Embryology: How the Quran fell into the scientific mistakes of its time

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 551

  • @dunyahali8926
    @dunyahali8926 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

    I’m an ex-Muslim from Turkey. Every time we criticize the Quran and point out its mistakes, people tell us that we should know Arabic to truly understand it. They say that the words we mention have many different meanings, and so on

    • @greatguy2141
      @greatguy2141 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And they tell the people who can actually speak Arabic that they must consult the ulema. It's just an avoidance mechanism. They are only fooling themselves.

    • @iblis6892
      @iblis6892 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      Tell them next time that if their argument is accepted, this implies Quran is not a source of guidance for a common man, as it is depend upon the language that has multiple meanings. Any god will not choose such a language to spread its message, till the end of time.

    • @extraordinary.verses
      @extraordinary.verses หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lets assume prophet Mohamed saw the embryo in the miscarriage. Mohamed said this piece of meat mudgha is not actually meat. It will develop into bones. How did he know that?

    • @extraordinary.verses
      @extraordinary.verses หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Mohamed said the mudgha piece of meat is not actually meat. It will develop into bones. How did he know that?

    • @Wise007Man
      @Wise007Man หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      well Adam Elmasri was born and raised in Egypt, he masters the Arabic language

  • @segirinyahenry8553
    @segirinyahenry8553 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Your EXPLANATION is very clear and therefore very understandable.

  • @TrueHope-q6z
    @TrueHope-q6z หลายเดือนก่อน +31

    I've always wished that Muslims would watch videos like these with an open mind without having any preconceived notions. They would understand very well how their religion is based on teachings of men and not some divine being.
    A lot of them would abondon this religion and free themselves from this delusional ideology. I always find these videos very well explained without any offences and keep on spreading the truth. Your videos deserve a million of views.

    • @galielachmatebrahim5063
      @galielachmatebrahim5063 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I'm a Muslim and I'm watching, and this guy is wrong and I'll prove it

    • @galielachmatebrahim5063
      @galielachmatebrahim5063 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ALLAH is the author, Allah is talking and giving us a description of what is happening in the womb, Now let us say the Quran is correct science is not, science is developing science changes when new discoveries or evidence is found, so the mistakes everyone is trying to do is match the Quran with science when it should be the other way around this, so how do we know this.
      The Quran and Allah did not need to emphasize the exact sequence, suffisethfor or those during those times and enough for us now to be amazed by what a bedouin Arab, who was illerate had produced, so instead of blindly and stupidly focus on exact wording, but rather that this kind of information from someone in the 24 century is amazing and proves it's not from a human

    • @mohammedsheik7329
      @mohammedsheik7329 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      We do watch with an open mind but when lies and deception are displayed as truth just like Satan, then we can't accept that. When you subscribe to Pagan beliefs like the Trinity and the Eternal Sin - how do you expect us to accept that. Every reliable historian of Christianity agrees that Paul changed the teachings of Jesus. Now, when you accept the teachings on a mortal over the teachings of your 'God', how do you expect us to trust you and your belief system. Jesus said, "The father is greater than I' and 'the only true God is the father'. Now if you don't believe in your God's words, how do you expect us to.

    • @rustyshackleford9557
      @rustyshackleford9557 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Deep down they know.
      Deep down the pharisees knew.
      But most folks love mama, family, traditions and their culture a heck of a lot more than they love God or the truth.

    • @nisarfazil6104
      @nisarfazil6104 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We watch it.
      Same week david wood similiar video.
      Leave islam bcome a worshipper of a jew, jesus, or become an alcoholic, an abuser of recreational drugs or
      A gambler ,a gay and abandon ur parents , stay single or have loads of girls or boyfriends , throw ur money on going out to clubs.

  • @canusapak7535
    @canusapak7535 27 วันที่ผ่านมา +20

    As an ex-muslim I spent so many long years wasted trying to defend Islam. I'm so relieved that I no longer believe in this religion and wish I had left much earlier. Alas, it is better late than never.

    • @chilichill7252
      @chilichill7252 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Did you find Jesus ?

    • @George-iv1hi
      @George-iv1hi 21 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@chilichill7252 why?

  • @barbaraberwick8993
    @barbaraberwick8993 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

    Let's not forget the other miracles, water containing dead dogs and menstrual rags are pure, the sun sets in a muddy pool, sperm created between the ribs and rhe backbone.

    • @Chickencee
      @Chickencee หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Sun sets in a muddy puddle is not literal if you chose to properly read and look at the context, rather it’s from the perspective of Dhul Qurnayn. Sperm is not mentioned, it is thought to mean seminal fluid, which does infact come from between the coccyx and the rib cage (the seminal vesicles being anterior to the coccyx, and the abdominal viscera providing different things that enter into seminal fluid)

    • @collybever
      @collybever หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      @@Chickencee It is though, because the Quran author was copying the Syriac version of the Alexander Romance, in summary form, with some alterations. These were literal locations in this fable, some of Alexander's soldiers got burnt so they didn't live (in the full version minitiarized by the Quran), by getting too close to the place where the sun rises, in the myth. "Mohammed" is also not just repeating to teach some lessons about being adventurous perhaps, but makes Allah agree that it all happened in Surah 18.91. So the Quran author was literally deceiving his hearers.

    • @mystery6980
      @mystery6980 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ⁠@@collybeverburden of proof lies on you to first prove the Quran allegedly copied the fable.

    • @TruthSeeker-c6z
      @TruthSeeker-c6z หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@mystery6980Burden if proif lies on you to prove that Quran is not a text inspired from pre-existing stories (the commonsensical notion), but from a supreme entity (the supernatural notion)

    • @Chickencee
      @Chickencee หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@collybever prove it rather than making unsubstantiated claims that go against the understanding of pretty much every muslim alive. But quite simply, you are wrong for hundreds of reasons, including the fact that Muhammad peace and blessings be upon him wouldn’t have had access to it given a) He was unlettered, b) even if he could read and write, the first arabic translation of alexander romance was done in the late eighth century.

  • @barbaraberwick8993
    @barbaraberwick8993 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    You did an excellent job showing the historical sources regarding these errors.

  • @MuftiMasala
    @MuftiMasala หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    Another amazing video

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Glad you enjoyed it

    • @lahleholivia7398
      @lahleholivia7398 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Al-Harith ibn Kalada was a close friend of Muhammad and the source of all the qurans scientific "miracles".
      Kalada studied at The Gondishapor Medical Academy where many of the Ancient Greek medical and scientific theories were being taught (Semen from ribcage / Born from clot of dead blood / Humans made from water / Heart controls thought, etc).
      All of these theories are found in the qurans. They have all been proven false by modern science.

    • @mystery6980
      @mystery6980 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AdamElmasriEnglishyou didn’t debunk the interpretation that the verse is talking about child birth. This interpretation has classical scholarly backing with Quturbi and ibn attiya.

  • @AmmonRa-wm5kc
    @AmmonRa-wm5kc หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    I hope your work continues for a long time.

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I hope so too! Thanks to people like you who support my work 🙏thanks for the super thanks

    • @UzbekExMuslim
      @UzbekExMuslim 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@AmmonRa-wm5kc Great job 👏❤️

    • @limitless5860
      @limitless5860 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@AdamElmasriEnglish Who created the universe? Why does the creation hold so much beauty? Why are humans the only conscious animals? Prove the land mass numerical miracle in the quran is by luck? Good luck 😁

  • @nnamogwu8256
    @nnamogwu8256 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    It was plagiarized from Galen. It couldn't have been blood clot too, as clot is made of dead blood

    • @celestialknight2339
      @celestialknight2339 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Blood is neither alive nor dead-it is neutral, since red blood cells (and thrombocytes which contribute to clots) both lack a nucleus and have no DNA. This is one of the most embarrassing comments I’ve read in a while, with all due respect. Now go back and revise your argument-because it fails.

    • @hommedesvoyages7296
      @hommedesvoyages7296 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It does not say blood clot. The respective term in the Quran just means just “an attached clot”.

  • @GL-jo4bk
    @GL-jo4bk หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    In other words, this is a man made book spread by the sword and nothing more. It is a collection of information from all different sources that were available at the time, like the story of the flying carpet, its a bed time story but someone added it to the Quran haha.

  • @t.m.guiapar-d-run-away-muslim
    @t.m.guiapar-d-run-away-muslim 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +6

    Wow... Thanks for this brilliant video bro adam.

  • @omarharris4758
    @omarharris4758 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Even if the Quran directly says milk is red muslim apologist will find a way to defend it 😂

  • @UzbekExMuslim
    @UzbekExMuslim หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Hassan Radwan made really beautiful points on this issue. I really recommend watching his channel to those who don’t know him.

