Pressure Builds For Justice Breyer To Retire From The Supreme Court | The Last Word | MSNBC
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มี.ค. 2021
- President Biden’s announcement of 11 diverse nominees for federal court seats raises questions about the future of the Supreme Court. Some Democrats would like to see Justice Stephen Breyer step down so that Biden can nominate a new justice - possibly a Black woman - while he still has a majority of the Senate. Aired on 03/31/2021.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc
About The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell:
Drawing upon his experience as a former chief of staff on the Senate Finance Committee and as an Emmy-winning executive producer and writer of ""The West Wing,"" Lawrence O'Donnell examines the compelling and impactful political stories of the day. O'Donnell convenes diverse panels of guests, including a variety of politicians and cultural voices, to offer unique viewpoints and perspective. In his signature style, O'Donnell highlights the latest news developments and offers his take on the political stories driving the national conversation.
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, Meet the Press Daily, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House with Nicolle Wallace, Hardball, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and more.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc
Subscribe to MSNBC Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersTH-cam
Find MSNBC on Facebook: on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc
#SupremeCourt #JusticeBreyer #MSNBC
Pressure Builds For Justice Breyer To Retire From The Supreme Court | The Last Word | MSNBC
Any second now, McConnell will be whining that with the midterms only 18 months away, there's not enough time to seat a judge. Way too close to an election.
You are absolutely right.... and don't call me, "Surley"...
@@bobcarp1239
We need to get these people to a hospital!
What is it?
It's a large building filled with patients, but that's not important right now.
Get real! McConnell can't even whine with those loose jowls.
@@nanahuang8623 He can warble.
@@billhicks6449 "Joey, do you like movies with gladiators..?"
Supreme and High Court Judges have to retire at 70 here in Australia. Ordinary lawyers have to retire at 79. Why? Public indemnity insurance cuts off to lawyers at 80 and you can't get a practicing certificate without it.
Flynn-effect: your grandparents, if they were considered intelligent on their generation will be perceived borderline imbeciles when compared to your generation.
And so it should be,
smart choices
australia isn't run by people who are idiots, because 1/2 of your voters aren't idiots.
in america, 4 out of 5 republicans are dumber than the other one. the other ones are elected by them.
That would surely save the turmoil surrounding the replacement of a justice.
In Australia the notion of a politically aligned judge is an alien concept. We see the turmoil in produces in the US.
Mitch McConnell: "It would be inappropriate for the Senate to confirm a new Justice during the last four years of a President's term". LoL
Also Mitch McConnell: Four hours after the passing of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg about four weeks before an election.
We have our nominee ready for confirmation. We expect to ram it through next week !
🤣🤣🤣
I'm sure he already has that in his notes when the next Justice leaves.
@Kimberly Winters I at first was going to slam you for your comment.
Then I actually read it.
Thank you, you cut through a lot of ...
Crap.
@Kimberly Winters No problem.
Stay safe healthy and ...
Well vote for Democracy... or whatever.
From, Canada.
Just because it is a lifetime appointment does not mean one needs to spend the rest of their lives on the bench. If we are very lucky the fratboy will be impeached and removed.
Won't happen until there is a clear and overwhelming majority in the Senate. Even though the Democrats currently control the Senate it's still a split Senate. And we all know how the last impeachment went.
@@nonamegame9857 if boofer is disbarred then it's a brand new ball game. there is an extremely good chance he committed crimes on his way to the sc.
I strongly agree you shouldn't drop dead on a job because of your ego telling you that no one else can do as great a job as you can, no one is indispensable one should be able to find something else to do that they can enjoy😳
🙏🙏🙏🙏
@@beverlyrhame3692 Veterans and single mothers do the same
May Americans get the Judge that will serve the people. And NEVER a President
No Justice ever serves a President.
@@slobnoxious Corrupt traitor Barr did 🙄
@@y9w1 Never knew Barry was a Justice. Interesting.
Or corporations
@@longQ1551 I'm waiting soon one of you psychos are gonna bomb a major corporation headquarters.
Go back and do the correct backround check on BRETT
FIRST . . . .
