Fuji C200 - Not My Favourite | ROLL REVIEW
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.พ. 2020
- Fuji's C200 35mm is one of their remaining consumer films for film photographers to pick up for cheap! It's definitely an acquired taste though for the results it gives so let's see how it compares to some of the other consumer stuff out there!
- - - SUPPORT ANALOG RESURGENCE & SEE MORE FILM EXAMPLES - - -
/ analogresurgence
- - - For New Analog Content Every Week - - -
SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL 🔔 ➡️ analog.watch/subscribe
- - - DEVELOPING & SCANS BY DOWNTOWN CAMERA - - -
downtowncamera.com/
- - - Buy Some C200 - - -
www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...
downtowncamera.com/shop/fujif...
- - - Follow Me on Instagram & Twitter - - -
/ noahender2000
/ analogresurge
Fuji C200 is actually my favorite because it has a cooler tone than Kodak Colorplus 200. It's almost always sunny at my place so the warmer Kodak made everything seemed too hot.
I like Fuji C200, it gives that nice 80s photo album tone.
what film gives a 90s photo album tone?
@@8andre3 No idea.
@@8andre3 Kodak colorplus or Kodak gold 200
@@8andre3 kodak gold
Films to review in future ❤️
Fuji Velvia 50,100
Fuji Provia 100f
Kodak Proimage 100
Kodak Ektar 100
Kodak Gold 200 (maybe a video trying to explain the difference between this and Colorplus 200)
Cinestill 800T
Lomo 800
Shangai GP3 100
Ilford FP4 Plus 125
I love this film. Probably my favourite. Overexposed it’s just delicious.
I appreciate the review. Maybe in a future episode you can review some lomography film stock, cinestill, or more black & white.
Got a roll of C200 in my Zenit 11 right now, can't wait to see it developed
C200 brilliant film with fantastic colours for landscape.. actually super sharp and detailed. With slightly poorer light I would choose Ultramax over 400H. For better light C200 is great and brilliant value...
Your videos are really cool and straight up. Thanks
C200 was my first Color film that i've used.
As someone who hasn't been able to get a hold of this (every time I go on Analogue Wonderland, it's out of stock) I quite like the look of it based on this video! Each to their own.
Thx this is very helpful to process negatives on Photoshop
Hey Noah, I really enjoy your roll reviews. It would be so interesting if you could make a video review for some more experimental films out there like Lomography purple film or basically all the films produced by dubblefilm.
I used it today and it's perfect for my restored DL290 camera.
I've noticed Walmart seems to carry fuji, and sometimes Kodak 400 color. It's become a bit of a game to see what different Walmarts or other large stores carry
Nice review! I shoot c200 at 50 or 100 iso. Looks so much better imo
As most of what I shoot is grean anyways, I love C200. Pretty much a staple for me documenting my hikes!
Dynamic range is good enough to handle open landscapes with bright skies and I just like the look for that sort of images.
Plus it is the cheapest single roll color negative film I can get at pretty much any drug store here in Germany (3 packs of Kodak Gold are a bit cheaper tho).
You nailed the "Fuji" look, never to be mistaken for Kodachrome but has its own unique characteristics. I really like your videos.
That "Fuji look" is just rebranded Kodak. That all this film is 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
one of my favourite film stocks out there
I have a slightly different track record with c200, as I rely on selenium meter that overexposes for about half stop. Yes, it blows the sky, but everything else looks so vibrant and punchy, with a refreshingly cold palette.
I bought a roll of this stuff and will take it to an airshow, will be interesting to see how things like the green J32 lansen or camo painted planes will look with green appearently being very vibrant on this film.
I would love to see an episode on cinestill 800t
also not my favorite overall, but I love when it nails the greens on a sunny day.
I loooove Fuji c200
C200 is my all time c41 favourite ❤️
Magenta Gang! Love Superia Xtra 400
I personally don't often shoot Fuji colour neg because of its tendency to exaggerate green and magenta as you say. I much prefer the warmer tones even in the "cheap stuff" like colourplus
I have an Olympus Stylus similar to what you used for the C200 photos. That camera seemed to take better picture using 800 speed film.
Mad at Fuji for dropping the last of the Polaroid Land camera film. On the bright side I got my 'hand rolled' color slide film from the Film Photography project! Now I for to fight for more fridge space till I burn it all.
I loved Superia 200
Normally i would shoot agfa color but with the price hovering at $35 a roll. I need a les expensive choice. Looks like Ektar for the win
I'd love to see a review of some of the lomography films. Do they actually look any different than the classic kodak/fuji/ilford?