    • @zk6239
      @zk6239 หลายเดือนก่อน

      welldone brother p a je et

    • @MrPhymed
      @MrPhymed หลายเดือนก่อน

      He refers to Keith Moore’s interpretation that bones form before muscles. I am not sure whether Moore actually said that. In any case we have numerous scientific evidence that this is not true and that the bones and the muscles form at the same time.

  • @chr_my
    @chr_my หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Very informative but also fair and respectful towards those who may have strong views about the topic and perhaps even take offence. Thank you for the video Adam.

  • @OctaveAcrobats
    @OctaveAcrobats 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Agreed. Error No. 1 is a serious mistake that condemns logic. Usually in construction, we build the walls first, then we proceed to build basic structures of the building. brilliant.

  • @sucaadmaxamad1484
    @sucaadmaxamad1484 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I left islam this month.thanks, Adam

    • @servantofthebenevolent9390
      @servantofthebenevolent9390 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I’m sorry for your loss. I hope you wake up before it’s too late.

    • @chr_my
      @chr_my หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Please stay safe.

    • @Simsimousse
      @Simsimousse 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      We will see on the day of judgement

    • @WahidurChowdhur
      @WahidurChowdhur 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@servantofthebenevolent9390Why are you even bothering these people lol......He is either lying or he never was a learned Muslim

  • @JohnStopman
    @JohnStopman หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I have already shared this video! Wel done man! 🙂

  • @rebaz7256
    @rebaz7256 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Another great vedio adam, keep up the great work 👍

  • @soulcrewblue8629
    @soulcrewblue8629 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great points Great video. Infuriating how the apologists attempt to prove, show it's not remotely flawed. Religion twists, rational and yes honest thought.

  • @mervynalfred6704
    @mervynalfred6704 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for sharing such a researched insight into the beliefs of the seventh century. We all know that whoever wrote the Quran clearly took to heart what was the norm of belief of that time and tried to impress the illiterate Arabs of their time. The real tragedy is that even in this 21Century Muslims are not willing to look beyond the lies they have been told out of sheer fear of repercussions from their society !

  • @FazalRehman-k7c
    @FazalRehman-k7c 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    There are still people who think the earth is flat, even though eresthostenes proved it was a sphere by simply using a stick 2300 years ago, my mother was one of those flat earthers.

  • @johnzuma4688
    @johnzuma4688 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Surah 9:30 states that “the Jews” that means all of them say that Uzair is the Son of GOD the way Christians say that Jesus is the Son of GOD. Problem is that there is NO Uzair in Jewish theology. So it is impossible for all Jews to say that someone nobody knows about is the Son of GOD. Clearly this verse is false.
    Surah 25:53 states that when fresh water and salt water meet, that they do not mix and that there is a barrier between them. This is false as today we know that when salt and fresh water meet that they mix immediately and that there is no barrier between them. So this verse is false.
    Surah 18:86 states that Dhul Qurnain FOUND the sun setting in a muddy pool and that are people living near where the sun sets in a muddy pool. Clearly this verse is false.
    Surah 21:30 states that EVERY living things are made from water. Yet surah 15:27 states that jinn who are living things are made from fire. Clear internal contradiction.

  • @Nonamam
    @Nonamam หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As always, an excellent breakdown.

  • @drtafeshmohammed8805
    @drtafeshmohammed8805 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Cartilage templates form first, providing a structural framework for the embryo. Muscles develop around this skeletal framework and attach to it. for ex:- hyaline cartilage develops earlier than myotome { which is the first muscle mass to form in the embryo}, and then the bones and muscles develop simultaneously,closely interwined and finally at the end stage of embryo development , all the muscles basically end developing at the last after the bones are fully formed. Its common sense to think that muscles need a structural framework to grow hence they dont start forming first and end up completely growing the last , which perfectly aligns with what the Quran says.
    References :-
    Larsen’s Human Embryology
    The developing human by Moore

    • @bradoxa2504
      @bradoxa2504 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yeah, but cartilage is not actually bone, so it's still wrong
      The quran is supposed to be the word of god and ur god can't talk properly at all

  • @irisvega5743
    @irisvega5743 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    القران كله اخطاء علميا و تاريخية

  • @dominiqueubersfeld2282
    @dominiqueubersfeld2282 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The only "scientific miracle" of the Qur'an is that Allah managed to learn that 1+1=2 without ever going to elementary school

    • @mohammedsheik7329
      @mohammedsheik7329 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, better than your God who can't count and says 1+1+1=1.

    • @abbynguyen5923
      @abbynguyen5923 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why do you assume they must believe in any God?

    • @hope3290
      @hope3290 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@mohammedsheik7329 Sweetheart, you do realize the people you're responding to likely do not believe in Christianity either, right? You're literally on an ex-Christian's page. You're all up and down these comments talking about Christian beliefs, but your whataboutisms don't refute anything.

    • @mohammedsheik7329
      @mohammedsheik7329 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hope3290 Hi. If you read most the comments below, most of the response is from a Christian point of view and from those who choose to mock Islam and Muslims. This content creator gets debunked all the time by the experts on the subjects he brings up. You are free to believe what you choose to, just like those of the churches of Satan.

    • @whatthefitt
      @whatthefitt หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hope3290 his name is mohammad, you got to understand he’s not that intelligent just like his prophet 😂

  • @r3ggi3000
    @r3ggi3000 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Religious people struggle with facts if it counters what they believe.

  • @Hamdan999-w2u
    @Hamdan999-w2u 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Keep up the good work Bro Adam exposed flaws in the Quran.
    Muslims Apologist can no longer defend Islam's falsehood. Garbage in the Quran is too obvious..

  • @extraordinary.verses
    @extraordinary.verses หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mohamed said the mudgha piece of meat is not actually meat. It will develop into bones. How did he know that?

  • @notrikleinad4918
    @notrikleinad4918 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The best fable tales ever , thats islam

    • @andipoercpl6754
      @andipoercpl6754 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The worst fable, bro😂😂😂

  • @telorceploksambelkecap
    @telorceploksambelkecap หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    After this, always get second opinion after consultation with a muslim doctor... 😂

  • @mohammedjameel2741
    @mohammedjameel2741 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Can you please provide some scientific resources referring to the formation of embryo in chronological way ! To see what forms first

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Check the references that were displayed on the screen.

  • @greatguy2141
    @greatguy2141 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Not to mention the Quran confusing Mary the sister of Aaron (and Moses) with Mary the mother of Jesus. 19:28
    "O sister of Aaron!1 Your father was not an indecent man, nor was your mother unchaste.”"
    Muslims claim Mary is the brother of Aaron in the metaphorical sense but there is no place where Mary or anyone else is metaphorically called "sister of Aaron" in the Bible. Nor is anyone else metaphorically called, "brother/sister of Moses".

    • @ibro2xx9
      @ibro2xx9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This has already been answered

    • @greatguy2141
      @greatguy2141 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ By whom? If you mean my Muslims, I addressed their reply above.

    • @mystery6980
      @mystery6980 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@greatguy2141sahih Muslim 2135 directly addresses this

    • @mystery6980
      @mystery6980 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@greatguy2141sahih Muslim 2135 addresses this

    • @mystery6980
      @mystery6980 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@greatguy2141sahih Muslim 2135

  • @I_am_not_your_sister
    @I_am_not_your_sister หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great video Adam , thank you

  • @HS-vs6bq
    @HS-vs6bq หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good explanation Thank you
    first time someone explained this in a professional way, i will definitely watch more Videos , looks so academic

  • @TheNmet42
    @TheNmet42 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love your channel and how you thoroughly research the topics . The early Muslims I believe didn’t even regard the Quran as having scientific miracles. It was more poetic and showed them the miracle of life … is there any truth to Muslim men not wearing gold? Where does this info come from?

  • @tamlynburleigh9267
    @tamlynburleigh9267 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for your posts. It is so good to see your ministry:)😊

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Although it is not a ministry, but thank you very much 🙏

  • @mustafashiker
    @mustafashiker หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    اشعار جميل اخ أدم ❤

  • @JediArchivist555
    @JediArchivist555 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    As a Christian, you helped me overcome my doubt about Islam. Thank you for these amazing videos!

    • @kkunknownkk
      @kkunknownkk 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Now it's your duty to search for muslim answers to these so called "errors" if you want to be certain. All this video demonstrated is that early scholars were incorrect in there initial interpretation of some of these vague verses. The verse doesn't even say semen, that's just what it was interpreted as. This video explains: Quran Contradictions Debunked EP 1: Sperm Comes From Between The Backbone And The Ribs? (86:5-7)

    • @mheditz8176
      @mheditz8176 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@kkunknownkk
      we take Surah 86:6-7. This context shows it is talking about the fluid used in the creation of man, this of course is identified as seemen. Stop trynna cope and misinterpret your own book. the issue is the Qurans claim of it being from the spine and ribs, this is incredibly false as it is proven such fluids only appear in the testes rather than actually appearing from the spine and ribs.