We need background checks on the Big Guy and Hunter
@@We_Finally_Defeat_Medicare
Your A,
Q Believer,
"ANY SENSIBLE PERSON WOULDN'T
BELIEVE THE BIG LIE" SIDNEY
YOUR FAMILY STILL LOVES YOU EVEN WHEN YOU REALIZE
YOU HAVE BEEN BELIEVING THE BIG LIE. GOOD LUCK
I'd rather see Clarence Thomas go bye bye. Oh well, we are all entitled to our dreams!
Oh me too. Alito as well. He may be the most worthless Supreme court justice ever.
Yes, yes! Clarence Thomas to go! He wasn't qualified to be a Supreme Court Justice to begin with. He has been no better since then.
Because he's black, right?
@@TroIIingThemSoftly ...Because he is a far right extremist.
@@TroIIingThemSoftly No, because he is a horrible human being
As long as they are capable. Because trump put a lot of unqualified judges on the courts.
Democratically nominated judges are almost always qualified. Your comment should be directed to dirty repukes.
@@xtbum3339 My comment is directed at Republicans. They have been placing unqualified judges not Democrats.
@Jack Duncan said no rational or intelligent person ever.
@Jack Duncan Dream on. Many of the over 200 judges trump and mcconnell appointed the American Bar Association said were unqualified. And, there is nothing patriotic about that.
@Jack Duncan Get real. Dirty repukes are a seditious and treasonous lot.
Clarence Thomas should retire, Amy Comey Barret sneaked through the dark of the night by Moscow Mitch should have the decency to resign.
Thomas AND Alito should go. Alito is the most rightwing judge I've ever seen, and makes no secret of his reactionary views. Forget Barrett resigning! If she had any integrity at all, she wd have refused the nomination made just days after RBG's demise, and said the choice shd be left to the incoming President. The fact that she didn't do the honourable thing tells me all I need to know about her.
In cultures where the wisdom of the elders is honoured, many elders assume an advisory role, rather than an active one in government.
Your first line spits in the face of the idea that elders are honored in any way in america
@@dashamccormick4088 As an elder I can safely say that elders are not always wise but some do have a wealth of experience to draw upon.
@@deepattison9329 As long as they can still remember it accurately. Retirement ages do make sense. I don't want an 80 year old surgeon operating on me.
Kate Linares
well in politics that depends on first, what political party they belong to and second , have they been brainwashed by the Democrats . For the most part I prefer them to just retire go away.
Here’s a crazy idea, pick the most qualified candidate.
When a Judge sits on the bench so long that they begin to fall asleep it's time for them to "Get up off ha that thing". 😆
There is a lot of damage to undo
Trump's appointments need to reinvestigated.
At the same time let's look at the Radical woke Left. Let's look at Biden, he sure isn't running the country, so who is? If you want a free America, educate yourself. Don't believe everything on bias main stream media need programs which are liberal and promote misinformation or disinformation. Educate yourselves is all l ask?
@@lindadouglass4692 bye snowflake
@@lindadouglass4692 wtf does any of what you said have to do with this? This whole whataboisim fallacy those on the right persistently engage in significantly erodes good discourse in this country. Anything you dont like is fake news...which shields from any form of criticism, anything you dont agree with is considered radical left which means any good natured debate on the discussion can't be had because evidence that goes against the point your wanting to make or against what your view on things of will just be dismissed as radical left or mainstream indoctrination, and when yiu throw on top of that the whataboutism, which anytime a discussion about the side you happen to agree with occurs you just shift the discussion from your side to another. Nobody on this planet is perfect, and everyone is able to be criticized and I mean imagine if a defense attorney could use as a defense for his defendant on trial for murder, wwell what about ted Bundy, he murdered 30 woman, my client murdered only 1, so let's ignore what we are on trial for now and focus on Bundy....that would be absurd...and if we wanna talk about double standards...thats different...but the solution to having double standards isnt to have no standards at all. Thats what's wrong with this entire thing the right commonly does in discourse, because all this does is muddy the waters.
, You should take your own advice and educate yourself.
@@worldview6218 i agreed with you but the “left “ does it too. They just are more carefully about it. America just replaced another old white men with another old white men. It’s obvious the media and the politicians just want to get ratings and money in their pocket so they decided where to push the narrative. We are looking at two devils pretending to be on our side. We are only choosing between the less of two evils. Atleast, with Trump the devil you know might be less dangerous then the devil you don’t know. Democrats can’t pretend they don’t follow the same play book as the republicans. They just hide it better.
