does the journal size have to do with rocker studs by the way? Wow, just wow???.....................
Chevrolet introduced the 327 cubic inch (5.4 liter) V8 engine in 1962. The 327 had a 4.00 inch bore and a 3.25 inch stroke, which were increases of an eighth and a quarter inch, respectively,
I've ran a bunch of them they were ok but the new engines of today will run circles around them .for instance I own a 03 mustang has a 281 cid eng.it will bury a 150 mph speedo.i had a 69 mach1 it had a 428 cid eng .top speed of it was 142 mph .see what I'm saying if rather build a bad ass ls motor.or a 5.2 voodoo .I'm 68 years old and have owned about every muscle car made over 70 cars all the muscle cars were slow compared to these pocket rockets they have now.by the way that 327 can only handle about 700 cams .2 4 barrels is way over kill that's why he doesn't want to rev it it would flood out
Whow i built almost the same exact 327 about 25 years ago. I loved it.
Love that 327!
Ole boy had this set up in a TBucket roadster back in the 90's I tuned it up and my mistake was taking a ride with him ,no seat belt nor roll cage he scared me! I've always been a Drag Racer knowing safety comes first,I'll never ride in one again, Also built a 427 or 430 for a jet boat I tuned it at the lake rhen grabbed my timing light and little red tool box and jumped out and said have fun I don't ride anymore! Nice Engine!!
Nice 327
That engine sounds like it needs to go into my 66 Chevelle 😂
The sound of a 60s Sting Ray.
Running this setup in a 57 Chevy
Awesome 👌
Does it have the double hump heads? That used to be the thing back in the day!🤠👍
462 casting # heads are Double Humpers. .had some on a 327 I built 30+ years ago..64cc chambers.
A 327 chevy small block with Skynyrd playing in the background,how much more American can you get?
🤗🤗🤗🥰🥰🥰
Is it really a 62?? I don't see the breather tube in frount of the intake.
Yes it's a 1962 the intake is from the 80s
Pining the rocker arm studs will not work small journal crank I hope you use some good rod bolts and always trim that water pump gaskets much cleaner look.
Look, I have no clue why you would say that SBC rocker arm studs can't be pinned? While it is considered a low budget option vs screw in studs it works, My guess is that sometime in the mid 1960's the heads were rebuilt and/or used for some high RPM activities like circle track and the owner didn't want to see his valve train explode every time he hit 7000rpm longer than 5 seconds.
They didn't have screw in studs for sale on Ebay in 1964 so you use what works.
There are some classes of racing now that require stock heads and pinning is allowed while screw in studs and guide plates are not.
WTF does the journal size have to do with rocker studs by the way? Wow, just wow???.....................
More show than go.
Major overkill intake for 327 with those mickey mouse heads.
😅
Nice engine these comments make me laugh seems some people have to put in their 2 dumb cents in arm chair mechanics
Lol
How much
$8400
327 came out in 62 not 64
Chevrolet introduced the 327 cubic inch (5.4 liter) V8 engine in 1962. The 327 had a 4.00 inch bore and a 3.25 inch stroke, which were increases of an eighth and a quarter inch, respectively,
Needs better exhaust little louder
I've ran a bunch of them they were ok but the new engines of today will run circles around them .for instance I own a 03 mustang has a 281 cid eng.it will bury a 150 mph speedo.i had a 69 mach1 it had a 428 cid eng .top speed of it was 142 mph .see what I'm saying if rather build a bad ass ls motor.or a 5.2 voodoo .I'm 68 years old and have owned about every muscle car made over 70 cars all the muscle cars were slow compared to these pocket rockets they have now.by the way that 327 can only handle about 700 cams .2 4 barrels is way over kill that's why he doesn't want to rev it it would flood out
Cfm
You keep playing with them junk fords their buddy
327 don't have a harmonic balancer they were internally balanced!!!!
Every motor uses a harmonic balancer internal or external balance
@@eagleals5797 Yes indeed
I stand corrected
Way over carved for that displacement.