    • @kkunknownkk
      @kkunknownkk 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@mheditz8176 The wording of the verse does not necessitate you identify the fluid as seemen, the literal translation without interpretation is "poured water". But sure let's call it seemen. The structure of the verse does not even necessitate it is the fluid that comes from there, it would be grammatically correct to assume it is man himself that comes from there (the womb) which is between the backbone and rib. And This is not me giving an adhoc explanation, this interpretation existed 800 years ago by Al Qurtibi beforeeeeeee science
      There's no coping on my end, y'all are just clinching on straws trying to disprove the Quran from a vague verse that may have been misinterpreted by some scholars with no knowledge of modern science, this is a sad objection.

  • @mutharockah2622
    @mutharockah2622 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So the quran is not actually debunked because it is inconsistent with current sciences. But is debunked because it is consistent with the past sciences of its time; which have been relegated to the annals of history by those more forthright than the Muslim apologists. Thank you for helping me realise this, Elmarsi.

  • @RavinTaksing-m4s
    @RavinTaksing-m4s 11 วันที่ผ่านมา

    You Adam brother is a star in my book ❤❤❤❤, you are so precise and to the point , your explanation is out of this world ❤

  • @moussataouk7495
    @moussataouk7495 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't understand why this is a problem for Islam. If Muhammad (assuming he existed) was inspired, or even dictated to verbatim by an angel, then it's perfectly possible that in his human limitation, and in the process of transferring the message from the oral to the written, there might have been mistakes made here and there. It might be legitimate to consider the main point and not get hung up on every detail. For example in this case the point would be the awesomeness of God in relation to the amazingness and power behind the beauty of creation and in particular the growth of a rational human from something so small as a single cell. Why would such an approach pose a problem for Islam? Why is it important that the particulars that are related in the Qur'an need to be precisely correct?

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Simply because mainstream Islam is a literalistic view and not mystical. And - on top of that, they shove it down the throats of all others who don’t necessarily agree with the literalistic view!

  • @b34rea1
    @b34rea1 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Another W video from Adam

  • @krishnachakrabarty577
    @krishnachakrabarty577 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Plz explain how child sex is determined according to muhammed rasulullah and science.

  • @sudiptosaha3263
    @sudiptosaha3263 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wonderful video brother ❤️

  • @ixxrossorxxi6291
    @ixxrossorxxi6291 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Have you considered doing debates?

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I have and I tried multiple times (especially on modern day debates) and other avenues. Bottom line, Muslim opponents refuse the debate.

    • @nisarfazil6104
      @nisarfazil6104 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@AdamElmasriEnglish ur refuted by muslims in comments amazing responss.
      Redo the video, read the comments.

    • @nisarfazil6104
      @nisarfazil6104 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@AdamElmasriEnglishnadir ahmad would do debates with.
      U need to explain how many muslims bodies in there graves dont corrupt.

  • @nisarfazil6104
    @nisarfazil6104 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Qurtabi and ibn kathir fell for weaker version of hadith on development over sequential 40 days than another sequence in 40 days

  • @allahmuhammad225
    @allahmuhammad225 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The word “fa” or then is the signature mark of Muhammad. The Quran is full of this word repeated over and over.

    • @mistmurth
      @mistmurth หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      momo, copied everything he came across with and pasted it onto the quran, even some poetry from the then poets like Imru Al Qais, and the story of the people of the cave (ancient fairy tale), dhu al qarnayn, it was a story of alexandre the great helmet ...

    • @allahmuhammad225
      @allahmuhammad225 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @ Yes, Mohammed copied stories-poetry from Imru’ al-Qais, the tale of the Sleepers of the Cave, Zul-Qarnain, and even narratives from the Torah and the Bible. But here’s the undeniable truth: all of these stories, whether the originals or their plagiarized versions in the Quran, are man-made fabrications. Christianity, Judaism, and Islam are all human inventions, rooted in myths, legends, and the imaginations of ancient societies. These religions haven’t offered humanity solutions; they’ve created endless problems-wars, oppression, division, and the delusion of a god who never existed. They detach people from reality, binding them to an imaginary world of divine fantasies and false promises. None of this has anything to do with the nature of reality or the real world. These are just made-up tales, clung to by those too fearful to face life without the crutch of fabricated belief. It’s time humanity moved past these outdated lies and embraced reality for what it is.

  • @MohamedTijaabo-s8y
    @MohamedTijaabo-s8y หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please remember
    There are verses of quran whose real meaning or translation are not yet according
    Because scholar time there were no scientist nor scientic knowledge
    Bu the quran is from the only one creator

  • @IshaqIbrahim3
    @IshaqIbrahim3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    GREAT! Have you seen this videos? It looks like they found an escape route in some of the debunk videos.
    Title: Comparing Qur'anic embryology with Aristotle and Galen.
    Duration: 17:53
    Channel: Against Atheism
    Title: Professor Keith Moore, Professor PZ Myers and Embryology in The Qur'an.
    Duration: 17:16
    Channel: Against Atheism

  • @arshaddarrif
    @arshaddarrif หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is what dr keith l moore said about quran
    “It has been a great pleasure for me to help clarify statements in the Quran about human development. It is clear to me that these statements must have come to Muhammad from God, or Allah, because most of this knowledge was not discovered until many centuries later.personally can’t see how this could be mere chance, there are too many accuracies… I have no difficulty in my mind reconciling that this is a divine inspiration or revelation which led him to these statements.No such distinct and complete record of human development such as classification, terminology, and description existed previously

    • @calibcrockett
      @calibcrockett หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dr. Moore is notable as the only embryologist directly quoted by Islamic sources in an attempt to prove embryology as described in the Qur'an is scientifically correct. In the 1980s he accepted an invitation by the Embryology Committee of King Abdulaziz University to produce a special 3rd edition of his most successful book "The Developing Human" specifically for use by Muslim students in Islamic Universities. He was financially patronized by the Saudi royal family for the use of his name, and for no real additional work.
      The textbook he delivered to the Saudi Universities that commissioned the work is titled, "The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology with Islamic Additions."[4] The base textbook was work that Moore had completed years before. He did nothing new for this new edition. The “Islamic additions” are actually the work of an Abdul Majeed al-Zindani, so it alternates chapters of standard science with Zindani's "Islamic additions".

    • @calibcrockett
      @calibcrockett หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The result of Moore's and Zindani's collaboration is not an academic book and subsequent editions omit and contradict the "Islamic additions". Reverting back to his previous description, they basically admit that the embryology in the Qur'an is a repetition of Greek and Indian medicine[7]
      For example, in 1986 he wrote that "The drop or nutfa [in Surah 23:13] has been interpreted as the sperm or spermatozoon, but a more meaningful interpretation would be the zygote which divides to form a blastocyst which is implanted in the uterus ("a place of rest"),"[8] but in the 8th edition of The Developing Human (published 2007), he writes that "Growth of science was slow during the medieval period... human beings [according to the Qur'an] are produced from a mixture of secretions from the male and female. Several references are made to the creation of a human being from a nutfa (small drop). It also states that the resulting organism settles in the womb like a seed, 6 days after its beginning."[9]
      It is interesting with regard to Dr Keith Moore's sincerity (or lack thereof) to note that during his lecture tours to promote his book to Muslim audiences, he stated many times that he never left his Christian faith to become a Muslim[10], and admitted that he had no knowledge of Arabic, that Muslim scholars had translated the Arabic words for him, and that he is not claiming his interpretations are accurate[11]. Indeed, it is evident how badly he was misinformed about the Qur'an in the above quote regarding 6 days. There is nothing about 6 days in any statement about embryology anywhere in the Qur'an nor even in the hadiths.
      This shows that Moore's previous statements on embryology in the Qur'an were not based on a sound knowledge of Islamic scriptures, but merely the result of patronage by the Saudi royal family.
      J. Needham, a well known authority on the history of embryology and a reference cited in Keith Moore's books, has also dismissed embryology in the Qur'an as merely "a seventh-century echo of Aristotle and the Ayer-veda."[12]

    • @calibcrockett
      @calibcrockett หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wiki Islam has lots of sources on this, he was paid by the Saudi government to let them write additions to his book lol, and btw he died as a Christian, so yeah..

    • @grahamchan6327
      @grahamchan6327 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Hahaha! 😅

  • @mdug7224
    @mdug7224 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It seems the fact that mundane fetus observations involving miscarriages and butchery of animals is completely overlooked because of a strange hero worship bestowing prophetic meaning.