Lifetime appointments are crazy. It puts pressure on the Justices. It could be organised so that there is a five year period, say from 70 to 75 years old, during which a justice must retire or be reappointed.
View from the UK, all British judges have to retire at 72
Yes, this is one way.
SCOTUS justices can have a lifetime appointment up to a certain age. Age 75 should be the upper limit.
There is no age limit in fact 49 of them have died while setting on the supreme Court.
Simply Google it.
@@nonamegame9857 Notice that he said *should*...
@@RoxnDox can have a lifetime appointment up to a certain age. That is wrong.
@@nonamegame9857 I am pretty certain he meant it as a proposal, not a statement of current fact...
We also need to investigate Trump's judicial appointments across all levels. Trump had a habit of appointing for loyalty over qualification (the ABA rated several as not qualified, which is rare) and we need to impeach any which ween't qualified.
..."loyalty" and very likely $$$.
We should NOT have lifetime appointments for Supreme Court justices.
We should not have lifetime appointments for any judges, Supreme Court or lower courts. Similarly, there should be term limits for all elected officials, from Representatives and Senators all the way down to Town Solicitor and Tax Assessor.
Even more than an age limit, wee need a mandatory code of ethics for SCOTUS. IMO three current justices should be impeached and removed for serious ethical lapses or basic unfitness: Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Chief Justice John Roberts.
I would add Alito to that list, who made an extremely biased speech a few months ago, to the Federalist Society, I believe.
@t w 2 vital rulings in which Roberts was not balanced were Citizens United, and 2013 Shelby County v. Holder, which gutted the Voting Rights Act. Any Chief Justice who couldn't see the entirely forseeable results of those 2 decisions is questionable, imo. Roberts' views on race and religion are ideological, doctrinaire and immoveable. NOT the qualities you want in SCOTUS, let alone in a Chief Justice.
We need to put pressure on congress too. A whole bunch of them need to retire.
So then run for office
@@Mo-oz6ed Good thought. Might just do it.
I wish there was a different process for nominating and confirming SCOTUS Justices. Some way that would reduce the partisan bs that often comes along with filling a seat.
*I mean, I also wish a million bucks would fall into my lap right now, but I understand that's probably never gonna happen. 😉
You probably have better luck with the million actually.
Selection and confirmation to the Supreme Court should not be in the hands of politicians. The sickening sight of the turtle chortling over his achievement of stacking the courts to get the numbers that will support a political ideology makes the point clearly enough. No matter to him that some of them are not qualified. Having an "R" next to their name is all that matters.
Suzy Q be careful a million dollars in 20s would not fall in your lap. it may hit you in the head from high above because good luck and bad luck travel together!! Love and Peace be with you Sweet Suzy !!!!
You and me both.
SCOTUS judges need to have term limits, so does Congress. It is so wrong to let anyone have a life appointment. It gives one person too much power!
82 !!!!!! Of course people should be able to work in their senior years but 82 !!!!! Come on. There is a BIGGER picture here then the “me, myself and I”. RETIRE NOW !
Is that what you told Ginsberg?
@@We_Finally_Defeat_Medicare It is what they should have told her. She set the country back by not retiring during the Obama years.
The Supreme Court needs overhauling. In this technological age that changes so fast, they can not be lifetime appointees any longer. They're out of touch with the people. I have a father in his 80's, he agrees, and was a lawyer for 50+ years.
The Supreme Court should also be designed like the lower courts -- many judges. Why do we always have the same judges hearing every case? There should be many more judges in a Supreme Court "pool" and for each case, the judges should be selected at random. And when I say "at random", I mean truly at random; think of the machines you may see on the news for choosing lottery numbers, where the person presses a button and a numbered ball is pushed to the top. This would also have the added benefit of allowing more cases to be heard within any given time frame.
Lawyer father or not, I fully AGREE with YOUR logic! It was among the worst mistakes in US law...the permanence of Supreme Court judges. Some too old and too sick to think straight forced themselves to remain...even if it means attempting to function with decrepit minds.
I strongly feel we need Asian American justice on the Supreme Court!
As an Asian American, that would be nice. But we need a black woman more. We're a much smaller minority than black and latino Americans.
Agree a young asian woman liberal judge. Conservatism and rightwing entitled privileged thinking is from the last century. The 1950s are over and gone.