C200 is the best cheap color film, IMO.
I’ve had some good luck with this rating it at 100. I think a half or full stop over helps with the muddy shadows
Yep, it really makes a difference.
Ektar 100 35mm roll review when? :D
I love fuji c200 also because its the only color film that its sold in my city. And its 5$ a roll.
Granted a lot has to do with scanning but pulling this to 100 makes this way better than colorplus or arguably better than Superia 400 or ultra max. Pulling this film makes this almost as good as Pro Image 100.
Your muddy colour casts looked to be more to do with underexposing it to me. The shots in the snow looked more like how it should be looking in daylight.
That seems right, the snow and daylight looks great. I had wanted to see how it behaves in a point and shoot because I’ve encountered a lot of people with automatic cameras shooting it because it’s so cheap! Maybe something I’ll give a second chance in an SLR for better shots!
Maybe next time you could tape over the DX code. From what I’ve heard a point and shoot will default to 100 iso when there’s no code.
Also - thanks for getting my name right.
@@AnalogResurgence Yes a bit more accurate metering is going to get better results I think. Thanks for the video in any case. Your content is always interesting and your presentation engaging. Cheers!
I like c200 when I feel like I want a more vintage feel to my pictures but will splurge more when I am aiming for more vibrant colors :)
Completely unrelated, but could you explain what autozoom lens does? I do not want to give up the freedom of manual focus but am conflicted in whether I should invest in one or not. THANKS!
I use often this film, it's good and have a medium ISO, however i prefer proplus ii 200, sadly it's not produced anymore.
This is an example using Fuji C200 instagram.com/p/B38jw2_l_zY/?igshid=iaqshbkgu0zj
I don't mind Fuji C200. Think you used it in the wrong conditions, inside with a flash for instance?? It really pops when the sky is nice and bright/blue. Not in overcast conditions......
I almost always use this film. It is by far the cheapest I can get for only €3,50 a roll. The rest of the films are all €6+ for 36 exposures. But I like the review anyway!
€3.50 for a roll?! That's a steal!
These days even the consumer-grade films are easier to buy online if I want something specific. The selection at drugstores is not what it used to be.
C200 > every Kodak consumer film
.
.
.
.
(and Portra)
Fuji saw this video and then ended its production😅🥲
Fuji Films do have so much less grain than the 200 Kodak films. They look like pro films compared to gold and colour. superia 400 is even less grainier than portra 400. overall I like the Fuji stuff way more than Kodak‘s
where do u buy ur film in Toronto?
Downtown Camera!
i hate the green shadows :(
I think it’s the family film stock
Not really a fan of Fuji colours. Maybe I would use it if I was going for a SciFi look, or a retro 80s vibe.
I also kinda dislike the magenta-green look of the C200 but the tragedy is: it is cheap and I am poor.
Many of this photos are underexposed. If the exposure is incorrect, the colours are not right either. If there is a lot of sky in the photo, it must be overexposed with such simple and old cameras.
This dude looks like that one actor... What was his name again?
Jay Baruchel
I don't think the Caucasian skin tones are that bad but I live in Massachusetts and we look like that at least 3 months out of the year.
Damn Fuji is really not that good. I'm glad when I got into film I was introduced to Kodak Portra. That stuff has never disappointed me.
My problem is I can't ever get the color temp right with portra, it always gets weird when I scan it. C200 I can just accept as not gonna be that great
Just convinced me to stick with Kodak
This is a cheap film vs portra which is pro film
I pooped while watching this
Me too! Right now!
Most of those images look awful, as if they're all very underexposed. Makes me wonder if that's just what the film looks like, if they actually were underexposed, or if the film just has bad underexposure latitude.
I just commented much the same thing. Some shots looked about two stops under, which is always going to cause colours to shift and increase the grain.
@@totallypixelated Thats what you get when you shoot it on a cheap instant point and shoot!! Try it on a leica or SLR properly exposed.
Some of those almost look like expired film. Fuji classically was very blue and always cooler than Kodak. Strange that it's been such a reversal.
Most of those shots are underexposed. If you look at the characteristic curves you will see why the colour is off.
This is just rebranded Kodak gold 200. "Has the Fuji look"🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I mean it wasn’t when this video came out 3 years ago
Honestly I can't see the difference between this and Kodak's 200 colour. In any case I CANT F*CKING FIND THEM ANYWHERE AND EVEN WHEN I DO THEY'RE EXPENSIVE AF.