  • @agengsatya96
    @agengsatya96 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it's started from clay from verse 12, so it's talk about abiogenesis & evolution, not about embryology

  • @ahmerrizvi4599
    @ahmerrizvi4599 หลายเดือนก่อน

    very nice explanation actually love it

  • @nisarfazil6104
    @nisarfazil6104 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Adnan rashid to pz myers said summa doesnt apply sequential order.
    So did naik to to campbell

  • @GL-jo4bk
    @GL-jo4bk หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Glad you bring it up, i have read tiny verses from the Quran and the one about making babies is the most funny thing I have read. This is a joke of a God made by ancient Disney called the moon God ;-) great vid as always

  • @mistmurth
    @mistmurth หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Adam you are the best

  • @aceheart5828
    @aceheart5828 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Explain this aspect.
    The verse says "We made it into a lump " ( or a lump which is like chewed flesh )
    Then the bones form ( or gain their properties as bone ), then the flesh clothes the bone ( or forms into the kind of flesh which clothe the bones )
    Now explain what the lump was made of, or if the lump was already a series of cells or a piece of flesh on one level or the other. A piece of flesh which then started to subdivide into specialist tissue.
    Bones have greater visual development in the initial stages then the flesh develops reaching something closer to its normative levels of fullness etc.
    ..... Leaving us with a generally reasonable description or set of verses.... Which make reasonable sense.

    • @treelight1707
      @treelight1707 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He totally ignores the fact that bones ARE covered with flesh.

    • @binary7775
      @binary7775 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Everything forms simultaneously. First cartilage forms within the flesh along with the organs then the cartilage is replaced with bone between weeks 5-12 which continues through puberty.

    • @aceheart5828
      @aceheart5828 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@binary7775
      The neural plate ( which becomes the brain and nervous system ) and the neural tube ( which becomes the spine or backbone ) form first.
      The neural tube ( which becomes the spine or back bone ) forms before most organs, and long before muscles form. ( Muscles begin forming around the tenth week, whilst the bones which the muscles will move begin forming around the sixth week )
      In general the bones tend to begin forming earlier than the flesh which surrounds the bone and after the brain or the organs which the bones will protect.....

    • @binary7775
      @binary7775 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @ the neural plate and the neural tube become the nervous system, not bones. The neural tube will become the spinal cord, not the backbone.
      neu•ral (ˈnʊər əl, ˈnyʊər-)
      adj.
      of or pertaining to a nerve or the nervous system.

    • @khandakerarif8681
      @khandakerarif8681 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's funny what lengths atheist apologists go trying to disprove Quran. There are so many things in the verse "clinging" clot . How can someone know about the embryo cling to womb in 7th century? But he is trying so hard to prove how muscles grow same time with bones . He doesn't know anything about embryology at all. Then talking about error 2 that's even more funny. The verse didn't say explicitly anything about semen. Only Allah knows exactly what he said we can try to understand it by thinking. And even more funny is he is not talking about other explicit clear scientific facts in Quran only the somewhat ambiguous ones which he can twist

  • @stopworrying8850
    @stopworrying8850 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can you ask for permission for Videos of Muslims like Hijab ...???
    I want to make video against them und using it against them. But im afraid they report my channel.
    Please help me

  • @MrSufiSeeker
    @MrSufiSeeker หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dear Mr. Adam Elmasri: I agree with you that the embryological details in the Quran are not scientifically accurate, but reflect the collective knowledge of the milieu in which the Quran was revealed. Like Saint Ibn Arabi of Andalusia, Sufis explained that all prophets, including Prophet Muhammad, spoke in a language common people of their respective eras could understand. Their main concerns were the afterlife and morality -- not scientific or historically accurate facts. For example, the geocentric view was the most natural and spiritual view of the people of the Classical Era, when human beings were considered at the center of the Cosmos. These are not scientific statements.
    I am a Sufi Muslim and a scientist, and I do not take the literal interpretation of any religion. The Wahhabi /Salafi apologetics like Zakir Naik and M. Hijab are lying to and deceiving unwary people by twisting the meanings of the Quranic verses from their original and authenticate ones in their futile efforts to do damage controls because they believe in the literal interpretation of the Quran. That is why nowadays Wahhabi /Salafi young Muslims leave Islam in droves when they discover these facts after being brainwashed from childhood that there were literal scientific miracles in the Quran.
    I applaud your honesty, scientific analyses, and respectful politeness, even if I disagree with your conclusions about scriptures as not of divine origin. Revelations are not the exact words of God, as the Literalists believe; however, Maturidi/Ashari/Shia schools and Muslim philosophers/scientists/Sufis do not believe in that way. They consider revelations as prophetic inspirations from God, in languages, idioms, and knowledge their proximate followers -- mostly illiterate -- could relate to and understand. Nor do they believe that the Quran as a text has been perfectly preserved as the Literalists do, but its message is preserved.

    It is also possible that the irreligious Umayyad rulers later tempered the Quran by inserting these then-sophisticated scientific verses from Greek sources into the Quran to entice Christians/Jews/Pagans to convert to Islam as a part of their political agenda. It is the same agenda of Zakir Naik and other Wahhabi propagandists. It is unlikely that an unlettered Prophet Muhammad, upon whom be peace, could go into such embryological details for his mostly illiterate and uncivilized audience. Only God Knows the Best.

    I thanked you on your previous videos, and once again I thank you for bringing critical thinking and clarity to Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I really respect you and I appreciate the time you took to write this comment and to clarify your stance.
      Unfortunately however, Sufi Islam is not a mainstream. In fact, they are discriminated and outcasted in a lot of other Muslim communities.
      The video is mostly addressing the stance of the literalistic views, which is unfortunately the vast majority of the Muslim world.

    • @greatguy2141
      @greatguy2141 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AdamElmasriEnglish Also, "Sufi" is too much of a catch-all term. Sufis have participated in jihad as well. They are not just about "peace and love" as they claim.

    • @MrSufiSeeker
      @MrSufiSeeker หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@greatguy2141 Yes, I agree not all Sufis are the same. That is why I quoted very liberal Sufi Saints like Ibn Arabi and Rumi. Sufis participated only in defensive Jihads, as they do not believe in harming or killing people. Some Sufis are vegetarians. Nowadays, Westernized liberal Sufis are the best, as some Sufis in the East, like general Muslims, have unfortunately degraded too.

    • @MrSufiSeeker
      @MrSufiSeeker หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AdamElmasriEnglish Yes, my brother, that is very true. Wahhabi/Salafi Islam propagated by such televangelists, as Wahhabi Zakir Naik -- with earlier massing petro-dollar Wahhabi propaganda across the world has replaced the earlier Traditional Islam/Sufism with narrow Wahhabism. However, in our civilized West, where I live and where human rights and freedom of speech are guaranteed, Sufis --the seekers of truth and lovers - are highly valued and studied.
      Your scientific critiques of religious Literalism with its resultant intolerance and fanaticism, and campaign toward critical thinking are steps in the right direction in this regard. Your broadcasts are denting the deluge of Wahhabi /Islamist propaganda. You may consider studying Sufism without subscribing to Islam or any religion. Please read Rumi. He is now the most popular poet in the Western World. Best wishes.

    • @MrSufiSeeker
      @MrSufiSeeker หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AdamElmasriEnglish Yes, my brother, Wahhabism/Islamism has become a mainstream Islam owing to the massive Wahhabi propaganda with petro-dollar by Saudi/Gulf Arab countries and lately, by televangelists like Wahhabi Zakir Naik. However, in the civilized West, where I live and where human rights and free thinking are guaranteed, Sufism is much loved and studied well. Unfortunately, even Sufism in the East, also somewhat degraded just as Islam has.
      Your campaign against religious Literalism with resultant intolerance and fanaticism and championing critical thinking are steps in the right direction. Your videos are denting the deluge of Wahhabi propaganda with lies and deceptions.
      I would request you to read Sufi writers like Andalusian Sufi Saint Ibn Arabi or Persian Rumi. Mevlana Rumi is now the most popular poet in the Western World -- his poems translated into all the European languages. Best wishes.

  • @JediArchivist555
    @JediArchivist555 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Using Greek science was probably the best way to deceive Arabia and the Middle East, due to Greeks being the most intelligent people around.

  • @suhealkhan2124
    @suhealkhan2124 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    as a doctor, profesor and surgeon we are taught in embryology that bones 'appear' first from 42nd day and later, 7 or 8th week then the muscles appears...the skeletal pattern is formed in cartilage and connective tissue membranes and ossification begins.

    • @peteroziegbe2398
      @peteroziegbe2398 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      lol, I guess you are a native doctor.

    • @Dr.antony1
      @Dr.antony1 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@peteroziegbe2398he never saw an ultra sound propably or he has doctorate in KFC university and the real problem is that they are not even ashamed,they spread lies like springlers.

    • @George-iv1hi
      @George-iv1hi 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Dr.antony1 muhamMADans think we are fools who believe in their stupid lies. Internet is the destroyer of islam.