Yes! Together with a black woman 👍👍❤️🇺🇸
@@dench2695 there are many who qualify. Our society changes and the world changes so should unelected justices. Also a position should not be a throne. Our judicial should not be its own monarchy
I’d like to see an Asian American too. Long overdue.
The most important question is: "does the new judge LIKE BEER???"🙄🤨🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I would like to see Barrack Obama in the Supreme Court.
But does He WANT to be there?
Obama was the right man at the right time in history to assume the presidency of the United States. With all the money he’s making and political influence he commands, I doubt seriously he’d take a stoic position as a member of the court. Moreover, his wife would put a stake in that idea.
I would, too. Just imagine the Republican drama that would ensue in the Senate over his confirmation.
@@dap9387 He has earned his rest although he would be good in the position.
We need a non-religious person on the bench.
You just freaked out a large segment of the population.
Kavenaugh needs to retire too. I still want to know who bought themselves a supreme court seat by paying off Brett Kavenaugh's debts and burying his background check.
If she's down with it, nominate Prof Anita Hill to the Supreme Court.
Yass!
That would be PERFECT!!!! Clarence Thomas would 'blank' in his pants. And it would be a great apology from President Biden to her.
Anita hill and clarence thomas on the same commitee... i side with hill, yet i feel this would be a toxic environment for judicial justice.
Not a good idea
How many years a was the trial and some same senators and congressmen are still here . TERM LIMITS
We shouldn’t have people at 80 plus years old on the Supreme Court. Regardless of party how in touch are you at 80 years old with the advantage Americans at 80 years old plus how sharp are you at 80 years old to be making decisions that effects millions of Americans. These people need term limits
Shouldn’t have a president pushing 80 either
Your sentence should correctly read "affect millions of Americans." Honestly, there are many 80 year olds who would still be cognitively aware enough to revise and edit younger people's mistakes.
Surely there is obviously a need to cease lifetime Supreme Court jobs
Needs too step down. It's the way of the world now. Black woman would be huge advance that's needed.
I thought judging people on immutable characteristics is what we’re trying to move away from.
Life time appointment for Supreme Court Judges simply don’t make any sense.
Yep, must prevent another RBG scenario.
Apparently there are only two types of jobs that are for life - royalty and supreme court justices.
The court should be expanded and have term limits
You need people at the top of their game and 70+ isn't it.
that's agist and not supported by evidence. you have a shallow understanding of the history of the court. term limits may benefit the court but they would need to be long enough to span beyond the volatility of decadal political swings
@@histershellac2842 there is nothing in the concept of term limits that is ageism or that makes the court a playing ball for the political system.
Term limits for people in any position of power!!
I agree. I really like Joe Biden, but look at any video of him when he was a senator years ago and he was a lot sharper. I'm a senior, and I support anyone who wants to work to a ripe old age, but RBG was 87 and Breyer will turn 83 this year. There are plenty of people who are sharp until 100, but most of us start to lose some brain cells after 70! It's unfortunate that some people need to work to put food on the table and pay for medication, but a Supreme Court justice gets a very generous pension for life. If I'm not mistaken, a justice gets his or her full salary so Breyer would get more than $277,000 plus benefits. That's at least $250,000 more than most seniors get from Social Security!
@@lottasunshine1325 For most of us the sharpness starts to fade long before 70, but experience can sometimes make up for that.
I agree that it can't be lack of finances that makes justices and senators want to stay on long after 70. Is it pride, is it that they hate their wives/husbands/grand children?
Aren't they interested in anything else?
Make WDC & PR states. Increase SCOTUS to 11. The residents of WDC & PR deserve this. SCOTUS deserves this.
How about we require the court to hear cases about constitutional law issues and increase the number of justices to accommodate presentations to a smaller subset of justices and then votes by all of the justices...
We shouldn't have to wait hundreds of years for answers on constitutional questions because the Supreme Court is permanently understaffed and can only hear a limited number of annual cases.
Unconstitutional laws should not remain in place indefinitely because the court forgave enough time this decade.
Good idea.
Mcconnell is just gonna meld his face and pose as him.
😂😂😂😂😂
Having a Black woman on the Supreme Court would be incredibly uplifting after four years of the clown show nominations under Trump.
Did you see the Supreme Court be controlled by Trump? This is the Radical woke Left. If you want to have a free America don't believe everything you see and hear on bias main stream media need programs.Broaden your education, try to watch Fox or other more right channels, you may then have a better idea of the truth.