  • @abdoobaset6100
    @abdoobaset6100 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I am about 40 years old already did my research to prove the book is wrong and Arabic is my native language but after all my research the book the prophet are all real and there is no away around it and you maybe Wonder why I did something like that... Will I was thinking about logging out permanently and as you know and you maybe have noticed from my username the region that I live in peoples believe in the book and the book says if if you logged out you will not end in the void but to the Eternal damnation and hellfire so I needed to be absolutely sure I will end up in the void so I did research long story short as I said earlier There Is No Escape the book is real and the prophet of it is real so stay safe everybody and don't screw this move up because it has severe consequences and I mean severe consequences.

    • @TruthSeeker-c6z
      @TruthSeeker-c6z หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Why hell? For what offence?

    • @killermoon635
      @killermoon635 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      So you concluded that there is 7 skies and lowest sky is decorated with lamps ?
      Did you also conclude that sky would fall down to earth if allah did not hold it ??

    • @abdoobaset6100
      @abdoobaset6100 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @killermoon635 yes you are correct All Stars function as lamps practically we will never reach them and they all just light in the sky for us humans which makes the lowest sky the whole universe which is expanding like the book said 1400 years ago

    • @Iffay-d5k
      @Iffay-d5k 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@killermoon635 Well the "sky" mentioned in the Quran is not the same as the sky we see everyday.

    • @TruthSeeker-c6z
      @TruthSeeker-c6z 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@Iffay-d5k Well, then we can also use metaphors for literally everything, right?

  • @brownluputa2584
    @brownluputa2584 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That Muslim guy went to school so that he can confuse more people on behalf of Muhammad.

  • @NoorAhmed-kn6sp
    @NoorAhmed-kn6sp หลายเดือนก่อน

    No mistakes in the Quran. Mankind is yet to comprehend the truth. There are people won't like to see these miracles mentioned in the Quran. The Quran is the words of Allah and it is the ultimate truth whether you like it or not.

    • @dorarie3167
      @dorarie3167 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Saying it is the truth means you are making a claim so you must present evidence to show your claim is true. We are all waiting for your evidence. Please present it.

  • @ServantofAllah5554
    @ServantofAllah5554 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What ever.... you will never ever change the miracle of the Quran.... And also not even a bit from me believing the Quran

    • @MegaSrsh
      @MegaSrsh หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      the Quran is a book of blunders. It was created by a Pagan false prophet.

  • @nisarfazil6104
    @nisarfazil6104 หลายเดือนก่อน

    🎉can u do ur response to the bukhari hadis on three questions of the jew , last being on resembalance of a chilf.

  • @nisarfazil6104
    @nisarfazil6104 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Can u do ur version of creation of earth in quran.

  • @okulbu4697
    @okulbu4697 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    thanks.

  • @johnnykevin-b6z
    @johnnykevin-b6z 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Please do a video about the Code 19 which is taken as a quranic wonder by quranists . They say that code 19 is real

    • @George-iv1hi
      @George-iv1hi 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      who cares what the fools say.

  • @labourdonnaishollycross4408
    @labourdonnaishollycross4408 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    CLEAR EXPLANATION GOOD GOOD TO MAKE VALUABLE CLIP AS SUCH THAN YOU
    TRUTH WALK WITH YOU

  • @KiloBaamia
    @KiloBaamia หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Embryology is misspelt in the clip's title. Cheers.

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thank you. Corrected it now

    • @KiloBaamia
      @KiloBaamia หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ⁠Good work, Adam.
      And great video as usual, mate.
      Have a good night.

    • @1541965
      @1541965 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AdamElmasriEnglish It is so funny. You misspelt Embryology and acting to be Islamic Scholar explain the Holy Quran to suite your needs. I refuted your ignorant clain in the comment Box. You don't have knowledge and the disaster that you don't know that you don't have knowledge.

    • @timmay676
      @timmay676 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@1541965
      Bro, even the Muslims have admitted that the miracle in the Qurans is false believe.
      By the way, where is theGogg and Magog and their imprisonment ?😳😳😳😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

  • @tahzeeb5785
    @tahzeeb5785 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Here is what Chat GPT says:
    Q: Does the bone grow first or the flesh?
    A: During fetal development, the skeletal system (bones) typically begins to form before significant muscle development. In the embryonic period, which occurs during the early weeks of gestation, the basic structures of bones start to develop. As the pregnancy progresses into the fetal period, bones continue to grow and ossify.
    Muscle development, on the other hand, also begins during the embryonic period but generally follows bone development. Muscles form from the mesoderm layer, and as the fetus develops, these muscles gradually grow and differentiate.
    In summary, the sequence often involves the initial formation of bones followed by the development and growth of muscles.
    And another;
    Q: In the fetus development which comes first the bones or the muscle / flesh
    A: In fetal development, bones generally start forming before muscles. The process of ossification, or bone formation, begins early in development, while muscles and flesh develop later.
    And even if you think that chat GPT is wrong, the Quran still holds true because it didn't state that the muscles form after the bones. It just states that Allah clothed the bones with flesh.
    If you try to criticize things, you'll surely end up loosing both common and rare senses.

    • @extraordinary.verses
      @extraordinary.verses หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks.

    • @MultiAllz
      @MultiAllz หลายเดือนก่อน

      This guy has lost the plot. I knew he was fraud from his first ‘error’ argument hahaha. Man’s is giving his non-PhD opinion and is definitely an Egyptian Coptic Orthodox - they despise Islam just as how he pronounces it… “IZLAM”.

    • @usman5502
      @usman5502 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@MultiAllzgood see Muslim brothers debunking him in comments

  • @kassimtufail9061
    @kassimtufail9061 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I agree with you 💯 percent and all religions not only Islam man made garbage, anti humanity religion separates human to human!

  • @joevoidable7549
    @joevoidable7549 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm going to share this video

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Please do!

    • @galielachmat2087
      @galielachmat2087 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you are a fool and hell will be your resting place,
      Question for you ,what is the difference between you and a Muslim?
      I the Muslim is right about God he is the winner , with nothing being lost to him following Quran,and if he is wrong,he still wins.
      However you will vcru the day you find out you wrong

  • @TheTechnoinflux
    @TheTechnoinflux หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    فَخَلَقۡنَا الۡمُضۡغَۃَ عِظٰمًا فَکَسَوۡنَا الۡعِظٰمَ لَحۡمًا ٭ ثُمَّ اَنۡشَاۡنٰہُ خَلۡقًا اٰخَرَ ؕ فَتَبٰرَکَ اللّٰہُ اَحۡسَنُ الۡخٰلِقِیۡنَ
    So we have created lumps, a bone so we have covered the bones with flesh, then We developed him into another creation. So blessed is Allah , the best of creators.
    Dear what does it means by word ف in Arabic? It is used in the meanings of "So" and "ثم" meaning then, I am not fluent in English however I know that then always use in the middle of sentence where the continuity becomes same, and "So" does not used in the continuity of any sentence, and Lord never said in this verse that we have created bones before flesh or flesh before bones. Quran doesn't made Chronicle sequences in this verse when ف used here. I think that it is enough to understand, or I could give you more examples,
    If you will read surah al-Haj verse 5, lord used chronicles order by using word "ثم"
    یٰۤاَیُّہَا النَّاسُ اِنۡ کُنۡتُمۡ فِیۡ رَیۡبٍ مِّنَ الۡبَعۡثِ فَاِنَّا خَلَقۡنٰکُمۡ مِّنۡ تُرَابٍ ثُمَّ مِنۡ نُّطۡفَۃٍ ثُمَّ مِنۡ عَلَقَۃٍ ثُمَّ مِنۡ مُّضۡغَۃٍ مُّخَلَّقَۃٍ وَّ غَیۡرِ مُخَلَّقَۃٍ لِّنُبَیِّنَ لَکُمۡ ؕ وَ نُقِرُّ فِی الۡاَرۡحَامِ مَا نَشَآءُ اِلٰۤی اَجَلٍ مُّسَمًّی ثُمَّ نُخۡرِجُکُمۡ طِفۡلًا ثُمَّ لِتَبۡلُغُوۡۤا اَشُدَّکُمۡ ۚ وَ مِنۡکُمۡ مَّنۡ یُّتَوَفّٰی وَ مِنۡکُمۡ مَّنۡ یُّرَدُّ اِلٰۤی اَرۡذَلِ الۡعُمُرِ لِکَیۡلَا یَعۡلَمَ مِنۡۢ بَعۡدِ عِلۡمٍ شَیۡئًا ؕ وَ تَرَی الۡاَرۡضَ ہَامِدَۃً فَاِذَاۤ اَنۡزَلۡنَا عَلَیۡہَا الۡمَآءَ اہۡتَزَّتۡ وَ رَبَتۡ وَ اَنۡۢبَتَتۡ مِنۡ کُلِّ زَوۡجٍ ۢ بَہِیۡجٍ ﴿۵﴾
    O People, if you should be in doubt about the Resurrection, then [consider that] indeed, We created you from dust, then from a sperm-drop, then from a clinging clot, and then from a lump of flesh, formed and unformed - that We may show you. And We settle in the wombs whom We will for a specified term, then We bring you out as a child, and then [We develop you] that you may reach your [time of] maturity. And among you is he who is taken in [early] death, and among you is he who is returned to the most decrepit [old] age so that he knows, after [once having] knowledge, nothing. And you see the earth barren, but when We send down upon it rain, it quivers and swells and grows [something] of every beautiful
    Thanks to my Lord, you never made it false by scientifically that human is not made by exact of clay as it is mention in verse 12.
    More references are surah dahr verse 2, surah al-Haj verse 5, surah qayamah verse 37 38, surah momin verse 67.
    Now second error you mention
    خُلِقَ مِنۡ مَّآءٍ دَافِقٍ ۙ﴿۶﴾
    He was created from a fluid, ejected,
    یَّخۡرُجُ مِنۡۢ بَیۡنِ الصُّلۡبِ وَ التَّرَآئِبِ ؕ﴿۷﴾
    Emerging from between the backbone and the ribs.
    These two verses are connected by لا at the end of first verse, " emerging" is used for " drop of water" . Where it produce? Practical example is that when you have intercourse with you wife twice or thrice you feel pain in back bones, why?
    My Lord always makes things easier for me, because I believe on my Lord. If anyone in any religion believes his Lord, He will help them.

  • @MultiAllz
    @MultiAllz หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’d have to disagree on your point about embryology. In fact, it doesn’t refer to any form of chronological sequence. If you read it with technical English grammar as translated…
    “And certainly did We create man from an extract of clay.
    Then We placed him as a sperm-drop in a firm lodging [the womb].
    Then We made the sperm-drop into a clinging clot, and We made the clot into a lump [of flesh], and We made [from] the lump, bones, and We covered the bones with flesh;
    then We developed him into another creation. So blessed is Allah, the best of creators.”
    The word ‘then’ is the separator of events, and as per the formation of the lump, bones and bones being covered with flesh, this merely indicates layering of humans from inside out. It’s very obvious that the bones are covered by flesh, and has no indication to bones being formed before flesh at all. If it had said “then bones were formed, then flesh was formed the cover the bones” that would be a different story and would understand your view. Nevertheless an incorrect perspective on this Surah.

  • @Qwettyg2c
    @Qwettyg2c หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ❤❤Bro slove this one challenge only one .If you say proper reason then so many Muslims will believe that islam is man made ."quran written in perticular mathametical patterns " you can't debunk it
    Few years back it was founded no one know untill now . I thick this is solid reason Muslims to belive that quran is preserved.please do one video ❤❤."IF YOU SLOVE I WILL LEAVE ISLAM.

  • @SwarnaVarna
    @SwarnaVarna หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ❤❤Please answer me why don't you do videos on christianity. Do you believe in jesus . If not make a video why you don't believe in jesus share you're knowledge i want to know. At least reply to my comment what is your thoughts on christianity Please ❤❤ answer only this Do you believe in jesus rose from dead please replay bro.😊

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      If you saw my recent videos you will see that I criticise Christianity too. I made a video recently about the myth of the virgin birth. That is not just against Islam, it is against Christianity too!
      It is one of the reasons I dont believe in any religion!

    • @SwarnaVarna
      @SwarnaVarna หลายเดือนก่อน

      @AdamElmasriEnglish 🤔what are the strong reasons not to believe in christianity . So many prophecy, science,match with history etc. Please do a video in detailed. I want to know. I love your videos❤️. I weached all your videos .Please replay

  • @FlyingSpaghettiMonster2000
    @FlyingSpaghettiMonster2000 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    4:38 hot air alert... 😂

  • @0786AHA
    @0786AHA หลายเดือนก่อน

    🤔You are forgetting that the most important thing. Quran is not a book of science. Its book of signs. Not only that the information provided is not intended for you to become medical doctor but reflect on the creator. So keep it in that perspective. 💯✅✅✅

  • @rashadabdulazeem5387
    @rashadabdulazeem5387 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Seriously, should the title of this video be how Gd fell into the scientific mistakes of it's time when Gd is the Creator of everything that exists? Such a claim is absurd. I would like to refer you to authentic scholars such Dr. Maurice Bucaille a well known french scientist who embraced Islam after reading various scientific verses in the Quran including this very topic, Embryology, but Dr. Bucaille is not alone other scientists who embraced Islam after reading the Quran include, Henry Klassen, stem cell scientist, Gary Miller, mathematician, Marshall Johnson, embryologist, yes indeed, and Dr. Okuda a Japanese scientist to name a few. Unfortunately, the internet is filled with charlatans pretending to speak on the history of Islam and the Quran with authority and knowledge.
    The enemies of Islam are working overtime trying to place doubt into the minds of Muslims with this idea of "different Qurans. Allah, swt, has warned and promised us that they desire to put out His light but He will perfect His light to the dismay of the disbelievers.
    Make no mistake they will fail like those before them have failed. Islam is here to stay and spread throughout the world. We have no doubt that Quran we have today is from, Allah, swt, the Lord of the Worlds and is guidance for mankind until the end of time.

    • @calibcrockett
      @calibcrockett หลายเดือนก่อน

      My favorite verse is 65:4, marrying and divorcing pre pubescent girls is what God loves! Sources for you
      Ibn Abbas: (And for such of your women as despair of menstruation) because of old age, (if ye doubt) about their waiting period, (their period (of waiting) shall be three months) upon which another man asked: “O Messenger of Allah! What about the waiting period of those who do not have menstruation because they are too young?”
      Ibn Kathir: Allah the Exalted clarifies the waiting period of the woman in menopause. And that is the one whose menstruation has stopped due to her older age. Her `Iddah is three months instead of the three monthly cycles for those who menstruate, which is based upon the Ayah in (Surat) Al-Baqarah. see 2:228 The same for the young, who have not reached the years of menstruation. Their `Iddah is three months like those in menopause.
      Jalalayn: And [as for] those of your women who (read allā’ī or allā’i in both instances) no longer expect to menstruate, if you have any doubts, about their waiting period, their prescribed [waiting] period shall be three months, and [also for] those who have not yet menstruated, because of their young age, their period shall [also] be three months.
      Oh and for the cherry on top is chapter 33 verse 49: O believers! If you marry believing women and then divorce them before you touch them,1 they will have no waiting period for you to count,2 so give them a ˹suitable˺ compensation, and let them go graciously.
      So it's SPECIFICALLY talking about marrying and having sex with pre pubescent children, then divorcing them and remarrying them. Disgusting cult. Why do you think 96 of the top 100 terrorist groups in the world follow 1 religion, guess which?

  • @agengsatya96
    @agengsatya96 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it's human (not semen) originating between the backbone & the ribs/the place of uterus

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I brought that up in the video. Did you even watch it to the end?

    • @agengsatya96
      @agengsatya96 หลายเดือนก่อน

      still refutable (contrary to your promise), i mean, what you mean with the ancient history/common believe, the quran is supposed to be the revelation from god, so it's should be interpreted as the revelation from god until it's proved otherwise

    • @calibcrockett
      @calibcrockett หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@agengsatya96 the arabic word is nutfa, literally semen, without lies, Islam dies.

  • @djayjp
    @djayjp หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Stop watching my video." 🤣
    Stay ignorant lol crazy advice.

  • @IshaqIbrahim3
    @IshaqIbrahim3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    GREAT! Have you seen this videos? It looks like they found an escape route in some of the debunk videos.
    Title: Comparing Qur'anic embryology with Aristotle and Galen.
    Link: th-cam.com/video/eAjJSzihPaA/w-d-xo.html
    Duration: 17:53
    Channel: Against Atheism
    Title: Professor Keith Moore, Professor PZ Myers and Embryology in The Qur'an.
    Link: th-cam.com/video/k8ZScVDpWS4/w-d-xo.html
    Duration: 17:16
    Channel: Against Atheism

  • @nisarfazil6104
    @nisarfazil6104 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not great adam.
    Comments section u been refuted.