Or at least see both sides of the narrative.
@@lindadouglass4692 You have no idea how thoroughly and pitifully lost you sound. Respond if you must but I will not read it nor respond to you again. I used to watch Fox but the lying and bearing false witness, the constant right-wing propaganda made them impossible for me to watch.
Or Asian or any ethnicity as long as they do the job with honesty
What makes a black person so special? People as ignorant as you shouldn't even be allowed to vote
RBG is greatly missed.
"When there are nine."
yes...sigh.
I realize that being a Supreme Court justice is a lifetime appointment, but I was always a little annoyed that RBG refused to retire when President Obama was in office and the Democrats had a majority in the Senate. She was born in 1933 which means she was 87 years old when she died.
Not to brag (OK maybe a little), but in Canada there's a mandatory retirement age of 75 for supreme court justices. Also, as former PM Harper learned, there's no guarantee that those you appoint will vote your way in cases.
Anita Hill
Justice Bryer has served his country well.. he should now retire and live in peace ✌🏽
You are not the one to make that decision for him. Get a life
Supreme justices should have a 20 yr limit. This idiocy of life time appointments is out dated considering how fast today’s world changes.
Same for all elected officials there should be limits (senators two terms. Congress 4 terms, governors two terms, presidents two terms) nothing in life should be a forever thing. Societies change generationally and today technology changes are even more rapidly
I agree with the justices in having a limit but not elected people. So long that people are willing to vote for someone, they can stay in their job.
JVS 3. ONE FOUR year term for the house ONE four year term for the Senate ONE TERM ONLY !!! NO GROVELING AND BEGGING for reelection BRIBES because one term and GO HOME. NO MORE CAREER
POLITICIANS from either party !!! BTW. republicans do not represent the american people. They represent MONEY and ignorant idiots !!
@@JohnSmith-hn6kv You are ignorant and stupid
@@JohnSmith-hn6kv the problem is with elected officials after a while they have figured out how to gain the system and use lobbyist monies to outspend and promote to make it difficult for any new candidates to win. Does anyone e believe Mitch is representing working class kentuckians (one of the poorest states?)
Term limits on everyone because the world changes so why have people with thinking that’s no longer in touch to the changing times and society but have gained the system thru their collective powers that they’ve built up over the decades. Our system of government was not intended to be a lifelong career based on working for those that can subsidize your re-election (a hired puppet). Term limits on all elected officials and judges
@@jamesmorett7300 I agree as long as they are staggered and the term times can be adjusted, but term limits need to be put in place. Problem is they will never vote for their own term limits.
He should, and don't let another RBG happen. Even though Mr Turtle would hope he doesn't in the event that he can do another Brett Kavanagh and a Amy Conen Barrett.
I don't understand why a Supreme Court Justice is a life time position, I never could figure that one out.
Mitch McConnell was using doublespeak; he meant, "It would be inappropriate for the Senate to confirm a new Justice during the last 6 years his term": what goes around comes around.
We are assuming we have the votes. Sen Manchin, I'm talking about you.
Ridiculous that US Supreme Court justices can retain their seats until they literally drop dead. The USA stands alone. No other functioning democracy still permits such absurdity in its apex court. In most countries the compulsory retirement age is 70-75 years. Should be the same in the USA.
If Breyer is drawing fire from this riff raff he must be doing something right.
...and Justice Breyer should retire. We don't want a repeat of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
I think that it’s the most stupidest law in the world for certain judges to be appointed for life. There is no real accountability and no change with the times as it pertains to their thinking over the years. There needs to be a cultural change on the courts now.
God my dad is ace for 83 but I would say so out of touch n how at that age can they remain as alert... I love older people but 82 and still in power , how can that be fair !!!! Stand aside and let some younger person. Dr wouldn't be working at 82 when lives are at stake
McConnell, Cruz, and Graham will be crying you can't fill a SCOTUS seat this early in a presidency.
Bring in age limits on SCOTUS judges - 75yr maximum
I think they need to limit the terms of the justices to one 10 year term. That’s enough. No lifetime appointments. That’s ridiculous.