  • @giljesusseraspe9225
    @giljesusseraspe9225 หลายเดือนก่อน

    He is better than any doctor I guess? Better take his advise then and good luck.😂😂😂

  • @ganisherhaydarov3425
    @ganisherhaydarov3425 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ah, so you're claiming that the Qur'an is wrong because science says bones and muscles develop simultaneously, and it "copied" from Galen? Brilliant! Did you actually read Galen’s work on this topic? Because if you had, you'd realize Galen explicitly said bones and flesh develop together-a claim that’s scientifically false and directly contradicted by the Qur'an. Let me break this down for you in case you missed every single detail:
    1. Galen’s Simultaneous Development Error
    In his work De Semine (On Semen), Galen claimed:
    "The flesh and bones are generated together, as if woven out of the same material."
    Translation: Galen thought bones and muscles form at the same time, like one big happy tissue party. Modern science laughs at this notion because embryology proves a clear sequence: bones (initially as cartilage) form first, and muscles develop later, attaching to the skeleton.
    If the Qur'an really copied Galen, why didn’t it parrot this incorrect claim? Why does the Qur'an instead say:
    > “...and We made the lump [into] bones, and We covered the bones with flesh...” (Surah Al-Mu’minun 23:14)
    This sequence-bones first, muscles second-matches what modern embryology confirms, not Galen’s outdated pseudoscience. So, let me get this straight: your argument is that the Qur'an copied Galen by... correcting his mistake? Genius.
    ---
    2. What Modern Science Actually Says
    Let’s compare Galen’s simultaneous-development blunder with actual science:
    T.W. Sadler, Langman’s Medical Embryology (2022):
    > "The sclerotome forms the cartilage template of bones first. Later, myogenic cells migrate to form muscle tissue around the skeleton."
    Keith L. Moore, The Developing Human:
    "The limb skeleton forms first as cartilage, and muscles form around the developing bones."
    So, no, bones and muscles do not develop simultaneously. Science says Galen got it wrong. The Qur’an’s description? Spot on. Try again.
    Your claim boils down to this:
    1. The Qur'an says bones develop first, and muscles form later.
    2. Modern science agrees with this sequence.
    3. Galen says bones and muscles develop simultaneously.
    4. Therefore, the Qur'an copied from Galen?
    I mean, are you hearing yourself? That’s like accusing someone of copying your homework, but they got all the answers right while you failed the test. If you’re going to throw around accusations of plagiarism, at least make sure the theories align. Otherwise, you’re just embarrassing yourself.
    ---
    4. Sources on Galen’s Error
    Galen’s De Semine
    Galen’s text explicitly says bones and flesh form together-look it up before making wild claims.
    Modern Critique:
    O’Malley, C.D. The Growth of Embryological Knowledge: Galen and His Influence.
    Needham, J. A History of Embryology.
    Both explain how Galen's theory was disproven by modern science.
    Your argument not only misrepresents Galen’s flawed theory but also demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of both the Qur'an and modern science. Next time you try to discredit the Qur'an, do your homework-or at least read the works you’re pretending to cite. Otherwise, you’re just exposing yourself as someone who doesn’t understand either ancient philosophy or modern biology.

  • @MeemHaMeemDhal--khaYaRaWawNun
    @MeemHaMeemDhal--khaYaRaWawNun หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about the BEE miracles of the Quran ?
    The actual Bee chromosome numbers is 16.
    This is ESTABLIHSED FACTS that can never be changed anymore due to the many advanced and ultra powerful microscopes such as the electron microscope !
    And Chapter The Bee happens to be Chapter 16 of the Quran too ! But this is not the only one. There are so many more instances of 16
    and even 32 too ( Female and Queen bee chromosomes ) INSIDE this very Chapter The Bee itself !

  • @SwarnaVarna
    @SwarnaVarna 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    🤔 you told no prophecy in bible bible .what about Isaiah 53 talk about messiah in dead sea scroll before jesus born .so many peoples says jesus full filled 350+ prophecy .Almost all scholars agree who study history jesus is died on cross historical fact 😮 .can you prove this prophecys about jesus is fabricated .if yes explain me in detailed please ❤or please do one clear video please reply bro waiting for your reply.

  • @KembaSowdia
    @KembaSowdia 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    And you think what the koran says is wrong and what the science is true.Put your finger here and we will see in the future.

    • @George-iv1hi
      @George-iv1hi 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      you will see nothing due to your brainwashing and indoctrination. 1400 years and you are still not important, pray 5 times a day and we will conquer the universe leaving you far behind.

  • @Faisalbinomar-qx9yx
    @Faisalbinomar-qx9yx หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ihdinas siratal mustaqim.
    Truth by harnessing/generating of giving possible with intelligence from signal by affirm from signal current of viewing from eye receptor activation with rememberance from learn with way by mechanic of utilize with signal by learn with brain from verify knowledge by automating from current of mechanic

  • @Chickencee
    @Chickencee หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is very easy to disprove, if only you would pick up a book on basic embryology. Pick up langmans, and look up the weeks of different events in the body. The striated skeletal muscle only forms after the formation of the cartilaginous structure is present in the limb buds while the mesenchymal cells are still dividing due to induction from the AER.
    Secondly, the area between the back bone and the ribs does not entail the spine and only the spine as your second point mentions (that the ancient people believed). The backbone goes down to the coccyx, the rib cage (not individual ribs) marks the boundary of the thorax. The space there fore is the space between the coccyx and the thorax, which is the perineum, pelvis, and the abdomen, all of which contribute to seminal fluid. Your videos appeal to the ignorant, many a embryologist studying quranic embryology have noted it’s exceptional, impossible accuracy.

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      “This widely used medical textbook describes the simultaneous development of mesodermal tissues, which differentiate into both muscle and bone, noting that they form together rather than sequentially.”
      Source: The Developing Human: Chnically Oricnted Embryolon"
      by Keith L. Moore, T.V.N. Persaud, and Mark G. Torchia (10th Edition, 2015) - Chapter 5
      Sadler's work also confirms that bone and muscle tissues originate from the mesoderm layer and develop in parallel rather than in a strict sequence.
      Sadler, T.W. (2018). 'Tangean's Medical Embryology'
      (14th Edition). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
      Chapter 10, specifically under musculoskeletal development, provides details about the simultancous differentiation of these tissues

  • @nisarfazil6104
    @nisarfazil6104 หลายเดือนก่อน

    David wood on apologetics rdshow just did muslim babies

  • @babaangi
    @babaangi หลายเดือนก่อน

    Of course it was an ancient ideas of 7th century of human embryology. Allah was all knowing and all wise but wrong at the same time.😂😂😂

  • @SwarnaVarna
    @SwarnaVarna หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    @AdamElmasriEnglish 🤔what are the strong reasons not to believe in christianity . So many prophecy, science,match with history etc. Please do a video in detailed. I want to know. I love your videos❤️. I weached all your videos .Please replay

    • @AdamElmasriEnglish
      @AdamElmasriEnglish  29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      There are many reasons why I don’t believe in Christianity. Unfortunately there is no prophecy (that was fabricated to look like prophecy) and science is always hit and miss in the Bible too (like the Quran) copying ancient legends.

  • @i.hopeinJesus
    @i.hopeinJesus หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant video! As a young man growing up in this generation, Muslim seems mainstream and scientific miracles are their main claims. Thank you for debunking it!
    Produce more science errors and also historical errors of the Bible please.
    Great video! Love your channel!

  • @lalmia4288
    @lalmia4288 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    >>The BIBLE says:
    "... God is not the author of confusion ..." (Corinthians 14:33)
    =>>In the Light of the Bible's descriptions the following Enqueries been made>:
    >(Regarding the Concept of GOD the Supreme Being)
    >>Ref: BIBLE>: How come Jacob wrestled with God and prevailed?(Genesis 32:24-32)
    >>Q: Lowering God the Most Powerful, the Supreme Being as been defeated in a wrestle to a human like Jacob?
    >Christianity did not destroy paganism but adopted it...
    >Muslim: Who is Jesus?
    Christian: Jesus is GOD.
    >Muslim: Is it True that Jesus claimed: I & my Father are One and ... Whosoever seen me has seen the Father?
    Christian: Absolutely Yes.
    >Muslim: Was Jesus Killed by Crucifying him on the cross by Romans?
    Christian: Absolutely Yes.
    >>NOTES: Muslim's astounded: OHH No!
    As per Christians' Logic since Jesus & GOD the Father are one therefore, Romans Killed both GOD the Son & GOD the Father at the same time.
    >Muslim: If GOD was Killed on the Cross Who did resurrect GOD Jesus?
    >Muslim: Is it not mentioned in the BIBLE that "GOD alone is IMMORTAL"?
    Q: Can GOD be KILLED BY HUMAN??
    >Muslim: Was Jesus, GOD the Son Tempted by the Devil for fourty days as the Bible Mentioned?
    Christian: Absolutely Yes.
    Q: Can GOD be KILLED BY HUMAN??
    =>What Human or Divine logic to apply in order to understand Trinitarian Christian Theology??
    >>Extra Biblical Trinitarian Pagan Concept of God which Christianity borrowed from Greek Mythology (Philosophy) and Roman Pagan Faith..
    >>To understand the Trinity & Salvation in Christian Theology it must require a sacrifice of your brain-cells!!
    -->Scholar Adammax maxon: Christianity belief that God sacrificed God to God to save God’s creation from God.... X-Files
    Muslim Q: Can God do anything ?
    Christian A: Of course !
    Muslim Q: Can God forgive Sin without shedding Innocent Blood ?
    Christian A: Of course not !
    =>Though Biblical God's One of the 10 Commandments is: "Thou shall not Kill" but Christianity believes Pagan Romans Killed God the Son, Jesus for their Salvation from sins!!
    -->Q: How "Good" (Salvation) can be achieved by the Sinner Humans from the "Evil" of Killing God the Son, Jesus and thus Shedding Innocent Blood of the most innocent God?
    -->God the Son, Jesus was constantly begging his GOD on the Cross to take away the "Cup" of Death and eventfully Jesus cried out loudly in the Cross from utterly lost Hope as felt been "Abandoned / Forsaken by his God" .(Ref: Mathew 27:46:)
    Q: Whenever you ask Christians: “Why did God all powerful lowered Himself to be a vulnerable Baby and a Mortal Man to be Killed by Sinner Human?” They say: “if God can do whatever He wants, why wouldn’t He? In order to humble himself for us as an example”.
    Q: What: God wanted to humble himself to Sinner Human so that He could be Killed by Sinner Human which really sounds like Paganism??
    =>NOTE: According to Islam: God only does that befits His Majesty.
    >>Seems without lies Christianity dies....
    =>NOTE: Christianity adopted so many lies such as The Lie of Santa Claus, Jesus was born in December (was not), Jesus is NOT his Name and Jesus did not has blond hair & blue eyes like White European but a Palestinian Man with Black hair & black eyes!
    >>NOTE: The BIBLE itself destroys the premise in the verses that state, "Any man hung upon a Cross is Cursed by God" and God is not man nor son of man".
    In the Bible 'Satan has been mentioned as God (Lord) of the World but in the Quran "Satan been mentioned as "The Cursed one".
    As per Bible Jesus also been mentioned as "Cursed" but according to the Muslim Quran Jesus is one of the mightiest Prophet of the the Supreme One & Only True God.
    =>OHH NO! WHO do Christians REALLY Follow? (It's not truly Jesus but actually PAUL & the CHURCH?)
    -NOTE: Paul mentioned what Christian indoctrinated as the main creed of "Salvation":
    "There is no Forgiveness without the shedding of "Blood" (Particularly Innocent Blood of Jesus).
    -->NOTE: Christian GOD can not forgive the Sinner without shedding the Blood of Innocent God Jesus and Jesus also was Burned in the Hellfire for three days. Therefore, we have salvation by just believing that God Jesus Died / been Killed by Pagan Romans to pay the payment of our Sins.
    =>Bible mentioned: "Those who Sin are the Children of Devil". And the Consequence of "SIN" is Death (The Eternal Condemnation in Hell).
    =>Question Remains as Sin has consequences: For Human which one is the "Greater SIN"?:
    -->Q: a) The Sin of Human Killing God Jesus Or, -->Q: b) The Sin of Human Eating a Forbidden Fruit from God's Garden?
    -->Q: How "Good" (Salvation) can be achieved by Human's "Evil" of Killing God (God the Son, Jesus) ?
    -->Q: God suppose to know Past, Present & Future then why would He create Human with "Free Will" with which Human would fall short commit Sin like eating Forbidden Fruit & millions of other Sins and for Which God Jesus or Innocent God the Son would have to die (been killed by the very Sinner Human) to rescue God's beloved creation Sinner Human Being from God's eternal Punishment?
    =>Christians are supposed to follow Old Testament Laws as per Jesus' following command: (NOTE: The Word Christian means Jesus Like and Jesus was a law-abiding Jew)
    -->Jesus said (which Modern-day Christianity does not follow):
    For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, . . . .(Mathew 5: 17+18)
    >>According to Bible : "Faith without deeds is dead".
    >But as per PAUL: Deeds (following Mosaic Laws) are curses which no more require but Faith only.
    >>Q: OHH No: HOW PAUL'S OPINION IS THE 'GOD'S FINAL OPINION' ABOUT FAITH & SALVATION which is Contrary to Fundamental Message of all the Messengers of the One & Only True GOD including Jesus?
    >In Matthew 7:21 & 7:22 "Jesus" clearly said *Those who don't do the will of My Father will not enter the kingdom of heaven *. * On that day many will say to me, 'Lord , Lord , did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name , and do many mighty works in your name?' And then I will declare to them , 'I never knew you; depart from me, you evildoers *.
    -->Q: What's the "Will of My Father" as Jesus mentioned? Is it Violating the most important 1st Commandment by Taking Jesus & Holy Spirit also as God beside GOD The FATHER when Jesus confirmed that " God the Father is the ONE and Only TRUE God ." (John 17:3 )?
    >>NOTE: Jesus emphasized about the One & Only True God, God the Father. (John 17:3)
    =>GOD IS NOT A MAN: Numbers 23:19 . God is not a man , that he should lie ; neither the son of man , that he should repent :
    Hosea 11 : 9 . for I am God , and not man
    -->JESUS IS A MAN:
    Acts 2:22 . Ye men of Israel , hear these words ; Jesus of Nazareth , a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs , which God did by him in the midst of you , as ye yourselves also know .
    >The following verse proves Jesus was not a Universal Messenger of Almighty God and he was not meant for the Pagan Christians as Jesus told:
    ⁠Jesus says, ‘I was not sent except to the lost sheep of Israelis’ (Mathew 15:24)
    & (Paraphrasing) That is why, Jesus says to follow the Comforter / Paraclete(Prophet Muhammad) will come after him who will guide humanity unto all Truth.... (John 16:13, 14:16)
    =>Quran 22:46: "It's not the eyes that are blind but the hearts".
    >>In spite of the Islamophobic & Media Propaganda ISLAM is the Most Practicing and Fastest Growing Religion across the World. People with open minds once would read the Quran and the Biography of Prophet Mohammad certainly understand why many Educated & Sincere people are Converting to ISLAM from all other Religious & Atheistic Backgrounds across the Globe.
    =>NOTE: Judaism rejected JESUS and Christianity but ISLAM established the Bridge among all the three Origins of Abrahamic Faiths upon the 1st & 2nd Commandments and also to Unite the Entire Humanity under the One & Only True God (Ref: John 17:3) which confirmed by Jesus.
    =>TH-cam Video-Clips to watch those are Open-Minded & Truth seeking as Follows:
    Paul never met Jesus, yet he invented Christianity - Rabbi Tovia Singer
    Christianity Has It All Wrong About God and Jesus | Rabbi Tovia Singer
    Did Jesus Claim to be God? Rabbi Tovia Singer Explores the Gospels
    Rabbi Tovia Singer: This is why Christianity is Wrong! Sin and Atonement, Sacrifice and the Blood
    Jewish Scholars Say Amazing Things About Islam - COMPILATION
    Russian Jewish Rabbi Accepts ISLAM after Intensive Research
    The Pope ADMITS that ISLAM is a Path to GOD
    AMERICAN BISHOP: The Future of the World Will Belong to Muslims! | ORTHODOX BISHOP CONVERTS TO ISLAM
    =>ISLAM is the Fulfillment of the Abrahamic Monotheism (Prophet Moses & Prophet Jesus and all the prophets of God's same fundamental Message: Recognize, Worship, Surrender & Obey the Commandments of the One & Only True God but none else.
    =>TH-cam Video-Clips to watch those are Open-Minded & Truth seeking as Follows:
    Muslims worship the God of Abraham, says Rabbi Tovia Singer
    10 Biggest Reasons Muslims Say ISLAM Is True
    Who is Allah - Mind Blowing!
    The Throne of Allah - Mind blowing
    The Meaning of Life | Muslim Revert Talk ISLAM
    Top 5 Reasons People Convert to ISLAM | Australian Reaction
    Prophet Muhammad -The greatest man in history
    Lesley Hazleton: A "tourist" reads the Koran
    Karen Armstrong : Islam is the Greatest Religion in the World
    =>NOTE:> Islamic Justice for Salvation is nothing But exact same as mentioned in Ezekiel 18 (para-phrasing}: "The Wickedest of the Wicked if turn away from Sins and Repent and do what is lawful & righteous surely he won't die but live. And his Sins will be forgiven (never be remembered) as if he never committed Sin."

  • @hommedesvoyages7296
    @hommedesvoyages7296 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yes as implied from the Quran the sequence of embryonic formation is chronological, but I disagree with you, it is not unscientific. Some epiblast cells become mesoderm cells and it’s only after this point that the original remaining epiblast is called ectoderm and hypoblast is called the endoderm (which forms the skin with nerves along with brain cells, and the internal organs respectively). The bones come from these differentiated epiblast cells that form the mesoderm. Hence, taking this (terminology) understanding into account the sequence mentioned in the Quran is not wrong.
    Regarding your other point , again the Quran is not wrong. The warm fluid is the bone marrow liquid portion of the spine that contains stem cells that ultimately form the reproductive organs.

  • @ggunasekaran-em4qs
    @ggunasekaran-em4qs หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I am a christian
    I love your videos, though you are a non believer
    God bless you for your knowledge for truth

    • @nisarfazil6104
      @nisarfazil6104 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Aron rA destroys ur faith