Age cap for federal officials
House reps: ages 25-70 (2 terms)
Senators: 30-70 (2 terms)
POTUS/VP: 35-70 (2 terms)
SCJs: 40-70 (10 year limit)
The minimum age is 35 for any federal office, but yes there should be an age cap.
Why can't we appoint a Mexican American/ Hispanic individual to the supreme Court why are we only seeking to appoint African American individual's? I think the hispanic people also need representatives in the judicial systems.
Hello! Where have you been?........ Ever heard of Judge Sonia Sotomayor?
Or we could appoint the most qualified, no matter who or what they are.
We need TERM LIMITS.
President Bartlet had a conversation with the Chief Justice. Didn’t get anywhere.
Moscow Mitch :it would be inappropriate for anything to happen that does not meet my approval
Time for a new Judge. Tic for tac.
I'd like to see him put Obama on the court.
I don't care about anything he should just make room for someone younger. Let's learn from our mistakes for once and play the game.
send home the members of congress that are his age as well
We need the best legal brains in the SC first....diversity should not be criteria.
Exactly, can we replace Amy I haven't ever read the constitution Barrett as she's clearly unqualified.
Term limits for the Justices.
President Biden needs to also think about a diversity in names for the next supreme Court Justice because we've already had a Burger, a Frankfurter and currently a Coney. I wonder if there are any current lower Court judges with the names of onion, lettuce or pita 🤣🤣🤣
😂😂😂😂😂
I find your remarks very chili.
@@stephenchapel2058 shall we hold the mustard 🤣🤣
I relish the thought, but the whole thing is something of a political pickle. Dill we meet again!
@@stephenchapel2058 🤣🤣🤣👍
USA,it is such a relief to see your president do the right thing,after four years of corrupted crazytown. Go JOE...hope he will get enough support to execute all of his most ambitious plans.The world will absolutely be a better place if he succeeds.
Leave SCOTUS alone! Even RBG was against packing the court!
Ginsberg should have stepped down during the early part of the Obama’s administration. Thanks for your service now go home.
I believe it is high time to have term limits and yes age limits in politics. no one should be able to serve that long on the Supreme Court. As much as I love RBG, she should have stepped down when Obama could have placed some one else.
It would seem to me the only way to have an equal SCOTUS would be to have an equal amount of Justices from each party, say each side has 4 or 5.
I don't think it's a good idea for anyone to work forever...
Just watch Mitch McConnell will tell us we can't fill this seat cuz we need to let the next president decide.
He look 'bout dead in the thumbnail, don't he?
If only they caught as his eyes rolled up - bet they could still find the negative of it a couple snaps later!!
Respect to Judge Breyer and his years of service but time to take one for the team & step aside. And when I say team I mean the American citizens.
He’ll be just as stubborn as Ginsberg was. Some people place themselves above a greater cause or good
What about an Asian woman?
There should be Age and Term limits for SC Justices. At certain Age a human physical and mental condition deteriorates.
Clarence Thomas too.
Why can't we just add more than 9 SCJs
Shouldn’t we have 2justices for each district?
There are far too many older politicians and authorative people in positions of power.
We need new blood, vision , forethought, compassion, common Sense.
AND waaaayyyyyy waaayyyy less self interest. The republican party and their influence is exactly what we do not need.
Ugggggg...my generation is fed up.
"qualified federal judges" one day we'll even have qualified reporters.
It should be an age limit . That this people stay on public service
Time to GO!
Why force him to retire. Let him stay until he wants and able like the late Justice Ginsburg.
U cannot tell them when to retire. Its up to them
Two extremely intelligent women who can't put periods at the end of declarative sentences. Why aren't they sure of what they're saying? That was a question.
I think that's a wonderfull idea
Breyer, at the ripe old age of 82, should step aside and let a younger soul take his post up. Go into retirement and enjoy the last five to fifteen years of his life until he can pass away at home from old age in the comfort of his family and friends.
He’s perfectly capable of doing that if he wants. Who are you to say what he should do with his own life?
Sorry... Plz choose the best person.. No matter a color..
Gotta bring race and gender into everything
It's time for Kavanaugh to step down. To many questions around his appointment and confirmation investigation
Asking an elderly Justice to give up their seat on the Supreme Court is kind of like asking a doddering senior to give up their car keys.
So they were good with Ruth being in there until she turned into dust but want the white male gone?
Just change your justice selection process so they're maybe _not_ influenced by politics! Just a suggestion